JAFP-19-0083, License Amendment Request - Proposed Change to the Technical Specifications to Revise the Allowable Value for Reactor Water Cleanup (RWCU) System Primary Containment Isolation
| ML19248B085 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | FitzPatrick |
| Issue date: | 09/05/2019 |
| From: | Jim Barstow Exelon Generation Co |
| To: | Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| JAFP-19-0083 | |
| Download: ML19248B085 (22) | |
Text
September 5, 2019
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
ATTN: Document Control Desk
Washington, DC 20555-0001
James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant
Renewed Facility Operating License No. DPR-59
NRC Docket No. 50-333
Subject: License Amendment Request – Proposed Change to the Technical
Specifications to Revise the Allowable Value for Reactor Water Cleanup
(RWCU) System Primary Containment Isolation
Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.90, "Application for amendment of license, construction permit, or
early site permit," Exelon Generation Company, LLC (Exelon) proposes changes to the
Technical Specifications (TS), Appendix A, of Renewed Facility Operating License No. DPR-
59 for James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant (JAF).
The proposed changes revise the JAF TS Allowable Value for RWCU System isolation on
low Reactor Pressure Vessel (RPV) water level from Level 3 (≥ 177 inches) to Level 2 (≥ 107
inches) in Table 3.3.6.1-1. JAF TS Table 3.3.5.2-1 is revised to be consistent with the
modified Table 3.3.6.1-1.
The proposed changes have been reviewed by the JAF Plant Operations Review Committee
in accordance with the requirements of the Exelon Quality Assurance Program.
Attachment 1 provides the Evaluation of Proposed Changes. Attachment 2 provides the
Proposed TS Marked-Up Page. Attachment 3 provides the Proposed Technical
Specifications Bases Marked-Up Page for information only. Attachment 4 provides Technical
Specification Bases Pages Summarizing Setpoint Methodology for information only.
Exelon requests approval of the proposed amendment by August 30, 2020. Once approved,
the amendment shall be implemented within 60 days.
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
License Amendment Request
RWCU RPV Water Level Isolation Setpoint
Docket No. 50-333
September 5, 2019
Page2
This amendment request contains no regulatory commitments.
Exelon has concluded that the proposed change presents no significant hazards
consideration under the standards set forth in 10 CFR 50.92.
In accordance with 10 CFR 50.91, "Notice for public comment; State consultation,"
paragraph (b), Exelon is transmitting a copy of this application and its attachments to the
designated State Officials.
Should you have any questions concerning this submittal, please contact Christian Williams
at (610) 765-5729.
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on the
5th day of September 2019.
Respectfully,
~._ .J ·-r ~oJr- ~
Director - Licensing & Regulatory Affairs
Exelon Generation Company, LLC
Attachments:
1) Evaluation of Proposed Changes
2) Proposed Technical Specification Marked-Up Page
3) Proposed Technical Specification Bases Marked-Up Page
4) Technical Specification Bases Pages Summarizing Setpoint Methodology
cc: USNRC Region I, Regional Administrator
USNRC Senior Resident Inspector, JAF
USNRC Project Manager, JAF
A. L. Peterson, NYSERDA
w/attachments
w/attachments
w/attachments
w/attachments
ATTACHMENT 1
License Amendment Request
James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant
Docket No. 50-333
EVALUATION OF PROPOSED CHANGES
License Amendment Request Attachment 1 - RWCU RPV Water Level Isolation Setpoint
Docket No. 50-333
Evaluation of Proposed Changes
1.0 SUMMARY DESCRIPTION
Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.90, "Application for amendment of license, construction permit, or early
site permit," Exelon Generation Company, LLC (Exelon) proposes changes to the Technical
Specifications (TS), Appendix A, of Renewed Facility Operating License No. DPR-59 for James
A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant (JAF).
The proposed changes revise the JAF TS Allowable Value for RWCU System isolation on low
Reactor Pressure Vessel (RPV) water level from Level 3 (≥ 177 inches) to Level 2 (≥ 107
inches) in Table 3.3.6.1-1. JAF TS Table 3.3.5.2-1 is revised to be consistent with the modified
Table 3.3.6.1-1.
2.0 DETAILED DESCRIPTION
The proposed changes address issues related to initiation of Reactor Water Cleanup (RWCU)
System isolation at the same Reactor Pressure Vessel (RPV) water level as the Reactor
Protection System (RPS) low RPV water level trip. RWCU System isolation coincident with
reactor scram can complicate post-trip recovery due to the inability to reject water from the RPV
bottom head region if the system cannot be quickly restored to service. Inability to remove water
from the bottom head can lead to thermal stratification as the result of inflow of cold water
through the Control Rod Drives.
Implementation of this change will require installation of new analog trips units associated with
RPV wide range water level transmitters to develop a trip signal for incorporation in the existing
logic circuits for the isolation valves. This change is required since the existing logic is supplied
from trip units associated with RPV narrow range level transmitters. The range of the narrow
range transmitters is insufficient to support the revised Allowable Value.
Proposed Revision to Table 3.3.6.1-1:
The Function and Allowable Value for Table 3.3.6.1-1 Function 5.e., Reactor Water Cleanup
(RWCU) System Isolation Reactor Vessel Water Level – Low (Level 3) are changed to Reactor
Vessel Water Level – Low Low (Level 2) and ≥ 107 inches respectively.
