text
NRC FORM 366 (4-95)
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY. COMMISSION LXCENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER)
(See reverse for required number of digits/characters for each block)
APPROVED BY OMB NO. 31504104 EXPIRES 04/30/98 ESTIMATED BURDEN PER RESPONSE TO COMPLY WITH THIS MANDATORYINFORMATIONCOLLECTION REQUEST:
50.0 HRS.
REPORTED LESSONS LEARNED ARE INCORPORATED INTO THE UCENSING PROCESS ANDFED BACK TO INDUSTRY. FORWARD COMMENTS REGARDING BURDEN ESTIMATE TO THE INFORMATIONAND RECORDS MANAGEMENT BRANCH (TW F33),
U.S.
NUCLEAR REGULATORYCOMMISSION.WASHINGTON,DC 205554)001, FACIUTY NAMEII)
Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant (BFN) Unit 3 OOCKET NUMBER IS) 05000296 PAGE Is) 1 OF7 TITLE te)
The reactor scrammed after an APRM high flux scram signal occurred because of a partial closure of the turbine control valves due to a faulty EHC frequency/voltage converter card.
This scram resulted in ESF actuations.
'ONTH DAY YEAR EVENT DATE (5)
LER NUMBER 6)
SEQUENTIAL REVISION NUMBER NUMBER MONTH DAY YEAR REPORT DATE (7)
FACILITYNAME NA DOCKET NUMBER 05000 OTHER FACILITIES INVOLVED(8) 29 96 96
001
00 03 26 96 FACIU'TY NAME NA DOCKET NUMBER 05000 OPERATING MODE (9)
POWER LEVEL (10)
NAME N'9.9 or more)
(11) 20.2201(b) 20.2203(a)(1) 20.2203(a)(2)(i) 20.2203(a)(2)(ii) 20.2203(a)(2)(iii) 20.2203(a)(2)(iv) 20.2203(a)(2)(v) 20.2203(a)(3)(i) 20.2203(a)(3)(ii) 20.2203(a)(4) 50.36(c)(1) 50.36(c)(2)
LICENSEE CONTACT FOR THIS LER (12) 50.73(a)(2) (i) 50.73(a)(2)(ii) 50.73(a)(2)(iii)
)(
50.73(a)(2)(iv) 50.73(a)(2)(v) 50.73(a)(2)(vii) 50.73(a)(2)(viii) 50.73(a)(2)(x) 73.71 OTHER Iow Specrfy ln Abstract be or in NRC Form 366A TELEPHoNE NUMBER IrrKrude Ares code)
UANTTO THE REQUIREMENTS OF 10 CFR: (Check one THIS REPORT IS SUBMITTED FURS James E. Wallace, Compliance Engineer (205) 729-7874 COMPLETE ONE LINE FOR EACH COMPONENT FAILURE DESCRIBED IN THIS REPORT (13)
CAUSE
SYSTEM COMPONENT MANUFACTURER REPORTABLE TO NPRDS
CAUSE
SYSTEM COMPONENT MANUFACTURER TO NPRDS CNV G080 SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT EXPECTED (14)
YES (Ifyes, complete EXPECTED SUBMISSION DATE).
X NO EXPECTED SUBMISSION DATE (15)
MONTH DAY YEAR ABSTRACT (Limitto 1400 spaces, I.e., approximately 15 single-spaced typewritten lines) (16)
On February 29, 1996, at 0158 hours0.00183 days <br />0.0439 hours <br />2.612434e-4 weeks <br />6.0119e-5 months <br />, Browns Ferry Unit 3 was operating at 99.9 percent power and Unit 2 at approximately 94 percent power when the Unit 3 reactor scrammed after receiving a high APRM neutron flux signal.
The reactor scram followed a pressure transient when the output of the Electric Hydraulic Control (EHC) frequency/voltage converter (FVC) card associated with the speed control drifted to a setting that created a demand to ramp down the turbine control valves.
These conditions resulted in engineered safety feature (ESF) actuations.
Therefore, this event is reportable pursuant to 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), as any event or condition that resulted in manual or automatic actuation of any ESF including the reactor protection system.
