ML18016A940

ASME QA Audit of Shnpp Construction, Conducted on 790319- 23

ML18016A940
Person / Time
Site:	Harris
Issue date:	04/03/1979
From:	Bissette L, Hall A, Sean Mcmanus CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT CO.
To:
Shared Package
ML18016A936	List: ML18016A935 ML18016A937 ML18016A938 ML18016A939 ML18016A940 ML18016A941 ML18016A942 ML18016A943 ML18016A952 ML18016A953 ML18016A954 ML18016A956 ML18022B063
References
QAA-170-1, NUDOCS 9905050220
Download: ML18016A940 (99)

Text

I

.'E-

Cerollnn Power 8 tighl Company

), <5 i)J C0<<95000dcnc<r April 3, 1979 Il File: QAA/170-1

<<lEMORANDUM TO: Messrs. Shcaron Harris

~~oltea tlPB9 <<79 RECEIVED

-PROH: S, McManuo 5 ~

CP&L C'.S r.;,'l

SUBJECT:

ASME Quality Assurance Audit of MCT'., "."

SHNPP Construction During the period March 19-23, 1979, a Corporate Quality Assurance Program Audit, was conducted at thc SHNPP Construction Site. This was conducted by Messrs. A. E. Hall (Lead Auditor), L. W. Bissetee, I. A. Johnson, and F. W.

Taylor of thc Corporate Nuclear Safety 6 Quality Asourance Audie Section.

The purpose of this audit was to evaluate the SHNPP ASME Quality Assurance Program and to verify compliance with thc implementing procedures.

'1 The attached audit report summarizes the resules of the audit. The completed checklist> which wao used as a guide in conducting this audit, is maintained

' in the CNS&QAA Seceion files.

As required by Audit Procedure QAAP-1, Manager -

it io the responsibility of the Engineering 6 Construction Quality Assurance eo review and investigate II I.

thc audit findings; to determine and schedule appropriate corrective acrion, I<'

@E including action to prevent recurrence; nnd to respond in vriting within II thirty dnyo after receipt of this report, giving results of the review and i<< I investigation, and describing corrective action taken to resolve the findings identified in this report.

'>>.l I~

L AEH:fdcTC L J

Attachment

'I J

cc: Messrs. N. J. Chiangi (v/a) M. A. McDuffie (w/a)

G. L. Forehand (v/a) W. W. Morgan (v/a) -"Er J S. Hamilton (w/a) R. M. Parsons (w/a) ,

W. Howe (v/a) S. D. Smith (w/a)

P W.

~

D; ei Je~r B. Kincaid (v/a)

(w/a) M. F. Thompson, Jr. (w/a)

T. H. Wyllie (v/a) r( ~ L. Mnyton, Jr. (w/a)

TO: Mr. S. McManuo FROM: J. A. Jones

. JI' The attached audit repore, QAA/170-1, hns been reviewed and is returned for placement in the CNS&QAA files with the folio g comments.

IEQ I 9905050220 990420 PDR ADOCK 05000400 I P PDR <<~<Ed'4.

tl'"

.'i'8 j. ~,,E'-

'/A'4.',.-7

P, k

f N 4

i I

<

N. J. Chiangi - Manager, Engineering & Construction QA c

• p, W. Howe - Vice President, Technical Services i i

• McLean - Senior Engineer, Mechanical

• W. Seylcr - Senior Engineer, Civil J. Schenck - Weld Material Issue Attendant

• . I.

pl ) t <<S. McManus - Manager, Corporate Nuclear Safety & QA Audit ( .V h

• Attended the Postaudit Meeting

>+ Attended the Preaudit Meeting ">"Attended the Preaudit and Postaudit Meetings ~Scn e: This audit waa conducted in accordance with CP&L's Quality Assurance Audit Procedure QAAP-l, "Procedure for Quality Assurance Audit as h Required by CP&L Corporate QA Program, and ASME QA Program." The purpose of thc audit was to review and evaluate selected portions of thc CP&L ASME QA Program, SUPP PSAR commitments on concrete containment (Append1x 5H in PSAR), Site QA Program/Procedurea, and verify site compliance with implementing procedurca. Areas/activities audited included: (1) ASME/Document Control; (2) Site Procurement-ASME Items; (3) Receiving Inspection - ASME Items; (4) Process Control; (5) Welding Control; (6) Heat Treating; (7) Calibration of Equipment and Tools/ ASME; (8) Inspection & Test - Welding p>'d ~ H >>7 ~ 4 tl rpl 7 'i' )r. 7 7 2 Q and Hydro; (9) Nondestructive Testing; (10) ASME QA Records; (11) Containment Construction - ASME Section Ill, Division 2; Within these c,.).o 4 and (12) Housekeeping During Construction Phase. l,>> 7" areas, thc audit consisted of dicussions with personnel, 7 examination of records and procedures, audit team walk through of construction site, and witness of construction work in 4) 4 process. La h) Ll ~sumpter: wtthte the scope oi this ausit, tha Asws Quality Asoutauca Program will be considered adequate when the seven findings identified in this report are resolved. The eleven concerns identified in the general section of this report should be reviewed by the responsible parties to determine if actual problem areas exist. '4 During this audit, thc audit team toured the SHNPP Construction Site and reviewed housekeeping during the construction phase as required by ANSI Standard N45.2.3, titled "Housekeeping During the Construction 4 Phase of Nuclear Power Plantaeu The auditors, immediately after 4 the housekeeping tour, informed the CP&L Site Manager and the Daniel i), Pro)ect Manager of thc conditions found. One nonconforming finding 7 was identified during the housekeeping tour and is detailed in this 4 report, which is the resul't that the site did not have documented 'I The site issued Eq procedures implemented to control housekeeping. ,u IEE their housekeeping procedures, however, they are not implemented 4))'E) as of this audit date. The auditors reviewed the site housekeeping procedures and they will meet the requirements of ANSI N45.2.3 when implemented. 'j Personnel contacted during the audit were cooperative and found 4 to be knowledgeable in their areas of responsibility. L, ')s 7 'r)2 u YPL Pindin s and Corrective Action: h ' During the audit, thc following items were identified as nonconforming findings. The items require corrective action and formal rcsponsc. )L Actions taken to preclude recurrence are also required for Item 2. L a! v Item 1: QC'AL Sl Reiutteaeet: r)7) ', ASME Section III, paragraph NB-5111, requires that radiographic o4 I penetrameters for single-wall radiographic technique be in accordance with Table NB-5111-1. P Nonconformance: E Penetrameter sensitivity for source site penetrametcrs in Table 2 .P 4 )LE of CP&L procedure NDEP-101, Revision 1, for material thickness >>) i )'4 over 7/8 inch through 1-1/4 inch is not in compliance with 4~ Table NB-5111-1. Procedure NDEP-101 requires that thc 4T hole in 7 l the penetramctcr bc displayed on the radiograph. Thc ASME Code, , ~ ' Section III, Table NB-5111-1, specifics that the 2T hola be displayed on the radiograph. 4

• t)Q LL) 7 44

')  ;-EQ)s~+QYQ~>~"Pv oh>>r ~>>v,'tel)EE)LLcKQPALLPL '-7 . !QPAQQ'-i'~ N ~uk<.

• fy.'

fear I IP, I 1 I' I 1~ . ' e 'u )I, tI I'-.,P . 'I I, I " ~ 'et I I 3 ee Acknowled emcnt and Res onse: ,I,",'\ The Manager, E&C QA stated the sensitivity shown in CP6L procedure NDEP-101 will bc modified to agree with the requirements of ASME Code, Section III. Item 2: ~Rc utteuent: Ebasco Specification CAR-SH-AS-55, Circular Liner Plates and 'i ~ R' ASME Code, Section III, Division 2, paragraph CC-2131.1(c). Nonconformance: The Ebasco Purchase Order NY435170, to vendor Hcmmingcr, for containment circular liner plates for Units 1 and 2 required the plate material to meet ASME Code, Section III, Division 2. The 'I L I $ R Certified Material Test Report (CMTR) supplied by the vendor does , "e 11, not meet thc requirements of CC-2131.1(c) . Thc code requires the CMTR to have a statement giving the manner in which the material is identified, including specific marking. XO 11- -1'l Acknowled emcnt and Res onse: I R Thc Principal QA Specialist stated the vendor is being contacted I" to supply corrected CMTR(s) and he will then review the vendor's

• t IL, identification on the material not yct installed in Unit 2.

