ML20043H272
| ML20043H272 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Callaway  |
| Issue date: | 06/12/1990 |
| From: | Schnell D UNION ELECTRIC CO. |
| To: | NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM) |
| References | |
| ULNRC-2227, NUDOCS 9006220343 | |
| Download: ML20043H272 (54) | |
Text
,
n
-4; June 12, 1990 1
)
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 0
ATTN:
Document Control Desk
!E J Mail Station F1-137
'y Washington, D.C.
20555 ATTN:
Document Control Desk UhMRC-2 227 Gentlemen g
DOCKET NUMBER-50-483 CALLAWAY PLANT 10CFR50.59 ANNUAL REPORT SUMMARIES UJil01 ELECT _RJ_C_APPROyED WRITTEN SAFETY EVALUATIONS
Reference:
ULNRC-2012, dated June 1, 1989
, w b-In accordance with 10CFR50.59, this-letter transmits a report which summarizoo written. safety evalu~.tionn of changes approved and' implemented ~for Callaway
- -t Plant since those reported in the: referenced submittal and 7
through March 30, 1989.
The report format is presented an follows:
- !i.
Report item number Safety evaluation ID number Title and descriptive text which summarizes-
]-
the safety evaluation.
2 All items reported herein were determined to not (h
involve an unreviewed r:afety question.
provides a key to the sourcon of the changes which are provided in this report.
-3 3; If there are any questions, please contact us.
m
}.
Very trul.y yours, e
_ _/f th?gwx$A j
Donald F.
Schnell
'~
+
/.
DJW/dvd ai,--
Attachment o
l 1
=E.
9006220340-900612 C
PDR ADOCK 05000483
/
gi
-u R
FDC
\\
[
,1
-4 d!
-jp.;
r
+
??
'ec t LGerald Charnoff, Esq.-
Shaw,tPittman, Potts & Trowbridge
'I-2300 N. Street, N.W.
-Washington, D.C.
20037
,[
- Dr;;J. O.1Cermak
~
~
CFAsLInc.
~'
' 4 Professional Drive (Suite 110)
LGaithersburg, MD:20879' i
R. C. Knop Chief, Reactor Project Branch 1
~
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commionion
'i Regi~on.III 799: Roosevelt Road I
Glen.Ellyn, Illinois 60137 Bruce' Bartlett Callaway Resident Office 1
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
-RR#1 Steedman, Missouri l65077
- l
- t Anthony T'.Gody,1Jr. (2)
' Office of Nuclea'r' Reactor Regulation U~.JS.' Nuclear Regulatory Commission
.MailiStop P-316.
7920iNorfolk Avenue LBethesda,. MD 20014' j
Manager, Electric; Department Missouri Public Service Commission
'l lP!O.rBox 360 ft Jefferson City, MO 65102 t
i r
4
- i E
i l-bcci D.- Shafer/A160.761
/QA Record (CA-758)
Nuclear Date E210.01 DFS/ Chrono D.
F.
Schnell J.
E.
Birk J. V. Laux M. A.
Stiller G.
L.
Randolph R.
J.
Irwin H. Wuertenbaecher W.
R. Campbell A.'C.
Passwater R.
P. Wendling D.
E.
Shafer D.
J. Walker O.
Maynard (WCNOC)
N. P. Goel (Bechtel)
T.
P.
Sharkey NSRB (Sandra Auston)
E llo. OMO E 1000098 l
m
+
ATTACHMENT 1 4
ULNRC-2227 JUNE 1990
-w t
i REFERENCE KEY Referen_ce
- CMP.'#
Callaway Modification Package (Design Change)
EMP Exempt Modification Package (Design Change)
RMP Restricted Modification Package (Denign Change)
- , SA FSAR Change, Site Addendum OL Technical Specification Change ETP Engineering Technical Procedures CTP Chemistry Technical Procedures MISC _#
Safety Evaluations performed for isolated items or activities OTS Special Operation Procedures
' 'S RFR Request for Resolution c
',a
! _ hi lgt-v4
- 47 Note
FSAR and Technical Specification changes are also reported under 10CFR50.71 and 10CFR50.90 as applicable.
i:
.j_
l \\'
ti s M
(.
~_
- ~
1 CFR59.59~ANZUAL CEPD T SUMMA 21ES
~ ~ ~ " ~
~
' Q OF U%IO3 ELECTQIC APPROVED
- ' ~-~
~
EVALUATIONS
~ ~'-
WRITTEN SAFETY
._ O
_ REPORT
, SAFETY EVALUATION
, _,, (}
ITEM ID 1
NE-88-0839 CMP 85-0398 ADDED A CONTAINER TO HOLD RV HEAD "0-RINGS" AND PROVIDE LEAD SHIEL CMP 85-0398 ADDED A CONTAINER TO HOLD SIX TO EIGHT SETS OF REACTOR VESSEL HEAD "0-RINGS" IN CONTAINMENT SLDG. AND TO PROVIDE A PERMANENT SHIELD WALL TO'
~ ~~
()
WORKERS DURING VESSEL HEAD CLEANING AND 0-RING CHANGE-0UT. THERE ARE NO SAFETY,-
RELATED COMPONENTS IN THE AREA 0F THE SHIELD WALL AND CONTAINER DURING PLANT
()
OPERATION. WITH THE "0-RINGS" IN PLACE IN 1HE STORAGE CONTAINER TMEY ADO A MINIMAL FIRE LOADrHOWEVER, NO FLAME SOUNCE IS LOCATED NEAR THE CONTAINER AND THE "0-RINGS" ARE ENCLOSED IN THE STAINLESS STEEL 80X. THE FSAR SECTION 9.5B (3'
WAS REVISEC TO GIVE CHANGE IN FIRE LOADING.
PU R SU A!J T TO THE ABOVE INFORMATION, THE CHANGE DOES NOT INYCLVE AN INCREASE IN PROEABILITY OF OCCURENCE OR CONSEQUENCES OF AW. ACCIDENT OR MALFUNCTION OF EOUIP-()!
MENT IMPORTANT TO SAFETY OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS IN THE SAFETY ANALYSIS RE-
~
PORTI OR CREATE POSSIBILITY FOR ACCIDENT OR' MALFUNCTION OF A DIFFERENT TYPE OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS IN THE SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORTJ OR REDUCE THE MAR-
..,().
GIN OF SAFETY AS DEFINED IN THE B ASIS FOR ANY-TECHNICAL SPECIFIC ATION.
THE EVALUATION DETERMINED THAT,AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY g ]~ d QUESTION DID NOT EXIST.
~
t k.
REPORT SAFETY EVALUATION ITEM ID 2
NE-88-DE63 RMP SS-2319 RECONFIGURED THE MAIN FEEDWATER PUMP RECIRC LINES DOWNSTREAM OF VLV
([f RMP 66-2019 RECONFIGURED THE MAIN FEEDWATER PUMP RECIRCULATION LINES DOWNSTREAM OF THE RECIRCULATION FLOW CONTROL VALVE. DUE TO EROSION DAMAGE ON THE EL90W,
()
THE NEd CONFIGURATION IS BEING IMPLEMENTED TO UTILIZE A BLIND FLANGE AS AN
~
IMPINGMENT PLATE.-THIS WILL ALLOW QUICK AND ECONOMICAL REPAIRS FOR FUTURE LEAKAGE PROBLEMS. THIS EQUIPMENT PERFORMS NO SAFETY-RELATED FUNCTIONS.
');
PURSUANT TO THE ABOVE INFORMATIONs THE CHANGE DOES NOT INVOLVE AN INCREASE IN
~
PROBABILITY OF OCCURENCE OR CONSEQUENCES OF AN~ ACCIDENT OR MALFUNCTION OF EQUIP-MENT IMPORTANT TO SAFETY OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS IN THE SAFETY ANALYSIS RE-ry[
PORT; OR CREATE POSSIBILITY FOR ACCIDENT ~0R MALFUNCTION OF A DIFFERENT TYPE OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS IN THE SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORTI OR REDUCE THE MAR-GIN OF SAFETY AS DEFINED IN THE BASIS FOR ANY TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION.
' ~ --
y TbE EVALUATION DETERMINED THAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY
-"-- -~~' '
l QUESTION DID NOT EXIST.
p
- n 4
e g
g
-py**-
-_....-s,
<7%,,,
,y->
9 p q 1y/
- .y,
+.
.m g e
,y-
-iw
.u__
.__..'.w.
. _ w._. _ _ _. _ _. _
" ~
~:
... _ _ - - CF UNIC3 ELECT.RIC APP 00VED l
.C. E PORT.
_.. SAFETY EVALUAT.IO_N l
3 NE-89-0825 CMP 87-1932 MODIFIED THE S/G LO-LO LEVEL TRIP LOGIC FOR TTD AND EAM CMP 87-1932 MODIFIED THE STEAM GENERATOR LO-LO LEVEL TRIP LOGIC TO PROVIDE (3
l TRIP TIME DELAY (TTD) BELOW 28% POWER AND.TO PROVIDE NORMAL / ADVERSE SETPOINTS BASED ON CONTAINMENT CONDITIONS,EAM(ENVIRONMENTAL ALLOWANCE MODIFIER). THIS l
~
MODIFICATION REVISED SECTIONS 15.9 AND 7.8 0F THE FSAR. THE NRC MAS APPROVED
^~
(i THESE CONCEPTUAL DESIGN CHANGES DOCUMENTED IN WESTINGHOUSE WCAP-11325-P-A AND
~
WCAP-11342-P-Ar AND SPECIFIC APPROVAL FOR CALLAWAY IN AMENDMENT 43.
^
' PURSUANT TO THE ABOVE INFORMATION, THE CHANGE DOES NOT INVOLVE AN INCREASE IN (i
PROBABILITY OF OLCURENCE OR CONSEQUENCES OF AN ACCIDENT OR MALFUNCTION OF EQUIP-MENT IMPORTANT TO SAFETY OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS IN THE SAFETY ANALYSIS RE-PORT; OR CREATE POSSIEILITY FOR ACCIDENT OR M4LFUNCTION OF A DIFFERENT TYPE
,;y l
OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS IN THE SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT; OR REDUCE THE MAR-GIN OF SAFETY AS DEFINED IN THE BASIS FOR ANY TECHNICAL SPECIFISATION.
(T ThE EVALUATION DETERMINED THAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION DID NOT EXIST.
n s REPORT SAFETY EVALUATION ITEM ID p'
4 NE-69-6347 RFR NO.5313 REVISED FSAR TABLE 3.11(8)-3 FOR CONTROL AIR SUPPLY SOLENOID VALVE RFR k0.5313 REVISED FSAR TABLE 3.11(a)-3 FOR THE CONTROL AIR SUPPLY SOLENOID g):
VALVE,LF-FV-06069. THIS VALVE IS POWERED FROM A NONSAFETY-Ri".ATED SOURCE AND SHOULD NOT BE LISTED IN THE FSAR AS PART OF THE EQ PROGRAM.
PURSUANT TO THE ABOVE INFORMATIONr THE CHANGE DOES NOT INVOLVE AN INCREASE IN PR03 ABILITY OF OCCURENCE OR ComSEQUEhCES OF AN ACCIDENT OR MALFUNCTION OF EQUIP-
.1ENT IMPORTANT TO SAFETY OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS IN THE SAFETY ANALYSIS RE-PORT; OR CREATE POSSIBILITY FOR ACCIDENT OR MALFUNCTION OF A DIFFERENT TYPE (y'
DVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS IN THE SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORTJ OR REDUCE THE MAR-GIN OF SAFETY AS DEFINED IN THE BASIS FOR ANY TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION.'
f THE EVALUATION DETERMINED THAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY (1
QUESTION DID NOT EXIST.
~
' );
REPORT SAFETY EVALUATION ITEM ID 5
NE-89-0248 RFR NO.60J9 REVISED FSAR FIG 9.2-4 FOR CORRECTIONS IN VACUUM DEGASIFIER SYSTEM
')
RFR NO.6009 REVISED FSAR FIG 9.2-4 TO CORRECT FOR AS-8UILT AND ACTUAL FIELD
~
INSTALLATION OF VALVES IN THE VACCUM DEGASIFIER SYSTEM SKID.
~'!
~~
~~
PURSUANT TO THE ABOVE INFORMATION, THE CHANGE DOES NOT INVOLVE AN INCREASE IN ~
~
PROBABILITY OF OCCURENCE OR CONSEQUEteCES OF AN ACCIDENT OR MALFUNCTION OF EQUIP-MENT IMPORTANT TO SAFETY OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS IN THE SAFETY ANALYSIS RE- ~~
PORTJ OR CREATE POSSIBILITY FOR ACCIDENT OR MALFUNCTION OF A DIFFERENT-TYPE
~
OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS 'IN THE SAFETY AN ALYSIS REPORT; OR REDUCE THE MAR- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
(j GIN OF SAFETY AS DEFINED IN THE BASIS FOR ANY TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION.
THE EVALUATION DETERMINED THAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION DID NOT EXIST.
. [*:
~
~~~ ~ ~ ~~~
+
-~
- - - 18C FRSS.57 A7_NU AL REPF,lT $UMM'.0IES ~
~
g<
__ _ OF UOIC3 ELECT 3IC APPCOVED. ___ _ ___.____.
II REPORT SAFETY EVALUATION
~
^
(3j ITEM ID.
FIG 13.4-6 FOR VALVE LINEUP OF MAIN FEED PUMP
,6__
,NE-89-9049 RFR NO.6173 REVISED _FSAR RFR NO.6173 REVISED FSAR FIG 18.4-6 FOR THE VALVE LINEUP OF THE MAIN FEED PUMP (3 l A AND 8 WARMUP RECIRCULATION LINE DOWNSTREAM OF ISOLATION VALVES AE-V276 AND AE-V277. PREVIOUSLY.0 PEN DURING NORMAL OPERATIONsTHESE WALVES ARE NOW CLOSED TO
~ ~
REDUCE EROSION FROM LEAKBY OF THE WARMUP RECIRCULATION LINE UPSTREAM OF ISOLA-
' ();
TION VALVES AE-V274 AND'AE-VZ75. THE LINES WARMUP THE MFP PRIOR TO PLACEMENT IM
'~
~~~
SERVICE. THE. CHANGE DOES NOT IMPACT THE FUNCTION OF THE MFP CA THE WARMUP RE-CIRCULATION LINE. THE CHANGE INCREASES RELIABILITY OF THE LINE BY PROVIDING
- fg; A DOUBLE ISOLATION FUNCTION AND REDUCING EROSION DUE TO LEAKBY.
PUPSUANT TO THE AB0VE INFORMATION, THE CHANGE DOES NOT INVOLVE AN INCREASE IN PROBABILITY OF OCCURENCE OR CONSEQUENCES OF AN AC_CIDENT OR MALFUNCTION OF ECUIP-MENT IMPORTANT TO SAFETY OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS IN THE SAFETY ANALYSIS RE-PORTI OR CREATE POSSIBILITY.FOR ACCIDENT OR MALFUNCTION OF A DIFFERENT TYPE' OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS IN THE SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORTI OR REDUCE THE MAR-
,p.
GIN OF SAFETY AS DEFINED IN THE EASIS FOR ANr TECHNICAL SPECZFICATION.
THE EVALUATION DETERM(NED THAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY gj CUESTION DID NOT EXIST.
ei REPORT SAFETY EVALUATION l
ITER ID 7
NE-89-0262 CTP-EN-26092,REV 1 PROCEDURE ADDED DETAIL FOR CHEM. ADDITION TO SPRAY ADD. TAWK CTP-EN-06090,REV 1 PROCEDURE PROVIDES GUIDANCE FOR ADJUSTMENT OF SODIUM MYDRO- '
XIDE SOLUTIch IN CONTAINMENT SPRAY ADDITIVE TAWK.
IPPLEMENTATION OF THE PROC-
- 3; EDURE REQUIRES THE USE OF TCMPORARY NON-SAFETY RELATED EQUIPMENT. THE TEMPOR-ARY PIPING AND PUNP ANE STAINLESS STEEL AND COMPATIBLE WITH TdE STAINLESS STEEL i
INTERFACING PERMANENT. PLANT PIPING. THE TERPORARY PIPING IS ADEQUATELY SUPPORTED
();
AND DOESNOT IMPOSE DELETERIOUS LOADS ON PERMANENT EQUIPMENT. THE' TANK IS VENTED
'~
ON FILLING AND DRAINING OPERATIONS TO PREVENT OVERPRESSURIZATION OR VACUUM.
IN ADDITION THE TANK-IS EQUIPPED WITH VACUUM BREAKERS AND A RELIEF VALVE.
()
PURSUANT TO THE ABOVE INFORMATION, THE CHANGE DOES NOT INVOLVE AN INCREASE IN PROBABILITY OF OCCURENCE OR CONSEQbENCES OF AN ACCIDENT OR MALFUNCTION OF EQUIP-MENT IMPORTANT TO SAFETY OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS IN THE SAFETY ANALYSIS RE-gj.
PORTI OR CREATE POSSIBILITY FOR ACCIDENT OR MALFUNCTION OF A DIFFERENT TYPE
~~
OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS IN THE SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORTI OR REDUCE THE MAR-GIN OF SAFETY AS DEFINED IN THE BASIS FOR ANT TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION.
(g THE EVALUATION DETERMINED THAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY
^
QUESTION DID NOT EXIST.
(j; y_ r 9-&
sq--
y-y-
aau,gr
,a y
m-
'e-fuo w'm,a g
e--'q--
-s y
q
+*'
, _ _.. __.... _. ~. _ _ _ _ _ _. _.
'. ~ _ _
OF U':IO:2 ELECTRIC APPO!VED '
WRITTEN' SAFETY EVAL'UATIONS REPORT SAFETY EVALUATION
~
8 NE-89-8867 ETP-EJ-ST883,REV 8 OCEDURE FOR RCS/RHR SUCTION VALVE ALARM TEST ETP-EJ-ST883,REV 8
,JCEDURE TESTED AN ALARM INSTALLED AS A PART OF CALLAWAY'S (Y
AUTOMATIC CLOSURE IWTERLCCK DELETION TO IMPROVE RNR SYSTEM AELIABILITY, ESPECIAL-LY DURING RCS PARTIAL DRAIN OPERATIONS. THE' TEST WAS PERFORMED WHILE THE REACTOR
~
CORE WAS OFFLOADED. THUS-THE PLANT WAS IN A NON-MODE SITUATION,WITH NO IMPACT r';
~"
0F THIS TEST PROCEDURE ON PLANT SAFETY.
^
PURSUANT TO THE ABOVE INFORMATION, THE CHANGE DOES'NOT INVOLVE AN INCREASE IN-PROBABILITY OF OCCURENCE OR CONSEGUENCES OF AN ACCIDENT OR MALFUNCTION OF EGUIP-MENT IMPORTANT TO SAFETY OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS IN THE SAFETY ANALYSIS RE-l PORTI 09 CREATE POSSIBILITY FOR ACCIDENT OR NALFUNCTION OF A DIFFERENT TYPE OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS IN THE SAFETY ANALYSIS _REPORTI OR REDUCE THE MAR-l GIN OF SAFETY AS DEFINES IN THE BASIS FOR AgY TECNNICAL SPECIFICATION.
THE EVALUATION DETERMINED THAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION DID NOT EXIST.
a REPORT SAFETY EVALUATION ITEM ID 9
NE-89-0J71 CN 88-42,5A 2.3-5 REVISED FSAR SECTION FOR RECALCULATED METEOROLOGICAL DATA CN SE-42,SA 2.3-5 REVISED FSAR FOR RECALCULATED METEORLOGICAL DISPERSION PARAMETERS. THIS INCLUDES NEW TERRAIN / RECIRCULATION CORRECTION FA; TORS FOR GROUND LEVEL RELEASES. THESE CHANGES DO NOT AFFECT SHORT TERM YALUES PRESENTED IN FSAR CHAPTER 15. THE NEW VALUES REPRESENT SLIGHT CHANGES TO THE CLD VALUES AND SLIGHT DIFFERENCES IN THEIR SPATI AL-DISTRIBUTION.
PURSUANT TO THE ABOVE INFORMATION, THE CHANGE DOES NOT INVOLVE AN INCREASE IN PROBA9ILITY OF OCCUREhCE OR CONSEQUENCES OF AN ACCIDENT OR MALFUNCTION OF EQUIP-MENT IMPORTANT TO SAFETY OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS IN THE SAFETY ANALYSIS RE-f,.
PORTI OR CREATE POSSIBILITY FOR ACCIDENT OR MALFUNCTION OF A DIFFERENT TYPE OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS IN THE SAFETY ANALYSIS REPOPTI OR REDUCE THE MAR-GIN OF SAFETY AS DEFINED IN THE BASIS FOR ANY TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION.
g7,j THE EVALUATION DETERMINED THAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY CUESTION DID NOT EXIST.
,i:
t
+-
,n.
m
}
~,
.- ; -- - 7 y- _.gns a., _.-.: -_
.sc:.
w_
. _.a. ; C ;,s, _ n 2._w -.__.;a a,_.;e;_ _ __ _,;W
". _. __ {S=:
u -.
l
=.
.. @E
" ' " ~ '
19CFR58.S9' ANNUAL'CEPORT:SUMMARIEST^ ~
.. _._ _._ _,.-~~~~~
(-
CT UNION ELECTRIC APPROVED
~
WRITTEN SAFETY ~ EVALUATIONS'~~~~
l e
REPORT SAFETY EVALUATION.
19 NE-89-0072 CN E9-13,SP 9.1A.7 REVISED FSAR FOR PROCEDURES TO PREVENT MISLOADING FUEL CN 89-13,$P 9.1A.7 REVISED THE FSAR FOR PROCEDURES TO PREVENT MISLOADING A FUEL.
(g ASSEPBLY IN THE REACTOR ~ 0R IN REGION 2 0F THE SPENT FUEL POOL. PRIOR PROCEDURES INCLUDED POSITIVELY IDENTIFYING FUEL ASSEMBLIES BEFORE ENTERING TNE REACTOR CAVITY AND BEFORE LEAVING THE CAVITY ~FOR THE' SPENT FUEL POOLJAND VERIFYING (i
ASSEMBLY NUM8Ft PRIOR TO MOVEMENT FROM REGION 1 TO REGION 2 0F THE SPENT FUEL'
~
POOL. THE NEV PROCEDURE INCLUDES PERFORMING A CORE INVENTORY AFTER LOADING;PER-FORMING AN INVENTORY OF REGION 1 PRIOR TO ANY MOVEMENT TO REGION 2. DURING RE-f3[
FUELING NO FUEL IS MOVED DIRECTLY TO REGION 2.
PURSUANT TO THE ABOVE INFORMATION, THE CHANGE DOES NOT INVOLVE AN INCREASE IN PROBABILITY OF OCCURENCE OR CONSEQUENCES OF A4 ACCIDENT OR MALFUNCTION OF EQUIP-( ;
l MENT IMPORTANT TO SAFETY OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS IN THE SAFETY ANALYSIS RE-
' 't l
PORT; OR CREATE POSSIBILITY FOR ACCIDENT OR MALFUNCTION OF A DIFFERENT TYPE OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS IN THE SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT; OR REDUCE THE MAR-f
' GIN OF SAFETY AS DEFINED IN THE BASIS FOR ANY TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION.
THE EVALUATION DETERMIyED THAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION DID NOT EXIST.
i l REPORT SAFETY EVALUATION ITEM ID 11 NE-89-0073 CN $9-14,$A APP 9.5A REVISED FSAR FOR STORAGE OF FLAMMABLE LIQUIDS (j
CN 39-14,SA APP 9.54 REVISED THE FSAR COMMITMENT THAT FLAMMABLE LIQUIDS BE STORED OhLY IN THE STORES, SERVICE,0R SOLVENT STORAGE BUILDINGS. IN ACCORDANCE WITH NFPA 3D A FLAMHASLE LIQUIDS STORAGE CABINENT IS PROVIDED FOR THE STORAGE 0F MOST TRANSIENT FLAMMABLE LIQUIDS IN THE HOT MACHINE SHOP. ANY STORAGE OF FLAMPABLE LIDT?DS IN A MONSAFETY-RELATED AREA DOES NOT IMPACT THE ABILITY TO fj ACHIEVE AND f4Mf1TAIN SAFE SHUTDOWN IN THE EVENT OF A FIRE.
~
PURSUANT TO ".dE ABCVE INFORMATION, THE CHANGE DOES NOT INVOLVE AN INCREASE IN PROBABILITY OF OCCURENCE OR CONSEQUENCES OF AN ACCIDENT OR MALFUNCTION OF EQUIP-()
MENI IMPORTANT TO SAFETY OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS IN THE SAFETY' ANALYSIS RE-PORT; OR CREATE POSSIBILITY FOR ACCIDENT OR MALFUNCTION OF A DIFFERENT TYPE OVER PREVIOUS EVALGATIONS IN THE SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT; OR REDUCE THE MAR-
- )
GIN OF SAFETY AS DEFINED IN THE BASIS FOR ANY TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION.
THE EVALUATION DETERMINED THAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION DID NOT EXIST.
l c%
j
~
g
+'
~
A
~
w, q
z ~"12CFR59.59 ANNUAL REPORTfSUMMARIES
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~
~'
-Q OF UNIO 2 ELECTOIC APPROVED
- ~ _.. w :-..
REPORT SAFETY EVALUATION O
ITEM ID 12 OA-84-OP28 CMP 84-0138 REPLACED THE GOULD RUNDELL'TWO POSITION HAND $ WITCHES REPLACED TWO POSITION HANDSWITCHES FOUND IN THE MOTOTR CONTROL CENTER CUBICLES n
WITH WESTINGHOUSE TYPE W-Z SWITCHES.
PURSUANT TO THE ABOVE INFORMATION, THE CHANGE DOES NOT INVOLVE AN INCREASE IN PROBASILITY OF OCCURENCE OR CONSEQUENCES OF AN ACCIDENT OR MALFUNCTION ^0F EQUIP- ()
IN THE SAFETY ANALYSIS RE-MENT IMPORTANT TO SAFETY OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONSRALFUNCTION OF'A DIFFERENT TYP
~ ~
PORTI OR CREATE POSSIBILITY FOR ACCIDENT OR OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS IN THE SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORTI OR REDUCE THE MAR-(m GIN OF SAFETY AS DEFINED IN THE BASIS FOR ANY TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION.
4#
THE EVALUATION DETERMINED THAT AN UNREVIEWE0 3AFETY CUESTION DID NOT EXIST.
REPORT SAFETY EVALUATION 13 NE-88-0085 RMP 85-2009 INSTALLED FL,ANGES TO CONDENSATE SYS PIPING ON BOTH SIDES OF VALVES ITEM ID RMP 58-2330 INSTALLED FLANGES TO CONDENSATE SYSTEM PIPING ON BOTH SIDES OF VALVES ADV-797,993, AND 999. THE PIPE FLANGES ALL0d A FASTER VALVE REPLACEMENTr WHILE MAINTAINING SYSTEM INTEGRITY. THIS IS A NONSAFETY-RELATED SYSTEM AND THE CHANGE ENHANCES SYSTEM MAINTENANCE WITHOUT IMPACTING SYSTEM FUNCTION. FSAR FI5 13.4-2 WAS REVISED. (THIS CHANGE IS PARTIALLY IMPLEMENTED).
y PURSUANT TO THE ABOVE INFORMATION, 'HE CHANGE DOES NOT INVOLVE AN INCREASE IN PROBABILITY OF OCCURENCE OR. CONSEQUENCES OF AN ACCIDENT OR MALFUNCTION OF EOUIP-fiE tlT IMPORTANT TO SAFETY OVER PREVIOUT EVALUATIONS IN THE SAFETY ANALYSIS RE-g',
PORTI OR CREATE POSSIBILITY FOR ACCID' INT OR MALFUNCTION OF A DIFFERENT TYPE OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS IN THE SAFF.TY ANALYSIS REPORTI OR REDUCE THE MAR-GIN OF SAFETY AS DEFINED IN THE Bats $ FOR ANY TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION.
,{g THE EVALUATION DETERMINED TdAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION DID NOT EXIST.
()
e
's.
+.e-e m-+e m
b mas s. 4
.*e-.,ee a
e-w.4-.e s6e '
s.m.eeW8."*1-wd.P W
?4e M.me m-*.-6*W
- D' m-e E.
Y.
a i.?
~
n -.
a.-
j
- -. - ~ _ _
0F UNIO.4 ELECTRIC APPROVED _ -..