The purpose of the proposed change is to separate the RWCU System Isolation on low RPV
water level from the reactor scram on the same parameter to facilitate improved control of RPV
water level and bottom head temperature post-trip.
Proposed Revision to Table 3.3.5.2-1:
The Function and Allowable Value for Table 3.3.5.2-1 Function 4.a., Reactor Water Cleanup
(RWCU) System Isolation Reactor Vessel Water Level – Low Level 3 are changed to Reactor
Vessel Water Level – Low Low Level 2 and ≥ 107 inches respectively.
The purpose of the proposed change is to maintain consistency between TS Tables 3.3.6.1-1
and 3.3.5.2-1.
Proposed Bases Revision:
The JAF TS Bases for Primary Containment Isolation Instrumentation and RPV Water Inventory
Control Instrumentation are revised consistent with the proposed changes to Tables 3.3.6.1-1
and 3.3.5.2-1 respectively.
3.0 TECHNICAL EVALUATION
Primary containment isolation instrumentation automatically initiates closure of Primary
Containment Isolation Valves (PCIVs). PCIVs in conjunction with other accident mitigation
systems limit fission product release during and following postulated Design Basis Accidents
(DBAs). The low RPV water level signal is a diverse signal indicating that the capability to cool
the fuel may be threatened. Isolation of the system on this signal potentially limits reactor
coolant loss for breaks located in the RWCU system outside of the Primary Containment (see
below for further discussion). RWCU isolation on low RPV water level is not directly assumed in
Updated Final Safety Analysis Report (UFSAR) safety analyses since the effects of a RWCU
line break are bounded by breaks in larger piping systems such as Reactor Water Recirculation
(RWR) and Main Steam.
The primary RWCU System flow path is from the RWR System with a secondary path from the
RPV bottom head drain. Breaks in RWCU piping are considered as part of the RWR pipe break
spectrum analysis. The volume of water in the RWCU system is a small fraction of that
contained in the RWR piping and RPV lower plenum. Any effect of this additional water on Peak
Cladding Temperature is negligible, even without RWCU System isolation. The Emergency
Core Cooling System - Loss of Coolant Accident (ECCS-LOCA) analysis methodology does not
include assumption of RWCU isolation, nor include the water in the RWCU system for breaks
inside of containment. Therefore, changing the RPV water level setpoint for RWCU isolation has
no effect on the ECCS-LOCA analysis.
The bounding break for containment analysis is a double-ended guillotine break of an RWR
suction line. If not isolated, a small additional source of hot water is available from the piping
between the inboard isolation valve and the check valves at the discharge of the RWCU pumps.
This mass of water could be added to the RPV for non-recirculation line breaks, or directly to
Primary Containment for RWCU or RWR line breaks. This mass and energy will ultimately be
transported to the Suppression Pool and contribute an additional rise in pool temperature of less
than 0.1°F assuming no RWCU System isolation. This small change is bounded by
conservatisms in the containment analysis methods and assumptions, or conservatisms in other
inputs. As such, there is no significant effect on containment response.
Environmental Qualification of Electrical Equipment outside of Primary Containment includes
consideration of RWCU High Energy Line Breaks (HELB). The JAF HELB analysis is based on
system isolation due to high area temperatures in spaces enclosing postulated break locations.
No credit is taken for isolation on low RPV water level in these analyses, therefore lowering of
the Allowable Value for the isolation setpoint can have no effect on analyzed HELB response.
Analyses supporting JAF operation utilize two values for the RPV Level 2 Analytical Limit
dependent on application. The higher of the two values is used for initiation of the High Pressure
Coolant Injection (HPCI) and Reactor Core Isolation Cooling (RCIC) Systems, while the lower
value is used for Anticipated Transient Without Scram-Recirculation Pump Trip (ATWS-RPT)
initiation (as well as for initiation of Alternate Rod Injection, ARI). The analysis supporting this
License Amendment Request also used the lower of the two Analytical Limits. Use of staggered
limits (and associated setpoints) provides an opportunity for HPCI and/or RCIC to restore RPV
water level during slow moving transients without further actions that would complicate transient
response. Allowable Values associated with each Analytical Limit is dependent on
instrumentation characteristics and may differ between functions.
4.0 REGULATORY EVALUATION
4.1 Applicable Regulatory Requirements/Criteria
The following regulatory requirements have been considered:
Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), Section 50.36, "Technical specifications,"
in which the Commission established its regulatory requirements related to the contents of the
TS. Specifically, 10 CFR 50.36(c)(2)(i) states, in part, "Limiting conditions for operation are the
lowest functional capability or performance levels of equipment required for safe operation of
the facility." 10 CFR 50.36(c)(2)(ii) states, "A technical specification limiting condition for
operation of a nuclear reactor must be established for each item meeting one or more of the
following criteria:" 10 CFR 50.36(c)(2)(ii)(A) states, “Installed instrumentation that is used to
detect, and indicate in the control room, a significant abnormal degradation of the reactor
coolant pressure boundary.”
The proposed changes to the Primary Containment Isolation and RPV Water Inventory Control
Instrumentation Allowable Values do not affect compliance with these regulations.
