JAFP-19-0083, License Amendment Request - Proposed Change to the Technical Specifications to Revise the Allowable Value for Reactor Water Cleanup (RWCU) System Primary Containment Isolation

From kanterella
(Redirected from ML19248B085)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

License Amendment Request - Proposed Change to the Technical Specifications to Revise the Allowable Value for Reactor Water Cleanup (RWCU) System Primary Containment Isolation
ML19248B085
Person / Time
Site: FitzPatrick Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 09/05/2019
From: Jim Barstow
Exelon Generation Co
To:
Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
JAFP-19-0083
Download: ML19248B085 (22)


Text

10 CFR 50.90

JAFP-19-0083

September 5, 2019

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

ATTN: Document Control Desk

Washington, DC 20555-0001

James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant

Renewed Facility Operating License No. DPR-59

NRC Docket No. 50-333

Subject: License Amendment Request – Proposed Change to the Technical

Specifications to Revise the Allowable Value for Reactor Water Cleanup

(RWCU) System Primary Containment Isolation

Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.90, "Application for amendment of license, construction permit, or

early site permit," Exelon Generation Company, LLC (Exelon) proposes changes to the

Technical Specifications (TS), Appendix A, of Renewed Facility Operating License No. DPR-

59 for James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant (JAF).

The proposed changes revise the JAF TS Allowable Value for RWCU System isolation on

low Reactor Pressure Vessel (RPV) water level from Level 3 (≥ 177 inches) to Level 2 (≥ 107

inches) in Table 3.3.6.1-1. JAF TS Table 3.3.5.2-1 is revised to be consistent with the

modified Table 3.3.6.1-1.

The proposed changes have been reviewed by the JAF Plant Operations Review Committee

in accordance with the requirements of the Exelon Quality Assurance Program.

Attachment 1 provides the Evaluation of Proposed Changes. Attachment 2 provides the

Proposed TS Marked-Up Page. Attachment 3 provides the Proposed Technical

Specifications Bases Marked-Up Page for information only. Attachment 4 provides Technical

Specification Bases Pages Summarizing Setpoint Methodology for information only.

Exelon requests approval of the proposed amendment by August 30, 2020. Once approved,

the amendment shall be implemented within 60 days.

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

License Amendment Request

RWCU RPV Water Level Isolation Setpoint

Docket No. 50-333

September 5, 2019

Page2

This amendment request contains no regulatory commitments.

Exelon has concluded that the proposed change presents no significant hazards

consideration under the standards set forth in 10 CFR 50.92.

In accordance with 10 CFR 50.91, "Notice for public comment; State consultation,"

paragraph (b), Exelon is transmitting a copy of this application and its attachments to the

designated State Officials.

Should you have any questions concerning this submittal, please contact Christian Williams

at (610) 765-5729.

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on the

5th day of September 2019.

Respectfully,

~._ .J ·-r ~oJr- ~

James Barstow

Director - Licensing & Regulatory Affairs

Exelon Generation Company, LLC

Attachments:

1) Evaluation of Proposed Changes

2) Proposed Technical Specification Marked-Up Page

3) Proposed Technical Specification Bases Marked-Up Page

4) Technical Specification Bases Pages Summarizing Setpoint Methodology

cc: USNRC Region I, Regional Administrator

USNRC Senior Resident Inspector, JAF

USNRC Project Manager, JAF

A. L. Peterson, NYSERDA

w/attachments

w/attachments

w/attachments

w/attachments

ATTACHMENT 1

License Amendment Request

James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant

Docket No. 50-333

EVALUATION OF PROPOSED CHANGES

License Amendment Request Attachment 1 - RWCU RPV Water Level Isolation Setpoint

Docket No. 50-333

Evaluation of Proposed Changes

1.0 SUMMARY DESCRIPTION

Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.90, "Application for amendment of license, construction permit, or early

site permit," Exelon Generation Company, LLC (Exelon) proposes changes to the Technical

Specifications (TS), Appendix A, of Renewed Facility Operating License No. DPR-59 for James

A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant (JAF).

The proposed changes revise the JAF TS Allowable Value for RWCU System isolation on low

Reactor Pressure Vessel (RPV) water level from Level 3 (≥ 177 inches) to Level 2 (≥ 107

inches) in Table 3.3.6.1-1. JAF TS Table 3.3.5.2-1 is revised to be consistent with the modified

Table 3.3.6.1-1.

2.0 DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The proposed changes address issues related to initiation of Reactor Water Cleanup (RWCU)

System isolation at the same Reactor Pressure Vessel (RPV) water level as the Reactor

Protection System (RPS) low RPV water level trip. RWCU System isolation coincident with

reactor scram can complicate post-trip recovery due to the inability to reject water from the RPV

bottom head region if the system cannot be quickly restored to service. Inability to remove water

from the bottom head can lead to thermal stratification as the result of inflow of cold water

through the Control Rod Drives.

Implementation of this change will require installation of new analog trips units associated with

RPV wide range water level transmitters to develop a trip signal for incorporation in the existing

logic circuits for the isolation valves. This change is required since the existing logic is supplied

from trip units associated with RPV narrow range level transmitters. The range of the narrow

range transmitters is insufficient to support the revised Allowable Value.

