ML18107A098

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Ny DEC Response to Comments from NRC Letter Dated 05/09/2017
ML18107A098
Person / Time
Issue date: 04/13/2018
From:
Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards
To:
Beardsley M
Shared Package
ML18107A056 List:
References
Download: ML18107A098 (1)


Text

NYS DEC Response to NRC Compatibility Comments on Proposed Amendment to Part 380 Regulations DECs Portion of New Yorks Agreement State Program The New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) is one of three agencies within the state that implements New Yorks Agreement State Program. DECs authority is limited to the regulation of radioactive materials in the environment; DEC does not issue radioactive materials licenses. As such, DEC is only authorized to adopt those rules, or portions of those rules, that are applicable to the regulation of radioactive material in the environment.

Recent Communication Between DEC and NRC On March 29, 2017 DEC submitted its proposed amendments to the 6 NYCRR Part 380 regulations, Prevention and Control of Environmental Pollution by Radioactive Materials to NRC for review and comment. On May 9, 2017 NRC provided DEC with comments on three provisions of DECs proposed amendments to Part 380, and issued an updated State Regulatory Status (SRS) for DEC which reflected those comments. DEC does not agree with two of NRCs comments, as explained below.

DECs Response to NRC Comments Notification of Incidents (RATS 1991-4)

As stated by NRC in the previous SRS for DEC dated February 24, 2017, NYDEC does not need to implement this provision under its portion of the Agreement. The reason DEC does not need to adopt this provision is because it is already covered by the States licensing agencies, which captures the universe of regulated parties within the State.

Nonetheless, DEC included a Notification of Incidents provision in the proposed (and final) amendment to Part 380; the notification threshold in the proposed amendment is significantly lower than NRCs thresholds, to require reporting of environmental release incidents of interest to DEC.

However, NRCs May 9, 2017 comment did not reflect the fact DEC does not need to adopt this provision. NRCs comment stated that DEC needed to replace its proposal to require notification of incidents by the next business day to within 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br />. DEC disagrees with NRCs comment, because this requirement does not need to be adopted by DEC at all. Even if DEC were required to adopt this provision (which is not the case), this is a Category C provision - the essential objectives of the program element should be adopted by the State to avoid conflicts, duplications or gaps; the manner in which the essential objectives are addressed need not be the same as NRC. In addition, the notification threshold is significantly lower than the threshold in NRCs rule. On March 22, 2018, NRC revised the SRS for DEC to restate, NYDEC does not need to implement this provision under its portion of the Agreement.

Definition: Public Dose (RATS 1995-5)

DEC agrees with NRCs comment regarding this provision and has added the phrase from exposure to individuals administered radioactive material and released to the final rule as suggested by NRC.

Deliberate Misconduct (RATS 1998-1)

NRC made two comments regarding this provision. In its first comment, NRC stated that DECs proposed rule omitted the terms employees of a licensee and employees of a contractor or subcontractor. DEC disagrees with NRCs comment, because these terms are included in the proposed (and final) rule. Please see proposed Section 380-10.8(a) which states, This section applies to the following persons and their employees (emphasis added).

DEC agrees with NRCs second comment regarding this provision, and has added the phrase that causes or would have caused, if not detected to the final rule as suggested by NRC.