The applicable 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix A, General Design Criteria (GDC), were considered
as follows:
Criterion 13 – Instrumentation and control. Instrumentation shall be provided to monitor
variables and systems over their anticipated ranges for normal operation, for anticipated
operational occurrences, and for accident conditions as appropriate to assure adequate safety,
including those variables and systems that can affect the fission process, the integrity of the
reactor core, the reactor coolant pressure boundary, and the containment and its associated
systems. Appropriate controls shall be provided to maintain these variables and systems within
prescribed operating ranges.
The proposed change maintains RPV water level as a parameter monitored to detect
degradation of the Reactor Coolant Pressure Boundary and initiate action to isolate Primary
Containment to limit fission product release. The revised Allowable Value for RWCU isolation
initiation is consistent with the values used for ECCS initiation. The instrumentation used to
perform the RWCU isolation function will be the JAF Analog Transmitter Trip System (ATTS)
that includes redundant Reactor vessel wide range level transmitters, Master Trip Units and
Slave Trip Units. The use of ATTS assures an acceptable operating range and takes advantage
of existing surveillance requirements as specified with the Technical Specifications.
Criterion 20 – Protective system functions. The protection system shall be designed (1) to
initiate automatically the operation of appropriate systems including the reactivity control
systems, to assure that specified acceptable fuel design limits are not exceeded as a result of
anticipated operational occurrences and (2) to sense accident conditions and to initiate the
operation of systems and components important to safety.
The proposed change senses RPV water level to detect degradation of the Reactor Coolant
Pressure Boundary and initiate action to isolate Primary Containment to limit fission product
release.
The proposed Allowable Value is based on new setpoint and uncertainty calculations. These
calculations utilize the methodology as described within the Technical Specification Bases
Revision 40 section B.3.3.6.1 and as referenced within section B.3.3.5.2 (attachment 4). This
methodology was reviewed by the NRC during the JAF conversion to Improved Technical
Specifications and utilizes an Analytical Limit that ensures the Safety Limit is not exceeded. The
Nominal Trip Setpoint is selected to assure the proposed Allowable Value is not exceeded. The
RWCU isolation function will be performed using the JAF ATTS thus the instrument loop error
and calibration limits (As Found and As Left) are calculated consistent with the other JAF ATTS
uncertainty calculations.
Criterion 22 – Protection system independence. The protection system shall be designed to
assure that the effects of natural phenomena, and of normal operating, maintenance, testing,
and postulated accident conditions on the redundant channels do not result in loss of the
protection function or shall be demonstrated to be acceptable on some other defined basis.
Design techniques, such as functional diversity in component design and principles of operation,
shall be used to the extent practical to prevent loss of the protection function.
The proposed change continues to use RPV water level to detect degradation of the Reactor
Coolant Pressure Boundary and initiate action to isolate Primary Containment to limit fission
product release. This is a signal diverse from monitoring drywell pressure to accomplish the
same purposes.
Criterion 24 – Separation of protection and control systems. The protection system shall be
separated from control systems to the extent that failure of any single control system component
or channel, or failure or removal from service of any single protection system component or
channel which is common to the control and protection systems leaves intact a system
satisfying all reliability, redundancy, and independence requirements of the protection system.
Interconnections of the protection and control systems shall be limited so as to assure that
safety is not significantly impaired.
The proposed change maintains RPV water level as a parameter monitored to detect
degradation of the Reactor Coolant Pressure Boundary and initiate action to isolate Primary
Containment to limit fission product release. The revised system configuration is consistent with
the current design in use of separate level transmitters processed through analog trip units to
generate signals further processed by relay logic to initiate RWCU isolation valve motion.
4.2 No Significant Hazards Consideration
Exelon has evaluated whether or not a significant hazards consideration is involved with the
proposed amendment by focusing on the three standards set forth in 10 CFR 50.92, "Issuance
of amendment," as discussed below:
1. Does the proposed amendment involve a significant increase in the probability or
consequences of an accident previously evaluated?
License Amendment Request Attachment 1
RWCU RPV Water Level Isolation Setpoint Page 5 of 6
Docket No. 50-333
Evaluation of Proposed Changes
Response: No.
RWCU System isolation on changing RPV water level is a response to an accident,
rather than an initiator, therefore changing the Allowable Value at which this is
accomplished has no effect on the probability of occurrence.
The fuel peak cladding temperature response to line breaks the RWCU low RPV water
level isolation mitigates are bounded by Reactor Water Recirculation and Main Steam
line breaks, therefore there is no increase in consequences of these accidents as a
result of lowering the Allowable Value for the isolation.
There may be a small increase in peak suppression pool temperature as a result of
lowering the RWCU low RPV water level isolation Allowable Value. This potential effect
is bounded by conservative modeling assumptions, inputs, and methods and is
insignificant.
Therefore, the proposed changes do not involve a significant increase in the probability
or consequences of an accident previously evaluated.
2. Does the proposed amendment create the possibility of a new or different kind of
accident from any accident previously evaluated?
Response: No.
Implementation of the proposed amendment will require installation of new trip units to
develop signals for input to the RWCU isolation logic utilizing RPV wide range water
level transmitters instead of the narrow range transmitters currently used. This will not
alter the principles of operation of the system, therefore no new failure modes or
mechanisms are introduced.
