ML20024B133
| ML20024B133 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Shoreham File:Long Island Lighting Company icon.png |
| Issue date: | 06/28/1983 |
| From: | Irwin D, Letsche K, Repka D LONG ISLAND LIGHTING CO., NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE LEGAL DIRECTOR (OELD), SHOREHAM OPPONENTS COALITION, SUFFOLK COUNTY, NY |
| To: | |
| References | |
| ISSUANCES-OL, NUDOCS 8307050266 | |
| Download: ML20024B133 (39) | |
Text
.
,/
N c:, i UNITED STATES OF AMERICA il JUL I 003 **,
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
~~
y Wfer et ts, g,,.
U$f'L kr.
Cv Before the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board gig -
In the Matter of
)
)
LONG ISLAND LIGHTING COMPANY
)
Docket No. 50-322 (OL)
)
(Shoreham Nuclear Power Station, )
Unit 1)
)
JOINT COMPILATION OF SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT OBLIGATIONS Pursuant to the Board's request of February 1 (Tr. 19,731), Suffolk County, Shoreham Opponents Coalition, LILCO and the NRC Staff submit the attached shorthand compila-tion of obligations undertaken by LILCO in settlement agree-'
ments reached in this proceeding, other than the Final Security Settlement Agreement.1/
This list also. includes certain relat-ed Staff obligations.
The partie's have excluded from this list various obligations and commitments that are inherently self-verifying (the vast majority of which require LILCO to provide other parties with certain documents), as well as several 1/
The Board specifically requested "a compilation which all parties agree to as to which conditions should be in the li-cense."
Tr. at 19,731.
The parties agree that there are three license conditions:
two conditions that were specified in the SC Contention 3 -- Inadequate Core Cooling settlement agreement (Resolution at 11 II.B.1, III.B.3, Attachment at 6) and one condition specified in the SC Contention 23 -- Containment Isolation settlement agreement (Resolution at 1 II.B.4.c, At-tachment at 17).
The attached compilation provides, in addi-
)
tion to that information,
- a. listing of other commitments made in the settlement agreements.
8307050266 830628
~
PDR ADOCK 05000322
\\
)
+.
s4 obligations which have already been fulfilled and accepted by Suffolk County and/or SOC.
The list also classifies each com-mitment either as a precondition to licensing, or as a license condition, or as a post-licensing obligation which is not a li-cense condition, or as fitting in some other miscellneous cate-gory.
It also lists each of the commitments made in the reso-lution of Phase I emergency planning contentions, all of which are considered preconditions to licensing.
The parties believe that the list is, within the framework described above, com-plete and accurate, though in the event of a conflict between the list and the text of an agreement, the agreement would gov-ern.
Respectfully submitted, DnaseP k /w Counsel for Long Isl~nd a
Lighting Company k
oD
/
~ cLe Counsel for the' Nuclear
~
Regulatory Commission and Staff
,9 M
a C6uhsel for
- ffolk County
% dL,LA younsel for/Shor aam~,
Opponents Coal tion DATED:
June 28, 1983 Attachment' b
.b LILCO, June 30, 19.,8K)j
'1 v',
i.
Y r-CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
. s.
, gy. Q~
- ~
.Q In the Matter of
'k""
4 LONG ISLAND LIGHTING COMPANY
~ __
(Shoreham Nuclear Power Station, Unit 1)
Docket No. 50-322 (OL)
I hereby certify that copies of Joint Compilation of Settlement Agreement Obligations were served this date upon the following by first-class mail, postage prepaid, or by hand (as indicated by an asterisk).
Lawrence Brenner, Esq.*
Secretary of the Commission Administrative Judge U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Atomic Safety and Licensing Commission Board Panel Washington, D.C.
20555-U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Atomic Safety and Licensing Washington, D.C.
20555 Appeal Board Panel U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Dr. Peter A. Morris
- Commission Administrative Judge Washington, D.C.
20555 Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel Atomic Safety and Licensing U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Board Panel Commission U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Washington, D.C.
20555 Commission Washington, D.C.
20555 Dr. James H.
Carpenter
- Administrative Judge Eleanor L.
Frucci, Esq.*
Atomic Safety.and Licensing Attorney Board Panel Atomic Safety and Licensing U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Board Panel Commission U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Washington, D.C.
20555 Commission Washington, D.C.
20555
e Bernard M. Bordenick, Esq.*
David J. Gilmartin, Esq.
David A. Repka, Esq.
Attn:
Patricia A. Dempsey, Esq.
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory County Attorney Commission Suffolk County Department of Law Washington, D.C.
20555 Veterans Memorial Highway Hauppauge, New York 11787 Herbert H.
Brown, Esq.*
Stephen B.
Latham, Esq.
Lawrence Coe Lanpher, Esq.
Twomey, Latham & Shea Karla J. Letsche, Esq.
33 West Second Street Kirkpatrick, Lockhart, Hill, P.
O.
Box 398 Christopher & Phillips Riverhead, New York 11901 8th Floor 1900 M Street, N.W.
Ralph Shapiro, Esq.
Washington, D.C.
20036 Cammer and Shapiro, P.C.
9 East 40th Street Mr. Marc W.
Goldsmith New York, New York 10016 Energy Research Group 4001 Totten Pond Road James Dougherty, Esq.*
Waltham, Massachusetts 02154 3045 Porter Street Washington, D.C.
20008 MHB Technical Associates 1723 Hamilton Avenue Howard L.
Blau Suite K 217 Newbridge Road San Jose, California 95125 Hicksville, New York 11801 Mr. Jay Dunkleberger Jonathan D.
