ML18016A941

QA Audit at Southwest Fabricating & Welding Co,Inc, Conducted on 770322-24

ML18016A941
Person / Time
Site:	Harris
Issue date:	04/14/1977
From:	Hall A, Hensley C, Locklear D CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT CO.
To:
Shared Package
ML18016A936	List: HNP-99-069, Forwards Info Requested in 990324 RAI as Suppl to 981223 Application for Amend to License NPF-63 for Alternative Plan for Spent Fuel Pool Cooling & Cleanup Sys Piping ML18016A937 ML18016A938 ML18016A939 ML18016A940 ML18016A941 ML18016A942 ML18016A943 ML18016A952 ML18016A953 ML18016A954 ML18016A956 ML18022B063
References
QAA-702-2, NUDOCS 9905050225
Download: ML18016A941 (92)

Text

I

~

~

~

t

~

1

~

~

~

~

~

I

~

~

~

I IA O

I

~

~

I II II

~

I I

I I

~

~ ~

~

I

~

~

~

~ ~

I I

~

~

~

~

~

I

~

~

II

~

I

~

II ~

~ '

~

~ I I

~

t ~

It It

~

~

~

~

I

~

~

~

~

II

~ '

~

~

I

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

I I

I

~

~

~ '

~

~

e I

~

~

~

I

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

I

~

~

~

~

I I

~

~ ~

~

~

~

I

~

~

I

~

I

~

~

I

~

~

I

~

I I

~

~

I I

II

~

~I ~ '

I I

~

~

I

~

~ ~

I I

~

~

I

~

I

~

~

~ It t

0 '00 I 40 I Q

I

AUDIT REPORT Activity Audited; Southwest 'Fabricat'ing 6 Welding Company, Inc,

Houston, Texas Audit Report No.:

QAA/702-2 Auditors:

C.

G. Hensley - Lead Auditor A. Et Hall Date:

March 22-24, 1977 Persons Contacted:

Southwest Fabricatin

• G. H. Lockwood - Chairman and Company Executive Officer

• B. J.

Goodwin - President

• N. H. Moerke - Vice President - Engineering (QA/QC)

C, Stock Chief Prospect Manager

• J. E. Harris - Prospect Manager

• S. M. Goodwin - Assistant

Manager, Quality Assurance R. P. Bornes Quality Assurance Manager M. Finn - Nuclear, Design Engineer H. S. Barber - Managex

-, Purchases G. Baumback -

QA Receiving Inspector J.

C. Aggers -

QA Receiving Inspector T. Russell -

QC Inspector R.

B, Griffith - Rod-Storage Attendant D. F. Hartman -

QC Technician

• These persons 'were present during the postaudit meeting.

S~co e:

Guidelines for conducting the sub)ect audit are outlined in CP&L Quality Assurance Audit Procedure QAAP-1, which establishes the methods for auditing'the quality system of vendors in accordance with the requirements of CPSL's Corporate QA Program.

This audit was conducted in order to assure that Southwest Fabricating 6

Welding Company, Inc.'s (SFGW) quality assurance program (and its implementation) was in compliance with the requirements imposed by Ebasco PO NY-435035, Supplement No. 3; Specification Cput-SH-M-30 Revision 3; and the associated quality system require<<

ments.

The ma)or areas of SFGW, Quality Assurance System selected for audit are as, follows:

(1) Quality Assurance organization and program; (2) design control, including required procedural sub-mittals; (3) procurement document control; (4) contxol of purchased matexial and components; (5) marking and identification of material and components;,

(6) control of special processes; (7) inspection/

test control; (8)'easuring and, test equipment control; (9) handling,

storage, and shipping; (10) nonconforming material control and cor-rective action; (ll),internal audit program; and (12) implementation

4 r

'l I

C k'

Il 4

.1{

'n I

1, i

{I

'1 r,

I

{

'iL{'f corrective action taken to resolve findings identified in Audit Report QAA/702-1.

Due to the st'atua of the contract with SF&W, i.e.

not released'or fabrication, some portions of the checklist ware not completed'.

Specifically, document control; instructions, proceduresf and drawings; quality assurance records; and portions of special processes.

. ('~ n

'4 4'44 SF&W has been contracted to supply, the power plant piping systems including hangers, seismic restraints, supports<<

and supporting steel for Units 1, 2 ~

3 ~ and 4 of the Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant Prospect.

By contract, SF&W is required to provide a quality assurance system which is in compliance with Appendix B of 10CFR50, Ebaeco's Quality System Procedure 860-72 (CAR-SH<<ME-12), those por-tions of Section III,of the 1971 ASME Code, including all addenda through Summer 1973, which applies to Code Class 1, 2, and 3 equip-

ment, and 'ANSI B31.1.0 for power piping.

SF&W's Quality Assurance, System applicable to this contract is delineated in their QA Manual (QAM), Revision 8.

In turn, the QA Manual will be supplemented by Shop Detail Sheets and Manu-facturing Record Sheets,,which are prepared for each piping spool configuration and will serve as the detail drawing and shop travc1er, respectively.

To date, SF&W has not 'been "released for fabrication" on this contract; therefore, it was not possible to audit some portions of the quality requirements which are required by this contract.

After SF&W is released for fabrication, it will be necessary to further audit implementation of the SF&W Quality Assurance Program.

I 4.

7.-

I L"<<.

7 l<

I L

I

'I (<<

IL' 0

.I I'

1 I

I

{JL t,;(7" 4

4, Q <<I'74; I

j'A<<LI

'{,I, During the course of this audit the auditors reviewed the NRC's "White Book" on vendor audits for the fourth quarter of 1976 with SF&W quality, assurance management personnel.

The auditors werc

,concerned with the negative inspection results reported by NRC as the result of their audits conducted on 9/7-10/76 at SF&W and 10/12-15/76 at Bergen Paterson Pipe Support Corporation located in Laconia, N.H.

'Bergan Paterson is SF&W's subsupplier of thc pipe hangers and restraints for the SHNPP Pro)act.

Discussions with SF&V personnel revealed that the NRC had conducted a

reaudit'f SF&W the, week of 3/14/77 and all but one of the deviations noted in the, 9/76 audit had been satisfactorily resolved.

The one unresolved item is being presented ae a code case to the ASME Board for resolution.

As for Bergan Paterson, NRC has scheduled a reaudit of tha Laconia facility the week of 3/28/77.

This will bc NRC's third attempt to resolve deviations previously identified at the Laconi of the same f (41

{

{,

Implementation of thc corrective action taken to resolve the six findings previously identified in Audit Report QAA/702-1 was audited.

The action taken tu resolve these findings was considcrcd sufficient and audit QAA/702-.1 is closed'<<

~~ 'r

~

17 I<<4 a facility.

Upon completion of NRC s audit and publication related audit'eport, SF&W plans to conduct an audit of this acility.

8..:(

<<g{,~7

{l.,

Wr<<',

r{

<<W

'$4<<4,L g t,

'I I

"<<I L A~r~a '44(<< ~

I t

5 lg A

f 4.

ee 3

SF&W Quality Assurance Program continues to be adequate to meet the requirements of PO NY-435035.

As a result of this audit, three items were identified as findings requiring corrective. action.

Findin s and Corrective Action:

Iten 1:

10CFR50 Appendix B, Cri,terion II Nonconformance:

Criterion II requires that the,QA Program provide for the indoctrination and training of personnel performing activities affecting quality, as necessary, to assure, that suitable proficiency is achieved and maintained.

In reviewing paragraph 2.2.3.1 of SF&W's QAM, which outlines the proce-dures for, training it was observed by the auditors that training aud indoctrination, requirements for Engineering and upper QA/QC management personnel are not presently covered by written procedures.

Acknowled ement and Res onse:

.G I'

li tf O te I

The Vice President - Engineering (QA/QC) stated this item will be taken under advisement for necessary, corrective action.

Iten 2:

a ~

~Re ueueneue:

SF&W Procedure QC-102, titled, "Auditing Personnel,"

Revision 0 dated 6/7/76 Nonconformance:

G In reviewing the',qualification records of SF&W's auditors, i.t was "observed that the audit participation records for D. Hartman did not reflect his participation in internal audits ss required and N. H.

Moerke's records were not approved by a second party to attest to his qualifications as an auditor.

The records reviewed for these two indi-viduals do not comply with the intent of Procedure QC-102.

. Acknowled ament and Res onse:

b.

The Vice President - Engineering (QA/QC) stated the necessary additions will be made to the auditor qualification records, including the company president signing thc qualifications of Mr. Mocrkc.

~Rn ulrcment:

SF&W Procedures:

QC>>104, titled, "Heat Treating Personnel,"

Rcv.

0 dated 6/8/76; QC-105, titled, "Hot Forming

& Banding Personnel>"

Rcv.

0 dated 6/8/76; and QC-106, titled, "Machinists," Rev.

0 dated 6/8/76.

s

@4, i'

ti Im I e+w i< iM Ii

IC 4

IV

~'

1

~

~

~

II I

~

I

~ 4 4

4

~

~

4

~

~

It

~

It

~

~

~

~

4 I

4 4

I

~

I

~

~

~

~

~

I I

i lt I

~

It

~

~

~

~

I

~

~

~

~

I I

~

~ I

~

I Il

~ I I

~

~

~

II I

~

~

I

~

~

~

~

I

~

~

~

~

~

~

i I

~

~

~

~

I I~

I

~

~

I '

I

~

I

~

~

~

~

tt

~

~

I

~

I 4

~

~

~

~

~

~

I'I 'I I'

~

itt

~

~

II

~

~

~

I

~

~

I I I

~

~

~

~

I

~

~

I II I'

~

it

~

I

~

It~,

~

I I

~ I

~

I

~

I

~

~

i

~

~

~

~ ~

~

~

'I I

~

~

It

~

I

~

I

~

i

~

I I

I I

~

~

I I

~

~

~

I I '

~

~

I

~

~

~

~

I

~

~ '

~

44

5

\\

(I t

In reviewing SF&W's procedures and QAM for rccertification of Nondestructive Examination, Personnel, it'was observed that paragraph 9'.2.2.1'f the QAM, Rev.