The cause of this event resulted from a faulty turbine speed control EHC FVC card.
The immediate corrective action was to bring the reactor to a stable condition. The faulty card was replaced.
TVA plans to send the faulty card to the vendor for further investigation.
Any additional corrective actions that are developed as a result of the vendor's investigation will be implemented in accordance with TVA's corrective action process.
There was a previous LER (260/94005) that resulted from an EHC system malfunction; however, corrective actions taken'in LER 260/94005 would not have precluded this event.
'T)604010335 960326 PDR ADOCK 05000296 8
PDR 6
4-
4l
~ ~
~
~
~
~
I III '
~
1 1
~
~
~ ~
~
~
~
~
~ ~
~ ~
~
~ ~
~ ~
~
~ ~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~ ~
~ ~
~ ~
~
~
~
~ ~
~
~
~
~
~ ~
~ ~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~ ~
~
~
~
~
~
~ ~
~
t
~
~ ~
~ ~
0
~ ~
~
~ ~
~
~
~
~
0
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~ ~
~
~
~
~ ~(4-95)
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER)
TEXT CONTINUATION FACXLZTY NAhK 1)
Browns Ferry Unit 3 DOCKET 05000296 NUMBER NUMBER PAGE 3 of 7 96 001 00 TEXT more space is requir
~ use ad inona copies o orm (17)
At 0159 hours0.00184 days <br />0.0442 hours <br />2.628968e-4 weeks <br />6.04995e-5 months <br />, the main turbine [TA) was manually tripped by the Unit Operator (utility, licensed).
At 0208 hours0.00241 days <br />0.0578 hours <br />3.439153e-4 weeks <br />7.9144e-5 months <br />, Unit 3 was stabilized in accordance with 3-AOI-100-1, "Reactor Scram,"
and the affected systems were returned to standby readiness.
All systems responded as expected during the scram.
B.
The event is reportable pursuant to 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv) as a
condition that resulted in the manual or automatic actuations of any Engineered Safety Feature (ESF) including the reactor protection system (RPS).
Ino erab1e Structures, Co
- onents, or S stems that Contributed to the Event:
c.
The faulty turbine speed control EHC FVC cazd (model number 115D3332 Gl) was manufactured by General Electric Company.
Dates and A roximate Times of Ma'or Occurrences:
February 29, 1996 at 0158 CST The Unit 3 reactor control rods inserted based on an RPS actuation (high APRM neutron flux)
February 29, 1996 at 0159 CST February 29, 1996 at 0208 CST The main turbine was tripped manually.
The PCIS actuations were reset.
SGT and CREV systems are returned to standby readiness.
February 29, 1996 at 0425 CST TVA made a 4-hour nonemergency notification to NRC in accordance with 10 CFR 50.72 (b) (2) (ii).
D.
E.
Other S stems or Seconda Functions Affected:
None.
.Method of Discove The Unit 3 Control Room Operator [utility, licensed]
received a
high APRM neutron flux alarm.
This alarm was followed by additional alarms associated with a full-power reactor scram.
~I(4-95)
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
'LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER)
TEXT CONTINUATION PACZLZTY NAME Z
Browns Ferry Unit 3 DOCKET 05000296 LER NUMBER NUMBER NUMBER PAGE
(
)
4 of 7 96 --
001 00 TEXT (
more space is requir
~ use a iuona copies o orm I17) erator Actions:
Operator actions
taken during this event were as expected.
PCIS
- groups, SGT system, and CREV system were verified to have performed as expected.
The Unit 3 scram was reset.
The Unit 3 Operator initiated abnormal operations instruction (3-AOI-100-1) to ensure that the affected systems were brought to standby readiness.
G.
Safet S stem Res onses:
None.
ZZZ.
CAUSE OF THE EVENT
A.
Zmmediate
Cause
The immediate cause of this event was the partial closure of the Unit 3 turbine control valves that caused an increase of reactor pressure and resulted in an automatic scram after a high reactor flux alarm was received.
B.