Feinberg, Esq.
New York State Energy Office New York State Agency Building 2 Department of Public Service Empire State Plaza Three Empire State Plaza Albany, New York 12223 Albany, New York 12223 W
mer-F.
Bowe,'Jr.
j/
Hunton & Williams 707 East Main Street P.O.
Box 1535 Richmond, Virginia 23212 DATED:
June 30, 1983 e
4
4
\\ b COMPILATION OF LILCO OBLIGATIONS UNDER SETTLEMENT AGREEMENTS I.
HEALTH AND SAFETY MATTERS SC Contention 1: Remote Shutdown Panel (Agreement dated December 14, 1982)
A.
Precondition to Licensing 1.
Install the following instrumentation and controls in accessible locations remote from the main control room or provide justification as to why the instrumen-tation and controls will not be installed prior to fuel load.
In any event, LILCO must install such equipment later than the end of the first refueling outage:
no (a)
Local indication of SWS train "B" flow to the Reactor Building Closed Loop Cooling Water System train "B" heat exchanger.
(b)
Controls for the Division II safety relief valves (on a local panel in relay room).
(c)
Control capability for the RHR-A pump (from the Division I emergency switchgear room) and for valves (from the reactor building secondary con-tainment).
(d')
RHRS-A flow indicator (on a local panel).
(e)
Control capability for the SWS-A pump (from the emergency switchgear room) and for valves (from the screenwell pump house and reactor build-ing secondary containment).
t 4
. (f)
SWS-A flow indicator (on a local panel).
(g)
Control capability for the Spent Fuel Pool Cooling System-A pump (on a local panel).
(h)
Division II indicator for reactor water level.
(i)
Division II indicator for reactor pressure.
(j)
Division I indicator for suppression pool water level.
(k)
Division I and II indicators for suppression pool temperature.
(Agreement at 9, T T 1, 4; Agreement at 5, 11 1-5)
B.
Post-Licensing Obligations 1.
By the end of the first refueling outage, revision of the following operating procedures to reflect addi-tional instrumentation and controls listed above:
(a)
SP 29.022.01, Rev. 2 (9/7/82):
" Shutdown From Outside Control Room Emergency Procedure."
(b)
SP 23.133.01, Rev. 4 (4/21/82): " Remote Shut-down Control System. ','
(c)
SP 23.121.01, Rev. 2 (6/11/82):
" Residual Heat Removal System."
(d)
SP 23.122.01, Rev. 2 (1/31/80):
" Service Water."
(Agreement at 9, 1 5).
I l
2.
Prior to the end of the first refueling outage, a i
caution step will be added to SP 23.133.01 (Remote l
m, 3
w y-
---~
wt
- .4,
Shutdown Control System), Section 8.1.6.
(SWS Operation at RSP), advising the operator to be aware that a po-tential SWS-to-RBCLCWS leak path could occur during shutdown of the plant.
(Agreement at 9, 1 5).
3.
Install, by the end of the first refuling outage, any items in A(1) above remaining after fuel load.
SC Contention 2: Diesel Generator Relays (Agreement dated May 4, 1982)
A.
Preconditions to Licensing 1.
All low voltage control relays will be covered.
(Agreement at 1, 1 1).1/
2.
The generator control panels will have louvered ventilation openings protected by filters.
The panel doors will be gasketed and mechanically latched closed.
(Agreement at 1, 1 1).2/
3.
The diesel control panels and the motor control centers will have gasketed doors that are mechanically
. latched closed.
(Agreement at 1, 1 1).3/
\\
1/
Incorporates commitment or representation in prefiled tes-timony of Brian R.
McCaffrey.
2/
Incorporates commitment or representation in prefiled tes-timony of Brian R. McCaffrey.
(
3/
Incorporates commitment or representation in prefiled tes-timony of Brian R. McCaffr,ey.
1 4-4.
Under normal conditions, when the diesel is not running, the inlet and outlet dampers of the large ven-tilation system will be closed.
(Agreement at 1, t
1).4/
5.
The walls within the diesel generator rooms will be painted to a height of S feet and the floors covered with an epoxy coating.' (Agreement at'1, T 1).5/
6.
Upon construction completion, there will be 3 inches of crushed stone on polyethylene, in the vicini-ty of diesel room air intakes, which will extend from the control room building wall a minimum of 20 feet to-ward a paved access road.
With the exception of a con-crete pad below each air intake, all other areas will be landscaped with grass or paved.
(Agreement at 1, 1
1).s/
7.
Each diesel control panel containing relays will be inspected just prior to fuel load to assure each is in a clean and dust-free condition.
(Agreement at 2, 1
2).
4/-
Incorporates commitment or representation in prefiled tes-timony of Brian R. McCaffrey.
5/
Incorporates commitment or representation in prefiled-tes-timony of Brian R. McCaffrey.
p/
Incorporates commitment or representation in prefiled tes-timony_of Brian R. McCaffrey.
t
-7pw-9
-m y,4 w
v F*"'-
T
8.
Procedures will be in effect which provide for:
(a)
Inspection, calibration and cleaning of all protective relays associated with the diesel gen-erators during refueling outages (every 12-18 months) (Agreement at 1, S 1);2/
(b)
Cleaning of all panels associ'ated with the diesel generators'every 24 months (Agreement at 2, Item 3b);
(c)
Compliance with housekeeping requirements of Regulatory Guide 1.39 for inside of diesel genera-tor rooms (Agreement at 2, Item 4);
(d)
The area immediately under and adjacent to the diesel generator intakes will be included in the site inspection route for security guards and inspected for debris buildup at least once every shift (Agreement at 2, Item Sa).
