NRC-90-0069, 1989 Annual Radiological Environ Monitoring Rept. W/900501 Ltr
| ML20042F795 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Fermi  |
| Issue date: | 12/31/1989 |
| From: | Sylvia B DETROIT EDISON CO. |
| To: | NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM) |
| References | |
| CON-NRC-90-0069, CON-NRC-90-69 NUDOCS 9005090399 | |
| Download: ML20042F795 (121) | |
Text
{{#Wiki_filter:J;jf
- e. n:tph sytyia
' Semor vice Presioent e
f TOl,f am uo,m oa,,, ny,o, Edison :==- May 1, 1990 , NRC-90-0069 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attention: Document Control Desk Washington, D. C. 20555 .
Reference:
Fermi 2 l NRC Docket No. 50-341 NRC License No. NPF-43 j
Subject:
Annual Radiological Environmental Operating-Report Pursuant to section 6.9 1 7 of the Technical-Specifications, please find attached the 1989 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report for Fermi 2. If you should'have any questions or comments regarding this report, please contact Barbara Siemasz, Compliance Engineer, at (313) 586-1683 Sincerely, l a}j) < ) cc: A. B. Davis R. W. DeFayette W. G. Rogers ~(w/ encl.) , J. F. Stang. (w/ encl.) Region III (w/ encl.) l l l. 0bk b b PDC41 \\ R \ l
I .
,,,, + ' ..
?? _l _ - e n , _E M. N M?%9fbr,u.si p *
- m; '"' #wW& 5?CWv6 en R W_Q wud %j %eb wy[? ,&.k! ,$q $59 &d($kih3h ; L hk\ W " L i
. t n naaspa . M ~ m..up,4.gw , r n n.s .' Q B u w h &' n . , [
=* ?
i , _ En{ viromnstau
.F , I'. _ .<sms, MCTli10IIilkhhfl Yd t
,3 4e ha]g3;pb $6hDf[ ~%g ~~4 g/ @ ,-
'M l p
-m l'hfp l 6).
's._$. m$ , '
h' th * ' . [$h",.. .
- m 2
;s .-- .,tm , _ x e ; eu E '"
ggp.m,.- w.,w ME$be '; e, ' . - s ,39 w
- aga 4N;pg m9' m(qq:
7 ig gy g. ~ m g y $ g. .h
+7 d +y p 94w saww
.x , s
% - - NSEE
,a wg -
l &
- k
' a;%)$
-;# l#
3, e o ( n . oll
,e
.g p
I
[I I I l RR_$_ wyr np &gamwsq%ma _R_REBRBEE.En,munmig%m dhe m m EE ym E= a ,,_ ,, _ , . . has g Mmw rnites nonn v1 i w#;yngg;g%%gwa,t
;p ;gy;9"gy3 p j
; 1, ,
g g As
,g,p
,W v y; 6;;ggg
;qga gggg g'ypygpyggy g a? wsdR4 u,,,,,vc. uia, iga,,
o,, g,, g,,,, _
- s- a v. ~ p p" g
. 9[ 21 0jy.: '
(ihS;f[%: ... [' ' 1. ,
't 1 h[e$$er,oh p l l Y %' $ P J l g wi %dh 17 cf,yi n 2 e %~;s +
e 7 g , e I g Tab e of Contents I I I I I I I
.~<. ..
g TABLE OF CONTENTS I Page Section 1: 1.0 introduction 2 2.0 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program 1 I. 2 2.1 Regulations
]
. 2' 2.2 Preoperational Program
- 23. Operational Program 2
2 2.4 Quality Control 1 3 3.0 Terrestrial Monitoring Program 3- 3.1 Introduction 3 3.2 Direct Radiation 'i
,k 4 3.3 Atmospheric Monitoring
= 4 3.4 Milk Sampling !
5 3.5 Garden Sampling l t 6 4.0 Aquatic Monitoring Introduction 6 4.1 6 4.2 Drinking Water
- 7. 4.3 Surface Water 7 4.4 Ground Water 7 4.5 Sediment Samples
., 8 4.6 Fish Samples 4
9 5.0 Land Use Census 9 5.1 ' 1989 Land-Use Census
- J 9 5.2 Resulta 10 Table 5.0-1 Residences 11 Table 5.0-2 Gardens-12 Table 5.0-3 Milk Locations 13 6.0 Program Execution 13 6.1 Thermoluminescent Dosimetry ,
-Il 13 14 6.2 6.3 Lower Limit of Detection Other Deviations From Program 15 7.0 Environmental Radiological Monitoring I Program Summary 22 8.0 Description of Fermi 2 Sampling Locations l
23 Table 8.0-1 Direct Radiation 26 Table 8.0-2 Fish and Sediment
;B' 27 Table 8.0-3 Milk 28 Table 8.0-4 Water 29 Table 8.0-5 Air Particulate /Alr lodine I:
U- :;
;I! . . . . . .
t I TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Section
' Continued 8.0 Description of Fermi 2 Sampling Locations 30 Table 8.0-6~ Food Products . Table 8.0-7 Land Use Census ,
32 Figure 1 Sampling Locations By Station Number (Site Area) ;
' 3:. 33 Figure 2 Sampling Locations By Station Number !
-[ (Greater Than 5 Miles) 34 Figure 3 Sampling Locations By Station Number (Less Than 10 Miles) . .
'. 35- - Figure 4 Sampling Locations By Station Number Site Area - Lake Erie 36 9.0 Complete Data Tables 101 Appendix A Interlaboratory Comparison Results .
t l - ?I g; g.
.IL
'I g
; i LI e
Ig
I _ L &e '\ N hionitoring direct (f. ,4, i\ [ l '
,y'9 i
l .
. ., / y
s l's',r','">bs' i air'sionescerst do.rirneters (TLDs)
;;7 i(*>)
I ,
,p ,
3 . within a ten mile radius around
- Fermi 2.
I Ag - ) y g .,
~
i e ii I ' *r* y gj ,g g % 7 4
.. s g Introduction i
I I I I I I I
. . . . . . . . . E
'O I 1989 Annual Radiological Environmental-Monitoring Report Page 1
1.0 INTRODUCTION
This report was prepared by the Detroit Edison Company in compliance with the requirements of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). This
'Ii ;
report describes the 1989 radiological monitoring and sampling activities conducted by Detroit Edison as part of the Fermi 2 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program (REMP). The Fermi'2 REMP was established by Detroit Edison in 1978. Up until the
~ time that Fermi 2 was started up by Detroit Edison in 1985, the program provided for acquiring environmental data in order to establish a preoperational baseline. .;
g Now that Fermi 2 is in operation, the REMP has been modified to focus on
-g- acquiring environmental data from monitoring and sampling locations. These locations would be most likely to indicate if there were any measurable ,
effects in the environment from the operation of Fermi 2. These monitoring I. and sampling locations are called " indicator" locations. Detroit Edison also collects data from environmental monitoring and sampling ,; I -locations which are distant from Fermi 2. These locations are considered to be outside the area which might be affected by Fermi 2 operations. These distant monitoring and sampling locations are called " control" locations, in 1989, Detroit Edison collected over 900 environmental indicator and control samples and performed more than 1200 analyses as part of the REMP. This ~! report contains the tabulated summaries of the sampling and analysis results i for 1989. < Throughout the year, the Detroit Edison Radiological Environmental staff at Fermi 2 collects and compares the environmental indicator data with the
- I' '
. control data. This data is used to determine if there have been any measurable' effects in the environment which are related to the operation of Fermi 2. Any significant differences between the indicator data and the 4 control data are required to be reported to the NRC.
In 1989 there were no significant differences found between indicator and control environmental monitoring data related to the operation of Fermi 2.
.I; -
The levels of radioactive. material which were detected in samples have been attributed to naturally-occurring radioactivity and/or fallout from previous
- atmospheric weapons testing.
Therefore, Detroit Edison has concluded that there were no discernable effects upon the environment related to the operation of Fermi 2 in 1989. 1. l~ l' ( r
i
~
- q. The atinosphereis monitored by i continuous air
'% samplers placed around Ferini 2.
j t,< 9 ,y. .
.!c 'e j,,_ t a n
; e. .
l h ,.
~; s '
$ f
'w
.: $k' $
4 { .
</
A' ' I Environmental i Monitoring E
=
. b
_i g A 5 1 .g di
! a
^
m ~ . K T~ g[ 1989 Annual "E Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report Page 2 2.0 -RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM l 2.1 REGULATIONS Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 50 Appendix 1, Section 4.B requires that Detroit Edison establish an appropriate surveillance and monitoring program to assure that radioactive products released to the
- . environment are kept at extremely low levels. Section 20.201 of 10 CFR Part 20 further requires that a licensee conduct surveys of levels of {
radiation or concentrations of radioactive products as necessary to show l compliance with Commission regulations. l 2.2 PREOPERATIONAL PROGRAM The preoperational environmental monitoring program was established seven Years prior to the operation of the Fermi 2 reactor. This preoperational program determined the existing levels of radiation and radioactive products occurring naturally and from man-made sources in the environment around ~ the Fermi 2 site. The program included continuous monitoring of direct radiation, radioactivity in air, take sands and water, drinking water, cow and l
- goat milk, and !ccc! garden variety vegetables.
2.3 OPERATIONAL PROGRAM The elements that made up the preoperational monitoring program are stillin effect today. The preoperational program became the operational program in June of 1985 when initial criticality was achieved for the Fermi 2 reactor. The sampling and analysis program in the operational phase still continuously monitors direct radiation, radioactivity in air, lake sands and water, drinking i water, cow and goat milk, and local garden variety vegetables. The Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program continuously samples and 3 analyzes the food chain to man for radioactive material. !
' I-
. 2.4 OUALITY CONTROL u Detroit Edison participates in an NRC approved interlaboratory comparison , program. In this program, simulated environmental samples are prepared by
- the Quality Assurance Branch of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
L : and sent to the Fermi 2 Raciological Environmental Monitoring Program l: (REMP) laboratory. The laboratory performs the required analysis and returns l ; the results to the EPA. The EPA performs a statistical analysis and L .
' comparison to known values and returns the results to the laboratory. If the p results do not fall within allowable limits, the laboratory's methods and L .
techniques are re-evaluated. The results of this program are reviewed by L . Detroit Edison and are required to be reported to the NRC. The interlaboratory comparison program results for 1989 are provided in L Appendix A. The analysis results for 1989 that were not within the allowable
. limits as required by the EPA are listed in an addendum to Appendix A.
o ; I
I Milk, garden M. i
~ ff:
, , < a:
- ,~ ,
? r sld,;,N; Q } pli'
. s.cgegaj,les and
^
i gy .e
-; c v
grass are some of
+,p the rnedia used to f} ';'q2) q monitor the land en \'Ironmellt
.g around Fermi 2.
8;. :n , , .
.4*"> >'"4 .
g _ I I I
, Terrestrial Monitoring i a
I I I I I I I I E
o Yh" s 1989 Annual _
; g~ Radiological Environmental. !
Monitoring Report j Page 3
' 3.0 - TERRESTRIAL MONITORING PROGRAM '
i
. l l
3.1 INTRODUCTION
l The terrestrial monitoring program provides continuous monitoring of the -1 I land environment pathways that may result in human consumption of radioactive products. The results of the monitoring program provide for a direct comparlslon of the effects of Fermi 2 on a short term basis' (i.e. weekly), and a review of long term trends over the course of operation for Fermi 2 The following sections discuss the type of sample', analysis 'I performed, a review of short and long term trends, and comparison to preoperational samples, 3.2 DIRECT RADIATION
- The most widely used continuous monitoring device in the environmental ,
program is the thermoluminescent dosimeter (TLD). The TLDs are subjected ( I to strict testing requirements of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) before they are used in the field. The environmental TLDs are located around Fermi 2 to monitor gaseous radioactivity and direct radiation resulting from the operation of Fermi 2. In 1989, the TLD monitoring program included forty-six (46) TLDs located around fermi 2. . During the first quarter, each of the 46 TLD locations had I two cards with 4 readout areas per card. After changing analytical laboratories, for the remainder of the year, each of the 46 TLD locations had one card with three readout areas per card. The TLDs were collected once
.. each calendar quarter and sent to the envirnnmental laboratory for analysis.
The results of the analysis were sent to Fermi 2 for comparison and trending. During 1989, two hundred and twenty-six (226) TLDs were analyzed for direct radiation exposure. The TLDs nearest the plant Indicated a mean'value of 20.9 millirem per quarter. The TLDs considered not to be effected by the operation of Fermi 2, (i.e. control TLDs) indicated a mean value of 22.2
~.
millirem per quarter. g in the period 1983 through 1989 (two years prior to the operation of Fermi 2
.g. through five years after) the average annual radiation mean for all indicating TLDs was 18.1 millirem per quarter. The indicating TLDs ranged from 8.7 to 36.6 millirem per quarter, showing variations from year to year. The control location covering the same time period had an annual average mean exposure of 18.9 millirem per quarter. The control TLDs varied from 9.2 to 35.5 millirem per quarter, which is equivalent to that of the TLD readings near the plant.
1989 Annual Radiological Environmental
. Monitoring Report Page 4 3.3 ATMOSPHERIC MONITORING I
Detroit Edison continuously monitors the air near Fermi 2 for radioactivity. The atmospheric monitoring program developed for Fermi 2 has continuously
'l- m' sampled the air since 1979. Four (4) of the five (5) air sampling sites selected for monitoring were based on the evaluation of predominant wind directions. A fifth location was selected approximately 14 miles west of the plant and is considered to be unaffected by the operation of Fermi 2.
During 1989, two hundred and fifty-four (254) air samples were collected and counted for gross beta radioactivity. The average gross beta radioactivity-level was 0.025 pCi per cubic meter of air sampled for all indicating air
- sample locations. The average gross beta radioactivity level for the controlling location in 1989 was 0 025 pCi per cubic meter of air sampled.
The range of the indicating locations in 1989 was from 0.008 to 0.082 pCi per
. cubic meter of air sampled. The range of the controlling location was from 0.013 to 0.082 pCi per cubic meter of air sampled which is equivalent to the range of the indicating locations.
I-
, From 1983, (two years prior to the operation of Fermi 2) through 1989, the annual average gross beta radioactivity level for indicating locations near the plant was 0.023 pCl per cubic meter of air sampled. The annual mean gross beta radioactivity for the control location for the same seven (7) year period was 0.023 pCi per cubic meter of air sampled. The range of the annual average gross beta radioactivity for sample locations near the plant.was from -
0.004 to 0.089 pCl per cubic meter of air sampled. The annual average gross beta radioactivity for the control location ranged from 0.005 to 0.089 pCI per cubic meter of air sampled.
' "' During 1989, two hundred and fifty-two (252) charcoal containers were counted to determine the presence of radiolodine in the atmosphere. None of the containers showed detectable levels of radiolodine, (i.e. above 0.07 pCl.
I. per cubic meter of air sampled). Twenty (20) composite samples for each individual atmospheric sampling B station were counted. No gamma or beta emitting radioactivity attributed to the operation of Fermi 2 was detected in any of the composite samples. All gamma or beta emitting radioactivity that was detected was naturally occurring. 3.4 MILK SAMPLING PROGRAM During 1989, fifty-six (56) milk samples were collected from farms participating in the Fermi 2 environmental program. One of these samples taken at an indicator location showed an activity of 1.9 pCi/l of I-131, versus the control location activity of 2.2 pCl/l. All samples with an activity of
-I greater than the lower limit of detection for 1-131, were taken when the plant was shut down for refueling. Analyses of Sr-90 showed an activity of 3.5 pCl/l'versus 3.0 pCl/l for the control location. The Sr-90 activity is most likely due to residual fallout from weapons testing, since there was no Sr-89 present.
tii. is .. --
...i- .
g
, . qs 1989 Annual .
l Radiological Environmental 'l Monitoring Report Page 5
!g, ,
Also detected in the samples was naturally occurring Potassium-40. The
'g- annual average Potassium-40 level at the indicating locations was 1494 pCi l per liter of milk. The annual average Potassium-40 level at the control i location was 1437 pCI per liter of milk.
From 1983 through.1989, the annual average Potassium-40 level for the l Fermi 2 sample locations was 1365 pCi per liter of milk. The range of the i
;g reported values for these samples was from a low of 590 to a high of l
_g 2310 pCl per liter of milk. The average annual value for the control location - during the same time period was 1186 pCI per liter of milk, The range of the i reported values was from a low of 730 to a high of 1781 pCi per liter of I milk. Thus, the control location reported values equivalent to the Fermi 2
<h
'" sample locations.
'g During 1989, seventeen (17) grass samples were obtained when milk was not L3 available. All samples were below the required lower limits of detection. ,
3.5 GARDEN SAMPLING PROGRAM During 1989, twenty-three (23) vegetable samples were collected and ' analyzed. No radioisotopes that can be attributed to the operation of Fermi 2
- l. were detected. The only radioactivity detected was naturally occurring Potassium-40. The indicating stations annual mean average was 3072 pCi of Potassium-40 per kilogram of vegetable. The range of the reported values was from a low of 1503 pCi per kilogram to a high of 7088 pCl per kilogram I of vegetable. The controlling locations' annual mean average was 2672 pCl of Potassium-40 per kilogram of vegetable. The range of the reported values 4
was 1767 to 3692 pCi per kilogram of vegetables sampled. In the sampling years 1983 through 1989, the annual mean average of indicating locations was 3498 pCl of Potassium-40 per kilogram of vegetables sampled. The range of the Indicating locations for these years was a low of I-- 1060 to a high of 7088 pCi per kilogram of vegetables sampled. The - controlling location had an annual mean average of 3650 pCI of 3 Potassium-40 per kilogram of vegetables sampled. The range of the g controlling location for these years was a low of 220 to a high of 8160 pCl ~ per kilogram of vegetables sampled. u l-LI l LI )
F
~
The aquatic
. :n.1,, - , , _ - ,. - - _~:
.- , m . ,
,, ; :- , .y? , ~, - *
, t &
environment
, . . ..~ ; I -: , o ' + .-
L surrounding Fermi
, . . . - jg 3. +'); .y. . .
, *k 2 is monitored by (p __s .. . . ~.. taking sediment,
~
psh and utuer
.hh....
.p., > .
__. s.
~
samples. y
. b94 4 .. ~
'.. M , .. .Y .
.y. g s Q
.l . .-
+
t.
., e ,
+: -
i - . .s . _~ -
.- -4 -
e r .
.s
% .. . - n .
4,4 .- Y ,n 4:.
.A.,,.,. -
.e # -
. t; - .'W '
.=.. +m,.. ,.
. ~
v r e . .,54 . .
~
f&
- I:i .
i.; ; wy 4 9 . . x .n:. ; .: y - ' , ;$; l ..
? J.
. w. h&,* . a .. kl __
% .% f. .,, . x;.. f.. ~.".;y .(,f? .
%g.o .
.t . .
j ; ,.. . t . s '*%Q. -.::n*Q.y .; *. y ;.... . . . 94
; .9. .n.
c, , y 4 %,. p ,_ ;- ,y , ... . 4 - ,; m r,
'3_,
-(, l 0 ;.h. .U 9kM' :.; JT ]- *
-.._.Io . i. ,:$m Q #
+.
l' l ^r g'.. . g, _ *,
. an,_,.' _ gvra.w,94-.
. ~. ,.
...A ; ..,.. g- . . gg . 4 ;. .,
!, 5 egp *. - -
- g
. . ,.g.*y,g l'%>p.a , , .'
- y. .,: - .
.? :
f Y$ * :h
. : C Jr.%. . ,-. ? l., y. (ea_.,; .WhQ !.; . .p))
['?q '
'}ke.
.. T'.23.:,s^g5. . r ._. ,3, c?,,x- :
e
.. ._. 4. j
- w. ys77 , s ..
c Aquatic Monitoring y
}
.tll c
O m E
.2 liim 13" elC
=
1989 Annual-l; Radiological Environmental k Monitoring Report Page 6 cI>: 4.0 AQUATIC MONITORING PROGRAM i l
4.1 INTRODUCTION
The aquatic monitoring program provides continuous monitoring of the i aquatic environment of' Fermi 2. At Fermi 2, the dominant feature of the aquatic environment is Lake Erie, on which the plant site borders. The
;l) ; EB aquatic environment also includes other surface waters, such as the Detroit River, groundwater (i.e. wells) near the plant, fish, and lake sediments.
q 1 i 4.2 DRINKING WATER During 1989 twenty-four (24) drinking water samples were collected from the !
- drinking water supplies of Detroit and Monroe. Water samples obtained at !
; the Monroe water intake are considered to be influenced by Fermi 2. The ]
Detroit city water intake located in Allen Park Michigan is considered not to j ' be influenced by liquid discharges from Fermi 2. Therefore, Detroit Edison considers the Detroit city water intake to be the " control" location for the
, I?!
aquatic monitoring program. In all the samples examined by gamma spectroscopy, no radioactivity was
.I; found that could be attributed to the operation of Fermi 2. The gross beta r.edioactivity analysis performed on these same samples indicated a mean d
conc 3ntretion of 3.5 pCi per liter of water sampled for the Monroe water , Intake. The gross beta ranged from a low of 2.3 to a high of 4.0 pCi per liter : of water sampled. The samples collected at the control station (the Detroit ! water intake) indicated a mean of 3.5 pCi per liter of water sampled. The j gross beta radioactivity levels in the control station samples ranged from a i
' I -- low of 1.8 to a high of G.0 pCi per liter of water sampled. ')
g: Sampling data for 1983 through 1989 show an annual mean gross beta g'; radioactivity of 3.0 pCi per liter for the indicating location. The gross beta radioactivity measured in these years ranges from a low of 1.6 to a high of
~
6.9 pCi per liter of water sampled. The annual mean gross beta radioactivity for the control station for the same period is 2.6 pCI per liter of water i sampled. The gross beta radioactivity range for these years is a low of 1.4 l to a high of 6.3 pCi per liter of water sampled. Those samples analyzed in ; 1989 were well within the ranges of the previous years. j In 1989 no tritium activity greater than the required lower limit of detection !
=
for tritium in water (2000 pCl per liter) was detected in the indicating and !
; control location samples. In samples collected at these same locations prior to the operation of Fermi 2, the average tritlum concentration of the indicator and control locations were 300 and 340 pCI per liter of water respectively. .
[ I <
- I 3
l! l I 1989 Annual Radi;l:gical Envircnmental Menitcring Report Page 7 4.3 SURFACE WATER MONITORING B During 1989 twenty-four (24) surface water samples were collected at the Fermi 1 intake and the Trenton Channel Power Plant. One sample taken hy showed an activity of 2 4 pCi/l of St-90. This sample result is very low in comparison to the lower limit of detection for St-90 (2.0 pel/l), and is most l likely residual from weapons testing, since there was no Sr-89 present. In 1989 no tritium activity greater than the required lower limit of detection for B tritium in water (2000 pCi per liter) was detected at the indicating surface water locat!on. l In previous sampling years,1983 to 1985, and again in 1988, tritium was
= detected at the indicating location. At the indicating location, the mean
! concentration ranged from a low of 160 pCl per liter in 1985 to a high of 390 I pCi per liter in 1983. For the controlling location at Trenton Channel, the mean concentration ranged from a low of 230 pCi per liter in 1983 and a high of 290 pCi per liter sampled in 1984. No tritium was detected at the control locction in 1985. In 1985 tritium was detected in the first calendar 'I quarter (January Marchi. The Fermi 2 resctor old not achieva operation until late In the second qucrter (April-June) of 1985. The detected tritium in the I first quarter of 1985 is not the result o' tha aceration of Fatml 2. The levels of tritium dete':le*J et tric Fermi 2 thschstge ir,10A3 are censistent with the ,5 ievels detet.ted in years prior to the coerat'no of formi 2. No effect from : plent operation s dstected. ! 4.4 GROUND WATEP MONI1CRING , Samoles were cofiocted orwe each cadendar o,uarter of 1BSW from th7 four (4) I monitoring weils ett the Fermi 2 fte. "'Te sempleb werd collected ano MMed on the gamma nectrot, copy Byism aaj showed no detectable gamma radioectiv:ty, Wr:en enclyzed for trittura, r'o radiotectlyht res detectbt. The tieta for 10P,9 is consistent with the rebults from the previous year, which I': also showed no detectable radioactivity. 4.5 SEDIMENT SAMPLING - in 1989, ten (10) lake sediment samples were obtained from five (5) separate locations. One (1) sample taken,1.1 miles Northeast, showed a detectable level (230 pCl) of Cesium-137. In samples collected at the Fermi 2 discharge, ,I- the presence of Cesium-137 was not detected. The values for the 1989 l sampling year are consistent with previous sampling years including g preoperational data. Therefore, it is concluded by Detroit Edison that the g detected levels of Cesium-137 are attributable to the residual fallout of the nucicar weapons tests. Additionally, one sample taken at the indicator location showed a St-90 activity of 159 pCl/kg of dry sediment, versus 308 pCl/kg of dry sediment at the control location. I I I
. t 1989 Annual Radiological Enditonmental Monitoring Report Page 8 4.6 FISH SAMPLING A total of sixteen (16) fish samples from three (3) locations (two indicating and a control location) were collected in 1989. From these fish samples, representative edible portions (fillet) of each fish species were processed and analyzed. Of these sixteen samples, none showed detectable levels of radioisotopes, in years 1983 through 1988, various concentrations of Cesium-137 have been detected in fish at both the indicating and control locations. At the
!ndicating locations, the levels of Cesium-137 ranged from a low of 25 pCi to a high of 68 pCl per kilogram of fish fillet. The control location during the same period showed radioactivity from a low of 24.4 pCi to a high of 120.7 pCi per kilogram of fish fillet, The values for th91989 sampling year are consistent with previous sampling years including preoperational data.
x
is
} , .
l t, M
/3
- '::l:','=r"'"
2';ll;;';;;;';;,",'l;1 i l ;;$*: [ > h? ?