8 requires recertifica-tion every '.three years in compliance with thc ASME, Code~ the auditors also, reviewed associated procedure QC-100, Revision 1

,titled, uNondestructive Examination personnel,"

to assure the

,three-year recertification requirement was included.

QC-100

,was marked with a,corresponding "pencil change," but the change had never been; typed, approved, and distributed to the affected SF&V personnel.

" (p I

I 2 ~

Submitted by:

During the !course of reviewing the qualification records of inspectors -the auditors observed the records of two inspectors, B. Reynolds'nd,,G.,

Baumback,,that had not been signed to esta-bl'ish, their date, of qualification as required by SF&W Procedure QC-103' Revision'.0 dated 6/7'/76.

I J

(

I IJ I

I

,I I

('j,.

Approver py:'i Manager -,Corp ate Quality Assurance Audit Section I

I II

(

III I

I

(

0 (5JP I '(

I

(

II!

II*

IJ t -.

'I t

r ll; gt 'I I r

I

f1 W

I t

Cl f

Southwest Fabricatin

& heldin Co.

Inc.

Houston Texas R~~OKC HO.

4/702-2 AUDIT PROCEDURE OAAP-1 DATE Harch 22-24, 1977 UALITY ASSURANCE AUDIT CHECR LIST AUDIT SUMECZ In lementation of Quality Assurance/Control Pro ram ITOR C. G. Hensle AUDITOR(S)

A. E. H311 1.0 3..1.3.

CHARACTERISTICS lit Assurance Pro ran A Or anization and Pro ran Do SF&M's organization charts reflect the current organization?

COWENTS 1.1.1 Yes, the Southwest Fabricating

& heldin Con any (SF&V) has issued Revision 8, dated 3/3./77 to their Quality Assurance Hanual

( AH) which lists their or anization as

~v ibits 1-1, 1-2 1-3 and 1-4.

The auditors verified their or anization to corn 1 1.1.2 The SF&M AM does outline a pro ran and referenced procedures for trainin instructions, re uired exanination, and required 1.1.2 Does SF&h's QA program provide for indoc-trination and training of personnel per-forming activities affecting quality?

(Appendix B, Criteria II) 3..1.2.1 Are records aaintained to verify that applicable personnel have been properly indoctrinated and trained?

records of ualification for ins ection and roduction employ-ees.

However, the SF&M, QAN does not contain any procedure to cover the re uirenent for trainin as required by 10CFR50, Appendix B; Criterion II for their engineering personnel and t e balance of their QA ersonnel.

(This is listed as Finding No.

1 in the Audit Report.-)

In a ition t e SF&

ev-sion 8, added a requirement in paragraph

9..2.1, Recert ca-tion shall. be at least every three years.

T e au tors reviewed Procedure QC-3. 0, Rev.,

ate Nondestructive Exanlnation ersonne an eterm ne t

s rocedure was aar e

wit a correspon ing penc c ange w

c was never type

, approved and distri ute to t e a ecte personne T is s

xste as ten o.

n t e cnera ect on of the Audit Re ort.)

0 g QJ) l-Cg 1.1.2.1 The auditors reviewed the records to verif that SF&h'ersonnel were ualified to the followin rocedures:

Page ~ of 15 S

P'

RH%RT NO.

AA/702-2 CHARACTERISTICS 1.1.2.1 1

cont'd CO~~S 100 Rev.

1 dated 2 28 74 itl d "N n ru v

Examination Personnel" The auditors verified SF&W ersonnel are ro erl uglified b record review.

2 101 Rev.

1 dated 5 21 76 titled " ualitv Control Ins ectors" The auditors verified SF&W ersonnel are ro erl uglified b record review.

3 102 Rev.

0 dated 6 7 76 titled "Auditin Personnel"-

The auditors verified SF&W ers nne a

e ro erl ual f ed b

record review.

However the followin two roblens were found which do not com 1

with th intent of the rocedure:

The record of D. liartnan dated 12 1

6 recorded his rior artici ation in internal audits.

The record of N. H. Moerke dated 9 3 76 was no a

r ved b his su eriors or an one to attest the fact he was ugli-fied.

This is listed as Findin Item 2a in the Audit Re ort.

4 103 Rev.

0 dated 6 7 77 titled "Receivin Ins ection Personnel" The auditors reviewed two records of B. Re nolds and G. Baumback which w re not dated b

the ndivi=

dual a rovin t e re d

f e d

e f the uglification.

This i lis ed s Item 2 i the General Section of th Aud R

t.

5 104 Rev.

0 dated 6 8 76 tit ed "Heat Treatin Personnel" 105 Rev.

0 dated 6 8 76 titled "Hot Vorm-in

& Bendin Personnel" and 106 Rev.

0 dated 6 8 76 titled "Machinists."

The auditors determined SF&W did not have an records to show the above rocedures have been im lemented.

This is listed as Findin Iten 2b in the Audit Re ort.

Page ~ of 0

c d

0, "<<

th

'I I

1

REZORT CHARACTERISTICS COMMENTS

+ >.~p kP;

. 1.1.3 Verify that responsible management is reviewing the QA progran for revision or updating on a six-month frequency as a nininum.

(Section 14.0 of the SF&W Qualit Assurance Hanual, QAM) w e

A 6

he nu 1 was evised and is ued n

1 77 which e c e

the six-n~fffLIbya s

T ud d d not fi d written records a

c

. I an e with AM 14.2.1 reflectin ev ew w h w 4 tent with a ractice b the

'1.1.4 Has the most current revision of the QAH been submitted to Ebasco2 (Specification 860-72, paragraph 3; Finding No. 2, QAA/702-1) revious Vice President - En ineerin A

C Mr. Green.

1.1.4 The auditors verified the latest Revision 8 of the A~I was sent on 3 17 77 to the followin

- Ebasco ersonnel:

Hr. B. R. >fazo-S N56 Mr. H. S. Brown S N125 and Hr. Cesivacius S N124.

1.1.4.1 Verify that an acknowledgment receipt has been received fron Ebasco.

(Section 14.0 of SF&W QAM)

Assure that the latest revision of SF&W's QA~f is being distributed and acknovledged in accordance with Distribution Lists per the requirements of Sections 14.1 and 14.3 of the SF&W QAH.

1.1.4.1 The auditors verified the acknowled ements of the SF&W AM Rev.

8 listed above have not been received b

SF&W.

1.1.5 The auditors verified the latest revision SF&W, A f was distri-buted and acknovled ed b selected sa le of followin manuals and verified a ainst the Master Distribution List:

R. B. Borncs AH S/N18 H. R. McAnall AM S/N4 and Scott Goodvin QAM S N55.

1.1 ~ 6 When the auditors revieved SF&W's control and distribution of their AM the auditors determined SF&W did not have any records to shov ara ra h 14.3.3 of the QAH has been inplemented.

This is listed as Findin

, Iten 3a, in the Audit Report.

'J 1 1.6 Assure that SF&W is auditing distribution of QAM as required by Section 14.3.3 of the QAM.

1.2.1 The auditors verified vith. the SF&W Pro ect )fana er.'s files that a final re-ob conference er AM 2.1.7 has not been held since the vendor has.not, been released for fabrication by Ebasco to this date.

SF&W has received a new set of Qo speci ications fron Ebasco which after evaluation by the ven or an w en a

roval is received from Ebasco to begin fa ricat on, a na re-ob conference will be held and the neeting ninutes recor e

3..2 Desi n Control 1.2 1 Assure that pre-)ob conference to reviev contractual (design) requirements for P.O. NY-435035 has been held.

(Section 2.1.7, SF&W QAff)

Page ~ of 15

4I 1+

I H

g

~ '

~C 1

~

~

I

~

~

~

l '

~

~l I ~

~

~

~

~

~

ll

~

i I'

~

~

~

I I

~

~

~I II

~ ~

~

H

~

~

~

~ ~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

I

~

l

~

t' o

e.

e I

4 I

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

'I

~

~

~

I~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~ '

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

4

~

I

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

N

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~ '

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~,

~

~

~ N

~

~,

~

~

~

~

l I

~

~

~

~

~l

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~,

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

l

~

~

I

~

~

~

~

I

~

~

~

~

,2 4

%If a~

1) g I

REPORX'HARACTERISTICS COMMENTS

.1.2.5.2 1.2.5.3 NDE Procedures - radiographic, liquid penetrant, magnetic particle, and ultra-sonic procedures?

Cleaning, preserving, marking and packing for shipment procedures?

2 2

The ~uditors verif ed the followin status of SF&W NDE roce-dures submittals:

l.

OPT-1 Rev.

2 Su lement 1 with Attachments 1

4 and 5

a roved b Ebasco 4 15 74 2.

PMT-1 Rev.

1 with Attachments 1

4 and 5 a roved b Ebasco 4 15 74 3.

8HT-2 Rev.

0 with Attachments 1

4 and 5 a roved b Ebasco

'/15/74 4.

CRT-5 Rev.

0 Su lement 1 a roved b Ebasco 4/17 74 5.

PUT-1 Rev.

1 a roved b Ebasco 4 17 74

'5.4 Hydrostatic and/or leak test procedures?

r

~

6.

CUT-3 Rev.

1 a roved b

Ebasco 4 17 74 7.

OUT-4 Rev.

2 a proved b Ebasco 4 17 74 8.

OUT-5 Rev.

0 a roved b Ebasco 4 17 74 1.2.5.5 Heat treating and/or stress relieving?

1.2.5.3 The auditors verified the following status of SF&W procedure submittals:

1.2.5.6 Pipe bending and forming (fitting made from pipe or plate)?

l.

7-101 Rev. 0, titled Austenitic Stain ess tee 2.

7-102 Rev. 0, titled Carbon

& Ferritic Al oys At the present SF&M has not receive comments or approva s

rom Ebasco.

1.2.5.7 Weld repair procedure?

1.2.5.4 The vendor cons ers t is requ rement to e not app ca e ror i in subassemblies on PO NY 3 0 5.

.2.5.8 Visual inspection procedure?

