05000302/LER-1978-034-03, /03L-0:on 780621,decay Heat Removal Flow Control Valve DHV-111 Failed to Respond to Open Command After Being Closed to Check for Low Pressure Injection.No Apparent Cause.Remote Control Immediately re-established

From kanterella
(Redirected from ML19308D214)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
/03L-0:on 780621,decay Heat Removal Flow Control Valve DHV-111 Failed to Respond to Open Command After Being Closed to Check for Low Pressure Injection.No Apparent Cause.Remote Control Immediately re-established
ML19308D214
Person / Time
Site: Crystal River Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 07/14/1978
From: Cooper J
FLORIDA POWER CORP.
To:
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
Shared Package
ML19308D151 List:
References
LER-78-034-03L, LER-78-34-3L, NUDOCS 8002270676
Download: ML19308D214 (2)


LER-1978-034, /03L-0:on 780621,decay Heat Removal Flow Control Valve DHV-111 Failed to Respond to Open Command After Being Closed to Check for Low Pressure Injection.No Apparent Cause.Remote Control Immediately re-established
Event date:
Report date:
3021978034R03 - NRC Website

text

-.

f eac eones ses u. s. mues.sAa r.s zutaroav comanaissson 17 771 LICENSEE EVENT REPORT EXHIBIT A O.

courtot atoce l l

l l l l I@

tesaAsa Pa:NT onTYPt Au. Atcusato esponMATIONS 0l0l 0 0l-l0 ;O g 4; 1;1l1 l1 gj l

pTI,I lF l LI Q RI P 3 Ig[ 0 l 0;- l 01 1

J J

d vca~ u coca i.

u weasu wna a

2.

ucasu... a

., ut u 7,8 g o', 7; l cwv i 4, 7, s,g C LLJ@l O r si r -iO : siO i 2 gl o,6, 2,l i O

[ o.l.!J a

u.

oocur s. na

  • . u i= a r =4r 1.

83 as. caro ra u

(VENT 04SCAIPTION Amo PMo4ASLE COM$Equ(Ncg3 1o (3TG IAt 1300, the Decay Heat Removal e ow Control Valve (DEV-111) would not i respond to an open coimaand af ter being closed to check for low pressure o

m injection low flow alarm.

DEV-111 was manually opened.

Remote control e I was immediately re-established.

Subsecuent investigation and cycling re-f (TTO I vaaled no anmlies. Health and safety of oublic and clant were not t

~

Ioi,1l endangered since manua'l control was available.

I toui!

I

,1,m,

,=:

=-

va:

. san

,s

==o, Ic i F I@' Lxj@ 1 zi@ I vi,9 L i vis i II@ IF l@ l GJ @'

io, i ii u

is i.

i,

=

1 SEvtsacas E s eq=q

.g eo.gy S.E.Q.L.*t4 f.i A.4.

,.u=r....

ar..

cc:a r.

o

@ ;u.;;;

I 7 i SI 1-1 103141 1-1 1013 IL I W

10 I

_si 2:

u is a

su

s a

si

2 EN
  • EWE 4 OVA'Nr

%'-n' ouas :- ' cat,~41E E".I's

    • ?.'.dU" v'UEUea s

LZ_J@l.Z_JG W@

L.Z.J@ l0101 08 I

LY.J@.INI@ d@

IC i 6 i ei 5;@

2 a

u o

u u

cAusa cases Prion ANo cenagens: A=ioxs @

ii,,,lCause of this event is undetermined as full control was re-established g

m Iand subsecuent investigation revealed no accarent cause.

This is the first I

, occurrence of'this event.

I.fstt l

l'tal?

@ EsE6=T

=*:w. verse...r.3.,@

's r*.T

,.:n.=

or ea srw-li 6+ 1 L Hj @ l 0 1 01 Ol g l N/A i lCtgt Operator observation l

u l i i. I LZ.J @o - i.d tst

'./m.e, c

.ve s,:.. m.r, @ I toc,.3s os e,u.n @

.. u u.

.u u r LZ.J31 NA I

NA I

w.... i...m,," u etse..,.es @

....,s s',

=

1 icioiOeuu@i NA m en m T i

Ii 6. I l at 0 p l@?;'s...,.,@

( e) e) JU

.E~-

j NA

,sesmy n-l

,, r. u. e, !h.';.'.),* "'" @

f [hg I, " " *

  • Ni u

.,,,,7 $i,.,, as @

e.ac tst c,.t -

I: t -I L2181 NA

! !riiieieiieei m

0[)795-6486 A..tc., c.aata 3.

'% m' '-

,-css (SEE ATTACmf SUPPLUJ.NTARY INFOR"ATION Sungh) 8 0 0-2 2Mf.

a

SUPILEMENTARY INFORMATION

)

( C 7 port No.:

50-302/78-034/03L-0 Q ]acility:

2.

Y Crystal River Unit #3 3.

Report Date:

14 July 1978 4

Occurrence Date:

21 June 1978 5.

Identification of occurrence:

No control of the Decay Heat Ramoval Flow control Valve DRV-lli rendering in a condition contrary to Technical Specification 3.1.2.5.

6.

Conditions Prior to Occurrence:

Mode 6 refueling.

7.

Description of Occurrence:

At 1300 with Decay Heat Removal Flow at approrimately 1000 GPM to check for low pressure injection low flow alarm, Decay Heat Removal Flow Control Valve (DEV-111) would not respond to an open consnand while in " bypass mode".

DEV-lll was manually reopened to regain required flow. Valve control was placed in Both " automatic" and " bypass" by the operators and DEV-lli responded in all cases. Maintenance electricians investigated and found no discrepancies. Valve DEV-111 was cycled several times and responded satisfactorily to commands.

T2esignation of Apparent Cause:

Cause of this event is undetermined as full control was re-established and subsequent investigation revealed no apparent cause.

9.

Analysis of Occurrence:

There were no safety implications presented by this occurrence as manual control of flow was available and utilized until remote controls responded.

10.

Corrective Action

None required as cause is a transient anomaly.

11.

Failure Data:

This is the first occurrence of this event.