ML20030A742
| ML20030A742 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | 05000000, Nine Mile Point |
| Issue date: | 04/28/1981 |
| From: | Damato A SENATE |
| To: | NRC |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20030A741 | List:
|
| References | |
| FOIA-90-44 NUDOCS 8106230229 | |
| Download: ML20030A742 (3) | |
Text
- 9
)TM
' ' ' ' ' ' ' ~
e i
1'e.
.)
((!!. I
,=
'21Cnifeb Sfafes Senait l
g wa s se s hc TON. D.C. 30810 j
April 28, 1981 l
1 TO:
Nuclear-. Regulatory Comis sion
{
1717 H Street, N. W.
,f
' Washington, E. C. - 2 0555 FROM: Alfonse D' Amato United States Senator i
Because of the desire of this~ office to be responsive to all inquiries and comunica-tions,. your consideration of the attached is i
i requested.
t PLEASE TRY '!O RESPOND WITHIN 4 KEEKS OF YCUR FECEIFT QF THIS REQUEST.
YOUR FINDINGS AND VIEWS, IN DUPLICATE, ALONG WITH RETURN OF THIS MEMC PLUS ENCLOSURY, -WILL BE APPRECIATED.
Many thanks..
r 1117030004 AD:dg N
xk i
J5
'WILLIAMST0WM IRRICA?JM, INE wn ut town.nEwvennisses v;,
PHONE: Area Code 315 964t2214 -
y 2. o Acril 15, 1981 jf A..lPR $ FN. 6: 25 u
Senator DiAmato Senate Office 11dg.
.Washingte., DC
Dear Senator:
Enclosed'is a clipping from a recent Wall Street Journal which is self explanatory.
- I.have no-intention of arguing the innocence or guilt of Niagara Mohawk in the-enclosed case, but how in the name of wisdom can
- the Nuclear Regulatory. Commission fine the public utility and expect to accomplish.anything.
Isn't there at least one economist in the URC that realizes that
- Niagara Mohawk or any other-utility has no =oney other than the money that comes from us as customers or patrons?
Doesn't anyone in the NRC realize that the 0215,000 fine will be only added to our bills as consumers and that the utility must pass these costs like fuel costs, taxes, cost of litigating and the cost of' filing forms can come from only one place, the person
- who uses there electricity?
Is.there-any limit to the stupidity of our bungling bureaucrac would be instrumental. the-budget of-this agency by-SOT, to 80 I feel a-reduction of in getting there attention.
LThis would induce them to-use wisdom rather than governcental force mis--
applied.
- Sincerely, WILLIAMSTOWN IRP.IGATION, INC.
-.DAMA
. David deGraff..
President DdG:ls
' Enc:
4
>d 99
i,,. l#,;
e
'f V-, #.
t t
U.S. Nuclear Agency SaysNiagara Mohawk e
i To Pay $215,000 Fine
(
het and
~. ~
s a w*u, avnae, Joven.6 megn.,,,w, i
e
- 1. Stans.
WASIGNCTON-The Nuclear Regulat
. the Cen. Commiss2n aald Niagara Mohawk Po
'atted to Corp. agmd 2 pay a M#0 A ory uker of charges that the company submined an m wer
. He wul accurate mport on safety equipment at its ne on meeung Nine MUe Point nuclear plant.
gg,jeg posed last NovemberThe nne was reduced bom sus re prod. near Oswego.the super. and the com, con pr a group agreed to let mission N
unitsin The agency's.Y.. return to work.
resident case based company hadn't installed ack
. anufac, system for monitoring high level thschar yre-
>ted to a unit, pany reported in January 1900 thatof r a new
~'
ges i
equipment was installed.
om-1 Md.)-
Last November, the NRC proposed the the af exec Sne and banned T.J. Perkins, the plant' came a clear supervisor, fmm working on nur t.
wu aspects of Ntagara Mohawk's operati s nu-r sar !
ulucer Stello, the NRC's inspecDon andla a letter to th ors.
.{
- krp, ment director, said " strong enforceprest, Dans" w
. ictor.
enforce-I ment ac-ist. for that " complete and accurateinfor Mass.. required by the NRC. -
e pount matknfis
. How.
But the letter said Mr. Perkins co ld as vie sume his duties because the NRC found th
,h@g, the company's January 1980 report " ret u re-
'h new the Dow of informauond. sulted from poor manag 2, ur a
Ameri
,n, u. went to wumy wee"d or decetve an nul as-rather than in unp cent 6;
'nc= PentairInc E porta xpects 1979,
LevelEarningsfor '812'*e ner
.i 7
t Jounnas aseffnepene DFnta)* J
- r
- t v
.