ML14316A309

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
2014 DC Cook Nuclear Power Plant Initial License Examination Form ES-301-4
ML14316A309
Person / Time
Site: Cook  American Electric Power icon.png
Issue date: 08/01/2014
From: Mcneil D
NRC/RGN-III/DRS/OLB
To:
Indiana Michigan Power Co
References
Download: ML14316A309 (2)


Text

ES-301, Rev. 9 Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist Form ES-301-4 Facility: D.C. Cook U1 /U2 Date of Exam: 07/21 -08/01 /2014 Scenario Numbers: 1 I 2 1 3 Operating Test No.: 2014301 Initials QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES a

b.

c#

1.

The initial conditions are realistic, in that some equipment and/or instrumentation may be out ltltl tJ/4 J~

of service, but it does not cue the operators into expected events.

2.

The scenarios consist mostly of related events.

16--.

~

3.

Each event description consists of The point in the scenario when it is to be initiated

. The malfunction(s) that are entered to initiate the event The symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew

~

The expected operator actions (by shift position)

-~

The event termination point (if applicable)

4.

No more than one non-mechanistic failure (e.g., pipe break) is incorporated into the scenario nn

~

without a credible preceding incident such as a seismic event.

5.

The events are valid with regard tophysics and thermodynamics.

~ ~

6.

Sequencing and timing of events is reasonable, and allows the examination team to obtain

~ pJ~

complete evaluation results commensurate with the scenario objectives.

7.

If time compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates. Operators 6r.

have sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue time constraints. Cues are

~

qiven.

8.

The simulator modeling is not altered.

br-v~.....

9.

The scenarios have been validated. Pursuant to 10 CFR 55.46(d), any open simulator

~

performance deficiencies or deviations from the referenced plant have been evaluated to ensure ~

that functional fidelity is maintained while running the planned scenarios.

10.

Every operator will be evaluated using at least one new or significantly modified scenario. All -~ dk....

other scenarios have been altered in accordance with Section D.5 of ES-301.

11.

All individual operator competencies can be evaluated, as verified using Form ES-301 -6 (submit rtm d~

the form along with the simulator scenarios).

12.

Each applicant will be significantly involved in the minimum number of transients and events

~

tA~

specified on Form ES-301 -5 (submit the form with the simulator scenarios).

13.

The level of difficulty is appropriate to support licensing decisions for each crew position.

~ t::IIM Target Quantitative Attributes (Per Scenario; See Section D.5.d)

Actual Attributes

1.

Total malfunctions (5-8) 6/ 6 /6

~ ~

2.

Malfunctions after EOP entry (1-2) 2/ 3 / 3

~ ~

3.

Abnormal events (2-4) 2/ 3 /2

~ ol.,..

4.

Major transients (1-2) 1 I 1 /1

~ tlw..

5.

EOPs entered/requiring substantive actions (1-2) 1 I 1 /1

~

&~

6.

EOP contingencies requiring substantive actions (0-2) 0 I 0 /1

~ d~

7.

Critical tasks (2-3) 2/ 2 /2

~ ~

ES-301, Rev. 9 Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES The initial conditions are r<l<.<listic, 1n that some equiprnent and/or instru:-nentation may be out of Each event description consists of the pont! in tile ::;r;enario when 1t is to be in1!1ated tl1e rnalfunction(s) that are onterod to 1nitiate the event the symptoms/cues that wtli be vistble to the crew the expected operator actions (by shift position)

4.

No mom than one non-mechanistic fatlure (e.g., p1pe bn~ak) is incorporated into the scenario


~!th~~-~9rodtble erece<?,!!!.£1. inci£~!:]1 S~£~.a..::;_a s~l~.!J1~.. £~~0..L.... __,,._,,..,.,,.... _..... ---m*-****-------*--

Sequencmg and timing of events is reason<~ble, and allows !he exarnmation team to obtain

____ --.£~l<:l~!2.V.~.~ation ms u Its :~_rr_lrner!;>U rate. wit.b_!:b.f!..:>~£!:1.9.f:i£E1J~tlv~~--------~--------

If tirne compression techniques are used, the scenano summary clearly so indicCJtes.

have sufficient !tme to carry out expected activities without undue ttrne constraints.

9.

The scenarios have been validated. Pursuant to 10 CFR 55.46(d). any open simulator performance deficiencies or deviations from the referenced plant have been evaluated

_______ _to ensure that _fun!::!:J.<::nal fidelity is maintain_~9-~hile

.I~.!:!E~.i.!:Ja.!J:!£J:!Ianned~c::!:!.?.!J?.L _____, _____ +.--'---I--11-*

10.

Every operator will be evaluated ustng at least one new or significantly modified scenario.

Ail other scenarios have been altered in accordance with Section D.5 of ES-301.

  • -*----~--~~~----*------------...... *-**------------*--*-"""-*-~*-**--........ ------*-~-*...... -ri~-*---.---~------*~.. ~~-*~-"""-~**-~"*~~~---*~