ML18016A940
| ML18016A940 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Harris  |
| Issue date: | 04/03/1979 |
| From: | Bissette L, Hall A, Sean Mcmanus CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT CO. |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML18016A936 | List:
|
| References | |
| QAA-170-1, NUDOCS 9905050220 | |
| Download: ML18016A940 (99) | |
Text
'
Cerollnn Power 8 tighl Company i)J C0<<95000dcnc<r April 3, 1979 File:
QAA/170-1
<<lEMORANDUM TO:
Messrs.
Shcaron Harris
~~oltea
-PROH:
S, McManuo
SUBJECT:
ASME Quality Assurance Audit of SHNPP Construction 5 ~
tlPB9 <<79 RECEIVED CP&L C'.S r.;,'l MCT'.,"."
During the period March 19-23,
- 1979, a Corporate Quality Assurance Program Audit, was conducted at thc SHNPP Construction Site.
This was conducted by Messrs.
A. E. Hall (Lead Auditor), L. W. Bissetee, I. A. Johnson, and F.
W.
Taylor of thc Corporate Nuclear Safety 6 Quality Asourance Audie Section.
The purpose of this audit was to evaluate the SHNPP ASME Quality Assurance Program and to verify compliance with thc implementing procedures.
The attached audit report summarizes the resules of the audit.
The completed checklist> which wao used as a guide in conducting this audit, is maintained in the CNS&QAA Seceion files.
AEH:fdcTC Attachment cc:
Messrs.
N.
G.
S.
P
~
W.
r( ~
J. Chiangi (v/a)
L. Forehand (v/a)
Hamilton (w/a)
W. Howe (v/a)
D; ei Je~r (w/a)
B. Kincaid (v/a)
L. Mnyton, Jr.
(w/a)
M. A. McDuffie (w/a)
W.
W. Morgan (v/a)
R. M. Parsons (w/a)
S.
D. Smith (w/a)
M. F. Thompson, Jr.
(w/a)
T. H. Wyllie (v/a)
TO:
Mr. S.
McManuo FROM:
J. A. Jones The attached audit repore, QAA/170-1, hns been reviewed and is returned for placement in the CNS&QAA files with the folio g comments.
9905050220 990420 PDR ADOCK 05000400 P
PDR As required by Audit Procedure QAAP-1, it io the responsibility of the Manager - Engineering 6 Construction Quality Assurance eo review and investigate thc audit findings; to determine and schedule appropriate corrective acrion, including action to prevent recurrence; nnd to respond in vriting within thirty dnyo after receipt of this report, giving results of the review and investigation, and describing corrective action taken to resolve the findings identified in this report.
I
.'E-
<5
),
Il
'1 II I.
I<'
@E II i<< I
'>>.l I~
L L
J
'IJ
-"Er J
. JI' IEQ I I
<<~<Ed'4.
tl'"
.'i'8 j. ~,,E'-
'/A'4.',.-7
P, k
f N
4 i
I
<
N.
- p,
- W.
J. <<S.
- Attended the Postaudit Meeting
>+ Attended the Preaudit Meeting ">"Attended the Preaudit and Postaudit Meetings C. Whitehead - Senior QA Specialist Simpson Senior QA Specialist Safarian - Senior QA Specialist G. Loving Senior QA Specialist L. Bets, Jr. - Senior QA Specialist J. Burnette - Material Supervisor D. Goodman - Pro)act Manager, Daniels L. Forehand - Principal QA Specialist F. Nevill - Site Engineer, Civil M. Parsons - Site Manager H. Wyllic - Manager, Nuclear Construction Hinnant - Principal Engineer, Mechanical/Electrical Kelly - Senior QA Specialist Nail, Jr. - Pro/act Office Engineer E. Recse - Pro)act Engineer/Welding Harrington - Senior Buyer J. Chiangi - Manager, Engineering & Construction QA W. Howe - Vice President, Technical Services McLean - Senior Engineer, Mechanical Seylcr - Senior Engineer, Civil Schenck - Weld Material Issue Attendant McManus - Manager, Corporate Nuclear Safety & QA Audit h ~Scn e: This audit waa conducted in accordance with CP&L's Quality Assurance Audit Procedure QAAP-l, "Procedure for Quality Assurance Audit as Required by CP&L Corporate QA Program, and ASME QA Program." The purpose of thc audit was to review and evaluate selected portions of thc CP&L ASME QA Program, SUPP PSAR commitments on concrete containment (Append1x 5H in PSAR), Site QA Program/Procedurea, and verify site compliance with implementing procedurca. Areas/activities audited included: (1) ASME/Document Control; (2) Site Procurement-ASME Items; (3) Receiving Inspection - ASME Items; (4) Process Control; (5) Welding Control; (6) Heat Treating; (7) Calibration of Equipment and Tools/ ASME; (8) Inspection & Test - Welding p>'d ~ H 7" '4 7 4) 4 2 Q and Hydro; (9) Nondestructive Testing; (10) ASME QA Records; (11) Containment Construction - ASME Section Ill, Division 2; and (12) Housekeeping During Construction Phase. Within these
- areas, thc audit consisted of dicussions with personnel, examination of records and procedures, audit team walk through of construction site, and witness of construction work in process.
~sumpter: wtthte the scope oi this ausit, tha Asws Quality Asoutauca Program will be considered adequate when the seven findings identified in this report are resolved. The eleven concerns identified in the general section of this report should be reviewed by the responsible parties to determine if actual problem areas exist. ~ >>7 4 tl rpl 7 'i' )r. 7 7 4 c,.).o l,>> Lah) Ll During this audit, thc audit team toured the SHNPP Construction Site and reviewed housekeeping during the construction phase as required by ANSI Standard N45.2.3, titled "Housekeeping During the Construction Phase of Nuclear Power Plantaeu The auditors, immediately after the housekeeping tour, informed the CP&L Site Manager and the Daniel Pro)ect Manager of thc conditions found. One nonconforming finding was identified during the housekeeping tour and is detailed in this report, which is the resul't that the site did not have documented procedures implemented to control housekeeping. The site issued their housekeeping procedures,
- however, they are not implemented as of this audit date.
The auditors reviewed the site housekeeping procedures and they will meet the requirements of ANSI N45.2.3 when implemented. 4 4 i), 4 'I 'j Personnel contacted during the audit were cooperative and found to be knowledgeable in their areas of responsibility. ')s 7 'r)2 u YPL During the audit, thc following items were identified as nonconforming findings. The items require corrective action and formal rcsponsc. Actions taken to preclude recurrence are also required for Item 2. a! v Reiutteaeet: r)7)', o4 I Nonconformance: E )'4 >>) i l , ~ ' 4 44 ')
- -EQ)s~+QYQ~>~"Pv oh>>r ~>>v,'tel)EE)LLcKQPALLPL
'-7. !QPAQQ'-i'~ Pindin s and Corrective Action: Item 1: ASME Section III, paragraph NB-5111, requires that radiographic penetrameters for single-wall radiographic technique be in accordance with Table NB-5111-1. Penetrameter sensitivity for source site penetrametcrs in Table 2 of CP&L procedure NDEP-101, Revision 1, for material thickness over 7/8 inch through 1-1/4 inch is not in compliance with Table NB-5111-1. Procedure NDEP-101 requires that thc 4T hole in the penetramctcr bc displayed on the radiograph. Thc ASME Code,Section III, Table NB-5111-1, specifics that the 2T hola be displayed on the radiograph. 7 Eq IEE ,u 4))'E) 4 L, h )L L QC'AL Sl P 4 .P )LE 4 ~ 7
- t)Q LL) 7
N , fear ~uk<.
- fy.'
I IP, I 1 I' . 'I I ~ e 'u )I, tII'-.,P ~ I 1 - 3 ee Acknowled emcnt and Res onse: The Manager, E&C QA stated the sensitivity shown in CP6L procedure NDEP-101 will bc modified to agree with the requirements of ASME
- Code,Section III.