9.
The preventive maintenance program, SP 12.015.01, will be amended to require inspection of the area imme-diately under and adjacent to the diesel generator in-takes at least once each month and any appropriate cor-rective. action.
(Agreement at 2, Item 5b).
B.
Post-Licensing ^ Obligation Following the first 31-day diesel generator test 2/
This commitment was made in prefiled testimony of Brian R.
McCaffrey.
See Agreement at 2, Item 3a for a duplicative com-mitment.
a n
-w e
-f-required under the Technical Specifications, all the relay panels for the selected diesel will be inspected.
If any appreciable dust' buildup appears, the relays will be cleaned and approprate modifications to the preventive maintenance program will be nade.
(Agree-ment at 2, S 2).
SC Contention 3: Detection'of Inadequate Core Cooling (Agreement dated December 9, 1982)
A.
Precondition to Licensing Elimination of the flow path through the fu'el Eone water level transmitter reference leg equilizer valve:.
(Agreement at 9, V II.B.4).
B.
LILCO Obligation (timing dependent upon S
Staff efforts in resolving ICC generic issue)
Following the Staff's generic resolution of the ICC de-tection issue, LILCO will perform and submit to the i
Staff and Suffolk County an evaluaEion of alternative
,means of ICC detection (other than water level measure-ment system improvements)', using specified criteria.
(NOTE:
If the Staff's resolution of the ICC detection 1
s issue requires physical modifications to~ths wate-x level measurement system (i ad'di, tion to certaiw specified modifications) that result in further reduc-i tion of residual risk by greater than 1%, LiLCO"will not be required to conduct'this evaluation).
1
~
1%
(Agreement at 12-15, 1 III.B.2)..
4
~
)
f 4,
C.
License Conditions a
1.
By July 1, 1983, LILCO shall submit to the Staff a description and schedule for hardware modifications to the Shoreham reactor vessel water level measurement system to eliminate dependence on early operator action during events involving an instrument 'line failure (leak or break) and a " single additional component fail-ure, in accordance with the second recommendation in the BWR Owners' Group Report SLI-8211 (July 1982).
The proposed modifications and schedule must be acceptable to the Staff and installation must be completed no later than the end of the second refueling outage.
(Agreement at 7-8, 1 II.B.1).
(NOTE:
The proposed modifications will be installed as soon as practicable, but in no event later than the end of the second refueling outage.)
(Agreement at 8, 1 II.B.3).
2.
LILCO shall implement any Staff requirements regarding additional instrumentation for detection of inadequate core cooling which may result from the Staff's review of the BWR Owners' Group Report on this subject in conjunction with LILCO documentation ad-dressing the subject.
(Agreement at 16-17, 1 III.B.3).
D.
Post-Licensing Obligation LILCO will give good faith consideration to installa-i-
tion of devices which receive a favorable evaluation (see item B.
above.) and any installation resulting from l
. such consideration will take place at the first available refueling or other extended outage following completion of the evaluation, recognizing that design and procurement lead times for safety-related compo-nents are on the order of 24 months.
(Agreement at 16, 1 III.B.2(e)).
SC Contention 5: Loose Parts Monitoring System (LPMS)
(Agreement dated November 30, 1982)
A.
Preconditions to Licensing 1.
Installation of two additional LPMS sensors on the reactor recirculation pump suction nozzles at the reac-tor vessel exit.
(Agreement at 4, 1 B.1.A).
2.
Inclusion of the LPMS alarm output in alarm printouts of the process computer.
(Agreement at 5, 1
B.1.B).
l
{
3.
Provision of a second permanently installed or i
portable LPMS tape recorder.
(Agreement at 5, 1
l B.1.C).
1 4.
Performance of additional " baseline mapping" of the LPMS to include recording of sensor responses to calibrated impacts at various locations distributed around the exterior of the RPV.
(Agreement at 5, V
B.1.D).
5.
Preparation and implementation ~of training pro-grams for personnel using the LPMS, including
J
_g.
operators, instrument technicians, shift technical advisors, and technical support engineers.
(Agreement at 6, 1 B.1.F).
1 6.
Performance of the cost-benefit analysis comparing the operation of the LPMS with the currently designed cable separation criteria, against its, operation assum-ing backfitting to achieve complete consistency with the separation guidelines of Regulatory Guide 1.133.
l (Agreement at 8, 1 B.2.A(1)).
s 7.
Preparation and submission to the Staff of a de-scription of a test program (to be conducted and com-pleted prior to completion of plant startup) to imple-ment the Deliberate Plant Maneuver Feature.
(Agreement at 8, 1 B.2.A(2)).
~
j B.
Post-licensing Obligations 1.
Performance of evaluation of the LPMS alarm i
~
threshold and inclusion of results-in Full Power LPMS Report to be submitted to the Staff and SC within 90
-days after the beginning of commercial operation.
f
.(Agreement at 8-9, 11 B.2.A(3) and B.2.B.).
2.
Inclusion of the results of the test program de-scribed in A.7 above, in the Full Power LPMS Report to be submitted to the Staff and Suffolk County within 90 days after the beginning of commercial operation.
(Agreement at 8, 1 B.2.A.(2)).
. C.
Staff Obligation Prior to fuel load, the Staff will issue an SER supple-ment or portion thereof closing out SER Open Item 64.
(Agreement at 9, T B.2.3).
SC Contention 9: ECCS Pump Blockage (Agreement executed August 18, 1982)
A.
