ML19256F595

Revised Pages 6-2,6-7 Through 6-9 & 6-11 Through 6-13 to Tech Specs,App a Re Administrative Controls & Revised Page 5-1-1 of Tech Specs,App B Re Organizational Changes

ML19256F595
Person / Time
Site:	Davis Besse
Issue date:	12/06/1979
From:	TOLEDO EDISON CO.
To:
Shared Package
ML19256F554	List: ML19256F553 ML19256F595
References
TAC-12617, NUDOCS 7912190532
Download: ML19256F595 (9)

Text

._ __ _.__ .._ _ _. _ _ . _

I. Change to Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station, Unit No. 1 Technical Specifications; Appendix A, Section 6 and Appendix B, Section 5 - see proposed changes attached.

A. Time Required to Implement This change is to be effective upon NRC approval.

B. Reason for Change (Facility Change Request 79-426)

This change is requested to reflect organizational changes within the Toledo Edison Company.

C. Safety Evaluation This change reflects an organizational alteration within the Toledo Edison Company. There has been no plant design effects which would constitute -

an unreviewed safety question as per 10CFR50.59.

v 162'1 070 gg

f

, ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLS

• c. Review of all proposed changes to Appendix "A" Technical Specifications.

d. Review of all proposed changes or mcdifications to plant systems or equipment that affect nuclear safety.

e.

Investigation of all violations of the Technical Specifications including preparation and forwarding of reports covering evalua-tion and recommendations to prevent recurrence to the Vice President - Cn:c;; Eu-^1 Nuclear Review Board. k ; p g yand to the Chainnan of the / C f.

Review of events requiring 24 hour2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> written notification to the Commission.

g.

Review of facility operations to det'ect potential safety hazards, h.

Performance of speciai reviews, investigations and analyses

- and reports thereon as requested by the Chairman o,f the Company Nuclear Review Board.

i.

Revie.i of the Plant Security Plan and implementing procedures and shall submit reccmmended changes to the Chairman of the Company Nuclear Review Board.

j.

Review of the Emergency Plan and implementing procedures and

shal~ submit reccmmended changes to the Chairman of the Company Nuclear Review Board.

AUTHORITY 6.5.1.;7 the Station Review Board shall:

a.

Recommend to the Station Superintendent written approval or disapproval of items considered under 6.5.1.6(a) through (d) above. -

b.

Render determinations in writing with regard to whether or not each item considered under 6.5.1.6(a) through (e) above constitutes an unreviewed safety question.

c.

~

Provide writtgn notjfication within 24 hcurs to the Vice President, En;fl]Im3 ply and the Company Nuclear Review Board of disagreenent between the SRB and the Station Superintendent; 4

(

however, the Station Superintendent shall have responsibility for resolution of such disagreements pursuant to 6.1.1 above.

OAVIS-BESSE, UNIT 1 6-7 * .

7 , ,

ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLS RECORDS 6.5.1.8 The Station Review Board shall maintain written minutes of each meeting and copies shall be provided to the Vice President, E : 3; N0cleehr- '

Sepp 4y and Chairman of the Company Nuclear Review Board.

6.5.2 COMPANY NUCLEAR REVIEW 30ARD (CNRB)

FUNCTION

.s 6.5.2.1 The Company Nuclear Review Board (CNRB) shall function to provide areas of:independent review and audit of designated activities in the

a. Nuclear pcwer plant operations,

b. Nuclear engineering,

c. Chemistry and radiochemistry,

d. Metallurgy,

e. Instrumentati.on and centrol,

f. Radiological safety,

.g.

Mechanical and electrical engineering, and

h. Quality assurance practices.

I

,4 DAVIS-BESS E. UNIT 1 6-8 1621. 072

ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLS COMPOSITION 6.5.2.2 The Company Muclear Review Board shall be composed of the:

C h ir m Gu u<ISapu.' M cd ,De w Lfseu:n *d M s % cb**\

MMChc . .cca: Vice President. .Fec P 'de:-Bevekpmen t4 w c. lev l Member: Vice President, Energy Supply

":mbar- heref--Super t 4Mende6ar Eq' ee dag j eM.-Gons t rJ. . w, Pember: General Superintendent, Transmission and Substations Member: Superintendent, Davis-Besse Station .

Member: .

.Geper4r.4 ender 4,1 A ercm Sec r4ce> b'Kedoe s Nude *r EpJ

.- Member: Nuclear Project Engineer, Power Engineering T Member: Nuclear Encineer, Power Engineering Director,QualityAssurance Member:

Member:

General Superintendent, Fossil pegggggg A

~~-

Member: Others as deemed advisable by the CNRB Chaint.an*

ALTERNATES 6.5.2.3 All alternate members shall be appointed in writing by the CNRS Chairman to serve on a temporary basis; however, no more than two alter-nates shall participate as voting members in CNRB activities at any one time.