Item 2: ~Rc utteuent: Ebasco Specification CAR-SH-AS-55, Circular Liner Plates and ASME Code,Section III, Division 2, paragraph CC-2131.1(c). Nonconformance: The Ebasco Purchase Order NY435170, to vendor Hcmmingcr, for containment circular liner plates for Units 1 and 2 required the plate material to meet ASME Code,Section III, Division 2. The Certified Material Test Report (CMTR) supplied by the vendor does not meet thc requirements of CC-2131.1(c). Thc code requires the CMTR to have a statement giving the manner in which the material is identified, including specific marking. Acknowled emcnt and Res onse: Thc Principal QA Specialist stated the vendor is being contacted to supply corrected CMTR(s) and he will then review the vendor's identification on the material not yct installed in Unit 2. Item 3: ~Raut tenent: ANSI Standard N45.2.3, "Housekeeping During thc Construction Phase of Nuclear Power Planes." Nonconformance: The ANSI Standard requires that procedures be documented and implemented for housekeeping control. The site docs not have a documented procedure implemented for control of housekeeping. The Site QA does not have a documented procedure implemented for surveillance of housekeeping. Both of the site organizations issued documented procedures during this audit which have not been implemented. The auditors reviewed both of these procedures during the audit and find they will meet the intent of ANSI N45.2.3 when implemented. Acknowled ement and Res onse: Both the Site Manager and the Principal QA Specialist stated they will have these new procedures implemented within one
- month, I,
'et I I ,I,",'\\ 'i ~ R' 'I L I $ R , "e 11, XO 11- -1'l I R I"
- t IL, I'4'.
'L u e nL., '." o.9 ', 'u Vpg E f/.W", ' 'L Zteu 4: ~Ra utrenent: Section IIX, ASME Code, Article NA-4133.10, Examination, Tests, and Inspections, states: "Checklists shall be prepared, including the document numbers and revisions to which thc examination or test is to be performed Nonconformances: a. The Weld Data Report (WDR) contains the checklist but it does not indicate the procedure or its revision to which the NDE examination or test will be performed. b. The "Hydro Test Form," Exhibit 1 of TP-30, Revision 1, dated 3/6/79, does not contain a checklist or provisions for listing procedure and its revision. Acknowlcd ement and Res onse: a. The Manager, E6C QA did not agree with the finding. He stated the type of NDE is marked on the WDR as hold point and the NDE Test Report will be attached to the WDR when documented after the NDE is performed. The NDE Test Report will indicate the procedure and its revision. b. The Principal Engineer - Mechanical/Electrical stated the Hydro Test Form is in the process of being revised to include requirements. Item 5: ~Reutrnuent: The Weld Data Report, Form QA-28, requires documenting the piece numbers and heat numbers of items welded together to identify a weld point. Nonconformance: The Weld Data Rcport for weld joint 3SW13FW169 stated piece number 3.-SW49-17, heat number 98267-23 was welded to piece number 4-SW-2-7, heat number 98534-23;
- however, piece number 1-SW&9-17, heat number 88151-23 was actually welded to piece number 4-SW"2-7, heat number 98534-23.
The pipe, piece 1-SW-49-17, had been flipped over exchanging ends and heat numbers, the weld fit-up inspection had been approved by Site QA Inspector. It was confirmed that the Weld Data Report was corrected during the audit. Acknowled ement and Res onse: Thc Principal QA Specialist stated that identifications will be reconfirmed at final inspection. I I I t ~ (" j)I 3 ~r2 'Ie 1 I 'I'-. I I 'i ' k'J; r 1 ,\\ 1 +Q I L I CI',)- 1 ) , I 1 IJ'k II~ ) k 'e r kJ'4 l l . Rl l r4- ~j l'. l i l 4 4 Jl -0 Item 6: ~Re eReeeeee: Procedure MP-03, Welding Material Control, Revision 1, states: "Dry rod, rebake and recondition ovens shall be temperature checked by a calibrated instrument on a weekly basis by the control area attendant and documentedeu Nonconformance: Weld Rod Holding Oven H1100 was checked thc weeks of 2/26/79 and 3/19/79. It was not checked for two weeks but was still used. The calibration instrument used to check ovens had been
- damaged, and no spaxe or replacement instrument was" available.
Acknowled ement and Res onse: Thc Welding Pro)act Engineer stated the procedure would be changed to require temperature check every two weeks. He also stated an extra calibrated instrument had been purchased. Item 7: ASME QA Manual, Section 3 Administrative Procedure IV-03 Nonconformance: The ASME QA Manual, paragraph 3.3.7, requires purchase orders to bc awarded for code items in accordance with PPCD procedures. The Site Construction Procuremcnt Services Section is issuing and approving purchase orders per PPCD Pxocedure P-066 which is not written as required in Administrative Procedure IV-03, paragraph 3'4 which requires the scope to contain thc sentence, "This is an ASME Section III procedure" when the procedure relates to ASME Code work. Acknowled ement and Res onse: The Manager, E&C QA stated that he did not believe that thc P-066 pxoceduxe should contain the statement since the procedure is used for all purchase orders issued by PPCD. Further study will be made to resolve the nonconformance. Concerns: The following items werc identified as concerns during the audit. It is recommended that they be investigated and evaluated to determine what actions are necessaxy to prevent them from becoming unsatisfactory conditions. ,4l h ~ '1 l J ' 'b.,~ l JR JRWR L .l J! JJ 'll e.. r J 0 "JJ I Jr C 'egad'e J 44 '4J>> l R,R 'l J J er"'JJ't, l I, , "-I) J ~l Concern 1: Paragraphs 8.1 and 8.2 in procedure NDEP-301, Revision 1, Magnetic Particle Examination, indicate that direct current is to be used for all general work, except when detection of fine surface dis-continuities is required or shape of a component or part would prevent use of direct current. The auditors are concerned that these paragraphs do not clearly define when direct current and alternating current are being used. During this audit, magnetic particle examination of a circumferential weld in a 30 inch diameter pipe was witnessed. The completed weld joint was ground only the amount necessary to remove abrupt ridges and the fusion line between the weld and base metal. Direct current would be used to examine this weld joint if the information in paragraphs 8.1 and 8.2 is used to determine current; however, alternating current was used. The Manager - E&C QA stated that the procedure does contain the information necdcd because it states that the current used can either be AC or DC as addressed by the coda. Concern 2: Administrative Procedure EX-10 requires the Document Control Supervisor to distribute the site-generated specifications in accordance with Administrative Procedure IX-02. It is of concern that contrary to distribution of controlled documents, site-generated specifications have been distributed to personnel for procuremcnt purposes without having the stamp "Uncontrolled" applied. The Manager - E&C QA stated that procedures will be examined to determine the need for corrections to allow unstamped documents to be issued by the Document Control Supervisor. Concern 3: A review of eight Construction QA Manuals of Procedures for their control and distribution was made by the auditor. It is of concern that one manual was found issued without having an Approval Page (Page i) and two manuals were issued without having the number of the manual shown on the Approval Page. These items were corrected during the audit. Concern 4: It is of concern that several code items receiving inspection
- packages, three of which arc numbered QA-169476-3, QA-169476-4 and QA-169476-7 contained cross-reference forms that listed obsolete receiving inspection package numbers in which pertinent information is filed.
The Principal QA Specialist stated that thc obsolete numbers would be changed to reflect the correct package numbers. F A( \\ EE .e II II ( / IE, 'I " E EI -7" Concern 5: It is of concern that two code item receiving inspection packages numbered H08009-1 and H08009-2 contained photo copies of chemical analysis reports having unreadable signatures and as such made them incapable of being properly reproduced. The Principal QA Specialist stated that these reports would bc corrected. Concern 6: A CP&L PPED letter No. CE-07426 to Fbasco states the A-E will review and approve the Site Procedure AP-IX-LL, titled "Construction Surveillance." The auditors are concerned that this procedure has not been reviewed and approved by Ebasco. Per Harris Site Engineering, Ebasco will not sign the site administrative procedures. Concern 7: The last survey of Site QA records was performed 9/21/78. Since that time, the Site QA Procedure CQA-3, titled "Construction Site QA Surveys," has been deleted. The auditors are concerned that this now is in confLict with requirements of ASME QA Manual, paragraph 11.1.6 which requires QA records to bc surveyed. The Manager - E&C QA stated that this conflict was an oversight and will be deleted from the ASME QA Manual. Concern 8: The Field Weld Number is marked in the pipe using a vibrator marker. It is of concern that this identification is very hard to read. The Manager - E&C QA stated that as long as the Field Weld Number is readable at the time of installation that the requirements for marking have been met. He also stated that they had suggested stamping for identification. Concern 9: Article T752 of Section V of the ASME Code requires for magnetic particle test equipment that each piece of magnetiring equipment shall be calibrated at least once a year. The magnetic particle yoke is being calibrated. It is of concern that there is no docu-mented record of thi,s yoke calibration. The Manager - E&C QA stated that thc blocks are part of the calibration program and there is a record of these blocks being calibrated. Thc auditor stated that he had no problem with thc blocks, but that the Magnetic Particle yoke had no record of calibration. The Manager -E&C QA stated that the calibraticn requirements are being met and that personnel have gone a step further by requiring that these be calibrated on a daily basis. , qi ))-' ', )II, ~ , ')E'p"j )' It) I, i" CC II'+ ) C I* o C. I')i e ) "I C t(II /II'- ')I "IE 1 1 I 'I c I i gf,i. 4 I ~ ~ ~ ~ 4 ~ ~ I ( ~ ~ ~ ~ II ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ + ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ n ~ 4 I I ~ ~ j 4 ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ H ~ ~ ~ \\< S ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I J g ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 4 ~ ~ ~ II ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 'I ~ ~ ~ t I I s t" I , 4 - P l 'e 4 ~ t ~.'IVI'GHPP Construction Site/ASHE Construction RZPO KO. QAA/170-1 / ><<~.i /)iw dnSuad~u' g.2.d ~a<~%2,d,zl~~ <<) io.>,g ~jc.l 4-('.>.C khiu>o LS (<, hl AUDIT PROCEDURE Q~-I 1 2 ~ I (2,( > (7,Q )p /( p(g( q) AUDIT SUBJECT ICE birch 19-23, 197/ E'L QA Audit of ASHE giYPkty Assurance UALITY ASSURAhCE AUDIT CHECK LIST A. Eo Hall -. NlDITOR(S) I. A. Johnson L. M. Bissette P. M. Ta lor >5 -C C o 1.0 2.0 2.1 CHARACTERISTICS Precudit K.etin Docuaent Control Arc thc construction tcchnical and work Proc durca being developed and approved in accordance vith ASHE QA Kmual, Para. 2.4.4.12 2.1 In accordance with the ASME QA Manual re uireneats Adainistrative Procedure IV-03 is vritten and used fot" t e cvelo ent and a roval of technical and work ro-c urea relati to ASHE Code items. The istribution of Construction QA Hanuals is'bc done secor iag to procedures.
