ML17319B601

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Amends 63 & 45 to Licenses DPR-58 & DPR-74,respectively, Changing Tech Specs Re Surveillance Requirements for Boron & Safety Injection Sys & Updating Core Flux
ML17319B601
Person / Time
Site: Cook  American Electric Power icon.png
Issue date: 10/04/1982
From: Varga S
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:
Shared Package
ML17319B602 List:
References
NUDOCS 8210250393
Download: ML17319B601 (79)


Text

~Q REQy>

Op 0O c

lj+a*++

l I

UNITEDSTATES t NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 INDIANA AND MICHIGAN ELECTRIC COMPANY DOCKET.NO. 50-315 DONALD C.

COOK NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT NO.

1 AMENDMENT TO FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE Amendment No. 63 License No.

DPR-58 1.

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the Commission) has found that:

A.

B.

C.,

D.

E.

The applications for amendment by Indiana and Michigan Electric Company (the licensee) dated December 22, 1978, February 22, 1980 and May 26, 1981 comply with the standards and requirements of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (the Act) and the Commission's rules and regulations set forth in 10 CFR Chapter I; The facility will operate in conformity with the applications, the provisions of the Act, and the rules and regulations of the Commission; There is reasonable assurance (i) that the activities authorized by this amendment can be conducted witho'ut endangering the health and safety of the public, and (ii) that such activities will be conducted in compliance with the Commission's regulations; The issuance of this amendment will not be inimical to the common defense and security or to the health and safety of the public; and The issuance of this amendment is in accordance with 10 CFR Part 51 of the Commission's regulations and all applicable requirements have been satisfied.

82i0250393 821004 PDR ADOCK 05000315 P

PDR

C) 2.

Accordingly, the license is amended by changes to the Technical Specifications as indicated in the attachment to this license amendment, and paragraph 2.C.(2) of Facility Operating License No.

DPR-58 is hereby amended to read as follows:

(2)

Technical S ecifications The Technical Specifications contained in Appendices A and B, as revised through Amendment No. 63, are hereby incorporated in the license.

The licensee shall operate the facility in accordance with the Technical Specifications' 3..

This license amendment is effective as of the date of its issuance.

F R THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Attachment:

Changes to the Technical Specifications Date of Issuance:

October 4, 19B2 a

ef n

1 Operating Reacto s

B anch No.

Division of Licen ing

ATTACHMENT TO LICENSE AMENDMENT AMENDMENT NO. 63 TO FACILITY OPERATING NO. DPR-58 DOCKET NO. 50-315 Revise Appendix A as follows:

Remove'a es 1-1 1-la 3/4 2-13*

3/4 2-14 3/4 3-3*

3/4 3-4 3/4 3-49 3/4 3-50*

3/4 5-6a 3/4 6-13 3/4 6-14*

3/4 6-35 3/4 6-36*

3/4 9-9*

3/4 9-10 B 3/4 2-3*

B 3/4 2-4 B 3/4 4-3 6-3 6-4 6-9 6-10*

6-19 6-20 Insert Pa es 1-1 3/4 2-13*

3/4 2-14 3/4 3-3*

3/4 3-4 3/4 3-49 3/4 3-50*

3/4 5-6a 3/4 6-13 3/4 6-14*

3/4 6-35 3/4 6-36*

3/4 9-9*

3/4 9-10 B 3/4 2-3* '

B 3/4 2-4 B 3/4 4-3 6-3 6-4 6-9 6-10*

6-19 6-20

, *Included for convenience

I

1. 0 DEFINITIONS DEFINED TERMS "

1.1 The DEFINED TERMS of this section appear in capitalized type and are applicable throughout these Technical Specifications.

THERMAL POWER 1.2 THERMAL POWER shall be the total reactor core heat transfer rate to the reactor coolant.

RATED THERMAL POWER 1.3

. RATED THERMAL POWER shall be a total reactor core heat transfer rate to the reactor coolant of 3250 MWt.

OPERATIONAL MODE 1.4 An OPERATIONAL MODE shall correspond to any one inclusive combination of core reactivity condition, power level and average reactor coolant temperature specified in Table 1.1.

ACTION 1.5 ACTION shall be those additional requirements specified as corollary state-ments to each principle specification and shall be part of the specifications.

OPERABLE - OPERABILITY 1.6 A system, subsystem,

train, component or device shall be OPERABLE or have OPERABILITY when it is capable of performing its specified function(s).

Implicit in this definition shall be the assumption that all necessary attendant instru-mentation, controls, normal and emergency electric power sources, cooling or seal water, lubrication or other auxiliary equipment that are required for the

system, subsystem, train, component or device to perform its function(s) are also capable of performing their related support function(s).

D.

C.

COOK " UNIT 1 AHEWDI1ENT NO 63

POWER DISTRIBUTION LIMITS DNB PARAMETERS LIMITING CONDITION FOR OPERATION 3.2.5 The following DNB related parameters shall be maintained within the limits shown on Table 3.2-1:

a.

Reactor Coolant System T

b.

Pressurizer Pressure c.

Reactor Coolant System Total Flow Rate APPLICABILITY MODE 1

.ACTION:

With any of the above parameters exceeding its limit, restore the param-eter to within its limit within 2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br /> or reduce THERMAL POWER to less than 51 of RATED THERMAL POWER within the next 4 hours4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br />.

SURVEILLANCE RE UIREMENTS 4.2.5.1 Each of the parameters of Table 3.2-1 shall be verified to be within their limits at least once per 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br />.

4.2.5.2 The Reactor Coolant System total flow rate shall be determined to be within its limit by measurement at least once per 18 months.

D.

C.

COOK - UNIT 1

3/4 2-13 AMENDMENT NO.

6'3

TABLE 3.2-1 DNB PARAMETERS PARAMETER 4 Loops In

~0eration LIMITS 3 Loops in

~0eration Reactor Coolant System Tavg Pressurizer Pressure Reactor Coolant System Total Flow Rate

< 571.8 F

< 571.8 F

> 2220 psia*

> 2220 psia"

> 1.350xl0 lbs/hr

> 0.9917x10 lbs/hr Limit not applicable during either a THERMAL POWER ramp in excess of 5X RATED THERMAL POWER per minute or a THERMAL POWER step in excess of lOX RATED THERMAL POWER.

TABLE 3.3-1 Continued REACTOR TRIP SVSTEM INSTRUMENTATION FUNCTIONAL UNIT 8.

Overpower hT Four Loop Operation Three Loop Operation TOTAL NO.

OF CHANNELS CHANNELS TO TRIP MINIMUM CHANNELS OPERABLE APPLICABLE MODES 1,

2 1,

2 ACTION 2

9 9.

Pressurizer Pressure-Low

, 10.

Pressurizer Pressure High 11.

Pressurizer Water Level--High 12.

Loss of Fl ow - Single Loop (Above P-8) 13.

Loss of Flow - Two Loops (Above P-7,and below P-8) 3/loop 3/loop 2/loop in any oper-ating loop 2/loop in two oper-ating loops 3

1, 2

2 1,

2 2/loop in 1

each oper-ating loop 2/loop each oper-ating loop

TABLE 3.3-1 (Continued)

REACTOR TRIP SYSTEM INSTRUMENTATION FUNCTIONAL UNIT 14.

Steam Generator Mater Level--Low-Low TOTAL NO.

OF CHANNELS 3/loop CHANNELS TO TRIP 2/loop in any oper-ating loops MINIMUM CHANNELS APPLICABLE OPERABLE MODES 2/loop in 1,

2 each oper-ating loop ACTION 15.

Steam/Feedwater Flow Mismatch and Low Steam Generator Mater Level 16.

Undervoltage-Reactor Coolant Pumps 17.

Underfrequency-Reactor Coolant Pumps 18.

Turbine Trip A.

Low Fluid Oil Pressure B.

Turbine Stop Valve Closure 19.

Safety Injection Input from ESF 2/1 oop-1 evel and 2/loop-flow mismatch in same loop 4/1/bus 4-1/bus 1/loop-level coincident with 1/1 oop-flow mismatch in same loop 1/loop-level and 2/1 oop-flow mismatch or 2/loop-level and 1/1 oop-flow mismatch 1,

2 1,

2

INSTRUMENTATION AXIAL POWER DISTRIBUTION MONITORING SYSTEM LIMITING CONDITION FOR OPERATION 3.3.3.6 The axial power distribution monitoring system (APDMS) shall be OPERABLE with:

a.

At least two detector thimbles available for which R has been determined from full incore flux maps.

These two thimbles shall be those having the lowest uncertainty, o, covering the full configuration of permissible rod patterns permitted at RATED THERMAL POWER.

.b.

At least two movable detectors, with associated devices and readout equipment, available for mapping F.(Z) in the above required thimbles.

j APPLICABILITY:

When the APDMS is used for monitoring the axial power dsstribut>on 8.

ACTION:

With the APDMS inoperable, do not use the system for determining the Axial Power Distribution.

The provisions of Specification 3.0.3 are not applicable.

SURVEILLANCE RE UIREMENTS 4.3.3.6.1 The full incore flux maps used to determine R and for monitoring F.(Z) shall be updated at least once per 31 EFPD.

The continued accuracy and representativeness of the selected thimbles shall be verified by using their latest flux maps to update the R for each representative thimble.

The original uncertainty, a, shall not be updated, except as follows:

Except as provided in Specification 4.2.6. l.b.

8The APDMS may be out of service:

1) when incore maps are being taken as part of the Augmented Startup Test Program, or 2) when surveillance for determining power distribution maps is being performed.

D.

C.

COOK - UNIT 1

3/4 3-49 Amendment No. 63

1

INSTRUMENTATION SURVEILLANCE RE UIREMENTS (Continued) a

~

Ri -K,.

If the absolute value of~ is greater than 2o., another R.

map shall be completed to verify the new F... If the second map shows the first to be in error, the first hap shall be dis-regarded.

If the second map confirms the new R

, four more maps (including rodded configurations allowed by the insertion limits) will be completed so that a

new R. and o

can be defined from the six new maps.

4.3.3.6.2 The APDMS shall be demonstrated OPERABLE:

a.

By performance of a CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TEST within 7 days prior to its use and at least once per 31 days thereafter when used for monitoring F.(Z).

b.

At least once per 18 months, during shutdown or below 5X of RATED THERMAL POWER, by performance of a CHANNEL CALIBRATION.

D.

C.

COOK-UNIT 1

3/4 3-50 AMENDMENT NO.

63

EMERGENCY CORE COOLING SYSTEMS SURVEILLANCE RE UIREMENTS Continued)

By performing a flow balance test during shutdown following completion of modifications to the ECCS subsystem that alter the subsystem flow characteristics and verifying the following flow rates:

Boron Injection System Sin le Pum Loop 1 Boron Injection Flow 117.5 gpm Loop 2 Boron Injection Flow 117.5 gpm Loop 3 Boron Injection Flow 117.5 gpm

, Loop 4 Boron Injection Flow 117.5 gpm Safety Injection System Sin le Pum ""

Loop 1 and 4 Cold Leg Fl ow > 300 gpm Loop 2 and 3 Cold Leg Flow > 300 gpm The flow rate in each Boron Injection (BI) line should be adjusted to provide 117.5 gpm (nominal) flow into each loop.

