ML19350E405
| ML19350E405 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Trojan File:Portland General Electric icon.png |
| Issue date: | 06/17/1981 |
| From: | Trammell C Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19350E406 | List: |
| References | |
| TASK-3.A.1.2, TASK-TM TAC-43091, TAC-46059, TAC-46131, NUDOCS 8106230007 | |
| Download: ML19350E405 (6) | |
Text
-
e.... n,,,,
~~J~ ' )
f,#
3, Ut3TEDOTATE:
/
- iUOLCAR REGULATORY CO'""m-~
.: m s <p W
wasuiworow. o. c. rosss 4
B l g = g g l" j T.~ Q:-
l
$ a[(J)'f/
\\..'[.. #
JUN 171981 w
ll
.b U
w Docket No. 50-344 dUIl 2 2198tu -a
~
- r-
"8 g FACILITY: Trojan Nuclear Plant
' )s LICENSEE: Portland General Electric Company (PGE)
D:
6
SUBJECT:
SUMMARY
OF MEETING HELD ON JUNE 15, 1981 TO DISCUSS PGE PLANS FOR EMERGENCY RESPONSE FACILITIES (NUREG 0737, ITEM III.A.I.E}
On June 15,'1981, the NRC staff met with representatives of PGE and their consultants to discuss selected topics related to emergency Those attending response facilities (ERFs) for the Trojan huclear Plant.
the meeting are identified in Attachment 1.
Copies of viewgraphs shown during the course of the meeting are contained in Attachment 2.
Highlights of the meeting are summarized below. The agenda is shown in Attachment 3.
In letters dated October 17, 1979, October 21, 1980, and April 15, 1981, To PGE submitted their plans for upgraded ERFs and related mtters.
date, PGE has received no response from NRC as to the accephbility of their plans. Therefore, the purpose of the sneeting was to get NRC response with respect to:
1.
EOF location 2.
EOF data set 3.
TSC design 4.
Backup SPDS 5.
Meteorological system PGE emphasized that they have been responsive, both in substance and timing, to the NRC's request for post-TMI changes and improvements, and have so far spent $10 million, with plans fot spending up to $17.2 million in improvements. NRC approval is needed very soon if schedules shown in the NRC February 18, 1981 letter are to be met.
This calls for upgraded ERFs to be operational by October 1,1982. PGE feels that NRC guidance has not been sufficiently specific and in cases is confusing.
They are reluctant to proceed unti. the acceptability of their plans is more firmly established.
For example, NUREG 0696 refers to Reg. Guide 1.97 Rev. 2 and NUREG 0700. NRC har. issued no specific guidance to PGE operating plants as to RG 1.97, and NUREG 0700 is not published.
committed to an SPDS in May 1980 and is concerned about recent (and upcoming)
NRC guidance on this subject.
810e e a o007 f
4
e 2
EOF PGE proposes a near-site EOF and an alternate, back-up EOF at St. helens, Oregon.
Some differences exist between the proposed PGE EOF and NUREG See Attachment 2.
NRC stated that the.two sites are acceptable 0696.
in concept, and that a. nearby EOF was generally preferable.
- However, more details were needed for a final decfsion on PGE's exceptions to NUREG 0696.
These will be provided by PGE about June 30.
NRC will respond in writing 30 days later. PGE will also provide a copy of WCAP-9725 (the }{ computer system) referenced in PGE's 10/21/80 letter.
Meteorological System PGE stated that they need to know acceptance criteria for modeling and data transmission for a Class A model. NRC responded that NUREG 0654 Appendix 2, together with proposed RG 1.123 Rev. 1, contains the necessary guidance. Any other finer details should be discuss 2d and worked out with the NRC site reviewer. PGE will do this via conference call later.
EOF Data Set In response to PGE questions, NRC stated that RG 1.97 Rev. 2 parameters should be available - by some means - in the EOF and TSC by 10/1/82.
The instrument ranges, environmental qualification, etc. specified in the reg. guide r.eed not-be satisfied by this date. A letter concerning RG 1.97 Rev. 2 is to be issued shortly.
Backup SPDS The PGE backup SPDS doesn't have all parameters on one panel. Neutron flux and steam generator levet are on separate control room panels nearby.
PGE stated that this arrangement will be reconsidered in their systems review, but it was their position that the present arrangement is acceptable for the 10/1/82 implementation data.
NRC did not provide a final answer pending discussions with management.
PGE will include more detail on this item in their upcoming June 30 letter. NRC will try to respond 2 week: later.
PGE's SPDS display, which was purchased 5/80, cannot be sent to the EOF as stated in NUREG 0696.