Ck
~ REPORT ~
SAFETY EVALUATION
' ITEM ID
()
14 NE-89-0012 RMP 88-2813 REPLACED CARBON STEEL PIPING, FITTINGS, ISO. VALVES IN FEEDWATER SYSTE RMP 88-2613 REPLACED CARBON STEEL PIPING, FITTINGS,AND ISOLATION VALVES IN PIPE"
~~
~
(T RUNS FROM HIGH PRESSURE'FEEDWATER HEATER CONTINUOUS VENT N0ZZLES TO THE ASSOC-IATED LOW PRESSURE CONDENSER CONNECTION. THE AFFECTED PIPING CONDUCTS AIR /NON-CONDENSIELE GASES FROM THE HIGH PRESSURE FEEDWATERS TO THE LOW PRESSURE ~ CON-~'
~
^
~ ' ([
DENSER. REPLACEMENT WITH STAINLESS STEEL PIPING WILL INCREASE EROSION RESIST-ANCE. THE EQUIPMENT INVOLVED HAS NO SAFETY-RELATED FUNCTIONS.
- "~~
'~~~ ~~~~~~ ~
PURSUANT TO THE ABOVE INFORMATION, THE CHANGE DOES NOT INVOLVE AN IRCREASE IN (i
PROBA9ILITY OF OCCURENCE OR CONSEQUENCES OF AN ACCIDENT OR MALFUNCTION OF EQUIP-MENT IMPORTANT TO SAFETY OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS IN THE SAFETY ANALYSIS RE-PORT; OR CREATE POSSIBILITY FOR ACCIDENT OR M4LfDNCTION OF A DIFFERENT TYPE
(,
OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS IN THE SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT; OR REDUCE THE MAR-GIN OF SAFETY AS DEFINED IN THE BASIS FOR A'NY TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION.
~
' i THE EVALUATION DETERMINED THAT AN UNREVIEWE9 SAFETY cuESTION DID NOT-EXIST.
PEPORT SAFETY EVALUATION
[
ITEM ID
,'{
15 NE-39-0016 CMP 88-1024 PROVIDED SEVERAL REVISIONS TO THE STAND 8Y DIESEL GENERATOR SYSTEM CMP 88-1004 PROVIDED SEVERAL REVISIONS TO THE STAND 8Y DIESEL GENERATOR SYSTEM.
(y THE CHANGES INCLUDE REVISING THE LOGIC FOR THE EMERGENCY FUEL CIL TRANSFER PUMPS SO THAT THEY WILL RUN CONTIfeUOUSLY WHEh THEIR ASSOCIATED DIESEL GENERATOR IS RUNNING; BYPASSING EMERGENCY FUEL OIL DAY TANK HIGH LEVEL ALARMS WHEN THE
('v'"
ASSOCIATED D/G IS RUNNING; INSTALLING TIME DELAYS ON ANNUCIATORS FOR HIGH DP ON FUEL OIL STRAINERS; AtJD ADDING VENT LINES DAY TANK STANDPIPES TO DAY TAhK VENTS. INSTEAD OF CYCLING THE EMERGENCY FUEL OIL PUMPS,A CONTINUOUS RUN REDUCES
( p' STRESS ON THE MOTORS AND IMPROVES RELIABILITY. SYPASSING ALARMS.DURING DIESEL
~
OPERATION ELIMINATED CONTINUOUS HIGH DAY TANK LEVEL ALA2MS. TIME DELAYS ON THE" STRAINER HIGH DP ALARMS ELIMINATED MOMENTARY NUISANCE ALARMS ON TRANSFER PUMP (y'
STARTS. ADDITIONAL VENT.LIFES ASSURE SYSTEM OPERABILITY WITH A BLOCKED STORAGE TANK VENT WHEN PUMPS ARE IN CONTINUOUS RUN. THERE WERE NO HARDWARE CHANGES EXCEPT TERMINATIONS OF CABLES AND JUMPERS IN THE CONTROL CIRCUIT. THERE WERE No cd i
CHANGES TO DAY TANK LEVEL AND STANDPIPE L EVEL ALARM SETP0INTS. EVALUATIONS
'i ASSURE THAT OTHER THAN THE OPERATIONAL CHANGES DESCRIBED,THERE'IS NO CHANGE ~
^
^ ^
I IN SYSTEM PERFORMANCE IMPORTANT'TO SAFETY.
{[
PURSUANT TO THE ABOVE INFORMATION, THE CHANGE DOES NOT IWVOLVE AN INCREASE IN PROBASILITY OF OCCURENCE OR CONSEGUENCES OF AN ACCIDENT OR MALFUNCTION OF EQUIP-MENT IMPORTANT TO SAFETY OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS IN THE SAFETY ANALYSIS RE-(y PORT; OR CREATE POSSIBILITY FOR ACCIDENT OR MALFUNCTION OF A DIFFERENT TYPE
~
OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS IN THE SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT;'OR REDUCE THE MAR ' "'
GIN OF SAFETY AS DEFINED IN THE BASIS FOR ANY TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION.
(j THE EVALUATION DETERMINED THAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY
~'
~ ~ - ();
QUESTION DID NOT EXIST.
'"~
0F U2ICN ELECTRIC APPROVED
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~
~
WRITTEN"$AFETV'EVAEUATIONS
_ _ _ _ _ __... _ ____. 1 (1
' CEPORT^
' SAFETY EVALUATION
' ITEM ID
'(y 16 NE-89-0922 CMP 87-1121 REPLACED THERM 0ELECTR'.C CONNECTORS ON IN-CORE THERMOCOUPLES CMP 87-1121 REPLACED THERM 0ELEr'RIC CONNECTORS ON THE IN-CORE THERMOCOUPLES(T/CJ,
WITH SPLICE ASSEMBLIES QUALIFIED BY PATEL ENGINEERS. THE SPLICES ARE GUALIFIE6-().
FOR A 43' YEAR LIFE.RATHER THAN 4.68 YEARS FOR THE CONNECTORS. THE SPLICES ARE QUALIFIED.FOR' ACCIDENT ENVIRONMENTS AS LOCA CATEGORY A AND MSLB CATEGORY A
()l EQUIPMENT.
~ INCREASE'IN PURSUANT TO THE ABOVE INFORMATION,'THE CHANGE DOES NOT INVOLVE AN PROBABILITY OF OCCURENCE OR CONSEQUENCES OF AN ACCIDENT OR MALFUNCTION OF EQUIP-(3l' MENT IMPORTANT TO SAFETY OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS IN THE SAFETY ANALYSIS RE-PORTI OR CREATE POSSIBILITY FOR ACCIDENT OR MALFUNCTION OF A DIFFERENT TYPE OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS IN THE SAFETY ANALYSLS, REPORT; OR REDUCE THE MAR-(v GIN OF SAFETY AS DEFINED IN THE BASIS FOR A,N Y TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION.
QUES 1'ON DID NOT EXIST.
(', i THE EVALUATION DETERMINED THAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY I I REPORT SAFETY EVALUATION ITEM ID j
17 NE-89-0346 RFR NO.5656 REVISED
-'AR FIG 9.4-1 TO 9EFLECT AS-BUILT DATA FOR CONTROL 6 LOG HV (j ;
RFR NO.5656 REVISED FSAR FIG 9.4-1 TO SHOW THE AS-BUILT CONDITION FOR AIR SIGNAL FROM HIS 184 TO SOLENOID OPERATOR FOR THE CONTROL BLDG SUPPLY AIR DAMPER.
THE (j :
FIGURE JAS ALSO REVISED TO SHOW THE CONTROL BLOG EXHAUST DAMPER AS A FAIL CLOSED i
PURSUANT TO THE ABOVE INFORMATION, THE CHANGE DOES NOT INVOLVE AN INCREASE IN g}j PROBABILITY OF OCCURENCE OR CONSEQUENCES OF AN ACCIDENT OR MALFUNCTION OF EQUIP-MENT IMPORTANT TO SAFETY OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS IN THE SAFETY ANALYSIS RE-PORTI OR CREATE POSSIBILITY FOR ACCIDENT OR MALFUNCTION OF A DIFFERENT TYPE
(-) J OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS IN THE SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORTI OR REDUCE THE MAR-GIN OF SAFETY AS DEFINED IN THE BASIS FOR ANY TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION.
THE EVALUATION DETERMINED THAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION DID NOT EXIST.
(J j e
e e
()!
.y w
g
-w
+
w
..-4sl.--
9_w-*
sp v
,a-g,
p.m--
r.
g-
..we--
- _, _.. i u - _. _, _ _ _
_w. i l_.__.
_i __ z
____ i_
" ~
0F UZIO3 ELECTRIC APP 20VED WRITTEN SAFETY.EYALUATION F ~~~
~
~~~ ~~
~~
_ _ _. _ _ iS
.- R EPO R T..... _.... S A F E T Y EVALUATION
.._ _ 18 _ _,,
,_ NE-89-0066 ETP,-EG-STOS2,REV 3 PROCEDURE TO DETERMINE THRUST TG,CCW SYS ISOLATION VALVES,_ _ _
ETP-EG-ST892,REV 9 PROCEDURE DETERMINED THE AMOUNT OF THRUST,DUE TO DIFFERENTIAL (y
PRESSURE-CONDITIONS,10 VARIOUS COMPONENT COOLING WATER SYSTEM ISOLATION VALVES.
THE SUBJECT VALVES ARE CONTAINMENT ISOLATION VALVES THAT ARE NORMALLY CLOSED AND
"~~
~
ONLY OPENED UNDER ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLS. THE PROCEDURE IS PERFORMED IN MODES r]!
5 OR 6.WITH THE RCP'S OUT OF SERVICE,AND ISOLATING THE CCW FLOW TO CONTAINMENT
' '~ ~~
~ ~
LOADS'WILL NOT CAUSE COMPONENT DAMAGE. AN' ADDITIONAL' PROCEDURE PRECAUTION PROHIBITS ISCLATING A RHR HEAT EXCHANGER CONCURRENT WITH A SPENT FUEL POOL c-COOLING HEAT EXCHANGER,$INCE THE TWO LOADS ARE THE MAJORITY OF THE CCW LOAD SYSTEM.
PURSUANT TO THE AB0VE INFORMATION, THE CHANGE DOES NOT INVOLVE AN INCREASE IN PROBABILITY OF OCCURENCE OR CONSEQUENCES OF.AN ACCIDENT OR MALFUNCTION OF EQUIP-l MENT IMPORTANT TO SAFETY OVER PREVIOUS EVAlbATIONS IN THE SAFETY ANALYSIS RE-PORT; OR CREATE POSSIBILITY FOR ACCIDENT OR MALFUNCTION OF A DIFFERENT TYPE gi OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS IN'THE SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORTJ OR REDUCE THE MAR-GIN OF SAFETY AS DEFINED.IN THE BASIS FOR ANY TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION.
~
l THE EVALUATION DETERMINED THAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION DID NOT EXIST.
REPORT SAFETY EVALUATION ITEM ID
. ;ji 19 NE-89-0070 ETP-ZZ-ST906,REV 0 PROCEDURE PROVIDED ROD SWAP METHOD FOR BANK WORTH MEASURE
. j ETP-ZZ-STC06,REV.0 PAOCEDURE PROVIDED A ROD SWAP METHOD FOR MEASURING THE BANK g,l REACTIVITY WORTH.
THIS METHOD PROVIDES AN ALTERNATE,LESS TIME-CONSUMING WAY
~
OVER CONVENTI0L ROD WORTH TESTS USING BORCN DILUTION. THIS PROCEDURE WAS USED TO PROVIDE BENCHMARK DATA TO BE USED IN DEVELOPING THE LICENSABLE ROD SWAP METHODOLOGY. THIS PROCEDURE WAS PERFORMED AT ZERO POWER WITH THE REACTOR
-PROTECTION SYSTEMS FULLY OPERABLE. THE TEST WAS PERFORMED DURING A SHORT TIME TO PRECLUDE THE CREATION OF ABNORMAL FISSION PRODUCT DISTRIBUTIONS. THE PROC-(){
EDURE ALSO LIMITS PERFORMANCE TO TWO BANKS AT A GIVEN TIMEsTHUS' PRESERVING
~
SIZEABLE SHUTDOWN CAPABILITY THROUGHOUT THE TEST.
23' PURSUANT TO THE ABOVE INFORMATION, THE CHANGE DOES NOT INVOLVE AN INCREASE IN PROBABILITY OF OCCURENCE OR CONSEQUENCES OF AN ACCIDENT OR MALFUNCTION OF EQUIP-
~~
MENT.IMPORTANT TO SAFETY OVER PREVIOUS' EVALUATIONS IN THE SAFETY ANALYSIS RE-
^~
PORTI OR CREATE POSSIBILITY FOR ACCIDENT OR MALFUNCTION OF A DIFFERENT TYPE
'f"l OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS IN THE SAFETY ANALYSIS REPJRTJ OR REDUCE THE MAR-'
GIN OF SAFETY AS DEFINED IN THE BASIS FOR ANY TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION.
f i
THE EVALUATION DETERMINED THAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION DID NOT EXIST.
~~ ~
7
.r_e aw
+
m.-
m.ie i
,wy w
_qy e
~ ~ ~ ~ " 18CFR55;59 ' ACUAC REP RT' SUMMARIES
' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' '
' ' ~ ~
{', :
CF ROIC:3' ELECTRIC APPRCVED
~'
WRITTEN 5AFETY' EVALUATIONS
~
..... _._.. ~. _.. _. ~. - _ - -.
('-
. REPORT SAFETY EVALUATION i
28
_,___,NE-89_-8888._
,RFR h0.5316 EVALUATED LEAVING _RV HEAD STUD TENSIONER NOISTS IN PLACE _ __
RFR NO.5316 EVALUATED LEAVING THE REACTOR VESSEL NEAD STUD TENSIONER HOISTS IN
' ~ ~ ~
~
PLACE DURING PLANT OPERATION.
THIS COMPONENT FACILITATES MOVEMENT OF THE STUD ~ -
~ (3:
TENSIONERS DURING REFUELING. WESTINGHOUSE EVALUATIONS VERIFIED THIS TO BE
~ ~ ~ '
ACCEPTABLE. THE INCREASED LOAD ON THE CONTROL R0D DRIVE MECHANISM PLATFORM AND (3
ON THE TIE RODS REMAIN WITHIN ASME BOILER AND PRESSURE VESSEL CODE ALLOWABLE
~
~
~
' ~
LIMITS. CALCULATIONS FURTHER ASSURE THAT.THIS' CONFIGURATION WOULD NOT ALTER"
~
~
^
i PLANT SAFETY IN A SEISMIC EVENT.
c'4 PURSUANT TO THE ABOVE INFORMATION, THE CHANGE DOES NOT INVOLVE AN INCREASE IN PROBABILITY OF OCCURENCE OR CONSEQUENCES OF AN ACCIDENT OR MALFUNCTION OF EQUIP-MENT IMPORTANT TO SAFETY OVER PREVIOUS EVALUALION_S IN THE SAFETY ANALYSIS RE-PORT; OR CREATE POSSIBILITY FOR ACCIDENT OR. MALFUNCTION OF A DIFFERENT TYPE
~
~
OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS IN THE SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT; OR REDUCE THE MAR-GIN OF SAFETY'AS DEFINED IN THE BASIS FOR ANY TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION.
THE EVALUATION DETERMINED THAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION DID NOT EXIST, REPORT SAFE!Y EVALUATION ITEM ID 2e NE-59-8103 RFR 40.5880 REVISED FSAR TABLE 3.11(83-3 TO CLARIFY INSTRUMENTS IN PRT LOOP RFR No.5888 REVISED THE FSAR TABLE 3.11(B)-3 TO CLARIFY THE SAFETY-RELATED AND EQ CLASSIFICATIONS OF ALL THE INSTRUMENTS IN THE PRESSURIZER RELIEF TANK (PRT) TEMPERATURE INSTRUMENT LOOP (88T-8468).
THE LOOP PROVIDES PRT TEMP-ERATURE IN THE CONTROL ROOM AND ON THE NSSS COMPUTER. THESE COMPONENTS NAVE NO ACTIVE OR PASSIVE SAFETY-RELATED FUNCTIONS AND THESE CHANGES PROVIDE CLARIFICATION ONLY.
');
PURSUANT TO THE AB0VE INFORMATION, THE CHANGE DOES NOT INVOLVE AN INCREASE IN PROBASILITY OF OCCURENCE OR CONSEQUENCES OF AN ACCIDENT OR MALFUNCTION OF' EQUIP ~~
MENT IMPORTANT TO SAFETY OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS IN THE SAFETY ANALYSIS RE-(, t PORT; OR CREATE POSSIBILITY FOR ACCIDENT OR MALFUNCTION OF A DIFFERENT TYPE
~l OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS IN THE SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT; OR REDUCE THE MAR-GIN OF SAFETY AS DEFINED IN THE BASIS FOR ANY TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION.
.l
~~ ' '
THE EVALUATION DETERMINED THAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY
~
l
,i QUESTION DID NOT EXIST.
~
()
n.
D
'~
~
~
x r
{"
~ ~1eCFR58.59 ANNUAL REPORT' SUMMARIES"~
' ~ ~ '
- ~ " ~~'
OF UNION ELECTRIC APPROVED WRITTEN ~ SAFETY EVALUATIONS
~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~
~
~
~.
REPORT--
S AFETY EVAL'J ATION 22 NE-89-3184 RFR NO.4867 REVISED FSAR TABLE 3.11(83-3 TO CORRECT INSTRUMENT SAFETY CLASS INSTRUMENTS IN THE ESSENTIAL' SERVICE WATER SYSTEM.
THE INSTRUMENTS PROVIDE ^
~
(3 RFR N0.4867 REVISED FSAR TABLE 3.11(B)-3 TO CORRECT THE SAFETY DESIGNATION OF LOCAL INDICATION OF ESW PUMP DISCHARGE TEMPERATURE. THIS CHANGE INVOLVED ~ ^ ^
(3 CHANGING THE FSAR TO REFLECT THE' ACTUAL PLANT.
PURSUANT TO THE ABOVE INFORMATION, THE CHANSE DOES NOT INVOLVE AN INCREASE IN CONSEQUENCES OF'AN ACCIDENT OR MALFUNCTION OF'EDUIP-
- (,
~~
~ '
~
PROBABILITY OF OCCURENCE OR ANALYSIS RE-IMPORTANT TO SAFETY OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIMNS IN THE SAFETY MENT CREATE POSSIBILITY FOR ACCIDENT OR MALFUNCTION OF A DIFFERENT TYPE PORT; OR OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS IN THE SAFETY ANALYSIS RCPORT; OR REDUCE THE MAR-
. GIN OF SAFETY AS DEFINED IN THE BASIS FOR ANY4T.ECHNICAL SPECIFICATION.
THE EVALUATION DETERMINED THAT AN UNREVIE$ED SAFElv
~
'~
QUESTION DID NOT EXIST.
REPORT SAFETY EVALUATION ITEM ID 23 OA-84-0083 CHP 84-0523 ADDED CHECK VALVES TO CENTRIFUGAL CHARGING PUMP LINES.
THE CHANGE CMP 84-3523 ADDED CHECK VALVES TO CENTRIFUGAL CHARGING PUMP LINES.
CHECK VALVES TO CENTRIFUGAL CHARGING PUMPS DISCHARGE LINE ADDED TJO THREE' INCH DOWNSTREAP OF VALVES BG-8483 A AND C ALONG WITH THE APPROPRIATE MANGERS.
THE ADDITION OF THE CHECK VALVES PREVENTS BACKFLOW TO THE PUMPS WITHOUT OPERA-TOR MANUAL ACTION FOR VALVE RECONFIGURATION.
(THIS CHANGE IS PARTIALLY IMPLEMENTED.)-
PURSUANT TO THE ASCVE INFORMATION, THE CHANGE DOES NOT INVOLVE AN INCREASE IN PROBABILITY OF OCCURENCE OR CONSECUENCES OF AN ACCIDENT OR MALFUNCTION OF EQUIP-MENT IMPORTANT TO SAFETY OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS IN THE SAFETY ANALYSIS RE-()
OR CREATE POSSIBILITY FOR ACCIDENT OR MALFUNCTION OF A DIFFERENT TYPE
~
PORT; PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS IN THE SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT; OR REDUCE THE MAR-OVER GIN OF SAFETY AS DEFINED IN THE BASIS FOR ANY TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION.
(y THE EVALUATION DETERMINED THAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY
()
'CUESTION DID NOT EXIST.
.~_....-
t)
~ ()
. -.. ~
e U
,4 g
5 3'. ", p '. e
,a d.v.J.
4
-.....[ ~ 13.g-. %. a w. s,,., i,e a g A
= a,,
.L
'. *g > W / e, of, j u
- L.i;.. y
,.fa f.. h.4. 4., a e. w /L. ;. %. ;. m.
s i v
.4, e 3
g
'a.se i g.1 t
=
.4Je w
s.
y,46 a
y, y=.
p=
=>
e.
=
b b
(
(
J w
(
p e-
- =.
3
.e.
v
- )
1 i
)
- t t
3 h
l I
i II I
/
l-0 1
A M
A A
I E EM E
Eeo E **
O MDI O
k e-e D 9 ke D 1 as.
O uJ
>e iu OW OW f
44 WWEuJ l
>=
EE4 WWW W l b
L4J W E W G 1
W M
- en
&E W
uJ O EE M
4E uW4 M
kE 0
10 W
e4 et b M > ag W
en y ees a w e4 > eg aW et6M>4 q
O m
He W O met-E e
2 W O M >= E MEM WOM>E
,q E: O GE E - E M
WWE E
M E
M E
M 9
k E W >=
W E > >= W e
.J OZM u2>>W e-4E W E > >= W G V
g i
4@
E O.J E E E
.J Ek 2 0.3 E z 3 '
Ou EOJEEE f
1 I
O E e e4 >e et W >= 0 W
O MMeW>O e>*
>e De e W > 0 f
}
f W
O O taa
- = E E
>e 3
wEO
>=
- m M
>
- e4
>EE Me i
>c W.J >=
E u 4 W W >=
t'=
0E E u 4 W W >=.
EEE E u 4 nea W 6*
- l l
A
(.
>=
er et E wu(
O E EE
- E E wu(
>= W 4. 4E es. u 4 '
M COE D>hDu Z
Mwo D>wDu l
l D>hpu ME Dwwj f,
v MED Wu.rMOM O
W u. w M O M E
w w. 0= M c M f.
O.
u u >.J W O W u.
E EE pJWOWh
> uwC >.J W O w m a
M O e4 u
.J w w EM W
uJ O Jew EM M+
E J 4 m.
EM l
M MW4 O E C et u
en M@E OEd(
u D
MEE OEdW u
.(i
- so 3 M
er W 2
M>4 M
as W w
u40 M.0=
EW r
O; O-Er wou W
Mx EE mos E
WM EE kE' MCWO 89 O
O e4 MCWO M
M EHH-MoWO en fu OMM E
es.
+
. Et OE4' 2
et E
W W
E es 4
2 uJ t
6= >= t= E k J O
ZOE
>= >= H E >=.J
>e O
M >= >= E > J s
8K l WCW' OR OE4 w
HWW OR OEW; 2
kWO-OR OE4 g
4J EWEMOW
>E EWEMOW^
0 WX4 EWEMCu 4
?
W.
dK M ID 0 pe H & pe
>=
0 0.J O OM >= 46 M t-
- =*
D>
0 >e > b M H
N ts# D 4 MM uWE W
H
>= 0 4 M **
uWE W
>=
Da W'
44 >4 WWE W
i A
) >
NOM' WuMEEE E
ME WuMEEE w
. W WEE WuMEEL h
4
.J - > W.A'e O u 2 m wt et
> > 44 O Ow2D u-et j D W M t= - 0wED u
se 9
-t E
.J W E O 4 O em to u4 M
.J
.J M w oetOmMW e4 d
O C O as. e4 W M
l 2
WJ E
E O.s w E >= = MM J M H, A
AO MJ u.
Ek e MJ wEr.MW W E *=. M H e
O e a O-M C
w2E.
M C
! 4 E uJ >= @ 4 et E > >
tu D
D W uJ
@ 4 at E > >
W
>MW 43 4 W E > >
W Ei MEuE-D JE QB to MM>
2 3
.J E 3
C en a >
E D
2E 3
A.
E tA O E a w J K er a W
ar (
- w.J ct 4 4 - W W
> E e4 W u..J K et et W
i dL M E D E C E O E M
E E EK.J 204OE M
H M
k.
2040E M
Wi E
- u. u >
er E W
WWW W
et et M
C en v >
et sK E6 WCM M W >=
0 W
@ (D sg MW>
0 W
Ee MWH C
W H
M' M>WW E>w E
o O ke uJ W X>w E
M O
E W ua E>b er W
> ua kEuHW>
E sk E.J >
ZuMW>
E
>4 O O EuMWH E
M E
2 >= W >= E D O uJ M 3
D
>=
t= E D 53 W M D
E
>= W >4
> E D O W e4 D
et 0 ;'
O,.
IK>Eh w O pe u. M M
we O W W O M u. M o
WXk WOMwM E
w o
W4 s D we W W W X
E Ekw sDM W et M E
pe O @ LJ 4 3 M u 4 to 2
a i
E utto m e E M E O > u M eg e
og E O > u M et eg H
M M us E O > W 44 et et A
E>E k'
E 4L O W W aC iD A
eOM O u8 w at W
W t= M >=
0 W W at S
I DOO E
k W M O pe M ar W
e AW 6 e M M sr W
H MWO M en su W
H P
f MEM W
ENDEHE&EZW 4
W eME>HE&EZW 4
M EON
>EAEXW 4
l
.w a. <
en-E > w M E u E u.
A>
E.
WMO WO O N
.E=
>=
Z w E u et w
.= >
M Mk EvEm
> >=
3 JDokWO ONZ Z
k WO Op2=
Z AK 4 'D M!
Q. M uJ K W
X X
>= M h&
W E
E 3 E EK E
W E
O
.J D'
M
>>0E>>ME O
uJ E M uJ w O dr > > M E O
>= us O =
0m>>ME O
A v 'd 0-D @ E E es. O O >
M W
X W
> M em O O >
pe W
M et E > i
- u. O O >
Ne W
W me >
W-OEWWE MM E e g
er EEI E
M aa E e 3
LU eE MM E e f EKW l WMEMMWHJRO M>
E eWOEMW>JZO MH WMWNMW>JEO Mk {
He W:
.J et u > ke o tu EM sr EO>0 u >= M O W EM et 23We u >= >e O W EM
.J v '> '
E, W L D E W X W (D we 2 aK we W
sr C 2 6 W X W Sa >e E EM
>= O IE e W Z W ID pe E E we
-l 4 W >=
1
>=
2 E u W > uJ w M > ke us x gL W sr we
> W h >e >= M WX A
W PD > W w ke > og. WW D.J W
>= M
>= O at d to et h
>= W b >=
O O tr 4 to 4 h - >= W W
O W eA O EK 4 to e b
>= W EWb O
to W H ED D M e4 D ua W
es, M e4 W fD D M M D W uJ
.J W O E CKiD D M to D W ~ ui E
4 W
D Z > et u O.A O O t=
et E W sr a u O.J O O >=
.J
.JW>batu O.a o o >=
j'
,4 E M M*-
WQHM uCE4 O
O WM WOka O
J>
u uCA*
O i
+
O' W,
e= We WO>
> en EE us O e E D W O >=
>M EE
>=
at et O Sa W O >
>M EE th M E O
eEDO@X W uJ et O
O WM40Z W W et O
M
>= J D= e-Z WW4 O
' - 4A E W
. LI O O E E >= b k >= -
MC O
O E 3 W to w to >=
re O E
MW W h >= k MC ieDe !
! D o >e < M O E < e4 >
>M ec oOwE - O E < in >
>M M
E su n. u.
O E < so >
>M 1
e >=
3.J aO ac W D > < O
= *
- O
W D >
=O e.e l DCO at w D > - ac O
?
AA 4 **
4 O E > > >= et O W D
4
>=.J M k > >= EK O W D
80,
>W
> > > at O W D
i ar c et N
- MWE N E W M u.
WE eWJE WEvMw-JE a
60 >= W e=
6-EwMw JE h
3 G-N M et et > ke O
> et et O ra wwerW>MO Jo et at O G
ED W et E k *e C
>d 4O W
N G W D M E.J CL 82 W M
>M N
OM M E.J C. Er W to
> we e==
G b (D W X 2 EL EK W3 M
> *e t
}.-
.9 i
N u >=
et Me E O EE W >=
0 N
e es et e-e E o rg W >=
l e= et E et M E O et W >= ;
T=
i ED I O u M D ED we AE en to I
.J W > D (D M en w M
>=
l so E W D in >e CL 6 M j 1
i EO : - 40 fr et en M et et O
WW 00 eb J k to to er og C
us W en
- b. E we sg M er es C
uA uA ;
i
! 00 Q. 4 ha OC ED >= > er ZD es seJ et er ID >= >= gr ZD to O re E ED > t= CC 3D
-j-en D u D O Z ar w E
>O c6 3 M z D O E at w z >= O n.