'E",'l:'l.i """ '"
3 y, c i
} W .e; b
q a h A_ { ;rl1 1 4 il E Land Use Census 4 1 1 I
c 1989 Annual I i Radiological Environm:ntal ' M:nitoring Report l Page 9 5 5.0 LAND USE CENSUS I 5.1 1989 LAND USE CENSUS
, As required by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Detroit Edison l perforrns an Annual Land Use Census. The annualland use census is a !
formal, documented evaluation of the changes in the location of the nearest ( I resident, dairy animals (goats and cows), and gardens. Locations were identified through several means One of the most common was Detroit Edison's continuing contact with neighbors of the Fermi 2 plant as company l personnel performed routine environmental sampling. Other census methods ) I included door-to-door contacts and observations. Using cartography and meteorology, each identified location "as evaluated. Based on the results of this evaluation, one loc 6 tion was dropped. l 5.2 RE$ULTd To document inc Land Use Census for 1989, figures and Tables sre provided . [ g for compar: son to the 1983 Land Use Census. The most signif!: ant difference is in 'the milk locations, in the NNE sector at 7806 Labo, tisa goet' prelously identified in 1961 nM been dit sed of. Also. notewotthy is the fut tht,t evrn thou.gh the calculated cr#tical receptor 6ddress has milk animals, they do not participate lh our ssmpi: rig progrLm. Therefore, grans r6mples etc co!!ected on the same frequent,y as milis in ticu of mi% waples. I I - I I I I I uI I,
y -
'l 1989 Annual
-; Radiological Envircnmental Monitoring Report Page 10 TABLE 5.0+1 . RESIDENCT.S f Sector Address Distance (MI) Change (MI) 1989 NE 6760 Lakeshore 1.1 NC* 1988 NE 6760 Lakeshore 1.2 1989 NNE 6500 Brancheau 1.0 -0.1 1988 NNE 6441 Branchesu 1.1 1989 N 6200 Blanchett 1.1 NC 1988 N 0200 Blanchett 1.1 1989 NNW 5701 Post 1.1 NC 1988 NNW G701 Post 1.1 1989 NW 6577 Leroux 1.1 NC 1988 NW 0577 Leroux 1.1 l 1989 WNW 6200 Langton 0.7 N'J* 1 l 1988. WNW 6200 La:1gton 0.8 1989 W 6001 Toll 1.1 NC' W 1988 6001 Toll 1J l l 1 Gf.,9 WSW 47?1 Pte. Aux Peavy, 1.5 + 0.1 1989 WSW 4981 Pto. Aux Pecox *4. 1989 SW 4981 Pte. Aux Peaux 1.2 . NC 1988 SW 5194 Pte. Aux Peaux 1.2 1989 SSW 5820 Pte. Aux Peaux 1.1 NC 1988 SSW 5B20 Pte. Aux Peaux 1.1 1989 S 4834 Long 0.9 NC 1988 S 4834 Long 0.9 ESE - SSE Lake Erie
? - Same location, different land base used NC - No Change ~
i
. I '
I 1989 Annual Radirligical Environmental Monittring Report Page 11 TABLE 5.0-2 GARDENS Address Distance (MI) Chenn' ii) I Sector 1989 NE 6940 Lakeshore 1.2 -O' 1988 NE 7477 Oladys 2.0 1989 NNE 6732 Brancheau 1.1 NC-same garden 1988 NNE 0441 Brancheau 1.1 different address l 1989 N 6306 Trombly 1.5 NC* 1988 N 6366 Trombly 2.0 I 1M tPtB NNW NNW 5283 Tromb8y 4950 Anteau 1.6
'. 9
- L'1 4
I- ' 489
. MW 6577 Lercur 1.1 1.1 198!! NW 7680 Di4e itwy 2.2 1989 WNW 6834 D;xle dwy 1.8 NC 1988 WNW 6804 Dirie r'iwy 18 l
1986 W 5900 Leroax '4 40.1 1908 W S170 Leroux 1.3 '; e B 1989 WSW 3121 Lakeslew 2.8 40.7 5 1988 WSW 4780 Pte. Aux Peacx 2.1 1989 SW 4995 Elm 1.4 -0.1 1988 SW 4971 Elm 1.5 1989 SSW ' 4375 5th 1.4 NC l 1988 SSW 4375 5th 1.4 ) 1989 S 6255 Highland 1.1 NC 1988 S 5991 Pte. Aux Peaux 1,1 ESE - SSE Lake Erie i I * - Same location, different land base used NC - No Change I I I .
- - - S
. .T o
1989 Annual l IE ' Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report Page 12 TABLE 5.0-3 l MILK LOCATIONS l Sector Addrett Distance (MI) Findings _ 1989 NE No identified Locations No Milk Animels 1988 NE No identified Locations No Milk Animals j I 1989 3988 NNE NNE No identified Locations 7806 Labo 4.3 No Milk Animals Goats l
-lW Ni4E NNE 10327 US Turnpike 9501 US Turnpike 4.0 4.5 No Milk Animals No Milk Animals l l
6339 Trombly No Milk Animans l I 1989 N 1.5 N 9691 Chinavare 3.R No Milk Animals
~1988 N 6339 Trombly 1.S No Mi!k Antmaic 1989 NNW No identified Location: fic Milk Animals - I' 1988 .NNW No identified Locetions No Milk Animals I 1989 NW NW NW #
W 3239 Newpun Rd 8288 S. Nar:ptvt 2705 Labo 4.3 3.6 5.7 Cows No Milk Animals Cows 1988 NW 3239 Newport Rd 4.3 Cows
! - NW 8288 S. Newraon 36 No Milk Animals ,
NW 2705 Labo 5.7 Cows l 1985 WNW
- 4262 Post 2.2 Milk Animals 5 1988 WNW
- 4202 Post 2.2 Milk Animals WNW 3674 Post No Milk Animals 1989 W 1972 Nadeau 4.2 No Milk Animals W # 7512 N. Custer 14.2 Cows 1988 W 1372 Nadeau 4.2 No Milk Animals f I W W
5904 Mentel 7512 N. Custer 4.2 14.2 No Milk Animals-Cows 1989 WSW 3979 Dixie Hwy 2.8 No Milk Animals
-I 1988 WSW 3979 Dixie Hwy 2.8 No Milk Animals No Milk Animals WSW 3020 Mentel
! 1989 SW 5194 Pte. Aux Peaux 1.2 No Milk Animals 1988 SW No identified Locations No Milk Animals I 1989 1988 SSW SSW No identified Locations No identified Locations No Milk Animals No Milk Animals 7-1989 S No identified Locations No Milk Animals L 1988 S No identified Locations No Milk Animals l * - Calculated critical receptor l # - Participated in Fermi 2 REMP
1 l I [
- av, n;. y
.y... ,*
The groundnater around Ferrni2 is sarnpledquanerly fromfour utils. > s,, . fEl "' - -' L. ,5 '*
," -A
;mb,,? 'pa ~ .
gp.re, .A
- , mW,,dgef; IWei:
$mS ,., '3 * . $
Wea W 'd
."a ,
2, 3-Y.lf
.g jet
- l. ,.
h4?.?' Program Execution ; f I I I : I I I I
1989 Annual Radiological Environmental Monitoring Raport
= Page 13 60 PROGRAM EXECUTION All phases of the terrestrial and equatic monitoring were conducted in accordance with the Technical Specifications as implemented in the sampling schedule if samples could not be obtained from a specific location, other samples were substituted where appropriate The following includes the details of deviations and corrective actions from the normal sampling schedule for 1989 6.1 THERMOLUMINESCENT DOSIMETRY (TLD) m No TLDs were available for the followmg First quarter 1989 - location T-34 Second quarter 1989 - location T-20.
Fourtn quarter 1989 - T-17 All TLDs were rep' aced during the quarterly changeout J. ,, i Vindalism is assumed by Detroit Ecison to be the cauae of the missing TL Ds at locati.3ns T -34 and '-20 These TLDs are monitoring devices located on
'E utoity pole
- m the virtaty '>f Fermi 2. and are therefo:e susceptible to vandal;sm Detroit Ed' son hcs determined that it is more cost-'811ectiv4 to infr?cuently replace a TLD at specific 'ocations rather than to design a device
" th61 would prevent ecnrialism _ i The loss o'. the TLD at location T-17 is due to the tact that the utility poli
' that the TLD wt.s attached to had been terrioved due to construction +, cross J the street The TLD Aas relocated to a utility pole immediately adjactn'. to the removed pole 6.2 LOWER LIMIT OF DETECTION For all samples collected and analyzed in 1989, the required Lower Limit of Detection was not met on the following samples' Surface water sample SW-1 collected on 04/26/89 (< 16.4 pCi/l Ba/La-140).
surf ace water sample SW-2 collected on 04/26/89 (< 26 9 pCi'l B8 La-140). / drinking water sample DW-1 collected on 04/26/89 (< 26 6 pCl/l Ba/La-140). drinking water sample DW-2 collected on 04/26/89 (< 32 0 pCi/l Ba/La-140). and milk sample M-3 collected on 05/10/89 (< 16 8 pCi/l Ba/La-140) did not meet the lower limit of detection because priority counts were not scheduled at the analytical laboratory This was a laboratory admmistrative problem with codmg in the receiving area samples that needed short-lived half-life isotopic analyses performed This was discussed with the vendor and corrected % Milk sample M-1 collected on 09/27/89 (< 2.4 pCi/l I-131) and milk sample d M-1 collected on 12/18/89 (< 2.05 pCi/l I-131) did not meet the lower limit of detection because of low chemical recovery. This is a function of the chemical process portions of the isotopic analysis that depend on the chemical recovery of the non-radioactive carrier of the analysis isotope that is added Fish sample F-1 (Sucker) collected on 09/21/89 (<350 pCi/kg Fe-59) did not
] meet the lower hmit of detection because of insufficient amont of sample that was processed for analysis 1
1989 Annual l RadioISgical Environmental 3 Monitoring Qeport Page 14 I Sediment sample S-3 collected on 09/29/89 (<159 pCi/kg St-90) and
)
1 l I sediment sample S-5 collected on 09/21/69 (< 155 pCi/kg Sr-90) did not rneet the lower limit of detection because of matrix interference. During the chemical process portions of the isotopic analysis, the sample matrix adds ; l extra mass that is not accounted for which decreases the counting instrumentation efficiency. 6.3 OTHER DEVIATIONS FROM PROGRAM For all samples scheduled to be collected and analyzed in 1989, the following , were deviations from the program: Air particulate and air iodine samples API-4 due for collection on 06/06/89 were not collected due to equipment failure. The equipment was repaired I and returned to service. Air iodine samples APl-1 and AP)-? collected on 12/05/09 wera It'st in shipmmt to the ane!ytical laborosory All #r samples are now bagged as wall as boxed prior to shipment Air parilculate simple API-4 couectsj on 05/22/83 was not !ncluded in the I third (tuhrtet compositt eince # wcs lost ir, stcrage at f.he enclyttal inboratory.a The volerM cf tha ccmpcsite was oppropriate!y adjut,ted. The Occond quartet turf ace ano c;rinking watcr comraoritet, were analyzed by two of water, but r ot by specific location. Tnit, was coraected for the third - E and fourth quarter analyses. I The Sr-89 and Sr-90 analyses of milk samp!e M-7 collected on 05/22/89 were lost owing to matrix interference during the chemical processes of analysis. There was insufficient sample remaining for reanalysis.a Fish samples F-1 (Walleye and Bass) collected on 09/21/89 were lost by cross contamination in preparation at the analytical laboratory.a Milk sample M-7 scheduled to be collected on 07/31/89 was missed due to farm dropping out of environmental sampling program. No grass sample was collected. Grass samples were subsequently taken on the milk schedule. Food product sample FP-4 scheduled to be collected on 08/30/89 was missed due to farm dropping out of environmontal sampling program. Other food product samples scheduled for that day were collected. Additional I garden locations will be looked at for 1990. Grass samples M-1 and M-7 scheduled to be collected on 12/18/89 were missed due to weather conditions, as allowed by Technical Specifications, a- The analytical laboratory has been audited and talked to about laboratory deficiencies. Correctable problems should not recur. , I l_
,I 1g .Q Ecrmi 2prabun D" 53f@+QW m%? lt : g ; ,g avermim=b p\G: l V.a it.; w?>
;yh -
y9ia . www t kA wag lf 9 ./ N Nh
.H y"hSie s-NI i' 1100 rr,reautstts of i;; 3 < cicci,,c,s a, yi
<k g g :n ' ,
g 3um gbr w fhd h
.q y%
, y$h al
, + 2lie a,4u$i!%y 4 s' ;;!$?hv; ;g *%9@0$qp ;p'l'>b%;
i yk%lr{l7 M g g>
?sl1 .QY Q g pf 3
s w feAR .:3m a '- W l eBVl . Sfc!qn;
' " *i!'-
- : ;;Glll, e
%^tf9llf;.':9 g;yggplJ'
- Qsja,
- q. 5 Ajf ,
r y" , , ,,g y;; -
?le y@S$OlN ;?l)lll},:l, ,> ' , +
,s> ,
I s. < w,
'I '
g~., { 1 I ,
. ;(
I i i Program Summary i B I I I I I I B l
1989 Annual l Radiological Environmentel Monitoring Report , 1 I Page 15 I 4 i l 1 l' i l 7.0 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM
SUMMARY
} _
's g ,
LI g . l l l l h-f
~~
r .
'{
- I s
l me_ .m i ee I 4 Ct
** m**
L O** O 3= O L O2 O O O O O O O O O O
=e '6 y
*Ca O e 4 I=9YCf
. 2*
%w
- f EE ga O
g , I ,m#T>f$ O4CD4 L.
*J, , g
*-t e
~C p =e O O.
p m= O N V. euwaa V o 6 .o epCt %N sN [ ** ** t C Q, Q Q Q Q , s O OM Q C
., s c.3 .
O O. , s s N, r I q ( g p =_ OV UO
.J a w O.
O. M to Nw J Y J v J v J v J v J v w@ N . he Nw
=@
J Y d v 7
! ^
O sm mm n 8-
, , w CE
-0
@ - O.
W A u. g g e ak %N NO @h a . e @ ec *e *@ t t i 1 e i %M g E 34 08 @ t @
,o O a -Q w T' g w o. .
*I4C.
o .
. O. 9 O. N N. O 1
& Se @w @N
.', o}
l
, 43 Nw Nw Nw b * .$ _. . . - . _ , _ . _ .. .= ..
I- .- c U
,I e[w O
*9 U f
U k C O
- C 9 V M @
e o b V * @W R .e
- w. >B g
D* .- O L3 *e .
.I. Y g 0 + Z p s 4
- O C.DMQ *
, V 4a - 4 4 I I e I a i 1 y D *1 *L E NfE
- m+E
, y s I w m=D$
=09 M*@ N4= = L T.
q . g g & um. 00@
> , et .W.e .- et w O > > (A 4 a g g _ = . __ . _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ . _ _ . ___ ___ _ _ _ _ _
O L . - - O
- OC 9 @
Z D we U Q Oa I o e*Ct Na 4 , U*93 N N to. L , , *etc % 9 O. @@ q O , o Vv34 ON O O O O O Q ON O C O y CO u he J a J J J J N e J a L o M .J w I .J .J .J .J .J .J w0 .A I a g #, 00 v v v v v v M Y v ID D [ g w Nw L - _ _ . _ . _ ._ _, _ _ . _ O O N @ C , N D , e, g Q 3 D O. O. O. M. C. O. O. O. O. . O O O O to e e O e m w o a g W
- O @ M
# .J l U C O f e . _ . _ - . _ . _ ._._ _ _.---
{ O e i i O g @
- N i O O
- N I
* *W N V > OF W O O @ W 9 g 4 O N N .e N !
E g , L M N 4 D l y @-h 0 O i
. I. -
u e Q h W C g M h M
*i - e e m L mO -
M 4 m mi m C ,x g H e e I a e e e F .,. y e e e 4 L t e e j t j g S v 0
.V. ._.U.
= 0 0 .m._ .L i
, n .- =. _O _.M. _M . j I.
l 1 '
.U e
> S @
C . e v W o g &^ e . U ** * \ m + eE 6 i i g ao @
=$*
e
$De
=%
@M e
O m L pm e-ti g g 90* C Cet Law ' O. Y hc L..DOU pec - I b e>O ow 6o .C .s e40s 6 M w D LM ctU E v .J tr Q
.E w v
& 6 el Eg>
I [
*4O *6 .o. wa 4 m w .E.a g "C" 4 e 6 0 %
e ! > b____-_.E _ _ __ _ - ,- _ I
E
. . C lI L
J' _ _
- w .C .ee L o**
E o6~ o o O O o n O O O O e o O O O O
-= e e6 e ee I a r'). Oa
# b* *C @
*C to m
it cn o o - 6 - -- --- o LN e - . - - ----- - - -- --- u- o- n oL* T.
$=** g p eV>c v . e meCo e o5ep ==
"UWE4 O L- ib m NO
+ >
- vC D O O O O O O O O O
- c O O .,oO O O .J e Cene .J .J .a .a a .J u .J .I .) %c .a .J .J Ov G .t .a .D 0 .J .J .J .a .J .J *t .J .J ml .I .J
> vo y v v v v v v v v v v v v v v
.I L e
.J w o.
O th
$w
- l. -- ---
t 6 .n
- t
- C$ aa L e e e@ O4 I @ C $ @C i f I I 1 i e i *
- I e 8 i I I I k & 34 %N u 6 I.
3 E *
- a c-. m e. +
C '. 9 L i t w e C @ .N en s Nw v I. 3 I S D e .e. . L . - ~.a. - .o ~ .~ - .a--- -- h & a mi e e t- + a Cl a $s e i ot - t- L
- a ta 4 d. C p .E. g .4 4 tv ,
1 g se e
. 4
- A r
** C .J t i I a i e e i e 4 1 4 , a 6 e e e p .C .*
6 . e= o r - u e a e* > w M f f 4L W t 3 le-
- 5 O .u +wO r L o R p
- e
* +4 5 . + L e W o e ot 2 L *Q v E +* e*Ce e e s .u es ao en L & O -eeC o4 m 4 9vae Q Q O O O O O O
- O O O O O O O o
L o s o D
&O a
- e. .J
.J
.i
.J
.J
.a 4
.J
.* .J
.J .J
.J
.J
.J
.J
.J
%N
* * .J J .6
.J
.J
.J
.J J
.a
.J
.J
.J
.J 3
+
h C w v v v v v v v v v v .- v v v v w g t.
@ p .N C 4 Nw
- a p L r - -~-= -_ =
D **
* '3
.- N O C M 0 +a o.
3 p ,o O. O. O. O. o. O. O. O. O. O. O. o. O. O. O. p C @ Q m o e M e. cD e m O N O o 9 m
- m -
- o e @ O M
= - .J e *
- e -
@ * .J O W
- f L O f
= -N _ r-O .I -
o O 4
& M C o
- O +4 N N to D U D0e W 4 4
- A C D o N N a L
- 4L e O 4 C * ' > 0) t W = W - e v 9. e
.b-
#
- C e O W D m.=
- M e ID @ o 4 m CD o O
** U > C @ @ 2 .J @ (D @ +* @ @ @ @ @
d h 4 p. 4 e e i e i i e a e e i e i i e t
't ** E O C L e e 4 0 L L L 0 e C W 0 0 C I
- 4D P- 0 U
,[ = 5 -- - .U N __ .N .U -.U .U .- M .M. - O. .&. .E...V. .N
- O L U
* # C D
> k 0 @ C C e u - -
w w
- N D 2 I
- b e
o* W 0 (e Z 4 u C J e
- at g6-t MC 4 >. 3 a
.e.
L 3 e .% .C Lw o U 4e
*QC 3 -*
Ca L o .% Lw v
*Q
@ w @ v w 9
- w
- e e D 3 3 4
e= ~ - - .,- s ~ ~ ~ - ,. - - - . _ - --- - L
e V r." & mammmmmmmm-mm--w-mme- , m-mmm----mmm----m-4- p- , .. C e.
.L 0ee L O O O O O O O O O O O O O
- @ n @L3
*Ok et i 4 4 9 b ,h
- a th ,: . - -
O , 4O g. .- --
~ > Om O L *a .
a D** @ . p a ea C r . eV)meC0@s v. 4 O {> C + a O. N a = g)
* $1 W 3 h O L .* e NN av Ah e+t 0 *m O O O O O to
- O O O ED *
*s O
.s e Ce3e .J % s .J .J .s .J .J en .s .J .J Ou R .J .J .I .J .J .J % i .I .J .3 w0 .A
> y w* O. v v v v v N* v v v bm v L v .0a w
- MN e c. fw M NN w*
- Nw ow ew >
L
- i. _
.m. .N-.- O
+*
') e k
a Q p (g a a d=6 a S O
+ g , [@ s.= 4.s e. N @@ .e.
L , e e> N @. et m ED @ %O
@ t t C 6 t 6 e i e M 1 I M *. hN 4 ==
h g 3e %* N e % 4
- I e D $ a 1,
@ . i %E w .
wO NM
- W S p. *C Ie@ 4$. @. wp $. Me **
.C
- e gr N .. a m. . @. >
+,
33, Nw w cw .- w - e L J] * - c a .o ._ --m.....4.e....-..-...-.. 4 m
>.b 1k a
4
" I a b. b I w
L *- .b 2 @ I. a - C +e w e 0 e e E E 3 4. 3 L3 L3 4 I
.J e @
e i e i e r e i a 22 ez a - e c C e v e O .-
- 3 0
- m O E E eE eF -
v w - .a e o e a w m t i N@N mO@ mo@ 8 33 N. I a a e> * * > *
- O .v. Ow- 3w@ 3ww a w at 4
- l L p
+>
m-Le v e
+* >
O
>L W
O
) C U 61 O O OC e a a @
2 6 *O U
- a ee C@ a@ CD a M L E
e vwep aa mD e. m@ e 1 L D
+4 a
6 C.
- e 4. C O
N .
%N O O O O O e m m. O O Mc to o MN O
3
+> u
.E.oJ .va 3 e 0 v + # = i .J .J .J .J .J %- .J _J *
- s L 0 0 w@ .J .J .2 .J en .J .J w e .s C
- 4 0
.J y @.@. .v v v v v V V w e. w@ v D
& w
@ m. 10. @ SM O I @-
m e $N .e wh u C. 6 Nw ew ew ww u e 4 . L t e----- m m m m -- ~ m .= = --.-m - ----.=~~ ** 3 0 -
- o L -
3
.e. N O o C io *
- O ** O O L 0 3
- e p O. O. O. O. O. O. O. O. O. O. O.
O
. a C @ O @ @ @ O N O m (D @ O @
D = .,3 c,D e e e C e e e O w @ e
# * .J O @ e 3 D
- E N 3 e E r.- - - - . . - . - - w .- .- .- . 4 u CD L O O @
m G b 1 ~ O
.D s
O we D O W N (D D D O.J V'* U pDe @ @ to .a .J e
- h L @ O @ @ O @ .J 0; 4 +- eL e w @ w $
C
- 4> e @ $ e G 4 uJ = 4 - N i t w 5
- h i t *
#
- O e e D M m O
- M M e @ +d
+* U m C M.
. .J g * (D @ m * .J O ED +*
C h e >24 i 6 6 4 e t .c e e i I 6 w e +* @
'f' ** 4 @ e L $ L L L I M $ M e I L @ @ l M @
I
.E
& .--. - .V C N U M >
43
..V .U- .C .E. .e.. E E
+*
O O +< 0 U
.L. e C S O C D E O C C * .C
- a D W + ** a t V -
O e ca 4 - D V * *=3 V
- 0 @ p L% C e I f.
r 8 *@* O** a 9 @ C. e nn. .vGC w Q QC - E EAC % D'* eHD LwQ
- t, e e A w @ v W ' . , w .a U Q MM e w I I
-D 3 3 e = N
>. ----- m - -- ----_
. . . ~. .. . . . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ .
I I 6 a w .C. S 4 oce
- O O p3 D O O O O O O O O O OO O O
[ ~4 e L. 6 e es
=~ea e
- 9* @ Ca ev40 o o u* VC 4
ER
, ojg g _ . - - -_____-_---- __ - - . _ - - - - -
m .o w**e T. 6 e a N to t" *> C $ v. g meC0e s -- a r3 m.O.
- a 4.8 3 a o c 6 .o C e e to @ ce *e
** ** - - O O O O O OO %M C O O I C43 %M .J .J .s .J .J .A .J Me .J %M .J .J 0V 2 @ l a .4 .J I .J .J .J v5 .J
- 4 .J .J h v0 -W v v v v v v v N@ v wO v v b J NN O@
4 O. N. @* eM D Mw Nw Mw t . - -
- 4. . -
4 _..
