ML19309B886
| ML19309B886 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | FitzPatrick  |
| Issue date: | 12/31/1979 |
| From: | POWER AUTHORITY OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK (NEW YORK |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19309B880 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8004070300 | |
| Download: ML19309B886 (200) | |
Text
-. -
" O 1979 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL 4
SURVEILLANCE REPORT JANUARY 1,1979 through DECEMBER 31,1979 i
l I
k
~
i JAMES A. FITZPATRICK j
NUCLEAR POWER PLANT OPERATING LICENSE NO. DPR-59 DOCKET NO. 50- 333 Power Authority of the State of New York 8004070
t.
t i
POWER AUTHORITY OF THE STATE OF NEi YORK ANNUAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT PART B:
RADIOLOGICAL REPORT JANUARY 1, 1979--oECEMBER 31, 1979 JAMES A. FITZPATRICK NUCLEAR POWER PLANT FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE DPR--59 DOCKET NUMBER 50-333 S
t 4
..7
- ~;- -
._.~
TABLE OF CONTENTS P,agg I.
INTRODUCTION 1
A.
Introduction 2
B.
Program Objectives 3
II.
. PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION AND DESIGN 4
A.
Sample Methodology 5
B.
Analysis Performed S
C.
Changes in Program 9
- III.
SAMPLE SUMMARIES 11 IV.
ANALYTICAL RESULTS 33 V.
DATA SUMMARIES AND CONCLUSIONS 67 A.
Lake Program 68 B.
Land Program 75 C.
Conclusions 82 D.
Exceptions to the Program 83 E.
References 85 VI.
RESULTS STATISTICS'AND HISTOGRAMS-86 VII.
HISTORICAL DATA 137 VIII.
FIGURES AND MAPS 163 9
i
.e. :,
~
..?
LIST OF TABLES Page Table 1 Required Sample Collection and Analysis 33 (Lake Program)
. Table 2 Required Sample Collection and Analysis 34 (Land Program)
Table 3 Periphyton Results 33 Table 4 Bottom Sediment Results 36 Table 3 Mollusk Results 37 Table 6 Ga:mnarus Results 38 Table 7 Fish Results 39 Table SA Water Composite Results, Gross Beta 40 Table 8B Water Composite Results, H-3, Sr-89, Sr-90 41 Table 9 Water Composite Results, Gamma Isotopic 43 Table 10,11 Particulate Filter Results, Gross Beta 44 Table 12 Particulate Composite Results, Gamma Isotopic 48 Tables 13;14 Airborne.I-131 Results 30 Table 15 TLD Results 34 Table 16 Radiation Monitor Readings 33 Table 17 Milk Results, I-131 39 Table 18 Milk Results, Gamma Isotopic, St-90 60
' Table 19 Milch Animal Census Results 61
~ Table 20 Food Product Results 63 Table 21 Farm Soil'Results 65 Table 22 Fodder Crop Results 66 ii
.-+
-w....-
t-LIST OF FIGURES-P,, age f
Figure 1 Off-Site Environmental' Station and TLD Locations 16S Figure 2 Off-Site /On-Site Radiological Monitoring Stations 166 Figure 3 On-Site Environmental Station and TLD Locations 167 Figure 4 Milk, Meat, Poultry, Eggs Sample Locations 168 Figure S Milch Animal Census Locations 169 Figure 6 Regional Physiographic Map 170 Figure 7 Bottom Sediment Description 171 Figure 3 Graph - Periphyton (Ce-144) 172 Figure 9 Graph - Periphyton (Co-6C) 173 Figure 10 Graph - Periphyton (Cs-137) 174 Figure 11 Graph - Bottom Sediment (Cs-137) 17S Figure 12 Graph - Bottom Sediment (Co-60) 176 Figure 13 Graph - Mollusk (Mn-S4) 177 Figure 14-Graph - Mollusk (Sr-90) 178 Figure-IS Graph - Fish (Cs-137) 179 Figure 16.
Graph - Fish (Sr-90) 180
' Figure'17 Graph - Lake Water (gross beta) 181 Figure 18 Graph - Air Particulate (gross beta) 182 Figure 19 Graph - Milk (Cs-137) 183 Figure 20 Graph - Milk (I-131) 184 Figure.21 Graph.- Milk (Sr-90)
ISS-iii
i n
8 e
I
[
R'\\
,c"k /
k' _M>'
i iQ8,(,\\ i j
INTRODUCTION 9
s*
~
I-A INTRODUCTION The Power Authority of the State of New York (PASNY) is the owner and licensee of the James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant (JAFNPP)
. which' is locat'ed on the eastern portion of the Nine Mile Point promontory approximately one-half mile due east of the Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation
. (NMPC) Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station (NMPNPS). The NMPNPS unit #1 is-located on the most western portion of the site and is a boiling, water reactor with.a design capacity of 610 MWe..The NMPNPS has been in commercial operation since the fall of 1969. Located between the JAFNPP and NMPNPS, Nine Mile Point unit #2 is under construction..NMPNPS unit
- 2 will have generation capacity of 1100 MWe and is expected to be completed in 1984 The JAFNPP is a boiling water reactor with a power output of 820 MWe (net). Initial' fuel loading of the reactor core was completed in November of 1974.. Initial criticality was achieved in late November 1974.
The site is located on the southern shore of Lake Ontario in Oswego County, New York, approximately seven miles northeast of the city of Oswego, New York. Syracuse, New York is the largest metropolitan center in the area and is located forty miles to the south of the site. The area consists of partially wooded land and shoreline. The land adjacent
.to the site is used mainly for recreational and residential purposes.
For many miles to the west, east and south the county is characteri:ed by rolling terrain rising gently up from the lake, composed mainly of glacial deposits. Approximately 34 percent of the land area in Oswego County is devoted to farming.
The Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program for the Fit: Patrick Plant is a site program with responsibility for the program shared by the Power Authority and Niagara Mohawk. Similar Technical Soecifications for radiological monitoring of the environment allows for majority of L the sampling and' analysis to be a joint undertaking. Data generated by the program is shared by the two facilities with review and publication of the data undertaken through each organi:ation.
.This report is submitted in accordance with Section 5.6.1 of Appendix B, to DPR-59, Docket 50-333. Environmental reports of.this nature have been compiled and submitted in semi-annual and annual reports since 1974. This report contains data from samples representing the period from January 1,1979 to December 31, 1979.
m -
~
.i l-B PROGRAM OBJECTIVES The objectives of the Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program are as follows:
1.
To determine and evaluate the effects of plant operation on the environs and to verify the effectiveness of the controls on radioactive material sources.
2.
To monitor and evaluate natural radiation levels in the environs of the JAFNPP site.
3
.To meet the requirements of applicable federal regulatory guides and limits.
4.
To provide information by which the general public can evaluate the environmental aspects of nuclear power using data which is factual and unblased.
=
a e
i i
i
y g
S I
II r%y' O
[
h.
,;g
\\
/
\\
.x.7J ws
\\/
PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION AND DESIGN i
l l
4
- u.
J ll PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION AND DESIGN To achieve the objectives listed in Section I-B, sampling and analysis are performed as outlined in Tables 1 and 2 in Section IV.
~
The sample collections for the radiological program are performed by' two groups. Texas: Instruments incorporated, Ecological Services Branch (TIES) performs much of the environmental sampling. TIES is presently performing the Nine Mile Point Aquatic Ecology Study at the site which is required by Section 4.1, Appendix B of OPR-59 The staff required by TIES to perform this s-tudy is used to perform the terrestrial sampling required for the site radiological monitoring program.
In-plant and remaining terrestrial sampling is performed. jointly by the JAFNPP and NMPNPS staffs.
1.
SAMPLE COLLECTION METHODOLOGY A.
Lake Water (surface water)-
The two indicator stations are the respective inlet canals at JAFNPP and NMPNPS. These samples are composited using con-tinuously running pumps which discharge into large holding tanks.
The control station sample is collected from the city of Oswego water intake. The sample is drawn from the intake prior to treatment and is composited in a large sample bottle.
Quarterly composite samples are made up.from proportional all-quotes of monthly samples.
B.
Ai r Particulate / lodine The air particulate glass fiber filters are approximately two inches in diameter and are placed in sample holders in the intake line of a vacuum sampler. Directly down stream from the particulate filter is a 2 x 1 inch charcoal cartridge used to absorb airborne radiolodine. The samplers run continuously and the charcoal cartridges and particulate filters are changed on a weekly basis.
The particulate filters are composited on a monthly basis by location (off-site, on-site) af ter being counted for gross beta activi ty.
The air sampling stations are located in two rings surrounding the site. The on-site locations ring the terrestrial area around the plants inside the site boundary.
I l
-5.
B.
Air Particulate / lodine (Continued)
~
The on-site sampling network is composed of 9 stations. The off-site air monitoring locations range 6 to_17 miles from the site and is composed of 6 stations. Air monitoring locations are shown on Figures Vlli-1, Vill-lA and Vill-2.
C.
Milk Milk samples are collected in polyethylene bottles from the bulk storage tank at each sampled farm. Before the sample is drawn the tank contents are agitated from 3 to 5 minutes to assure a homogenous mixture of~ milk and butterfat. Two gal-lons are collected during the first week of each month from each of the five farms. An additional one gallon is collected f rom each farm at mid-month to make up the second half of the monthly composite. The complete composite is made up from one gallon collected during the first week of the month and one gallon from the mid-month collection. The samples are frozen and shipped to the analytical contractor within 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> of collection in insulated shipping containers. The milk sampling locations are found on Figure Vill-4.
d.
Heat, Poul try and Eggs Semi-annually one kilogram of meat is collected from locations within a 10 mile radius of the site. Weekly phone calls are made to the local slaughter houses to determine availability of slaughtered live stock from within the sampling area.
Whenever possible meat samples are collected from locations previously used.
' Semi-annually cne kilogram of poultry and one kilogram of eggs are collected from each of three locations within a 10 mile radius of the site. Attempts are made to collect poultry and eggs at the same time as the meat samples. The poultry and eggs are frozen and shipped in insulated containers. Whenever possible samples are obtained from previously sampled farms (see Figure Vill-3).
F.
Human Food Croos Human food crops are collected during the late summer harvest season _at locations previously sampled, if available. One kilogram each, of the cao types of fruits and/or vegetables
.from each of the three locations within a ten mile radius of the site are collected. The-types of fruits and vegetables sampled depends on what is locally available at the time of collection. Attemots are made to collect at least one broad-leaf type vegetable from each location. The fruits and vege-tables are chilled' prior to shipping and shipped fresh in insulated ' containers (see Figure Vill-3).
t
-6
G.
Soll Samoles Soll samples are required once every three years. No samples were collected during 1978. SoII samples-will be collected again during the 1980 sample season.
H.'
Fish Samoles Available fish species are removed from the Nine Mile Point Aquatic Ecology Study monitoring collections during the spring and fall collection periods. Samples are collected from a
. combination of-the four on-site sample transects and one off-site sample transact -(see Figure Vill-1). Available species are selected under the following guidelines:
1.
0.5 to 1 kilogram of edible portion only of a maximum of 5 species per location.
2.
Samples compos?d of more than one kilogram of single species from the same location are divided into samples of 1 kilogram each prior to shipping. A maximum of three samples per ' species per location are used. Weight of samples are the edible portions only.
Selected fish samples are frozen immediately after collection and segregated by species and location. Samples are shipped f rozen within two weeks in insulated containers.
I.
Gammarus Ganmarus (f resh water shrimp) samples are collected by TIES perscnnel during the spring and fall season f rom two on-site locations and from one off-site location. A 0.5 m Tucker Trawl (333 u) 1.0 m Hensen Net (571 u), boxtraps and arti-ficial substrates are used to collect samples. The Gammarus samples are removed from the sampling gear, frozen and shipped to the analytical contractor in Insulated shipping containers.
J.
Mollusks During the spring and fall seasons at two on-site and one off-site location benthic samples are collected. The mollusks are collected by divers and sorted. The tissue is removed from the shell, frozen and shipped for analysis in insulated con-tainers.
K.
Bottom Sediments One kilogram of bottom sediment sample is collected at two on-site locations and one off-site location. Samples are collected at the same time and location as the mollusk samples, where possible, by a diver. The samples are placed in plastic bags, sealed and shipped for analysis in insulated' containers.
i.
[
i '
L.
Periphyton Periphyton samples are collected in the spring and fall season from two on-site locations and one off-site location. Periphyton is collected from natural and/or artificial substrates (plexiglass slides). The periphyton is' scraped from the substrates into vials, labeled, fro:en and shipped in insulated containers for off-site analysis.
M.
TLD (direct radiation)
Thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLD's) are used to measure direct radiation in the JAF/NMP-1 environment. The TLD stations are placed around the site using a three :one division. The first group of TLD's are located within the site boundary and are called "on-site" TLD's.
The second set of TLD's are called " site boundary" stations and are located at approximately the site perimeter. The third divlsion of TLD stations are the "off-site" stations, located at the off-site air monitoring stations.
Each TLD set is made up of 2 CaSO dosimeters (2 chips per dosimeter), sealed in a polyethyl,ene package to insure dosimeter integrity. The TLD packages are further protected by placement in plexiglass " birdhouses", or by tape sealing to supporting surfaces. The dosimeters are collected, replaced and evaluated on a quarterly basis.
2.
ANALYSIS PERFORFED The environmental radiological surveillance sample analysis is performed by Radiation Management Corporation (RMC) except for the particulate samples and iodine cartridges which are counted on site. These two sample media are counted on site to facilitate the compositing of the air particulate filters after. gross beta analysis and the timely analysis of charcoal cartridge for Iodine-131.
Other environmental radiological analyses are also performed by RMC. Tables 1 and 2 in section III list the media and the associated
- analyses, o
-e.
3.
CHANGES IN THE 1979 SAMPLE PROGRAM A.
An additional milk sample location was added to the 1979 sampling program.- This farm was previously sampled during the 1977 program, but chose not to participate in the 1978 sampling program. This additional sample station is designated as location number 8 (see Figure VIII-4) and is located approximately 2.75 miles southeast of the plant. This same sample station was designated as station number 4 in the 1977 Environmental.
Report. With the addition of this new milk sample location the number of dairy farms sampled increased to six which excee'ds the' required number of sample locations by two for the 1979 sample program.
B.
1979 sample results' reported as "less than" (<) represent the lower limits of detection (LLD). LLD is defined by the "USNRC Branch Technical Position (revision 1, November 1979)" as "the smallest concentration of radioactive material in the sample that will yield a net count (above system background) that will be detected with 95's probability with only 5?4 probability of falsely concluding that a blank observation represents a "real signal". Sample data reported in the 1979 report as "less than" results were calculated using 4.66 times the standard deviation of the background count rate or of the counting rate of a blank sample were appropriate. -Sample data reported as "less than" results prior to the 1979 sample program were calculated based on 3.0 times the standard deviation-of the background count rate.
3-C.
Lower Limits of Detections for airborne radioiodine (I-131) analysis reported for 1979 are decay corrected to end of sample period. Previous airborne I-131 analysis result was decay corrected to the mid-point of sample collection.
D.
An additional mollusk collection was made during the 1979 sample program. The additional collection was made in August 1979. This collection was made to strengthen the data base as mollusk sampling success is routinely limited due to the unavailability of sufficient -sample from the local populations.
4
_v r._-
O
-'M 4 &
4r%s w w
-9m-@*uw y..gm 1II h
/
\\
e- %
\\
-'>WD
/
x/N j
SAMPLE SUMMARIES
)
I 4
~~
Y III.
SAMPLE SU14% RIES Environmental sample. data is sumarized by the following methods:
1.
All sample data is summarized in table form. The tables are titled " Environmental Sample Statistical Analysis" and use the following format:
1.
Sample medium 2.
Type of analysis performed 3.
Number of analyses performed 4.
Range 'of detectable levels. The data column is labeled " lower limits of detection". This wording is not intencrd to indicate that inclusive data is based on 4.66 sigma of background.
5.
Mean value of the data, based on positive measured values.
(1) 6.
Standard Deviation, based on positive measured values.
(The standard deviations represent the variability of measured results for different samples rather than single sample uncertainty).
(1) 7.
Maximum and Minimum values 8.
Range of the data, calculated by subtracting the minimum value from the maximum value.
2.
Tables are provided for selected sample media and contain data summaries based on quarterly mean values. These tables are titled " Environmental Sample Summary."
(1)
Only positive measured values are used in statistical calculations. The use of MDLs in these calculations ~
would result in the means being biased high and the i
standard deviations being biased ' low.
l l i
t i
fHVIR0t#1fHIAI SAHl'I E SIAILSIICAI ANAI_YSIS l'Alil LAY 01 l 1111 lYl'E 0F ANAL.YSIS HtflBER OF L0liR LIMIIS STANDARD MAXIMlH MINIMirl san 'l t0 PLP.10lR D AND ANALYSIS OF MEAN DEVIAll0N VALUE VALUE RANGE:
DgRANGF)lEEll0N (llul:S)
IS0f0PE PERf0f0ED 8ul i;um Isoioric l's altilVUri OlNIkul.
ICs/g Imst) 7 Be-7 2
Haw;3.
n.#4 p.50 1.0 0.3 0.7 E-lo 2
preli
.1.55 1.34 4.5
' 2.6
- 1. 9 '
the-51 2
0.84831 - U. thel 9
<l.I D
- f..s.u 2
0.011 - n.pl4
< l.l u Zr-95 2
0.Hi? - 4.n28
< l lis til 95 -
2 0.00( 2 - p.tul91
<l t h 1:ss. lik.
2 0.082
- 0.092
- llp Es-117 2
tura p.u7 0.08 0.8%
0.02 p.li I-s'c-834 2
p. tu.4.
0.80 -
A p.in
- d. lu -
0.00 C
lt.s-21s.
2 Mwai 0.03 7.07 0.01 0.d 5 0.10 8
'l1-212 2
0.011 0.12 A
p.82 0.82 fl. 4ND 4:n-I l l 2
0.4pr.H. - 0.HiMH.
<IID Ag-liek 2
p.017 - 0.014
< l.i.D IIHa t rA t t*
1C)
Be-7 4
M til:
- 0. 55 0.21 0.70 0.13 0.5
'h) l'-10 4
MINE 4.15 1.48 so.10 3.20 2.90 I
- itsi-5 8 4
0.012 - 0.015 0.04 0.02 0.05 0.02 0.03 (C,')
d'u-44 4
0.fN 1 fl.ph 0.04 H.I1 0.04 0.07
~
Zr-95 4
0.015 - 0.021 allu fil. 95 4
H.dH41 - 0.014
<llin ptu-lp6 4
0.0bd.
- p.8%
< l.l h j.
2EME9 J.
a
'bdII J
A - Olity olie. eoSilivE VALUE,'140 STATISilCS POS$1DLE N
j W
e i
. e.
- e e
F '
g N **
e e. t e en M
e. C. C. g e 5. e C.
e e e
e e e o e 1
e s e e e
e e
e e e-e N
== eCCOC
-e e 's eC e e e e eCC e
- g
~n e-e C.
e_.
. O. o.
e e E
O.
e e e s o. e e e e
e i e e o
e e e e
e e o "E >
0 eOOOO e e o eC e e e e eCC e a e
a C
m-WN h
-C
. e.. C..
e en. ~. e e a eOOOO.
e e e e. e e e e
a e
e e e e e e e a e e e yq e e e eC e e e e eOG e e y
tA m-(A
>a e
QE es MC
- IC =
c >=
e
-- N ee e e e eC e.=. C. e e
a auC W e C e<CO<
a e a eCe e e e e
C. C.
e a e e e a e t e e e g
.e e e e e eCoe e g
rsn
~
=
.M
->=
w elC M
LeJ e
W 4C=cem gi44m444 CC 44-44 mammCC
=-m-Hm-dYdddd Yd Y YYdd v
I
- EC e-(n E
m ee h C.
en h E k g
m MM en ec c=w D
. E.
C, N, e, C, C,
- C, w 5, N,=,=,
J a'= W M.-
WC C C O M. O CCCC CCN CC=COC UE." e m
en W
g y<
e eoe.
e e e o e eo e eoe e e a
e aa d h.
>=fm@d dhem E
Cd
=O.
a=. m. C. C.
N. w.
. Q.
m MJ "M"
m ee.= = m oN 6
C. Q. O.
.Q.
CC CCC o
J CCC e
CCCC CC C.
4 m
Q fM C
.U
==
N M >=
m
.J wwwwww m m m m en m e og 44eeed
==
b-
>=
M
- C
- IC I.aJ
>=
2 c.
m o
Cn=g
=
W
>= *IC
- D U
J A
"r aC S
C N
W CM M
- 5
- e g-
., w. ~ e.2.
.~~
., ~
n oen 3 ~.m.,.,.,
a w e e e e M
w-v
~m w~mm s
e e e e e e ew e e e e e e sCm nn
- - ee n - -
- e. - -
==geau oe seneae I oe sose C
vvmev<
C mu-varvu mu-var 6
w I
IO p.
E
.yn nn bel
- '! o
>.c a
<Cw a
= = a-wa c3 e
%m c i
fE :E 5
$5 em:
$ 2..w c.
s Y. o 5
4 9
y
,_mm_
+
t 3
ffNIR0r#1 ENTAL. SAlil'l f STAllSTlfAl ANALYSIS Uj y IYl'E OF NIALYSIS NilMI'ER OF 10llER LIMITS STANDARD MXIHlft HilllHitt
'l D PEl10llEID AllD ANALYSIS OF KNI DEV All0N VALUE VALUE RN16E.
(iiili is)
IS0l0PE PERF0lNED DEIECIlQN (l{ AfME s IAn spin tirsE Iw elt isolot'ic 14'4 /g lev e l 1 *lCA lt et (cont.)
fs-137 6
0.016 - 0.047-allp 1:s-838 6
0.4112 - 0.048 a l.i p B All. nillis%E Sr.59. Sr 90 gd:g/g (ma 8 )
f4 Pf! sta si, e-*
St-M9 3
0.011 - 0.074 119 Y
Se 90 3
la ngui H.07 0.05 1.00 0.02 0.sNB I All' skilletSK it:6/g 16ct)
IlJitt:AIO64 Sr-39 6
0.015 p.4H 0.01 0.07 0.01 0 im St-90 6'
laws!
u 10 0.04 0.17 0.05 0.12 8L3 2P9) e -)
- ys4ED ko e) 4
- Onu ollE Postrive y^t"E, tro sTArtsTics Posserite g
'b-l.
1 i
i f
0 fl 0
1 0
07324 Al 0
1 90n 030
- 5. 8. - -
- - 091 70 ll 0 - - 003 10 4
R 0 - - -
0000 H E WU 0
l L 0
n002 00 13781 13110 870 51 - -
l A l
I.
8 - - - -
t l V i
4 - - - -
f 000 40 - - 40000 t
~
H l
E 0
0 MU 0
l 0005 t
- 0. 9 L
0 498 2 J
l.0690
- - - - 5800 IXA 1 - - - -
6 1 - - -
001 0 1 0 - - 0l15 0 MV S
S Y
lAN DN A
R0 Al l
0 061 25 i l 5720 4682 HA I
AI 0
1 02 74 -
A
- - - - 8 00A 40 - - Ap000 V.
0 - - - -
C IS T 8
l i
I S
l l
A T
S E
NA 0
0 7 552 34 14282 I
.K
- 0. 0 lll 1 f'lA l 1 I i 1 0000
- 13. l0.01 4660 t o 0 4.M 8 0 0
5 S
l 0l l 00300 ll lA I
S H
1
[
1 1459 256 M
H 1
5 1
1 l
0 t
lg M
f l.
f.580 0
11 E
I R
F IC 0000 00I I
OCN i
l El3
! 8 - - - :I l Ei E
i i
N W
R EA i - - - - INeW 0 e
N
! i n
Ni4 L
l l
I 0
?
I 0.4 9 3 I W W ):
l E
l g
M4 4f 4 RMMM0 M04 74MfEMM l
E l
0 D
001 0 000 S
L 0l 00 000 S
f O
P F
S OSD C
I E I
SH T
RYl S
EL0 I
222222222 444444444 BAF T
Htl R A
t AE T
N P
S 0
11 S
I
)l Si E
l YA U
L E
C c
L lA1 l'
I i
V 1
A l
f 0 P
P O
0 Al 1 l
pd V
if 0 l
l t E
F0S S
il I
i sl Of I
t 002t121 0 nCl 06I 8ll R
I l
35i7 f 2 A
35i762 T
i 0D2l 1.2 3 0 I
l DH
\\
p EE 1229 2 29 S
0611l.
PP tl i 4 - - -
ri N
8
- ouhs%
- e. ht
- u. iN
- 0ut s s
- e. 1 r O
Y urO f SC ECRSC0R1S CI 1 0RSCCR1S P
1 l
E l
Ol l
)
l y
e a
t y
r n
b) i TJ rT O
t r
t aE S tt R i
l
,@1 n l NI g N i
oN l
l
. l/
i l A
i l
'u )
g l
yf 3A U l i 6 t o pS (
l t
iC A. S IS I f
hy N
i 3
t 1
f s
EfWIR0f81ENIAL SAlflE STAflSIICAL ANALYSIS ITDgtlit l'AlfRlhY lYPE OF AllALYSIS HlMBER OF L0llER LIMITS STAtIDARD IMX1HlM '
HilllHUM SAfilt 0 PERf 0Rfl0 Afl0 AtlALYSIS OF MEAN DEVIATION VALUE
~VALUE RAllGE-(usi is) lSol0PE PERFORf1ED DElEEI10H UAl10.E )
l.Mi~awenRus GAern ISnitWIC ICl/g (wct)
Sr-M9. Sr-9n owlsuit.
Sc-7 2
0.077 - 0.24 al l.D K-40 2
lasteli p.a,5 0.21 0.Jin 0.50 0.30 the-54 2
0.018 - n.017
< l.1.11 s:s-817 2
44)Nii H.05 0.04 0.03 0.02 el.ps.
re-un 2
p.n2 p.n5 A
0.u5 0.05 0.0n Ra-22(i 2'
O..sil - 0.0 8 7
< l.I D Sr-n l 2
p.UN2 - 0.1A
<l l te Sr-90 2
IWNE H.40 0.02 0.l1 0.08
, 0.tli i
[
If;IeH2 H 44 I
po-7 4
0.22 - 1.80
.Ilp K 40 4
P.' N N:
2.74
- 1. Mit
- 8. A86 U.?H 1.3" flen-L l 4
0.Ol(s - H.l?
<llas On-li?
.4 U.18
- 48. l(=
fl. 86 0.02 n.H7 0.04 p.H1 fas. t.4 4
0.nl - 0.02 p 01 A
0.03 0.03 0.00, it;i-228.
4 0.047 - 0 l(>
.llD S g. ai9 4
0.0 to - 0.922 4.Ih5 A
0.Ii 0.Il 0.Op i
Sr-98 4-fa tial'.
H.19 0.08 p.20 0.17 0.01 5@
u I
gg z
c==
b=
~
A - OliLY OllE l'USITIVE VALUE,140 STATISIICs POS$iDt.E 2:so
&===
- a o
a W
en
- C C
C C-'
s e m
. m es C.
C. C.
o en. C. e C.
m.
e e.
4 e e e e e oC s CC e eCC e C N
'T YmrED
-C. f.
e C.
C. C. i c.
. 8 e, e -
C e
e e e
E *EC e
e e e e
e e e C e CC e oCC eC N
N e-
$w EC M
en e
=e C
C
,- a 4
em
. e en Ca eC*
E*
M*
f1 e e G. e C C.
e e e
- e
+
eC T
4 g gg
- j O e e
e eye 3C e eOC GEs$
e 2l" CZ C
%C C=
n-s e e.*
- C*
e*
C*
C*
O eA Ob=
ap S
2 acO e
eC* eCC**
'e C a e C
'e C C
's C at eC*'
eCC===
8 y
-y Mi; C
m u
F 0
a I:
f -]
_ii w
=
Q!
C 4 0. 4 C. :.
.C. C Z..C. C C.
C.
M.
a a
Z
===CaC M
M daCaCC w
w w w w
4
- EC-M
=
C*'
=
h e. P s.e m e e
=
-g Cgg
@ ag.- -
u - * *
- g h.*
C. C. 5. C E. -
==
-C C.CC5 M
J
_ WI CCC C
OA 6*C CCC CCCQC C 63 2 e e a e
ce W
W
==
gi g
wJ =c e e e e e e a e e g w-
.m. e A d
.a es en c I, E'
$ E
-E M
N w
.. - en to O
E CCC666 CCCCC=
b$
bb$Yb C
C 6
to sJ C.M C
=>
e y
M **
M >= E M
6 9 <J c -
e4ee44 ee g_g wh>Nm>
N k<
C, -
- =
- eC y to i
1 2
i O
=
M.- C s
.M C:
W
>= *EC 3
LJ b
.J il= C
- C 5.s "C.
-%I i
~ L l
C *l a.t W
i dC A h a
p E
W C.s.n 7 r, a c.
sa 6=
.4 p
Q L,,,.
e-h a*
.g
- e..P et g
g
=F ". fr.
C * " '* A g U
- ""n.M M S g gg 0
TA M 4
2,P
.Jw CC
- - =..
e
-_. ha,
- e. er
. e 4
v:.. -
h *,
O e-4.
=
s.
C e
e o e e C
b j um e hWWMM
'.9 '.
=
Q.
4
.$ J e.
P h h C
- M CI
- W IJ in in
==
p.=
)
=C 3-
.J g
>C-
=
i
-a :.,- o 7,
-m C
i
<.a as e. *=.
g
""S sa "m. EC%..
s
= * *
.=.
"*3 1.
.5-
8EE 4
=
.eC. 2 'Q 1
C 4.0 w
.T.",
at._
.+w.+y m_s
d 7-fMViltofflEtlIAL SNielE STATISilfAl AflAl YS[S pagf IYl'E OF NIALYSIS NIEBER OF L0lfER LIMITS STAllDARD MAXIMIM filillMlH oat 1Plb PERI'0lW D AtlD ANALYSIS OF MEAN DEVIATION VALUE VALUE RAll6E (UNiis)
IS010PE PERf0RMED D{lECTION ANGE)
(
l'8 11 4
273.0 258.7 73.7 305.0 174.0
,111.0 y
,g., f g INDICAIOlt 8
NONE 234.0 40.7 286.0 176.0 110.0 Sr.89 roris kol.
4 0.8 - I.2 0.7 0.14 0.8 0.6
- 0. 2 -
paiiC_Ayg 8
a.7 - i.6
< l l.n s r..o -
ovalwg 4
n.s 0.80 0.26 1.1 '
O.6 o.s yay,CAyg 8
Hufni D.Al 0.34 1.3 0.4 p.9 7
B All ICAll H t VSTA ISulOrlC vlAlysis t ura pol.
l4 i/l co-a.o 12 8.s. - 4.A allo Ic.59 12 3.9 - 7.9
<llD the 54 12 1.3 - 3.4 allu rie-53 12 1.7 - 3.7
-I l li i
til.-tes 12 1.2 - 1.6 Ilp i
i Cs-I U I2
- 1. f - 3.1 2.5 A
2.5 2.5 n.no Cs-134 12 l.3 - 1.9
<llb h
h 4:r-51 12 19 - 4t8
<l l it Cc-l i t 12 2.1 - 9.0
< l.lh U.a l.a - 1l0 12 6.8 81
< l.Ib F-D A - Oltl.Y ONE POSlilVE VALUE,140 STATISTICS POSSillLE Sc F
~
b i
.-m m
.. + - -- -
" 1 l
l 0
!. e e X C
e o a e e e o e e
~
e.
M e e e e e e e e s e a e eO e *.*
- C C
]
w=;
M y
C E3
=.O. O.
O e C.
e e e o e e e e-
_y e e e e e
e e e e
_= *EC e e e e e4 e o e e
- O O
=>
E 1
4 5
y-e.e
..f w 3
O e=
e C. e e o e e e e e e see e o e O.
ee.
e e e xq e e e e e
e e e e C.
M t,h D
.-eC 2
C1 E 4
=C p.
- E:'
e a e e e e e e e G
O C "-
e e e e e o e e e l
- r est e e e o e et * * *
- C*
C*
- IC -
G;
>= >
M 1
M w
acl~
e.-
M W
g e
e E
'Y-4434434:44 C*
C
... ~.. ~. ~. ~. -. -
C w-4 v - v w w w w w w w v
g J
e.c:- M
=
2:
E 2
2*5 ca
- p. c. e. O. <.
e.s* c.
- a
-w K
W >= C 4 O ee Q 4.2 2:
- w. em w.e se e. er. - 4 m:
a' W
==g G:
GJ *C j h mJ g
a
... e e e e e e e g g m
G.
-w
.. se.
- m.. e. a. a.
e.
~
Q Q
M J
se se.
- 4 N si M
=
C
~
A W
M C.M C
.u g
t.n i-gpg
-wwwww--ww N
nonnnnnnnn g
a g g ssa est 6
>=
'g E
aC W
z M
C T.
-e C.
M_
3W
>= *EC J
ta d
<=c p.
E y e._.
c J
- EC W
ag
- 3.o M y
w y
O
- w..
E-av s.2 f _
e
~ i
- m. El
- C
- C W
v gewne-.-w a -e u
e
,,e
.e.e e
-e-=
1
.F u i
- 3. u E u* u* u u asm v
-E gI E A
Q W
00. C ^
e e e 4:'
b G M -
W 2O 3
-e J
E M^
et 5
2
- EC.e.J M. -
w
- a C-Cll%.,,.g e.
- e.d=
g l.t4 th
&=M
.C ll
(
3r Vi g
h 8"
_- =.
t
.%.k. b.
ag $ (
ECC C
r -
.%. R *g
<829
.s dt:
e-
.. ~..
9 s
-8
. e-a e - o s ee e e. 8. E.c. c Se e. 8. 2. e o
e~
e e e
,.e
==
e e e e e. e e
e a e
e e
e.
.C e e 'a,e e== a e *e C
- e o C e C-e o e-e M C F.C t:
e 4
4
.g*
- m
.W
'.s M.
e e. e. C.e8e =
y on e e e e e e. e e en. w.
. o e C eC. e e eM-e e
e e e e
e o e e.
e e e e e s a e e g
C e e e o eC e eM m
e e eC e e== C -C C
- '* y an-5mW e 3. e e,, 8. e o m.. O...
a e e e.e e
e e..
e e -
s ~.
-a
, e o e e o We
.C= e e C eC e e e-.
e e
e e e e
- ec ag, e e e e e a en C CC C e e e e eN e m.
==
M M>=
l C2 2
c;:l: A 4
4
.S pe C
=
m 4
d 5 >=
4 e a. e e n. e e ce.
~ eIC C e e e e eC. e e a en. e o
es e
e e e o e,
e e a e e e a
e e e e o e e e
e
.C > e e C-e4 e e eC e e
- a. ( 2 4 dC e
==
.=
C 4:
> = >
M a
.Me
=
M L
e e
m c
w e
N
.8e e
m 4
m h===
W C C $ 3 C C *e. 4 O ar== 4 4 4 en 4 - 4 3 $ 4 4 O es a.;m==
- s
=e'
- . *= = = = = * = = = = * * *
- r*
C t e== = =.=====M-*4=
C = C.=.== n C e a M C EC C*
.ai.
y
-.w w
w w av v v
v v v v v 4
v w w 4*C M
- E
-=
x-e ce C.
- e..=. v 4. a. e. 4 5 5. e. e.