Root Cause:
This, event resulted from an unexpected and random equipment failure, specifically, a faulty turbine speed control EHC FVC card.
The faulty card simulated a turbine overspeed condition and created a demand signal to ramp down the turbine control valves (from 54 percent open to 25 percent open) and to open the bypass valves (reducing the impact of the control valves closing).
Some bypass valves cycled as the turbine control valves ramped down.
- However, the reactor pressure continued to
- increase, and a high APRM neutron flux condition was sensed.
ZV.
ANALYSZS OF THE EVENT The throttling (closure to the 25 percent position) of the turbine control valves is similar but less severe than a previously analyzed
- event, Generator Load Rejection Without Bypass (GLRWB).
In the BFN Unit 3 Cycle 7 Supplemental Reload Licensing Report, fast closure of the main turbine control valves is analyzed assuming that the Bypass valves fail to open, resulting in a pressure transient.
During this LER event, the reactor experienced an increase of less than 30 psig in about.4 seconds.
In the GLRWB event, the reactor vessel pressure increases by more than 150 psig in about 2 seconds.
Therefore, this LER event is clearly bounded by the previous analysis, and the Safety Limit MCPR was not challenged.(4-95)
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER)
TEXT CONTINUATION PACZLZTY NAME 3)
Browns Ferry Unit 3 DOCKET 05000296 LER NUMBER NUMBER NUMBER PAGE 5of7 96 001 00 TEXT (I more space is requir, use a diuona copies o orm (11)
CORRECTZVE ACTIONS A.
Zmmediate Corrective Actions:
Immediate corrective action
was to manually trip the main turbine and to bring the reactor to a stable condition in accordance with site procedure 3-AOI-100-1.
B.
Corrective Actions to Prevent Recurrence:
During the troubleshooting of the EHC circuitry, it was revealed that a faulty FVC card associated with the turbine speed control circuitry was malfunctioning.
The faulty card was replaced and the replacement card was successfully tested.
TVA plans to send the faulty card to the vendor to perform a failure analysis of the EHC FVC card.
Any additional corrective act'ions that are taken as a result of the vendor's investigation will be incorporated in BFN's corrective action program (BFPER960169).'Z.
ADDZTZONAL ZNFORMATZON A.
Failed Co onents:
The faulty turbine speed control EHC FVC card (model number 115D3332 Gl) was manufactured by General Electric Company.
Previous LERs on Similar Events:
One previous LER (260/94005) resulted from an EHC system malfunction.
This previous LER's root cause was a failed EHC pressure regulator setpoint potentiometer.
However, in this LER (296/96001) the failed component was not a regulating potentiometer in the pressure control circuitry.
Therefore, no
corrective actions
taken in the previous LER would have precluded this. event.
'hese additional corrective actions are considered as enhancements and are not commitments.(4-95)
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER)
TEXT CONTINUATION PACZLZTX NAME Z
Browns Ferry Unit 3 DOCKET" 05000296 LER NUMBER NUMBER NUMBER PAGE 6 of 7 96 --
001 00 TEXT more space is requir, use a iuoira copies o orm (17)
VZZ.
COMMZTMENTS None.
Energy Industry Identification System (EIIS) system and component codes are identified in the text with brackets (e.g.,
fXX]).