1.2.5.5 The auditors veri ie the o

owing status o

submittals:

proce ure l.

PHT-Pl-1 Rev.

1 approved by E asco HT-P Rev.

approve y

asco 1.3 1.3.1.

Procurement Document Control Verify that gA is reviewing, signing and dating each P.O.

and Purchase Requisition for quality-related requirements.

(Para-graph 3.3.4, JAN; Appendix B, Criteria IV) 1.2.5.6 The auditors verified the followin status of SF&W procedure submittals:

1.84-106 Rev.

0 Su lement 1, approved by Ebasco 8 6 74 2.84-107 Rev. 0, Su lement 1, approved by Ebasco 3.

P4-108 Rev. 0, Supplement 1, approved by Ebasco 4.

P4-109 Rev. 0, Supplement 1, approve y E asco 5.

8-100 Rev. 1, Supplement 2, approve y

asco Page 4

of 15

~

'I V

I

I

'I N.t>

.:- -'<, ':;+ ~=,it

~

I~

I

~

~

~;

~

~

~

~ ItIN

~

~

~

~

f

~

~

4

~

~

~

~

~

~

I

~

+ t-y g'<

~

~

~

~

~

t

~

~

~

~

~

I.: ~ I

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

N

~

~

~

~

~

~

I

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

I

~

~

~

I

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

IL P

4

/

~

I I

~

~

~

~

~

~

g

~

I I

I

~

~

~

~

~

I

~

~

~

~ '

~

~

~

I~

~

~

~ 1

~

~

~

~I

~

~

~

~

~

N

~

~

~ '

~

~

~..

~

~

I '

I

~ I

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~I

~

~

~

~

~

N I

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

N

~

~ '

I

~

~

~

~

~

I

~

~ N

~

N '

~ I '

~

N

~

~

N

~ ~

~

~

~

~ ~

~

~

~

4

~

~ '

ff

~

~

~

N

~ ~

N N ~

~

~

~

'I

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

\\ '

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

I

~

I

~

~

~

~

~ ~

~

~

~

~

I I

I

~

~

~

~

~

~

~ N ~ ~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~,

~

~

~

~

~

~

~ '

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

I

~.

~

I

"f y l

C h,

f

"<"n

~

I I

~

~

~

~

~

Il ~

~ ~

~ '

~

~ ~

~

I

~

~ tttt

~

~

~,

~

I

~

~

~

~

I

~

I I fl

~t ~

~

t

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~t ~

~.

tt

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

I

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

ll

~

~

~

~

~

4

~

~

~

~

~

t

~ lt

~

~

~

~

lt I

~

~

~

~

~

~ ~,

~

~

~

~

~

~

ll I

~

~

I

~

't

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

l\\

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~ '

~

~

~

~

lt

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~ t

~

l t

~

~

I

.tt I

~

~ ~

tt ~

~

t

~

~

~

I

Il I

r,,>

li lt n

'/t REPOEX 80 02<<2 CHARACTERISTICS nonconforming material is properly segregated at receiving inspec-tion.

(Appendix B, Criteria VIII)

OMMEHTS 1.4-5 Verify that material test reports are checked by QA and are in accordance with Section 1.A, Appendix H of Spec.

M-30 and para. 4.1.1 of the QAM.

1.4.6 1

d e

r als we e ail b e ew d d The ASNE Code and AFDf sta dards as a

licable 1ist the acce tance criteria.

Actual values are noted on the material thenltel snd h steel te~st re orts.

1.4.6 Are there provisions for listing the required range of values (acceptance criteria) at receiving inspection?

(NA-4442.2; 860-72, para. 5.3) 1.5.1 Yes.

The auditors observed the markin of fittin and i in material at receivin ins ection in-rocess and final re uired markin information was etched on the material.

1.5 Identification and Control of Material and

~ton onents 1.5.1.1 An individual is assi ned in the fabrication area to remark material which is cut into more than one iece this same individual is also res onsible for cuttin the material as well.

Pi in subassemblies were examined for ro er markman after fitu and weldin and re uired ~rkin was evident.

p

'.5.1 Is the material marked with applicable material specification,

grade, and heat numbers (serial number) as required by Appendix H, Section leD of Specification M-30?

1 5.1.1 Assure that when material is cut into more than one piece; all material identificatio is retained on each piece.

(para. 5.3.1, QAM) p er e

r p

o o

Page 7

of 15

-Q-n p

te r

o p

o 0

o' p p s

t 0

'4 I

1 C

REPORT HO.

702-2

.1.5.2 CHARACTERISTICS Is marking applied such that only electric etch, vibra tool, or lo-stress or inter-rupted dot. die stencil is used2 (Appendix H, paragraphs 2 and 3, to Spec.

M-30)

COMMENTS i men the i in subasse bl e noted n the mate-and S

e w

ch 1.5.2.1, 1.5.3 Is such identification located in an area which does not interfere with functions or quality aspects of the product2 (NA-4442.3)

Verify that welding material is properly inspected and accepted, stored, distributed and reconditioned in accordance with welding control procedure MfC-1.

(Para-graph 6.1, JAM) e i 1 t red he tern erature controlled r

R in c rda c

with weld material control ocedu e KtC-1 Rev.

2 dated 3 10 77.

Distribution and control is naintained-b the rod-stora e room attendant who issues and stores all weldin material for nuclear vork.

Coate rod whichhhasebeen o ened is stored in a te erature controlled oven.

Onl one lot of a'ven size and ty~e of rod is issued t the floor at a tine.

An weldin rod returned is then onl used for nonnuclear vork.

The attendant collects all unused rods at the end of each shift.

1.5.3.1 Yes.

'The Rod-Stora e Roon Attendant maintains a list of that material which has been a roved for release;

also, he indicates if this material has been issued to fabrication for use.

1.5.3.1 Assure that QA is maintaining a list of approved welding material.

(Paragraph 6.1.6, JAM) 1.5.4 Onl one lot of material of a iven size and type is release at a time to a welder and the heat no. is maintained on t e e

Material Issue form vhich is maintained with the materia unused coated electrodes are destro ed or use or wonnuc ear obs.

Verify that welding material identificatio is maintained in the welding areas and on unused material returned to the storage area.

1.6 Instructions Procedures and Drawin s Page ~ of

>>>>jp I Wl

~

~

~

~

~

'I

~

~

I

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

II I ~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

N

~

~

~

~

~

~

5 I

~

ll

~ -

~

\\

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~ '

~

~

~

o I

II

~

~ ~

~

~

~ '

I ~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

I

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~ ~

~

~

~ ~

~

~

~

~ II

~

~

~

s '

~

~

~ I

~

~

~

I I I

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

REPORT NO.

AA 702-2 CHARACTERISTICS COMHBiTS L.8.2 Review welding procedures and welder quali-fication records to assure compliance with Section IX, ARK Code.

(General Comment No. 2, Audit Report QAA/702-1)

The auditors verified that SF&W Weldin Procedures and Welder ualifications corn 1 vith ASME Code Section IX an by reviev of a san le of records listed in uestion 1.2.5.1 that the eneral comment no. 2, Audit Report QAA 702-1 has een reso v

.>'1".r)Qf, Un ble to audit at this tine. see uestion 1.2.1.

1.8.3 1.8.4 Is SF&W maintaining Heat Treating Logs for this contract?

(Para.

7.2.3, QAM)

Assure that veld data records contain the information for weld points and repairs as required by Para.

6, Appendix G of Specification M-30.

e udit at thi ime.

ee uestion 1.2.1.

1.8.5 The auditors verified b review SF&W record of ualification of their NDE ersonnel their e e examinations vere current and h neets u

to date.

Their ersonnel are tested to Jea er fl vhic the latest Addenda of the 1974 ASME B&PV Code Section III.

1

.1 Currentl CP&L's contract has not been released for fabrication therefore the Manufacturln Record Sheet (MRS has not been re ared.

The auditors did review other MRSs re ared for resent work in'he sho these a

eared complete.

1.8.5 Are there provisions to assure that persons performing visual examinations have passed an eye examination equivalent to that required by SNT-TC=lA?

(Para.

3, Appendix E to SpeciHcation M-30) 1.9.2 Sho ins ection ersonnel're maintainin a list o materia ins ected b

S.O.

number iece number, and S N of the equ pment used to erform the ins ection.

H drotest c arts re ect t e ressure a e used to conduct the test.

Q 0

~E Ins ection/Test Control l.9.1 Is the MRS being completed by the QC Inspector to indicate completion of the inspection operations?

(NA-4530; 860-72, para.

8) 1.9.2 Are there provisions to assure that adequat test instrumentation is available and used?

(860-72, para.

8; Appendix B, Criteria XI)

Page 10 of 15

4i jv i ~e I

I A,l'I.

~i ',

a

~

~

REPORT r

t CHARACTERISTICS COMMENTS 1..9.3 1.9.4 1.9.5 Assure that acceptance limits are esta-blished on the Shop Detail Sheet as required by the QAM.

Are there provisions to assure that inspection/test status of material and parts is known throughout manufacturing' (NA-4540; 860-72, paragraph 8.2)

Are there provisions on the Shop Detail Sheet for correct measurement of pressure boundry items for minimun wall thickness?

1.9.3 Dimensional re uirements are rovided on the Sho Detail Sheet for each iece of the i in subassenbl The Sho Detail Sheets and MRS reference those ins ection rocedures and instructions which do contain acce tance limits i.e. Attach-ments 1

2 3

etc. to the rocedures vhich have the actual acce tance limits.

1.9.4 Yes.

Ins ection test status and operation status is note on the MRS.

1.9.5 This t e of information is normall referenced on the Sho Detail Sheet re ared for a iven ob however unable to verif due to status of contract.

1.9.5.1 See res onse to check list item 1.9.5.

1.9.5.2 See res'nse to check list item 1.9'.

1.9.5.1 Does this include measurement of all cast fittings in piping systens (Safety Class 1, 2, or 3)?

(Part One, para.

8.9 of Spec.