Under these conditions there is zero miniflow and 80 gpm simulated RCP seal injection line flow.

The actual flow in each BI line may deviate from the nominal so long as the difference between the highest and lowest flow is 10 gpm or less and the total flow to the four branch lines does not exceed 470 gpm.

Minimum, flow (total flow) required is 345.8 gpm to the three most conservative (lowest flow) branch lines.

  • Total SIS (single pump) flow, including miniflow, shall not exceed 650 gpm.

D.

C.

COOK - UNIT 1

3/4 5-6a Amendment No.

63

CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS SURVEILLANCE RE UIREMENTS Continued

/

c.

At least once per 18 months during shutdown, by:

1.

Cycling each power operated (excluding automatic) valve in the flow path that is not testable during plant operation, through at least one complete cycle of full travel.

2.

Verifying that each automatic valve in the flow path actuates to its correct position on a Containment Pressure High-High signals d.

At least once per 5 years by verifying a water flow rate of at least

-20 gpm (> 20 gpm) but not to exceed 50 gpm (< 50 gpm) from the spray additive tank test line to each containment spray sys'em with the spray pump operating on recirculation with a pump discharge pressure

> 255 psig.

D.

C.

COOK - UNIT 1

3/4 6-13 Amen'dment No.

CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS 3/4.6. 3 CONTAINMENT ISOLATION VALVES LIMITING CONDITION FOR OPERATION 3.6 '.1 The containment isolation valves specified in Table 3.6-1 shall be OPERABLE with isolation times as shown in Table 3.6-1.

APPLICABILITY:

MODES 1, 2, 3 and 4.

ACTION:

1 With one or more of the isolation valve(s) specified in Table 3.6-1 inoperable, either:

a.

Restore the inoperable valve(s) to OPERABLE status within 4 hours4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br />, or b.

Isolate each affected penetration within 4 hours4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br /> by use of at least one deactivated automatic valve secured in the isolation position, or I

c.

Isolate each affected penetration within 4 hours4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br /> by use of at least one closed manual valve or blind flange; or de Be in at least HOT STANDBY within the next 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br /> and in COLD SHUTDOWN within the following 30 hours3.472222e-4 days <br />0.00833 hours <br />4.960317e-5 weeks <br />1.1415e-5 months <br />.

SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 4.6.3.1.1 The isolation valves specified in Table 3.6-1 shall be demonstrated OPERABLE:

a.

At least once per 92 days by cycl,ing each OPERABLE oower ooerated or automatic valve testable during plant operation through at least one complete cycle of.,full travel.

b.

Immediately prior to returning the valve to service after maintenance, repair or replacement work is performed on the D.

C.

COOK-UNIT 1

3/4 6-14 AMENDMENT NO.'63 '

CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS CONTAINMENT AIR RECIRCULATION SYSTEMS LIMITING CONDITION FOR OPERATION 3.6.5.6 Two independent containment air recirculation systems shall be OPERABLE.

APPLICABILITY:

MODES 1, 2, 3 and 4.

ACTION:

With one containment air recirculation system inoperable, restore the inoperable system to OPERABLE status within 72 hours8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br /> or be in at least HOT STANDBY within the next 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br /> and in COLD SHUTDOWN within the following 30 hours3.472222e-4 days <br />0.00833 hours <br />4.960317e-5 weeks <br />1.1415e-5 months <br />.

K SURVEILLANCE REOUIREMENTS 4.6.5.6 Each containment air recirculation system shall be demonstrated OPERABLE at least'once per 3 months on a

STAGGERED TEST BASIS by:

a.

Verifying that the return air fan starts on an auto-sCarC signal after a

10 +

1 minute delay and operates for at least 15 minutes, P

b.

Verifying that with the return air fan discharge backdraft damper locked closed and the fan motor energized, the static pressure between the fan discharge and the backdraft damper is

> 4.0 inches, water gauge.

c.

Verifying that with the fan off, the return air fan damper

'pens when a force of <

11 lbs is applied to the counter-

weight, and d.

Verifying that'he motor operated valve in the suction line to the containment's lower compartment opens after a. 9

+

1 minute delay.

D. C..COOK-UNIT 1

3/4 6-35 Amendment No.'3

CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS FLOOR DRAINS LIMITING CONDITION FOR OPERATION 3.6.5.7 The ice condenser floor drains shall be OPERABLE.

APPLICABILITY:

MODES 1, 2, 3 and 4.

ACTION:

With the ice condenser floor drain inoperable, restore the floor drain to OPERABLE status prior to increasing the Reactor Coolant System tem-perature above 200'F.

SURVEILLANCE REOUIREMENTS 4.6.5.7 Each ice condenser floor drain shall be demonstrated OPERABLE at least once per 18 months during shutdown by:

a.

Verifying that valve gate opening is not impair'ed by ice, frost or debris, b.

Verifying that the valve seat is not damaged, C.

d.

Verifying that the valve gate opens when a force of.< 100 lbs is applied, and Verifying that the 12 inch drain line from the ice condenser floor to the containment lower compartment is unrestricted.

D.

C.

COOK-UNIT 1

3/4 6-36 AMENDMENT NO.

63

REFUELING OPERATIONS COOLANT CIRCULATION LIMITING CONDITION FOR OPERATION 3.9.8 At least one residual heat removal loop shall be in operation.

APPLICABILITY:

MODE 6.

ACTION:

a

~

b.

C.

With less than one residual heat removal loop in operation, except as provided in b. below, suspend all operations involving an increase in the reactor decay heat load or a reduction in boron concentration of the Reactor Coolant System.

C'lose all containment penetrations providing direct access from the containment atmosphere to the outside atmosphere within 4 hours4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br />.

The residual heat removal loop may be removed from operation for up to 1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> per 8 hour9.259259e-5 days <br />0.00222 hours <br />1.322751e-5 weeks <br />3.044e-6 months <br /> period during the performance of CORE ALTERATIONS in the vicinity of the reactor pressure vessel hot legs.

The provisions of Specification 3.0.3 are not applicable.

SURVEILLANCE RE UIREMENTS 4.9.8 A residual heat removal loop shall be determined to be in operation and circulating reactor coolant at a flow rate of > 3000 gpm at least once per 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br />.

D.

C.

COOK - UNIT 1

3/4 9-9 AMENDMENT NO. 63

REFUELING OPERATIONS CONTAINMENT PURGE AND EXHAUST ISOLATION SYSTEM LIMITING CONDITION FOR OPERATION 3.9.9 The Containment Purge and Exhaust isolation system shall be OPERABLE.

APPLICABILITY: During Core Alterations or movement of irradiated fuel within ACTION:

With the Containment Purge and Exhaust isolation system inoperable, close each of the Purge and Exhaust penetrations providing direct access from the containment atmosphere to the outside atmosphere.

The provision of Specification 3.0.3 are not applicable.

SURVEILLANCE RE UIREMENTS 4.9.9 The Containment Purge and Exhaust isolation system shall be demonstrated OPERABLE within 100 hours0.00116 days <br />0.0278 hours <br />1.653439e-4 weeks <br />3.805e-5 months <br /> prior to the start of and at least once per 7 days during CORE ALTERATIONS by verifying that containment Purge and Exhaust isolation occurs on manual initiationand on a high radiation signal from each of the containment radiation monitoring instrumentation channels.

D.

C.

COOK - UNIT 1

3/4 9-10 Amendment No.

63

r cI 4c I ~ o v/

~ tv\\

ai Power Therm 100%

~ I i ~

90%

80o%%d

~

~

70%

60o/o Target Flux Difference

~ /

50o%%d 40%

30%

20%

10%

~30%

.20'/o

~ 10%o 0

+10%

+20o%%d INDICATED AXIAL FLUX DIFFERENCE Figure B 3/4 2.1 TYPICAL INDICATED AXIALFLUX DIFFERENCE VERSUS THERMAL PO(VER AT BOL 30%

0.

C.

COOK-UNIT 1

B 3/4 2-3 AMENDMENT NO.

63'

POWER DISTRIBUTION LIMITS BASES 3/4. 2. 2 and 3/4. 2. 3 HEAT FLUX AND NUCLEAR ENTHALPY HOT CHANNEL FACTORS-

~Fo>

d The limits on heat flux and nuclear enthalpy hot channel factors ensure that 1) the design limits on peak local power density and minimum DNBR are not exceeded and 2) in the event of a LOCA the peak fuel clad temperature wi 11 not exceed the 2200'F ECCS acceptance criteria limit.

Each of these hot channel factors are measurable but will normally only be determined periodically as specified in Specifications 4.2.2 and

'.2.9.

This periodic surveillance is sufficient to insure that the hot channel factor limits are maintained provided:

a.

Control rods in a single group move together with no individual rod insertion differing by more than + 12 steps from the group demand position.

b.

Control rod groups are sequenced with overlapping groups as described in Specification

3. l. 3. 5.

c.

The control rod insertion limits of Specifications

3. 1.3.4 and 3.1.3.5 are maintained.

d.

The axial power distribution, expressed in terms of AXIAL FLUX DIFFERENCE is maintained within the limits.

The relaxation in F

H as a function of THERMAL POWER allows changes in the radial power shape for all permissible rod insertion limits.

F will be maintained within its limits provided conditions a thru d aboN, are maintained.

When an F

measurement is taken, both experimental error and man-ufacturing tolerance must be allowed for.

5X is the appropriate allowance for a full core map taken with the incore detector flux mapping system and 3X is the appropriate allowance for manufacturing tolerance.

N When F

is measured, experimental error must be allowed for and 4X is the appr'seriate allowance for a fu11 coreNmap taken with the incore detection system.

The specified limit for F also contains an SX allowance for uncertainties which mean that kormal operation will result in F

H < 1.51/1.08.

The SX allowance is based on the following considera-tion)":

D.

C.

COOK - UNIT 1

B 3/4 2-4 Amendment No. 63

REACTOR COOLANT SYSTEM BASES 3/4.4.6 REACTOR COOLANT SYSTEM LEAKAGE 3/4.4.6.

1 LEAKAGE DETECTION SYSTEMS The RCS leakage detection systems required by this specification are provided to monitor and detect leakage from the Reactor Coolant Pressure Boundary.

These detection systems are consistent with the recommendations of Regulatory Guide 1.45, "Reactor Coolant Pressure Boundary Leakage Detection Systems,"

Hay 1973.

3/4. 4. 6. 2 OPERATIONAL LEAKAGE Industry experience has shown that while a limited amount of leakage is

. expected frxttr the RCS, the unidentified portion of this leakage can be reduced to a threshold value of less than 1 gpm.

This threshold value is sufficiently low to ensure early detection of additional leakage.

The 10 GPH IDENTIFIED LEAKAGE limitations provides allowance for a limited amount of leakage from known sources whose presence will not interfere with the detection of UNIDENTIFIED LEAKAGE by the leakage detection systems.

The CONTROLLED LEAKAGE limitation restricts operation when the total flow supplied to the reactor coolant pump seals exceeds 52 GPM.

This limitation is based on the maximum seal injection flow capability of the Reactor Coolant Pumps and ensures a maximum safety injection flow assumed in the accident analysis.

D.

C.