- e. =r.
w e
W 2
- 4. es. e. es on. 4. c. e. a. N.
g ee C
== m C - C - C 3== M Pe
= h C.=CCNCCC3-
Cm
==== m mg G
a e e e e e e o e e e e e e e o e e e e e e e e e e e g
Q e v =.
=
u m
w4 3
== @
g
.,a W
C *C
=1 M
CCCCCCCCeCC.
ee. C.
m.ee.n...ee.m.5 5.e.e E <.
M E
a
~
- m. e. a. m. ee. m. e. a. n.
MM CCCCCCCCC=O. C.=
M w
==
C www C
L M
C M.O u.
-w M~
s.=
gym e.=s es es M Pe *e es e.s. ee.m.e N ed es et es N e.s me ee N es N ed e.e Pe esee. M g
g ac" e-E <z e.c.
c
-E en C=
M
'- C"2 M =
ya
>* *EC C
J W
< c= c o
- P
- -wo 5.==
Q uoM CL M.J
- cc:
= = -
yy
- e. *
..* O -
- e..* *-
"e aC g-gG-I C.;. o w e. m e * *. w w.. e. =.C.=
C.: c - m m e m. e - -
e.~C o
u m
..n. en. v. z. a...
..n. on. m. o. e..-e...
e.. -
>=
e,**
e e
. e.
P s
wee h ae&= =
m
@ u.
- . h u.0 3 0 4 h 2
- h vus: : -
u.s..j :,. a.: n u u u u u ma. m e
u a esu a u u u a a m uJ OC
.J g"
>=C3 e."=
f C
<w M
o
. "5E&
k - *G.- -
- -" ;:-=2 O EC O.$?n =~
i ~ 5 E. :
.*y=
n Qm..
/.
..i.
-. );..
in FINIR0l#1til Al SAll'l f STAllSilf.Al AllALYSIS IElijHil p3 1YPE OF ANALYSIS NtMBER OF LOWER LlHilS STANDARD MAXIHIM filNilRlH SAli
~
PERf0Rl[D AllD ANALYSIS OF IEAN DEVIAll0N VALUE VALUE ~
, RAtlGE
~ (thil IS) -
IS0IOPE PERFOINED D{TECTION RAf4GE )
AIRlulR*:1. 10lillZ IW il\\ ANA1.YSIS ANAL.YSIS It49 t NI:- 8 3) 3
[Cl/m 0011 Rt11.
306 0.01 - 0.210
<1lp I?:lllCAIOR 465 0.00S - 0.043
< l.l p LNY1Rf ME NTAL 10lAl. f10SF 1,
133 kg Asig;jrs g*g it epian gg.a go anm/ tit r.
DIT, Si1 E i
first thsarter 7
- 10. 2(.
0.79 11.74 9.18
- 2. t.0 SeconJ thearter 7
9.90 2.50 14.64 8. 7(.
5.18 1hird (hearter 6
11.16 I.74 17.40 '
12.71 4.66 Fmerth Snarter (7
14.11 1.51 16.33 12.51 3.52
,51_1E BOIINii4RY First Ibiaster 5
9.R1 (1.98 11.00 8.37 2.11 9.02 3.62 18.41 7.67 3.74 Setend f) arter 5
ili b rJ (hs.o r t er 5
8 4. f.-1 8.83 17.75
- 13. 2(.
4.4p Imart h Qe.irter 5
3.1.95 y 2.78 18.28 -
18.54 6.74 A - OilLY OflE POSITIVE VALUE, No STATISTICS l'OSSIBLE 1
44
1 l
i l
i l
k=J es.
,v,s 9,3 en me I in em
. ~ - -
=5
. =. 5. =. =. =. 5. =. 5 e e e e e e e e e e e e O
CC333233C e e e e e e
.r.
led W
p.
en ma 3
e, e sn en re e.n en ee e a e 6 e e M
-"E<.
C.
C. 2 3. O. 2. C. C. 3 3 e o e e e a O
=ccCCCCC3 e e e o e e g.
E,.
,f,, 6 e
meeds N
y ee en es no en w - m ee x4 O.
. O. O. C. C. C. C. c. o.
e e e e e e e a s e e e g 'D-o cooocooco e e e e e e t.n e
v
<- c:t -
.,n. m e..3,m c;; C-
.sa. e,. :. s
.e ew.
-5
=. =. 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
=m e e e e e a e e e e e e E<
o CecccCCCc e e e e e e
_cw mu e
C
--Mi M<
w
'/2 L
=
Cl es en,.3 2..* ** es C a,
.e c e e e
.a. ae es k
M COCO
= COO 432223
$dddddddd CUC2I2 e
e w e C
Z
=
.3*,
2 ee se 4 r* q -
M P* C **
ce
.w ee. ce. ce. ce. ce. ce.
-t 6 'b")
M C
C2OOSC O
w M
W<
EWWWWWWWy e e e e s e g
a W.
W e
E 2 k 3. m E E e. 2 ggp,ggg
,g G.
E tittttitt as es e s
- 4..n e.n. e. w. s.
=
6 C
a n.
J g
CCCCCC g
C W
m CMC y
- "" ;=d m
w
= >- E yc ce
.e a.s..e en.e c.e.
.m.
es r<6 E <= =
w
.2 m
O W
.==:=-
M=
w
>= <
=
2 O
N
=
a
<%2 :s C
.h w
5
%CD C
y
=4.
".=..
w.a O
C '.
==
.i W
g
.rTg
.e E
- Pe e Q
>=
). Ca a
O. O.
9 V. *,J
.= & "..J 46. 43 E." *'I.5 Q
.a.t g.
ee 89.* en.1 e/o g
-O
'e in 3
- T i c
"M t
>=
,4 E 'Wl2 2 2. 3 o 2 Q.
8""*
,..,*1
- ?*
4 W
O$-A C
t./.l
- .)
J-E K..=V.
,k 1
m S.
t_ai n
5
.=%
- ,, g.
q
=
.c -
=u,u g
g
=
a a. 3 s a e l*<
Q c..,.3 gg
--. g q
w
.a. -
- A* =.;
a-
.*, 9 C i **== 1 D * *I.
~T
~
- i g
bb uh.,
w 2
w a
s r =.n.=. =.
- o..,
- s. m..
- 8...
=~
. S. ;
z.
,-,,4 e.
e s
~
7.
6 4
A
=
YM BE=5 255..22
- o..
- 8. e.
- 8...
83
.=: <
w N a. m - c e,
e,e c en oe. n na en p.
g-
==
g g
o w
-ED
- m. s. q E. n. cc c. =
es.
- e. e.
owwmme g4.
5.
- 8. e.
88 J
X ag m
gm g,C h
en e.
a as se D._
aC O
E< - k.g.
..a a =>.* m -
e en at e.
4e
== C== N =.n.
~..er.
C==,'
- e. e.
~
ee 4O e et, N. N J
- EC eC
=
n m
=e e- >
M N
es L.a
='
MLI p-G
.f.h.-
9.=<
e.=
M 6J g
b-
,d e 4. a.i., a.
e=.=.
- a.,.
in - e q
- e=
d **
CE no., e.
N.
in h e.
.Y g
M M
P= m.
e.e, c.e s
a.
N m
so
- C p-M
=.
g M
C^
=
C J
-w g
6 h-e N
e=*
W C 4.,J Z g
gM
.E i
.E M.
m" 4*
==
2 u*
N. m
- E s o.
a.
m~
- t e t t sn -
t E
E t<
e a
u E
4
-m 5
1 o
=
L i
L4.
M Q C.f3. C
.U a-CC >
.M.
.a e P.m>Whn ee ee as e as e aC' L D'=
EC '
z cr.
4 e=
E M
o
-c
=
M=
W
><w D
a a
aC C C tJ y
aC l
gwc e
D-E h
u o =S
.=
W e
CL 0 B
.v g I,,
~
~
g,g
=
e P.
1 h
h em
>=
y
. -Nmede e - -le -
m le - el e glc -
e-m m
e e
m e
g g 5. -
g g!R R.ik.T. uE jlT E jjia sl.i a se -
3 e
.3 L 'd a'
=*
g a i d.j =i e
C-i n
.. u u
u
-m-2.
w
~
O ga e
=
=
.J
=Mm M
M alg.ng W Q
--z;Es -
s CO-=
3 4.c
=.
41 -
ad N ad E.
=w
=v
e
L.J 9_
m.
- s. e. '
9_ m e s. 9. e.,e s ee. e e e.
e e e e e
e 2S e CS e eO eO e e e e c4
$e e
E W ee e
m-
=e E
=,,,l3 O. v.
C. M.
.e e. O.
e C. -
2 e
e o e e e
.J
.. e e e
e g4 en e-O e to ee.. e e gm m
i.
5 La es EC c.
c.
- e e
e es e e e e e C.
==
J O. m.
O. O.
- e. M. Q.
e e
e e a e e e
xq eNO e eO
.ea e e o e C ese -
g O_
y p.
.o
.M V>=
C DE 4.
C4 C e
4e ce in
.= e*
M e e e e e e
. =>
gg
- m. ce.
- o. e.
- e. e. C.
e.
e e e
e a e e
~.< g es e ee eCO a e aC eC e e e e
,gv ->
fe
- Mw M
M g
,g L.4 6
e m
m e*,
ed -
m Ae se
=
a P4 C 4 C.
.a f.= = 2 4 S M. C. 2 acf P e..
e s. h.
M C
=a - e
- e. e 4
m g
M w w w w w
w w m.
m d
eC:
M
-=
.e e m ee e
et m 4
=
E T
- g. - g.
w Ce C.
- 3. C.
.=
O.
C. C. C. C.
g 3
,a
. m m
CCCC C
CCCC g
g we f
W M O.bJ 2 u.:
e'-
~*g o s.* ee g3 e e e e e
a e a e J
J<
- .; e 2
W W
Jm ges a
8 fh.h.5mIE Ef8.f g"
E
2$
b B
o m
a d didd 4 didd o
~
r,.
W U
Q M C3 W3 M >=
MdC de@@de em me
- e. n e. m. m.m.
G <E M u-4 e-
_ < ta W
2 G
O2 US-
-=
kJ ME D
S "El". L.J
,=
J u
u J
aC = c,.
=
g b
T W *C h.
k b
3A T Z
3 7.
W
-C 3
g 7.g 2*
U
'g.C.M d {e, m.
4le - g.
- e. e - e -
g-
~
e
.c c.
- e.,e e
e,. a.. m. m N
- =
m
- b MCr9 ( ".
yy
- ,. c., - ee
.=,
g,
.. I e
$lE N d
.e
..y e
e e 3. m a e e e og e jA eM
, a i.s..$ e g 3U
. a 6.
.w r.,
aav m.
- .4 r,
aw vva e
uJ=Q
!J w
.e
=
a
>.c -
n
=
c C
f-
<a m
5&
L MOa >
- 4. =
=.9J e
3 g
a-~~._. = = -
d Z
i!N -_""s 4 er
.a 4
as
. et
=
S ' *w an 4
.s %
N
- .~, '
e
- v_
i9 D M D C#
ia D g.
g J\\\\.d u o
W
-g
.c
.. u C-
.C
=
... 5...
~.
- e...
m E
--: lx.: : :
ta WD
-a
.e...
=<
x::
E
..E i.u
.c. -g...
m w
x<
a: l 4 l-l l f#
m CA
>a<
C :Z" 4
MC<=
e
=p C.
e e e e e e e e o e
= ac N e e ac e e s g-D- >
V sn y 4/:
>=
m M
LaJ.
E"
=. C C. 5 3 :*-4 Q
- e. - - u - - -
m V v v v v J
.C, ca
='
N g
e.
a.
$. E. E. h. C. k.
=
-J
- == w E
6 6.= C C C C C== -
c s.a r w
=g a
w<
w.
..i..
8
- -i=
K G
La.i-Iq.-
g e,,, X es
= ~ 3. s. =. Xs.
E. s.
,c,g C
C=C2Cc C
Q-W CMw C
U
.m ar-UM JC P. N Pe N et. N et
-.= - - -
< l.
E_, E E e-g.
m OE V3
-= C:3 to =
>= *C W
L.a L.
d
<CC 7
~ & O-h 2s.
~
C 0-u,. O m
~
Ob" e4 g
e ir.. q *. caa w
d W.-
9 m
aaaan.s o
ww=
w 2O
).d
- >-= ^
e 5
<w =
-C eg >=
y CC~m ua -
i '*
~ 22 2 N
N ee LA
- E D F. Y-9 i._.
l i
!!Illi'
(
t a
f r
e tr a
5 u
4 4
3 4
5 Q
0 0
0 0
0 0
h t
4 re trau 5
4 5
5 5
4 Q
0 0
0 0
0 0
d r
3 re tr a
S 3
4 4
2 3
3 t
0 0
0 0
0 0
d n
2 re trauQ S
S S
S S
S N
N N
N N
N ts 1
e d
i 1
1 1
1 1
1 l
/
3 3
3 3
3 3
c i
1 1
1 1
1 1
u C N
1 I
I I
I I
l
)n o
sa p
4 3
4 6
5 8
e a
1 1
1 2
s M
gn iz Y
n a
R o
r A
i g
4 t
SS a
1 2
3 4
5 6
n c
i IS o
l t
il.
on t
I'
(
s M
A d
S e
l l
e p
A m
l r
p a
N m
S a
'n 5
IM S
o t
N
/
i o
e O
m t
N r
R u
s u
I i
e
=
g V
d g
i N
e n
S i
M 1
l N
I iUI I7' i
f i1 i
4 ENVIRotellNrAI. SAMi'!Ji SIMMARY Medium / Sample 1.oca tion Nuclido ist' Quarter 2nd Quarter _
3rd Quarter 4th Quarter Ai rl>o rne pCi/m3 l'a rt iculate On-Sites Gross Beta 0.036 0.079 0.089 0.010 Fitters.
DI
'O.035 0.072 0.074 0.043 D2 0.039 0.081 0.096 0.049 E
0.041 0.082 0.079 0.043
.F 0.040 0.083 0.103-0.044 6
II 0.027 0.060 0.065 0.032 I
0.025 0.072 0.093
.0.035 J
0.016 0.050 0.056
-0.033 0.019 0.070 0.067, 0.017 K
Off-Sites C
0.076 0.096 0.095 0.045 0.037-0.079 0.090 0.045 y
og
. 0.094 0.105 0.044 0.036
-D2 0.037 0.099 0.097 0.047 E
0.035 O.I14 0.I14 0.046 F
0.034 0.155 O.104 0.044 G
1:NVIROtNIINTAL SAMi't.li Sil> NARY Hedium/ Sample 1.ocation Nuclide 1st Quarter 2nd Quarter 3rd Quarter 4th Quarter.
Ai rix:'rno Charcoal On-Sites 1-131 Cartridge gC1/m3' lig
<0.030
<0.027
<0.028
<0.031' j
112
<0.031
<0.033
<0.028
<0.021 li
<0.021
<0.021
<0.022
<0.026 F
<0.025
<0.025
<0.021
<0.020 G
<0.022
<0.022
<0.02)
<0.018 11
<0.019
<0.015
<0.015
<0.014 I
<0.012
<0.010
<0.010
<0.010 2
J
<0.010
<0.011
<0.011
.0.011 K
<0.012
<0.010
<0.009
<0.008 Of f-Si tes 4
l$
8 C
<0.022
<0.022
<0.022
<0.023 Og
<0.021
<0.021
<0.022
<0.026
<0.020
<0.022
<0.022
<0.020 02
. Il
<0.020
<0.021
<0.021
<0.020 F
<0.027
<0.027
<0.028
<0.021 G
<0.027
<0.050
- 0.027
<0.024 i
4 t "
f i
liNV I RONMIINTAL ' SAMPI.li SilNMARY Medium / Sample 1ocation Nuclide 1st Quarter 2nd Quarter 3rd Quarter 4th Quarter Water pCi/l Ibuthly Composite
'NMP. Inlet Mn'-54
<2.1
<l.5:
<l.6
<l.5 Fe-59
<5.0
<5.1
<5.3
<5.9 00-58
.<2.5
<2.0
<2.8
<2.1 Co-60..
<3.6
<3.I
<3.I
<3.1 Zn-65
<4.4
<3.9
<4.0
<5.0 Cs-134
<2.1
<2.I
<l.6
<2.1 Cs-137
<3.1
<2.1
<2.1
< l.6.
t I
Ba-La-140
<8.9
<21.3
<26.0
. <!6.6 Gross Beta 5.2 3.5 2.6 3.0 1
Pe4P Discharge Mn-54
<l.6
<l.5
<l.7
<l.7 Fe-59
<6.2
<6.9
<7.3
<6.4 Co-58
<l.8
<2.9
<2.1
<2.1 o.
<3.7
<3.7
<3.6
<3.1 Zn-65
<5.1
<4.0
<5.7
<5.0 Cs-134
<2.2
<2.1
<2.7
<2.1 Cs-137
<3.2
<4.4
<3.2
<2.9 Ba-La-140
<23.4
<21.6.
<24.5
-<l5.0 Gross Beta 5.5 7.5 '
5.1 4.6 i
9
i liNVIRONMiiNTAI. SAMPl.!! Sl#4 MARY
' Medium / Sample location hclide 1st 4sarter 2nd Quarter 3rd Quarter 4th Quarter hier pCi/l Monthly Composite
..lAF Inlet Mn-54'
<l.5
<l.5
<l.7
<l.7 Fe-59
<6.9
<6.6
<7.8
<5.6 Co-58
<2.1
<2.9
<2.2
<l.9 Co-60
<3.1
<3.7
<3.1
<4.2
. 5.1
<5.0 Zn-65
<4.5
<4.6 Cs-134
<2.1
<l.6
<l.6
<l.6 Cs-137
<l.6
<l.6
<l.6
<l.6 Ba-La-140
<20.4
<28.0
<27.5
<l5.0 Gross Beta 3.3 3.0 2.8 2.5 JAF 111scharge Mn-54
<2.i
<2.3
<l.7
<2.1 Fe-59
<5.8
<7.4
<9.1
<4.8 Co-58
<2.1.
<2.2
<2.2
<l.9 i.
Co-60_
<3.7
<3.2
<3.1
<3.1 M
Zn-65
<3.4
<4.1
<5.2
<4.2 8
Cs-134
<l.6 52.1
<2.2
<l.6 Cs-137
<l.6
<2.6
<!.6
<2.1 Ba-l.a-140
<20.4
<25.6
<32.9
<l5.3 Gross Beta 3.2 3.8
<2.3 3.1 f
4 8
r liNVIR(N#4tiNTAL SAMI'I.fi SIN #4ARY l
~
- Medium / Sample 1.oca tion Nuclide 1st Quarter 2nd Q arter
' 3rd Qitarter 4tli 4 arter Water pC1/1 Mon t li t y.
Raw City
.j.
Composito_
Water Mn-54
<2.0
<2.2
<2.2
<l.7 Fe-59
<4.3
<6.3
- <5.6
<5.5 Co-58
<3.8
<2.1
<2.0
<2.0 3.6 Co-60
<3.1
<2.7
<3.7 Zn-65
<3.8
<4.6
<4.6
<3.9 Cs-134
<2.0
<l.6
<l.6
<1.6 Cs-137
<l.9
<l.6
<2.1.
<2.0 j
Ba-La-140
. <10.6
<28.7
<34.6
<14.7 Gross Beta 2.0 3.5
<2.2 2.5 1
h s
I
t IV l'
%,'\\-3
\\
f..
INfN
/
-)<o/-c
~
}
s A.7v' ANALYTICAL RESULTS r
w.
+s.m om, < wee
+-ue
,w m
.=wwm.
m, m.
i TAbt.E I I
SAMPlji COLLiiCil0N ANil ANAL.YSIS g
i S1Tli RAD 10lIX;1 CAL liNVIRONMiiNTAL MONITORING PROGRAM A.
l.AKli PROGRAMlII' t
i MiiDI A ANALYSIS FRiiQUENCYl4)
LOCAT10N(2) 90 Fish GeLi, 89Sr G Sr 2/yr 2 onsite 1 offsite N
2.
Mollusks GeLi, 89Sr G Sr 2/yr 2 onsite 1 offsite 3.
Gammarus GeLi, 89Sr fa Sr 2/yr 2 onsite 1 offsite 4.
Botton Sediments GeLi, WSr 2/,yr 2 onsite 1 offsite S.
Periphyton GeLi 2/yr
' 2 onsite 1 offsite
{
O 8
6.
I.ake Water GB, GSA or GeLi M Comp.
3(3) j 3ll, 89 r 90 r Qtr. Comp.
S S
Notes:
(1) Program continued for at least three years after the startup of James A. Fitzpatrick Nuclear Power Plant.
(2) Onsite locations samples collected in the vicinity of discharges, offsite samples collected at a distance i
of at' least five miles from site.
[3) The three lake water samples to include Nine Mile Point Unit 1 intake water, James A. FitzPatrick intake water, and Oswego City water.
(4) Samples of items I through 5 collected in spring and fall when available.
4 e
f 6
i i-TABLE 2 4
SAMPLE COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS SITE RAD 101DGICAL ENVIRONMIXTAI. MONITORING PROGRAM h.
l.AND PROGRAM (I)
ME111 A ANALYSIS FREQUENCY NO. OF LOCATIONS IDCATIONS-1.
Air Particulates CB W
At least 10 ~
9 onsite 6 offsite CSA M Comp.(6) j 2.
Soil GSA, 90Sr Every 3 years 15 9 onsite 6 offsite 3.
TLil Gamma Dose Qtr.
20 14 onsite'- 6 offsito 4.
Radiation Monitors Gamma Dose C
10 9 onsite 1 offsite 5.
Airborne - I I31 GSA W
At least 10' 9 onsite 6'offsite L
j
6.
Milk I
M 4l7)
(8)
GSA, 90Sr M Comp.
7.
Iluman Food Crops GSA, 131I A
3'
-(8) 8 Meat, Poultry, Eggs GSA Edible Portion SA 3
(8)
. Cont.)
Notes:
(
(6) Onsite samples counted together, offsite counted together, any high count samples counted separately.
(7) Frequency applied only during grazing. season.
(8) Samples to be collected from farms within a 10-mile radius having the highest potential concentrations of radionuclides.
Abbreviations:
M Comp. - Monthly composite of weekly or bi-weekly samples A - Annually BW - Bi-weekly (alternate wks.)
GB - Gross beta analysis W - Weekly Qtr. - Quarterly GeLi - Gamma spectral analysis on a GeLi system (quantitative)
M - Monthly SA - Semiannually USA - Gamma spectral analysis on a Nal system (quantitative)
C - Continuous
TABLli 3 CONClilRRATIONS 01: GAPflA 13tITrliRS IN PERIPilYTON SAlfl.ES
'Results in linits of pCi/g(wet) 1 2 signa C01.1.li("Il0N HilCl.II)liS.
SITli llMING 5-23-79 8-24-79 0ff-S'ito Be-7 1.010.1 0,320.1 00 K-40 2.610.3 4.510.5 Co-60
<0.01
<0.01 Cs-137 0.1310.01 0.01710.008 i
Cc-144 0.1030.02
<0.07 Ra-226 0.1310.01 0.0310.02 Th-232 0.I210.02
<0.03 i
.l Al:
lle-7 0.1810.07 0.310.1 1
81 3 K-10 3.2t0.3 6.110.6 2
i Hn-54 0.02310.007
<0.01 Co-60 0.11J0.01 0.03910.009 i
8 Cs-134 0.02010.008
<0.01 t
Cs-137 0.1810.02 0.0810.01 i
Cc-144
<0.05
<0.07 1:a-226 0.0610.01
<0.02 Th-232 0.0910.03 y
<0.03 i
t II}
NHPP Ile-7 0.710.2 0.210.1 02 K-40 5.310.5 3.210.3 Fin-54 0.0510.02
<0.02 4
Co-58 0.0210.02
<0.02 Co-60
<0.06 0.0410.01 Ag-llom
<0.05 0.0410.02 Cs-134 0.0510.02 0.0210.01 Cs-137 1.110.1 0.08111.02 Cc-144
<0.08
<0.07 Ra-226 0.I110.03
<0.03 l
Th-232 0.111,0.04
<0.05 (1) The collection dates for this sample were 5-23-79 to 5-24-79.
4 N
I TAltLE 4
')
CONCENTRATIONS OF Sr-90 AND CAkttA EMITTERS IN SEI)! MENT SAMPl.ES Results in Units of pCi/g(dry) i 2 sigma
.i.
COLI.E("FION COI.I.l!(*rION CAFDIA EMI1TERS
}
SITl!
DATE Sr-90 K-40 Co-60 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ra-226 Th-232
.j
- Off-site 5-30-79
<0.03 1111
<0.09
<0.1 0.5410.08 0.8910.09 1.010.2 00
,0.08 0.4010.007 0.810.1 0.710.2 10-03-79 0.02010.004 1111
<0.08
.lAF 03 5-30-79 0.00710.005 4.510.7 0 1010.04
<0.06 0.1310.06 1.620.2 1.910.2 NHPP
-02 10-03-79 0.04810.006 16t2 0.9010.09 0.1IJ0.04 1.110.1 0.4710.06 0.410.2 b
i NHPW 5-30-79 0.01710.004 9.7!!.0 0.1310.03
<0.05 0.3910.05 0.2310.04 0.2210.07 01 10-03-79 0.005?0.003 1111
<0.08
<0.05 0.1510.01 0.1710.06 0.1810.09 j
.\\
1
3-m m g
3 O
O
~.
d d d 8
8 8
~8 8
e P
en O
O O O O O
O.
at
.=
v v
v v
v v
w Ime O'O O
m Y
m' a m O.
S O.
O.
O.
3 O.e Oe 3.
oO.
a-3 O O O
O K"a O
O O
3 v
v v
v
==
v v
v
_ =. ' 5 d-d i
N N
N ee om e
Z m
-,m M
or e
o.
o.
o.
o.
o.
y m - ~
O.
O.
O.
o O.
O O
O.
O.
4 5
m.
==.
g v.
m e
35 O
O O
O O
v.
U 8
N e
p 3.
e e
=
t I.
non e.
e N
O N
==
3 2
d O
Q O
O O
W k
3.
$ b'0 b
b b b ' b $
b
~
E h
O W
8*.
M M
a C
O
'P w.
W
-.==
~.
==
no.
e O
.a O=
O.
O.
D.
em.
e O
O O
O.
O.
h-6 3
.O O
O O -
O O
e n.
u 4
w m
n - -
o.
o.
~ -
~
~
u 8
O.
O.
O.
O.
e O.
O O
O O
.u O
O O
O
.~- O
, ~ -
M V
V V
v O..
O.
O.
O.
9 v
a e
g C
O O
O
~
-=
=.s bOw
$~
~. ~.
~.
~.
R.
~. ~. ~.
~
e
-w v.8 3 O.
O.
O, C,
O, O,
~ -
~,
O ~ -
m w
4 sO O.
e O
O_.
sO O_.
s v
e
~5-s o
-w m
v.
-m
. 28 4,8 ka
- 5..
5 ss
.O
o%,
4=-
we~r
~
d e
o e
.N Q.
O.
N.
O.
O
- e.
~
O O
em O
e*
g.
.v
. o.
M w-v e
g me O
M.
.E D.
7 5
-,3 p
V V
O v
v
,o Ii o
g 5
L n
= k'
~
. S.
d.
6 4
9 0
M nd V5 R
Vs
~.
"~
d 6
o e
e-E
=*
y s.g 2
a m
G a
e N
m 4
c
~
o o
9 %
5 d
d d
d d
4 w
g ;a". -
L j
A a
e d
.L, - : -
o o
e o
o O
e5
.g E e 1
E.
8
~.
- e.. - -
E.
d u.
6 o
o o
.O.
6 a
m v
v
. o e-v v
M O
.v 3%
li M
- =
3
- t. - ~ t.
e -
e.
R.
R, R
R, R,
R, R
1
-w E
W *=
m O **
O w
M O w$
eO e
g-
' y a s.
A 4 a aa -
N'9 O T ee u
w wg NwO e
Nw Ow wG Ow 6
as aa y
m-t=
=
u g
S
=
= w-
.2 a
. 22
- 2. '
e W
28 2,8 It3 o
t h
y
.b
s a.
.=
. ~...
e D
e
- t t
4 l
~. g O.
.,-m
~N N
eN O C.
Q C. Q.
. C. Q. mQ
.8'9 OCOC OCO C.Q Q C.
O. en W9O. O C. Q. Q. Q.
N en to W1 Q Q C. Q Q.
C O. C. O C. O. O.
e 12 in e N 2ll 50 en A et O ar eOOeC m na m v OOO C. Wi. O CO
- C.
C. Q. Q.
QQv0 Q v v C. v O. C. O. O.
=Q
.. O
-O.
O COOO vvv
. w OCO CO O
- en had M
N WT g.
O. =. N sq- -
m W5 m gn
,.==. =.=. o.
C. C.,.
! a. N N N
- a. C. C. C. C.
C. a. o..
- a. c. Q.
N e m m sA in
= =. =
wi na m
- =. =. =.
v' 1
2=2 OOD iCCCC CCCcc COCO COC na.
- < O s.
s vvv vevv vvvvv vvvv vvv 3
Y h
s $=
,g -
j m. m. in. en.
e.t I m.,. m. e.
- m. m. m.
N. go. go. O. O.
. m. m. m. N. O. O.
e-
==
w
,3
.O,
.C_ C C C_
C C C_
CCC 3C.OQQ C. C C C COO N
..-_C
.e -
C.
N. N n. m. a.
~.
.u. Q.
.=.O.
< N..n.. e w.a.
a g
.e sg mm e
-~
mNNem
.e NN
~me 5.
s
.=
39 h.i
=
Q e'
-s v
.. Wiig mmmm
-g - e e m ar g
mm m.,
1 5a.5.8 8 8.8.=o
$ 8. a. 5 8.8.88.Q t z $.8 8. 88.
4 O
a h
e ch eCCCO -OCQ*
ECCOa CocCO*
CCCO CQQ*
0 I
N-
- - - = = -~
C Q M' M 8'9 mQ
=s l== N'.P N.= W=3 C W m a d'i e
@ m' 4
Q
-- b
-9 p.
2 es ad 4-d C'1.= m==
v
==N=Q CC v
v N m *'
Dv ar.
. C. O. Q.
Q C.
X, Q. Q. c.
C. Q.
Q Q O.
.Q m $
QCCQ OC CQ OCQC 30Q CO e-e 2.
5
.=
ed 5~
3 N
N M
we N
ES O. =
O.
e-y e
NmNN
=e m =.
N N sn
== c cN
-to E
O, O. Q. Q. Q.
Q O. O.
C. Q. Q.*.'
.... O. O. '-
O. Q. C Q. - QQC
- e I
g Q
v Q
E d
d k
i I
- ,',a 9
.e w
a D.
e vt
== N
.ise ed e.
ille
=N%%
7 3*
2.e6 4
= b 2b
.G b
g2b d
4f 3g
-6 gb I
h.ad la w Q a 3we Jg 2 g W w 43 3qg g g as u
g I
- sin iu m J.6 w64
' 4 w.ns ed Wu6 6.E w as 4 J 6.m g J.d,
) 6.lJ. qd g C
6 tie w
.* 6 w "lI 6
6 D &@ E
$W 6 en W 6 yQ a
g 3
- J ch3 E e-A
- to a
ed
=t 3Q
- C.s.a 6 3
e 3
eA 3 b
.% 4 wi
. in
=8 M
t
=*
ed b 3 to - E. en Q
.C.
I
.u 6 ds.Q.u - u.o 9
-ou w
i
==.en.5 6 =e--
4.a.s. 6 e..em
- a O
ou o aan u$e es,
.es--- e.a
.es es e es j
g=-
3.= g.,d 553.
6 6
mo=.
z > x =.:
w e
3 r
.9
=es o.
o
>. 5 ns a
.m a = ac 5 23 2 D
G G
6.-
1 On S
S G.
N N
tyt a
0%
O
.O.n 4-m.
.=
e en 404 m
b ja W.
O.n.
b b
O.g.
b 4/5 e.
and C
47 CFt U
s
.2 4.ri=
y -
.,3
.ae Q
.l h A
e 58-,
,e 8
12 3
2 8
c.
=*
h a
O$ e
9 ll
.i
.. l (
l' i
ilSt[ AA CONCffliRAil0NS OF 8EIA fillllERS lti (Ar.[ HAILR $NFl[5 Results in Units of pCl/l 12 sigu 2
1-01-79 2-01-19 3-01-19 4-01-79 5-01-79
'6-01 ]-
STATION to to to to to to 1-PurBER l-31-79 2-20-79 3-31-19 4-30-19 5-31-79 6-30-79, fit-SilA-JAF-Discharge 3.610.7 2.6#0.6 3.5'O.7 3.4#0.n 4.3 0.7 3.7t0.7 Fis-5UA-JAF-Inlet.
3.910.7
. 3.110.7 2.910.7 2.1s0.7 3.210.7 3.6!0.8
.l FN-5WA-ff r-Discha r9e 3.1:0. 7 -
2.9#0.6 list 7.3 n.9 8.611.0 6.6 0.9 f 4-StlA-itP-Inlet 3.610.7 6.3t0.8 5.8t0.8 3.0 0.7 4.5s0.8 3.0#0.7 FN-50A-OSilP 3.910.7 2.9:0.6 3.0:0.7 2.110.7 4.810.8 -
3.610.8
'I 7-01-79 8-01-79 9-01-79 10-01-79 11-01-79 12-01-79 i
STATION to to to to to to IR54BER 7-31-79 8-31-79 9-23-79 10-31-79 11-30-79 12-28-79 III fil-SWA-JfF-Dischar9e 3.0#0.7 (0.9 3.Inc.7 3.4s0.7 2.410.7 3.5to.7 III IN-5WA-JAF-Inlet 3.340.7 2.3so.7 2.710.7 2.810.6 2.220.7 2.5so.6 Fil-5WA-iflP-Discharge 6.410.9 4.210.8 4.610.8 5.010.8 3.210.7 5.5to.8 Fil-5WA-NFF-Inlet 3.710.7 2.010.7 2.210.7 3.2:0.7 3.110.7 2.8t0.7 FN-5WA-OSWP 3.610.7 (0.9 2.110.7 2.5t0.6 2.210.7 -
2.9:0.7 (1)
Sample collection dates were 12-28-79 to 1-02-14.
a
~
t:
\\.;.
[
~ TABLE ss.
CuisCINIRAll0NS OF TRiilist Ai40 51Rt41Tilfl-89* Allo -90181 l AKE WAltR (QUARIERLY COWOSITE SAMKES)
Resul,ts in thits of FCl/l 8 2 SIFid.
STATI0li C0li IMIE THilit#I Sr-89
$r-90 ill-SilA-JAF-Discharge 1-01-79 to 211:170
.<0.7-1.240.3 3-31-79 4-01-79 to 449:100
<l.$
1.0a0.4 6-30-79 7-01-79 to.
<l25 (1.1 0.6 0.3 9-23-79 9-30-79 to 305:100 (0.9 1.0a0.4.
I-02-a0.
e fil-SWA-JAF-Inle t 1-01-79 to 234:170 (0.7
- 1. !s0. 3.
. E.-
3-31-79 w
e 4-01-79 to 22/t110.