*s e
~
D G o - e sa to e g w te em L e e e@ NO I 4 e i
'I e c t- t C co
- N. i i e a e e i sN k 8 4 34 s tD N i o @ n h a w*
m e . C w M c. c f4 O@ C 14 N <D N t
* "I 43 Sw ww L o . = - .I e
O + _ . .- .-.- a c 1 4 6 v 8' a 2 C C
*' G O5 m 0 t 6 -= cg g a 4 4 - o 2 w @ o @ vB EB JT I-V *
.L. o *- 2 1 6 i DB
*' C .J 4 4 I I i k I l i t C t u ,
- O ~ t E NE v v -@ I e , eo w M g N@N / eN*
- e a . hw .
> .u. wwN I- 0
( 3 3wc
. + 6 e O p oC mm E 6 ** O U ~
E ** e*Ce e co a) e +* si u .* e 3 >a e a) 4
- 0 *eaC MN %O
@ a tv3e s . O O O O O O O ID N O O O O O u o CO E 0 10 .J .J .a .J .J .e .J e s .J .J .J .J b 9 O M .J N i J .J .J .J J .J .J wM .J .J .J J I
& Q v v v v v v v NO V V V V
** w
@ M. b@
@ e .N O*
C @ Mw Mw
- 3 L 4 -- _.. .. .
. ~ _ _
O v
- D
- N O C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 e w O.
3
- e f N O O O O O O O OO O D C & O @ @ to @ @ op C M @ M M t N *' e
= D
- e e'
e a u * $ .
= g - -..- . - - . - - . - - -. -- --
m 6 O C @ M
** s 0
0 +4 h k M M @ V e U VOe e e
- O N N e
- C 4 O g E 4 ee 4Le C a- h =
- niJ t - w N i g h 8
- n 9 O MM e e. M e e CD O
** U h C @ M ** e- .J M t.e
=
- I O
g
@ m @ @
i C h 4 624 i a e e i = t i e e
** h L i A e e e : A e e 6 6 C e 0 0
- M U 4 U
.I.D, .= 0 V V ---
M
= ei. ----- _ _ - -_ _ _ - - O _ .U .U. .3.C .- 0 3.
w O
- O
% u
- n C D 44 0 C
- e em a W in- ** *e ww 4 O 4 = @ v at t I-
- 0 I
y s 4 u 0
.J
- 4 **
3Q=
^
e a D D t 3
.g V
D3 om ga a 3 3 E t he + a s. s. N g > :3 .s. v e .s . . I O w aUC cu t) U IU L =QO 4Q OQ cQ
*w v Lw 0- -w D E w 0 w k 9 :
6- 6.+-- - - - - - - - - - _ _ -= I 1 l
. , , , , . ..m . . .
. = . . . . . ..
, .F u-~..g-
.w8
= -- ~.---- -- _ - - - - - - - - - = . * -
E !- b O**** L, O D* Q k OD C O O OO OO O O O O O O O O
~b m eb e
~On a i a
- Ce m *a SuCp * $
-- - zz tm * - -- -
. 4*
0 LO DN { .*_ _ = -. - - -_ _ -- - T
%OL+ **O g
*r p
ID V P C @ . m e.- @nCO6 a obc 6 ao 6-** W W 3 4 0 6e ea
***C D 0 0 0 0 0 Ne D D t S @ & &
.o .J .J %s C C C C C : a t
bnae UO u a J v
.J J
v
.J J
v J v J v
.J J
v Ne we O 2 C O 2 O 2 2 O O Z Z E O l L .J ED O 4 C* 1
.I
. - _ _ - . * - ---.*---.. - - - - -- -.~ ----
m
'J Q O
- Z
- C6 *
- b e e 43 I 1 8 ao am W C & @C 4 N ED i (D @ t i 4 a 1 6 8 1 h 3 4 3S %N %*
O m a e e
- i (b > *C wO w@
E T. e O CD @@
- C e to N
** 5 L3 Nw O.- w~
s O
- O * * .
Q t 3 9 E k a a
- 4 C 4 I t 6 *e t u v ik
- g$
e e w e @ @ V * (D W (D W , I
- O +8 4 2 tg 4 t 4 6 i I 8 i
+* 4 s .-
- C i l'
$ N v n* 4*
O
- DI O
- e. E 6( !
u 9 e .J Mmp w M & Mma ; t v i W . I W t ewa I x 0
- Awa L @ 3 g -- -.-- . - - - -
- I a
- b e j O O OC Z L *O U .
ae C@ I F ** l 4 ** 4 v +* 4 @ a a L @ O e 4@ C ^O ^m a a tuae O O O O co D 0 tD m O O O O O IO O O .J .J .J O v + C0 m .J .J .J .J wN .a s* .i .J .J .J L O O e=e .J .8 .J .J .J * .J *1 .J 6 .J J J .b .J .J
& O v v v v w O' v wm v v v v v v v v l
- S C
L O
++
V 6 3 D O (D m) N Nw mo
*w
- N O C M O. O. O. O. O. O.
O w C. O. O. O. O. O. O. O. - 3 *
- D O O O O O O mO O O O O O 80 i C @ O @ M CD 0
- M =
- M * *
- p * .4 N
- c. e. ~ e O ~~ I W * $ --
- g *. - . _ _
O b O i O t M
- 4 j O 4
- O sn O N V V VO* *
- dr
- A C D E k +* 4Lm @
C * @
- w
- e 6 .>. g N e N i e h 8
- O 4 @ M M M M mO 9 m 10 0 @ D M M
+d O h C @ * * *
- CD @ c e O @ @ z -
- C h a b24 : I 4 i e i i t i e i a e e i
' ** 4 C e e e e e L L M C @ O O C L e e
- V Q U U M M C 3 4 W N U U
% -- .N .U _W__ -- .N O
- O L U
- 4 C
> u.
-L .c~ n m D W * ** *e
- C 0 m e= 6 3 V ^ 30 V O
* @ O @ W 6 m 4 1 E .J t ** 3D ** Oi 0m=
4 QQ* .s C Ca O+ Z E*C s* es *N P. M gF3 w
* * . (* L*
@U IOC *U h *QO Dh ** Q gw
*w u tw
~D 4 w e 3 4
b L- - -- --- - - - c--.
'E-E E E ' '
E E~ E ' .
~
E~ - E g~ 1989 Annual RadiologicOI-EnvIronaentoi Won 9tortog Report 9sge 21 Table 7.0-1 Environmental Radiolog1 cal Monitoring Program Su m ry ( cont in, sed ) Name of Facility Enetco Fermt (Joi t 2 Docket No. 50-341 Reporting Period January - Dece e r 1989 Location of Factitty 30 miles Southwest of Detroit. W9thigan (Frenchtown Township) i l l ' l I l l- l l l l Indicator l Locat90n olth Hig%cs t l Control l l I Sample l Type and l Locations i Annual Wean l Locations l Mumber of l l Type l Number of l l Wenn I I Wean l Waan l Non-routine l l (Units) l Analyses
- l LLDb g p ,9 c l Locationd l penge l Ranga l Desults' 'I I I I i 1 1 I I I I water. Ground l Ba-La-140 h 15.0 l <tLD $
l -
!! Mone 1 0 l 1 (pCl/t) l l l l I 1 l I l (continued) l Tritium 8 l2000.0 l <LLD l -
l - I Mone l 0 l a GB = gross beta- GS = gamma scan D 1.LD 2 nominal lower limit of detection based on 4.66 sigma error for background s aap l e . C Wean and range based upon detectable measurements only. Fraction of detectable measurements at specifled locations is indicated ln parentheses (F). d Locations are specified by Fermi 2 code. location description. distance and dfraction from the Fermt 2 reactor.
- Non-routine results are those whlCh exceed ten times the control station value. If no Control station value is swallable, the result Is Considered non-routine if It exceeds ten t imes the preoperational value for the IOCatton.
NOIE: Other nuclides were considered in analysis results. but only those identitlebte mere reported in addit 9on to Tech Spec flsted nucIides. G dP
-m <e-- '*' ---e q w -, ~ _.7, . . ,, , _ _ , _ , , , , _ _ . , , . _ _ _ __ _,,
, .. , , . 1 Die Fenni2 Plant A
?'
)k,
'~
ha"I idif-habitats. , j,3:.s ;.[ F} i l' ji 7-
.]
g...- l
+ -
?
4 t g w.,,q g-L -
- 1. . > <
l l r : i sq t gy
; m y
, jI[hI .
l 1 : 1 i Sampling Locations I i s
.Ia I .
I I I
---_--___,_--_-.s___sm__.__,_-a m_.-_-._ . _ _ . . _ . _ _ _ . _ _
1989 Annual i Radiological Environmsntal l
' Monitoring Report l Page 22 1
i i i
..I
8.0 DESCRIPTION
OF FERMI 2 SAMPLING LCCN? TONS y 1 W i L I bl e l-i
?
g I t
Tatyl e 8. 0- 1 Radiological Environmental Isontforing Programe, Ferna l 7 Sangs t e tocatlons and Associated Media 04 rect Radiation Meteorological Statinn Sec t or / Ar imst h Distance from Media F r eq.,ency Direction Reactor (Appron) Description Number Estral Beach (Communi+y) Pole on tabashore. Direct Redist8en 0 71 NE/38 0 1.4 mi 18 Poles 5 of takeview Direct Radiation O 12 NNF/21 0 1.1 mi Tro- at the Termination Brancheau \t ( Pr iva t e Residence) Direct Radiation O T3 N/4 0 1.1 mi Pote. NW Corner of 5.an eoat Ctoo Sence (Community) Site Boundary and Tot 1 Rd. on Site Fence by Direct Radiatinn O 0 0.6 mi T4 NNW/340 API F2 Rd, on Site F en< e by Direct Radiation O NW/321 0.6 mi site Boundary and Tott r5 API #3 Pole. NF Lorner of Rridge over Tott Rd Dirert Radiation O 76 WNW/296o 0.6 mi Dirert Radiation Q i7 W//69 0 14.7 mi Pole, behind Onty F ar *. 7%17 N f_ us ' e r WM ( C orit r o l l Direct Radiation O T8 NW/304' 1.9 mi Pole. NE Corner of Di=ie **=y and Post sd Pole. NW Corner of Trombley and Sean view Rd Direct Radiation O T9 NNW/333 0 1.5 mi Direct Radiation O N/6 0 2.2 mi Pole, 5 Side of Massarant - 2 Poles W T10 of Chinavarre Direct Radiation O 6.3 mi Pointe Mouillee - W of Jefferson and Campau T11 NNE/25 Rds. Pole on SE Corner of Bridge Pointe Mouillee Game Area - Fleid Offite, Dole Direct Radiation Q T12 NNE/33 6.1 mi near Tree, N Area of ParkihQ Lot Labo and dinic Hwy Pole nn SW Co nar Direct Radiation Q T 1 '1 N/357 0 4.I mi with Light Direct Radiation Q T14 MNW/338 0 4.4 mi Labo a rid Brandon - Pole on SE Cerrer near RR Direct Radiation 0 3.9 mi Pole, be%4nd Newport Post Of f ice Y t r. NW/318"
.c Ie *#*
VCD 4 b Sa-O O OO O O O O O O O O O O O
* 'C O -
O ae 6 IQSte@*** ON 8 w C C C C C C C eV D 0 0 0 0 0 0
@# e .C . . . . . . . -
e e e w e e e e e e e e e e e W 4 .e .e .e i .e I'*MW34 ,$ 9 D t 2 4 4 0 V V e e m a V a 4 V a e D a e D a e t 4 a V V V e e e a a a V a e V a e V a e y & W & w w w w w w w w e c w & p U U U U U V U U U U U U U U U q E 4 @ @ @ @ @ @ 4 @ @ 4' @ @ @
.I 6 O O 6 6 OO 6
O L O k O 6 O 4 O 6 6 O O O 4 L O 6 O L O 4 s 6 O *
. t O e - I. ,
L t@ 3* O - L a 3 3 8
+
C 9
- 9 e -
C O b D U O we s s o- s - 4 s Je C - ah i 6 & 9 d 6 C e 1 0 L Q a *m Da *
- L iI4 @ 4 0 se U t . - i aA
- O M V O $
4 V be O N 1 L E O C C
& b @* e a 3 8 4 6
- W 4 M L 4 *L4 @ u k O 39 @ E C*
s e@ L M - 3 3m WC E L T E @ Va 3eC > e e @D @ C @ * @ V V ee a aO
- 4 @ O aC
.I g i @ @@ 4 V. C C C w k a 0. v & O 6 a 4 e e u U 4 . '-
V e ol @ D . m C a <* a a u se 3@ e $ m - a@ f 3 - C4 3 3w gw +- L U -
- 4 @ a
- 4 4 * $ A - e
- O e @ v s.03 % @ N @ @@ @
- w @ .$ $^*
^*
- O V C **@ 44 m @ @Q *w - M 3 6
- h 4 a e v om u L2@
I" , es @ Mu> *6 *4 e we C 0 @
- 4 2 3 @*** ~4 L@ Cm *@ a - E 1-
- F b w * .cLz - eL *x .C a Ow 0 0 0 E **
g S b + + E606 *= @A OL 0+ ae M a & 6 6 *
- U % 0 0 L @ e 34 & as aC O
- O Ow M **-
e @* @a C D *HW [ g . a * @ C6 LC C
- O I
L L 6 6 4C +U *@ 4 &> i L
- 6 a e @4 @ * @ 06 C* O O so
- te @U O @U g a e C4 Gw *0@
3 Ca C + 4* 0 0
- V V
- L s Ow Le te @- @m @w 43 a a b@ k @ LL 0 y b O O C** Dw V3 V D Ob 06 V e @ Cn
, w 0 V U W CM * *Q *@ -* @w - - UE UV He
*0w g 6 - LW Mh @O Mw eu w e - - C WE g
- W WI W @@ O E a e @ 20 O O W- We - 3 6
, O O 2 2 -CCC MI Zw ZMw et 04 > > Re Me WO
- V @
, @ Owa=
- L >
. .- . ao - .@ .c . .C -@ . . .U .e .* ege
@~ @ @ @- @C $ a 6.
-4 -@ e UsL 6@ -@-u -tum -
@ @O
-6 $u -O - -
6 t a -a -O - E D 00 O mW4w O* C@ 00 03 @@ O On Om OU 0- 0
. a as a -rae a0 km as aI sw a a aw as aw kW+ ,
e I. I ^ l u I hk A tt.. . . .. . . . . . . . . . . I- *
@w
< E L e.
E N. E E
- m. C.
E c. E h. E N. E E N. E E E w
. . O.
E c. E M. E e. 0 g c w e N N - - - - - N O O N ! n * * ' I U
-a O@
.$ 8
-c E -z
- e. ;
- I- .
i UpC e
-ao
== e o N
o e e U W o M o N M 0 o M o N o e W O e o
@ M e
N o s M o 8 T i g N* N M N M N N m - N N N N N N N ' i
, -( U % N N N % % @ % N % % N N N N g 0%@ 3 N 3 % b 3 - 3 % 3 3 % % 3 3 6 6 6 Z % e 3 e e % e 3 e e 3 3 e e
@ 00* 3 3 3 6 3 3 e e e 3 3 e e 3 3
. @*C g *U h hn I -
-$&g C A 2 O O N N
- N N
M N 9 N 0 N N A N m N N C M e H > > > > > > > > > F I 5 k b k
.-.. ~ . . _ _ _ _ _ . - _ _ _ _ - - _ _ . . _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ __ . A
E E O E. N '
' E
.1989 Crenual R-diological Envi.onmentet Monitoring Report Page 25 Table 8.0-1 Radiological Erwironment al Monitoring Program. Fermi 7 Sample tocatl e and Assoclated media Olrect Rad ia t t or, Weteorological Station Sector / Azimuth Olstance from Number Direct 8sn Reactor (Approm) Description Media Frequency T31 WSw/254 0 0.9 at 1st Pete W of Entrance Drive Milton "9at" Direct Radiation Q Munson Recreationat Reserve - N Custer Rd (Control)
T32 WNw/296' 10.3 mi Pote. Corner of Stony Cre.k and Finzet pas Direct Radiation O T33 Nw/318o 9.3 mi Pole, w Side of Grafton Rd. 1 Pete M of Direct Radiation Q Ash /Grafton Intersection T34 NNw/339' 9.7 ml Pole. E Side of Por+ Creek. 1 Pola % of D6 rect Radlation O witt-Carleton Rd T35 N/360' 7.0 ml Pole. 5 Side of S Heron River D- ecross from 04 rect Radiation Q Pace St (Spectat area) T36 N/360 0 9.2 al Pole. NE Corner of Gibraftar and Cahitt Rds Direct Radiat9en Q T3/ NNE/23' 9.9 ml Pole. S Corner of AJans and Gi bra l t ar (across Direct Radiation Q t rom Hurrbug Marina) T38 WNw/289 0 1.7 ml Residence - 6594 M. Diele H=y. Direct Radiation O T39 SSE/147' O.17 ml SE Corner of Protected Area F enc e (PAF) Direct Radiation Q T40 SE/139 0 0.16 ml Midway stong DaA - PAF Direct Radiat'en 0 T41 SE/133' O.15 ml Midway between OOA and Shteld watt - 9AF Olrect Rad 4=tlen 0 T42 SE/125' O.15 mi Midway along Shield watt - PAF Direct Radiation Q T43 ESE/114' O.14 mi Midway between Shield wait and Aum soltars - Direct Radiation Q PAF T44 E/101 0 0.14 ml Opposite OSSF Door - PAF Dlrect Radiation Q T45 E/84 0 0.16 mi NE Corner - PAF T46 ENE/71 0 0.2 ml NE Side Barge Stip - on Fence Direct Radiation O ) e WM ,4.4, ..
E E' ~ E. ~ ' E ?E E E 'E E E E E 1999 Annuot Radiological Er.wironmentel Monitoring Cleport Page 26 Table 8.0-2 Radiological Environmental monitorleig Prograsa. Teret 2 Sample e.ccatlens and Associated Media Flsh and Sedime*it Iseteorological
'Statton Sector /Arlauth Distance from Number Directton Reactor (Appron) (Jescs Ipt ton Media Frequency SEDIMENTS S-1 SSE/164 0 0.9 mi Pointe Aun Peaum Shoreline to 500 ft Sedime.it SA to offshore t.ighting directly t o Cand Pese .
Water Tower a 5-2 ENE/67 0 0.2 ml Fermi 2 Discherge syro m 200 ft M
- ish,r e sediment SA S-3 NE/37 0 1.1 mi Estral Beach, mopeon 200 ft offshore. if S*diment SA North shoreline where Swan Creek and take Erie meet S-4 WSW/240' 3.C mt Indian Traits Comnwntty Beach Sediment SA S-S NNE/2C O 13.0 mi DECO *s Trenton Channet Power Plaat it.t a k e Sediment SA area (Control)
FISH F-1 NNE/30' 9.5 mi Ceferon isIand (Con:eef) Fish SA F-2 E/85 0 0.4 ml Fermt 2 Discharge tacprom 1200 ft offshore) Fish SA F-3 Sw/238* 5.0 mt Brest Bay warina Area (Controt) Fish SA i i I I e
- - + , r,c . . . . . . .+. ., _ _ . _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ . . . . . _ _ _ , _ , _ _ _ _ _
+
l \ I t - r o p y M M M M t e c S S S S s eR n - * - - l at acng e s M M M M ui e n t ngmi e nonr7 a r Al oo2 i F ort 9iiie d 8dvng 0 e 9anoe 1 REMP 9 d e t a e s s l l s s c d a a o e r B r s I G G
/ /
s k k k k A l l l l i i i i W MWM Ms s n o i t e r c
?
e l p n u
~ u -
N 7 d 3 M i m r e o d A r n t b t o e e s = r R F t u L o t p C c t
- s M n a
r i r M E 5 e f e o P _ p c 0 - h s / 7 0 2 e t e 1 7 3 6 r i D L 2 3 PW 7 - 3 4 g n - m r i r m) rl aF mr m r o ao a a t t Fr e F F t m n yn u s b B o t o s a b B oC e o e l D( R V W a
- t. .
) _
- s e mo or l
i rp fp i l l l v A m m e m _ n e( E c 2 7 5 1 l nr . a ao 4 3 S 4 2 tt c sc i g ia _ o De l R o l d - a l h R at _ cun 0 3 imo gii 0 ' 2
- 0 9 1 8 0 ozt 9 1 1 2 l A c 6 3 3 /
8 o/e 2 / / W rrr / W W N e ooi W N N W t et D
> t c t
a ee T MS _ n or - ie t 2 3 7 tb am M M M M t u SM
1999 Annual 1 RadicloglCSI' Enwironmental Monitor %ng Report. Page 28 . Table 8,0-4 Radiological Environmental Isonttoring Program, reral 2 Sample *statlens and Associated leedia water tiieteorological Station Sector / Azimuth Distance frome GBedIS Frequent:y Number Direction Reactor (Approm) DeSCrIDtim DRINMING WATER Drinking water M ow-t .S/169 0 1.2 ml Monroe water station N Side of Pointe Ace Peaus 1/2 Block w of Long Rd Drinking water # g*Alten Park) WJter Stat *On Dw-2 N/S o 20 mi Detroit 14700 Moran Rd. (Cue t rol l SURFACE WATER Surface water M Fermt Unit i .! a w Lake water I,etaae Strweture SW-1 SSE/159 0.4 ml Surface water M Sw-2 NME/20' 13.0 ml CECO *s Trenton Channet Power P l a.n t inta66 St ructure (Scree *.?*ouse s43) (Contro') SITE WELLS Grouewfma t er Q GW-1 S/174 0 0.4 en t Approm 100 ft w of Laka Erie. EF-9 Pack 1M; tot near pas f ra+J psakerr Groundwater Q Gw-2 SSw/207 0 1.0 ml 4 ft 5 of Pointe Aun Peaun (PAP) R.A Fence 427 ft w of ener t P.9 trosses ever Stoe.ey Polnf *s western Dik? Ground-ater C Gw-3 Sw/225 8 1.C ml 143 ft W of PAP ad Gate. 62 ft M of PAP Rd Fence 42 f t S of Langton N;. 8 f t E of Groundwater 0 Gw-4 WNw/289 0 0.6 mi Tot 1 Rd Facee e aman
-=--;;,;----=..-::::.c.,;'eu...a-- -
- ' - - - ' - - ' ' - ' - ' . ' - ' - " " . . . ,. p
..--.i.-,a- ,
E E' ~E E fE E E' E E E E E. E E E ~ E E 1989 Annuo* ficdlolegical Environmental Nonitoring Report Page 29 - Table 8.0-5 Radiological Environmental asonttoring Program. Feral 7 Sample Locatlens and AsseClated Reedia Air Part4culate/R1r Iodine teeteoretogical Statton Sector / Azimuth Distance from Mumber Directton Reactor (Appros) Descrlpfton asedia Fregewy API-t NE/38 0 1.4 el Estral Beach Pole on Lekashore. 18 Pales S of Radiolodine W' ' W Lakeview (Nearest Community) PartSculates API-2 NNW/340 0 0.6 al Sita Boundry and Tolf R osef , e Site Fance by Radlolodine W T-4 Pa r t icula t es W API-3 NW/321' O.6 ml Site 8toue* y and Tcti R owt . on Site Fence by Radiolodine W i T-5 Particulates W API-4 W/269 0 14.2 mi Pole, tNhtno Ooty Farm - 7532 N. Custer Road Padiolodine W (Contros) Particulates W API-5 SW/tB0 0 1.0 mi Corner of Cr N $t and Pointe Aum Eppua Rds Radiolodine W Particulates W t l I I l l l l l i i I s 4 _.-_2 _ - _ . ___--._____-__._-----__----__A - - - - - _ - - - - - - - - - w 4 e es -- -- ---a'-m--Le--- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ~ - - _ - - - - - - - - - * - - ^ - - - - - - - - - ' * - ~ - -
. . . .= . . . . . . . . .
1989 Annuat Radiological ' Environnentat Moniterlog Deport Page 30 i Table 8.O-6 Radiological Environweental soonitortN Prograse. Fer:nl 7 Sample torations and Assoclated GBedte Footl Proriucts I t aseteorological Stat 6en Sector /Azlanuth Distance from media Frequency Direction Reactor (Appros) Description Mumber Ratant Farm - 9501 TymoiLe Highway Food Products M (when FP-1 NNE/220 4.0 mt avaitable) 6141 Brancheau Food Products M (= hen FP-3 N*d E /110 1.1 mi avattable) 4262 PCst Food Products M (when FP-4 WNW/282o 2.2 ml avaltable) Food Products M (when FP-3 NNE/20' O.4 =9 780s t_ abo avaitable) 8200 Geirman (Control) Food Products M (= hen FP-6 wMW/289 0 14.6 el avalfacle)
+
6 e N
.-1989 Annua 1-Cadiologica3' Environmental Wonitoring Repoet Page 31
" t.
Table 8.0-7 Radiological Environmental monitorino Program.. Fermi 2 Sample Locations and Associated Media t end Use Census Meteorological
- Sector / Azimuth Distance from-Direction Reactor ( Agapros ) Description 36 0 /M 1.1 mi 6760 t.akeshore 170 /NNE 1.1 mt 6441'Brancheau 360 0 /N 1.4 mi . 6200 Blanchett 3350 /NNW 1.2 mi 5701 Post.
0 6577 terou= 317 /NW 1.1 mi 0 303 /WNW 0.7 mi 6200 Langton i 278 0/W O.8 ml 6001 To11
. 224 0/WSW 1.2 ml 4981 Pointe Aus Peaum 1
2210 /SW 1.2 ml 5194 pointe Aun Peaus 8970 /SSW 1.1 mi 5820 Pointe Aus Peaum 0 0.9 et 4834 Long 179 /S
. NOTE: These locations have been identified as the closest residences in the most recent Land Use Census /Per Meteorlogical Sector that' are applicable.
