ML17250B056
| ML17250B056 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Ginna  |
| Issue date: | 11/15/1989 |
| From: | Andrea Johnson Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Mecredy R ROCHESTER GAS & ELECTRIC CORP. |
| Shared Package | |
| ML17250B057 | List: |
| References | |
| TASK-03-02, TASK-03-04.A, TASK-03-06, TASK-03-07.B, TASK-3-2, TASK-3-4.A, TASK-3-6, TASK-3-7.B, TASK-RR TAC-54364, NUDOCS 8911200187 | |
| Download: ML17250B056 (5) | |
Text
gP,A RfgI j'
0
~0
++*++
Docket No. 50-244 UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 November 15, 1989 Dr. Robert C. Mecredy General
- Manager, Nuclear Production Rochester Gas
& Electric Corporation 89 East Avenue Rochester, New York 14649
Dear Dr. Mecredy:
SUBJECT:
SUPPLEMFNTAL SAFETY EVALUATION - SYSTEMATIC FVALUATION PROGRAM (SEP)/STRUCTURAL UPGRADE PROGRAM (SUP)
AT R.E.
GINNA (TAC NO. 54364)
The Safety Evaluation provided to,you on March 24, 1987 concluded that, subject to the plant modifications which RG&E had committed to install, the implementation of the SUP would provide reasonable assurance that Ginna Station could be safely shut down followina specified environmental events.
The NRC has reviewed all requested information submitted by RG&E, for which the conclus-ions of the March 24, 1987 Safety Evaluation were based, and for which an I"RC/RG&E meeting was he1d in Bethesda, Maryland to discuss outstanding items on December 14, 1988.
The NRC conducted an audit of the SEP/SUP analyses and calculations at the RG&E corporate office in Rochester, NY and inspected the Ginna plant for the SEP/SUP related modifications on August 3-4, 1989.
In addition, RG&E submitted further analyses and confirmatory information to the NRC on August 31, 1989.
Based on the NRC review, audit, and plant inspection, the NRC concludes that the evaluation and resolution of R.E.
Ginna Nuclear Power Plant SEP Topics III-2 Wind and Tornado Loadings, III-4.A Tornado Missiles, III-6 Seismic Design Considerations, and III-7.8 Load Combinations are acceptable.
The NRC has also concluded that,RG&E analysis and implementation of the SUP are acceptable.
9ii200i87 S9iii5 PDR ADOCK 05000244 P
Dr, Robert C. Mercredy Our Supplemental Safety Evaluation is provided in Enclosure 1.
We consider our efforts on TAC No, 54364 complete.
We understand that full implementation o~
SUP modifications is targeted for September 1990.
Sincerely, len John on, Project Manager roject rectorate I-3 D
n of Reactors Projects,I/II Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Enclosure:
Supplemental Safety Evaluation cc:
See next oage
Dr. Robert C. Mercredy November 15, 1989 Our Supplemental Safety Evaluation is provided in Enclosure 1.
We consider our efforts on TAC No. 54364 complete.
We understand that full implementation of SUP modifications is targeted for September 1990.
Sincerely,
/s/
Allen Johnson, Project Hanager Project Directorate I-3 Division of Reactors Projects I/II Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Enclosure:
Supplemental Safety Evaluation cc:
See next page DISTRIBUTION esto PDI-3 r/f SVarga GLainas BBoger MRushbrook AJohnson
,OGC (f/info)
RWessman DJeng GBagehi
- JJohnson, RI 1
LA P DI-3/PM R shb ok AJohnson:nv K /P/89
't) / $ /89 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY Document Name:
"/WI89
"k
'i'l F
h tl g
l1 1
i!
I'
Dr. Robert C. Mecredy cc w/enclosure:
Harry H. Voigt, Esquire
- LeBoeuf, Lamb, Leiby and MacRae 1333 New Hampshire
- Avenue, N.W.
Suite 1100 Washington, D.C.
20036 Resident Inspector R.E.
Ginna Plant U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 1503 Lake Road
- Ontario, New York la519 Regional Administrator, Region I U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 475 Allendale Road Kinq of Prussia, Pennsylvania 19406 Ms.
Donna Ross Division of Policy Analysis 5 Planning New York State Enerqy Office Agency Building 2
Empire State Plaza
- Albany, New York 12223 Mr. Bruce A. Snow, Superintendent Nuclear Production Rochester Gas 8 Electric Corporation 89 East Avenue Rochester, New York 14649-0001 Charlie Donaldson, Esq.
Assistant Attorney General New York Department of Law 120 Broadway New York, New York 10271