05000335/LER-1981-032-03, /03L-0:on 810624,plant Personnel Determined Periodic Test of AB Battery Charger Had Not Been Performed. Caused by Interpreting Tech Specs Precisely.Test Satisfactorily Performed

From kanterella
(Redirected from ML20009G152)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
/03L-0:on 810624,plant Personnel Determined Periodic Test of AB Battery Charger Had Not Been Performed. Caused by Interpreting Tech Specs Precisely.Test Satisfactorily Performed
ML20009G152
Person / Time
Site: Saint Lucie NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 07/24/1981
From: Pace P
FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO.
To:
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
Shared Package
ML20009G148 List:
References
LER-81-032-03L, LER-81-32-3L, NUDOCS 8108030378
Download: ML20009G152 (3)


LER-1981-032, /03L-0:on 810624,plant Personnel Determined Periodic Test of AB Battery Charger Had Not Been Performed. Caused by Interpreting Tech Specs Precisely.Test Satisfactorily Performed
Event date:
Report date:
3351981032R03 - NRC Website

text

-.

n. ~. ;.:. _

m sac roRM 3sa u.s.nuctsAa nscutATony conensission 1.lCENSEE EVENT REPORT e@

couract stoeg: l l

l 1

I I

tetsAsa paisica rves ALL ascusaro issomuArious i

l0101 -101 O O 10 I O l 101 Ol@l4 I 11 ill I Il@l l l

4r 64 @

I lo i fl l FlL l S I Ll Si i l@is P

4 3 WCantetcoot

.acLN44 awas44A is IS 6.Cis&& rypt 43 17 CCN'T 2,"*y I L@l 01 51 010 l 01 31315 @b 16 I 2 I 4 I 811 @(7nl 7 I 9Ia I n I il@

Ioai1 e.

s

.i coexaruu aa se se mar sars r*

apoar oara as avsa.rcascnimon Ano anosAeLa consacusucas @

(TTTl l Members of the Plant Staff determined that the surveillance requirements I

g, of T.S. 4.8.2.3.2.d had not'been completely satisfied in that a periodic i

iai.1i test of the "AB" battery charner was not performed to demonstrate its I

capab m ty of recharging a battery under the specified conditions.

I ios,#

,,,,, ; There were no consequences to the health and welfare of the public.

[ o, i i This-was the first event of this tvoe.

I I

iois e i tu'Em*o, sOsia

'UEe

TSE!

sus $'s coupons =r cooe Ioial i Elc l@ (JJ@ Lxj@ In l Al T T IR lY l@ LZJ@ L2J @

l 7

8 9

10 13 82 f2 33

'9 23 J gagnAg

>}g;t,, q e g ggg AgyrgaQg sto'on r.vo.

ag pe.ggy mer coot tv 1 aso.

g Evtaer y tAA

@,a,,gq,8Ca;18 111 1-1 101312I I/t i Of al LJ.i.]

l-J [Q_}

a n

n a

2.

s a

a n

's%*.?"rYo' o'"t'..

"l",'t:5

,i?,*22M,,

lofoIo@loI ic:M *:9;T o':L%

'W3T ouns LIJ@

Ls.j@

L.Aj@

l XI 919 I 91@

Ud@Lgl@

LZJ@

Il @

s 2s
s 33 40 43 42 as a

as CAUSE CE5C."tiPTloN ANo CC'MGC."lVe ACTloNS 27 i

ii,oiI The surveillance requirements of the "AB" battery charger were missed due i

i o interpreting the Tech Specs precisely.

T.S. 4.8.2.3.2.d states "at the,

t l

completion...the battery charger shall be demonstrated capable of re-

,,,,, i i,i:1Icharging "its" batterv See attached additional cause descriotion'and I

corrective action

7, i.-

~

,,,,,i orwensvan.:s @ EsEsOv"

's #E7 siscovsav oesenianon ::

seowen li is I [E j@ l 11010 !@l NA l lZl@lDISCUSSIONBYMEMBERSOFP STAFF 8*

.c'riv,rv c 4rtur 2=ovaron.cnvery @ l tocAncu e, meAsa @

l i i s I i Z l @o es msAseLZ_J@l m e.s.

NA l

NA

...sond'. ax, esses erscai.non @

u.. a..

ms l e ii 1010 !O !@LZJ@l NA l

2*

,s s:=

'u' mu'4 s

' 8

ncai.nc~@

li t il 101010 j@l NA l

7 4 3 31 f2 30

% ',*,*'

  • Pla' M e? * " @

l e i iI (Z_l@l NA w

l

.ss.;,l'ls'seni, ten @

"#C "5 0 Y I iciIL @l NA If 'tiIIIIIfI !

a u n

a 3 s

Paul L. Pace (305) 552,3654 92uson2=E7AAEa 7*CN E:

9108030378 810724 l

PDR ADOCK 05000335 S

PDR

aa D

  • * '),(j'/

/ C. C C C e n s

ku toe.I-

~ k+

se af g _ ~ *Aud/-syruf 6 /

.g/sm -

  1. CA

> <<.v Vs Lef -

2 lis " &

2 v s'A

~??

9 sjJ~b-J *a w R w ~ t a i" ^ "it u p a yu,A,d f'^ Q a IV? k eda. -so wil.4 e

pL w

8 A% m Wr-d

~
4. -- n+e <,~.a

\\

sh &y.

I t

(

i L

(

I

\\

7I

.4 7

)

'll m }"

~l V f yr"Yu.

l8

k i

y J

l

)

\\

e F

/

N h

y a

+ / Sa-,~f +yvj eA4 t

1 o.

l l

STo LUCIE UNIT 1 LER - 335-81-32 CAUSE DESCRIPTION AND CORRECTIVE ACTIONS.

After discussing the wording of T.S. 4.8.2.3.2, the plant staff determined that the intent of the T.S., since the "AB" charger is occasionally aligned to either the "A" or "B" battery, is to require surve'111ance on the "AB" charger. A test was satisfactorily performed cn the "AB" charger using a load bank to demonstrate the ability to charge the battery.

e e

. O"4 e

m

{'i

-, _-.,.,,,, ~.