0 jl
~
~
~
~ ~
~ ~
~
I ~ ~
~ ~
~
~
C.B 5 ES 5
4
~
4 I
~ I ~
~
~
~
~
~
II I
|
|---|
|
|
| | | Reporting criterion |
|---|
| 05000259/LER-1996-001-01, :on 960121,Unit 1/2 B DG Auto Started During Local Panel Testing.Caused by Failure of Blocking Diode in Start Failure Circuitry.Failed Diode Replaced & Panel Alarm Pushbutton Annuciation Circuitry Checked |
- on 960121,Unit 1/2 B DG Auto Started During Local Panel Testing.Caused by Failure of Blocking Diode in Start Failure Circuitry.Failed Diode Replaced & Panel Alarm Pushbutton Annuciation Circuitry Checked
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) | | 05000296/LER-1996-001-04, :on 960229,reactor Scrammed After APRM High Flux Scram Signal Because of Partial Closure of Turbine Control Valves Due to Faulty EHC Frequency/Voltage Converter Card.Main Turbine Manually Tripped & Faulty Card Replaced |
- on 960229,reactor Scrammed After APRM High Flux Scram Signal Because of Partial Closure of Turbine Control Valves Due to Faulty EHC Frequency/Voltage Converter Card.Main Turbine Manually Tripped & Faulty Card Replaced
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii) | | 05000260/LER-1996-001-03, :on 960216,10CFR50 App R Noncompliance Resulted in Plant Being Outside Design Basis & Being in Condition Not Covered by Plant Operating Instructions.Initiated Problem Evaluation |
- on 960216,10CFR50 App R Noncompliance Resulted in Plant Being Outside Design Basis & Being in Condition Not Covered by Plant Operating Instructions.Initiated Problem Evaluation
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii) | | 05000260/LER-1996-001, :on 960216,discovered That 10CFR50 App R Noncompliance Condition Existed Due to Failures to Correctly Implement Design Criteria During Original Development of App R Programs.Fire Watches Established |
- on 960216,discovered That 10CFR50 App R Noncompliance Condition Existed Due to Failures to Correctly Implement Design Criteria During Original Development of App R Programs.Fire Watches Established
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii) | | 05000259/LER-1996-002-02, :on 960328,EDG auto-started Due to Undervoltage Condition as Result of Personnel Error.Functional Tests on Breakers Associated W/Shutdown Bus Stopped & EDG Shutdown & Placed in Standby Readiness |
- on 960328,EDG auto-started Due to Undervoltage Condition as Result of Personnel Error.Functional Tests on Breakers Associated W/Shutdown Bus Stopped & EDG Shutdown & Placed in Standby Readiness
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) | | 05000296/LER-1996-002-04, :on 960421,unit Scrammed Following Loss of Reactor Feed Pump 3C.Caused by Personnel Error.Personnel Stabilized Reactor,Reactor Feed Pump 3C Isolated & Reactor Feed Pump 3C Oil Tank Refilled |
- on 960421,unit Scrammed Following Loss of Reactor Feed Pump 3C.Caused by Personnel Error.Personnel Stabilized Reactor,Reactor Feed Pump 3C Isolated & Reactor Feed Pump 3C Oil Tank Refilled
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii) | | 05000260/LER-1996-002-03, :on 960323 & 24,main Steam Isolation Valve Leak Rates Exceeded Acceptance Criteria.Caused by Excessive Leakage on a & C Inboard MSIV Line Valves.Leaking Valves Investigated |
- on 960323 & 24,main Steam Isolation Valve Leak Rates Exceeded Acceptance Criteria.Caused by Excessive Leakage on a & C Inboard MSIV Line Valves.Leaking Valves Investigated
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii) | | 05000259/LER-1996-003-03, :on 960403,Unit 2 Received Unplanned ESF Actuation.Caused by Electrician Introduced Fault Into ECCS Logic While Preparing Wires for Termination in Panel 2-9-81. Problem Evaluation Rept Initiated |
- on 960403,Unit 2 Received Unplanned ESF Actuation.Caused by Electrician Introduced Fault Into ECCS Logic While Preparing Wires for Termination in Panel 2-9-81. Problem Evaluation Rept Initiated
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) | | 05000296/LER-1996-003-04, :on 960501,unit 3 Scrammed on Low Reactor Water Level.Caused by Failure of Steam Packing Exhauster by Pass Flow Control Valve.Valve Replaced |
