ML19347F414

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Draft Memo Re Qualification of Electrical Equipment
ML19347F414
Person / Time
Issue date: 06/20/1979
From: Gibbon T
NRC
To: Bradford P
NRC COMMISSION (OCM)
Shared Package
ML19347F399 List:
References
FOIA-81-97 NUDOCS 8105190215
Download: ML19347F414 (2)


Text

4

"#g* " Gup').;

4 h,

UNITED STATES g?

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION I

<=. 7,..- g;- g WASHINGTON. C. C. 20555 m

'i %~sEl?a[/ !

i s,.

.., e June 20, 1979 i

cer,--.- a s w.

. c:.,u: w..s,

..sg at*!

,c p

t*/

U

?

c r

MEMO T0:

Peter A. Bradford L-TomR.Gibboh FROM:

/

Attached is a draft memo on qualification of electrical equipment.

cc:

Hugh L. Thompson ao I

  • w p

ID.~}

i3 r.4 lg I_g J',

a l

i

/

i V

Blosioogns

lj

~, <

k3

].

. i*

ij DRAFT I.i m5 Jij MEMO TO: Samuel J. Chilk w

Secretary di FROM:

Peter A. Bradford

SUBJECT:

UCS PETITION - QUALIFICATION OF ELECTRICAL EQUIPMEN I would bike a Commission briefing to be scheduled concer to I&E Bulletin 79-01.

At that briefing I would like the following questions addressed:

l' (1)

Which office will be responsible for reviewing the responses and wha is the rationale for this decision?

(2)

What criteria will be used to judge the qualification o' the equip ment and how do those criteria compare to IEEE 323 (1974)?

(3)

What is the status of licensee responses to 79-0l?

Specifically what methods will be used to determine whether or not the equipment will withstand aging?

~ ~~

(4)

What do the responses reveal about the qualification problem?

j ]4 Dis-cuss specific plants where significant problems have been identified I'3 s

and actions taken or planned.

[d (5)

Are any enforcement actions contemplated as a result of the responses to 79-0i?

t I