05000335/LER-2007-001, Re Mispositioned Service Air Containment Isolation Valves

From kanterella
(Redirected from 05000335/LER-2007-001)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Re Mispositioned Service Air Containment Isolation Valves
ML072260432
Person / Time
Site: Saint Lucie NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 08/03/2007
From: Johnston G
Florida Power & Light Co
To:
Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
L-2007-120 LER 07-001-00
Download: ML072260432 (4)


LER-2007-001, Re Mispositioned Service Air Containment Isolation Valves
Event date:
Report date:
Reporting criterion: 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)

10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability

10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)

10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(A)

10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition

10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B)

10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii)

10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ix)(A)

10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x)

10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v)(B), Loss of Safety Function - Remove Residual Heat

10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(A), Completion of TS Shutdown

10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function

10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications

10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)
3352007001R00 - NRC Website

text

0 FPL Florida Power & Light Company, 6501 S. Ocean Drive, Jensen Beach, FL 34957 August 3, 2007 L-2007-120 10 CFR 50.73 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Control Desk Washington, D. C. 20555 Re:

St. Lucie Unit 1 Docket No. 50-335 Reportable Event: 2007-001-00 Date of Event: June 6, 2007 Mispositioned Containment Isolation Valves The attached Licensee Event Report 2007-001-00 is being submitted pursuant to the requirements of 10 CFR 50.73 to provide notification of the subject event.

Attachment an FPL Group company

NRC FORM 366 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION APPROVED BY OMB: NO. 3150-0104 EXPIRES: 06/30/200 Estimated burden per response to comply with this mandatory collection request: 50 hours5.787037e-4 days <br />0.0139 hours <br />8.267196e-5 weeks <br />1.9025e-5 months <br />. Reported lessons learned are incorporated into the licensing process and fed back to industry. Send comments regarding burden estimate to the Records and FOIA/Privacy Service Branch (T-5 F52), U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER)

Washington, DC 20555-0001, or by internet e-mail to infocollects@nrc.gov, and to the Desk Officer, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, NEOB-10202, (3150-0104), Office of Management and Budget, Washington, DC 20503. Ifa means used to impose an information collection does not display a currently valid OMB control number, the NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, the information collection.

3. PAGE St. Lucie Unit 1 05000335 1

OF 3

4. TITLE Mispositioned Service Air Containment Isolation Valves
5. EVENT DATE
6. LER NUMBER _
7. REPORT DATE
8. OTHER FACILITIES INVOLVED FACILITY NAME DOCKET NUMBER MONTH DAY YEA R YEAR SEQUENTIAL REV MNH DY YA NUMBER NO.

MONTH DAY YEAR FIACILITY NAME DOCKET NUMBER 06 06 2007 2007 -

001 00 08 03 20071 OPERATING MODE

11. THIS REPORT IS SUBMITTED PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF 10 CFR§: (Check all that apply) 1E 20.2201(b)

[I 20.2203(a)(3)(i)

[

50.73(a)(2)(i)(C)

E 50.73(a)(2)(vii)

El 20.2201 (d)

El 20.2203(a)(.3Xi)

[] 50.73(a)(2)(iiXA)

[] 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(A)

El 20.2203(a)(1)

El 20.2203(a)(4)

El 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(B)

[] 50.73(a)(2)(viii)(B)

[I 20.2203(a)(2)(i) 0 50.36(c)(1)(i)(A)

E] 50.73(a)(2)(iii)

[]

50.73(a)(2)(ix)(A)

10. POWER LEVEL E 20.2203(a)(2Xii)

[1 50.36(c)(1)iixA)

[] 50.73(a)(2)(ivXA)

Ej 50.73(a)(2)(x)

E 20.2203(a)(2)(iii)

El 50.36(c)(2)

El 50.73(a)(2Xv)(A)

El 73.71(a)(4) 100%

20.2203(a)(2)(iv)

[] 50.46(a)(3)(ii)

El 50.73(a)(2)(v)(B)

[

73.71(a)(5) 0] 20.2203(a)(2)(v)

El 50.73(a)(2)(i)(A)

El 50.73(a)(2)(v)(C)

El OTHER F1 20.2203(a)(2)(vi) 0 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B)

Ej 50.73(a)(2Xv)(D)

Specify in Abstract below or in NRC Form 366A

12. LICENSEE CONTACT FOR THIS LER Donald L.

Cecchett - Licensing Engineer 772-467-7155 El YES (If yes, complete 15. EXPECTED SUBMISSION DATE)

ABSTRACT (Limit to 1400 spaces, i.e., approximately 15single-spacedlpeswrittent lines)

On June 6, 2007, St. Lucie Unit 1 was in Mode 1 at 100 percent reactor power and while performing a surveillance to verify position of administratively locked valves for the containment and shield building integrity, two containment isolation valves, (CIVs),

service air header to containment isolation (non-safety class system) were found locked open, versus the required locked closed position.

The valves are required to be locked closed prior to entering Mode 4 in accordance with Technical Specifications 3.6.1 and plant procedures to ensure containment vessel integrity. The valves were restored to the locked closed position upon discovery.

It was estimated the valves were left open for approximately 3 weeks from the time when Unit 1 entered into Mode 4 until time of discovery.