COOK - UNIT 1 B 3/4 4"3 Amendment No, giP 63

I C.

PLANT MANAGER ADMINISTRATIVE SUPERVISOR MAINTENANCE OPERATION SUPERINTENDENT SUPERINTENDENT SOL TECHNICAL SUPERINTENDENT STAFF TRAINING COORDINATOR STAFF PROD. SUPV.

OPERATIONS SOL SHIFT OPERATING ENG.

SOL QA SUPERVISOR OPERATING ENGINEER OL NUCLEAR PERFORMANCE ENGINEFR SUPERVISOR ENGINEER CONTROL AND +

INSTRUMENTATION ENGINEER PLANT CHEMICAL SUPERVISOR PLANT

~

RADIATION PROT. SUPV.

LEGEND:

OL - SENIOR OPERATOR LICENSE OL - OPERATOR LICENSE

~ - KEY SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL UNIT SUPERVISOR OL PERFORMANCE PERFORMANCE ENGINEER ENGINEER INSTRUMENT MAINTENANCE SUPERVISOR CHEMIST RADIA PROTE SUPERVISOR 3

(D CL Gl C+

O EQUIPMENT OPERATOR AUXILIARY EQUIPMENT OPERATOR TECHNICIANS TECHNICIANS Figure 624 Facility Organization - Donald C. Cook - Unit No.

1

TABLE 6.2-1 HINItlUH SHIFT CREM CCtlPOSITIOM8 LICENSE CATEGORY SOL OL NON-Licensed Shift Technical Advisor APPl ICABLE NODES 1, 2, 3

8 4

2 Mone Required Woes not include the licensed Senior Reactor Operator or Senior Reactor Operator Limited to Fuel Handling, supervising CORE ALTERATIOMS after the initial fuel loading.

dShift crew composition may be less than the minimum requirements for a period of time not to exceed 2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br /> in order to accommodate unexpected absence of on duty shift crew members provided itnnediate action is taken to restore the shift crew composition to within the minimum requirements of Table 6.2-1.

shared with 0.

C. Cook Unit 2.

D. C.

COOK - UNIT 1

6-4 Amendment No; PP 63

ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLS COMPOSITION 6.5.2.2 The NSDRC shall be composed of the:

Chairman:

Member:

Member:

Member:

Member:

Member:

Member:

Member:

Member:

~

Member:

~ Member:

Alternate:

Alternate:

Alternate:

Alternate:

ALTERNATES Assistant Vice President, Nuclear Engineering Vice Chairman, Engineering and Construction President and Chief Operating Officer of IQlECo Executive Vice President, Construction and New York Engineering Vice President, Mechanical Engineering Vice President, Electrical Engineering Vice President, Engineering Administration Assistant Vice President, Design Division Assistant Vice President, Environmental Engineering Division Plant Manager, D.

C.

Cook Plant

Manager, Nuclear Safety and Licensing Section Assistant Chief Mechanical Engineer Assistant Plant Manager, D.

C.

Cook Plant Executive Assistant to the President of IMECo Assistant Division Manager, Nuclear Engineering 6.5.2.3 All alternate members shall be appointed in writing by the NSDRC Chairman to serve on a temporary basis;

however, no more than two alternates shall participate as voting members in NSDRC activities at any one time.

CONSULTANTS 6.5.2.4 Consultants shall be utilized as determined by the NSDRC Director to provide expert advice to the NSDRC.

MEETING FRE UENCY 6.5.2.5 The NSDRC shall meet at least once per calendar quarter during the initial year of facility operation following fuel loading and at least once per six months thereafter.

UORUM 6.5.2.6 A quorum of NSDRC shall consist of the Chairman or his designated alternate and more than half the NSDRC membership including alternates or at least 5 members including alternates whichever is greater.

No more than a

minority of the quorum shall have line responsibility for operation of the fac i 1 ity.

D.

C.

COOK " UNIT 1

6-9 Amendment No.

63

ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLS REVIEW 6.5.2.7 The NSDRC shall review:

a

~

b.

c

~

The safety evaluations for 1) changes to procedures, equipment or systems and 2) tests or experiments completed under the provision of Section 50.59, 10 CFR, to verify that such actions did not constitute an unreviewed safety question.

Proposed changes to procedures, equipment or systems which involve an unreviewed safety question as defined in Section 50.59, 10 CFR.

Proposed tests or experiments which involve an unreviewed safety question as defined in Section 50.59, 10 CFR.

'd.

Proposed changes in Technical Specifications or licenses.

e.

9 ~

Violations of applicable statutes,

codes, regulations,
orders, Technical Specifications, license requirements, or of intet nal procedures or instructions having nuclear safety significance.

Significant operating abnormalities or deviations from normal and expected performance of plant equipment that affect nuclear safety.

REPORTABLE OCCURRENCES requiring 24 hour2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> notification to the Comoission.

h.

All recognized indications of an unanticipated deficiency in some aspect of design or operation of'safety related structures,

systems, or components.

Reports and meetings minutes of the PNSRC.

D.

C.

COOK - UNIT 1

6-10 AMENDMENT NO.

63

ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLS 6.9 REPORTING RE UIREMENTS (Continued) e.

Seismic event analysis, Specification 4 ~ 3.3.3.2.

f.

Sealed Source leakage in excess of limits, Specification

4. 7. 7. 1. 3.

g.

Fire Detection Instrumentation, Specification 3.3.3.7 h.

Fire Suppression

Systems, Specifications
3. 7. 9. 1, 3. 7. 9. 2, 3.7.9.3 and 3.7.9.4.
6. 10 RECORD RETENTION

~ 6.10.1 The following records shall be retained for at least five years:

a.

Records and logs of unit operation covering time interval at each power level.

b.

Records and logs of principal maintenance activities, inspec-tions, repair and replacement of principal items of equipment related to nuclear safety.

c.

All REPORTABLE OCCURRENCES submitted to the Commission.

d.

Records of surveillance activities, inspections and calibra-tions required by these Technical Specifications.

Records of reactor tests and experiments.

Records of changes made to the procedures required by Specifica-tion 6.8.1.

g.

Records of radioactive shipments.

h.

Records of sealed source leak tests and results.

i.

Records of annual physical inventory of all.sealed source material of record.

6. 10.2 The following records shall be retained for the duration of the Facility Operating License:

a ~

b.

Records and drawing changes reflecting unit design modifi-cations made to systems and equipment described in the Final Safety Analysis Report.

Records of new and irradiated fuel inventory, fuel transfers and assembly burnup histories.

D.

C.

COOK - UNIT 1

6-19 Amendment No. 63

ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLS c.

Records of radiation exposure for all individuals entering radiation control areas.

d.

Records of gaseous and liquid radioactive material released to the environs.

e.

Records of transient or operational cycles for those facility components identified in Table 5.9-1.

f.

Records of training and qualification for current members of the plant staff.

g.

h.

Records of in-service inspections performed pursuant to these, Technical Specifications.

~

'ecords of equality Assurance activities required by the gA Manual.

i.

Records of reviews performed for changes made to procedures or equipment or reviews of tests and experiments pursuant to 10 CFR 50.59.

j.

Records of meetings of the PNSRC and the NSDRC.

k.

Records for Environmental qualification which are covered under the provisions of paragraph 6.13.

6. 11 RADIATION PROTECTION PROGRAM Procedures for personnel radiation protection, shall be prepared consistent with the requirements of 10 CFR Part 20 and shall be approved, maintained and adhered to for all operations involving personnel radiation exposure.

6.12 HIGH RADIATION AREA 6.,12.'1 In lieu of the "control device" or "alarm signal" required by paragraph 20.203(c)(2) of 10 CFR 20:

A High Radiation Area in which the intensity of radiation r

is greater than 100 mrem/hr but less than 1000 mrem/hr shal.l be barricaded and conspicuously posted as a High Radiation Area and entrance thereto shall be controlled by issuance of a Radiation Mork Permit and any individual or group of individuals permitted to enter such areas shall be provided with a radiation monitoring device which continuously in-dicates the radiation dose rate in the area.

D.

C.

COOK - UNIT 1 6-20 Amendment No.

63

~pg REgy (4

0 e

O 0

n +**++

t UNITEDSTATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 INDIANA AND MICHIGAN ELECTRIC COMPANY DOCKET NO. 50-316 DONALD C.

COOK NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT NO.

2 AMENDMENT TO FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE Amendment No.

45 License No.

DPR-74

).

The B.

C.

D.

E.

Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the Commission) has found that:

0 The applications for amendment by Indiana and Michigan Electric Company (the licensee) dated December 22, 1978, February 22, 1980 and May 26, 1981 comply with the standards and requirements of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (the Act) and the Comission's rules and regulations set forth in 10 CFR Chapter I; The facility will operate in conformity with the applications, the provisions of the Act, and the rules and regulations of the Commission; There is reasonable assurance (i) that the activities authorized by this amendment can be conducted without endangering the health and safety of the public, and (ii) that such activities will be conducted in compliance with the Commission's regulations; The issuance of this amendment will not be inimical to the common defense and security or to the health and safety of the public; and The issuance of this amendment is in accordance with 10 CFR Part 51 of the Commission's regulations and all applicable requirements have been satisfied.

2.

Accordingly, the license is amended by changes to the Technical Specifications as indicated in the attachment to this license amendment, and paragraph 2.C.(2) of Facility Operating License No.

DPR-74 is hereby amended to read as follows:

(2)

Technical S ecifications The Technical Specifications contained in Appendices A and 8, as revised through Amendment No. 45, are hereby incorporated in the license.

The licensee shall operate the facility in accordance with the Technical Specifications.

3.

This license amendment is effective as of the date of its issuance.

F R THE NUCL R REGULATORY COMMISSION

Attachment:

Changes to the Technical Specifications Date of Issuance:

October 4, ]9Q2 ven V rg, Chief Operating Reac o s Branch No.

1 Division of Li e sing

ATTACHMENT TO LICENSE AMENDMENT AMENDMENT NO. 45 TO FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE NO. DPR-74 DOCKET NO. 50-316 Revise Appendix A as follows:

Remove Pa es 1 1 1*

1V 1-1 1-1 a 3/4 l-l*

3/4 1-2 3/4 2-15*

3/4 2-16 3/4 3-3 3/4 3-4*

3/4 3-8 3/4 3-25 3/4 3-27 3/4 3-39 3/4 3-40 3/4 3-41 3/4 3-42*

3/4 3-48 3/4 3-53 3/4 3-54*

3/4 4-1 3/4 4-2*

3/4 4-25 3/4 4-26*

3/4 5-5*

3/4 5-6 3/4 6-11*

3/4, 6-12 3/4 6-43*

3/4 6-44 3/4 9-9 3/4 9-10*

8 3/4 2-3*

8 3/4 2-4 8 3/4 3-2 8 3/4 4-1 6-3 6-4 6-9 6-10 6-19 6-20

  • Included for convenience Insert Pa es 111*

1V 1-1 3/4 1-1*

3/4 1-2 3/4 2-15*

3/4 2-16 3/4 3-3 3/4 3-4*

3/4 3-8 3/4 3-25 3/4 3-27 3/4 3-38a 3/4 3-38b 3/4 3-38c 3/4 3-39 3/4 3-40 3/4 3-41 3/4 3-42*

3/4 3-48 3/4 3-53 3/4 3-54*

3/4 4-1 3/4 4-2*

3/4 4-25 3/4 4-26*

3/4 5-5*

3/4 5-6 3/4 6-11*

3/4 6-12 3/4 6-43*

'3/4 6-44

3/4 9-9 3/4 9-10*

8 3/4 2-3*

8 3/4 2-4 8 3/4 3-2 8 3/4 4-1 6-3 6-4 6-9 6-10 6-19 6-20

INDEX LIMITING CONDITIONS FOR OPERATION AND SURVEILLANCE RE UIREMENTS SECTION 3/4.0 APPLICABILITY............................