I e 4
. .. a .._.a. , ,, .. , . _ , . . - , , _ . - , , , --, s--.. . _ .m. _ _m ____._________._
~
- 1989 Annual'
. Radiological Env i rcrwnen t a l ,
neon %toring Report'
.N a ee 32 NNW NNE
^
/ f __.
P i
' NE NW / y I l -1 7 ,
, ENE WNW _
2 _i
. -3 un a
/my m.
T38 8"'
=
s E WE, T26 LmA i T' - o I h= kk v SCALE IN MILES
" =g a a g> __
LY A -
*
- Z*"4 --
ESE _ LEGEND W = . e-T- DIRECT RADIATION
- " ' O-API- AIR PARTICULATES/ AIR IODINE
" A SEDIMENTS A-DW/SW- DRINKING WATFR/ SURFACE WATER
-GW- GROUND WATER SE -* "rtK FP- F000 PRODUCTS' SW -r- rISn SSE~ FmmE 1 SSW s = 1"S'aca"*"5 BY STATION NERSER S <SIvE AREA >
.S l e se P
Al.
!*ElIn!l lJ 1.? !li fi%
M M ~
=
lt !!!!
# 55t 0 lg!
l"3557
. gl E35If oo <ee.
I I I g x - .,>,e ,, g I y g \ ,, .. j/ _ l . < v ,,,,,,-p s I z G , ,,- s-l
,1
.- G
~'
< 9 '11 14 l ,
i I I ' l 'j j I IQ j , (
@,er s/IE_
, ['
i b R
?
lm i
* . .q y
yE s r k& = g 1 2 W n I -4 54 %wp-/ u~s h* ; . . . -. / :s. - 5/ w. I I
>:. _ z ~~e 2E. O_ I :1 -
2 .;-- -
~
-- - 2 -
~
i ~ 1989 AnnuaI'
- Radiofogical Environmental --
Monitoring' Report N Page 34 NNW. NNE A 1 Y n 4 NE NW . 4 r ,f M s/ \ .
" i jt t \ M/ -
. ~J - ;,, - ;
s - c , Y _+ 2 W-u - T1 i WNW -
%/ bll
/(/ h . _
s.- 2' ( jt , j N N 'F f 7; i -
! % /# 1' '
d '_ ' i E-W; g }
- 3 ,
y? f x : 0 i 2 3 ! y - o s ' / SCALE IN MILES
'~ _
l .
. 1
~
i - 's - ESE WSW -
\.
LEGEND-S-T- DIRECT RADIATION . O-API- AIR PARTICULATES/ AIR IODINE A SEDIRENTS ' g A-OW/SW- DRINKING WATER / SURFACE WATER
-S*- au" =a
- s SE + ""
SW 'g -FP- FOOD PR000 CTS g -F- FISH
\
SSW 's% SSE ricuRE 3 SAAFLING LOCATIONS
$ 's- ---~~
BY STATION NUIEBER Issette .
~] (LESS THAN 10 MILES)
_ _ _ 1__ _ _ _ l
% A.. % is%+--m- y %.. .,. Mas- .wg #4 y- e. ,f9 , ...a. . , , . _
4 t or lews Retxte t NNW NNE e NE NW , 4 A I-2 WNW API-3 h I % LAKE T6 $ G 4 g U T4 g @ F-2 ENE { T WE o 05 m ._ 4 M d' 3 SCALE IN MILES 2 4
~
i ( F gf I ESE LEGEND ggg g API P ES/ AIR IODINE DR DR$ I M WATER /5URFACE WATER GROUND WATER GW SE "I g 4p'm racoucis SW $ s-i w-2 m N- - SSE _ r,1 ,GuRE g , , SSW S s;;tS Ig!L"j"g!E .
I I , ys- .~ ,y m s....,,,,,c,,n,,1 , g ,
,p;1; dairyfarmers is 1- i .c ,
L done cach rnonsh l + Nh '?- ' ' as part of, Fermi 2 s v< = serrestria
"{
., h:
[ N' (e 7 t ,
'. n g } g 4-
. d' (
9
%{
pi7lf ._ y cr: - c t s- <, w, n.- - g g Data Tables I I I g a si i
*1
, . .l l :1989 Annual l:, M Radiological Environmental-
'- Monitoring Raport i = Page 36-l: LI t-l t-9.0 DATA TABLES l l-
~
I - l! g 1
. 1 i-l
^
i :R 1989 Annual- ,! Is Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report j Page '37-FERMI-2 i ' TLD ANALYSIS f Gamma Radiation, as measured by TLDs (Vendor - Teledyne isotopes)- Collection: 1st Quarter (January - March) t Units: mR/ standard quarter, net exposure (
'[ -
- Date Placed: 12-29-88 l R Date Removed: 03-31-89 Days In the Field: 92
. Calculated Transit Dose: 6.2 + 0.6 '
y.- Location mR/Std. Otr.
!k:E Station - Azip)uth
(' Distance . (miles) A B Mean + s.d. % s.d. T-1' 17.4 + 1.4 38 1.4 19.220.8- 18.3 + 1.3 7.0
. T-2 ~. 21 1.1 ' 19.0 + 1.2 22.9 + 1.9 21.0 + 2.8 13.1 .
T-3 4' 1.1 .16.871.1 16.9 I 0.8 16.8 I 0.1 0.4-T -340 0.6 - 20.071.8 20.270.9 20.1 I 0.1 0.7 ' T-5 321 0.6 22.8 I 1.5 22.0 I 1.0 22.4 I 0.6 2.5 ' T-6' 296 0.0 19.4 I 1.3 20.471.6 19.9 I 0.7 3.6 E L T-7 269- 14.2- 20.1 I 1.3 20.6 I 1.4 20.4 I 0.4 1.7 I ( T 304 1.9 21.0 [ 1.3 20.5 { 1.4 20.8 [ 0.4 1.7
'T 333 1.5 - 17.6 + 1.0 - 17.0 + 0.8 17.3 + 0.4 2.5 T-10. 6 2.2 19.6 I 1.7 19.4 I 1.4 19.570.1 0.7 T-11 25- 6.3 '13.8 I 0.8 16.0 I 1.1 14.9 I 1.6 10.4. ~
'T-12 33 6.1 16.071.1 16.5 I 1.1 '16.2 I 0.4 2.2 T-13 357 - 0.0 - ;
; 4.~1
'21.5 [ 0.8 21.5 { 1.7 21.5 { 0.0
- T-14 .338- 4.4 21.2 + 1.3 19.7 + 0.8 20.4 + 1.1 5.2 T-15 318 . 3.9 ' 18.5 I 0.9 18.7 I 0.9 18.6 I 0.1 0.8' T-16 282 4.8 19.6 { 1.1 19.5 { 1.2 19.6 { 0.1 0.4 ;
}' lg(;
.T-17 T-18 273 245 5.2 4.8 18.5 + 0.8 18.4 I 1.2 17.8 + - 1.4 19.6 I 0.8 18.2 + 0.5 -
19.0 I 0.8' 2.7 4.5
-T-19. 234- 5.0 24.0 I 1.4 24.9 I 1.3 24.4 I 0.6' 2.6 T 253 2.6 22.9 I 1.8 22.9 I 1.7 22.970.0 ' O.0
- T-21 237' 2.7 18.8 I 0.9 19.4 I 0.8 19.1 I'O.4 2.2 -
, T-22' 168 1.2 18.4 I 0.2 18.8 I C.7 ' 18.6 I 0.3 1.5 0 .l.T-23 193: 1.1 20.6 I 1.1 20.571.0: 20.6 I 0.7 3.3 T 20.1 I 0.8 18.6 I 0.7 '19.471.1
~
; 222 1.2 5.5
.T-25 249 1.4 23.8 I 1.3 23.9 I 1.2 23.8 I 0.1 0.3
!1 T-26 258 1.1 22.5 I 1.1 23.2 I 1.1 22.8 I 0.5 2.2 ' , 1 ~T-27 223 7.0 15.7 I 0.9 16.771.1 16.2 I 0.7 4.4 L T-28 227 10.6 21.2 I 0.7 21.9 I 0.8 21.670.5 2.3 L T-29 237 10.3 20.9 I 1.2 20.6 I 0.8 20.8 I 0.2 1.0 . h- 'T-30 247 7.8 18.071.0 17.9 I 1.4 18.0 I 0.1 0.4 L ; T-31 '254 8.9 22.170.6 21.9 I 0.6 22.0 I 0.1 0.6 b : T-32 296 10.3 21.2 I 0.9 21.0 I 0.7 21.1 I 0.1 0.7 L T-33 318 S.3 15.4 { 1.1 15.7 { 0.8 15.6 { 0.2 1.4 h 1 r ' ' y
->e-- -
= ~
Jg-1989 Annual. 5 Radiological Environmental- , Monitoring Report I Page 38 FERMI-2 l W. TLD ANALYSIS Gamma Radiation, as measured by TLDs (continued) Collection: 1st Quarter (January - March) , Units: mR/ standard quarter, net exposure {
.. 9 Date Placed: 12-29-88 -j Date Removed: ~30-31-89 .l Days in the Field: 92 I
Calculated Transit Dose: 6.2 + 0.6
, l
! i
'gL Location mR/Std. Otr. d g' Arip)uth Distance Mean + s.d. % s.d.
Station ( (miles) A B
-T-34 339 9.7 LOST IN THE FIELD -
T-35 360 7.0 17.7 + 1.0 17.6 + 0.7 17.6 + 0.1 0.4 T-36 360 9.2 21.371.3 21.970.8 21.6 I 0.4- 2.0 . T-37 23 9.9 20.271.1 20.871.0 20.570.4 ' 2.1 T-38 289 1.7 18.7 + 1.2 18.971.1 ' 18.8 + 0.1 . 0.8 T-39 147 0.17 20.9 I-1.2 21.271.0 21.070.3 1.0 : T-40 139 0.16 '18.0 { 0.7 17.8 { 0.7 17.9 { 0,1 0.8 - ] 20.7 + 0.4 2.0 -l T-41 133 0.15 21.0 + 1.0 20.4 + 1.2 T-42 125 0.15 22.071.0 22.570.8 22.270.4 1.6-T-43 .114 0.14 23.5 7 1.3 23.771.0 23.6 I 0.1 0.6 21.671.0 21.470.2 R T-44 101 0.14 21.371.1 1.0 T-45 84 0.16 20.2 { 1.0 20.9 { 1.3 20.6 { 0.5 2.4 ; T-46 71 0.2 20.0 + 0.9 20.4 + 0.7 20.2 + 0.3 1.4 i I,. g
.I. ?E ,
1.'
. f' 1989 Annual Radiological Environmental H [L 1
i Monitoring Report
"'S' 38 ll q FERMI-2 ]! .g- TLD ANALYSIS ; I Gamma Radiation, as measured by TLDs (Vendor - ITC)
Collection: 2nd Quarter (April - June) Units: mR/ standard quarter, not exposure
- Date Placed: 03-31-89 Date Removed: 06-30-89 Days in the Field: . 92 Calculated Transit Dose: 10.5 j Location mR/Std. Qtr. 2-Sigma Distance g Station Atlp)uth
( (miles) T 38- 1.4 20.0 8.5
'I' T-2 T-3 21 4
1.1 1.1 22.7
'20.8 9.1 9.1 8.3 T-4 340 0.6 19.1 T-5 321 0.6 24.0 9.5 i
~T-6 296 0.6 21.3 8.7 T-7 269 14.2' 21.8 8.9
'gl T-8 304. 1.9 22.2 8.9
-T-9 333 -1.5 21.5 8.6 15'- 23.7 9.8
- T-10 6 2.2 i
--, *T-11 25- 6.3 17.8 7.4 .;
.T-12 33 6.1 18.5 8.0 j T-13' 357 4.1 24.4 9.7 .j '
T-14 338 4.4 23.2 9.8 T-15 318 3.9 20.0 8.2 T-16' 282 4.8 22.9 9.1 - 'l T-17 273 5.2 22.3 8.9
.T-18 245 4.8 21.0 8.5 i 3 25.0 9.9 !
- g? T-19 234' 5.0 T-20 253 2.6 LOST IN THE FIELD T 237 2.7 19.2 8.1
.T-22 168 1.2 24.3 10.2 5i I.- T-23 193 1.1 28.9 12.5 T-24 222 1.2 55.8 44.0-T-25 249' 1.4 37.2 14.5
. 3:
- g. ~
T-26 258 1.1 40.5 21.7-T-27 223 7.0 25.1 10.7 T-28 227 10.6 38.3 18.9
'T-29 237 10.3 36.6 18.6
/' 25.6 11.3
'T 247 7.8 T-31 254 8.9 32.9 14.0'
*T-32 296 10.3 31.2 12.5 E'
B T-33 318 . 9.3 30.4 14.7 Placed in field 05/24/89. I;~
,3-
. -1989 Annual' Radiological Environman'tal-Monitoring Report
_V Page 40 i FERMI-2 TLD ANALYSIS y
- l Gamma Radiation, as measured by TLDs (continued)
L Collection: 2nd Quarter (April - June) l, Units: mR/ standard quarter, net exposure rJ ^ Date Placed: 03-31-89 m Date Removed: 06-30-89 :
' Days in the Field: 92' Calculated Transit Dose: 10.5 Location mR/Std. Otr. 2-Sigma j
; Distance l
~ Station Azip)uth
( (miles) i
- :- l T 339 9.7 .- 31.7 19.0 i T 360 7.0 19.1 7.8
[' i T-36 360- 9.2 22.2 8.8 ! T 23 9.9 21.5 8.6 l
- T-38 289 1.7 23.7 9.5 !
T-39 29.3 11.4
'! I'l- T-40 147 0.17 12.0 T-41 T-42 139-133 125-0.16 0.15 0.15 21.5 35.7 31.0 13.7 13.6 ll T-43 114 0.14 37.1 14.8 ;i j
T -101 0.14 32.5 12.9 g' T-45 84- 0.16- 24.6 17,1 9.8 9.6
.g. T-46 71 - 0.2 l
?
I: 1 LI
;g
. .r l l 1989 Annual-F Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report Page 41 7
FERMI-2 W TLD ANALYSIS
!g: Gamma Radiation,' as measured by TLDs (Vendor - ITC) ! 'g; - Collection: 3rd Quarter (July - September) !
Units: mR/ Standard Quarter, Net Exposure 1
-Date Placed: 06-30-89 I t '
Date Rernoved: 09-28-89 , Days in the Field: 91 1' Calculated Transit Dose: 6.4 Location mR/Std. Otr. 2-$igma Distance ; Arip)uth (I- Station (- (miles) - T-1 38 1.4 12.4 12.9
.T-2 21 ' 1.1 11.4 14.3 .i I'-
T-3 -4 1.1' 13.9 9.0 ~ T-4 340 0.6 14.4 9.2 T-5 321 0.6 16.4 10.7 I), T-6 296 0.6 15.9 11.0 <
~
T-7 269 14.2 15.5 13.7 T 304 - 1.9 17.3 11.1 333 1.5 16.1 10.2-
! .T-9 T-10' 6 2.2 19.6 12.7 l
*T-11 25 6.3 15.3 10.2- 'l t T-12 33 6.1 16 9 10.7 i J I'- T-13 357 4.1 20.1 13.6
[ T-14' 338 4.4 16.4' 12.7? ! 11.4
< :T-15 '
318 3.9 17.2 l
; T-16 -282 4.8 19.9 12.6 .j T-17 273 5.2 19.8 13.2 l T-18 245 4.8 19.1 12.1 i T-19 234 5.0 20.9- 13.1 1
- I> T-20 253 2.6 .19.5 13.3 i T-21 237 2.7 18.0 11.4 :
T-22 168 1.2 17.4 11.2 j
?E 3; T-23 193 1.1 19.1 13.3 1 1~ T-24 -222 1.2 13.4 16.1 L T-25 249 1.4 21.4 15.6 T 258 1.1 21.3 13.7' I T 223 7.0 15.1 9.6 l l?
12.5 ; K.- . T 227- 10.6 19.7 237 10.3 18.1 12.0 l h ! .T-29 l> -T-30 247 7.8 16.1 10.6 T-31 254 8.9 19.3 12.2 -j I T-32 296 10.3 -23.7 15.4 . 3 20.5 13.1 3 T ~318 9.3
- Place in the field 08/28/89.
nr ; g. = ,
, ,y- ; 3-" 1989 Annual Radiological Environmental- l i3 ' '
Mcnitoring Report - l Page 42 ; 1 FERMI-2 > I
~g _
W- TLD ANALYSIS - s3- Gamma Radiation, as measured by TLDs (continued) . 'I
.g Collection: 3rd Quarter.(July - September)
Units: mR/ Standard Quarter, Net Exposure
-i j
l Date Placed: OS-30-89
' Date Removed 09-28-89 Days in the Field: 91 Calculated Transit Dose. 6.4 Location mR/Std. 0tr. 2-Sigma i
- g. Distance Arip)uth.
(- ag Station . (miles)
-s T-34. 339 9.7 21.8 14.6 0T-35 360 7.0 19.1 12.2-T-36 360 9.2 22.7 14.3
.T-37 23 9.9 18.5 15.5 T-38 '283 1.7 23.3 1 5.11
~3 g 'T-39' 147 0.17 27.7 17.5-15.2 t T-40 -139 0.16 22.1
- T 133 0.15 30.8. 19.4 T-42 125 0.15 27.0 18.9 '
T-43 23.9 15.9 114 0.14-
. . -T-44 101 0.14 27,7 17.4- .g .T-45 :84 0.16 22.5 21.8 14.3 13.8, .;
5 T-46 71 0.2 ' ri
)
+
L5i l
?
.I -
i
.I l 1
I ' 1989 Annual Radiological Environmental
. Monitoring Report Pa9e 43 ]
FERMI-2
- TLD ANALYSIS
-1
' Gamma Radiation, as measured by TLDs (Vendor - ITC)
I.'.
~
Collection: 4th Quarter (September - December) Units: mR/ Standard Quarter, Net Exposure Date Placed: 09-28-89 Date Removed: 01-03-90
- Days in the Field: 98
' Calculated Transit Dosei 8.7 Location mR/Std. Otr. 2-Sigma -!
l 3.' Distance Azip)uth g; - Station ( (miles) T-1 38 1.4 14.3 10.0 I' T-2 T-3
.T-4 21 340 4
1.1 1.1 0.6 18.4 14.3 16.4 12.6 9.8 13.0 T-5 321 0.6 17.0 11.7
'E -
[ 'T-6 296 0.6 16.5 12.0 T-7 269 14.2 17.3 11.8 .i T-8 304 - 1.9 17.3 11.8
-T-9 333 1.5 15.8 11.1 ,
c I-- T-10 6 2.2 14.5' 17.4 L. T-11 25 6.3 10.5 13.3 i
/g- T-12 33 6.1 13.4 9.3 12.1 g T-13 357 4.1 16.0 ^
T-14 '338 4.4 20.1 16.8 fg T-15 318 3.9 19.6 13.3
- g= T-16 282 4.8 19.1 13.2 T-17 273 5.2 - LOST IN FIELD i T-18 245 ' 4.8 19.8 13.5 ,
- I T-19 234 5.0 20.7 14.3 >
T 253 2.6 23.2 15.7-T-21 237 2.7 17,9 12.2 T-22 168 1.2 18.4 12.8
-I. ..T-23 T-24 193 222 1.1 1.2 20.0 15.9 13.7' 11.2 T-25 249 1.4 20.4 13.8 ' ,I.--
T-26 258 1.1 20.3 -13.8 T-27! 223 7.0 13.4 9.4 T-28 227 10.6 16.9 12.0 T-29 237 10.3 16.1 11.0
, 1 T-30 247 7.8 11.3 8.6
'T-31 254 8.9 17.1 12.5
' Lg T-32 296 10.3 18.7 12.7 ll T-33 318 9.3 15.8 10.9 I iI
. . -i 1-1989 Annual Radiological Environmental. ,
Monitoring Report
= . Page 44
- FERM: 2 TLD ANALYSIS Gamma Radiation, as measured by TLDs (continued)
= Collection:- 4th Quarter (September - December)
Units: mR/ Standard Quarter, Net Exposure 3 Date Placed: 09-28-89 Date Removed: 01-03-90
- Days in the Field: 98 Calculated Transit Dose: 8.7 ==
Location mR/Std. Otr. 2-Sigma Distance Station Azig)uth ( (miles) T-34 339 9.7 17.3 12.3 T-35 .360 7.0 14.2 9.9 T-36 360 9.2 15.6 10.9 T-37 .23 9.9 15.8 10.8 T-38 289 1.7 16.8 12.2 T 147 0.17 11.5 8.6
.T-40 139 0.16 11.2 7.9 T-41 133 0.15 12.1 8.5 T-42 125- 0.15 12.3 10.8 9.3 T-43 114 0.14 13.2 T - 101 0.14 11.9 10.8 T-45 84 0.16 12.5 9.1
-I T-46 71 0.2 11.8 8.5 m
]
J I A _3 J 1
-3
~ 9 M E E t Ol l acng t aR at r o p e 7 8 3 3 4 3 ui e n - - 3 3 ngmi T T - - EAl nonr5 9ii1 e oo4 ort : p u 3 1 2 7
. 2 4
7 2 22 1 9 2 3 T 5 T 4
, 8dvng o - - T T TT - 1 1 9anoa r T T T - -
RENP G . . . . T T 6 . 5 1 9 4 061 . E1 i n 03 1 -
- T 1
1 4 T 4 T 3 T 2 T 223 TTT 7 1 6 1 8 9 s T T T T T T D ; . . . . . . . L 5 . 6 4 3 0 2 3 98 850 . . T 33 2 t 4 4 4 4 2 2 1 2 1 23 7 6 5 4 E TT T T T T T T T T TT TTT T T T T n a e E m l a u 9 8 3 7 7 5 1 0 2 6 2 1 8 7 4 n . . . n 8 7 6 7 1 1- 0 1 2 2 2 9 0 9 9 E A 1 1 1 t 2 2 i' 2 2 2 2 1 2 1 1 E n o t r i Q . 5 3 2 7 3 3 8 4 4 t c h 9 8
. 2 9 0 0 e t 4 4 4 1 2 3 t 5 0 6 8 7 7 7 7 r 4 1 1 1 1 1 1 f 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 E S I
i D 2 S s Y s I L a M A p ) R N . . E E F A D C m o t r r t L O Q T y 1 5 4 8 1 9 6 6 1 3 1 7 7 9 2 b . d . . . d r 9 5 2 1 5 3 6 2 9. 7 9 7 0
- 7 d t 3 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 E e p
u S
/
R o m r ( G e n t . E i t o a R t Q r e 0 1 0 1 6 1 4 6 9 1 4 1 8 2 9 ia r d . . . . d u n 2 0 0 7 8 7 9 6 8 6 0 2 4 4 3 a8 s 2 2 2 2 1 2 3 2 2 2 3 3 2 2 2 2 R8 o E a1 9 E p x m'. m ay e Gl g r a . E ye l t rr r e v t Q r ea A 4 2 3 2 0 6 3 8 6 4 1 3 9 4 3 t u t . rQ s 9 8 8 0 1 3 0 9 0 0 1 9 9 9 9 a 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 E' u Q: er e gu as ro ep E' vx AE si n o st E E E E E r wS W S W w w wN ac pe N N N N E S S S S W N N N E E S S W W N mr
~
oi CD T _
~
Il!Illl! r',l.!ll .
llljil1II{!Il Jillf!jjjl1!) )f)'lll! ill1ij ! !l!!! 1ll! ! Ii i Ii 1llll, I l1i ' ~- [ = { }. &., t r
~
o
,p~
- l e l
aR Dl at 1 acng' . 3 ui e n 8' -
. ngmi 4- T nonr6 T . . . . . . . .
Al oo4 T 61 4 481 225 . 9iiie ort p 3244" 1 1 2 1 33 9 2 u 82- - - - - - - - - A 8cvng o 33- TTT TTT TTT - 9enoa r - - T T 1 REMP G TT . . . . . . . . . 5036 360 7047 . n . 22444 1 1 2 1333 8 262- - - - - - - - - - - 2 M i D s
- - - TTTT TTT TTT .TTTT T
L . . 4925 059 1 736 . I 1 592344 1 1 1 1 233 7 TTTTTTT TTT TTTT T ~ M .
