ML20010B295

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Second Motion to Compel Further NRC Response & Production of Documents Per Porter County Chapter Intervenors' Second Request.Nrc Should Be Ordered to Provide Definitive Response.Related Correspondence
ML20010B295
Person / Time
Site: Bailly
Issue date: 08/10/1981
From: Whicher J
PORTER COUNTY CHAPTER INTERVENORS, VOLLEN, R.J. & WHICHER, J.M.
To:
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel
References
NUDOCS 8108140331
Download: ML20010B295 (2)


Text

,

4

@TED C0hnESPONDENCE UNITED' STATES ~0F AMERICA N NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 1 BEFORE Tile' ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOAR U \

!: -\

AUG 121981 > .:_5 In the Matter of ) gg ~

) Docket No. 5-367 C 4, a wa 6 NORTilERN INDIANA PUBLIC - ) (Construction $ " 'Tibch -

SERVICE COMPANY ) Permit Extension) D (Bailly Generating Station, )

Nuclear-1) ) [T PORTER COUNTY CliAPTER INTERVENORS' SECOND' s' aECWW - $

MOTION TO COMPEL FURTilER STAFF i. SUCJ 3 W Ih '

o.s. D sE &^^'*h

  • RESPONSE AND PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS -

PURSUANT TO PCCI'S SECOND REQUEST l

On May 19.-1981, Porter County Chapter Intervenors (' P

'h .

l submitted their Second Request to the NRC for Production of l

Documents. Some of the requested documents were dependent on the staff's answers to PCCI's First Set of-Interrogatories to the NRC Staff, which was also filed.on May 19, 1981. On' July 24, 1981 the staff answered PCCI's Interrogatories, and enclosed a letter from Stephen li. Lewis, Staff Counsel,,to one of the-attorneys for PCCI, apparently intended as a response to that portion of PCCI's-document request which related to the inter-rogatory answers. / Because of deficiencies irt the staff's response, PCCI file the instant motion requesting the Board to order the staff to respond in a sufficient manner to PCCI's Second Requnst.

  • / 1aragraphs 4 titrough 9 and 12 of the Second Request, 8108140331 810810 9$0)\\

I PDR ADOCK 05000367i G pg, t . ufa -

J_

i

. . , . The staff letter states: " Enclosed are documents responsiveL to Paragraphs 4, 7, 8 and 12 of your Second Request which a diligent. search of our files has. revealed" and that."[n]o documents are provided in response to paragraphs 5, 6 and 9."

The letter does not state that.all documents which the " search"-

has " revealed" have been produced, nor does it state'whether any.

are being withheld, and, if so, the basis for such withholding.

The staff should be ordered to prnvide a definitive response as to whether.it has ir.'eed produced all<the documents responsive to Paragraphs 4 through 9 and 12 of PCC1's Second Request. -

DATED: August 10, 1981 Respectfully submitted, Robert J. Vollen Jane M. Whicher by: C .- b J_

Jane M. Whicher Attorneys for Porter Coun*.y Chapter Intervenors R;bert J. Vollen .

Jane M. Whicher c/o BPI 109 North Dearborn Chicago, Illinois 60602 ,

(312) 641-5570 s

A