<l.6 1.2sD.5 6-30-79 7 01-79 to 276279 (1.0 0.480.3 9-28-79 i
i j
9-30-79 to 176t130
<0.9 1.380.3 -
I-02-80 fil-5uA-Mf-Discharge 1-01-79 to 250:170
<0.7 1.2 0.3 3-31-79
- {
4-01-79 to 519t160
<l.4 1.120.4 -
6-30-79 7-01-79 to 189t120 1.020.7
<0.6 9-28-79 9-30-79 to 275 100
<0.8 0.910.3 12-20-79 t
- i.
t t
~
h-
,TAott as (cont.)
. CONCENTRAll0NS OF TRITilm Nio STRoniltsM9* N10 -90 IN LAKE UA1ER (QUARTElaY C0er0 SITE SAMPLES)
Results in Units of PC1/1 a 2 slye _
SIAilOri CODE DATE TRilital Sr-89 Sr-90 TN-SWA-Mt*-Inle t 1-01-79 to 2041170
<0.8 0.7t0.3 31-79 4-01-79
. to 197t110-(0.9 0.6t0.3 6-30 7-01-79 i
. to 272#19
< l.0 0.5t0.3
+
'9-2H-79 9-30-79
. to 286 100 (0.8 0.920.3 12-28-79
- i
[.
Iff-SUA-OSWP-I-01-19
?
9 8
to (273
<0.8 1.It0.3 3-31 6 4-01-79 to 174t110
<l.2 0.6s0.4 6-30-79 7-03 79 to 294179 0.8 0.7 (0.5 9-27-79 i
9-30-79 to 308 100 0.6to.6 0.7t0.4 12-28-79 Sr-89 results are corrected for decay to sample stop dates.
I
. i.
.5 IAillt 9
- Cotect#111Ul110145 Of GAlllA LHiIIIkS Ill 1 Alf WATIR sal 5'ttS Resylts tu thilts of pCi/l e 2 sl9u 4
1-01-79 2-01-79 3-01-79 4-01-79
'5-01-79 6-01-19 51 All(W4 to to to to to
' to
- unit R HUEllif 1-31-79 2-2ft-79 3-31-79 4-30-79 5-31-79 6-30-79' fil-SUA-JAl-Discharge All(LLD All(ILD All<llD All<tlD All<tLD All(LLD fil-til A-JM-Inle t All(LLD All(LLD All(LLD All<ttD All(LLD All(LLD fil-SuA IN-Dinharge Cs-137 (1.6
<l.6 6.St2.1 4.7s2.5
<3.1 5.4:2.4 i
Others All<tLD All(LLD All(LID All<!LD All(LLD All<LLD Fil-LilA-INP-Inle t K-40
<31
<31
- 97:40 (16 (31.
<31 Cs-137 (1.6
<l.6 6.0,2.1
<l.6
<3.1
< 1.6 -
6tl.e rs All(LLD All(LLD-All <t LD All<tLD All(LLD
- All(LLD l
<l.6 2.5:1.8
<1.6
<l.6
<l.6 fil-5HA-OSWP C5-137
<l.6 All(LLD All(LID All<ltD All(LLD All(LLD Others All(LLD l-T 7-01-79 8-01-79 9-01-19 10-01-79 11-01-79 12-01-79 51 Alloil to to-to to to to IM11ER fluCLIDE 7-31-79 8-31-79 9-28-79 10-31-79
!!-31-79 12-28-79 III
. fil-LUA-JM-Discharije All(LLD All<lLD All<tLD All(LLD All<tLD All(LLD III fil-suA-JAF-Inlet All(LLD All(LLD All(LLD All(LLD All(LLD All(LLD IN-SW A-IdlP-Discha rge Cs-137-(4.7 3.4st.7
< l.6
<3.1
<l.6 4.0:2.1 Others All(LLD All(LLD All(LLD All(LLD All(LLD All(LLD fli-$WA-liHP-Inle t K-40
<31 (31
<31
<31
<47 (31 Cs-137
<3.1
<l.6
< l.6
<l.6
<l.6 (1.6 Others All(LLD All(LLD All(LLD.
All(LLD All<tLD All(LLD IN-5WA-OLUP Cs-137
<l.6
<3.1
< l.6 (1.6
<3.1
<l.2 Others All(LLD All<tLD All(LLD All(LLD All<tt0 All<LLD l
.i (1)
Sample collection dates were 12-01-79 to 1-02-80.
HOIE: REFLR 10 SLCTIOf4 III, SAMPLE SUMMARIES FOR Ltp RAtlGES OF VARIOUS NUCLIDES (ENVIROHHENTAL SAMPLE STATISTICAL.
At4ALYS I S ).
1 e
4 o
e-
- t TABlJi til I NVIRtN#A ltl AI. Alululluel! l'AR110tal.Alli SAMI'lJos - HIT Sill" SI AlletPri 4:Ittr3 HEIA MilVITY 14:4/ml e, 2e.
,.l '-
I All'AT IUpl
~ ~
IR;I E ItA l'It C
lig 182
. II l'
il j
t 0.tNe2,0. tut? '
W.tmle p.eMut,
I a.9-79 tl. tw.R e p.tMIF 0.074ett.INNt-o.IN.9eo.4mp7 7
2 1 -Ite-79 p.n2230. pol 0.n%e0.005 p.n34 eo UeH -
0.tllGitt.th6 0.th ele u.tN6
' O.DileO.elet$ -
3
.l.21-79 0.029;o. inh.
al.017 e n.txts n.nt l e,n. OHS.
. 0.04 4 en.shl5 es.n ll,e st.shl5 es.pitee st. tu6
}
4 1-30 79 ti.nlle n. shl1 c.pI2 0.tnol 0.015en.enl3 el.032*o.tues o.til t oo.tnH p.llla e a.inu 2.te-79 el.p24 e p.eMH o.025en.tull 0.02p e o. TMH n.ts18eep.smH sp.p2te e n.shes (B.tl27 ess.sw6 6
28379 a.e:55ete. inh tl.o15.n.enH
. ii.si19e n.In6 o.usi,see.eMis a.n2A e n.eii6 ei. nlle n.tum e
7 2 20 79
- 0. u l5 e n.tH6 49.0 80 e 0.646 0.tH 2 e n.thl5 0.042en tMt5 0.O l l e G. tnt 5 0.nj 5 e te.tMb f
A 2 27 79 0.01A s el. sM6
- 0. sl3 tee p.tN#5 0.017ep.lN6
, 0.014+tt.eMH 0.017 U.eM6
- p. sH 5 ess. tu6 '.
9 3-fe.79 0.03tiou.tMl4
. H.tl26 ell.qMH 0 n32en.enH u.n25 e n.tNl4 tl. H25 e n.th6 ft. 02 0 ell. eu6 10 31379 el. fl39 e D.tHl5 0.El%3en. TMH '
N. 012 s tl. f MH G.015e# tMll G.Olt e n. ek6
- 0. p g l e_tp. ptg 4.
Il 3-20 79
- 0. ti ? 2_e p. 4MWe D. tk4_e n. eMI(e
- 0. tM.5.e.u. tNb O. ell 7_eG. eM6 tl. tlSee_e tt.tNW n, ep le.e p.gn m 4,.
B2 3-27-79 0.025e,0.tNH.
II.025e tt.On l D. 8924 e el. lMH tl. OlG,e O. tM6
- 0. 01H e 0. 84t5 (f. tB22 e tt. IIe p5 il 4 3-79 0 eH2.en.De6
- 0. 012.e,n. th6 ti. eH l e.n. tH6 0.03h.e.n TMH al. n14 en.tN6 H.ellp e n.esem Il
- 4. l el-79 0.017.en.tstH tl.015 60.tM6 U. DAR.e o. eW6
- 0. tH A e p. tMIS
- p. es li e.u. tH6 0,n tS e n. eMN.
35 4-57 79 0.045 0.IN6
- 0. pM e O.tN 6
- 0. tl15 en.tMe4 0.9 %h e n.tNB4
- p. ll32 e p. tN6
- p. lt h.e u. eM b 0.0fM 4.tMl7 0.124 en.tNBA 0.13A e n. INIA U.2Alen.pI7 -
- p. l l5 e H.4M19 Ih 4-28 79 n.erNien.tNI7 1
17 5 1-79 p.oS5 ets.tN%
' O.eue2en.tism -
fl.075 e tt.qNE el.074 e 0. tNth
- u. tW.ee s ti. s Nl7 el. ente ts gul?
s i
la 5.n-79 n.121s tl. tuss u.t:77,en.tHue o.ons o.tMo7 n.u. wen.pny p.trll e n.tuen to. orwe se.txis 19 5-15 79 U.DA2en.eMere U.orti o n. eNI7
- 0. 0'.Ml e,0. tnt ?
O.1H1e0.004
- 0. 815 e el. ele 19 Ju 52279 p.86 0 en.tH6 O tHSep.tM6 0.sh.l e D.INWe 89.05760.005 H.tl55eG tNWe 21 5 3p.79 n tmte.o.eN6 n.tuhon.tM6 es.n41;o.tuH n.u th e n. inh te. USA e ts.est6 h.5 19 n.1794,n.tMr9 n.1 % e p.tMr.1
- n. 2tlR e et.Hi ts n.2tre en.nl l n.213 n.es12 22
- a. pit H.tMG OtH4en.tu6 0.tmas e n.eu6 n.n%7en.tum 21 fe.32 79 ft.tll t e n,tM6 1
28 to.19 79
- n. 2ert e n.tMel fl. I t.5 ell.ture
- n. 2pt elp.sMrs 0.233eg.esto n,2:sS e u.esl l
- o. 7p t oo.86A 25
, 6-2h.79.
u.174 ett.eurs es. l.lele n.emen H. i the ft. eMin p.117 gt.euss te.17 0 en,ellte
- o. i tt e n.tuen a
2h 737's it. el97 e u.aul7
- 0. sw.l e tt.nem o.emien.tNb O.el5Non the U.H5'l e U.tMb gg. el14 e n,lMt1 I
..ree-se ot t w las e.,t s re.een e ics)
" Van la t i s=
aa p.
M' e
o
a 1 AltlE 140 4thMI.) -
les'..lAl; Sill; I NVileepeH N1'A1. AININNeNIi l'AkiltillAll: SApe'115 - 141 $111i S'I AllONS
?
ClasaSS Bl.TA ACTIVIlY lC6/m3 + 2a
'fg tilCAIILWI i
Wl:8 I; DAII:
C l'a l'2 I
l' N
~
o.150 u.tN)8
- c. ls9 e n.4MM4 a lSI,eG.Ol0
- a. lbh e et.tll O I
27 7 10 79 II. I f.a e n.sm9
- 0. 8 3.l* 0. tMM 1
[
25
. 7-lh.79' O.132*o.4m1
- a. 8 40e p.tMs4 0.132en.ous.
- p. 4 28 eo.sme
- 0. lo4 *ta.INNI
- . I lt f #.ities
' 29 7 24 79' O.459en.tNI9
- o. l t.7 9 48. tht9 0.19 ele 0.Ihm
- o. 214 *o.Illu -
H. itt9est. ales ts.15 t e n.esents i
3 40 7 31 79 ft. 8 5Hiu.tHm
- o. 412 en.tM)B
- n. I B3 e n.thm 0.165 eo. nee
- p. ise7en.cise e.itt.eu.ule 8-ll N.7 79 0.pl4ete.tMs5
- p. tH6e n. sN15 n.of.2 e n.new 0.plf.eo.ims.
0.oeist e n.INE H.Ille.e st.mm 32 A.14 79 u.tMmen.tM67 p.ol010.am3
- 0. 8 25e ss.tma
- o. lot en.sto7
- c. lo3 s tl.ame o.092eo.com 0.343 0.004-p.2tMou.oll n.151 e_u.thes '
35 a.Jl 79 II. 4 2te e n.4N37 o.13 B e,0.utm G.188 e n.tM19 3
34.
S.28-79 0.utMeio. tH16 o.092_eu.tm7
- n. 3 22.o.0868,
o.otE
- 0. INN.
- 0. 802ep.otet.
G. Int en.sm/
35 9-4-79 o.095 e_d.4Mm u.tMi9ets.oiWe o.104e0.007 p.140e0.007
- a. 804 ete. ques
- e. g o2en.stes7 36 9 11 79 0.078 e tt. tMNe 0.096e G.tN17 II.Hilen. TMH o.023 e n.tM33 0.o72*9.tMil b
U.o87 D.tMM.
H.823,eu.IMil 48.o23 *o.thil 0.384*0.004 s1 9 88 79 0.077 o.nem f
ue 0
o.o91 0.thNe
- 0. 8 dMie n.atets 0.o9sen.ste7 18 9-25-79' o.tNs8 eH.tms 0.0791o.dMWe
- o. 095 e o. tHW.
1 lu 18 2-79 0.o401o.004 0.039 60.tNa4 0.o ss e n. TMH 0.035 e es, TMH 0.u14 e,es.tues u.sa39en. Int 5 au 80-9 79
- 0. st21 e u.tMil n 021eu.4MH 0.025,en.tMIS o 023e,0.tNH 0.025en.tMIS u.025eo.usH -
l 41 las It. 79 0.sH 7 e tt.lMes G. ps4 o n. tMi$
4.tW. Hen.eMm 0.tH5e,o.em5 es.oss ett.thes n.ussets.nos 42 10 25 79 0.059en.tMefe 0.05d en.tNE o.ne 9eu.tMwe o.phaf o.tNN.
G.ph2 e st.nol
. G.Osoon.tstM.
6 9-13 lu.3o.79 ii.ol7 e_o.ool o.nzt en. tun n,t8sso.nos o.oloesi.tuis o.orten tMis o.eI9eo.neH O
48 18 6-79 p.tH5eo.no5 n.o49_en.swes u.nsos o.ims o.iH5en.4mi5 o.o4 4 en.tNH o.als.,o.tuwe b?S) i-is 11 11 79
- p. ust en.ims 0.04s ep.sms s.ogsen.im4 0.038en.003 p.ntsen.tml o.t:19en.tw5 k
)
4se iI-21-79
- p. IIH sp.tm7 n.Dui o.INI7 81.4*7 0.INI7 H. I 13,e o. 8080N
- 48. B l 5e G.Im?
II,48918 e G.INNB f
1 2?S) 47' 11 27 79 a.uS41o.mM.
o.ussen.mm o.ost.eu.ims u.4w.g eo.im5
- u. tu.2 e n.im5
- a. m.9 e,n.im7 gg in 12479 o.u54en.tms o.o4 ten.nos o.nso o n.im5 a.n4 teen.no5 n.o19en.im5 n.tH 7en tun.
4s 12.ll.iu
- o. nit.e o.ams o.u sn eo.mes o.ussen.not u.nin eo.sms u.n s t en.mq
- o. tH a e n. inh So u.la.79 o.ouen.mH o.nllen.mH o.a.sl e.o.smi n.nloon.imi u.ushop.tml n.n si o n.im t r.3 u 2a.-79 a.un e n. imi n.oiren.ine) n.ozi e n.tMis n.u14 *ii.tuH ti.t:22ein.sms ei.o25en.tu 3 g
s2 12..u - 79 n.o24 en.mu n.ois en.oie o.nnen.ims u.n s2 *p.ims o.o25en.mH o.o2 4.n.mH e e v.seol.e 8 i s.
a,
~:
J e.
e.
...- T,
m' e
e.
m.
I.. n.5. '..5 5
-5
- T 5 5 5 E.
5 5
- 5.. 5
- 5..- 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
' E.
5 E. 5.
= =. =. ' =..
= = =.
=.4
=.- =. i =.. '. = '. =.,. =.. =.. =. 8
=. =. =. ' =.'
=*l
=. s
=. 6
=i
- e
- e
- =
l-. g.t
=.
t
. m
.e 4
- =
m g
u
'W r
a.
2 *
~
^2-g
=
. =. 5 5 - g g ~-
m m
=
m...i I.
m
~
- 5. :=' =.= = =. =. 5
.. =.
I..
=. -=.
.. =. =.
2.
i.. =.
T.. =. i..
..i.
= = = =
=
= =
= =
=
... 5
..5
. 5 5
.a.
m n.
m.
e.
m.
m.
e.
e.
T a
e.
n e_
n.
n.
.5...z.
=.. =. a -
n.
n e.
=
=..
x..
m z
z s
a a
x 5 9 2
m
=
z..
=.. =. a =. i =. 4
=.1 =, =..
s.,
=.I' =.* =. i
=.1
=.,. =.i
.I
=. : =. i =. 6,=. :. =. i. 5 -.
- e.. 4 m.:
T.
=. 2
- = e m =
e e
"9 5 =
e
= = = =.. 2. '. =.
. =.
E.. f g m m
y e
e
- =-s
=
= =. =- =.
=.. 2.
- 2. =...
..=.
E..
C..
=
c.
5 5
=
.. ". =..
z.
.x z
.z
=
. =..
= = = = =
m.
N.
e.
e.
m n.
n 2 T -
e e.
T n
m e.
e m.
=
m.
5 E 5
.5 5 8 5 5 E. 5
.5 5. 5
.5 5 5
.5 5 5 5 5 5
5 5
- i. 5 i..
i.4 i. t i. i i.6 i.6 i. t i. i i a. a. 6 - i. ; i. : i. I i. i i. t
- i..,. i. ; i. !
- i. i i. ? i.. i..
et m
m a e
-m 4
~
m m-m m
m-e m
e g e
- =
=.
a m-=.
- 5..
-=.. 3 e.
=. =..I..*=.=. =. =. -=... =.
=..=.
... =.
e n
n y
g g
y g h.
n n
m e
g
= = = = = = === = = = :
= = =
t e.
e.
m.
w.
e e
m e
e e
m e m 2 e a Ls. 2 3
5
... 5 5 5 ' E.
- m K - 1 2
. 5 I.
E. 5. - 5 5 E. -s.
-5
-5
-5 3 5 - - 5 5 5
5 5 5
-c
=
.6
.i =. 4 =. 4-m
-=.6 =.I
- s., =. I =. 4 =. I =. ! =. t =. I
=.!
=. 4 -=. I =. 6=f
=. 4
=.t
=.. =.. =. i -.
=. I
=. '
m
=
g-g e
-4
- =
=
- m e =
4
=
v.
=.
I. =. 5 - = = =. =. =. -
-4 m
m
-=. =. =. =. =.
I.
=.
. =. 5.
-e.
a e
a g g
~
m
~
- e m
- ~
- =.
E.
=. =. 3 =.
w.
e
=
=
=
=. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =.- = (b~
h-g e m o e ~
g-
~ ~ g m y i i. i.i i.. i. i. i. i.
i.t i.; i. 6 =. i =* E E E 5 I E 5 E 5* !y kkeE!m E !e 5~
E 5 5 5 gm 9 E
E 's 5 5 5
- i. i. i.;
e=., i. ;
=.*t =. : i.4 =. : i. ;
e.': i i. : h3Ek e
=:
,.4 g
+1
g m - ~ m m.
~
e
=.
~ = m - ~
=
~.m w
q = m e
. E..m=.=... =.
.=
~. y e
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =.
I.
c..
. 5 E.
e y
n e
m n
a y
-s.
5 e.
3 -=. =. =. _ E.
=. =. =. =.
me
= = = = =
s
-..=-
O e
x.
e.
e.
e.
e.
w-e e.
~. ~- ~. ~. ~.
m.
E.
z
-r 5 ~-
E=.
E
~..
5 E.. e.55 5 5 5 5 5 E. 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
" s,< w
- 5. - 5 5.
=
. a.. - y -
=. t =. !. i =. t
=.. =.i=.
=.1 =.i =. =. =.i r =. : =. t =.i
- e.,.
=. ! =. i =.
c.
=..
. =. - =. :
w<
=
e
=,.i i
.. m = ~ -
e m.,, e e
- * = ~
e g
CCC s, e ~
- = i i.
. = =
= = = = = = = =. = =. = =. 5 e.. n.. s..
O c.'
s.
s.
z.
T. 1 r..
=.
3 x.. 2.
m..=. =.. c.. 2.
=
s s
= = = = = = =
...,eIk s
m.
m_
w am 52 5-
-5 5
- e. 5 5 5 5 5 -
- m..
m.
. 2 s n.
~.
n.
e e.
s. n a.
w.
e
. g m.
e.
s 2 2 5 5 5
- 5.. 5
.5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
=
==
=. t =. i
=.4 =. i =. I - - I g: -=. 6
=.I
=. t,=. I =.i =. '
m=- i =. i =. -. ;
= =.
- c.
=t
=.; =. i
=.4
=. I
=.6 =. i =.i.-
C..
T.
I.
=.
E.. E.. C..
=
m.
e m -
~
4-m u
e m
- =
-m
=
a e e e
2.
W
- 2 2
T.
- E s
i.
C 2.
=.
2.
2.
- 2..= = = =
========*======c J
z
=.
I.
w
=
.= = = = =
.e
.i
- c. i
=l-i. i. i. i. i. i. 1..i. i. !. !. !. I. i. i. i. i.-!. !. ?. E.
i
- i. i. i. i. i.. i.
E m
e
-=. I =!
=.4
=i. =.1
=. I =. 4 =. i =. 4 =. !
e.t N=. I=.I
=.1
=. I
=l
,.4
=. 6 =. I =. ' -
- =
z
- s...' =. I =
~=
N e -
e
=
e m e
a.
4 4
e m
m e
m
- y
- ~. m -
n m
E e
5-
=. 3 =. =. =..
y n
e m
~
. =. =. =.. =. =.
. =. =. =.
.,= = = = = =. =... =. =.
. =.
. b =. {
m e
m m
y n
y g.
= = =- = = = = = =
= = = = = = = = = C
-, e e.
m m
g g y ~ ~ ~
m. g = ~
m ~
5 5 5.
E.
E. 5 !. ' ~E. E. ' g5 E. $. g f
-g
. 5 5 5 5 E.
E.
E.
E.
5 E.
E.
E.
E.
E.
=.,. =.
=.s =. i =. i =. I =. i
=.t
=. i -=. 4 =.,. =. i
=.I
=. I =.i =.i =. = e. =.. =.; =..
= =. = = =. :
--=t
.~- g. t,.i -,.i
.t q ~
g -
m e
a ~ =
m
=
4 g.
~
n
- - ~ ~ ~ ~ g m
m
~ ~
-=. =. =. =. =.
E. 8 3 =. =. =.
I.
. =. =. =. =.. =...
^5
. =.
g m
~
~ ~
=.=- = === = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
m-m m a m m e m' s m m m m m e a m m m h
2 5
m N
N m > ~.
m m W
h.
N.
M. -
m.+. m>
m h
N N.
N.
k.
e e
h e
o N
,s S
e s
A e
M N
- m. '-
e m -
N N
m -
M N
m - -
N N
m -
N M
M M
N W
m a
sm
.N m - e N
3 e
N m
4 e
e J
e
=
s E
N N
n'.'n n'
m' e'
m' '
m' w'
e' a'
e' e'
a' a'
a' -
a' n'
3' 5
n-0 m
T 0
u_.- ~. m,
- ..~. m =. - ~
m
, m 4
~. m = - ~
m
- e..
N m m e
E l L 1
i I
..y'em-g-+
g m e.
w w_
p e-
')'.
i Aha ni is idiNI*.)
so#*
.sAs-Sill!
4 JiWisiilinoJi As. Ainnumidi e'AssiidoAsei SAeN'll.5. tm Siih 57AliuNS G.
ss heta Aciiy6ey gCl/.nl. 2 im'Ai' aim ae's E oAlii os i.2 h
i; G
is i
J.
'E_
o.is7 o.4mie.
- o. i sa._e.mm
'27 7979 ti ass.o.oin o.e44 0.uisi o.2:5 0.uiu
- u. is.7eo.tus. o.2o2 0.tus
- 0. 4 4.si. sum. c.imge.tuin,
3
- u. 4 2 o. iu>=. o. i i e.o. inen
- o. a ssin.im7 a.eus.o.imi.
- o. iis2.o. inn o.02s.,o.on:
- o. suis.ie.sais
- o. i27 o.uo.
- o. iim.o.ims
- 2n 7-in.79 1
t o.inM o. sus H.i2 0.tio4
- n. i 7 s.o.tma 0.on i.,.tuH
- n. i sa.ti.ims o.silofo.in 2 te.eis.4.o.eW 6 o
29 7-25-79 o.es.2 0.olo c.i4s.o.oin 3
so 7 3o.79 o.4.ip.uin
- o. e ss.o.ni n o.ina.o.nus
- o. n u.o. mm
- o. i 7 3 0.ms o.o93.o.emm o.n s.o. ems
- o. is7.o.oin.
- p. in 2.o.mi7
'u a Ja. 79 e u.ons.o.ous o.su.a.si.inus
- o. essa.,0. suir o.u743 o.iuin
- o. er.m. o. ceu, o.ai74.o.iins o.o47 0. ems n.oso.a.eius o.im7.es.siin
- o. in7 0.im7
- a. ip2.o.cou7
- c. 21 0.mi
- n. ion.p.ims
- o. iso.,o.ons
- o. insf o.ims o.as 2.,o.ons 's.es.79
- a. g os.o.ans o.nns.o. ems 3
o.i=.2 o.= w e.asi.e.m 2 n.nu.o.ma u
n.2o.79
- o. m. i. e. mm o.o4.u.mu.
o.us7.e.ims
- o. ui s.o. m4
.o.m.s.o.nos o.sw.i.p.uos 1
si n.n 79
- a. m.i. o. mu.
o.nsng.mu.
o.ornia.mu.
- o. m.a.. o. m4 o.is2 0. uni n.oss.o.nas
- e. suis.o. inn
- u. cia.o. cat o.assen.wis ss 9 s.79-o.uss.o.mu.
o.oso..o.ims o.im e._o.ims o.use.a. inh n.o75 0.isus o.as7.o.a.o4 c.uss.o.inis o.ina.o.eises o.si42 0.nos se. -
9.so.79 a.unto.nor o.o29.o.ww.
o.o22.o.mu o.o23.o. inn o.o29.o. wn o.sesp.uus
- o. int..o.coi. a.m.s.o.imi. o.os2.o.mn
~
g 57
'9 87 79 se.o7n.p. sisN.
o.tN.J.o.ms
- 0. 07 s. II. thN.
o.uil8.o.oam
- o. iMi8. o. thM.
- 0. 4M 9.,0. m t o.tu.s eo. TMH
- 0. tis 9.o.8ms o.o25.fi.am2
.i.
i-8 in 9-24 79 a.ois2.is.no7 a.079.u.shm
- c. o91.ai.uim o.u79.n. saw.
- p. u96.o. amw.
0.02i.e.sm s
- o. ele s.se.oin4 c.o27.o.sms is. ori.e.enH j
g T
o.o 2.,o.imi o.o24,eo.uis2 n.o 2,se.sisi2 o.o18 o.tu4 c.oss.,o.thH 29 so.i.79 0.02s,.o.uos o.o26 0.ihis o.osp10.ieni n.ost.o.smi 1
~
sa:n.79 a.o2s.o.oo4 n.u24p. inn u.of s.o. sun
- o. unio.mn o.olo.a.ms o.nzs.o.mn o.oi 9.o.m2 a.mn.a. m2 o.mn.e..mi.
4o.
4 in-is.i9
- n. u2o.o.ims
- o. n u..o. mn o.on n.uos n.u 63o.ma o.u2 s.o.mn o.uisto.mn o.im6:n.noi
- n. m s.o.com o.mm.o.ons a
T 52 so.n.is o.uss.u.nor o.sno.u.mn u.in i.e. mi n.ow.o.ima u.os s.o.ima n.oi6.o.mn o.on.o.uos o.uis.o.ims H.cio.a.m2 6
9 I
n in.29 79 a.u2n.o.nos p.o2 5.n.mn o.o24;o.uos u.u249. inn o.u24.o.une o.ols.o.uos
- u. mn.o.m e.cor.o.ime o.m m.o.sm a
q 9
4 si.s.79 c.in i. o. ims o.uss.o.no4 a.oi7.o.inw.
- o. oss_.o.eun o.'uss.o. m i o.o2s.si.ims o.o29 o.ine2 a.uso.o.ima si.iiss9.o.coi j
MO..O is si.is.79 a.us2.o. mis o.usi.o.uos o.m.i.e. uni
- n. m. i. e. inn si.o74.o.ines o.siss.o.iini n.o72.si.euis se. ass.o.inis o.nzi.e.ois
,4h si.49 79 U. insgo.nes
- 0. i n s.o.sm7 a.asufo.us2
- p. i 2 s.o. sm7
- p. ii4 to.iio7 0.im.o.(ms
- o. net.o.not o.ss9.si.ims o.u i7 en.this MP) 47 s i.2e. 79 n.uss.o.cor'
- o. m.i. o. ww.
o.m.9.o.uur o.sm.sto.oos' o.ne.2.o.ons o.sw.i..o.asw o.uss.o.mi u.oi s.o.co2 - e.ou..o.on2
{
4n s e a-79 a.nu.a.uus o.o29.o.mu o.osa u.mm o.oso..o.nos o.02s.o.ima n.o 4 0.m2 o.oso.a.ima n.ina.m.ms u.o 9.o.m2 gg 1.ims ei.silien.m M o.il2h.o.iun o.u29.H.mn o.clu e o.shn o.o29.o.ml n.seon eo.insi n.029.ii.isol n.uneo. sten j
49 2.ip.79 n.o2: 0 so 2.i7 79 a.n u.o.mn
- o. u so.o.mn
- o. o i... o. mn o.o29.o.imo n.uiu n.mn o.uis.o. cue 0.uw.o. inn o.nu.o.nus o.o u.a. sun si 32 2s. 19 a.o29.n.ma o.ui...o.nus o.os 2.u. mo
- n. un.u.mo a.u u.u.mn
- o. ors.o.ous o.ou.a.on2 a.nio..m2
- n. i=9. o. im i g
s2 2-u.79
- a. u2 i. u. m.s o.on.a.oin o.oas.n.nus
- o. oa s.o.mu n.o2 5.o.mn o.ami.o.im2 a.ni a.n.im:
n.u28.o.nu2 a.ons.o.nus
~
+-
.4 m
/
=
W e
4Z<
en 4
4=
Z t.
O ee E
M.
em.
N w.
8%f
==
Q.O-N.
er.
O.
=.*e nn.
- m. -M.
M.
C.
M.
ina O#
W
==
a g
=
=
O O
O O M
in.
C 8
N.
=*
M
=*
W W
v v v
4%s v
v v
v v
v 8')
e
==
ee
==
en en v
46 teJ Q
.J W
6 M.
E*
O Z3 at C
C--@.
en.
='
M M
gr O
ar C
- 3 5
==
M w
N O
c c M
g
=.d W
Q C
v v
v v
v v
v v
. C Q*
g a=
b
.e V
v 3
N O
T Q
En
==
d M
=
t
-o m
==*
k D
N
==
C.
C, m.
=
O.g e.
er.
e.
er.
1r.
O.
m.
==. Q e
4 **
O en.
C.
M.
y
.,a
==
==
e
.J g
- p. ga
-g C
er.
=d W
C C
C M
gw P'*
.C.=
ar.
N. ' C M.
k.
==
a g
y v
y p
gg y
y y
v v
y
- = g,e
.=
se en
=
O N
Z
- 5. 3 W
==
eC 8
v m.
e
=
g O
w M
. E
. = -
w e.
e w
s
. Nw==
5
=8
.e:
C w
tea Y
en.
m.
M.
M.
C.
g w
- =
w
=. a m -.. o w.
O
== 2 en an in.
C er.
N.
O en.
==.
O.,a
=
. c
=
m.
a-.
ag
>. =
0
=
6 w
==
.s e
=
e-m we E
en O ** **
C C.
5""
N O
CC.
C
=8 s.
6
=
==
an O.
Q M
as
.T a S.
N v
v v
v v
ed 6
C v
v v
O M
g
. y. M Q
W eC C
E 5
5 W.
m o '-
s=)
M.
O.
O.
3 2
O.,,,
In e
W O C
~
gr.
=.=.
O,a e.n O
O
=.=e c N.
O.
e ma y
CE E
.=J 4r to.
W O
W Pt.
C O.
M.
C N.
=d
=
=d eg v
. v en
.a O O N
==. O eme C
==
4 v
v v
o=
aC 6
O Z
E aC E
~
.n U
=* e C
gr.
er.
na.
N.
N.
N.
N.
M.
C.
= =
w
.g u
to N.
O O== O en C
o O W-ar.
C.
N.
.v O =(
C O== O
.is' 2 "J 5
M
== a0 gr"'
N' N'
N.
M.
- - ~ *'
- ' ~ -
=d
==
E e
v v
.n v
di" O
=*
N O
O O C
C N
== Z "3
U lad.J to *C W
O-ww ins K 'w=
sc N
=
gr e
M
- P e
an,a 0
fut
==
gr 6
gr - O O
O ft er er b
g(
==
m
==
e N
ien
-========
w
.4 y.
e e
e e
4 e
e a
0 0
9 9
E.
M IO G
Q ene G
ta ed b
Q 3
3 e%
G G
e e w w w W
Q S
=.
W CC M
V w
W G
$0ll
=
4 O2 W -
ll
.!!i"
~ TABLE 12(Cont.)
C0iaCENIRAllot45 Of CNetA EBCIIIRS 11419W81184V C(NF05 tits Of JAF
)-
AIN Pali ICl4 Alf SNrtI5
~3 Results in thits of 10 pCi/m s 2 signa htKLit(5 JtLY.
AUGUST StPILitt[R OCl00ER 140V[itiE R DECtet[R of F-SITE COIP058iE Be-1 110:11 84sl4 67 ell 4718 69s9
-Fis?
Co-60 (1.4
<1.3
<l.I
<l.1
<1.0 (0.9 C5-13 7.
1.4:0.5
<0.9
<0.8 (0.6
<0.6
<0.6
' 2.0 (l.I
<l.5
<0.5 Ce-141
<1.2
'<2.1 Ce-148
<3.4 (3.7
<3.5
<l.7 (3.4,
(l.7 lt Others
<LLD (LLD
<tLD.
<ll D (LID (LLD I
e g
4 ON-Stic OlitoSIIE Be-7 85s9 75:8 64:6 54:5 66:7 64s6 l'a-54 (0.3 (0.4 (0,.4 -
<0.3
<0.3 (0.3 t
Co-60 (0.6
<0.6
<0.5 (0.5
<0.3
<0.5 6-s Ru-103 (0.3 (0.5 (0.4
<0.3 (0.3
<0.2 i
Ru-106
<3.4
<l.8
<l.7 (1.7 (1.7 (I.6 Cs-137 0.8:0.2 (0.6 0.4:0.2 (0.3
<0.3 0.5:0,2
+
Ce-141
<0.8
<1.4 (0.5
<0.8 (0.4
<0.5
}
Ce-144 3.7s1.1
<1.8
<l.1 (1.6
<l.0
<l.5 '
OtherY
<t LD (LLD
R[fLR 10 SLCilota li t, SAMPLE Suf1MARIES, FOR LLD RAreGES OF VARIOUS HUCLICES (ENylRONMENTAL SAMPLE
$1 A T ISilCAL AHALYSIS).
r 0
h
t
,e-O
- t'
}'
TARIJE R3 teII"-JAF 5871:
IssWTWHe00lNTAl. 438MtuiAL CAalltfle? AC71VITY 4WF-511F. STATitutS 8 :l/e4 4.e.f.6 l-lil 4
'leretless est3 E pall!