Proposed Revision to Table 3.3.6.1-1:

The Function and Allowable Value for Table 3.3.6.1-1 Function 5.e., Reactor Water Cleanup

(RWCU) System Isolation Reactor Vessel Water Level – Low (Level 3) are changed to Reactor

Vessel Water Level – Low Low (Level 2) and ≥ 107 inches respectively.

The purpose of the proposed change is to separate the RWCU System Isolation on low RPV

water level from the reactor scram on the same parameter to facilitate improved control of RPV

water level and bottom head temperature post-trip.

Proposed Revision to Table 3.3.5.2-1:

The Function and Allowable Value for Table 3.3.5.2-1 Function 4.a., Reactor Water Cleanup

(RWCU) System Isolation Reactor Vessel Water Level – Low Level 3 are changed to Reactor

Vessel Water Level – Low Low Level 2 and ≥ 107 inches respectively.

The purpose of the proposed change is to maintain consistency between TS Tables 3.3.6.1-1

and 3.3.5.2-1.

Proposed Bases Revision:

The JAF TS Bases for Primary Containment Isolation Instrumentation and RPV Water Inventory

Control Instrumentation are revised consistent with the proposed changes to Tables 3.3.6.1-1

and 3.3.5.2-1 respectively.

3.0 TECHNICAL EVALUATION

Primary containment isolation instrumentation automatically initiates closure of Primary

Containment Isolation Valves (PCIVs). PCIVs in conjunction with other accident mitigation

systems limit fission product release during and following postulated Design Basis Accidents

(DBAs). The low RPV water level signal is a diverse signal indicating that the capability to cool

the fuel may be threatened. Isolation of the system on this signal potentially limits reactor

coolant loss for breaks located in the RWCU system outside of the Primary Containment (see

below for further discussion). RWCU isolation on low RPV water level is not directly assumed in

Updated Final Safety Analysis Report (UFSAR) safety analyses since the effects of a RWCU

line break are bounded by breaks in larger piping systems such as Reactor Water Recirculation

(RWR) and Main Steam.

The primary RWCU System flow path is from the RWR System with a secondary path from the

RPV bottom head drain. Breaks in RWCU piping are considered as part of the RWR pipe break

spectrum analysis. The volume of water in the RWCU system is a small fraction of that

contained in the RWR piping and RPV lower plenum. Any effect of this additional water on Peak

Cladding Temperature is negligible, even without RWCU System isolation. The Emergency

Core Cooling System - Loss of Coolant Accident (ECCS-LOCA) analysis methodology does not

include assumption of RWCU isolation, nor include the water in the RWCU system for breaks

inside of containment. Therefore, changing the RPV water level setpoint for RWCU isolation has

no effect on the ECCS-LOCA analysis.

The bounding break for containment analysis is a double-ended guillotine break of an RWR

suction line. If not isolated, a small additional source of hot water is available from the piping

between the inboard isolation valve and the check valves at the discharge of the RWCU pumps.

This mass of water could be added to the RPV for non-recirculation line breaks, or directly to

Primary Containment for RWCU or RWR line breaks. This mass and energy will ultimately be

transported to the Suppression Pool and contribute an additional rise in pool temperature of less

than 0.1°F assuming no RWCU System isolation. This small change is bounded by

conservatisms in the containment analysis methods and assumptions, or conservatisms in other

inputs. As such, there is no significant effect on containment response.

Environmental Qualification of Electrical Equipment outside of Primary Containment includes

consideration of RWCU High Energy Line Breaks (HELB). The JAF HELB analysis is based on

system isolation due to high area temperatures in spaces enclosing postulated break locations.

No credit is taken for isolation on low RPV water level in these analyses, therefore lowering of

the Allowable Value for the isolation setpoint can have no effect on analyzed HELB response.

Analyses supporting JAF operation utilize two values for the RPV Level 2 Analytical Limit

dependent on application. The higher of the two values is used for initiation of the High Pressure

Coolant Injection (HPCI) and Reactor Core Isolation Cooling (RCIC) Systems, while the lower

value is used for Anticipated Transient Without Scram-Recirculation Pump Trip (ATWS-RPT)

initiation (as well as for initiation of Alternate Rod Injection, ARI). The analysis supporting this

License Amendment Request also used the lower of the two Analytical Limits. Use of staggered

limits (and associated setpoints) provides an opportunity for HPCI and/or RCIC to restore RPV

water level during slow moving transients without further actions that would complicate transient

response. Allowable Values associated with each Analytical Limit is dependent on

instrumentation characteristics and may differ between functions.

4.0 REGULATORY EVALUATION

4.1 Applicable Regulatory Requirements/Criteria

The following regulatory requirements have been considered:

Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), Section 50.36, "Technical specifications,"

in which the Commission established its regulatory requirements related to the contents of the

TS. Specifically, 10 CFR 50.36(c)(2)(i) states, in part, "Limiting conditions for operation are the

lowest functional capability or performance levels of equipment required for safe operation of

the facility." 10 CFR 50.36(c)(2)(ii) states, "A technical specification limiting condition for

operation of a nuclear reactor must be established for each item meeting one or more of the

following criteria:" 10 CFR 50.36(c)(2)(ii)(A) states, “Installed instrumentation that is used to

detect, and indicate in the control room, a significant abnormal degradation of the reactor

coolant pressure boundary.”

The proposed changes to the Primary Containment Isolation and RPV Water Inventory Control

Instrumentation Allowable Values do not affect compliance with these regulations.

