ML19323D283

Views in Response to ASLB 800328 Order Re Prehearing Conference Transcript.Present Transcript Does Not Adequately Reflect Prehearing Conference & Should Be Corrected,Retyped & Redistributed Prior to Other Steps.W/Certificate of Svc

ML19323D283
Person / Time
Site:	Bailly
Issue date:	04/10/1980
From:	Hansell D, Scott W ILLINOIS, STATE OF
To:	Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel
References
NUDOCS 8005210377
Download: ML19323D283 (5)

Text

_ ._ __ .

. l r * \

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 1

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD IN THE MATTER OF: )

)

NO RTHERN INDIA'!A .."2 * ~ ?  ; NRC DOCKET 50-367 SERVICE COMPANY ) (Construction Permit Extension)

(Bailly Generating Station, )

Nuclear 1) )

VIENS OF ILLINOIS REGARDING TPANSCRIPT Intervenor, People of the State of Illinois ( " Illinois ")

by William J. Scott, Attorney General in response to the March 28, 1980 Order of the Board requesting its views regarding the prehearing conference transcript states as follows:

1. The transcript of the special prehearing conference is of such poor quality as to be of minimal value in determining what really took place at the hearing. Portions of comments made by Counsel for Illinois have been omitted, other statements are misstated (some of them to such an extent as make the statement incomprehensible) and similar problems exist with the responses to Illinois' statements by both the Chairman and the other participants.

2. The simplest way to attempt to correct the transcript is to order that a new transcript be typed with copies distributed to all participants. Perhaps under the pressure of having to j produce daily copy the Court Reporters made mistakes that could be corrected by a more carefully typed version. A determination may then be made about the adequacy of the new transcript before we decide on more drastic measures.

80 05210h37 7

(<

1

3. The transcript as it presently exists does not adequately reflect the prehearing conference. However, before determing what should be done about the special prehearing conference a second transcript is an improvement over the first it may eliminate any need to consider other steps.

Illinois also suggests that the Board give consideration to engaging another court reporting firm in the future so that tbase problems are avoided.

Respectfully submitted, WILLIAM J. SCOTT Attorney General State of Illinois DEAN HANSELL Assistant Attorney General Environmental Control Division 188 West Randolph Street Suite 2315 Chicago, Illinois 60601 312-793-2491 l

l l

1 i

o .

e CERTIFICATION OF SERVICE I, JESSIE GIBSON, hereby certify that I have served a cop *f of the foregoing views of Illinois Regarding Transcript upon each of the following persons by deposit in the United States Mail, first class postage prepaid, this 10th day of April. 1980.

Herber: Grossman, Esquire U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Conmission Washington, D.C. 20555 Glenn O. Bright U.S. Nuclear Regulatory COnnission Washington, D.C. 20555 Richard F. Cole U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commissicn Washing:On, D.C. 20555 Cocketing and Service Section Office of the Secretary U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission WashingOn, D.C. 20555 Howard K. Shapar, Esquire Executive Legal Director U.S. Nuclear Regulatory C = mission Washington, D.C. 20555 Steven Goldberg, Esquire Office of the Executive Legal Director U.S. '.iuclear Regulatory Conmission

.das ht_ngton , D.C. 20a_s_o_

Dr. George Schult:

110 California Michigan City, Indiana 46360 i

William H. Eichorn, Esq.

5243 Hohman Avenue Hammond, Indiana 46320 t

t u

. ..~--

, D W[Dl Il kLim F[0')ll@M J1iM V WldL

.=.. ..... . . ...

.w

... ...p

./ . . -

wi

.*.-..%. *s..s

.., .N-- s -w... . ..- m m .--.

• . * * ^^

. 4 . .a

• J 4 - ** *

• .. %. .'..;w . s . p. ---- . e.-Q .....?

7.4.34

. .N .=

ee.

• g w .s. ...p

.p T

.s .. ..,

J s.

• =. a.

.. *. T.V.

. . O. .* .s. .a. .s

.4 . n. 7 :. ..,P.

~

w .%..s w=;w s . m p .T * *-.4 .we.s-3 .w;.-.

.=.m .-- % a . * . 3...%. .s .. r 7. . , . 4.

. a-

e. R ..

.... ~.. ~..*

1 9 . .%. T =.*. e C .

e w %..4 w=;w . s . a. - - - .J .we .4 3. .....

V.

. - . . . 4 .'.*.- s b. 9 .e .s =. - .. s. .f. 4

• • = .

. , .. b 1 4. .J .J. w-=. . J e.s. .w.

?.? 4 = c A .=--.

.=e.ga -aa**w...-a p2 w- 1.. c ..d. s.

7 "/ , .. . .

T... e. .i.J J ... 3 .... s. .. .

d **

73S- - .%. 4-=;w = s . p. ..... J .J .s .-

s 4..-S m

./ .i .s..=. n O. F b .a. .b =. p  ?. ..

. c* ~,. . J. .=. m-

• se-

• J .7. .* .*. s = 0. . .Ow.m b.u .*..p. . .T. .e..- -. 4 s

.C .... ..J a "e *9%

• . *.JA. O. O. .C a s. a. . p .. .se. ,

m *

• • d.g%..d.

• • s . ..;- ..=.p w. . . .w. 9 e.w,^, r .T .*

• Z.

..6.  %. .g . J=

. . - . . *..w% .%. E .3p T.G, . .Z m

. s.

• 7

.w **a-.

to w 3 w =se* = .f. Q w

.= w .aVw-=

..s.4

=*94 *m***

r.%.

w 4-=;w. s n ep -.. .we.sS ..CJ7

.4

.v_. . r".se.

w a. " . s .b e .... .e .'N -

u-.

• ...t.4

.se .m .

.s

s. %. . w 3.N .

=

-4

/ J * ?. . 1. .* .* - .b. .s . s bsAs= Gr ." J.4s a *

=--- . . *E . -. ..s n . . A. 7.

.c . a-7... . %. s

• s..J; .4

==== p . T e .. . J o s

-=g..--

44* \.

• e. -.

O=-a....*.S.. . .t ;-.... 3 .c ... . s. e. .

..s 4

.% g.e .3 .m m .. m.

T . . .J. .i .n..e. .s. =y w--T =3p =

~ . J. .s. -s

- . . . ..s. -r  ;. . Jr r

4

, , e' e

j * - -

4 4

.',.!.3.9..*.3 3

=====w w3 J

• g.a .s. ***

.f. .n. . . a.2-s% 3. .v.

. q . 3w 4 .p **

.4 n e%m...

= 3. .p .T...g . g p

• ' #3 w w I .*. .,. = M 2 * "."*^w* -

. . 9 . o* C.

. . . .g. ..

e 4 ... ..g..=,

, . . . .s.7 .

.s =..,: ....:

- ., .. , m.n.

. -~s .v .,

. .. .:. .,...... g = : .,.. ,. .,. ,  ;

u. .. e . .

.a 3-e...,...a-- ,. .s. .c .sg.

930

- .e. . .---.

ti 2 iJW c.u. t .,. c. wa n - - - - . .n-aa -

u~

a a-i e

a 4

r SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO 4

SEFORE ME THIS 10TH DAY OF APRIL, 1980.

i NOTARY PUBLIC 4 Y

l l

L l

l-i l

\ '- -- - , _ .., ,w ,- - , -