ML19270H392
| ML19270H392 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Crystal River  |
| Issue date: | 04/12/1979 |
| From: | Mchenry T NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19270H391 | List: |
| References | |
| FOIA-79-98 TI-2592-2, NUDOCS 7906290557 | |
| Download: ML19270H392 (2) | |
Text
.
e
/
' z c.
. '7 6
.~.
. (.
.....a..
. +
m.
T I, '/ $'M / 2 e,
A t tacinuait 1
~~
l'a ge 1 o f 2 8
OFFICF. OF I NSI'lTTI ON AN1) P.N FORC!CtF.NT B&W SITI'. 1*.SPECTOR DA ll.Y KF.PuRT p.,te,4/12/79 Site Crystal River 3 Inspector (s)
Mcnry _.._
4.eneral Plant Stata=: 75%__ger, one reac_ tor cociant,pu=p secured due
- to suspect seal.
1 ::.
Review of Similar Transients (Item 2 of IEB 79-05A):
Licensee has responded to this item by letter of 4/11/79.
%p.
p,;
5M
-w
(
h.
Revi.cv and Revision of Op.?ratiny and Maintenance Procetturen (Icens 3. 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 10 of IF.B 79-05A):
- 1) Licensee has responded to items 3, 4, and 5 by letter dated 4/11/79.
2)
Licensee review of items 7-10 is continuing.
iteview and hapla mentation of Changes in Containment Isolation c.
(Item o IEB 79-0%A):
No additional information.
2325
- 01 790g g gg gS.q d.
Training of Plant Persnnnel (Items 1, 4. II and plant / procedures c!aing..s) :
Licensee issued revisions to 4 emergency.1 abnormal, and 1 operating procedure to incorporate changes described in response to IIB 79-05A.
~
L __. 4, _
3 1
i
- TI 2595/2 Attachment i Vay..' 2 nf 2 i
2.
SU.'OtAm 0F NRC 1.';SPECTIsiN A( TI V ! !'Y DUR INf; PEHloo
- 4/11/79
( Aib! res-Items I..: t hi u :'. il.ibove, give eit her indepeiident /nigni f f r. int effort, ident i fy sS!( t s oa which activ f a v was done during paat. 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br />)
[
a.
Conducted inspection of some control roca operations on all shifts.
b.
Reviewed 11censeo response to ite=s 1-5 of IE3 79-05A. Completed inspection with regard to licensee's response to itema 1 and 2.
Licensee's response and actions on these items appears satisfactory.
c.
Conducted a preliminary review of procedure changes identified in l.d. above.
d.
Walked down decay heat (lowhead injection), makeup system (high head inj ec tion), to verify systens alignment as required. No problems identified.
e.
Verified valve check lists against current drawings for the following systems:
(1)
Nuclear Services Cooling Water (2)
Decay Heat Flow Cycle Cooling (3)
Decay Heat Sea Water (4)
Decay Heat Re= oval (Low Head Injection)
(5)
Reactor Makeup (High Head Injection) 1.
STATtS OF lhSPECrok DISCUdSIONS WITH PIANT PERSONNEL.:
w Verified that control roon personnel were a==are of re riW proceduren v
ref erenced in 1.d. ab1ve. Procedures had been placed in special binder for review and sign-off by shif t operating personnel.
I 9
- t..
DESCRtt'T TON OF GMERAL PLANT STATUS (1.c., operating power level, planned ch tunes..e c in.:di l.ed o u t a ge s, ESF out of wrvice. major maintenance.
rep.it L;: hie i*rc.2r rence:4 etc.)
75% power with one reactor coolant pump out of service due to suspect seal (2.1-2.6 gps). Normal operating temperatures and pressures. Outage still scheduled for 4/24/79.
2325 02
~
O f.
D"*D "D ~T f
4
~
a
,b.
i oc c
o G
^
n y, w.,,;
z. =..,2,
,~
~. -
,; ; g ; g q. n.g;.
.