The applicable 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix A, General Design Criteria (GDC), were considered

as follows:

Criterion 13 – Instrumentation and control. Instrumentation shall be provided to monitor

variables and systems over their anticipated ranges for normal operation, for anticipated

operational occurrences, and for accident conditions as appropriate to assure adequate safety,

including those variables and systems that can affect the fission process, the integrity of the

reactor core, the reactor coolant pressure boundary, and the containment and its associated

systems. Appropriate controls shall be provided to maintain these variables and systems within

prescribed operating ranges.

The proposed change maintains RPV water level as a parameter monitored to detect

degradation of the Reactor Coolant Pressure Boundary and initiate action to isolate Primary

Containment to limit fission product release. The revised Allowable Value for RWCU isolation

initiation is consistent with the values used for ECCS initiation. The instrumentation used to

perform the RWCU isolation function will be the JAF Analog Transmitter Trip System (ATTS)

that includes redundant Reactor vessel wide range level transmitters, Master Trip Units and

Slave Trip Units. The use of ATTS assures an acceptable operating range and takes advantage

of existing surveillance requirements as specified with the Technical Specifications.

Criterion 20 – Protective system functions. The protection system shall be designed (1) to

initiate automatically the operation of appropriate systems including the reactivity control

systems, to assure that specified acceptable fuel design limits are not exceeded as a result of

anticipated operational occurrences and (2) to sense accident conditions and to initiate the

operation of systems and components important to safety.

The proposed change senses RPV water level to detect degradation of the Reactor Coolant

Pressure Boundary and initiate action to isolate Primary Containment to limit fission product

release.

The proposed Allowable Value is based on new setpoint and uncertainty calculations. These

calculations utilize the methodology as described within the Technical Specification Bases

Revision 40 section B.3.3.6.1 and as referenced within section B.3.3.5.2 (attachment 4). This

methodology was reviewed by the NRC during the JAF conversion to Improved Technical

Specifications and utilizes an Analytical Limit that ensures the Safety Limit is not exceeded. The

Nominal Trip Setpoint is selected to assure the proposed Allowable Value is not exceeded. The

RWCU isolation function will be performed using the JAF ATTS thus the instrument loop error

and calibration limits (As Found and As Left) are calculated consistent with the other JAF ATTS

uncertainty calculations.

Criterion 22 – Protection system independence. The protection system shall be designed to

assure that the effects of natural phenomena, and of normal operating, maintenance, testing,

and postulated accident conditions on the redundant channels do not result in loss of the

protection function or shall be demonstrated to be acceptable on some other defined basis.

Design techniques, such as functional diversity in component design and principles of operation,

shall be used to the extent practical to prevent loss of the protection function.

The proposed change continues to use RPV water level to detect degradation of the Reactor

Coolant Pressure Boundary and initiate action to isolate Primary Containment to limit fission

product release. This is a signal diverse from monitoring drywell pressure to accomplish the

same purposes.

Criterion 24 – Separation of protection and control systems. The protection system shall be

separated from control systems to the extent that failure of any single control system component

or channel, or failure or removal from service of any single protection system component or

channel which is common to the control and protection systems leaves intact a system

satisfying all reliability, redundancy, and independence requirements of the protection system.

Interconnections of the protection and control systems shall be limited so as to assure that

safety is not significantly impaired.

The proposed change maintains RPV water level as a parameter monitored to detect

degradation of the Reactor Coolant Pressure Boundary and initiate action to isolate Primary

Containment to limit fission product release. The revised system configuration is consistent with

the current design in use of separate level transmitters processed through analog trip units to

generate signals further processed by relay logic to initiate RWCU isolation valve motion.

4.2 No Significant Hazards Consideration

Exelon has evaluated whether or not a significant hazards consideration is involved with the

proposed amendment by focusing on the three standards set forth in 10 CFR 50.92, "Issuance

of amendment," as discussed below:

1. Does the proposed amendment involve a significant increase in the probability or

consequences of an accident previously evaluated?

License Amendment Request Attachment 1

RWCU RPV Water Level Isolation Setpoint Page 5 of 6

Docket No. 50-333

Evaluation of Proposed Changes

Response: No.

RWCU System isolation on changing RPV water level is a response to an accident,

rather than an initiator, therefore changing the Allowable Value at which this is

accomplished has no effect on the probability of occurrence.

The fuel peak cladding temperature response to line breaks the RWCU low RPV water

level isolation mitigates are bounded by Reactor Water Recirculation and Main Steam

line breaks, therefore there is no increase in consequences of these accidents as a

result of lowering the Allowable Value for the isolation.

There may be a small increase in peak suppression pool temperature as a result of

lowering the RWCU low RPV water level isolation Allowable Value. This potential effect

is bounded by conservative modeling assumptions, inputs, and methods and is

insignificant.

Therefore, the proposed changes do not involve a significant increase in the probability

or consequences of an accident previously evaluated.

2. Does the proposed amendment create the possibility of a new or different kind of

accident from any accident previously evaluated?

Response: No.

Implementation of the proposed amendment will require installation of new trip units to

develop signals for input to the RWCU isolation logic utilizing RPV wide range water

level transmitters instead of the narrow range transmitters currently used. This will not

alter the principles of operation of the system, therefore no new failure modes or

mechanisms are introduced.