- However, one manual vas found to have no a roval a c and tvo other manu 1
to have a roval a es vithout shovin the ass s of those manuals. This vas vritten u as Concern Xo -'6 in thc audit re ort. 2.2 Are the E&C QA site construction, QA and QC proccdurca beiag distributed as designated in AQAS proccdurea2 (~K-2.4.3) 2.2.1 A docunent control lo is bein used and vas found to be u to date. 2.2. 1 Aro the above distributed procedures recorded on a docuaent control log2 (A%~A-2.4.3.) Page 1 of 31 KE)R 2.3 2.3.1 2.3.3 CHARACTERISTICS Select exaaples of the following documents for detarainiag if they are being distributed and cmCzol.led as described in PPCp,'go~p~ea on document distribution and.C',~,,:.".,-.-'ii~QA-2.4. 4, 2): Design Specif icag >~,ot,'i'-'~t Drawings. Site originated specifications. 2.3.1 A distribution list for Desi n Speci ications ss not been considered necessary since there are no requ re-ments for the s ecifications to be istr ute zeco is te t for those s eci ications c ve cn at thc individuals re uest. 2.3.2 o a re r< .....,.. -.:,",:aooor:. in PPCD roce urea. e rewings are not (~-.g'.,; ~< Code Itaa. 2.3.3 Oiteori-inated e eci cat are not roe io ~o distribut A recora s pt o t ose ap that have been distributed. It was ou t odm'o these site-enerated o cci ications are asu to a to ineerin ersonnel as controlle ocuncnts not the atae uncontrolled a ixed t at are nten to bc used with urchase re uisitions an pure se or erne This is written u as Concern o. in t e a t report. 2.4 2.5 2.6 Are documents zecoivcd at the site being recorded on the Document Record Porn (Exhibit 2-5) T (hSHE-Qh-2.4.4.2) Aro re~iona to specifications and, + drawings being reviewed and approved by the am@ organisation that performed the original review or other properly authorised pcrconnclt (ASME-gA-2.4.5) Select ap cifications and drawings and detamino if current rcvihions to sane are availablo for usa whore the function io being performed. (hSME-QA-2.4.5) 2.4 2.5 Allconstruction contro ocuucnts are ogg on t e Received Doc~t Rccor All revisions to site spec cat ons an s te ra ngs are sing r ew an ap rov y t e sane organ ra that cr o t e or ina rev cw. The current apeci cat on - was e ng us t pur sc o crs or we ngr t cr 0 e t~ specs ~ draw~ s vc hot can ssu or use. apl, r d." ~ x I'Q +c; ] Page 2 of 3I e t 2 r r ~ a <1 1!4 f f ~ IA ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ f I ~ f I 'tt. '.: ' tf f'f . ~ t f ~ ttt ~ I~C ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I t tt- ~ ~ I ~ ~ I ~ ~ ' ~ 'f f ~- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ I ifl. f ~ ~ ~ ~ f ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ f I ~ t ~it ~ t ~ t 'f ~ I t ~I ~ ~ 7 f i ~, ~: i ~ t't .f ~ ~ f i,f f ~ ~ C ) ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C ~ 'ft, I ~ I ~ ~ ~ t I'% i I ~ ~ tt ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ f ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' f ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ C I ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Itt I ~ 6 I ~ ~ ~, ~ ~ I I I t ~ I ' I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I I ~ ~ ~ ~ t ~ ~ I I ~ f I ~ ~ I ~ t ~ ~ It ' C ~ ' ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ I ~ I ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ I I 1 '1 (I I l ~ ~ ~ I ~ 1 ~ 1 ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ I ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ' ~ Lh ~ ~ I L ~ ~ ~ g II.' I ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ 11 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I& ~ ~LS\\tkI~ ~ ~ ~I I ~ 1 ~ ) ~ ~ 1 ~ 1 1 ~ 1 I ~ I ~. I ~ I. L ~ ~I S 1 1 ~ ~ ~ i I ~ ~ ~ CW ~ ~ I ~ I1 I. ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ II%+ ~ ~ ~ I ~ 1. ~ ~ t SIC ~ ~ ~ ~ L I 4 S MFAILL 3.5 CHARACTERISTICS Does tho Sita Procurenent Unit have docu-nantod evidence of ~ Qh,'n approval of suppliers oned to $~~.~c itens on Construction Pr~-,.%"8yvices issued purchase.g>>'.';,:Rg~-QA-3.3.5.2) Select Coda it~-~-y~~~~p..born received by Sito QA Ins~Cprp~~ro the following raquirmaato have been net& (ASHE-QA-4.0) COiHEHTS eli i a do df vendor ds ixmedietel. transmitted to si unit. 6.1 1 ta or heat nunbers ctc. are revic and martin s as re uired aro then a 1 before bein laced in store e. 4.1.2 Thc recaivin ine ection re ort formnhas a c ~ f ~ notin inforcation about s ccial a kn i and handlin as observed b the receivin i 4.1.3 Por itecs that r etre s ecial handlin sucl a r o vessels a s ccial hn 19m brt is m'1 t 4.1.1 Items have been identified by the inspector to provide traceability of thoaa it~2 (ASIDE-gA;4.2) o t c rec vi i rd e 1 F o e o and is e 4.1.2 Et~ hnva been axanined to ensure special pcchagingp Ghipping and handling had been carried out during ohipnent2 (ASm-qa-4.3, 4.4) 4.1.3 Itcni have been handled according to spccificationo after rocoipt2 (ASHZ~-6. 3) Page 5 of I , ~ i',s l II i) I",, 0 + P g,t l P Ik i rg s IB ~ ~ ~ I ~ A ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ 1 1 1 ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ '1 1 I ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Ssss ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ 1 1 ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ s ~ I ~ 1 ~ '1 ~ '1 ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ s, ~ ~ g ' ~ ~ ~ ~ '1SS ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ 1 ~ 1 1 ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ I ~, ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 c ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ( ~ 1 1 ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ Js ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 1 ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ Is c'a ' ~ ~, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ sss \\ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I. ~ 1 ~ ~ 1 1 I ~ ~ ~11 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .@~4 i l' I ,- r gC. 4.3 4.6 4.5 4.5 1 4@2 4.5.3 4.5.4 4.5.5 (BDQtLCTERISTICS Have the data packages supplied vith it~ purchased by t+ A. E vhich vere selected in 4.1 eJpp~~;govieved and accepted by the f~">,"<p~~~&4'Coordinator2 (ARE-QKA.12);; .~-"'ra ait~urchn.'= =.-.~,;.~ved and inspected in ncc-.~ '"'-'="-~~*~endure 't So required Certified Notarial Test Roporto include, ao applicablo, the folio&my: (Section III-NA3767.4) Actual results of all raquirod choaica1. analysis2 Actual teat and oxcnination resulta2 Results of veLd repairs nada2 Radiographic film raquire6 for the oxanination of material or naterial repair valdo2 Resulto of heat treatments required in-cludin tinea and tmporaturoo2 c COMKtPiS vas ai ned b the resident A-R s te oor ~tor. The siee urchased receiving aspect on p did shag that the itaas een race v ~..u,p of Procedure C The roceivln ins act on reports exon e 1 aio re orts a lI cu did hot have readabfi"r.'~< =,~m.~.~.~.. 0 o'ritten u as Concorn~a&>>WSL = jf~~:w,'5 1 aa 4
- 8
~
4.
e on and teat data vas included in th" pa
..CO O
ts for re irs.
for radio ra hs.
iced vas included in t e Page 7
of "a~
-'a, ~
v V~
V a~= ~a '
4 IJ-f,
gi
H gt t
g I ~
I
~
I Ii a1j
~
~
~
~
~ j I
~
~
~ ~
5g
~,
~
~
II '
~
~
t 1l
~ g.
s
~
~
~
g
~
~
~
~
~
I
~
~
~
~
~ I I
~.
