ML20036B338

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Informs That Region I Ofc Completed Followup of Concern Brought to NRC Attention on 910605,asserting That Design Change Package Pdcr 2-057-90 Remaining Open from 901212- 910605.Since No Safety Concerns Involved,Issue Closed
ML20036B338
Person / Time
Issue date: 07/19/1991
From: Wenzinger E
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
To:
AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED
Shared Package
ML20036A053 List:
References
FOIA-92-162 NUDOCS 9305190158
Download: ML20036B338 (5)


Text

__

i f'pa s t og).,

4 usiTED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION l

y g

I E

8 REGION I I

475 ALLENDALE ROAD l

0,g,

,,8 KING OF PRUSSIA. PENNSYLVANIA 154 % 1415 4

JUL 1P L%1 i

The NRC Region I office has completed its followup of a concern that you brought to o attention on June 5,1991, asserting that a design change package PDCR 2-057-l f

by Work Order M2-90-15617 involving the service water system remaining o 12,1990, through June 5,1991.

l Our resolution to your concern is that the work specified in the design change packa 1

I has been completed, but remains open pending a leak test on a strainer. Since no l

2-057-90 l

regulatory safety concerns are involved, this issue is closed.

We appreciate you informing us of your concern and we feel that we have been r your concern. Should you have any additional questions regarding these matte l

collect at (215) 337-5225.

J Sincerely; l

ft,,

Edward Wennnger, C Reactor Projects Bran AM i

i i

1 IUICIII.2!ID3 IG llli3 ICCOTd rias d@!cd

]

in accertya rfir,, p,e rge g g Act, exemptons _p_7c F0lA. _ f_ 2 & z I

/

9305190158 930216

/

PDR FDIA j

HUBBARD92-162 PDR

l 2

bec:

RI-91-A-0135 Allegati,in file,

-M-PwWas 6-%

E. Conner W. Ray.nond EG&G idaho Representative 1

i l

l l

i i

l i

i i

w I

?

6 a

OS e

a

)

  • nogk uwrito svaras NUCLEAR REGULAYORY COMMISSION ArGtON I t.

05 ALLENDAtt ROAD Q",,

K1NG eF PRLisstA, MhNsYLVAMA iWJg-1415 JUL 191991 l

The NRC Region I office has cornp!cted its followup of a concern that you b attention on June 5,1991, asserting that a design change package PD by Work Order M2 9015617 invohing the service water system re 12, 1990, through bne 5,1991.

Our resolution to your concern in that the work specified in the design c has been completed, but remains open pending a leak test on a straine 2-057-90 regulatory safety concems are involved, this issue is closed.

We appreciate you informing us of your concern and we fect that we your concem. Should you have any additional questions regarding t coiicct at (215) 337-5225.

Sincerely; j

l d$

J Edward Wenunger, C

./

Reactor Projects Branc 6

l' l

1 k

l d

J J

9

{

ws ALLEMTION RECEIPT REPORT

gg Date/ Time 2%

s Received:

LV 24 M41 l '.00M Allegation No. 6 -7/- /- 04/O _

(leave blank)

~

Address:

Nase:

Phone:

City /$ tate / Zip:

Confidentiality:

Yes I No /

Vas it requested?

Yes No Vas it initially granted?

Vas it finally granted by the allegation panel Yes No Does a confidentiality agreement need to be sent Yes No to alleger?

Has a confidentiality agreement been signed?

Yes No Memo cocurnenting why it was granted is attached?

Yes No

%V b& y Id Position /

Title:

O A2 oe Facility:

NINSYoM 1 Docket No.:

50-334 YdF/0US (Allegation Suwtary (brief description of concern (s):

Concerns on necrasportw. drameneerse,and w/ve fakl Prf0(S.