Therefore, the proposed changes do not create the possibility of a new or different kind

of accident from any accident previously evaluated.

3. Does the proposed amendment involve a significant reduction in a margin of

safety?

Response: No.

Lowering the Allowable Value for the RWCU isolation on RPV water level from Low

(Level 3) to Low Low (Level 2) will introduce a small delay in isolation valve closure for

line breaks within Primary Containment. The LOCA radiological analysis assumes no

specific closure time for Primary Containment Isolation Valves, therefore there can be no

effect on this safety margin.

As stated previously, the change in Allowable Value has an insignificant effect on peak

suppression pool temperature, therefore there is also no significant reduction in margin

of safety for this parameter.

Therefore, the proposed changes do not involve a significant reduction in a margin of

safety.

License Amendment Request Attachment 1

RWCU RPV Water Level Isolation Setpoint Page 6 of 6

Docket No. 50-333

Evaluation of Proposed Changes

Based on the above, Exelon concludes that the proposed amendment does not involve a

significant hazards consideration under the standards set forth in 10 CFR 50.92(c) and,

accordingly, a finding of “no significant hazards consideration” is justified.

5.0 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATION

A review has determined that the proposed amendment would change a requirement with

respect to installation or use of a facility component located within the restricted area, as defined

in 10 CFR 20, or would change an inspection or surveillance requirement. However, the

proposed amendment does not involve (i) a significant hazards consideration, (ii) a significant

change in the types or significant increase in the amounts of any effluent that may be released

offsite, or (iii) a significant increase in individual or cumulative occupational radiation exposure.

Accordingly, the proposed amendment meets the eligibility criterion for categorical exclusion set

forth in 10 CFR 51.22(c)(9). Therefore, pursuant to 10 CFR 51.22(b), no environmental impact

statement or environmental assessment need be prepared in connection with the proposed

amendment.

6.0 REFERENCES

1. 005N2981, “James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant Reactor Water Level Setpoint

Change for Reactor Water Cleanup System Isolation,” Rev. 0, July 2019

ATTACHMENT 2

License Amendment Request

James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant

Docket No. 50-333

Proposed Change to the Technical Specifications Allowable Value for Reactor Water

Cleanup (RWCU) System Primary Containment Isolation

Proposed Technical Specification Marked-Up Page

TS Page

3.3.5.2-3

3.3.6.1-10

RPV Water Inventory Control Instrumentation

3.3.5.2

JAFNPP 3.3.5.2-3 Amendment 321

Table 3.3.5.2-1 (page 1 of 1)

Reactor Pressure Vessel (RPV) Water Inventory Control Instrumentation

FUNCTION

APPLICABLE

MODES OR

OTHER

SPECIFIED

CONDITIONS

REQUIRED

CHANNELS

PER

FUNCTION

CONDITIONS

REFERENCED

FROM

REQUIRED

ACTION A.1

SURVEILLANCE

REQUIREMENTS

ALLOWABLE

VALUE

1. Core Spray

a. Reactor

Pressure –

Low (Injection

Permissive)

4, 5 4(a) C SR 3.3.5.2.1

SR 3.3.5.2.2

< 490 psig

b. Core Spray

Pump

Discharge

Flow – Low

(Bypass)

4, 5 1 per pump

(a)

D SR 3.3.5.2.1

SR 3.3.5.2.2

> 510 gpm

and

< 980 gpm

c. Core Spray

Pump

Discharge

Pressure –

High (Bypass)

4, 5 1 per pump

(a)

D SR 3.3.5.2.1

SR 3.3.5.2.2

> 90 psig

and

< 110 psig

2. Low Pressure Coolant

Injection (LPCI) System

a. Reactor

Pressure –

Low (Injection

Permissive)

4, 5 4(a) C SR 3.3.5.2.1

SR 3.3.5.2.2

< 490 psig

b. Low Pressure

Coolant

Injection

Pump

Discharge

Flow – Low

(Bypass)

4, 5 1 per pump

(a)

D SR 3.3.5.2.1

SR 3.3.5.2.2

> 1040 gpm

and

< 1665 gpm

3. RHR System Isolation

a. Reactor

Vessel Water

Level – Low,

Level 3

(b) 2 in one trip

system

B SR 3.3.5.2.1

SR 3.3.5.2.2

> 177 inches

4. Reactor Water Cleanup

(RWCU) System

Isolation

a. Reactor

Vessel Water

Level – Low

Low Level 32

(b) 2 in one trip

system

B SR 3.3.5.2.1

SR 3.3.5.2.2

> 177 107

inches

(a) Associated with an ECCS subsystem required to be OPERABLE by LCO 3.5.2, “Reactor Pressure Vessel (RPV) Water Inventory Control.”

(b) When automatic isolation of the associated penetration flow path(s) is credited in calculating DRAIN TIME.