C pg p2 F
F e3 I
,3-9-79
< 3.68e-n2
< 2.69e-02
<3.68e-o2
< 4. 9 4e-02
<4.pye.n2 2
l'-16-79
<2.eSe-02
<2.n3e-02
<t.71e-02
<l.65e-02
< 2. 25e-et2
- I.97e-m2 3
1-23-79
< 2. s le-n2
<2.IBe-c2
<2.17e-02
<l.73e-n2
<2.2te-of
< 2.4 7e 02
' 2. Ole-02
<2.49e-n2
<2.78.e-02 4
3-30-79
< l.22e-02 '
<2.nle-02
<2.82e-02 5
.2-6-79
<l.7pe-02
<l.95e-02
< 2. 29e-02
<l.73e-02
< 2. 2fe-02
<2.55e fl2 6
2 83-79
<2.tsse-02
<l.02e-02
<2.fs6e-02
<l.69e-02
<3.sute-n2
<2.82c-D2.
7 2-20-79
- 2.04e.02
<2.34c-02
- 2. 4 3e-02
<l.78e-02
<2.35e-82
<2.mae-02 2
2 27-79
< l.7 7e-ft2
< 2.4sie-n2
<2.39e-02
< 2. 29e n2
<3.nSe o2
<2.25e-02 9
3-6 79 cl.97e-02
<l.76c-n2
<l.95e-02
< l. 4 9o - st2
<2.d=5e-02
- 2.89c-n2 le-3-83-79
<l.ase-u2
<l.9Be-02
<l.73e-02
< 2.p2e- 02
<2.49e.02
< 2.41e-n2 -
8y Il 3-20-79
< 2. 31e-02
<2.24e-a2
<2.31e-02
<2.21e-02
<2.9he-#2
<2.63e-02 9
42 3-27 79 42.00e-02
<2.85e-n2 el.76c-02
<i.9tle-n?
42.4te-02
<2.f.Sc 92 q
-83 4-3-79 el.86e-e2
<l.95e-02
<t.73e-02
<2.15eal2
< 2.4 9e-n2
< 1. 21e-t 2 le 4-10-79
< 2. 2Re- 02
<9.55e et)
<2.04e-n2
<2.08e-02
< 2. nbe-elf
<2.a3c-n2
.15 4 37-79
<2.25c-02
<2.nle-n2
<2.19c.n2
<2.cle-02
- 2.9t.e-n2
<3.24e-82 16.
4-24-79
<2.27e-02
<2.32e-02
<2.12e-882
< 2. 25e -832
<3.73e-n2
<1.67e n2 e
I 1
l7 5.l-79
< 2. 51e'- 02
<2.l2e-n2 "l.77e-n2
<!.76e-n2
<2.57c n2
- 2.81c 02 i
e In 5-a.79
<t. time of
<2.50e-n2
<2.one.02
< l.t:5,-02
< 2. 8ste-02
<3. lee-n2 19 5 15-79
<1.29e-n2
<l.92e-n2
< l.95e-st2
<l.s4c n2
<2.62c p2 2n 5-22 79
< g.92e.892
<2.32e-02
< 2. 41e - tal
<l.26e-n2
< 2. 41e-en!
21 5-10-79
<l.6ne-02
<I.97e-02
< l. s t e -tv2
< l. 7se -et2
<l.92c-n2 22 6 5-79
<2.73c-asi
<2.7ne n2
<2.lte n2
<2.59e-512
<2.75e-n!
23 6-82-79
<2.3te-n2
<2.21e-02
< 2. 3de - elf
<2.f*T t-El2
<2.57e-es2 24 4.-19 79
<2.37c-02
<2.39e-82
<2.87e-elf
<l.6te-n2
< 2. 3 t e-O !
<2.fmo-up
)*
25 f.- 28.-79
- 2.fu.e-n1
<2.42c-n2
-2.e.*-82
<2.ute m2
- 2. p b et2
<3.lge.n2 26 7-3-79
<2.54-92
<l.95c.n2
<2.She-n!
<2.5Ae-n! ~
< 2.15c-es2 42.47e-n2 M
e MUJ1 %
.. sw e st r. iv e n e re frer r.- Tne
" Van.l.e l i sm m
.s 4
1 1 A511 13 f e)sil.1 9ee'-JAF Silti INVl1NWeENTAI tilAltt3 TAI. 8:ANIRilNJi MTIVIIY etI F-SII11 SIATitWIS i :l/ml.4.ad.de I-lit d
Im.ition 1
Ist I k' InAIIf '
C-til isy li F
I; 27 7-10-79
<2.52e-u2
<2.s.se-02
< l. t.ae - 02,
<2.59c-n2
<2.64e-H2
<2.69e-U2 la 7 87 79
<2.3se-02
<2. 3s.e -n2
<2.32e-H2
<2.3te-02
<2.3Ae-02
<2.52c-e2 29 7-24-79
< 2. 84.e -#2
<2.3Mc-02 2.72e-02
<2.75e-02
<3.49e-02
<3.37c-82
.lu 7-31-79
<l.82e 02
<2.2s.e-02
<2.25e-u2
<l.92e-02 42.ble-n2
<2.52e-u2 il a-7-79'
<2.6Ho-H2
<2.37e 02
<2.42e-02
<2.31e-02
<3.25e-u2
<2.57e 02 l
12 3-14-79
<l.93e-02
<2.35e-02
<2.70e 02
< l. ed.e- 02
<2.79e-02
<1.one-e2 33 2-21-79
<l.5He-H2
<l.81e-02
< l. 99e - u2
<1.88e-02 42.69e-n2
<2.39e-02 34 8-18 79 el.lHlo-u2
< 2. 44.e-432
<2.87e-n2 si.N2e-02
<2.89e-02
- 2.77e 02 35 "9 4-79
<2.lle-ul
<2.85e-02
< 1, M.e- 02
<l.s9e-82
<2.55e-02
<2.Ile-02 Af.
9-88-79
<l 92e-n2 42.5te-02
<2. ole-u2
<l.97e n2-
<2.74e-u2 t
17 9 18-79
<2.82e-02
<l.83e-02
<2.49e-02
<l.94e-02
< 2. 51 e 02,
I 33 9-25-79
<2. nee-02
<1.97e-n2
< l. 5Nao-H2
<2.52c-o2
<3.c7e-02
<J.82e-02<
d 39 10-2-79 '
<2.21e-H2
<2.40u-02
<2.28e-02
<2.2a.e-02
<2.77e-02
<2.78e-02 l
1 4n '
10 9-79
<2.t:7e-02
<l.73e-u2
<1.62c-02
<2.05e-H2
< 2. 86e - n2
<2.34e-H2 i
1 48 lu-lh-79
<l 72e-02
<2.48e-H2
<l.i.Ac-H2
<2.43e-02
<2.67e-H2
<1.800-02
- (
3 42 10-23-79
<l.37c-02
<l.9te-02
<l.72e-02
<l.90e-H2
<2.42e-n2
<2.32e-02 r
/
45 lu do -79
<2. ole-02
<2.38e-02
<2.07e c2
<I.7se-02
<l.99e-n2
<2.49e-H1 il' 11-6-79
<2.22e-u2
<2.ple-n2 42.uoe-u2
<l.n4e-o2
<l.79e-n2
<l.8s.e-02 45 41-14 79
<l.99e-HJ
<2.02e-02
<2.05e-02
<1.19c-02
<l.6te-of
<2.46e-02.
'i 4h 18-21-79
<2.35c-H2
<2.ple-n2
<3.33e u2
<l.79e-02
<2.50e-02
<3 37e.02 47 18-27-79 42.55e-u2
<2.9%-u2
<l.9ac-H2
<2.H5e-H2
<1.90e-u2
<3.ple.02 4s -
82-4-7te
<2.23c-02
<2.Meu-02
<2.H7c-H2
<2.Ibe-02
<2.Ibe-n2
<2.e. le-u2.
49 32-11-7:n
<3.nle-02
<2.23e-02
<I.A3e-H2
<2.38e-02
<2.04o-st2
<2.83e.u2 g
su 12-88-79
<2.2ne-02
<l.93c-H2
<2.05e-02
< 2. 2s.e - 02 41.54e-HJ
<l.95c o2
)
b SR 82-2s. 79
<1.8pe-u2
<2.pne-02
<1.59e-02
< l.90e-H2
<l.47c-02
<l.4le-H2 I
52 82-31-79
<l.58c-02
<7.n9e-02
<2.15c.nl
< 2. sen c - 02
<3.IIc.n2.
< 2. 7s.e-#2 a
-
- V.au.l.e I i se l
. I
s
+
w 1 Ahl2i l 4.
NMi*.lAF SITl!
I)0VlueN#4134 TAI. tilAttt31Al. CANI'RIDilli AGIVilY (BirSilti S1 AfinNS 1 :l/mi 4.66s%
I-III 4
I. oration DJ li F
tl ll 8
J K
14.8% '
DAlli pg I
l-8-79
<4.83e 812
<4.21e-n2
<3.pne-02
<2.73e 02
<3.nSe-02
<3.pte-n2
' <l.35e-02
< l.tMe -02
< l. es'ae-es2 e
~
e
<8.41e-01
<9.31e 03
<1.5Be 02 j-2 I-85-79
'<2.98e-02
<2.66e-st2 cl.77e,02
<l.56c-n2
<2.tre -et2 1
3 1 22-79
<3.74e-02
<3.15e-ts2
<2.57c-n2
<1.14e-02
<2.49e-n2
<l.57e-02
. <l.14e-02
<l.47e-02 4
l-29-19
<2.t.5e-02
<3.13e-02
<l.9We-02
< 2.10e-92.
<2.02e-n2
<l.90e-Ill
<9.34e-Ill
<5.32e-n3
' <9 21c-el3 5
2-5-79
<2.97e.n2
<2.89e <2.35e-02
<2.39e-et2
< 2. sMie-n2
<l.74e-n2
<s.31e-n3
.n 96e t:3
<9.74e.n1 6
2-82-79
<2.95e-02
<2.76e-02
<l.56e-02
<2.37e-02
<l.63e-02
<l.39c-02
' <I.37e-H2
< A.19e <9.75e-ut 1
2-2n-79
<3.coe-o2
<2.79e-02
<2.62e-#2
<3.13e-02
<2.nse-n2
<2.27e-n2
<l.4te-n2
<9.49e-n1
<s.9te n1 a
2 26 79
<3.90e-02
<3.25e-02
<2.59c-n2
<3.52e-el2
<2.67e-02
< 2. 3 2e-02
<l.18e-02
<9.26e-n1
<s.78 e-t:1 l'
9 3-5-79
<2.47e-02
<2.86e-n2' 42.27e-02
<2.4t.e-02
<2.29e-n2
<l.6te-02
<l.11e-02
< l.tMne n2
- <7.45e-u3 la 3-12-79
<2.16e-02
<2.55e-02 c l. 34 e-sp2
<2.16e-n2
<l.98e-fl2
<l.96e-02
< l. nhe-et 2.
<9.80e.03
<l.Ile-02 l
11 3-89-79
<2.55e-02
< 3.tMeo-n2 -
41.89e-02
<l.46e-02
<2.22e-st2
<l.a.oe n2 cl.74c-02
< 9. 2'ac -01
<l.69e-n2
. os 52 3-26-79
<2.66c-Il2
<3.57e-n2
<l.7Ae-02
<2.6ste 02
<2.39e-02
<2.06c n2
<7.64e-n.1
<9.31o.01 el.psc.n2 f
13 4-2-79
<2.64e-02
<3.01c-02
<2.31e-n2
<2.88e-02
<2.lle-02
<l.65e-02
< 2. 85e set
<1.19e-02
< 9. tNee-03
'14 4-9-79 e l. R 2e-el2
<3.36e-elf
<2.12e-02
<2.6te-02
<2.51e-s12
<2.22e-02
<l.17e-02
<9.28e-01 85 4-lb-79
<3.20e-02
<3.34e-n2
<2.ste-n2
<l.6te-02
<2.6te-02
<l.77e-n2 49.nle-n1 49.47e-n1
<9.3te.n3 p
<l.22c n2 16 4-23-79
<3.02e-02
.3.Sese-n2
<2.2ne-02
<3.05e-02
<2.0Ae-02
<l.25e-02
.9.75e-n1 17 4 an-79
<3.19e-n2 42.a6e-e2
< l.9's n2
< 2. 53 e- 02
<2.24e-n2
<l.5ne-02
<l.n7e-si2
< s. 46e - t:1
< l,3 e est e
la 5 7-79
. <2.62e-02
< 2. 8 2e-182
<l.99e-02
<2.23e-02 42.23c-02 cl.37e-H2 cl.12e-02
<9.21e-01
< 7. 79e-ell 89 5-14-79
.2.51e-02
<3.pte-02
< 2.40e-02
<2.t.8e-02
<2. erne n2
<l.3te-02
<t.Ile-n2
. <A.5le-o1 20 5-21-79
< 2.44e 02
<3.nic.02
<2.Ile-02
<I. Ale-02
<l.92e-n2
<l.41c-02
<a.4oe-n3
<9.sfe n1
' <n.55e-n1 21 5-29 79
<2.2pe-n2
<3.84e-02
<l.77e-02
<1.93e-H2
<l.7pe-02
<l.44c-02
<7.33e n1-
<n.abe-ni n. 22e-sti 1
22 6-4-79
<3. %e-n2
<3.67e-02
< 2. 4 3e- 02
<2.92e-02
< 2. 51c-tI2
<l.82c-02
< l. I pe-u2
< 9. s l e.c l
<l.4ne-u2 21 6-11 79
<2.65e 02
<3.2Re-02
<l.92e 02
<2.86e-n2
<2.23c-n2
< l. 22e- 02
<S.44e-n1
<1.cle 02 el.13c.p2 24 6.In 79
<2.33c-02
<2.95c H2
<2.21e n2
<2.76e-02
<2.41c-st2
<I.lse-n2
<9.3ne-01
<9.95c n1
<l.nic of 25 6-25-79
<2.77e-02 43.tMee-n2
<2.29e 02
<2.31e-n2
< 2. 23c-st2
<l.29s-02
<1.nic-n2
<9.02e-n3 el.o2e.n2 4
26 7-2-79
<1.46e-02
<4.27e-02
<2.25e-n2
<3.57c-n2
<2.ple-n2
<l.55e-n2
- 49. 95e- 01
<I n'.e-u2 9.tMie-n3
<r.,le..l.ce>ti."
D #*D D
N ]lI%
/h Sh
-oo a1
[
TABIJ: 14 (811N8'.)
i
.I peNN.IAF Sill:
j'-
1.NVilHN#NNI Al 81644t0648. 4:ARTitild;ti ACTIVITY tan-SITI SI'ATitlNS l 4.66/II
.l 1-831 l<l/m ImcatIsm we f.E -
IaAll!
lel 112 li I
s; II I
J K
27-7-9-79
<3.Hle-02
<2.53e-n2
<2.6te-ut'
<2.13e-02
<2.02e-02
<l.5se-02
<l.ine-02
<l.15e-02
<l.lle-u2
' 28 7 86-79
< 2.4. l e - u 2
<3.5se n2
<l.95c-02
<2.73e-02
<2.26e-02
<l.30e-02
<9.92e-03
< l.13e-e 2
<l.eSe-e2 29 7-23-19
<2.32c-n2
<3.66c-u2
<2.72e-02 42.95e-02
<2.40s-02
<l.05e-02
<l.ppe <8.73e-03
<6. sac-03 Ef '
30 7-30-79
<2.Ste-02
<3.45e-02
<2.47e-02
<2.79e-02
< 2. 90 e-st2
< l. ed.e-02
<9.56c-03
<l.tWee-02
<l.e3e-u2 l
I 31 n -de-79 43.54e-n2
<4.11e 02
<2.52e-u2
<2.22e-n2
< 2. 74.e - 02
<l.7se-02
<l.83e-02
<A.99e-03 49.76e-p1
't l
32 M-11-79
<2.57e-u2
<2.t.te-02
< 2. pt.e- 02 42.ple-02
<l.83e-02
< l. 4 7e-432
<9.62e-u3
- 49. sac-el
<7.stsc-o s Il s-20 79
<3.61e-02
<2.aSe-02
<2.uoc-02
<l.nle-02
<l.73e-02
<l.09e-02
<l.em.e-u2
< l. l ete-n2 49.9ee-03 54 8-27-79 42.62e-02
<2.95e-H2
<2.15e-02
<l.73e-02
<l.99e-02
<l.48e-02
< l. 2 tee-02
<l.89e-02
- 49. 4 9e-03 35 U-1-79
<l.65e-02
< 2. 6sse -u2
<2.24e-02
<1.57e-n2
<l.85e-02
<l.i.6e-H2
<7.79e-01
<8.67e-03 B.93e-un g
. 34.
9 In-79
<2.4te-02
<2.42e-02
<l.95e-02
<1.49c-02
<l.75e 02
<l.44e-02
<9.t #e < 9. 8.s.e- # 3
< S.59e - es3 un ba 37 9-17-79
<2.95e-u2
<2.03c-u2
<l.sle-02
<2.43e-02
<l.84c-02 c a.55e-st2
<l.25e-62
<l.puc-02
<7. % e-ni I
' 42.11o-02
< 2. e une-02
.2. loc-02
< l. 74 e - el2
<2.ple-02
<l.64e-02
<l.s*Ac-02
<1.4pe-02
< 5. 7pe- 03 la 9 24-79 39 10 1-79
<3.45e-u2
<2.33e-02
<2.42e-u2
<l.She-02
<2.21e-H2
<l.90c-02
< 9. 4.0o - 01
<l.05e-02
<8.6de-03 40 lu s-79
<2.97e 02
<l.50u-of
<l.82e 02
< l. 4 3c- 02 cl.a.7e u2
< l.tMe 02
<5.43e-ul
<l.65e-02 48.7se-03 48 10 15-79
<2.sle-u2
<l.s7e-n2
<l.77e 02
<2.14e-u2
<l.85e-02
<l.16e-02 S.sd.e-u3
<S.4se-03
<a.75e.n3 42 1d-12-19
<2.59e <2.24e-02
<l.38c-02
<l.63e-02
<l.52e-02
<l.54e-n2 49.43e 65
<9.soe-a3
<a.39e.nl.
43 10-29-79.
<2.6te-H2
<l.94e-u2
<2.71e-02
<3.81e-n2
<l.82e-02 si.73e-02
<7.44.e-ni
<S.24e-03
<6.lete u3
)
48 11-5-79
<3.lic-02 si.6te-H2
<3.60s-02
<l.52e-n2
<l.50c-u2
<1.34e-02 st.02e-02
<l.17e-el2
<s. loc-u3 45 11-83-79
<2.59e H2
<2. Ole-u2
- 42. 9 8 e-u2
<l.47e-H2
<l.42e-H2
<l.44e-u2
<S.Dae-03
< 8.92e- 0 4
<6.Sle-ni
!l 4 t.
11-89-79
.<l.19e-of
<3,35e-02
<1.43e-02 cl.99e-u2
<l.57e-o.
<l.79c-02 c l.14 e-02 cl.32e-02
<a.ple.as 47 81-26-79
.3.49e-02
<2.3ne 02
<3.29e-n2
<1.38e 02
<l.45e-02
<l.58e-02 49.32e-sl3
<l.43c-ul
< 5. 26e-se.1 48 12-3-79 43.23e u2
<2.07e-02
<3.19e-#2
< l. 84 e- 02
<2.23e-02
<l.34e u2
<l.33e-n2
<l.190 02
.g. lee-03 4
19 12-10-79
<3.07c 02
<2.24c.u2 48.35e-ol
<l.52e-02
<l.9to-02
<l.Ile-02 el.H9e-H2
<l.lle-02
<l.02e-02 a
Lu 12-17-79
<2.95e 02
<1 u9u-H2
<2.. toe-02
< l. 9 tie-n2
< 2. 2 5c <a.4 3e-all. - < l. 49n- 02
< l.19e-el2
<l.82c-02 58 12-2s.-79
<2.3a.e-02
<l.54e u2 c l. tk e-H2
<l.57e-02 49.75e-pl
<l.56e-02
<7 E.No-O S
<9.97e-93
<f. 38e-03 52 12-31-79
<4.59e-u2
<2.4% D2 4 3.4deo-n2
<2.25c-02
<2.57c-02
<l.77c-02
<l.27e-u2
<l.42e-02
<l.2le.uf b
- t'umge luoperal6vc 1
... a
s.
/
TABLE 15 CIRECT RADIATIC:1 MEASURDIEf3T5 - CUARTERLY RE31LTS CUARTER STATIC:1 fA23ER LOCATICN 1st 2nd 3rd 4th
'3 D1 on Site 25:1 1725 16:4 4
C2 on site 1:::
11:3 15 3 1723 E on Site 11:1 1021 14 1 14:1 6
F on 51to 11:1 82:
1321 14:2 7
G on Site 9 21 8::
15 5 13:1 8
C off $1te 12 2 1327 17:3 16:2 9
D1 off Site 10:1 9 22 1421 14 3 10 D2 off Site 10:1.
9:1 13:2 11 E off 5fte lost 9 21 1333 13 ;
12 F off Site
. 9:0 9:2 13:3 15:*
13 G off Site lot!
9:3 14:3 13:4 14 5'.i Oswego lost 15 1 13:3 16::
15 Pole 66. W. Sound 921 3:2 13 2 1:24 16 Pole 51. W. Sounc 1021 3:1 15:3 13:4 17 Prog. Cen. E. Yard 1:20 1113 1824 1622 18 Prog. Cen..Picn*c 11 1 1023 13:3 12:1 19 -
Pole 9. E. Souno 11:0 1012 14:2 1523 20 JAF snore. W. Ecur.d
- 1 26 ?
21:3 33:3 21 Pole 67. E. Bounc 11:1 1124 late 1824 22
- Pole 53. E. Sound 921 set 1321 1::1 23 H on 5tte 15:1 1212 16:1 19:2 24 1 on Site 112:
82:
14:2 12:2 25 J on Site 10:1 10:1 las:
14:3 26 K on Site 10:2 s3 14:3 13:1 27 Lign Pole (!!).JAF 65:3 5326 41:4 72:13 21 Lignt Pole (E) JAF 218:20 27 :12 131:18 188:39 29 N. ' Fence (E) JAF 1:6:19 117:19 83:10 100:2 30 N. Fence (t:1) JAF 342:
2126 23 2 4:27 31 N. Fence (144) ?.HP-1 43 2 56 6 4:29 53:7 32 N. Fence (W) t:PP-1 28:3 3427 27:4 29:3 33 iWP/JAF 7 win Pole (W) of JAF M. Fence 25:2 15:1 19:2 34 N of Unit 2 on Lake 15:1 1633 132;
- geg 35 E of Unit 2 on Stor. 51dg.
16:1 179:19 14:2
- a
- 36 Pole Tower, F?i!-1-13 1121 11::
14,1 j$;]
37 Pole Tower. F?tf1-14,
14:0 l6st 19 2 18 2 2
38 SE End of Shop on Fence !:1P-1 16:2 1431 1931
- 33 39
?:'S-1 :1E Gate 35::11 389:c6 401:39 445:37 40 tit Gate ic1P-1
'39:1 42:1 46:3 59:10 41 Paint Snoo W.
Unit 2 24:1 33:6 33:3 40:7 42
,Turo. Bldg. (;M)
Unit 2 -
56:16 83:12 77216 93:4 Average 34.05
- 40. 3.
31.s9 41.1, TLCs lost.
.:,o
~
L.
e s
TABLE 16 CONTINUOUS RADIATION HONITORS* (G1) mR/hr 1st HALF mR/hr
~
LOCATION PERIOD MIN.
MAX.
AVE.
C Off-Site January 0.010 0.030 0.018 February 0.012 0.023 0.018 March 0.013 0.030 0.020 April 0.015 0.030 0.022 May-0.015 0.030 0.022 June 0.018 0.032 0.021 D On-Site January 0.035-0.065 0.050 g
February 0.035 0.080 0.050 Starch 0.030-0.100
-0.050 April 0.030 0.120 0.040 May 0.015 0.040 0.020 June 0.010 0.030 0.012 D, On-Site January 0.010-0.020 0.012 February 0.025 0.035 0.050
~
i..
March 0.010 0.028 0.020 April 0.023 0.060 0.040 May 0.030 0.080 0.045 June 0.012 0.040 0.020 E On-Site January 0.015-0.025 0.025 Februarv 0.012 0.025 0.020 March 0.015 0.050 0.025 Acril 0.015 0.065 0.022
~ ~ -
May 0.018 0.040 0.020 June-0.015 0.035 0.020 F On-Site
' January 0.010 0.014 0.015 February-0.010 0.035 0.015-March 0.010 0.060 0.020 April 0.010 0.045 0.018 May 0.010 0.050 0.020 June 0.010 0.028 0.020
- Detectors are ' bugged' to insure onscale readings.
c.
Il-i i-l-
z..
)
/
TABLE 16 (Cont.)'
CONTINUOUS RADIATION MONITORS * (GM) mR/hr~
1st HALF mR/hr LOCATION PERIOD HIN.
MAX.
AVE.
G On-Site
'Januarv 0.010 0.025 0.015-4 February 0.010 0.020 0.015 March 0.010 0.020 0.015 April 0.010 0.025 0.015 May 0.010 0.018 0.025 June 0.010 0.030 0.020 H On-Site January-0.018 0.040 0.030
.Februarv 0.019 0.040 0.025 March 0.018 0.045 0.023 April-0.020 0.045 0.030 May
-0.020 0.050 0.030 June 0.020 0.050
-0.035 I On-Site January 0.010 0.018 0.012 February 0.010 0.019 0.013 March-0.010 0.020 0.013 April 0.010 0.050 0.012 May 0.010 0.020 0.012 June 0.010 0.020 0.012 J On.-Site Januarv 0.010 0.025 0.018 Februarv 0.010 0.020 0.015
- March 0.010 0.030 0.018
-April 0.010-0.030 0.020 May 0.018 0.035 0.020 June 0.010 0.420 0.020 K On-Site January 0.010-0.020 0.015 February 0.012 0.025 0.020 March 0.012 0.030 0.018 April 0.015 0.035 0.020 May 0.015 0.030 0.020 June 0.015 0.030 0.022 I
~
,-,m
--a "r
=
T TABLE-16 (Cont.)
CONTINUOUS RADIATION MONITORS * (Qt) mR/hr 2nd HALF mR/hr LOCATION' PERIOD MIN.
MAX.
AVE.
C Off-Site.
July 0.023-0.032 0.025 August 0.017 0.034 0.025 September 0.010 0.023 0.017 October 0.010 0.050 0.021 November-0.015 0.029 0.020 December 0.015 0.023 0.013 D On-Site July 0.010 0.070 0.015 g
August 0.010 0.027 0.015 Sentember 0.012 0.032 0.021 October 0.017 0.045 0.035 November 0.013 0.073 0.030 December 0.018 0.073 0.040 D On-Site July 0.010 0.045 0.025 2
August 0.010 0.035 0.020 Sentember 0.010 0.027 0.017 October 0.011 0.030 0.019 November 0.010 0.023 0.015 December 0.011 0.023 0.015 E On-Site July 0.015 0.040 0.020 August 0.015 0.035 0.020 September 0.015 0.038 0.020-j October 0.017 0.033 0.020 November-0.015 0.035 0.020 December 0.013 0.035 0.020 F On-Site July 0.012 0.03n 0.020 August 0.010 0.028 0.020-Sentember 0.017 0.030 0.024.
October 0.017 0.033 0.023 November 0.017 0.035 0.025 December 0.015 0.035 0.021
- Detectors are ' bugged' to insure onseale readings.
l I
57
s TABLEE16 (Cont.)
CONTINUOUS RADIATION MONITORS * (G!)
i mR/hr 2nd HALF mR/hr LOCATION PERIOD' MIN.,
MAX.
AVE.
G On-Site July 0.015 0.032 0.022
-August 0.016 0.030 0.023 1
September October 0.012 0.029 0.015 j
November 0.010 0.023 0.015-December 0.015 0.023 0.018 j
H On-Site July 0.020 0.055 0.045 August 0.020 0.050 0.035 Sectember 0.020 0.050 0.035 October 0.023 0.050 0.035 November 0.023 0.050 0.030 December 0.023 0.050 0.033 I On-Site July 0.010 0.028 0.01S August 0.010 0.029 0.017 September 0.010 0.025 0.016 October 0.010 0.027 0.013 November 0.010 0.023 0.013 December 0.010 0.023 0.013 J On-Site July 0.010' O.060 0.025 August 0.018 0.050 0.025 September 0.015 0.040 0.030 October 0.010 0.043 0.023 November 0.015 0.040 0.025 December 0.015 0.040 0.023 l
K On-Site July 0.012 0.032 0.022 August 0.010-0.035-0.020 September 0.010 0.023-0.021 October 0.010 0.025 0.015 November 0.010 0.030 0.020 December 0.012 0.030 0.020 J
- CHART LOST 1
j L'
iz
r r
- -q r
n
' * ~
.1ABLE 17 a
s
.s 8
CoriCElllMIIO:Is of 100llE-13I IN HitK ltesults in thits of pCi/l a 2 sigma -
- l=
r $1Alloit t DCAT 101:54 '
5-01-19
'6-05-79 7-05-79 844-79' 9-04-79 10-01-79 11-05-[9 12-04-79
. {
,. ! L T e,'
-<0.3
- (0.3
<0.4 (0.6
<0.4 -
<0.5 (0.4
'<0.4 g3-
.<0.3' (0.4
<0.5 (0.3 s o'. 4
<u.5.
<0.3
<0.4
' 0. 3 '
'(0.3
- ~,.
< 0. 4 '
<0.3
<0.6
<0.3
<0.5 (0.4 p
" 0.2
<0.3 (0.7 (0.4
<0.5
<0.5
<0.5 -
<0.3 if
. 0.3 (0.3-
<0.4 (0.3
<p.5
<0.6
< 0. 4
<0.4 n.
III 0.4
<0.3
<0.3 (0.7
< 0. 4 -
<0.3 a.
..<0.2
<0.3 I
E (1)
.5areling date was 5-08-7'9.
4 k E t t. R 10 strilota vil FOR SAstPLE. LOCATIONS.
'I f.
.I e
0 e
t
n
.h, TNILE 18 i-
'l' CONCENTRATIONS OF STROIITIIM-90 AIID GMMA EMITTERS IN MILK (NONIHLV Cole 0 SITE SAlfLES) 5-01-19 6-05-79' 7-05-79 8-01-79 9-04-79 10-01-79
'11-05-79 12-04-79
'j to to to to to to to to STATION N" NUCL10ES 5-14-79 6-18-79 7-16-79 8-14-79 9-18-79 10-16-79 11-21-79
'12-11-19
[-
4 K-40 1100'1110 1100:110 840192 12002120 1400:140 1400:140 1600 160" 14004140 Cs-137
<3.1 4.212.0 4.911.9 3.812.0 9.113.4 6.0t3.1 (6.2 4.9 2.7 Sr-90 3.110.7 4.0 1.5 3.712.2 4.711.3 3.310.9 3.741.0 2.8t0.9 4.85t4.5 13 K-40
' 13002130 11001110 11001110 1200t120 1600:160 1500 150 1400:140.
15001150 s
<4 Cs-137
<3.1 3.912.0 3.411.7 3.942.0 (4.7 (4.7
< 4. 7. '
348723 4 Sr-90 4.210.8 4.810.9 5.4 3.3 4.7tl.2 4.5t1.0
' 5.812.7 '
1.710.6 14' K-40
.810181 1100t110 1200:120 1400tl40 1400t140 1500t150 1500 150 1400 140 Cs-137 (1.6
<3.1 (3.1
<3.1 5.612.5
<3.1
< 3.1
<4.7 I
m Sr-90 1.510.6
. 4.210.8.
4.612.8 3.811.7
<3.5 3.310.7 2.3t0.9
<8.45 4
+
o 16
.K-40 750198 10001100 870t96 990199' 1600:160 17001170'
~16001160 14001140 Cs-137 (1.6 4.211.9 4.112.0 6.212.0 4.812.8 4.813.3
<3.1
<3.1 Sr-90 4.010.7 8.311.2 7.913.7
<l.2 5.413.0 6.011.1 4.1t1.0 7.32t6.5 3
i 25 K-40 11001110' 1100t110 910t91 1300:130 17001170 1600t160 1600t160' 17001170 Es-137 7.4 2.4 1.5t2.2 10:3 9.3t2.2 4016 15t4 (6.2 2415 Ra-226 (4.7
<3.1
<4.7
<4.7 (9.3
<6.2
<6.2 7.0:5.6 Sr-90 9.011.7 5.510.9 8.311.9 3.811.4 6.8:1.5 8.612.6 4.210.9
<10.5 III 910:100 1200:120 1200tl20 1600:160 15002150-1700:170 1400 140 e
. 8.012.9 2.711.8 5.611.9 9.112.5 8.613.4 15t4 19t4
<9.3
.Sr-90 2.611.0 6.611.0 (5.0 6.611.7 6.8tl.3 4.710.9 0.7t0.7
<10.3 (1)
Sampling dates were 5-08-79 to 5-14-79.
u REFER TO SECTION VIII FOR SAMPLE LOCATIONS.
s
L u
Table 19 MILCK AIGAL CENSUS SPRING 1979 T C'.IN
'ITO. CH MA?
NO. MILCH ANIMALS New Haven 1
300 k
55C 10 40C 30 2G Mexico 2
kOC 3
29C 6
5CC 23 6kC 9
160 lE 600 12 E5C 15 2G 17 3kC 19 13C 2C
$6C 22 36C 2h 1C 21 6C 26
. kOC 29-20C 31 300 1
Rich 1'nd-11 57C a
Lyecming 25 25C Hannibal
-13 23C Oswege 3
7 13C c
26C.
16 39C 16
$C
.27 3CC 26 LC C = cows G.= goats
- = wculd not cocpers e a
4 Table 19 (continued)
MILCH. ANIMAL CENSUS S~ucGER 1979 TOW -
No. ON MAP NO. MILCH ANDIALS New Haven 1
ElO 4
&C 10 EOC 30 0
Mexico 2
36C 5
0 6
520 9
17C 1E-CEC 12 (5C 15 0
10 35C 19 E2C 20 ESC 22 E00 2}
o 2u 1C 21 21C 26 35C 29 0
31 290 Richland 11 55C Lyccming 25 250 Ennnibal 13 26C Oswego 3
400 7
0 6
26C 16 39C 18 2C 27 16C 26
-8C C = ccws G-= goats o = Numercus attempts were made to contact this person, all unsuccessf.L
-.*s'.~
.. -... ~,
W 7
m w
-w ee
.e N -
-y e
m n - 4 u*
e o m
m o o o o o e o o o o e 3 o o o a N
o L
d & 4 4'd.4 4 a. d. &d d ad & & 4 & d v
v v
v v
v v
v v
v w
w v
v v
v v
v J
~
~
I. -
8.
- 5 5.
- e
- 8. u n
e
~.
5 & & G & & & afd d & d &. o~
o o a
a o o a o m
o ad a
{d
~
v v
v v
o, v
v v
v v
g g.
g v
v v
v v
o o.
o
.o-o e
'~
M M
M N
=*
N N
M M
N e W N
N N
w e d
gg S,
N N, $ $ $ i N I'I I $.i I i i N d Y Y
~
e. ~ e - - - - e. o - -
o ~ e aaaaa4 aaaad aaaa -aa a4 1_ ~
q at et a.