E ne D D O R E W E
>= O E
L W R C a oc W O > M E
e6>=2>=simWO>M E
st EO6mwo>M i
IK E Z et CC (L E EL O O tr E O W >e dL E dL O @
u E M >e W
& E A O LD l
j
=
ENEL KZO3 WMME l
I i
k i
i t
i 4
3 2
2 2
j 3
O O
O M
>e de 6
>=
4.
v=.
et e=
et W
D 4
D g-D v=
=
c J
G
.J cp
.J F.
et G-eg Eg 4
.9 t
i l.
0 0
[
i W D ED W O 06 W 4 Oh L
M E0 M to
>e EO I
0 0
e 1
l 4
>=
'W
>=
W 9-W
,t ud E
uJ E
W X
h w
w p
i '
4 4
e.'
g-M 44 M
j
=
4 I
4 i
l i
i i
s
=
i E E *d s
E E en EE E 4 i
O uJ N OWN OWN (L >=
f' IL t.
G. >=
s WM WM g-WM r
E.
E E
a i
6 l
I l_ / ^ A [ A } ? "('V. *g 'Ll,e " ] [t'; jf F
"#Y %,"
, i
- 7 ~~ *
- M[
7E* *,
j' (( " N
'[= fN
- ~~
- 5..
_ __ _ _ ~
.__u.-_._.__.___c-__
. ~ 18CFK58.59 ~ A%NUAt~ REPOOT:~ SUMMARIES
~-
~ ~ - ~ Q;
_ _. -.. _ _. 0F U 103 ELECT.GIC APPROVED.
.g
~ _ _. _. _ _,.. _ _.... _., _. _ _
O' R
T
. SAFETY EVALUATION 27 NE-89-0030 CMP 89-1991 IMPLEMENTED CHANGES TO TS FOR DECAY HEAT REMOVAL CONCERNS (GL 88-17)
~~
CMP 89-1981 IMPLEMENTED DESIGN CHANGES TO INCORPORATE TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION '
g:
REVISIONS IN SUPPORT OF THE DECAY HEAT REMOVAt CONCERNS RAISED'IN GENERIC-LETTER 88-17. THE DESIGN CHANGES INCLUDE DELETION OF THE AUTOCLOSURE INTERLOCK FUNCTION ONTHE RHR SUCTION VALVES; THE ADDITION OF CONTROL' ROOM ALARMS'IF~~~~ '
n'
~~~
THE VALVES ARE NOT FULLY CLOSED AND THE RCS PRESSURE IS. GREATER THAN 436.8PSIG; AND REVISIONS TO SETPOINTS IN SUPPORT OF THE CHANGES.~ THE'NRC'HAS REVIEWED'AND~~ ~ ~ ^ - "
APPROVED THESE CHANGES AS AMENDMENT 48 TO THE CALLAWAY OPERATING LICENSE.
n PURSUANT TO THE ABOVE INFORMATION, THE CHANGE DOES NOT INVOLVE AN INCREASE IN PROBABILITY OF OCCURENCE OR CONSEQUENCES OF AN ACCIDENT OR MALFUNCTION OF E Q UI P-MENT IMPORTANT TO SAFETY OVER PREVIOUS EVALUAT,IDNS IN THE SAFETY ANALYSIS RE-Q, PORT; OR CREATE POSSIBILITY FOR ACCIDENT OR. MALFUNCTION OF A DIFFERENT TYPE-OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS IN THE SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT;-CR REDUCE THE MAR-t GIN OF SAFETY AS DEFINED IN THE BASIS FOR ANY TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION.
n-THE EVALUATION DETERMINED THAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION DID NOT E X I S T,.
J")
REPORT SAFETY EVALUATION
+
ITEM ID 28 NE-89-0051 RFR NO.6565 REVISED FSAR FIG 11.2-1 TO SHOW CORRECT CONFIGURATION FOR VALVES RFR No.6568 REVISED FSAR FIG 11.2-1 TO SHOW THE CORRECT PLANT CONFIGURATION FOR Tree MISCELLANEOUS VALVE STEM LEAKOFF HEADER.
THE VALVE LEAKOFF HEADER PROVIDES A FLOUPATH FOR THE LEAKAGE FROM VARIOUS VALVES TO BE DIRECTED TO THE O
REACTOR COOLANT DRAIN TANK.
THIS CHANGE ONLY CORRECTS A DRAWING AND DOES NOT AFFFCT COMPONENTS IN THE FIELD.
PfRSUANT TO THE ABOVE INFORMATION, THE CHANGE DOES NOT INVOLVE AN INCREASE IN
()
PROBABILITY OF OCCURENCE OR CONSEQUENCES OF AN ACCIDENT OR MALFUNCTION OF EQUIP-MENT IMPORTANT TO SAFETY OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS IN THE SAFETY ANALYSIS RE '
'~~
PORT; OR CREATE POSSIBILITY FOR ACCIDENT OR MALFUNCTION OF A DIFFERENT TYPE O
OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS IN THE SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT; OR REDUCE THE MAR-GIN OF SAFETY AS DEFINED IN THE BASIS FOR AhY TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION.
g~
THE EVALUATION DETERMINED THAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION DID NOT EXIST..
~~
~ ~ ^ ~ ^ -
- 1. 's i
- .+
..g
,e 4-
~
se
+-.
e.
h
,__.,,g
,ys m,_
~ ~ ' ~ ' ' ~ 18C F P58.59 ' ANNU AL REPORT ' SUMfl ARIES "~ '
p
~
~ ~ ~ ~ -
0F UNION ELECTRIC APPROVED WRITTEN' SAFETY EVALUATIONS ~
_ REPORT
_ SAFETY EVALUATION
,e 29 NE-89-0074 CN 89-21,$P T3.11(B) REVISED FSAR FOR ENVIRON. CLASS. CHANGES TO MAIN STEAM VALV ITER ID' CN 89-21,SP T3.11(B) REVISED THE FSAR FOR CHANGES IN ENVIRONMENTAL CLASSIFIC A,
(3 TION OF THE MAIN STEAM LINE ISOLATION. VALVES AND THE MAIN FEEDWATER ISOLATION V ALVES 10% EXERCISE LIMIT SWITCHES FROM AAD TO CCD. THE CHANGE FACILITATES REPLACEMENT OF THE LIMIT SWITCHES ON A PERIODIC BASIS. THE LIMIT SWITCHES PRO ~
~ ~ ~
(
VIDE THE ELECTRICAL INTERLOCK TO ALLOW SURVEILLANCE TESTING OF THE VALVES. THERE
~~
IS NO FAILURE MODE OF THE 105 LIMIT SWITCHES WHICH COULD PREVENT THE VALVES
~
~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~
f' FROM GOING TO THEIR SAFE POSITION.
PURSUANT TO THE AB0VE INFORMATION, THE CHANGE DOES NOT INVOLVE AN INCREASE IN PROBABILITY OF OCCURENCE OR CONSEQUENCES OF AN ACCIDENT OR MALFUNCTION OF EQUIP-MENT IMPORTANT TO SAFETY OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIDMS IN THE SAFETY ANALYSIS RE-PORTJ OR CREATE POSSIBILITY FOR ACCIDENT OR,MALFU'NCTION OF A DIFFERENT TYPE OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS IN THE SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORTI OR REDUCE THE MAR-
' ~
GIN OF SAFETY AS DEFINED IN THE BASIS FOR ANY TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION.
THE EVALUATION DETERMINED THAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION DID NOT E X I S T,.
4,
REPORT SAFETY EVALUATION 30 NE-89-0075 CN 89-23,$A 2.2.1.2.3 REVISED FSAR TO INCLUDE LEASED GROUND FUEL STORAGE TANKF ITEM ID CN 89-23,SA 2.2.1.2.3 REVISl0 THE FSAR TO INCLUDE A DESCRIPTION OF THREE LEA',ED GROUND FUEL STORAGE TANKS THAT CONTAIM DIESEL FUEL FOR CALLAWAY VEHICLES. TAE EXISTENCE OF THESE TANKS POSES NO THREAT TO SAFETY-RELATED EQUIPMENT OR C r,M-(3 PONENTS.
PURSUANT TO THE ABOVE INFORMATION, THE CHANGE DOES NOT INVOLVE AN ICCREASE IN PROBABILITY OF OCCURENCE OR CONSEQUENCES OF AN ACCIDENT OR MALFUNCTION OF EQUIP- ()
MENT IMPORTANT TO SAFETY OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS IN TMs SAFETY ANALYSIS RE-PORTI OR CREATE POSSIBILITY FOR ACCIDENT OR MALFUNCTION OF A DIFFERENT TYPE
~
OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS IN THE SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT; OR REDUCE THE MAR-()
GIN OF SAFETY AS DEFINED IN THE BASIS FOR ANY TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION.
's THE EVALUATION DETERMINED THAT AW UNREVIEWED SAFETY
~
GUESTION DID NOT EXIST.
e
- --.+,
._._.-_-. ~._
w 4'++m
-o a
'"x d
e w
+-.-.4 m.-.
-J.--
~.-
..b
., - -.--++-
~s
-.. - a..
~
OF U3IC3 ELECTRIC APPROVED
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
WRITTEN SAFETY'EVALDATIONS
_.m..
I"
-' ITEM ~ ^ ' ' SAFETY EVALUATION REPORT ID
-- (;
31 NE-89-6891 RFR NO.6235 REVISED FSAR FIG 6.3-1 TO CORRECT ALARM IN N.P. COOLANT INJ. SYS.
~~
RFR NO.6238 REVISED FSAR FIG 6.3-1 TO SHOW THE CORRECT LOCATION OF FLOW ALARM
- (7 EM-FE-917A AND 8 FOR'THE HIGH PRESSURE COOLANT INJECTION SYSTEM. THE CHANGE-
INVOLVED DOCUMENT CORRECTION ONLY AND DID NOT IMPACT ACTUAL COMPONENTS OR PLANT SAFETY.
- ' "~
- - ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~
()
PURSUANT TO THE ABOVE INFORMATION, THE CHANGE DOES NOT INVOLVE AN INCREASE IN PROBABILITY OF OCCURENCE OR CONSEQUENCES OF AN ACCIDENT OR MALFUNCTION OF'EOUIP-7 MENT IMPORTANT TO SAFETY OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS IN THE SAFETY-ANALYSIS RE-(*
PORT; OR CREATE POSSIBILITY FOR ACCIDENT OR MALFUNCTION OF A DIFFERENT TYPE
^ '
OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS IN THE SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT; OR REDUCE THE MAR-GIN OF SAFETY AS DEFINED IN THE BASIS FOR ANY,T.ECHNICAL SPECIFICATION.
{}
THE EVALUATION DETERMINED THAT AN UNREVIE5ED SAFETY QUESTION DID NOT EXIST.
()
REPORT SAFETY EVALUATION
()
ITEM ID 32 NE-89-0297 RFR NO.65S3 REVISED SEVERAL FSAR FIGURES TO SHOW AS-BUILT VALVE POSITIONS RFR h0.oSSB REVISED SEVERAL FSAR FIGURES TO SHOW AS-BUILT VALVE POSITIONS.
THESE CHANGES INVOLVED DOCUMENTATION ONLY AND 00 NOT IMPACT SYSTEMS OR PLANT OPERATIONS.
PURSUANT TO THE ABOVE INFORMATION, THE CHANGE DOES NOT INVOLVE AN INCREASE IN PROBABILITY OF OCCURENCE OR CONSEQUENCES OF AN ACCIDENT OR MALFUNCTION OF EQUIP-MENT IMPORTANT TO SAFETY OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS IN THE SAFETY-ANALYSIS RE-
{j PORT; OR CREATE-POSSIBILITY FOR ACCIDENT OR MALFUNCTION OF A DIFFCRENT TYPE GVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS IN THE SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT; OR REDUCE THE MAR-GIN OF SAFETY AS DEFINED IN THE BASIS FOR ANY TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION.
(y
~
THE EVALUATION DETERMINED THAT AN UNREVIEVED SAFETY QUESTION DID NOT EXIST.
()
{
l REPORT SAFETY EVALUATION s ;
ITEM ID 33 NE-88eB2o8 RNP 67-2025 INSTALLED PRESSURE RELIEF VALVES IN RESIN-TRANSFER HEADER IN~AK STS
~
' ?
RMP 87-2025 INSTALLED PRESSURE RELIEF VALVES AND ASSOCIATED DISCHARGE PIPING IN THE RESIN-TRANSFER HEADER OF THE CONDENSATE DEMINERALIZER SERVICE VESSELS.
THE ADDITION OF PRESSURE RELIEF VALVES PREVENTS RUPTURE DISC FAILURES'DURING~ ~
NORMAL OPERATING TRANSIENTS AND ENHANCES SYSTEM AVAILABILITY.
PURSUANT TO THE ABOVE INFORMATION, THE CHANGE DOES~NOT INVOLVE ~AN INCREASE'IN ~
PROSABILITY OF OCCURENCE OR CONSEQUENCES OF AN ACCIDENT OR MALFUNCTION OF EQUIP-MENT IMPORTANT TO SAFFTY OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS IN THE SAFETY A N ALYSIS RE- ~
4 PORT; OR CREATE POSSI8ILITY FOR ACCIDENT OR MALFUNCTION OF A DIFFERENT TYPE
~~~
OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS IN THE SAFETY' ANALYSIS REPORT; OR REDUCE THE' MAR-
~~~
' (r GIN OF SAFETY AS DEFINED IN THE BASIS FOR ANY TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION.
THE EVALUATION DETERMINED THAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION DID NOT EXIST.
_._m___
- ~. -... -. _ -
CF U2IO3 ELECTRIC APPROVED
~
~
WRITTEN" SAFETY' EVALUATIONS
. - ~. -. -
.~.
_ R. E P O R T.
-_ SAFETY EVALUATION 34 NE-88-0979-CMP 87-1119 REPLACED FUEL POOL SYS VALVE EC-7129 WITH A GATE VALVE CMP 87-1119 REPLACED THE FUEL POOL COOLING AND CLEANUP SYSTEM VALVE,EC-7129, r3
~WITH A~ GATE VALVE OF THE SAME QUALITY. THE EXISTING DIAPHRAGM VALVE MAD'
~
EXPERIENCED SEPARATION OF THE DIAPHRAGM DURING USE. THE REPLACEMENT VALVE MEETS THE S4ME REGUIREMENTS AS THE ORIGINAL VALVE;IS NOT'AN ENVIRONMENTAL (3
CUALIFICATION CONCERNIWILL NOT ALTER VALVE FUNCTION TO ALLOW FINAL DRAINDOWN
~
OF THE REFUEL POOL AFTER REFUELINGI AND DOES NOT HAVE ANY SIGNIFICANT EFFECT^
_ (3 ON THE EXISTING PIPING SYSTEM.
PURSUANT TO THE AB0VE INFORMATION, THE CHANGE DOES NOT INVOLVE AN INCREASE IN PROBASILITY OF OCCURENCE OR CONSEQUENCES OF AN ACCIDENT OR MALFUNCTION OF EGUIP-MENT IMPORTANT TO SAFETY OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATI.ONS IN THE SAFETY ANALYSIS RE-
' {~
PORTI OR CREATE POSSIBILITY FOR ACCIDCNT OR RALFUNCTION OF A DIFFERENT TYPE OVER PREVIOUS EVALU4TIONS IN THE SAFETY ANAiYSIS REPORTJ CR REDUCE THE MAR-GIN OF SAFETY AS DE,INED IN THE BASIS FOR ANY TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION.
.- )
F THI_FVALUATION DETERMINED THAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY
(
MEStION DID NOT EXIST,.
{g REPORT SAFETY EVALUATION ITEM ID 35 NE-69-2001 CMP 86-1227 PROVIDED EASIER ACCESS TO TURS.BLOG. FIRE PROT. ISO. VALVES CMP 86-1927 PROVIDED EASIER ACCESS TO TURBINE BUILDING FIRE PROTECTION ISOLA-TION VALVES KC-V-dD64 AND KC-V-J457. THESE VALVES ISOLATE PORTIONS OF THE TURBINE SUILDING FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEM FOR MAINTENANCE. VALVE OPERATION AND
()
DESIGN BASES REMAIN UNALTERED. THIS CHANGE REVISED FSAR FIG 9.5.1-1.
~
PURSUANT TO THE APOVE INFORMATION,.THE CHANGE DOES NOT INVCLVE AN INCREASE IN PROSAeILITY OF OCCURENCE OR CONSEQUENCES OF AN ACCIDENT OR MALFUNCTION OF EQUIP-g3 MENT IMPORTANT TO SAFETY OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS IN THE SAFETY ANALYSIS RE-
~
PORTI OR CREATE POSSIBILITY FOR ACCIDENT OR MALFUNCTION OF A DIFFERENT TYPE OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS IN THE SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORTI OR REDUCE THE MAR-()
GIN OF SAFETY AS DEFINED IN THE BASIS FOR ANY TECHNICAL SPECfFICATION.
[,
THE EVALUATION DETERMINED THAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION DID NOT EXIST.
O
- t. 1 9
~
c'-
as merm ag.o eq p
eh.
-o
H. __
D
~
~~~~
~
~ ~ ~ 18CFR59.59"ANNUAt REPORT SUMMARIES ~
~~
~ ~ ~ -
~
OF UNION ELECTRIC APPROVED
~
WRITTEN' SAFETY ~ EVALUATIONS ~~~~~~"
~~
-.. _ _. O
~ REPORT.
. SAFETY' EVALUATION
_u.
36 NE-89-9036 CMP 86-9818 REMOVED DECON TANKS FROM THE NOT MACHINE SHOP CMP 86-3818 REMOVED DECONTAMINATION TANKS FROM THE NOT MACHINE SHOP TO ALLOW
(~)
MORE ROON FOR WORKERS. THE DECONTAMINATION TANKS THAT WERE REMOVED ARE NOT USED OR NEEDED. THE CHANGE REVISES FSAR FIG 12.3-4.
'~~
~
~~-
PURSUANT TO'THE ABOVE INFORMATIONr THE CHANGE'DOES NOT INVOLVE ~AN INCREASE ~IN (3
OCCURENCE OR CONSEQUENCES OF AN ACCIDENT OR MALFUNCTION OF EOUIP-PROBABILITY OF IMPORTANT TO SAFETY OVER PREVIOUS' EVALUATIONS IN'THE SAFETY ANALYSIS RE-MENT PORT; OR CREATE POSSIBILITY FOR ACCIDENT OA MALFUNCTION OF A DIFFERENT TYPE (g
OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS IN THE SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT; OR REDUCE THE MAR-GIN OF SAFETY AS DEFINED IN THE BASIS FOR ANY TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION.
THE EVALUATION DETERMINED THAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY OUESTION DID NOT EXIST.
O REPORT SAFETY EVALUATION
$7 NE-89-0052 RFR NO.6716 REVISED FSAR FIG 11.4-1 TO CLARIFY NOUN DESCRIPTION OF PIPE LINE
~
ITEM ID RFR NO.6716 REVISED FSAR FIG 11.4-1 TO CLA9IFY THE NOUN DESCRIPTION OF PIPE-gy LINES IN THE SOLID RADWASTE SYSTEM.
THE CLARIFICATION DOES NOT ALTER SYSTEM FUNCTION-OR ADVERSELY AFFECT PLANT SAFETY.
PURSUANT TO THE ABOVE INFORMATIONr THE' CHANGE DOES NOT INVGLVE AN INCREASE IN
(}
PROBABILITY OF OCCURENCE OR CONSEQUENCES OF AN ACCIDENT OR MALFUNCTION OF EGUIP-HENT IMPORTANT TO SAFETY OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS IN THE SAFETY ANALYSIS RE-PORT; OR CREATE POSSIBILITY FOR ACCIDENT OR MALFUNCTION OF A DIFFERENT TYPE
()
OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS IN THE SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT; OR REDUCE THE MAR-GIN OF SAFETY AS DEFINED IN THE BASIS FOR ANY TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION.
THE EVALUATION DETERMINED THAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY "
~
QUESTION DID NOT EXIST.
O
^
REPORT SAFETY EVALUATION (y
36 NE-89-0054 RFR NO.6741 REVISED FSAR FIGS 10.4-6 AND 9.S.1-1 FOR AS-8UILT CONDITION OF VALV ITEM ID FIGS 18.4-6 AND 9.5.1-1 TO SHOW THE AS-BUILT NITROGEN
(-)
RFR NO.6741 REVISED FSAR BACKUP TO STEAM GENERATOR FEED PUMP RECIRCULATION VALVES. THE LOCATION OF THE SUPPLY LINES WERE INADVERTENTLY OMITTED FROM THE DRAWINGS.
PURSUANT TO THE ABOVE INFORMATIONr'THE CHANGE DOES NOT INVOLVE'AN INCAEASE IN (y
PROBABILITY OF~0CCURENCE OR CONSEQUENCES OF AN ACCIDENT OR MALFUNCTION OF EQUIP-
~~~~~ ~
MENT IMPORTANT TO SAFETY OVEA PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS IN THE SAFETY ANALYSIS RE-
~
~
- 0VER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS IN THE SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORY; OR REDUCE THE MAR-('e PORT; OR CREATE POSSIBILITY FOR ACCIDENT OR MALFUNCTION OF A DIFFERENT TYPE GIN OF. SAFETY AS DEFINED IN THE BASIS FOR ANY TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION.
~
THE EVALUATION DETERMINED THAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY
~
~ ~'
~~
~
~ QUESTION DID NOT~ EXIST.
~
-__sm a
... _ _ ~... _
- 18C FR55.~59~ ACLUAL' REPDAT^ SUMMARIES
~ ~ ~
~~~
j])l l
OF UJIO2 ELECTRIC APPR!VED-
- ~ " - -
WRITTEN SAFETY ~ EVALUATIONS
~
~
D' REPORT
._ SAFETY E V A LU A_ T I O. N.. _...._
, 39 NE-89-0064 ETP-AN-ST884,REV 9 PROCEDURE TO TEST USE OF DECATIONIZED DILUTION WATER
~
~
~
ETP-AN-ST384,REV 9 PROCEDURE TESTS THE USE OF DECATIONIZED DILUTION WATER IN-() l STEAD OF ACID DILUTION WATER'FROM ACTIVATED CARBON FILTER WELL WATER.
THE' ~ ~
~ ~~~'
... _. _.. _. - ~
DECATIONIZED DILUTION WATER SHOULD HELP TO REDUCE THE HIGN SODIUM LEAKAGE FROM THE STRONG' CATION' UNITS IN THE DEMINERALIZED WATER SYSTEM. THE DEMINER ALIZED '
^ ~' (-) !
~
^
WATER SYSTEM SERVES NO SAFETY FUNCTION AND HAS NO SAFETY DESIGN BASIS.
PURSUANT ' TO THE ABOVE INFORMATION,~ THE ' CHANGE DOES 'NOT INVOLVE AN INCREASE IN~
~ ' " "'
I PROBABILITY OF OCCURENCE OR CONSEQUENCES OF AN ACCIDENT OR NALFUNCTION OF EQUIP-r){
' ~
MENT IMPORTANT TO SAFETY OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS IN THE SAFETY ANALYSIS RE-PORT; OR CREATE POSSIBILITY FOR ACCIDENT OR MALFUNCTION OF A DIFFERENT TYPE OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS IN THE SAFETY ANALYSJS REPORT; OR REDUCE THE MAR-(;
GIN OF SAFETY AS DEFINED IN THE BASIS FOR ANY TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION.
THE EVALUATION DETERMINED THAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY ri :
QUESTION DID NOT EXIST.
~'
REPORT SAFETY EVALUATION ITEM ID 40 NE-69-JC90 RFR NO.2743 ALLOWED USE OF STAINLESS STEEL PIPE AND GATE VALVES IN SERVICE SYS
,3 RFR NO.2748 ALLOWED THE USE OF STAINLESS STEEL PIPING AND GATE VALVES IN THE SERVICE WATER SYSTEM. USE OF STAINLESS STEEL IN LIEU OF CARBON STEEL ELIMINATED
,;y l' LINE PLUGGING DUE TO CORROSION. THE REPLACEMENTS ARE CONSIDERED AN EQUIVALENT FOR THE APPLICATION AND ARE NONSAFETY-RELATED. FSAR FIG 9.2-1 WAS REVISED.
PURSUANT TO THE ABCVE INFORMATION, THE CHANGE DOES NOT INVOLVE AN INCREASE IN
(),
PROBABILITY OF OCCURENCE OR CONSEQUENCES OF AN ACCIDENT OR MALFUNCTION OF EQUIP-MENT IMPORTANT TO SAFETY OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS IN THE SAFETY ANALYSIS RE-i PORT; OR CREATE POSSIBILITY FOR ACCIDENT OR MALFUNCTION OF A DIFFERENT TYPE
(~, '
OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS IN THE SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORTI OR REDUCE THE MAR-GIN OF SAFETY AS DEFINED IN THE BASIS'FOR ANY TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION.
~ "~ ~
THE EVALUATION DETERMINED THAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION DID NOT EXIST.
>\\
- )'
i n
-i
~.. -..
e.
.w.-
I
- fl [
1 y..
g
. ~. -.
~
_..._. ~ 1eCFR58.59EANZUAL~ REP 3RT SU'MARIES-Q OF UNI.O.2 ELECT.RIC APPCOVED tT REPORT
_ SAFETY EVALUATION 1()
ITEM ID 41 NE-89-0094 RFR NO.6653 REVISED FSAR FIG 9.5.9-1 FOR ADDITION OF PUMP SKID TO AUX.9 OILER RFR NO.6653 REVISED FSAR FIG 9.5.9-1 FOR THE ADDITION OF A PUMP SKID TO THE
()
AUXILIrRY SOILER RECIRCULATION SKID WHICH IS DESIGNED TO MIX' CHEMICALS'TO-''
STRATIFICATION OF HYDRAZINE WITHIN THE AUXtLIARY BOILER WATER PREVENT
'~
- r3 THE AUXILIARY BOILER'IS NONSAFETY-RELATED AND CONNECTING A PUMP ^ --
VOLUME.
SKID FOR RECIRCULATION DOES NOT ADVERSELY IMPACT PLANT' SAFETY.
~
~ ~ ~
PURSUANT ' TO THE ABOVE INFORMATION, THE CHANGE DOES NOT INVOLVEAN ' INCREASE IN ~"
^
PROSABILITY-OF OCCURENCE OR CONSEQUENCES OF AN ACCIDENT OR MALFUNCTION OF EGUIP-(,
MENT IMPORTANT TO S'FETY OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS IN THE SAFETY ANALYSIS RE-PORT; OR CREATE POSSIBILITY FOR ACCIDENT OR MALFUNCTION OF A DIFFERENT TYPE OVER PREVIOUS fVALUATIONS IN THE SAFETY ANALYSIS _ REPORT; OR REDUCE THE MAR-GIN OF SAFETY AS DEFINED IN THE BASIS FOR ApY TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION.
THE EVALUATION DETERMINED THAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY r,
QUESTION DID NOT EXIST.
e-REPORT SAFETY EVALUATION ITEM ID 42 NE-59-0098 RFR NO.6112 REVISED FSAR FIG 9.2-5 FOR EQUIP. NO. ADDED TO EVEWASH EQUIPMENT RFR NO.6112 REVISED THE FSAR FIG 9.2-5 TO ASSIGN EQUIPMENT ID NUMBERS TO PLANT EMERGENCY SHOWER EYEWASH STATI'ONS.
THE ASSIGNMENT OF 10 NUMBERS IMPACTS DOCUMENTATION AND DOES NOT ADVERSELY IMPACT PLANT SAFCTY.
PURSUANT TO THE ABOVE INFORMATION, THE CHANGE DCES NOT INVOLVE AN INCREASE IN PROBABILITY OF OCCURENCE OR CONSEcuCNCES OF AN ACCIDENT OR MALFUNCTION OF EQUIP-3 MENT IMPORTANT TO SAFETY OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS IN THE SAFETY ANALYSIS RE-PORT; OR CREATE POSSIBILITY FOR ACCIDENT OR MALFUNCTION OF A DIFFERENT TYPE OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS IN THE SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT; OR REDUCE THE MAR-
-)
~
GIN OF SAFETY AS DEFINED IN THE BASIS FOR ANY TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION.
77)
THE EVALUATION DETERMINED THAT AN UNREVIEWE0 SAFETY QUESTION DID NOT' EXIST.
s
+W
..g
.s..
L
24
--or,_j v.,_
^
4 A
p, p
y
[
%2 * ^
}$ ~
-Tyj{- Q; gqf ' ), L,.
.L
. pg. [,
c
-n c
~ -
. r;
~
.. Q
__._ 2 '18CFR5s.59 ANNUAL REPORT. SUMMARIES'
~~
~ ~ ~ "
'~~
~
2 OF UNION-ELECTRIC APPkOVED WRITTEN. SAFETY EVALdATIONS d'
i f
j _
- REPOR_T_,
, _ SAFETY EVALUATION
(;
ITEM ID 43 LF-59-8191 RFR NO.6438 REVISED FSAR SECTION 4.4.1.1 FOR STE AM FL0d C ALORIMETRIC METHOD RFR N0.6438 REVISED FSAR SECTION 4.4.1.1 FOR STEAN FLOW CALORIMETRIC METHOD.
