ML19347F421
| ML19347F421 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 04/29/1981 |
| From: | NRC |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19347F399 | List: |
| References | |
| FOIA-81-97 NUDOCS 8105190241 | |
| Download: ML19347F421 (2) | |
Text
NtfREG-0588 IEEE-STD. 323 DOR GUIDELINES-1971 E
,19J4-No specific guidelines for evalua-Specific guidance is provi.h Equipment Specification Specific reautrements General requirements ting equipment specifications are in Sections 1.1 thru 1.4 on including:
provided. The DGP. reviews are ad acceptable methat to estab.
a) perforinance hoc and equipment has already been lish environmental conditfoe..
characteristics purchased and installed. Therafore, to which equipment must be b) voltage, frequency it is not possible to backfit purchase qualified.
. ranges specification requirements, c) installation d) maintenance e design life f control, indication g environment h) operating cycle Specific guidance is provide
- 1) qualified life in Section 2.1 on selection Specific guidelines for selection of of qu&lificatioa methods.,
General for regarding:
type tests, partial type qualification methods appropriate for The NUREG states that quali-2.
Principles of Qualification Specific requirements different applications are provided f
t a) type tests in Section 5.1.
OCyl,lygcg
,iyn I tests and analyses.and b) partial type tests operating experience est data is not ak c)' oper n e perience er$b y
d) equipment' interface Section 8.0 includes a requirement for Specific guidance is providt in Section 5.0 on documen-Specific and detailed Less specific and complete and auditable records to be tation, including informatn 3.
Documentation requirements for diff-detailed with no maintained available which describe the required durin; licensing erent qualification specific requirement qualification method used in sufficient methods. Requirement to maintain documenta-detail to verify the extent of compliance reviews.
to maintain documenta-tion files with the DDR guidelines.
tion files.
General test plan in Specific guidelines for evaluating type Specific guidance is provie in Section 2.2 Qualificatic tests are provided in Section 5.2 for by Tests, 2.3 Test Sequence 4.
Type test Qualification Specific test plan, the fonn of data require.
Precedure including:
the following:
- 3. Margins, and 4. Aging.
ments for:
a) mounting a.
mounting Plants required to conform b) connections a) mounting b,
connections with 323-1971 must address c) monitoring b) connections operation (functional testing c.
d) margin c) monitoring and failure criteria) aging concerns.
e) test sequ;nce d)testsequence d.
test sequence f) aging e) vibration e.
aging g) vibration f) radiation f.
test specimen selection h) radiation g) operation test duration e
h) acceptance criteria g.
m i) operation NOT INCLUDED ARE:
O" j) inspection
~) aging k) acceptar.ce criteria a
b) margin y
c) inspection 0
l..
2 i
00R GUIDELINES NUREG-0588
/.
,1g-S.
Operating Experience Qualifi.
Specific General outline of These types of qualification methods
$I'#ifiC 9"Id**C' 15 are lumped in a single category called provided in Section 2.4 procedure in the qualification by a combination of on other qualification cation Method form of data methods (Section S.3).
In general 8*
requirements.
> the combination must include some General outline of type testing when the equipment is located inside containment. Any 6.
Qualification by Analyses Specific procedure in the analysis relied on must be based
, Procedure form of data on test data.
requirements.
7.
On-Going Qualification Specific Not included Procedure B.
Simulated Service Condition Description and Not included No generic simulated service condi-Sections 1.l(3) and (4) tion test profile is provided. Specific and 1.2(3) and (4) provide Typical Test Profile figures showing:
guidelines for evaluating the service specific guidance on test a) margin (additional conditions specified for a particular
- profiles, peak temp.. press.
type test or analysis are provided and time) in Section 4.0. In general the b) operation service conditions specified in the c) pressure and individual plant FSARs are considered temperature acceptable. No separate margin factors d) time period are required to be added to the service conditions to establish acceptable test conditions (see Section 6.0). Require-ments for functional testing and the failure crite'ria in Section S.2 of the guideltnes assure adequate conservatism in the overall testing program without specifically identifying the margin factors that exist in the test profile. The best estimate approach for MStB qualification is followed as set forth in NUREG-0458 pending completion of TAP A-21.
%