05000333/LER-1980-071-03, /03L-0:on 800810,during Plant Startup at Less than 150 Psig,Reactor Core Isolation Cooling Turbine Speed Would Not Control in Manual During Surveillance Test.Sys Flow Also Did Not Control in Automatic.Cause Not Determined

/03L-0:on 800810,during Plant Startup at Less than 150 Psig,Reactor Core Isolation Cooling Turbine Speed Would Not Control in Manual During Surveillance Test.Sys Flow Also Did Not Control in Automatic.Cause Not Determined

ML19344F068
Person / Time
Site:	FitzPatrick
Issue date:	09/09/1980
From:	W. Verne Childs POWER AUTHORITY OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK (NEW YORK
To:	NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
Shared Package
ML19344F063	List: 05000333/LER-1980-071, Forwards LER 80-071/03L-0 05000333/LER-1980-071-03, /03L-0:on 800810,during Plant Startup at Less than 150 Psig,Reactor Core Isolation Cooling Turbine Speed Would Not Control in Manual During Surveillance Test.Sys Flow Also Did Not Control in Automatic.Cause Not Determined
References
LER-80-071-03L, LER-80-71-3L, NUDOCS 8009120365
Download: ML19344F068 (1)

LER-1980-071, /03L-0:on 800810,during Plant Startup at Less than 150 Psig,Reactor Core Isolation Cooling Turbine Speed Would Not Control in Manual During Surveillance Test.Sys Flow Also Did Not Control in Automatic.Cause Not Determined

Event date:
Report date:
3331980071R03 - NRC Website

text

ussexo ensemazuusruwamuu w 17 771 LICENSEE EVENT REPORT CONTROL BLOCK: l l

l l

I l lh (PLEASE PRINT OR TYPE ALL REQUIRED INFORMATION) 1 6

'lo t il i Ni Yl Jl Al Fl 1[gl50 l 0 j -l 0 l 0 l 0 l 0 l - l 0 l 0 l 0 lgl 4 l 1 l 1 l l ] 1 lgl l

lg 7

3 9 LICENSEE CCCE 14 1

uCENSE NUYSER 25 26 UCENSE TYPE J0 57 CAT 54 CON'T I0lil

"$RN I b hl 0l 5 l 0 l 0 l 0 l 3 l 3 [ 3 @l 0 l8 l1 l0 l8 10 l@lOl9l0l9l810l@

o

?

8 60 61 CoCKET NUMS ER 68 69 EVENT OATE 74 75 REPORT C ATE 80 EVENT DESCRIPTION AND PROBABLE CONSEQUENCES h l o 121 l During plant startup at less than 150 psig, the RCIC turbine speed would not control l Io la1 I in manual during surveillance required by TS 3.5.E.

About nine (9) hours later, l

l0t4l l fellowing resolt31on of the speed control problem, testing was resumed and system i

lo IuI I flow would not control in automatic.

In both cases the reactor pressure remained l

lo is l l below 150 psig and the HPCI was tested fully operable.

Neither system is required l

lo97; j to be operable upon startup until system pressure is 150 psig.

l l o is t l I

90 7

3 3 SYSTEM

CAUSE

CALSE COMP.

VA LV E CCCE CCCE SUSCCCE COMPCNENT SCDE SUSCCCE SUSCCCE 10191 I c l e l@ k_J@ l t l@ h l Ni si Tl al ul@ lx l@ l zl@

7 3

9 10 11 12 12 18 13 20 SECUENTI AL CCCURRENCE REPCRT AEVISION EVENT vEAR R EPORT NC.

CCOE TYPE NC.

@ {LE A AC I8l0l l-l 10l7l1l l/l l013l l Ll l-l l 0l E,*g;

_ 21 22 2J 24 26 27 23 29 30 31 32 AK N AC CN CN PLANT VET Q MCURS 22 S 8 T O 8CR 1 8.

SLP' IE VANUFA T PER Ixl@lzl@

l z l@

LZ_]@

l o lo lo Yi I l Nl@

lYl@

[N l@

l Gl 0l 8l 0l@

33 34 2t 36 37 40 41 42 43 44 47 CAUSE OESCRIPTION AND CCARECTIVE ACTIONS h li )o l l Trouble shCoting and additional test could not duplicate the manual speed control i

Ii t t l l problem. The auto flow control problem was the result of a failed amplifier which I

~

pql was replaced.

Two (2) hours later, system operability was demonstrated.

No l

53,3; l additional action is required.

l It iAll I

7 3 3 30 ST S

% POWER CTNER STAT *.;S IS C RY CISCCVERY CESCRIPTION l1 l5 l l c l@ l 010 l 0 l@l NA l

lB l@l Surveillance l

ACTIVITY CC TENT CELEASEC AMCUNT OF ACTIVITY LCCATION CF RELEA3E li181I:l@PRELEASEl zi@l NA l

l NA l

7 3 9 to 11 44 45 SO

• ERSCNNEL EXPCSURES NUMBER TYPE DESCRiprtCN l 1 l 7 l l 0 l 0 l 0 l@l z l@l NA l

8ERSONN EL IN R ES NUMBER CESCRIPTICN NA l

l 1 l a l l 0 l 0 l 0 l@l 7

d 3 11 12 30 LCSS CF 09 CAMAGE TO FAC:UTV Tvet C E SCRIPTION li 191 I n l@l Nl l

7

$ 3 to 60 '

i,, o, 'g'LattCtTVg '5c'""'

NRC USE ONLY 0 0 912 03G 5 i

i i iiiiiii!iiil o

NA 7

3 3 to 68 69 SO 3 w_3hr;.nfu ' A (315T 3A2-38'.0 X20T e