~
~
~
E n ~' a e ' m ~
^'
l
~'
a 2 u 9 3 9 2 n i n 0 0 8 2 m A 2 2 1 2 r ^ e F
'~
m o f r
~
r
) t ~
s Q e 4 0 6 9 t i m ) h t 4 5 1 9 1 4 1 6 1
'~
( . S - I e d. 2 S c s Y n L I A a + M t - R E NA is r r F D D t t L y O Q T 9 0 0 2 b . d d r 9 9 9 8 d t 3 1 1 1 1 e S - p / u, R o m r ( G - e n t . o a r i R t t Q - a e 8 4 1 4 i r d . d u n 7 2 4 2 a s 2 2 2 2 3 - R o p -- a x m E - m
. a e G g -
a y r r l e t r v Q e A 4 6 0 2 t t r s 0 0 8 1 a 1 2 2 1 2 - u - Q e , g . a ._. r e s v l A e e o c)hr 2 5 r nst o t ae t - - n tl mc 5 o sioa 0 2 > C iMre D(fR
i 1989 Annual Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report
- Page 47 I
FERMI-2 ( I J AIR PARTICULATE ANALYSIS l, Location = Estral Beach, Pole on Lakeshore,18 Poles South of Lakeview APl-1 (Indicator) Distance = 1.4 Miles NE/380 of Fermi 2 Sample = Airborne Particulates and Airborne lodine Analysis = Gross Beta and lodine - 131 a I Sample Frequency = Coginuoup= 10' pCi/m eekly (.001 pCi/m3) Units = Date Date Vop)me Gross (pCi/m g) eta Vop)me Gross (pCi/m g) eta I Collected (m Collected (m 01-10-89 233 41.2 + 5.4 04-05-89 275 18.0 + 5.0 01-17-89 234 32 8 I46 04-11-89 206 26.0 I 7.0 1 01-24-89 239 20.0 I 4.1 04-18-89 239 26.077.0 01-31-89 239 42.9 7 3.9 04-25-89 255 19.0 I 5.0 02-07-89 236 41.7 ; 5.3 05-02-89 240 14.074.0 1 02-14-89 239 33.5 ! 5.0 05-09-89 244 15.0 I 4.0 02-21-89 234 23.875.2 05-16-89 243 14.0 I 4.0 02-28-89 238 25.9 I 4.7 05-23-89 248 18.0 I 5.0 03-07-89 242 32.674.8 05-30-89 248 19.075.0 1 03-14-89 237 32.6 I 3.5 06-06-89 250 19.0 I 5.0 03-21-89 240 25.4 I 3.2 06-13-89 250 21.0 I 5.0 03-28-89 241 27.4 -! 4.8 06-20-89 249 15.0 I 4.0 1 06-27-89 252 21.0 [ 3.0 1st Otr mean 31.6 2nd Qtr mean 18.8 a lodine-131 concentrations are <0.7 pCi/m 3unless noted otherwise. b Pump ran for eight days. 1 I
- - . ,1 1
'1989 Annual.
I. 1 I Radiological Environmental l Monitoring Report Paga 48 ] ,i IL FERMI-2 ) AIR PARTICULATE ANALYSIS Location ' = - Estral Beach, Pole on Lakeshore,18 Poles South of Lakeview API-1 (Indicator)
,1.4 Mile,G NE/38 0 of Fermi 2 Distance! =
Sample' , -= Airborne Particulates and Airborne lodine t Analysis- = Gross Beta and lodine - 131a I^.- Sample i L Frequency = ' Corginuoup= eekly (.001 pCl/m3) l . Units = 10 pCi/m
.i Date Vopme Date
~ Collected Gross (pCi/m g)- eta Collected Vop)me (m Gross (pCi/m g) eta
-'(m )
i (continued)
= 07-04-89 249 .18.0 + 5.0 10-03-89 247 22.0 + 6.0 07-11-89 254 21.0 + 5.0 10-10-89 247 20.075.0 ^
07-18-89 251 18.0 I 5.0 10-17-89 255 38.0 I 9.0 07-25-89 253 24.0 I 6.0 10-24-89 243 17.0 I 5.0
'08-01-89 253 19.0 I 5.0 10-31-89 249 82.0718.0 08-08-89 .248 19.0 I 5.0 11-07-89 243 29.0 I 7.0 08-15-89 252 28.0 { 3.0 11-14-89 243 23.0-{ 6.0 08-22-89 250. 34.0 + 3.0 11-21-89 239 23.0 + 6.0 08-29-89 252 19.0 I 5.0 11-28-89 241 29.0 I 7.0 b d '
09-05-89 250- 22.0 I 6.0 12-05-89 239 23.0 I 6.0 ' 09-12-89 250 .24.0 I 6.0 12-12-89 238 26.0 I 7.0 1' 09-19-89 249 20.0 I 5.0- 12-19-89 241 48.0711.0 09-26-89 249_ 14.0 { 4.0 12-26 267 31.0 [ 7.0 3rd Otr mean' 21.5 4th Otr mean 31.6 a lodine-131 concentrations are <0.7 pCl/m3 unless noted otherwise b Airborne lodine cartridge lost in shipment, no 1-131 concentration reported. IL
- li -
I 4'- . 1
. . .~ _ _
1989 Annual' Radiological EnvironmGntal Monitoring Report j Page 49 l FERMI-2 AIR PARTICULATE ANALYSIS
. Location - = Site Boundary and Toll Rd on Site Fence by T i API-2 (Indicator) 0 Distance = - 0.6 Miles NNW/340 of Fermi 2 l
i Sample = Airborne Particulates and Airborne lodine
' Analysis- = - Gross Beta and lodine - 131 a l Sample - ,
Frequency = - Corginuoup=eekly I3, Units = - 10 pCl/m (.001 pCl/m3)
. , Date Date Vopme Collected Vop)me (m Gross (pCl/m g) eta Collected '(m ) Gross (pCl/m -g) eta D
- l 01-10-89 254 37.5 + 5.0 04-05-89 289 16'.0 + 4.0
'F 01-17-89 251 29.3 I 4.2 04-11-89 247 29.077.0 01-24 250 21.474.1 04-18-89 255~ -28.077.0 01-31-89 251' 42.473.8 04-25 255 21.075.0 1 02-07-89 247 41.075.1 05-02-89 251 12.0 I 4.0-
, 02-14-89 253 25.374.5 09-89 255 .15.074.0 02-21-89 249 26.2 I 5.0 05-16-89.. 256 16.074.0 02-28-89 252 29.9 + 4.7 05-23-89 259 -18.0 + 5.0 03-07-89 248 31.274,7 05-30-89 .258 19.075.0 03-14-89 253' 35.0 I 3.4 06-06-89 260 18.075.0 .
03-21-89 252' 25.773.1- 06-13-89 260: 20.075.0 ? 28-89' 253- 25.6 { 4.6 06-20-89 260 16.0 { 4.0. 06-27-89 262 20.0 + 5.0 j 1st Qtr mean 30.9 2nd Qtr mean 19.1- l a lodine-131 concentrations are <0.7 pCl/m 3:unless noted otherwise. b Pump ran for eight' days. 1 i - l Ih - 1 n L l
~
- T 1989 Annual
- Radiological Environmental.-
Monitoring Report Page 50 FERMI-2 AIR PARTICULATE ANALYSIS i
- Location - = Site Boundary and Toll Rd on Site Fence by T-4 ;
APl-2 (Indicator) Distance - = 0.6 Miles NNW/340 0 of Fermi 2'
= Airborne Particulates and Airborne lodine Sample
- Analysis . = Gross' Beta and lodine - 131 a l
- Sample Frequency =
Conjinuoug/ Weekly 10 pCl/m = (.001 pCi/m )3
~
Units = . Date Date Collected - Vop)me (m Gross (pCl/m g) eta Collected Vop)me (m Gross g) eta (pCl/m
]
(continued)
'07-04-89 260 = 19.0 + 5.0 10-03-89 260 20.0 + 5.0 1 07-11-89 07-18-89.
263' 21.0 I 5.0 16.074.0 10-10-89 259 20.0 I 5.0 40.0 I 9.0 3 263 10-17-89 '260 07-25-89 265 29.0 77.0' '10-24-89 258 14.0 I 4.0-08-01 263 18.0 I 5.0 10-31-89 260 50.0 I 11.0 I '08-08-89 08-15-89 257 262 18.0 I 5.0 27.0 I 3.0 11-07-89 11-14-89 257 258 29.0 I 7.0 23.0 I 6.0-
?08-22-89 260 60.0 I 3.0 11-21-89 253 27.0 I 7.0 :
~
08-29-89 264 22.0 6.0 11-28-89 256 24.0 I 6.0 b
- 09-05-89'- 261- 21.0 + 5.0 12-05-89 -253 ' 14.0 + 4.0 - -
j 09-12-89= 261- 32.0 I 8.0 12-12-89 255' 29.0 I 7.0 g'. 09-19 262' 24.0 I 6.0.
~
12-19 249 .40.0 I 9.0- l Jp- 09-26-A9 260 16.0 + 4.0 12-26-89: 247- 38.0 [ 9.0 i 3rd Ot n een 24.8 4th Otr mean 28.3 1 a lodine-131 concentrations are <0.7 pCi/m3 unless noted otherwise, l b ~ Airborne lodine cartridge lost in shipmeat, no 1-131 concentration reported. F 7 l J
s , , i 1989 Annual-
=
Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report
= Page 51
. _J FERMI-2
-- AIR PARTICULATE ANALYSIS Site Boundary and Toll Rd on Site Fence by T-5 Location = --- Distance = 0.6APl-3 (Indicator)
Miles NW/3210of Fermi 2 Sample - = Airborne Particulates and lodine 131 a
~ Analysis ~ = Gross Beta and lodine - 131 Sample g Frequency = Co 5 . Units = > 10~ginuoup-=eekly pCi/m (.001 pCl/m3)
'au j _ Date , Grossgeta Date Gross
= Collected Vop)me (m (pCl/m ) Collected Vop)me (m (pCi/m g) eta 5 01-10-89 '272- 31.4 + 4.5 04-05-89 309 17.0 + 4.0 01-17-89 '268 27.9 I 4.0 04-11-89 234 29.0 + 7.0 24-89 268 20.473.8 18-89 275 -26.076.0 3 01-31-89 270 ' 41.8 { ~ 3.6 04-25-89 270 19.0-{ 5.0 02-07-89 05-02-89 267 16.0 + 4.0 >
264 37.6 + 4.8 02-14-89 271 29.474.4 05-09-89 273 15.074.0
~ 02-21-89 266 22.774.6 05-16-89 272 12.0 74.0-
= .02-28-89 269 27.7 { 4.4 05-23-89 278 18.0 { 5.0.
1 03-07-89_ 266 '31.5 + 4.5 05-30-89 276 16.0. + 4.0 03-14 270 36.0 { 3.3 06-06-89 278 19.0 [ 5.0 03-21-89 269 30.0 + 3.1 06-13-89 278 17.0 + 5.0 _ 03-28 271- 23.4 I 4.3
~
06-20-89 278 13.074.0
'06-27-89 280 20.0 { 5.0 1st Otr mean 30.0 2nd Otr mean 18.2 "a
lodine-131 concentrations are <0.7 pCl/m3unless noted otherwise. D
- Pump ran for eight days.
1 3 1 J
-1
l,3 1989 Annual'
. Radiological Environmental l'E
)y
' Monitoring Report' l Page 52 FERMI-2 AIR PARTICULATE ANALYSIS !
l _ Location - = , Site Boundary and Toll Rd on Site Fence by T-5:
'. API-3 (Indicator)
Distance = 0.6 Miles NW/321 of Fermi 2 a il; Sample = . Altborne Particulates and lodine 131
- 5.1 - Analysis = Gross Beta and lodine - 131
' Sample , . .j
; ; - Frequency
= Conjinuoup=eekly . (.001 pCl/m3)
Units = 10 pCi/m
= Date Date Collected Vop)me Gross (pCl/m g) eta Collected Vop)me (m
Gross (pCi/m g)ota (m (continued)
' 07-04-89 277 15.0 + 4.0 10-03-89 277. 18.0 + 5.0 07-11 281 21.075.0 10-10-89 277 21.075.0 07-18-89 278 16.074.0 10-17-89 277 35.0 I 8.0 07-25-89 282 28.077.0- 10-24-89 276 14.0 I 4.0
. . 08-01-89 '282 21.075.0 10-31-89 282- 50.0711.0-08-08-89 278 20.075.0 11-07-89 .276 23.076.0
~
15-89 283 26.073.0 11-14-89 277 23.0 6.0
~
08-22-89 279 46,0 3.0 - 11-21-89 272 22.0 I 6.0 08-29-89 282 20.0 I 5.0 11-28-89. 275 25.076.0 09-05-89' 280 23.076.0 05-89 272 24.076.0
.09-12-89 280 27.076.0 12-12-89 270 26.076.0 09-19-89 278' 23.076.0 12-19-89 293 8.0 7 3.0 26-89 277 17.074.0 _
12-26-89 268 34.0 _+ 8.0 1 3rd Qtr mean 23.3 4th Otr mean 24.8- i a lodine-131 concentrations are <0.7 pCi/m3unless noted otherwise. r . c
~ ~ ~
. . , . ,l r .1989 Annual-Radiological Environmsntal:
E , ,
, fU Monitoring Report Page 53 ;
- FERMI-2 AIR PARTICULATE ANALYSIS f
': Location- = ' Pole ~behmd Doty Farm 7512 North Custer Road Monroe, Michigan i t API-4 (Control)
Distance = 14.2 Miles W/2690 of Fermi 2 Sample - Airborne Particulates and lodine-131
- l. El
-- Analysis Sample '
= Gross Beta and lodine - 131a
~"
J Frequency Cont eekly 1 1 ; Units = .10-puousp= pCl/m (.001 pCl/m 3 ) , Date Grossgeta Date - Collected Vog)sme (m= (pCl/m ) Collected Vog)me (m Gross (pCl/m g)ota ' D 01-10-89 .233 30.7 + 5.0 04-05 268 16.0' + 4.0
- g. 01-17 233 37.174.8 04-11-89 202 :29.0 I 7.0 i 3 01-24-89 235 17.0 I-4.0 04-18-89 241 26.0 T 7.0 01-31-89 235 43.874.0 04-25-89 285 17.074.0
': gi 02-07-89 259 36.774.8 05-02-89 286 14.0 74.0 .
(( 02-14-89 02-21-89 235 231 27.874.8 22.875.2 05-09-89 05-16-89 293 292
~ 14.0 7 4.0.
14.074.0 i
-. 02-28-89 261 24.9 T 4.3 05-23-89 298 17.075.0' i 0/-89
.233 31.5 { 4.9 05-30-89 298 17.0 [c5 .0
.03-14-89' 235 34.3 + 3.6 06-06-89' NS 03-21-89 233 25.873.3 06-13-89 302 20.0 + 5.0 03-28-89: 236 25.6 I 4.8
~
06-20-89 298 14.074.0 06-27-89 301 23.0 [ 6.0 x 1st Qtr mean. 29.8 2nd Qtr mean 18.4 .; P I a lodine-131 concentrations are <0.7 pCi/m3unless noted otherwise.
- Pump ran for eight days.
c
. Sample collection equipment failure, no volume reported.
y;g; 'g ; }. , L h .
,- -. g m- -
1989 Annual Radiological Environmental. m o- Monitoring Rsport - Page 54 FERMI-2 1
' AIR PARTICULATE ANALYSIS Location - = Pole behind Doty Farm ,
7512 North Custer Road i Monroe, Michigan' ll API-4 (Control) 'l Distance = 14.2 Miles W/269c of Fermi 2 j Sample = Airborne Particulates and lodine-131 j
. Analysis = Gross Beta and lodine - 131a ;j
' Sample
. Frequency - 1;;
= Corginuoup=aekly.
Units- = 10' pCl/m . 001 pCi/m3) ( _ Date Date
' Collected Vop)me (m . '@oss 4Cl/m g) eta Collected Vop)me (m Gross (pCl/m g) eta (continued)
'07-04-89 299 13.0 + 4.0 10-03-89 293 16.0 + 4.0 07-11-89 303 23.0 I 6.0 10-10-89 294 21.0 I 5.0- 4 07-18-89 300 22.075.0 10-17-89 295 37.0 I 8.0 1' 07-25-89 303 29.0 I 7.0- 10-24-89 288 16.0 I 4.0 1 08-01-89 .298 20.0'I 5.0 10-31-89 300 47.0 I 10.0- )
08-08-89 297 19.075.0 11-07-89 287' 24.0 I 6.0- : 15-89 301 27.073.0 11-14-89 290 21.075.0
.08-22-89 :298 82.0 I 3.0 11-21-89 285- 24.0 I 6.01 d 08-29-89 299 19.0 + 5.0 11-28-89 288 26.0 + 6.0 -
09-05-89 298 15.0 I 4.0 12-05-89 286 25.0 I 6.0' , 09-12-89 297 26.0 I 6.0 12-12-89 282 21.0 I 5.0- l 09-19-89 297 24.0 I 6.0 12-19-89 287 41.0 I 9.0 1 09-26-89 297 13.0 + 3.0 12-26-89 278 36.0 + 8.0 j
' 3rd Otr mean
-25.5 4th Qtr mean- 27.3 a . lodine-131 concentrations are <0.7 pCl/m3 unless noted otherwise. :-
4
,1 A---
1 _.____..__._.__.___.__m____
. 1989 Annual? i
, Radiological Environmental' Monitoring Report -
--e Page 55 l =
FERMl-2 i AIR PARTICULATE ANALYSIS I
. Location '= Corner of Erie St. and Pointe Aux Peaux Road' !
API-5 (Indicator) ' 0 : Distance = 1.0 Miles SW/188 of Fermi 2 Sample = Airborne Particulates and lodine-131' - fti a Analysis = Gross Beta and lodine 131 . Sample; _ j Frequency = Coginuoup= 10- pCl/m eekly (.001 pCl/m3) I Units = ?j
,, t Date_ Date l Collected _
-(mVop)me Gross (pCi/m g) eta. Collected Vop)me (m Gross (pCl/m g) eta -!
.- 1 b
10-89 266 32.4 + 4.6 04-05-89 316 14.0 + 4.0 01-17 268 34.874.3- 04-11-89. 241 -22.0 I 6.0' ]1 1 24 269 22.273.9 04-18-89 286 22.0 I 0.0 11 i 01-31-89 271 39.5 73.5 04-25-89 280 18.0 I 5.0 I 02207-89 267 43.2 I 5.0 05-02 282 12.074.0
'02-14-89 271 25.6 [ 4.3- 05-09-89 287 13.0 { 4.0 ;
02-21-89: 267 21.6 ' + 4.6 . 05-16-89 '287 13.0 + 4.0 '; 02-28-89 270 23.274.2 05-23-89 280 17.0 I 4.0 03-07-89 263 31.7 74.5 05-30-89 289 17.0 I 5.0 03-14-89 274 34.1 I 3.2 06-06-89 295 18.0 I 5.0 03-21-89 272- 27.1-{ 3.0 06-13 .296- 20.0 { 5.0 j 03-28-89 275 27.0 + 4.4 06-20 292 12.0 + 3.0 ' 06-27-89 295. 20.0 [ 5.0
!1st Otr mean 30.2 2nd Qtr mean- 16.8 j al lodine-131 concentrations are <0.7 pCl/m3 unless noted otherwise, b'
g Pump ran for eight days. g 4
~
1
)
I
)
l : _-__-__-__l:--._-_-
I
?
' 1989 Annual Radiological Environmental - , ;
Monitoring Report - i Pa9e 56 l l FERMI-2 l AIR PARTICULATE ANALYSIS I Location = Corner of Erie St. and Pointe Aux Peaux Road . API-5 (Indicator) Distance = 1.0 Miles SW/188 of Fermi 2 I' . Sample Analysis . Sample
= - Airborne Particulates and lodine-131
= Gross Beta and lodine - 131a i
l Frequency
=- Corginuoup=eekly tI.- =
Units - = 10~ pCl/m (.001 pCl/m3) i l
, . . .1
! Date Date Gross geta i
=
Collected Vop)me (m Gross (pCl/m g) eta Collected Vop)me (m - (pCi/m ) J (continued) . 07-04-89 294 17.0 + 5.0 .10-03-89 291 17.0 + 4.0 - 1 i; .07-11-89 298 21.075.0 10-10-89 290 20.075.0 d
.. 18-89 296 18.075.0 10-17-89 291. 35.078.0 1 07-25-89 298 29.0 + 7.0 10-24-89 286 18.0 + 5.0 10-31-89 296 47.0 7 10.0 0
< 08-01-89 297 18.0 7 5.0
'08-08-89 294 22.075.0 11-07 286 27.077.0. .
08-15-89 296 25.073.0 11-14-89 287' 25.076.0. ,
! 08-22-89 294 39.073.0 11-21-89 281 27.0 I 6.0. U 08-29 296 20.075.0 11-28 283 26.076.0
'I": 09-05-89( 293 19.0 [ 5.0 12-05-89 281 28.0 [ .7,0' 29.0 + 7.0
.q 12-89 295- 26.0 + 6.0 12-12-89 279
- 09-19-89 -295 25.076.0 12-19-89 282 49.0711.0 Il 09-26-89 295 20.0 [ 5.0 12-26-89 273- 33.0 [ 8.0
. 3rd Otr mean 23.0 4th Otr mean 29.3 a' lodine-131 concentrations are <0.7 pCl/m 3.unless noted otherwise, l a
i 1 1 c g ,I ; 1 x -_
_ _ __7___ _ _ _ _ , 1989 Annual' i B Radiological Environmental' ji3 Monitoring Report Page 57 FERMI-2
;I. . AIR PARTICULATE ANALYSIS i'
Airborne particulates Monthly. gross beta averages .) of weekly sampilng collections (a) q I Units = 10-3 pCl/m3 = (.001 pCi/m3) y l l Collection Location Period APl-1 API-2 API-3 APl-4 api-5 January 34.2 32.6 30.4 32.1 32.2 February 31.2 30.6 29.4 28.0 28.4 j
- March -- 29.5 29.4 30.2 29.3 30.0 J
'_ April 22.2 23.5 22.7 22.5 19.0 h May' 16.0 16.0 15.4 15.4 14.4 i June 19.0 18.5 17.3 19.0 17.5
)
-July - 20.3 21.3 20.0 21.8 21.3 ,
. I .- ; August 23.8 29.0 26.6 33.6 24.8 1 a' September . 20.0 23.3 22.5 19.5 22.5
- g. ..)
October - 35.8 - 28.8 27.6 27.4 27.4 .j
. November ' 26.0 25.8 23 3 23.8 26.3
-December 32.0 30.3 21.0 30.8 34.8 I
'Annu Mean 25.8 25.7 23.9 25.3 24.9 j ig; ,
a
- Unless specified otherwise, data from samples collected on the first, second, or third day of a month are grouped with data from the preefous month, b
Annual mean is determined by averaging monthly means. g: l I w r
1989 Annual l Radicitgical Environmental ' M: nit ring R:psrt Page 58 FERMl-2 AIR PARTICULATE ANALYSi$ Outrterly Airborne Particulate Analysis Quarterly Composite of Weekly Samples by Location j i Gamma Isoppic Units = 10- pCl/mAnglysis of Quarteg)ly Composite
= (.001 pCl/m i I Lab Other Location Code Voly)
(m e' Be-7 Cs-134 Cs-137 Gemmes, St-89 Sr-90 1st Otr.,1989 APl-1 FAP-1418 2852 74.0 + 24.0 <1.6 < 1.7 < 2.8 < 0.9 <0.7 APl-2 FAP-1419 3013 71.4711.6 < 1.1 < 1.1 < 1.7 < 0.8 <0.7 API-3 FAP-1420 3224 72.2712.9 <0.9 < 1.0 <2.2 < 1.1 <0.9 API-4 FAP-1421 2859 91.6717.4 <1.2 <1.3 < 2.5 <0.8 <0.9 API-5 FAP-1422 3233 70.6 { 20.5 < 1.1 < 1.3 <2.4 < 0.6 < 0.5 c 2nd Otr.,1989 I APl-1 API-2 07-017-01 07-017-02 3199 3338 150.0 + 30.0 140.0 7 20.0
<5.0
<5.0
< 6.0
<6.0 NA NA
<5.0
<5.0
<1.0
< 1.0 I API-3 API-4 API-5 07-017-03 07-017-04 07-017-05 3565 3365 3727 140.0 7 20.0 130.0 7 20.0 120.0 [ 10.0
<5.0
<5.0
<5.0
<6.0
<6.0
<6.0 NA NA NA
<5.0
<5.0
<5.0
< 1.0
<1.0
<1.0 d
3rd Otr.1989 APl-1 01-031-01 3260 <4.0 <5.0 <6.0 NA <5.0 <1.0 .I API-2 API-3 01-031-02 01-031-03 3401 3637 b 2 0.0 + 5.0 10.0 + 4.0
<5.0
< 5.0
<6.0
<6.0 NA
'NA
<5.0
<5.0
<5.0
<1.0
< 1.0 API-4 01-031-04 3590 10.0 75.0 < 5.0 <6.0 NA < 1.0 API-5 01-031-05 3842 10.0 [ 4.0 < 5.0 <6.0 NA <5.0 <1.0 d
4th Otr.,1989 APl-1 01-073-01 <6.0 <5.0 3193 100.0 + 20.0 < 5.0 NA < 1.0 API-2 01-073-02 3325 70.0 720.0 <5.0 < 6.0 NA <5.0 <1.0 API-3 01-073-03 3592 70.0 7 20.0 < 5.0 <6.0 NA <5.0 <1.0 I API-4 API-5 01-073-04 01-073-05 3751 3704 70.0720.0 60.0 [ 20.0
< 5.0
< 5.0
< 6.0
<6.0 NA NA
<5.0
<5.0
<1.0
< 1,0 I
I I I
I s 1989 Annual s Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report Page 59 H FERMI-2 AIR PARTICULATE ANALYSIS (continued) ~ a For all gamma isotopic analyses, spectrum is computer scanned from 80 to 2048 kev Specifically included are Mn-54, C0-58, Fe-59, Co-60, Zn-65, Zr-95, Nb-95, 1-131, Cs-134, Cs-137, and Ba-La-140. Naturally occurring gamma-emitters, such I as Ra daughters are frequently detected but not listed here. Potassium-40 is listed only if detected. Data listed as *<* are at the 4.66 sigma level, others are 2 sl0ma. Unless noted otherwise, the less than value (*<*) for air particulates listed under *0ther Gammas'is for Nb-95 and may be higher or lower for other radionuclides. All concentrations, except gross beta, are decay corrected to the time of collection, b Sample was not included in the third quarter composite, since it was lost in storage at the analytical labortory. The volume of the composite was appropriately adjusted. c Seconf. quarter lab codes are all prefaced with R9 . e 1hi,d and ,ee,th eea,,e, ,ah coees a,e a,, p,e,acee w,th S0 . I I I I I
R & \' }- \ h
- 1999 Armese1 Roe 1OSogiCOI Enw1 reewn.n t o1 Benttor9sw Repert e.e. so Airborne Particulates Monthly Gross Beta Averages of Weekly Sampling Collections for Fermi 2 from 1987 through 1989 soo LEGEND
_ AP12 me--
....... A993 pp- -
Arte I l l p- = .......... A98 l h s 50- - b
- =
% lT
-/.
m- -
.. f s y..'