~
~
~
I
~
~
~
~
~
):
~
~ I
~ I
~
~
~
~ I I
~
~ '
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~ I
~
~
~
~ 'I
~
~
J I
~
~
~
~ I I t
~
~
~
~
~
~ C
~
~
~
~
~
~
I ~
I
~
~
~
~
~
I
~
~
~
I
~
~
I I
~
I
~
I
~
~
1
.d
~ ~
Q
~
~
~
I
~
~
I
~
I
~
~
~
~
I
~
~
~
LO t
~
~
~
I
~
~
I I ~
~
J
~ ~
~
~
I':
~:
~
~
~
~ '
~
~ '
~
..W
~ -,.I, 4I'.
t
~
~
~
~
I
~
~
~
~
~
~
C
~
~
E
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
1
~
I
~
~
\\ I
~
~
~
~
~
~
~; I
~
~
~
~
I
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~ I
~
~
I
~ I
. I ~
~
~
I
~
~
~
t
.4
~
I
~
~
~
~ '
~
~
~
~
t t t
~
t
~
~
~
J
~
a
~
a
~
~
~
~
L ~
I
~
~
~ ta f
~
~
~
~
I t
t
~
\\ t E
~
a I
~
~
\\ f
~
. ~;
~
~
t
~
~
~
~
t
~
~
t
~
~
~
~
~
~
t
~ t t
~
a
~
~
~
~
~
~
a
~
~
~
t
~
~
t
~ t a a
~
~
~
~
gf l l' t
t ~
~
~
I ~
4
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
\\
~
~
~
f
~
~
~
~
~
4 I ~
~
~
~
~
~
t a
~
~
t f
~
~. ~ I
~
~
~
~
I I+gg
~
I
~
~
~
~
~ I a
~
~
~ 4
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
a
-I "4
f;ty
\\
GEM 6.0 CHARACTERISTICS Maldin Control Section IX COHHEHTS M
e field maids FW-15 end PM-were in ASME
'F 7
F 1
P4 6.1 6@1 Select vel6mntn-P~ gael@ in accord-ance vith the ~0g."W~>>~~.y that a Molding Procedutg';,
'-,4.-<'jtion vas prepared.
(Art9~~-'- '~F
. -'- '~$01)
Are tha follovioj..~l gg>
~
~
~
~
~
1
~
~
~
I
~ I
~
~
~
~
I '
~ ~
~
~
I I
~
~
~
\\
1
~ ~
~ ~
~
~
~
\\
~
~
~
~
~ I
'+
I>>
~
1 l>>
~ >>>>
h
~
~
4
~
I C
1 1
~
~
I
~
~
~
~
~
>> ~
~
~
~
I >>
~
~'
~
~
I I
~
~
~
1
~
~
~ '
~
1 1
~
~
~
~
~ '
4 ~ 4 E'
4 ct I.
h 4
t 1
1$
I
.(
$ a
('
CQAHACTEKISTICS
~I CG~MBIES oo o
Q 6.3>>l 8 re parko~~ce qealification teata
<<<<aided in acco< t~.. ~,h <aaliHed taldir~ Pmc&v'
'>>'"~ >~>>iona2 (krticle XXX, Q
~ 3>>
.3.3 ea> n& ra Q
~ Q U"
cr <<."or~~
on the and AB3 vere anal ointa identifi ceo t o~ticn was veriRied to h~ -'-
r~orcznce ual ication teat recor a.
O>>3>>2 Xa cn idmUZQ
~'ol c,'~~"'h~
%&re O C.a c-,mator2
-->>tery or
. to 98~tify
.3l.3}
~
~
~
~
0 q operatoro vera not imrolvcd ~itb a"
tc
~
c r red tc-to <<~a ocr orred 5>>3>>3 Xa Xaformticn re~~.rd~~
caamtial varicblm ~
c~t rmultc obt~ by ccc'4 <<:Qdcr rccordcl on a L-.cord OC PcrCO
"~o ~liflcation Tc"tc2 (Reticle XXX, +--3D1.4)
~
~
U a ot ceo'arM ea QG to UcW s'..e Q
<<;me vcr to a.,ree e
oce n the 4'ds.
I:.3.0 Xa izgoz atiox re~a rding caaential v >~ic>lcm c=>>." 4""~r. e"M data c d t~== r=-~r-, c=r43 by ecch. c~Rg o a o>> a P~g ~ g Q~ioerd VezPO=-==~a Q. XK't'ien cata2
~~~ziclc XXZ, +2-3Gloh) p co&>>a
~~~ ~~-=" ~--oo>>e3 <<y A"ticlc XXX 0
Ooao ma c.: Uc~G~<<
o <8>>
Lo o
op op a
5 f
o rt'g
'":wo Q ra.o t.e z "g
.. =2 o~
lf *l lc
~
IA
~ I
~
4
~
4
~
4
~
~
~
1 "
~
~ ~
~
4 I
~
~
4 1
~
4
~ '
~
~
1 4
I ~
~
~
~
1
<> ~
~
~
~
~
)
~
L4
~
~
~
~ 4
~
~ 4
~
~
~
I
~
R 4
4 I I
~
I ~
~
4
~
~
~ '
~
~
~
~
~
- 4
~ te I
I I ~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
I
~
~
~. '
I ~ i
~
~ I I
~ I I I Iti
~
~
I i I m~
I j
~
~
~
~
0 I
~
~
~
~
0
~
~
I~
~
0 ~
~
I I
I
~ I
~
~ I
~
~
~
~
I
~ I
~
- 31. I,i
~
~j
~
~':
~
~
~
~
0
~
~
I
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~"
x a
I
~
~
I
~
~;
~ I
~ I
~
I I
~
~
~
I I ~
~
~
i
~
~
~
~
~
~ 0
~
I
'. I
.L
~
~
'I I
~,
~ I I
~
0 I
~
~
~
i
~
I.
I '-
~
~
~
i i
'I
~
I ~ i I ~
I i
I I
I I 'I 0
~
~
~
0
~
~
~
~ ~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
I
~
~
0
~
~
f)t k4
, ty t,
I I
t
/gal
a C
EEPOQX C
4 l
C Q.
')
S>-
~
QiARACTERISTICS 8.1.3.1 Held rod ovens?
8.1.3.2 8 1,3.3 8.1.3.4 Reaouring ~~p,
- ~;.
Hoot induct@jjL~~~+ts'f Pressure testing instnmcnts?
8.2 Hera test gouges used for preoouze tests tooted against a standard dead weight tester or a chiibratcd nester goggcR
- (Section III, NB-6413) 8.3 Lrc welding covered electrode bake.
ovens calibrated to ensure tmpora-tu"e of 800 P + 25 P2 (Section III, 53-4642.3(c))
8.3.1 Are the ovens calibrated to ddternine when 3N P eaah:uu temperature io rcachcN
/
8.2.1
.Herc the test gouges calibrated befozc each teat or series of teats (not czcecding tm yodm) 2
. Q 8.1.3.2 8.1.3.3 There are no measuri e ui ent in thea;P"=: ~~,"-~i~
The re uirc"ent for h dro is that water."k~i4-4-~+go'-4',~:Y>>
Dro razle Page
~8 of 8.1.3.1 Oven H730 Procedure S ecification No. >>5 ond work ides and Procedure MP-03 for Holdin and Portable Ovens r dire thc calibration test oints to be the oints that arc critical - see ueotions under 8.3.
s, II 1
V5g 5
'V
'I
~
~,
I
~
~
I' 1
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
4~,
~
1
~
~
~
II
~ '
~
s
'1
~
~
~
~
~
~ '
~
~
0 I
~
I
~
~
~
~
~
\\
1
~
~
~1' 1
~
~
~
1
~
~
~
~ ~
~
~
~
~
~
1
~
1
~
~
I 1
~
~
II '
~
~
~
1
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
I '
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
1 4
~
~
1 I
~
'1 1
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
1
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~ ~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
1
~
~
~
4
~
~
~
~
~
\\
1
~
1
~
~
~
1 1
~ ~
1 1
~
~
1
~
~
~
1
~
1
~
~
1
~
~
~
~ ~
1
~
~
1
~
~
~
~
1
~
~
~
4 ~
~
~ 4
~
~
~
1
~
~
~
~
~
~
L
~
~
1
% ~
~ ~
~
~
~
1 1
~
~
1
~
~
~
~
~ ~
~
1
~
1
il
~
a I
~
~
1
~
~
~ '
~
~
~
~
~
44 I
1
~
~
~
~
ill,h'
~
~
~ '
~
~
~
~
I 1
1
~
~
'I I
~
a 1
~
~
I A'
~..