~
()
IMPLEMENTATION OF THE STEAM FLOW CALORIMETRIC PERMITS THE RECOVERY OF LOST ~~~~~
GENERATING CAPACITY.FROM FEEDWATER VENTURI FOULING. THE STEAM FLOW CALORIME-
~
TRIC UTILIZES A MEASUREMENT OF STEAM FLOW RATHER THAN FE EDW AT ER ~ F LOW IN ' THE ' ~~ ~ ~ ~~"
' (3 DAILY CALORIMETRIC PERFORMED TO CALIBRATE THE NUCLEAR INSTRUMENTATION SYSTEM
~
POWER RANGE INSTRUMENTS.
IMPLEMENTATION OF THIS METHODOLOGY PERNITS THE ' ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~
MEASUREMENT OF CORE POWER WITH AN UNCERTAINTY OF 1.601 FULL POWER.
THIS (i
CHANGE DOES NOT ALTER THE EXISTING DESIGN BASIS CORE THERMAL LIMITS, THE SAFETY ANALYSIS LIMITING DNER RATIOS, OR THE FSAR ACCIDENT AMALYSIS DNOR STATEPOINT n
EVALUATIONS.
PURSUANT TO THE ABOVE INFORMATION, THE CHANGE DOES NOT INVOLVE AN INCREASE IN PROBABILITY OF OCCURENCE OR CONSEQUENCES Of AN ACCIDENT OR MALFUNCTION OF EQUIP #
MENT IMPORTANT TO SAFETY OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS IN THE SAFETY ANALYSIS RE-PORTJ OR CREATE POSSIBILITY FOR ACCIDENT OR MALFUNCTION OF A DIFFERENT TYPE OVER PREVIOUS EVALdATIONS IN THE SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT; OR REDUCE THE MAR-GIN OF SAFETY AS DEFINED,IN THE BASIS FOR ANY TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION.
THE EVALUATION DETERMINED THAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION DID NOT EXIST.
j REPORT SAFETY EVALUATION ITEM ID 44 NE-89-9321 CMP 88-1932 PROVIDED AN ALTERNATE COOLING SUPPLY FOR COMPRESSOR FOR SERV.WTR 00 CMP SS-1032 PROVIDED AN ALTERNATE COOLING SUPPLY FOR COMPRESSORS CK8201A,8 AND CKAD1C TO ENSURE OPERABILITY DURING OUTAGES OF THE SERVICE WATER SYSTEM. THESE COMPRESSORS ARE PART OF THE BREATHING AIR SYSTEM AND THE SERVICE WATER SYSTEM.
"p THIS MODIFICATION INVOLVED NONSAFETY-RELATED COMPONENTS.
PURSUANT TO THE ABOVE INFORMATION, THE CHANGE DOES NOT INVOLVE AN INCREASE IN'
~
PROBABILITY OF OCCURENCE OR CONSEQUENCES OF AN ACCIDENT OR MALFUNCTION OF EQUIP-()
MENT IMPORTANT TO SAFETY OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS IN THE SAFETY ANALYSIS RE-~
PORTJ OR CREATE POSSIBILITY FOR ACCIDENT OR MALFUNCTION OF A DIFFERENT TYPE OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS IN THE SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT; OR PEDUCE THE MAR-
)
GIN OF SAFETY AS DEFINED IN THE BASIS FOR ANY TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION.
THE EVALUATION DETERMINED THAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION DID NOT EXIST.
a M6
'c oM
, H 4
e,
~..
m n
.,.o~
a
-w.,
- e.
(-
H I
~. _, _ _ - _ _ _._
_ _ __ _ _. ~ _.
..18CFR55.~59 ANNU AL" REPORT SUMMARIES
~~~
~
^
~
'y 0F UNION ELECTRIC APPROVED
~ " ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
'MRITTENlAFETT EVALUATIONS
-~ ~ ~ ~
~~
REPORT
~' SAFETY EVALUATION
3(
ITEM
ID 45 NE-89-9045 RFR N0.5113 EVALUATED A NONSAFETY NANGER SUPPORT ON ACCUM. SAFETY.INJ.SYS VALVE RFA NO.5118 EVALUATED THE USE OF.A NONSAFETY-RELATED HANGER SUPPORT ON A ACCUM-'"
^
~ (3 INJECTION SYSTEM VALVE. THE SUPPORT FUNCTIONS TO KEEP THE VALVE ULATOR SAFETY FROM EXCESSIVE VISRATIONSLIN AN SSE/0BE EVENT.
THE SUPPORT HAS BEEN INSPECTED
~
AND FOUND ACCEPTABLE. IT WILL BE UPSRADED TO ASME III-NF REQUIREMENTS ~DURING' '~~~ - ~ ~ l(3
~
REFUEL IV.
~
~ ~
PURSUANT TO THE A80VE INFORMATION, THE CHANGE DOES NOT' INVOLVE'AN' INCREASE'IN~ '
PROBABILITY OF OCCURENCE OR CONSEQUENCES OF AN ACCIDENT OR MALFUNCTION OF EQUIP-(3 '
MENT IMPORTANT TO SAFETY OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS IN THE SAFETY ANALYSIS RE-PORT; OR CREATE P0SSIBILITY FOR ACCIDENT OR MALFUNCTION OF A DIFFERENT TYPE OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS IN THE SAFETY ANALYSIS _ REPORT; OR REDUCE THE MAR-(3 GIN OF SAFETY AS DEFINED IN THE BASIS FOR ANY TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION.
~
THE EVALUATION DETERMINED THAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY
()
QUESTION DID NOT EXIST.
.O REPORT SAFETY EVALUATION YTEQ ID 46 NE-89-0057 RFR NO.6824 REVISED FSAR FIG 9.5.2~2 FOR CORRECT GAITRONICS HANDSET TYPE
(-
.RFR NO.6824 REVISED FSAR FIG 9.S.2-2 TO SHOW THE CORRECT GAITRONICS HANDSET TYPE THE CORRECTION TO THE FIGURE DOES NOT IMPACT THE PERFORMANCE OF THE GAITRONICS
(;
(PUBLIC ADDRESS) SYSTEN.
j PURSUANT TO THE ABOVE INFORMATION, THE CHANGE DOES NOT INVOLVE AN INCREASE IN PROBABILITY OF OCCURENCE OR CONSEQUENCES OF AN ACCIDENT OR MALFUNCTION OF EQUIP-(3 MENT IMPORTANT TO SAFETY OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS IN THE SAFETY ANALYSIS RE-PORT; OR' CREATE POSSIBILITY FOR ACCIDENT OR MALFUNCTION OF A DIFFERENT TYPE OVER PREVIOUS. EVALUATIONS IN THE SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT; OR REDUCE THE MAR-()
GIN OF SAFETY AS DEFINED IN THE BAS ~IS FOR ANY TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION.
THE EVALUATION DETERMINED THAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY
()
QUESTION DID NOT EXIST.
l QEPORT SAFETY EVALUATION
~~
ITER ID 47 NE-69-0058 RFR NO.6897 REVISED FSAR FIG 10.4-2 TO SHOW AS-BUILT FOR COMPONENTS IN CONDENSA RFR NO.6897 REVISED FSAR FIG 10.4-2, SHEETS 5 AND 7,70 SHOW THE AS-BUILT CONDI-TION FOR COMPONENTS IN THE NONSAFETY-RELATED CONDENSATE SYSTEM. THE CORRECTIONS
()
TO THE DRAWING ARE BASED UPON A WALKDOWN AND VISUAL INSPECTION.
PURSUANT TO THE ABOVE INFORMATION, THE CHANGE DOES NOT' INVOLVE AN INCREASE ~IN' PROBABILITY OF OCCURENCE OR CONSEQUENCES OF AN ACCIDENT OR MALFUNCTION OF EQUIP-MENT IMPORTANT TO SAFETY OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS IN THE SAFETY ANALYSIS RE-PORT; OR CREATE POSSIBILITY FOR ACCIDENT OR MALFUNCTION OF A DIFFERENT TYPE
~
()
OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS IN THE SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT; OR REDUCE ~THE MAR-GIN OF SAFETY AS. DEFINED IN THE BASIS FOR ANY TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION.
THE EVALUATION DETERMINED THAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY -
QUESTION DID NOT EXIST.
.~.
~
ya
_c..
a
.._....,_a_._
~ ~ ~ ~
~ 18CFR58.59 ANN!AL^REPrJT'SUMMr. RIES
~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ' ~ - ~
~ D.
CF U3103 ELECTCIC APPREVED kRITTEN' SAFETY ~ EVALUATIONS ~~
~'
't REPORT SAFETY EVALUATION ITEM ID
- (3 48 NE-89-0859 RFR NO.6898 REVISED FSAR FIG 9.3-9 TO $NOW AS-8UILT IN SERVICE GAS SYSTEM RFR NO.6898 REVISED F?AR FIG 9.3-9,$HEET 2,TO REFLECT THE AS-8UILT FIELD CONDITION OF A H2 TES's CYLINDER USED TO PERFORM CALIBRATION CHECKS ON INSTRU- _
F3:
~ ~ "
~~
~
MENTATION ASSOCIATED WITH THE RECOMBINERS. THE DRAWING CHANGE ONLY AFFECTS
~ ~ ~ ~ ^ /T!
DOCUMENTATION,NOT PLANT SAFETY.
INVOLVE AN INCREASE IN
-PURSUANT TO THE AB0VE INFORMATION, THE CHANGE DOES NOT
~ "~~
PROBABILITY OF OCCURENCE OR CCNSEQUENCES OF AN ACCIDENT OE MALFUNCTION OF EQUIP-'
" ~ " ' ' ~
MENT IMPORTANT TO SAFETY OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS IN THE SAFETY ANALYSIS RE-
,l PORTI OR CREATE POSSIBILITY FOR ACCIDENT OR MALFUNCTION OF A DIFFERENT TYPE OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS IN THE SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORTI OR REDUCE THE MAR-GIN OF SAFETY AS DEFINED IN THE BASIS FOR ANY,TfCHNICAL SPECIFICATION.
l
^ '
THE EVALUATI(2 DETERMINED THAT AN UNREVIE5ED SAFETY QUESTION DID NOT EXIST.
71 REPORT SAFETY EVALUATION ITEM ID l
49 NE-39-0063 ETP-AP-ST031,REV O PROCEDURE DETERMINES MINIMUM NITRGN FLOW TO CONDENSATE TANK ETP-AP-ST001,REV'8 PROCEDURE DETERMINES THE MINIMUM FLOW R ATE OF MITROGEN TO THE CONDENSATE STORAGE TANK TO MAINTAIN DISSOLVED OXYGEN BELOW A SET CONCENTRATI0M LEVEL. THE PROCEDURE UTILIIES THE NITROGEN SPARGING SYSTEM. THE CONDENSATE gj,
STORAGE AND TRANSFER SYSTEM SERVES NO SAFETY FUNCTION.
PURSUANT TO THE A60VE INFORMATION, THE CHANGE DOES NOT INVOLVE AN INCREASE IN PROBABILITY OF OCCURENCE OR CONSEQUENCES OF AN ACCIDENT OR MALFUNCTION OF EQUIP-
,3" ' "
MENT IMPORTANT TO SAFETY OVER PREVICUS EVALUATIONS IN THE SAFETY ANALYSIS RE-PORTI OR CREATE POSSIBILITY FCR ACCIDENT OR MALFUNCTION OF A DIFFERENT TYPE
(' j OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS IN THE SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORTI OR REDUCE THE MAR-yl j _
GIN OF SAFETY AS DEFINED IN THE BASIS FOR ANY TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION.
(
THE EVALUATION DETERMINED THAT AN UNREVIEVED SAFETY
() ;
QUESTION DID NOT EXIST.
~
<)r
,.A
(*!
e I
I
i i.__ __. _ __ a., _ _
u t.. -
.1ECFR58.~59 ACCUAL REP!QT' SUMMARIES ^ ~
~
~
~ ~ - ~ ~ ^ ^
l t
OF UNIO: ELECTRIC APPROVED WRITTEN SAFETY' EVALUATIONS ~~ ~~
~
~
_.V5 2
2_,
u_
j CEPORT
$_AFETY' EVALUATION _
, (vl i
ITEM ID l
50 NE-89-8968 ETP-ZZ-90044,REV 1 PROCEDURE FOR RCCA EDDY CURRENT EXAMINATION ETP-ZZ-99944,REW 1 PROCEDURE FOR EDDY CURRENT EXAMINATION OF RCCAS. THE PROC-g; l
EDURE REGUIRES INSTALLATION OF TWO EDDY CURRENT TEST FIXTURES IN THE SPENT FUEL l
~~
~
~ ' '
MAL IMPACT ON COOLING WATER FLOW.
RCCAS ARE MANIPULATED IN A MANNER CONSISTENT p,;
STORAGE RACKS. EACH TEST FIXTURE FITS IN A STORAGE LOCATION AND PROVIDES MINI-WITH REFUELING OPERATIONS.
~
~
PURSUANT TO THE AB0VE INFORMATION, THE CHANGE DOES NOT INVOLVE AN' INCREASE IN'
~
PROBABILITY OF OCCURENCE OR CONSEQUENCES OF AN ACCIDENT OR MALFUNCTION OF EQUIP-('
MENT IMPORTANT TO SAFETY OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS IN THE SAFETY ANALYSIS RE-
'1 PORTI OR CREATE POSSIBILITY FOR ACCIDENT OR MALFUNCTION OF A DIFFERENT TYPE l
OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS IN THE SAFETY ANALYS.IS _REPORTI OR REDUCE THE MAR-g-
f GIN OF SAFETY AS DEFINED IN THE BASIS FOR A,ItY TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION.
THE EVALUATION DETERMINED THAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY 4
QUESTION DID NOT EXIST.
f REPORT SAFETY EVALUATION ITEM ID 51 NE-r.9-0017 CMP 87-1095 INSTALLED STRAINERS IN DP INDICATORS IN THE LIQUID RADWASTE SYSTEM CMP 87-1095 INSTALLED STRAINER ELEMENTS UPSTREAM OF DIFFERENTIAL PRESSURE I
INDICATORS HSPDI1078 AND HBPDI1979 TO ELIMINATE AND REDUCE PARTICLE ACCUMULATION j
IN THE BELLOWS AREA. PAST PAR 11CLE ACCUMULATION RESULTED IN INSTRUMENT DAMAGE.-
THE PROCESS LINES AND THE PRESSURE INDICATORS ARE NOT SAFETY-RELATED. THE INSTALLATION OF THE FILTERS IS CONSISTCNT WITH ALARA CONCERNS.'
4 3 PURSUANT TO THE ABOVE INFORMATION, THE CHANGE DOES NOT INVOLVE AN INCREASE IN PROBABILITY OF OCCURENCE OR CONSEQUENCES OF AN ACCIDENT OR MALFUNCTION OF EQUIP-MENT IMPORTANT TO SAFETY OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS IN THE SAFETY ANALYSIS RE-y;
~~~-'
PORTI OR CREATE POSSIBILITY FOR ACCIDENT OR MALFUNCTION OF A DIFFERENT TYPE i
OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS IN THE SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORTI OR REDUCE THE MAR-i GIN OF SAFETY AS DEFINED IN Th? BASIS FOR ANY TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION.
()
THE EVALUATION DE1 ERMINED THAT AR UNREVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION DID NOT EXIST.
i:
i) ;
~
~
~
C:
w+..
y.
.c
..,-.-w
.. - _.o
- ~ 3
.,m 0F UNION ELECTOIC CPP20VE)
WRITTEN SAFETY EVALUATIONS
~
i CEP3GT SAFETY EVALUATION
-- ' ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~~ ~
~
~~
n-ITEM ID 52 NE-89-8853
, _ RFA NO.6712, REVISED FSAR FIRE PROTECTI,0A FOR _CO,MSUSTIOLES ADDED TO CONTRCL, ROOM _ _
RFR NO.6712 REVISED FSAR FIRE PROTECTION SECTION 9.58,C.27.3,FOR C058USTI8LE (3
LOADING ADDITIONS TO THE CONTROL ROOM,AS PART OF CONTROL ROOM REFURNISNING. THE COMBUSTIBLE LOADING EVALUATION ENSURES THAT EXISTING PLANT FIRE MAIARDS DO NOT ENDANGER THE ABILITY TO ACM' EVE AND MAINTAIN SAFE $NUTDOWN IN TME EVENT'0F A (3!
FIRE. THE CONTROL ROOM AREA 15 CONTINUGUSLY MANNED BY PERSONNEL TRAINED IN FIRE EXTINGUISHMENT; AUTOMATIC FIRE DETECTION IS INSTALLEDIPORTAELE FIRE EXTINGUISNERS AND FIRE WOSES ARE WEARBY;AND IGNITION MAIARDS ARE LOW.
PURSUANT TO THE ABOVE INFORMATION, THE CMANGE DOES NOT INVOLVE AN INCREASE IN PROBABILITY OF OCCURENCE-OR CONSEQUENCES OF AN ACCIDENT OR MALFUNCTION OF EGUIP-MENT IMPORT AN F TO S AFETY OVER PREVIOUS EVALUAEIDMS IN THE SAFETY ANALYSIS RE-(-
PORTI 04 CREATE POSSIBILITY FOR ACCIDENT OR,NALFU'NCTION OF A DIFFERENT TYPE OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS IN THE SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT; OR REDUCE THE PAR-GIN OF SAFETT AS DEFINED IN THE BASIS FOR ANY TECNNICAL SPECIFICATION.
o c
THE EVALUATION DETERMINED THAT AK U4 REVIEWED SAFETY OUESTION DID NOT EXIST,.
REP 02T SAFETY EVALUAft0N ITEM ID i
53 NE-89-0055 RFR No.6795 REVISED FSAR FIG 9.3-1 TO SHOW AS-BUILT FOR INSTRUMENT AIR SEID RFR NO.6795 REVISED FSAR FIG 9.3-1, SHEET 6,70 SNOW THE AS-9UILT SYSTER C04 FIG-URATION OF TdE INSTRUMENT AIR DRYER / FILTER SYSTEM SKID. THE CHANGE DOES NOT IMPACT SYSTEM FUNCTION AND INVOLVES DOCUMENTATION ACCURACY ONLY.
PURSUANT TO THE A90VE INFORMATION, TME CNANGE DOES NOT INVOLVE AN INCREASE IN
'I PROSABILITY OF OCCURENCE OR CONSEGUENCES OF AN ACCIDENT OR bALFURCTION OF EeUIP-MENT IMPORTANT TO SAFETY CVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS IN TME SAFETY ANALYSIS RE-3; PORT; OR CREATE POSSIBILITY FOR ACCIDENT OR MALFUNCTION OF A DIFFERENT TYPE OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS IN THE SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT; OR REDUCE THE MAR-GIN OF SAFETY AS DEFINED IN THE dASIS FOR ANY TECNNICAL SPECIFICATION.
()[
THE Eb AL*jATION DETERMINED THAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETT I
QU'STION DID NOT EXIST.
E i
I L l
I m.=m o
a
/
-.e
+
Y v
s m
4.
3
.,/
L
~
~
?
1,.1
. L C
,e m
p a
e r
s l '1 t
i 1
t
> )
.),
\\
I I
3 i
)
i fh' l
f l
i t
i i
l
- w M
a 6:
4 I
t' f
M.
W EM e
EMi M
i O
MDl O
W MJ MDl
=
0 OOM ow E
we E
ww ow i
m WWWED WWsW8 M
MMMM MD WWEWS W-MkWOR AE JWJHW dm M
AE M.MkW I.
j LEAEm e
( m'M>*
O EWME %EW W
trawDeME.
t w
wumWws3 wCM*E wom>E EmMM=
b
=
M
<R>DMwo a
M e
4 me WWOO uR>>W e w mM O
v3M WE>>W e
E OsomWM EOJEEE v
WA@4WuMMk EOJREE O
>>btJO MMwWro K
MEtOO 4R MNEWPO k
EE +wudz kEE M
WmMOM e
W MEN M
3 OWJWE 4
EU4WWW W
WWWWDJMJD EU4WWW 4
ed W
ME CE mW4 u
W S
WJEWW WE mWW t
WWEW Ok D>mDu D
EJ O
MOD D>mDW El
- EERNME Wa> MOM N
OWpW3MmW WmHMOM g
!wkOMEkW O
>Jw&Wm M
JOw E
N E
>JWOW 1
O MO44E eJ<=
=M ar=wrMews Jam wM s
1, 1
Of WOwCMOME>
M
= W Emm*Oow32 M
=W E
WWaawwsworw<
w w
D Oo Osw OE44 w
f M.
EMAJmJDWEE
- OA O
42 ErsL>M RE SOA kj M
M ODMOWO M
E EMO44 C0 MOWO M
i
! W WWWWE3WW E
en W
{
w6 e swoEw
>>>EkJ Ja J
O E
l w.
ED* Jew kkp3*J
=
O
6* O p e M E c u C E Osa Mha>MDEOm OR Owe l
l t
J EMM WMEWEMou O
DeAmWmMgW EWEMOW a
w
=O3rEWpE OMr6M k
OR Dee J*
OMH6M I
}
i i
m, OwCMMEwMMM vWE W
Ew MDOw J
MM uwE a
l i
meed
>MMww'MEmE m
J w
WMkwD>4 wwMEaB m
l 5
da O.
uWowED w e o
EWEW mg OWED W
E
=
O Mw E eOMO%CmMw M
C MErwwww3e O=Om6W M
l' m.
MOk EEM MJMH
> >> wows 40 MJMP i MJew OM4wWkem.
O M
MEMe g3 WEHWM O
f MA kW JM4
@4WE>>
W W
W WEDESH W44E>>
W i
M.
JsOJJM ER p.
JE 3
E 3. ODeerMM E
D JE 3
i Mi e ws4MMMemamme w
M OMEM gmdw( 4 W
3 W.
EMMEEWM EC40E M
J
=JMO>
3 2040E M
t j J (WDOMaMWu (w
A CeEMJO wE w >
4m i
e.
3 M
h w
MWH O
w A
rOOmEkEs MWH O
w i
M Ef O 'm M M MkW464WW E>=
E 4
wwE>E %EMw WW Ekm E
l 4
m OMM.EEwMW>DE.-EDOWM W
E a
MM ewdWOW EwMwn E
M
.J D
DM=
M
-EDOWM D
W O.
N4 MOM-A WOMmM
( COMDMOW WOMmM 60 E'
W J4 um
%DMWEM E
W O
>>emMau
%DMUMM E
WM 4'
EW4 HMJkEObuMW W
H WEW M
EO>uMW 4
6
>E N-E WEk( ECWWW S
3 34t>WWWWD OWWW m
00
- WMWEWW wMME W
W O
WJEECMO MME W
H MSM E~
4 EMEEW>>EEKXW W
O JEA3>>w(M WEAWEW 4
A>
M ee L O E m' W O ONE E
JOOO W
WO CHE E
kkw w'
me
- Mweggwam ag JEEW k
Ewgm i
E4D W
m *@DD kw W
E W
mWMMMEWE a
w E
O 4
M-MJERO42 OW>>ME o
w W
3 EMOEW Ca>>ME O
Aus m-dwCMW WomOOH M
w D
wWHONDOpO wCOM M
w WMD MwCE EWWE MM E, e O
Du wM M
E MM E e VOW Ei *WKHOH3 MWWWEO Me W
OueMa>MEu MW>JEO M W He 4
W OWMkk WHMOW EM W
WMEJ UMMw WWMOW EM Ju>
M WWMJM3WEWEwmME EM o u ~ etWe W E.W m M E EM i
- (WW
=
EMkWW Sw>WmMMM WM E
OW AskJe WW MMM WM DJW HMW MW EOmWMWm
>W 4
wueww2 OWE OK4MWm MW WWm O,
EMWuwWASDMMDW W
ADW OCEE SDMMDW W
E 4
W Om DorWMau CJO Ok N
WWMMuWsm uu OJO OH
'WEM M
W WMW4ED wCAM O
NMwMO Om woA4 O
Of M
MkEkM eOWoe DM FE ONJm WCW DM EE DME D.
ME W42 AWE WWW O
W
>(
WWEuesW E
WWW O
MEW W'
>OKW 44 kmkb MO F
us Wu WDWE MmkW MO
'eDH E
WWWHO WO CE*M>
MM WWDEWWE4k OrdMk kw W
W EDHOREJwo
<WDM 40 4
s>>OvMe o
aWDM
=O MmM W
EEE4Mukk>>KOW D
- t WOMmuCEMG
>>> WOW D
CI C r e mawk
>mwMm JE u
wE a
( E
>wwMm JE m
3 N
MwWO WW3M HMO
>d 40 W
j NO WJWZwWJAMWM
>M Q
u m E s ua M E w
EJAEWM
>H
()
e
@WOJ4>WWWNEOw W>
e m
WWE
>>D WMEOm WW O
ehde (H eDmM hm M
N eO 2p>
HM eDeM Am M
e i
E-OWO4Wwu>Mw et O
Ww N
N>mA OEMEWM4 O
WW
)
XEJMEOMemm>>w ED e
M ODWRODWetm>>a ED i
w O
3*JmwDON=WE pu a
i J v
M
<DOEmWE ro i
- . WHW 4 mm4WWODM N
40mWEWWHOELmwo>M I
d' mDEW>MDW A K 4 0 e9 W
I' l
t
=<*seMMM
> O D E M.m M u W e AEAO@
wwE*M D<<O i
i i
I 1
4 E
E 3
O, O
M l
M e
k i
W q
O l
3 M
D J
e J
~
i
(
S' W
G l
18 l
Wem won i
MW>
Me l
0 l
W W.
W w
2 W
E l
=
m W
(
M M
h i
t g
t l
4 a
l WEd' ECM OwM OWM EH WM us M M
K
[
(
L
.=
y
=.
s.
s
.=
}'
4
?
f l
t f
5 I
i t
i i
{
I I
0 i
l i
A A
i 6
O' O
R ea w
RM i
o.e D 1 O
k MD1 i
H Iw J.- 330; ew M
4 Jw d
i oms wwwws' W
M wwwwa
- a 4,
W' We e et ' em L GE -
e w
we
&a J:
O==
<mM><
um a s wi > 4 4!
- wH@
wOMME tra D **
w0MkE
==
r.
=
M v
a a
M O{
wi wo. um>>w e E
aM vm>=w e O
E en en E E t E O.J E E E 4 La R O.J K 3 3 i wW44M oeM4wkO E
M o=MeWMO Oi AM 4
>Ea M
O 04 kEK M
M4 W3MR RW4WWk 2W4WWH
@ s=e O 3 >
43 em u W w
43 te. v w j
J; R. J J w D>hDW H
MD D>hDW w,
e O M
w m e= ** a e4
< Ee w m k M O se Rt t4M>
e'
>.J w O w te.
M N
> =J w O w te.
i So w e W 3.
.J e m aM W
=J e m EM 0: ww aw OEed W
3
.J C OEe(
w te
- 3EE M ' >
64 4w 3
dM M
EW W'
MkOW>'
EW bok RK h0A W
W Maw MOwO en a
6= u MOWO M
l b
2 sN Vo 4 E E
es e
38
- s j
i
- w w 4.A
>>>=*>.J MD
> k s= W H.A I
t& '
SMe4 ON Osa O
C ia.
OR Osa 2: WHO a
3wRHOu b
SWEMOu l
.t Mi 4aawe e e og t= k M em E
m e.a M to A M m
ww=xJJMM uwa w E
aw e
wwa w 1
w<
.J wt
> e w w u ie a a a m
a w>
w w e4 a er z en.
l W.
uwd SouRDI W e
W HM OWED u
4 E; D e e W D E o 4 O an, e4 W M
J D>
0 W O es. M w M
M R
R R em O M.J M >=
a A wt M.A M >
g l
W O H W to w M >= af M e
E W R k e 44 0
S 34MEwwW44E>>
w k
ON WEwE>>
w wi O M e= a e w e D
.nr 3
m Ww a
D
.a a 3
I
.J w 4 O N & e is..Aer a 4 w
M k
awJkea w
.J
& ts.
EOeOa M
C
.J.J K O at O z M
i 3
l i
C.
4WDWWWW
> ew >
h we W
4W I
l
.J sWwOa en w k O
tu in w e O
w M
=J OMW&MMWw E > in, sE a
w>
ww 3 > tm a
w l 4
0
>m3uMwk F
W 40 XuMwk y
e.
m
.J = w e= a D o w M D
k a >= m D e w in D
tl i
O EO www wCMmM D
2 W O M ea. M 4O'
>=
or RRM2 s D M u a 64 E
A WM
%3Mu4M E
g w en
' we w M a in, e= m o > w to a w
E Mw r o > w wt e i
EDE E'
m O 4 O M G O W su s m O
EO Oww4 m
DOO e
M >= en W X M en at w
W
%O M wt N taJ k
44 E M 49 W t= E E teJ w >= 2 4 M E W W
3
>=N&4EW W
i b oa h
2WMwA eo OkE E
.J OM
- O OkE E
>=8.*
> w W A we et E W m em W
>=
w
.8 M E W dE es.