,{. 'I
,$ k-h k~.,/
so- -
**, c,A,.
% , . **.*e, e
~ *
- s to- - [..
\ .
; : : : : : : : :ar: ::::: : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :
JAM /IBF GAAY Jesq/BS teMr SEP Alfq/We te4Y SEP _ _ _ _ - I H
1989 Annual l
'I 1 s Redirl:9ical Envircnmental 1 M: nit: ring Reptrt Page 61 i I FERMI-2 i
l SURFACE WATER ANALYSIS i I Location Distance
=
=
Fermi Unit 1 Raw Lake Water intale Structure SW-) (8.ndicator) 0 4 Miles SSE/1590 of Fermi 2 ; l I Sample = Surf ace Water - Analysis = Osmma Emitting Isotopes / Strontium 69-90 Sample f Frequency = Monthly ! Units = pCi/ liter
- i Location Sample Description and Concentration ,
SW-1 Date Collected 01-25-89 02 2349 03-23-89 04-26-89 :i I Lab Code Mn-54 FSW-258
<7.4 FSW-604
<4.1 F SW-932,3
<3.1 05-022-01 c
< 15.0 Fe-59 < 13.0 <0.2 <6.0 < 30.0 Co-58 <6.7 <3.7 <2.9 <15.0 Co-60 <5.6 <3.2 <3.0 <15.0 I Zn-65 < 11.0 <7.7 < 7.0 < 30.0 Zr-Nb-95 < 12.0 <7.3 < 4.9 < 15.0 Cs-134 < 7.5 <4.0 < 3.0 <15.0 Cs-137 < 7.1 <4.3 < 2.9 < 18.0 D
Ba-La-140 < 8.8 <3.3 <5.0 < 16.4 Sr-89 < 0.6a < 0.6a <0.6aa < 10.0 t a a Sr-90 0.5 + 0.4 0.5 + 0.4 0.5 + 0.4 2.4 + 0.4 . L Date Cel8,cted 05-25-89 06-23-89 07-24-89 08-28-89 Lab Code 06-015-01 06-152-01 07-103-01 08-137-01 l-L Mn-54 < 15.0 < 15.0 < 15.0 < 15.0 : Fe-59 < 30.0 < 30.0 < 30.0 '< 30.0 Co-58 < 15.0 <15.0 <15.0 < 15.0 l- Co-60 < 15.0 < 15.0 < 15.0 < 15.0 Zn-65 < 30.0 < 30.0 < 30.0 < 30.0 L' Zr-Nb-95 <15.0 < 15.0 < 15.0 <15.0 l Cs-134 < 15.0 < 15.0 < 15.0 < 15.0 > l: Cs-137 < 18.0 < 18.0 < 18.0 < 18.0 Ba-La-140 < 15.0 < 15.0 < 15.0 < 15.0 r lI' Sr-89 Sr-90
< 10.0
<2.0
< 10.0
<2.0
< 10.0
< 2.0
< 10.0
< 2.0 a Strontium 89/90 results for first quarter were analyzed as a composite. Monthly analyses startad 94-26-89.
b Samole did not meet the LLD because priority count was not scheduled at the analytical laboratory. c Second through fourth quarter lab codes are all prefaced with R9 .
1989 Annual I. Rad 60 logical Environmental Monitoring Report Page 62 I FERMI-2 SURFACE WATER ANALYSl$ Location = Fermi Unit 1 Ravv Lake Water intake Structure SW-1 (Indicator) Distence. 0 4 Miles SSE/159 of Fermi 2 I
=
Sample = Surf are Water Analysis = Osmma Emitting isotopes / Strontium 89-90 Sample I frequency Units
=
=
Monthly pCi/ liter Location Sample Description and Concentration (continued) Date Collected 09-24-89 10-23-89 11-29-89 12-27-89 Lab Code 09-184-01 10-128-01 12-001-01 12-117-01 Mn-54 < 15.0 < 15.0 < 15 0 < 15.0 Fe-59 < 30.0 < 30 0 <30 0 < 30.0 Co-58 < 15 0 <150 < 15 0 <150 _I Co-60 < 15 0 < 15 0 < 15 0 < 15.0 Zn-65 < 30 0 < 30.0 < 30 0 < 30.0 I Zr-Nb-95 Cs-134 Cs-137
< 15.0
< 15.0
< 18.0
< 15 0
< 15.0
< 18.0
< 15 0
< 15 0
<180
< 15.0
< 15.0
< 18 0 j Be-La-140 < 15.0 < 15 0 < 15 0
< 10 0
< 15 0
< 10 0 g Sr-89 < 10.0 < 10 0 Sr-90 < 2.0 <20 <20 <2.0 I
I
;I I
- I
!I
;I
1989 Annual .. Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report Pa9e 63 FERMI-2 SURFACE WATER ANALYSIS Location = DECO's Trenton Channel Power Plant intake Structure SW-2 (Control)
- 0
. Distance = 13 Miles NNE/20 of Fermi 2 Sample = Surface Water , ; Analysis a Gan.:'a Emitting Isotopes / Strontium 89-90 '~
Sample Frequency = Monthly Units = pCl/ liter Location Sample Description and Concentration SW-2 Date Ccliected 01-25-89 02-23-89 03-23-89 04-26-89 Lab Code FSW-259 FSW-605 FSW-934 05-022-02 c 7 Mn-54 <6.3 <40 <2.2 < 15.0 Fe-59 < 14.6 < 7.8 <4.9 < 30.0 ' p Co-58 < 6.1 <40 <2.3 < 15.0 Co-60 < 6.1 <43 <2.2 < 15.0 Zn-65 < 12.4 <90 < 4.5 < 30.0 Zr-Nb-95 < 11.8 < 7.7 <4.2 < 15.0 -2 Cs-134 <54 <41 < 2.0 < 15.0 Cs-137 < 6.9 <47 <27 < 18 0 D
+ Ba-La-140 < 8.1 <36 <2.3 < 2 6.9 8 8 Sr-89 < 0.6a <0.6 < 0.6 < 10.0 a *:
E Sr-90 0.6 10 4 06 10.4" 0.61 04" < 2.0 Date Collected 05-25-89 06-23-89 07-24-89 08-28-89 Lab Code 06-015-02 06-152-02 07-103-02 08-137-02 > Mn-54 < 15.0 <15.0 <15.0 < 15.0 Fe-59 < 30.0 < 30.0 < 30.0 < 30.0 -...- Co-58 < 15.0 < 15.0 < 15.0 < 15.0
*f Co-60 < 15.0 < 15.0 < 15.0 < 15.0 L
Zn-65 < 30.0 < 30.0 < 30.0 < 30.0 Zr-Nb-95 < 15.0 < 15.0 < 15.0 <15.0 ~ ,
< 15.0
~
Cs-134 < 15.0 < 15.0 < 15.0 Cs-137 < 18.0 < 18 0 < 18.0 < 18.0 Ba-La-140 < 15.0 < 15.0 < 15.0 < 15 0 . Sr-89 < 10.0 < 10.0 < 10.0 < 10.0 Sr-90 <2.0 < 2.0 <2.0 < 2.0 a Strontium 89/90 results for first quarter were analyzed as a composite. Monthly . analyses started 04-26-89. x b Sample did not meet the LLD because priority count was not scheduled at the analytical laboratory. c
. . . - Second through fourth quarter lab codes are all prefaced with R9-
I 1989 Annual Radiol:9l cal Environmental Monitoring Report Page 64 q l I FERMI-2 ; SURFACE WATER ANALYSIS J Location = DECO's Trenton Channel Power Plant intake Structure ' Distance SW-2
= 13 Miles (Control)
NNE/200 of Fermi 2 I Sample Analysis Sample
= Surface Water
= Gamma Emitting Isotopes / Strontium 89-90 i
Frequency = Monthly Units = pCl/ liter ; Location Sample Description and Concentration (continued) i Date Collected 09-24-89 10-23-89 11-29-89 12-27-89 Lab Code 09-184-02 10-128-02 12-001-02 12-117-02 Mn-54 < 15.0 < 15.0 < 15.0 < 15.0 .i Fe-59 < 30.0 < 30.0 < 30.0 < 30.0 - I Po-58 Co-60 2n-65
< 15.0
< 15.0
< 30.0
< 15.0
< 15.0
< 30.0
< 15.0
<15.0
< 30.0
< 15.0
< 15.0
< 30.0 I Zr-Nb-95 < 15.0 < 15.0 +
< 15.0 < 15.0 Cs-134 < 15.0 < 15.0 < 15.0 < 15.0 Cs-137 < 18.0 < 18.0 < 18.0 < 18.0 Ba-La 140 < 15.0 < 15.0 < 15.0 < 15.0
-I Sr-89 Sr-90
< 10.0
< 2.0
< 10.0
< 2.0
< 10.0
<2.0
< 10.F
<2.0 .
L f I I g
. . .U 1989 Annual Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report
- Page 65
- 4. FERMI-2
~ DRINKING WATER ANALYSIS Location = Monroe Water Station North Side of Pointe Aux Peaux Road 1/2 block West of 1.ong Road f DW-1 (Indicatorg Distance = 1.2 Miles S/169 of Fermi 2 Sample = Drinking Water Analysis = Gamma Emitting isotopes and Gross Beta / Strontium 89-90 Sample Frequency = Monthly Units a pCl/ liter Location Sample Description and Concentration DW- 1 Date Collected 01-25-89 02-23-89 03-23-89 04-26-89 Lab Code FDW-255 FDW-606 FDW-935 05-022-03c Gross beta 2.4106 2.3 1 0.3 2.310.3 <4.0 Mn-54 <5.3 <5.9 <3.2 < 15.0 Fe-59 < 12.8 < 11.2 <7.8 < 30.0
' <3.4 <15.0 Co-58 <6.0 <6.6 Co-60 <5.0 <6.7 <3.6 < 15.0 Zn-65 <12.6 < 15.7 <8.2 < 30.0 Zr-Nb-95 <9.0 < 11.4 <5.7 < 15.0 Cs-134 <5.3 .<7.0 <3.2 < 15.0 Cs-137 <5.6 <6.8 <3.5 < 18.0 Ba-La-140 <8.8 <6.2 <4.9 < 26.6 D Sr-89 < 0.5a < 0.5 a < 0.Sa < 10 0 a a a Sr-90 0.610.3 0.6 0.3 0.6 + 0.3 <2.0 a Strontium 89/90 results for first quarter were analyzed as a composite. Monthly analyses started 04-26-89.
b Sample did not meet the LLD because priority count was not scheduled at the analytical laboratory. c Second through fourth quarter lab codes are all prefaced with R9 .
. -i '
1989 Annual Radiological Environmental ~ Monitoring Report 4 Page 66 L: FERMI-2 DRINKING WATER ANALYSIS L Location = Monroe Water Station North Side of Pointe Aux Peaux Road 1/2 block West of - Long Road DW-1 (Indicatorg Distance = 1.2 Miles S/169 of Fermi 2 :- I Sample = Drinking Water
~
Analysis = Gamma Emitting Isotopes and Gross Beta / Strontium 89-90 Sample l Frequency Units
= Monthly
= pCl/ liter
] -
I . Location Sample Description and Concentration - (continued) Date Collected 05-25-89 06-23-89 07-24-89 08-28-89 Lab Code 06-015-03 06-152-04 07-103-04 08-137-04 Gross beta < 4.0 <4.0 < 4.0 <4.0 Mn-54 < 15.0 < 15.0 < 15.0 <15.0 a Fe-59 < 30.0 < 30.0 < 30.0 i Co-58 Co-60
< 30.0
< 15.0
< 15.0
< 15.0
< 15.0
< 15.0
< 15.0
< 15.0
<15.0 Zn-65 < 30.0 < 30.0 < 30.0 < 30.0 Zr-Nb-95 < 15.0 < 15.0 I Cs-134
< 15.0
< 15.0
< 15.0
< 15.0 < 15.0 ' < 15.0 Cs-137 < 18.0 < 18.0 < 18.0 < 18.0 Ba-La-140 < 15.0 < 15.0 <15.0 < 15.0 1 Sr-89 < 10.0 < 10.0 < 10.0 < 10.0 Sr-90 <2.0 <2.0 < 2.0 <2.0 _
1 l - _ar,.4f___.------.. . . . , , , , , , ,, .
N 1989 Annual Radiological Environmental ~ Monitoring Report + Page 67 + y FERMI-2 DRINKING WATER ANALYSIS Location = Monroe Water Station North Side of Pointe Aux Peaux Road 1/2 block West of Long Road DW-1 (Indicatorg 1.2 Miles S/169 of Fermi 2 I . Distance Sample
=
= Drinking Weter Analysis = Gamme Emitting Isotopes and Gross Beta / Strontium 89-90 I Sample Frequency Units
=
=
Monthly pCl/ liter i Location Sample Description and Concentration
'(continued)
Date Collected 09-24-89 10-23-89 11-29-89 12-27-89 Lab Code 09-184-04 10-128-04 12-001-04 12-117-04 Gross beta 4.0 + 2.0 <4.0 <4.0 3.0 + 1.3 Mn-54 < 15.0 < 15.0 <15.0 < 15.0 Fe-59 < 30.0 < 30.0 < 30.0 < 30.0 Co-58 < 15.0 <15.0 < 15.0 < 15.0 Co-60 < 15.0 < 15.0 < 15.0 < 15.0 2n-65 < 30.0 < 30.0 < 30.0 < 30.0
< 15.0 ~i
. Zr-Nb-95 < 15.0 < 15.0 < 15.0 Cs-134 < 15.0 < 15.0 < 15.0 ' < 15.0 j Cs-137 < 18.0 < 18.0 . < 18.0 < 18.0 Ba-La-140 < 15.0 < 15.0 < 15.0 < 15.0 Sr-89 < 10.0 < 10.0 < 10.0 < 10.0 l Sr-90 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 1
. 7 I 1989 Annual Radiological Environmontal Monitoring Report I Pa9e 68 ?
FERMI-2 DRINKING WATER ANALYSIS i Location = Detroit Water Station , 14700 Moran Road, Allen Park, Michigan I Distance Sample Analysis DW-2 (Control)
= 20 Miles N/80of Fermi 2
= Drinking Water
= Gamma Emitting Isotopes and Gross Beta / Strontium 89-90 i
Sample Frequency
= Monthly Units = pct / liter :
. Location Sample Description and Concentration DW-2 Date Collected 01-25-80 02-23-89 03-23-89 04-26-89 Lab Code FDW-256,7 FDW-607 FDW-936 05-022-04c Gross beta - 2.3 + 0.4 1.8 + 0.3 2.2 + 0.3
<4.0 i Mn-54 <7.0 <3.0 < 3.7 - < 15.0 f Fe-59 < 12.8 <7.4 <8.7 < 30.0 l Co-58 <6.8 <3.7 < 4.4' < 15.0 Co-60 < 5.1 < 4.4 <4.5 < 15.0 ,
2n-65 < 14.9 < 7.5 < 8.9 < 30.0 Zr-Nb-95 < 11.5 <6.3 <7.8 < 15.0 Cs-134 <6.6 <3.5 <4.5 < 15.0 -I Cs-137 <8.2 <3.6-
<5.8
< 4.4
<4.9
< 18.0 b
Ba-La-140 < 7.1 "< 3 2.0 Sr-89 < 0.7 a <0.7a < 0.7 a < 10.0
<0.8 8 <2.0 Sr-90 < 0.8a <0.8a J
a Strontium 89/90 results for first quarter were analyzed as a composite. Monthly analyses started 04-26-89. 5 b Sample did not meet the LLD because priority count was not scheduled at the l I_. analytical laboratory, c Second through fourth quarter lab codes are all prefaced with R9 . l 1 1
'l
1' I 1989 Annual Radiological Envircnmental Monitoring R: port j Page 69 FERMI-2 - DRINKING WATER ANALYSIS t I Location = Detroit Water Station, 14700 Moran Road, Allen Parx, Michigan
- DW-2 (Control)
Distance a 20 Miles N/80 of Fermi 2 Sample = Drinkin9 Water . Analysis = Gamma Emittin9 Isotopes and Gross Beta / Strontium 89-90 ' Sample Frequency = Monthly Units = pCl/ liter J I Location Sample Destrlption and Concentration I (continued) Date Collected 06-01-89a 06-23-89 07-24-89 08-28-89 Lab Code 06-015-04 06-152-05 07-103-05 08-137-05 a Oross beta <4.0 5.0 + 2.0 <4.0 .<4.0 [ Mn-54 < 15.0 < 15.0 < 15.0 < 15.0 Fe-59 < 30.0 < 30.0 < 30.0 < 30.0 Co-58 < 15.0 < 15.0 < 15.0 < 15.0 Co-60 < 15.0 < 15.0 < 15.0 < 15.0
.E Zn-65 < 30.0 < 30.0 < 30.0 < 30.0 W~ 2r-Nb-95 < 15.0 < 15.0 < 15.0 < 15.0 Cs-134 < 15.0 < 15,0 < 15.0 t 15.0 Cs-137 < 18.0 < 18.0 < 18.0 < 18.0 Ba-La-140 < 15.0 < 15.0 < 15.0 <15.0 Sr-89 < 10.0 < 10.0 < 10.0 < 10.0 Sr-90 <2.0 < 2.0 <2.0 < 2.0 L
a Replacement samplo for May collection. Original sample collected 05-25-89 damaged durin0 transit. LI I I
,.-%.'s y. w - ., , . - - . -
,,w ,- . . , .:.+.,, .,y .. y
e ( 1989 Annual Radiological Environmental e Monitoring R port Page 70 FERMI-2 DRINKING WATER ANALYSIS Location
- Detroit Water Station, 14700 Moran Road, Allen Park, Michigan DW-2 (Control)
I Distance Sample Anal', sis
= 20 Miles N/80 of Fermi 2
= Drinking Water
= Gamma Ethitting Isotopes and Gross Beta / Strontium 89-90 I Sample Frequency
- Units
= Monthly
= pCi/ liter Location Sample Description and Concentration (continued)
Date Collected 09-21-89 10-23-89 11-29-89 12-27-89 Lab Code 09-184-05 10-128-05 12-001-05 12-117-05 Gross beta < 4.0 < 4.0 <4.0 2.1 + 1.2 Mn-54 < 15.0 < 15.0 < 15.0 < 15.0 I Fe-59 Co-58 Co-60
< 30.0
< 15.0
< 15.0
< 30.0
<15.0
< 15.0
< 30.0
< 15.0
< 15.0
< 30.0
< 15.0
< 15.0 Zn-65 < 30.0 < 30.0 < 30.0 < 30.0 I Zr-Nb-95 Cs-134 Cs-137
< 15.0
< 15.0
< 18.0
< 15.0
< 15.0
< 18.0
< 15.0
< 15.0
< 18.0
< 15.0
< 15.0
, < 18.0 l
I Ba-La-140 Sr-89 Sr-90
< 15.0
< 10.0
<2.0
< 15.0
< 10.0
<2.0
< 15.0
< 10.0
<2.0
< 15.0
< 10.0
< 2.0 i
. .I T 1989 Annual b Radiological Environmental 7 Monitoring Roport C Page 71 h: FERMI-2 s SURFACE AND DRINKINO WATER ANALYSIS Quarterly Surface and Drinking Water Analysis Quarterly Composite of Monthly Samples by location Tritium Analysis of Quarterly Composite i Units = pCi/ liter i Location Compositing Period Lab Code H-3 Indicator SW-1, Surf ace 1st Otr., 99 FSW-996 < 211 2nd Otr.,89 R9-07-032-02a < 2000 3rd Otr., 89 S0-01-039-03 < 2000 1 4th Otr., 89 S0-01-040-03 <2000 DW-1, Drinkin9 1st Otr., 89 FPW-998 240 + 120 I 2nd Otr., 89 3rd Otr., 89 R9-07-032-01 S0-01-039-01 a
< 2060
< 2000 4tn Utr., 89 S0-01-040-01 < 2000 I
Control SW-2, Surf ace 1st Otr., 89 FSW-997 < 211 2nd Otr., 89 R9-07-032-02a < 2000 3rd Otr., 89 S0-01-039-04 < 2000 4th Otr., 89 S0-01-040-04 <2000 DW-2, Drinking 1st Otr., 89 FPW-999 273 + 112 a 2nd Otr.,89 R9-07-032-01 < 2050 3rd Otr. 89 S0-01-039-02 < 2000 4th Otr., 89 S0-01-040-02 < 2000 a Second quarter surf ace and drinking water composites were analyzed by type of water, but not by specific location. I
'C l 1989 Annual l Radiological Environmental i l Monitoring Report l Page 72 FERMI-2 GROUND WATER ANALYSIS Location = GW Approximately 100 Ft. W. of Lake Erie, Fermi 1 Parking Lot near Gas ,
Fired Peeters , 0
- 'g Distance = 0.4 Miles S/174 of Fermi 2 i g Sample = Ground Water Tritium and Gamme Emitting isotopes Analysis = ,
Sample il
=
Frequency Units
=
=
Quarterly pCl/ liter
}
Sample Description and Concentration , GW- 1 GW-1 GW-1 i Location GW-1 Date Collected 03-17-89 06-12-89 09-14-89 12-08-89 Lab Code FGW-871 R9-06-080-01 R9-09-084-01 R9-12-047-01 H-3 < 206 < 2000 <2000 < 2000
< 15.0 <15.0 < 15.0 3
Mn-54 < 3.9
< 30.0 < 30.0 3 Fe-59 Co-58
<8.6
< 4.0
< 30.0
< 15.0 < 15.0 < 15.0 -
Co-60 <4.3 < 15.0 < 15.0 < 15.0 Zn-65 <9.1 < 30.0 < 30.0 < 30.0 Zr-Nb-95 <7.0 < 15.0 < 15.0 < 15.0 Cs-134 < 4.0 < 15.0 < 15.0 < 15.0
<3.8 < 18.0 < 18.0 < 18.0 I' Cs-137 Ba-La-140 <3.7 < 15.0 < 15.0 - < 15.0
- f. -
lI l I I i I :
c p 1888 Annut'
'E Radigiggical Environmental "g Mtnittring R:ptrt Page 73
[ FERMI-2 GROUND WATER ANALYSIS Location = GW 4 Ft. South of Pointe Aux Peaux (PAP) Rd. Fence,427 ft. W of where PAP crosses over Storiey Point's Wastern Dike
= 1.0 Miles SSW/207 0 Distance of Fermi 2 I Sample Analysis Sample
= Ground Water
= Tritium and Gamma Etnitting isotopes I Frequency Units
= Quarterly
= pCl/ liter Sample Description and Concentration I Location Date Collected Lab Code GW-2 03-17-89 FGW-872,3 GW-2 06-12-89 R9-06-080-02 GW-2 09-14-89 R9-09-084-02 GW-2 12-08-89 R9-12-047-02 i H-3 < 206 < 2000 <2000 <2000
<4.3 < 15.0 < 15.0 < 15 0 j
. Mn 54
<9.5 < 30.0 < 30.0 < 30.,1 Fe-50 q
! Co-58 <4.3 < 15.0 < 15.0 < 15.0 ; Co-60 <3.9 < 15.0 < 15.0 < 15.0 l Zn-65 < 9.0 < 30.0 < 30.0 < 30.0
=I Zr-Nb-95 <7.9 < 15.0 < 15.0
< 15.0
< 15.0
< 15.0 Cs-134 <4.1 < 15.0 Cs-137 <4.5 < 18.0 < 18.0 < 18.0
< 15.0 I- Ba-La-140
<4.0
< 15.0 < 15.0 l.
'I l
- I I ,
I..
, ,3 I 1989 Annual Radiological Environmental Monitcring R: port Page 74 I FERMI-2 GROUND WATER ANALYSIS Location = GW 143 Ft. W of Pointe Aux Peaux Rd.,62 Ft. N of Pointe Aux Peaux Rd.
