ML13331A415
| ML13331A415 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | San Onofre  |
| Issue date: | 05/18/1990 |
| From: | Tatum J Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Ray H SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. |
| Shared Package | |
| ML13331A416 | List: |
| References | |
| GL-84-04, GL-84-4, TAC-74792, NUDOCS 9005240238 | |
| Download: ML13331A415 (3) | |
Text
May 18, 1990 Docket No. 50-206 DISTRIBUTION Docket File ACRS (10)
NRC & LPDRs ESullivan Mr. Harold B. Ray JZwolinski Vice President LA Southern California Edison Company JTatum (2)
Irvine Operations Center OGC 23 Parker PD5 Plant File Irvine, California 92718 EJordan
Dear Mr. Ray:
SUBJECT:
INSERVICE TESTING PUMP RELIEF REQUEST NO. 6, SAN ONOFRE NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION, UNIT NO. 1 (TAC NO. 74792)
In your response to Generic Letter 89-04 dated November 30, 1989, you requested relief from ASME Section XI inservice testing (IST) requirements for certain components. The purpose of this letter is to provide our evaluation of pump relief request (PRR) number 6. PRR Nos. 2, 4 and 9 will be addressed by future correspondence.
The enclosed safety evaluation specifically addresses your request for relief associated with auxiliary feedwater pumps G-10 and G-10S. As discussed in the enclosed safety evaluation, we did not evaluate your request for relief associated with the safety injection pumps and the refueling water pumps.
Based on our review, we have concluded that certain ASME Section XI Code requirements are impractical to perform for auxiliary feedwater pumps G-10 and G-10S. Therefore, we are granting relief from these requirements. However, the frequency of alternate testing shall be as prescribed in our safety evaluation. Please revise your IST program accordingly and notify us within 30 days after you have made the necessary changes.
We currently consider our actions to be complete regarding PRR No. 6. If you should determine that additional relief is required for the safety injection pumps and the refueling water pumps as a result of your continuing evaluation, please contact us.
The reporting and/or recordkeeping requirements contained in this letter affect fewer than ten respondents; therefore, OMB clearance is not required under Pub. L.96-511.
Sincerely, original signed by James E. Tatum James E. Tatum, Project Manager Project Directorate V Division of Reactor Projects -
- III, IV, V and Special Projects Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation cc:
See next page P/PD5 S /PD5 MEB (A
- PD5
~ea tum:dr ESulli 5//d/9
/90 5/16/90 5/
[SO1 RAI 74792 g 900518 P
.G %UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 May 18, 1990 Docket No. 50-206 Mr. Harold B. Ray Vice President Southern California Edison Company Irvine Operations Center 23 Parker Irvine, California 92718
Dear Mr. Ray:
SUBJECT:
INSERVICE TESTING PUMP RELIEF REQUEST NO. 6, SAN ONOFRE NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION, UNIT NO. 1 (TAC NO. 74792)
In your response to Generic Letter 89-04 dated November 30, 1989, you requested relief from ASME Section XI inservice testing (IST) requirements for certain components. The purpose of this letter is to provide our evaluation of pump relief request (PRR) number 6. PRR Nos. 2, 4 and 9 will be addressed by future correspondence.
The enclosed safety evaluation specifically addresses your request for relief associated with auxiliary feedwater pumps G-10 and G-1OS. As discussed in the enclosed safety evaluation, we did not evaluate your request for relief associated with the safety injection pumps and the refueling water pumps.
Based on our review, we have concluded that certain ASME Section XI Code requirements are impractical to perform for auxiliary feedwater pumps G-10 and G-10S. Therefore, we are granting relief from these requirements. However, the frequency of alternate testing shall be as prescribed in our safety evaluation. Please revise your IST program accordingly and notify us within 30 days after you have made the necessary changes.
We currently consider our actions to be complete regarding PRR No. 6. If you should determine that additional relief is required for the safety injection pumps and the refueling water pumps as a result of your continuing evaluation, please contact us.
The reporting and/or recordkeeping requirements contained in this letter affect fewer than ten respondents; therefore, OMB clearance is not required under Pub. L.96-511.
Sincerely, J es E. Tatum, Project Manager roject Directorate V Division of Reactor Projects -
- III, IV, V and Special Projects Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Enclosure:
Safety Evaluation cc w/enclosure:
See next page
Mr. Harold B. Ray San Onofre Nuclear Generating Southern California Edison Company Station, Unit No. 1 cc David R. Pigott Mr. Richard J. Kosiba, Project Manager Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe Bechtel Power Corporation 600 Montgomery Street 12440 E. Imperial Highway San Francisco, California 94111 Norwalk, California 90650 Mr. Robert G. Lacy Mr. Phil Johnson Manager, Nuclear U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission San Diego Gas & Electric Company Region V P. 0. Box 1831 1450 Maria Lane, Suite 210 San Diego, California 92112 Walnut Creek, California 94596 Resident Inspector/San Onofre NPS U.S. NRC P. 0. Box 4329 San Clemente, California 92672 Mayor City of San Clemente San Clemente, California 92672 Chairman Board of Supervisors County of San Diego 1600 Pacific Highway Room 335 San Diego, California 92101 Regional Administrator, Region V U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 1450 Maria Lane, Suite 210 Walnut Creek, California 94596 Mr. John Hickman Senior Health Physicist Environmental Radioactive Management Unit Environmental Management Branch State Department of Health Services 714 P Street, Room 616 Sacramento, California 95814 Mr. Don Womeldorf Chief, Environmental Management California Department of Health 714 P Street, Room 616 Sacramento, California 95814