> >=
s t.1 D O.
ME ea w
W z
a w R
O
=J
'W O
WwWOE>>MN O
W wt >=
0IK>>ME O
it. W 4 M
w M C E 3.J w O O M M
w
.J Z
- OO>
M W
WMD M
e4 M k >=== u 2 MM N e g D e e3 MM E e UCw
>, ME D og W >.J R O Mk to O M o=e W >.) E O MM k
w
>>W E3 w>MCw EM 2
WWR w >= M o naJ E wt
.J W >
EK w
& e5 w2wmM2 EM D
3eOw2WEDMR KM 4 W >=
.E e3m O M>LaJts.Mt=M lu M
>= 0 M > w m M >= M ved M t
D.J W N,:
e4 > 4 w W 4"t er 4 en 4 E
>w CL e H O a e M W ts.
>= W 3 W na.
o N3yagOg3MMDw w
W O
4 at D M wt 3 w w O.J O Q>
M w.J.8 4 w O.J O Ok E
W e=
v.etaJ D W w 3
- Wu O EL at O
h MOO uOA4 O
43M e'
M a.J &.J O'
sa i e > >= 4 wWCH
>M 23 M
te. m M w C H D s4 EE
&ME ei e= w e4 w O E 2 anJ w w O
O M >= W z wwW O
M R tad N,
ea W >= M M w >= >=
MO O
OE H es. > >
Me j
eDk e= - N
.J.A O W 4 49 > >= M E
OOM OFWM>
>= M M
N e-W W din O E O 4 naJ D >*
- O EuwO 4w3>
eo MEM
- f '
er X 4 W O >= > > st O w 3
N O M > >= GE O W D
LI t.# #
M' W4O>MM
>* 8E W M h
=J R M
N E d6
>= 4E W M S
=J R te.
3 M.J M w h >= D M O
>W eO tD v= M 3kMC
> et et O u l et>=e4e.eet X )(LWin M
>M M
G et X.J Ek N W 44
>M
()
M e < z.J u 4 M E o a w >=
a e= E o e a o E O a tie H w=
1 MENWeMDEM 4%
tm 4
W D til M A em 44 e-I sE e4 4 3 am M et
- s O
ww we n w M e4 4 es O
w naJ i
i 40
>OE HHE (D >= >= a 2D w.E O fr CD > > Eis ZD j
I Wmd>
JDOMEwM WU L
HMDOXEw2 NG I
z.
sro.JOeA= wo >M E
si c e sr w O > **
j w.
zwammD arAOo u
rz>
AEtow waOe4o woe 4
I i
i 4
4 S
8 i
O O
I e.e e.e J
l i
e=
6 w
< c g
3
> = '
D 00 1
=J ' S
=J ts) j e
G, E
9 4
4 '
4 nae a >
Led a >
Mm M 00 11 1
w:
H W
> =.
nnJ 2i LaJ it w
a w
l !
4 4
4
+
l I
wt.
t/t l
1 l
' l i
j i
i i
4 l
)
t s
l l
t=
>=
dE E @ #
dK E Pm l
. O w in OWM e & >=
A>
I
}
} tad M w e=0 I g a
e sE i
b i
+
m e
n s
m e
m n
n
=
U
\\;
'.)
%)
J
,J v
l w
l!,
i j
i
)
i h
I l
6 i
I I
t 4
i b
i 6
EM W
BH MDI M
2 MD4 t
OW s
e>
oW at WWawl w
W>
WwsW4 6
@f n M kE WJM M
AE i
3-W WhM>d W
MDb WhM>e a-3 WOMME o
e><W WW wCM>E WW u-M O
weEEWMM M
, M a
ug>>we w >
e@>EE4 wr>>w e
)
M ROJ3E3 mWW kWW eROJETE
, M J ek.
MMewwo a
Cetww M
WMMew&O 4
i WE kWu M
W WOOOWEWWJ HEE N
@4 WRe Rwsww>
> sww wwMacRusWWW EMJ.
Es www O
J mEM Oger mwd a
>36 D>hDe a
DOOww3kwk D>mDu e
wwkMo k
wwwww w AWm> mom
>, wak DJweew k
w>Mrkeenw>JWews et Oswe Jew f M M
woJWwwAwwJew mM a = =
OE==
w a6wo*E>wCE<<
w t
I ei Ek M
L m u
ehk WMOg>
M mW I
sWE EW wo a
RhDeOM a
RN hok 2
M MOWOg.
d e M a p u k h W M O W O.g M
OkM j
f E
g CosM E
we
>M l.
w: <>>
>>>3>.
m sww eMRe<>>>3kJ 6
I O
WMJ B
OEe o
emMkwM ECE Ces
{
0 W
WRMou I NDE>44WWRwNMou a-Jam aMstM o
a O@e mea mM*6M t
+
w OR MM wWE W
M EmEMDMew MM wwE W
l O'
WWW WuMWWE b
D wO@WJE MWuMERE m
5 9
i e
J
==> Ows3 w
a s
4 3 e W M ie w C w u D w l
. HES eachMW M
3 eWM
>>WWMe*OmMW M
s I
i k
W4 MJMk O
MMMWWMDMM MJMW WI 9
e J
DME O
@. rem w e M M.J M W W R h. e M w'
kW Er>
w J
W D...
E>>
W
.4 w wwk t
t a
wWO D
JR
'A 4
JW3 e
>R D Ja 3
f O
o => a r3r EOsom M
W e
R abJEs4 U
mE W3d MMabJted W
i i
w Owe w >
<w eMrMwOww
> sw >
6 WMM Mwk O
W WMROLEMR Mwk O
W l
M g
C:
We WW R>m a
EsMM W
X>w a
e.
4 M. W w k s W. M W W OM EwMw>
JEwMw>
=
W I
M i
ese WEDeWM e
t >>we KJ
>RDeWM D
(t p,
R WOMSM e
awMREwpDW WOMmM dO 4
1,
e>4 4DMueM E
w aw>Cs3 wh 4DM weM W
M' 0 S BObwMW 4
h wdHwo>kJMBODWMW E
IW>M F
e me>
Owww m
o NW w
dekOWwe m
OO 1
me og MMm W
M g
@ggggy MMg W
l MEM e
M4 MBEE EW W
MEROMMk JkRAEEW W
kW e>O 80 ONE E
W OMM wJeo Ops E
DM l
kAs '
sed
. EWEh J
WMAkeQAM4Eush m
W a
m JRMewwww a
w a
O J
M GW OED>ME a
4 mDAEpwM>>Os>>M3 e
}
kwg b,
MEM mOOp M
w
> a aWDmwwwCO>
M w
www mr>
=
MM
=
- e Hs=Ow.Mwo=
MM
= e l
WQw i
W.
W MWhJRO Mk OOsmEEJkMwkJEO MW 1
W.
ER>
ukMow EM 4
Edw3EMww wkMOW EM Ju>
M EME WEWSMR WM M
ad MO SWRw2MR EM QWM bi M W.
Os* Mew WW m
W L9 wwCMoseMem WW
>WhM>M WM h
MeM wM Fw>WwMMM WM JW m m F.
WW 4;
MD WDMMDW W
O ODDwmMMweDMMDW W
R e
W ODu 4W OJe Ok W
OpWOEMDRMWw OJO Ok
,s c M M
WNO wome O
M iu wwwwCDs WOt=
0 M,
W>o wor
>M ra M
MM>R nE wWQr
>M r2 SMR M
E WW4 O
Mk O
>E WWW O
M W
W
>WA-
>bkk M4 W
>R@E eMW e
>b>>
MO
<e E
w>W OEMM>
WM a
WWWEM MMM ORWMW WM e >
EJ>
0 gWDM to mAMWWwerwo
<wD>
eo MmM N
44
>>>EOW D
4 M4 PEMODe>>EDW D
k C05 N
k>O
>EwMw JE D M t'. E J H W M J HEwMs JE I
w 3
m N
@ E4 pe 394>MO De 40 Sh3 PJANwM
>M e
m3 OMpF wpRJhuwM DM 9 ',
w9 e
9hM eMECW W>
e 00 3
O u
e'M E O m WM e
O
- O eDmM th M
O eve W
e M @ *J m M Aw M
i R'
C WWWW og O
WW X
O I MEMMw?Me
- g O
WW
+
SRWWWm>>K ED EWewwwwMMam>>R ED l
N 3Rw3ONEm2 ko 4
ne)
( >JADOMWW2
>O
=O*maswo>M w
eM4Ja=JeEn=wo=M j
M hERM bE40W N
mDeWOEeDe AEAO@
umum aMassM>oo I
i I
i i
l
'l 1
=
E l
3 0
O
}
M M
l i d 9
4 m
i i
D a-3 m
J e
J e
{ 4 S
4 0
l WQP WOm MM Me 1
W w
I W,
El W
E m,
j m
E 4,
4 M
i M
I i
I l
I i
w I
k E E W'.
KE&
Own OWm kk b>
3 4
i WM WM l
E' l
E I
)
j-t,
)
- - - _ _. ~
.u.____ _.;
CF UNION ELECTCIC CPPROVE3
~
WRITTEN' SAFETY' EVALUATIONS~ -- ~ ~~~
~
CEP!QT SAFETY EVALUATION 63 NE-89-8944 RFA No.4168 DETERMINED OPERASILITY OF CONTROL 8tDG SUPPLY AIR RAD MONITORS RFR NO.4168 DETERMINED THE OPERASILITY OF TME CONTROL BUILDING SUPPLY AIR FAD-()
IATION MONITORS GE-RE-4,AND 5 FOR A SITUATION WITMOUT TME SUPPLY FAN RUNNING AND A SITUATION DURING A MANUALLY INITIATED CONTROL ROOM VENTILATION ISOLATION
~~
~~~
~
SIGNAL. THE FUNCTION OF TME MONITORS IS TO AUTOMATICALLY TRANSFER TME CRVIS (9
SYSTEM FROM NORMAL TO EMERGENCY MODE OF OPERATION UPON DETECTION OF AIR 90RNE RADIATION WHICH COULD ADVERSELY EXPOSE C04;ROL ROOM PERSONNEL. BASED ON AN EVALUATION OF BOTH SITUATIONS GK-RE-4,AND 5 ARE CONSIDERED OPERABLE.
(si PURSUANT TO THE ABOVE INFORMATION, THE CHANGE DOES NOT INVOLVE AN INCREASE IN PROBAPILITY OF GCCURENCE OR CONSEQUENCES OF AN ACCIDENT OR MALFUNCTION OF ECUIP-MENT IMPORTANT 70 SAFETY OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATJONS IN THE SAFETY ANALYSIS RE-3 PORTI OR CREATE POSSIBILITY FOR ACCIDENT OR MALFUNCTION OF A DIFFERENT TYPE OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS IN THE SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORTI OR REDUCE THE MAR-GIN OF SAFETY AS DEFINED IN THE BASIS FOR ANT TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION.
THE EVALUATION DETERMINED THAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETV QUESTION DID NOT EXIST,
,l REPORT SAFETY EVALUATION 3
ITEM ID 61 NE-89-0053 aFR N0.(474 REVISED TECH SPEC TABLE 4.3-1, NOTE 5 FOR CALIBRATION OF SOURCE RANG RFR N0.6474 REVISED TECH SPEC TABLE 4.3-1, NOTE 5 TO DESCRIBE A CALIBRATION METHOD FOR A LOW NOISE PREAMP PLANT LICE CALLAWAY AND RECONMENDED IN THE NIS MANUAL. THE CLD METHOD REQUIRED A SOURCE RANGE HIGM VOLTAGE PLATEAU TO DETERMINE r 3; THE OPERATING VOLTAGE OF THE DETECT 02. THE MEN METMOD REOUIRES THE USE OF AN INTEGRAL BIAS CURVE WHICM IS MORE INCLUSIVE AND PROVIDES TME SAME INFORMATION.
PURSUANT TO THE AB0VE INFORMATION, THE CHANGE DOES NOT INVOLVE AN INCREASE IN y:
PROBABILITY OF OCCURENCE OR CONSEQUENCES OF AN ACCIDENT OR MALFUNCTION OF EQUIP-MENT IMPORTANT TO SAFETY OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS IN THE SAFETY ANALYSIS RE-PORTI OR CREATE POSSIBILITY FOR ACCIDENT OR MALFUNCTION OF A DIFFERENT TYPE
()-
OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS IN TME SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORTI OR REDUCE THE MAR-GIN OF SAFETY AS DEFINED IN THE eASIS FOR ANY TECHNICAL SPECIFICATICN.
I THE EVALUATION DETERMINED THAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION DID WOT EXIST.
I 1
?
,P
_ _ ~.. _.. _
_ _ __.._ _ _ _ _. _ _ __ _ _.. _ _. _ _ __. _ _ _ _ _ _ _. _ _ _ ~ _ _
CF UNION ELECTOIC CPPROVED.
CEfCOT SAFETY EVALUATION
~
~
~
~'
- (3 IIEQ
' ID
'~
62 NE-89-8868 RFR NO.7184 REVISED FSAR FIG 18.4-7 TO SHOU PORTADLE DRUM PUMP FOR CMER. ADD.
RFR NO.7184 REVISED FSAR FIG 18.4-7 TO SMOU THE USE OF A PORTABLE DRUM PUMP
()
THAT CAN BE EITHER AIR OPERATED OR ELECTRICAL MOTOR. THE PUMP TRANSFER $ EITMER AMMONIA OR MYDR AZINE TO THE APPROPRI ATE ME ASURING TANES ASSOCI ATED WITN TME
~~
CONDENSATE AND FEEDWATER CHEMICAL ADDITION SKIDS.~ THE PUMP IS RECOMMENDED BY (t
THE VENDOR FOR THIS APPLICATION AND IS RATED FOR USE IN ENVIRONMENTS TMAT COM-l TAIN EXPLOSIVE VAPORS. THE CONDENSATE AND FEEDWATER CHEMICAL ADDITION SKIDS MAVE NO SAFETY DESIGN BASIS AND SERVE NO SAFETY-RELATED EQUIPMENT g3 PURSUANT TO THE AB0VE INFORMATION, THE CMANGE DOES NOT INWOLVE AN INCREASE IN PR09 ABILITY OF OCCURENCE OR CONSEQUENCES OF AN ACCIDENT OR MALFUNCTION OF EQUIP-MENT IMPORTANT TO SAFETY OVER PREVIOUS EVALUALIONS IN THE SAFETY ANALYSIS RE-f, PORTI OR CREATE POSSIBILITY FOR ACCIDENT OR. MALFUNCTION OF A DIFFERENT TVPE OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS IN THE SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT; CR REDUCE THE MAR-I GIN OF SAFETY AS DEFINED IN THE BASIS FOR ANY.TECMNICAL SPECIFICATION.
TdE EVALUATION DETERMINED THAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY GUESTION DID NOT EXIST, CEPORT SAFETY EVALUATION ITEM ID 63 NE-59-DC61 R*R NO.7125 REVISED FSAR FIG 9.4-3 TO CORRECT A DUPLICATION OF EQUIP. NUMBERS RFA NO.7185 REVISED FSAR FIG 9.4-3 TO CORRECT A DUPLICATION OF EQUIPMENT NUMBERS 4
I TO TWO SUPPLY AIR BALANCE DAMPERS FOR THE AUNILIARY SHUTDOWN PANEL ROOM. THE TWO DAMPERS ARE RENUMBERED TO ELIMINATE DUPLICATE NUMBERS. THE CHANGE DOES NOT g,
IMPACT SYSTEM OPERATION OR PLANT SAFETY.
PURSUANT TO THE ABOVE INFORMATI0Mr THE CHANGE DOES NOT INVOLVE AN INCREASE IN PROBA8ILITY OF OCCURENCE OR CONSEGUENCES OF AN ACCIDENT OR MALFUNCTION OF EOUIP-
,)
MENT IMPORTANT TO SAFETY OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS IN THE SAFETY ANALYSIS RE-PORTI CA CREATE PCSSIBILITY FOR ACCIDENT OR MALFUNCTION OF A DIFFERENT TYPE OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS IN TME SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT; OR REDUCE THE MAR-()
GIN OF SAFETY AS DEFINED IN THE BASIS FOR ANY TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION.
THE EVALUATION DETERMINED THAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION DID NOT EXIST.
k
+
4 s
W 9
n 9
9 e
4
%u+ ' -
-ha1 H.
-w' t
-A m
-....m.a.-m. - mm a
. ~.
. ~
ri r
(
(
p p
p.
~
e n
p s
e n
(
j w
w V
w
\\
s.
b y
i l
I i
l 4
j l
i i.
I I
t 4
3' m@
k E {1 g
-j OM MDI MDI 4
ei mE 1
ew OW D
OW W
WWEW1 MI WWEWI ki WMEmu M
At M
At M'
>EMMOwM
<mM><
ME dmM><
skE WM WOMkE EW 1 WOMME e
d WOWE a
M DEu a
M E
Ewh>MWW uR>>W e WO uR>>W e
4 MO MNE EOJEEE M
WJe ROJEEE 9 5 eeM W
MmeWHO
> eg MMWWHO M.
bE34 WE WEs M
M
>me HER M
ei ukOOOW Ev4WWW E
EMW EuMWWW De seWJamu 42 mud D
eE mua kl OW 8 4 4
D>mDu OWJ D>hDu Mi >
WW JJ Wh> MOM W
kEO Wm>MeM l
S. O W s.E e k EME DJWews a
>JWoWh J
=
MW J4m
=M M
E J
h
.M W-W D
MWE CE44 u
2 www OEa4 u
>: EMSWMW D
M WW WM M
NW O
W>s>WWW Em h0E O
S4W eEW mOA u
W4edeWE MOWO M
ENG>MOWO M
>E EW X
og DMNk 2
es I
l > E EDW kkkEkJ RJ4WkkkEkJ a.
Se uRWO OR Owe t
M EmOE OuS 2
WEdukEM EWBMou E
kuv43WXMou i
3 4
eMkkM k
24 M
eMMAM St Mkb W
MM uwE W
e WhW MM WWE W
E l
.I t W OR
=
e e3 wu,WE=E h
a E
MkWuME=E Swee Ov2D u <
M 6MEBouRD u
4-l >- EEW WW atomMW M
D Ma>4640mMW M.
r I
s Et kMMk(@H MJMk O
DW J
MJMk S
EDJWEM W W H 4 M..
W em kWEkeM 1
l E,
b&
A444 W4WE>>
W WE o W44E>>
W i
i i
i 4
M O
WsWEE E
>, JE 3
E DEME D
JE 3
E!
O E S.J W ehWWE4 W
d RE4ughJs44 W
J i
l 6
kak E
E040E M
M e
=4E040E M
f l
Ek EWhM v >
( K M
MkW4W Mr I
W W
equo MWH O
W M
MEDE MWh O
W j
<W M l' EWWuMEW WW Ekm W
4 MWsMWW Ekh a
W WE3 M
EUMWN E
WEA EUMWH E
M ukOwsWe MEDewM D
C 6
>>EDewM 3
ft b
4 JuWWW WOMmM N
OMWJ WOMhM 40.
O-JEJMM44 4DMusM E
HDuW gDMv4M E
EWM AO4DI u
EgbuMe e
W OEMWebuMe g
EDE k
Wm WEME OWW4 S
I WWW40WWW S
300 E
a HOMEM MME W
H W
q Et<MHa W
i esM W
ME O
HE4 MEW e
WWW>>EksEW e
i hk E
OhWWWMW WO OWE E
eEkedO ONE E
M&W W
EDEEGHE EWWh ONEMEWWm 5u3 u<
MEWMDuk a
w E
M s
W E
O W 4-W v
JW Ot>>ME A
M W
e>OWD>ME o
4..E W S J,.4 64 ouMe SCOk M
W h
M *EOhook M
W WMD bl WDJEW E
E MM E, 4 mM EE MM E o UQW WI WWhWWW4 MWWJRO M k N
EW MWhJRO Mk N
W.
MMWDLE ukMOW EM 4
WCDM v> MOW EM
'J u '>
J NO M %
WEWmMX SM M
eMMWWEWmME EM etWH i e
O WM>A
>WmMMM WM m
MkkO>WhMMM WW gaw E
WEW dew OgaMdm WW mqqcOEwMem WW EWh M
( ENEEW SDMMDW W
Q uk GDMMDW W
E e
W-A kekME ev OJO Ok W
ODEOew OJe Ok 4
QEM 6
WM 3
We vCL4 O
M WJWE wok 4 O
O' W
3e ese E
Wok
>M RE M
M DWWOW
>M RE DME W
ODMeRou E
WWW O
MkW X
WWW Q
MEW M
JkEEWaR kb>>
MO W
>EE>>mkk MA eDM J
JHO OD ORWMk HM g
W4kJ OR*Mk kM O >
4 kWHJ O
eWDW we mJ RO eWDM ao mmM m'
WWEW O
>>>wCW D
m Euck>>aOW D
t 4
WOE W,
WWEkWHM WEuMS JE O
E HEvMm JE I
- 3 m>W MEJ HMO 40 W
eM>MkMO
>W 40 W
4
@CERE W4 eEJAEWM
>M M
4D O R J 4 t W 6's DM e
e Wuwo@E WWMEOg WM e
MOEMWM FOR WW e
O e
w WMJDmM
&m M
O eMONDEM Em M
t i
}
' E O>
W>uMmMW eg C
WW E
Om WMW es O
WW r
EWEv44 Mam>>m ZD EwFkam>>&
23
~
W*
14M3JkJDOREWE NO 2
>OEDOREWE Me 6
ERWWEAEW&nWCDM m
a MW&EWO>M j
g E'
Ed>WWWWW
&C&OW M
mEME AEAQW l
. EMoE=EE wM<D j
i 4
6 1
g g
i O
O M
M 4
d O
l D,
.M 3
J J
O i
.'I l
4-S' Q
ii i
>W o.i woo l
MW, Me a:
e W
k W
W E,
e W
E h
m 4
4 M.
M i k 1
i,
O I
e f
i-
-E.
-EM I
l OW@
Owe a>
ak WM WM M
N e
~
~
Q C
C
'C
~ C C
0 C
0 0
C O
C 0
0 0
D C
)
r
)
i i
6
'e l
i i
i
(
l, i,
i I
+
t i
i
.i 6
RM e.
M RM 1
MDI m4JW M DS j
R' l
SW 054 WRER OW O'
M WWWWI EWMOM 8 W WWWW I J
j M.
m>
M AE M%W>E W
kmOOE M
AK I
k, OM GwM>4 NEkW3WW4k 4mM>4
+
+ 4 WOMME EkMOMWOROO WOMME Ka 33 K
M WME 3 REM WJu M
I f
DI OO WR>>W e
43Wh 4
EW O
WR>>W e
w; MM ROJRER tuoJRE@ERw ROJRzR I
M
>> eMM4WHO M
ww EWWWW MP MM4WHO 3
m WWW
>RE M
k MWWWW MkMMM kWE M
R' KWERWWWWW F
ARNM>WAWJ M
RW4WWW O
DWOGR wW4 m
E44EMKweJOR
( R mW4 W-WOM D>hDW h
DHM Okk MkN 3>*3U MKkWh>MeM Em RE W
Wh>MeM E
bhMpWWOWE E
WWOeRROQWM DJWOWh W
R SJ4h EM W
WWe WMMM D>
Jah EM i
J, OWSOE44 W
WERh>
>WO OE44 W
1 W
WKOD M
KW 4
WEO3JAWME M
EW I
R.
MWRE mOA 3
40WWOWNDOJW RE EOk j
M WE MOWO M
DH WMDEJWME MOWO M
E, E
et W
MEE MJWW WM 2
et l
L! kWJkkkakJ W
W OEMOWWWE MkkRkJ Me RMOR C54 M
WEm e>RWW X
OR OKW i
SMDRWRMOW D
MW k
20 Ekw RWRMOW k-O eMkkM J
DMORkMWWEO OMMEM M
W R30 MM VWR W
M J4WWW EkRM MM WWE W
Wj MMMWWMREE M3M3WMMk M
WWMBER h
i E
40Wro W
d E
Do E%
>JM.
OWRs W
4 O;
K
>M e40mMW
.M W
En WWWM man, e40mMw M
JWE MJMW 2
WWWERNM e MW MJMW i
i W
>>OWRh4M 9e M
zMemMM em3 WRHEM e
{
! WJmW44E>>
W M
MM 4>WWW k
W44R>>
W si W4 3
3 JR 3\\
J MJonkMMMMMM R
a JR 3
O ED>4wWE44 W
O J4NWR E4WWD EbJE44 W
R, 5
JROSOR M
A DE %HMWMDWRe 20403 M
M OWSW WE
&Wm44EMJhM R W
D 45 WWC MWW O
W W
R>REkW4mWO WWW O
W M
O 3
WW R>m K
WMMM MD4 W
WW R>h E
W W.
OJREWMwk N
4 WEWreo WRW EWMW*
M kWONR3mWM D
M 4Www3M DAK WE3eWM 3
ft e
GM WOMwM R
MOWJ4>
- W MO WOMhM 4
40 t
e
> 43MW4M R
W W
RW XOEMA %
4DMueM R
WM e
IW4Ro>WM4 4
n WWW kWWWM W
ce>WM4 4
kW e
PEMOWW4 m
R eXMWWEk2
- t A OWWW G
l 00 M
okRMME W
W O
RM wwW4
>MM MME W
k WEM e
M WWRbEKW 4
W O
WR EJ>>W4 WR&EEW 4
sk ewEWO Oka E
WRo4wMwkME 40 Oka E
j kt*
eOmEWEm i
X W
3 EWHO G E t9 d O E
W R
O J
M WECOK>>MR O
N WOO W>@W W
ON>>MR A
&W4 b
M40mOOH M
W RWWWOEWWe*e S OOH M
W WMD kW X
MM R e go EMZW WkREO E
MM 2 e UGW K
EmMWWJRQ Mk 3
00
>mRMMW MW>JRO Mk 4
' k 4
EkW WWMOW EM M
MWW ENEM WW WhMOW EM JWW M
WMPWRWSIME EM WMk 4WWW WWE WRWWMR EM ffWW b
MRJkWmMMM WM O
WWpMFJKKJ
>WwM MM W4 DJW E3OCE4Mem HW W
QEMW4MOJD W
OK4M4m WW RWE a
ODEDMMDW W
J WWRM3ER4kOE SDMMQW W
X 4
W meR4W OJO ek J
jew >
W 3WR I 4W OJO Op 4RM M
W M
WOkt O
4 JenKOzJ 34>
uOAS O
O M
MM WOW
>H RR 4 3MWWWJWE k
WCW
MEWE WWW O
M k
OWN WENRW 3
WW4 O
MRW W
WWW>bkk MO E
M3W MK MMOh MENH HQ i
ieDH E
WeX OR4Mk WM M
20 a40We M4 OR4Mk HM O >
E440 4WDH 40 MJWEn>EJWHM O
WW3M 40 I
MEM w
WEkkkKOW D
m JZWE44H OW
>>WECW D
Uuw w
eEu WEuMs JF M
W4kxWE DJDO MEWMs aR h
3 m
- kMO De 40 m
M MRWGemMR e>MO
>4 40 W
6 PKWRJAEWM DM M
NMEMMER MEJAEWM DM g
e e
ew34MEon wk a
na4JEwM eWoowSMEDE wk l
O JMDeM tw M
4 i ExOwoWxzERRomM sw M
e 3,
OW M4 es O
WW e
43kAe 43k34MM4 es O
WW e
it l
RX EmkkE 33 WA w
EEG A
J E Gi> H E ED 6
l E
M eDOREWF ko A
EKees es sOREWR Ma i
h' EEEAEWO>M L
4WwWWWWOWEM3bEWO>M i
I' W.
bkW A E A O t3 W
EEZHWHkREO@w AEAC@
KMW Wh>M4MF4kw32 f
\\
i I,
r R
R O
O M
+
M N
k 4
N 4
m l.
D 9
D 4
J w
J N
\\
i 1
4 9
4 3
1 0
0 j
WOD WOM i
MS Mm l
l k
8.
t i
r W
O 4
W X
W W
m m
1 g
s M
M 1
i 6
1 i
k s
EE@
EEN l
OW4 OWC j<
A>
l WM WM j l E
E i
..-w.
- - - - - - - - -.. - -- _...--. ~.- -
-~ -
10CFL50.59'CNNU2L'CEPORT'SIM99AZIES ~ ~ - ~ ~~
' " ~ ~
Q
_ _ _ _ _ CF CGION ELECTOIC CPPROVED
_ ');
CEP 3T SAFETY EVALUATION
~ -..