NRC stated that PGE should explain tnis in more detail, and discuss possible options available for showing SPDS information (SPDS information is not.equired in the alternate EOF).
~
in the EOF.
TSC Design PGE should indicate where NRC space in the TSC is located, indicate who is in the various offices and how information fleus into the command center.
I 6
e
3-
~ More information should be provided generally'on how the TSC functions.
PGE should indicate the availability of protective clothing. The TSC layout, size, location, etc. is acceptable. PGE will include the requested additional informi' ion in their upcoming letter.
At the conclusion of the meeting, PGE emphasized that they will be unable to meet the 10/1/82 deadline for ERF implementation if NRC doesn't provide a rapid response to.their proposals.
Cin77amef/
C.M. Trammell, Project Manager Operating Reactors Branch #3 Division of Licensing, NRR Attachments:
l '. Attendees 2.
Viewgraphs 3.
Agenda cc: See next page s
g
..e...,.,............,-...
.... v..y_
L i c +n <,e+ :
Portland _' General Electric Company (PGE) f
'Capies al>o scr.t to th:s: pccoic cr. scrti:e f:0} litt f:r tubjcet plant ( ).
Occket File t:RC PDR L F G.-
t:5IC TERA OP.5?3 Rdg 201::in L' JHelte::c, AE00 EGrimes F.Clurk Project Managar Licensing Assistant ACR5 (.10)
Mtg Summary Disc.
NRC Participants R. Caruso, MP F-63 (TSC)
R. Snaider, MP F-66 (NDL) 1 L
Portland General Electric Company
\\
\\
cc: Mr. J. W. Durham,- Esquire Vice President and Corporate Counsel Portland General Electric Company 121 S. W. Salmon Street Portland, Oregon 97204 Multnomah County Library Social Science and Science Department 801 S.W. 10th Avenue Portland, Oregon 97205 Michael Malmros,_ Resident Inspector U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Trojan Nuclear Plant:
P. O. Box 0 Rainier, Oregon 97048 Robert H. Hunt, Chairman Board of County Commissioners Columbia-County St. Helens, Oregon 97501 Director, Criteria and Standards Division Office of Radiation Programs ( ANR-460)
U. S. Environmental Protection Agency Washington, D. C.
20460 Donald W. Godard, Supervisor Siting and Regulation Oregon Department of Energy Labor and Industries Butiding Room 111 Salem, Oegon 97310 O
e
ATTACHMENT 1 ATTENDEES PGE/ TROJAN MEETING' JUNE 15, 1981 NRC PGE C. Trammell G. Zimmerman B. - Zalcman W. Orser L. Beltracchi
-T. Walt S. Ramos~
T. ' McKenna.
E. Williams-J. Lewis.
WESTINGHOUSE GENERAL' PHYSICS-M. Wright D. Burgy J. Little C. Gaddy G. Strussion
TROJAN NUCLEAR PLANT UPGRADE EMERGENCY SUPPORT FACILITIES III A.1. 2 INITIAL NRC NBC EPER SUBMirTAL MEETINGS ISSUED IMPLEMENTATION AMENO 1 7/81 9/lG/80 10/80 12/ 2 / 8 0 1/9/o1 I
L-l TROJAN RADIOLOGICAL y
(
p p
~(~~'~~~~~~~~~~~~~
FINAL ANNUAL SUBMITTAL DRILL OF TREP 3/4/ 81 1E/29/80 INITIAL DESIGN SUBMITTED CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULED SYSTEM FEMA NRC COMMENCED COMPLETION TEST G/20/80 7/1/80 1/ 9/ 81 7/1/61 7/ 31/ 81 I
1 EARLY WARNING
{
y y
q SYSTEM (SIRENS) gg FEMA NRC APPROVED APPROVED 7/8/80 7/11/80 DESIGN
\\
DEVELOPMENT,.
COMPUTER
[ CONSTRUCTION
-- s,\\
COMMENCE START FURCHASED
\\
INSTALLATION OF W/ SYSTEM
/
OF BLDG.
\\
COMPUTERS COMPLETE TSC
- 5/80 12 / 3 / 8 O i,
9/15/ 61
$/1/8E
,],.
~~~~~~~~~~L~~~
=
^
-~~~ l BUILDING INITlh DESIGN SUPPLEMENTAL COMPLETE COMPLETE 5
COMPUTER ROOM iofijgg SUBMITTAL \\
SUBMITTAL 10/21/6 0 4/15/ 81 9/1/ 81
...y' PRIMARY EOF
1,--
I-EOF PRESENT J,j G/l/81
..