Item 3: I'4'. ~Raut tenent: ANSI Standard N45.2.3, "Housekeeping During thc Construction Phase of Nuclear Power Planes." 'L Nonconformance: The ANSI Standard requires that procedures be documented and implemented for housekeeping control. The site docs not have a u documented procedure implemented for control of housekeeping. The Site QA does not have a documented procedure implemented for surveillance of housekeeping. Both of the site organizations issued documented procedures during this audit which have not been implemented. The auditors reviewed both of these procedures during the audit and find they will meet the intent of ANSI N45.2.3 when e implemented. Acknowled ement and Res onse: Both the Site Manager and the Principal QA Specialist stated they will have these new procedures implemented within one month, nL., '." o.9 ', 'u Vpg E f/.W", ' 'L I I I t ~ (" Zteu 4: ~Ra utrenent: Section IIX, ASME Code, Article NA-4133.10, Examination, Tests, and Inspections, states: "Checklists shall be prepared, including the document numbers and revisions to which thc examination or test is to be performed 1 j)I 3 ~r2 'Ie Nonconformances: I 'I'-. I

a. The Weld Data Report (WDR) contains the checklist but not indicate the procedure or its revision to which the it does I NDE examination or test will be performed.

b. The "Hydro Test Form,"

'i ' Exhibit 1 of TP-30, Revision 1, dated 3/6/79, does not contain a checklist or provisions for listing procedure and its revision. Acknowlcd ement and Res onse: 'J; k

a. The Manager, E6C QA did not agree with the finding. He stated the type of NDE is marked on the WDR as hold point and the NDE Test Report will be attached to the WDR when r

documented after the NDE is performed. The NDE Test Report will indicate the procedure and its revision.

b. The Principal Engineer - Mechanical/Electrical stated the 1 Hydro Test Form is in the process of being revised to include ,\

requirements. 1 Item 5: +Q I L ~Reutrnuent: I The Weld Data Report, Form QA-28, requires documenting the piece numbers and heat numbers of items welded together to identify a weld point. Nonconformance: CI',)- The Weld Data Rcport for weld joint 3SW13FW169 stated piece number 1 ) 3.-SW49-17, heat number 98267-23 was welded to piece number 4-SW-2-7, heat number 98534-23; however, piece number 1-SW&9-17, heat number 88151-23 was actually welded to piece number 4-SW"2-7, heat number 98534-23. The pipe, piece 1-SW-49-17, had been flipped over exchanging , I 1 ends and heat numbers, the weld fit-up inspection had been approved by Site QA Inspector. It was confirmed that the Weld Data Report IJ'k was corrected during the audit. Acknowled ement and Res onse: Thc Principal QA Specialist stated that identifications will be reconfirmed at final inspection. II~ k ) 'e r kJ'4 ,4l h ~ '1 l Item 6: J ' ~Re eReeeeee: Procedure MP-03, Welding Material Control, Revision 1, states: "Dry rod, rebake and recondition ovens shall be temperature checked by a calibrated instrument on a weekly basis by the control area 'b.,~ attendant and documentedeu Nonconformance: Weld Rod Holding Oven H1100 was checked thc weeks of 2/26/79 and 3/19/79. It was not checked for two weeks but was still used. l JR The calibration instrument used to check ovens had been damaged, and no spaxe or replacement instrument was" available. JRWR Acknowled ement and Res onse: Thc Welding Pro)act Engineer stated the procedure would be changed to require temperature check every two weeks. He also stated an extra calibrated instrument had been purchased. L .l J! Item 7: JJ e 'll .. r ASME QA Manual, Section 3 Administrative Procedure IV-03 l Nonconformance: l . Rl The ASME QA Manual, paragraph 3.3.7, requires purchase orders to bc awarded for code items in accordance with PPCD procedures. The Site Construction Procuremcnt Services Section is issuing J l and approving purchase orders per PPCD Pxocedure P-066 which is not written as required in Administrative Procedure IV-03, paragraph 0 3 '4 which requires the scope to contain thc sentence, "This is "JJ an ASME Section III procedure" when the procedure relates to ASME I Jr r4- ~ j Code work. C Acknowled ement and Res onse: . 'egad'e J l'. The Manager, E&C QA stated that he did not believe that thc P-066 44 pxoceduxe should contain the statement since the procedure is used for all purchase orders issued by PPCD. Further study will be '4J>> made to resolve the nonconformance. Concerns: 'l R,R J l J l The following items werc identified as concerns during the audit. It is recommended that they be investigated and evaluated to determine er"'JJ't, i what actions are necessaxy to prevent them from becoming unsatisfactory "-I) l I, l4 4 Jl conditions. , J -0 ~l Concern 1: Paragraphs 8.1 and 8.2 in procedure NDEP-301, Revision 1, Magnetic Particle Examination, indicate that direct current is to be used for all general work, except when detection of fine surface dis-continuities is required or shape of a component or part would prevent use of direct current. The auditors are concerned that these paragraphs do not clearly define when direct current and alternating current are being used. During this audit, magnetic particle examination of a circumferential weld in a 30 inch diameter pipe was witnessed. The completed weld joint was ground only the amount necessary to remove abrupt ridges and the fusion line between the weld and base metal. Direct current would be used to examine this weld joint if the information in paragraphs 8.1 and 8.2 is used to determine current; however, alternating current was used. The Manager - E&C QA stated that the procedure does contain the information necdcd because it states that the current used can either be AC or DC as addressed by the coda. Concern 2: Administrative Procedure EX-10 requires the Document Control Supervisor to distribute the site-generated specifications in accordance with Administrative Procedure IX-02. It is of concern that contrary to distribution of controlled documents, site-generated specifications have been distributed to personnel for procuremcnt purposes without having the stamp "Uncontrolled" applied. The Manager - E&C QA stated that procedures will be examined to determine the need for corrections to allow unstamped documents to be issued by the Document Control Supervisor. Concern 3: A review of eight Construction QA Manuals of Procedures for their control and distribution was made by the auditor. It is of concern that one manual was found issued without having an Approval Page (Page i) and two manuals were issued without having the number of the manual shown on the Approval Page. These items were corrected during the audit. Concern 4: It is of concern that several code items receiving inspection packages, three of which arc numbered QA-169476-3, QA-169476-4 and QA-169476-7 contained cross-reference forms that listed obsolete receiving inspection package numbers in which pertinent information is filed. The Principal QA Specialist stated that thc obsolete numbers would be changed to reflect the correct package numbers. F A( , qi -7" ))-' Concern 5: \ EE It is of concern that two code item receiving inspection packages numbered H08009-1 and H08009-2 contained photo copies of chemical analysis reports having unreadable signatures and as such made them incapable of being properly reproduced. The Principal QA Specialist stated that these reports would bc corrected. Concern 6: A CP&L PPED letter No. CE-07426 to Fbasco states the A-E will review and approve the Site Procedure AP-IX-LL, titled "Construction Surveillance." The auditors are concerned that this procedure has not been reviewed and approved by Ebasco. Per Harris Site Engineering, Ebasco will not sign the site administrative procedures. ', )I I, ~ Concern 7: ')E 'p" j The last survey of Site QA records was performed 9/21/78. Since that time, the Site QA Procedure CQA-3, titled "Construction Site )' QA Surveys," has been deleted. The auditors are concerned that this now is in confLict with requirements of ASME QA Manual, paragraph 11.1.6 which requires QA records to bc surveyed. .e The Manager and will Concern 8: be - E&C QA stated that this conflict deleted from the ASME QA Manual. was an oversight I t) I, i" CC II'+ I* is C The Field Weld Number marked in the pipe using a vibrator marker. ) It is of concern that this identification is very hard to read. o ' The Manager - E&C QA stated that as long as the Field Weld Number is readable at the time of installation that the requirements II II for marking have been met. He also stated that they had suggested C. ( stamping for identification. / Concern 9: IE, Article T752 of Section V of the ASME Code requires for magnetic 'I " particle test equipment that each piece of magnetiring equipment shall be calibrated at least once a year. The magnetic particle yoke is being calibrated. It is of concern that there is no docu- E mented record of thi,s yoke calibration. EI The Manager - E&C QA stated that thc blocks are part of the calibration program and there is a record of these blocks being calibrated . Thc auditor stated that he had no problem with thc blocks, but that the Magnetic Particle yoke had no record of calibration. I')i The Manager -E&C QA stated that the calibraticn requirements are being met and that personnel have gone a step further by requiring that these be calibrated on a daily basis. ) e "I t(II /II'- C ')I "IE 1 1 I 'I c I i gf,i. 4 ~ ~ I ~ ~ 4 ~ ~ I ( ~ ~ ~ ~ II ~ ~ + ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ 4 ~ n I I ~ ~ j 4 ~ ~ H ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ \< S I ' J 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ g ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ 4 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ II ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ 'I ~ ~ ' ~ t I I s t" I , 4 - P l 'e 4~ t / ><<~.i /)iw dnSuad~u' g.2.d ~a<~%2,d,zl~~ <<) ~.'IVI'GHPP io.>,g ~jc.l 4-Construction Site/ASHE Construction khiu>o LS (<, hl Q~-I ('.>.C AUDIT PROCEDURE RZPO 1 2 ~ I (2,( > (7,Q )p /( p(g( q) KO. QAA/170-1 ICE birch 19-23, 197/ E'L UALITY ASSURAhCE AUDIT CHECK LIST AUDIT SUBJECT QA Audit of ASHE giYPkty Assurance A. Eo Hall -. NlDITOR(S) I. A. Johnson L. M. Bissette P. M. Ta lor CHARACTERISTICS 1.0 Precudit K.etin 2.1 In accordance with the ASME QA Manual re uireneats Adainistrative Procedure IV-03 is vritten and used fot" t e cvelo ent and a roval of technical and work ro- >5 c urea relati to ASHE Code items. The istribution of Construction QA Hanuals is'bc done -C 2.0 Docuaent Control secor iag to procedures. However, one manual vas found C 2.1 Arc thc construction tcchnical and work to have no a roval a c and tvo other manu 1 Proc durca being developed and approved to have a roval a es vithout shovin the ass s o in accordance vith ASHE QA Kmual, of those manuals. This vas vritten u as Concern Xo -'6 Para. 2.4.4.12 in thc audit re ort. 2.2.1 A docunent control lo is bein used and vas found to be u to date. 2.2 Are the E&C QA site construction, QA and QC proccdurca beiag distributed as designated in AQAS proccdurea2 (~K-2.4.3) 2.2. 1 Aro the above distributed procedures recorded on a docuaent control log2 (A%~A-2.4.3.) Page 1 of 31 KE)R CHARACTERISTICS 2.3.1 A distribution list for Desi n Speci ications ss not 2.3 Select exaaples of the following been considered necessary since there are no requ re-documents for detarainiag if they are ments for the s ecifications to be istr ute . zeco being distributed and cmCzol.led as t is te for those s eci ications . c ve cn described in PPCp,'go~p~ea on document at thc individuals re uest. distribution and .C',~,,:.".,-.-'ii~QA-2.4. 4, 2): 2.3.2 .....,.. oa re - .:,",:aooor  :. r< 2.3.1 Design Specif icag >~,ot ,'i'-'~t in PPCD roce urea. e rewings are not (~-.g'.,; ~< Code Itaa. 2.3.3 Oiteori-inated e eci cat are not roe io ~o Drawings. distribut . A recora s pt o t ose ap that have been distributed. It was ou t odm'o these site- enerated o cci ications are asu to a to ineerin ersonnel as controlle ocuncnts not 2.3.3 Site originated specifications. the atae uncontrolled a ixed t at are nten to bc used with urchase re uisitions an pure se or erne This is written u as Concern o. in t e a t report. 2.4 Are documents zecoivcd at the site being 2.4 All construction contro ocuucnts are ogg on t e recorded on the Document Record Porn Received Doc~t Rccor . (Exhibit 2-5) T (hSHE-Qh-2.4.4.2) 2.5 All revisions to site spec cat ons an s te ra ngs are sing r ew an ap rov y t e sane organ ra that cr o t e or ina rev cw. 2.5 Aro re~iona to specifications and, + drawings being reviewed and approved by The current apeci cat on - was e ng us t pur sc <<>> "-, the am@ organisation that performed the o crs or we ngr . t cr 0 e t~ specs ~ apl, r original review or other properly draw~ s vc hot can ssu or use. authorised pcrconnclt (ASME-gA-2.4. 5) d." 2.6 Select ap cifications and drawings and detamino if current rcvihions to sane are availablo for usa whore the function io being performed. (hSME-QA-2.4.5) ~ x I'Q +c; ] Page 2 of 3I e 2 r t ~ -. a r <1 1!4 f ~ ~ ' ~ ~ I ~ ' ~ I ~ ~ f ~ ' I 'tt. '.: f ~ ~ IA f tf f 'f . ~ t f ~ ttt ~ I~C ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ' ~ ~ I t tt- ~ ~ I " ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I 'f f ~- ' ~ ~ ~ I ~ ifl . f ~ ~ ~ f ~ ~ t ~ it ~ ~ ~ I ~ fI ~ 7 ~ ~ C ) ~ ~ ~ ~ 'ft, f i ~, ~: i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ I ~ t I ' ~ t ~ ~ ~ t I'% 'f ~ I t i I ~ I ~ ~ ~ t't ~ tt .f ~ . ~ f i,f f C ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 I ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ f ' ' ';~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Itt ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ' f ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ C I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 6 ~, ~ I ~ I ~ ~ ~ II ' I t ~ I ' I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I I ~ ~ ~ ~ t ~ ~ I I ~ f I ~ ~ ~ ~ It ' C ~ I I ~ t ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ I ~ ' ~ ~ I ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ I I 1 '1 (I I l ~ ~ ~ I ' ' ~ 1 ~ 1 ~ ' I ~ ~ ~ ' ~ I ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ' ~ Lh ~ ~ I L~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ g II.' ~ ~ I ~ 11 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I& ~ ~ LS\tkI ~ ~ ~ ~I I ~ 1 ~ ) ~ ~ 1 ~ 1 1 ~ 1 I~ I ~. I ~ I. L ~ ~ I S 1 1 ~ ~ ~ i I ~ ~ ~ CW ~ ~ I ~ I1 I. ~ ~ ~ ~ I~ II%+ ~ ~ ~ I ~ 1. ~ ~ t ~ ~ SIC ~ . ~ L