Therefore, the proposed changes do not create the possibility of a new or different kind
of accident from any accident previously evaluated.
3. Does the proposed amendment involve a significant reduction in a margin of
safety?
Response: No.
Lowering the Allowable Value for the RWCU isolation on RPV water level from Low
(Level 3) to Low Low (Level 2) will introduce a small delay in isolation valve closure for
line breaks within Primary Containment. The LOCA radiological analysis assumes no
specific closure time for Primary Containment Isolation Valves, therefore there can be no
effect on this safety margin.
As stated previously, the change in Allowable Value has an insignificant effect on peak
suppression pool temperature, therefore there is also no significant reduction in margin
of safety for this parameter.
Therefore, the proposed changes do not involve a significant reduction in a margin of
safety.
License Amendment Request Attachment 1
RWCU RPV Water Level Isolation Setpoint Page 6 of 6
Docket No. 50-333
Evaluation of Proposed Changes
Based on the above, Exelon concludes that the proposed amendment does not involve a
significant hazards consideration under the standards set forth in 10 CFR 50.92(c) and,
accordingly, a finding of “no significant hazards consideration” is justified.
5.0 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATION
A review has determined that the proposed amendment would change a requirement with
respect to installation or use of a facility component located within the restricted area, as defined
in 10 CFR 20, or would change an inspection or surveillance requirement. However, the
proposed amendment does not involve (i) a significant hazards consideration, (ii) a significant
change in the types or significant increase in the amounts of any effluent that may be released
offsite, or (iii) a significant increase in individual or cumulative occupational radiation exposure.
Accordingly, the proposed amendment meets the eligibility criterion for categorical exclusion set
forth in 10 CFR 51.22(c)(9). Therefore, pursuant to 10 CFR 51.22(b), no environmental impact
statement or environmental assessment need be prepared in connection with the proposed
amendment.
6.0 REFERENCES
1. 005N2981, “James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant Reactor Water Level Setpoint
Change for Reactor Water Cleanup System Isolation,” Rev. 0, July 2019
ATTACHMENT 2
License Amendment Request
James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant
Docket No. 50-333
Proposed Change to the Technical Specifications Allowable Value for Reactor Water
Cleanup (RWCU) System Primary Containment Isolation
Proposed Technical Specification Marked-Up Page
TS Page
3.3.5.2-3
3.3.6.1-10
RPV Water Inventory Control Instrumentation
3.3.5.2
JAFNPP 3.3.5.2-3 Amendment 321
Table 3.3.5.2-1 (page 1 of 1)
Reactor Pressure Vessel (RPV) Water Inventory Control Instrumentation
FUNCTION
APPLICABLE
MODES OR
OTHER
SPECIFIED
CONDITIONS
REQUIRED
CHANNELS
PER
FUNCTION
CONDITIONS
REFERENCED
FROM
REQUIRED
ACTION A.1
SURVEILLANCE
REQUIREMENTS
ALLOWABLE
VALUE
1. Core Spray
a. Reactor
Pressure –
Low (Injection
Permissive)
4, 5 4(a) C SR 3.3.5.2.1
SR 3.3.5.2.2
< 490 psig
b. Core Spray
Pump
Discharge
Flow – Low
(Bypass)
4, 5 1 per pump
(a)
SR 3.3.5.2.2
> 510 gpm
and
< 980 gpm
c. Core Spray
Pump
Discharge
Pressure –
High (Bypass)
4, 5 1 per pump
(a)
SR 3.3.5.2.2
> 90 psig
and
< 110 psig
2. Low Pressure Coolant
Injection (LPCI) System
a. Reactor
Pressure –
Low (Injection
Permissive)
4, 5 4(a) C SR 3.3.5.2.1
SR 3.3.5.2.2
< 490 psig
b. Low Pressure
Coolant
Injection
Pump
Discharge
Flow – Low
(Bypass)
4, 5 1 per pump
(a)
SR 3.3.5.2.2
> 1040 gpm
and
< 1665 gpm
3. RHR System Isolation
a. Reactor
Vessel Water
Level – Low,
Level 3
(b) 2 in one trip
system
SR 3.3.5.2.2
> 177 inches
(RWCU) System
Isolation
a. Reactor
Vessel Water
Level – Low
Low Level 32
(b) 2 in one trip
system
SR 3.3.5.2.2
> 177 107
inches
(a) Associated with an ECCS subsystem required to be OPERABLE by LCO 3.5.2, “Reactor Pressure Vessel (RPV) Water Inventory Control.”
(b) When automatic isolation of the associated penetration flow path(s) is credited in calculating DRAIN TIME.