3/4.1 REACTIVITY CONTROL SYSTEMS 3/4.1.1 BORATION CONTROL Shutdown Margin - T

) 200'F avg Shutdown Margin - T

( 200'F.......

avg-Boron Dilution..........

Moderator Temperature Coefficient...

Minimum Temperature for Criticality..

~Pa e

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

3/4 0

1 3/4 1-1 3/4 1-3 3/4 1-4 3/4 145 3/4 1-7 3/4.1.2 BORATION SYSTEMS Flow Paths - Shutdown..............

Flow Paths

- Operating..

Charging Pump - Shutdown................

Charging Pumps -'perating.

Boric Acid Transfer Pumps - Shutdown.

Boric Acid Transfer Pumps - Operating.

Borated Water Sources

- Shutdown........

Borated Water Sources

- Operating....

3/4.1.3 MOVABLE CONTROL ASSEMBLIES Group Heighto ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

~

~

~

~

Position Indicator Channels

- Operating.

Position Indicator Channels

- Shutdown..

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

Control Rod Insertion Limits.........

~

~

~

~ ~

~

~

R p

~

od Drop Tlmet ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

Shutdown Rod Insertion Limit............................

3/4 1-8 3/4 1-9 3/4 1-11 3/4 1-12 3/4 1-13 3/4 1-14 3/4 1-15 3/4 1-16 3/4 1-18 3/4 1-21 3/4 1-22 3/4 1-23

'3/4 1-24 3/4 1-25 D.

C.

COOK - UNIT 2 AMENDMENT NO. 45

INDEX LIMITING CONDITIONS'FOR OPERATION 5 SURVEILLANCE RE UIREMENTS Axial Power Distribution Monitoring Fire Detection Instrumentation.

3/4. 3. 4 TURBINE OVERSPEED PROTECTION.

3/4.4 REACTOR COOLANT SYSTEM 3/4.4.

1 REACTOR COOLANT LOOPS System.............

3/4. 2 POWER DISTRIBUTION LIMITS 3/4.2.1 Axial Flux Difference...

3/4.2.2 Heat Flux Hot Channel Factor...

3/4.2.3 RCS Flow Rate and R..

3/4.2.4 quadrant Power Tilt Ratio....................

3/4.2.5 DNB Parameters

'3/4.2.6 Axial Power Distribution.

3/4.3 INSTRUMENTATION 3/4.3.

1 REACTOR TRIP SYSTEM INSTRUMENTATION 3/4.3.2 ENGINEERED SAFETY FEATURE ACTUATION SYSTEM INSTRUMENTATION.

3/4. 3. 3 MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION Radiation Monitoring Instrumentation.....

Movable Incore Detectors......

Seismic Instrumentation..

Meteorological Instrumentation...

Remote Shutdown Instrumentation.

Post-Accident Instrumentation..........................

3/4 2-1 3/4 2-5 3/4 2-9 3/4 2-13 3/4 2-15 3/4 2"17 3/4 3-1 3/4 3-14 3/4 3-34 3/4 3-38 3/4 3-38a 3/4 3"39 3/4 3-42 3/4 3"45 3/4 3"48 3/4 3-50 3/4 3"53 3/4.4.2 3/4.4.3 3/4.4.4 3/4. 4. 5 Normal Operation.............,.

SAFETY VALVES - SHUTDOWN...............................

SAFETY VALVES - OPERATING..........

PRESSURIZER............................

STEAM GENERATORS.......................................

3/4 4-1 3/4 4"4 3/4 4-5 3/4 4-6 3/4 4-7 D.

C.

COOK - UNIT 2 IV Amendment No.

45

1. 0 DEFINITIONS DEFINED TERMS 1.1 The DEFINED TERMS of this section appear in capitalized type and are applic-able throughout these Technical Specifications.

THERMAL POWER

1. 2 THERMAL POWER shall be the total reactor core heat transfer rate to the reac-tor coolant.

RATED THERMAL POWER

l. 3

. RATED-THERMAL POWER shall be a total reactor core heat transfer r'ate to the reactor coolant of 3391 MWt.

OPERATIONAL MODE I

1.4 An OPERATIONAL MODE shall correspond to any one inclusive combination of core reactivity condition, power level and average reactor coolant temperature specified in Table 1. 1.

ACTION 1.5 ACTION shall be those additional requirements specified as corollary state-ments to each principle specification and shall be part of the specifications.

OPERABLE - OPERABILITY 1.6 A system, subsystem,

train, component or device shall be OPERABLE or have OPERABILITY when it is capable of performing its specified function(s).

Implicit in this definition shall be the assumption that all necessary attendant instru-

'entation,

controls, normal and emergency electrical power sources, cooling or seal water, lubrication or other auxiliary equipment that are required for the
system, subsystem,
train, component or device to perform its function(s) aye also capable of performing their related support function(s).

D.

C.

COOK - UNIT 2

'MENDMENT NO. 45

l)

~

~

~

~

I I

I I

~

I

~

~

~

I ll

~

I

~ ~

~

~

~

I II

~

I lit

~ I

~ I

~

~

~

~

I I

~

~

~

I

~

I

~

I

~

~

~

I

~ I

~

~

~

~ I

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

I

~ ~

~

r

~

~

~ I ~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

I

~

~

I

~

II

~

~

~

~ I I

I I

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

r

~

~

I

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

REACTIVITY CONTROL SYSTEMS SURVEILLANCE RE UIREMENTS Continued d.

e.

Prior to initial operation above 5X RATED THERMAL POWER after each fuel loading, by consideration of the factors of e below, with the control banks at the maximum insertion limit of Specification

3. 1.3.6.

When in MODES 3 or 4, at least once per 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> by consideration of the following factors:

l.

Reactor coolant system boron concentration, 2.

Control rod position, 3.

Reactor coolant system average temperature, 4.

Fuel burnup based on gross thermal energy generation, 5.

Xenon concentration, and 6.

Samarium concentration.

4. l. l. 1.2 The overall core reactivity balance shall be compared to predicted values to demonstrate agreement within + 1X h,k/k 'at least once per 31 Effective Full Power Days (EFPD).

This comparison shall consider at least those factors stated in Specification 4. l. 1. l. l.e, above.

The predicted reactivity values shall be adjusted (normalized) to correspond to the actual core conditions prior to exceeding a fuel burnup of 60 Effective Full Power Days after each fuel loading.

D. C.. COOK - UNIT 2 3/4 1-2 Amendment No. 45

OWER DISTRIBUTION LIMITS NB PARAMETERS IMITING CONDITION FOR OPERATION 3.2.5 The following DNB related parameters shall be maintained within the limits shown on Table 3.2-1:

a.

Reactor Coolant System Tay b.

Pressurizer Pressure.

APPLICABILITY; MODE 1

ACTION:

With any of the above parameters exceeding its limit, restore the param eter to within its limit within 2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br /> or reduce THERMAL POWER to less than 5". of RATED THERMAL POWER within the next 4 hours4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br />.

SURV E I LLANCE R E 0 IR EMENTS 4.2.5 Each of the parameters of Table 3.2-1 shall be verified to be within their limits at least once per 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br />.

D.

C.

COOK - UNIT 2 3/4 2-15 AMENDMENT NQ.

45

TABLE 3.2-1 DNB PARAMETERS PARAMETER Reactor Coolant System Tavg Pressurizer Pressure LIMITS 4 Loo s In 0 eration

< 578 F

> 2220 psia" 3 Loo s In 0 eration

< 570 F

> 2220 psia" Lim)t not app

~ca e during either a THERMAL POWER ramp in excess of 5X RATED THERMAL POWER per minute or a THERMAL POWER step in excess of lOX RATED THERMAL POWER.

TABLE 3.3-1 (Continued)

REACTOR TRIP SYSTEM INSTRUMENTATION FUNCTIONAL UNIT TOTAL NO.

OF CHANNELS MINIMUM CHANNELS CHANNELS TO TRIP OPERABLE APPLICABLE MODES ACTION 9.

Pressurizer Pressure-Low 10.

Pressurizer Pressure High 11.

Pressurizer Water LevelHigh 12.

Loss of Flow - Single Loop (Above P-8) 13.

Loss of Flow - Two Loops (Above P-7 and below P-8) 14.

Steam Generator Water Level--Low-Low 3/loop 3/1 oop 3/1 oop 2/loop in any oper-ating loop 2/loop in two oper-ating loops 2/loop in any oper-ating loop 2/loop in each oper-ating loop 2/1 oop each oper-ating loop 2/loop each oper-ating loop 1,

2 1,

2 1,

2 1 j 2 e¹ 6¹ 7¹ 7¹ 7¹ 15.

Steam/Feedwater Flow Mismatch and Low Steam Generator. Water 2/loop-level and 2/loop-flow mismatch in same loop 1/loop-level coincident with 1/1 oop-f1 ow mismatch in same loop 1/loop-level 1,

2 and 2/loop-flow mismatch or 2/loop-level and 1/1 oop-f1 ow mismatch

TABLE 3.3-1 Continued REACTOR TRIP SYSTEM INSTRUMENTATION FUNCTIONAL UNIT 16.

Undervoltage-Reactor Coolant Pumps 17.

Underfrequency-Reactor Coolant Pumps TOTAL NO.

OF CHANNELS 4-1/bus 4-1/bus CHANNELS TO TRIP MINIMUM CHANNELS APPLICABLE OPERABLE MODES ACTION 18.

Turbine Trip A.

Low Fluid Oil Pressure 3

B.

Turbine Stop Valve Closure 4

19.

Safety Injection Input from ESF 1,

2 6

20.

Reactor Coolant Pump Breaker Position Trip A.

Above P-8 B.

Above P-7 21.

Reactor Trip Breakers 22.

Automati'c Trip Logic

'1/breaker 1/breaker 1/breaker 1

1/breaker 1

per oper-ating loop 1,

2 and

  • 1, 2 and
  • 10ll

TABLE 3. 3-1 Continued DESIGNATION CONDITION AND SETPOINT FUNCTION P-7 With 2 of 4 Power Range Neutron Flux Channels

> illof RATED THERMAL POWER or 1 of 2 Turbine impulse chamber pressure channels

> 66 psia.

P-7 prevents or defeats the automatic block of reactor trip on:

Low flow in more than one primary coolant loop, reactor coolant pump under-voltage and under-frequency, turbine trip, pressurizer low pressure, and pressurizer high level.

P"8 With 2 of 4 Power Range Neutron Flux channels

> 31K of RATED THERMAL POWER.