M-30)

1. O.l In order to verif that calibrated instrumentation is properly e laiized and ta ed five micrometers three ressure

ages, tw thermometers and four D.C. voltmeters and a meters vere udited.

Each of these instruments vas ro erl labeled and 1 bel ro erl corn leted.

3~9.5.2 Is the information required by Part One-Specification M-30, paragraph 8', a thru e provided?

1.10 1.10.1 Control of Measurin and Test ui ment Verify that calibration stickers or labels are placed on each iten calibrated and include initial of persons performing calibration, date of calibration, and calibration due date.

(Para.

8.2.2 of QAM; Pinding No.<< 1, Audit Report QAA/702-1) ll x D Page ~I of l5

V E

I L

I 4,

II

II ~

l

~

~

M

~

0

~

~

I

~

I

'. ~

'~..l@QA'gt 4,,: "Q

~

~

I O

~

~

~

~

M

~

~

~

~ '

~

~

~

I

~

~F

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

M

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~\\ I

~

~

~

~

~

~

M

~

~

~

~ ~

~

~

~

~

~

M

~

~ ~

~

~

~

M I

~

~

~

~

~

~

e I;oi

~,

~

~

5

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

M

~ M

~

~

M I

I

~

~

~

I

~

~

~

~

~

~ I

~ I

~

~

I '

~

~

~

~

~

I I

~

~

~ I

~ ~

~

~

~

~

I '

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

o

~

~

~

~

~

0

~

+

~

I ~

MM ~

~

I

~ M '

~ I I

el<

I '

I ~

~

~

I

~

~

~

~

~

~

~ M I '

~ I M

~

~

~

~

~

0

~

~

I

~

~ H

~

gC tq V

~I I IIA

~

~

~

I

~

~

~

~

I

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~ ~

~

~

~ ~

4

~

~

~

~

~

~ '

~

I

~ II

~

~

~

~

~

~

4

~

~ I

~ I

~

Il

~

~

~

~

~

~

4

~

~

~

~

~

~ 4

~

~

~

I

~

~

~ 4

~

~

~

~

~

I

~

I~ ~

~ 444 '

~

I

I

~

~

~

~

I

~

~

~

~

s

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

4

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

I I

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

j

~

~

~

~

~

I

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

I

~

~

~

I

~

~

tl '

~

~

~

~

~

4 4 ~

~

4

~

If

~

~'I

~

~

~ 4 ~

~

~

~

~

4 4

~

~

~

~

~

I

~

~

~ ~

P 4

~

)b

2-2 CHARACTERISTICS COMMENTS

. 1.13 lit Assurance Records 1.13.1 Unable. to audit at this time; see uestion 1.2.1.

le13.1 1.13.2 Verify that a "Documentation Check List" has been prepared for this contract.

Assure that necessary documents for accu-mulation are noted on the Manufacturing Record Sheet (MRS) for the contract.

1.13.2 Unable to audit at this time; see question 1..1.

1.14.1 Yes, verdfted by auddrorts;revdeu~oduteraal auteur repotts and audit schedule.

The auditor d d in two au ts w c

exceeded the interval by one mont owever, steps were a rea y bein taken by vendor to correct.

1.14.2 See question 1.1.

1.1.3 The SF6W QAM Rev.

ate rev se t s

y r.

e per o 1.14 Internal Audit Pro ram to read "Corrective.-ction shall be verified b reaudit within one month."

The one month was verified b review of internal audit records.

1.14.1 Are audits being conducted at intervals not exceeding 6 months7 (Para.

13.1.2, QAM) 1.14.4 Yes after one month reaudit of corrective action, the audit re ort is distributed to the Com an Chairman-Chief eratin Officer President and other ro er levels of management.

le14.2 Verify that the auditors are properly trained in accordance with SF6W's proce-dure QC-102.

(Finding No. 6, Audit Report QAA/702-1) 1.14.3 Is required corrective action being docu-mented and verified by reaudit within 15 working days per paragraph 13.2.2 of QAM.

(Finding No. 6, Audit Report QAA/702-1) 1.14.4 Are copies of the audit report being distributed to proper levels of manage-mentT (Appendix B, Criteria XVIII)

Page 14 of 15

(r "P.;

1 F'

y gl

>>I

~

'I

~

~

ll

~

~

~

~

~ '

~

~

~

I '

~

~ '

~

I '

II I

~ '0>>

~

~

I

~

~

I 1

~

~

~

~

i

~.

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

lf I

~

~

~

g>>

~ N;

~

~

~

~

~

I

~

~

I I

~

~ ~

~

~

~

~

~

~ '

~

~

~

~ ~

~ ~

~ ~

~ ~

~

~

~

~

4, ~

j e@

V

e

>o>>hip> Mtn I

lf,,

l,t 11 e

I)

I 1)

QI Lt

(

ttr 1~~4'W

$'L>tlj'1

'Et

>ffIE-l t~ f>t)t)/j CHAL Caroffna Power & Lffff>tComp>>ny, f>ntoieh, N cf 2>602

.'Et P!r)$ >E',y

~i

~ 't

~ 'I

~.

Pile:

QhA/702-2 September 13, 1977

@C /jrg 4g e <C+

<,', 4r.

@AS/ 'L "Ix.:f. ff. Hoorke Vice Praaident Lnglneoring (QA-QC)

Southwest Fabricating and Welding Company 7525 Sharuan Street P.

O. Box 9449 lfouaton, Texas 77001

'O&0202

', fi, I

H 0

I V

QU/J XTY ASSUR>VfCH >WDIT Deox Vw. "Eoarke:

ffoferance io made to your letter of August 26, 19/7, wherein you providnd corrective action to Finding Mos. 1; 2 and,3 of Carolina Power 5 Lief>t Company

/>udit Mo. Qhh/702-2.

Tna inioxrtatiou provided i>aa beau evaluated aa entiafactory and, pending xevision to Section 1,4.3. of thc Quality Assurance khmuM, completes the correct ivo action to tflc audit ~

IE 'E Should you have any questiouo concerniug this uattor please contact fma.

f Your>> very, truly, Qriginal" Sigflod 8'.

,, t!, L.I>I>igni,,

0 c I

IE 1P t,,ttl1 4

D/df/jag cc!

Mr. I. V. Tf>iar>rachtar f>cc:

Mr. N. J. Chiangi Mr. P.

W, lfofrc Mr. D. Locklcar ~

Mr. L. Z. Laflin Engineering

'6 Conatructian Quality Assurance I ~

I I'

(

~"'"':-0

~~I E-o IE.

E I)

.0 E

>.N'~'i",~ ',

'.W~.a te" w4k&M

P lL s s t

1 yr "c

p A

8 t

rt l t

'tg A rt A

V I1i

~

E Irt'

4 r

o rorm 244 Q

VQf

\\

il G

Carolina Powor 8 ughl Company

Raleigh, Noreh Carolina Sepeember 9,

1977 Company Couoapondonco o 0 P,'

'J' I

,-A.r i

J g

r c~a FILE:

QAA/702-2 MEMORANDUM TO:

Mr, Dallas Locklear FROM:

A. E. Hall

SUBJECT:

Southwest Fabricating Letter, Dated 8/26/77 N. J. Chiangi Lett'er, Dated 9/8/77 t

1; I

Based on my evaluation of the information contained in Che above referenced memorandums (copies attached), I concur Chat Che vendor has taken or is Caking, adequate corrective action to resolve and correct audit findings.

I hereby close audit findings nos. 1, 2a, 2b, 3a, and 3b which closes out tice findings on ehis audit.

The above referenced memorandum completes fulfillment of Audit Procedure QAAP-1.

cc:

Mr. N; J. Chiangi CONCURRENCE:

~/

,";F c'1 jt ct AEH/nahF4 ACeachments C

J r

~

4 E.

Manager - Corporaee Quality Assurance Audit

,,l(Q'+~o,, o g lg '

'lt Py tp 1

~s

- O'

(

ko,,

I I

it r

il

~

0

) ',

1'J Il

)

J

, pd

,l

I (I

4 tj s<

n 1

<<4,4 pttlttt pal Company Conasponaanco File:

QAA/702-2 o

CÃG~E Carolina powor a Light Company I

z c yr~< -- Wrl~ +~~"le

~<<.>r'g t /PfA.

a~'@ ro r76S--

SF.P 1977 N

RGYES' F.'g g C QAR SF(g 4 P g~Z2gr QA>>206 September 7, 1977 MEMORANDUM TO:

Mr. D. Lockleax FROM:

N. J. Chiangi.

SUBJECT:

Quality Assurance Audi.t of Southwest Fabricaeing and Welding Company

<< I<<S<< '

Reference is made eo my memorandum of June 9, 1977, wherein you were advised of satisfactory correceive action being taken to resolve Finding No. 3b and the need fox additional action to resolve Finding Nos. 1, 2a, 2b and 3a for the sub)ect audit.

Attached find a copy of Southwest Fabricating and Welding Company leteer daeed August 26, 1977, which provides the additional corrective aceion and informaeion intended to resolve ehe audit findings.

Briefs of the findings and resolution are as follows:

I-I

, <<7'<<

7, I.i I,

I<<<< Iy I g>

4

~ v Ir Jp II <<"i7 I

1.

Finding No.

1 stated that the training and indoctrination for Engineers and upper QA/QC management personnel were not addressed in the QA program requirements.

The vendor intends to revise Section 1.4.1 of the QA Manual to indicate the qualificat'ions of the.,Chief Engineer and the Vice Preoident-Engincering

{QA-QC).

The change will.,be submitted for approval to the ASME ao a portion of Revision 9 to the QA Manual and when approved will be incor-porated into the manual on or about December 1, 1977.

The xesponse is evaluated as satisfactory to resolve the findings and implementation will be verified by xepresentatives of t'e Engineering 6 Construction QA Section subsequent eo the aforesaid date.

2.

Finding No. 2a stated that qualification records for Mr. D. Hartman and Hr. N. H. Hocrke were deficient.

The initial response from the vendor corrected the deficiency, and the response attached hereto provides the action to prevent recurrence.

The response is evaluated as satisfactory to resolve the finding.

