ML20032C251
| ML20032C251 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Crane  |
| Issue date: | 10/30/1981 |
| From: | METROPOLITAN EDISON CO. |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20032C244 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8111090555 | |
| Download: ML20032C251 (19) | |
Text
.
3.2 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING 3.2.1 MONITORING P'<0 GRAM REQUIREMENTS LIMITING CONDITIONS FOR OPERATION:
The radiological environmental monitoring program shall be conducted and samples shall be collected as specified in Table 3.2-1 from the.
locations given in the tables and figures in the Offsite Dose Calculation Manual and shall be analyzed pursuant to the requirements of Table 3.2-1 and 3.2-2.
APPLICABILITY:
At all times.
ACTION:
a.
With the radiological environmental monitoring program not being conducted as specified in Table 3.2-1, prepare and submit to the Commission the annual Radiological Operating Report, a description of the reasons for not crnducting the program as required and the plans for preventing a recurrE Ce.
b.
With the level of radioactivity in an environmental sampling medium exceeding the reporting levels of Table 3.2-3 when averaged over any calendar quarter, prepare and submit to the commission within 30 days from the end of the affected calendar quarter, a report pursuant to 5.6 of Appendix B.
When more than one of the radionuclides in Table 3.2-1 are detected in the sampling medium, this report shall be subr.atted if:
concentration (1) concentration (2) +
> 1.0
+
limit level (1) limit level (2)
When radionuclides other than those in Table 3.2-3 are detected and are the result of plant effluents, this report shall be submitted if the potential annual dose to an individual is equal to or greater than the calendar year limits of Specification 2.1.1 or 2.1.2 of Appendix B.
This report is not required if the measured level of radioactivity was not the result of plant effluents; however, in such an event, the condition shall be reported and described in the Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report.
c.
With milk or fresh leafy vegtables unavailable from one or more of the sample locations required by Table 3.2-1 in lieu of any other report required by Specification 5.6 of Appendix B prepare and submit to the commission within 30 days, a Special Report which identifies the cause of the unavailability of samples and
. identifies locations for obtaining replacement samples. The locations from which samples were unavailable may then be deleted from those required by Table 3.2-1, provided the locations from 0$bo0$$o PDR 3.2-1
which the replacement' samples were obtained ara added to the environmental monitoring program as replacement locations.
BASES:
The radiological monitoring program required by this specification 1
provides measurc.nents of radiation and of radioactive materials in those exposure pathways and for those radionuclides which lead to the highest potential adiation exposures of individuals resulting from l
the station coeration. This monitoring program thereby supplements the radiological ef fluent monitoring program by verifying that the measureable concentrations or radioactive materials and levels of radiation are not higher than expected on th9 basis of the effluent measurements and modeling of the environmental exposure pathways. The initially specified monitoring progran will be effective for at least the first three years of commercial operation. Following this period, program changes may be initiated based on operational experience.
2 i
i i
I e
5 i
r j
3.2-2
)
~
TABLE 3.2-1 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIR0tNENTAL MC..ITORING PROGRAM Number of Samples Exposure Pathway ard Sampling and Type and Frequency and/or samole Sample Locations" Collection Freauency of Analysis
- 1. AIRBORNE Radiciodine and 3 minimum of 5 locations Continuous operation of Radiciodine cenister.
Particulates
. from Table 1 of the 0004.
sampler with sample col-Analyze at least once lection as required by per 7 days for 1-131.
dust loading but at least once per 7 days.
4 Particulate sampler.
Analyze for gross beta radioactivity > 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> following filt'er change.
Perform gamma isotopic analysis on each sample when gross beta activity is
> 10 times the calendar yearly mean of control sanples. Perform gamma isotopic analysis on composite (by location) l sample at least once per 92 days.
- 2. DIRECT RADIATION A minimum of 38 locations At least once per 92 days Gamma dose. At least from Table 2 of the 00CM once per 92 days.
(using either 2 dosimeters or at least 1 instrtsnent for continuously measurinq and recording dose rate at each location).
- Sanole locations are given on the figure and table in the ODCH.
3.2-3
I
(
l TABLE 3.2-1 (continued)
RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONPENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM Hmber of Samples Exposure Pathway and Sampling and Type and Frequency and/or smole Samole Locations **
Collection Frequency of Analysis
- 3. WATERBORNE a.