>m E
- 7 e 9 >-
e
~
m
- 8. 8. ~. =. $. 8.
o.
e.
o.
a.
a.
o.
g e o e o o o,o e o o o o a o a o o -
a.
o a
e.
o.
o.
a-w w.-
g v
v v
v v
v v
v v
v v
v v
v v
v v
v v
g R
s 3
i
=
-j. ::
g a ;
8 =
3 d'
2 E
a a e m
s e s C..
I 5
-6 32-e w
= =.
y
.I-t t "
E
~
- c a o$.1;.~!
E M j 5
-a5 (m) m
.. 2 e 2' E E E 8 2
- - ~ -- o e m
o - - - -
N
(
L l
.s U
a e e... e e e e e e e e e e 3 e.
e
.c e e e m
p A
N N
N N
A e
m g e
a A
N E d d. d.
b h.k k - h h h
--'h-b
~ e
~ u o o o
- - - - - h - b b-b 4
tas u~
h h
'h 5.
m 1.7 i.t d
g --
W N
.a e
' S '-
w 5, M E E E E W W
S' E
d E.
7 II
( '. as
9 6
TNitt 20 (cont.)
ColeCENTRATIONS OF GMGM EMITIEP.S IN VARIOUS FOOD PRODUCTS -
Results in thits of pCl/9(wet) t 2 slyna
., SAlett
$40'tE DAIE DESCRIPTI0ll Be-7 K-40 Cs-137 Ce-141 I
10-10-79 Squash
<0.07 1.920.2
<0.006 (0.01-
[
4 10-10-19 Tomatoes
<0.01 2.6to.3
<0.005
<0.02 E
11-02-79 Bee f
<0.3 1.910.3 (0.01 (0.06 l-8-
11-02-79 Pork
<0.3 2.1:0.2 0.02t0.01.
<0.08 L
11-19-79 Chicken
<0.1 2.510.3
<0.009
<0.05 L
11-27-79 Eggs
<0.1 0.9 to.1 '
(0.009
<0.04 i
O 11-27-79 Eggs
<0.1 1.2t0.2
<0.008
<0.04 f
12-05-79
[99s
<0.1
- 1. to.2
<0.01
' <0.04
-l D'
. 12-12-79 Cabbage
<0.2 2.4to.3
<0.02
<0.04 a
12-12-79 Cabbage
<0.1 3.0t0.4
<0.02 0.03to.02
.'7 i
12-13-79 Cabbage 9.220.1 4.120.4
<0.03 (0.02 i.
. Chicken
<0.1 2.5 0.3 0.010s0.007 (0.05 K
11-26-79 Chicken
<0.2 2.210.2
< 0.01 (0.05 T
12-13 79 Beef
<0.1 2.7to.3 0.07:0.01
<0.03 G 17-79 Beef
<0.1 2.3t0.2
<0.01 0.03:0,02 X REftR TO SECilON Vill FOR SAMPLE LOCATIONS.
L
\\
. N"
- m. -
N.
N.
m N,
D.
C C
C.
C.
2' h
w m.
e.
p a.
w
=
-3' C - C C C
C N
A e.
-o.
e.
N.
O.
O.
C.
O C.
C..
g.
. M.
N.
N m
to.
N.
3 C
C O
l C
C C 1
I i
C:::S i.
~ e g o.
o.
m.
m.
~
a m
==
C.
C C.
C.
C C.
3 e
~ N C
M W
M N.
J
.J C := 3
.e o C
= 1.
=
==
ade C
N-
==
i
,C m
N.
m N.
m m
M m
fu9 g
A e
d*9 m.=
, ad am
==
a=s a
8 1 c0 0
i C e E
$ C
- T T W
=. 5 8 5 5 5
.E S
e.
e e
-- o e.
o.
.e I
, c..
es 6
aus esse M
g m
m m
g
- i 9
3 i i 5 a
= = c e o e 3
g g W
m 1
u mz
.ma 5
'r w
E w
5 m e e e e
~. ~. ~, ~,
R.
~
=
o.
e N
m m
O a=e ses
=
e-s sie
==
g e - e e
e
.a
.e mo
.m.
e-a ame aus ens - ame sue m
.u.
see 1
2
_I C.
N N
a+
Z.
M w
W 3
1, '. w_
c l
2
.. w,
.f E-J e
10 g
co
, m,-
e TABLE 22 CONCENTRATIONS OF Ut9% EMITTERS IN F0DDER CR0PS Results in Units of pC1/g(wt)
SAMPLE SAMPLE LCCATIOP8 DATE Be-7' K-40 Cs-137 Ra-226 14 11-12-79 6.9:1.1 5.121.0
<0.09
<0.2 16 11-13-79 2.620.4 4.320.6
<0.03
<0.09
.25 11-16-79 4.5:1.1 4.6:1.2 0.14:0.08 0.14 :0.09 8
11-16-79 4.920.7 2.6:0.7
<0.06
<0.2 4
11-16-79 3.9:1.0 3.720.9 (0.06
<0.2 I
13 11-19-79 4.8:0.9 3.421.0 0.11:0.06
<0.2
^
..,.
- i 1
a
.\\
V DATA SUMMARIES AND CONCLUSIONS
. weg,-.
- =.-
s
+.
V DATA SU WARY AND CONCLUSIONS The results of the 1979 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program must be put into perspective considering the natural processes of the environment and the aggregate of past' data. Several factors must be considered in the course of radiological-data evaluation and interpretation.
First, it must be recogni:ed that our environmenc includes an abundant inventory of natural background radiation of primordial and daily origin which is in a constant state of flux, influenced by a myriad of phenomena, from solar activity.to barometric pressure. Secondly, the detonation of man-made nuclear devices in the atmosphere has resulted in an extensive array of radioactive isotopes in the atmosphere and on the surface of the Earth from global fallout.
Section VII, titled HISTORICAL DATA, contains sample statistics from previous environmental sampling. In the process of determining the impact (or lack of impact) of the plant on the enivronment, the scrutiny of past analytical data can be a tool by which positive (and possible negative) trends can be discerned. The interpretation of historical data in this report was performed to a limited degree. Because of the constant change in analytical sensitivities, as state-of-the-art detection capabilities improve, data comparisons become difficult. Minimum d,etection capabilities for the 1969 and 1974 analyses of environmental data would be considered anomalies by 1980 analytical standards.
A.
LAKE PROGRAM Tables 3 through 9 list the analytical results for the aquatic media sampled during the 1978 sampling program.. Aquatic samples were obtained at a combination of four on-site locations. The transect designations.used for the on-site sampling are NMPW (01),
NMPP (02), JAF (03) and NMPE (04). Due to the local availability l
of certain required sample media, samples could not be obtained consistently at each of the same on-site transects sampled for-other media. Off-site samples were collected in the vicinity of the Oswego Harbor OFF-SITE (00).
1.-
~Periphyton' Samples.- Table 3 The collection and analysis of periphyton samples was performed
'twice during the'1979 program.
Periphyton is an abundant. fresh water algae found throughout the Great Lakes. Periphyton is a single celled organism which coloni:es the natural and artificial substrates found in shore and near shore waters. _ Colonies of periphyton are found from the shore :one to water depths which can be sufficiently penetrated by sunlight to support photosynthesis. Periphyton is dependent on sunlight and
. inorganic materials found'in lake water to support life. Periphyton is locally identified as the slippery green-brown coating found-on the near-shore rocks. Periphyton is used as an indicator organism to help evaluate the possible effects of plant operation on the local aquatic environment.
The first collection of periphyton samples was completed on 5/24/79
'and the second collection was completed on 8/24/79. The results of gamma spectral. analysis of periphyton samples are presented in Table 3,Section IV.
Analytical results show concentrations of Mn-54, Co-60, Co-58 and Cs-134. These isotopes can be considered to be plant related isotopes. In addition, concentrations of Be-7, K-40, Ce-144 - and Cs-137 were detected. This second group of isotopes can be considered to have their origins from sources other than the plant. These radionuclides occur either as a result of natural phenomenon or as fallout from the detonation of atmospheric nuclear tests. It is this second group of isotopes, among others, that result in the natural background of man's environment.
The first set of periphyton samples collected on 5/24/79 yielded detectable concentrations of Co-60, Co-58, Cs-134, Cs-137 and Mn-54.
These plant related isotopes ranged in concentration from 0.02 pCi/g (wet) for Co-58 and Cs-134 to 1.1 pCi/g (wet) for Cs-137.
The isotope detected in the most significant quantity was Cs-137.
The levels of Cs-137 found at the indicator stations are likely to be the results of fallout from atomospheric testing with a small contribution from plant effluents. Concentrations of Cs-137 were also found at the control station for this same sample period which is an indication that the Cs-137 levels were the result of atmospheric fallout.
The second set of periphyton samples collected during 1979 showed a significant reduction in the concentration of Cs-137 levels as did the Cs-137 concentrations at the control location. Concentration of all plant related isotopes were also lower in the second collection.
The isotope detected in the most significant quantity in the second periphyton collection was also Cs-137 as in the first sample collection.
Cs-137 was also detected in the control station sample in the second collection.
-- 69 -~
.s.
Three of'the indicator samples contained concentrations of Co-60 which ranged from 0.90 pCi/g (dry) to 0.10 pCi/g (dry). The presence of Co-60 in sediment off shore from the plant may be due to the-deposition of plant effluents. The chemical properties of the sediment can cause low concentrations of trace materials to become concentrated by acting as-an ion exchange medium with the dissolved material in the lake water. This " ion exchange" or scavenging processes exhibited by aquatic sediments can result in the sedbnent concentrations to be much higher than the overlying water column from which the material is obtained. The sediment found in the vicinity of Nine Mile Point is composed mainly of inorganic aggregate material which is routinely rearranged by the near shore wave and current action. 1Due local sediment does not deposit in static horizontal layers as is generally the case with organic sediments.
The lack of heavy sedimentation in the area of Nine Mile Point results in past isotope deposition being available for sampling each year as the material does not become covered by succeeding layers of sediment (see Figure 7 in Section VIII, Composition of Bottom Sediment).
The total liquid release to the lake for 1979 was 0.241 Ci for Co-60 and 0.092 Ci for Cs-137. All liquid releases were well within allowable effluent Itaits.
The dose to man cannot be directly calculated for lake bottom sediment as bottom sediment is not accessible to man and the radioactivity found in the sediment is shielded by the overlying water column. In addition, lake sediment is not a major component of the aquatic food chain due partially to the low organic content of the sediment and secondly because much of the material absorbed by organisms that are primary to the lake sediment habitat is not passed up through the food chain to higher life forms. This mechanism can be illustrated by the presence of small quantities of Co-60 in i
periphyton and sediment samples, but the general lack of Co-60 in the fish samples collected in the vicinity of the plant.
To illustrate the impact of radioactivity in sediment samples with respect to the dose to man concept, the unlikely assumption could 1
be made that lake bottom sediment could at some future time find its way to the surface and become shore Assuming i
thatthedensityofsedimentis40kg/m{inesediment.
(dry) and an average residence time on the shore of 47 hours5.439815e-4 days <br />0.0131 hours <br />7.771164e-5 weeks <br />1.78835e-5 months <br /> per year for a teenager,
)
the annual dose rate from a Cs-137 concentration of 1.1 pCi/g (dry) would be 0.009 mrem /yr whole body and the dose from the Co-60 concentration 0.90 pCi/g (dry) would be equal to 0.029 mrem /yr.
whole body, resulting in a total dose of 0.038 mrem /yr whole ~ body.
This dose can be considered minimal, if not insignificant, j
l
?,
l
-e with respect to natural background' levels. A review of historical data shows-the. level of Cs-137 to be randomly distributed with no definable trends evident'. Detected levels of both Cs-137 and Co-60 were lower in.1979 than-in 1978 but are of the same order of magnitude.
Past. levels of Cs-137 and Co-60 are presented in graphic form in section;VIII.
Each of the plant related isotopes detected in the 1979 samples were trace concentrations with the probable source being past and present plant liquid effluent releases.
A dose calculation from activity found in lake periphyton in the vicinity of the plant is difficult to perform as these organisms are not in the human food chain. For the purpose of illustration, a dose calculation can be made using some unrealistic assumptions.
If an adult were to consume 64 'kg/yr of periphyton (an amount equal to the maximum annual adult consumption of leafy vegetables) the dose from the indicator Cs-137 concentration of 1.1 pCi/g (wet) would be 5 mres/ year to the whole body. The resulting dose from the Co-60 concentration of 0.11 pCi/g (wet) would be equal to 0.03 mres/ year to the whole body. The total resulting hypothetical dose would be equal to about 6 mrem / year. The majority of this dose is
~
the result of Cs-137 concentrations which can be mostly attributed to atmospheric fallout. The whole body dose of 0.03 mrem / year resulting from the Co-60 concentration is very low with respect to natural background radiation and the changes in _the natural background levels due to man's activities.
A review of past data shows Cs-137 levels in periphyton samples to be in the same order of magnitude as the 1977 and 1978 samples and significantly lower than concentrations detected from 1974 to 1976.
Co-60 concentrations in periphyton samples showed a similar trend as Cs-137-concentrations, 1979 results were at the same levels as concentrations detected in 1978. Past levels of Cs-137 and Co-60 l
are presented in graphic form in Section VIII.
2.
Bottom Sediment-- Table 4 Bottom sediment samples were collected twice during the 1979 samp1-ing program. Gamma spectral and Sr-90 analyses were performed on each sample and the results are represented in Table 4.
The review of the sample results show that Cs-137 was the most abundant radio-isotope occurring in this sample media. The presence of Co-60 was also detected in samples taken at each of the three indicator stations, with a maximum concentration of 0.90 pCi/g (dry) at the NMPP (02)- sample transect.
1 l
The presence of Cs-137 in the sediment samples can be attributed primarily to the accumulation of fallout in the environment as a result of the detonation of nuclear devices in the atmosphere.
4 71-
k The long radioactive halflife of Cs-137 (30 years) is condusive to the accumulation of this fission product in the environment. The presence of detectable concentrations of Cs-137 at. the OFF-SITE (00). sample station of 0.54 pCi/g (dry) in the May sample and 0.40 pCi/g (dry) in the October sample, is strong evidence that Cs-137 activity in the vicintiy of Nine Mile Point could be from sources other than plant effluents.
3.
Mollusks - Table 5 The results of Mollusk sampling are presented in Table 5,Section IV.
Sampling efforts for Mollusks in the vicinity of Nine Mile Point were of limited success. Because sample volumes in some cases were insufficient for high sensitivity analysis, a total of three sample collections were m de during 1979, one each in May, August and October. In cases %here sample volumes were low, three distinct attempts were made at each sample location to collect sufficient quantities of sample. The main reason for poor sample yields is that the lake bottom configuration off shore from'the site is mainly bedrock, with sediment of insuffic'ient depth to sustain an extensive Mollusk population. Mollusk samples were successfully collected at the JAF (03) sample transect only during the August sample effort. No sample was collected at the NMPP (02) transect during the May sample effort. Gamma spectral analysis reveals the presence of Mn-54 and Co-60 activity in Mollusk tissue.
Mn-54 activity was found in all the indicator samples except the NMPW '(01) October sample. A possible explanation for the presence of such disproportionate concentrations of Mn-54 could be the very high bioaccumulation factor for fresh water Mollusks of 90,000 pCi/kg per pCi/1. Such a high bioaccumulation factor would result in a rapid accumulation of manganese activity in Mollusks which are indigenous to the off shore area of the site. The total release of Co-60 and Mn-54 via liquid effluent from the FitzPatrick Plant for the period of January 1,1979 to December 31, 1979 was 0.144 Ci for Mn-54 and 0.241 Ci for Co-60. fi.scharge dilution flow for this same time period was 5.02 X 10
' liters.
Fresh water Mollusks found in the vicinity of Nine Mile Point are not consumed by humans and are considered to be in the food chain to only a limited degree. Because fresh water Mollusks are not considered edible, no accurate estimate of the possible dose contribution to man from their use as a food can be made. A dose estimate can be made using substituted parameters for the purpose of putting into perspective the possible significance of the Mn-54 and Co-60 levels detected in the Mollusk samples. Using the average individual consumption of seafood of 1.0 kg/yr for an adult, the dose resulting from ingestion would be 0.0005 mrem /yr to the whole body and 0.0074 mrem /yr to the gastrointestinal tract for Mn-54 concentration of 0.53 pC1/g (wet). The dose resu1 Hug from a l
l i
l -
j Co-60 concentration of 0.02 pCi/g (wet) would be 0.0001 mrem /yr to whole-body and 0.008 mrem /yr to the gastrointestinal tract. The maximum dose received from consuming 1 kg of fresh water Mollusks in a year's time'would be 0.0006 mrem to the whole body and 0.0082 mrem to the gastrointestinal tract. The calculated dose is very low and as outlined above, the dose in reality would be 0.00 because the species is inedible.
Detectable concentrations of Sr-90 were measured in each of the Mollusk samples collected in 1979. Sr-90 levels ranged from 0.13 to 0.1 pCi/g (wet) with the control station mean equal to 0.07 pCi/g (wet) and the indicator station mean equal to 0.10 pCi/g (wet). The Sr-90 detected in the Mollusk samples are the result of atmospheric nuclear tests in past years. Sr-90 has a radioactive half-life of 28 years and remains detectable in the environment for years as the Sr-90 activity would be reduced to approximately 10%
of the original concentration after 100 years.
The levels of Co-60 and Mn-54 in Mollusk samples were down signifi-cantly from 1976 levels and were less than or equal to last years (1978) levels. Sr-90 levels have remained at a relatively constant level since 1974 due to the long half-life of the isotope and recent reduction of atmospheric testing. Graphs of previous Mollusk samples with respect to Co-60,.Mn-54 and Sr-90 are presented in section VIII. Also found in Section VIII is a physical description of the lake bottom in the vicinity of Nine Mile Point.
4.
Gammarus - Table 6 Gammarus are benthic or demersal dwelling organisms found in the general vicinity of Nine Mile Point. They are generally confined to natural substrates such as rock debris and areas of cladophora growth. Gammarus'are a omnivorous scavenger and are shrimp like in appearance. The major predator of gammarus is the fish population in the area which are considered to be at the top of the aquatic food chain. Gammarus samples were collected twice during the 1979 sample program. The first gammarus collection in May yielded biomasses of 81, 63 and 16 grams at the OFF-SITE (00), NMPP (02) and JAF (03) transects, respectively. The August sampling effort yielded marginally sufficient sample volumes from JAF (03) transect with 101 grams and the OFF-SITE (00) transect with 239 grams. The NMPP. (02) transect yielded only 26 grams of sample. Three collection attempts were made on each location.using a variety of sampling methods. The limited sample success is similar to that experienced in previous years. It should be noted that gammarus are normally less than 10 mm in size and require a large number to reach a biomass of I gram of sample..
4
k' As a result of the small sample volumes, sensitivity of the gamma spectral analysis was low, but data was at an acceptable level considering sample size. Sr-89 analyses sensitivity were most affected by the small sample site. LLD values ranged from a low of
.0.08 pCi/g (wet) at the OFF-SITE (00) sample location to a high of 0.90 pCi/g (wet) at the JAF (03) indicator location. The wide
~
range of Sr-89 LLD's for the May 1979 samples resulted in the indicator station value being ten times the control station values.
The ten times differential between the control and indicator station does not represent an acutal detected concentration of ten times control. The differential between the LLD values reported is directly attributed to the difference in sample size parameters used in the calculations.
The analysis of gammarus data reveals no significant impact from plant operation. Historical gamarus data shows a general reduction from earlier isotopic concentrations. No strong trends can be identified since the data base is not extensive due to the routine difficulty in collecting sufficient sample for meaningful analysis (see periphyton graphsSection VIII).
5.
Fish - Table 7 A total of 23 fish samples were collected from Lake Ontario in 1979 and each was analy:ed for gamma emitters, Sr-89 and Sr-90 activity.
Sample collections were made during May (spring season) and October (fall season). Samples were collected in the Oswego Harbor area which serves as the control station and at two on-site locations (NMPP-02 and JAF-03) which serve as indicator stations.
Analysis results for 1979 indicate no detectable impact from plant operation. The fact that no plant related radioisotopes were
~
detected in the fish samples is significant because fish represent the top level of the aquatic food chain. Because fish are located at the top of the food chain, they are considered to be an important indicator sample due to the probable reconcentration of radionuclides in fish tissue from consumption of organisms at lower levels in the aquatic food chain. The fish analysis data does show, however, a number of radioisotopes present in the fish samples which can be directly attributed to atmospheric nuclear test.u g.
Cs-137 activity was detected in 16 of the 23 samples collected in 1979 from both the on-site and off-site sample locations. It should be further noted that Cs-137 was detected in 4 of the 7 off-site samples collected and detected in 12 of the 16 on-site samples collected, which indicates the probable source of Cs-137 to be other than nuclear power plant releases. The point can be argued that fish populations are transient and that each sample fish may not have habitated solely in the area in which it was collected. Regardless of the possible transient nature of some species of fish, the fact that 70% of the fish collected contained proportional amounts of Cs-137 and 78_% of the same samples contained Sr-90 activity is supporting data to the conclusion that the detectable activity was not the result of plant operation.
l a
Because Lake Ontario fishfare in the human food chain, a reasonable estimate of dose to man can be made. Assuming that the average adult consumes 6.9 kg of fish per year and the fish contain the maximum concentration of 0.55 pCi/g (wet) Sr-90, the calculated dose to man would be a total of 0.77 mrem /yr to the whole body and 2.3 mrem /yr to the bone. If the amount of fish consumed were raised to the estimated maximum of 21 kg/yr, the resulting dose would be equal to 2.3 mrem /yr to whole body and 7.12 mrem /yr to the bone. The dose to man as a result of past atmospheric nuclear testing can be calculated to be many times the dose calculated for previously discussed sample media.
Historical data shows that Cs-137 levels have declined from 1975-1976 and has leveled off in 1978'1979. Cs-137 reached a mean high of 1.40 pCi/g (wet)'in 1975 and has fallen off to the present mean of 0.10 pCi/g (wet) for the indicator station samples and 0.04 pCi/g (wet) for the control station. Sr-89 and Sr-90 levels have shown a similar trend with detectable levels less than those detected in 1976. Cs-137 and Sr-90 concentrations have been graphed and are
'found in Section VIII.
6.
Lake Water - Tables 8A, 8B and 9 Lake water samples are analyzed for gross beta activity, tritium, strontium 89, strontium 90_and gamma emitters.
Analytical results for the 1979 lake water sample program show no evidence of plant related radiological impact on the environment.
The gross beta activity for 1979 was comparable to 1978 results and both were significantly lower than for previous years in which gross beta analysis were performed. The reduction in gross beta activity since 1974 is primarily the result of improved analytical procedures and equipment and not changes in plant operation.
Lake water tritium analysis for 1979 was found to have an indicator mean value of 234 pCi/1 and a control mean value of 258 pCi/1.
Tritium levels in the area of Nine Mile Point have remained constant from 1974 to 1979. Tritium is a naturally occurring radioactive isotope of hydrogen which is produced in the upper atmosphere by cosmic radiation. The-fact that tritium is naturally occuring accounts for background levels in the lake varying slightly from year to year.
Strontium - 90 activity was detected in 11 of the 12 quarterly samples. Both the on-site and the off-site sample locations showed detectable levels of Sr-90, ranging from 1.1 pCi/1 to 0.6 pCi/1.
As in the fish sample discussion above, Sr-90 concentrations can be attributed to atmospheric nuclear testing. Overall Sr-90 levels have decreased slightly from 1977, and 1979 results remain consistent with the 1978 mean activity. Strontium-89 was detected in one on-site sample and in 2 off-site samples taken during 1979. Each of
. i
~.
e w
the detectable Sr-89 activities were at or below the routine LLD level with the associated errors ranging from 70 to 100 percent.
The presence of Sr-89 activity is not considered to be significant and is not attributable to the operation of the plant.
Gamma spectal analysis'was performed on 36 monthly composite samples collected from 2 indicator stations and 1 control station. 'The only radioisotopes' detected in the 1979 samples were K-40 and Cs-
-137.
K-40 was detected in 1 composite sample and is a naturally occuring radioisotope. Cs-137 was detected _twice in the monthly composites, once at the control location and once at=the indicator station. The detected Cs-137 concentrations ranged from 6.0 pCi/1 at the indicator station to 2.5 pCi/1 at the control station.
These concentrations are not believed to be the result of plant operation. No other radioisotopes were detected in the 1979 monthly composites. Lake Water gross beta activity from 1974 to 1979 is shown in graphic format in Section VIII.
B.
LAND PROGRAM The results of terrestrial sample analysis for the 1979 reporting period are presented in Tables 10 through 21.
1.
Air Particulates - Tables 10 and 11 Tables 10 and 11 contain the air particulate gross beta results for the 6 off-site and 9 on-site stations respectively. No significant levels of gross beta activity were present on the 304 off-site i
samples or the 462 on-site samples analyzed during the 1979 program, The off-site air monitoring stations showed a gross beta activity i
slightly greater than the associated on-sitg stations for the same sampig period (off-site mean of 0.073 pCi/m, on site mean of 0.056 pCi/m ). Both the'off-site and on-site gross beta activities were down by 50% from 1977 and 1978 and down more significantly from 1969. This change'in gross beta activity over the years can be attributed to several factors.
In the early 1960's, atmospheric detonation of nuclear devices was numerous. With the adoption of nuclear test ban treaties by most of the world's countries, the atmosphere had purged itself of most of the contaminants from this testing. The decrease in gross beta activity since the 1960's has been a world wide and nationally observed trend.
In the last several years the majority of activity found on air particulate filters, analyzed for gross activity, was the result of naturally occurring radioactivity in the form of uranium and thorium daughter products. The concentration of the naturally occurring isotopes in the biosphere is based on location and is affected by time related processes such as wind direction and snow cover. The fluctuation of natural background concentrations and the fact that the People's Republic of China conducted two atmospheric nuclear detonations l -
/
during 1978 can be considered the major reason for the slight increase in gross beta activity in the 1978 samples at both the off-site and on-site sample locations and the subsequent reduction in activity for 1979. A graph of air particulate gross beta activity from 1974 through 1979 can be found in Section VII.
2.
Monthly Particulate Composites - Table 13 On a monthly schedule, air particulate filters are composited by location (off-site /on-site) and analyzed for gamma emitters.
Activities were detected for Be-7, Co-60, Cs-137, Ce-141 and Ce-144 at both the off-site sample locations and the on-site sample locations.
Be-7 is a naturally occurring isotope and was identified in each of the 12 off-site and on-site samples taken during 1979.
Cs-137, the second most abundant radioisotope identified, was detected in 7 of 12 off-site samples and in 9 of the 12 on-site samples. Cs-137 concentrations ranged from 0.80 to 2.0pCi/m3 at the off-site station and 0.30 to 1.5 pCi/m3 at the on-site station. The concentrations of Cs-137, Ce-141 and Ce-144 may be attributed to sources other than the plant, whereas the concentration of Co-60 and Mn-54 can be related to plant operation. Co-60 was detected on 3 of the on-site monthly composite samples while bb-54 was detected on 2 of the on-site samples during 1979.
Dose to man calculations can be made based on inhalation rates and sample concentrations. Using the average adult inhalation rate of 8000 m3/yr and the maximum concentration detected at the on-site sample stations the following yearly doses can be computed.
ISOTOPE (pCi/m3)
DOSE (mrem /yr)
Co-60 (0.7) 0.01 bb-54 (0.2) 0.001 Cs-137 (1.5) 0.64 Ce-144 (5.3) 0.97 Ce-141 (0.8) 0.001 Ru-103 (0.1) 0.00007 Ru-106 (0.3) 0.003 It should be noted that the above listed yearly doses are calculated using the assumption that the maximum concentration was present for the entire year.
In reality, each of the radionuclides used above were detected only in a portion of the sample year. Cs-137 had the highest percent of detectable concentration with identifications in 9 of 12 monthly composite samples.
In contrast, Mn-54 and Co-60 I
concentrations were detected in only 2 and 3 of the 12 monthly composite samples respectively, i '
- 4
3.
Airborn Radioiodine (I-131)'- Tables 13 and 14 The results of I-131 (charcoal cartridge) analysis for the 6 off-site and 9 on-sites monitoring stations are presented in Tables 13
.and 14.
During the 1979 sampling program, no airborn radioiodine was detected at any'of the 9 on-site or the 6 off-site air sampling stations.
Samples were changed on a weekly basis and analyzed,for I-131 by gamma spectral analysis. LLD valves for I-131 analysis ranged from 0.005 to 0.048 pCi/m3 at the indicator stations and from 0.01 to 0.218 pCi/m3 at the control station. 1979 sample results indicate that there was no environmental impact due to the release of I-131 from the plant.
4.
TLD's (Environmental Dosimetry) - Table 15 TLD results are reported on a quarterly basis. The reported dose rates are the average of 4 independent readings. Each TLD station or location is composed of 2 individual TLD's, with each TLD contain-ing 2 distinct dosimeters.
The TLD's are broken down into 3 groups for reporting purposes.
The groups are on-site, off-site and site boundary (see TLD location map, Figure 3,Section VIII). The net doses at the site boundary (site boundry average minus off-site average) were as follows:
QUARTER SITE BOUNDRY DOSE (mrem) 1 0.0 2
0.0
'3 0.6 4
0.2 The total site boundary dose for 1979 was less than 1 mrem. Dosimeters 31,.32, 39 and 40 are locations within the NMP-1 restricted area near the Radwaste Building and are influenced by waste trucks being.
j loaded in the building or parked nearby. Dosimeters 27 through 30 are located within the FitzPatrick plant restricted aret and are affected by waste trucks being loaded in or parked near the FitzPatrick Radwaste Building.
Dosimeter #35, which is located in the northeastern section of the Nine Mile Unit #2 construction site, showed an increase from 16 mrem for the~first quarter 1979 to 179 mrem for the second quarter 1979. An investigation as to the possible causes for the increase in exposure revealed that radiographing of welds in the general j
vicinity of the Dosimeter location occurred during this
~.
period; The'D-1 on-site environmental radiation monitor also recorded the presence of an increased dose rate during the month of JJune 1979 due to the radiography nearby.'
The radiography that was recorded by dosimeter #35 occurred from May 25 to June.27. The radiography activity was done'by-3 crews on an around the clock basis using;a 100 Ci Iridium source. Approximately 6722 radiographs
.were taken, varying from a few seconds to 5 minutes in exposure time. No increase in radiation exposure to the general public
-resulted from the radiographic testing.
5.
Radiation Monitors - Table 16' Environmental radiation monitors are located in 10'of the 15 air monitoring environmental stations. Each of the on-site environmental monitoring stations contain a radiation monitor and in addition, the C off-site monitoring station contains a similar monitor. The
-radiation monitors consist of a GM detector with an associated power supply,. chart recorder and trip unit. The monitor has an operating and recording range from 0.01 to 100 mrem /hr. Each radiation' monitor has a small radioactive source mounted inside the detector casing to produce an on-scale reading. The design intent of the monitors is-to detect possible dose rates resulting from plume releases from the plant. The monitors are not - considered to be capable of high sensitivity environmental monitoring and do not detect minute fluctuation in levels of background radiation.
Because of the relatively poor sensitivity of the monitors (environ-mentally speaking) no comparisons are made between the radiation monitor readings and the readings from environmental T1.D's.
6.
Milk - Tables 17 and 18 Milk samples were collected monthly from each of 6-farms and analyzed for radioiodine 131 (I-131). Twice per month additional collections were made at the same 6 farms. The two additional monthly samples are composited and analyzed for gamma emitters and Sr-90.
I-131 results are found on Table 17.
Gamma analysis and Sr-90 results are found on Table 18.-
Milk sampics were taken beginning with the month of May and continued through the month of December. Milk sampling was not conducted from January through April because local dairy herds are not consist-antly on open pasture.
No concentrations of I-131 were detected in the 1979 milk samples.
All I-131 analytical results were reported as lower limits of
-. detection. 'The comparison of 1979 milk I-131 data showed a decrease in I-131 levels in milk from previous years during which samples
'were taken.
It should be noted that previous data is biased by the presence of I-131 concentrations resulting from the detonation of
-nuclear devices in the atmosphere, while such results are not part
'of 1977, 1978 and 1979 data. 'I-131 concentrations detected in
[
previous years are found in a graphic format in Section VIII.
(..
' L p
t
'1 x
- Potassium - 40 (K-40) was the.most abundant isotope detected in the
-milk samples collected in 1979. K-40,was detected in every sample andl ranged in concentration-from 750 to'1700 pCi/1. K-40 is a
. naturally: occurring isotope and is found in many-of the environmental
- media sampled.. K-40 is a major ~ contributor to the natural background present in the biosphere.
Cesium - 137 (Cs-137) was a second isotope found.in the majority of milk sample collected. Cs-137' concentrations were detected in 29
- of the.48 milk samples. The Control Station results showed Cs-137 concentrations'in 3 of the 8 samples collected and ranged in activity from 3.4 to 3.9 pCi/1. The indicator. stations results showed Cs-137 concentrations in 26 of 40 samples collected.and they ranged in activity from 2.7 to 40.0 pCi/1.
Five of the six farms used as sampling locations are located within a ten mile radius of the site and are termed indicator stations. A sixth sample location is located 18 miles SSW of the site and is used as a control station.
It is considered to be outside of the influence of site releases. A map of the milk sample locations is
~ included in Section 'VIII of.this report. One of the milk sample stations (#2S) located within the 10 mile radius of the site showed an elevated concentration of Cs-137 in the September sample. This level of 40.0 pCi/1, while not above the Fit: Patrick technical specification reporting level or significantly high in comparison to values from previous years, was deemed unusual enough to warrant further. investigation.
In an effort to. determine the source of the elevated Cs-137 levels in the milk pathway, plant and site parameters during the sample. time period were studied.
In addition, extra milk samples were collected past the normal grazing season and will continue to be taken until the end of the 1980 grazing season.
i-
~
Each of the 6 farms routinely sampled for milk were also sampled for the related media of-soil, pasture grass and animal feed. Soil and pasture grass samples were collected during the week of November 11, 1979 and analyzed for gamma emitters. Due to subsequent snowfall additional samples could not be obtained. Stored feed samples were also collected at each of the farms.in the form of grain, hay,' corn silage and haylage. Feed sample collections were made on 1/7/80, 2/12/80 and 3/3/80. At this time no definite conclusions have been made as to the source term of the identified Cs-137 in the milk samples. ' Investigations.into the site parameters have been conducted and do not indicate that the plant is the total source of the Cs-4 137. Calculations have been made based on known sample and plant parameters. A calculation can be made to determine the required concentration of Cs-137 in animal feed to result in a concentration of 40 pCi/1 in the milk. The result of this ' calculation indicates
.that. 67 'pci/kg of Cs-137 would have to be present' in the animal
~
feed.to result in the 40 pC1/1 detected in the September sample.
The analysis of pasture grass from the farm under investigation showed Cs-137. concentration of.140 pCi/kg, which would be sufficient to j
L l
i-l' I a
.. I
produce'the 40LpCi/1 found in the milk. An additional'calculetion can be made to determine the deposition rate from the air onto the ground to produce 67~pCi/kg in'the animal feed or pasture grass.