3.

Finding No. 2b stated that records to substantiate training and qualification of personnel implementing various shop special process procedures were not available.

The initial response from the vendor displayed numerous shop practices and records utilixed to substantiate personnel qualifications.

The additional response attached hereto states that the vendor Judges those practices of demonstrating personnel qualifications to be adequate.

The vendor amplified this position by indicating that should the ASME broaden

E

'l t

II

I I 1Y

.I tl' tt 1

1 I

1i 1

I I

0 i'I 1-Mr. D. Locklear

~

2' September 7p 1977 Y,

I 7'P 8I gt

~

the interpretation of training records requirements, they would comply accordingly.

The response is evaluated as satisfactory to resolve the finding.

4.,

Finding No. 3a stated that audit records, were not available to verify control and distribution of the QA Manual.

The initial xesponse'rovided t'e requisi.te corrective action to resolve the finding, and the" followmp response provides the action taken to prevent recurrence.

The'esponse is evaluated as satisfactory to resolve the'inding.

5.

Finding, No. 3b. stated that all applicable areas and sections were not audited to verify compliance to the'A program.

The'endor's audit program has,been expanded'o encpmpass all applicable areas of the'A program and was verified as 'acceptable during an NRC, audit during the week of June 13, 1977. 'his 'response is evaluated as satisfactory to resolveJthe finding.

6.

The two general comments have been, satisfactorily resolved.

Based on the aforesaid information and the 'attachment herewith, Audit Finding Nos. 1, 2a, 2b, 3a, 3bt and the two. general comments have',been satisfactorily resolved.

This completes the, corrective 'action to Audit QAA/702-2 and this memorandum is written notification of such in fulfillment of Audit Procedure QAAP-1.

Should you have any questions, please contactme.'I I

I tt~t-I)

DAM/gag Attachment J

0 cc:

Mr. P.

W. Howe Mr. M. F. Thompson, Jr.

File'W/A tent Yl b o

)IJ I~

tt 0

$4~~

I

II

~f II r fI,I If S

C I

I f

g II

~

', I

~]

R Q J

~

~

I

I 585l NK!%~

4 I

~

~

~

~

~

~

I o

~

el

~

~

~

~

~

I

~

~

I

~

~

II

~ ~

I

~

I I

l

~

~

~

4 ]t

~

~

~

g

~

I II

~ I] ~

I

~

'I

~

~

~

I ]I

~

~

]

~

~ I

~

~

~

~

~

~

I

~

~

~

~

I I I

~

I

~ I]

~ I I

I

~

~

~

II ~

~

~

~

~

~

I

~

~

4 I

]

I

~

~

~

~

~

I

~

I

~

~ II ~

I

~

~

~

~

~ ~

~

~

I

~

I

~

~

~

~

I I

I I

~

~

I I

t+

50UTHwE5T FABRlCATlMG A leiilAen Ot iv lactea>1S ~ Ol Mr. N. J. Chiangi August 26, 1977 response has been evaluated as nonresponsive.

Further action is requested, to resolve this finding.

Res onse and Corrective Action A.

In order,to provide specific recognition of training and indoctrination in our QA Manual for "engineering and upper QA/QC management personnel,"

we plan to incorporate the

,following additions to Section 1.4.1 in Revision 9 of our QA Manual:

trinaeed in the application of the rules in ASME Section III to the satisfaction of SFl'W management and responsible for appropriate indoctrination and training for all personnel assigned to ehe Engineering Department.

Vice President-En ineerin The Vice President of Engineering (QA/QC).

A Registered Professional Engineer indoctrinated in the application of the rules in ASME Section III to the satisfaction of SF&W management and responsible for appropriate in-docerination and training of all personnel assigned to the Quality Assurance and Quality Control Departmenes.

This revSsion will be submitted to our Authorized Inspection Agency for acceptance of the next revision to our QA Manual.

B.

Each revision of our QA Manual muse be accepted by our Authorized Inspection Agency before the change can be incorporated into the QA Manual.

Therefore, since we have not officially submitted this proposed

change, we cannot assure you that it is acceptable to our Authorized Inspection Agency.

When thc changes are authorized, the revised,seceions of our QA Manual will be dis-tribueed eo all individuals who have controlled copies of our QA Manual.

C.

This change, if accepted, will be incorporated in Revision 9 of the QA Manual which is scheduled for diseribution prior to December 1, 1977.

Audit Findin 2a The response to correct the noted deficiencies has been evaluated as satisfactory, but action eo prevene recurrence has not been provided.

Therefore, this finding remains open pending receipt of a response stating the action taken to prevent recurrence.

)

%i 1

1 I

t A'

W l~

'n c.

FA8RlCATIN6 MVGOINGCC. NC, A 41uJleg

~I IV 4l ~ <a ~ >losel Mr. N. J. Chiangi August 26, 1977 Res onse and Corrective Action a.

Periodic audits of QA records are conducted to minimize recurrence.

W.b.

The initial audit was conducted by Mr. J.

E. Harris on 5/27J77.

Reaudits of,such items will be conducted at six month intervals.

Audit Findin 2b Althou h the response provides numerous actions to verify implementing these procedures by supervisory personnel, it fails to in oug personne ersonnel training records attesting to qualification(s) were, are, or wiii be maintained to demonstrate compliance to Criterion IX of 10CFR50 di B and NA-4000.

The response has been evaluated as nonresponsive; Appen x

an and further action, including action to prevent recurrence, q

e is ze uested to resolve this 'finding.

Res onse and Corrective Action a.

No additions to our QA Program or records are )udged to be neces-sary since, in our opinion, we are in full compliance with t e intent of NA-4000 relative to "Qualification of Personnel" and "Personnel Records" as applicable.

b.

Presently, we are not aware of any additional mandatory training requirements that must be recozdcd to be in compliance with our QA Manual or the ASME Code.

We have determined that others, including a member of the ASME III Working Group on Quality Assurance, interpret the intent of the Code to require records of formal-training and indoctrination programs only where qualification requirements are clearly established, such as they are for NDE, inspector'ye examinations, and welding operators'ualification tests.

However, it has been indicated to us that this sub)ect of training programs will be pursued at the next meeting of the ASME IIIWorking Group on Quality Assurance.

c.

l'f it is determined that the intent of the Coda requires additional training records, we shall comply accordingly.

Audit Findin 3a The response indicates that QA files and records maintained by the secre-tary were audited for control of Southwest Fabricating 6 Welding Company's QA Manuals and no findings were reported.

The response to verify correc-tion of the noted deficiency has been evaluated as satisfactory, but action to prevent recurrence has not been provided.

Therefore, this finding remains open pending receipt of a response stating action taken to prevent recurrence.

,~

I, r

'C b

I, ggl s$

~ g I '

0

~

~

~ l l

~

~

~

~

I i

~

~

~

l l

~

~

l

~

~

~

l l

~

~

~

~

l II

~

~

~

~

~ ll ~

~ l l

~

~

~

i l

~

~

~

~

~ ~

~

~

i

~

~

~

~

l

~

I

~

~

~

~

~

Il

~ l l

~

~

l

~

~

~

~

l I

~

~

~ l

~

l

~

~

~ l

~

~

~

~

~

I 1'

~

~

~

~

~ '

~

I

~

~

~

~

~ ~

f

~

~

l i

l

~

~

~

~

~

II

~

~

~

l

~

l

~

~

~

~

l l ~

I i

~

~

~

I

~

~

I ~

I

~ I

~

~

~

~

I

~

I

~

~

~

I I

~

I

~

~

I

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

i

~

~

~

~

l f

~

~

~

f

~

~

~

I

~

~

~

~ '

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

i

~

~

~

l

~ l

~

~

~

~

~

N A

I

&WELLINGCL lt4C, 4 SA1144~

~I N laiotaollosol Mr. N. J. Chiangi August 26, 1977 I

b.

As presented in the response to Pinding 3b, future audits will address all sections (15) of, the QA Manual.

These periodic audits will include verification of the referenced procedures.

General Comment No.

2 - Re ardin Effective Dates of Two Ins actors'glification Records The response indicates several actions taken as a result of the auditors'omment, but fails to indicate that the inspectors'ualification recorJds have been signed, as required by procedure.

It is suggested that thi's matter be given additional attention to prevent future problems 'of: a like or similar nature.

Res ense and Corrective Action a.

Inspector recoxds have been reviewed and approved as necessary to, establish qualification 'dates.

4 4NI

<II, I

.b.

As presented in,the response

'to, Pinding 3b, future audits will

'address,all'sections, (15) of the QA Manual.

These pex'iodic audits will include verifi'cation of applicable personnel records.

I

-~

If we can be of further service in this matter, please contact us at your convenience.

Very truly yours, N. H. Moerke Vice President-Engineering (QA/QC)

NHM:dc cc:

B. J.

Goodwin R. P.

Bornes J.

E. Harris Info. copy:

G. H. Lockwood 0

0 0

II ~I P

0 '

t C

C F'

J 5

"d

'g 1

< c lq g*'~

4

~i',

lr

~sr

(

g4

~

~

l

~

~

~ II ~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

I

~ ~

~

~

I

~

~

~

~

I l ~ '

~

l

~ '

~ ~

~

~ l

~

I

~

~

~

~ ~

~

~

~ ~

~

I

~

~

~

I

~

~

~

I I l

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

II ~

~

~

I

,a t ~

'e f4

~,1 k

y I I

)4 p'k ~

j4

,J' li

'I I A

. ~c)

I!

I I

I II 1,

i C

4 "II 4

C

'I gh P

l

~

~

I tA I '

~

I i '

~

~

~

~

j

~

~ h

~ l

~

i

~

~

~

~

e

~

~

~

~

~

5

~

~

~

I

~

~ ~

~

~

~ j S

~

~

~

~

~ ~

~

II ~

~

~

j

A h

1I

'.a 1

h l

~,

~

I

~

~

~

~

1

~

I 44

~ I

~ '

Is s.

