ML20033D368
| ML20033D368 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Big Rock Point File:Consumers Energy icon.png |
| Issue date: | 10/29/1981 |
| From: | Fitzgerald J NRC OFFICE OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL (OGC) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML18058B973 | List: |
| References | |
| FOIA-92-436, TASK-AIA, TASK-SE SECY-81-619, NUDOCS 8201110270 | |
| Download: ML20033D368 (5) | |
Text
3a 1
m oe c
.#go eqs 1,
.N rt if
'C
) E October 29, 1981 i, f ^ './,
SECY-El-619 n
o.....+g-g v
ADJUDICATORY ISSUE (Affirmation)
For:
The Com:nissioners From:
James A.
Fitzgerald Assistant General Counsel Sub -i e c t :
REQUEST FOR A HEARING ON BIG ROCK FOINT
Background:
On August 4, 1981, the Director of the Division of Licensing, Office of Nuclear
, Reactor Regulation, issued a tconfirmatory order imposing certain
'rE5uiremenTE related to the TMI Action fr.furm i a in 5 5 n: C un di ac Plan on the B;.g Rock Point Plant to H1 Kurdr:te tc.h he irnem c !af amg 3 Censumers Power Company.
Pursuant to At!. cnmpion 5'
the opportunity for a hearing offered by F0iA f1-93(,
the rder (46 Fed. Reg. 40746, August 11, 1981), JoAnn Bier,. Jira Mills,
~--
and'Christa-Mari~a recue9ted a hearing by letter dated Auc w' 24, 1981.
(Attachment 1).
The licensee, by
[y consenting to tde'erder, has waived its right to a hearing.
See 10 CFR
[
- 2. 202 (e ).
The SY staf f'and the licensee bcT?roppose the recuest on the basis that the petitioners have not demonstrated an interest adversely affected by the order.
In orc.er to be granted a hearing on an Discussion:
l enforcement order, a party must show 7
that it has an interest affected by the
(
es y Y'3 l
order.
L.
'~1/
There is currently a separate proceeding in the pre-hearing stage on an amendment to permit the spent fuel pool expansion at the Big Rock Point Power Plant.
Contact:
11arian E.
Moe, OGC t
,7
~ x.x41465 g
n
~..
( 3 2 0 t i l Q ? ? ? o ;
i f, >
n?
4 t
h' 1
Recor.mendation:
/,. -
. g James A.
Fitzgerald
.. Assistant General Counsel U
Attachments:
1.
Letter recuesting a hearing 2.
Draft Order Comissioners' comments or consent should be provided directly to the Office.of the Secretary by c.o.b. Friday,flovember 13, 1981.
Comission Staff Office coments, if any, should be submitted to the Commissioners flLT flovember 5,1981, with an information copy to the Office of the Secretary.
If the pape-is of such a nature that it requires additional time for analytical review and coment, the Commissioners and the Secretariat should be apprised of when coments may be expected.
This paper is tentatively scheduled for affirmation Et an open meeting during the week of flovember 16, 1981.
Please refer to the appropriate Weekly Comission Schedule, when published, for a specific date and time.
DISTRIBUT10t4 Comissioners Comission Staff Offices Secretariat
5 m a t
e e
t t
,1, f.ls r**
m ATTACHMENT I I
~ e eum*
T a
4
- 4 N *- P O
'=
e 4
Jb r
t 8
i 9
6
~ ^ -- -.
i Augest 24, 1981 1
~
Exe:utive Legal Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation 7. ?.'
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commis_sion t
Mashington, D.C.
20555,7....
, r.;
DOCKET 50-155 Letter August 4,1981 from the NRC Division of Licensing Refs:
(1) to Mr. David P. Hoffnann, Nuclear Licensing Administrator, Consumers i
Power Compar,y, Jackson, Michigan, regarding TMI-related req for the Big Rock facility, and (2) i Licensee Commitments on Post-TMI Related issues, in the matter of CPC's Big Rock Point plant.
We, the undersigned, hereby petition the Nuclear Regulatory Commissior pursuant to 10CFR 2.714(a)(2), to intervene ircedi the Big Rock nuclear facility.
The NRC staf f has developed and proposed post-TMI requirements to u safety for employees and citizens in this area.
from those requirements, nor any modifications for cost-benefit purposes, should be allcwed until citizen input is het d and duly considered by the NRC.
We request a hearing and wish to be involved in all aspects of the proceedings that will pertain to the TMI-related deferrals sought by Consumers Power Company specifically for the Big Rock f acility and which are currently being evaluated by the NRC.
At Bic Rock, the spent fuel pool is within the same containment as the
/
l reactor sessel, a condition not found in the rewer lftensed nuc ear Current PRA and NRC guidelines or erercen:y worst-case r
basis de not include direct effects of a dual meltd facilit"es.
i to cause a LOCA in the other system also, The special conditions steming from the Big Rock facility's early desig must be addressed so the health and safety of the surrounding comunity can be protected.
Intervenors.Christa-Maria et al.
State of Michigan
,(
D>u -
I County of Charlevoix JoAnn Bier 6t j<
204 Clinton Charlevoix, MI 49720
/
GeC e
August lo, 1983 Expiratien date.
.f hi L
Jim Mills Rt. 2, Box 10BC, Charlevoix, MI 49720 f
/Ys J d Odt.t
-x Christa-Maria 49720 Rt. 2, Box 10BC, Charlevoix, MI
'l
A.
I L
1 5
i n.
l fs f
j t
~~
e j.
9 J
[
- /
a iO f.
s,/
~
~
~
ATTACHMENT -2 t
t b
d w'
I E
k i
?
6 b
i r
,