P-8 prevents or defeats the automatic block of reactor trip on low coolant flow in a single loop.

i'-10 With 3 of 4 Power range neutron flux channels ( 9X of RATED THERMAL POWER.

P-10 prevents or defeats the manual block of:

Power range low setpoint reactor trip, Intermediate range reactor trip, and intermediate range'od stops.

Provides input to P-7.

D.

C.

COOK - UNIT 2 3/4 3-8 Amendment No.

45

TABLE 3. 3-4 Continued)

ENGINEERED SAFETY FEATURE ACTUATION SYSTEM INSTRUMENTATION TRIP SETPOINTS FUNCTIONAL UNIT TRIP SETPOINT ALLOWABLE VALUES 4.

STEAM LINE ISOLATION a.

Manual b.

Automatic Actuation Logic c.

Containment Pressure High-High d.

Steam Flow in Two Steam lines--

High Coincident with T

--Low-Low avg Not Applicable Not Applicable

< 2.9 psig

< A function defined as follows: A hp co~respond-ing to 1.47 x 10 lbs/hr steam flow between OX and 20K load and then a hp increasing linearly to a hp corresponding to 110K of full steam flow at full 1 oad.

T

> 541 F

Not Applicable Not Applicable

< 3.0 psig

< A function defined as follows:

A gp corresponding to 1.62 x 10 lbs/hr steam flow between OX and 20K load and then a hp increasing linearly to a hp corresponding to 111.5X of full steam flow at full load.

T

> 540'F e.

Steam Line Pressure--Low 5.

TURBINE TRIP AND FEED WATER ISOLATION a.

Steam Generator Water level High-High

> 600 psig steam line pressure

< 67X-of narrow range 7nstrument span each steam generator

> 585'sig steam line pressure

< 68K of narrow range instrument span each steam generator

TABLE 3.3-5 Continued)

ENGINEERED SAFETY FEATURES

RESPONSE

TIMES INITIATING SIGNAL AND FUNCTION

RESPONSE

TIME IN SECONDS e.

g.

Containment Purge and Exhaust Isolation Motor Driven Auxiliary Feedwater Pumps Essential Service Water System 3.

Pressurizer Pressure-Low a.

Safety Injection (ECCS) b.

Reactor Trip (from SI) c.

Feedwater Isolation d.

Containment Isolation-Phase "A"

c 24.0"/12.0¹

< 2.0

< %.0

< 18.0¹ Not Applicable

< 60.0

< 48. 0*/13. 0¹

'4.

Differential Pressure Between Steam Lines-Hi h

a ~

b.

C.

d.

e.

g.

Safety Injection (ECCS)

Reactor Trip (from SI)

Feedwater Isolation Containment Isolation-Phase "A"

Containment Purge and Exhaust Isolation Motor Driven Auxiliary Feedwater Pumps Essential Service Water System 12.0¹/24.0¹¹

< 2.0

< 8.0

<. 18. 0¹/28. 0¹¹ Not Applicable

< 60.0

< 13.0¹/48.0¹¹ 5.

Steam Flow in Two Steam Lines - Hi h Coincident w1th Tav Low Low a 0 b.

C.

d.

e.

g.

h.

Safety Injection (ECCS)

Reactor Trip (from SI)

Feedwater Isolation Containment Isolation-Phase "A"

Containment Purge and Exhaust Isolation Auxiliary Feedwater Pumps Essential Service Water System Steam Line Isolation Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable D.

C.

COOK " UNIT 2 3/4 3-27 Amendment No.

45

INSTRUMENTATION SEISMIC INSTRUMENTATION" LIMITING CONDITION FOR OPERATION 3.3.3.3 The seismic monitoring instrumentation shown in Table 3.3-7 shall be OPERABLE.

APPLICABILITY: At all times.

ACTION:

a.

b.

C.

Mith the number of OPERABLE seismic monitoring instruments less than required by Table 3.3-7, restore the inoperable instru-ment(s) to OPERABLE status within 30 days.

With one or more seismic monitoring instruments inoperable for more than 30 days, prepare and submit a Special Report to the

.Commission pursuant to Specification 6.9.2 within the next 10 days outlining the cause of the malfunction and the plans for restoring the instrument(s) to OPERABLE status.

The provisions of Specifications 3.0.3 and 3.0 ~ 4 are not appl icabl e.

SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS

4. 3. 3. 3. 1 Each of the above seismic monitoring instruments shall be demonstrated OPERABLE by the performance of the CHANNEL CHECK, CHANNEL CALIBRATION and CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TEST operations at the frequencies shown in Table 4.3-4.

4.3.3.3.2 Each of the above seismic monitoring instruments actuated during a seismic event shall be restored to OPERABLE status and a

CHANNEL CALIBRATION performed within 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> following the seismic event.

Data shall be retrieved from actuated instruments and analyzed to determine the magnitude of the vibratory ground motion.

A Special Report shall be pre-pared and submitted to the Commission pursuant to Specification 6.9.2 within 10 days describing the magnitude, frequency spectrum and resultant effect upon facility features important to safety.

Shared System with D.

C.

Cook Unit 1.

D.

C.

COOK - UNIT 2 3/4 3-38a Amendment No. 4g

TABLE 3.3-7 SEISMIC MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION INSTRUMENTS AND SENSOR LOCATIONS 1.

STRONG MOTION TRIAXIAL ACCELEROGRAPHS a.

Reactor Pit FLoor b.

Top of Crane Wall c.

Free Field

,2.

'PEAK RECORDING ACCELEROGRAPHS a.

Containment. Spring Line b.

Diesel Generator Room Floor c.

Spent Fuel Pool MEASUREMENT RANGE O-l g

0-1 g

O-l g

0-2 g 0-2 g 0-2 g MINIMUM INSTRUMENTS OPERABLE D.

C.

COOK - UNIT 2 3/4 3-38b Amendment No.

45

TABLE 4.3-4 SEISMIC MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION SURVEILLANCE RE UIREMENTS INSTRUMENT CHANNEL 1.

STRONG MOTION TRIAXIALACCELEROGRAPHS a.

Reactor Pit Floor 1.

Time History Recorder 2.

Seismic Trigger b.

Top of Crane Mall 1.

Time History Recorder c.

Free Field 1.

Time History Recorder 2.

Seismic Trigger 2.

PEAK RECORDING ACCELEROGRAPHS a.

Containment Spring Line b.

Diesel Generator Room Floor c.

Spent Fuel Pool CHANNEL CHECK M

NA NA CHANNEL CALIBRATION CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TEST M

NA M

NA NA NA

0 INSTRUMENTATION METEOROLOGICAL INSTRUMENTATION LIMITING CONDITION FOR OPERATION 3.3.3 '

The meteorological monitoring instrumentation channels shown in Table 3.3-8 shall be OPERABLE.

APPLICABILITY: At al 1 times.

ACTION:

a.

b.

C.

With the number of OPERABLE meteorological monitoring channels less than required by Table 3.3-8, suspend all release of gaseous radioactive material from the radwaste gas decay tanks until the inoperable channel(s) is restored to OPERABLE status.

With one or more required meteorological monitoring channels

.inoperable for more than 7 days, prepare and submit a Special Report to the Commission pursuant to Specification 6.9. 2 within the next 10 days outlining the cause of the malfunction and the plans for restoring the channel(s) to OPERABLE status.

The provisions of Specifications 3.0.3 and 3.0.4 are not applicable.

SURVEILLANCE RE UIREMENTS 4.3.3.4 Each of the above meteorological monitoring instrumentation channels shall be demonstrated OPERABLE by the performance of the CHANNEL CHECK and CHANNEL CALIBRATION operations at the frequencies shown in Table 4.3-5.

Shared system with D.

C.

COOK - UNIT l.

D.

C.

COOK - UNIT 2 3/4 3-39 Amendment No. '45

TABLE 3.3-8 METEOROLOGICAL MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION INSTRUMENT 1.

WIND SPEED LOCATION INSTRUMENT MINIMUM ACCURACY MINIMUM OPERABLE a.

Microwave Tower, Nominal Elev.

50 ft.

b.

Microwave Tower, Nominal Elev.

150 ft.

2.

WIND DIRECTION a.

Microwave Tower, Nominal Elev.

50 ft.

b.

Microwave Tower, Nominal Elev.

150 ft.

3.

AIR TEMPERATURE - DELTA T a.

Microwave Tower, Nominal Elev.

30 ft.

b.

Microwave Tower, Nominal Elev.

180 ft.

R (I), (2)

(I), (2) 50 50

+015C

+ 0.15 C

1 Starting speed of anemometer shall be 1

mph (2) +

1% or 0.5 mph, whichever is greater D ~

C.

COOK - UNIT 2 3/4 3-40 Amendment No. 45

TABLE 4.3-5 METEOROLOGICAL MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION SURVEILLANCE RE UIREMENTS INSTRUMENT 1.

MIND SPEED a.

Nominal Elev.

50 ft.

b.

Nominal Elev.

150 ft.

CHANNEL CHECK CHANNEL CALIBRATION SA SA 2.

MIND DIRECTION a.

Nominal Elev.

50 ft.

b.

Nominal Elev.

150 ft.

SA SA 3.

AIR TEMPERATURE - DELTA T a.

Nominal Elev.

30 ft.

b.

Nominal Elev.

180 ft.

SA SA D.

C.

COOK - UNIT 2 3/4 3-4l Amendment No., 45

INSTRUMENTATION REMOTE SHUTDOWN INSTRUMENTATION LIMITING CONDITION FOR OPERATION 3.3.3.5 The remote shutdown monitoring instrumentation channels shown in Table 3.3-9 shall be OPERABLE with readouts displayed external to the control room.

'APPLICABILITY:

MODES 1, 2 and 3 ~

ACTION:

a.

With the number of OPERABLE remote shutdown monitoring channels less than required by Table 3.3-9, either restore the inoperable channel to OPERABLE status within 30 days, or be in HOT SHUTDOWN within the next 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br />.

b.

The provisions of Specification 3.0.4 are not applicable.

SURVEILLANCE RE UIREMENTS 4.3.3.5 Each remote shutdown monitoring instrumentation chanr el shall be demonstrated OPERABLE by performance of the CHANNEL CHECK and CHANNEL CALIBRATION operations at the frequencies shown in Table 4.3-6.,

D.

C.

COOK - UNIT 2 3/4 3-42 AMENDMENT NO.. 45

c' INSTRUMENTATION AXIAL POWER DISTRIBUTION MONITORING SYSTEM LIMITING CONDITION FOR OPERATION 3.3.3.7 The axial power distribution monitoring system (APDMS) shall be OPERABLE with:

a.

At least two detector thimbles available for whi.ch R has been determined from full incore flux maps.

These two thimbles shall be those having the lowest uncertainty, o, covering the full configuration of permissible rod patterns permitted at RATED THERMAL POWER.

b.

At least two movable detectors, with associated devices and readout equipment, available for mapping F.(Z) in the above required thimbles.

3

~

. APPLICABILITY:

When the APDMS is used for monitoring the axial power dsstributson ¹.

ACTION:

With the APDMS inoperable, do not use the system for determining the Axial Power Distribution.

The provisions of Specification 3.0.3 are not applicable.