C8 LF-89-SS77 OL 1969 TS 5.8 REVISED TECM SPEC 70 CORRECTLY SMOW LAND AREAS CLOSED TO PUBLIC
_ CL 1869 TS !.S REVISED TECM SPEC SECTION 5.8 TO CORRECTLY SNOW TNE ARE AS CLOSED ~
():
TO PUdLIC USE PER THE NEFORM WILDLIFE AREA MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT. ADDITIONAL ~
AREAS WERE EXCLUDED PER THE REFORM WILDLIFE AREA MANAGENENT AGREEMENT DATED i
~ ' ' ~ '
APRIL 18,1939. THIS CHANGE WAS APPROVED BY TME NRC AS AMENDMENT 48 TO TWE
~
r,-
"~~ ~"~~~~~~
CPERATING LTCENSE.
PURSUANT TO THE AB0VE INFORMATIONi'THE CMANGE DOES NOT INVOLVE AN INCREASE IN
^
~~
PR09 ABILITY OF OCCURENCE OR CONSE9UENCES OF AN ACCIDENT Ca MALFUNCTION OF E8UIP-MENT IMPORTANT TO SAFETY OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS IN THE SAFETY ANALYSIS RE-PORTI OR CREATE POSSIBILITY FOR ACCIDENT OR MALFUNCTION OF A DIFFERENT TYPE OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS IN THE SAFETY ANALYSJS _REPORTI OR REDUCE THE MAR-GIN OF SAFETY AS DEFINED IN THE BASIS FOR AMY TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION.
THE EVALUATION DETERMINED THAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY CUESTION DID M3T EXIST.
REPORT SAFETY EVALUATION ITEM ID 49 NE-59-9343 RFa N0.3341 sEVISED FSAR FIG 19.&-12 FOR SUSPENDED PARTICLE FILTERS
- Fa No.3341 REVISED FSAR FIG 10.4-12 TO SHOW A FILTER UNIT AND aACKUP FILTER UNIT IN THE SECONDARY LICUID WASTE (SLW) SYSTEM. THE NEW FILTERS REMOVE A SUFFICIENT QUANTITY OF SUSPENDED MATERIAL TO MEET NPDES LIMITS. TME FILTER UNITS ARE DESIGNED TO WITHSTAND THE SLW SYSTEM DESIGN TEMPERATURE AND PRESSURE. THE i
SLW SYSTEM SERVES NO SAFETY-RELATED FUNCTION.
PURSUA4T TO THE ABOVE INFORMATION, THE CHANGE DOES NOT INVOLVE AN INCREASE IN Pa0BABILITY OF OCCURENCE OR CONSEQUENCES OF AN ACCIDENT OR MALFUNCTION OF EGUIP-MENT IMPORTANT TO SAFETY OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATICNS IN TME SAFETY AkALYSIS RE-
,3 PORTI 04 CREATE POSSIBILITY FOR ACCIDENT OR MALFUNCTION OF A DIFFERENT TYPE OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS IN THE SAFETY ANALYSIS REPURT; OR REDUCE THE MAR-
'~
GIN OF SAFETY AS DEFINED IN TME BASIS FOR ANY TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION.
7:
THE EVALUATION DETERMINED THAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY CUESTION DID NOT EXIST.
ei
-p h
a r.,.,
~. - - -. _.... _.
_.. _.13CFC55.59 CNMUAL REP 0;T' SUMMA 21ES~~~
~~~
~
" ~ ~ ~
' ~ ~
~ ~ ~ -
D' ':
CF UNION ELECTOIC CPPOCVED
~~~ ~~ ^
~~~ WRITTEN ~ SAFETY EVALUATIONS c
4 REP &QT ^
~ SAFETY EVALUATION
~ ~ ~ ~
~ (,;
ITEM
~ ID 78,,,
NE,-89-EE65 ET_P-88-83134,REV S, PROCEDURE ADJUSTED RCS CONTINUOUS SPRAY FLOW VALVES, ETP-88-03134,REW S PROCEDURE ADJUSTED RCS CONTINUOUS SPRAY FLOW VALVES 8ASED
() ;
ON TEMPERATURE DOWNSTREAM OF THE VALVES RATHER TNAN NUM8ER OF TURNS OPEN. THE NEW VALVE POSITIONS PROVIDE OPTIMUM FLOW TO KEEP THE SPRAY LIAE NARM AND MINI-
~' ~^
MIZE AUTOMATIC PRESSURIZER 8ACKUP MEATER CYCLING. TME NEW POSITIONS ARE REGUIRED
~
() !
~'
DUE TO FLOW CHANGES FROM VALVE WEAR OR SEAT LEAKAGE.
THE VALVES ARE ADJUSTED IN 1/2 TURN INCREMENTS WITH TEMPERATURE MONITORED AT 18 MINUTE INTERVALS. THE VALVE IS REOPENED IF THE TEMPERATURE DROPS BELOW 539F AND THE VALVES ARE NOT (7
COMPLETELY CLOSED FOR EXTENDED PERIODS OF TIME.
THIS PROCEDURE DOES NOT REDUCE MARGIN OF SAFETY AND DOES NOT AFFECT THE PRESSURE BOUNDARY.
l PURSUANT TO THE AB0VE INFORMATION, THE CHANGE 4BOES NOT INVOLVE AN INCREASE IN
(.t PROBABILITY OF OCCURENCE OR CONSEQUENCES OF AN ACCIDENT OR MALFUNCTION OF EQUIP-t MENT IMPORTANT TO SAFETY OVER PREVIOUS EVAL 6ATIONS IN THE SAFETY ANALYSIS RE-PORT; OR CREATE POSSIBILITY FOR ACCIDENT OR MALFUNCTION OF A DIFFERENT TYPE OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS IN THE SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORTJ OR REDUCE THE MAR-GIN OF SAFETY AS DEFINED IN THE BASIS FOR ANY TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION.
THE EVALUATION DETEPMINED THAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY
(
GUESTION DID NOT EXIST.
REPORT SAFETY EVALUATION gj !
ITEM ID 71 NE-89-0995 RMP 87-2811 REVISED FSAR FIG 9.2-13 FOR REPLACEMENT RX MAKEUP TRANSFER PUMPS RMP 67-2011 REVISED FSAR FIG 9.2-13 FOR REPLACEMENT OF THE REACTOR MAKEUP Ja, WATER TRANSFER PUMPS.
THE EXISTING PUMPS FAILED PREMATURELY. THE REPLACE-l MENT PUMPS WERE SIZED TO MEET CURRENT CAPACITY, MATERIAL REQUIREPENTS, AND I
SERVICE CONDITIONS. THESE PUMPS SUPPLY ON DEMAND DEMINERALIZED MAKEUP AND FLUSH WATER TO VARIOUS NS$$ AUXILIARIES, RADWASTE SYSTEMS, AND THE FUEL POOL
~
COOLING AND CLEANUP SYSTEM.
THE EXISTING ELECTRICAL FEED DESIGN TO THE NEW l
PUMP MOTORS REMAINS ADEGUATE.
.:)
PURSUANT TO THE AE0VE INFORMATION, THE CHANGE DOES NOT INVOLVE AN INCREASE IN PROBASILITY OF OCCURENCE OR CONSEGUENCES OF AN ACCIDENT OR MALFUNCTION OF EQUIP-MENT IMPORTANT TO SAFETY OVER PREVICUS EVALUATIONS IN THE SAFETY ANALYSIS RE-
,j PORT; OR CREATE POSSIBILITY FOR ACCIDENT OR MALFUNCTION OF A DIFFERENT TYPE OVER PAEVIOUS EVALUATIONS IN THE SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT; OR REDUCE THE MAR-3IN OF SAFETY AS DEFINED IN ThE BASIS FOR ANY TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION.
THE EVALUATION DETERMINED THAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY l
QUESTION DID NOT EXIST.
C M
W
- .---.--.-.-- a.-.a..
.wm 2 2 0
~
C C
u t
t
)
^
.i s
I l
1 i
1 0
e i
A O
A t
j EM M
EM I
MSI 1
MDI E
UW e
O M@
oW W
WWEWS D
E DM WWWWI i
X eM AE e
4 CM M
LE M
WWhM>E u
M (bM>a g
OWOMkK
>MEX WOMME mE EME M
4430 E
M OWEMEUE>>W e k
Wh4M vr>>W e WWO WROJEEE u
WMMk EOJEEE WObWhMMwWho W
WW W
MMeWHO EEE MD kEE M
E EJ kEE M
O OWD EuMWWp E
3kWO Eu(WWW EkJ EMS Eud O
WEEM eX hud E
EWESEW 3>hDu u
EWpH D>h3u O
OW 40 Wh > MOM M
>O wh> mom M
MOWMhM>JWOWh M
WW R
>JWOWh k
(OMuSECE44 W
G WAEM OE44 v
E J>
WWW2 M
EW M
E WH M
EW M
JEE4MMEE hoa O
MO 4
WE WOE E
e M
kWMOWO M
OMMJ MOWO M
E
>W WMM E
4 O
WM E
og W.
MEMEJLkkMEbd (JMk kkMEkJ EkkdeWOE des O
skE CE CEa M
E DERWEMou
>EMW EWEMou E
EWE 9 OMMEM k
SWJD OMM&M H
W WORO WMH WWE W
M Me MM uwE W
E.
E E C M M W W u M E,E E h
MMEW WWMEME b
u >
t > M M o v E s-U e
W E
NO Ov33 u
4
%Ed 4GwCwMW M
W WhCM AeChMW H
4' EWOEME MMMM M
HWED MJMk E-CEuMEuWEkWM O
M WQmo WEkeH O
EM EM W4dE>>
W E
M%4E W44E>>
W E
EWEEME D
JE 3
M EE E
D JE 3
O MEEWEM4hWE**
W E
MO3 Wh4Ee4 W
h I MeeMEEO40E M
E 00 2040E M
m Nu
- E E
- WWW ev (E
M-m>W3M MWk O
W H
Edh E
MWk O
W M
li w(MWW WW Ekh E
k
%MOWW E>h W
I' m
PWWEW eEUMWH E
E WWEMEUMWW X
M S
PEE EkME3OWM D
Q EOWOkkEDOWM D
- L1 w
e MW E
WOMhM N
OM3>4 WOMhM (T O '
P.
ME EEW %2Mv4m E
M
>>OMu%DMU4M E
EWM P'
W WWERODUMW E
E MohEMEODuM4 4
EDE e'
WE e ELOWW4 e
O EE ChCWWE e
DVD M'
JuWauMMME W
k E
OsbEMMME W
M fl M e>EM>3kEAEEW 4
E O
OkzhEEW 4
Ak W
EdM 4040 ONE E
E O
WOdo ONE E
>&e J
HEuMEWEumb 0
EMMEEEWEh i
E4D S
JJ B
W X
M C
Me E
W E
O J
4 EOM4WkOE>>M E O
k MEO WOE
>>M E
O Aud k
4WDMEEhDQk M
W 4
N O J h E. h C O H M
W WMM MMSEWWE MM E e o M
(M 03 3 MM E e JOW E
hk W
OMWWWEO Mk O
MkW MW>JEO MH W
d' MkW M
ukMOW EM 4
440E>
WWMOW EM I
Juw M
WJE< euw3WeME EM E
<mromWEweME EM
[
et W k b
EdWKMubWhMkM WM EMMM DWhMMM WM l
zJW mmE E40E=Meh
>W Q
WErOCawM4h
>w EWh O
WHJO m3MM3W W
W C40uWm3MMDW W
t E
4 W
O MJMksu OJO Ok M
W EEEqu OJO Ok 4 71 M M
WWWe>M uS4W D
E Mb DW uCL4 O
O M
HEN MCWOW
>H EE M
kWob> WOW
>M EE SME D
MMX QAI WWE O
O 6 44H JE WWW Q
M ft w W
>MO eR wh>>
MO O
OW Wakh>k MO our E
Wmurce OE4M>
HM E
OEWER CE<M>
WM e
M E
WWOO
= War 40 t
m>mo WWow 40 MhM e
%WH
>>W&OW D
P EO H>>EDW D
l UOE M
eEEMWW HauME JR e
P C em HEUMb JE
[
h 3
O Mokku2kMO 40 m
whMW7kMO
>4 40 u
M pH MMWEJkEWM DM w
Q epm EJAEWM DM W
e MHE
>F4MECE WW I
wWOO44MECE WW e
o edMJEEDSM Ah M
E I BMMEDEM
&b H
.R DE OWMMW O
WW W
C4kkWWW og O
WW
+
EMMEMMR bMkw 23 W34 4ERSkME ED E
Ekw M3OMEWE
>0 M33 DOREWE NO h
EEMEWF&eWODM L
AhWMJ4EWODM E
WWROEC 4FAOW u
T.Ouuw A E & O t9 MHDuku uM44E f
l e
E e
O O
1 M
M
(
4 N
8
(
N.
l o w o.
J J
~
. 4 S
4 Q
0 0
1 WOS WOm t
i MW MM i
8 l,
e e
> w
> w
{
W E,
W E
j- ;
h h
4 4
1 M
M l
i t
4
~
EEN WEM OWN OWN L>
kW
'j WH i
E e
WM E
r I
i
---~-
- - - - - - - 1CCFC58.59 CNNUCL REP 0;T SUMMAOIES
~
f USISO ELECTRIC CPPDOVED.
CF CEP02T SAFETY EVALUATION
~
~ ~~
~
~
~~
g-ITEM ID 74 NE-89-0392 RFR N0.7296 REVISED FSAR FIG 18.4-6 TO INDICATE SCSAFETT) COMPONENTS RFR NO.7296 REVISED FSAR. FIG 18.4-6 TO INCORPORATE AS-9UILT DATA AND INCLUDE
(*
DESIGNATIONS OF 'Q'(SAFETY) COMPONENTS. THE CHANGE INVOLVED DOCUMENTATION ONLY AND DID NOT IMPACT PLANT SAFETY.
THE REVISED FIG CONCERNS THE FEEDWATER
(-
SYSTEM.
PURSUANT TO THE A80VE INFORMATION, THE CHANGE DOES NOT INWOLVE AN INCREASE IN PROBABILITY OF OCCURENCE OR CONSEGUENCES OF AN ACCIDENT OR MALFUNCTION OF EOUIP-
~
MENT IMPORTANT TO SAFETY OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS IN THE SAFETY ANALYSIS RE-PORTI OA CREATE POSSIBILITY FOR ACCIDENT OR MALFUNCTION OF A DIFFERENT TYPE OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS IN THE SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORTI 02 REDUCE THE MAR-GIN OF SAFETY AS DEFINED IN THE BASIS FOR ANY,IECHNICAL SPECIFICATION.
THE EVALUATION DETERMINED THAT AN UNREVI[WED SAFETY
,+
QUESTION DID NOT EXIST.
REPORT SAFETY EVALUATION
' ITEM ID 75 Li-*A-0091 CMP 35-P017 REVISED FSAR FIG 9.3-1 FOR REPLACEMENT OF PROPE IN UNIT VENT C P.P 45-0017 REVISED FSAR FIG 9.3-1 FOR THE REPLACEMENT OF THE EXISTING VELOCITY P408E SYSTEM IN TME UNIT VENT WITH A FLCb MEASUREMENT SYSTEM CONSISTING OF FOUR GAS FLod SENSORS IN THE UNIT VENT AND TWO LOW-RANGC PNEUMATIC DIFFERENTIAL PRESSURE TRANSMITTERS WITH SQUARE POOT EXTRACTORS IN THE AUXILIARY BUILDING.
THE REPLACEMENT IS REQUIRED TO PROVIDE ACCURATE MEASUREMENTS OF FLOW.
THIS FLOW MEASUREMENT SYSTEM PROVIDES NO SAFETY FOCTION ANF THE REPLACEMENT ENHANCED THE SYSTEM FUNCTION.
(THIS CHANGE HAS BEEN PARTIALLY IMPLEMENTED.)
PURSUANT TO THE ASCVE INFORMATION, THE CHANGE DOES NOT INVOLVE AN INCREASE IN P409A9ILITY OF OCCURENCE OR CONSEQUENCES OF AN ACCIDENT OR MALFUNCTION OF EGUIP-MENT IMPORTANT TO SAFETY OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS IN THE SAFETY ANALYSIS RE-PORTJ OR CkEATE POSSIBILITY FOR ACCIDENT OR MALFUNCTION OF A DIFFERENT TYPE OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS IN THE SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORTI OR REDUCE THE MAR-r, GIN OF SAFETY AS DEFINED IN THE BASIS FOR ANY TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION.
THE EVALUATION DETERMINED THAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION DID NOT EXIST.
o 4
-6
..--#,..-.m
.. - ~ -. ~... - +.
w
+
w CF GCION ELECTOIC APPROVED
.. ~ -
CIPCQT SAFETY EVALUATION ~
~
~
~~
~
(N ITER ID T4 NE-38-9084 EMP 86-3825 IN!!aLLED BACKUP _ COOLING SYSTEM FOR THE 80P COMPUTER ROOM _,_,
EMP 86-3825 INSTALLED A SACKUP COOLING SYSTER FOR THE 80P CDNPUTER ROOM. TME SYSTEM ENSURES TNAT THE EQUIPMENT IN THE ROOM IS MAINTAINED AT AN ACCEPTA9tE (T
OPERATING TEMPERATURE. THERE ARE 40 SEISMIC II/I HAZARD CONCERNS AND FIRE PROTECTION REMAINS INTACT. THE COMPUTER ROCR MVAC SERVES NO SAFETY FUNCTION.
()
FSAR FIG 9.4-4 IS REVISED.'ITHIS CHANGE IS PARTIALLY IMPLEMENTED.)
~
PURSUANT TO THE ABOVE INFORMATION, THE CHANGE DOES NOT INVOLVE AN INCREASE IN P409 ABILITY OF OCCURENCE OR CONSEGUENCES OF AN ACCIDENT OR MALFUNCTION OF EOUIP-()
1ENT IMPORTANT TO SAFETY OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS IN THE SAFETY ANALYSIS RE-PORTI 04 CREATE POSSIBILITY FOR ACCIDENT OR MALFUNCTION OF A DIFFERENT TYPE OVEP PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS IN THE SAFETY ANALYSLS REPORTI OR AEDUCE THE MAR-(3 GIN OF SAFETY AS DEFINED IN THE BASIS FOR ANY TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION.
THE EVALUATION DETERMINED THAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY (1
QUESTION DID NOT EXIST.
~
REPORT SAFETY EVALUATION ITEM ID 77 NE-80-2993 CMP 87-1259 REVISED FSAR SECTION 12.5 TO REFLECT CHANGES TO HEALTH PHYSICS AREA C1* S7-1059 REVISED FSAR SECTION 12.5 AND FIG 12 5-1 TO REFLECT CHANGES IN THE HEALTH PHYSICS ACCESS CONTROL AREA 0F THE CONTROL BUILDING. THE CHANGES (j
INCLUDED INSTALLATION OF WALLS, RAISED FLOORS, FIRE PROTECTION, AND ELECTRICAL WORK.
THE WORK WAS PERFORMED WITH SEISMIC II/I, SEPARATION GROUPING, AND FI*E PROTECTIDW AND DETECTION CONCERNS ADDRESSED.
(THIS CHANGE NAS BEEN gy PARTIALLY IMPLEMENTED.)
PURSUANT TO THE ABOVE INFORMATION, THE CHANGE DOES NOT INVOLVE AN INCREASE IN PR09 ABILITY OF OCCURENCE OR CONSEeufMCES OF AN ACCIDENT OR MALFUNCTION OF EQUIP-gy MENT IMPORTANT TO SAFETY OVER PR*VIOUS EVALUATIONS IN THE JAFETY ANALYSIS RE-PORTI OR CREATE POSSIBILITY FOR ACCIDENT OR MALFUNCTION OF A DIFFERENT TYPE OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS IN THE SA.'ETY ANALYSIS REPORTI OR REDUCE THE MAR-()
GIN OF SAFETY AS DEFINED IN THE BASIS 70R ANY TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION.
THE EVALUATION DETERMINED THAT AN UNREVIE ?D SAFETY GUESTION DID NOT EXIST.
F 1
(
w:
. ~. _
... ~. -. - - - -
~
_ _. _ _.. ~ _...
~'
.. _ ~
OF UNIO.N ELECTCIC CPPCOVED.
Ni CEPOST_
SAFETY EVALUATION ATE 3 ID 3:
78 NE-89-8096 RMP 87-2827 REVISED FSAR FIG 9.4-1 TO SHOW COUNT ROOM MVAC MODIFICATIONS RMP 87-2927 REVISED FSAR FIG 9.4-1 TO SHOW CouMT ROOM MVAC RODIFICATIONS. TME
():
CHANGE PROVIDED ENHANCED ISOLATION OF THE COUNT ROOM FROM THE NOT LAB WHICM IS
~
A SOURCE FOR AIR 80PNE NOBLE GASES AND MIGN BACKGROUND COUNTS. THE CHANGE DID
~ ~ ~
~
NOT AFFECT THE FRESH AIR SUPPLY TO AND FROM THE ROOM. ' CHANGES INCLUDED r3'
~
SHIFTfNG FROM AN EXHAUST DUCT TO A LOUVRED DOOR AND BETTER SEALINGS IN TdE WALL OPENINGS BETWEEN THE TWO ROOMS.
THE CHANGES DID MOT ALTER DESIGN FLOWS AND DID NOT ADVERSELY IMPACT PLANT SAFETY.
3 (THIS CHANGE HAS BEEN PARTIALLY IMPLEMENTED).
PURSUANT TO THE AB0VE INFORMATION, THE CHANGE DOES NOT INVOLVE AN INCREASE IN PR00 ABILITY OF OCCURENCE OR CONSEQUENCES OF AW. ACCIDENT OR MALFUNCTION OF ECUIP-5-
MENT IMPOR1 ANT TO SAFETY OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS IN THE SAFETY ANALYSIS RE-PORTI 04 CREATE PCSSIBILITY FOR ACCIDENT OR MALFUNCTION OF A DIFFERENT TYPE
~
OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS IN THE SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORTI OR REDUCE THE MAR-3-
GIN OF SAFETY AS DEFIhED IN THE BASIS FOR ANY TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION.
THE EVALUATION DETERMlNED THAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY QUESTI0ri DID NOT EXIST.
REPORT SA*;TY EVALUATION ITEM 10 79 NE-9J-Dd35 EMP 88-3334 DELETED FSAR FIG 18.3.2-3 WITH RENOVATION OF SERVICE BUILDING (j
EMP 83-3034 DELETED FSAR FIG 16.3.2-3 WITH THE RENOVATION OF THE SERVICE BUILDING FOR MORE EFFICIENT USE OF EXISTING SPACE.
THE EMERGENCY OPERATIONS 1;
SUPPORT CENTER REMAINS IN THE SERVICE BUILDING, BUT THIS FSAR FIGURE DUPLI-CATES FIGURES MAINTAINED IN THE RADICLOGICAL ENERGENCY RESPONSE PLAN (RERP).
DELETING THE FSAR FIG DOES NOT ADVERSELY IMPACT PLANT SAFETY.
.);
(MODIFICATIONS TO THE SERVICE BUILDING HAVE BEEN PARTIALLY IMPLEMENTED.)
PURSUANT TO THE ABOVE INFCRMATION, THE CNANGE DOES NOT INVOLVE AN INCREASE IN PROBABILITY OF OCCURENCE OR CONSEQUENCES OF AN ACCIDENT OR MALFUNCTION OF EQUIP-();
MENT IMPORTANT TO SAFETY OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS IN THE SAFETY ANALYSIS RE-PORTI OR CREATE POSSIBILITY FOR ACCIDENT OR MALFUNCTION OF A DIFFERENT TYPE OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS IN THE SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT; OR REDUCE THE MAR-y:
GIN OF SAFETY AS DEFINED IN THE BASIS FOR ANY TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION.
THE EVALUATION DETERMINED THAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETT QUESTION DID NOT EXIST.
i!
o
+'
'*s-9-
- m' ' '
r.
2 o-m*
I
-.. ~ -. -. -.
...u___._.__.._.._
.. _ _. _ _ _. _. __ _ _ _ _..- ~1CCFG59.59 ANNU n CEPORT SUMCOIES ~~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
D'
_ _,. _ _. _ _ _ CF UNIC3 ELECT.01C APPOSVED. __.___._ _.
O i
CEP;RT SAFETY EVALUATION ITEM ID
~~~~ ~ ~~ ()
SB LF-99-8019 OL 1378 TS T3.3-6 REVISED TECH SPEC RADIATE 0N MONITORING F,0R_TME PLANT,
I
(
OL If78 TS T3.3-6 REVISED TECH SPEC RADIATION MONITORING SY INCREASING FROM ONE
()
HOUR 70 72 HOURS THE PERMITTED PERIOD OF IMOPERASILITY FOR ONE CMANNEL OF 80TH l
THE CONTROL ROOM AIR INTAKE MONITORS AND THE FUEL BUILDING ATMOSPMERE MONITORS.
~~
() :
THE PROPOSED CHANGE DOES NOT AFFECT THE MARGIN OF SAFETY,NOR ALTER THE MANNER IN WHICH SAFETY LIMITS AND LIMITING SAFETY SYSTEM SETPOINTS ARE DETERMINED.
REDUNDANT MONITORS REMAIN CPERh8tE DURING THE EXTENDED' ALLOWED OUTAGE TIME AND UNDER THE REVISED MINIMUM OPERABLE CMANNELS REQUIREMENTS. THE NRC MAS APPROVED
() l l
THIS CHANGE AS APENDMENT 49 TO THE LICENSE.
l l
PURSUANT TO THE ABOVE INFORMATION, THE CHANGE DOES NOT INVOLVE AN INCREASE IN PROBASILITY OF OCCUREhCE OR CONSEQUENCES OF AN AC_CIDENT OR MALFUNCTION OF EQUIP-(} l MENT IMPORTANT TO SAFETY OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS IN THE SAFETY ANALYSIS RE-l PORTI OR CREATE POSSIBILITY FOR ACCIDENT OR' MALFUNCTION OF A DIFFERENT TYPE OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS IN THE SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT; OR REDUCE THE MAR-(,;
GIN OF SAFETY AS DEFINED IN THE BASIS FOR ANY' TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION.
THE EVALUATION DETERMIAED THAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY
'a; CUESTION DID NOT EAIST.
t 's !
REPORT SAFETY EVALUATION ITEM ID 61 NE-90-DfE7 RTR NO.6908 CORRECTED FSAR FIG 11.4-1 FOR AS-BUILT LIQUID,5CLID RADWASTE SYSTEM (j j i
RFR %0.6998 CORRECTED FSAR FIG 11.A-1 FOR AS-8UILT DESIGNATIONS OF COMPONETS WITHIN THE LICUID RADWASTE AND SCLIO RADWASTE SYSTEMS. ONLY DRAWINGS ARE COR-( 'g.
RECTED JITHOUT CHANGING PLANT AS-BUILT CONFIGURATION. VALVE LINEUPS AND FIELD COMPONENTS ARE UbAFFECTED.
PURSUANT TO THE ABOVE INFORMATION, THE CHANGE DOES NOT INVOLVE AN INCREASE IN e};
PR09491LITY OF OCCURENCE OR CONSEQUENCES OF AN ACCIDENT OR MALFUNCTION OF EQUIP-MENT IMPORTANT TO SAFETY OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS IN THE SAFETY ANALYSIS RE-PORTI OR CREATE POSSIBILITY FCA ACCIDENT OR MALFUNCTION OF A DIFFERENT TTPE
() '
OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS IN THE SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT; OR REDUCE THE MAR-GIN OF SAFETY AS DEFINED IN THE BASIS FOR ANY TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION.
(3 i THE EVALUATION DETERMINED THAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY
' i QUESTION DID NOT EXIST.
fit i k,/ '
() :
f
. - -. ~..
~.... _ _
___._2
_ _........_. ~. C F UNIC3 ELECTOIC APPCOVED._...__ __... _...
REP 02T SAFETY EVALUATION ITEM ID~
~
"~ ~ " ~ (3 82 NE-99-8519 RFR NO.7247 REVISED FSAR FIG S.1-1 TO SHOW INSTALLED ISO. VALVES IN RCS SYS RFR NO.7247 REVISED FS AR SIG 5.1-1 TO SHOW INSTALLED ISOLATION VALVES IN THE (3
3/8 INCH SS PACKING LEAK 0FF TUBING FROM VALVES BB-PV-6782A,8. THESE VALVES FUNCTION AS ISOLATION VALVES BETWEEN THE REACTOR COOLANT SYSTEM AND THE RESIDUAL HEAT REMOVAL SYSTEM. THE INSTALLATION GF AN ISOLATION VALVE IN THE LEAR.0FF (3:
~
LINES ALLOWS ANY RCS LEAKAGE TO BE CONTAINED WITNIN THE VALVE UNTIL REPAIRS CAN BE MADE. THE SUBJECT LEAKOFF LINES ARE NOT SAFETY-RELATED AND THE INSTtLL-ATION OF AN ISCLATION VALVE IN THE LEAKOFF LINE DOES NOT AFFECT THE CODE PRES-SURE 900NDARY OF THE SUBJECT CLASS 1 VALVES. THE PURPOSE IS ONLY TO CONTAIN LEAKAGE.