• I 4

S MFA ILL CHARACTERISTICS COiHEHTS Does tho Sita Procurenent Unit have docu-3.5 nantod evidence of suppliers oned to $ ~ ~~.~cQh,'n approval of itens on do eli i df a Construction Pr~-,.%"8yvices vendor ds ixmedietel. transmitted to si issued purchase .g>>'.';,:Rg~-QA-3.3.5.2) unit. 6.1 1 ta or heat nunbers ctc. are revic and martin s as re uired aro then a 1 before bein laced in store e. Select Coda it~-~-y~~~~p..born received by Sito QA Ins~Cprp~~ro the following raquirmaato have been net& 4.1.2 Thc recaivin ine ection re ort formnhas notin inforcation about s ccial a kn i a c ~f ~ (ASHE-QA-4. 0) and handlin as observed b the receivin i 4.1.3 Por itecs that r etre s ecial handlin sucl a r o vessels a s ccial hn 19m brt is m'1 t 4.1.1 Items have been identified by the o t c rec vi i e o and is e rd e 1 F o inspector to provide traceability of thoaa it~2 (ASIDE-gA;4. 2) 4.1.2 Et~ hnva been axanined to ensure special pcchagingp Ghipping and handling had been carried out during ohipnent2 (ASm-qa-4.3, 4.4) 4.1.3 Itcni have been handled according to spccificationo after rocoipt2 (ASHZ~-6. 3) Page 5 of I , ~ i',s l II i) I",, 0 + P g,t l P Ik i rg s IB ~ ~ ~ ' I ~ A ~ '1 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 1 1 Ssss 1 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ' ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ 1 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I s ~ ~ 1 ~ '1 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ '1 ~ s, ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ 1 ~ 1 ~ '1SS ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ g ' ~ * ~ 1 ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 I ~ ~ ~ 1 c . ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ 1 I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ 1 ' c'a ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 1 1 ~ ~ ( ~ 1 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Js ~ ~ ~ ~, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Is ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ sss ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ \ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 1 ~ ~ ~ I. ~ ~ I ~ 11 (BDQtLCTERISTICS COMKtPiS .@~4 4.3 Have the data packages supplied vith vas ai ned b the resident A-R s te oor ~tor. it~ purchased by t+ A. E vhich vere selected in 4.1 eJpp~~;govieved and The siee urchased receiving aspect on p accepted by the f~">,"<p~~~&4'Coordinator2 did shag that the itaas een race v ~..u,p (ARE-QKA.12);; of Procedure C i .~-"'ra l' 1 The roceivln ins act on reports exon 4.6 ait~urchn.'= =.-.~,;.~ved and e 1 aio re orts a inspected in ncc-.~ '"'-'="- ~~*~endure lI cu did hot have readabfi"r.'~< =,~m.~.~.~.. o'ritten t as Concorn~a&>>WSL jf~~:w,'5 0 u = aa 4 ~ 4.