A-required deposition-of 0.61 pCi/m2 hr would be: required to produce-a 67c pCi/kg concentration in the animal. feed or pasture grass. The
-calculated deposition rate can in turn be used to calculate an effluent release rate that would be rquired to result in the deposition rate calculated above. Using a deposition factor of 1.7E-101/m2(D/Q),
. the required release rate would be equal to 1.0E-6 Ci/sec of Cs-137 to' result in a pasture grass concentration of 67 pCi/m2 at the
- location of the farm. A review of station records show that at.no
' time-in 1979 did the release rate of Cs-137-approach the calculated
' release rate of 1.0E-6 Ci/sec. The maximum release rate of Cs-137 I
in 1979 was~1.84 E-10 Ci/ rec, whi'ch is only 1/10,000 of the calculated -
required release rate. It should be noted that calculations.used-with respect to milk Cs-137~ concentration are based on the assumptions
- outlined in USNRC Regulatory Guide 1.109 (Revision 1).
~
The analysis of all associated samples were not complete as of this -
writing and feed sampling is continuing at this time. The results of completed -samples are included in this report in Table 21 (soil samples) and 22 (fodder crops). Analyses of these samples show.
some unexpected results. The soil sample collected at the control Station contained approximately twice:the concentration of Cs-137 as did the. soil from the indicator station with the highest concen-tration of Cs-137 in the milk (Control = 1.3 pCi/g, Indicator =
0.72 pCi/g). ' Pasture grass sample from the same two sample locations -
- showed approximately equal concentrations of Cs-137. The Control Station grass sample contained'0.11 pCi/g and the indicator station
(#2S) contained a concentration of 0.14 pCi/g. The 4 remaining u
indicator stations contained no detectable concentrations of Cs-137. These results are contradictive if the plant is considered the sole source of the Cs-137 concentrations.' These results could indicate that there may be a general distribution of Cs-137 from past nuclear testing in the atmosphere. No firm conclusions can be l
made until.all the analyses are complete and the data can be reviewed l
as a whole.
)
In-order to obtain an independent analysis of the available data, i
a consultant has been contracted. The: consultant will perform an J
evaluation of the Cesium concentrations in the environmental milk samples and the environmental significance of these Cesium concen-trations. The scope of work for the evaluation is comprised of.
five tasks. Task I will be a data review which addresses results from the site environmental program, plant operating and release data, radiological monitoring data from other sources and site meteorlogical data. Task-II covers the statistical evaluation of assembled data. Task III is the assessment of facility contribution to milk Cesium levels. Task IV is the evaluation of the analysis
- contractor performance and Task V will be'the. writing of a final
. report.
4 5
g a -
,-p-.-k.
im p--1-,-.,y---,
=
'e-r-
A Strontium - 90 concentrations detected in the 1979 milk samples are a remnant _of past atmospheric testing. Detected levels of Sr-90 range from 0.7 to 9.0 pCi/1 and were recorded in both
~
the on-site and off-site samples. Past data review (1974-1979) shows a consistent level of Sr-90 in the milk samples since 1974. Peak concentrations were recorded in the 1974 samples and levels have been on a general decrease to date. A graph of Cs-137 and Sr-90 concentrations in milk (1974 to 1979) can be found in Section VIII.
7.
Milch Animal Census - Tables 19 and Figure 5 The number of milch animals located within a ten mile radius of the plant is estimated to be 903 cows and no goats for the spring
- census, which is an increase of 191 cows'and a decrease of 18 goats from the spring 1978 census. The 1979 summer census showed a total of 838 cows and no goats which represents increase in the number of cows by 195 and a decrease in the number of goats by 15 from the 1978 census..
8.
-Human Food Crops - Table 20 The results of analysis performed on meat, poultry, eggs and food crops are shown in Table 20.. Human food crop analysis for I-131 showed no detectable concentrations with LLD values ranging from
<0.024 to <0.030 pCi/g (wet). All analysis for I-131 were performed within one half-life. Slight traces of Cs-137 were found in 6 of the meat samples collected. Cs-137 was'also detected in one produce sample. The detected Cs-137 levels are attributed to atmospheric fallout and have been detected in similar concentrations in previous years.
. *1
C.
' CONCLUSION The Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program is conducted each year to determine -the _ radiological impact of the James A. FitzPatrick.
Nuclear Power Plant on the local environmet.L. As demonstrated by the. analytical results of the 1979 program, the major radiological impact on the environment was the result of fallout from atmospheric nuclear testing.
The levels of natural background and the associated fluctuation in intensity _ are much more significant in terms of dose to man (normal background in the vicinity of the site is equal.to 60 mrem /yr) than radiation levels in the environment associated with the operation
~
of the plant.
At the present time much more is known about_ radiation and its effects on~ man and the environment than is known about the effects of many other of. the byproducts of man's civilization. Even though the vast amount of-information indicates that the releases of radionuclides from nuclear power plants are very small and in most cases not significant, continuing environmental surveillance
-will assure that environmental effects, if present, will be detected.
Using the data presented in this report, and ' earlier reports as a basis, it can be concluded that no appreciable radiological environ-mental impact has resulted from the operation of the James A.
FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant.
.s D.
EXCEPTIONS TO THE PROGRAM 1.
Meat samples were collected at only one location during the spring sampling period. Attempts were made to collect the required samples from 4/23/79 to 6/6/79. Efforts to identify possible sample locations were made by weekly phone calls to the local meat market and individual farmers.
The first meat sample w;' obtained on 5/24/79 and a second meat sample was obtained on 7/3/79. The second sample was a pork sample being butchered because of poor health and was obtained outside the required sampling time frame (spring sample period of 4/23/79 to 6/6/79). A third meat sample was collected on 8/2/79 which was also outside the spring sample period.
The difficulty in obtaining the required number of samples may be attributed to several factors.
First the number of animals raised for meat and located within the ten mile radius of the plant is not extensive. Secondly, butchering of animals is not always performed at the local meat market. Third, and most significant is the fact that the vas't majority of meat is butchered in the fall so animals can graze in pasture for the summer to economically increase the meat yield.
The collection of spring meat samples has historically been a difficult sample media to obtain due to seasonal unavailability.
2.
The analysis of the 6/4/79 gammarus samples resulted in the indicator sample results exceeding the control station results by a factor of ten. The LLD level (lower limit of detection) of Sr-89 for the JAF (On-Site) sample was ten times the control sample LLD value for the same sample period.
The anomalous measurement is based on a comparison of 2 LLD values, of <0.082 p i/g (wet) for the control station and
<0.922 pCi/g (wet) for the JAF indicator sample. Using an LLD to evaluate anomalous measurements results in the comparison being biased by sample size and count time. As sample si:e and count time increase, the achievable LLD becomes proportion-ately lower. In this instance, the LLD for Sr-89 is high for the JAF. on-site sample due to the -very small amount of gammarus tissue which was collected during the sampling effort. The sample effort at the indicator station (JAF) yielded only 6.30 grams (wet) while the control station yielded 64.5 grams (wet). This disproportionate sample si:e resulted in an artificially anomalous result.
t 3.
1Dn 11/15/79.at 0830 electrical power was lost to seven of the nine on-site environmental stations (D2, E, F H, I, J, K).
On-site power _was restored at 1145. This resulted in a total
. power loss of 3 hours3.472222e-5 days <br />8.333333e-4 hours <br />4.960317e-6 weeks <br />1.1415e-6 months <br /> and 15 minutes. The power loss was due to a planned power line interruption to_ facilitate the transport of the 9 Mile Point Unit No. 2 reactor. vessel to the construction site. The interruption of Power to the environmental.
station was required so the power lines crossing the delivery path of the reactor vessel could be temporarily removed allowing safe passage of the moving equipment.
A review of' station and site releases during this time period showed no increase or unusual variation from normal operating conditions. As immediate corrective action, each effected
-monitor was inspected to ensure that power had been successfully restored and the cabinet equipment.was functioning as intended.
'The environmental significance of this event is considered to be minor, and as having no effect on the quality of the site environmental program, s
4.
The_ required milk I-131 analysis sensitivity of 0.5 pCi/1 was exceeded on five analyses performed during the 1979 program.
Analyses results which exceeded the required sensitivity ranged from 0.532 to 0.69 pCi/1. The lower sensitivities were not routine and represent only twelve percent of the analyses performed. The decrease in sensitivity was the result of two factors,.the first being the use of a 4.66 sigma confidence level in calculating the LLD and secondly, the result of periodic low chemical yield (<70%) in the separation process.
Corrective action has been identified and initiated by the analysis contractor.
6 D.
REFERENCES 1.
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Regulatory Guide 1.109,
" Calculation of Annual Doses to Man from Routine Releases of Reactor Effluent for the Purpose of Evaluating Compliance with 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix I", March 1976.
2.
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Regulatory Guide 1.109,
" Calculation of Annual' Doses to Man from Routine Releases of Reactor Effluent for the Purpose of Evaluating Compliance with 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix I", October 1977.
3.
Eichhol:, G. Environmental Aspects of[ Nuclear Power, First
. Edition,1976, Ann Arbor Science Publishers, Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan.
4.
National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP), Environmental Radiation Heasurements, NCRP Report No.
50, 1976.
85A
4 e
e VI s" /'s g<ik.:C)r a yy,>
us x i
y/ dr :,y)
'v{\\ X /
/
N v
RESULTS STATISTICS AND HISTOGRAMS I
-as-ay
i V.
RESULTS STATISTICS AND HISTOGRAMS The 1979 environmental sample data is presented in'Section V in table format with associated histograms.
A.
Special Considerations 1)
Only measured values were used in histogram and statistical calculations.
2)
Histograms and associated data were generated only for sample medium or sample locations with sufficient data points for adequate graphic depiction (i.e. > 4 data points).
B.
Format 1)
Basic statistics - the following statistics are reported with each histogram:
a) Number of data points used in developing the histogram, b) Hean or " average" of all data points used for each histogram.
c) Standard Deviation of the data used for each histogram.
d) Variance of the data used for each histogram.
e) Minimum and Maximum values.
f) Range of the data for each histogram.
g) Class width used in generating the histogram 2)
The HISTOGRAMS presented in this sectior ere a graphic display of frequency distribtulon, with equal intervals of values marked on a hori:ontal axis. The frequency of each interval is indicated by a rectangular bar plotted on a vertical axis.
CELL STATISTICS for each histogram are shown by 1
class number, lower bound, upper bound, frequency
. of occurrence and relative frequency in percent.
i
4
- **ENVIRONF;TAL SAMPLE STATISTICAL DATA **
- T AB LE 3 c.
LAKE PEPIPHYTON GAMMA ISOTOPIC ICi/g wet K-40 INDICATOR STATICM FAMPLE STATISTICS NUMBER OF SAMPLES 4.000 MINIMUM VALUE 3.200 STANCAPD DEV.
1.480 PANGE
- 2. 900 MEAN VALUE 4.450 MAXIMUM VALUE 6.100 VARIANCE 2.190 CLASS WIDTH 0.348
- HISTCGRAM***
CLASS NO.
LOWER B.
UPPER B.
PPEOUENCY R EL.F PEO. t 1
- 2. 910 3.258 2.0 50 2
3.258 3.606 0.0 0
3 3.606
- 3. 954 0.0 0
4 3.954 4.302 0.0 0
5 4.302 4.650 0.0 0
6 4.650
- 4. 998 0.0 0
7
- 4. 998
- 5. 346 1.0 25 8
5.346 5.694 0.0 0
9 5.694 6.042 0.0 0
10 6.042 6.390' l.0 25
- PLOT OF HISTOGPAM***
2.am i.sm i.se
!.42 I.22 U
i.33
_z-w m.sc m5 m.sa a:::
w m.9m 2.22 iii 9
R O
F G
C C4 9 R M
M M
a a
a a
CLREE MIDFOINTE
.~.
/
- ENVIPONMENTAL SAFPLE STATISTICAL DATA ***
TABLE 3 LAKE PERIPHYTON GAMMA ISOTOPIC tCi/g wet Cs-137 INCICATOR STATION FAMPLE STATISTICS NU!'BEP OF SAMPLES 4.000 MINIMUM VALUE 0.080 STANDARD DEV.
O.496 RANGE 1.020 MEAN VALUE 0.360 MAXIMUM VALUE 1.100 VAT.IANCE 0.246 CLASS WIDTH 0.120 i-
- * *5f I S TO GR AM * *
- CLASS NO.
LOtTP B.
UPPER B.
FREQUENCY R EL.F PEO.1 1
0.000 0.120 2.0 50 2
0.120 0.240 1.0 25 3
0.240
- 0. 36 1 0.0 0
4 0.361 0.481 0.0 0
5 0.481 0.601 0.0 0
6 0.601
- 0. 72 1 0.0 0
7 0'. 721 0.841 0.0 0
8 0.641
- 0. 96 2 0.0 0
9 0.962 1.082
- 0. 0 0
10 1.08 2 1.202 1.0 25
- PLCT OF HISTOGRAP***
2.ma I.se I.sm I.HE l.22 D
I.22
=e w
2.92 m$
m.sm a:::
w m.we 2.22 2
m 92 5;
ts M
M G
EC ww w
w w
w w. w C Li:15 E MiDPDINTE
...~.
- ENVIPONMENTAL SAMPLE STATISTICAL DATA ***
T7BLE 3 LAKE PERIPHYTON GAMMA ISOTOPIC tCi/g wet Re-7 INDICATOR STATICM SAMPLE STATISTICS NUMBER OF SAMPLES 4.000 MINIMUM VALUE 0.180
' STANDARD DEV.
O.242 RANGE 0.520 MEAN VALUE
- 0. 34 5 MAXIMUM VALUE 0.700
' VAPIANCE 0.059 CLASS WIDTR 0.062
- HISTCGRAM***
CLASS NO.
LOWER B.
UPPER S.
FREOUDICY REL.FPEO.*
1 0.128 0.190 1.0 25 2
0.190 0.253 1.0 25 3
0.253 0.315 1.0 25 4
0.315 0.378 0.0 0
5
- 0. 378 0.440 0.0 0
6 0.440 0.502 0.0 0
7 0.502 0.56 5 0.0 0
8 0.565 0.627 0.0 0
9 0.627 0.690 0.0 0
10 0.690
- 0. 7 52 1.0 25
- *
- PLOT O F HISTCCRAM* **
i.am m.sm 2.92
-2.72 a.sm l
C a.s a
==:
w a.9a m
m.2m ac j
u 2.22
'3.l3 1
A R
M 5:
9 Q
5 t2 A
4 4
a 4
a a
C L.R E E MlDFOINTE
d
- * *ENVIPOMPENTAL SAPPLE STATISTICAL D ATA ***
- T AB LE 4 -
LAKE BOTTOM SEDIPENT GAPPA ISOTOPIC tCi/g dry Th-232 INDICATOR STATION SAMPLE STATISTICS NUMBER OF SAMPLES 4.000 MINIPUM VALUE 0.180 STANDARD DEV.
0.822 RAFGE
- 1. 72 0 MEAN VALUE 0.675 MAXIMUM VALUE 1.900 VAPIANCE 0.676-CLASS WIDTH 0.206
- * *HI STCGR AP* *
- CLASS NO.
LChTR B.
UPPEP B.
FPE00ENCY R EL.F R EQ. %
1
- 0. 008 0.214 1.0 25 2
0.214 0.421 2.0 50 3
0.421 0.627 0.0 0
4 0.627 0.834 0.0 0
5 0.834 1.040 0.0 0
6 1.040 1.246 0.0 0
7 1.246 1.453 0.0 0
8 1.453 1.659
- 0. 0 0
9 1.659 1.866 0.0 0
10 1.866 2.072 1.0 25
- PLOT OF HISTCGRAM***
2.22 I.EE 1.52 I.42 f.22 U
l.22-
=
W 2.E2 8
a.Em a==
6 2.HB 2.22-C A
Cl P
57 3C M
>E!
E w
w w
w w
CLFl55 MiDPDiNTE 1
-.t i
- **ENVIPOFFENTAL SAPPLE STATISTICAL DATA ***
TAB LE 4 IAKE BOTEM SEDIFENT GAPPA ISOTOPIC CCi/g dry Ra-226 INDICATOR STATICN SAMPLE STATISTICS NUMBER OF SAMPLES 4.000 MINIMUM VALUE 0.170 STANDARD DEV.
0.668 PANGE 1.430 MEAN VALUE 0.618 MAXIMUM VALUE 1.600 VAPIANCE 0.446 CLASS WIDTH 0.172
- HISTOGRAM ***
CLASS NO.
LOWER B.
UPPER B.
FREQUENCY REL.FREO.%
1 0.027 0.199 1.0 25 2
0.199 0.370 1.' O 25 3
0.370 0.542 1.0 25 4
0.542
- 0. 713 0.0 0
5 0.713 0.885
- 0. 0 0
6 0.885 1.057 0.0 0
7 1.057 1. 2 23 0.0 0
8 1.228 1.400
- 0. 0 0
9 1.400 1.571 0.0 0
10 1.571 1.743 1.0 25 4
- PLCT OF HISTOGPAM***
i.am m.Se a.Em m.7m m.se C
m.se
- z u
m.9m m
5 m.se c2::
m.2m m.im
=
lE!
F G
- t E
E R
_m t5i 4
4.
4 4
CLR55'MIDFOINTE
9
- **ENVIRONPENTAL SAFPLE STATISTICAL D ATA**
- TAB LE 4 LAKE BOTTOM SEDIPENT GAMMA ISOTOPIC ICi/g dry Cs-137
' INDICATOR STATICN SAMPLE STATISTICS NUMBEP CF SAMPLES 4.000 MINIMUP VALUE 0.130 STANEAPD DEV.
0.454 RA NGE 0.970 MEAN VALUE 0.443 MAXIMUM VALUE 1.100 VARIANCE 0.206 CLASS WIDTH 0.116
- HISTOGRAM ***
i CLASS NO.
LCEEP B.
UPPER B.
F REQUENCY REL.FFEO.t i
1 0.033 0.149 1.0 25 2
0.149 0.266 1.0 25 3
0.266 0.382 0.0 0
4 0.382 0.499 1.0 25 5-0.499 0.615 0.0 0
6 0.615 0.731 0.0 0
7 0.731 0.848 0.0 0
8 0.848
- 0. 96 4 0.0 0
9 0.964 1.081 0.0 0
10 1.081 1.197 1.0 25
- * *P LOT O F HI STOGRAM* **
l.22 2.50 2.80 2.72 2.52 C
2.E2 se::
L1 2.42
==
2.32 a:::
w 2.20 2.t2 iiG m
A iF - t:M G
PC E:i G
E-W w
w w
w w
w w
CLR55 MiDPDiNTE
... ~
s
- **ENVIPONFENTAL SAMPLE STATISTICAL DATA ***
TAB LE 4 LAKE BOTTOM SEDIMENT GAMPA ISOTOPIC tCi/g dry K-40 INDICATOR STATION SAMPLE-STATISTICS f
NUMBER-OF SAMPLES 4.000 MINIMUM VALUE 4.500 STANDARD DEV.
4.725 RANGE 11.500 MEAN VALUE
-10.300 NAXIMUM VALUE 16.000 VARIANCE 22.327 CLASS WIDTH 1.380
- * *III S TO GR AM * *
- CLASS NO.
LOWER B.
UPPER B.
F REQUENCY REL.FREQ.%
1 3.350
- 4. 730 1.0 25 2
4.730 6.110 0.0 0
3 6.110 7.490 0.0 0
4 7.490 8.870 0.0 0
5 8.870 10.250 1.0 25 6
10.250 11.630 1.0 25 7
11.630 13.010 0.0 0
8 13.010 14.390
- 0. 0 0
9 14.390 15.770 0.0 0
10 15.770 17.150
.1.0 25
- PLCT OF HISTOGRAM ***
i.am m.se a.am 2.70.
a.se C
2.E2
==:.
w m.we
==
a.3m wa:::
w a.za m.ra E A A
=
OpJ 2 -i ci ci ee
=
=
'_C L R E E M!DPOINTE
_gc_-
- ENVIEONPEUTAL SAMPLE STATISTICAL DATA ***
T AB LE 4 LAKE BOTTOM SEDIMENT GAMMA ISOTOPIC ICi/g dry.
Sr-90 l
INDICATOR STATION SAMPLE STATISTICS NUMBER OF SAMPLES 4.000 MINIMUM VALUE 0.005 STANDARD DEV.
0.020 RANGE
.0.043 MEAN VALUE 0.019 MAXIMUM VALUE 0.048 VARIANCE 0.000 CLASS WIDTH 0.005
- HISTCGRAM***
CLASS NO.
LCEER B.
UPPER B.
FREQUENCY REL.FREO.%
1 0.001
- 0. 006 1.0 25 2
0.006 0.011 1.0 25 l
3 0.011
- 0. 0 16 0.0 0
4
- 0. 016 0.021 1.0 25 5
0.021 0.027 0.0 0
6 0.027 0.032
- 0. 0 0
7 0.032 0.037 0.0 0
8 0.037 0.042 0.0 0
9 0.042 0.047
- 0. 0 0
10 0.047 0.052 1.0 25
- PLOT OF HISTOGRAM ***
!.22 m.sm m.se 2.72 m.se O
m.sa
- =:
w m.se m
N 0.32 ya:=
w z.za a.ra E
in E
e b.
b.
b.
=.
m W
=
E 9
=.
=.
9
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
CLR55 MIDPOINT 5
_9s.
h
- ** ENVIPONMENTAL SAMPLE STATISTICAL DATA ***
1 TAB LE 5 LAKE MOLLUSK GAMMA ISOTOPIC-ECi/g wet Mn-54 INDICATOR STATICN SAMPLE STATISTICS l
NUMBER OF SAMPLES 5.000 MINIMUM VALUE 0.080 STANDARD DEV.
- 0. 18 3 RANGE 0.450 MEAN VALUE 0.208 MAXIMUM VALUE 0.530 VARIANCE 0.034 CLASS WIDTH 0.054
- HISTOGRAM ***
CLASS NO.
LOWER B.
UPPER B.
FREQUENCY R EL.F R EO. %
1 0.035 0.089 1.0 20 2
0.089 0.143 2.0 40 3
0.143 0.197 1.0 20 4
0.197 0.251 0.0 0
5 0.251 0.305 0.0 0
6 0.305 0.359 0.0 0
7 0.359 0.413 0.0 0
8 0.413 0.467 0.0 0
9 0.467 0.521 0.0 0
10
- 0. 521 0.575 1.0 20
- * *P LOT OF HISTOGRAM * **
2.22 1.E2 I.E3
!.40
! '. 23 C_
!.20
=w
.2.80
-2 3
2.52 y=
6 2.H0 2.22 liS C
C A
R R
R F
_E.
M 4
4 4
4 4
a CLR55 MIDFOINTE
- **ENVIRONPENTAL SAMPLE STATISTICAL DATA ***
TAB LE 5 -
LAKE MOLLUSK -
GAMPA ISOTOPIC TCi/g wet Sr-90 INDICATOR STATION SAMPLE STATISTICS NC!!BER OF SAMPLES 6.000 MINIMUM VALUE 0.050 STANDARD DEV.
0.044 RANGE 0.120 MEAN VALUE 0.099 MAXIMUM VALUE 0.170 VARIANCE 0.002 CLASS WIDTH 0.014
- HISTOGRAM ***
CLASS NO.
LOKER B.
UPPER B.
FREQUENCY REL.FREQ.1 1
0.038
- 0. 052 1.0 17 2
0.052 0.067 0.0 0
3 0.067 0.081
- 2. 0 33 4
0.081
- 0. 096 1.0 17 l
5 0.096 0.110 0.0 0
6 0.110 0.124 0.0 0
7 0.124 0.139 1.0 17 8
0.1 39 0.153 0.0 0
9 0.153 0.168 0.0 0
10
- 0. 16 8 0.182 1.0 17
- PLOT OF fiISTOGRAM***
2.ca l.BB I.52 I.40 l.22 C
t.am
==
w m.es L
cw' m.sm cm 6
2.40 2.20 i-1 m
5 F
s a
C Pt
!!e 5
>c 9
9 9
m m
m m
m m
m m
m
=
l CLR55 MiDPDiNTE e
m me.,ow e
m.-
/-
- **ENVIRONFENTAL SAPPLE STATISTICAL DATA ***
TAB LE 5
- LAKE MOLLUSK GAMPA ISOTOPIC ECi/g wet Sr-89 INDICATOR STATICN SAPPLE STATISTICS NUMBER OF SAMPLES 4.000 MINIMUM VALUE 0.010 STANDAPD DEV.
0.026 RANGE 0.060 MEAN~VALUE 0.035 MAXIMUM VALUE 0.070 VAPIANCE 0.001 CLASS WIDTH 0.007
- HISTCGRAM***
- CLASS NO.
LCh'ER B.
UPPER B.
FREQUENCY R EL.F R EQ. %
1 0.004 0.011 1.0 25 2
0.011
- 0. 018 0.0 0
3 0.018 0.026 1.0 25 4
- 0. 0 26 0.033 0.0 0
5 0.033 0.040 0.0 0
6 0.040 0.047 1.0 25 7
0.047 0.054 0.0 0
8 0.054 0.062 0.0 0
9 0.062 0.069
- 0. 0 0
10 0.069 0.076 1.0 25
- *
- PLCT OF HISTCGRAM***
1.am 2.92 a.em 2.72 a.se C.
3. 5'O
==:
u m.se
=5 m.sm c2=:
w m.am 0.12 E
a Q
E ii; iii;;
E Wii G
E a
a a
a u-a e
a a
CLREE M!DPDiNTE
^
- ENVIRON.* ENTAL SAMPLE STATISTICAL DATA ***
TABLE 6 LAKE GA*4MAFUS GAMMA ISOTOPIC ICi/g wet S r-90 INDICATOR STATION SAMPLE FTATISTICS NUMBER OF SAMPLES 4.000 MINIMUM VALUE 0.170 STANDARD DEV.
O.013 RANGE 0.030 MEAN VALUE 0.188 MAXIMUM VALUE 0.200 VAPIANCE 0.000 CLASS WIDTH 0.004
- HISTOGRAM ***
CLASS NO.
LOWER B.
UPPEP B.
FREQUENCY REL.FREO.%
1
- 0. 16 7 0.171 1.0 25 2
0.171
- 0. 174 0.0 0
3 0.174 0.178 0.0 0
4 0.178 0.181 0.0 0
5 0.181 0.185 0.0 0
6 0.185 0.18 9 0.0 0
7 0.189 0.192 2.0 50 8
0.192 0.196 0.0 0
9
- 0. 196 0.199 0.0 0
10 0.199 0.203 1.0 25
- *
- PLOT O F HI STOGRAM* *
- 2.22 I
I.53 l.50 I.42
!.20 C
I.00
=
w 2.82
=2$
D.50 F
a.wm m.2m C
C E
E E
E E
E M
M 4
-d 4
4
.CLR55 MIDPDINTE
- ** ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLE STATISTICAL DATA **
- TABLE 6 LAKE GAMMARUS
- GAMMA ISOTOPIC ECi/g wet
~
K-40 INDICA'1VR STATION SAMPLE STATISTICS NUMBER OF SAMPLES 4.000 MINIMUM VALUE 0.700 STANDARD DEV.
1.813 RANGE 4.100 MEAN VALUE
- 2. 700 MAXIMUM VALUE 4.800-VARIANCE 3.287 CLASS WIDTH 0.492
- HISTOGRAM ***
CLASS NO.
LOWER B.
UPPER B.
FREQUENCY REL.FREQ.1 1
0.290 0.782 1.0 25 2
- 0. 78 2
- 1. 274 0.0 0
3 1.274 1.766 0.0 0
4 1.766 2.258 1.0 25 5
2.258 2.750 0.0 0
6 2.750 3.242 0.0 0
7 3.242 3.734 1.0 25 8
- 3. 734
- 4. 226 0.0 0
9
- 4. 2 26
- 4. 718 0.0 0
10 4.718 5.210 1.0 25
- PLOT OF HISTOGRAM ***
i.BO m.se 2.80 2.72 2.52 C
' E. 5'O
=a=w m.9a S
.m.so P
2.22 m.ra K
2 Ct sr
=
EB F
=
L=
isi w
N N
H
. -i
. -i
==
==
CLR55 MIDPOINT 5 L
-100-
[.
3
.O
- ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLE STATISTICAL' DATA ***
TABLE 6 LAKE GAMf%RUS GANMA ISOTOPIC ECi/g wet Sr-90
~
INDICATOR STATICN SAMPLE STATISTICS NUMBER OF SAMPLES 4.000 MINIMUM VALUE' O.170 STANDARD DEV.
O.013 RANGE 0.030 MEAN VALUE 0.188 MAXIMUM VALUE 0.200 VARIANCE 0.000 CLASS WIDTH 0.004
- * *H I STOGRAM * *
- CLASS NO.
LCWER B.
UPPER B.
FREQUENCY REL.FREO.%
1 0.167 0.171 1.0 25 2
0.171
- 0. 1 74 0.0 0
3 0.174 0.178 0.0 0
4 0.178 0.181 0.0 0
5 0.181 0.185 0.0 0
6 0.185 0.18 9 0.0 0
7 0.189 0.192
- 2. 0 50 8
0.192
- 0. 196 0.0 0
9 0.196 0.199
- 0. 0 0
10 0.199 0.203 1.0 25
- PLOT OF HISTOGRAM ***
2.20 l.82 1.E2 l.42
!.20 U
I_. 0 0
==-
w B.80
=3$
2.50 m
W' O.42 2.20 C
-C E
E E
E E
E j!!!
M a
d-4 a
CLR55 MiDPOINTE
-101-
l
- ** ENVIRONPENTAL SAMPLE STATISTICAL DATA ***
s TAB LE 6 IAKE GAMPARUS GAMMA ISOTOPIC Ni/g wet K-40 INDICATOR STATIOi SAMPLE STATISTICS NUMBER OF SAMPLES 4.000 MINIMUM VALUE
- 0. 70 0 STANDARD DEV.
1.813 RANGE 4.100 MEAN VALUE 2.700 MAXIMUM VALUE 4.800 VARIANCE
- 3. 28 7 CLASS WIDTH 0.492
- HISTOGRAM ***
CLASS NO.
LOWER B.
UPPER B.
0.290
- 0. 782 1.0 25 2
0.782 1.274 0.0 0
3 1.274
- 1. 766 0.0 0
4
- 1. 76 6 2.258 1.0 25 5
2.258 2.750 0.0 0
6 2.750 3.242 0.0 0
7 3.242
- 3. 734 1.0 25 8
- 3. 734
- 4. 226 0.0 0
9 4.226
- 4. 71 8 0.0 0
10 4.718 5.210 1.0 25
- *
- PLOT OF HISTOGRAM * **
i.am 2.S2 2.EE 2.72 2.50 O
m.sa
==:
u a.He m5 m.se m.2m a.tm.
5 G
Dt E
m E
!F iR 5:
hR mi A
r,;
r,;
CLR55 MiDFOINTE
-102-
i
- ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLE STATISTICAL DATA ***
TAB LE 7 LAKE FISH GAMMA ISOTOPIC $1/g wet C s-137 CONTROL STATION SAMPLE STATISTICS NUMBER OF SAMPLES 4.000 MINIMUM VALUE 0.030 STANDARD DEV.
0.014 RANGE 0.030 MEAN VALUE 0.040 MAXIMUM VALUE 0.060 VAPIANCE-O.000 CLASS WIDTH 0.004
- HISTOGRAM ***
CLASS NO.
LCWER B.
UPPER B.
FREQUENCY REL.FREQ.%
1 0.027 0.031
- 2. 0 50 2
0.031 0.034 0.0 0
3 0.034 0.038 0.0 0
4 0.038 0.041 1.0 25 5
0.041 0.045 0.0 0
6-0.045 0.049 0.0 0
7 0.049-0.052 0.0 0
8 0.052 0.056 0.0 0
9 0.056 0.059 0.0 0
10 0.059 0.063 1.0 25
- * *PLCT O F HI STOGRAM* *
- 2.ma l.se l.52 f.He
!.22 4
O r.ma
=e w
m.se
m m.se c:t
w m.9m 2.22 E
G E
E -E W W IiG iiE liS u
a a
a a
a a
a a
u
' C L FIE S MiDPD1NTE l
-103-I
- ** ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLE STATISTICAL DATA ***
TABLE 7 LAKE FISH GAMMA ISOTOPIC Ni/g wet Cs-137 INDICATOR STATION SAMPLE STATISTICS NUMBER OF SAMPLES 12.000 MINIMUM VALUE 0.016 STANDARD DEV.
0.143 PANGE 0.534 MEAN VALUE 0.101 MAXIMUM VALUE 0.550 VARIANCE 0.021 CLASS WIDTH 0.060
- HISTOGRAM ***^
' CLASS NO.
LOWER B.
UPPER B.
FREQUENCY REL.FREQ.1 1
0.000 0.060 5.0 42 2
0.060 0.121 6.0 50 3
0.121
- 0. 18 1 0.0 0
4 0.181 0.241 0.0 0
5 0.241 0.302 0.0 0
6 0.302
- 0. 362 0.0 0
7 0.362 0.422 0.0 0
8 0.422 0.483 0.0 0
9 0.483 0.543 0.0 0
.10 0.543 0.603 1.0 8
- *
- PLOT O F HI STOGRAM* **
s.am s:. 9m 9.sm 9.2m 3.se C
3.am z
_w 2.9m
=2 C28 l.se w
C2::
-.2m w
l m.se la lE tc m
i;;
A A
W2 m
G-a a
a a
a a
a 1
CLR55 MiDPDINTE
-104-
o
- ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLE STATISTICAL DATA ***
TABLE 7 IAKE FISH GAMMA ISOTOPIC pCi/g wet Sr-90 CONTROL STATION SAMPLE STATISTICS NUMBER OF SAMPLES 5.000 MINIMUM VALUE 0.008 STANDARD DEV.
0.012 RANGE 0.025 MEAN VALUE 0.018 MAXIMUM VALUE 0.033
_ VARIANCE 0.000 CLASS WIDTH 0.003
- HISTOGRAM ***
CLASS NO.
LCWER B.
UPPER B.
FREQUENCY REL.FREQ.t 1
0.006 0.009 1.0 20 2
0.009
- 0. 0 12 1.0 20
-3 0.012 0.015 1.0 20 4
0.015
- 0. 0 18 0.0 0
5 0.018 0.021 0.0 0
6 0.021 0.024 0.0 0
7 0.024 0.027 0.0 0
8 0.027 0.030 1.0 20 9
0.030 0.033 0.0 0
10 0.033
- 0. 036 1.0 20
- *
- PLOT OF HISTOGRAM * **
l.22 2.92 2.E0 B.72 0.52 1
D O. 5:2
- =:
w 2.42 l
- 13 0.32 c2=
w 2.22 2.10 E
E E
E G dEE Q
==
m m
an m
g u
a a
a a
..N. =-.
(?===
- a. ' ' N. = -'
?
s
, w.
-105-
- *
- ENV IRONMENTAL ' SAMP LE STATISTICAL D ATA * *
- TABLE 7 LAKE FISH GAMMA ISOTOPIC FCi/g wet Sr-90 INDICATOR STATIOi SAMPLE STATISTICS NUMBER OF SAMPLES 13.000 MINIMUM VALUE 0.006 STANDARD DEV.
0.011 RANGE 0.033 MEAN VALUE 0.018 MAXIMUM VALUE 0.039 VARIANCE 0.000 CLASS WIDTH 0.004
- **HI STO GR AM * **
CLASS NO.
LOWER B.
UPPER B.