LILCO Obligations (timing dependent upon Staff's efforts to resolve NUREG-0606 Task Action Plan Item A-43) 1.
LILCO will actively monitor the analyses undertaken as part of the Staff effort to resolve NUREG-0606 Task Action Plan Item A-43, " Containment Emergency Sump Performance."
(Agreement at 6).
1 2.
LILCO will perform the quantitative analyses,-
developed as a result of the A-43 effort, if applicable to Shoreham, and will provide copies of the results to the County.
(Agreement at 6-7).
3.
If necessary as a result of the analyses, LILCO
.will make appropriate modifications to the use and in-stallation of insulation 'in the drywell to ensure that potential blockage of the ECCS pump strainers will not exceed the 50 percent margin design basis.
(Agreement at 7).
e-r r--,
y e
--,-,a-,
.=,
y
.v--
em,-
=--y
. SC Contention 17: Fire Protection (Agreement dated May 4, 1982)
A.
Preconditions to Licensing 1.
LILCO will perform a systematic survey of combus-tion sources in the control room and the cable spreading room to determine the types of toxic gases that could be released'in a fire.
(Agreement at 2, t
1).
2.
LILCO will install and keep operable in the con-trol room a toxic gas detector capable of detecting and warning operators of the presence of the predominant gases identified in the survey before they reach a haz-ardous level.
(Agreement at 2, V 2).
SC Contention 18: Human Factors: Equipment (Agreement dated November 30, 1982)
A.
Preconditions to Licensing 1.
Preparation of a hard copy index correlating pro-
' cess computer. data points for the NSSS and BOP first-out sequence of events computer points with the appro-priate Alarm Response Procedures (ARPs) and with those corresponding data points in the Emergency Response Fa-cilities' (Phase II) pre-event log.
(Agreement at 5, Item B.2(ii)).3/
g/
The agreement requires that this index must be provided prior to initial criticality.
However, LILCO, for convenience, is treating this commitment as a precondition to licensing.
. 2.
Preparation and implementation of a procedure governing the use and availability of the process com-puter, including the provisions set forth in Attachment 1 to the Resolution Agreement.
(Agreement at 7, 1
B.2(iii)(c)).
3.
Performance of experimental tests'to determine the susceptibility of J-hahdled switch ~s (located on the e
main control boards) to inadvertent operation, and im-plementation of necessary remedies, as set forth in At-tachment 2 to the Resolution Agreement.
(Agreement at 13-14, 1 B.5(v)).
4.
Prior to fuel load, LILCO will:
(a) insert proper chart paper into the chart re-corders; (b) identify the units associated with the chart recorder scales either on the recorder or on the recorder label; and (c) verify that chart recorders associated with plant operation are, fully operational.
(Agreement at 16, T B.5(ix)).
B.
Post-Licensing Obligations 1.
The Independent Safety Engineering Group (ISEG) will perform a three-phase review of all the Main Con-trol Room ARPs to verify that if the instructions in each ARP are followed to completion, it will result in assurance to the o.perator that the alarmed condition p
m 2
=
~
I has cleared or that the system status is appropriately logged.
(Agreement at 8, S B.3).
Phase I (substan-tially complete) includes all ARPs relating to the core spray and high pressure coolant injection systems (61 procedures).
Phase II will include the remaining safety-related systems ARPs, and will be completed, with documentation provided to SC and SOC, as soon as possible but in any event, prior to the first refueling outage.
(Agreement at 9, 1 B.3).
Phase III will in-clude the remaining ARPs, and will be completed with 1
documentation provided to SC and SOC, as soon as possi-ble but in any event, prior to the second refueling outage.
(Agreement at 9, B.3).
~
2.
Performance of an evaluation of the addition of a ringback feature on annunciators, and implementation of changes, relative to ringback, resulting from the long-term control room design review and required by the NRC Staff.
(Agreement at 9, B.3).
3.
LILCO will maintain in effect control of shift turnover to assure that operators receive the necessary information on system status and operability, as set forth in the Resolution Agreement.
(Agreement at 11, B.4).
1
. SC Contention 19:
Human Factors: Procedures (Agreement executed September 13, 1982)
A.
Preconditions to Licensing 1.
Prior to fuel load, LILCO will provide additional training on the use of respirator face masks, and will document the performance of a drill regarding same.
(Agreement at 6, 1 B.2'(c)).
2.
Prior to fuel load, LILCO will perform walk-throughs of the following event-oriented emergency operating procedures, using criteria provided by ERG, Inc.:
(a)
SP 29.010.01 (Rev. 3), " Emergency Shutdown,"
and (b)
SP 29.016.01 (Rev. 1), " Loss of Instrument Air."
The walk-throughs will be monitored by ERG, Inc.
(Agreement at 8, 1 B.3).
3.
Prior to fuel load, LILCO will perform a walk-through of a drill spenario, to be agreed upon by SC consultants and LILCO, that will demonstrate the op-erator's transition from use of alarm response proce-dures to use of event-or symptom-oriented emergency procedures.
(Agreement at 8-9, 1 B.3).
B.
Post-Licensing Obligation Prior to Shoreham's second refueling outage, LILCO will (a) perform a review cf all system descriptions, i
i i
l L
l e
1
\\
l operating procedures and lesson plans to ensure that there is consistency in nomenclature, descriptions and instructions, and (b) make whatever modifications to procedures and/or lesson plans are necessary to achieve such consistency.
This review will be conducted by the Shoreham Operations Staff in conjunction with the ISEG, and the results will be provided to SC.