• 8 e on and teat data vas included in th" pa ..CO 4.5 So required Certified Notarial Test O Roporto include, ao applicablo, the folio&my: (Section III-NA3767.4) ts for re irs.

for radio ra hs. 4.5 1 Actual results of all raquirod choaica1. iced vas included in t e analysis2

• 4@2 Actual teat and oxcnination resulta2 I

4.5.3 Results of veLd repairs nada2 "a~ -'a, ~ v V~ ,- r gC. V a~= ~a ' 4.5.4 Radiographic film raquire6 for the oxanination of material or naterial repair valdo2 4.5.5 Resulto of heat treatments required in-cludin tinea and tmporaturoo2 4 Page 7 of c . ' IJ-f, gi H gt t g ' ~ I~ I ~ I ~ j I ~, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 5g Ii . a1j ~ ~ ~ ~ II ' ~ ~ t 1l ~ g. s ~ g ~ ~ ~ I ' ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I I ~ . ~ ~ ' ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ): ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ I ~ I I ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ 'I ~ ~ J I ~ ~ ~ ~ I I t ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ' ~ ~ I I I ' ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ I ~ I ~ ~ Q ~ ~ ~ I ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ I ~ ~ 1 .d ~ ~ I ~ LO ~ ~ t ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ I I ~ ~ J ' ~ ~ I ': ~ ~: ~ ~ ~ ~ ..W ~ -,.I, 4I'. t ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C '. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 E ~ ~ ~ \ I ~ ~ ~ I ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~; I ~ ~ ~ ~ I ' ~ I ~ ~ I ~ ~ t ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . I ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ I .4  ! ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ' ' ~ ~ ~ L~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t t t ~ ~ ~ ~ ta f t ~ J ~ a ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ \ t I E t ~ t a I ~ ~ \f ~ . ~; ~ ~ t ~ ~ ~ ~ t ~ ~ t ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t t ~ ~ t ~ ~ t ~ t ~ t a a ~ l l' ~ ~ ~ gf t t ~ ~ ~ I ~ 4 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ \ ~ ~ ~ f ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 4 I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a~ t ~ ~ t f ~ ~.~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ I I+gg ~ I ~ I a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 4 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~ a -I "4 f;ty \ GEM CHARACTERISTICS COHHEHTS M e field maids FW-15 end PM-6.0 Maldin Control Section IX were in ASME II i u 6.1 Select vel6mntn- P~ gael@ in accord-ance vith the ~0g."W~>>~~.y that a Molding Procedutg';, '-,4.-<'jtion vas 'F 7 prepared. (Art9~~-'- '~F . '~$01) R 1 F Pl o Pl 6@1 Are tha follovioj..~l gg> ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ >> ' 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I' ~ ~ ~ ~ ' I ~ I ' ~ ~ I I ~ ~ ~ \ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ >>>> ~ ~ ~ \ ~ ' ~ ~ ~ >> ~ I '+ I>> ~ 1 l>> ~ >>>> h ~ ~ 4 ~ I C 1 1 ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ >> ~ ~ ~ ~ I>> ~ ~ ~ ~ I . I ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ' ~ 1 1 ~ ~ . >>>> ~ >> ~ ~ 4 ~4 E' 4 ct I. h 4 t 1 1$ I .( $a (' Q CQAHACTEKISTICS CG~MBIES ~ I oo o 6.3>>l 8 re parko~~ce qealification teata <<<<aided in acco< t~.. ~,h <aaliHed '>>'"~ >~>>iona2 ~ 3>> ea> n& ra Q ~ Q and AB3 vere anal taldir~ Pmc&v' U" cr <<."or~~ on the ointa identifi (krticle XXX, Q .3.3 ceo t o~ticn was veriRied to h~ -'- r~orcznce ual ication teat recor a. O>>3>>2 Xa cn idmUZQ -->>tery or ~ 0 q operatoro vera not imrolvcd ~itb ~'ol c,'~~"'h~ . to 98~tify ~ a" tc ~ %&re O C.a c-,mator2 .3l.3} ~ ~ c r red tc-to <<~a ocr orred ~ ~ <<;me U a ot vcr ceo'arM to a.,ree e ea QG oce to UcW s'..e n the 4'ds. Q Xaformticn caamtial 5>>3>>3 Xa varicblm ccc'4 <<:Qdcr ~rccordcl re~~.rd~~ c~t rmultc obt~ on a L-.cord OC by PcrCO "~o ~liflcation Tc"tc2 (Reticle XXX, +--3D1.4) I:.3.0 Xa izgoz atiox re~a rding caaential v >~ic>lcm c=>>." 4""~r. e"M data c d t~== r=-~r-, c=r43 by ecch. c~Rg o a o>> a P~g ~ g Q~ioerd VezPO=-==~a Q. XK't'ien cata2 ~~~ziclc XXZ, +2-3Gloh) co&>>ap ~~~ ~~-=" ~--oo>>e3 <<y A"ticlc XXX 0 Ooao ma c.: Uc~G~<< Lo o <8>> o '":wo op op a Q ra.o t.e 5 z "g f.. o =2 rt'g o~ lf *l lc ~ IA ~ I ~ 4 ' ' I ~ ~ 4 4 " ~ ~ ~ 4 1 ~ 4 ~ ~ 1 " ~ ~ ~ ' ~ . 4 ~ ' ~ ~ 1 4 I ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 4 ~ ~ ~ 4 \ 1 ~ reap'4 <<S 4 4 ~ ~ 11 ' ~ 4 ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ 4 ~ 4. ' ~ ~ g I ' ' I Y ~ 4~ ~ 4 4 ~ ~ w ' ~ ~ 1 ' I ~ ~ 1 ~ 4 44 ~ ~ 4 ~ ~ ~ 4 4 ~ ' ~ ~ 1 ~ )4 4 ~ ~ 8,. ~ ~ ~ 4 ~ 4 ~ 4 ~ ~ 1 ~ 4 4 ~ ~ ~ 4 ~ p $ 'a ~' II I C L CCC g C ~ CA ~ \ ~ ~ ~ Ciltlil l l i ~ ~ ~ ~ i 1. ~ i 'I: i ~ i ~ ii 4 C E ~ ~ l ~ p ~ ~ l 4~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ l ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ i ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ L ~ ~ v ~ ~ I ~ ~ ' i li ~ ~ ~ ' 'l C ~ ~ ~ i ~ heL ~ ' ~ ~ i i ~,l ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ Q il ~ I'I !I I I! I, Il a 4q 1 li 1, ~v ~ ]I REPORT 7 2.3 PHHT heating and cooling rate r equiraaents conforn to HC-46232 7.2.4 t~t@ welding is in accord~~~,:-: '-,~,-'- +02 Q.5 r forning 7.3 Verify tha following for HtHT of Class III ~nants: 7.3.1 -P~tuycraturo recording@ aro ado with waM, iten, or cmpri~t identified on tha record ing2 0~622) 7 3.2 molding t~ trolled in and t~oraturoa are con-accordance with HD-4622.42 7.3 3 heating and cooling rato zcquirc-confo~ to E3-46232 7.3.4 Boat trina~ astor repair by voiding ia in accordance with H&46402 7.3.5 Heat treatment after bending or fornfng ia in conpliance with ND-46502 Page 15 of V 41 lt l I tg 4 III A' )1 c~ I ' I ~ U4 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ U ~ t ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ << ~ 4 1 4 ~ 4 t ~ ~ I, ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ U ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 4 t ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ I ' 4 ~ ~ I t ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I 4 ~ ' ~ ' ~ I ' ~ 4 ~ ~ ~ )44)t I ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~ 4 ~ ~ MI ~ 4 ' 'I ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 4 ) I ~ ' ~ ~ I ~ 4 ) ~ I I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 4 ~ ~ I ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 4 ~ I U~ ~ ~: ~ I ~ ~ ' ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ I ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ {J ~ ~ ~ ~ ' I ~ 4 ~ 4) 44 ~ I ~ ~ 4 >> ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ) ~ L4 ~ ' ~ 4 ~ ~ 4 ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ' ~ I I ' ~ I ~ R 4 4 ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ 4 ~ ~ ~