~
~
11 ~
I e
~
~
~
~
~
~
~ 1
~
~
~
)
~
~
~
~
1
~
~ ~
1
~
~
~
~
~
0
~
1
~ ~
~
1
~ 1
~
. ~
~
~
~
1
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
1 ~
~
~
14
~
~Il '
~ ~
~
OOI 1
~
~
~
~ ~
1
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
1
~
~
~
~
~
~
1
~
~
1
~
~
~
1
~
~
~
I
~
~
~
~
e
~
~
~ '
~
1
~ '
1 1
I ~
~
1 1
I a
e
~
1
~
111
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
1
~
~
~
~
~
~
1
~
1 1
~
~
~
~
~
\\
~ 1
~
. \\
~
)
~
~
~
I'
1*
k,ah r~'
e' "C
I s
.r~
- fe-(
I
'r J
I
,a,
~-
4 QDLEACEERISTICS 9.2.3.1 9.2.4 Ql.d.l Has the data report signed by the A.l.t (Section III<'+section NA, Appendix V)
Qo the procg~h"=".~ =.:..=.=;,,QtinS contains (NA-4133. 10) ";.~~~~~,'-~
T.
Provfaiona fqi~>.'ZgpW ~t docmmting7 9a2a<a2 P ovisiona for use of the n0" StanPT 9.2.4.3 Provisions for asaiSn2mnt of a National Board a~or and application of this nmbar on the nameplate2 Q.O LO.X Nondeatructivo Tcatin Verify the following for nondestructive cxa=inatioua being porforvxd on Class I capo~to:
10.1.1
~inntiona aro pcrforn"d in accordan"o uith dote&ad written proccdurca that, have boon proved by actual d~tration2 (HS-5112) 10.1.2 The Uriteen procedure eely vith thc appropriato Article of S~mtion V for the rticular ezaninntion ethod?
Na-5112)
Page COHHEHTS ds es hr'he!'asek" veld vas assessed.as a Class aa '-~
a2"dd>>af
~e.=
h
,i u d enetrant exaMnation was erforned '& a~@neo vit NDEP-201 Revision l.
2 Thin r edure vas in corn lisnca vith ArticIa G Cn S c ion V of the ASK? Code.
iv" a
~ Ia he a e
e rl e v.
~e ear 2
~
a e
sr
~a (y.
v
I 118
~
~\\
~ I
~
~
I I
~
l '
~
I I
~
~
~ I
~
~
I' Qjf Ql rt
~.i
~
~
11
~
11 '1' 1 ~
~
~
I
~
~
~
~ '
~
~
~
~
I
~
~
~
I
~
~
~
~
~ ~
~
~
~
~
~
~
I l I
~
~ ~
~
~ '
~
~
~ I <<
~ '
~
I
~
~ <<<<I Q t ~
~f 'l t Q<<
~
<<1 I
~
~
I
~
I
~
~
~
~
~
~
I
~
~
~
I
~
I
~ ~I: ~
~
~
I 1"
I
~
~
~
I t
~
~
~
~
~
1
~
~
~
~
~
~
QQI t I
~
I I
~
~
~
~
~
I l ~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~ k ~
l
~
~
I
~
~ I<<
~ I
~
~
~
t I I
~
Q<<
l
~
~
t
~
~
~,Q
~
~
~ '
~
~
'I,
~
I. ~
~
~
~
1 ~
~
~
~
~
~
l
~
I
~ I
~
~
~ QI ~ j I
~
~
~
~
~
> IA
~
I
~
~ ',
4 i
~
~ j
~ 2
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
4 ~
~ I
~
~
~
~
I
~
\\
~
~
I
~
~ I i
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~ ~
~
~
~
~
I' l
~
~
~
I
~
~
7
~
~
~
~
~
~ ~
~ '
~
~
~
~
~
k ~
~
~
~
~ I
~ f
~
~
~
~
~ tI ~
~
~ ~
I
~
~
4
~
C
~
~
I
~
~
~
~
~;
i
~ '
~
~
~
l
~ j 1
4 4,
g
~ 4 I
~ ~
C
~
~
~
~I t 1
~
I
~
~
I gl
+g
~
~ kgb
~
~ I I
e a
s a
.~
'S ~
O
~
~
~
~ 4.
i
~ I
~
~
~
~
~
~
44
~
~
I
~
~ Hp ~
~ h
~
'f s'] "t I g,'
gN hI I
"J I
l
~
'll II
REPORT 10.3.2 CHAR.~ISTICS Circumferential wHd points in piping pumps and valves are exazLined by either magnetic qir/tale>> liquid penetrant, or xC-"ig~~~c methodsT
. o'r4>y:f.
Acceptance s~~'pccif fed in HD-5300 are uogtd'@5?)A/2)
Eas the Principal Qh Spedtalist or his designee prepared record hhecklists for ASHE Code structures, syat~ and/
or components and is QA Review document oa checklists (ASME QA Manual 11.1.3)
COMMENTS c o din to the information in ara ra hs 8.1 and 8
Revf fon 1 direct riant would be used cle examine eld I-HM-A8-PN-15'ow r
w ed This conditio e audit re ort as Concern No. l.
i fed Yes the weldln OA S ecialfst re ares a
'weldfno doc~
acka c checklist" which list documents attached znch at(
HDR weld re air MDR NDE re uest NDE resorts DDR s corrective action re uest etc.
Each acka e is identified b
the field weld oint identifiaation number.
The civil S ecfalist rc ares a document checklist for each concrete arement with attached documents.
This documentation ms verified b the auditors review of several documents in the vault.
i su Princi al A S ecialist dated 7
is memo d sted on the door of the record Ke o thc vault are controlled bv the Prfnci ialfst with the ko s restricted to the h S ecfalint-2 The acce tance criteria for ma netic arti ~t~
m io of e service water veld iden fied in 10. '=,
". ~o.
f ed on a
e A-3 of NDEP-301 Pevision 1.
This c r~
in accordance with ND-5300.
0
.or it ersonnel 11.3 Is access to thc Qh Records vault restricted to a liat of authorizod personnel'ASME QA Manual 11.1.5)
Is QA record sign-out log naintainad by Principal Qh Specialist or his design-"cT (ASME QA Manual 11.1.5)
P d
mu lo is maintained b
the h
c fdentff each record rLocked-
'L e -o t ers c eckin -out si nature and d
e d d es and initials of erson in vault s checked-out and returned.
Records checked ou
. t be returned b
the end of the da shift.
A amo u
1-6-7 b
the Prfnci al A S ecialist authorized a f.
ersonncl who can check-out records for a eriod of 2
'he above was verified b the auditor s review of-wdcords in the vault.
11.4 Boa the Principal
@!. Specialist or his dosfgnea conducted periodic internal survey of QA records in hhc Qh vault7 (ASHE A Manual 11.1.6) 11.A Aft e'o 'Crc Of A reCOrda eee by the Cfsf1 QA eyetf~a1at oa"9. Z.t to a mitten checklist wit no pro em ent Since that ties the Site QA Proce ure
, t t on-structfoa Site Qh Surveys, as cen w t rawn rom use at t e Paae 24 of 31
'EPOSE EO.