(Agreement at 4-5, 1 B.1).
SC Contention 20:
Human Factors: Simulator (Agreement dated September 10, 1982)
A.
Preconditions to Licensing Prior to the commencement of LILCO's Licensed Operator Requalification Program, LILCO procedure 21.006.03 and FSAR Section 13.2 will be revised to reflect the fol-l lowing:
1.
Shoreham-specific normal, abnormal, and emergency operating procedures will be used by Shoreham operators during simulator requalification training at the Limer-ick simulator.
(The Limerick simulator will be used for Shoreham operator requalification training for that period of time commencing with initial requalification training and ending with the availability of a Shoreham-specific simulator.)
(Agreement at 3, 1 A.1).
2.
Simulator requalification training will be con-ducted using a team concept; the team will be required
i
- i to duplicate the functions and responsibilities of a typical Shoreham control room staff.
(Agreement at 4, 5 A.2).
3.
Plant walk-through drills will be performed at the Shoreham plant as part of the recualification training program.
Drills will be conducted utilizing Shoreham alarm response, abnormal, and emergenc'y procedures, and will be performed from an initiating event through the required immediate action to subsequent actions.
(Agreement at 4, A.3).
4.
The in-plant drills described above will be performed by a team of operator requalification candi-dates to whom the responsibilities of a typical Shoreham control room staff have been individually assigned.
(Agreement at 4, 1 A.4).
5.
Each Shoreham licensed reactor operator and senior reactor operator will undergo at least 5 days of simulator-related training every 6 months.
Each 5-day session will include at least 3 days of actual simulator training at Limerick, plus preparatory training, either at Shoreham or at Limerick, to identi-fy and reinforce Shoreham-specific plant characteris-tics and required operator responses.
(Agreement at 5, 1 B.1).
6.
The plant evolutions listed in the Attachment to the Resolution Agr.eement will be performed by each
. Shoreham licensed reactor operator and senior reactor operator on an annual or biannual basis, as set forth in the Attachment.
The evolutions will be performed using any combination of the following three methods:
(a)
Actual in-plant performance at Shoreham dur-ing normal plant operation;
~
(b)
Simulated in-plant drills at Shoreham; and (c)
Performance at the Limerick simulator.
l (Agreement at 5, S B.2).
l SC Contention 23:
Containment Isolation (Agreement dated February 22, 1982)
A.
Preconditions to Licensing 1.
LILCO will modify Technical Specifications 3 6.1.8 and 3.6.1.8(b) with respect to 4-inch purge / vent l
valves, as set forth in the Resolution Agreement (Agreement at 9-10, II.B.1).
2.
LILCO will revise SP 23.418.01 to reflect the NRC licensing condition for restricted use of the 4-inch and 6-inch purge / vent valves (i.e.,
SER Supplement input on Open Item II.E.4.2, filed 12/14/82), Technical Specifications limits for their utilization and clari-fication of their operation, and limited use of 18-inch valves during cold shutdown and refueling.
(Agreement at 10, 1 II.B.2).
... 3.
LILCO will revise SP 23.425.01 where appropriate, to provide direction to an operator on how to use the 4-inch and 6-inch purge / vent valves to maintain con-tainment pressure during plant operation.
(Agreement at 10, T II.B.3).
4.
LILCO will revise SP 23.702.04, Section 3.3, to address use of the suppression pool pump back system as an additional, partial means of mitigating the effects of a Scram Discharge Volume (SDV) break.
(Agreement at 13, 1 II.C.1).
5.
Subject to conditions set forth in the Resolution Agreement, LILCO will complete environmental qualifica-tion of alarms 1G11*LE645 (A, B) and 1T46*PDTO43 (A, B) prior to fuel load.
(Agreement at 14, T II.C.2).
6.
LILCO will prepare and provide for SC's review, a
lesson plan which includes specific discussion of the SDV break scenario.
(Agreement at 14, II.C.4).
B.
License Condition LILCO will also revise SP 23.425.01 to include the li-cense condition that an operator will be dedicated to the con,tainment isolation valve controls whenever operation of the system is required and to instruct the operator to close these valves if a high-radiation con-tainment alarm should occur.
The license condition will be deleted when the automatic high-radiation isolation signal 1s installed.
(Agreement at 11, s
n
.- II.B.4(c)).
The signal will be installed and operable by December 31, 1983.
(Agreement at 12, 1 II.B.4(d)).
C.
Post-Licensing Obligation LILCO will provide SC with a copy of the. purchase order when issued ta Nuclear Measurements Corporation (NMC) for the radiation monitoring output signal necessary to
~
effect automatic isolation of the purge / vent valves.
(Agreement at 11, V II.B.4(b)).
SC Contention 24/ SOC Contentions 19(c) and (d)
Cracking of Materials and Material Selection (Agreement dated November 30, 1982)
A.
Preconditions to Licensing 1.
LILCO will take appropriate corrective actionI, prior to fuel load, if the pre-operational tests of the low feedwater flow controller do not demonstrate com-pliance with NUREG-0619' requirements.
(Agreement at 16-17, Item 9).
2.
Prior to fuel load, LILCO will attempt to improve the inspectability of certain recirculation and RHR welds identified in the Resolution Agreement.
(Agree-ment at 12, Item 3).
3.
LILCO will:
(a)
Participate in the Pooled Inventory Manage-ment (PIM) program being implemented by General Electric'or an equivalent pooled inventory program;
~ (b)
Sponsor inclusion of piping materials in the
.PIM program; (c)
Participate in and encourage, on an ongoing basis, applicable developments in the Group Remedy Development Center; and (d)
Closely follow the plan and implementation of the large recirculation pipe replacement program underway at Nine Mile Point, Unit 1.
