ML17284A764

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Summary of 970127 Oversight Panel Meeting with Util Re Upcoming Insps Identified Including Corrective Actions & Special Insp on Instantaneous Overcurrent & Drywell Pressure Instruments
ML17284A764
Person / Time
Site: Columbia 
Issue date: 02/07/1997
From: Johnston G
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
To: Perkins K
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
Shared Package
ML17284A751 List:
References
NUDOCS 9809160020
Download: ML17284A764 (3)


Text

~pS REgII~

C O

(

Vg

()N

+**<<<<

MEMORANDUMTO:

THRU:

FROM:

UNITEDSTATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION REGION IV 611 RYAN PLAZADRIVE, SUITE 400 ARLINGTON,TEXAS 76011-8064 February 7

1997 K, E. Perkins, Director, Walnut Creek Field Office H. J. Wong, Chief, Reactor Projects Branch E G. W. Johnston, Senior Project Inspector IU

SUBJECT:

WNP-2 OVERSIGHT PANEL MEETING MINUTES-JANUARY 27, 1997 The WNP-2 Oversight Panel convened by confererice call'on January'27,'1997.

The topics discussed included the following:

The latest SSFI inspection results were presented by T. Colburn.

Systems discussed included ADS, SWS, RHR, and the ultimate heat sink.

The FSAR was noted as not being updated sufficiently to capture all the current calculations for various systems.

Of special note w'as that the design of the ultimate heat sink may not be in conformance with R.G. 1.27 and a question was raised concerning the design basis for multiple cycles of the ADS valves.

George Replogle presented the current status of the adjustable speed drive system.

- Currently the licensee has not determined the cause of the January 15 event.

Current issues related to the instantaneous overcurrent trip setpoints for the SSW, RHR, and LPCS pumps, and the improper venting of the drywell pressure instruments were presented by George Replogle.

Upcoming inspections were identified including corrective actions (40500) and a special inspection on instantaneous overcurrent and drywell pressure instruments.

Response

Time Testing inspection results were discussed by Tim Colburn.

Results include two proposed apparent violations and one Level IV. It was noted that some instruments may not have been tested in accordance wIth th'e T.S., thereby, potentially placing the facility in T.S. 4.0.3.

[K. Perkins to followup with the licensee to make sure they understand potential implications.]

SALP public meeting date change:

Ken Perkins and Bill Bateman agreed that the date change was acceptable.

A followup with Ken Brockman is required to establish whether his calendar is compatible.

(April 23, 1997, to April 22, 1 997) 9809160020 980904 PDR ADOCK 05000397 p

PDR 0$ nell<z~'~

SALP previsit coordination was discussed (persons for interviews, tours, etc.).

[H.Wong to coordinate common interviews with licensee.]

The licensee's proposed February 20 meeting agenda was discussed.

The panel determined to add a discussion of maintenance to the agenda and reduce the time for licensing and QA discussions.

CC:

J ~ Callan S. Collins Oversight Panel J, Dyer K. Perkins K. Brockman W. Bateman T. Colburn H. Wong G. Replogle A. Howell D. Chamberlain B. Henderson' M. Hammond C. Hackney D. Kunihiro Members-