ML17228B265

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Responds to Licensee Response to 940809 & 941228 RAIs Re GL 92-08, Thermo-Lag 330-1 Fire Barriers, & Concludes That Response Incomplete.Requests Forwarding of Info,Including Request for Submission of Revised Response
ML17228B265
Person / Time
Site: Saint Lucie  NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 09/12/1995
From: Calvo J
NRC (Affiliation Not Assigned)
To: Matthews D
NRC (Affiliation Not Assigned)
References
GL-92-08, GL-92-8, TAC-M85608, TAC-M85609, NUDOCS 9509140317
Download: ML17228B265 (5)


Text

September 12, 1995 MEMORANDUM TO:

David B. Matthews, Director Project Directorate II-1 Division of Reactor Projects I/II FROM:

SUBJECT:

Jose A. Calvo, Chief (Original signed by J.

Calvo)

Electrical Engineering Branch Division of Engineering

RESPONSE

TO THE FOLLOWUP TO THE REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING GENERIC LETTER 92-08 (TAC NO. M85608 AND M85609)

Plant:

St.

Lucie Units 1 and 2

Licensee:

Florida Power and Light Review Status:

Open We have reviewed Florida Power and Light's responses of November 4,

1994, and March 28, 1995, to the requests for additional information (RAI) of August 9,
1994, and December 28, 1994, respectively, regarding Generic Letter 92-08, "Thermo-Lag 330-1 Fire Barriers."

The licensee was required, pursuant to Section 182A of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as

amended, and 10 CFR 50.54(f), to submit written reports, under oath of affirmation, that provided the information specified in the RAIs.

On the basis of our review, we have determined that the licensee's responses to the RAIs are incomplete.

The specific areas where we found the licensee's responses to be incomplete are discussed in the attachment.

Please transmit this information to the licensee and request that it submit a revised response.

We recommend that the licensee be given 45 days to submit its revised response.

DISTRIBUTION:

Docket No.:

50-335 50-389

Attachment:

As stated CONTACT:

R. Jenkins, NRR/DE 415-2985 Central F.iles-PDR EELB R/F BWSheron GCLainas SPLB TSI File JANorris HGamberoni EConnell DISK/DOCUMENT NAME:

G: iSHAREDiSTLUCIE. RAI To receive a co of this docunent indicate in the box:

"Ca ~ Co w/o attachment "E<< = Co w/attachment "He "-No co OFC EELB:DE SC:EELB:DE

~

C:EELB:DE NAME RVJenkins:jc ASGill DATE

/I 95 I /l4'95 JACalvo q //Z/95 "

OFFICIAL RECORD COPY 9509i403i7.,9509i2 PDR ADOCi,'O5000335 P

PDR

1 H

t ll

~

~>R RE00 0

ty I

C Op

/p gO

++*++

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 September 12, 1995 MEMORANDUM TO:

FROM:

SUBJECT:

David B. Hatthews, Director Project Directorate II-1 Division of Reactor Projects I/II Josh A. Calvo, Chief Electrical Engineering Branch Division of Engineering

RESPONSE

TO THE FOLLOWUP TO THE REQUEST" FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING GENERIC LETTER 92-08 (TAC NO. M85608 AND H85609)

Plant:

St. Lucie Units 1 and 2

Licensee:

Florida Power and Light Review Status:

Open We have reviewed Florida Power and Light's responses of November 4,

1994, and March 28, 1995, to the requests for additional information (RAI) of August 9;
1994, and December 28, 1994, respectively, regarding Generic Letter 92-08, "Thermo-Lag 330-1 Fire Barriers."

The licensee was required, pursuant to Section 182A of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as

amended, and
10. CFR 50.54(f), to submit written reports, under oath of affirmation, that provided the information specified in the RAIs.

On the basis of our review, we have determined that the licensee's responses to the RAIs are incomplete.

The specific areas where we found the licensee's responses to be incomplete are discussed in the attachment.

Please transmit this information to the licensee and request that it submit a revised response.

We recommend that the licensee be given 45 days to submit its revised response.

Docket No.:

50-335 50-389

Attachment:

As'tated CONTACT:

R';""Jenkins, NRR/DE 415=:2985,

ATTACHMENT ST.

LUCIE UNITS 1

AND 2 DOCKET NO. 50-335 AND 50-389 FOLLOWUP REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING GENERIC LETTER 92-08 "THERMO-LAG 330-1 FIRE BARRIERS" 1.0 REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (RAI) OF AUGUST 9, 1994 In the RAI of August 9, 1994, the NRC staff requested information regarding important barrier parameters, Thermo-Lag barriers outside the scope of the NEI

program, ampacity derating, alternatives, and schedules.

No information was provided by the licensee in its submittal of November 4, 1994 to address the ampacity derating issue.

During a public meeting on March 14, 1995, with the licensees for the four lead plants for the resolution of Thermo-Lag issues, the staff responded to the question, "Will the resolution of the ampacity derating concern be deferred until agreement is reached on the appropriate testing protocol (i.e.,

IEEE P848)?"

The staff reiterated its position, which was previously stated'n the September 1994 RAI, that the ampacity derating concern could be resolved independently of the fire endurance concerns.

After a review of the tests performed under the draft IEEE standard

P848, the staff transmitted comments which were designated to ensure the repeatability of test results to the IEEE working group responsible for the test procedure.

The licensee is requested to submit its ampacity derating evaluations, including any applicable test reports, in order to provide an adequate response to Generic Letter 92-08 reporting requirement 2(c).

2.0 REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION OF DECEMBER 28, 1994 In the RAI of December 28, 1994, the staff requested information describing the examinations and inspections that will be performed to obtain the important barrier parameters for the Thermo-Lag configurations installed at St. Lucie.

In its response of March 28, 1995, the licensee stated that there is sufficient margin in existing ampacity derating calculations to bound any testing which-may be performed.

Finally, after an acceptable approach and test methodology has been agreed upon and testing has been performed the licensee will-review-these test results to determine if there is any impact on these calculations.

On May 18,

1995, members of the NRC staff held a telephone conference call with Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) representatives on ampacity derating issues for Thermo-Lag fire bar riers.

The staff indicated that the latest IEEE P848 draft procedure can be used by licensees or NEI as the basis for an ampacity derating test program.

NEI agreed to review the Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station Unit 2 Safety Evaluation (SE) in order to develop a generic test program.

The memorandum dated May 22, 1995, which documents the subject telephone conference meeting, is attached for your information.

In addition,

a copy of the subject SE dated June 22,

1995, was sent to those licensees who rely on Thermo-Lag installations.

Please submit the anticipated test procedures or alternatively, a description of the analytical methodology including typical calculations which will be used to determine the ampacity der ating parameter s for the Thermo-Lag fire barriers that are installed at St. Lucie Units 1 and 2.