(Agreement at 13-14, Item 4).
B.
Post-Licensing Obligations 1.
LILCO will install an augmented leak detection system for "high risk" welds as follows:
(a)
LILCO will systematically identify "high-risk" welds, according to procedures set forth in the Resolution Agreement.
(Agreement at 8-9, Item 2).
i (b)
LILCO will perform an engineering review of the Techmark/Nutec Leak Detection System, and will perform a Shoreham-specific evaluation of the use of the system at Shoreham, according to procedures se,t forth in the Resolution Agreement.
The Shoreham-specific evaluation will be completed in time to permit installation of the system at the first refueling outages.
(Agreement at 9-11, Item 2).
w
i
(
l 1
. (c)
If the Techmark system is determined to be
" qualified," LILCO will install it on all of the "high-risk" welds, in accordance with procedures set forth in the Resolution Agreement.
(Agreement at 11, Item 2).
2.
LILCO will classify as " service sensitive" and subject to augmented inspection as defined in NUREG-0313, welds meeting specific criteria set forth in the Resolution Agreement.
(Agreement at 12, Item l
3).
3.
LILCO will provide to SC the results of the startup test of the low feedwater flow controller and l
)
as soon as possible, but no later than the first refueling outage, LILCO will take corrective action required to cause the controller to satisfy the NUREG-0619 criteria.
(Agreement at 17, Item 9).
Supplemental Agreement Resolving "Halapatz Concern" l
(Agreement dated February 22, 1983)
A.
Post-Licensing Obligations 1.
LILCO will develop and incorporate into and as part of the Shoreham In-Service Inspection (ISI) pro-gram provisions described in the Agreement, designed for the detection of intergranular stress corrosion cracking.
The ISI program will be submitted to the Staff.
(Agreement at 5, 1 B.1).
3 i
1 1
l l
, 2.
LILCO will evaluate and implement, where practica-ble, state-or-the-art improvements in scope or methods of implementing its ISI program throughout the life of the plant.
At a minimum, such improvements will be evaluated and considered and incorporated in each 120-month revision to the Shoreham ISI program.
(Agreement at 6, 1 B.3).
~
B.
Staff Obligation The Staff will monitor LILCO's implementation of the commitment set forth in A.1 above as part of its normal inspection functions relating to the ISI program, and will document the results of such monitoring in inspec-L tion reports.
(Agreement at 6, B.2).
SC Contention 25/ SOC Contention 19(a): Pre-Service Inspection (PSI) and In-Service Inspection (ISI) and Reactor Pressure Vessel Integrity (Agreement dated September 17, 1982)
A.
Post-Licensing Obligations 1.
LILCO will complete development and documentation of the ISI program in a timely manner but no later than one year after issuance of an operating license.
(Agreement at 5, 1 (a)).
2.
The ISI program will implement the provisions ap-plicable to BWRs of the June 1981 issut of Regulatory Guide 1.150, or of the next subsequent revision of the Guide.
(Agreement at 7, 4).
y
e 3.
The scope of the piping inspections of the ISI program, to the fullest extent possible, will be at least as extensive as implied by the Shoreham PSI pro-gram unless code or regulatory requirements change.
(Agreement at 5, 1 (b)).
4.
The Reactor Pressure Vessel ISI program will be conducted in accordance with, and to the fullest extent possible as provided by certain documents and drawings identified in the Resolution Agreement.
(Agreement at 5,
1 (c)).
SC Contention 26: ALARA (Agreement executed September 13, 1982)
A.
Preconditions to Licensing 1.
Installation of removable and numbered insulation panels in lower drywell area.
(Agreement at 4, S 2).
2.
LILCO will reanalyze inboard MSIV removal and maintenance accessibility after the drywell is cleared of other obstructions, and will provide SC and the Staff with the results of its reanalysis as soon as it is completed,.but in no event later than 20 days prior to commencement of fuel load.
(Agreement at 5, V 2).
3.
LILCO.will maintain an adequate number of spare control rod drive units to minimize rework during refueling outages.
(Agreement at 5, 2).
.
- 4.
LILCO will perform cost-benefits analyses to de-termine:
(a)
If adding permanent shielding to reduce doses during potential fuel pool cooling and cleanup pump maintenance is consistent with the ALARA principle.
(This analysis will evaluate shielding between pumps and'between valve / piping areas and pumps for both systems).
(b)
If installing shielding between the six small radwaste pumps sharing a cubicle in the radwaste building is consistent with the ALARA principle.
LILCO will provide the results of the cost-benefit studies to SC and to the Staff as soon as they are complete and in no event later than 20 days prior to the commencement of fuel load.
(Agreement at 7-8, H 4).
B.
Post-Licensing Obligations 1.
Based on the results of the reanalysis described in paragraph A.2 above, LILCO will take appropriate ac-tion to reduce interferences and thereby improve access and maintainability features.
(Agreement at 5, 1 2).
2.
Based on the results of the cost-benefit analyses described in paragraph A.4 above, LILCO will construct, manufacture or install shielding, as appropriate.
(Agreement at 7-8, 1 4).
y
,y y-
25-3.
LILCO will procure a " refueling radiation shield" for the upper drywell.
(Agreement at 6, S 3).
4.
LILCO will purchase a hydraulic removal tool to facilitate snubber removal in the upper drywell.
(Agreement at 6, T3).
5.