CHARhCTERISTICS COHKKXS Pa~e Phd of 31
'E
,J a
I E
W
% ~
i
'~ Il
'k
)I p!
t t
~
tA I '
~
i
~
~ I
~
~
~
I
~ I
~
~
I I
I I
I
~
~
C i
~
~
l ~
~
~
~
~
~
~
I
~
~ ~
~
~
~ ~
~ ~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
C I
~
~
lggCjl
~
~
~
~ (
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~ I
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~ ~
t
~
Q ~
~
~
~
~
~ I
~ I
~
I
~
lt ~
~ I
~
~
I '
i
~
~
~
I '
~
~
~ 'I
~
~
\\
~
I C
I
~
~
~ ~ I I
~
~
~;
~
~ x I
~
~
~
~
~ ~
~
I I
~
~
~ I
~ Lt I ~
~ L I
I
~
I
~L I
~
~
I ~
~
~
~
~ I
'I I
~
~
~
~ I
~
t
~
~ I,
~
~
L 41
~
~
I
~
~
~I
~
~
~
C ~
~
~
~
~
l~
~
~
~
~
ltl 11
~ I I
~
~ \\
~
~
~
~ I
~
~I:
~
~
~ I
~
~ '
I
~
C
~
LI
'll~
V
~
~
~
~ I I
c
~
~
I C
~
I C
.9 pit
o I
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~ ~
I,
~ w o
~
~
~
~
~
~ '
~
4
~ I, 1
~
I
~
~ \\
~
~
~;
~
~
~
~
~
~ '
0
~
~:
~
~
~
I'
~
~
I I I
~
~
~
~
k.~ I
~
I v
~
~ '
~
~
~ I
~
~
~
~
V I 4hA
~
~
~
~ ~
~
~
1
~-:
e
~
S 0'I ~
~
~ i Lt
~
~
r
~
~
~
~
~
P
~
~
~
~
~
~ ~
4P
~
I I
+
~
~
~
~
0
~
~
~
~
~
~
~ '
C
~
~
~ ~
~
t c
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
4
~
~
~
~
~
a ~::
~ a:
~
~
~
~
L
~
~
~
L
~
4
~ ~
hl
,y ~
lr
'I il "i
lt
,l
RE!%BR QQQRCTERISTICS 11.11.6 11 11.7 As-built sketches,
- dra5inas, ox tabulation of caterialaT NDE exarLinatg."~. -',.;, ~<".,'~+eh include results of er=-.~
.."-'= - '
Pinal radiogrr~~g~.;"gadiography haa been pcrfo~
11.11.9 Records of all heat treatments (HQ-2200 and HB-4600) 2
- 11. 12 Are ASHE Qh records at the construc-tion sita fQ,ed and maintained ia faci1ities that prevent deterioration or dmus to documents aad are these records controlled to prevent losel
- 12. 0 Contact Coastructioa (PEAR tr~t to ACI-359
- 12. 1 Has CP&L dcsianated the designer's reaponaibQ.itics Mth respect to construction surveillance?
(CA-2200(i), CA-3211(12),
& CA-3220 (n))
Page 27 of
>> '4" ~
~
>>>>I I
I>>,
I >>IJ
~
~
~
\\
~
I
~
~
~
I ~
I
~
I I
~ ~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
I
~
~
~
~
'I'~>>, I I
~
I
~
~
~
~
~ ~
~
~
~ ~
~
~
l4
~
I
~4'I II>>'
~
I I
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~ ~
~
~
I I ~
I, ~
~
k I
~
I
~
>> fiT
~
I.
~
~ >> I
~ I I
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~.
~
I
~
I I
~
~
~
~
~ '
~
I
~
~
~
~
I
~
~
I
~
~
>>I ~
~
~
~ I
~
~
~
~
~ I I
~ I
~
I
~
~
~
~ I
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
)
I
~ ~
I
~
~
~
I ~ I I
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
I
~
~
I I
~
I I I
~
~
~
~
~
\\
~
~
I' I
I
~ '
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
I
~
~
~
I
~
~
~
~
~
I
~
I I 4
~
~
AI I
~
~
~
~
~
~ I
~
~
I
~
~
~
~ 'I
~ ~
~
I
~
~
~
~
~
I
~
I I
~
~
I
~
~
~
I
~
I
~
~
~
~
I
~
~
~
~
I I
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
I
~
~
~
~
~ I
~
I
~
~ I
~ ~
~
~
~
I 0
~
III I
I g'~,
7 I
~ fe I
I 1
I
~
~ I
~
~
1
~
~
~
I
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
I
~
~
~
~
~
~
~ '
~
I I
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
'1
~
I
~
I
~
~ I
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~ ~
~
~
1
~
~:
~
I S
CS% ~
~
~
~ '
~
~
~
1
~
~
~ W 1
~ ~
1 I
~
I I
~
~
I I
~
~
~
I
~
~ ~
~
~
~
~
S
~
~
~
~ > ~. ~
~
~
~
I
~
~
~
~
~
~ '
I I
~
I
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
I
~
~ ~
I
~ I
~
~ 'II I ~ I
~
~
~ I
~
~ ~
I
~
~
~
Sl'
+
1 ~
~
~
~
~
~ '
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
I I
~
~
~
~
I
~
~
~
~
1
~
je
~
S
~
~ '
~
~
I1
\\
~
~
~ I I
~
1 I
~ ~
I
~
~
~
1
~
1
~
~
1
~
~
I
~
~
~
~
~
~ '
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~ ~e
~
I
~
1
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
t'ai '
~
I
~
~
~
~
~
I tjt.
~
~
~
~ \\
~
~
Nj I
~
~
e
~
I I
~ ~
~ '
~
e
'e
~
~
I~
I
. ~
~
~
t
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
I I
It
~ '
)
~
~
I
~
~ ~'
I I
~
e
~
I
~ '
~
~ I
~.e I
11 I
~
~
I
~
I
~ j
~
g I ~
~
I I~ '
I
~
~
~
+
~
~
~
t
~
~
~
~
Q ~
~ I
~
~
~
f Ijj
~ ~
I
~ I e
~ ~
j
~
~
~
~
r
~
~
~
I
~
te ~
I
~
~,
~
~
~
e
~
I
$ ~ '
~
~
~
e I
~
~
I
~ I
~
~
~t I
I I
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
l
~ ~
'I t
~
~
~ ~
~
~
~
A
~ I
~ I I
t
~
~
~
t e
4 1
~
I
~
~
I I
~
~
~
I ~
~
~
~ ~ I
~ ~
~
~
~
~ t f
Ct
~ I I
i j
I I
~
t
~
~
~
~
'I I
~
~
~
~ '
~
I
~
I
~
t t
I ~
~
'I t I
~
~
~ I
~
~
~
I
~
~
~ I I
~
~
~ '
~
~
~
e I
I
~
1, t~
l1 tg
J'>>
~
. c'
.'l".n h
4 Pg Cl >>
'~f Qhh/170-1 CKGQCTERISTICS COHHENTS o
to date.
The auditor are concerned this Code l)
I l
'J l,c
,lC
?
-'U u-"
Q.
)2.11. 2 Q.O L3.1 13.1.1 13.1.2 Have provisions been made for protec-tion of overprcasurc during structural integrity test of contafmaat7 (CC-7000)
~~~~.. g -+
-'~*:-=.
'udit tea@'a cEmh og"~~P Site's housekeeping par raquhi~ts of PSAR ~temts:
The cite has housekeeping procedures which arc properly luplementcd2 4
A ~
~"l H f
~j t
'l
- t. 'l-
~
~ la.l \\-
All areas of construction site have adequate housekeeping7 re uirement has not been addressed b
rocedure or s ecif-e dit r will fo low-u on later a o
as of 3-1 -7 the site does not have a m
ro edure im lemented for control of hous~~,~~+
A did ot have a docume ted rocedu ~-~ >'~,'-
- f the surveillance of housekee in at the H
4.:":>
'5~$
ears in the audit re ort as Pindin Ite&-h~
the audit the site issued but has not ~l~teX
occM~ro AP-VII-06 Revision 0 3-20-7 titled "Pro ec kee in."
Durin the audit the Princi al S ecialMt is ued ut s
ot im lemented Procedure A-3 o
3-2 -7 titled "Housekee in Control."
The auditors reviewed both of these rocedures durin the audit and find e will meet the intent of ANSI N45.2.3 when im lementcd.
Res onabl so the auditors observed the followi Electric Sho - trash on floor and in cardboard containers.
e a r cation Sho tres on oor an n car oar containers tres n
ve-ga on containe at eac we stat on c
presents re azar E
ed Sho a er tres on oor.
en er o -
ras arre over ow n an rasn n
S l.
X s'*l
)gl
.1.3 14.0 Postcudi" ~tin All areas of Harehousc and Storage Facilities are adequate to ANSI Standards ?
oor ~
ons ruc on ress a
a 8
U Containment ue n
ng g.,
an aste rocess
- g. - so t r cans an tres ever ere, tres arre.s u
a over o
ng, tras a
so t rin cans own t roug re ar pr or to concrete pour.