Surface A minimum of 2 locations Cog osite* sample collected Gama isotopic analysis from Table 3 of the ODCM over a period of < 31 days of each composite sa@ le.
Triti m analysis of composite sample at least once per 92 days.
b.
Drinking A minimum of 2 locations Co@ osite* sample collected Gross beta and gamma from Table 3 of the ODCM.
over a period of < 31 days.
isotopic analysis of each composite sample. Tritium analysis of composite sample at least once per 92 days.
c.
Sediment from A minimum of 2 locations At least once per 184 days.
Gamma isotopic analysis of Shoreline (1 Control and 1 Indicator) of each sample.
from Table 4 of the ODCM.
- Composite samples shall be collected by collecting an aliquot at intervals not exceeding 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br />.
- Sample locations are shown on the figure in the ODCM.
3.2-4
=*
TABLE 3.2-1 (continued)
RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONfENTAL MONITORIfC PROGRAM Number of Samples Exposure Pathway and Sampling and Type and F;equency and/or sample Sample Locations
Collection Frequency of Analysis 4 INGESTION a.
Milk A minimum of 4 locations At least once per 15 days Gamma isotopic and from Table 5 of the ODCM.
when animals are on pasture; I-131 ar.alysis at least once per 31 days of each sample.
at other times.
b.
Fish anj Invertebrates A minimum of 2 locations One sample in season, or at Gamma 1sutopic analysis from Table 6 of the ODCM.
least once per 184 days if on edible portions.
not seasonal. One sample of each of the following species:
1.
Preditor (channel catfish or Bluegill or Punkinseed).
2.
Prey c.
Food Products A minimum of 4 locations At time of harvest. One Gamma isetopic analysis from Table 7 of the 00CM sample of each of the fol-on edible portion.
(when available).
lowing classes of food products:
l 1.
Fruits 2.
Vegetables Indicator Location and At time of harvest. One I-131 analysis.
Control Location sample of broad leaf l
vegetation
- Sanple locations are shown on the finure in the 0004, 3.2-5 l
~
TABLE 3.2-2 MAXIt1N VALUES FOR THE LOWER LIMITS OF DETECTION (LLD)a,c Wa*cr Airborne Particulate l Analysis (pCi/1) or gas Fish Milk Food Products Sediment (pC1/m3)
(pC1/kg, wet)
(pC1/1)
(pCi/kg, wet)
(pC1/kg, dry)
- gross t eta 4
1 x 10-2 l
l3H 2000 4
i 54tn 15 130 l59Fe 30 260 58,60to 15 130 l 65 n 30 260 Z
- 95 r 30 Z
- 95Nb 15 l1311 lb 7 x 10-2 1
60 134Cs 15 5 x 10-2 130 15 60 150
- 137 s 18 6 x 10-2 150 14 80 180 C
- 140Ba 60 60 140La 15 15 3.2.6
TABLE 3.2-2 (Continued)
TABLE NOTATION a.
The LLD is the smallest concentration of radioactive traterial in a sample that will be detected with 95% probability with 5%
probability of falsely concluding that a blank observation represents a "real" signal.
For a particular measurement system (which may include radiochemical separation):
4.66 Sb LLD =
E x V x 2.22 x 106 x Y x exp (-Aa t)
Where:
LLD is the "a priori" lower limit of detection as defined above (as microcurie per unit mass or volume),
J Sb is the standard deviation of the background counting rate or of the counting rate of a blank sample as appropriate (as counts per minute),
E is the counting efficiency (as counts per transformation),
V is the sample size (in units of mass or volume),
2.22 x 106 is the number of transformations per minute per microcurie, Y is the fractional radiochemical yield (when applicable),
A is the radioactive decay constant for the particular radionuclide, and a e is the elapsed time between midpoint of sample collection and time of counting (for plant effluents, not environmental samples).
The value of Sb used in the calculntion of LLD for a detection system shall be based on the actual observed varltnce of the background counting rate or of the counting rate of the blank samples (as appropriate) rather than on an unverified theoretically, predicted variance. Typical values of E, V, Y, and at shall be used in the calculation.
i b.
LLD for drinking water.
.c.