CONSULTANTS 6.5.2.4 Consultants shall be utili:ed as determined by the CNRS Chairman to provide expert advice to the CNRB.

MEETING FREQUENCY 6.5.2.5 The CNRB shall meet at least once per calendar quarter during the initial : car of unit operation following fuel loading and at least once per 21x months thereafter.

OUORUM 6.5.2.6 A quorum of CNRB shall consist of the Chairman or his designated alternate and at least half of the appointed CNRS members or their alternates. No more/than a minority of the quorum shall have line responsibility for operation of the facility.

"Otners as ceemed advisable by the CNRS chairman, who are appointed to the Company Nuclear Review Boarc shall have an acacemic decree in an Engineering or Physical Science Field; and in addition, shall have a minimum of five years of technical experience,,of which a minimum of three years shall be in one or more of the areas specified in Spedification 6.5.2.1. ,

• 6-9 Aaendment No.

DAVIS-BESSE, UNIT 1 4

. - - . . _ . _ . . . . . { {)2 ]._ 07 3

1

. ADP.INISTRATIVE CONTROLS AUDITS 6.5.2.8 Audits of facility activities shall be perfomed under the cognizance of the CNRB. These audits shall encompass :

a. The confomance of unit operation to provisions contained within the Technical Specifications and applicable license conditions at least once per 12 months. -

b. The performance, training and qualifications of the entire

. station staff at least once per 12 months.

c. The results of actions taken to correct deficiencies occurring in unit equipment, structures, systems or method of operation that affect nuclear safety at least once per 6 months.

d. The perfomance of activities required by the Quality Assurance program to meet the criteria of Appendix "B",10 CFR 50, at least once per 24 months,

e. The Station Emergency Plan and implementing procedures at least once per 24 months.

f.

The Station Security Plan and implementing procedures at

, least once per 24 months.

g".

Any other area of facility operation considered appropriate by the CNRB.

~

h.. The Facility Fire Protection Program and implementing procedures at least once per 24 months.

i.

An independent fire protection and loss prevention program inspection and audit shall be perfomed at least once per

'12 months utilizing either qualified offsite licensee per-sonnel or an outside fire protection firm.

j.

An inspection and audit of the fire protection and loss pre-vention program shall be performed by a qualified outside fire consulant at least once per 36 months.

AUTHORITY

' 6.5.2.9 The Company Nuclear Review Board shall report to and advise the 4*ec t . ; 7 ? ; ; ' . . . L.1; , W W :-% on those areas of responsibility I specified in Sections 6.5.2.7 and 6.5.2.8.

- h t$ bQb ce d CC,e h OperaNq O fCOcr DAVI,S-BESSE, UNIT 1 6-11 Amendment No.

/ -

5 1621 074

ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLS RECORDS 6.5.2.10 Records of Company Nuclear Review Board activities shall be prepared, approved and distributed as indicated below:

a. Minutes of each CNRS meeting shall be prepared, approved and forwarded to the Ex: = ti : 'l % . T. . d de - t , pera m n + !

. and CNRB members within 14 days following each meeting.

b. Reports of reviews encompassed by Section 6.5.2.7 above, shall be prepared, approved and forwarded to the S:=ti .: " "A Asident , OpwcMon#and CNRS members within 14 days following j completion of the review.

c. Audit reports encompassed by Section 6.5.2.8 above, shall be forwarded to the Exct:ti .: 'li::--Fr:'A & ra , Op" =31c d and CNRS l members and to the management positions responsible for the 2 areas audited within 30 days after completion of the audit.

6.6 REPORTABLE OCCURRENCE ACTION 6.6.1 The following actions shall be taken for REPORTABLE OCCURRENCES:

a. The Comission shall be notified and/or a report submittec pursuant to the requirements of Specification 6.9.

b. Each REPORTABLE OCCURRENCE requiring 24 hour2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> notification to the Cor:raission shall be reviewed by the SRB and submitted

to the CNRB. .

(Ql ace. uJ i'"A Pre 4 der.h c d Ckie[ oggJ.,*

OWeer

• DAVI5-BESSE, UNIT l 6-12 Amendment No.

. T624-075

o ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLS 6.7- SAFETY LIMIT VIOLATION 6.7.1 The following actions shall be taken in the event a Safety Limit

. is violated: ..

." a. The facility shall be placed in at least HOT STANDBY within one hour. .

. I

b. The Safety Limit violation shall be reported to the Commission. (

• the Vice President,J:Wre  %./rfandtotheCNRSwithin24.

. #- hours. - f $4r-

c. A Safety Limit Violation Report shall be prepared. The report shall be reviewed by the SRB. This report shall describe

- (1) applicable circumstances preceding the violation, (2) effects of. the violation upon facility components, systems or

- structures, and (3) corrective action taken to prevent recurrence.