~

~

~

~

I I

~ II ~

~

~

~

I

~

I I

~

I I

I I Is

~

~

~

~

~

II

~

~

~

II '

I

~

~ ~

~

ll

~

4 I

1 ~

~ I

~

~

I

~ '

I

~

~

~

~ I ~

~ ~

I

'I ~

~

~

~

~

~

~I

~

~

~

I

~

~

~

I

~ tl

~

~

I

~

\\

~

~

~\\

SI l.'

I-

~

I ~

I IQ@'yS' I"'

1

~

~

Jh hl J /

~I ~

h

~

l

~

I J

~

l I ~

l l l

~

I

~

I I

~

~ ll ~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

I

~

~

~

I

~

~ ll ~

~ I

~

~

~

I

~

I

~ li 1

~

I

~

1 I

~

~

~

~ '

~ I I

~l

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

jj I I'l I

~

~

I

~

~

I ~

I

~

I

~

I ~

I

~

~

~

~

I ~

~

I

~

I I

~

I

~

1

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

lt

~

~

~

I

~

~

~

~

I

~

~

~ '

~

~

i

~

~

~

~

~

I

~

~

~

~

I I

I

~

~

S I

~

~

~

~

~

I

~j I

~

I

~

~

I '

t.

~

I

~

~

~

~

ll I I

~

~ I I

~ I

~ ~

~

~

~

~

I

~

~

I

~

~

~

I I

~

~

~ 1 I '

I I

~

~

'I

~

~

~

Ji 'O'

~

I

~

~

I

'I'lI I

~

~

1

~

~

~

~

~

I

~

~

~

I I

~

~

I

~

H p

4 lh

'J PK V

I "A

h

~ h l'"

H r

y 4'4 I<a

,V l

tp

>lr. D. Locklear t<<

-2'"

June 9,, 1977 5.

Finding 3b stated that all areas and sections of the gA program were not sub)ected to intcrnnl audit as.prescribed by the gA manual.

The vendor is xevising the internal audit program,to,encompass,a11 areas and sections under the + program with, nn intended completion date of June 30,, 1977.

This xesponse is evaluated as satisfactory,,

and the finding will remain,open pending xeceipt of completion of action.

6.

The first general comment hns been resolved.

The, second general comment has been referred, back to the vendor with,a, suggestion, that it be given additional attention, since they failed,tostate that, the recoxds were signed to indicate date.of qualification.

I

('.

I, 0

Based on the aforesaid, satisfactory action is, being taken, to" Pinding No. 3b. All findings remain open pending furthe'r response from the vendor.

v<<t DAM/gag t

Attachment cc:

Mr. P. V. Howe Mr. L. l. Loflin Pile "I

n,

h I

J 9

t,

'(

Vl,

~

1 1

l'

~,

s m

'i )

g V

g ~

4"

~yt Jl,

Ih

'I (I

, (1

('

gt E

(I

~7 tt, I

(5 Cfet/

t

, EP,I(

g,'>> -

(

I tag j5a htt 2s, f

I I

Eat et

'I

~

~

~

~

~(34 b G tang 5OUTHNfEST" FABRtCATtNCIi,",':"; zo ftWCIDIIIGCG.INC, i'(II72(t f15(II(atts$6c4 /tp+(6, IIle')/Ise(tss(t(s,featsfmII/l1I2I II2b2I2I/TWIIIIIIONIIIscO A etasststtt

~I sss sas ~ taatlaatl E E I IEfg~

"<dcdl/0 May 31, 1977 It ~ III,g r r ~."LI,f.

Ia I

I hal p

I

't Mr. N. J. Chiangi, Manager Engineering 6 Construction Quality Assurance Carolina Power 6 Light Compan./

P. 0.

Box( 1551 Raleigh, North Carolina 27602

Dear Mr. Chiangi:

k(2ss(c Ic

/(Lett,e ceto (5

, J Reference Sub5ectc File QAA/702-2 HI/A - ID Harris Prefect Units 1, 2, 3 and 4

Quality Assurance 'Audit of Southwest Fabricating and Welding Co., Inc.

March 22-24, 1977 I(

C In response to your letter 'daI."ed Apr.'.1 18, 1977 that was directed to our Mr. J.

E.

Harris, we submit,t our comment>'o the findings that werc reported by your Messrs.

C.

G. Hensley and A. E. Hall.

Our response and corrective action schedule are outlined below:

(

4E rt Findin s and Corrective ActioII:

X(aa 1:

I

/5 I

I

"(S (I '

I It (s

17 (

.I

(

~

t I

I 1(i,(-,.I, -4C 10CFR50 Appendix Bt Criterion II Nonconformance:

Criterion II required that thc QA Program provide for thc indoctrination and training of personnel performing activities affecting quality, as necessary, to assure that suitable proficiency is achieved and maintained.

In rc&iewing paragraph 2.2.3.1 of SF&WIs QAMt which outlines tlIc proce-dures for training, it was observed by the auditors that training and indoctrination requirements for Engineering and upper QA/QC management personnel are not presently covered by written procedures.

Res onse and Corrective Action; a.

Neither 10CFR50 Appendix B Criterion II nor ASME Section III hava mandatory requirements that training and indoctrination requirement for Engineering and upper QA/QC management personnel shall bc covered by written proccdurcs.

I<

0 (I I 05 a

t P

l' l

,)

1 1t ~h (P

r,r t

P Fa g

V I

lb

'f

~

y I

I soUTHWear FABRlCATING r eccuera tc,uc, i )Atwl~ I~ ol m lCletsoll ~ C ~I Hr N, J. Chiangi, Manager Engineering

& Construction'uality Assurance Page 2~

Hay 31, 1977 b.

The SF&W QA Program, as presented in the QA Manual, Rev.

8 dated March 1' 1977 specifically addresses ASME Section III. Article NA-4000 provide<< the bases'or compliance with SF&W management responsibility for,assignment of qualified personnel to functions

, within the scope of Sccti'on III to assure,trair'lng and indoctrination

,of Engineering 'and upper QA/QC management personnel:

1.

Engineering The SF&W personnel report titled "Indoctrination Program" that is prepared and periodically updated by the Chief Engineer identified the 'SF&W personnel trained to perform engineering work on nuclear power plant items within the scope of products furnished by SF&W.

This report ennumerates the following disciplinesi a)

Squad Supervisor/Nuclear b)

Qualific:d to Check Nuclear c)

Qualified to Take-off Nuclear d)

Qualified to Detail Nuclear The current evaluation is dated May 19, 1977.

2.

QA/QC management personnel:

a)

All QA and

'QC management qualifications will continua to be evaluated periodically for each individual.

A certifica-tion of qualification approved by the Vice-President-Engineer-ing (QA/QC) is maintained in the QA,records.

b)

Nondcstructivc Examination personnel vill continue to bc qualified for his individual diciplinc(s) in accordance with applicablc provisions of the ASME Code and SNT-TC-lA.

The certification ia approved by the Vice-President-Enginecrcc ing (QA/QC) and maintained in the QA records.

Item 2:

II

~RQ CCCCcCCC'F&W Procedure QC-102, titled, "Auditing Personnel,"

Revision 0 dated 6-7-76.

P 1I S

U'I

~ r

)E al ll r'"

4

I I', ( \\)

III t I

+

I SOUTHWE5T FABRtCATtNG tv '(fVELVNGCO, l<C, A Sv(IIM(~Ip ~ ( N (vfvfvvflv>~I Mr. H, J, Chiangi, Manager Engineering 6 Construction Quality Assurance Page May 31, 1977 Nonconformance:

In reviewing the qualification records of SF&W's, auditors, it was observed that the audit participation records for D. Hartman did not reflect his participation in internal audits as required and N. ll.

Mocrke's records were not approved by a second party to attest to his qualification av. an auditor.

The records reviewed for these two individuals do not comply with the intent of Procedure QC-102.

Res onse and'orrective Action:

vf vf r0 l.

The qualification records of Mr. D.'artman h.xs been revised to reflect his participation in surveys and audi:s over thc past two years'.

f 2,

The auditor qualification record for. Mr. N. Mnerke, dated 9-3-76, was approved by, Mr'. B. J.

Goodwin, President nn 3-25-77 to certify his qualificaticn as an auditor.

(11 f,(I, 1,

'fV 4'[

SF6W Procedures:

QC-104, titled, "Heat Treating Personnel,"

Rev.

0 dated 6-8-76; QC-105, titled, "Hot Forming 6 Ben<ling Personnel,"

Rev.

0 dated 6-8-76; and QC-106, titled, "Machinists," R(.v.

0 dated 6-8-76.

Nonconformance:

Personnel training records verifying implementation of those procedures listed above wore not available for review.

Rcs onse and Correceive Action:

I 4 g ',,t I I

'Iv1 (14

,<<(."vf',

• I(

I"~I I Documeneaeion of deficiencies with the "Report of Nonconformance" (RON) >

properly executed in accordance with the SF&W QA Manual, provides records for SF&W Management eo evaluate the ef.'crtivcness of the SF6W Training and Indoctrination Programs.

1.

The performance of the mechanics who arc qualified in accordance with applicable procedures QC-104, 105 and 106 will continua to be monieored continuously by the cognizant foreman in charge of each operation.

~'

k V

gt

)

I lI,)

I'I I

j)

I I I

I I

I),

V SOUTHNIE5T FABRtCATlNG a'l)j(clvjsa co tNC, 4 4%IWI~ll ll jjj jhhhlh ~hjylli Mr, N, J. Chiangi, Manager Engineering 6 Construction Page May 31, 1977 I

Quality Assurance hh 2.

Zn addition, records to attest to the qualifications and performance are generated and recorded as follows:

a)

QC 104 "Heat Treating Personnel,"

Rev.

0 dated 6-8-76:

1)

Personnc-1 assigned to this function ace monitored periodically by the CA Metallurgist whoerifies aid records characteris-tics of furnace temperature controller "cams" and related furnace zone temperatures.

2)

The QA Yeeallurgist periodically reviews the Heat Treating Log to verify adherence to the QA programs.

3)

The assigned Quality Control Inspector monitors and endorses the furnace eemperature recorder char" to signify validity of heat treatment.')