FREQUENCY REL.FREQ.%
1 0.003 0.007 1.0 8
2 0.007 0.011 3.0 23 3
0.011 0.015 3.0 23 4
0.015 0.019 1.0 8
5 0.019 0.023 0.0 0
6 0.023 0.026 1.0 8
7 0.026 0.030 1.0 8
8 0.030 0.034
- 2. 0 15 9
0.034 0.038
- 0. 0 0
10 0.038 0.042
- 1. 0 8
- PLOT OF HISTCGRAM***
3.22 2.72 2.42 2.12 l.E2 D
I.E2
==
W
!. 22 -
5 2.s2 x
O.52
[
l 2.22
[
I l
W3 E3 C2 C
E
!!E A
M
!n H
l M
WE3 M
M M
ENER M
WE3 M
JE3 l
CLR55 MIDFOINTE
-1.06-
l
^
- ** ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLE STATISTICAL D ATA***
TAB LE 8A LAKE WATER MONTHLY COMPOSITE GROSS BETA pCi/l BETA INDICATOR ~ STATION SAMPLE STATISTICS NUMBER OF SAMPLES 24.000 MINIMUM VALUE 2.000 STANDARD DEV.
1.059 RANGE 4.300 MEAN VALUE 3.242 MAXIMUM VALUE 6.300 VARIANCE 1.122 CLASS WIDTH 0.516
- HISTOGRAM ***
4 CLASS NO.
LCWER B.
UPPEP B.
FREQUENCY R EL.F REO. %
1 1.570 2.086 1.0 4
2
- 2. 08 6 2.602 5.0 21 3
2.602 3.118 8.0 33 4
3.118 3.634 5.0 21 5
3.634 4.150 2.0 8
6 4.150 4.666 1.0 4
7 4.666 5.182 0.0 0
8 5.182 5.698 0.0 0
9 5.698 6.214 1.0 4
10 6.214 6.730 1.0 4
- PLOT OF HISTCGRAM***
s.ee 7.22 E.9m
~ 5". E 2 H.E2 C
4.02
- =:
w 3.2m m]
2.43 E-I.E2 m.se E
Rs W
E 5:
91
!!i-E 5:
A M
M
=s
=?
M M
J CLR55 MIDPDINTE
-107-t y---
g yv w
.m
-iy-w
-e
)
'l
~
~
- ** ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLE STATISTICAL DATA **
- TABLE 8A LAKE WATER MONTHLY COMPOSITE GROSS BETA pCi/l BETA CONTPOL STATION SAMPLE STATISTICS NUMBER OF SAMPLES.
11.000 MINIMUM VALUE 2.100 STANDARD DEV.
O.852 RANGE 2.700 MEAN VALUE 3.055 MAXINUM VALUE 4.800 VAPIANCE 0.727 CLASS WIDTH 0.324
- HISTOGRAM ***
CLASS NO.
L CWE R B.
UPPER B.
FREQUENCY REL.FREQ.1 1
1.830 2.154 2.0 18 2
2.154 2.478 1.0 9
3 2.478 2.802 1.0 9
4 2.802 3.126 3.0 27 5
3.126 3.450 0.0 0
6 3.450
.3.774
- 2. 0 18 7
- 3. 774 4.098 1.0 9
8 4.098 4.422 0.0 0
9 4.422 4.746 0.0 0
10 4.746 5.070 1.0 9
- *
- PLOT OF HISTOGRAM ***
3.am 2.72 2. 4 121 a.Ia I.E2 O
i.se
.z:
W I.30 5
a.se c2::
w m.se s.22 IR A
5 L4 81 G
E W
5 s
N N
N
.N r,-i w s
=:
s CLR55-MlDPDiNT5'
-108-
- ENVIPONMENTAL SAMPLE STATISTICAL DATA ***
TABLE 8B LAKE WATEP QUAPTERLY COP.POSITE TPITIUM $1/1 H INDICATOR STATION SAMPLE STATISTICS
.NUMBEP OF SAMPLES 8.000 MINIMUM VALUE 176.000 STANDARD DEV.
40.697.
RANGE-110.000
^
MEAN VALUE 234.000 MAXIMUM VALUE 286.000 VAPIANCE 1656.286 CLASS WIDTH 13.200
- * *HI STOGRAM * *
- CLASS NO.
LCWEP B.
UPPER B.
FREQUENCY REL.F REQ. 4 1
165.000 178.200 1.0 13 2
178.200 191.400 0.0 0
3 191.400 204.600 2.0 25 4
204.600 217.800 0.0 0
5 217.800 231.000 1.0 13 6
231.000 244.200 1.0 13 7
244.200 257.400 0.0 0
8 257.400 270.600 0.0 0
9 270.600 283.800
- 2. 0 25 10 283.800 297.000 1.0 13
- *
- PLOT OF HISTOGRAM ***
2.22 I.EE I.E2-f.H3 l.20 O
I.22
- =:
w 2.80
- 13 2.EE a:
6 B.42 E.22 i m, m,
==
tv,
=r-w::. m,
- mus, m,
=r-E
!!R
=
5-P M"
N m
m m
CLR55 MIDPDiNTE
-109-
~
i
- *
- ENVIRONMENTAL SAPPLE STATISTICAL DATA **
- TABLE 8B LAKE WATER QUARTERLY COMPOSITE STECer.'IUM rCi/1 -
Sr-90 INDICATOR' STATION SAMPLE. STATISTICS NUMBER OF SAMPLES 8,000 MINIMUM VALUE 0.400 STANDAPD DEV.
O.338 RA NGE 0.900 MEAN VALUE 0.838 MAXIMUM VALUE 1.300 VARIANCE 0.114 CLASS WIDTH 0.108
- HISTOGRAM ***
CLASS No.
LOWER B.
UPPER B.
FR EQUENCY REL.FREO.%
1 0.310 0.418 1.0 13 2
0.418 0.526 1.0 13 3
0.526 0.634 1.0 13 4
0.634
- 0. 74 2 1.0 13 5
- 0. 74 2 0.850 0.0 0
6 0.850
- 0. 958 1.0 13 7
- 0. 958 1.066 0.0 0
8 1.066
- 1. 174 1.0 13 9
1.174 1.282 1.0 13 10 1.282
- 1. 39 0 1.0 13
- *
- PLOT O F HI STOGRAM* **
I.22 2.52 2.52 2.72 2.52 D
2.EZ
=a:
w 2.42
=a 2.33 c2=:
w 2.22 2.IU N.
m.
E 9
O
=!
9
=
=
=
=
=
==
CLR55 Midi:DiNTE
-110--
- **ENVIPONMENTAL SAMPLE STATISTICAL DATA ***
T AB LE 12 MONTHLY PARTICULATE COMPOSITE GAMMA ISOTOPIC 10-3 ;Ci/ cubic meter Be-7 CONTROL STATION SAMPLE STATISTICS NUMBER OF SAMPLES 12.000 MINIMUM VALUE 47.000 STANDARD DEV.
17.531 RANGE 63.000
'MEAN VALUE 84.667 MAXIMUM VALUE 110.000 VARIANCE-307.333 CLASS WIDTH 7.560
- HISTOGRAM ***
CLASS NO.
LOWER B.
UPPER B.
FREQUENCY REL.FREQ.1 1
40.700 48.260 1.0 8
2 48.260 55.820 0.0 0
3 55.820 63.380 0.0 0
4 63.380
- 70. 940 1.0 8
5 70.940 78.500 1.0 8
6 78.500 86.060 5.0 42 7
86.060 93.620 1.0 8
8 93.620 101.180 1.0 8
~
9 101.180 108.740 0.0 0
10 108.740 116.300 2.0 17
- *
- PLOT OF HISTOGRAM * *
- 5'.22 4.E2 i
4.22 3.E2 I
3.00 U
2.E2
=w 2.22
=2$
I.E2 c2:::
l 6
I.22 2.E2 F
E 5
2 A
R E
F 9
R i
Di Si d #
Gi d
Gi EE CLR55 MIDPDINTE
-111-
J
'.e
- ENVIRONFENTAL SAFPLE STATISTICAL DATA ***
s TAB LE ' 12 MONTHLY PAPTICULATE COPPOSITE GAMMA ISOTOPIC 10-3 tCi/ cubic meter
~
Be-7 INDICATOR STATION SAMPLE STATISTICS NUMBER OF SAMPLES 12.000 MININUM VALUE 51.000 STANDARD DEV.
18.845 RA NGE 69.000 MEAN VALUE 69.667 MAXIMUM VALUE 120.000 VAPIANCE 355.152 CLASS WIDTH 8.280
- HISTOGRAM ***
CLASS NO.
LCWER B.
UPPER B.
FREQUENCY R EL.F P EQ. %
1 44.100
- 52. 380 2.0 17 2
52.380 60.660 1.0 8
3 60.660 68.940 5.0 42 4
68.940 77.220 2.0 17 5
77.220 85.500 1.0 8
6 85.500 93.780 0.0 0
7 93.780 102.060 0.0 0
8 102.060 110.340 0.0 0
9 110.340 118.620 0.0 0
10 118.620 126.900 1.0 8
- *
- P LCT O F HI STOCRAM * *
- s.am H.E2 H.ee 3.sz 3.00 O
z.ca
=
w 2.ca m
5 i.sa a:=
6 I.23 a.ca K
G m
=M 5
mN E
N Y$$
$ds#$ES CLREE MiDFOINTE
-112-
l 4
- **EEVIRONMENTAL SAFPLE STATISTICAL ~ DATA ***
TABLE 12 MONTHLY PARTICULATE CCFPCSITE GAMMA ISOTOPIC 10-3 Ici/ cubic mete r C e-14 4 INDICATOP STATICH SAPPLE STATISTICS NUMBER OF SAMPLES 7.000-MINIMUM VALUE 1.700
-STANDARD DEV.
1.258 RANGE 3.600 MEAN VALUE 3.257 MAXIMUM VALUE 5.300 VARIANCE 1.583 CLASS WIDTH 0.432
- HISTOGRAM ***
1 l
CLASS NO.
LOWER B.
UPPER B.
F REQUENCY REL.F REQ.1 j
1
- 1. 340.
1.772 1.0 14 j
2
- 1. 772 2.204 1.0 14 i
3 2.204 2.636 1.0 14 4
2.636 3.068 0.0 0
5 3.068 3.500 0.0 0
6 3.500 3.932
- 2. 0 29 7
3.932
- 4. 36 4 1.0 14 8
4.364
- 4. 796 0.0 0
9 4.796
- 5. 228 0.0 0
10 5.228 5.660 1.0 14
- *
- P LOT O F HI STOGRA P * *
- 2.az l.E2 l.EE 1
I.92 l.22 C.
l.ae
=z:
w a.es
.5 m.se a=
w m.9m 2.22 ta iR 9
m
!!E A
5 5l E
F:
nM M
M W
A wh CLR55 MIDPOlNTE
-us-j:
3;
- ** ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLE STATISTICAL DATA ***
TABLE 12 MONTHLY PARTICULATE COMPCSITE GAMMA ISOTOPIC 10-3. gi/cy.bic meter Cs_137 CONTROL STATION SAMPLE STATISTICS NUMBER OF SAMPLES 7.000 MINIMUM VALUE 0.800 STANDARD DEV.
O.416 RANGE 1.200 MEAN VALUE 1.243 MAXIMUM VALUE 2.000 VARIANCE 0.173 CLASS WIDTH 0.144
- **HI STC GRAM * *
- CLASS NO.
L OWE 3 B.
UPPER B.
FREQUENCY REL.F REQ. %
1 0.680 0.824 2.0 29 2
0.824
- 0. 96 8 0.0 0'
3 0.968
- 1. 112 1.0 14 4
'l.112 1.256 1.0 14 5
1.256 1.400 0.0 0
6 1.400
- 1. 544 2.0 29 7
1.544 1.688 0.0 0
8 1.688 1.832
- 0. 0 0
9 1.832 1.976 0.0 0
1 10 1.976 2.120 1.0 14
- *
- PLOT OF HISTOGRAM * *
- 2.ma I.Em i.se i.we
!.2m O
i.ma z:
w m.se
=$
m.Em a:::
w a.wa a.2m
>c!
E iE A
F G
ie m
ea w
w s
CLREE MIDFOINTE
-114-
et
~
- **ENVIPONMENTAL SAMPLE STATISTICAL DATA ***
T AB LE 12
- MONTHLY PARTICULATE COMPOSITE GAMMA ISOTOPIC 10-3 p::i/ cubic mete r
~
Cs-137 INDICATOP STATICN SAMPLE STATISTICS NUMBEP OF SAMPLES 9.000 MINIMUM VALUE 0.300 STANDARD DEV.
- 0. 36 2 RANGE 1.200 MEAN VALUE 0.689 MAXIMUM VALUE 1.500 VARIANCE 0.131 CLASS WIDTH 0.144
- **H I STOGRAM * *
- CLASS NO.
LOWER B.
UPPER B.
FREQUENCY REL.F REQ. %
1 0.180 0.324 1.0 11 2-0.324 0.468 2.0 22 3
0.468 0.612
- 1. 0 11 4
0.612 0.756 1.0 11 5
- 0. 756.
- 0. 90 0 3.0 33 6
0.900 1.044 0.0 0
7 1.044 1.188 0.0 0
8 1.188 1.332
- 0. 0 0
9 1.332 1.476 0.0 0
10 1.476 1.620 1.0 11
- *
- PLOT OF RISTOGRAM* **
3.22 2.72 2.42 2.12 I.E2 D.
I. 5*2
- 2:
w I.22
-3$
2.52 a::
6 2.E2 2.32 l
N E
E E
E b - ---
N'E M
w 4
w w
w e
a j
i CLFIES MIDPDINT5
-115-
- ** ENVIRONMENTAL ~ SAMPLE STATISTICAL D'ATA***
TAB LE 15 ENVIORNMENTAL TLD READINGS TOTAL DOSE lst Ctr. r/Pem/Qtr.
GAMMA CONTROL STATION SAMPLE STATISTICS NUMBER OF SAMPLES 7.000 MINIMUM VALUE 3.050 STANDAPD DEV.
0.263 RANGE 0.870 MEAN VALUE 3.460 MAXIMUM VALUE
- 3. 92 0 VARIANCE 0.069 CLASS WIDTH 0.104
- HISTOGRAM ***
CLASS NO.
LOWEP B.
UPPER B.
FREQUENCY R EL.F R EQ. %
1
- 2. 96 3 3.067 1.0 14 2
3.067
- 3. 1 72 0.0 0
3 3.172 3.276 O.0 0
4 3.276 3.381 1.0 14 5
3.381 3.485 2.0 29 6
3.485 3.589 2.0 29 7
3.589 3.694 0.0 0
8 3.694
- 3. 7 98 0.0 0
9
- 3. 7 98 3.903 0.0 0
10 3.903 4.007 1.0 14
- *
- PLOT OF HI STCGRAM***
6 2.02 l.92 l.E2 I.92 l.2D D
I.3C
==::
u G.82
- s Q.E0
=c 4
Q.40 2.20 5
5 W
59 hG G
N A
M M
,,4 M
M M
M M
M M
CLFiEE M I DFO I NTE'
-116-
l
- * *ENVIFOMf" ENTAL SAMPLE STATISTICAL DATA ***
s TAB LE 15 ENVIORNMENTAL TLD READINGS TOTAL DOSE 2r.d Otr. r. Rem /Otr.
GAMMA COMTROL STATION SAMPLE STATISTICS NUMBER OF SAMPLES 7.000 MINIMUM VALUE
- 2. 780 STANDARD DEV.
0.739 RANCE 1.810 MEAN VALUE 3.299 MAXIMUM VALUE
- 4. 5 90 VARIANCE 0.546 CLASS WIDTH 0.217
- RISTOGRAM***
CLASS NO.
LOWER B.
UPPER B.
FREQUENCY REL.FREQ.%
1 2.599
- 2. 8 16 1.0 14 2
2.816 3.033 4.0 57 3
3.033 3.251 0.0 0
4 3.251 3.462 0.0 0
5 3.468 3.685 0.0 0
6 3.685
- 3. 90 2 0.0 0
7
.3. 902 4.119 0.0 0
8 4.119 4.337 1.0 14 9
4.337
- 4. 5 54 0.0 0
10
- 4. 554
- 4. 771 1.0 14
- PLOT OF HISTOGRAli'**
H.mm 3.sm 3.20 2.E2 2.9m C
2.mm 5
r.sa
==
!.22 D.em A.42 F
A EC *
=
A mi A
kP t=
l L
l r-:
N H
-i H
M s
e e
s CLR55 MIDFO!NTE
-117-
- **ENVIFONMENTAL SAMPLE STATISTICAL DATA ***
TABLE 15 ENVICPNPENTAL TLD READINCS TOTAL DOSE 3rd Otr. rPen/Otr.
~
GAMMA CONTPOL STATION SAFPLE STATISTICS NUMBER OF SAMPLES 6.000 MINI Wtt VALUE 4.500 STANDAPD DEV.
0.638 RANGE 1.730
.MEAU VALUE
- 4. 987 MAXIMUM VALUE 6.230 VARIANCE 0.407 CLASS WIDTH 0.208
- HISTCGRAM***
CLASS NO.
LOWER B.
UPPER B.
F P ECUENCY R EL.F REQ. %
1
- 4. 32 7 4.535 1.0 17 2
4.535
- 4. 74 2 2.0 33 3
- 4. 74 2 4.950 1.0 17 4
'4. 950 5.157 1.0 17 l
5 5.157
- 5. 36 5 0.0 0
6 5.365 5.573 0.0 0
l 7-5.573 5.780 0.0 0
8 5.780
- 5. 99 8 0.0 0
9 5.988 6.195 0.0 0
10 6.195 6.403 1.0 17
- *
- P LOT O F HI STCGRAM * *
- 2.am I.E2 I.50 i.' H 3 I.20 D
I.20
==:
w m.so
=
=
m.Ec m
^
-0.sa
- Q* 23 9
5' m- =
l e '
_C.
5
=
A
=-
A J
J J
J J
J CL FiEE MlDFOINTE l
l-
.- j -
-118-
l 0
- ** ENVIPONFENTAL. SAMP LE STATISTICAL DATA **
GAMMA CONTROL STATION SA!!PLE STATISTICS
. NUMBER OF SAMPLES 7.000 MINIFUM VALUE 4.000 STANDARD DEV.
O.482
. RANGE 1.230 MEAN VALUE 4.513 MAXIMUM VALUE 5.230 VARIANCE 0.232 CLASS WIDTri 0.148
- HISTOGPAM***
CLASS NO.
LOWEP B.
UPPER B.
FPEOUENCY REL.FREO.%
1 3.877 4.025 2.0 29 2
4.025 4.172 0.0 0
3 4.172 4.320 1.0 14 4
'- 4.320 4.467 1.0 14 5
4.467 4.615 0.0 0
6 4.615
- 4. 76 3 1.0 14 7
4.763
- 4. 91 0 0.0 0
8
- 4. 910 5.058 1.0 14 9
5.058 5.205 0.0 0
10 5.205 5.353 1.0 14
- ** PLOT O F HISTOGRAM * *
- 2.22
!.E2 I.50 l.H2 l.22 D
I.22
- ==
.w m.E2 m$
2.G2 E
a.w2 2.22 M
N A
E S
E Ei!
O N
a J
CL FI55 MIDPDINTE l
-119-u-
. c.
- ** ENVIFONMENTAL SAFPLE STATISTICAL DATA ***
TABLE 15 ENV IOPMMENTAL TLD PEADINGS
- TOTAL P' SE FOR YEAR mrem /Qtr.
J GAMT.
CONTROL STATIOP SAFPLE STATISTICS NUMBER OF SAMPLES 27.000-MINIMUM VALUE
- 2. 780 STANDAPD.DEV.
O.883 PANGE 3.450 MEAN VALUE 4.030 MAXIMUM VALUE 6.230 VAFIANCE 0.779 CLASS WIDTH 0.414
- HISTCCRAM***
CLASS NO.
LOWER B.
UPPEP B.
FPEOUENCY R EL.F FEO. %
1 2.435 2.849 2.0 7
2 2.849 3.263 4.0 15
.i 3
3.263 3.677 5.0 19 i
4 3.677 4.091 3.0 11 5
4.091 4.505 4.0 15 6
4.505
- 4. 91 9 5.0 19 7
- 4. 91 9 5.333 3.0 11 8
5.333
- 5. 74 7 0.0 0
9 5.747
- 6. 161 0.0 0
10
- 6. 16 1 6.575 1.0 4
- *
- P LOT O F HI STOCFAM* *
- s.am 9.sm H.am 3.E2 3.ma C
2.Ka 5
2.ac
=m r.sm xw I.33 Q.E3 4
RM N
5 9E HR m
m m
=-
=r-m m
m m
i CLFiE E M i D i= O l' N T E l
-120-
l
- **ENVIPCMMENTAL SAMPLE STATISTICAL CATA***
T AB LE 15 EMVICPMMENTAL TLC 'REACINGS TOTAL CCSE let Otr. ePer./Qtr.
)
INCICATOP STATION -
SAMPLE STATISTICS NUMBER OF SAMPLES 5.000 MINIMUP VALUE
- 2. 96 0 STANDAPD DEV.
0.318 RANGE 0.720 MEAN VALUE 3.284 MAXIMUtt VALUE 3.680 l
VAPIANCE 0.101 CLASS WIDTP 0.086 l
~***HISTOGRAP***
i l
CLASS NO.
LCWER B.
UPPER B.
FREC UENCY R EL.F REQ. %
1 2.888
- 2. 974 1.0 20 2
2.974 3.061' l.0 20 3
3.061 3.147 0.0 0
4 3.147 3.234 1.0 20 5
3.234
- 3. 320 0.0 0
6
- 3. 320 3.406 0.0 0
7 3.406 3.493 0.0 0
8 3.493 3.579 1.0 20 9
3.579 3.666 0.0 0
. 10 3.666
- 3. 7 52 1.0 20
- *
- P LCT O F HI STOCP A M* * *
!.22 I
2.52 2.B2 2.72 2.E2 U
12!. E 2 5
2.w2
==$
2.30 2.22.
2.:2 Q
G 2
5 S
W Y
5 C
F='
H H
.-i
,-i M
.-i
,-i
-i
.-.4
,,4 CLR55 MIDPOINT 5
-121-
e o.
- ** ENVIPOMf4 ENTAL SAPPLE STATISTICAL DATA ***
TABLE 15 ENV ICRNPENTAL TLD READINCS
~
TOTAL DCSE 2nd Ctr. rPem/Ctr.
GAMPA I?TICATOR STATION SAMPLE STATISTICS NUMBEP OF SAMPLES 5.000 MINIMUM VALUE 2.400 STANDAPD DEV.
O.510 PAPGE 1.180 MEAN VALUE 2.830 MAXIMUM VALUE 3.580 VAFIANCE 0.2GO.
CLASS WIDTH 0.14 2
- * *9I STCGPAM* * *
-CLASS NO.
LCWER 9.
UPPEP B.
PPEOUENCY REL.PPEO.%
1 2.282 2.424 1.0 20 2
2.424 2.56 5 1.0 20 3
2.565
- 2. 707 1.0 20 4
- 2. 70 7 2.848 0.0 0
5
- 2. 8 4 P,
- 2. 990 0.0 0
6
- 2. 990 3.132 1.0 20 7
3.132 3.273 0.0 0
8 3.273 3.415 0.0 0
9 3.41 5
- 3. 5 56 0.0 0
10
- 3. 556 3.698 1.0 20
- * *PLCT O F HI STOGPAM* **
1.mm m.se a.sm E.72 Q.E2 U
Q.E3
=z:
w m.9c
=2$
p.32 a.ac 2.10 m
F 5
F!!
G h=
A E
F G
M f&
CLFiEE MiDPCINTE j
-122-
n
- ** ENVIFOMPE*!TAL SAPPLE STATIETICAL DATA ***
T AB LE 15 ENVICPNMEMTAL TLD READINGS TOTAL DOSE 3rd Ctr. ePem/Otr.
GAMYA INDICATOR STATICN SAMPLE STATISTICS NUMBEP OF SAf1PLES 5.000 MINIF.UP VALUE 4.740 STANDAPD DEV.
0.656 PA NGE 1.610 MEAN VALUE 5.236 MAXIFUM VALUE 6.350 VAPIANCE 0.430 CLASS FIDTH 0.193
- * *HI STCGRA M * *
- CLASS NO.
LCFEP B.
UPPEP B.
' FREQUENCY REL.FREO.t 1
4.579
- 4. 772 1.0 20 2
4.772
- 4. 96 5 1.0 20 3
- 4. 96 5 5.159 1.0 20 4
5.159
- 5. 3 52 1.0 20 5
5.352
- 5. 54 5 0.0 0
6 5.545
- 5. 738 0.0 0
7 5.738 5.931 0.0 0
8 5.931 6.125 0.0 0
9
.6.125
- 6. 318 0.0 0
10 6.318 6.511 1.0 20
- PLOT OF HISTOGRAM ***
!.22 A.52 E.ED 3.72
.g.Em O
2. 5:2 J
d m.92
=2$
2.32
=
Q.22 L
2.12 5
G htl W W
E5 G
E R:
EF:
M M
M M
M J
J J
CLFIEE MIDPDINTE
-123-
\\
- * *ENVIPOWENTAL SA MPLE STATISTICAL. D ATA* *
- TAB LE 15 ENVIOPNMENTAL TLD READINGS TOTAL DOSE 4 th Otr. rPem/Otr.
GAMMA INDICATOR STATION SAMPLE ETATISTICS NUMBER OF SAMPLES 5.000 MINIMUM VALUE 3.650 STANDAPD DEV.
O.882 RANGE
- 2. 14 0 MEArt VALUE 4.416 MAXIMUM VALUE 5.790 VAPIANCE 0.777 CLASS WIDTH 0.257
- HISTOGRAM ***
CLAFS NO.
LCWER B.
UPPER B.
F REQUENCY REL.FREO.1 1
3.436' 3.693 1.0 20 2
3.693 3.950 1.0 20 3
3.950
- 4. 206 0.0 0
4 4.206 4.463 1.0 20 5
4.463
- 4. 72 0 1.0 20 6
- 4. 72 0 4.977 0.0 0
7 4.977 5.234 0.0 0
8 5.234 5.490
- 0. 0 0
9 5.490 5.747 0.0 0
10 5.747 6.004
.l.0 20
- * *PLCT OF HISTOCPAM* **
i.mo m.se p.Ec 0.70 m.sc O
a.sc Ci c.9c
=~1 0.30 E
'p.ac
~
p.ro M
C
==
A A
- G
=
m G
M 4
A A
A C LFIE E MIDPDiNTE
-124-
~
- ENVIPOMPENTAL SAMPLE STATISTICAL ~ DATA ***
s.
~
TAB LE 15 ENV!OPNMENTAL TLD READINGS
~
TOTAL DOSE FOR YEAR mPem/Otr.
GAMPA IND ICATOR STATI ON -
SAMPLE-STATISTICS NUMBER OF SAMPLES 20.000 MINIMUM VALUE 2.400 STANDAPD DEV.
1.127 RAFGE
- 3. 950 MEAN VALUE 3.942 MAXIMUM VALUE 6.350 VAPIANCE 1.269 CLAFS WIDTH 0.474
- HISTOGPAM***
CLASS NO.
L OWER B.
UPPER B.
FPEQUENCY REL.FFEO.%
1 2.005 2.479 2.0 10 2
2.479 2.953 1.0 5
3 2.953 3.4 27 4.0 20 4
3.427
- 3. 90 1
- 5. 0 25 5
3.901 4.375 1.0 5
6
- 4. 375 4.849 3.0 15 7
4.849 5.323 2.0 10 8
5.323 5.797 1.0 5
9 5.797
- 6. 271 0.0 0
10
- 6. 271 6.745 1.0 5
- **P LOT OF HI STCGRAM* **
E.mm H.Em 9.mm 3.Em 3.mm C
2.Em 5
a.mm
=$.
t.Em m
6
-I. mm
'IB. E m iiC P1 El t2 2C.m E
h!!!
E c:r r~;
r~;
M A
A J
J CLFiEE MiDPOINTE
-125--
g-.
r
-y a,
.g
~
- ** ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLE STATISTICAL DATA ***
TABLE 16
- CONTINUOUS RADIATION MONITORS AVG. MONTHLY VALUE mr/hr GAMMA INDICATOR STATION SAMPLE STATISTICS NUMBER OF SAMPLES 107.000 MINIMUM VALUE 0.012 STANDARD DEV.
0.009 RANGE 0.038 MEAN VALUE 0.023 MAXIMUM VALUE 0.050 VARIANCE 0.000 CLASS WIDTH 0.005
- HISTOGRAM ***
CLASS NO.
LOWER B.
UPPER B.
FREQUENCY R EL.F REQ. 4 1
0.008 0.013 6.0 6
2
- 0. 013
- 0. 017 23.0 21 3
0.017 0.022 38.0 36 4
0.022
- 0. 026 18.0 17 5
0. 0 26 0.031
- 7. 0 7
6 0.031 0.036 6.0 6
7 0.036 0.040 3.0 3
8 0.040 0.045 0.0 0
9 0.045 0.049 2.0 2
10 0.049 0.054 4.0 4
- *
- PLOT O F HISTOGRAM * *
- 39.00..
34.22..
32.90..
25.52..
22.93 D
fE.00
- =:
r w
15:.22..
_m 1I.MO
=
t 6
7.E2 l
3.s2 l
1 m
=
=
c a
RSm m
9 9
E.
H H
9 9
9
=
=
=
=
CLFiS 5 MIDFOINTE
-126-w 9 --
-r-,+
y wy-
_,y w-
- ENVIRONMENTAL SAPPLE STATISTICAL DATA ***
TAB LE 16 CONTINUOUS RADIATION MONITOPS AVG. MONTHLY VALUE mr/hr GAMMA CONTROL STATION SAMPLE STATISTICS NUMBER OF SAMPLES 12.000 MINIMUM VALUE 0.017 STANDAPD DEV.
0.003 RANGE 0.008
-MEAN VALUE 0.021 MAXIMUM VALUE 0.025 VARIANCE 0.'000 CLASS WIDTH 0.001
- HISTOGRAM ***
CLASS NO.
LOWER B.
UPPER B.
FREQUENCY REL.FREO.%
j 1
- 0. 016 0.017 1.0 8
2 0.017
- 0. 0 18 3.0 25 3
0.018 0.019 0.0 0
4 0.019 0.020 2.0 17 5
0.020 0.021 0.0 0
6 0.021 0.022 2.0 17 7
0.022 0.023
- 2. 0 17 8
0.023 0.024 0.0 0
9 0.024 0.025
- 0. 0 0
10 0.025
- 0. 026
- 2. 0 17
- PLOT OF HISTCGRAM***
l 3.22 j
-2.72 j
2.42 2.12 1.E2 D
I.E2 sew I.22 2.:s c2=
6 2.52 2.32
=
=
9 9
=.
E.
9 O.
b.
N W
C-E E2 'M
=.
=
=
=
=
.D CLR55 MiDFOINTE
-127-
\\
~.
- ENVIRONMENTAL SAFPLE STATISTICAL DATA ***
TABLE 20 MEAT AND POULTRY GAMMA ISOTOPIC $1/g wet Cs-137 INDICATOR STATION SAMPLE STATISTICS NUMBER OF SAMPLES 7.000 MINIMUM VALUE 0.010 STANDARD DEV.
O.021 RANGE
- 0. 060 MEAN.VALUE 0.030 MAXIMUM VALUE 0.070 VARIANCE 0.000 CLASS WIDTH 0.007
- HISTOGRAM ***
CLASS NO.
L CWE R B.
UPPER E.
F REQUENCY REL.F REQ. %
1 0.004 0.011 1.0 14 2
0.011
- 0. 018 1.0 14 3
0.018
- 0. 026
- 2. 0 29 4
0.026 0.033 1.0 14 5
0.033 0.040 0.0 0
6 0.040 0.047 1.0 14 7
0.047 0.054 0.0 0
8 0.054 0.062
- 0. 0 0
9 0.062 0.069
- 0. 0 0
10 0.069 0,076 1.0 14 i
l
- *
- PLOT O F HISTOCRAM***
2.22 I.82 I.E2 l.H2 I.22 C
I.22
- 2l-g 2.s0 O.e2 0.40 2.20
_g CLR55 MIDPOINT 5
-us-
\\
- {
- ** ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLE STATISTICAL DATA ***
TABLE 20
' MEAT AND POULTRY GAMMA ISOTOPIC TCi/g wet K-40 INDICATOR STATIOM' SAMPLE STATISTICS' NUMBER OF SAWLES 13.000 MINIMUM VALUE 1.800
. STANDARD DEV.
O.301 RANGE 0.900 MEAN VALUE 2.338 MA XIMUM - VALUE
- 2. 70 0 VARIANCE 0.091 CLASS WIDTH 0.108 3
- HISTOGRAM ***
CLASS NO.
LOWEP B.
UPPER B.
FREQUENCY REL.FREQ.%
1 1.710 1. 8 18 1.0 8
2 1.818
- 1. 926 1.0 8
~
3 1.926 2.034 0.0 0
4
- 2. 034 2.142 2.0 15 5
2.142 2.250 1.0 8
6 2.250-
- 2. 358 1.0 8
7 2.358 2.466 1.0 8
8
.2.466
- 2. 5 74 3.0 23 9
2.5 74 2.682 0.0 0
10 2.682
- 2. 790 3.0 23
- PLOT OF HISTOGRAM ***
3.22 2.72 2.42 2,12 I.EE C
I. 5:2
=ar::
W I.20
=33 E.. SE
=
6 2.EE l
2.32 i
l-N E
E N
N E
b m
m m
m m
m m
1 CLR55 MIDPOINT 5 l-
-129-
.m
/
- ** ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLE. STATISTICAL DATA **
- TABLE 20 CHICKEN EGG 3 GAMMA ISOTOPIC pCi/g wet K-40 INDICATOR STATION
^
SAMPLE STATISTICS NUMBER OF SAMPLES 6.000 MINIMUM VALUE 0.900 STANDARD DEV.
G.147 RANGE 0.300 MEAN VALUE 1. 08 3 MAXIMUM VALUE 1.200 VARIANCE 0.022 CLASS WIDTH 0.036 4
- HISTOGRAM ***
CLASS NO.
LOFER B.
UPPER B.
FREQUENCY REL.FREQ.1 1
0.870
- 0. 906 2.0 33 2
0.906
- 0. 942 0.0 0
3 0.942 0.978 0.0 0
4 0.978
- 1. 014 0.0 0
5 1.014-1.050 0.0 0
6 1.050 1. 08 6 0.0 0
7 1.086 1.122 1.0 17 8
1.122 1.158 0.0 0
9 1.158 1.194 0.0 0
10
- 1. 194 1.230 3.0 50
- **P LOT CF HISTOGRAM * **
3.am 2.72 2.9m 2.IO f.Em C
r.sa
=
g I.22-5 a.se a=
m.se l
2.se i s am
=
=
a=
=
s l
_4
.4 4
CLR55 MIDPOINT 5
-130-
]
- **EFVIPON!' ENTAL SAMPLE STATISTICAL D ATA***
y T AB LE 18 MILK j
\\
STPONTIUM cCi/l Sr-90
)
INDICATOR STATICN l
SAMPLE STATISTICS NUMBER OF SAMPLES 32.000 MINIMUM VALUE 0.700 STANDARD DEV.
2.126 RANGE 8.300 MEAN VALUE 4.841 MAXIMUM VALUE 9.000 VARIANCE 4.518 CLASS WIDTH 0.983
- HISTOGRAM ***
CLASS NO.
LOWER B.
UPPEP B.