Fence Distance = 1.0 Miles SW/2250 of Fermi 2 Sample = Ground Water Analysis - Tritium and Gamma Emitting isotopes Sample Frequency = Quarterly Units = pCl/ liter Sample Description and Concentration Location GW-3 GW-3 GW-3 GW-3 Date Collected 03-17-89 06-12-89 09-14-89 12-08-89 Lab Code FGW-874 R9-06-080-03 R9-09-084-03 R9-12-047-03 H-3 <206 < 2000 < 2000 < 2000 Mn-54 <3.2 < 15.0 < 15.0 <15.0 I Fe-59 Co-58 Co-60
<6.2
<3.2
<3.4
< 30.0
< 15.0
< 15.0
< 30.0
< 15.0
<15.0
< 30.0
< 15.0
< 15.0 Zn-65 <5.8 < 30.0 < 30.0 < 30.0 Zr-Nb-95 <5.7 < 15.0 < 15.0 < 15.0 Cs-134 <2.9 < 15.0 < 15.0 < 15.0
<4.2 < 18.0 < 18.0 < 18.0 i
I Cs-137 Ba-La-140 <2.7 < 15.0 < 15.0 <15.0 LI cI I l. I
1989 Annual ~ Radiological Environmsntal Monitoring Report Page 75 L FERMI-2
- p. GROUND WATER ANALYSIS L
Location = GW 42 Ft. S of Langton Rd. 8 Ft. E of Toll Rd. Fence Distance = 0.6 Miles WNW/2890 of Fermi 2 [ Sample = Ground Water Analysis = Tritium and Gamma Emitting Isotopes ~ Sample Frequency = Quarterly Units = pCi/ liter Sample D.:scription and Concentration Location GW-4 GW-4 GW-4 GW-4 i Date Collocted Lab Code 03-17-89 FGW-875 06-12-89 R9-06-080-04 09-14-89 R9-09-084-04 12-08-89 R9-12e047-04 H-3 <206 < 2000 < 2000 <2000 Mn-54 < 4.4 < 15.0 < 15.0 < 15.0 Fe-59 <9.4 < 30.0 < 30.0 < 30.0 Co-58' < 4.6 < 15.0 < 15.0 < 15.0 1 Co-60 <4.2 < 15.0 < 15.0 < 15.0 Zn-65 < 10.9 < 30.0 < 30.0 < 30.0
< 15.0 I Zr-Nb-95 Cs-134 Cs-137
<8.2
<7.2
<5.1
< 15.0
< 15.0
< 18.0
< 15.0
< 15.0
< 18.0
< 15.0
< 18.0 Ba-La-140 <5.3 < 15.0 < 15.0 < 15.0 1
I
(3 1989 Annual , ig Radiol:gical Environmental t 1 Monittring Report > r Page 76 '
-I FERMI-2 LAKE ERIE SEDIMENTS ANALYSIS /
Location = S Pointe Aux Peaux, Shoreline to 500 Ft. to Offshore sighting directly to ' Land Base Water Tower ' 0 Distance = 0.9 Miles SSE/164 of Fermi 2 (Indicator) Sample = Sediment Analysis = Gamma Emitting Isotopes / Strontium 89-90 Samr.le Frequency = Seml+ Annual
- Units = pCl/kg Dry Weight Location S-1 I Date Collected Lab Code 05-02-89 R9-05-117-01 09-21-89 R9-10-018-01 Fe-59 < 76 < 59 LI Mn-54 Co-58
< 25
< 27
< 23
<22
<31 <30 I Co-60 Zn-65 Zr-95
<62
< 56
< 37
< 68
<45
<28 l Nb-95 Cs-134 < 150 <150 >
l Cs-137 < 180 < 180 L Sr-89 < 117 <250 i
' Sr-90 <150 < 150 ll' <78 < 158 W Ba-140
<40
- La-140 < 42 I ;
I LI
~
1 1 I I I
I 1989 Annual Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report Page 77 FERMI-2 LAKE ERIE SEDIMENTS ANALYSIS Location = S Fermi-2 Discharge Approximately 200 Ft. Offshore Distance = 0.2 Miles ENE/67 of Fermi 2 (Indicator) - Sample = Sediment
. Analysis = Gamma Emitting Isotopes / Strontium 89-90
- Sample Frequency = Semi-Annual Units = pCi/kg Dry Weight Location S-2 ~
Date Collected 06-02-89 09-28-89 Lab Code R9-05-117-02 R9-10-018-02 Fe-59 <61 < 86 I Mn-54 Co-58 Co-60
<22
<22
<32
< 34
< 33
< 42 Zn-65 <49 < 82 Zr-95 <45 < 50 Nb-95 <30 <35 Cs-134 < 150 < 150 I Cs-137 St-89 Sr-90
<180
< 92
< 150
<180
< 250
< 150 I Ba-140 La-140
<178
< 67
<151
<38 I
I I
- I I
I I N ml " W
. 1989 Annual Radiological Environmontal Monitoring Report =
" Page 78 FERMI-2 LAKE ERIE SEDIMENTS ANALYSIS Location = S Estral Beach Approximately 200 Ft. Offshore of North Shoreline where Swan Creek and Lake Erie meet Distance = 1.1 Miles NE/370of Fermi 2 (Indicator) i Sample Analysis
= Sediment
= Gamma Emitting Isotopes / Strontium 89-90 l
Sample . i Frequency Units
=
=
Semi-Annual pC1/kp Dry Weight
~
Location S-3 -- I Date Collected L_ab Code _ 05-02-89 R905gi7-03 09-29-49 R9-10-018-03 Fe-59 < 72 < 115 B Mn-54 < 26 < 57 Co-58 < 29 <48 Co-60 < 37 <51 I Zn-65 Zr-95
< 57
< 51
<138
< 76 Nb-95 < 38 < 57 I Cs-134 Cs-137
< 150
<180
< 150 280.0 + 60.0 Sr-89 <61 < 225 I Sr-90 Ba-140 La-140
<150
<229
< 72
< 159 8
<263
<46 a LLD could not be achieved due to matrix interference.
+ 1989 Annual l ,. Radiological Environmental f' Monitoring Report d Page 79 i FERMI-2 LAKE ERIE SEDIMENTS ANALYSIS Location = S Indian Trails Community Beach' 0 s Distance = 3.0 Miles WSW/240 of Fermi 2 (Indicator) Sample = Sediment Analysis = Gamma Emitting Isotopes / Strontium 89-90 I Sample Frequency = Semi-Annual Units = pCi/kg Dry Weight Location S-4 Date Collected 05-15-89 09-27-89
- Lab Code R9-05-117-04 R9-09-204-01 Fe-59 < 54 < 50 Mn-54 < 23 < 23 I Co-58 Co-60
< 22
< 34
<21
<35 Zn-65 < 61 < 66 I Zr-95 Nb-95 Cs-134
<46
< 27
<150
< 40
< 24
<150 I Cs-137 St-89 Sr-90
< 180
< 112
<150
< 180
<230
< 150 Ba-140 < 105 < 96 I La-140 <31 < 33 I
g: I-
---______7 T 1989 Annupi Radiological EnvironmGntal
- Monitoring Report
- Page 80 L FERMI-2 LAKE ERIE SEDIMENTS ANALYSIS l
, location = S-S - DECO Trenton Channel Power Plant Intake Area u 13 Miles NNE/20 0 Distance of Fermi 2 (Control) l Sample = Sediment Analysis = Gamma Emitting Isotopes / Strontium 89-90 Sample
= Frequency = Semi-Annuel Units = pCl/kg Dry Weight
' Location S-5 Date Collected 05-14-89 09-21-89 I Lab Code R9-05-117-05
< 58 R9-10-018-04
< 96 Fe-59 I Mn-54 Co-58 Co-60
<31
< 27
<38
< 36
<32
<48
< 69 < 85 I Zn-65 Zr-95 Nb-95
< 51
<30
< 64
< 46
< 150 Cs-134 <150 Cs-137 < 130 < 180 Sr-89 < 120 < 260 a
St-90 460.0 + 50.0 <155 Ba-140 < 135 < 279 La-140 <51 < 121 a LLD could not be achieved due to matrix interference.
4
- 1989 Annual Radiological Environmental
" Monitoring Report 4: Page 81 FERMI-2 . MILK SAMPLE ANALYSIS I Location = Doty Farm (M-1) (Control) 7512 N. Custer Rd. Monroe. Mich. Distance = 14.2 Miles W/269 of Fermi 2 1 Sample = Milk Analysis = Gamma Emitting isotopes and lodine 131 Sample 1 Frequency = Monthly - Non Grazing Season Semi-Monthly - During Grazing Season i Units = pCi/ liter i Collection Date Lab Code 1-131 Cs-134 Concentration Cs-137 Ba-La-140 K-40 01-11-89 FMI-3001 < 0.2 <7.2 <7.0 <6.0 1230 1 130 02-16-89 FMI-3106.7 < 0.5 <6.4 <5.6 <6.2 1290 1100 03-16-89 D FMI-3176 <0.3 < 4.9 <5.3 <2.6 1300 + 110 04-26-89 05-013-01 <1.0 <15.0 < 18.0 < 15.0 1355 7 192 1 05-10-89 05-091-01 < 1.0 <15.0 < 18.0 < 15.0 1636 7 264 05-22-89 05-150-01 <1.0 <15.0 < 18.0 < 15.0 1301 7 264 I 06-14-89 06-28-89 07-18-89 06-090-01 06-178-01 07-069-01
<1.0
< 1.0
< 1.0
< 15.0
< 15.0
< 15.0
< 18.0
< 18.0
<18.0
< 15.0
< 15.0
< 15.0 1260 7 204 1400 I 200 1350 7 179 07-31-89 08-016-01 <1.0 <15.0 < 18.0 < 15.0 1781 I 242 08-16-89 08-091-01 < 1.0 <15.0 < 18.0 < 15.0 1500 7 224 08-30-89 09-008-01 <1.0 < 15.0 < 18.0 < 15.0 1680 7 244 09-13-89 09-066-01 < 1.0 <15.0 < 18.0 < 15.0 1379 7 268 a
09-27-89 09-202-01 <2,4 < 15.0 < 18.0 < 15.0 1275 I 218 10-11-89 10-062-01 < 1.0 <15.0 < 18.0 < 15.0 1645 7 297 10-25 10-152-01 <1.0 <15.0 < 18.0 < 15.0 1573 7 214
;11-15-89 11-128-01 < 1.0 <15.0 < 18.0 <15.0 1413 7 257
~
a 12-18 12-085-01 < 2.05 < 15.0 < 18.0 < 15.0 1500 1 234 a LLD not met due to low chemical recovery, b Second through fourth quarter lab codes are all prefaced with R9 . i
1989 Annual I Radioingical Environmental Monittring Report Page 82 i t FERMI-2 i MILK SAMPLE ANALYSIS , i I Location = Doty Farm (M-1) (Control) 7512 N. Custer Rd. Monroe, Mich. 14.2 Miles W/2690 of Fermi 2
;I- Distance Sample
=
= Milk Analysis = Strontium 89/90 I Sample Frequency = Monthly - Non Grazing Season Semi-Monthly - During Grazing Season Units = pCi/ liter 3 Collection Lab Concentration ,
3 Date Code Sr-89 St-90 (continued) 01-11-89 FMI-3001 <0.5 1.1 + 0.3 02-16-89 FMI-3106,7 <0.5 1.1 + 0.3 I. 03-16-89 FMI-3176 <0.7 1.3 I 0.5
<i.0 04-26-89 05-013-01 < 10.0
<2.0 I 05-10-89 05-22-89 06-14-89 05-091-01 05-150-01 06-090-01
< 10.0
< 10 0
< 10.0 3.6 + 1.5
<2.0 06-28-89 06-178-01 < 10.0 <2.0 1 07-18-89 07-069-01 < 10 0 3.0 + 0.6 l 07-31-89 08-016-01 < 10.0 <2.0 !
t 08-16-89 08-091-01 < 10.0 3.4 + 0.9 l 08-30-89 09-008-01 < 10.0 3.1 + 0.6
.l <2.0 s 09-13-89 09-066-01 < 10.0 L 09-27-89 09-202-01 < 10.0 <2.0 10-11-89 10-062-01 < 10.0 <2.0 10-25-89 10-152-01 < 10.0 2.7 + 1.1 l 11-15-89 11-128-01 < 10.0 2.4 + 0.4 E 12-18-89 12-085-01 < 10.0 < 2.0 - 1 l ;.
I l
a 1 r 1989 Annual i Radiological Environmental , ; i Monitoring Report '" Page 83 I FERMI-2 j I inii.k SAMPLE ANALYSIS Location = Resume Farm (M-2) (Indicator) 2705 E. Labo Rd. Carleton, Mich. Distance = 5.7 Miles NW/3190 of Fermi 2
- I' Sample = Milk Analysis = Gamma Emitting Isotopes and lodine 131 I Sample Frequency = Monthly - Non Grazing Season Semi-Monthly - During Grazing Season Units = pCl/ liter I
Collection Lab Concentration
-I Date Code I-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-La-140 K-40 01-11-89 FMI-3002 <0.2 <5.6 < 5.4 <5.2 1180 + 110 02-16-89 FMI-3108 <0.3 < 5.1 < 5.2 < 3.3 1170 + 110 FMI-3177 ' < 0.5 <6.6 <8.5 <5.0 1300 I 140 03-16-89* <7.1 <8.4 <5.7 1419 I 230 04-26-89 05-013-02 < 1.0 05-10-89 05-091-02 <1.0 <15.0 < 18.0 <15.0 1310 I 248 05-22-89 05-150-02 <1.0 < 15.0 < 18.0 < 15.0 739 + 182 06-14-89 06-090-02 <1.0 < 15.0 < 18.0 <15.0 1520 + 267 06-27-89 06-167-01 < 1.0 < 15.0 <18.0 <15.0 1350 7 145 07-19-89 07-069-02 <1.0 < 15.0 < 18.0 <15.0 1400 I 268 07-31-89 08-016-02 <1.0 < 15.0 < 18.0 < 15.0 1524 7 226 I- 08-16-89 08-30-89 08-091-02 09-008 <1.0
< 1.0
< 15.0
< 15.0
< 18.0
<18.0
< 15.0
< 15.0 1780 7 243 1655 + 245 09-13-89 09-066-02 < 1.0 < 15.0 < 18.0 <15.0 1320 I 260 I 09-27-89 10-11-89 10-25-89 09-202-02 10-062-02 10-152-02 1.9 2+ 0.9
< 1IO
<1.0
< 15.0
< 15.0
< 15.0
<1P.0
< 18.0
< 18.0
< 15.0
< 15.0
<15.0 1440 + 237 1477 I 222 1574 I 288 11-15-89 11-128-02 <1.0 < 15.0 < 18.0 < 15.0 1382 I 237
'12-18-89 12-085-02 <1.0 <15.0 < 18.0 < 15.0 1484 [ 242 a Second tiirough fourth quarter lab codes are all prefaced with R9 .
r Y LI: , 1 I
. . c 1989 Annual
[I Rediriggical Environm:ntal Monitoring Report Page 84 l FERMI-2 MILK SAMPLE ANALYSIS Location = Resume Farm (M-2) (Indicator)
.g 2705 E. Labo Rd. Carleton, Mich.
'g' Distance = 5.7 Miles NW/3190 of Fermi 2 Sample = Milk Analysis = Strontium 89/90 Sample Frequency = Monthly - Non Grazing Season
> Semi-Monthly - During Grazing Season Units = pCi/ liter Collection Lab Concentration Date Code Sr-89 Sr-90 (continued) 01-11-89 FMI-3002 <0.6 1.5 + 0.4 02-16-89 FMI-3108 <0.5 1.1 I 0.4 03-16-89 FMI-3177 < 0.7 2.4 + 0.6 04-26-89 05-013-02 < 10.0 8.2 I 1.7 05-10-89 05-091-02 < 10.0 < 2.0
!I 05-22-89 06-14-89 05-150-02 06-090-02
< 10.0
< 10.0
<2.0
< 2.0 06-27-89 06-167-01 < 10.0 < 2.0 -
07-19-89 07-069-02 < 10.0 2.5 + 1.2 07-31-89' 08-016-02 < 10.0 <i.0 08-16-89 08-091-02 < 10.0 5.0 + 1.4 I 08-30-89 09-13-89 09-27-89 09-008-02 09-066-02 09-202-02
< 10.0
< 10.0
< 10.0 2.8 7 0.5-
<i.0 4.1 + 0.9
, 10-11-89 10-062-02 < 10.0 <f.0 10-25-89 10-152-02 < 10.0 4.6 + 1.3 11-15-89 11-128-02 < 10.0 2.7 7 0.4 12-18-89 12-085-02 < 10.0 <i.0 i l
~
I
h 1989 Annual
; s.
Redirlogical Environmental l [ M:nittring Reptrt Page 85 l I FERMI-2 ;
, MILK SAMPLES ANALYSIS
- v. l l
l Location = Yoas Farm (M-3) (Indicator) 3239 Newport Rd. Newport, Mich. Ig Distance = 4,5 Miles NW/3110 of Fermi 2 g - Sample = Milk Analysis = Osmma Emitting isotopes and lodine 131 l Sample . J
! Frequency = Monthly - Non Grazing Season Semi-Monthly - During Orazing Season ,
' Units = pCl/ liter Collection Concentration lI Lab Date Code 1-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 Sa-La-140 K-40 e
01-11-89 FMI-3003 <0.3 <4.6 <4.7 < 3.9 1590 + 120 02-16-89 FMI-3109 <04 < 4.7 <5.6 <4.2 1340 7 90 03-15-89 D FMI-3178 <0.3 <3.5 < 3.5 <3.9 1370 7 90 .
< 15.0 1378 7191 i 04-26-89 05-013-03 < 1.0 <15.0 < 18.0 8
05-10-89 05-091-03 <1.0 <150 < 18 0 < 16.8 1300 7 246 ." l 05-22-89 05-150-03 <1.0 < 15.0 < 18.0 <15.0 13237 263 06-14-89 06-090-03 < 1.0 < 15.0 < 18.0 <15.0 1130 7139
- 07-20-89 07-082-01 <1.0 <15.0 < 18.0 <15.0 1380 7 219 07-31-89 08-016-03 <1,0 < 15.0 <18.0 < 15.0 1648 7 221 08-16-89 08-091-03 <1,0 < 15.0 < 18.0 < 15.0 1900 7266 08-30-89 09-008-03 <1.0 <15.0 < 18 0 < 15.0 20657 288
. I. l 09-13-89 09-066-03 <1.0 < 15.0 < 18.0 <15.0 2000 7296 i 09-27-89 09-202-03 < 1.0 < 15.0 < 18 0 <15.0 2062 7 304 l
~10-11-89 10-062-03 <1.0 < 15.0 <180 < 15.0 1810 7 280
- l- .
10-25-89 10-152-03 <1.0 <15.0 < 18 0 <15.0 1831 7 286 l 11-15-89 11-128-03 < 1.0 < 15.0 < 18 0 < 15.0 1789 7 319 12-18-89 12-085-03 <1.0 < 15.0 < 18.0 < 15.0 7 1821_,279 a LLD not reached due to priority count not being scheduled at laboratory. D Second through fourth quarter lab codes are all prefaced with R9 . I I f
pw ., r Dg 1989 Annual lg Radiological Environmental i Monitoring Report ' E Page 86
'I FERMI-2 MILK SAMPLES ANALYSIS Location = Yoas Farm (M-3) (Indicator) 3239 Newport Rd. Newport, Mich.
U I Distance Sample. Analysis '
' = 4.5 Miles NW/3110 of Fermi 2
'=
=
Milk Strontium 89/90 j Sample ' Frequency = Monthly - Non Grazing Season Semi-Monthly - During Grazing Season - _
' Units = . pCl/ liter j l
p I Collection Date Lab Code St-89 Concentration Sr-90 (continued) i t 01-11 FMI-3003 - <0.6 1.8 + 0.5 , i ': 02-16 FMI-3109 <0.4 1.4 7 0.4 - l-- 03-15-89 FMl-3178 <0.7 1.3 7 0.5 04-26-89 05-013-03 < 10.0 4.6 I 0.9
<f.0
$ 05-10-89' 05-22-89 05-091-03 05-150-03
< 10.0
< 10.0 4.4 + 1.3 j
& 06-14-89 06-090 < 10.0 3.9 + 0.6 j 07-20-89 07-082-01 < 10.0 < 2.0 '
>a ' 2.3 + 0.9 -l' 07.-31-89 08-016-03 < 10.0 Lg 08-16-89' 08-091 < 10.0 2.6 7 0.5
.. 08-30-89 09-13-89' 09-008-03 09-066-03
< 10.0
< 10.0 3.0 I 0.6 2.3 + 0.4 l
-l
. 09-27.89 09-202-03 < 10.0 2.6 + 0.8 ' -l 10-11-89-- 10-062-03 < 10.0 2.8[0.9 10k 25-89 10-152-03 < 10.0 2.3 + 1.3 .
,ig' I g; i11-15-89 11-128-03 < 10.0 2.7{0.5
< 2.0 -
12-18-89 12-085-03 < 10.0 , s a g: . IL 1
1989 Annual Radiological Environmental-
;f Monitoring Repor2 Page 87 -
FERMI-2 MILK SAMPLES ANALYSl$ I' Location = iveo f am (M-7) (Indicator) 435'e P s' Rd. Newgort, Mich. I' Distance Sample Analysis
= 2.2 W - WNW/282 of Fermi 2
=
Milk Gamma Emitting Isotopes and lodine 131 Sample
, I Frequency = Monthly - Non Grazing Season
-- Seml-Monthly - During Grazing Season
- . Units = pCl/ liter I Collection Date Lab Code 1-131 Cs-134 Concentration Cs-137- Ba-La-140 K-40 0 1629 + 299 05-22-89 05-150-04 < 1.0 < 15.0 < 18.0 <15.0 ,
06-14-89 06-090-04 <1.0 < 15.0 <18.0 < 15.0 1270 + 211 06-29-89 06-178-02 <1,0 < 15.0 < 18.0 ' '< 15.0 11007 200
~
NS* a NS = No sample.' Location M-7 dropped from program as of 07-31-89.
'b Lab codes are all prefaced with R9 .
g I g iE. s 1 .. I I
'1989 Annual i Radiological Environmental-Monitoring Report
_ - -_ Page 88
=
FERMI-2 MILK SAMPLES ANALYSIS-Location = Webb Farm (M-7) (Indicator) 4362 Post Rd. Monroe, Mich. 3' . Distance = 2.2 Miles WNW/2820 of Fermi 2 j , Sample = Milk Analysis. = Strontium 89/90 7 - Sample Frequency = - Monthly - Non Grazing Season Semi-Monthly - During Grazing Season
- Units = pCl/ liter M
E i Collection ' Lab Concentration L -I Date Code St-89 St-90 (continued) e a
.05-22 05-150-04 06-14-89 06-090-04 < 10.0 4.0 1 0.8
..I= 06-29 06-178-02 < 10.0 <2.0 a ' Sample =was lost owing to matrix interference. There was insufficient sample remaining
~
for reanalysis.
;I ;I:
I g
=
I! ,
'I! u
8 o, v. o . . 1989 Annual ], *
- Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report '
( l ' Page 89 FERMI-2 GRASS SAMPLE ANALYSl$ i Location . = Doty Farm (M-1) (Control) 7512 N. Custer Rd. Monroe, Mich. Distance- = 14.2 Miles W/2690 of Fermi 2 Sample = Grass Analysis = Gamma Emitting Isotopes and lodine 131 Sample - Frequency = Monthly - Non Grazing Season Semi-Monthly - During Grazing Season Units = pCi/ liter I' Collection Lab Concentration Cs-137 Sa-140 La-140 I Date Code 1-131 Cs-134 07-087-01 < 60.0 < 60.0 < 80.0 < 118.0 < 40.0 07-21-89a 08-092-01 < 60.0 < 60.0 < 80.0 < 49.0 < 49.0 08-16 08-30-89 09-000-01 < 60.0 < 60.0 < 80.0 <6.0 <6.0 I 09-13-89 09-27-89 10-11-89 09-067-01 09-203-01 10-063-01
< 60.0
< 60.0
< 60.0
< 60.0
< 60.0
< 60.0
< 80.0
< 80.0
< 80.0
= < 22.0
< 64.0
< 30.0
< 22.0
< 64.0
< 30.0 10-153-01 < 60.0 < 60.0 < 80.0 < 17.0 < 17.0 10-25-89 Is 11-15-89 11-129-01 < 6 0.0 . < 60.0 < 80.0 < 21.0 < 21,0 8
I; I;' I I: 1 I I I: .
.1989 Annual Radiological Environmental
>B '
Monitoring Report - Page 90
+ FERMI-2 GRASS SAMPLES ANALYSIS iE Location = Yoas Farm (M-3) (Indicator)
-- 3239 Newport Rd. Newport, Mich.
'. Distance = 4.5 Miles NW/3110 of Fermi 2
- Sample = Grass Analysis = Gamma Emitting Isotopes and lodine 131
'g- Sample Monthly - Non Grazing Season 3 Froquency =
Semi-Monthly - During Grazing Season Units = pCi/ liter g-iB Collection Lab- Concentration
>;E .
. W ;. Date Code 1-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-140 La-140
... 06-27-89a- 06-168-01 < 60.0 < 60.0 < 80.0 <70.0 < 24.0 a La, ceee is prefaced with R9 .
3
/IL 21:
I
-B LI; .
1 LI ! 4
-a'--.b...-6-...-,.
~1989 Annual
' Radiological Environmental I Monitoring Report Page 91 FERMI-2 L GRASS SAMPt.ES ANALYSIS Location = Webb Farm (M-7) (Indicator) 4362 Post Rd. Newgort, Mich.