Primary Containment Isolation Instrumentation
3.3.6.1
JAFNPP 3.3.6.1-10 Amendment 321
Table 3.3.6.1-1 (page 5 of 6)
Primary Containment Isolation Instrumentation
FUNCTION
APPLICABLE
MODES OR
OTHER
SPECIFIED
CONDITIONS
REQUIRED
CHANNELS
PER TRIP
SYSTEM
CONDITIONS
REFERENCED
FROM
REQUIRED
ACTION C.1
SURVEILLANCE
REQUIREMENTS
ALLOWABLE
VALUE
5. Reactor Water Cleanup (RWCU)
System Isolation
a. RWCU Suction Line
Penetration Area
Temperature — High
1,2,3
1
F
SR 3.3.6.1.7
≤ 144°F
b. RWCU Pump Area
Temperature — High
1,2,3
1 per
room
F
SR 3.3.6.1.7
≤ 165°F for Pump
Room A and ≤
175°F for Pump
Room B
c. RWCU Heat
Exchanger Room Area
Temperature — High
1,2,3 1 F SR 3.3.6.1.3
SR 3.3.6.1.7
≤ 155°F
d. SLC System Initiation 1,2 2(d) I SR 3.3.6.1.7 NA
e. Reactor Vessel Water Level —
Low Low (Level 32)
1,2,3 2 F SR 3.3.6.1.1
SR 3.3.6.1.2
SR 3.3.6.1.5
≥ 177 107 inches
f. Drywell Pressure — High 1,2,3 2 F SR 3.3.6.1.1
SR 3.3.6.1.2
SR 3.3.6.1.5
≤ 2.7 psig
6. Shutdown Cooling System Isolation
a. Reactor Pressure — High
1,2,3
1
F
SR 3.3.6.1.2
SR 3.3.6.1.5
≤ 74 psig
b. Reactor Vessel Water Level —
Low (Level 3)
3
2
J
SR 3.3.6.1.2
SR 3.3.6.1.5
≥ 177 inches
(continued)
(d) SLC System Initiation only inputs into one of the two trip systems and only isolates one valve in the RWCU suction and return line.
ATTACHMENT 3
License Amendment Request
James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant
Docket No. 50-333
Proposed Change to the Technical Specifications Allowable Value for Reactor Water
Cleanup (RWCU) System Primary Containment Isolation
Proposed Technical Specification Bases Marked-Up Page
(for information only)
Bases Page
B 3.3.5.2-5
B 3.3.6.1-4
B 3.3.6.1-18
B 3.3.6.1-19
RPV Water Inventory Control Instrumentation
B 3.3.5.2
BASES
APPLICABLE
SAFETY ANALYSIS,
LCO, and
APPLICABILITY
3.a - Reactor Vessel Water Level - Low, Level 3 (continued)
Instrumentation Reactor Vessel Water Level - Low, Level 3 Allowable
Value (LCO 3.3.6.1), since the capability to cool the fuel may be
threatened.
The Reactor Vessel Water Level - Low, Level 3 Function is only
required to be OPERABLE when automatic isolation of the associated
penetration flow path is credited in calculating DRAIN TIME. This
Function isolates the Group 11 valves.
Reactor Water Cleanup (RWCU) System Isolation
4.a - Reactor Vessel Water level -– Low Low, Level 32
The definition of Drain Time allows crediting the closing of penetration
flow paths that are capable of being isolated by valves that will close
automatically without offsite power prior to the RPV water level being
equal to the TAF when actuated by RPV water level isolation
instrumentation. The Reactor Vessel Water Level – Low Low (Level 32)
Function associated with RWCU System isolation may be credited for
automatic isolation of penetration flow paths associated with the
RWCU System.
Reactor Vessel Water Level -– Low Low, (Level 32) signals are
initiated from four level transmitters that sense the difference
between the pressure due to a constant column of water (reference
leg) and the pressure due to the actual water level (variable leg) in
the vessel.
While four channels (two channels per trip system) of the Reactor
Vessel Water Level – Low (Level 3) Function are available, only two
channels (all in the same trip system) are required to be OPERABLE.
The Reactor Vessel Water Level - Low (Level 3) Allowable Value was
chosen to be the same as the RPS Reactor Vessel Water Level – Low
Low (Level 32) Allowable Value (LCO 3.3.1.1), since the capability to
cool the fuel may be threatened. The allowable value is referenced
from a level of water 352.56 inches above ther lowest point in the
inside bottom of the RPV and also corresponds to the top of a 144
inch fuel column (Ref 6).
The Reactor Vessel Water Level – Low Low (Level 23) Function is only
required to be OPERABLE when automatic isolation of the associated
penetration flow path is credited in calculating DRAIN TIME. This
Function isolates the Group 5 valves.
(continued)
JAFNPP B 3.3.5.2-5 Revision 38
Primary Containment Isolation Instrumentation
B 3.3.6.1
BASES
BACKGROUND
3, 4. High Pressure Coolant Injection System Isolation and Reactor
Core Isolation Cooling System Isolation (continued)
two-out-of-two trip systems. The output of each equipment area
temperature channel is connected to one trip system so that any
channel will trip its associated trip system. This arrangement is
consistent with all other area temperature Functions, in that any
channel will trip its associated trip system.