4 ~ te I I I I Iti I ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ i ~

~ I ~ ~ I ~ ~ ' I ' I i I m~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~. ' j ~ ' ~ 0 I ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ I ~ ~ 0 ~ ' ~ I ~ I I I I I,i ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~

31. ~

~ j ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ I ~ ': ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~ > ~ ~ ~ ~" x . a I ~ ~ I ~ ~; ~ I ~ I ~ I I ~ ~ ~ I I ~ ~ ' ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ I '. I ~ ~ .L 'I I ~, ~ I ~ I ~ i 0 ~ I I. ~ ~ I '- ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ I i i I I I ~ i I 'I i 'I I 0 ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ' 0 ' ~ ~ f )t k4 ty t, I I t /gal a C EEPOQX QiARACTERISTICS 8.1.3.1 Oven H730 Procedure S ecification No. >>5 ond work ides 8.1.3.1 Held rod ovens? and Procedure MP-03 for Holdin and Portable Ovens r dire thc calibration test oints to be the oints that arc C critical - see ueotions under 8.3. 8.1.3.2 Reaouring ~~p, - ~;. 8.1.3.2 There are no measuri e ui ent in thea;P"=: ~~,"-~i~ Dro razle 8.1.3.3 The re uirc"ent for h dro is that water."k~i4-4-~+go'-4',~:Y>> 4 8 1,3.3 Hoot induct@jjL~~~+ts'f 8.1.3.4 Pressure testing instnmcnts? 8.2 Hera test gouges used for preoouze l tests tooted against a standard dead weight tester or a chiibratcd nester goggcR - (Section III, NB-6413) / 8.2.1 .Herc the test gouges calibrated befozc each teat or series of teats (not C czcecding tm yodm) 2 . Q 8.3 Lrc welding covered electrode bake . ovens calibrated to ensure tmpora-tu"e of 800 P + 25 P2 (Section III, 53-4642.3(c)) Q. 8.3.1 Are the ovens calibrated to ddternine when 3N P eaah:uu temperature io rcachcN ') S>- ~ Page ~8 of s, II 1 V5g 'V 5 'I ~ ~, I ~ ~ I' 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 4 ~, ~ ' 1 ~ ~ s ~ ~ 0 I ~ ~ ~ ~ \ 1 ~ ~ II '1 ' I ~ ~1' ~ ~ ' 1 ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ' ~ 1 ~ ~ I 1 ' ~ ~ II ' ~ ~ " ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 4 ~ ~ I 1 ~ '1 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ 1 ~ ~ ' ~ ' 4 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ \ 1 ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ 1 1 ~ ~ 1 1 ' ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ 1 ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ 4 ~ ~ ~ 4 ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' L ~ ~ 1  % ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 1 ~ ~ 1 ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ' ' ~ 1 il ~ a I ~ ~ . 1 ' ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~ 44 ' I 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ill,h' ~ ~ ' I ' ' . 1  ! ~ 'I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ I ' ~ a 1 ~ ~ I A' ~ ~ ~ 11 ~ I e ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ' ) ~ 1 ' 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' . ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ 1 ~ ~ 1 ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ 14 ~ ~ Il ' ~ ~ ~ OOI 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ . ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ' ~ e ~ ~ ~ ~ ' 1 ~ ' 1 1 I ~ ~ 1 1 I a e ~ 1 ~ 111 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ' ~ 1 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ \ ~ 1 ~ . \ ~ ) ~ ' ~ ~ I' 1* k,a h r~' e' QDLEACEERISTICS COHHEHTS 9.2.3.1 Has the data report signed by the A.l.t (Section III<'+section NA,

• e Appendix V) ds es rl 9.2.4 Qo the procg~h"=".~ =.:..=.=;,,QtinS contains T

veld vas assessed.as a Class aa '-~ a2"dd>>af hr'he!'asek" (NA-4133. 10) ";.~~~~~,'-~ . ~e.= ,i u d enetrant exaMnation was erforned '& a~@neo h I s "C Ql.d.l Provfaiona fqi~>.'ZgpW ~t docmmting7 vit NDEP-201 Revision l. .r~ 2 Thin r edure vas in corn lisnca vith ArticIa G Cn S c ion V of the ASK? Code. 9a2a<a2 P ovisiona for use of the n0" StanPT e v. -

• fe-( 9.2.4.3 Provisions for asaiSn2mnt of a National I Board a~or and application of this nmbar on the nameplate2 ~e Q.O Nondeatructivo Tcatin LO.X Verify the following for nondestructive ear

'r cxa=inatioua being porforvxd on Class I a 2 ~ capo~to: e J

• 10.1.1 ~inntiona aro pcrforn"d in accordan"o uith dote&ad written sr proccdurca that, have boon proved by I

actual d~tration2 (HS-5112) ,a, ~- iv" a ~ Ia he a ~a (y. 10.1.2 The Uriteen procedure eely vith thc appropriato Article of S~mtion V e 4 for the rticular ezaninntion ethod? Na-5112) Page v I 118 ~ II ~ ' I I ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ' I' Qjf ~ ~ \ ~ I ~ l ' ~ Ql rt .i ~ ~ ~ 11 ~ 11 '1' ~ ~ ~ I ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I lI ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ' ~ ~ ~ I << ~ ' ~ ' I ~ ~ <<<<I Q t ~ ~ f 'l t Q<< ~ <<1 I ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ I: I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .' ~ I ~ 1" I ~ I ~ ~ ~ I ~ I ' ~ ~ It ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ QQI t I ~ I I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I << l ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ k ~ l ~ ~ - I ~ ~ I<< ~ I << ~ ~ ~ t I I ~ Q<< l << ~ ~ t ~ ~ ~,Q ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ 'I, ~ I. ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ l ~ I ~ I ~ ~ ~ QI ~ j I ~ ~ ~ ~ IA ~ > ~ I ~ ~ 4 i ~ ~ j ~ 2 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 4~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ \ ~ ~ I ~ ~ I i ~ ~ ~ ' ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I' l ~ 7 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ I ~ f ~ ~ ~ k ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ tI ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ 4 ~ C ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~; i ' ~ ' ~ ~ ~ l ~ j 1 4 4, g ~ 4 I ~~ C ~ ~ ~ ~ I t 1 ~ I ~ ~ I gl +g ~ ~ kgb ~ ~ I I e a s a .~ 'S ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 4. i ~ I ~ ~ 44 ~ ~ I ~ ~ Hp ~ ~ h ~ 'f s'] "t I g,' gN hI "J ' I I l ~ 'll II REPORT CHAR.~ISTICS COMMENTS c o din to the information in ara ra hs 8.1 and 8 Circumferential wHd points in piping Revf fon 1 direct riant would be used pumps and valves are exazLined by cle examine eld I-HM-A8-PN-15'ow either magnetic qir/tale>> liquid r w ed This conditio i fed penetrant, or xC-"ig~~~c methodsT e audit re ort as Concern No. l. 2 The acce tance criteria for ma netic arti ~t~ . m io of e service water veld iden fied in 10. '=, ". ~o. f ed on a e A-3 of NDEP-301 Pevision 1. This c ' r~ in 10.3.2 Acceptance HD-5300 are s~~'pccif fed in . o'r4>y:f. accordance with ND-5300. uogtd'@5?)A/2) Yes the weldln OA S ecialfst re ares a 'weldfno doc~ acka c checklist" which list documents attached znch at( HDR weld re air MDR NDE re uest NDE resorts DDR s corrective action re uest etc. Each acka e is identified b the field weld oint identifiaation number. The civil S ecfalist rc ares a document checklist for each concrete arement with attached documents. This documentation ms Eas the Principal Qh Spedtalist or verified b the auditors review of several documents in the his designee prepared record hhecklists vault. for ASHE Code structures, syat~ and/ or components and is QA Review document i su Princi al A S ecialist dated oa checklists (ASME QA Manual 11.1.3) 7 is memo d sted on the door of the record Ke o thc vault are controlled bv the Prfnci ialfst with the ko s restricted to the h S ecfalint-0 .or it ersonnel Is access to thc Qh Records vault restricted to a liat of authorizod P d mu lo is maintained b the h personnel'ASME QA Manual 11.1.5) c fdentff each record rLocked- 'L e -o t ers c eckin -out si nature and d e d d es and initials of erson in vault s checked-out and returned. Records checked 11.3 Is QA record sign-out log naintainad by ou . t be returned b the end of the da shift. A amo Principal Qh Specialist or his u 1- 6-7 b the Prfnci al A S ecialist authorized design-"cT (ASME QA Manual 11.1.5) a f. ersonncl who can check-out records for a eriod of 2 . 'he of-wdcords in the vault. above was verified b the auditor s review 11.4 Boa the Principal @!. Specialist or his 11.A Aft e'o 'Crc Of A reCOrda eee by the Cfsf1 QA eyetf~a1at dosfgnea conducted periodic internal oa"9. Z to a .t mitten checklist wit no pro , tt em ent on-survey of QA records in hhc Qh vault7 Since that ties the Site QA Proce ure , (ASHE A Manual 11.1.6) structfoa Site Qh Surveys, as cen w t rawn rom use at t e Paae 24 of 31 'EPOSE EO. CHARhCTERISTICS COHKKXS Pa~e Phd of 31 'E ,J a I E W ~ i '~ Il 'k )I p! t t ~ tA I ' ' ~ ' ' i C i ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ I ~ I ~ ~ I I ~ ~ ~ " I I I I ~ ~ ~ l~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C ~ ( ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ lggCjl ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Q ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ t ~ ~ I ~ ~ I ' i ~ I ~ ~ ~ ' I ' I I lt ~ ' ~; ~ ~ ~ ' ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ " ~ 'I ~ I C I ~ \ . ~ x ~ . ~ ~ ~ I ~ Lt I~ ~ ~  ; ~ ~ ~ I I ~ I I ~ ~ ~ I I ~ ~ L I ~ ' I ~ L I ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I 'I I ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ I, ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~I ~ ~ ~ t ~ L 41 ~ C ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ l ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ltl 11 ~ I I ~ ~ \ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ I: ~ - ~ ~ I ~ ~ ' I ~ C ~ LI 'll ~ ~ ' ~ I V ~ ~ I c ~ ~ I C ~ I C .9 pit o I ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I, ' I, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 4 ~ w o ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ I ~ ~ \ ~ ' ~ ~; ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ' 0 ~ ~: ~ ~ ~ I' ~ ~ I I I ~ ~ " ' ~ ~ k. ~ I ~ Iv ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ V I 4hA 'I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i 1 Lt ~ ~ -: e ~ ~ S r 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ P ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 4P ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ' C ~ ~ @ ~ I I ' + ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t c ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ 4 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~:: ~ a: ~ ~ ~ ~ L ~ ~ ~ L ~ 4 ~ ~ hl ,y ~ lr 'I il "i ,l lt RE!%BR QQQRCTERISTICS 11.11.6 As-built sketches, dra5inas, ox tabulation of caterialaT 11 11.7 NDE exarLinatg."~. -',.;, ~<".,'~+eh include results of er=-.~ .."-'= - ' Pinal radiogrr~~g~.;"gadiography haa been pcrfo~ 11.11.9 Records of all heat treatments (HQ-2200 and HB-4600) 2