Primary Containment Isolation Instrumentation

3.3.6.1

JAFNPP 3.3.6.1-10 Amendment 321

Table 3.3.6.1-1 (page 5 of 6)

Primary Containment Isolation Instrumentation

FUNCTION

APPLICABLE

MODES OR

OTHER

SPECIFIED

CONDITIONS

REQUIRED

CHANNELS

PER TRIP

SYSTEM

CONDITIONS

REFERENCED

FROM

REQUIRED

ACTION C.1

SURVEILLANCE

REQUIREMENTS

ALLOWABLE

VALUE

5. Reactor Water Cleanup (RWCU)

System Isolation

a. RWCU Suction Line

Penetration Area

Temperature — High

1,2,3

1

F

SR 3.3.6.1.3

SR 3.3.6.1.7

≤ 144°F

b. RWCU Pump Area

Temperature — High

1,2,3

1 per

room

F

SR 3.3.6.1.3

SR 3.3.6.1.7

≤ 165°F for Pump

Room A and ≤

175°F for Pump

Room B

c. RWCU Heat

Exchanger Room Area

Temperature — High

1,2,3 1 F SR 3.3.6.1.3

SR 3.3.6.1.7

≤ 155°F

d. SLC System Initiation 1,2 2(d) I SR 3.3.6.1.7 NA

e. Reactor Vessel Water Level

Low Low (Level 32)

1,2,3 2 F SR 3.3.6.1.1

SR 3.3.6.1.2

SR 3.3.6.1.4

SR 3.3.6.1.5

SR 3.3.6.1.7

≥ 177 107 inches

f. Drywell Pressure — High 1,2,3 2 F SR 3.3.6.1.1

SR 3.3.6.1.2

SR 3.3.6.1.4

SR 3.3.6.1.5

SR 3.3.6.1.7

≤ 2.7 psig

6. Shutdown Cooling System Isolation

a. Reactor Pressure — High

1,2,3

1

F

SR 3.3.6.1.1

SR 3.3.6.1.2

SR 3.3.6.1.4

SR 3.3.6.1.5

SR 3.3.6.1.7

≤ 74 psig

b. Reactor Vessel Water Level

Low (Level 3)

3

2

J

SR 3.3.6.1.1

SR 3.3.6.1.2

SR 3.3.6.1.4

SR 3.3.6.1.5

SR 3.3.6.1.7

≥ 177 inches

(continued)

(d) SLC System Initiation only inputs into one of the two trip systems and only isolates one valve in the RWCU suction and return line.

ATTACHMENT 3

License Amendment Request

James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant

Docket No. 50-333

Proposed Change to the Technical Specifications Allowable Value for Reactor Water

Cleanup (RWCU) System Primary Containment Isolation

Proposed Technical Specification Bases Marked-Up Page

(for information only)

Bases Page

B 3.3.5.2-5

B 3.3.6.1-4

B 3.3.6.1-18

B 3.3.6.1-19

RPV Water Inventory Control Instrumentation

B 3.3.5.2

BASES

APPLICABLE

SAFETY ANALYSIS,

LCO, and

APPLICABILITY

3.a - Reactor Vessel Water Level - Low, Level 3 (continued)

Instrumentation Reactor Vessel Water Level - Low, Level 3 Allowable

Value (LCO 3.3.6.1), since the capability to cool the fuel may be

threatened.

The Reactor Vessel Water Level - Low, Level 3 Function is only

required to be OPERABLE when automatic isolation of the associated

penetration flow path is credited in calculating DRAIN TIME. This

Function isolates the Group 11 valves.

Reactor Water Cleanup (RWCU) System Isolation

4.a - Reactor Vessel Water level -– Low Low, Level 32

The definition of Drain Time allows crediting the closing of penetration

flow paths that are capable of being isolated by valves that will close

automatically without offsite power prior to the RPV water level being

equal to the TAF when actuated by RPV water level isolation

instrumentation. The Reactor Vessel Water Level – Low Low (Level 32)

Function associated with RWCU System isolation may be credited for

automatic isolation of penetration flow paths associated with the

RWCU System.

Reactor Vessel Water Level -– Low Low, (Level 32) signals are

initiated from four level transmitters that sense the difference

between the pressure due to a constant column of water (reference

leg) and the pressure due to the actual water level (variable leg) in

the vessel.

While four channels (two channels per trip system) of the Reactor

Vessel Water Level – Low (Level 3) Function are available, only two

channels (all in the same trip system) are required to be OPERABLE.

The Reactor Vessel Water Level - Low (Level 3) Allowable Value was

chosen to be the same as the RPS Reactor Vessel Water Level – Low

Low (Level 32) Allowable Value (LCO 3.3.1.1), since the capability to

cool the fuel may be threatened. The allowable value is referenced

from a level of water 352.56 inches above ther lowest point in the

inside bottom of the RPV and also corresponds to the top of a 144

inch fuel column (Ref 6).

The Reactor Vessel Water Level – Low Low (Level 23) Function is only

required to be OPERABLE when automatic isolation of the associated

penetration flow path is credited in calculating DRAIN TIME. This

Function isolates the Group 5 valves.

(continued)

JAFNPP B 3.3.5.2-5 Revision 38

Primary Containment Isolation Instrumentation

B 3.3.6.1

BASES

BACKGROUND

3, 4. High Pressure Coolant Injection System Isolation and Reactor

Core Isolation Cooling System Isolation (continued)

two-out-of-two trip systems. The output of each equipment area

temperature channel is connected to one trip system so that any

channel will trip its associated trip system. This arrangement is

consistent with all other area temperature Functions, in that any

channel will trip its associated trip system.

