ML13322B130
| ML13322B130 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | San Onofre  |
| Issue date: | 04/06/1990 |
| From: | Tatum J Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Ray H SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. |
| References | |
| GL-89-04, GL-89-4, TAC-74792, NUDOCS 9004180144 | |
| Download: ML13322B130 (3) | |
Text
April 6, 1990 Docket No. 50-206 DISTRIBUTION Docket File ACRS (10)
NRC & LPDRs JHayes, Jr.
Mr. Harold B. Ray JZwolinski ESullivan Vice President CTrammell Southern California Edison Company PShea Irvine Operations Center OGC 23 Parker PD5 Plant File Irvine, California 92718 EJordan JTatum (2)
Dear Mr. Ray:
SUBJECT:
INSERVICE TESTING PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION (GENERIC LETTER 89-04),
SAN ONOFRE NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION, UNIT NO. 1 (TAC NO. 74792)
By letter dated November 30, 1989, you submitted your response to Generic Letter 89-04, "Guidance on Developing Acceptable Inservice Testing Programs."
Based on our review of your response, we understand that you have revised your IST program to conform with the 11 positions stated in Attachment A of the Generic Letter (GL). Additionally, in your response you stated that "the implementing procedures required to perform component testing will be revised by March 1, 1990, or by the next due date for the test, whichever is later."
We interpret this statement to mean that should inservice testing be required for a component prior to the next scheduled due date for some reason, the implementing IST procedure will be revised at that time to accommodate the situation. With this clarification, we find your response to the GL to be acceptable.
In implementing the requirements of the GL, you identified four pump relief requests (PRRs) that require NRC review and approval.
We are currently reviewing these PRRs and our conclusions will be the subject of future correspondence.
As stated in Paragraph F of the GL, your implementation of the GL requirements may be the subject of future NRC inspections. Enforcement action may result in cases where the program and procedures are not in conformance with 10 CFR 50.55a(g), as allowed by the GL or otherwise accepted by us. Additionally, aspects of your IST program not addressed by Attachment 1 of the GL may also be inspected.
If you should have any questions regarding this matter, please contact us.
Sincerely, original signed by James E. Tatum James E. Tatum, Project Manager Project Directorate V
- 004 1801 04Division of Reactor Projects -
- III, FDR PC
- 0IV, V and Special Projects Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation cc:
See next page
- See previous concu nce D 5 DRSP/PD5*
/PD5
/
P/D:PD5 PShea um:dr s,Jr.
mmell 4/2/90 94/3/90 4
/90 4/ /90
[SO1 RAI 74792]
CV PR REG&, I UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 April 6, 1990 Docket No. 50-206 Mr. Harold B. Ray Vice President Southern California Edison Company Irvine Operations Center 23 Parker Irvine, California 92718
Dear Mr. Ray:
SUBJECT:
INSERVICE TESTING PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION (GENERIC LETTER 89-04),
SAN ONOFRE NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION, UNIT NO. 1 (TAC NO. 74792)
By letter dated November 30, 1989, you submitted your response to Generic Letter 89-04, "Guidance on Developing Acceptable Inservice Testing Programs."
Based on our review of your response, we understand that you have revised your IST program to conform with the 11 positions stated in Attachment A of the Generic Letter (GL). Additionally, in your response you stated that "the implementing procedures required to perform component testing will be revised by March 1, 1990, or by the next due date for the test, whichever is later."
We interpret this statement to mean that should inservice testing be required for a component prior to the next scheduled due date for some reason, the implementing IST procedure will be revised at that time to accommodate the situation. With this clarification, we find your response to the GL to be acceptable.
In implementing the requirements of the GL, you identified four pump relief requests (PRRs) that require NRC review and approval. We are currently reviewing these PRRs and our conclusions will be the subject of future correspondence.
As stated in Paragraph F of the GL, your implementation of the GL requirements may be the subject of future NRC inspections. Enforcement action may result in cases where the program and procedures are not in conformance with 10 CFR 50.55a(g), as allowed by the GL or otherwise accepted by us. Additionally, aspects of your IST program not addressed by Attachment 1 of the GL may also be inspected.
If you should have any questions regarding this matter, please contact us.
Sincerely, ames E. Tatum, Project Manager Project Directorate V Division of Reactor Projects - III, IV, V and Special Projects Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation cc:
See next page
Mr. Harold B. Ray San Onofre Nuclear Generating Southern California Edison Company Station, Unit No. 1 cc David R. Pigott Mr. Richard J. Kosiba, Project Manager Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe Bechtel Power Corporation 600 Montgomery Street 12440 E. Imperial Highway San Francisco, California 94111 Norwalk, California 90650 Mr. Robert G. Lacy Mr. Phil Johnson Manager, Nuclear U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission San Diego Gas & Electric Company Region V P. 0. Box 1831 1450 Maria Lane, Suite 210 San Diego, California 92112 Walnut Creek, California 94596 Resident Inspector/San Onofre NPS U.S. NRC P. 0. Box 4329 San Clemente, California 92672 Mayor City of San Clemente San Clemente, California 92672 Chairman Board of Supervisors County of San Diego 1600 Pacific Highway Room 335 San Diego, California 92101 Regional Administrator, Region V U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 1450 Maria Lane, Suite 210 Walnut CreEk, California 94596 Mr. John Hickman Senior Health Physicist Environmental Radioactive Management Unit Environmental Management Branch State Department of Health Services 714 P Street, Room 616 Sacramento, California 95814 Mr. Don Womeldorf Chief, Environmental Management California Department of Health 714 P Street, Room 616 Sacramento, California 95814