FPEOUENCY REL.FFEO.%
1 0.000
- 0. 98 3 1.0 3
2 0.983
- 1. % 6 1.0 3
3' l.966 2.949 3.0 9
4 2.949 3.932 7.0 22 5'
3.932
- 4. 91 5 8.0 25 6
- 4. 91 5 5.898 2.0 6
7 5.898 6.881
- 5. 0 16 8
6.881 7.864-0.0 0
9 7.864 8.847 4.0 13 10 8.847 9.830 1.0 3
- * *P LOT O F HISTOGRAM * **
E.22 7.22 E.HD E.EG H.E2 i= ;
H.22
=w 3.22
=2$
2.42 t_
l.52 D.82 b.
b b
k k
E.
k E.
c-
==
=n r
r-m
=
CLR55 MlDPDINTE 1
-131-w y--
me
-V w
- ** ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLE STATISTICAL DATA ***
TARLE 18 MILK STRCNTIUM ECi/l Sr-90 CONTROL STATION SAMPLE STATISTICS NUMBEP OF SAMPLES 7.000 MINIMUM VALUE 1.700 STANCAPD DEV.
1.325 PAFGE 4.100 MEAN VALUE 4.443 MAXIMUM VALUE 5.800 VAPIAt!CE 1.756 CLASS WIDTII 0.492
- HISTCGBAM***
CLASS NO.
LOWEP B.
UPPEP B.
FRE D E*!CY R EL.F F EO. t 1
1.290 1.782 1.0 14 2
- 1. 78 2 2. 274 0.0 0
3 2.274
- 2. 766 0.0 0
4
- 2. 76 6
- 3. 258 0.0 0
5 3.258 3.750 0.0 0
6 3.750 4.242 1.0 14 7
4.242
- 4. 734 2.0 29 8
4.734
- 5. 2 26 1.0 14 9
5.226 5.718 1.0 14 10 5.718
- 6. 210 1.0 14
- *
- P LOT O F ITI STOCP A M * *
- z.za
!.E2 I.E2 l.H3 I.23 O
r.ac
==:
w a.Ba m-
=
_m.sa w*
m.wa 3.20
. 5
=
0; as lllll P
=
5:
Wi M
M A
A CLR55 MIDFOINTE
-132-
'l
- **ENV IPONVENTAL SAFPLE STATIFTICAL DATA ***
TAB LE 18 MILK
' G AM.*A ISOTOPIC rCi/1.
l
~
Cs-137 IND ICATOR ST ATI CN SAMPI.E STATISTICS NUMBER OF SAMPLES 26.000 MINIt'UM VALUE
- 2. 700
.STANCAFD DEV.
8.018 RANGE 37.300 MEAN VALUE
- 9. 37 7 MAXIMUM VALUE 40.000 VAPIANCE 64.283 CLAFS WIDTF
- 4. 373
- * *H I STOGR A M * *
- CLASS NO.
LOWEP B.
UPPEP B.
FPEOUENCY REL.FREQ.%
1 0.000 4.373 5.0 19 2
4.373
- 8. 74 6 12.0 46 3
8.746 13.119 4.0 15 4
13.119 17.492 2.0 8
5 17.492 21.865 1.0 4
6 21.865 26.238 1.0 4
7 26.238 30.611 0.0 0
8 30.611
- 34. 984 0.0 0
9 34.984 39.357 0.0 0
10 39.357 43.730 1.0 4
- * *PLCT OF HI STOCPAM* **
12.22 is.sm.
s.se s.42 7.22 t
s.mm 5
w.es
=2 i
3 sm 2.42
!.22 l
l l
l E
t!!!
A.
- 5. E G. R999 N
w.5 5
E E
!E:
A A
EF CLFIEE -M I DPD I NTE
-133-
$ +
- **ENVIrOMPENT AL SAMPLE STATISTICAL D ATA***
TABLE 18 MILK GAMPA ISOTOPIC tCi/l K-40 INDICATOR STATIC 1 SAMPLE STATISTICS NUMBER OF SAMPLES 41.000 MINIttf8 VALUE 750.000 STANDAFD DEV.
279.698 FANGE 950.000 "EAN VALUE 1301.951 M AXIMU!? VALUE 1700.000 VAPIANCE 78231.098 CLASS WIDTH 114.000
- * *sTI S TOGR A M* *
- CLASS NO.
LCFER 3.
UPPEP B.
FPEOUEMCY R EL.F FEO. %
1 655.000 769.000 1.0 2
2 769.000 883.000 3.0 7
3 883.000 997.000 3.0 7
4 997.000 1111.000
- 7. 0 17 5
1111.000 1225.000 4.0 10 6
1225.000 1339.000 1.0 2
)
7 1339.000 1453.000 8.0 20 J
8 1453.000 1567.000 4.0 10 9
1567.000 1681.000 6.0 15
)
10 1681.000 1795.000 4.0 10
- * *P LCT O F HISTOGRAM * **
E.22 I
7.20 E.HE 5:.50 H.EQ D
4.02 a
2.aa a
3 2.42 Ch::
w I.50 Q.E0 seg sung sus i
N LJE
- und F
G E
=
C N_
C C
CLFiEE.M I DPO I NTE
-134-I
r
- ** ENVIPONFENTAL SAMPLE STATISTICAL DATA ***
T AB LE 18 MILK GAMMA. ISOTOPIC ICi/1-K-40 CONTROL STATION SAMPLE STATISTICS NUMBER OF SAMPLES 8.000 MINIMUM VALUE 1100.000 STANDAPD DEV.
192.261 RANGE 500.000 MEAN VALUE 1337.500 MAXIMUM VALUE 1600.000 VAPIANCE 36964.286 CLASS WIDTH 60.000
- HISTOGRAM ***
CLASS NO.
LOWE R B.
UPPER B.
FREOUENCY REL.FREO.%
1 1050.000 1110.000 2.0 25 2
1110.000 1170.000 0.0 0
3 1170.000 1230.000 1.0 13 4
1230.000 1290.000 0.0 0
5 1290.000 1350.000 1.0 13 6
1350.000 1410.000 1.0 13 7
1410.000 1470.000 0.0 0
8 1470.000 1530.000
- 2. 0 25 9
1530.000 1590.000 0.0 0
10 1590.000 1650.000 1.0 13
- PLOT OF HISTOGRAM ***
2.mm I.s2
!.s2
!.40 I.20 O
r.ac
- =
w m.se m5 2.sc
=w
'O.40 2.22
. Y d
6 6
d $
2
=
c c
35t Ec CLR55 MIDPDINTE
-135-en *
- are
.a ma-
- ww e oe e,*
a m-m.
9 ee e
O h
VII A
f';N.f>
(m< {[:.2b 9
(v ;< N)\\'
i HISTORICAL DATA i
-136-
VII.
SAMPLE STATISTICS FROM PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLING The mean', standard deviation, minimum value, maximum value and range were calculated for selected sample mediums and isotopes.
Special' Considerations 1); Sample data listed as'1969 was taken from the NINE MILE POINT, PRE-OPERATIONAL SURVEY, 1969 and ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING REPORT FOR NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORPORATION NINE MILE POINT NUCLEAR STATION,-NOVEMBER 1970.
2)
Sample data listed as 1974 is tak'en from the NINE MILE
~
POINT NUCLEAR STATION, ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT.
The 1974 data is pre-operational to the James A. Fit: Patrick Nuclear Power Plant, which started commerical operation.in November 1974 3)
Sample data listed as 197S, 1976, 1977, and 1978 is taken from the respective Environmental operating reports for Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station and James A. Fit: Patrick Nuclear Power Plant.
4)
Only measured values were used for statistical calculations.
t i.
i
[.
l-l l
-137-
64 -
1 BNIRNelTAL SNRE STATISTICS Periphyton Cs-137 pCi/g (wet)
S3.
3ntrol MEAN DEV.
MAX..
MIN.
RANGE 1979 0.07 o.os o.13
.o.02 0.11 197g o.04 0.03 0.063 0.023 0.04 1977
<mL 107R s.co oNI.Y oNE DATA POINT 1975
<mt.
1974 o.io o.02 0.12 0.09 0.30 1969 No DATA (PRE-0PERATioNAL)
Periphyton Cs-137 pCi/g (wet)
SID.
Indicator MEAN DEV.
MAX.
MIN.
RANGE 1079 c.36 0.55 1.10 0.08 1.02 l
1978 0.11 0.06 0.19 0.0s o.14 1977 o.42 o.s6 1.ao o.09 1.31 l
i f.
l 1976-2.60 1.3a 4.10 1.40 2.70 1975 22.2s 14.34 36.00 4.00 32 00 1974 s.18 3.73 8.u
- 1. 2 6.n (PRE-}969 No DATA PERATioNAL)
-138-
2 1
BNIR0tf9ffAL St#1.E STATISTICS Mollusks-Sr-89 pCi/g -(wet)
STD.
control MEAN DEV.
MAX.
MIN.
RANGE 1979
<ttD 1978 0.02 oNtY ONE DATA POINT 1977 mDL NO DATA 1076 1975 NO DATA 1974 N DATA 1969 (PRE-0DERATf0NAt_)
NO DATA Mollusks Sr-89 pCi/g (wet)
- BID, Inaicator MEAN DEV.
MAX.
MIN.
RANGE 107Q o.o4 0.03 0.07
~o.01 0.06 1978 o.os o.os o.07 0.03 o.os 1977 mDc 4
1976 o.42 oNtY oNE oATA po m 1975 mDt 1974
<mt 1969 NO DATA (PRE-UPERATIONAL)
-139-i
3 ENVIf0fENTAL Si?FLE STATISTICS Mollusks SID MAX.
MIN.
RANGE Sr-90 pCi/g (wet)
Control MEAN-DEV 1979 0 07 o.os 1.00 0.02 0.08 lo7g o.14 0.02 0.15 0.12 0.03 1977
< mr 1q76 NO DATA 1975 NO DATA 1974 NO DATA 1969 NO DATA (PRE-0PERATTONAL)
Mollusks Sr-90 pCi/g (wet)
SID.
Indicator MEAN DEV.
MAX.
MIN.
RANGE 0.10 0.04 0.17 0.05 0.12 1979 1978 0 14 0 03 0 18 0 10 0 08 1977 o.lo c.02 0.11 0.o-o.04 1976 0.51 ONLY ONE DATA P0_ INT 1975 0.017 0.04 0.19 o.14 o.os
[_
197l1 o.32 ONLY ONE DATA POINT JO69 0.12 0.17 0.24 0.01 o.24 l
(PRE-UPERATIONAL) l 1
-140-
4 4
ENVliUPENTAL SATLE STATISTICS Mollusks Cs-137 pCi/g (wet)
STD.
Control MEAN DEV.
MAX.
MIN.
RANGE ig79
<ttD 197g omt 1977
- L 1q7g NO DATA j
1975 NO DATA
. - ~ -
1974 NODMA 1969 No DATA (Pas-0PERATIONAd t
Mollusks i
Cs-137 pCi/g (wet)
STD.
I"dic
- r MEAN DEV.
MAX.
MIN.
RANGE 197q
<ttD 1978 o.99 o.so 2.lo o.24 1.86 e
1977
<>et 1
1976 0.18 ONLY ONE DATA POINT 1975
<MDL 1974 0.26 ONLY ONE DATA POIhT 0.08 ONLY ONE DATA POINT
}ggg (PRE-UPERATIONAL)
-141-
5 i
ENVIIDfENT/L SNRE STATISTICS a
Botton Sediment-Sr-90 pCi/g (wet)
S Control MEAN Dc,.
MAX.
MIN.
RANGE o.02 DNLY ONE DATA POINT ig7g i
197g o.oS o.oI o.04 0.061 0.02 ig77 0.05 ONLY ONE DATA POINT l
197R
'mL 1975 4SL 1974
<mL
^7^
~
~
~
~
(Poe-O Ticut)
Bottom Sediment Sr-90 pC1/g (wet)
STD.
Indicator MEAN DEV.
MAX.
MIN.
RANGE 0.02 0.20 0.05 0.01 0.04
]q7q 1978 o.oIs ONLY ONE DATA POINT 1977 "SL 1976 0.04 0.%
0.04 0.04 0.%
1975 0.29 3.27 a.65 0.03 0.62 1974
<mt 1969 o.oS.
ONLY.
OhT DATA -
POIST (PRE-UPERATIONAL)
-142-
l 6
EWIR0f0ffAL SMPLE STATISTICS Bottom Sediment Cs-137 pCi/g (dry)
$ID, Control MEAN DEV.
MAX.
MIN.
RANGE 1979 o.47 0.10 0.s4 0.40 0.14 197g o.61 0.15 0.71 0.50 0.21 1977 0.68 0.08 0.73 0.62 0.11 a
1q7g
< sot 1975 0.40 0.1o o.so o.3o o.20 I
1974 0.11 oNLY ONE DMA poi.NT
~~
~"
(Par-0 A rf 0NAL)
Bottom Sediment Cs-137 pCi/g (dry)
STD.
Indicator MEAN D&.
MAX.
MIN.
RANGE 1q70 o.44 0.4s 1.00 0.13 o.97 1978 o.99 0.80 2.10 0.24 1.86 4
1977 2.27 1.90 4.10 0.31 3.79 1976 2.4s o.64 2.90 2.00 0.90 1975 0.83 o.86 3.so o.20 3.30 e
1970 o.40 0.26 0.58 o.21 0.3-
~
(PRE b ATIONAL)
-143-i
,. _.. ~..
e
(
7 ENVIlutENTAL SifRE STATISTICS Gammerus Sr-89 pCi/g (wet)
$]II, Control MEAN DEV.
MAX.
MIN.
RANGE 1979
<LLD p
1978
<MDL 1977 "L
1978 NO DATA l
1975 NO DATA 1974 4mL (PRE ')1969 NO DATA PERATIONAL) i Gannarus STD.
Sr-89 pCi/g (wet)
MEAN D&.
MAX.
MIN.
RANGE Indicator 0.105 ONLY ONE DATA POINT gg7q 1973 jfDL 1977 smL 1976 NO DATA 1975 NO DATA 197Li
- L
-1969 NO DATA (PRE-UPERATTOMAL) t l
-lu-
g EWilufENTAL S/fPlf STATISTICS l
Gammarus St M PCi/g (wet)
STD.
Control MEAN DEV..
MAX.
MIN.
RANGE o.zo o.02 o.11 0.08 0.o3 4
1979 ig7g
.o.14 0.01 0.14 0.13 0.01 1977 o.32 ONLY ONE DATA POINT 4
3q7g NO DATA
)
1975 NO DATA i
1974
<MDL
~~-
(PRE-0 Trontt) l Gamrarus Sr-90 pCi/g (wet)
STD.
Indicator MEAN DEV.
MAX.
MIN.
RANGE 4
0.19 o.01 0.2o o.17 0.03 3q79 1
.14 o.04 o.21 o.13 o.os 1978 1977 o.4o 0.46 0.73 0.os o.65 i
1976 S DATA 1975 2 DATA 1974
<MDL
,1969 (PRE-UPERATIONAL)
NO DATA
-145-
9 BNIlufENTAL S#RE STATISTICS
't Gammarus Cs-137-pCi/g (wet)
STD' C atr 1 MEAN DEV.
MAX.
MIN.
RANGE 1979 o.os o.04 0.08 o.02 0.06 1978 0.028 oNLY oNE DATA POINT 1977
<nDu.
1q7R NO DATA 1975 No DATA 1974 NO DATA 1969 NO DATA (Pos-CospArtonn )
i camrarus i
cs-137 pci/s (wet)
STD.
Indicator.
MEAN DEV.
MAX.
MIN.
RANGE lo7q 0.06 0.02 0.07 0.04 0.03 1978 o.os o.e o.os
-o.os o.m 1.
~ 1977
<MDL 1976 No DATA 1975 No DATA l
197h o.21 ONLY ONE DATA POINT 1969 (PRE-DPERATIONAL)
NO DATA i.
g
-146-
lo-
+-
ENVIROWENTAL St#LE STATISTICS Fish Samples Sr-89 pCi/g (wet)
STD.
control MEAN DEV.
MAX.
MIN.
RANGE 1979 0.07 0.04 0.09 0.04 0.03 1978 mot 4-1977 0 04 0 01 o.os o.os o.02 1976 0.24 0.08 0.33 0.19 0.14 1975
'MDL 1974
' Mot (Pac-Oh!TionAL) i l
Fish Samples STD DEV MAX.
MIN.
RANGE
!O!la@/s (wet)
MEAN 3a79
,tto
)
1978 0 01 0 001 0 015 0 014 0 001 i
1977 o.o7 o.os o.24 0.03 o.21 1976 o.27 o.ls o.41 0.12 0.29 1975
<mt 1974
- 2L 1969 E DEA (PRE-UPERATIONAL)
L l
l
-147-l.
i
6.
11
.EWIRNMAL St#tf STATISTICS Fish Samples i
Sr-90 pCi/g (wet)
STD Control MEAN DEV.
MAX.
MIN.
RANGE 1979 0.01s 0.012 -
o.oss o.cos o.02s I
1978 0.01 0.004 0.ols.
o.004 0.01 1977 0.07 o.o3 0.14 0.02 0.12 1Q76 0.2s 0.27 o.81 0.0s 0.76 1975 0.07 0.06 0.10 0.04 0.o6 i
1974 0.07 0.02' O.09 0.04 o.Os NU DATA (P9s-0 TronAd l
Fish Samoles Sr-90 pC'i/g (wet)
SID.
Indicator MEAN
.DEV.
MAX.
MIN.
RANGE 1070 o.019 o.01 0.04 0.01 0.03 1978 o.013.
o.cos o.o2s o.co4 0.021 1977 0.o7 o.os o.2s o.os o.21 1976 o.2s o.48 2.20 o.os 2.1s 1975 0.08 0.03 0.13 0.02 0.11 u
i 197t!
o.23 o.69 2.30 0.01 0.29 1
1969 0.23 0.17 0.31 0.30 0.48 (Pas-OPERATIONAL)
L
-148-1
- ~
J
12 EWIRN9ffAL SATI.E STATISTICS Fish Samples Cs-137 pCi/g (wet)
STT)
Control MEAN D9' MAX.'
MIN.
RANGE 0.04 0.01 0.06 0.03 0.03 yg7g 0.09 0.050 0.200 0.040 0.16
,g7g 0.13 ONLY-ONE DATA POI.T N
ig77 0.12 ONLY ONE DATA POINT 147g 1975 omC 1974 0.43 0.37 0.94 0.09 0.85 1969 (Pas-0PERATIONAl_)
NO DATA Fish Samples Cs-137 pCi/g (wet)
SIO.
Indicator MEAN DEV.
MAX.
MIN.
RANGE 0.10 0.14 0.55 0.22 0.53 g7q 0.08 0.02 0.100 0.030 0.07 yg7g 0.29 0.21 0.79 0.13 0.66 yg77 l
1.40 1.67 3.90 0.50 3.40 ig7g 1975 1.38 0.22 1.70 -
1.10 0.60 ig74 0.57 0.82 4.40 0.09 4.32
,1969 0.06 0.04 0.13 0.01 0.12 (PRE-UPERATIONAL)
-149-
o 13 EWIRNENTIL S4RE STATISTICS Lake Water Gross Beta pCi/1 control MEAN MAX.
MIN..
RANGE 1979-3.Os 0.8s 4.80 2.10 2.70 1978 3.ss 1.58 6.10 0.30 s.60 1977 10.9 14.s 49.3 2.50 46.8 lo7F; 42.48 s0.62 139.00 4.90 184.10 1975 4s.33 2.79 160.00 1.00 159.00 1974 4.8s 0.07 4.90 4.30 0.10 ATA (Pas-0 Tf 0NAd Lake Water Gross Beta PCi/1
- SID, Indicator-MEAN DEV.
MAX.
MIN.
RANGE 3.24 1.06 6.30 2.00 4.30 197q 1978 4.s3 2.62 11.10 0.60 10.30
.i 1977 1s.80 21.00 s7.00 1.00 86.00 1976 41.76 ss.23 192.00 1.10 190.90 1975 18.24 17.0s 80.00 0.60 79.40 1973 31 ~1 20.22 60.00 6.30 s3.70 r
,1969 (PRE-UPERATIONAL)
NO DATA l
-150-
14 ENVIR0 TRENTAL S/fFLE STATISTICS
-LAKE WATER Sr-89
$$tro1 MEAN b'
MAX.
MIN.
RANGE 4
1979 o 70 0 14 o.8o o.6o o.20 1978
<mt 1977
<2L i
1q7g
<mL i
1975
<mt 1974 NO DATA 1969 NO DATA j
(PRE-OPERATIONAL)
LAKE WATER Sr-89 pci/t STD.
Indicator MEAN DEV.
MAX.
MIN.
RANGE
<LLD 3q7q 1978 0.70 0.1o o.sn o 60 o 'n 1977
<mt 1976
<*L 1975 o.30 ONLY ONE DATA POINT 1974 NO DATA 1969~
No DATA (PRE-UPERATIONAL)
I l
-151-l l
t
,-.i
---c..
-~
l 15 ENVIIUfENTAL SATtI STATISTICS LAKE WATER Sr-90 l
$(Io1 MEAN.
k
- MAX, MIN.
RANGE 1979 o.so o.26 1.to o.6o o.so 1978
<mt j
1977
<mt lo7R
<mt 1975
<"ot 1974 No DATA
'969 (Pas-0$sRATIONAd No DATA LAKE WATER Sr-90 pCi/L SID.
Indicator MEAN DEV.
MAX.
MIN.
RANGE 1070 0 34 0 34 1 30 o.4o o.9n 1978 o 80 0 30 1 to o do
- o. o 1977 1.00 oNLY ovE nan POINT 1976
<mL
-1975'
<mL 197a so onA 1969
-No DnA (PRE-UPERATIONAL)
R
-152-
16.
BNIR0ff9ffAL SifPLE STATISTICS LAKE WATER TRITIUM STD.
control MEAN DEV.
MAX.
MIN.
RANGE 134.0 1979 2ss.7 73.7 sns n 33 n 1978 303.75 127.s1 490.00 -
21s.00 275.00 1977 407.s-97.4 s30.00 300.0 230.00 1q76 6s1.7 2s1.00 929.00 440.00 489.00 1975 362.s 72.s 414.0 311.00 103.00
< Mot (Pu-0!T10NAll
~"
~"
~~
~~
LAKE WATER TRITIIP!
STD.
Indicator MEAN DEV.
MAX.
MIN.
RANGE 1
234.0 40.7 286.00 176.00 110.00 1Q70 389.38 119.94 s60.M 2s3.M 307.M 1978 1977 4s0.m 67.20 s30.
- 380.m is0.m 1976 513. M 250.30 889.M 297.M s92.M 1975 334 80 132.s0 482.x 124.m ssa.m 1974 440.m 84.9 se.m 380.m 120. m
,1969 (PRE-UPERATIONAL)
NO DATA
-153-
17 EWIIBMNLL SMPtf STATISTICS i
Air Particulate ST)
MAX.
MIN.
RANGE Gross Beta Pci/='
MEAN DE/
Control 1979 0.o77.
o.090 0.703 0.010 0.693 Ig7g o.140 0.130 0.660 0.010 0.650 1977 o 126 -
o.080 0.484 0.001 0.483 lo7g o.osi 0.031 0.240 0.004 0.236 1975 0.08s 0.060 0.294 0.008 o.286 1974 0.121 0.104
- o. sos o.001 o.so7 1969 (Pos-Cps 9ArtonAL) 0.334 0.097 o.sao o.130 c.41o Air Particulate Gross Beta SID.'
pCi/m MEAN DEV.
- MAX, MIN.
RANGE 3
Indicator 0.0s8-0.060 0.271 0.001 0.270
)q7q 1978 0.100 0.090 0.340 0.010 0.330 1977 0.070 0.034 0 130 0 ou a 124 1976 0.047 0.032 o.191 n.non
- n. tao 1975 0.067 0.0s5 o as6 a.ont ne-1973 0 111 0 114 0 355 0 oa3 a 853 (PREG 969 PERATIONAL) o.320 0.090 0.320 0.130 0.390 154-
l 18 ENVIR0ffBEALS/fPl.ESTATISTICS Environmental TLD's Quarterly reading for STD the year, MREM MEAN DEV.
MAX.
MIN.
RANGE Off-Sit e 1979 12.01 2.54 17.40 8.76 8.64 1978 10.76 1.56 14.00 7.00 7.00 1977 15.63 4.00 24.00 11.00 13.00 147g 15.42 3.51 21.50 9.60 11.90 1975 16.46 1.95 21.40 13.50 7.90 1974 16.00 6.04 26.70 7.20 19.50 1969 (PRE-0PERATIONA_)
ALL DATA REPORTED AS
<10 1
l Environmental TLD's 1
Quarterly Reading for STD.
the year, mrem MEAN DEV.
MAX.-
MIN.
RANGE Site-Boundary.
11.86 3.07 18.28 7.67 10.61 3q7q 1978 11.15 1,39 14.00 9.00 5.00 lg77 14.90 5.13 28.00 10.00 18.00 1976 15.61 3.26 21.50 11.30 10.20 1975 16.52 4.14 24.40 12.20 12.20 1974 16.91 6.35 28.30 s.40 19.90
,}g69.
ALL DATA REPORTED AS
<10 l
(PRE-UPERATIONAL) l i
-155-
19 ENVIf0fENTAL SARE STATISTICS Milk Samples Sr-90, pC1/L
- STD, Control
-MEAN DEV.
- MAX, MIN.
RANGE 1979 4 44 1.33 s.80 1.70 4.10 1978 5.88 2.04 9.00 3.00
-6.00 1977 NO DATA lo74 NO DATA 1975 No 0ATA 1974 NO DATA (Pac-Oh!kTTONAL)
~~~
~~~
~~~
Milk Samples Sr-90 pCi/L
- SID, Indicator MEAN
- DEV, MAX.
- MIN, RANGE 107q-4.84 2.12 9.00 0.70 8.30 1978 5.93 1.81 10.00 2.50 7.50 6.07 3.50 15.00 2.00 13.00
- 7. 6 3.41 14.s0 1.30 13.30 1976 6.31 3.11 13.s0 2.30 11.50 1975 5.66 2.39 14.00 1.00 13.00 yg73 (PREb!h!ATIONAL)
^
~~~
~~~
-156--
19A ENVIR0ffelTAL S/YRE STATISTICS Milk Samples Cs-137
- 33..
Control MEAN Dt.v.
MAX.
MIN.
RANGE i
197g 3.73 0.289 3.90 3.40 0.50 1978 1977 NO DATA 1q76 NO DATA 1975 NO DATA 1974 NO DATA 1969 NO DATA (Pas-0PERATIONAL)
Indicator MEAN DEV.
MAX.
MIN.
RANGE 107Q 9.37 8.02 40.00 2.70 37.30 1978 9.97 7.12 33.00 3.40 29.60 1977
<1s.0 m.D 1976 1975 1974 1969 (PRE-UPERATIONAL)
-157-
20 1
BWIROMMAL SAME STATISTICS Milk Samples Iodine-131 pCi/L STD Control MEAN DEV.
- MAX, MIN.
RANGE 1979
<LLD 1978 ML NO DATA 1977 1976 NO DATA 1975 NO DATA l
1974 no DATA 1969 NO DATA (PRE-OPERATTONAL)
Milk Samples Iodine-131 pCi/L STD.
Indicator MEAN DEV.
MAX.
MIN.
RANGE 1979
- LLD 1978 0.19 ONLY ONE DATA POINT 1977 0 20 0 14 0 22 0 20 a 62 1976 3 20 7 81 2s.m o.n2 22.98 1975 0.37 0.60 2.99 o ni 2 aa 197h 1.23 a 22
- aa a
- r l
',1960 (PRE-UPEhATIONAL)
~~
"~
-ua-
21 EWIR0 RENTAL S/fPE STATISTICS Meat Cs-137. pCi/g(wet)
$7D, MEAN DEV.
- MAX, MIN.
RANGE 1979 197g o.021 0.011 0.040 0.013 0.027 1
4 1977
- L 3q7g
<mt 1975 0.1
- o. o*
o.1
- a la o. o*
1974 NO DATA 1969 (Png-0PERATIONAL)
NO DATA Eggs Cs-137, pCi/g(wet)
STD.
MEAN DEV.
MAX.
MIN.
RANGE 1q7q
<LLD 1978
- L 1977
- L 1976
- L 1975
<*L 1
1971.1 NO DATA' 1969
- DATA (PRE-UPERATIONAL)
-159-e
-m m
s
22 EWIluteffAL SAHE STATISTICS Human Food Crops DEZ)
MIN.
RANGE
. pCi/g (wet)
MEAN 1979 1978 0.01 ONLY ONE DATA POIVT 1977 1q76
<MDL 1975
<xot 0.142 0.09 0.34 0.04 0.30 1g74 1969 (PRE-0PERATfONAL)
~~
~~
~"
Human Food Crops gg MI)"g NN)
MEAN DEV.
MAX.
MIN.
RANGE 1479 1978
< MDL 1977
<2L
-1976
< MDL 1975
< MDL 1970 No oATA (PREG 960PEhATIONAL)
^^
~~
~"
~~
"~
4
-160-
23 ENVIf0f0ffAL S/fR.E STATISTICS Soil Samples Cs-137 pCi/g (dry)
STD '.
i C "* 1 MEAN DEV MAX.
MIN.
RANGE 1979 NO SAMPLE REQUIRED IN 1979
]q7g NO SAMPLE REQUIRED IN 1978 1977 1 17 o.48 2.00 0.70 1.30 1q76 NO DATA 1975 1.07 0.21 1.30 0.90 0.40 1974 NO DATA 1969 (PRE-0PERATIONAL)
NO DATA Soil Samples Cs-137 pCi/g (dry)
- STD, Indicator MEAN DEV.
MAX.
MIN.
RANGE NO SAMPLE REQUIRED IN 1979 3q7q NO SAMPLE REQUIRED IN 1978 1978 f
1977 1.os o.62 2.00 o.30 1.70 1976 NO DATA 1975 NO DATA 1974 1.03 1 18 2.so o.40 2.m 1969 (PRE-UPERATIONAL)
NO DATA
-161-i
J 24 ENVIRNWAL S40.E STATISTICS Soil Samples Sr-90 pCi/g (dry)
ST),
Control MEAN
. DE/.
MAX.
MIN.
RANGE 1979 NO SAMPLE REQUIRED IN 1979 197g NO SAMPLE REQUIRED IN 1978 1977 0.21 0.07 0.29 0.13 0.16 1976 NO DATA 1975 0.13 0.1o o.2e o.04 0.22 1974 NO DATA 1969 NODMA (PRE-0PERATTONAL)
Soil Samples Sr-90 pCi/g (dry)-
STD.
Indicator MEAN DEV.-
MAX.
MIN.
RANGE 1979 so suetF QFOM RCD W
'?Q 0 Ig7g NO.
SAMPLE REQUIRED IN 1973 1977 o.4o o.ls o.6s o.17 o.48 1976 NO DATA 1975 NODEA 1974 o.27 0.06 o.34 c.:3 0.11 1969 (PRE-UPERATIONAL)
NO DATA
-162-:
. m...
..,,._.m,
r-t VIII
,-~.
.ol)C,)
(
[ypp['x' X
s LX /N)
FIGURES AND MAPS l
1 1
-163-
e a
VIII.
FIGURES AND MAPS
' 1.
DATA GRAPHS This section includes graphic representation of selected sample results.
For Graphic Representation results less than the MDL were considered to be at the EL level of activity.
2.
SAMPLE LOCATION Sample locations referenced as numbers on analysis results tables are plotted on maps.
b T
-164-
'\\
i1/_#
d"'
/
i
- f. -( I 1 (
,f ip1(' %
y\\')k.f'ff; kW W
( f'~
9.J n
NO l, 6 ',.
~%
)
.f,f;c:r p(R a W( g c
(
c g y
. Gj3 s2
(
p.
3 n
/'
,l 3
7-(
kA y
p y
1 ij#
rF@i T' [ f. -.de,54
(
i
~
I lj 11 j
c j
1,2
~
4 b::
a_
- % ( y.
j[/
s j i.,_
gq
}
Q~j
~ '
, jj
_ I _. g P 1's.n Y
- Mt "'
O
- Q 3,i'j '<,VJ Ki j g.
~
s
~ o$
M I
f l
_V II ij R
+
^
s.
1 g
f
~
1 Ik i ;
/d
%[
u p
o
/]
s &=. %
e n
. 1
.s.
E-ljl g/
! 3 35 3
}8-l
=
j
.l
/t ! Ti 3 d,.
=
s 8
s '}'~N!
1 i
ji ~:
\\
3-
.p
!i;dd!IIj s
1
- d e
I s
.I
...ii.f.i.;.l i.' { h
- J g
o
%r ;~.,
n a%D_, g Ng, *
^
N.
p:
o w
3
,,1 l
-165-
4
-Figura 2
/
. OFF-SITE MONITORING
./
g STATION LOCATIONS B
C O
MONITOR STATION
/.....**.**..
8 0 5
n MILES w1 g
SITE f: :;,...... **.
PULASKI
\\f
~
o
$g Q
s 0
OSWEGO
/
i **.
t
- fe l 5
>g
),
....c "'./
- t MEXICO w
't.
g3 G
l
\\..
e U
/
F i
E d
+
8' i
pet *"rA
.... - 9.....
i y
g-.....,, T,..T.,o
. 4 8.... 000 NUCLE AR P0eER y
PLANT klNE MILE POINT NUCLE AR STATION
()
N 1.242.000
~
PROPERTY LINE
\\
SCALE PEET g
ON-SITE R ADICLOGIC AL 68QNITORING STATION 5
$ EEISTING MON 170AING STAT 80NS l
l
~
MONITORING 17Afl0NS LOCATED AT L000 FT. AA3is Fitou STACx3 I
i
-166-t 1
1
s
~ *
- FIGURE 3 O M I W
2s y/ St
% 27 L A K E I
""MAIF,07d" **
h D' 3 n
Pt. ANT wY*
NINC WILE A j7 h Nu'$" tin 3 II
- UNW 3 Y%"
until
'EEUIn**
(
37 36
/
G4 7
4 D*
J 2
b.
p (PRI E
, gg 6
5 s
26 g
r Lakeview NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORPORATION POWER AUTHORITY g
STATE OF NEW YORK
$4 22 o
- ueNC, RCAO T ANSM ION RIGHT OP way
]O Y 9
i D
m0 s h\\.1 A b
scAte-mus o
ag SITE VICINITY MAP ON-SITE ENVIROMENTAL STATION AND TLD LOCATIONS I
..TLD's Letters - Stations
-167-
hh.p{gl"'P..rl Y 'b
.,*, 1:%
- Id.\\*,C-1" g.
- 1 Q fQ IG' ',
- 'lii g.
- :s f r
- oae, M~Ch
- i-8 o'r.
- n
- } }. ['~, f g,
- ~G Q
- c-
- t bi '. , Y M')j
- "w
- p
- ?.l} '
- 0 4
- r* ** t:
- e:w
- a*
- t
- t I:.c=*.ce
- r* *. t :- *.t:
- I p
- 0escription tased en USEPA (1973) field evaluation mothed for categorizing soils.
- P D *yWy Od SAL 1 k
- 0. 0,
- 0. 0 "."
- 1. 5 -
- r US f.D fs CD G
- r<
- ~
- M FISH SRMPLES N
- 8
- o. e.
- 1. 0-
- C0" * '
- D Sr-90
- O f)
- 4. 0 3.0-