- on 960501,unit 3 Scrammed on Low Reactor Water Level.Caused by Failure of Steam Packing Exhauster by Pass Flow Control Valve.Valve Replaced
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) | | 05000260/LER-1996-003-02, :on 960328,determined That Fuel Movement Performed W/Inoperable Refueling Interlock.Caused by Misinterpretation of TS Requirements.Fuel Movement Activities Discontinued |
- on 960328,determined That Fuel Movement Performed W/Inoperable Refueling Interlock.Caused by Misinterpretation of TS Requirements.Fuel Movement Activities Discontinued
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) | | 05000296/LER-1996-004, :on 960717,loss of ECCS Division I & Division II Instrumentation Renders ECCS Equipment Inoperable.Caused by Loss of Inverter Output.Failed Components Replaced in Atu Inverter Circuitry & Instrumentation Logic Restored |
- on 960717,loss of ECCS Division I & Division II Instrumentation Renders ECCS Equipment Inoperable.Caused by Loss of Inverter Output.Failed Components Replaced in Atu Inverter Circuitry & Instrumentation Logic Restored
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) | | 05000296/LER-1996-004-01, Forwards LER 96-004-01,clarifying Analysis of Event Section Which Div I & II ECCS Equipment Remained Operable for Automatic Initiation | Forwards LER 96-004-01,clarifying Analysis of Event Section Which Div I & II ECCS Equipment Remained Operable for Automatic Initiation | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability | | 05000296/LER-1996-004-03, :on 960717,ECCS Division I Instrumentation Rendered ECCS Equipment Inoperable.Caused by Loss of Inverter Output.Cleared Fuse,Shorted SCR & Failed Inverter Control Board Was Replaced in ECCS Division I Atu Inverter |
- on 960717,ECCS Division I Instrumentation Rendered ECCS Equipment Inoperable.Caused by Loss of Inverter Output.Cleared Fuse,Shorted SCR & Failed Inverter Control Board Was Replaced in ECCS Division I Atu Inverter
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii) | | 05000260/LER-1996-004-01, :on 960425,Unit 2 SRV Pilot Cartridges Failed Setpoint Acceptance Tests.Caused by SRV Pilot Disc/Seat Bonding Resulting in SRV Setpoints Deviating.Valves Currently Being Retested & Recertified |
- on 960425,Unit 2 SRV Pilot Cartridges Failed Setpoint Acceptance Tests.Caused by SRV Pilot Disc/Seat Bonding Resulting in SRV Setpoints Deviating.Valves Currently Being Retested & Recertified
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(e)(2)(x) | | 05000296/LER-1996-004-02, Forwards LER 96-004-02,providing Root Causes for Four Failures of ECCS Inverters.Revision Bars Identify Where Changes Made | Forwards LER 96-004-02,providing Root Causes for Four Failures of ECCS Inverters.Revision Bars Identify Where Changes Made | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications | | 05000260/LER-1996-005-01, :on 960510,unit Automatically Scrammed on Low Reactor Water Level Due to Runback of Reactor Feed Pumps. Caused by Inadequate Design of Digital Feedwater Control Sys Software.Design Change Implemented |
- on 960510,unit Automatically Scrammed on Low Reactor Water Level Due to Runback of Reactor Feed Pumps. Caused by Inadequate Design of Digital Feedwater Control Sys Software.Design Change Implemented
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) | | 05000296/LER-1996-005-03, :on 960915,reactor Scrammed as Required by TSs Due to Trip of Reactor Recirculation Motor Generator Set 3A. Caused by Bus Bar in Generator Armature Circuit Failing. Collector Rings Were Replaced |
- on 960915,reactor Scrammed as Required by TSs Due to Trip of Reactor Recirculation Motor Generator Set 3A. Caused by Bus Bar in Generator Armature Circuit Failing. Collector Rings Were Replaced
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(A), Completion of TS Shutdown 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(s)(2)(viii) | | 05000260/LER-1996-005, Forwards LER 96-005-00 Re Unit 2 Automatic Scram on Low Reactor Water Level Occurred | Forwards LER 96-005-00 Re Unit 2 Automatic Scram on Low Reactor Water Level Occurred | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications | | 05000296/LER-1996-006-03, :on 961106,loss of ECCS Div 1 Instrumentation Rendered ECCS Equipment Inoperable.Caused by Cleared Fuse in ECCS Div.Fuse Replaced & Addl Testing to Challenge Replacement Fuse Performed |