Rene h I o
the auditors observed the follovin:
ou e areas had ci arette butts and food a cr'n floors.
ressor leakin oil on floor Aine 6 22 where buildina had small hole in outer wall Mum rodents could enter.
w A~.>>>
i='->>
Pate 31 of 31 4
4 I I PP 4.
x'I 4
r c
fi pP I
Z JI,'"
P
-4 SK92f ZZZ. Md~lZD-1.
CHh2hCTERESTICS cont d water accmmlatin under items stored.
14.0 The nonconfoanances an concerns i ent were CS3t cuss
~
cat of tho neet a
K"-et s were lkum ~t nonco orrzancen e
mnegment pcrso uct eec y o t o I
44
~ 4 4
- Zi, 4 J t 4+441 g
~
CtKREHTS 13.1.3 Outside store e areas so t drink cans a
U
~'G.
~>.
,'"I. IZ IZ'-2'-i' r P 4
p'""..-";-..
Z,PJ ZPI 4
I4'S i
JP= rt4.P W SZ 4 1 SM
'4-"
,4 f
-:- ~~ =
Paae 3la of 31 P'
4 IP 1
~
~
t t
~
~
~
~
~
~
s e
s o
t C
~t ~
It
~
~
t
~
I t
~
4 t
t
~
~
~ '
~
~
t
~
~
I
~
I t
~
~ ~
- a
~,
E.l g
'a I
h
'I l
>,a~
h I
WNWh4Wflke I
8.L, t
~
~
~
~
IS I'
~
IIH ~
I
~
~ I
~
~
I I
~
~
I
~
~ I
~
t wva ~
~ I
~
II I
~
~I
~
I I
~
~
~
I
~
~
~
~ I
~
~
I
~
I
~
~ I '
~
I I
~I I
~
~
~ ~
~
I
~
I
~
)r ~~
~ t
'I
'J ll E
I
'l, l
' I l
<<\\
- I'
(
(
I,I'~
h I
(
(I
'>',t +t: "Vcckl 'Elcctrodc Cnbinet Tc craturc Bccord r
~
(
hATE VIP(Z SATh ATe INSPECTOR T&PERATUii'M<GE
~(~ QCj 4 Kf(- e~ h Aq'h4!0 wnll>lwC " 8' 7
I h g
~
~
/h/
-//4 7 HATED OVEPS 275' 25'F ELECTRODE CADIZ xa 1gr04F IU.n
~QO'F lrax.
REBATER OVW = 253'F i%in.
800'F Y~
- /3E>
jr
- /983
/r=NP]
~f - Ag3' gpss'-
DES zoo - ggg4 l
I g~
h'48'4 Fc ~
Joow ZWYc9 kg/oA//".
p~pyij4(r p/8 t/2 ~i I,
t.
(Jh
(
,I'
(
I
((I 1
i III.
k' I.
'I
'f, ht 0"5-79'-cay s~r P ~ tt(3$$
51((P'
/g- /5'4 S
&7 5A 7
/
82.
+< Ie 9 toI;.
r~
~
<C
)i'&/
SH i 1
~t
(
~
kp II (
Crrrolina Powar fL Lish) Company May 14, 1979 File:
QAA/170-1~
ORANDUM TO:
Mr. S.
McManus FROM:
A. E. Hall
SUBJECT:
ASME Quality Assurance Audit of SHNPP Construction A mini-audit of corrective action response was performed at the S))NPP site May 11, 1979, for the purpose of closing the finding item(s) by audit, with the following results:
1.
Finding Item 1, the auditors confirmed by review of revised proce-dure NDEP-101, Revision 2 (4-5-79) where on page 20, Table 2 was corrected for thickness 7/gu to 1)r" from 4T to 2T holes on source side.
This finding is closed by audit.
2.
Finding Item 2, the auditors confirmed by review of corrected CMTR(s) now on file for Ebasco P.OS N4435170 do contain the statement that the material 'iao been stamped by steel stamping, the hant numbers and slab number for each plate shipped and received at site.
This finding is closed by audit.
3.
Finding Item 3, will be reviewed for implementation of oite house-keeping during next audit by CNSSQAA Section personnel.
This finding is not closed by audit.
Finding Item 4a, the auditors confirmed by review of corrected WDR(s) that they have bean back-fitted, with thc correct NDE procedure and procedure revioion lioted on the QA record.
In addition, the Manager-Engineering and Construction QA states thc NDE procedure(o) appropriate wiII ba listed on the future VDR(s) prior to welding.
This finding io closed by audit.
5.
Finding Item 4b, the auditors confirm by review of Site Procedure TP-30, revision 2 (4-20-79) that Exhibit 1, Hydro Test Form, Revision 2 has been revised to list the checklist necessary, including a place to record the procedure number and its rcvi,sion number.
As of this
- data, the form had not been placed in uoe.
This finding is closed by audit.
Memorandum to Mr. HFUus "2-May 14, 1979 6.
Finding Item 5, the auditors confirmed by review that the Principal QA Specialist had issued the necessary written instructions to Q
Specialists to check heat number verification as part of final inspection of welds.
This finding is closed by audit.
7.
Finding Item 6, the auditors confirmed by review of Site Procedure HP-03, Revision 4 (4-30-79) that it has been revised to require calibration on a two-week basis and documented.
Confirmation that oven H-1100 was found to be in calibration on 3-19-79 is to be foxwarded to the auditors by the Principal QA Specialist.
This finding will be closed by audit when this confirming documentation is received.
8.
Finding Item 7, the auditors confirmed by review of PPCD Procedure P-0066, Revision 5, that it has been revised to state the procedure is fox ASHE Section III. This finding is closed by audit.
Summary:
Finding Items 1, 2, 4a, 4b, 5, and 7 axc hereby closed by audit.
Finding Items 3 and 6 arc not closed by audit.
AEH:)w)M7 v
S' us Manager - Corporate Nuclear Safety Quality Assurance Audit cc:
Mr. H. J. Chiangi Mr. G. L. Forehand Mr. P.
W. Howe Mr. R. H. Parsons Mr. Sheldon D. Smith Mr. T. H. Vyllic
C t t ll i
F NI
'I II t'
eg
~
~
t
~
~
~
~
i I
~ '
~
~
~
I
~
I I
~
~
~
~
~
I ~
~
~
I
~I
~
~
~
~I '
~
I
~
~
~
~
I I
~
I I
~
I
~
I ~
~
I ~
~
~
I
~\\
.V J
14 I
l C
I I
lt ih
~
~
~ '
~
I ~
I
~
~
~ ~
I
~
~ '
~ l I
I
~
I
~ I
~ll
'I
~ 1
~ g
~
~
I
~ \\
I
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~ I
~ ~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
I
~
~
~ I I
H I
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~ I
~
~
~
~
~
I I
~
~
I I
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
l
~ I
~
~ ~
I I
ln
~
~
I I
~
~
4 l
j
~I 7
1 e-=-
~~f '~ <L 0
Carolina Power & Light Company I
9 y',fhffh'999,jfhhrh ll File:
QAA/170-1~
")ENORANDUH TO:
Hr. S.
Hc.")anus FRON:
A. E. Hall May 11, 1979
'4 J'$9
'fP 1, I
'9 I
19 J 1
J'h,"
9','., I; I
'1 J99
~fle
SUBJECT:
ASHE Quality Assurance Audit of SHNPP Construction
REFERENCE:
Letter QA-1112, dated Hay 11, 1979 The reference letter QA-1112, dated Nay 11, 1979, with the E&CQA response to Audit QAA/170-1 has been evaluated with the following results:
1.
Thc response for Finding Items 6 and 7 is considered as action taken to resolve these items and these finding items are hereby closed by report.
This completes all action necessary for this audit and all finding items on this audit are closed by report.
Qu-AEH:Jw)F7
.. - I/<//yyzz~piw S."McManus Manager - Corporate Nuclear Safety Quality Assurance Audit
<<c:
Ne.
G. L. Forehand
."lr. P.
V. i)owe
.'Ir, R. N. Parsons He. Sheld on D ~ Smith Ne. T. H. Wyllic He.
N. J. Chiangi I
hj lh'h II'I' W)l "V
Tl,g j% h+
9 1
PJf'l" f I
. I (J.'
Jf'lJ
'f G,.h-V'I r
99 I
J tfCJ
'I Cr
,P, '
JJJ 9 ~ 'll C~l
, G)r!
,94 J
I t.
91~
J'f1 V -f V
r
I'I l
i, I
form 244 Carollno Power a Light Company, Co!rrpeny Corresponrronco April 30, 1979 QAA/170-1 MEMORANDUM TO:
Mr. S.