5.Reactor Water Cleanup System Isolation

The Reactor Vessel Water Level — Low Low (Level 32) and Drywell

Pressure

— High Isolation Functions (Functions 5.e and 5.f) receive input from

four channels. The outputs from these channels are connected into

two two-out-of-two trip systems for each function. The SLC System

Initiation Function (Function 5.d) receives input from two channels,

with both channels providing input to one trip system. Any channel will

initiate the trip logic. The Function is initiated by placing the SLC

System initiation switch in any position other than stop (start system A

or start system B). Therefore, a channel is defined as the circuitry

required to trip the trip logic when the switch is in position start system

A or start system B. The Area Temperature — High Functions

(Functions 5.a, 5.b and 5.c) receive input from eight temperature

monitors, four to each trip system. These are configured so that any

one input will trip the associated trip system. Each of the two trip

systems is connected to one of the two valves on the RWCU suction

penetration and only one trip system is connected to the RWCU return

penetration outboard valve. The trip system associated with the SLC

System Initiation Function is connected to the outboard RWCU suction

valve and the outboard RWCU return penetration valve.

6.Shutdown Cooling System Isolation

The Reactor Vessel Water Level — Low (Level 3) Function (Function

6.b) receives input from four reactor vessel water level channels. The

outputs from the reactor vessel water level channels are connected to

two two-out-of-two trip systems. Each of the two trip systems is

connected to one of the two valves on the RHR shutdown cooling

pump suction penetration and on one of the two inboard LPCI

injection valves if in shutdown cooling mode. The Reactor Pressure —

High Function (Function 6.a) receives input from two channels, with

each channel providing input into each trip system using a

one-out-of-two logic. However, only one channel input is required to be

OPERABLE for a trip system to be considered OPERABLE. Each of the

two trip systems is connected to one of the two valves on the

shutdown cooling pump suction penetration.

(continued)

JAFNPP B 3.3.6.1-4 Revision 38

Primary Containment Isolation Instrumentation

B 3.3.6.1

BASES

APPLICABLE

SAFETY ANALYSIS,

LCO, and

APPLICABILITY

(continued)

5.d. SLC System Initiation

The isolation of the RWCU System is required when the SLC System

has been initiated to prevent dilution and removal of the boron

solution by the RWCU System (Ref. 6). The RWCU isolation signal is

initiated when the control room SLC initiation switch is in any position

other than stop.

There is no Allowable Value associated with this Function since the

channels are mechanically actuated based solely on the position of

the SLC System initiation switch.

Two channels (start system A or start system B) of the SLC System

Initiation Function are available and are required to be OPERABLE

only in MODES 1 and 2, since these are the only MODES where the

reactor can be critical, and these MODES are consistent with the

Applicability for the SLC System (LCO 3.1.7).

As noted (footnote (d) to Table 3.3.6.1-1), this Function is only

required to close one of the RWCU suction isolation valves and one

return isolation valve since the signals only provide input into one of

the two trip systems.

5.e. Reactor Vessel Water Level — Low Low (Level 32)

Low RPV water level indicates that the capability to cool the fuel may

be threatened. Should RPV water level decrease too far, fuel damage

could result. Therefore, isolation of some interfaces with the reactor

vessel occurs to isolate the potential sources of a break. The isolation

of the RWCU System on Level 32 supports actions to ensure that the

fuel peak cladding temperature remains below the limits of

10 CFR 50.46. The Reactor Vessel Water Level — Low Low (Level 32)

Function associated with RWCU isolation is not directly assumed in

the UFSAR safety analyses because the RWCU System line break is

bounded by breaks of larger systems (recirculation and MSL breaks

are more limiting).

Reactor Vessel Water Level — Low Low (Level 32) signals are initiated

from four level transmitters that sense the difference between the

pressure due to a constant column of water (reference leg) and the

pressure due to the actual water level (variable leg) in the vessel.

Four channels of Reactor Vessel Water Level — Low Low (Level 32)

Function are available and are required to be OPERABLE to ensure

that no single instrument failure can preclude the isolation function.

The Reactor Vessel Water Level — Low Low (Level 32) Allowable Value

was chosen to be the same as the RPS Reactor Vessel Water Level

Low Low (Level 2)

(continued)

JAFNPP B 3.3.6.1-18 Revision 38

Primary Containment Isolation Instrumentation

B 3.3.6.1

BASES

APPLICABLE

SAFETY ANALYSIS,

LCO, and

APPLICABILITY

5.e. Reactor Vessel Water Level — Low (Level 3) (continued)

(Level 3) Allowable Value (LCO 3.3.1.1), since the capability to cool

the fuel may be threatened. The Allowable Value is referenced from a

level of water 352.56 inches above the lowest point in the inside

bottom of the RPV and also corresponds to the top of a 144 inch fuel

column (Ref. 13).

This Function isolates both RWCU suction valves and the RWCU

return valve.

5.f. Drywell Pressure — High

High drywell pressure can indicate a break in the RCPB inside the

primary containment. The isolation of some of the primary

containment isolation valves on high drywell pressure supports

actions to ensure that offsite dose limits of 10 CFR 100 are not

exceeded. The Drywell Pressure — High Function, associated with

isolation of the primary containment, is implicitly assumed in the

UFSAR accident analysis as these leakage paths are assumed to be

isolated post LOCA.

High drywell pressure signals are initiated from pressure transmitters

that sense the pressure in the drywell. Four channels of Drywell

Pressure — High are available and are required to be OPERABLE to

ensure that no single instrument failure can preclude the isolation

function.