5.Reactor Water Cleanup System Isolation
The Reactor Vessel Water Level — Low Low (Level 32) and Drywell
Pressure
— High Isolation Functions (Functions 5.e and 5.f) receive input from
four channels. The outputs from these channels are connected into
two two-out-of-two trip systems for each function. The SLC System
Initiation Function (Function 5.d) receives input from two channels,
with both channels providing input to one trip system. Any channel will
initiate the trip logic. The Function is initiated by placing the SLC
System initiation switch in any position other than stop (start system A
or start system B). Therefore, a channel is defined as the circuitry
required to trip the trip logic when the switch is in position start system
A or start system B. The Area Temperature — High Functions
(Functions 5.a, 5.b and 5.c) receive input from eight temperature
monitors, four to each trip system. These are configured so that any
one input will trip the associated trip system. Each of the two trip
systems is connected to one of the two valves on the RWCU suction
penetration and only one trip system is connected to the RWCU return
penetration outboard valve. The trip system associated with the SLC
System Initiation Function is connected to the outboard RWCU suction
valve and the outboard RWCU return penetration valve.
6.Shutdown Cooling System Isolation
The Reactor Vessel Water Level — Low (Level 3) Function (Function
6.b) receives input from four reactor vessel water level channels. The
outputs from the reactor vessel water level channels are connected to
two two-out-of-two trip systems. Each of the two trip systems is
connected to one of the two valves on the RHR shutdown cooling
pump suction penetration and on one of the two inboard LPCI
injection valves if in shutdown cooling mode. The Reactor Pressure —
High Function (Function 6.a) receives input from two channels, with
each channel providing input into each trip system using a
one-out-of-two logic. However, only one channel input is required to be
OPERABLE for a trip system to be considered OPERABLE. Each of the
two trip systems is connected to one of the two valves on the
shutdown cooling pump suction penetration.
(continued)
JAFNPP B 3.3.6.1-4 Revision 38
Primary Containment Isolation Instrumentation
B 3.3.6.1
BASES
APPLICABLE
SAFETY ANALYSIS,
LCO, and
APPLICABILITY
(continued)
5.d. SLC System Initiation
The isolation of the RWCU System is required when the SLC System
has been initiated to prevent dilution and removal of the boron
solution by the RWCU System (Ref. 6). The RWCU isolation signal is
initiated when the control room SLC initiation switch is in any position
other than stop.
There is no Allowable Value associated with this Function since the
channels are mechanically actuated based solely on the position of
the SLC System initiation switch.
Two channels (start system A or start system B) of the SLC System
Initiation Function are available and are required to be OPERABLE
only in MODES 1 and 2, since these are the only MODES where the
reactor can be critical, and these MODES are consistent with the
Applicability for the SLC System (LCO 3.1.7).
As noted (footnote (d) to Table 3.3.6.1-1), this Function is only
required to close one of the RWCU suction isolation valves and one
return isolation valve since the signals only provide input into one of
the two trip systems.
5.e. Reactor Vessel Water Level — Low Low (Level 32)
Low RPV water level indicates that the capability to cool the fuel may
be threatened. Should RPV water level decrease too far, fuel damage
could result. Therefore, isolation of some interfaces with the reactor
vessel occurs to isolate the potential sources of a break. The isolation
of the RWCU System on Level 32 supports actions to ensure that the
fuel peak cladding temperature remains below the limits of
10 CFR 50.46. The Reactor Vessel Water Level — Low Low (Level 32)
Function associated with RWCU isolation is not directly assumed in
the UFSAR safety analyses because the RWCU System line break is
bounded by breaks of larger systems (recirculation and MSL breaks
are more limiting).
Reactor Vessel Water Level — Low Low (Level 32) signals are initiated
from four level transmitters that sense the difference between the
pressure due to a constant column of water (reference leg) and the
pressure due to the actual water level (variable leg) in the vessel.
Four channels of Reactor Vessel Water Level — Low Low (Level 32)
Function are available and are required to be OPERABLE to ensure
that no single instrument failure can preclude the isolation function.
The Reactor Vessel Water Level — Low Low (Level 32) Allowable Value
was chosen to be the same as the RPS Reactor Vessel Water Level —
Low Low (Level 2)
(continued)
JAFNPP B 3.3.6.1-18 Revision 38
Primary Containment Isolation Instrumentation
B 3.3.6.1
BASES
APPLICABLE
SAFETY ANALYSIS,
LCO, and
APPLICABILITY
5.e. Reactor Vessel Water Level — Low (Level 3) (continued)
(Level 3) Allowable Value (LCO 3.3.1.1), since the capability to cool
the fuel may be threatened. The Allowable Value is referenced from a
level of water 352.56 inches above the lowest point in the inside
bottom of the RPV and also corresponds to the top of a 144 inch fuel
column (Ref. 13).
This Function isolates both RWCU suction valves and the RWCU
return valve.
5.f. Drywell Pressure — High
High drywell pressure can indicate a break in the RCPB inside the
primary containment. The isolation of some of the primary
containment isolation valves on high drywell pressure supports
actions to ensure that offsite dose limits of 10 CFR 100 are not
exceeded. The Drywell Pressure — High Function, associated with
isolation of the primary containment, is implicitly assumed in the
UFSAR accident analysis as these leakage paths are assumed to be
isolated post LOCA.
High drywell pressure signals are initiated from pressure transmitters
that sense the pressure in the drywell. Four channels of Drywell
Pressure — High are available and are required to be OPERABLE to
ensure that no single instrument failure can preclude the isolation
function.
The Allowable value was selected to be as low as possible without
inducing spurious trips. The Allowable Value is chosen to be the same
as the RPS Drywell Pressure — High Allowable Value (LCO 3.3.1.1),
since this may be indicative of a LOCA inside primary containment.