Number of Cencerns:

6 Ps/lalwhsh Employee Receiving Allegation:

(first'two i nitials and last nas,e)

Type of Regulated Activity (a _/ Reactor (d) _ Other:$afeguards Vender (e) _

(b _ Materials (5pecify)

(c Materials License No. (if appitcable):

Functional Ares (s):

a) Operations Emergency Preparedness b construction Onsite Health and $afety

~((c)) Safeguards

[

Offsite Health and Safety

_(d) Transportation Other:

(WRC Region I Fors 207 Inferma!bn in this rc6d was de'eted Revised 10/89) in arrerme 915 the in& ci !rJctmation Act, c;;tmpucus __/f 7 C p

\\

/l F0W-92=/dk -

/

f j l DsSt e l l ed Des:rtptier, cf Alasg& tion:

t On July 29. 19?1 the a:1eger stopped by the resider.t office to present l

oxempiss c3 disagreement se, j

an :: anda t a nnal! y vart cus J'

twe concorrn.

N O - Af.sa <n < ps cr i ti c al 1

older ellegatices.

d: as: ngg L

7 e x a rep! p of operatto

1. The allegee presented _another l

that the calses ar-e not labele 2n the pisnt, and a dr awing errer. The as t he turni ne sampli r-Q kysteth Sy* tem the allsgse was referring to was 25203-26'J25 sheet 3 c4 4.

According to the al.cger

[

all valvec. sp t ct &d wi th a pr of i s: c4 "O-5" are not l ed el ed :n tn:

j f depictoc cr-dr-w.r; M

'i pla.!.

i n + 9 :::12 um ar. a l y :: e r AE 7764 A6 1s 1abe'lec en the decwing.

'l o w e v e'- :t should be demtgnatfd ac oE 7764 AS. The 2tsm or the soct urn

,an al yz er accert:ng t c, the al l e;er was presentec to tr e 591 f t su?Gevisse

[e l

Jul y CC.

147 v o-c)scovery.

l i

i anc tn-e, 1

er ng mer.a;pr, er

") WW

"/

Y 2nter-cepartt!&nt rt+ mor nc urt add-essed te the 10 coa-tv t head and westten on Jiit y

'M, 1991.

Tne alleger's N -2f/_

l I

TV a l ; rg br presented an 6 m;:1 i f 2 c.t t i on t the ne.To was that he Delieves that circuit changes to f

t h e tr,a ; r: g._ r.g r L t Or hyceog6n ncnitor wars acconplishsd withedt a p t.cl a;c. p aperwor k, and addat2enal1y, the al1e;pr hac s s tr t o hi s ti-anec t raen t a ppr cx t enat el y twc. years s.gc j

mod;ficatacn altcratich l

broug' t

  • 2s :

w 2 t h n.. t ri e s rt t va eternet:ve ac ti ons tason tc a drsss M'e A b

- nf &[#M.j a-v '

a, n h

concarns wtth the my :-ces answer his c on t a rsval g_

i b el l o ve s the NRC d i d n o t i

The s.1 1 p g er r ed s at i nn mnn2tre ho-ne and tNi c WC letter c:ated on July 18, 1991 (enclosec: tdsnt2 41Gd a k

.identif.catten Of ecntrols (cr arca Januar v 24.nd 25.

4 7e sve.t. yet the NOC responte focusac on cren g

y~.

bypessin;.

l GC-13-12 and closure of 69-13-13.

1 * *s +

can be made cperGblE without a

4. ~he al'egor tirenti ons how a system cpen pest i.aintenancs test outstanding and this not being a regulato y yl.ly t

Ini s Lucsti on was prompted by the N5eC !st+se es a t s-r*

o-safety ee-cern.

Jul y 19, 1991 (encl osed).

r N ance g-

5. The alleger believes that two te:hnt ians s

procedur r. without having perf ormed the task s a procecural viclatten.

Enciceed 2s lettor eated July 19 2991 wnich refers tne issus over to ni f i c a t,i on s th IPA to cons 2 der he eric r 6.

I J

% ttthe-p w- &

'id cad'&.+ee-a cati on on br:ng the Alert 4ergencyclassi the c,muncastor 7

The a.;sger s

7/26/91

?-st th= ECr r eci eved i n a d q.,ia t e i ni ce rr a t i on on f

pcwer h.rlies. and it.crof ors ordured t N, wrong moen1 lamsca s a;.:.1. o s, q /-3 In addat:.:n, ths i l l e g ?*- statoc that it e two pcwor su."rIM tt.

tac 4611ed nare schsduled for replacoment appr ox i rna t el y 1.5 years ago,

.--e

-t em1 Mad due to econorse dectsiens.

j

-