The Allowable value was selected to be as low as possible without

inducing spurious trips. The Allowable Value is chosen to be the same

as the RPS Drywell Pressure — High Allowable Value (LCO 3.3.1.1),

since this may be indicative of a LOCA inside primary containment.

This Function isolates both RWCU suction valves and one RWCU

return valve.

6.a. Reactor Pressure — High

The Reactor Pressure — High Function is provided to isolate the

shutdown cooling portion of the Residual Heat Removal (RHR)

System. This interlock Function is provided only for equipment

protection to prevent an intersystem LOCA scenario, and credit for the

interlock is not assumed in the accident or transient analysis in the

UFSAR.

The Reactor Pressure — High signals are initiated from two

transmitters that are connected to different condensing chambers.

(continued)

JAFNPP B 3.3.6.1-19 Revision 38

ATTACHMENT 4

License Amendment Request

James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant

Docket No. 50-333

Proposed Change to the Technical Specifications Allowable Value for Reactor Water

Cleanup (RWCU) System Primary Containment Isolation

Technical Specification Bases Pages Summarizing Setpoint Methodology

(for information only)

RPV Water Inventory Control Instrumentation

83.3.5.2

B 3.3 INSTRUMENTATION

B 3.3.5.2 Reactor Pressure Vessel (RPV) Water lnventary Control Instrumentation

BASES

BACKGROUND

JAFNPP

The RPV contains penetrations below the top of the active fuel (TAF)

that have the potential to drain the reactor coolant inventory to below

the TAF. If the water level should drop below the TAF, the ability to

remove decay heat is reduced, which could lead to elevated cladding

temperatures and clad perforation. Safety Limit 2.1.1.3 requires the

RPV water level to be above the top of the active irradiated fuel at all

times to prevent such elevated cladding temperatures.

Technical Specifications are required by 10 CFR 50.36 to include

limiting safety system settings (LSSS) for variables that have

significant safety functions. LSSS are defined by the regulation as

•where a LSSS is specified for a variable on which a safety limit has

been placed, the setting must be chosen so that automatic protective

actions will correct the abnormal situation before a Safety Limit (SL)

is exceeded.• The Analytical Limit is the limit of the process variable

at which a safety action is initiated to ensure that a SL is not

exceeded. Any automatic protection action that occurs on reaching

the Analytical Limit therefore ensures that the SL is not exceeded.

However, in practice, the actual settings for automatic protection

channels must be chosen to be more conservative than the Analytical

Limit to account for instrument loop uncertainties related to the

setting at which the automatic protective action would actually occur.

The actual settings for the automatic isolation channels are the same

as those established for the same functions in MODES 1, 2, and 3 in

LCO 3.3.5.1, "Emergency Core Cooling System (ECCS)

Instrumentation.a or LCO 3.3.6.1, ff Primary Containment Isolation

instrumentation".

With the unit in MODE 4 or 5, RPV water inventory control is not

required to mitigate any events or accidents evaluated in the safety

analyses. RPV water inventory control is required in MODES 4 and 5

to protect Safety Limit 2.1.1.3 and the fuel cladding barrier to prevent

the release of radioactive material should a draining event occur.

Under the definition of DRAIN TIME, some penetration flow paths may

be excluded from the DRAIN TIME calculation if they will be isolated

by valves that will close automatically without offsite power prior to

the RPV water level being equal to the TAF when actuated by RPV

water level isolation instrumentation.

(continued)

83.3.5.2-1 Revision 38

BASES

BACKGROUND

(continued)

APPLICABLE

SAFETY ANALYSIS,

LCO,and

APPLICABILITY

JAFNPP

RPV Water Inventory Control Instrumentation

B3.3.5.2

The purpose of the RPV Water Inventory Control Instrumentation is to

support the requirements of LCO 3.5.2, "Reactor Pressure Vessel

(RPV) Water Inventory Control," and the definition of DRAIN TIME.

There are functions that are required for manual initiation or

operation of the ECCS injection/spray subsystem required to be

OPERABLE by LCO 3.5.2 and other functions that support automatic

isolation of Residual Heat Removal subsystem and Reactor Water

Cleanup system penetration flow path(s) on low RPV water level.

The RPV Water Inventory Control Instrumentation supports operation

of core spray (CS) and low pressure coolant injection (LPCI). The

equipment involved with each of these systems is described in the

Bases for LCO 3.5.2.

With the unit in MODE 4 or 5, RPV water inventory control is not

required to mitigate any events or accidents evaluated in the safety

analyses. RPV, LCO, water inventory control is required in MODES 4

and 5 to protect and Safety Limit 2.1.1.3 and the fuel cladding barrier

to prevent the release of radioactive material should a draining event

occur.

A double-ended guillotine break of the Reactor Coolant System (RCS)

is not postulated in MODES 4 and 5 due to the reduced RCS

pressure, reduced piping stresses, and ductile piping systems.

Instead, an event is postulated in which a single operator error or

initiating event allows draining of the RPV water inventory through a

single penetration flow path with the highest flow rate, or the sum of

the drain rates through multiple penetration flow paths susceptible to

a common mode failure (e.g., seismic event, loss of normal power,

single human error). It is assumed, based on engineering judgment,

that while in MODES 4 and 5, one low pressure ECCS injection/spray

subsystem can be manually initiated to maintain adequate reactor

vessel water level.