- on 961106,loss of ECCS Div 1 Instrumentation Rendered ECCS Equipment Inoperable.Caused by Cleared Fuse in ECCS Div.Fuse Replaced & Addl Testing to Challenge Replacement Fuse Performed
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(s)(2)(ii) 10 CFR 50.73(s)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(s)(2)(iii) | | 05000260/LER-1996-006-01, :on 960402,process for Determination of Generic SLMCPR Values Might Not Always Give Most Conservative Result.Administrative Controls Instituted,Colr Revised & Amend Request Submitted |
- on 960402,process for Determination of Generic SLMCPR Values Might Not Always Give Most Conservative Result.Administrative Controls Instituted,Colr Revised & Amend Request Submitted
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii) | | 05000260/LER-1996-007-02, :on 961029,Unit 2 Scram on Turbine Control Valve Fast Closure Occurred Due to Loss of Excitation to Main Generator.Exciter Brushes Inspected & Replaced & Procedures Revised |
- on 961029,Unit 2 Scram on Turbine Control Valve Fast Closure Occurred Due to Loss of Excitation to Main Generator.Exciter Brushes Inspected & Replaced & Procedures Revised
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(s)(2)(v) 10 CFR 50.73(s)(2)(viii) 10 CFR 50.73(s)(2)(iii) | | 05000296/LER-1996-007, Forwards LER 96-007-00 Re Unplanned Esf.Caused by Inadequate Planning of step-text Work Order That Did Not Fully Isolate Circuit Prior to Adding External Power Supply | Forwards LER 96-007-00 Re Unplanned Esf.Caused by Inadequate Planning of step-text Work Order That Did Not Fully Isolate Circuit Prior to Adding External Power Supply | | | 05000296/LER-1996-007-04, On 961213,engineered Safety Feature Actuations Resulting from Inadequate Planning of step-text Work Order Occurred.Tripped Breaker Reset & LCO Condition Exited | On 961213,engineered Safety Feature Actuations Resulting from Inadequate Planning of step-text Work Order Occurred.Tripped Breaker Reset & LCO Condition Exited | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) 10 CFR 50.73(b)(2)(ii) | | 05000260/LER-1996-008-02, :on 961101,MS SR Valves Exceeded TS Required Setpoint Limit as Result of Disc/Seat Bonding.Caused by Corrosion Bonding of SRV Pilot Interface.Replaced All Thirteen Ms SR Valve Pilot Cartridges |
- on 961101,MS SR Valves Exceeded TS Required Setpoint Limit as Result of Disc/Seat Bonding.Caused by Corrosion Bonding of SRV Pilot Interface.Replaced All Thirteen Ms SR Valve Pilot Cartridges
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii) | | 05000260/LER-1996-008, :on 961101,Unit 2 Main Steam SRV Pilot Cartridges Failed Setpoint Tolerence Bench Tests.Caused by SRV Pilot Disc/Seat Bonding Resulting in SRV Setpoints.Srv Pilot Cartridges Replaced |
- on 961101,Unit 2 Main Steam SRV Pilot Cartridges Failed Setpoint Tolerence Bench Tests.Caused by SRV Pilot Disc/Seat Bonding Resulting in SRV Setpoints.Srv Pilot Cartridges Replaced
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii) | | 05000296/LER-1996-008-03, :on 961217,loss of ECCS Division II Instrumentation Caused ECCS Equipment to Be Inoperable. Replaced Cleared Fuse & Shorted SCR |
- on 961217,loss of ECCS Division II Instrumentation Caused ECCS Equipment to Be Inoperable. Replaced Cleared Fuse & Shorted SCR
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), Prohibited by Technical Specifications 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x) 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii) 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii) | | 05000296/LER-1996-008, Forwards LER 96-008,providing Details Concerning Loss of Instrumentation Input Logic for Plants Division II ECCS Due to Cleared Fuse & Shorted Silicon Controlled Rectifier in Atu Inverter | Forwards LER 96-008,providing Details Concerning Loss of Instrumentation Input Logic for Plants Division II ECCS Due to Cleared Fuse & Shorted Silicon Controlled Rectifier in Atu Inverter | 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability |
|