- Distance = 2.1 Miles WNW/282 of Fermi 2 B< Sample = Grass Analysis = Gamma Emitting Isotopes and lodine 131 Sample I
Frequency Units
= Monthly - Non Grazing Season
=
Semi-Monthly During Grazing Season pCl/ liter Collection Lab- Concentration I- Date Code I-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-140 La-140 07-20-89 a 07-083-01 < 60.0 < 60.0 < 80.0 < 61.0 < 23.0 5 08-16-89 08-092-02 < 60.0 < 60.0 < 80.0 < 74.0 < 74.0 08-30-89 09-009-02 < 60.0 < 60.0 < 80.0 <59.0 < 59.0
'g'- 09-13-89 09-067-02 < 60.0 < 60.0 < 80.0 < 40.0 < 40.0
-g 09-27-89 09-203-02 < 60.0 < 60.0 < 80.0 < 40.0 < 40.0 10-11-89 10-063-02 < 60.0 < 60.0 < 80.0 < 34.0 < 34.0 10-25-89 10-153-02 < 60.0 < 60.0 < 80.0 < 28.0 < 28.0 11-15-89 11-129-02 < 60.0 < 60.0 < 80.0 < 27.0 < 27.0 a
<ab codes are aii pref aced with R9 .
g I I g
;g-I I
B;
.E E . <O Of O M O.O- ,
' 1989 Annual- . . . ~
'~
Rad io logica l : lnw i ronmentC1 - Conitoring Report _ Pege 92 FERMI-2 FOOD' PRODUCTS ANALYSIS' tocation = Rolant Farm 9501 Turnotke Hwy. Newport. Mich. FP-1 D'istance = 4.0 Miles NME/220 of Fermi 2 Sample = Food Products Analysis = Gamma Emitting Isotopes Sample Frequency = Monthly (When available) Units = pC4/kg Wet Date Sample. Lab Concentration Location Collected Type Code I-131* Cs-134 Cs-837 M-40 Indicator 07-31-89 Swiss Chard R9-08-015-01 <60 <60 #80 3482
- 690 07-31-89 Cabbage R9-08-015-02 <60 <60 <80 2070 [ 511 07-31-89 Beet Tops R9-08-015-03 <60 <60 <80 5162 3 1179 08-30-89 Cabbage R9-09-007-01 <60 <60- <80 1714 3 415 l 08-30-89 Broccoll R9-09-007-02 <60 <60 <80 3533 + 692 08-30-89 Swiss Chard R9-09-007-03 <60 <60 <80 2056 [ 416 Location = 6441 Brencheau FP-3 Distance = 1.1 miles NNE/110 of Fermi 2 Sample = Food Products Analysis = Gamma Emitting Isotopes Sample i Frequency = Monthly (When available)
Units = pCi/kg Wet-l Date . Sample tab Concentration tocation Collected Type Code I-131" Cs-434 Cs-137 M-40 l 07-31-89 Cabbage R9-08-015-04 <60 <60 <80 1890 + 480' 07-31-89 Koltrobi R9-08-015-05 <60 460 <80 3600 + 837 08-30-89 Cabbage R9-09-007-10 ' <60 <60 <80 1503 [ 410. 08-30-89 Kotirobi LR9-09-007-11 <60 .<60 <80 2526 + 518 a I-131 analysis required for leafy vegetables only. l .
~
l
. , > - w # .a,+ w ,W. +u-4%. m- ,,m'es- a- -m- p'- g ,3 e s.- ,ma+ ymy u- -,y, ~ 4 4% ,p., ,
4
W-
, ,g .d
- -'b .
W.+ . l ' Be 4 e. C
*s'**
E >b cO-WQ I
. Bg 4
83t C o. C0LM (* Om-
, l =ID@anRa VCD RON D .e*
Mb *= ENC @ (D N @ w NN
-I Ow
@e
+ le t O
@@4@N4
+l41+l+1+l+1 g
C == to I @mCO@@ it N co at M@9NO@
$ @c O@MMa m MMNNMa B g NN
- h h
- M
- n. e=
1 00 i 000000 C W cD to C m to CD D) CD CD (D C U V v O U V y ,Y Y Y Y I 5 E b b e ed M C # w C T M 6M 6 M
> U m
.J l CO I OO COO
(' W WW W @@ @@@ 3 UV V v U Q vvvvvv
' I' . N
[.m B B l - - W- gooooo no , I-6 , t @@ l @@@@@@
= vv =* vvvvvv 1 *N @N@ nom w -- 000000 -
s : i e i e i a C B @ mc ee 00
@@m.NNN ee e OOO 000000 O
m N @ se @ i e i i e a @ e CD (D N 8 (D(DED m m m -
~~ .J U J U 000000 D g O. O i
- e e i e i e a LI n c w
6
^
mm Ct E E b
@ m a
9 m e es e m m ' EE2EEE
@ W Un
@ e ik u >
+ G b- G -D +=
+ 3 3 I
O O 4 0 5
* - O +n - +e 0- h
- V O e ** L +
O O 9 Q R N e M w - 0 W 4 ED ** > @ O w > J M @
* * ~
N N a N N V % D @U * % @ @~ @ @*== e- 3mC C @ O *C WeC C @ CCum@ O L O Z ed * @ mo EVu 24 @ *u3eeu
+
O E 3 u +' 4 @ Ce bE* Z U +3 4 9 u +* O WI u
, I'.
+e "e0-
** eOEi 3 4A 3 **
w@ Q h' s e3 D* UM W oO 3 A * @oE 3 ** 3 +* oV- t w e ; *. -. 3 N a r O +4 C30 (Ae vJ @ a U EDe 6CD
- s. a TL s*
3 >= " 6 O =6W > V E 4J = 6W h e- @ , *
+
4 e Q. =0 LJ6 *4 N C .x V a 0 3 K2 D 3 I Ng E V *a s @ mm - @ am V -*% @ mmmmmm & Wt NO C* +8 (D (D ' == 0 3 1 4O C* +d CD(DED(DCD(D
'OU W es
- CD @ (L = c 0U U e i e e ie L N4
- O4 @ ~~~O00 TENwc 3a @ e- BNZ404 3a MMMMMM e
$w MM @ e=
+a== I I i 4 I i *
**== p i 4O NN 5O N N N (D ED CD e It H tl 11 ' 11 11 QU OO is it ti et 11 le QU CCOOOO ,A C
> b > L M C @ W u C 0 C @ W u C C 0 +. O u + C 0 *a 0 0 - C M
- C@m@@
- A - C@e@ @ *
+*
4 "
- ma >= 3$ ** O w m A- 3W W 4
- Q ~ Q C +, 5 .
- 3 *, -Q - C, U ** 4 * 't
.I- u eEeE@* -
u eteE@- U u O *NCNLC O O ~ NCS% C 0 4 s OOatew3 . -= 1 3e(ew3 s ==
i a f. n' t e m n r' --o it vr no Ep e l R a - l cg i n gi~ or4 ot o9 i ie. dng aoa RMP 46475 7971 4 65545 -
- 7 7 {*
0 21 1 71 4 97964 . K
- 66675 3221 2
. 7
. 3 1 . n o C s
- 0O0O0 8R8R8 i
t a r S t I n 4 S e3 Y c 1 L n - 0O000 A o s 6G666 N C C < <<<< 2 A i S T e R UC " 1 E D 3
- F O R
P O O 1 1 00000 66666 O 90456 y F 01 000 l
- - - - - n 55777 o 1 1 000 2 e 00000 s b d - - - - - e i ao 88999 m L C 0000C lb r - - - - - a e 99999 t F ) RRRRR e s e g f e l e o p b v o a y
.. 0 t l 9 o i f 8 s a a 2 i v e
/ a i i l W g eeel
. Nsn n e logcgo r mnh Wti e l cauac o rac ct h pe cbtbc f
- ami F.. irM ledi ae, ire dGe mP sut om. y W-Wt
( e l g ST mp ay obtbo raear BCLCB d i e r u
. . 6 d e a hk d q t/ e 99999 u0b b0y- 3 6. dom m nl t 80888 e
+ a2aP4oa oC c - - - - - r L8MF1 FG Mp e 1 1 000 el 33333 s tl - - - - - i ao 77888 sy
= = == = = DC 00000 l
. a n
a
. n o
e s c c i n y n o l 1 i nesee i o 3
. r t al yl us t 1 a t pl pqt a t -
c smamei c n I o ianarn o o
.. L DSASFU L C a : - t
g ,
- si "E , 11989 Annual i' 3 #
Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report Page 95 - l FERMI-2 FISH SAMPLES ANALYSIS Location L = F Celeron Island Area
- Distance - = 9.5 Miles NNE/300 of Fermi 2 Sample -_ = -Fish Analysis ' = Gamma Emitting isotopes > B-Sample Frequency = Semi-Annual Units = pCi/kg Wet Weight (Edible Portions)
Location Sample Description and Concentration Control-Date Collected 05-10-89 05-10-89 09-21-89 I Lab Code. Type R9-05-116-03 a R9-05-116-04 Carp R9-10-015-01 Perch
- Mn-54 < 130 < 130 < 130 If Fe-59 Co-58
<260
< 130
<260
< 130
< 260
< 130
>Co-60 < 130 < 130 < 130 7
c l Zn-65 < 200 <260 - < 260 Cs-134 < 130 <130 < 130 Cs-137' < 150 < 150 < 150
<30 < 94 < 103 Jg: Zr-95
<73 < 102 gl Nb-95 ' < 21 Ba-140 <402- < 879 <1847 e - La-140 < 100 < 211 < 887 .
J ' Sr <40 < 40 < 40 Sr-90 ' <8 13.0 -+ 2.0 ' 8.7 + 2.5 y 7 a Laboratory did not separate samples by species.
;I I
I 1 h_ l
- __ _ _ - .._. 7 ..
1989 Annual. Radiological Environmental I Monitoring Report Page 96- .l FERMI-2 FISH SAMPLES ANALYSIS i Location = F Celeron Island Area ' Distance . = 9.5 Miles NNE/30 of Fermi 2
. Sample = Fish ,
Analysis = Gamma Emitting Isotopes Sample Frequency' = . Semi-Annual , pCi/kg Wet Weight (Edible Portions) Units = l Location - Sample Description and Concentration
-i
. Control (continued)
!: Date Collected 09-21-89 09-21-89' 09-21-89 5 R9-10-015-03 R9-10-015-04 I Lab Code Type R9-10-015-02 Walleye
< 130 White Bass-
< 130 Sucker
< 130 l Mn o Fe < 260 <260 < 350s -
~
- Co-58 < 130 < 130 < 130 _
< 130 < 130 -
i: Co-60 <130 2n-65 <260' <260 <260 I,-': Cs-134 <130 < 130 < 130 - Cs-137 < 150 ' < 150 < 150 ,
< 193 '
3' Zr-95 <22 < 89 . g Nb-95 Ba-140
<21
<485
< 89
<2265
< 177
< 4204 <
P La-140 < 159 < 743 < 1815
- Sr-89 b 'b <40
.<8 t .Sr-90 b b .
a . Insufficient sample amount to meet LLD, - '! i b Sample cross-contaminated in preparation at laboratory. 1 I . I: l 4
1989 Annual I
, Radiolog'ical Environmental Monitoring RGport Page 97 I
h FERMI-2 I FISH SAMPLES ANALYSIS I Location .
- Distance' Sample
= F Fermi 2 Discharge (Approximately 1200 Ft. Offshore)
'= 0.4 Miles E/85 of Fermi 2
= Fish I Analysis Sample Frequency
= Gamma Emitting Isotopes
= Semi-Annual Units = pCl/kg Wet Weight (Edible Portions)
I'
' Location Sample Description and Concentration Control Date Collected 05-10-89 05-10-89 09-21-89 R9-05-116-02 R9-05-116-05 R9-10-016-01 I
. Lab Code Type a Carp Walleye Mn-54 < 130 <130 < 130
.Fe-59 < 260 < 260 <260 Co-58 < 130 <130 < 130 C0-60 < 130 < 130 < 130
. 2n-65 < 260 > <260 < 260 Cs-134 < 130 < 130 < 130
< 150 Cs-137 <150 < 150 Zr-95 '- <45 < 53 < 13
=
-Nb-95 < 47 <51 < 13 -
Ba-140 < 608 <200 <387 La-140 < 225 < 591 < 113 I Sr-89 Sr-90 .
< 40 22.0 + 3.0
< 40
<8
< 40
<8
.a Laboratory did not seporate samples by species.
I g. I g
_a._ . . . . . . . .
=
.1989 Annual' Radiological Environmsntal-Monitoring Report Page 98 -
FERMI-2 FISH SAMPLES ANALYSIS location = F Fermi 2 Discharge (Approximately 1200 Ft. Offshore) Distance = 0.4 Miles E/85 of Fermi 2 Sample - -= Fish Analysis Gamma Emitting Isotopes
----- =
- Sample Frequency = Semi-Annual -
" Units - = , pCl/kg Wet Weight (Edible Portions)
Location Sample Description and Concentration-b Control (continued) Q. Date Collected - 09-21-89 09-21-89 5 -Lab Code R9-10-016-02 R9-10-016-03
. Type Catfish - Perch
{ Mn-54 < 130 ' < 130 Fe-59 <260 <260 Co-58 < 130 < 130 Co-60' < 130 < 130 Zn-65 < 260 ' < 260
'Cs-134- < 130 < 130 Cs-137 <150 < 150 Zr-95 <51 < 10
'Nb-95 <58 -<11 Ba-140 < 1465 < 317 La-140 < 459 < 96
~ Sr-89 <40. < 40 Sr-90 <8 <8
!I
-I I
I
.g
.I .
d
. . _.t
~
1989 Annual-Radiological Envirca. mental
- ~ '
Monitoring Report y Page 99 FERMI-2 1 FISH SAMPLES ANALYSIS = l
- Location = F Brest Bay Marina jy Distance - = 5.0 Miles SW/2380 of Fermi 2
~ Sample - = Fish Analysis . = .Gamme Emitting Isotopes
. Sample -
- Frequency- = Semi-Annual Units = pCl/kg Wet Weight (Edible Portions)
Location Sample Description and Concentration Control Date Collected 04-27 09-21-89 09-21-89 Lab. Code R9-05-116-01 R9-10-017-01 R9-10-017-02 Type a Walleye Perch Mn-54 < 130 < 130 < 130 Fe-59 <260 < 260 <260
'Co-58 < 130 < 130 < 130 .
Co-60 < 130 < 130 < 130
'Zn-65
- -<260 < 260 <260 Cs-134_ <130 < 130 < 130 Cs-137- < 150 < 150 < 150 Zr-95 <25 < 14 < 197 Nb-95 <23 < 15 < 174
'Ba-140 <476 <318 - <3446 La-140 <170 <111 < 1403 St-89 <40- <40 <40 Sr-90 <8 <8 <8 a- Laboratory did not separate samples by species.
I I IL
1989 Annual 'l Radiological Environmental In > Monitoring Report ; Page 100 FERMI-2 FISH SAMPLES ANALYSIS - Location'- = F Brest Bay Marina -, RI Distance = 5.0 Miles SW/238 of Fermi 2-s Sample - = Fish: .s Gamma Emittin9 lsotopes ; u ;- Analysis = e Sample -
= Frequency .= Semi-Annual -
= pCi/k9 Wet Weight (Edible Portions)-
~
. Units-c
. I L Location Sample Description and Concentration Control (continued)
Date Collected - 09-21-89 09-21-89
, Lab Code R9-10-017-03 R9-10-017-04 Type White Bass- Bull Head i? Mn < 130 < 130 l hl' L.W .
Fe-59 Co-58
<260
< 130
<260
< 130 ;l Co-60 <130 <130 --
l' - Zn-65 <260 < 260 li - Cs-134 <130 < 130 Cs-137 - < 150 < 1 SO Zr-95 < 30 < 129 l
<28 '<123
'I. ; Nb-95 EBa-140- < 543
< 211
-< 2415 -
<755 l
1 La-140 g< Sr-89 < 40 <40 3- Sr-90 <8 11.4 + 2.7 ; 1 1 g u I 1 I 1 l
E ~M
. Fermi 2 is bordered by both land and aquatic environments.
i .p 4 l- .cwagy i .sapy,si97 , i t,+/ . i 5
,y 1 l ,;ju v 1y
'~
i lI g q== ; e, . sup$guwg= N$$kb . I Is! J M E M - i a . -- ,g Append'ces I I I I I I I I I
... . .. .. . ~ - .- .. .
I , 1989 Annual-Radiological Environmental. Monitoring Rsport-i Page 101 -]
; g. ,
, g.
^
-L APPENDIX A INTERLABORATORY COMPARISON PROGRAM RESULTS I ;
I.L: Ll .
- n 'g.
J' i r L It 3
, , ~,)
-1989 Annual .
I > Radiological Environmental Monitoring RGport Page 102 jIl u
- Appendix A ! Interlaboratory Comparison Program Results First Quarter 1989 )
Teledyne isotopes Midwest Laboratory (formerly Hazleton Environmental. I Sciences) has participated in interlaboratory comparison (crosscheck) programs since the formulation of its quality control program in December, 1971, These programs are operated by agencies which supply
.g.. environmental-type samples (e.g;. milk or water) containing concentrations of g radionuclides known to the issuing agency but not to participant laboratories. The purpose of such a program is to provide an independent check on the laboratory's analytical procedures and to alert it to any possible I problems.
The results in Appendix A were obtained through participation in the environmental sample crosscheck program for milk, water, air filter, and food I- samples during the period January through March,1989. This program has been conducted by the Environmental Protection Agency intercomparison and D. Calibration Section, Quality Assurance Branch, Environmental Monitoring and Support Laboratory, Las Vegas, Nevada. Second through Fourth Quarters 1989
~= International Technology Corporation participates in the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Interlaboratory comparison (crosscheck) program to provide an independent check on the laboratory's analytical procedures.
Participant laboratories measure the cor.centrations of specified radionuclides
'g. and report them to the issuing agency. Several months later, the agency g:' reports the known values to the participant laboratories and specifies control limits Results consistently higher or lower than the known values or outside-the control limits indicate a need to check the instruments or procedures
- used.
The results in Appendix A were obtained through participation in the environmental sample crosscheck program for air filters, milk, and water I during the period January through December,1989, I; I i t :
1989 Annual I Radiological Environmental Monitoring Roport Pa9e 103
' l EPA Intercomparison Results for Teledyne j r .
i All results pCl/l except K-40 (mg/l) and Air Filter samples (pCi/ filter) l Concentrattori Lab Sample Date TIML Flesult EPA Result"
-Code Type Collected Analysis + 2 s 1s,N=1 Control Limits Jan 1989 Sr-89 40.0 + 8.7 40.0 + 5.0 31.3-48.7
.e 3 STW-559 Water 25.0 + 1.5 22.4-27.6 Lg Sr-90 24.3 + 3.1 ) - STW-561 Water Jan 1989 Gr. alpha 7.3 + 1.2 8.0 + 5.0 0.0-16.7 Gr. beta 5.3 [ 1.2 4.0[5.0 0.0-12.7 STW-562 Water Feb 1989 Cr-51 245 + 46 235 + 24 193.4-276.6 Co-60 10.0 T 2.0 10.0 T 5.0 1.3-18.7 Zn-65 170 I 10 159 + 16 139.2-186.7 Ru-106 181 I 7.6 178 I 18 146.8-209.2 j' . Cs-134 9.7[3.0 10.0 [ 5.0 1.3-18.7 Cs-137 11.7 + 1.2 10.0 + 5.0 1.3-18.7 STW-563 Water Feb 1989 l-131 109.0 + 4.0 106.0 + 11.0 86.9-125.1 I g STW-564 Water Feb 1989 H-3 2820 + 20 2754 + 356 2137-3371 L g STW-565 Water Mar 1989 Ra-226 4.2 + 0.3 4.9 + 0.7 3.7-6.1 ,g- Ra-228 1.9[1.0 1.7{0.3 1.2-2.2 STW-566 Water Mar 1989 U 5.0 + 0.0 5.0 + 6.0 0.0-15.4 L STW-567 Air Mar 1989 Gr. alpha 21.7 + 1.2 21.0 + 5.0 12.3-29.7 ; l-Filter Gr. beta 68.3 + 4.2 62.0 + 5.0 53.3-70.7 L Sr-90 20.0 + 2.0 20.071.5 17.4-22.6 l Cs-137 21.3 [ 1.2 20.0 [ 5.0 11.3-28.7 3 I-LI l I
- 1 1989 Annual Radiological Environmental l B Monitoring Rsport Page 104 ; g lc EPA Intercomparison Results for ITC All results pCl/l except K-40 (mg/l) and Air Filter samples (pCl/ filter)
Normalized L Analysis Date ITC Result EPA Result Deviation
** Sample Matrix Type = Air Filter Crosscheck Ref# = 01
- Alpha 03/31/89 17.67 21.00 -1.15 Bete 03/31/89 44.67 62.00 -6.00 c I' Cs-137 03/31/89 18.00 20 00 20.00
-0.69
-3.85 d Sr-90 03/31/89 16.67-
** Sample Matrix Type = Milk Crosscheck Ref # = 01 Cs-137 04/28/89 52.00 50 00 0.69
'K-40 04/28/89 1796 00 1600.00 4.24' Sr-89 04/28/89 25.33 39.00 -4.73
~ Sr-90 04/28/89 54.00 55.00 -0.58 l ** Sample Matrix Type = Water Crosscheck Ref # = 01 g Alpha 01/20/89 9.00 8.00 0.35 g_ Alpha 05/12/89 31.67 30.00 0.36 Beta 01/20/89 4.33 4.00 0.12 Beta 05/12/89 44.67 50.00 -1.85 Crosscheck Ref# = 02 Sr-89 01/06/89 39.00 40.00 -0.35
- I Sr-89 Sr-90 05/05/89 01/06/89 5.33 25.33 6.00 25.00-
-0.23 0.38 Sr-90 05/05/89 5.67 6.00 -0.38 Crosscheck Ref# = 03 I l-131 1-131.
02/17/89 08/04/89 113.67 80.00 106.00 83.00 1.21
-0.65 Crosscheck Ref# = 04 H-3 02/24/89 2720.00 2754.00 -0.17 H-3 06/23/89 not provided not provided NA9 Crosscheck Ref# = 05 Alpha 04/18/89 15.00 29.00 -3.46 h lI Beta Cs-134 04/18/89 04/18/89 43.00 18.67 57.00 20.00
-4.85 h
-0.46 Cs-137 04/18/89 20.67 20.00 0.23 Ra-226 04/18/89 3.47 3.50 -0.12
. . .i 1989 Annual:
Radiological Environmental
~
Monitoring Rsport ' Page 105 EPA Intercomparison Results for ITC All results pC(/l except K-40 (mg/l) and Air t'ilter samples (pCl/ filter) Normalized Deviation Analysis Date ITC Result EPA Result
** Sample Matrix Type = Water Crosscheck Ref# = 05 Ra-228 04/18/89 4.13 3.60 1.85 I -
St-89-- St-90 U-nat. 04/18/89 04/18/89 04/18/89 5.67 8.00 3.00 8.00 8.00 3.00
-0.81 0.00 0.00 Crosscheck Ref# = 06 Ba-133 06/09/89 43.67 49.00 -1.85
'; Co-60 02/10/89 10.33 10.00 0.12
.Co-60 06/09/89 35.33 -31.00 1.50 Cr-51 02/10/89 252.67- 235.00 1 27 -l
-Cs-134 02/10/89 9.00 10.00 -0.35 {
Cs-134 06/09/89 37.33 39 00 -0.58 i Cs-137 02/10/89 11.33 10.00 0.46
.Cs-137 06/09/89 20.00 20.00- 0.00 Ru-106 02/10/89 166.33 178.00 -1.12 Ru-106 06/09/89 121.00 128.00 -0.9 3 .
Zn-65 02/10/89- 171.00 159.00 1.30 i Zn-65 06/09/89 176.67 165.00 1.19 ;
;ll j I
;I I; ..
I . I lI: 3
i 1989 Annual-Radiological Environmental H L
.I Monitoring Report Page 106
' f ,t..
.s ADDENDUM TO APPENDIX A a USEPA results are presented as the known' values and expected laboratory precision r (1s,1 determination) and control limits as defined by EPA.
b- Unless otherwise indicated, the TIML results are given as the mean + 2 standard
. I< deviations for three determinations.
c The filter medium was changed from previous studies. The beta determination had I d a negative deviation owing to uncompensated backscatter. The Sr-90 determination had a negative deviation owing to matrix interference from the filter medium, e The K-40 result is due to the conversion for activity to mass units and therefore not due to the gamma results, f The laboratory was outside three (3) sigma for Sr-89. Sixty-one percent (61%) of the responding laboratories were outside of two (2) sigma for Sr-89. In 1988, sixty-!;even percent (67%) of the responding laboratories for the June intercomparison and sixty-five percent (65%) for October were outside two (2) sigma for St-89. There appears to be an established and documented sample matrix problem associated with this crotischeck for Strontium isotopes. g Sample lost during analysis, insufficient sample and time for reanalysis.
'h The known gross alpha and beta activities for this study are calculated by the EPA instead of measured. For responding laboratories, over thirty-two percent (32%)
were outside of +/- 2 normalized deviations for gross alpha, and over fifty percent (50%) for gross beta-with a profound negative bias, it is probable that the EPA I-- expected values are in error. ~ Somo participating laboratories refuse to provide data for the gross alpha and gross beta portions of this study because the expected
- values are calculated and not determined. Other EPA crosschecks are conducted I which may be utilized to demonstrate gross alpha / beta compliance.
I LI g; 1 I , _}}