05000317/LER-1979-075-04, /04T-0:on 791129,waste Neutralizing Tank Overflowed to Ground in Unmonitored Discharge Against Environ Tech Specs.Caused by Operator Error in Reading Tank Level.Procedures Revised

From kanterella
(Redirected from ML19256F304)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
/04T-0:on 791129,waste Neutralizing Tank Overflowed to Ground in Unmonitored Discharge Against Environ Tech Specs.Caused by Operator Error in Reading Tank Level.Procedures Revised
ML19256F304
Person / Time
Site: Calvert Cliffs 
Issue date: 12/13/1979
From: Eherts R
BALTIMORE GAS & ELECTRIC CO.
To:
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
Shared Package
ML19256F299 List:
References
LER-79-075-04T, LER-79-75-4T, NUDOCS 7912180469
Download: ML19256F304 (2)


LER-1979-075, /04T-0:on 791129,waste Neutralizing Tank Overflowed to Ground in Unmonitored Discharge Against Environ Tech Specs.Caused by Operator Error in Reading Tank Level.Procedures Revised
Event date:
Report date:
3171979075R04 - NRC Website

text

r4 sc t ur ra.n,t>

v. a...v m a n n co w asv n vv.....aa.v.

(7 77)

LICENSEE EVENT REPORT CONTROL B LOCK: l l

l l

l l

lh (PLEASE PRINT OR TYPE ALL REQUIRED INFORMATION) 1 6

h l o l i l l M I 0 l C l C l N l 1 l@l 0 l 0 l - l 0 l 0 l 0 l 0 l 0 l -

0 l0 l@l4 l1 l1 l1 l1 l@l l

lg 7

8 9 LICENSEE CODE 14 16 LICENSE NUMSER 26 26 LICENSE TYPE Jo b7 CAT 58 CON'T

$$"CE

1. )@l 0 ] 5 l 0 l 0 l 0 l 3 l 1 l 7 l@l 1 l 1 l 2 l 9 l 7 l 9 @]l l 2 l1 l 3 l 7 l 9 l@

0 1 7

60 61 DOCKET NUMBER 68 69 EVENT DATE 74 75 REPORT DAT E 80 EVENT DESCRIPTION AND PRoSABLE CONSEoUENCES O'o l At 0020 while performing a rinse of #12 make-up train resin the Service i

O 2 l Building Operator discovered that #12 Waste Neutralizing Tank (WNT) was I

O 3

10141 1 overflowing to the ground, resulting in an unmonitored discharge of the 1

[ WNT which is not allowed by Environmental T.S. 2.2.1.

No environnental l

O s

lO ls l 1 impact is expected due to the small amount of partially exhausted regenerant i

10171 I chemicals discharaed as comnared to the dilution flow rate. Unit 2 was in l

101Bl l Mode 5.

This is not a repetitive occurrence.

I

' $E"

  • !OTE SNCiSE C

COMPONENT CODE Sus iE

$ C E l0l91 lW lC j @ [_A_J@ [Bj @ l Z l Z l Z l Z l Z l Z l@ [Zj@ [ Z_j @

~

7 8

9 10 11 12 13 18 19 20 SE QUENTI AL OCCUR R E NCE REPORT REVISION LER/RO EVENT YEAR R EPORT NO.

CODE TYPE N O.

O,Rt,g 1719l

[-j 1017 l 5 l [d

1 014 l l Tl l--J LOJ

_ 21 22 _

23 24 26 27 M

M 30 31 32 A EN ACT O ONP NT ME HOURS 22 SB I FOR 8.

SUPPLIER MANUFACTURER Ln.J@Lf_J@

lZl@

rZ I@

i 01010ioi og iNjg LZ j@

lZl9l9 9l@

33 34 3b 36 37 4g 41 42_

44 47 43 CAUSE DESCRIPTION AND CORRECTIVE ACTIONS h i

O I The cause was apparently an operator error in readino the tank level and I

I apoarent disregard to events while performing a regeneration.

Imediate i

i i 1 corrective action was to revise the procedures to reouire the operator to-1 i

2 i record WNT level hourly while WNT's are in use.

Further measures to prevent l

1 3 I recurrence are being considered.

I i 4 7

8 9 80 STA US

% PCWER OTHER STATUS dis O Y

DISCOVf

  • OESCRIPTION [Ej@ l 01315l@l N/A l

l A l@l Operator Observation l

1 s A TIVITY CO TENT 54 ELE ASED OF RELEASE AMOUNT OF ACTIVITY

.LOCAe SON OF RELEASE l1 l61 [_Z_J @ [Z_j@l N/A l

l N/A l

7 8 9 10 11 44 45 B0 PERSONNEL EXPOSURES NUveER TYPE

DESCRIPTION

I 0 l 0 l 0 }@[Z._j@l N/A l

1 7

,E m a',N,UllES ctSCRiPriON@

DwD D yy a

NuveER 101010l@l N/A ay l\\

J\\_ )] N l

i a

_a m

OSS OF OR O ' AGE TO FACILITY TYPE CESCRIPTION [J j@l N/A 1 9 7 0)Ol bb PU8La TY Nacg$ggyty

DESCRIPTION

eSSUED@lN/A I

llIlIllill1111 INl 2 O 7

s 9 to 68 69 80 -

_ _ _. _ _ _ _._... 'J E :._.. _ _ _

w..E OF PREPARER PHO

. ;L t

LER NO.

79-75/4T

.0 DOCKET NO.

50-317 50-318 t

EVENT DATE 11/29/79 REPORT DATE 12/13/79 3'

ATTACHMENT l

CAUSE DESCRIPTION AND CORRECTIVE ACTION:

(CONTINdED) j At 0020 while performing a rinse after regenerating the resin of #12 make-up train the Service Building Operator discovered #12 Waste Neutralizing Tank (WNT) level indication was pegged high; he immediately secured the rinse.

Subsequent investigation revealed the WNT to be full and overflowing to the ground, resulting in an unmonitored discharge of the tank, which is not allowed by Environmental Tech Spec 2.2.1.

A sam

.l to 12.1 and total dissolved solids (TDS)ple taken of the tank showed a pH equal equal to 12,000 ppm. A calculation based on ititial tank level and flow to the tank revealed the quantity of regenerant waste and rinse water that spilled on the ground to be approximately 8,400 gallons.

j No environmental impact is expected since a rinse cycle was in progress resulting in dilution of the tank contents. The spilled regenerant waste was further I

diluted by the flow in outfall 002, thus significantly minimizing any environmental impact associated with this event.

i

~

~

i DJ 4

e