THE AFFECTED COMPONENTS ARE RATED FOR SERVICE AT DESIGN RCS CONDITIONS AND MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF DESIGN CODE ANSI $3.1.1.
PURSUANT TO THE ABOVE INFORMATION, THE CHANGE DOES NOT INVOLVE AN INCREASE IN PROSABILITY OF OCCURENCE OR CONSEQUENCES OF~AN ACCIDENT OR MALFUNCTION OF EGUIP-MENT IMPORTANT TO SAFETY OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS IN THE SAFETY ANALYSIS RE-(s PORTI OR CAEATE POSSIBILITY FOR ACCIDENT OR MALFUNCTION OF A DIFFERENT TYPE OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS IN THE SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORTI Od REDUCE THE MAN-GIN OF SAFETY AS DEFINED,.IN THE BASIS FOR ANY TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION.
THE EVALUATION DETERMINED THAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY OUESTION DID NOT EXIST.
EEPORT SAFETY EVALUATION ITEM ID S3 NE-90-0036 RFR No.7264 REWISED FSAR FIG 9.3-1 TO ADD OMITTED COMPRESSED AIR COMPONENTS RFR NO.7264 REVISED FSAR FIG 9.3-1 TO SHOW COMPONEhTS ADDED TO THE MECHANICAL i
EQUIPMENT LIST FOR THE COMPRESSED AIR SYSTEM.
THESE COMPONENTS ACTUALLY EXIST, BUT WERE NOT REFLECTED IN THE DOCUMENTATION. THIS CHANGE INdCLVED DOCUMENTATION ONLY AND DID NOT ADVERSELY IMPACT PLANT SAFETY.
PURSUANT TO THE ABOVE INFORMATION, THE CHANGE DOES NOT INVOLVE AN INCREASE IN PROBABILITY OF OCCURENCE OR CONSEOUENCES OF AN ACCIDENT OR MALFUNCTION OF EOUIP-();
MENT IMPORTANT TO SAFETY OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS IN THE SAFETY ANALYSIS RE-PORTI OR CREATE POSSIBILITY FOR ACCIDENT OR MALFUNCTION OF A DIFFERENT TVPE OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS IN THE SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORTI OR REDUCE THE MAR-g{
GIN OF SAFETY AS DEFINED IN THE BASIS FOR ANY TECMMICAL SPECIFICATION.
THE EVALUATION DETERMINED THAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION DID NOT EXIST.
);
O C'
w w
1e-
't w-x
.m.
y C
C C.
v 3
(
s
+
I i
t l
l i
)
i
+
i 8
8 l-A a
e A
ul M
EM w
i M
M EM 3
W:
MDB R
k@M MD1 E
N k
OW O
ER Ow g
el N E %E WWEW1 W
E WMk WWEW B A;
OMW M
AE J
MMEkN M
As t
l C
E JEME WhM>W e
DwWtw
( EM>e 4
)
4 E
O Jheo WOMME F
E@mOE WOMWE i
M h
(
OR E
M W
wRMAn M
e f
W3w uR>>w e eDwR WE>>w e
e
?
El EMkEWE EOJEZR a2OKW EOJ2XF 1
i M'
OwsMWs MMsWHO E
EWw E
MMewko M
MMEMM WEE M
w 4
Woq HER M
3 kJW oM EU4WWW A
W W
EU4WWW (S
W 4
4E mW4 JE>DM
( R but M.
EEoJW D>mDu M
WHERW D>hDW O
wwwekw wwkMoM E
v OM Wa> mom
}
I M
AMowww
>Jwows w
M e>>w
>JwoWw k.
OMM3Ea Jm EM
-.-< =o J<m EM I
e
<> Ops Oza<
w M
OmJos oEe<
w 1
E o
OJuz M
Ew J1 3w<
M EW j
w WoEduw zW wCA M
Cow z zW wCA A
30644 MOWO M
M MWW3W MOWO M
I l
0 EE M
E W
o EO E
et M
EWEM kkkWpJ K
WE JM kkk2kJ f
o kJWEOZ OE dew EWWJM OR CEE w
=Ok>mr
==nMov v
kw=x EwmMou 1
o CEM eMkAM H
M
- w eMe&M
\\
l a
ww>oWo MM uwE W
h OWEo MM WWE W
w aMwEw w v e'Z E z m
M J
zo wuMEEz
=
1 j
30 oM>
Ovas w
=
v J
O=w CumD w
=
2 x Owezwo o<o*Mw M
w euk o<O Mw M
W J
Ww E
MJMW A
DM MC MJMH dwvkWA WFWee o
M OE2JK Waken o
8 3
4EEMWA WWWE>>
W EWOOA WWEEM>
w O.
O WSE E
D
- J E 3
W WEMEA E
D J2 3
i J
ORW w
s h W E u e, w
EWh>E emJEgg w
j J
EW3w ECWOE M
O
@wr EO*CX M
(.
ENWOE w >
WE D
F W
MOM w >
4E MO EME MWW O
w w
Ourwe Mwk O
w M
O' W
REW ww Ekh E
E MEW 2
WW E>m E
t W
H wWMEWw EuMwk F
MEW twMWM N
I M
A2 WKZ MEDeWM 3
O M
Wpu WRDoWM D
u' MOM M
WOMhM WhJeu WOMwM (t
C O6 W
EMW 4DMUMM 2
WCADE
%DMUMM E
$wM A
EEWME e 2ODWMW W
W A
EO EODUMW 4
EDE M
WWJKOR Owwd W
W MWMww OWW4 m
300 WM e>E3 MME W
w w
ox MME w
MtsM E
ke 3 0 0
HEAEEW W
A 22E4>
MEAEFW W
Ak W,
%E GWo WO OHE E
M WWO WO ONE 2
>Ad W.
WEAW
> Eusw k
w&EE EWEw (143 H
EM J@D E
W X
T WM W e E
W E
O J
, WWJm22 OE>>M E o
w show OE>>Mr o
&us o
AE*MM
=O0>
M w
w W@RKE
=005 M
w wMD W
oWWA1 X
MM d e H
2 W D t9 E
MM E e g (2 w M
WEMAOb eMW>JRO M k, HWH M eMW>Jzo Mk H.
M M
EMJJW WHMOW EM o
ENEMw upMow WM i
I JWW D
MokEJEMWEW4MF EM W
okOMEMWEWmME EM et w k W
DEWWWWWWWmMkN WM M
w UWWE>WhMkM WM SJW E
WWW oWOEWMWh
>W M
ME EDWOMEMWh
>w RWm E
JEMEWmDMMDW W
D MWEwCWWDMMDW W
R M
MwMDOM4W OJo op w
>&ts Mau OJo ok
<pM e
MM
<x J
v0A=
O E
W E
nJ wCA<
O s #
w.
wOkw%xoz WwW O
M wCHwar Wwd O
eMcEko WOW
>M zz EMoMr wor
>M ar oMz e
MzW W
em EMarew>>
M o MwtW Ekwh>
Mo 435 WOW E 4M O2WMk WM w
WAAE4M O24M>
HM i
O N
M
%eDMDEMO Ww35 ao a
WM wkO 4WDM 40 MEM MMooOMWH>kECW D
E FOMWh>>ECW D
.3
>. o 034E NEWMm JP M
Tw>>E NEWMb JD EVE Mi M
WE AWHMO
>W 40 Muk WWpMO
>w wo u i MEJ NWA2JAEwM DM N tJ J M E w 2 J A E w M DM S
M OmoNECWMEDE WH N
WME OwMECE WH w
W MhWw DSM th M
m N
Ou DmM
&w M
S M
EWOEWMW O
ww 3
WJkM MWMW O
WW w
eMwwbw2E m>>E ID e
awoMEZEmkpK 3D PEAW
>>D02EWF M9 ebMM WDOEKw2 MO i
J DObMM AEWO>H J
E DE 4EwobM O
JorwM> O ANAOW O
JwowCO AEAO@
i OEMMMMM OEoE m>
I t
t g
y C
O M
M k
k
(
S' W
w i
D N
D N
i J
M J
S e,
a G
0 0
i W o G' WoQ M&,
i Mo
>, 1 1 1
m.
H m
W.
J w
J l mi i
m i
<l W
M; M
=
i l
j s
h
,t s
REW EEM i Owe Owm A>
sk WM wM t
E~
E I-g 4
~ ~ ~~
~ ~ ~ ~
A
-. ' ~
18CFR58;59 LNN';CL CEPORT SUMMMIES -
~~~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
-- _ ___ CF U2ICQ ELECTOIC OPPOOVED
~
'i REP 02T ~'
SAFETY EVALUATION
^
^
r ITEM ID PEAK CLAD TEMPERATURE FOR AFW PURGE DELAY 86 LF-98-8938 MISC CHAP 15 LOCA REVI_ SED FSAR MISC CHAP 15 LOCA REVISED FSAR PEAK CLAD TERPERATURE FOR AUXILIARY FEEDWATER (3
PURGE DELAY. THE VALUE INCREASED FROM 157JF TO 1757F. THE INCREASED VALUE REMAINS WELL WITHIN THE 2284F REGULATORY LIMIT. FOLLOWING A REVIEW OF TME SMALL BREAK LOSS-OF-COOLANT ACCIDENT ANALYSIS METHODS,U$C OF
()
~ ~
~~
WESTINGHOUSE STANDARD MOTRUMP COMPUTER CODE INPUT VALUE FOR PURGE DELAY TIME WAS DETERMINED
~
TO RESULT IN A NON-CONSERVATIVE CALCULATION OF PEAK CLAD TEMPERATUREsPCT.'
THE AFW ENTHALPY PURGE DELAY TIM! CALCULATED BY WESTINGHOUSE WAS LONGER THAN gg STANDAFD TIME ASSUMPTIONS USED IN THE CODE. THE RESULT OF THE REANALYSIS INCREASED THE FSAR PCT FOR THE AFW PURGE DELAY.
PURSUANT TO THE A80VE INFORMATION, THE CHANGE POES NOT INVOLVE AN INCREASE IN PROBABILITY OF OCCURENCE OR C3NSE00ENCES OF.AN ACCIDENT OR MALFUNCTION OF EOUIP-MENT IMPORTANT TO SAFETY OVEa PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS IN THE SAFETY ANALYSIS RE-PORT; OR CREATE POSSIBILITY FOR ACCIDENT OR MALFUNCTION OF A DIFFERENT TYPE OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIO4S IN THE SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORTI OR REDUCE THE MAR-GIN OF SAFETY AS DEFINED IN THE EASIS FOR ANY TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION.
~
THE EVALUATION DETERMINED THAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY 3UEST10N DID NOT EXIST.
3 REPORT SAFETY EVALUATION ITEM ID 87 NE-52-0392 CMP ST-1111 REVISED FSAR FIG MU2EF81 TO SHOW ADDED RfD PRO 9ES IN UNS POND CMS 97-1111 FEVISED FSAR FIG MU2EFB1 TO SH0b ADDED RfD PA06ES INTO THE UMS POND TO TAKE READINGS OF AVERAGE WATER TEMPERATUPE.
THE CHANGE ENNANCED SYSTEM M041TORING SY PROVIDING AN ACCURATE AND RELIABLE MEASUREMENT OF THE UNS POND TEMPEPATURE. THIS CHANGE DID NOT ADVERSELY IMPACT PLANT SAFETY.
PURSUANT TO THE ABOVE INFORMATION, THE CHANGE DOES NOT INWOLVE AN INCREASE IN PROBASILITY OF OCCURENCE OR CONSEGUENCES OF AN ACCIDENT OR MALFUNCTION OF EOUIP-MENT IMPORTANT TO SAFETY OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS IN THE SAFETY ANALYSIS RE-r)
PORT; OR CRFATE POSSIBILITY FOR ACCIDENT OR MALFUNC1 ION OF A DIFFERENT TYPE OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS IN THE SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT; OR REDUCE THE MAR-GIN OF SAFETY AS DEFINED IN THE BASIS FOR ANY TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION.
3
~
THE EVALUATION SETERMINED THAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFE 1Y QUESTION DID NOT EXIST.
~)
(%
0F UNIO..N ELECT.RIC QPPO;VED.
- ~ _ _, t)
CEP RT SAFETY EVALUATIO1
~~ "~
~
(3 /
~~
~ ITEM ID
~
38 RFR,NO.6289 REVISED FSAR FIG 9.3-5 TO REFLECT REM _0 VAL OF SPRING IN VALVES _
NE-90-9994 MELP SEAT CHECK VALVES LF-W3829 AND LF-Vf831 IN THE FLOOR AND EOUIPMENT DRAINS
~ ()
RFR N0.6289 REVISED FSAR FIG 9.3-5 TO REFLECT THE REROVAL OF A SPRING USED TO SYSTEM. THE FUNCTION OF THE VALVES WILL NOT BE ALTERED AND THE VALVES PROPERLY SEAT THEMSELVES DUE TO GRAVITY AND BACKPRESSURE FROM TME PROCESSED WATER.
()
PURSUANT TO THE ABOVE INFORMATION, THE CHANGE DOES NOT INVGLVE AN INCREASE IN PROBABILITY OF OCCURENCE OR CONSEGUENCES OF AN ACCIDENT OR MALFUNCTION OF EQUIP-MENT IMPORTANT TO SAFETY OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS IN THE SAFETY ANALYSIS RE-s-) l PORT; OR CREATE POSSIBILITY FOR ACCIDENT OR MALFUNCTION OF A DIFFERENT TYPE OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS IN THE SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORTJ OR REDUCE THE PAR-GIN OF SAFETY AS CEFINED IN THE BASIS FOR ANYsTECHNICAL SPECIFICATION.
(j THE EVALUATION DETERMINED THAT AN UNREVIEEED SAFETY
()
GUESTION DID NOT EAIST.
a QEPO2T SAFETY EVALUATION ITEM ID 89 NE-96-2006 RFR 40.6912 REVISED FSAR FIG 9.3-1 TO SHOW SIGNAL SWAP FOR AIR SUPPLY INSTRUMEN RFR NO.6912 REVISED FSAR FIG 9.3-1 TO SHOW A SWAP IN SIGNAL SOURCE FOR INSTau-MENT AIR SUPPLY.
THE CMANGE AVOIDS A SITUATION WHERE INSTRUMENT AIR SUPPLY COULD BE LOST WITHOUT AFFECTING THE MAIN CONTROL BOARD INDICATOR BY ISOLATING (j
AIR AT THE DRYERS. THE CHANGE ALLOWS THE CONTROL ROOM INDICATOR TO MONITOR INSTRUMENT AIR HEADER PRESSURE RATHER THAN RECEIVER PRESSUPE. TNIS WILL ALLCW ACCUPATE INDICATION OF INSTRUMENi AIR PRESSURE EVEN WITH THE DR4ERS ISCLATED, (y
AND WILL ALLOW OPERATORS MORE TIME TO RECOVER FROM AN EVENT.
PURSUANT TO THE ABOVE INFORMATION, THE CHANGE COES NOT INVOLVE AN INCAEASE IN PR06 ABILITY C1 OCCURENCE OR CONSEGUENCES OF AN ACCIDENT OR MALFUNCTION OF EGUIP- (y MENT IMPORTANT TO SAFETY OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS IN THE SAFETY ANALYSIS RE-PORTJ OR CREATE POSSIBILITY FOR ACCIDENT OR MALFUNCTION OF A DIfFERENT TYPE OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS IN THE SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORTI CR REDUCE THE PAR-()
GIN OF SAFETY AS DEFINED IN THE BASIS FOR ANY TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION.
FHE FVALUATION DETERMINED THAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETT
{p GUESTION DID NOT EAIST.
O t) t)
~
()
f
a.-
+
p e
f r.
=
3 4.,
m 4
g l
he v
'v J
v sd
.i J
d a
e.
-w l
l 1
I l
j i
I i
t 4
l f,
h f
i l
t i
I I
j kl 4
A E'
RM RM Wk W
l MDS MDI i
W<
E J
OW G H e
mW essW wwsW e mW HwwsWe i
i ki O
E M
kW M
ek WM Am N-mM t>
wmMbe WO W4mM>e O-Oke WOMME M
JP FWOMkE f
4 ',
WW e s
M W
- s M
E WWWWE.
WR>kW e J
>WEW2>kW e 3
30080 30J323 O
OWWW3OJgE3
' Mt EMJ40 MM*WHO O
2WE MMeWHO JHWEJ kEm M
A 4R4h Mrs M
4 3-(>
' SWMMWW EEEEu%WW>
M JKNWm 43 mud J
@OWM(R mug O'
WOWWk D>mDW W
WW D
D>mDu M'
SEOM Wa> MOM 3
M MAWm>MeM i
WWkMa
>JWQws a
JOMM>JWOWm
=
e4 Em HM Jem mM OMEwdam aM i
W' 04m OEW4 W
2 O
MMO&44 W
W:
>2W M
RW M
We M
MW 4
mEWOM EE mOA W
EEE wCL O'
OW Jo MOWO M
JM eOMOWO M
l W8 K
es J
OMJ E
n W
WWOJR
>>>R>J M
ODOJkkkEkJ E'
OEMew OE Owe D
kWogCE Owe s
I M
kWO EWEMOW m
RAWRWRMCW i
kWEMJ OMkhM 1
J M
OMkhM M
m.
=EmMM MM Wws w
M WMJMMM WWm w
j
. t, Ol U k W > D.
WWMast m
e dew >WUMas*
m O
SEm-O u r De W
=
m3DEOWa3 W
=
R JOOA e40mMW M
a mbagomMW H
g O,
WW W
MJMk o
W@
MJMk I
Me E
EWE WRheM e
m REkWWR>sM A
j k
WMEN
@ EWE >>
W HMME@(CE>>
W 4'
WD
>, R D
JE 3
W 3WME D
JE 3
l l
W, 300 w
swJE44 W
WWADemJReg W
i O
N W>O Rowoz M
=
>=MoEO<Or M
l' J'
OBJ
. W D
ME 0
40 WW 4E D
W' W W M W E'.
MWk O
W L
e WM MWk O
W r
M sl OkeoW WW awm a 3
kWs WW a>m a
W r.
mWE 5'
MWMWW X
DEkkEWWWW R
M E'
WW %4 HEDOWM D
C OMEDOWM D
Oi WOKW WOMmM N
O WR WOMmu s
40 m
(J CW gDMW4M M
N O
tDMWWH E
EWM MWWMW MODWM4 1
M emORODWH4 4
EDE El mEMkR' OWWW W
I MR HOWWW e
200 4'
OW4 MME W
W w
I OJOMMa W
H M ;1 M M
WM EE H2mWEW W
e PMW WEAWEW 4
hk i m EMWDW esO ONE E
e>>Owo ONE E
kud Al Em>OEWKm DWWREWWm EQD WWE W
E EJ4K W
X O
u Wi AM WMMOW>>ME O
M
@w Os>>ME O
awe i
M' W
OWMwCOM M
W m
MokkmOOM M
W WM>
M M e e E>3 MM M e mmWJR MM E e g (J W D
Ma@E WMWWJRO M k b a
WWFMW>JEO Mk W
WWR@WE WWMOW FM e
EMMO WHM OW EM
,J W >
E WkMME WRWSMR EM M
d 3
WFWWMR EM i
eWM EROMMMDWmMkM WM m
Mk RDWmMkM WM l
DJW N
WWW 40sWMew kW SJJOOweMem MW SWh e
NWMOE2mDMMDW W
O MWMSDMMDW W
3 E
N-D H
su OJO Q>
W ODEkuu OJO Ok
- WM s'
NkeH k
WOAE o
M wmWw Wote O
O M
em MMDWOP
>M RE M
M 4 OhWCW
>M RK SMR e'
MOWM202 WWW O
MMMMX WWW O
M2W W
- AW M >>mkk MO W
WW WWmkk MO eDM e
WEMkW4 02WMk HM a
W WE O24M>
HM M >
PD>WEJO WWDM eO usEDO MWDM se MwM W
MK4W
>>>EDW D
M Okup>>ECW-D Uus M-4 Wksa WKWMm J2 W
4m O
HsWMm JR l
l m
,3 MMME OkMO DW wo M
- 1 Gu>MO De so W
4 4
E MMOzJarWM
> H N
MKr aJaEWM
>M
()
e 40>
MJ4MEON WW e
NWMOMM EON WW e
6, BMWk EDSM Em M
C e>RWDOM Am M
e t >202 MW n
O WW y
OHa>Mg n O WW SWER@kMWWWE 13 E > W J u sD > > W ED SEJ DMDOMEWE NO E
MWODOMEWP MO l
E WJOONAEWo>M m
E>amWCDM l
W' R&4MEM
&CAO@
K mAOR AE40@
- WOWQum WDWM l
{
8 4
i O
O M
M I
l 4
W-4 4
D e
D M
J 9-4 G
l 1
4 S
4 e3 i
e a
l
l W
W W
i i
W K
W E
m I
I
(
W M
M 4
W W
EES ste t
owe CWS i
6>
sk WM WM
'K K
b x
~...
-. -.. ~
. ~ _. -.. _
CF UNIC.O ELECT.OIC CPPCOVED_
__. i QEPC3T SAFETY EVALUATION
,p TO DELETE INPO ACCREDITED TRAINING DESCRIPTIONS 92 LF-98-0C16 CM 89-53 54 13.2 REVISED FSAR CN 89-53 SA 13.2 REVISED YMIS FSAR SECTION TO DELETE INPO ACCRE*ITED TRAINING
()
DESCRIPTIONS FROM THE FSAR.
THE DESCRIPTIONS ARE REPLACED WIT
- A REFV.RENCE TO THE ACCREDITATION DATE AND THE PROGRAM PROCEDURE NUM8ER. THIS CONSTITUTES
~
DOCUMENTATION ONLY CMANGES AND NOT PROGRAM CONTENT. THE CNANGE IMPLEMENTS TME
()
GUIDANCE OF NRC GENERIC LETTER 67-37,NUREG 1262,1DCFR55.31,AND ifCFR55 59.
PUASOANT TO THE ABOVE INFORMATION, THE CHANGE DOES NOT INVOLVE AN INCREASE IN PROBAeILITY OF OCCURENCE OR COWSEQUENCES OF AN ACCIDENT OR MALFUhCTION OF E4UIP-()
MENT IMPORTANT TO SAFETY OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS IN THE SAFETY ANALYSIS RE-PCRT; OR CREATE POSSIBILITY FOR ACCIDENT OR MALFUNCTION OF A DIFFERENT TYPE OVER PREVIOUS EV4LUATIONS IN TME SAFETY ANALYSIS, REPORT; OR REDUCE THE MAR-(,
GIN OF SAFETY AS DEFINEC IN THE BASIS FOR ANY TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION.
THE EVALUATION DETERMINED THAT Ak UNREVIEWED SAFETY 4,
JUESTION DID NOT EXIST.
6 REPORT SAFETY EVALUATION ITEM ID 93 NE-89-0083 CMP 66-1922 MODIFIED THE D/G ROOM COOLING ARRANGEMENT CMP SE-te22 MODIFIED THE D/G RCOM COOLING ARRANGEMENT TO PREVENT AC J??fon OF LO4 TEMPERATURE ALARMS 8EFORE SUPPLY FAN THAT COOLS THE DIESEL AND THE KEEP
()
WARM SYSTEMS CYCLES OFF. THIS MODIFICATION CHANGES AIR DISTRIBUTION WITMIN THE 200N,80T TOTAL AIR FLOW IS UNALTERED, AND THE MINIMUM AMOUNT OF OUTSIDE AIR (p
SUPPLIED TO THE ROOM IS UNALTERED.
PURSUANT TO THE A90VE.INFORMATION, THE CHANGE DOES NOT INVOLVE AN INCREASE IN PR094BILITY OF OCCURENCE OR CONSEQUENCES OF AN ACCIDENT GR MALFUNCTION OF EQUIP-MENT IM*0RTANT TO SAFETY OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS IN THE SAFETY ANALYSIS RE-PORT; OR CREATE POSSIBILITY FOR ACCIDENT OR MALFUNCTION OF A DIFFERENT TYPE OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS IN THE SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT; OR REDUCE THE MAR-GIN OF SAFETY AS DEFINED IN THE BASIS FOR ANY TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION.
()
THE EVALUATION DETERMINED TMAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY
()
QUESTION DID NOT EXIST.
9 5
~
()
~.
i
.,,c,=3,,3,L,,,,L. REPORT SUMMARIES ^ ^
~~-
-- p, v
OF UNION ELECT _CIC CPPROVED. _ _ _
REP!OT SAFETY EVALUATION 94 NE-89-d884 CMP 88-1845 ADDED A TELEPMONE TO NOT TOOL ROOM IN THE AUXILIARY SLDG CMP 88-1945 ADDED A TELEPHONE TO THE NOT TOOL ROOM IN THE AURILIARY SLDG TD (3
ALLOW PERSONNEL TO VERIFY TOOL AVAILABILITY PRIOR TO ENTERING TNIS RADIATION CONTROLLED AREA. THE PLANT TELEPHONE SYSTEM WILL NOT BE AFFECTED. THE NEW
~
TELEPHONE AND THE ENTIRE PHONE SYSTEM IS NONSAFETY-RELATED. NEW CONDUIT WAS ~
(3 ROUTED WITHOUT SEPARATION VIOLATIONS OR SEISMIC II/I CONCERNS. FSAR FIG 9.5.2-1, WAS REVISED.
PURSUANT TO THE AB0VE INFORMATION, THE CHANGE DOES NOT INVOLVE AN INCREASE IN (i
PPO* ABILITY OF OCCURENCE OR CONSE9UENCES OF AN ACCIDENT OR MALFUNCTION OF EOUIP-MENT IMPORTANT TO SAFETY OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS IN THE SAFETY ANALYSIS RE-PORTI OR CREATE POSSIeILITY FOR ACCIDENT OR M4LFUNCTION OF P. DIFFERENT TYPE
(;
OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS IN THE SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORTI OR REDUCE THE MAR-GIN OF SAFETY AS DEFINED IN THE BASIS FOR ANY TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION.
'> 3:
THE EVALUATION DETERMINED THAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION DID NOT EXIST.
b REPOST SAFETY EVALUATION ITEM ID 95 NE-03-0222 OTS-KE-00012iREV 7 *ROCEDURE REVISI.ON FOR ALTEPNATE GAS SUPPLY TO PNEUMATIC SEA OTS-KE-C*012,REV 7 PROCEDURE REVISICM ALLOWED THE USE OF AN ALTERN ATE G AS SUPPLY j'
TO THE SPENT FUEL POOL GATE PNEUNATIC SEALS. TO PERFORM MAINTENANCE ON THE COMPPESSED AIR SYSTEN OR WHEN BOTH SEALS ARE LEAKING,A TEMPORARY GAS SUPPLY IS NEEDED TC MAINTAIN PRESSURE TO ThE SPENT FUEL POCL GATE SEALS. THE PORTABLE GAS
+:
CYLINDER 4AS SUPPORTED IN A MANNER TO PREVENT IT FROM BECOMING A PROJECTILE.
PURSUANT TO THE ABOVE INFORMATION, THE CHANGE DOES NOT INVCLVE AN INCREASE IN PROBABILITY OF OCCURENCE 04 CONSEOUENCES OF FN ACCIDENT OR MALFUNCTION OF ECUIP-g:
MENT IMPORTANT TO SAFETY OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS IN THE SAFETY ANALYSIS RE-PORTI OR CREATE POSSIBILITY FOk ACCIDENT OR MALFUNCTION OF A DIFFERENT TYPE OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS IN THE SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORTI OR REDUCE THE MAR-();
GIN OF SAFETY AS DEFINED IN THE BASIS FOR ANY TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION.
THE EVALUATION DETERNINED THAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY 3:
QUESTION DID NOT EXIST.
s-
-e e
=
- u
_ ~
- =
9--
P m
s' m
m.
m
p
.a OF UNION ELECTOIC CPPOOCED
~
WRITTEN SAFETY EVALUATIONS REP 33T,_
SAFETY EVALUATION (3
ITEM ID
,_ J6 NE-90-9208 RFR NO.7116 REVISED FSAR FIG 13.&-5 TO ADD DRAIN LINES _IN CONDENSATE POLISMER _
RFR N0.7116 REVISED FSAR FIG 12.4-5 TO ADD DRAIN LINES TO THE CONDENSATE POLISH-()
ER REGENERATION SEID ACID AND CAUSTIC MIXING TEES. THE CHANGE ALLOWS DRAINING OF THE MINING TEE AND ASSOCIATED DISCHARGE PIPING FOR NONROUTINE MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES. THE MODIFICATION ENWANCES PERSONNEL SAFETY WHILE PERFORMING MAINTEN-()
ANCE ACTIVITIES. THE CONDENSATE POLISMER REGENERATION SKID MAS NO SAFETT DESIGN BASIS AND SERVES NO SATETY-RELATED ECUIPMENT.