As discussed in References 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, operating experience

has shown RPV water inventory to be significant to public health and

safety. Therefore, RPV Water Inventory Control satisfies Criterion 4 of

10 CFR 50.36(c)(2)(ii).

Permissive and interlock setpoints are generally considered as

nominal values without regard to measurement accuracy.

(continued)

B3.3.5.2-2 Revision 38

BASES

BACKGROUND

(continued)

APPLICABLE

SAFETY ANALYSIS,

LCO, and

APPLICABI LllY

JAFNPP

Primary Containment Isolation Instrumentation

B3.3.6.1

7. Traversing lncore Probe System Isolation

The Reactor Vessel Water Level - Low (Level 3) Isolation Function

receives input from two reactor vessel water level channels. The

outputs from the reactor vessel water level channels are connected

into one two-out-of-two logic trip system. The Drywell Pressure- High

Isolation function receives input from two drywell pressure channels.

The outputs from the drywell pressure channels are connected into

one two-out-of-two logic trip system.

When either Isolation Function actuates, the TIP drive mechanisms

will withdraw the TIPs, if inserted, and close the inboard TIP system

isolation ball valves when the TIPs are fully withdrawn. The outboard

TIP system isolation valves are manual shear valves.

The isolation signals generated by the primary containment isolation

instrumentation are implicitly assumed in the safety analyses of

References 2 and 3 to initiate closure of valves to limit offsite doses.

Refer to LCO 3.6.1.3, "Primary Containment Isolation Valves (PCIVs),"

Applicable Safety Analyses Bases for more detail of the safety

analyses.

Primary containment isolation instrumentation satisfies Criterion 3 of

10 CFR 50.36(c)(2)(ii) (Ref. 4). Certain instrumentation Functions are

retained for other reasons and are described below in the individual

Functions discussion.

The OPERABILllY of the primary containment instrumentation is

dependent on the OPERABILllY of the individual instrumentation

channel Functions specified in Table 3.3.6.1-1. Each Function must

have a required number of OPERABLE channels, with their setpoints

within the specified Allowable Values, where appropriate. A channel is

inoperable if its actual trip setpoint is not within its required Allowable

Value. The actual setpoint is calibrated consistent with applicable

setpoint methodology assumptions. Each channel must also respond

within its assumed response time, where appropriate.

Allowable Values are specified for each Primary Containment Isolation

Function specified in the Table. Nominal trip setpoints are specified in

the setpoint calculations. The nominal setpoints are selected to

ensure that the setpoints do not exceed the Allowable Value between

CHANNEL CALIBRATIONS. Operation with a trip setpoint less

conservative than the nominal trip setpoint, but within its Allowable

Value, is acceptable. Trip setpoints are those predetermined values of

output at which an action should take place. The setpoints are

(continued)

B3.3.6.1-5 Revision 38

BASES

APPLICABLE

SAFETY ANALYSIS,

LCO,and

AP PU CAB I LITY

(continued)

JAFNPP

Primary Containment Isolation Instrumentation

B3.3.6.1

compared to the actual process parameter (e.g., reactor vessel water

level), and when the measured output value of the process parameter

exceeds the setpoint, the associated device (e.g., trip unit) changes

state. The analytic limits are derived from the limiting values of the

process parameters obtained from the safety analysis or other

appropriate documents. The trip setpoints are derived from the

analytical limits and account for all worst case instrumentation

uncertainties as appropriate (e.g., drift, process effects, calibration

uncertainties, and severe environmental errors (for channels that

must function in harsh environments as defined by 10 CFR 50.49)).

The trip setpoints derived in this manner provide adequate protection

because all expected uncertainties are accounted for. The Allowable

Values are then derived from the trip setpoints by accounting for

normal effects that would be seen during periodic surveillance or

calibration. These effects are instrumentation uncertainties observed

during normal operation (e.g., drift and calibration uncertainties).

Certain Emergency Core Cooling Systems (ECCS) and RCIC valves

(e.g., minimum flow) also serve the dual function of automatic PCIVs.

The signals that isolate these valves are also associated with the

automatic initiation of the ECCS and RCIC. The instrumentation

requirements and ACTIONS associated with these signals are

addressed in LCO 3.3.5.1, •Emergency Core Cooling Systems (ECCS)

Instrumentation," and LCO 3.3.5.3, "Reactor Core Isolation Cooling

(RCIC) System Instrumentation," and are not included in this LCO.

In general, the individual Functions are required to be OPERABLE in

MODES 1, 2, and 3 consistent with the Applicability for LCO 3.6.1.1,

"Primary Containment." Functions that have different Applicabilities

are discussed below in the individual Functions discussion.

The specific Applicable Safety Analyses, LCO, and Applicability

discussions are listed below on a Function by Function basis.

Main Steam Line Isolation

1.a. Reactor Vessel Water Level - Low Low Low (Level 1)

Low reactor pressure vessel (RPV) water level indicates that the

capability to cool the fuel may be threatened. Should RPV water level

decrease too far, fuel damage could result. Therefore, isolation of the

MSIVs and other interfaces with the reactor vessel occurs to prevent

offsite dose limits from being exceeded. The Reactor Vessel Water

Level - Low Low Low (Level 1) Function is one of the many Functions

assumed to be OPERABLE and capable of providing isolation signals.

The Reactor Vessel Water Level - Low Low Low (Level 1) Function

(continued)

B3.3.6.1-6 Revision 38