SURVEILLANCE RE UIREMENTS 4.3.3.7.1 The full incore flux maps used to determine R and for monitor-ing F.(Z) shall be updated at least once per 31 EFPD.

The continued accuracy and representativeness of the selected thimbles shall be verified by using their latest flux maps to update the R for each representative thimble.

The original uncertainty, cr, shall not be updated, except as fol 1ows:

Except as provided in Specification 4. 2. 6. 1. b.

¹The APDMS may be out of service when surveillance for determining power distribution maps is being performed.

D.

C.

COOK " UNIT 2 3/4 3"48 Amendment No. 45

'I INSTRUMENTATION 3/4. 3 ~ 4 TURBINE OVERSPEED PROTECTION LIMITING CONDITION FOR OPERATION 3.3.4. 1 At least one turbine overspeed protection system shall be OPERABLE.

APPLICABILITY:

MODES 1, 2 and 3.

ACTION:

a.

b With one stop valve or one control valve per high pressure turbine steam lead inoperable or with one reheat stop valve or one reheat intercept valve per low pressure turbine steam lead inoperable, operation may continue for up to 72 hours8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br /> provided the inoperable valve(s) is restored to OPERABLE status or at least one valve in the affected steam lead is closed; otherwise, isolate the turbine from the steam supply within the next 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br />.

With the above required turbine overspeed protection system otherwise inoperable, within 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br /> either restore the system to OPERABLE status or isolate the turbine from the steam supply.

SURVEILLANCE RE UIREMENTS 4.3.4.1.1 The provisions of Specification 4.0.4.are not applicable.

4.3.4. 1.2 The above required turbine overspeed protection system shall be demonstrated OPERABLE.

a.

At least once per 7 days by cycling each of the following valves through at least one complete cycle from the running position.

1.

Four high pressure turbine stop valves.

2.

Four high pressure turbine control valves.

3.

Six low pressure turbine reheat stop valves.

4.

Six low pressure turbine reheat intercept valves.

D.

C.

COOK - UNIT 2 3/4 3"53 Amendment No. 45

INSTRUMENTATION LIMITING CONDITION FOR OPERATION b.

At least once per 31 days by direct observation of the move-ment of each of the above valves through one complete cycle from the running position.

c.

At least once per 18 months by performance of a CHANNEL CALIBRATION on the turbine overspeed protection systems.

d.

At least once per 40 months by disassembling at least one of each of the above valves and performing a visual and surface inspection of valve seats, disks and stems and verifying no unacceptable flaws o'r corrosion.

D.

C.

COOK - UNIT 2 3/4 3-54 AMENDMENT NO.

45

3/4.4 REACTOR COOLANT SYSTEM 3/4.4.

1 REACTOR COOLANT LOOPS NORMAL OPERATION LIMITING CONDITION FOR OPERATION

3. 4. l. 1 All reactor coolant loops shall be in operation.

APPLICABILITY:

As noted below, but excluding MODE 6."

ACTION:

Above P-7, comply with either of the following ACTIONS:

a ~

With one reactor coolant loop and associated pump not in operation, STARTUP and/or continued POWER OPERATION may proceed provided THERMAL POWER is restricted to less than 31K of RATED THERMAL POWER and the following ESF instrumentation channels associated with the loop not in operation, are placed in their tripped condition within 1 hour:

1.

T

-- Low-Low channel used in the coincidence circuit wf5 Steam Flow - High for Safety Injection.

2.

3.

Steam Line Pressure Low channel used in the coincidence circuit with Steam Flow - High for Safety Injection.

Steam Flow-High Channel used for Safety Injection.

b.

4.

Differential Pressure Between Steam Lines - High channel used for Safety Injection (trip all bistables which indicate low active loop steam pressure with respect to the idle loop steam pressure).

With one reactor coolant loop and associated pump not in operation, subsequent STARTUP and POWER OPERATION above 31K of RATED THERMAL POWER may proceed provided:

1.

The following actions have been completed with the reactor in at least HOT STANDBY:

a)

Reduce the over temperature hT trip setpoint to the value specified in. Specification 2.2.1 for 3 loop operation.

See Special Test Exception 3.10.4.

D.C.

COOK " UNIT 2 3/4 4-1 Amendment No.

45

REACTOR COOLANT SYSTEM ACTION Continued b)

Place the following reactor trip system and ESF instrumentation

channels, associated with the loop not in operation, in their tripped conditions:

1)

Overpower aT channel.

2)

Overtemperature hT channel.

3)

T

-- Low-Low channel used in the coinci-d3k3e circuit with Steam Flow - High for Safety Injection.

4)

Steam Line Pressure

- Low channel used in the coincidence circuit with Steam Flow - High for Safety Injection, 5)

Steam Flow-High channel used for Safety Injection.

6)

Differential Pressure Between Steam Lines - High channel used for Safety Injection (trip all

'istables which indicate low active loop steam pressure with respect to the idle loop steam pressure).

c)

Change the P-8 interlock setpoint from the value specified in Table 3.3-1 to 76% of RATED THERMAL POWER.

2.

THERMAL POWER is restricted to 71% of RATED THERMAL POWER.

Below P-7:

a.

With K

) 1.0, operation may proceed provided at least two reactor coolant loops and associated pumps are in operation.

b.

With K ff

< 1.0, operation may proceed provided at least one reactor coolant loop is in operation with an associated reactor eff coolant or residual heat removal pump.*

c.

The provisions of Specification 3.0.3 and 3.0.4 are not applicable.

D.C.

COOK - UNIT 2 3/4 4-2 AMENDMENT'NO. 45

260$

2400 2200 2000 D

1800 1600 1400 z

1200 1000

\\

LEAKTEST LIMIT REACTOR COOLANTSYSTEM HEA I:". MATERIALPROPERTY BASIS BASE METALCu = 0.15%

'.;.INITIALRTNPT = 580F ii 5.0 EFPY RTNPT (/4T) = 129 F

(AT) =107 F

UNACCEPTABLE

)

ACCEPTABLE.

OPERATION

~

OPERATION T-UP LIMITATIONSAPPLICABLE

FOR FIRST 5.0 EFFECTIVE FULL POWER YEARS. (MARGINS OF

-"'60 PSIG AND 100F ARE INCLUDED FOR POSSIBLE INSTRUMENT Tt ZTT 800 600 PRESSURE

- TEMPERATURE LIMITFOR HEATUP RATES

.- UP TO 1000F/HR.

CRITICALITY LIMIT 40b 200 0 ii.

0

~

~

100 200

= ~

300 400 AVERAGE REACTOR COOLANTSYSTEM TEMPERATURE (QF)

FIGURE 3.4-2 REACTOR COOLANT SYSTEM PRESSURE - TEMPERATURE LIMITS VERSUS 100 F/HOUR RATE-CRITICALITY LIMIT AND HYDROSTATIC TEST LIMIT

~

~

2600 2400 2200 U

tt.

2000 D

1800 1600 1400 1200 Z

0 1000 0

800 6oo 400 200 0

ri ! :I:

!t I I 'I I::: :!t! (IjiI'!'-" ( i I!

lit tai ta a

jllI !

~jl

~

) l:.:i! i It!i

,I t I '!I i!I'! i.:1 l': :

t:jl :tl i'i :!i::iiiiii ilMATER IAL P ROPE RTY BASIS

,'I BASE METALCu = 0.15%

l INITIALRTNPT ='8OF 5.0 EFPY RTNDT (/4T) = 129OF

('/4T) = 107 F

I::al Iit!!!Li l',Il !:I'(

Ia tjf t

~

l

~ t

!ii!liii.ii:!iiii!I!iii!

~ ~

~ a

~ t

~ ~

'it!i ll!i

! tlat

~ l 'l II i Ill

! I! III!

I'l I

~'l '

lii il.l iii UNACCEPTABLEii!l OPE RATION jl:: alit at!tl '.)::

)ii "ill

'.:I lt:

la:: j !:

jjla t

':l la: atjl

\\ ~

a

l l

a aii iii!:iii ii:i iii: iiii :iii at la'l

!i'li I'.ii '.ii:i a

jIl

)'EII ii!i iii!:)ACCEPTABLE

i:ii i:l!':i)OPERATION al PRESSURE-TEMPERATURE LIMITS

~ ~ ~

~ lt COOLDOWN RATE ~F/HR. i

~ fat( ~

-': 0

~ 25

"'-i i:,'.50 100

!!REACTOR COOLANT SYSTEM COOLDOWN LIMITATIONSAPPLICABLE i.:FOR FIRST 5.0 EFFECTIVE FULL POWER YEARS. (MARGINSOF 60 tlPSIG AND 10 F ARE INCLUDED FOR POSSIBLE INSTRUMENT ERROR.) l a

ii iiii

'li,'ibel a

~ l 0

100 200 300 AVERAGE REACTOR COOLANT SYSTEM TEMPERATURE (OF) 400 FIGURE 3.4D REACTOR COOLANT SYSTEM PRESSURE TEMPERATURE LIMITSVERSUS COOLDOWN RATES tD

EMERGENCY CORE COOLING SYSTEMS SURVEILLANCE RE UIREMENTS (Continued) d.

At least once per 18 months by:

1.

Verifying automatic isolation and interlock action of the RHR system from the Reactor Coolant System when the Reactor Coolant System pressure is above 600 psig.

e.

2.

A visual inspection of the containment sump and verifying that the subsystem suction inlets are not restricted by debris and that the sump components (trash racks,

screens, etc.)

show no evidence of structural distress or corrosion.

r At least once per 18 months, during shutdown, by:

l.

Verifying that each automatic valve in the flow path actuates to its correct position on a Safety Injection test signal.

2.

Verifying that each of the following pumps start automatically upon receipt of a safety injection test signal:

a)

Centrifugal charging pump b)

Safety injection pump c)

Residual heat removal pump f.

By verifying that each of the following pumps develops the indicated discharge pressure on recirculation flow when tested pursuant to Specification 4.0.5:

1

~

Centrifugal charging pump 2405 psig 2.

Safety Injection pump

,> 1445 psig 3.

Residual heat removal pump 195 psig By verifying the correct position of each mechanical stop for the the following Emergency Core Cooling System throttle valves:

1.

Within 4 hours4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br /> following completion of each valve stroking'peration or maintenance on the valve when the ECCS sub-

'ystems are. required to be OPERABLE.

D.

C, COOK - UNIT 2 3/4 5-5 AMENDMENT NO.

45

EMERGENCY CORE COOLING SYSTEMS SURVEILLANCE RE UIREMENTS (Continued 2.

At least once per 18 months.

Boron Injection Throttle Valves Valve Number 1.

2-SI-141 L1 2 ~

2-S I-141 L2 3.

2-SI-141 L3 4.

2-S I-141 L4 Safety Injection Throttle Valves Valve Number 1.

2"SI-121 N

2.

2-SI-121 S:4 h.

By performing a flow balance test during shutdown following completion of modifications to the ECCS subsystem that alter the subsystem flow characteristics and verifying the following flow rates:

Boron Injection System Sin le Pum "

Loop 1 Boron Injection Flow 117.5 gpm Loop 2 Boron Injection Flow 117.5 gpm Loop Boron Injection Flow 117.5 gpm Loop 4 Boron Injection Flow 117.5 gpm Safety Injection System Sin le Pum ""

Loop 1 and 4 Cold Leg Flow > 300 gpm Loop 2 and 3 Cold Leg Flow > 300 gpm

""Total SIS (single pump) flow, including miniflow,'shall not exceed 650 gpm.

"The flow rate in each Boron Injection (BI) line should be adjusted to provide 117.5 gpm (nominal) flow into each loop.

Under these conditions there is zero mini-flow and 80 gpm simulated RCP seal injection line flow.

The actual flow in each BI line may deviate from the nominal so long as the difference between the highest and lowest flow is 10 gpm or less and the total flow to the four branch lines does not exceed 470 gpm.

Minimum flow (total flow) required is 345.8 gpm to the three. most conservative (lowest flow) branch lines.

D.

C.

COOK - UNIT 2 3/4 5-6 Amendment No.

45

CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS SPRAY ADDITIVE SYSTEM LIMITING CONDITION FOR OPERATION 3.6.2.2 The spray additive system shall be OPERABLE with:

a.

A spray additive tank containing a volume of between 4000 and 4600 gallons of between 30 and 34 percent by weight NaOH

solution, and b.

Two spray additive eductors each capable of adding NaOH solu-tion from the chemical additive tank to a containment spray system pump flow.

APPLICABILITY:

MODES 1, 2, 3 and 4.

ACTION:

With the spray additive system inoperable, restore the system to OPERABLE status within 72 hours8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br /> or, be in at least HOT STANDBY within the next 6

hours; restore the spray additive system to OPERABLE status within the next 48 hours5.555556e-4 days <br />0.0133 hours <br />7.936508e-5 weeks <br />1.8264e-5 months <br /> or be in COLD SHUTDOWN within the following 30 hours3.472222e-4 days <br />0.00833 hours <br />4.960317e-5 weeks <br />1.1415e-5 months <br />.

SURVEILLANCE RE UIREMENTS 4.6.2.2 The spray additive system shall be demonstrated OPERABLE:

a

~

At least once per 31 days by verifying that each valve (manual, power operated or automatic) in the flow path that is not locked, sealed, or otherwise secured in position, is in its correct position.

b.

At least once per 6 months by:

2.

I Verifying the contained solution volume in the tank, and Verifying the concentration of the NaOH solution by chemical analysis.

D.

C.

COOK - UNIT 2 3/4 6-11 AMENDMENT NO. 45

CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS SURVEILLANCE RE UIREMENTS Continued) c.

At least once per 18 months during shutdown, by verifying that each automatic valve in the flow path actuates to its correct position on a Containment Pressure--High-High test signal.

d.

At least once per 5 years by verifying a water flow rate of at least 20 gpm (> 20 gpm) but not to exceed 50 gpm (< 50 gpm) from the spray additive tank test line to each containment spray system with the spray pump operating on recirculation with a pump discharge pressure

> 255 psig.

D.

C.

COOK UNIT 2 3/4 6-12 Amendment No. 45

CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS DIVIDER BARRIER PERSONNEL ACCESS DOORS AND E UIPMENT HATCHES LIMTING CONDITION FOR OPERATION 3.6.5.5 The personnel access doors and equipment hatches between the containment's upper and lower compartments shall be OPERABLE and closed.

APPLICABILITY:

MODES 1, 2, 3 and 4.

ACTION:

Mith a personnel access door or equipment hatch inoperable or open except for personnel transit entry and T

> 200'F, restore the door or hatch. to OPERABLE status or to its closes fosition (as applicable) within 1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> or be in at least HOT STANDBY within the next 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br /> and in COLD SHUTDOMN within the following 30 hours3.472222e-4 days <br />0.00833 hours <br />4.960317e-5 weeks <br />1.1415e-5 months <br />.

SURVEILLANCE RE UIREMENTS 4.6.5.5.1 The personnel access doors and equipment hatches between the containment's upper and lower compartments shall be determined closed by a visual inspection prior to increasing the Reactor Coolant System T

above 200'F and after each personnel transit entry when the Reactor Coolant System T

is above 200'F.

avg 4.6.5.5.2 The personnel access doors and equipment hatches between the containment's upper and lower compartments shall be determined OPERABLE by visually inspecting the seals and sealing surfaces of these penetra-tions and verifying no detrimental misalignments, cracks or defects in the sealing surfaces, or apparent deterioration of the seal material:

a.

Prior to final closure of the penetration each time it has been opened, and i

b.

At least once per 10 years for penetrations containing seals fabricated from resilient materials.

P~Cy gCOQK - UNIT 2 t:~

3/4 6-43 C

AMENDMENT NO.:45

.0 CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS CONTAINMENT AIR RECIRCULATION SYSTEMS LIMITING CONDITION FOR OPERATION 3.6.5.6 Two independent containment air recirculation systems shall be OPERABLE.

APPLICABILITY:

MODES 1, 2, 3 and 4.

ACTION:

With one containment air recirculation system inoperable, restore the inoperable system to OPERABLE status within 48 hours5.555556e-4 days <br />0.0133 hours <br />7.936508e-5 weeks <br />1.8264e-5 months <br /> or be in at least HOT STANDBY within the next 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br /> and in COLD SHUTDOWN within the following 30 hours3.472222e-4 days <br />0.00833 hours <br />4.960317e-5 weeks <br />1.1415e-5 months <br />.

SURVEILLANCE RE UIREMENTS 4.6.5.6 Each containment air recirculation system shall be demonstrated OPERABLE at least once per 92 days on a

STAGGERED TEST BASIS by:

a.

Verifying that the return air fan starts on an auto-start signal after a 9 + j.

minute delay and operates for at

~

least 15 minutes.

b.

Verifying that with the return air fan discharge backdraft damper locked closed and the fan motor energized, the static pressure between 'the fan discharge and the backdraft damper.

is

> 4.0.inches, water gauge.

c.

, Verifying that with the fan off, the return air fan damper opens when a force of < 11 lbs is applied to the counterweight.

l d.

Verifying that the motor operated valve in the suction line to the containment's lower compartment opens after a 9 +

1 minute delay.

. C.

COOK, - UNIT 2 le 3/4 6-44 Amendment No.

45'

REFUELING OPERATIONS CONTAINMENT PURGE AND EXHAUST ISOLATION SYSTEM LIMITING CONDITION FOR OPERATION 3.9.9 The Containment Purge and Exhaust isolation system shall be OPERABLE.

APPLICABILITY: During Core Alterations or movement of irradiated fuel within the containment.

ACTION:

With the Containment Purge and Exhaust isolation system inoperable, close each

'of the Purge and Exhaust penetrations providing direct access from the containment atmosphere. to the outside atmosphere.

The provision of Specification 3.0.3 are not applicable.

SURVEILLANCE RE UIREMENTS 4.9.9 The Containment Purge and Exhaust isolation system shall be demonstrated OPERABLE within 100 hours0.00116 days <br />0.0278 hours <br />1.653439e-4 weeks <br />3.805e-5 months <br /> prior to the start of and at least once per 7 days during CORE ALTERATIONS by verifying that containment Purge and Exhaust isolation occurs on manual initiation and on a high radiation test signal from each of the containment radiation monitoring instrumentation channels.

D.

C.

COOK - UNIT 2 3/4 9"9 Amendment No. 45

REFUELING OPERATIONS WATER LEVEL - REACTOR VESSEL LIMITING CONDITION FOR OPERATION 3.9.10 At least, 23 feet of water shall be maintained over the top of irradiated fuel assemblies seated within the reactor pressure vessel.

APPLICABILITY:

Dut ing movement of fuel assemblies or control rods within

~p <<1 hi i

MOE ACTION:

'With the requirements of the above specification not satisfied, suspend all operations involving movement of fuel assemblies or control rods within the pressure vessel.

The provisions of Specification 3.0.3 are not applicable.

SURVEILLANCE RE UIREMENTS 4.9.10 The water level shall be determined to be at least its minimum requi red depth within 2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br /> prior to the start of and at least once per 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> thereafter during movement of fuel assemblies or control rods.

D.

C.

COOK - UNIT 2 3/4 9-10 AMENDMENT NO; 45

Percent of Rated Thermal Power

~\\

S%

SII

~<

90%

80%

70%

60II

,Target Flu iffe x D rance SO'lf 40%

30%'0%

10%

~30%

+20%

~10%

0 10'NDICATED AXIALFLUX DIFFERENCE Figure B 3/4 2.1 TYPICAL INDICATED AXIALFLUX DIFFERENCE VERSUS THERMAL POWER D.

C.

COOK - UNIT 2 B 3/4 2-3 AMENDMENT NO. 45

POWER DISTRIBUTION LIMITS BASES 3/4.2.2 and 3/4.2.3 HEAT FLUX HOT CHANNEL FACTOR RCS FLOWRATE AND NUCLEAR ENTHALPY RISE HOT CHANNEL FACTOR The limits on heat flux hot channel factor, RCS flowrate, and nuclear enthalpy rise hot channel factor ensure that 1) the design limits on peak local power density and minimum DNBR are not exceeded and.2) in the event of a

LOCA the peak fuel clad temperature will not exceed the 2200'F ECCS acceptance criteria limit.

Each of these is measurable but will normally only be determined periodically as specified in Specifications

4. 2. 2 and 4. 2. 3.

This periodic surveillance is sufficient to insure that the limits are maintained provided:

a.

Control rods in a single group move together with no individual rod insertion differing by more than

+ 12 steps from the group demand position.

b.

Control rod groups are sequenced with overlapping groups as described in Specification

3. 1. 3. 6.

c.

The control rod insertion limits of Specifications

3. 1.3.5 and 3. 1.3.6 are maintained.

d.

The axial power distribution, expressed in terms of AXIAL FLUX DIFFERENCE, is maintained within the limits.

F H will be maintained within its limits provided conditions

a. through d.

abIIIIe are maintained.

As noted on Figures 3.2-3 and 3.2-4, RCS flow rate and F

may be "traded off" against IIne another (i.e.,

a low measured RCS flow rate f3 acceptable if the measured F

is also low) to ensure thatNthe calculated DNBR will not be below the design DNIIlf value.

The relaxation of F H as a function of THERWAL POWER allows changes in the radial power shape for all permissible rod insertion limits.

When an F~ measurement is taken, both experimental error and manufacturing tolerance must be allowed for.

5X is the appropriate allowance for a full core map taken with the incore detector flux mapping system and 3X is the appropriate allowance for manufacturing tolerance.

When RCS flow rate and F>

are measured, no additional allowances are.

necessary prior to comparison Pith the limits of Figures 3.2-3 ~nd 3.2-4.

Measurement errors of 3.5X for RCS total flow rate and 4X for F>H have been allowed for in determination of the design DNBR value.

D.

C.

Cook - Unit 2 B 3/4 2-4 Amendment No.

45

3/4. 3 INSTRUMENTATION BASES 3/4.3 '.2 MOVABLE INCORE DETECTORS The OPERABILITY of the movable incore detectors with the specified minimum complement of equipment ensures that the measurements obtained from use of this system accurately represent the spatial neutron flux distribution of the reactor core.

The OPERABILITY of this system is demonstrated by irradiating each detector used and normalizing its respective output.

3/4. 3. 3. 3 SEISMIC INSTRUMENTATION The OPERABILITY of the seismic instrumentation ensures that sufficient capability is available to promptly determine the magnitude of a seismic event and evaluate the response of those features important to safety.

This capability is required to permit comparison of the measured response to that used in the design basis for the facility.

3/4.3. 3. 4 METEOROLOGICAL INSTRUMENTATION The OPERABILITY of the meteorological instrumentation ensures that suffi-cient meteorological data is available for estimating potential radiation doses to the public as a result of routine or accidental release of radioactive mater-ials to the atmosphere.

This capability is required to evaluate the need for initiating protective measures to protect the health and safety of the public.

3/4.3.3.5 REMOTE SHUTDOWN INSTRUMENTATION The OPERABILITY of the remote shutdown instrumentation ensures that suffi-cient capability is available to permit shutdown and maintenance of HOT STANDBY of the facility from locations outside of the control room.

This capability is required in the event control room habitability is lost and is consistent with General Design Criteria 19 of 10 CFR 50.

3/4.3. 3. 6 POST-ACCIDENT INSTRUMENTATION The OPERABILITY of the post-accident instrumentation ensures that sufficient information is available on selected plant parameters to monitor and assess these variables during and following an accident.

3/4.3.3.7 AXIAL POWER DISTRIBUTION MONITIORING SYSTEM (APDMS OPERABILITY of the APDMS ensures that sufficient capability is available for the measurement of the neutron flux spatial distribution within the reactor core.

This capability is required to 1) monitor the core flux patterns that are representative of the peak core power density and 2) limit the core average axial power profile such that the total power peaking factor F~ is maintained within acceptable limits.

D.

C.

COOK - UNIT 2 B 3/4 3-2 Amendment No.

45

3/4.4 REACTOR COOLANT SYSTEM BASES 3/4.4.

1 REACTOR COOLANT LOOPS The plant is designed to operate with all reactor coolant loops in operation, and maintain calculated DNBR above the design DNBR value during Condition I and II events.

With one reactor coolant loop not in operation, THERMAL POWER is restricted to <

51 percent of RATED THERMAL POWER until the Overtemperature bT trip is reset.

Either action ensures that the calculated DNBR will be maintained above the design DNBR value.

A loss of flow in two loops will cause a reactor trip if operating above P-7 (ll percent of RATED THERMAL POWER) while a loss of 'flow in one loop wi-ll cause a reactor trip if operating above P-8 (31 percent of RATED THERMAL POWER).

A single reactor coolant loop provides sufficient heat removal capability for removing core decay heat while in HOT STANDBY; however, single failure con-

. siderations require placing a

RHR loop into operation in the shutdown cooling mode. if component repairs and/or corrective actions cannot be made within the allowable out-of-service time.

3/4.4.2 and 3/4.4.3 SAFETY VALVES The pressurizer code safety valves operate to prevent the RCS from being pressurized above its Safety Limit of 2735 psig.

Each safety valve is designed to relieve 420,000 lbs per hour of saturated steam at the valve set point.

The relief capacity of a single safety valve is adequate to relieve any over-pressure condition which could occur during shutdown.

In the event that no safety valves are OPERABLE, an operating RHR loop, connected to the RCS, pro-vides overpressure relief capability and will prevent RCS overpressurization.

During operation, all pressurizer code safety valves must be OPERABLE to prevent the RCS from being pressurized above its safety limit of 2735 psig.

The combined relief capacity of all of these valves is greater than the maxi-mum surge rate resulting from a complete loss of load assuming no reactor trip until the first Reactor Protective System trip set point is reached (i.e.,

no credit is taken for a direct reactor trip on the loss of load) and also assuming no operation of the power operated relief valves or steam dump valves.

D.

C.

COOK - UNIT 2 B 3/4 4"1 Amendment No.

45

PLANT MANAGER ADMINISTRATIVE SUPERVISOR MAINTENANCE SUPERINTENDENT SUPERINTENDENT SOL TECHNICAL SUPERINTENDENT STAFF TRAINING COORDINATOR STAFF PROD. SUPV.

OPERATIONS SOL SHIFT OPERATING ENG.

SOL QA SUPERVISOR OPERATING ENGINEER OL NUCLEAR PERFORMANCE SUPERVISOR ENGINEER CONTROL AND ~

INSTRUMENTATION ENGINEER PLANT CHEMICAL SUPERVISOR PLANT

~

RADIATION PROT. SUPV.

LEGEND:

OL - SENIOR OPERATOR LICENSE OL - OPERATOR LICENSE

~ - KEY SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL UNIT SUPERVISOR OL PERFORMANCE PERFORMANCE ENGINEER ENGINEER INSTRUMENT MAINTENANCE SUPERVISOR CHEMIST RADIATION PROTECTIO SUPERVIS EQUIPMENT OPERATOR TECHNICIANS TECHNICIANS AUXILIARY EQUIPMENT OPERATOR Figure 6M Facility Organization - Donald C. Cook - Vnit No. 2

~

~

~

TABLE 6.2-1 MINIMUM SHIFT CREW COMPOSITIOHtP LICENSE CATEGun'PPLICABLE MODES SOL OL Non-Licensed Shift Technical Advisor Hone required Does not include the licensed Senior Reacto~ Operator or Senior Reactor Operator Limited to Fuel Handling, supervising CORE ALTERATIOHS.

'Shift cr ew composition may be less than the minimum requirements for a period of time not to exceed 2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br /> in order to accommodate unexpected absence of on duty shift crew members provided immediate action is taken to restore the shift crew composition to within the minimum requirements of. Table 6.2-1.

~Shared with 0.

C.

Codk Unit L.

0.

C.

COOK - UNiT 2 6-4 Anendment No. Q 4~

0 ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLS COMPOSITION 6.5.2.2 The NSDRC shall be composed of the:

Chairman:

Member:

Member:

Member:

Member:

Member:

Member:

Member:

Member:

Member:

Member:

Alternate:

Alternate:

Alternate:

. Alternate:

Assistant Vice President, Nuclear Engineering Vice Chairman, Engineering 8 Construction President and Chief Operating Officer of I8BECo Executive Vice President, Construction and New York Engineering Vice President, Mechanical Engineering Vice President, Electrical Engineering Vice President, Engineering Administration Assistant Vice President, Design Division Assistant Vice President, Environmental Engineering Division Plant Manager, D.

C.

Cook Plant

Manager, Nuclear Safety and Licensing Section Assistant Chief Mechanical Engineer Assistant Plant Manager, D.

C.

Cook Plant Executive Assistant to the President of I8RECo Assistant Division Manager, Nuclear Engineering ALTERNATES 6.5.2.3 All alternate members shall be appointed in writing by the NSDRC Chairman to serve on a temporary basis;

however, no more than two alternates

-shall participate as voting members in NSDRC activities at any one time.

CONSULTANTS

6. 5. 2.4 Consultants shall be utilized as determined by the NSDRC Chairman to provide expert advice to the NSDRC.

MEETING FRE UENCY 6.5.2.5 The NSDRC shall meet at least once per calendar quarter during the initial year of facility operation following fuel loading and at least once per six months thereafter.

D.

C.

COOK " UNIT 2 6-9 Amendment No.

45

ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLS 4

UORUM 6.5.2.6 A quorum of NSDRC shall consist of the Chairman or his designated alternate and more than half the NSDRC membership including alternates or at least 5 members including alternates whichever is greater.

No more than a

minority of the quorum shall have line responsibility for operation of the facility.

REVIEW 6.5.2.7 The NSDRC shall review:

a.

b.

C.

d.

e.

g.

h.

The safety evaluations for 1) changes to procedures, equipment or systems and 2) tests or experiments completed under the provision of Section 50.59, 10 CFR, to verify that such actions did not constitute an unreviewed safety question.

Proposed changes to procedures, equipment or systems which involve

-an unreviewed safety question as defined in Section 50.59, 10 CFR.

Proposed tests or experiments which involve an unreviewed safety question as defined in Section 50.59, 10 CFR.

Proposed changes to Technical Specifications or this Operating License.

Violations of codes, regulations,

orders, Technical Specifications, license requirements, or of internal procedures or instructions having nuclear safety significance.

Significant operating abnormalities or deviations from normal and expected performance of plant equipment that affect nuclear safety.

Events requiring 24 hour2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> written notification to the Commission.

All recognized indications of an unanticipated deficiency in some aspect of design or operation of safety related structures,

systems, or components.

Reports and meetings minutes of the PNSRC.

D.

C.

COOK - UNIT 2 6-10 Amendment No.

45

1

ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLS

6. 10 RECORD RETENTION
6. 10. 1 The following records shall be retained for at least five years:

a.

Records and logs of facility operation covering time interval at each power level.

b.

Records and logs of principal maintenance activities, inspections, repair and replacement of principal items of equipment related to nuclear safety.

c.

ALL REPORTABLE OCCURRENCES submitted to the Commission.

d.

Records of surveillance activities, inspections and calibrations required by these Technical Specifications.

e.

Records of changes made to Operating Procedures.

~ f.

Records of radioactive shipments.

g.

Records of sealed source and fission detector leak tests and results.

h.

Records of annual physical inventory of'll sealed source material of record.

6. 10.2 The following records shall be retained for the duration of the Facility Operating License:

a ~

b.

C.

Records and drawing changes reflecting facility design modifications made to systems and equipment described in the Final Safety Analysis Report.

Records of new and irradiated fuel inventory, fuel transfers and assembly burnup histori es.

Records of radiation exposure for all individuals entering radiation control areas.

D.

C.

COOK " UNIT 2 6"19 Amendment No. 45

ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLS d.

Records of gaseous and liquid radioactive material released to the environs.

e.

Records of transient of operational cycles for those facility components identified in Table 5.7-1.

f.

Records of reactor tests and experiments.

g.

Records of training and qualification for current members of the plant staff.

h.

Records of in-service inspections performed pursuant to these Technical Specifications.

Records of equality Assurance activities required by the gA Manual.

j.

Records of reviews performed for changes made to procedures or equip-ment or reviews of tests and experiments pursuant to 10 CFR 50.59.

k.

Records of meetings of the PNSRC and the NSDRC.

1.

Records for Environmental qualification which are covered under the provisions of paragraph

6. 13.

6.11 RADIATION PROTECTION PROGRAM Procedures for personnel radiation protection shall be prepared consistent with the requirements of 10 CFR Part 20 and shall be approved, maintained and adhered to for all operations involving personnel radiation exposure.

6. 12 HIGH RADIATION AREA 6'2.

1 In lieu of the "control device" or "alarm signal" required by paragraph 20.203(c)(2) of 10 CFR 20, each high radiation area in which the intensity of radiation is 1000 mrem/hr or less shall be barricaded and conspicuously posted as a high radiation area and entrance thereto shall be controlled by requiring issuance of a Radiation Work Permit".

Any individual or group of 'individuals permitted to enter such areas shall be provided with or accompanied by one or more of the following:

a.

A radiation monitoring device which continuously indicates the padia-tion dose rate in the area.

Health Physics personnel shall be exempt from the RWP issuance requirement during the performance of their assigned radiation protection duties, provided they comply with approved radiation protection procedures for entry into high radiation areas.

D.

C.

COOK - UNIT 2 6-20 Amendment No. 45