11. 12 Are ASHE Qh records at the construc-tion sita fQ,ed and maintained ia faci1ities that prevent deterioration or dmus to documents aad are these records controlled to prevent losel

12. 0 Contact Coastructioa (PEAR tr~t to ACI-359

12. 1 Has CP&L dcsianated the designer's reaponaibQ.itics Mth respect to construction surveillance? (CA-2200(i), CA-3211(12), & CA-3220 (n))

Page 27 of >> '4" ~ ~ >>>>I I I>>, >> I >>IJ ~ ~ ~ ' \ ~ I ~ ~ ~ I ~ I ~ I I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ 'I'~>>, I ~ ~ I ~ 4'I I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ I ~ II>>' ~ I ~ k I ' I I~ I, ~ ~ I ~ >> fiT ~ ' ~ ~~ ~ ~ l4 I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ >> I ~ I I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ' ~ . ~ I ~ I I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ I ~ ~ >> ~ ~ I ~ ~ I ~ ~ >>I ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ I I ~ I ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ ) I ' ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ I ~ I I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ I ~ ~ I I ~ ' ~ I I ~ I I ~ ~ ~ \ ~ ~ I' >> ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ I ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ I I4 ~ ~ AI I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ 'I ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ I I >> ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ I ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ' ~ ~ ' ~ I ' I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ I ~ ~ ~ ' ~ I ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I 0 ~ III I I g'~, 7 I ~ fe I I 1 I ~ ~ I ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ' ~ ' I ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' '1 I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ I ~ I ' I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I . ~ ~ ' ~ ~ I ' ~: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ I S CS% ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ S ~ ~ 1 ~ I I I I ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ W 1 ~ ~ 1 I ~ ~ ~ ~ > ~. ~ ' ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' II ~ I ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ' ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 'II I ~ I ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~ I I ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ Sl' ' ' ~ ~ ~ ~ + 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ je ~ S ~ ~ ' ~ ~ I1 \ ~ ~ ~ I I ~ 1 I ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ 1 ~ . ~ 'I 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~e ~ I ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t'ai ~ I tjt. ~ I I ~ I ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ \ ~ Nj I ~ ~ e ~ 'e ~ ~ ' ~ e ~ ~ I ~ I . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t ~ ~ ~ I I It ~ ~ .e I 11 I ~ ~ ~ I~ t ) ' ~ I ~ ~ ~ I ~ e ~ I I ' ~ ~ I ~ ' ~ ~ Q ~ ~ I ~ ~' ~ j ~ g I ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ I I ~ ~ + ~ ~ f Ijj ~ ~ I ~ I e ~ ~ j ~ ~ r ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ te ~ I ~ ~, ~ ~ ~ e ~ I $~ ' ~ ~ ~ e I ~ ~ I ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~t I I I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ l ~ ~ 'I t ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I t e A . ~I I t 4 1 ~ i t ~ ~ ~ t ' ~ j ~ 'I ~ ~I Ct I I ~ I ~ ~ I I ' ~ ~ ~ I ~ '. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ f ' ~ I I I ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ I ' ~ I ~ t t I ~ ~ 'I t I ~ ~ << ' ' ~ I ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ I I ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~ e I I ~ 1, t~ l1 tg .'l".n J'>> h " c' ~ . 4 Pg Cl > '~f Qhh/170-1 CKGQCTERISTICS COHHENTS l) I l o to date. The auditor are concerned this Code )2.11. 2 Have provisions been made for protec- re uirement has not been addressed b rocedure or s ecif-tion of overprcasurc during structural e dit r will fo low-u on later a integrity test of contafmaat7 'J (CC-7000) o as of 3-1 -7 the site does not have a m ~~~~.. g -+ ro edure im lemented for control of hous~~,~~+ -'~*:-=. A did ot have a docume ted rocedu ~-~ >'~,'- - f the surveillance of housekee in at the H 4.:":> '5~$ l,c ears in the audit re ort as Pindin Ite&-h~ the audit the site issued but has not ~l~teX occM~ro ,lC Q.O AP-VII-06 Revision 0 3-20-7 titled "Pro ec S 'udit kee in ." Durin the audit the Princi al S ecialMt L3.1 tea@'a cEmh og"~~P Site's housekeeping par raquhi~ts of is ued ut s ot im lemented Procedure A-3 o PSAR ~temts: 3-2 -7 titled "Housekee in Control." The auditors reviewed both of these rocedures durin the audit and find e will meet the intent of ANSI N45.2.3 when im lementcd. l. X s'*l 13.1.1 The cite has housekeeping procedures which arc properly luplementcd2 Res onabl so the auditors observed the followi )gl A~ ~ "l 4 ? H f ~j t 'l t. 'l- ~ ~ la.l \- Electric Sho - trash on floor and in cardboard containers. -'U e a r cation Sho tres on oor an n car oar u-" 13.1.2 All areas of construction site have containers tres n ve-ga on adequate housekeeping7 containe at eac we stat on c Q. presents re azar . Standards? - ras tres E ed Sho a er on oor. en er o arre over ow n an rasn n .1.3 All areas of Harehousc and Storage oor ~ Facilities are adequate to ANSI ons ruc on ress a a 8 U Containment , ue n ng g., an aste rocess g. - so t r cans an tres ever ere, tres arre .s u a over o ng, tras a so t rin cans own t roug re ar pr or w A~ .>>> 14.0 Postcudi" ~tin to concrete pour. i='->> Rene h I o the auditors observed the follovin: ou e areas had ci arette butts and food a cr'n floors. ressor leakin oil on floor Aine 6 22 where buildina had small hole in outer wall Mum rodents could enter. Pate 31 of 31 4