Other peaks which are measured and identifiable, together with the l
' radioactivity in Table 3.2-2, shall be identified and reported.
3.2-7
i
~
t TABLE 3.2-3 i
REPORTING LEVELS FOR RADI0 ACTIVITY CONCENTRATIONS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SAMFLES Reporting Levels l
l Analysis Water Airborne Particulate Fish Milk Food Product (pCi/1) or Gases (pCi/m3)
(pC1/kg, wet)
(pCi/1)
(pCi/kg, wet) l l
H-3 2 x 10 (a) 4 Hn-54 1 x 103 3 x 104 l
Fe-59 4 x 102 1 x 104 Co-58 1 x 103 3 x 104 Co-60 3 x 102 1 x 104 Zn-65 3 x 102 2 x 104 l
(
Zr-Nb-95 4 x 102 I-131 2
0.9 3
1 x 102 Cs-134 30 10 1 x 103 60 1 x 103 Cs-137 50' 20 2 x 103 70 2 x 103 l
Ba-La-140 2 x 102 3x102
(
(a) For drinking water samples. This is 40 CFR Part 141 value.
l l
3.2-8 l
(
e 3.2 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIROMENTAL MONITORING 3.2.2 LAND USE CENSUS LIMITING CONDITION FOR OPERATION A land use census shall be conducted at least once per 12 months during +he grazing season (June 1 to October 1) to determine the location af the nearest milk animal in each of the 16 meteorological sectors within a distance of 5 mi'ae.
Broad leaf vegetation sampling at the site boundary or closest It ~< itu location in a sector with the highest annual average D/Q shall bc aonducted during the harvest season.
APPLICABILITY: At all times.
ACTION:
a.
With land use census identifying a locat!.Jn(s) whiCh yields a calculated dose or dose committment greater than the values currently ceing calculated in Specification 2.1.1 or 2.1.2 of Appendix B, in lieu of any other report required by Specification 5.6 of Appendix B, prepare and submit to the Commission within 30 days, a Special Report which identifies the new locations.
b.
With a land use census identifying a location which yields a calculated dose or dose committment (via the same exposure 1
pathway) greater than at a location from which samples are i
currently being obtained in accordance with Specification 3.e.1, in lieu of any other report required by Specification 5.6 of Appendix B, prepare and submit to the Commission within 30 days, a Special Report which identifies the new locations. The new location shall be added to the radiological environmental monitoring program within 30 days. The sampling location, excluding the control station location, having the lowest calculated dose or dose committments (via the same exposure pathway) may be deleted frcm this monitoring program after October 31 of the year in which this land use census was conducted.
BASIS:
This specification is provided to ensure that changes in the use of unrestricted areas are identified and that modifications to the monitoring program are made if required by the results of this census. The best survey information from the door-to-ooor or aerial j
surveys or consulting with local agricultural authorities shall be used. This census satisfies the requirements of Section IV.B.3 of
' Appendix I to 10 CFR Part 50. Restricting the census to gardens of greater than 500 square feet provides assurance that significant exposure pathways via leafy vegetables will be identified and monitored since a garden of 3.2-9 a
l this size is the einimun required to produca the quantity (26 kg/ year) of leafy vegtables assumed in Regulatory Guide 1.109 for consumption j
i by a child. To detemine this minimun garden size, the following i-assumptions were used,1) that 20% of the garden was used for growing broad leaf vegetation (i.e. similar to lettuce and cabbage), and 2) a vegetation yield of 2 kg/ square meter.
1 i
?
j l
3.2-10
3.2 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONENTAL MONITORING 3.2.3 INTERLABORATORY COWARISON PROGRAM i
LIMITING CONDITION FOR OPERATION:
1 Analysis shall be performed on radioactive materials stoplies as part of an Interlaboratory Comparison Program which has been approveo by NRC.
APR_ICABILITY: At all times.
ACTION:
With analyses not being performed as required above, report the corrective actions taken to prevent a recurrence to the Commission in the Annual Radit,lagical Environmental Operating Report.
BASES The requirement for participation in an Interlaboratory Comparison Program is provided to ensure that independent checks on the precision and accuracy of the measurements of radioactive material in environmental sample matrices are performed as part of a quality assurance program for environmental monitoring in order to demonstrate that the results are reasonably valid.
t I
l l
3.2-11 l
5-6 with Subsection 5.7.2.
