ML19308D214

LER 78-034/03L-0:on 780621,decay Heat Removal Flow Control Valve DHV-111 Failed to Respond to Open Command After Being Closed to Check for Low Pressure Injection.No Apparent Cause.Remote Control Immediately re-established

ML19308D214
Person / Time
Site:	Crystal River
Issue date:	07/14/1978
From:	Cooper J FLORIDA POWER CORP.
To:	NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
Shared Package
ML19308D151	List: ML19308D150 ML19308D214
References
LER-78-034-03L, LER-78-34-3L, NUDOCS 8002270676
Download: ML19308D214 (2)

Text

- .

f eac eones ses .

u. s. mues.sAa r.s zutaroav comanaissson 17 771 LICENSEE EVENT REPORT EXHIBIT A O.

courtot atoce l l l l l l .I@ tesaAsa Pa:NT onTYPt Au. Atcusato esponMATIONS d pTI,I lF l LI Q RI P 3 Ig[ 0 l 0;- l 01 0l0l weasu wna 0 0l-l0 ;OaJ g2.4; ucasu 1 1;1l1...l1aJ gj l

., ut u

. . vca~ u coca i. u

• cwv

[ o.l.!Ja C LLJ@l O r siOr -iO : siO i 2*.glu o ,6, 2,l i 7,8 g o', 7; l i 4, 7, s ,g

u. .. oocur s . na i= a r =4r 1. 83 as. caro ra u (VENT 04SCAIPTION Amo PMo4ASLE COM$Equ(Ncg3 1o (3TG IAt 1300, the Decay Heat Removal e ow Control Valve (DEV-111) would not ,

o i respond to an open coimaand af ter being closed to check for low pressure ,

m injection low flow alarm. DEV-111 was manually opened. Remote control e I was immediately re-established. Subsecuent investigation and cycling re- f (TTO I vaaled no anmlies. Health and safety of oublic and clant were not t

~

Ioi,1l endangered since manua'l control was available. I toui! I

=-

va: . san .. ,s ==o, ,1,m, ,=:

io, i Ic i F I@' Lxj@ 1 zi@ I vi ,9 L i vis i II@ IF l@ l GJ @'

, . . .. ii u is i. i,  := 1 E s eq=q SEvtsacas ar . . f.i A.4.

S.E.Q.L.*t4 cc:a .gr.

eo.gy

.u=r.... o

@ ;u.;;; I 7 i SI

_si 2:

1-1 u

103141 is a 1-1 su 1013

., :s IL I a

W si 10 I

2 EN

• EWE 4 OVA'Nr  %'-n' ouas :- ' cat,~41E E".I's **?.'.dU" s v'UEUea LZ_J@l.Z_JG u - W@ L.Z.J@ l0101 08

. . 2 I

a LY.J@

u .INI@

o d@

u IC i 6 i ei 5;@

cAusa cases Prion ANo cenagens: A=ioxs @

ii,,,lCause of this event is undetermined as full control was re-established g m Iand subsecuent investigation revealed no accarent cause. This is the first I

, occurrence of'this event. ,

I.fstt l l'tal?  !

's r*.T ,.:n.= or ea srw- @ EsE6=T =*:w. verse...r.3.,@

li 6+ 1 L Hj @ l 0 1 01 Ol g l N/A i lCtgt Operator observation l

'./m.e, " " " '* u c

.. u u. .u u r toc ,.3s os e,u.n @

.ve s,:.. m.r, @ I 1

l i i . I LZ.J LZ.J31 @o - i.d tst

.. .. ,s s',

NA I

NA

=

I w... . i . ..m,,",, u etse..,.es @

icioiOeuu@i" '

NA m en m T "

i Ii 6. I ": l at.E~- 0 pj l@?;'s...,. ,@ ( e) e) JU NA ,sesmy n- l I, " " * *

, , r. u. ue, !h.';.'.),* "'"Ni@

- f [hg "

.,,, ,7 $i, . ,, as @ e.ac tst c,.t -

• I: t -I L2181 NA m  ! !riiieieiieei A..tc.

. , c.aata 3. '% m' '- ,-css 0[)795-6486

. (SEE ATTACmf SUPPLUJ.NTARY INFOR"ATION Sungh) 8 0 0-2 2Mf.

a

SUPILEMENTARY INFORMATION

)

( C 7 port No.: 50-302/78-034/03L-0 Q ]acility:

2. Y Crystal River Unit #3

3. Report Date: 14 July 1978 4 Occurrence Date: 21 June 1978

5. Identification of occurrence:

No control of the Decay Heat Ramoval Flow control Valve DRV-lli rendering in a condition contrary to Technical Specification 3.1.2.5.

6. Conditions Prior to Occurrence:

Mode 6 refueling.

7. Description of Occurrence:

At 1300 with Decay Heat Removal Flow at approrimately 1000 GPM to check for low pressure injection low flow alarm, Decay Heat Removal Flow Control Valve (DEV-111) would not respond to an open consnand while in " bypass mode". DEV-lll was manually reopened to regain required flow. Valve control was placed in Both " automatic" and " bypass" by the operators and DEV-lli responded in all cases. Maintenance electricians investigated and found no discrepancies. Valve DEV-111 was cycled several times and responded satisfactorily to commands.

T 2esignation of Apparent Cause:

Cause of this event is undetermined as full control was re-established and subsequent investigation revealed no apparent cause.

9. Analysis of Occurrence:

There were no safety implications presented by this occurrence as manual control of flow was available and utilized until remote controls responded.

10. Corrective Action:

None required as cause is a transient anomaly.

11. Failure Data:

This is the first occurrence of this event.

.: