ML18017A678
| ML18017A678 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Harris |
| Issue date: | 09/19/1979 |
| From: | Howe P CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT CO. |
| To: | James O'Reilly NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML18017A671 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 7910240422 | |
| Download: ML18017A678 (10) | |
Text
CRATE Carolina Power & Light OdnjpkPj~ ~~.<-,- -.
'$7 I'eptember 19, 1979 BIO: P8 Mr. James P. O'Reilly United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region II 101 Marietta Street, Northwest Atlanta, Georgia 30303
Dear Mr. O'Reilly:
In reference to your letter of September 6, 1979, referring to RII:
JRH 50-400/79-17, 50-401/79-17, 50-402/79-16, 50-403/79-16, the inspection report for the August 21-24,
- 1979, Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant visit has been reviewed and found to contain no proprietary infor-mation.
Thank you for your consideration in this matter.
Yours very truly, P.
W. Howe Vice President Technical Services NJC/cid cc:
Mr. J.
A. Jones 791024Q+z ~
411 Fayetteville Street
~ P. O. Box 1551
~ Raleigh, N. C. 27602 7
go~43'~Fi~XKk~ QGPV
~g Rangy
~
~
0
++*4+
In Reply Refer To:
RII:JRH 50-400/79-17 50-401/79-17 50-402/79-16 50"403/79"16 UNITEDSTATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION REGION II 101 MARIETTAST., N.W., SUITE 3100 ATLANTA,GEORGIA 30303
$EP 061979 Carolina Power and Light Company Attn:
J.
A. Jones, Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer 411 Fayetteville Street Raleigh, North Carolina 27602 Gentlemen:
This refers to the inspection conducted by J.
R. Harris of this office on August 21-24, 1979 of activities authorized by NRC Construction Permit Nos.
CPPR-158, CPPR-159, CPPR-160 and CPPR-161 for the Shearon Harris facility, and to the discussion of our findings held with R.
M.
Parsons at the conclusion of the inspection.
Areas examined during the inspection and our findings are discussed in the enclosed inspection report.
Within these
- areas, the inspection consisted of selective examinations of procedures and representative
- records, interviews with personnel, and observations by the inspector.
We have examined actions you have taken with regard to previously identified enforcement matters and unresolved items.
The status of these items is discussed in the enclosed report.
One new unresolved item resulted from this inspection and is discussed in the enclosed report.
This item will be examined during subsequent inspections.
During the inspection, it was found that certain activities under your license appear to be in noncompliance with NRC requirements.
This item
.and references to pertinent requirements are listed in the Notice of Violation enclosed herewith as Appendix A.
This notice is sent to you pursuant to the provisions of Section 2.201 of the NRC's "Rules of
Carolina 'Power'nd Light Company Practice", Part 2, Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations.
Section 2.201 requires you to submit to this office, within 20 days of your receipt of this notice, a written statement or explanation in reply including:
(l) corrective steps which have been taken by you, and the results achieved; (2) corrective steps which will be taken to avoid further noncompliance; and (3) the date when full compliance will be achieved.
In accordance with Section 2.790 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice,"
Part 2, Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, a copy of this letter and the enclosed inspection report will be placed in the NRC's Public Document Room. If this report contains any information that you (or your contractor) believe to be proprietary, it is necessary that you make a written application within 20 days to this office to withhold such information from public disclosure.
Any such application must include a full statement of the reasons on the basis of which it is claimed that the information is proprietary, and should be prepared so that proprietary information identified in the application is contained in a separate part of the document.
If we do not hear from you -in this regard within the specified
- period, the report will be placed in the Public Document Room.
Should you have any questions concerning this letter, we will be glad to discuss them with you.
Sincerely, C. E. Murphy, Chi Reactor Construction and Engineering Support Branch
Enclosures:
l.
Appendix A, Notice of Violation 2.
Inspection Report Nos. 50-400/79-17, 50-401/79-17, 50-402/79-16 and 50-403/79-16 cc w/enclosures:
R. Parsons, Site Manager Post Office Box 101 New Hill, North Carolina 27562
APPENDIX A NOTICE OF VIOLATION Carolina Power and Light Company Shearon Harris, Unit 1 License No.
CPPR-158 Based on the NRC inspection August 21-24, 19?9, certain of your activities were apparently not conducted in full compliance with NRC requirements as indicated below.
These items have been categorized as described in correspondence to you dated December 31, 1974.
As required by Criterion V of Appendix B to 10 CFR 50, and as implemented by Carolina Power and Light PSAR Section 1.8.5.5, "Activities affecting quality shall be prescribed by documented instructions, procedures or drawings,....and shall be accomplished in accordance with these instructions, procedures or drawings".
Shearon Harris Specification CAR-SH-CH-6, "Concrete", states, "Concrete shall be maintained in a moist condition for at least the first seven days after placing".
Contrary to the above, at 8:00 p.m.
on August 23, 1979, interior wall placement numbers 1CBIW 248 001 and 1CBIW 233 002 in the Unit 1 containment building were dry.
The placements were made August 22, 1979.
This is an infraction.
~Q REOy UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORYCOMMISSION REGION II 101 MARIETTAST., N.W., SUITE 3100 ATLANTA,GEORGIA 30303 Report Nos. 50-400/79-17, 50-401/79-17, 50-402/79-16, and 50-403/79-16 Licensee:
Carolina Power and Light Company 411 Fayetteville Street Raleigh, North Carolina 27602 Facility Name:
Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant Docket Nos. 50-400, 50-401, 50-402, and 50-403 License Nos.
CPPR-158, CPPR-159, CPPR-160, and CPPR-161 Date Signed Date Signed Inspection at Shearon Harris Site near Raleigh, North Carolina Ieepecto~ K oP J.
R. Harris Approved b C
T. E. Conlon, Section Chief, RCES Branch
SUMMARY
Inspection on August 21-24, 1979 Areas Inspected This routine unannounced inspection involved 42 hapectoz hours onsite in the areas of structural concrete, dams and licensee action on previous inspection findings.
Results Of the three areas inspected, no items of noncompliance or deviations were identi-fied in two areas; one item of noncompliance was found in one area (Infraction-Improper curing of structural concrete - Paragraph 5).
DETAILS 1.
Persons Contacted Licensee Employees
-R.
M.
-G. L.
-AD M.
-J. F.
-D. S.
="N J
E. L.
-T. M.
G.
M.
- Parsons, Site Manager
- Forehand, Principal QA Specialist Lucas, Resident Engineer Nevill, Senior Engineer, Civil
- Canady, Geologist
- Chiangi, Manager Engineering and Construction QA Kelly, Senior Civil Specialist QA Myllie, Manager of Nuclear Construction Simpson, Principal Construction Inspector Other Organizations
-W. D. Goodman, Project Manager, Daniel I. Ciloglu, Geologist, Ebasco P. Shiebel, Geologist, Ebasco Attended exit interview.
2.
Exit Interview The inspection scope and findings were summarized on August 24, 1979 with those persons indicated in Paragraph 1 above.
3.
Licensee Action on Previous Inspection Findings a ~
b.
(Open)
Noncompliance (400/79-07-02, 401/79-07-02, 402/79-06-02 and 403/79-06-02):
Failure to Place Embankment Core Fills at Specified Moisture Content.
Revised procedures and specifications have been examined and approved by NRR and IE:RII.
New impervious fillis being placed in accordance with the revised procedures and specifications.
Impervious fill in the separating dike has been removed and replaced in accordance with revised procedures and specifications.
Impervious fill in the west auxiliary dam between stations 21+00 to 25+00 has been removed.
Previously placed impervious fillin the Vest Auxiliary dam diversion area between stations 37+00 to 41+00 is still being evaluated by the licensee.
This item remains open pending review of the licensee's evaluation by NRR and IE:RII.
(Open)
Unresolved Item (400/79-07-03, 401/79-07-03, 402/79-06-03 and 403/79-06-03):
Category I Piping Fill Support.
The Licensee's response dated June 12, 1979 has been reviewed by NRR and IE:RII. Region II, in a letter dated June 18, 1979 from J.
P. O'Reilly to J.
A. Jones, concurred with CPM 's schedule for resumption of fillaround seismic category I pipe and adjacent electric conduit between coordinate N230
and the number 1 tank building.
Emergency service water lines crossing fillbetween the tank building and rock will be on concrete extending to bed rock.
Density tests will be made at the 5 foot, 7 foot and 10 foot levels and the foundation grade proof rolled at excavations into old yard fill for the nuclear service water line.
Where the nuclear service water lines cross natural
- ground, the excavations will be controlled in accordance with CAR-SH-CH-8.
The licensee is still evaluating powerblock fills and yard fills crossed by category I fuel lines and electrical ducts.
This item remains open pending examination of the licensee's evaluation by NRR and IE:RII.
4.
Unresolved Items Unresolved items are matters about which more information is required to determine whether they are acceptable or may involve noncompliance or deviations.
New unresolved items identified during this inspection are discussed in paragraph 5.
5.
Independent Inspection The inspector examined the following areas:
a.
Concrete placement numbers 1CBIW248001 and 1CBIW233002 in the Unit 1 containment building and 1TKXW256003 in the Unit 1 tank building.
b.
equality control field reports, nonconformance
- reports, and curing records for June, July and August of 1979.
c ~
At 8:00 p.m.
on August 23,
- 1979, exposed concrete surfaces of interior wall placement numbers 1CBIW248001 and 1CBIW233002 in the Unit 1
containment building were in a dry condition.
The placements were made August 22, 1979.
Specification CAR-'SH-CH 6 states "concrete shall be maintained in a moist condition for at least the first 7 days after placing".
Failure to maintain concrete in a moist condition for the seven day curing period was identified to the licensee as Noncom-pliance Item 400/79-17-01, "Improper curing of structural concrete".
d.
Examination of quality records on structural concrete disclosed that numerous deficiencies are being reported by gA inspectors regarding curing, vibration and vertical discharge of concrete when using the creeter crane to place concrete.
Examination of the Nonconformance Report (NCR) log indicated that some of the construction deficiencies reported by QA inspectors are not being followed up with an NCR report as required by procedure CgC-2, "Nonconformance Control." This was reported to the licensee as Unresolved Item 400/79-17=02, 401/79-17-02, 402/79-16-02 and 403/79-16-02, "Processing and Review of Nonconformance Reports," pending further examination by RII:IE of DDR/DR logs.
Qa "3-6.
- Lakes, Dams and Canals - Observation of Work and Work Activities The inspector examined results of replacement of the impervious core in the west auxiliary dam separting dike, spillway excavations in the west auxiliary
- dam, geologic mapping of the spillway between stations 10+00 to 12+00 and results of grouting to date on the main dam and west auxiliary dam.
Acceptance Criteria examined by the inspector were:
a.
PSAR, Appendix 2E b.
CAR-SH-CH-4, "Embankments, Dams, Dikes and Canals" c.
Procedure TP-08, Soil Control Program - Class I Dams, Fill and Backfill d.
CgA-9, Soil Control e.
CAR-SH-CH-ll, Ebasco Specification Drilling and Grouting f.
Drawings CAR-2167-G-6280 to CAR-2167-G-6282, Reservoir, West Auxiliary Dam Spillway, Plan and Profile; CAR-2161-C-6281, Reservoir West Auxiliary Dam Spillway Sections.
Observations of records and completed worked showed operations were being accomplished in accordance with the above listed acceptance criteria.
No deviations or items of noncompliance were identified.