These reports shall describe the changes made, the reasons for making the changes, an evaluation of the environmental impact of these changes, and the statement required under the provisions of Subsection 5.5.5.
5.5.5 Consistency with Initially Approved Procrams Any modifications or changes of the initially approved program descriptions developed in accordance with Subsection 5.5.1 shall be governed by the need to maintain consistency with previously used procedures so that direct comparisons of data are technically valid.
Such modifications or charges shall be justified and supported by adequate comparative sampling progrems or studies demonstrating the comparability of results or which provide a basis for making adjustments that would permit direct comparisons.
These demonstrations of comparability shall be submitted to the NRC in accordance with the provision of Subsections 5.5.4 and 5.6.1.
5.5.6 NRC Authority to Recuire Revisions The NRC may require modifications or revisions in the program description document developed in accordance with Subsection 5.5.1 or require modifica-tion or revisions of changes made by the licensee in accordance with Subsection 5.5.4, as a result of NRC reviews of the results of these programs, if such modifications or revisions are judged necessary to maintain consistency with the initially approved programs or with the intent of these ETS. The NRC may also require modifications or revisions of procecures and programs as a result of changes in station operation or changes in environmental conditions or concerns associated with station operation.
l 5.6 Station Reporting Requirements 5.6.1 Routine Reports t
A.(1) Annual Environmental Operating Report Part A Non Radiological 1
A report on the environmental monitoring programs for the previous calendar year shall be submitted to the NRC as a separate document by May 1 of each year. The period of the first report shall begin with the date of initial critjaality subsequent to istuarce of the operating license.
The report. all include summari s, analyses, interpretations, and statistical evaluation of the results t f the environmental monitoring required by the nonradiological environmental monitoring 1
i
5-7 activities (Section 3), and the special studies and requirements (Section 4) for the report period, including a comparison with preoperational s'.udies, operational controls (as appropriate) and previous environmental monitoring reports, and an assessment of the observed impacts of the station operation on the environment.
If harmful effects or evidence of irreversible damage are suggested by the monitoring or special programs, the licensee shall provide a more detailed analysis of the data and a proposed course of action to alleviate the problem.
The Annual Report shall also include a summary of:
1)
All ETS noncompliances and the corrective actions taken to remedy them.
2)
Changes made to state and federal permits and certification.
3)
Changes made to the Environmental Program Description Document.
4)
Changes in station design which could involve an environmental impact or change the finding? of the FSFES.
5)
All nonroutine reports submitted per ETS Section 4.6.
1 6)
Changes in ETS.
(2) Annual Environmental Doeratina Recort Part B Radioloolcal A report on the radiological environmental surveillance program for the previous calendar year shall be :,ubmitted to the Director of the NRC Regional Office (with a copy to the Director, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation) as a separate document by May 1 of each year. The period of the first report shall begin with the date of initial criticality. The report shall include a summary of Table 5.6-1, interpretations, and statistical evaluation of the results of the rcdiological environmental surveillance activities for the report period, as deemed appropriate by the licensee, including a comparison with operational controls, preoperational studies (as appropriate), and previous environmental surveillance reports and an assessment of the observed impacts of the station operation on the environment.
The report shall also include the following; a summary description of the radiological environmental monitoring program including sampling methods for each sample type, size and physical characteristics of each sample type, sample preparation methods, analytical methods, and measuring equipment used; a map of all sampling locations keyed to a table giving distances and directions k
5-8 from the site; the results of land use censuses; and the results of licensee participation in the Environmental Protection Agency's Environmental Radioactivity Laboratory Intercomparisons Studies (Crosscheck) Program.
In the event that some results are not available the report shall be submitted noting and explaining the reasons for the missing results.
The missing data shall be submitted as soon as possible in a supplementary report.
B.
Data Reportina Formats Results of analysis of all nonradiological environmental dats collected shall be summarized and tabulated on an annual basis.
In the event that some results are not avsilable by May 1, the report shall be submitted noting and explaining the missing results. The missing data shall be submitted as soon as possible in a supplementary report.
C.