LILCO will procure a shield for the spud end of the control rod drive to be used for drive movement whenever a man-rem reduction will occur due to the use of the shield.
(Agreement at 5, 1 2).
6.
.LILCO will take into account the disadvantages of using cobalt-bearing materials when LILCO makes deci-sions concerning spare parts.
(Agreement at 10, S 6).
7.
LILCO will conduct a review of oxygen control methods and procedures at Shoreham relative to those outlined in NEDO-23631, and will document the rationale for choosing Shoreham's methods of controlling oxygen from among those outlined in the NEDO report.
LILCO will also continue to investigate other oxygen control
' methods which come to its attention.
(Agreement at 12-13, S 8).
SC Conte'ntion 27/ SOC Contention 3: Post-Accident Monitoring (Agreement executed August 27, 1982)
A.
Precondition to Licensing Equipment described in the August 27, 1982 Resolution Agreement and Attachments thereto, will be installed b
e 9
w.
r,
---c-
.--4.-
g--
,y y
,w 9
<--p
.a y
. and operable, and personnel trained in its use, by June 1,
1983.
(Agreement at 4).
SC Contention 28(a)(i)/ SOC Contention 7.A(1): ECCS Cutoff (Agreement dated July 30, 1982 and Agreement executed January 10, 1983)
A.
Preconditions to Licensing 1.
LILCO will perform a review of pertinent operating and emergency procedures to ensure that operators are instructed, as set forth in the January Agreement, with respect to the Core Spray pumps.9/
(Jan. Agreement at 2-3, 1 1).
2.
LILCO will modify pertinent emergency and operating procedures to provide necessary instructions to operators with respect to the Core Spray pumps, as set forth in the January Agreement.
(Jan. Agreement at 3, 1 3).
SC Contention 31/ SOC Contention 19(g):
Elegtrical Separation (Agreement dated August 26, 1982, with Amendment dated January 10, 1983) b A.
Preconditions to Licensing LiLCO's design criteria for physical separation of 1.
electrical cables and raceways between equipment and I
l 9/
For convenience, LILCO is treating the commitments made under the January 10, 1983 settlement agreement as pre-j conditions to licensing, but the agreement itself is silent on j
the timing of such commitments.
1 1
I i
l
. panels will meet or exceed the provisions of IEEE 384-74 and Regulatory Guide 1.75 (Rev. 2), based upon criteria and guidelines set forth in the Resolution Agreement.
(Agreement at 3, 1.(a)).
2.
LILCO will perform an inspection of cable and raceway installation, according to procedures set forth in the Resolution Agreement and the Attachment thereto.
The results of the inspection will be provided to the Board and the Parties no later than 20 days prior to the commencement of fuel load.
(Agreement at 5-7, 1.(c)).
3.
All deviations, as defined in the Resolution Agreement and the Attachment thereto, will be resolved prior to the completion of fuel load and will be docu-mented according to the terms set forth in the Resolu-tion Agreement.
(Agreement at 4-7, 11 1.(b), (c)).
4.
LILCO will resolve certain Staff concerns relating to cable separation in the NSSS cabinets and will im-
'plement the proposed resolutions accepted by the Staff, prior to completion of fuel load.
(Agreement at 7, 1
1(d)).
t
.r-
. SC Contention 32/ SOC Contention 19(f): Electrical
{
Penetrations (Agreement dated February 1, 1983)
A.
Preconditions to Licensing 1.
Prior to fuel load, LILCO will alter an electrical penetration module in the containment so that insula-tion resistance may be tested from out' side the contain-ment.
(Agreement at 4-5, 3).
2.
LILCO will modify the appropriate plant procedures to provide for electrical surveillance testing on a sample of electrical penetration conductors as set forth in the Resolution Agreement, and will document the test procedure and schedule in the FSAR.
(Agree-ment at 5, 1 4).
3.
Prior to fuel load, LILCO will prepare and provide to SC the following procedures:
(a)
SP 32.009.01, " Insulation Resistance Test of Auxiliary Electrical Equipment."
(b)
SP 84.654.02, " Primary Containment Leak Rate Test, Type B."
(Agreement at 5, V 5).
B.
Post-Licensing Obligations 1.
LILCO will measure nitrogen pressure of electrical penetrations and will take necessary corrective actions according to the criteria and schedule set forth in the Resolution Agreement.
The, test procedure and related j
matters will be documented in the FSAR.
(Agreement at 3-4, V 2).
6
29-2.
LILCO will perform insulation resistance testing, and will take necessary corrective action, according to the criteria and schedule set forth in the Resolution Agreement.
(Agreement at 5, S 3).
SOC Contention 9:
Notification that a Safety System is Disabled (Agreement dated July 23, 1982)
A.
Post-licensing Obligations 1.
Prior to the end of the first refueling outage, LILCO will install an annunciator in the control room (with fail-safe wiring) that monitors the status of the' six safety grade power feeds at the Remote Shutdown Panel.
(Agreement at 1, T 2).
If other compatible work on the RSP is performed prior to the first refueling outage, the installation will be done earli-er.
(Agreement at 3, 1 5).
2.
Prior to the end of the first refueling outage (or earlier if compatible RSP work is performed (Agreement at 3, V 5), LILCO will install a manually-actuated sys-tem status display in the RSP enclosure, with indicating lights for the following systems:
(a)
Reactor Core Isolation Cooling System (b)
Residual Heat Removal System (c)
Reactor Recirculation System (d)
Nuclear Boiler System (e)
Service Water System p-
,e--
s.-
7-
.7 lyyg
~ (f)
Reactor Building Closed Loop Cooling Water System (g)
Fuel Pool Cooling System (h)
Instrument Nitrogen System (Agreement at 2, 1 3).
