05000255/LER-1981-002-03, Determined That 125 Volt DC Distribution Panel D21A Mounting Did Not Meet Seismic Restraint Criteria.Caused by Engineering Judgment Error. Frame Holding Panel Modified by Adding Braces

From kanterella
(Redirected from ML19341C588)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Determined That 125 Volt DC Distribution Panel D21A Mounting Did Not Meet Seismic Restraint Criteria.Caused by Engineering Judgment Error. Frame Holding Panel Modified by Adding Braces
ML19341C588
Person / Time
Site: Palisades Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 02/26/1981
From:
CONSUMERS ENERGY CO. (FORMERLY CONSUMERS POWER CO.)
To:
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
Shared Package
ML18046A459 List:
References
LER-81-002-03L, LER-81-2-3L, NUDOCS 8103030791
Download: ML19341C588 (1)


LER-1981-002, Determined That 125 Volt DC Distribution Panel D21A Mounting Did Not Meet Seismic Restraint Criteria.Caused by Engineering Judgment Error. Frame Holding Panel Modified by Adding Braces
Event date:
Report date:
2551981002R03 - NRC Website

text

UPDATED REPORT-2/26/81 INITIAL REPORT-1/26/81 PALISADES PLANT NRC 7 ORM 3s4 U. S. NUCLEAR RECULATORY COMMIS$10N (7 77)

L'CENSEE EVENT REPORT CoNTRotsLock: 1 I I l l l l@

(PLEASE PRINT OR TYPE ALL REQUIRED INFORMATIONI 1

6 IoTG i Ml Il P l Al 41l@isl 0l 0 l -l 0 l 0l 0l 0 l 0) -l 0l Ol@l h l1 l 1l 1l lj@l l lg 7

8 9 UCt=5itCOOg is vCE%st%wwatm 24 26 6aCENSE Tv.t JJ 67 GAT 64 1

con'T A

0' "J LLJ@l o f si 01 o f 012 i si s1@l olli o f el 8111@l ein 191 el a I 11@

i 8

M 61 DOCK ET NWw4a m et 69 EvtNT DATE 74 75 Pt, ORT 3Af t SQ EVENT DESCRIPTION AND PROSA8LE CON $toutNCES O'o During post installation review of fire protection modifications, i t, was,

Io i2i l f5TD I determined that 125 volt DC distribution panel D21A vas not adequately i

e Ly.cnnt.d 4,

to

. nc -. e 4 - c.

n 4 -4 4 -an+

n4*+

~4 ta 4 n.

na

- a h 4 - +

1 panel D.-11A was properly counted.

The loads supplied by the panel (1-2,

io,,,,

e i Diesel Gen. and 2hooV Bus 1DI were declared increrable: repairs were I

io 1 T I I initiated and completed within time reauired by LCO of TS 3.7.2c.

No I

eI threat to rublic health or safety existed.

I 7

8 9 80 svsTEM

CausE

CALst

COM, balvE CCCE CCCE sLOCOCE COM*ONENT CCDE sus 000E sys;Oct l@ b,,.J@ L.tJ @ l 9 f " I "I n l = I ",.I@

L,.IJ @ dJ @

i +

b,.m.

,o m

m

= avis.c%

sa:Us=Trat cc:unaises a s se,.T ga tvgNTyram at, ORT NC.

CCOE "f

E NC.

@,"(y;ao i 8!1l

{--J l of Ol 21 W

I o l 31 [L_J

[--j W

p 2,

a n

1 v

2.

u v

n AN %

04, ANT F(

3VR$

, B

,OR 9 5

VANV,ACT ata a 3%

LaJ@LZ J@ Lll@

LIJ@

1 o IoIo I oI L1J@

Ltlu@ L.AJ@ lni3IsI5I@

JJ J4 J$

M 3

4Q 4l gg 43 g

gy cAust oEscRi> Tion ANo ecRREc rlVE ACTIONS h fiTo 1 i The seismically analified canel was mounted on a field fabricated fra.e I

si#ilI which was insufficiently braced. The antarent causa was incorrac+

1 mi encineerine M-ent - ida dund -c et

'4 e' d A ge.

Tc satisfy seismic I

gi restraint criteria, frame was modified by a~ddition of braces.

I I

L,LL*.J. l

.o st aN

%,0*Em OTwtasTATus so av OtsCoviny cts mi Tio%

[,E_J@ l o! 9 I 8l@l NA l [DJ@l Notification by AE l

i s

'.A!TiviT, C:aTisT Aoov=T o,.CTiv Tv @ I tocAT,ose,.a.s,@

l

.u.s.o o,. u.s.

l li Ie I Lc_J q_a) LtJ@l 1e i

11 1

' '...so. 'il.. e, Mis o sc...T,o, @

Tv.,

I o I of ol@LIJ@l NA i

..so~~.l'i=23 s

>isCa,, Tie-@

~uo...

FOTl I o I oIo l@l NA l

l 7

8 9 11 12 go Loss os OR DAwaGE To f ac1LITY Tvet des mieTION R W@l NA l

,o

,o rs3L E DE Cni,TicN 12 l o f [,N,J@l NA l lIl1illtiItt l i

e s io se e,

so j

l l

Blos o s 0 l't t i