Quarterly Radioloaical Releases and Estimated Duse Report The following information shall be submitted to the Director of the Regional Office. This information shall be submitted on a calendar quarter basis (January-March, April-June, July-September, and October-December) and shall be submitted no later than 60 days following the end of each calendar quarter.
(1) Estimates of the amounts and types of radioactivity that were released to the environment during the quarter and during the calendar year. This shall include estimates of the total activity of each nuclide and time rate of release of each nuclide.
(2) Estimates of populations and maximum individual doses which occurred during the calendar quarter and during the calendar year shall be provided. The estimates shall be based on actual hydrological and meteorological conditions which occurred during the releases.
Calculational methods shall be those of U.S. NRC Regulatory Guides 1.109 (Revision 1, October 1977), 1.111 (Revision 1, July 1977),
1.112 (Revision 0-R, April 1976) and 1.113 (Fevision 1, April 1977).
These calculations shall be based on estimates of actual population distributions during the releases and shall take into consideration factors such as boating or fishing recreation.
i
b o
5-9 5.6.2 Nonroutine Recorts A report shall be submitted in the event that a " Limiting Condition for Operation" (Section 21, if soplicable, is exceeded, a report level as specified in Section 3, " Environmental Monitoring," is reached or if an
" Exceptional Occurrence" as specified in Section 4.6 occurs. Reports shall be submitted under one of the report schedules described below.
5.6.2.8 Prompt Recort Those events specified as oromot recort occurrences shall be reported within 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> by telechone, telegraph, or facsimile transmission to the NRC followed by a writ * * ' report to the NRC within 30 days.
5.6.2.b Thirty D iy Reoort Non-routine evenus not recuiring a oromot recort as described in Subsection 5.6.2.a, shall be reported to the NRC either within 30 days of their occurrence or within ths time limit specified by the reporting requirement of the corresponding certification or permit issued pursuant to Sections 401 or 402 of PL 92-500, whichever time duration following the non-routine event shall result in the earlier submittal.
5.6.2.c Content of Nonrog1[ne Reoorts Written 30-day reports and, to the extent possible, the preliminary telephone, telegraph, or facsimile reports shall (a) describe, analyze, and evaluate the occurrence, including extent and magnitude of the impact, (b) describe the cause of the occurrence, and (c) ind.icate the corrective action (including any significant changes made in procedures) taken to preclude repetition of the occurence and to prevent similar cccurrences involving similar components or systems.
5.6.2.d Non Routine Radir.coical Environmental Doeratino Reoorts "If a confirmedl measured radionuclide concentration in an environmental sampling medium averaged over any Quarter sampling period exceeds the reporting level given in Table 3.2-2, a written report shall be submitted to the Director of the NRC Recional Office (with a copy to the Director, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation) within 30 days from the end of the cuarter.
If it can be demonstrated that the level is not a result of plant effluents (e.g., by comparison with control station or preoperational data) a recort need not be submitted, but shall be discussed in the annual report. When more than one of the radionuclides in Table 3.2-2 are detected in the medium, tha reporting level shall have been exceeded if:
concentration (1) concentration (2)
,,3 3
reporting level (1) reporting level (2)
x 5-11 If radionuclides other than those in Table 3.2-2 are detected and are due from plant ef fluents, a reporting level is exceeded if the potential annual dose to an individual is equal to or greater than the design objective doses of 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix I.
This report shall include an evaluation of any release conditions, environmental factors, or other aspects necessary to explain the anomalous result.
5.7 Charges in Environmental Technical Specifications and Permits 5.7.1 Chance in Environmental Technical Specifications Request for changes in environmental technical specifications shall be submitted to the NRC for review and authorization per 10 CFR 50.90.
The request shall include an evaluation of the environmental impact of the proposed change and a supporting justification.
Implementation of such requested changes in ETS shall not commence prior to incorporaticn by the NRC of the new specifications in the license.
5.7.2 Chances in Permits and Certifications Changes or additions to required Federal, State, local, and regional authority permits and certificates for the protection of the environmtat that pertain to the requirements of these ETS shall be reported to the NRC within 30 days.
In the event that the licensee initiates or becomes aware of a request for changes to any of tS3 water cuality requirements, limits or values stipulated in any certificatica or permit issued pursuant to Section 401 or 402 of PL 92-500 which is also the subject of an ETS reporting requirement, NRC shall be notified concurrently with the authorizing agency. The notification to the NRC shall include an evaluation of the environmental impact of the revised requirement, limit or value being sought.