3.
Procedures regarding manual alarms and surveil-lance testing will be revised as set forth in the Reso-lution Agreement.
(Agreement at 2-3, 11 3, 4).
SOC Contention 19(j):
Turbine Orientation (Agreement dated May 3, 1982)
A.
Preconditions to Licensing 1.
A Limiting Condition for operation set forth in the Resolution Agreement will be added to Technical Specification 3.4.7.10(a).
(Agreement at 2, 1 (a)).
2.
Surveillance requirements set forth in the Resolu-tion Agreement will be added to Technical Specification 4.4.7.10(a).
(Agreement at 2, 1 (b)(1)).
,3.
Inspection and testing requirements to demonstrate turbine rotor integrity, as set forth in the Resolution Agreement, will be added to the Technical Specifica-tions. '(Agreement at 2-3, 1 (b)(2)).
i e
e
l
. Stipulation Regarding Certain SC Contentions dated June 5, 1979 A.
Precondition to Licensing LILCO will establish a maximum permissible leakage rate into the spent fuel pool leakage collection system.
(Stipulation at 2).
B.
Continuing Obligations-1.
Once every five years, LILCO will verify the torque on the nuts securing the spent fuel pool hold-down plates.
(Stipulation at 2).
2.
Once every five years, LILCO will visually check for corrosion the accessible portions of the rack hold-down assemblies.
(Stipulation at 2).
Second Stipulation Regarding Certain Suffolk County Contentions, dated November 2, 1979 A.
Precondition to Licensing LILCO will establish limits on operation, as set forth in the Stipulation, based on reactor coolant system leakage specified in the Stipulation.
(Stipulation at 2).
c i
j
. II.
PHASE I EMERGENCY PLANNING MATTERS 10/
SC Contention EP 3:
Federal Resources H
(Agreement dated October 12, 1982) 1 LILCO will amend Section 5.3 of the Shoreham Emergency Plan as set forth in the Resolution Agreement.
(Agree-ment at 2-3).
SC Contention EP SC:
Notification of Response Organization and Emergency Personnel (Agreement dated October 12, 1982)
Prior to the commencement of fuel loading, LILCO will-amend Section 6.2 of the Shoreham Emergency Plan as set forth in the Resolution Agreement.
(Agreementiat 2-3).
.l SC Contention EP 6:
Training (Agreement dated October 15, 1982) 1.
Prior to the commencement of fuel loading, LILCO will notify in writing all Primary Mutual Aid fire de-partmants of the availability of training by LILCO, and will furnish such training in accordance with the Shoreham Emergency Plan.
(Agreement at 2).
2.
LILCO will provide Suffolk County, on a regular basis, with the following information:
l i
10/
All Phase I Emergency. Planning obligations are considered to be preconditions to licensing.
m--+w-=,w
-9m,"
-g-
-. 1 (a) which fire and ambulance services (and per-
. sonnel_ within ' those organizations) have received
+ raining;>
t' (b[' when refresher courses are due, and provided j
for all personneli-(c) confirmation that training will be made available to'allinew fire and~ ambulance personnel within reasonable time upon their entering such L
organizations.
(Agreement at 2).
/
SC Contention EP-7A:
Onsite Response Organization (Emergency Director / Response Manager), and i.
SC Contention.EP-8i Emergency Operations Facility (Agreement dated October 12, 1982)
LILCO will amend Section 7.1.3 of the Shoreham Emergen-cy Plan asDset forth in the Resolution Agreement.
(Agreement at 2-3).
SC Contention EP-9:
Radiological Exposure (Agreement dated October 12, 1982)
LILCO will amend Section 6.5.1 and pages 6-9 through 6-15 of the Shoreham Emergency Plan as set forth in the Resolution Agreement.
(Agreement at 2-6).
A
s e
- '~~'
s SC Contention EP-10A:' Field Monitoring Teams s
(Agreement dated October 12, 1982)
Prior to the commencement of fuel loading, LILCO villt amend the Shoreham Emergency Plan and implementing-pro-cedures to reflect the existence of a replacement fi~ eld monitoring team and its role in an eme'rgency.
Such s
amendments will be submitted to th'e~ Staff and to Suffolk County.
(Agreement at 2).
~
N6C CoEAentio5 CP-11(D):
Redundant Power Supplies T Agreernent dated October 12, 1982)
LILCO will provide battery backup power'to offsite hadios used by LILCO at the Emergency Operations'Facil-i
~ity.
(Agr'eement at 2).
Communicstions through Beepers'(Agreement dated October 12, 1982) t'-
.(,
'*w
'LILCO[ vill provide training to LILCO emergency response s
personnel who are issued,beepersg and will amend the
\\
x emergency planning impfemEnting procedures in the man-
- ~.
nor, set forth in the Resolution Agreement. i (Agreement
~
~
~
.....5-at 2).
' ?% [ s 5
y 4
i 4w b.
s g
g t
u l
t
)
i.
s 6
s q
1 4
t i
a h,,
a
g.
c r
l %
3,
Personnel Assignments to Communication / Notification (Agreement dated October 12, 1982) 7*
LILCO will provide seven communicators in the Emergency Operations Facility, and will revise Section 5.2.8 of the Shoreham Emergency Plan to reflect their duties as set forth in the Resolution Agreement. '(Agreement at 2).
O d,
?
I ks 4
i w
t s
k 3
~
i 1
6, o 'L5 3. *
?
l 4
j
.i