Detail cf each furnace change for ferritic steel materials are recorded on the Manufactu'ring Record 'Sheet (MRS).

This includes actual furnace time versus the maximum furnace time shown on the MRS.

These data become part of the Code Document Package.

h 'hQ

)

b)

QC-105 "Hot Forming 6 Bending Personnel" Rev.

0 dated 6-8-76:

1)

Personnel assigned to ehis function 'are monitored periodically by the QA Manager or his designated representative, normally the QA 'Metallurgist, 'to verify compliance with QC-105 and the applicable pro)oct specification.

jg j(h, 2)

The bends are subjected to 100Z inspection by ehe QC Inspector to verify conformance to specifications and pro)act specifica-tions, including dimensional tolerance.

This continuous monitoring assures SF6W Management that all personnel per-forming functions are qualified as specified in the applicable Code and Speci.fication.

3)

Hot bending furnace temperature charts arc retained by QA.

c)

QC-106 "Machinists," Rev. 0'ated 6-8-76.

0 1)

When hiring or promoting of the individual mechanic by the Machinist Foreman, he significs his approval and acceptahce of the qualifications of the machinist.

This compliea with the intent of QC-106.

't

" 4 t

'>h 3)

The issuance of "Report of Nonconformance"'RON) initiated by the cognizant QC Inspector to cover any deviation from Code or,specification,

'and appropriats disposition of the RON's an adequate record to effectively furnish management with information to monitor thc effectiveness and adequacy of training and indoctrination of machine shop personnel.

Item 3:

e.

~Reurreuent:

SF&W's Quality Assurance Manual

{QAM), paragraph

.".4.3.3 Nonconformance:

Ilh

,I

~ gl 'I (tet ue, e'aragraph 14.3.3 requires that control and distri!>ution of SF&W's QAM be verified by audit

~

However, in reviewing SF&W's audit results, it was observed that records are not available to verify control, and distribution,of the QAM is being 'audited, Acknowlcd ement and Res onse:

QA files and records, that are maintained by Ms. D. Cooper, QA Secretary, were audited on 5-27-77 by Mr. J. E.,Harris.

Records of control and distribution of thc SF&W QA Manual, both internal and outside SF&W, were reviewed and found'dcquatc.

No findings werc reported.

t.

ReRuareaeut:

10CFR50 Appendix BR Criterion XVXXI Nonconformance:

I Criterion XVIIX requires that a system of planned and periodic audits be carried out to verify compliance with all aspects of thc QA Program and determine 'thc effectiveness of the program.

llowevcr, in reviewing Exhibit 13-1, "Xntcrnal Audit Report," contained in thc SF&W QAM, the auditors observed that all areas and sections of SF&W quality assurance program are not audited to verify compliance with all aspects of the QA Program.

Examples of areas,cited include Design Control and QA/QC responsibilities.

st',

0 I

e

P n

4 E

V'\\

P N

II

'l l I ~

Eh 7 I

I

~

~

I SOUTHN/EsT FABRlCATlNG Kr klVCLOINGtQ, INC, 4 lAIwl~ Ig ~I Ihh khlwa ~ hi%au z

pi Mr. N. J, Chiangi.,

Manager Engineering

& Construction Quality Page May 31, 1977 Assurance C

I

'I I 0 '

0

~

7 I

Comments and Corrective Action:

1)

The practives that have been employed in conducting internal audits in accordance with Exhibit 13-1 "Internal Audit Report" complies with the SF&W QA Manual, liowcvcr, as stated, Exhibit 13-1 docs not assure, that the contents of all fifteen sections of the QA Manual will,be fully addressed in the audit program.

2)

The internal audit program is being supplemented and the planned futures program will separately address all se tions of the QA Manual instead'f thirteen elements shown on Exhibit 13-1 "Internal Audit'IReports."

This will assure morc comprehensive audits of all elements of the SF&W QA Program.

Files and the supplemental Internal Audit Report (IAR) have been prepared with a morc Detailed ",Audit Check List".

"A 1

~

7 ~

(

~

.n"

, rr I>>I' r

17 I

kl,l

,0

<<Ar kl I

I

"',I k.',:,

I 7

,(I+kEj, I,

El'hP "lk

~

This supplementary audit program to increase tn-depth surveillances of the QA Progrsm will be implemented prior ta June 30, 1977.

Ceneral:

Two items were presented at the postaudit meeting as comments to SF&W's QA System:

1)

In reviewing SF&W's procedures and QAM for re"ertification of Nondestructive, Examination Personnel, it was observed that paragraph 9.2.2.1 of the QAM, Rev.

8 requires'ecertification every three years in compliance with the ASME Code;" the auditors also reviewed associated procedure QC-100, Rev.

1 titled, "Nondestructive Examination. Per-sonnel," to assure the three-year recertification requirement was included.

QC-100 was marked with a corresponding "pencil change,"

but the change had never been typed, approved, and distributed to the affected SF&W personnel:

a)

Revision 2 of Procedure QC-100 "Nondestructive Examination Personnel" had been misfiled at thc time of the March 22-24, 1977 audit.

The subject'pencil changes" had been incorporated in Rev.

2 on 6-7-76 and approved.,

Nowevcr, due to the clerical error, full distribution had not been accomplished.

b)

Distribution of QC-100, Rcv. 2 dated 6-7-76, "Nondestructive Examination Personnel" will be distributed during the week of June 6, 1977.

I h

'o h,l

".j<fk',

p'm

'n 11 I

PPij44 J,

J

~

~

~,

~

I o wae<<a ca,wc.

A 341<<ije<<

~I m <<jtjsoAaol Hr, N. J. Chiangi, Manager Engineering

& Construction Quality Assurance Page>>7-Hay 31, 1977 l'I O.

J. ~

2)

During,the course of reviewing thc qualification records of inspectors the auditors observed thc records of two inspections,,B.

Reynolds and G.'aumback, *that had not, bean signed, to establish their date of qualificatian,as.rcquixed by SF&W Procedure QC-103, Revision 0 dated 6-7-.76.

l a)

The records of the two inspectors, B. Reynolds, and'.

Baumback havej been 'ixeviewed to verify their date of qualification as requixcd by SF&W Procedure QC-103, Rev.

0 dated 6-7-76.

b)

Both mcn are long'erm employees and were engaged,in inspection activities at SF&W before formal requirements were established for nucleax inspectors.

4 Il gt r'j LJ'

~,

4,J c)

Written, results of the cyc examinations in the files establish the certification date of 6-3-76 for Messrs.

B. Reynolds and G. Baumback.

The results of these examinations were accepted on 6-3-76 by the QA Manager.

f you require additional information in order to complete your records on the Southwest Fabricating

& Welding Co., Tnc.

QA Program, please contact us at your convenience.

Very txuly yours, j

J J

p, W N. H. Moex'kc Vice President-Engineering (QA/QC) i%N/)d cc:

B. Goodwin R. Bornes J. Harris 4,'i jtJ" J

-j

~ J j

j 0

(

U j'4 l(Qr

'CJ jr,

514

I 1

I

)

)I I

k foRM 2L)509 PU.e:

QAA/702-2 CIGAR Carolina power g Llghl Company Rsoiyh, N, C. 21502 Iv5 J Cr()

7o2~2 Juno 9, 1977 Hr. N. H. Hoerke Vien Prnsidnnt,'

Engineering (QA-QC)

Southveat Pabricating and Welding Company 7525 Sherman Street P. O,,Box 9449

Houston, Texas 77011 QUALI1Y ASSURANCE AUDIT OF'OUTHWEST PABRICATIHG AHD WELDZHG 2%'1 J~>>6r

~~@)c)l l J 1 c ()el Doer Mr. Hoerke:

Ref renca is made to your letter dated Hsy 31, 1977, vhich provides the corrective eren e

tion responses to the CP6L, Quality Assurance audit of your company during th period March,22-24, 1977.

CPEL han completed evaluation of the response, and hereinafter are, the results.

PLnding Ho. 1 stated that thn QA'anual did not, address traiaiag and indoctrination for engineers and upper QA/QC management personnel.

Another revtev of the QA manual, including Envision,g forvardod to CPhL on March 17, 1977, confirms that tho manual does aot address the aforesaid training and indoctrination.

Both Criterion II to 10CPR50 Appendix B and subsection NA4000 to ASHE B&PV Code Section IIIrequire the QA program to provide for indoctrination aad trahdag of personnel performing'ctivities affecting quality, 'as necessary, to assure that suitable proficiency is achiaved and maintained, Also, subsection NA4000 requires the manufacturer to assure that personnel performing functions within tbe scope of tho section are qualified and that personnel,traixdng records are retained.

Although tho response indicates Southvest, Pabricating and Welding Company maintains a report on indoctrination sad training for engineers nnd provides msnagemoat revicv of QA/QC management qualificatioas, tho QA manual doos aot recognise this training.

In vied of this, thc rcspoase has been evaluated as aoarespoasive, Further action in requested to resolve thin finding.

Finding Ho. 2a stated that qualification records for Mr. D. Hartmsn and Mr. N. H. Hoerke vere doficient.

The ronponne to correct the noted deficieacins han bona evaluated as satisfactory, but nction to prevent recurrence han not bonn provtdad.