The apparent cause, along with contributing causes, was determined to be human error in which implementation of existing configuration control processes were incorrectly implemented by the Clearance Center Senior Reactor Operator (SRO).

Corrective actions included re-performance of the procedure, creation and issuance of an Operations Event Report 07-008, and immediate standdown with all personnel.

RC FORM 366 (6-2004)

PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER RC FORM 366 (6-2004)

PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPERU.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION (7-2001)

LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER)

TEXT CONTINUATION FACILITY NAME (1)

DOCKET LER NUMBER (6)

PAGE (3)

FACIITYNAME(1)NUMBER (2)

YEAR SEQUENTIAL REVISION NUMBER NUMBER St. Lucie Unit 1 05000335 Page 2 of 3 2007 001 00 TEXT (if more space is required, use additional copies of NRC Form 366A) (17)

Description of the Event On June 6, 2007, St. Lucie Unit 1 was in Mode 1 at 100 percent reactor power. While performing a surveillance to verify position of administratively locked valves [v].

for the containment and shield building integrity, two containment isolation valves (CIVs) V18794 and V18796 (service air header to containment isolation) [PEN] were found locked open versus the required locked closed position. The valves are opened to provide service air to the containment during Mode 5 and 6 conditions through a containment penetration. The valves are required to be locked closed prior to entering Mode 4 in accordance with Technical Specifications 3.6.1 and plant procedures, and verified locked closed once every 31 days in accordance with administrative procedures.

Unit 1 exited Mode 5 and entered Mode 4 on 5/20/07 following a refueling outage.

Prior to entering Mode 4 the valves were re-opened (previously closed) to support ongoing containment activities.

Although, there are sufficient station processes and procedures in place to control components that are aligned outside of their normal position (e.g., valve deviation log, open penetration log, or equipment clearance orders),

the Clearance Center SRO did not establish configuration control via these station procedures.

In addition, during subsequent communications on the valve opening with the Control Room, the Clearance Center SRO did not clearly communicate that the now "open" penetration required tracking and documentation in the Open Penetration Log Data Sheet by the Control Room.

This miscommunication resulted in the Control Room not logging it as an "open" penetration. These human performance errors and incorrect use of the configuration control process ultimately lead to the open position of the valves being missed by both the Control Room and the Clearance Center SRO when entering Mode 4.

Cause of the Event

The apparent cause, along with contributing causes, was determined to be human error in which implementation of existing configuration control processes were incorrectly implemented by the Clearance Center SRO.

Contributing causes included inadequate communication, perceived schedule pressure, distractions, and less than adequate guidance in the configuration control procedures.

Analysis of the Event

In accordance with NUREG-1022, "Event Reporting Guidelines 10 CFR 50.72 and 50.73,"

Revision 2, this event is reportable under 10 CFR 50.73(a) (2) (ii)

(A) as, a principal safety barrier being seriously degraded as well as 10 CFR 50.73(a) (2) (i) (B) as a condition or operation prohibited by the Technical Specifications.

Analysis of Safety Significance Since the passage of service air into the containment is not needed or required for core damage mitigation, the CIVs are generally not included in the PSA model(s) used for estimating Core Damage Frequency (CDF).

Inoperable CIVs (i.e.

in the open position) for this penetration will not have an impact on CDF or Incremental Conditional Core Damage Probability (ICCDP).U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION (7-2001)

LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER)

TEXT CONTINUATION DOCKET LER NUMBER (6)

PAGE (3)

FACILITY NAME (1)

NUMBER (2)

YEAR SEQUENTIAL REVISION NUMBER NUMBER St. Lucie Unit 1 05000335 Page 3 of 3 2007 001 00 TEXT (If more space is required, use additional copies of NRC Form 366A) (17)

The calculated Incremental Large Early Release Probabilities (ICLERPs) for both seismic and non-seismic event initiators indicate that the level of risk associated with large early releases due to CIVs V18794 and V18796 left in open position for 3 weeks (or 504 hours0.00583 days <br />0.14 hours <br />8.333333e-4 weeks <br />1.91772e-4 months <br />) is significantly below the acceptance criterion value of 5.0E8, and thus, based on Reg.

Guides 1.177 and 1.174 the associated risk impact is considered small.

Corrective Actions

The proposed corrective actions and supporting actions listed below are entered into the site corrective action program.

Any changes to the proposed actions will be managed under the commitment management change program.

The following actions will be tracked within the St. Lucie Corrective Action Program:

l.Appendix E of AP 1-0010123 "Containment and Shield Building Integrity Valve List" that was being used for the configuration control was re-performed.

2.Operations Department "Standdown" with all personnel was held to discuss the event and the Operations expectations regarding configuration control.

3.The Clearance Center SRO that involved in this event has been counseled.

4.Operations Event Report 07-008 on this issue was issued and reviewed by all operating crews.

Similar Events

A search of the PSL's Corrective Action database over the past two years was performed.

The search included the event for program/process issues and events for configuration management issues.

Thirty-four condition reports were found that addressed configuration management.

A review of these condition reports did not reveal a similar event.

No other condition reports were identified related to the above search topics.

Failed Components None