McMnnus FROM:
A. E. Hall
SUBJECT:
ASME Quality Assurance Audit of SHNPP Construction
REFERENCE:
Letter QA-1087, dated April 26, 1979 The referenced letter QA-1087, dated April 26, 1979, with the E5CQA response to Audit QAA/170-1 has been evaluated with the following results:
1.
Thc response for Pinding Items 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 is considered ao action tnken to resolve these items and these finding items are hereby closed by report.
2.
The response for Finding Items 6 nnd 7 will be adequate when the reoponoe can be reported ao action completed.
Therefore, Items 6 and 7 will bc held open until additional response is received from the Manager - Engineering and Construction QA stating thc rcoponoe action hao been completed.
AEH:SCH11 Attacit Concur cot us
>ncgcr - C rate Nuclear Safety 6 Quality Assurance Audit cc:
Hr. G. L. Porehand Hr. P. H. Hove Hr. R. H. Parsons Mr. Sheldon D. Smith Hr. T. H. flyllie
Pl
)
V 1
I l
~
~
I
~
~
~
I
~
I: 'l
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
I
~
~
~
II I
~ ~
~
I
~
~
~
I L I
~
~
~
~
~
~
~ ~
I
~
~
~
I C
~
~
~
~
~
~
I
~
I
~ ~
~
~
~
~
I
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~ '
t
~
~
~
~
L
~
I
~ ~
~
~
~
L I ~
~
~
~
~
L
~
~
I ~
L L
~
~ '
I
~
~
~ I I
~
~ I
~
I l ~
~
~
l
~
I ~
~
~
l II
~
~
~
'N (1
J
~
yl g>>l 19 QI I
h k
I *
'i
RESPONSES TO QAA/170-1 Item 1
Procedure NDHP-101 has been revised to conform to ASME Section IIX, Table NB-5111-1 showLag the appropriate hole-sires.
EE; Item 2 The site hns received corrected CMER's from the Vendor for 3/8" containment liner circular plate.
The CMI'R's contain the following statement:
"THE ABOVE MATERIAL HAS BEEN IDENTIFIED BY STEEL STAMPIhG THE HEAT NUMBER AND SIM NUMBER ON EACH PLATE."
The heat number aad slab number of each plate Ls included on the CEIIR's.
To preclude similar aoaconformances on CMER's for containment liner material purchased by the erection Contractor, Ebasco has added the following statement to thc General Instructions for the QA Plan for Purchase Order NY-435204:
"Por
~.,
~
CMzI purchased material ascertain that the reeIuiremcnts of ASME Section III, Division 2, Subsection CC2131. 1 1975 Edition nre complied with where applicable."
Ztekt 3
- ~
< o' I
Jfk' I
I
,1 4,'rocedure AP-VII-06, Pzo]cct Housekeeping, has bean implcmcnted.
Housckccpiag Zone Designation forms for the areas aow under construction, those that soon will be under construction, warehouses and laydown areas have been approved by the Resident Engineer nad distributed to the appropriate personnel.
Hazchouses nad some lnydown areas have been designated Zone IV and signs are Ln the process of being fabricated for posting in these locations.
All other areas are designated Zone V.
Personnel have bann designated to ensure that housekeeping in each area Ls performed ia nccozdaace with the proper Zone Housckccpiag Procedures.
Procedure CQA-3, Housekeeping Control, has been implemented.
QA Personnel have been dcsiguatcd to provide QA surveillance of thc individual Housckcepiag Zones wLthLn their assigned areas to assure compliance with AP-VII-06.
Zttkt 4 A.
Thc appropriate NDE procedure nnd zcvisioa numbers are now being inscrtad on the L~~~s,'below thc designated NDE process on the MDR's.
A review of all WDR's Z~"~,4@to wcldiag has been completed aad thc NDE proccdurc aad revision a~az>z
~~z<a entered.
E B.
Rcviaioa 2 to thc "Hydro Test Porm" coatniniag a checklist and provisions for
~
listing the procedure nnd revision numbers was issued 4/20/79.
Item 5 The MDR's werc corrected duriag thc audit.
Thc welding inspectors have been instructed to include heat number verification as part of final inspection (hold point Ill on N)R).
t v
1g 7~
Zttm 6 I
,l I
Procedure HP-03, Melding Haterial Control, has been revised to read, "..
. Dry rod, rcbake cnd recondition ovens shall be temperature checked by a calibrated instrument on a two-week basfs by the control area attendant and documented."
The procedure revision is in the review cycle at the present time.
2 I
l
= ~
~ I-I
((
During the audit, the calibration instrument used to check ovens had been damaged and no spare or replacement instrument was available.
There are now three (3) calibrated instruments on site.
The manufacturer recoaraended temperature ranges for ovens and electrodes.
This change has also been incor-porated into MP-03.
The Issue Room httendant has been instructed to use the previous two weeks'alibration to justify the accuracy of the ovens if the instrument fs not, available for use.
He shall document this action on Exhibit 2 of MP-03.
ZttFI 7 PPCD Procedure P-066, Construction Procurement, fs being revised to meet the requirements of ASME Section III and to fncorporate the, statement, "This is an ASME Section IIIprocedure."
The revision is currently fn the review cycle.
j"'
I t.t F,,
1, I t.
~1th I ll -,
FFF F
li" II
-. 'a'"" "hatt"'m'"J '"'-">'"'"' '"""'~~
- I " I I
"'t,
~
j
'll H,
I
"[
-.CC~.
- 'I'I I Ci
)"Q tIF
,, CF I
- ')C
(~l I
1
'F I t
C~
I
{
I 11
~,I j
&Pawl" '
'i'1' 4~~-
'c
~t 0 to Serial: HNP-99-069 (e
Prefabricated Piping Supplier (Southwest Fabricators, Inc)
Quality Assurance Documentation:
(1) Quality Assurance Documentation Audit Reports (2)
Representative Vendor Data Package
f Nd e
C
55 55
~
5
~
~
Op
~
\\
~
'I
~ ~
~
5 l
~ '
Ij 55
~
5
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
4 15 55 ~
5
~
~
55
~
I I
~
5
~
~
j
~
~ ~,
~
5
~
~
~
~
~
~
5
~
II
~
~
~
~
~
~
5
~
5
~
~
~
~
~
I
~
5
~
~
5 5
5
~
~
~
5 II 55 V,
W 4 F,
,J
roRhl Zl 00hl I)
'),
I SQ5 Csrollnp Power & Light Corapsny,.>>
Ralalgh, N, C,2rt02 t)r 0
Filet QAA/702-2~~,.
HI/A-1D April 18, 1977 Mr. J. E. Harris, Pro)oct Manager Southwest Fabricating and Welding, Company,'525 Sherman Street P.O. 'Box 9449 Houoton, Texas 77011 CAROLINA POWER & LIGHTCOMPANY HARRIS PROJECT 1984 86%8%0 3 ~600 MW IJNITS 1 > 2 ~ 3, AND '4 QUALITY ASSURANCE tAUDIT OF SOUTHWEST PABRICATINC AND WELDINC COMPANY
- OHNOSO, K,r,t718l9c)y
>t'e>077 g
&gy@
g, a
CPd I g'QAA t.(CO I
- ~
Doer Mx'. Harr1a:,
r
. Attached plnnoe find a report of tho Quality Assurance Audit, conducted during the period of March 22-24, 1977, by, Carolina'Pcxrer
& Li@t Company.
personnel at your facility)located in Houston, Texas.
-Tho attnchmmtt contains three multi-part findings, requiring corrective action, including action to prevent rocuxxnncn and two comments requiring your evnlunt1on for resolution.
It is requostod that you xoyicer, this matter and provide Carolina Power
& Light Company, within thirty dnys, of your receipt of this letter, inddivtdual statements
'f corrective action 'taken ox intended to, each finding in numerical aoqunnce.
as dnltuoatnd in the attachment.
In tho event that corrective action, cannot bn completed within thirty dnyo>
a, dual response is required.
Tha initiil response should include,thn intended action nnd, indicate a,scheduled completion dntn.
Tho follow-up rnnponoe should indicate, that tho intended corxoctivn action hnn boca completed.
'Additionally, statement:o of action taken to prevent recurrence of each finding and your resolution of tho general comments are required.
t Should you have any quent:ious in thin rnatter, plnnnn" contact mni Kt DAM/gag Attachmnnt cc:
Mr. L. V. Thioxwochtor W/h ORPil~ ~rN'>d B'l Pl, i. Chiangi N. J.'hiangi - Manager Engineering
& Construction Quality Assurance
,~
bcc:
Mr. D. Locklearv Mr. L. I. Loflin Mr. M. P. Thompson, Jr.
W/A File I p
~
K)
I I) r' I) t I