If, durirg NRC's review of the proposed change, it is determined that a potentially severe environmental impact could result from the charge, the NRC will consult with the authorizing agency to determine the appropriate action to be taken.
5.8 Records Retention Records and logs relative to the following areas shall be made and retained throughout the term of the operating license. These records and logs shall be made available to NRC on request.
5-11 a.
Records and drawing changes detailing station and unit design changes made to systems and equipment which could potentially affect the environment.
b.
Records of all data from environmental monitoring, surveillance and study activities required by these environmental technical specifications.
A confirmatory reanalysis of the original, a duplicate, or a new sample 1
may be desirable, as appropriate. The results of the confirmatory analysis shall be completed at the earliest time consistent with the analysis, but in any case withir. 30 days.
1 5-12 l
TABLE 5.6-1 I
ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL SLM4ARY FORMAT EXAWLE Name of Facility Docket No.
Location of Facility Reporting Period __
(County, State)
Medium or l Type & Total l Lower I All l
l Control I Number of Pathway i Number of I Limit of l Indicator l
l Locations l Nonroutine l Mean (f)b I Reported Sampled 1 Analyses l Detectiona l Locations l Location with Highest Annual Mean~
l Range l Measurements (Unit of 1 Performed I (LLD) l Mean (f)D l
Name Name (f)0 Measurement) l I Ranae l Distance & Direction Range l
I I
l l
Air I
I I
I l
l Particulates l l
l l
l l
(pC1/m) l Gross B416 1 0.003 1 0.008 l Middletown 0.10(5/52) 1 0/08 (8/104) I 1
l l
1 (200/312) l l
l l
l l (0.05-2.0)
I 5 miles NNW (0.08-2.0) l (0.05-1.40) l Spec. 32 l
l l
l l
lI37o l
C I 0.003 1 0.05 (4/24) l Smithville 0.08(2/4) l < LLD l
4 l 140 l
l (0.03-(0.13) I 2.5 miles 0.03-(0.13) l l
Ba 1 0.003 1 0.03 (2/24) l Podunk 0.05 (2/4) 1 0.02 (2/4)
.I 1
l l
1 (0.01-0.08)
I 4.0 miles (0.01-0.08) i I
I 895r 40 1 0.002 I < LLD l
l < LLD l
0 Fish l 90Sr 40 1 0.0003 l < LLD I
l < LLD 1
0 pC1/kg i
i l
l I
I ll37y-Spec. 8 l
l l
l l
(net weight) l Ca l 80 1<LLD I
<LLD l 90 (1/4) 1 0
ll34Ca l 80 l < LLD i
<LLD l < LLD l
0 1 60 o l 80 l 120 (3/4) l River Mile 35 See Column 4 l < LLD l
0 C
l l
I (90-200) l Podunk River l
l I
I I
I I
I a See Table 3.2-2, note b.
b Mean and range based upon all measurements with LLD treated Fraction of detectable measurements at specified as positive valve.
locations is indicated in parentheses. (f) c Note: the example data are provided for illustrative purposes only.
=..
11/3/81
- i-. e,
,,r ic)
-n, t.
C
. r *.
i e
T -
m, e
eiy L!?
1
- s
-s lic.,z
,gt n3 ;ive tFe 'c;'
4 r
m
[ri
.'r j'n r
,78 3 r; '
s p
s u
1 to m~
!e"
?* t ir ir
?H' i'.' ;i i: ~,
(-
- pr '.u r r '( r riis.
3+t n i
,s 045755 rF,ck '; n
's r m, q +'-.
_ _ _ _ 4;, pag. ga.
Date
_ __ __4gj_g jg _
L*r
_at>
10/30/81 vetropolitan Edison Company opii mi Docket
',3 50-320
(
E
/
/
.A
<_ o tu ha s
' ' ~
~. _
P
,)
/, o m,,
no n m,;
.~4,.,
MIKE THE ATTAF.HED APPEap Tr; Cf THE NOTAR f[D Fr)p![5 ( 0p I r,I N A l c, ).
W[ D() Uni KNOW IF H!'i !S
'N 'HE Rv'.7rv.
l i
9