~

d. The Safety Limit Commission, theViolation CNRB and Report shallPresident,4~

the Vice be submittedutoL;,$.the-/fvc/ var-within 14 days of the violation.

'( .

6.8 PROCEDURES 6.8.1 Written procedures shall be established, implemented and main-tained covering the activities referenced below:

The applicable procedures recommended in Appendix "A" of

. ~

a.

Regulatory Guide 1.33, November, 1972.

b. Refueling operations.

c. Surveillance and test activities of safety related equipment.

d. Security Plan implementation.

e. Emergency Plan implementation. ,

- f. Fire Protection Program i6plementa tion. .

,a 6.8.2 Each procedure of 6.8.1 above, and changes thereto, shall be reviewed by the SRB and approved by the Station Superintendent prior to implementation and,, reviewed periodically as set forth in administrative

{ procedures. .

~

.; DAVIS-8 ESSE, UNIT 1

~

6-13 fadndmentNo.6 L ,

. J. Q [._ g

. e

. . = .

5.0 ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLS 5.1 Review and Audit i

j Review and audit of environniental matters and complianca.with these Environmental Technical Specifications in particular shall be provided by the Station Revig Bo,ard, the Company Nuclear Review Board, and the g Quality Assurance Manascr- This activity shall be controlled in accordance l with QAP 5000 of the Toledo Edison Nuclear Quality Assurance Manual.

' ".. 5.1.1 Station Review Board A Station Review Board, composeo of technically qualified station personnel has been established to perform timely and continuing reviews of unit Operation. The makeup of the Board, specification of quorum, and meeting frequency are set forth in Section 6.0 of the Unit's Appendix "A" Technical Specifications. The Board's review responsibility will include all new

/ or revised unit environmental procedures, proposed changes or modifications to unit structures or equipment, reported violations of the unit's Environmental Technical Specifications, proposed changes to the unit's

. Environmental Technical Specifications, results of the Environmental Monitoring Programs prior to their submission in each Environmental Operating Report, anu any occurance of a safety limit being exceeded.

5.1.2 Company Nuclear Review Board A Company Nuclear Review Board, composed of technically qualified personnel, has been appointed ';- + i : :Jr -

=-2m L . _ l +..m . At o f perform independent reviews of unit operation. The makeup of the Scard,

. specification of quorum and meeting frequency are set forth in Section 6.0 of the Unit's Appendix "A" Technical Specifications. The Boards independ-ent review responsibility will include all new or revised un'it environ-mental' procedures, proposed changes or modifications to unit structures or equipment, reported violations of the unit's Environmental Technical Specifications, proposed changes to the unit's Environmental Technical Specifications, station operation, and minutes of the Station Review Board meeting.

5.1.3 Quality Assurance % ;ger-CI"eC """

D&-c c 12. -

The Quality Assurance Maneter shall be responsible for verification of compliance with the Environmental Technical Specifications. Planned periodic reviews and audits will be conducted in accordance with the provisions of the quality assurance program for unit operation described in the unit's Final Safety Analysis Report. The Quality Assurance p oecra. {

Yans;cr shall also be responsible for reviewing all nonconfor=ance reports concerning Environmental Technical Specifications including corrective actions taken to prevent any recurrence of the sage nonconformance. ,

I. .

5.1-1 162t 077 A

e

• U 0Ok 0 2

.,2

!:.il:

-s:3, 5 'ig i l i. -

- 1,;, .--!

i

, s. ,

, ,~f!

" ' !i,91" wr -

al i.

tl l' .

~ls!D $*

]f._5J; s I:

n - x tid :f:

.ti:

ilj

- 2 i 12; : i 5. ;;

1 i.:

a i, ,i j a1,. .

e :.s 3

E I

i .Tl d C, 1 - il .

R:

l-5

.n1i,ji ,:i

- !!: :is.:

lIl u!.. - il ; 3351_

x =

. 51' I i ..! =3 e

i i !! - :: _ ,:t i r I; "- f.- r!  !

R.i ,

r:::

,. i,

!o -,

i.i

$ ,i "l;ii;

- 1-- -

j j;"o;ja_lt

- i io; !.i 1.: 4 3., i 1, ...:,i

!!,3..!'!H !!! l d:. C.:.

!!{

• I t i]

• I f' as s:ii 'ii::

I ~illim!!!!

l Il i g3j:l

-1.',

I;-:

i' i". .1-1s.i 3;y - -

m

. 1 U

l}f

,- T

p l t

!,M,,-

l f'-i

=;

j*

'. li II!i  ! ,-: i ,- ...

lI_I iI ;I!!. ~, !I$!

i I

1 t - -

a! I s' !T3!

Ilil 12: l13:..

1 ! i2'

]! t-a6 lm' -

~1621 078 6*t aupCM0eT =

3 avis St.SSE.wmf h 6 8