This Function isolates both RWCU suction valves and one RWCU
return valve.
6.a. Reactor Pressure — High
The Reactor Pressure — High Function is provided to isolate the
shutdown cooling portion of the Residual Heat Removal (RHR)
System. This interlock Function is provided only for equipment
protection to prevent an intersystem LOCA scenario, and credit for the
interlock is not assumed in the accident or transient analysis in the
The Reactor Pressure — High signals are initiated from two
transmitters that are connected to different condensing chambers.
(continued)
JAFNPP B 3.3.6.1-19 Revision 38
ATTACHMENT 4
License Amendment Request
James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant
Docket No. 50-333
Proposed Change to the Technical Specifications Allowable Value for Reactor Water
Cleanup (RWCU) System Primary Containment Isolation
Technical Specification Bases Pages Summarizing Setpoint Methodology
(for information only)
RPV Water Inventory Control Instrumentation
83.3.5.2
B 3.3 INSTRUMENTATION
B 3.3.5.2 Reactor Pressure Vessel (RPV) Water lnventary Control Instrumentation
BASES
BACKGROUND
The RPV contains penetrations below the top of the active fuel (TAF)
that have the potential to drain the reactor coolant inventory to below
the TAF. If the water level should drop below the TAF, the ability to
remove decay heat is reduced, which could lead to elevated cladding
temperatures and clad perforation. Safety Limit 2.1.1.3 requires the
RPV water level to be above the top of the active irradiated fuel at all
times to prevent such elevated cladding temperatures.
Technical Specifications are required by 10 CFR 50.36 to include
limiting safety system settings (LSSS) for variables that have
significant safety functions. LSSS are defined by the regulation as
•where a LSSS is specified for a variable on which a safety limit has
been placed, the setting must be chosen so that automatic protective
actions will correct the abnormal situation before a Safety Limit (SL)
is exceeded.• The Analytical Limit is the limit of the process variable
at which a safety action is initiated to ensure that a SL is not
exceeded. Any automatic protection action that occurs on reaching
the Analytical Limit therefore ensures that the SL is not exceeded.
However, in practice, the actual settings for automatic protection
channels must be chosen to be more conservative than the Analytical
Limit to account for instrument loop uncertainties related to the
setting at which the automatic protective action would actually occur.
The actual settings for the automatic isolation channels are the same
as those established for the same functions in MODES 1, 2, and 3 in
LCO 3.3.5.1, "Emergency Core Cooling System (ECCS)
Instrumentation.a or LCO 3.3.6.1, ff Primary Containment Isolation
instrumentation".
With the unit in MODE 4 or 5, RPV water inventory control is not
required to mitigate any events or accidents evaluated in the safety
analyses. RPV water inventory control is required in MODES 4 and 5
to protect Safety Limit 2.1.1.3 and the fuel cladding barrier to prevent
the release of radioactive material should a draining event occur.
Under the definition of DRAIN TIME, some penetration flow paths may
be excluded from the DRAIN TIME calculation if they will be isolated
by valves that will close automatically without offsite power prior to
the RPV water level being equal to the TAF when actuated by RPV
water level isolation instrumentation.
(continued)
83.3.5.2-1 Revision 38
BASES
BACKGROUND
(continued)
APPLICABLE
SAFETY ANALYSIS,
LCO,and
APPLICABILITY
RPV Water Inventory Control Instrumentation
B3.3.5.2
The purpose of the RPV Water Inventory Control Instrumentation is to
support the requirements of LCO 3.5.2, "Reactor Pressure Vessel
(RPV) Water Inventory Control," and the definition of DRAIN TIME.
There are functions that are required for manual initiation or
operation of the ECCS injection/spray subsystem required to be
OPERABLE by LCO 3.5.2 and other functions that support automatic
isolation of Residual Heat Removal subsystem and Reactor Water
Cleanup system penetration flow path(s) on low RPV water level.
The RPV Water Inventory Control Instrumentation supports operation
of core spray (CS) and low pressure coolant injection (LPCI). The
equipment involved with each of these systems is described in the
Bases for LCO 3.5.2.
With the unit in MODE 4 or 5, RPV water inventory control is not
required to mitigate any events or accidents evaluated in the safety
analyses. RPV, LCO, water inventory control is required in MODES 4
and 5 to protect and Safety Limit 2.1.1.3 and the fuel cladding barrier
to prevent the release of radioactive material should a draining event
occur.
A double-ended guillotine break of the Reactor Coolant System (RCS)
is not postulated in MODES 4 and 5 due to the reduced RCS
pressure, reduced piping stresses, and ductile piping systems.
Instead, an event is postulated in which a single operator error or
initiating event allows draining of the RPV water inventory through a
single penetration flow path with the highest flow rate, or the sum of
the drain rates through multiple penetration flow paths susceptible to
a common mode failure (e.g., seismic event, loss of normal power,
single human error). It is assumed, based on engineering judgment,
that while in MODES 4 and 5, one low pressure ECCS injection/spray
subsystem can be manually initiated to maintain adequate reactor
vessel water level.