• I . IZ IZ 4

'-2'-i' I I SK92f r P 4 ZZZ. Md~lZD-1 . CHh2hCTERESTICS CtKREHTS PP 13.1.3 - Outside store e areas so t drink cans a U ~'G. ~>. cont d water accmmlatin under items stored. 4. 14.0 The nonconfoanances an concerns were cuss ~ i e mnegment pcrso ent CS3t cat of tho neet a x'I t 4 K"-et lkum ~t s were nonco orrzancen uct eec y o o p'""..-";-.. Z,PJ ZPI 4 r c fi pP 4'S I I Z i J JP= rt4.P I,'" W SZ 4 1 SM '4-" ,4 P f~= ~ -4 I 44 ~ 4 4

• Zi, 4 J t 4+441 g ~

Paae 3la of 31 P' 4 IP 1 ~ ~ tt ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ s e s o t C ~ t ~ It ~ ~ t ~ I t ~ 4 t t ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ t ~ ~ ' I ~ I t ~ ~ ~

• a

~, E.l g I 'a h 'I l h I >,a~ 8.L, WNWh4Wflke I t ~ ~ ~ ~ IS I' ~ IIH ~ I ~ ~ I ~ ~ I I ~ ~ I ~ ~ t wva ~ ~ I ~ ~ I II I ~ ' ~ ~ ~ I ~ I I ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ I ~ ~ I ~ I ~ ~ I' ~ I I ~I I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ' .: ~ I ~ )r ~~ ~ t 'I 'J ll E I 'l, l I l I' <<\ * ( I,I'~ h I ( ( (I '>',t +t: "Vcckl 'Elcctrodc Cnbinet Tc craturc Bccord r ~ ( hATE VIP(Z SATh ATe INSPECTOR T&PERATUii'M<GE ~(~ QCj 4 HATED OVEPS 275' 25'F wnll>lwC " 8' 7 ELECTRODE CADIZ xa 1gr04F IU.n Kf(- e~ h Aq'h4!0 I h g ~ ~ ~QO'F lrax. -//4 7 REBATER OVW = 253'F i%in. 800'F Y~ /h/ - /3E> ~f - Ag3' l gpss'- DES jr I zoo - ggg4 - /983 g~ h'48'4 kg/oA//" . Fc ~ Joow ZWYc9 /r=NP] p ~pyi j 4(r p/8 t/ 2 ~i I, (Jh t. ( s~r ,I' ( I 1 ((I i 79'-cay P ~ tt(3$ $ 51((P' r~ +< I e 9 to I; . /g- /5'4 S &7 ~ III. k' <C I. 0" 5- 5A 7 'I / )i'&/ 'f, ' 82. ht SH i ~ t ( ~ 1 kp II ( Crrrolina Powar fL Lish) Company May 14, 1979 File: QAA/170-1 ~ ORANDUM TO: Mr. S. McManus FROM: A. E. Hall

SUBJECT:

ASME Quality Assurance Audit of SHNPP Construction A mini-audit of corrective action response was performed at the S))NPP site May 11, 1979, for the purpose of closing the finding item(s) by audit, with the following results:

1. Finding Item 1, the auditors confirmed by review of revised proce-dure NDEP-101, Revision 2 (4-5-79) where on page 20, Table 2 was corrected for thickness 7/gu to 1)r" from 4T to 2T holes on source side. This finding is closed by audit.

2. Finding Item 2, the auditors confirmed by review of corrected CMTR(s) now on file for Ebasco P.OS N4435170 do contain the statement that the material 'iao been stamped by steel stamping, the hant numbers and slab number for each plate shipped and received at site. This finding is closed by audit.

3. Finding Item 3, will be reviewed for implementation of oite house-keeping during next audit by CNSSQAA Section personnel. This finding is not closed by audit.

Finding Item 4a, the auditors confirmed by review of corrected WDR(s) that they have bean back-fitted, with thc correct NDE procedure and procedure revioion lioted on the QA record. In addition, the Manager-Engineering and Construction QA states thc NDE procedure(o) appropriate wiII ba listed on the future VDR(s) prior to welding. This finding io closed by audit.

5. Finding Item 4b, the auditors confirm by review of Site Procedure TP-30, revision 2 (4-20-79) that Exhibit 1, Hydro Test Form, Revision 2 has been revised to list the checklist necessary, including a place to record the procedure number and its rcvi,sion number. As of this data, the form had not been placed in uoe. This finding is closed by audit.

Memorandum to Mr. HFUus "2- May 14, 1979

6. Finding Item 5, the auditors confirmed by review that the Principal QA Specialist had issued the necessary written instructions to Q Specialists to check heat number verification as part of final inspection of welds. This finding is closed by audit.

7. Finding Item 6, the auditors confirmed by review of Site Procedure HP-03, Revision 4 (4-30-79) that it has been revised to require calibration on a two-week basis and documented. Confirmation that oven H-1100 was found to be in calibration on 3-19-79 is to be foxwarded to the auditors by the Principal QA Specialist. This finding will be closed by audit when this confirming documentation is received.

8. Finding Item 7, the auditors confirmed by review of PPCD Procedure P-0066, Revision 5, that it has been revised to state the procedure is fox ASHE Section III. This finding is closed by audit.

Summary: Finding Items 1, 2, 4a, 4b, 5, and 7 axc hereby closed by audit.

Finding Items 3 and 6 arc not closed by audit.

AEH:)w)M7 v " S' us Manager - Corporate Nuclear Safety &

Quality Assurance Audit cc: Mr. H. J. Chiangi Mr. G. L. Forehand Mr. P. W. Howe Mr. R. H. Parsons Mr. Sheldon D. Smith Mr. T. H. Vyllic

C t t ll i

F NI

'I II t'

eg

~ ~

t ~ ~

~ ~

i I

~

' ~

~ I ~ ~

I ~

~ ~ I I ~ ~ ~

~ ~ I ~ I ~ ~ ~

~ I ' ~ I ~

~ ~ ~ I I ~ I I ~ I ~ I~

~ I ~

~ ~ I ~\

.V I

J 14 l

C I

I lt ih

~ ~

~

' ~

I ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ I '

~ ~ ' ~ l I I ~

~ g ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

~ 1 I I ' ~ ~ ~ ~ I

~ I ~ ll 'I ~ \ I ~

~ ~ ~ I H

~ ~

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ I I ~

~ ~ ~

~ I ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~

~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I I I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ l ~ I ~

~ ~

I I ln ~ ~

I I ~ ~

4 l

j

~ I 7

1 I

e-=- hj lh'h II 'I'

~~f '~ <L 0 Carolina Power & Light Company W)l I y',fhffh'9 99,jfhhrh ll May 11, 1979 "V

File: QAA/170-1 ~ Tl,g 9

")ENORANDUH TO: Hr. S. Hc.")anus j% h+

FRON: A. E. Hall

SUBJECT:

ASHE Quality Assurance Audit of SHNPP Construction

REFERENCE:

Letter QA-1112, dated Hay 11, 1979 The reference letter QA-1112, dated Nay 11, 1979, with the E&CQA response to Audit QAA/170-1 has been evaluated with the following results:

'4 1. Thc response for Finding Items 6 and 7 is considered as action taken to resolve these items and these finding items are hereby closed by report.

9 J'$9

'f P 1, This completes on this audit are closed all action necessary for this audit by report.

and all finding items PJf

'l" f 1

I I . I

'9 (J .' Jf'lJ I

Qu- G,.h- V'I

'f r

AEH:Jw)F7 19 J 99 I/<//yyzz~piw I

1 .. - tf'I CJ J

S ." McManus J'h,"

9','., I; Manager - Corporate Nuclear Safety &

Cr I

Quality Assurance Audit

,P,

<<c: Ne. G. L. Forehand

."lr. P. V. i)owe

.'Ir, R. N. Parsons He. Sheld on D Smith ~

'll C~l

'1 Ne. T. H. Wyllic JJJ 9

~

J99 He. N. J. Chiangi

, G)r!

e

,94

~ fl J

I t. ', 91~

• J'f1 V

V -f r <<

I'I l

i, I

form 244 Carollno Power a Light Company, Co!rrpeny Corresponrronco April 30, 1979 QAA/170-1 MEMORANDUM TO: Mr. S. McMnnus FROM: A. E. Hall

SUBJECT:

ASME Quality Assurance Audit of SHNPP Construction

REFERENCE:

Letter QA-1087, dated April 26, 1979 The referenced letter QA-1087, dated April 26, 1979, with the E5CQA response to Audit QAA/170-1 has been evaluated with the following results:

1. Thc response for Pinding Items 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 is considered ao action tnken to resolve these items and these finding items are hereby closed by report.