Therefore, this finding remains opoa pending receipt of a response stating the action tnkna to prevent recurrence

~

4 4

X 5 I1 P

4

~ ~

~

~ I

~

t I

I I

~

I 4 \\

~

I I

~

~

~

I

~

~

~

~ ~,

~

I

~

I I

I

~

~

II~

~

~

I

~

I

~

4

~

I

~

~

~

~

~

I

~

~ I

~

4

~

~

~

I I

~

~

~

I

~

~

I

'I Il~ ~

~

~

~

~

~

I I

~

~

1 ~

~

I

~

I I

~

~

~

~ 4 I

~

~

I

~

~

~

I I

~

~ I

~ j

~

I

~

~ \\

~

~

~

I 'I

~ I

~

~

I

~

~

1 I I

~

~

~

~

~

~

~ I I

~ ~ I I

~

I

~

~

~

~

I'

~

4

~

~

I

~

I

~

1 I

~

~

~

I

~

~

~

~

~

~ I 1

~

It~

~

~

I

~ 'I

~

~

~

~

~

I

~

~

I~ ~

I

~

~

1

~

I

~

~

1 I

~ I ~

\\

~

I~

~

~

~

I I

~

4

'I

~

I

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~ I

~

1 4

~

I

~

~

~

~ 4

\\

~

1 1

~

~

~

I

~

~

~

I

~

~

~

I~\\

~ I I

~

~

~

~

~

lt~

~

~

I

~ I

~

~ I

~

~ ~

I I I

~ ~ ~,I I

~

~

~

~

~

~

~ '

I

~

~

~

~ I

~ I

~

~

~

~

I

~

4 ~

~

~

~

I

~

- 4 I

~

I

~

~

~

~

~

I~

~

~

~ ~

~

~

~

~

~

~ ~

\\

~

~

~

~

I

~

~ I I

I ~

I

~

~

~

~ ~

I

~

~

~ ~

~

~

I

~

1

~ I '

~

~ \\

~

~

~

~

~4

~ t I

~

~ \\

I~

~ I

'I

~

~

I I I I ~

I

~

I

~

~

~

m. ~

~

~

t I

~

~

I

~

~

I

~

~

4

~

~

I ~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

I I

~

~ III I ':

~

~ I

~

~

~

~

I

~

I

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

I

~

~

I I

~

~

~ I

~

~

~

~

I

~ ~

~ '

I

~

~

~

1

~

~

I

~

~

~

I

~

~

~

~

~

~

~ I I ~

~

~

~

~

~

~ I

~

~

~

~

~ ~

~ 4 I '

I

~ I

~ I

~

I

~

~

~

~

~ I

~

~

I

~

~

I

~

\\

~

~

~

I I

~

~

~

~ '

~ ~

~

~

III I

~

~,

~

I

~

~

~ I

~

~

~

~

~

~ ~

~

I

~

I

~

I

~

I I

~

~

~

~

~

I

~

~

~

~ I

~

~

I

~

~

I

~

~

~ '

~

~ ~

ll ~ I I

~ '

~ I

~

~ I

~ ~

I

~

~

4

~

I

~

~

I 11

~

~ \\

'1

~

~

~

~

~

I

~

84 ~

~

~

~ '

t

~

I

~

~ I

~

~

I'

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

I

~ ~ 4 \\

~

~

t I

~

~

~

. ~

~

I I I I

~

~

I

~

I

~

~

~ ~

I

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

I

~

~

~

~

~

~ ~

NI

~

~

~

I

~

~

~

I I 4

~

~

~ ~

~

I

~

~

~

~

~

I

~

'I

~

~ I'4 I

~

I

~

~

~

4

~

~

~

~

I I I

~

~

~

I

~

~ ~

~

~

II 11

.'C jt I

'~V'4

",W V

'I, 11l 1*.4

. +.j~4te I',Vktj+h 11 1 4,.';

~'-

4p('i:I..

I'

's f

lp J

~

~

N, A'

I' 0

'1

'. p l

il I,

~

1

.441% 134~.','

f41 4'

. Mr, N. Hi Mocrke

~4 3 IW June 9, 1977

~ 4" '

ft I

DAM/)ag OI1gli"iSI Fgi18d Big N. j.

Chia,"hagi N. J. Chiangi - Manager Engineering

& Construction

/Vilitykdsurance cc:

Mr. J. E. Harris (SQ&P)

Mr.,L. V. Thierwechter W/Referenced Lotter)

Your prompt attention to tld.o matter is appreciatodI and should yoy have any questions in this matter, ploaao contact ma.,

bcc:

Mr. P, W. Howe Mr, D. Locklear 4

'r.

L. Z. LoElin Mr, M. F.- Thompson, Jr.

Pile, 4~'-

34.

I

'3 4

I n

II

~ i 41 '

(I I

Il I

.I (4(+4 I

r I

II

'I

>.i"I III'

'l I

ii8lQt thSOM Carolina power & llghl Company Aalelqh, tt( C. Ãg(2 g

D Pobruary, 13, 1978 Pilot QAA/702-3

~0398 Mr. John Harris, Contract Administrator Southvast Fabricating G Welding, Company, Inc.

7525 Sherman Street P, '0, Box 9449 Houston, Te~o

'77011 I

44);

CAROLINA POWER G LXC11T COMPANY HARRIS PROJECT 1984-86-88-90-3GOO'W - UNITS 1'h 2, 3, 6 4 QUALITY ASSURAhCE AUDIT OF SOUTHWEST FABRICATING 6 WELDINC CQ1PA1iY, INCe REPERENCE Po Oo NY435035 Dear Mr. Harriat 14 I

Pa 4

),

rlr,p ht r,l "I(I I

14 v I~

(

4h h Ql l(il Il I

h I

(k

'",,'Ih

~ (

'I i I'4',.

I III'I'rh

'I I I

1

~ ~~((-l' Your asoiocance in, assuring your conpany's, readinesa for this audit ia appreciated, and if there are questiono in this,natter, please contact Mr, Hall at (919)836-616G.

41

~ ~ ~

ro very, truly, l( sl M 's~(r j yJ(

• '1 S.

McManiut >> Manager Corporate Nucloar Safety 6 Quality Assurance Audit AEHtfdcTC452 Actachmont cct Mr. L. V. Thoirwcchter (2) v/a bcct Meaara.

N. J. Chiangi (v/a)

W. B. Kincaid (w/a)

M. P. Thonpoon, Jr. (v/a)

This will confirm a January 30> 1978 telephone conversation between yourself and our Mr. A.,E. 11all, in which.tho sub)oct audit waa discussed.

It io planned to conduct a quality assurance audit oi Southveot Fabricating 6

Welding Company, Houoton, Texas, during the period March 14-16, 1978.

The attachment-provides the, audit agenda/plan for this audit. It is requested that no formol presentation bo prepared, for lthio audit.

.4 044 (I

C

1. (h I

4 (h

a ihg',i (I(

I.

(h"

-I "

4Irrl

- r<

"W+>>

~

'lhh Audit A ends Plan Ik

'l.

Activityt Southwest Fabricating 6 Welding Company, Inc.

Houston~

Texas E

~Audit Schedule Date:

March 14-16, 1978 Auditors:

A. E. Hall', Lead,Auditor T. L.,Kosmatin Requixcmentst P., 0. NY435035 10CFR50l 'Appends E

ASME Section ',III CAR-SH-ME-12 Applicable Documents:

Southwest Pabricating 6 Welding Company's QA Manual Agenda t 1.0 Preaudit Meeting 2.0 Quality Assurance/Control Program 2.1 Quality/Organization Program 2.2 Design Control 2'.3 Procuremene Document Control 2'.4, Document Conerol

. 2.5 Control of Purcha'sed Materials

. 2.6 Identification and Control of Material, Parts, and Components

,2.7 Special Process Control 2.8 Inspect:ion/Tese Contxol

,2.9 Control of Measuring and Tese Equipment

,2.10 Handling, 'Storage, and, Shipping 2.11 'nspection, Test',

and Operat:ing Status

'2.12 Nonconforming Material/Correct:ivc Action

. 2.13 lQuality Assurance

Records,

,2 14

Audits, 2.15 Review ofPindings/Corrective Action for'udit QAA/702-2 3.0 Postaudit Meeting Audit Repor t,No.:

QAA/702-3 QAA Procedure No.:

QAAP-1

4 r

1 0

Zntnta fn f0+

CAROLINA POW'BR &: LIGHT COMPANY RAffllGlf,NORTJf 'CAROONA.lf601

'arah 28,

1978, Co 800457,

y r

Filol QAA/702-3 t

II Mr. John Harris, Prefect Maaagcr Southwcot Fabricating

& Vold$ag Company, 7525 Sherman Street P. 0. Box 9449

Houston, Tfafao 77011 r

Inc r CAROLI?lA PO'nfER &'ICSX'OMPAHY HARRISt PRMlNT 1984-86-88-90-3600?B - UHITS 1, 2, 3y AUD,4'",

QUALITY ASSURAHCE" ARIZ OF SOtlXHVZST'FABRICATIEQ & HZLDIHC COMPAHY~ IHCa

'REFZREHCE PiOo HY435035 Dear Mr. Harriof n

Attached please find'aa audit report of tha quality'assurance audit conducted" during tho period March l4-16,, 'l978, by, CP&L personnel at your facility located ia Houston, Terna'.,

Tho, attached audit zaport contains four, findingfi, zequixiag corrective action, including action to prevent recurronce aad five general c~ato rcquiriag your, evvaluatioa

",for zeoolutioa.

il n

I I

It io requested Chat you reviser this, natter,and provide CP&L,,within thirty (30) daya of your receipt of this audit';rcport, iadividuoi atatemcnta of correctivea'cttiotn'aken or being token to each,finding in numerical order'a, deliaaatod, ia the,'audit rcport.

In cbe cfvcit that corrective action cannot be cccrplated within thirty dayo a, dual,rcapoaio 'ia required.

'Thc initial response'ithin thirty days ohould include e schedule completion dote for corrective octioa rcffiainiag incoaplcte aad the corractive "action Icompleted.

The second follow-up raoponoe should indicata that correctiVe action haa bean completed.

Additionally, atatcmoato of actions taken'to prevent recurrence of thc findiago ara required,,

Yourn yvdzy truly, Br('giriff/ b'fgnffd Ny'PCnfftffdl 77k

~ f EffffffS S. McMaauo, Manager

,,Corporate Huclear Safety

, QuaU,CQ" Aoouroaca Audit AEH/tlcHl Attachment T

In

'b

'I

~

I i". ',$

n o I

ccl Mr. J. Harris (2) w/a

'r.

L. V. Thoixvachtar (2) ff/a bcc:

Messrs.

Ny J. Chiangi (w/a)

M. B. Kincaid {w/s),

M. F'. Thompson, Jr., (w/a) r b

b T

V

gW

~,

~ I 1