As discussed in References 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, operating experience
has shown RPV water inventory to be significant to public health and
safety. Therefore, RPV Water Inventory Control satisfies Criterion 4 of
Permissive and interlock setpoints are generally considered as
nominal values without regard to measurement accuracy.
(continued)
B3.3.5.2-2 Revision 38
BASES
BACKGROUND
(continued)
APPLICABLE
SAFETY ANALYSIS,
LCO, and
APPLICABI LllY
Primary Containment Isolation Instrumentation
B3.3.6.1
7. Traversing lncore Probe System Isolation
The Reactor Vessel Water Level - Low (Level 3) Isolation Function
receives input from two reactor vessel water level channels. The
outputs from the reactor vessel water level channels are connected
into one two-out-of-two logic trip system. The Drywell Pressure- High
Isolation function receives input from two drywell pressure channels.
The outputs from the drywell pressure channels are connected into
one two-out-of-two logic trip system.
When either Isolation Function actuates, the TIP drive mechanisms
will withdraw the TIPs, if inserted, and close the inboard TIP system
isolation ball valves when the TIPs are fully withdrawn. The outboard
TIP system isolation valves are manual shear valves.
The isolation signals generated by the primary containment isolation
instrumentation are implicitly assumed in the safety analyses of
References 2 and 3 to initiate closure of valves to limit offsite doses.
Refer to LCO 3.6.1.3, "Primary Containment Isolation Valves (PCIVs),"
Applicable Safety Analyses Bases for more detail of the safety
analyses.
Primary containment isolation instrumentation satisfies Criterion 3 of
10 CFR 50.36(c)(2)(ii) (Ref. 4). Certain instrumentation Functions are
retained for other reasons and are described below in the individual
Functions discussion.
The OPERABILllY of the primary containment instrumentation is
dependent on the OPERABILllY of the individual instrumentation
channel Functions specified in Table 3.3.6.1-1. Each Function must
have a required number of OPERABLE channels, with their setpoints
within the specified Allowable Values, where appropriate. A channel is
inoperable if its actual trip setpoint is not within its required Allowable
Value. The actual setpoint is calibrated consistent with applicable
setpoint methodology assumptions. Each channel must also respond
within its assumed response time, where appropriate.
Allowable Values are specified for each Primary Containment Isolation
Function specified in the Table. Nominal trip setpoints are specified in
the setpoint calculations. The nominal setpoints are selected to
ensure that the setpoints do not exceed the Allowable Value between
CHANNEL CALIBRATIONS. Operation with a trip setpoint less
conservative than the nominal trip setpoint, but within its Allowable
Value, is acceptable. Trip setpoints are those predetermined values of
output at which an action should take place. The setpoints are
(continued)
B3.3.6.1-5 Revision 38
BASES
APPLICABLE
SAFETY ANALYSIS,
LCO,and
(continued)
Primary Containment Isolation Instrumentation
B3.3.6.1
compared to the actual process parameter (e.g., reactor vessel water
level), and when the measured output value of the process parameter
exceeds the setpoint, the associated device (e.g., trip unit) changes
state. The analytic limits are derived from the limiting values of the
process parameters obtained from the safety analysis or other
appropriate documents. The trip setpoints are derived from the
analytical limits and account for all worst case instrumentation
uncertainties as appropriate (e.g., drift, process effects, calibration
uncertainties, and severe environmental errors (for channels that
must function in harsh environments as defined by 10 CFR 50.49)).
The trip setpoints derived in this manner provide adequate protection
because all expected uncertainties are accounted for. The Allowable
Values are then derived from the trip setpoints by accounting for
normal effects that would be seen during periodic surveillance or
calibration. These effects are instrumentation uncertainties observed
during normal operation (e.g., drift and calibration uncertainties).
Certain Emergency Core Cooling Systems (ECCS) and RCIC valves
(e.g., minimum flow) also serve the dual function of automatic PCIVs.
The signals that isolate these valves are also associated with the
automatic initiation of the ECCS and RCIC. The instrumentation
requirements and ACTIONS associated with these signals are
addressed in LCO 3.3.5.1, •Emergency Core Cooling Systems (ECCS)
Instrumentation," and LCO 3.3.5.3, "Reactor Core Isolation Cooling
(RCIC) System Instrumentation," and are not included in this LCO.
In general, the individual Functions are required to be OPERABLE in
MODES 1, 2, and 3 consistent with the Applicability for LCO 3.6.1.1,
"Primary Containment." Functions that have different Applicabilities
are discussed below in the individual Functions discussion.
The specific Applicable Safety Analyses, LCO, and Applicability
discussions are listed below on a Function by Function basis.
Main Steam Line Isolation
1.a. Reactor Vessel Water Level - Low Low Low (Level 1)
Low reactor pressure vessel (RPV) water level indicates that the
capability to cool the fuel may be threatened. Should RPV water level
decrease too far, fuel damage could result. Therefore, isolation of the
MSIVs and other interfaces with the reactor vessel occurs to prevent
offsite dose limits from being exceeded. The Reactor Vessel Water
Level - Low Low Low (Level 1) Function is one of the many Functions
assumed to be OPERABLE and capable of providing isolation signals.
The Reactor Vessel Water Level - Low Low Low (Level 1) Function
(continued)
B3.3.6.1-6 Revision 38