2. The response for Finding Items 6 nnd 7 will be adequate when the reoponoe can be reported ao action completed. Therefore, Items 6 and 7 will bc held open until additional response is received from the Manager - Engineering and Construction QA stating thc rcoponoe action hao been completed.

AEH:SCH11 At tacit Concur cot us

>ncgcr - C rate Nuclear Safety 6 Quality Assurance Audit cc: Hr. G. L. Porehand Hr. P. H. Hove Hr. R. H. Parsons Mr. Sheldon D. Smith Hr. T. H. flyllie

Pl

)

V 1

I l ~

~ ~

~ I

~ I ~

I:

~

'l ~

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I

~ ~ ~ II I

~ ~ ~ I

' ~ ~ ~ I L I ~ ~ ~ ' ~

~ ~ ~ ~

I ~ ~ ~ I C ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

' ~

I ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '

I ~ ~

' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' t ~ ~ ~ ~ ' L ~

I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ L I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '

L ~ ~ I ~ L L

~ ~ ' I ~ ~ ~ I I ~ ~ I ~

I l ~

~ ~ l ~

I ~ ~

~ l II ~ ~ ~

'N (1

J

~

yl g>>l 19 QI I

h k

'i I

• RESPONSES TO QAA/170-1 Item 1 Procedure NDHP-101 has been revised to conform to ASME Section IIX, Table NB-5111-1 showLag the appropriate hole-sires.

EE; Item 2 The site hns received corrected CMER's from the Vendor for 3/8" containment liner circular plate. The CMI'R's contain the following statement: "THE ABOVE MATERIAL HAS BEEN IDENTIFIED BY STEEL STAMPIhG THE HEAT NUMBER AND SIM NUMBER ON EACH PLATE." The heat number aad slab number of each plate Ls included on the CEIIR's.

To preclude similar aoaconformances on CMER's for containment liner material purchased by the erection Contractor, Ebasco has added the following statement to thc General Instructions for the QA Plan for Purchase Order NY-435204: "Por

~., ~

CMzI purchased material ascertain that the reeIuiremcnts of ASME Section III, Division 2, Subsection CC2131. 1 1975 Edition nre complied with where applicable."

Ztekt 3 AP-VII-06, Pzo]cct Housekeeping, has bean implcmcnted. Housckccpiag

~ Zone will be Designation forms for the areas aow under construction, those that soon under construction, warehouses and laydown areas have been approved by the Resident Engineer nad distributed to the appropriate personnel. Hazchouses nad some lnydown areas have been designated Zone IV and signs are Ln the process of being fabricated for posting in these locations. All other areas are designated

< o' 4,'rocedure Zone V. Personnel have bann designated to ensure that housekeeping in each area Ls performed ia nccozdaace with the proper Zone Housckccpiag Procedures.

I Jfk' Procedure CQA-3, Housekeeping Control, has been implemented. QA Personnel have been dcsiguatcd to provide QA surveillance of thc individual Housckcepiag Zones wLthLn their assigned areas to assure compliance with AP-VII-06.

Zttkt 4 A. Thc appropriate NDE procedure nnd zcvisioa numbers are now being inscrtad on the L~~~s,'below thc designated NDE process on the MDR's. A review of all I

WDR's Z~"~,4@to wcldiag has been completed aad thc NDE proccdurc aad revision a~az>z ~~z<a entered.

E I

B. Rcviaioa 2 to thc "Hydro Test Porm" coatniniag a checklist and provisions for

~

listing the procedure nnd revision numbers was issued 4/20/79.

,1 Item 5 The MDR's werc corrected duriag thc audit. Thc welding inspectors have been instructed to include heat number verification as part of final inspection t

(hold point Ill on N)R).

. 1g 7~

v

I I

"'t, I

~ j H,

'll Zttm 6 Procedure HP-03, Melding Haterial Control, has been revised to read, ". . . Dry I rod, rcbake cnd recondition ovens shall be temperature checked by a calibrated

,l I I

instrument on a two-week basfs by the control area attendant and documented." "[

The procedure revision is in the review cycle at the present time.

-.CC~. - 'I'I During the audit, the calibration instrument used to check ovens had been << I Ci damaged and no spare or replacement instrument was available. There are now three (3) calibrated instruments on site. The manufacturer recoaraended

, 2 temperature ranges for ovens and electrodes. This change has also been incor-porated into MP-03. The Issue Room httendant has been instructed to use the I

previous two weeks'alibration to justify the accuracy of the ovens if instrument fs not, available for use. He shall document this action on Exhibit the 2

of MP-03.

ZttFI 7

=~

I-l

~

I PPCD Procedure P-066, Construction Procurement, fs being revised to meet the

(( requirements of an ASME Section ASME III Section procedure."

III and to fncorporate the, statement, "This is The revision is currently fn the review cycle.

)" Q j"'

tIF I

,, CF I

• ')C (~l I

1 t.t

'F I t C~

F,,

1, I t.

,* ~1th I I

ll -,

FFF F

{

li" II

'a'"" "hatt"'m'"J '"'-">'"'"' '""" '~~ * &Pawl" I 11 ~,I j

'i'1' 4~~- 'c

~t

Enclosure 10 to Serial: HNP-99-069 (e

Prefabricated Piping Supplier (Southwest Fabricators, Inc)

Quality Assurance Documentation:

(1) Quality Assurance Documentation Audit Reports (2) Representative Vendor Data Package

f Nd e

C

55 55

~ 5 ~

~ Op

~ \ ~ 'I ~ ~ ~ 5 l ~

' Ij 55 ~ 5

~ ~ ~

~ ~ ~ ~

4 15 55 ~ 5 ~ ~ 55 ~ I '

I ~ 5 ~

~ j ~ ~ ~, ~ 5 ~

~ ~ ~ ~

~ ' 5 ~ II ~ ~ ~ ~

~ ~ 5 ~ 5 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~

5

~ ~ 5 5 5 ~ ~ ' ~ 5 II 55 V,

W 4 F,

,J

I)

'),

I t)r roRhl Zl 00hl SQ5 Csrollnp Power & Light Corapsny,.>>

0 Ralalgh, N, C,2rt02 Filet QAA/702-2~~,. OHNOSO, HI/A-1D K,r,t718l9c)y April 18, 1977

>t'e>077 ga &gy@

CPd I g, Mr. J. E. Harris, Pro)oct Manager g'QAA Southwest Fabricating and Welding, Company,'525 Sherman Street t.(CO P.O. 'Box 9449 Houoton, Texas 77011 CAROLINA POWER & LIGHTCOMPANY HARRIS PROJECT 1984 86%8%0 3 ~600 MW IJNITS 1 > 2 ~ 3, AND '4 QUALITY ASSURANCE tAUDIT OF SOUTHWEST PABRICATINC AND WELDINC COMPANY Doer Mx'. Harr1a:,

~

I r

. Attached plnnoe find a report of tho Quality Assurance Audit, conducted during the period of March 22-24, 1977, by, Carolina'Pcxrer & Li@t Company.

personnel at your facility )located in Houston, Texas. -Tho attnchmmtt contains three multi-part findings, requiring corrective action, including action to prevent rocuxxnncn and two comments requiring your evnlunt1on for resolution.

It is requostod that you xoyicer, this matter and provide Carolina Power & Light

'f Company, within thirty dnys, of your receipt of this letter, inddivtdual statements corrective action 'taken ox intended to, each finding in numerical aoqunnce.

as dnltuoatnd in the attachment. In tho event that corrective action, cannot bn completed within thirty dnyo> a, dual response is required. Tha initiil response should include,thn intended action nnd, indicate a,scheduled completion dntn. Tho follow-up rnnponoe should indicate, that tho intended corxoctivn action hnn boca completed. 'Additionally, statement:o of action taken to prevent recurrence of each finding and your resolution of tho general comments are required. t Should you have any quent:ious in thin rnatter, plnnnn" contact mni Kt ORPil~ ~rN'>d B'l N.

Pl, i. Chiangi J.'hiangi - Manager DAM/gag Attachmnnt Engineering & Construction Quality Assurance cc: Mr. L. V. Thioxwochtor W/h bcc: Mr. D. Locklearv Mr. L. I. Loflin Mr. M. P. Thompson, Jr. W/A

~

File t

I K) I I) p ~

r' I)

I