PURSUANT TO THE ABOVE INFORMATION, THE CHANGE DOES NOT INVOLVE AN INCREASE IN
()
PR0eABILITY OF OCCURENCE OR CONSEQUENCES OF AN ACCIDENT OR MALFUNCTION OF EQUIP-MENT IMPORTANT TO SAFETT OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS IN TME SAFETY ANALYSIS RE-PORTI OR CREATE POSSIBILITY FOR ACCIDENT OP S4(FUNCTION OF A DIFFERENT TYPE
()
OVER PREVIOUS EV ALU ATIONS IN THE S AFETY ANALISIS'REPORTI OR REDUCE THE MAR-GIN OF SAFETY AS DEFINED IN THE BASIS FOR ANY TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION.
f' )
THE EVALUATION DETERMINED TMAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY
^
QUESTION DID NOT EXIST.
.)
REPCGT SAFETY EVALUATION ITEM ID
, y 97 NE-03-0209 RFR No.7193 REVISED FSAR FIG 9.4-6 FOR CORRECT CONFIG. OF UNIT VENT LOW PT DR AI RFR NO.7193 REVISED FSAR FIG 9.4-6 FCR THE CORRECT CONFIGURATION OF THE UNIT
()
VENT LOW POINT DRAINS.
THE DRAINS PREVENT MOISTURE BUILDUP IN TME DUCT t!ORK OF THE EMMAUST FANS CONNECTED TO THE UNIT VENT.
THIS CHANGE REVISES DOCUMENTATION AND MAS AO IMPACT ON SYSTEM OPERATION 02 PLANT SAFETY.
('g PURSUANT TO THE AB0VE INFORMATION, TME CHANGE DOES h0T INVOLVE AN INCREASE IN PROSABILITY OF OCCURENCE OR CONSECUENCES OF AN ACCIDENT OR MALFUNCTION OF EQUIP-MENT IMPORTANT TO SAFETY OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS IN THE SAFETY ANALYSIS RE-(3 PORTI OR CREATE POSSIBILITY FOR ACCIDENT OR MALFUNCTION OF A DIFFERENT TYPE OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS IN THE SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORTI OR REDUCE THE MAR-GIN OF SAFETY AS DEFINED IN THE BASIS FOR ANY TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION.
().
THE EVALUATION DETERMINED TMAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY OUESTION DID NOT EXIST.
()
J 8 i
')
~
(?
e f
. 2-m
.* eMUFb--- -'
dtfEG%. Mn m
~.. ww u w.+nw. v w v m
,,.r. u
%==. w m -m p
p p
p om e
e r.
n as m.
a p
,s
.=
m (J
d
%s e
v b
ur w
b L
L
- s. -
- /
k
}
j f
i 1
k 4
1 I
k I
1 E
E 4
l c-EM J
FM e
+
s i
o M30 e
MDB 2
MDB j
4' 1
1 a
e ow w
ow 4
ew' t
t j
R wwmwe z wwawl WWswl G.-
o M
AK M
M AN 4
M AE M
shM>e WhM>d O
WhM>4 O'
W woHWE M
Jk woMME M
W WOMME ERM s
M M E e w
M WRO E
M E
Woe WE>>w e m
DwM au2>>W e MM WE>kW, e of MS MoJXE2 m
etw32oJXER 42, SOJREE m'
Who MMewho ak>oMMwwho 4
o MMawko
- MWW kas M
MMJM H2m M
EM kas M
I I
Mi w
NW4wwk J
EDektunwwk Wok-Ru(wwk 4
6 W
Mkk WR hud M
G>usz wud M
ood: **
kW4 i
e WoJ D>hDu D
kw E
D>mDu HEW D>hDW d
s J
>EM wwkMOM e
W EDwwkMOM N
M whkMOM f
I e
JAD DJWOww I
weoh>Jwowb W
Jkm DJwcWh D; 4 J4h EM M
JMM Jew WM E
OWM-Jew EM
>we OEEE W
4 kwkEoEs4 u
o WRW oEWW W
R-am >
M WW w>4w>
M Ew b
EMW D
M WW M
EM4 RE EOA N
NJJkEN h0L E
>mk 2K hok s
Mm MoWo M
o MOMMOWo M
o M4M 1
M o w o.. M j
l a
4 w
z et a
o>M>
x es W
W z
MMwkkuka
> z kkkups t
o swa kukaka.
or om m
om oa4 u vue om one O
)
2 i
O E
zwzMou >
e ma*>rwmMou
=
wzM awmMoW >
[
E 405 OMk&M N
m iWFW OMH&M k
aWM OMkkM f
4 Boo MM uw2 w
m mEwdMM uwE w
3 K
w MM WWE w
,A l
EWS wumagt w
w EDrawuMEEZ m
owe wuMrsz m
l k
ouRD ul 4 e
->=MO oD wmDKoWE w
4 WE owed W
4 q
y 1
t a kne O=owMw, M
Mw M
O
> > OsowMw M
t
,i w zow MJMk e
wMk MJMk J
w m
MJMk i! -
j wh>
WEbeM 9 O
m eEMkw2kEM O
e ERM WFkdM O
Q
>WW
@McE>>
w mM to@m4E>>
w how G4WE>>
w 3
ww r D
Ja 3
w MBE D
JK 3
W mW X
D J#
3 6
f O
MwE WhJkqq
'w J
WE Wh JEs4 w
I 2
J
( bJEs4 W
,a d
i 1
E ORk Rosor M
m JwWWEceor M
M o3u KoeOE M
M Ewo u >
WE w
m>2wW D
WW a
Eo W
(E I
MWW Mwk o
w eMMo Hwk o w a
MJO Mwk o
W y
M e
o' ww R>m a
>>>Oww E>m a
D mR ww R>m E
W
> oJM zuMwk R
A MM EWMwk a
> o a
SuMwk I
4 J
M kww MzDewM D
a O
MekzDowM D
kw MEDOwM D
(f I
m M3 WoMhM 4
EkME w o M e* H 4
ow w o M m s4 l
(T O O
WW
. RODWH4 4
w a
2GDWMW 4
W I RM EODuMe e
%DMW4H 2
( Nw4 %DMWWM E
8 W
O
%DMW4H 2
EWM N
4 MG 3
EDE e
NOR eowww a P Jw>owwe a
e 4DD owwd a DoD e
MOMMA w
e l o>JMMa w
eMo MME w
k f
MEM DW3wk2hEZw 4
e POMEME4EEW W
DME WEAEZW 4
ak e
x4mmo Orz z n
eWmono okx x
e us ao opz E
4 k&W M
WWwWEWam e
WWWh M
Gw
- Eumm 54D b
e ONE W
W FoFW W
W E
MEMES w'
E o
J w@
Jow>>ME O
M is o k o o a > > M R A
mM room >>ME O
bWW 5
Ewdho9k M
w w
M>
Mhook M
w G
CoMh ook M
- W WMD 4
EM ENE MM 3 e wuCHE MM E e E
MWE MM E e UEW M
d>>DMWhJRO Mk a
( w(MWhJ20 M k M
4WHUMW>JFO HM M.
MJ WkMow EM
= awn >
WpMow EM
=
Mzum WpMow EM 4
'J u >
mm eMwawmMa wM M
enomwwweM a mM skwDwEwmMr mM-e tswk O
&WE>wwwkM wM m
M M w>wmMkw WM e
sh>wmMkN wm 11 DJw w
OD>MOs= Mew kw mMMEoweMem
> w w
OOm os=Mem
>w rww wMJemDMMDw w
A DMDmDMHDw w
wzoEmDMMDw w
E W-sE4W OJO Ok w
Co4uWW oJO uk W
M4Wwau OJO Ok l
MEM W
uw>w Wohe o
WM o uote o
w W
> uoke o
l 1
o a wz swok
>M az
>wwowok
>M rz a
wkwMwok
>M zu p
i nMa a
rMw z
wwd o
O 4er z
www o a
saz>x www O
MEW o
adWEpbkk MO A
ObwMWwh>
Me O
KwkMkmkk MO
,/
i
.eDe u
O Do orem>
HM D
a aw ozwM>
WM W
om omeMk WM h-4 5
WKJMo aw3>
WO De
>o s w D H' WO WO Ho 4WDM Wo k]
m 3
4: **
zkwo ><
Eo n m O>>Mo
>< co N
mowaHMo
>4 do mhM N
wwkkkkmow D
4 oHJk>> tow D
A sup>ksow 3
1 aos
> Nkov bwWMm Jz M
wwro MaWMm Jr m
OEmW MaWMw Wr l
W 6
h.
43EDEJAEWM
>M N
MIM EdJEEWM
>M N.
kWEEFJa#WM DM J
o N
w w = M r. o =
wk e
NokMcMEo=
wp NOM.
oH4MEo=
wk 1
o.
swJ DeM sw M
o eMe Dew aw M
o DmM sw M
M z
oJWEM4 o
ww a
OkawMe o ww r
owh>Ma o
wm a
i amawam>>w xD eMowamMka zD r>Momokka zD i
E' WMHDOEMw2 MO W
OMEDo2Nw2 WU E
EQEDOREW2 MU
'a i
l' h
h KWEMAwwoDM m
WFM*Anwo>M h
WD2 kmwo>M i
a woA>
asnow a mows s E A o ie
= wooo aEtoo (I
l l
4 54MM uwoW EEWO l
I, H
I l
j 3
l t
l 9
a E
I R
g i
l(
l O
o o
l, M
M M
e 4
P W
N 4
m T
D D
D w
t l*
i J
B J
G J
u A
1 4
8 4
m 4
m s
e e
a i
WO4 WOG weg b
s' M*
Me Ma 0
0 g
W W
w w
W E'
W F
w 3
l g
w w
g
}
}
C 4
4 l
n l
3 i
4
'I f
1 e
i j
g EEO EES gro e
I ow>
owe ows n
h' f
Ak Ek Akw t
i WM WM ww E
E g
a p
k i,y i >,..
y.,
pe+
y*
' ' 'go,,c g% e ;.,
gq
,., 5 g
,, g,, g.,
.j.
p w, +-es, -,ge, -e
.. g er+ie
- e suo uN-e
'g,
, e
!.4 k
- )
- U 9
._ _ _ _. - ~^
~15CFRSS 5'TANNUAC CEPIOT ~$UMM,0IES'
- ' ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
- ~ ' ~ ~ " ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~
C'
- - _. _ _ ~
OF UNION ELECTRIC APPO2VED-REP 02T'
. SAFETY EVALUATION
_~
__ 191 NE-98-0815 CN 89-32,$P T3.9(N) REVISE _D FSAR ACTIV_E COMPONEN_T TABLES TO REMOVE, __
CN 89-32,SP T3.9(N) REVISED THE FSAR ACTIVE COMPOWENT TABLES TO REMOVE RELIEF
().
VALVES FROM THE TABLE SINCE THEY ARE NOT ACTIVE COMPONENTS. THE SUBJECT RELIEF VALVES FUNCTION TO PROVIDE OVERPRESSURE PROTECTION FOR ASSOCIATED PIPING /COMPON-ENTS. THE CHANGE IN STATUS Fa0M ACTIVE TO PASSIVE WILL NOT ELIMINATE PERIODIC
' ().
VERIFICATIONS OF FUNCTIONABILITY,BUT ELIMINATE THE NEED FOR ASME SECTION XI INSERVICE TESTS FOR ACTIVE RELIEF VALVES.
PURSUANT TO THE ABOVE INFORMATION, THE CHANGE DOES NOT INVOLVE AN INCREASE IN rgl PROBABILITY OF OCCURENCE OR CONSECUENCES OF AN ACCIDENT OR MALFUNCTION OF ECUIP-MENT IMPORTANT TO SAFETY CVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS IN THE SAFETY ANALYSIS RE-PORTI OR CREATE POSSIBILITY FOR ACCIDENT OR M$LFUNCTION OF A DIFFERENT TYPE
~
OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATION 3 IN THE SAFETY ANALYSIS'REPORTI OR REDUCE ThE MAR-GIN OF SAFETY AS DEFINED IN THE BASIS FOR ANY TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION.
- 1!
THE EVALUATION DETERMINED THAT AN UEREVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION DID NOT EXIST.
9 REPORT SAFETY EVALUATION ITEM 13
' 3; 4
132 NE-90-0317 CN 90-03 SP 9.5.1 REVISED FSAR FOR ACTIONS TAKEN AFTER FIRE ANNUNCIATION IN CR
+
CN 9C-93 SP 9.5.1 REVISED THE FSAR FOR THE ACTIONS TO BE TAKEN UPON A FIRE (j '.
l ANNUNCIATION IN THE CONTROL FOOM FOR TROUBLE IN A FIRE DETECTION ZONE. ORIGIN-ALLY AN OPERATOR WAS DISPATCHED TO INVESTIGATE VIA VISUAL INSPECTION. N0W THE ASSOCIATED DETECTION ZONE IS ASSUMED INOPERABLE AND ELECTRICAL MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL MUST VERIFY AN ELECTRICAL PROBLEM IN THE FIELD. TMIS CHANGE ONLY ADDRESSES ACTIONS TAKEN BY CONTROL ROGM PERSONNEL AND HAS NO IMPACT ON THE FUNCTION OF THE FIRE AND SMOKE DETECTION SYSTEM OR ON VISUAL AND AUDIBLE INDIC-1-
ATIONS TO THE CONTROL ROOM.
8Y ASSUNING A DETECTION ZONE IS IN0PERA8LE UPOW RECEIPT OF THE TROUBLE SIGNAL ENSURES THAT THE APPROPRIATE COMPENSATORY PEA-PJRES ARE IN PLACE.
()i PURSUANT TO THE AB0VE INFORMATION, THE CHANGE DOES NOT INVOLVE AN INCREASE IN l
PROBASILITY OF OCCURENCE OR CONSEQUENCES OF AN ACCIDENT OR MALFUNCTION OF EOUIP-MENT IMPORTANT TO SAFETY OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS IN THE SAFETY ANALYSIS RE-g):
PORTI OR CREATE POSSIBILITY FOR ACCIDENT OR MALFUNCTION OF A DIFFERENT TYPE OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS IN THE SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORTI 04 REDUCE THE MAR-l GIN OF SAFETY AS DEFINED IN THE 6 ASIS FOR ANY TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION.
. 3 l
THE EVALU4 TION DETERMINED THAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY CUESTION DID NOT EXIST.
():
~
(':
I l
v m+..
(*
(
3 n
~
~
p mea J
%d w
r e
4 i
i e
t j
I 1
4 4
- Wi W
e A
i J
W e
OO EM W
H EM
}
W E
1
>>WE MDS E
EW MD0
}-
J ME ekJ MWe WWmW1 w
kMMJ WWWW I t
MW MW kJJe Ow M
MMOD OW W
MEWWJJEE>
M tw pm he M
AK
+
D J e WW4WMWWJ whM>W JwWWWW
<hMME b
wkON kDeWEm WOMME e>WDM WOMME j
DJ E
w M
a M
b.kMW& hew
> > C. J > O 3;
E>vW exww vE>>W.
4
.wd v3-kW e i
W EMMEWJOWSM EOJEEE S
hakDOO EOJEEE 4
E' Sw euwa M
MMWwho 1
O M
MMeWHO I
I l
i E-EMJww
=
Mk Ew4wWk m
kMWEJE Ev4Wwk wM>WE4EAMO4 kEm M
o ulWWW MEN M
?
M; 494kWOW G
WE kWW MWJMSN ME bud W
EEEERWIWW D>hDW E
MWD e
D>hDW J.
EdwCMM ECEA WhkMOM W
JEhEEE WbkMOM i
w kwMk4kMwMM A
>JWOWh W
WO4
>JWOWh j
D DMME ukko J46 EM N
WWhEME J46 MM j
bl hh4 EMDD E
DE44 w
W C34>
OE44 W
O J40Mv>40 M
=W W
wh w
M uw l
i E-kWw u se Em EOA OOWWas Ew EOA 1
O' WEEDHONOkkW Mowo M
W D
DE W eMOWO M
g MWWhMOD M4 E
et M
JMJMW3M E
i
[
l 38 DE MkkE 4
kkHEW J WW4k OkkkkRkJ t
O MGkWWWRO>O OR Oma W
EMD WJECE Que M
W ERJw>wWJE EWEMOu 3
MW We WRWEMou M
E4MwS&WOwm OMHAM M
w EWW
>E QMkhM M
3 DAE JMNEM MM uwz W
w OwECOJWMM uWt W
N' hCMWWwW w
WWMERE h
MEMEJwwWuMEKE E
w E M'w w 3OE MJ M
Our3 w
=
=
MkkD>EOv2D w =
k O
s4MeJ<>n>
O=OEMW M
O ODM MOMwOwohMw M
' M JEM444W M%J MJMH E
WOE EME HJMH
{
l E'
JMDE EDW3 a
WEkeH O
WWMWMWEWEkeH e
0:
(<>=JobE wE wwga>>
w M
MwJe
>wwawE>>
w I
l w
te
> > E =. E D
JE 3
W WWs 2
3 JE 3
OmmEwM i
1
\\
I' Dw3 E0
=kJa=<
w o
wWWmDwEchd===
w w.
i E'
ME4 EWWhW W
ZOWOZ M
E mEEWJM*EOMOR M
i
- a watEN mJM Mwk O
w Z
H
<>Co Mwk O
W i
mW
20=>
v >== >
HM>< Emu >
(=
t t
1 M
1 O,.
eOMME4WMDEh Ww E>h a
v 4kk wOww E>h a
t W
[
l h
W Ecuo eEwMwk E
3wenu mEuMwk E
M 6
OWHERWER MONEDOWH D
e WEDEWakEDowM D
e t e[
, W ERMWHM DO3DM wCMhM e
eEk Ms WOMEM M
W OMEO ZhowoEJsDMudM E
e Wwsk sDMueM E
EWM E
M M4WHOm JHWEobuMe g
kowM MEO>wMd 4
EDE 4
WEMEEM kJ DOWWW m
w
>Ww2EMWOWWW m
D E9 0 E
WCW@k3WWEW e Mwa W
a W&mWMwkMME w
k
- M fl M W
WMMW MEW WRMEANZW 4
wkMEJD WEbWEW 4
Ek i Mk l OSEDHDMMM* C ONE t
E s
DW JWWO ONE E
MAW K
DE OW WJdWEwth H
H e
EMohW4WEwKm WQD 4.
Apo>
k eE CAEw w
E a
eWWWEDMw W
E O
'd M
WMEJEM>MuwWwom>>M n A
e mEssk
>Om>>M E O
& W 'd W
MM>>
EMHash COM M
W O
WM 3ahCOM M
W WMD EMMEWMMMEX X
%M E e E
OkNW eWWE M M E e UEW N
45 6&
DMMOEWMW>JZQ Mk A
E wh>EMMWNJEO Mk k
e MOMEWWM3Mv0M ukMQw EM AWhJJ E
wkMow EM JWW hWMONEW W
%E WEWSME EM WHERWMWEWGME EM MWk e
W L
kuGMWOWWWhMkN WM E
WOWWWE
>WhMMM WM DJW e
OKWEm (E
DEJOnsMwh
>W M
Ewa EHWOmWM*h
>W EWh e
W OWCW
( WM4WmDMMDW w
k M k 40 OSDMMDW W
E 4
MWWh%QW E4W OJO QM M
WMW K eD( u OJO QW
( EM MO4 44WPhWE uGAs O
w M
M E E W.J uC44 O
O E
>D> mew 2OOaO>WCW
>M XX W@ao wwwCH
>M RE SME M
WJWCW@eM WMgE WWW o
MEW WEEE WWW D
MMW EuJN WEk>MwOkh>k Mn W
MEONWMkh>>
MO
- JH EWWEQW4kMDW OudM>
WM u
WWwwes OE4Mk HM t
W k
M.
@M
>O MaMENZO
- WDM wn M
ww@MawMO eWDH do MhM 1
M JwM>EWJMMwh>> SOW D
M E WWWWW>>uCW D
i MOE I OWJ><MAMEk>
MauMb JE a
>MWegWe NavM E JR E
3 m
>>Dw3EwomoMEMMC DW 40 W
EJE OEEMMO 40 u
W h
E dw2MEJhmWM DM M
W WW WEJhuwM DM M
E E
JMO GS O
MMEOw wk E
H3 eOWEwM EOm Wk e
W EO3WWEWZO eWLDmM
&b M
M EW WEWDEM bb M
WWWDMMEM*WwWMd
's O
WW M E se >
Ma C
WW E
WEh2 kJh>EWWMkkE ED W
WJE WW WWWW ED i
W ED O>
o O
DozmWE Ho e
UEMD4EWDOEMWE NO i
M WWW3WHEEWEKMAaWODM M
M> l COCE4mWO>M f
b MJEWWMO*EWOk EEAC@
E MMOEEm>
EEAOG I
EWWER>hEksh M E3eMWhO
?
h e
i i
e t
E E
O O
1 M
M
-3 4
4 e
4
)
D m
D e
J e
J W
l 4
W G.
l 4 i
l J;
l j
m' W
l-4 l
W J
W X
w h
4
=
H H
i EEM mE4 Owm OWO
?
Abe kwe a
wM wM t.
N E
a h
4
. _. ~.
CF CCION ELECTCIC CPPCCVED... - -.
c
~
L.'
AEP00T.
SAFETY EVALUATION i
ITEM ID (e
195 NE-90-9825 RFA NO.7847 REVISED FSAR FIG 9.5.2-2 FOR AS-9UIL7 FIELD CONFIGURATION RFR NO.7847 REVISED THE FSAR FIG 9.5.2-2 TO SHOW TWE AS-8UILT FIELD CONFIGURA-(N TION FOR A WIRING SEQUENCE IN THE PUBLIC ADDRESS,GAITRONICS, SYSTEM.
PURSUANT TO THE T80VE INFORMATION, THE CHANGE DOES NOT INVOLVE AN INCREASE IN OCC' RENCE OR CONSE00ENCES OF AN ACCIDENT OR MALFUNCTION OF ESUIP-(>
PR09AEILITY OF J
MENT IMPORTANT TO SAFETY OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS IN THE SAFETY ANALYSIS RE-PORTI 08 CREATE POSSIBILITY FOR ACCIDENT 04 MALFUNCTION OF A DIFFERENT TYPE OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS IN THE SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORTI OR REDUCE THE MAR-()
GIN OF SAFETY AS DEFINED IN THE BASIS FOR ANY TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION.
THE EVALUATION DETERMINED THAT AN UNREVIEWED JAFETY
(-
QUESTION DID NOT EXIST.
GEP02T SAFETY EVALUATION (S
ITEM ID 106 NE-90-8026 RFR NO.7478 REVISED FS A% FIGS 5.4-7,6.3-1,9.3-8 FOR NUMEROUS IhSTRU9ENTS RFR NO.7478 REVISED FSAR FIGS 5.4-7,6.3-1,AND 9.3-8 FOR NUMEROUS INSTRUMENTS SUPPLIED FOR SAFETY-RELATED APPLICATIONS IN THE CVCS SYSTEM,RHR SYSTEM,AND HIGH PRESSURE COOLANT INJECTION SYSTEMIBUT TdESE INSTRUMENTS LACKED THE MECES-SARY LUALIFICATIC1 AhD QUALITY ASSURANCE DOCUMENTATION. BASED UPON THE AUGMENT-ED CONTACLS IMPOSED BY WESTINGHOUSE DURING PROCUREMEhi AND THE SIMILARITY IN DESIGN TO OTHER CUALIFIED INSTRUMENTS,THESE COMMERCI ALLY SUPPLIED ITEPS ARE DEDICATED FOR SAFETY-RELATED USE. THIS ENSURES THAT THE FUNCTIONS ASSUMED IN THE FSAR ARE MAINTAINED.
([
PURSUANT TO THE A90VE INFORMATION, THE CHANGE DOES NOT INVOLVE AN INCREASE IN PROBASILITY OF OCCURENCE OR CONSEQUENCES OF AM ACCIDENT OR PALFUNCTION OF EQUIP-MENT IMPORTANT TO SAFETY OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS IN THE SAFETY ANALYSIS RE-PORTI OP CREATE POSSIBILITY FOR ACCIDENT OR MALFUNCTION OF A DIFFERENT TYPE OVEa PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS IN THE SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORTI 04 aEDUCE THE MAR-GIN OF SAFETY AS DEFINED IN THE BASIS FOR ANY TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION.
()
THE EVALUATION DETERMINED THAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION DID NOT EXIST.
i 3
.m
+
. ~
~ ~ ' ~
18CFCSS.59 ENNUT.L CEPORT SUMMA IES
(-
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
. CF U2 ION ELECTCIC CPPC' VED i
CEPS2T SAFETY EVALUATION l
ITED ID
,187 NE-98-8832 RFR N0.7951 ADDED FLANGED PIECE TO PRIMARY EVAP.80TTORS TANK RECIRC PIPING RFR NO.7951 ADDED A FLANGED SPOOL PIECE IN THE RECIRCULATION PIPING TO THE
(-
PRIMARY EVAPORATOR BOTTOMS TANK (PEBT).
THE SPOOL PIECE FACILITATES MAIN-TENANCE WHEN THE PIPE BECOMES PLUGGED.
IT ELIMINATES THE NEED TO CUT, l
REWELD, AND HYDR 0 STATICALLY TEST.
THIS PIPING SERVES AS A PRESSURE BOUNDARY FOR FLUIDS BEING PUMP (D IN RECIRCULATION TO THE PEBT. THE SAFETY EVALUATION CONCLUDED THIS TO BE AN EQUIVALENT HARDWARE REPLACEMENT OF WELDED PIPIEG l
WITH A FLANGED SPOOL PIECE IN THE RECIRCULATION LINE.
THE FLANGE HAS THE SAME TEMPERATURE, PRESSURE, AND MECHANICAL CHARACTERISTICS AS THE PI9ING; AND WAS BUTT JELDED WITHOUT USING BACKIMG RINGS TO MINIMIIE THE CREATICA 0F CRUD TRAPS IN THE PIPE.
THE AFFECTED EQUIPMENT SERVES No, SAFETY FUNCTION.
(
FIG 11.4-1 WAS REVISED.
INVOLVE AH INCREASE IN PURSUANT TO THE ABCVE INFORMATIONs THE CHANGE DOES NOT PROBASILITY OF OCCURENCE OR CONSEQUENCES OF AN ACCIDENT OR MALFUNfTION OF EQUIP-(7 MENT IMPORTANT TO SAFETY OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS IN THE SAFETY ANALYSIS RE-PCRTI CR CREATE POSSIBILITY FOR ACCIDENT OR MALFUNCTION OF A DIFFLRENT TYPE OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS IN THE SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORTI OR REOUCE THE MAR-GIN OF SAFETY AS DEFINED IN THE BASIS FOR ANY TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION.
TNE EVALUATION DETERMINED THAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY OUESTION DID NOT EXIST.
OEPORT SAFETY EVALUATION ITEM ID 105 NE-90-0333 CMP 88-1933 REVISED FSAR FIG 11.2-1 FOR INSTALLATION OF ACID METERING PUMP CMP E3-1033 REVISED FSAR F IG 11.2-1 FOR THE INSTALLATION OF AN ACID METERING PUMP AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT IN RADWASTE ROCM FOR PH ADJUSTMENT OF THE DISCHARGE MONITOR TAMES.
THESE TAMKS SERVE TO COLLECT POTENTIALLY CONTAMINATED LIQUID WASTE FROM VARIOUS SOURCES WITHIN THE PLANT.
TNIS PORTION OF THE LIQUID RADdASTE SYSTEM IS NOT SAFETY-RELATED.
THE INSTALLATION OF THE ACID INJECTION
. ')
SYSTEM WAS IN COMPLIANCE WITH LIQUID RADWASTE SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS.
PURSUANT TO THE A50VE INFORMATION, THE CHANGE DOES NOT INVOLVE AN INCREASE IN PR09 ABILITY OF OCCURENCE OR CONSEQUENCES OF AN ACCIDENT OR MALFUNCTION OF EQUIP-1ENT IMPORTANT TO SAFETY OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS IN THE SAFETY ANALYSIS RE-PORTI OR CREATE POSSIBILITY FOR ACCIDENT OR MALFUNCTION OF A DIFFERENT TYPE OVER PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS IN THE SAFETY ANALYSIS REPCRTI OR REDUCE THE MAR-GIN OF SAFETY AS DEFINED IN THE 6 ASIS FOR ANY TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION.
THE EVALUATION DETERMINED THAT AN UNREVIEWED SAFETY QUESTION DID NOT EXIST.
r
.m_
.__,.__._m___
__m~
M