ML13316A847
| ML13316A847 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | San Onofre  |
| Issue date: | 08/05/1985 |
| From: | Zwolinski J Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Baskin K Southern California Edison Co |
| Shared Package | |
| ML13316A848 | List: |
| References | |
| TAC-56339 NUDOCS 8508090324 | |
| Download: ML13316A847 (8) | |
Text
- f REG, UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 August 5, 1985 Docket No. 50-206 Mr. Kenneth P. Baskin Vice President, Nuclear Engineering Safety and Licensing Department Southern California Edison Company 2244 Walnut Grove Avenue Post Office Box 800 Rosemead, California 91770
Dear Mr. Baskin:
SUBJECT:
REVISED RADIOLOGICAL EFFLUENT TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS AND DELETION OF APPENDIX B TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS Re:
San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, Unit No. 1 The Commission has issued the enclosed Amendment No. 90 to Provisional Operating License No. DPR-13 for San Onofre Unit No. 1. This amendment is in response to your application dated December 13, 1984, as supplemented January 16, 1985, and revised April 10, 1985.
The amendment (1) modifies portions of the Radiological Effluent Technical Specifications (TS) that were issued by Amendment 79 to the license, (2) updates former Section 5.8 of the environmental TS and redesignates this section as Section 6.19 of the Appendix A TS, and (3) deletes the remaining portion of the Appendix B Environmental TS.
A Notice of Consideration of Issuance of Amendment to License and Proposed No Significant Hazards Consideration Determination and Opportunity for Hearino related to the requested action was published in the Federal Register on May 21, 1985 (50 FR 20990).
No public comments or requests for hearing were received.
A copy of our related Safety Evaluation is also enclosed. This action will appear in the Commission's biweekly notice publication in the Federal Register.
For administrative convenience we are enclosing a revised page 3 of DPR-13 showing the change made by this amendment.
Sin7 z~
John A. Zwolinski, Chief Opera ing Reactors Branch #5 Enclosres:
Divis n of Licensing Endlosures:
- 1. Amendment No. 90 to License No. DPR-13
- 2.
Safety Evaluation cc w/enclosures:
AD032K 05000206 See next page PDR PDR
Mr. Kenneth P. Baskin San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Southern California Edison Company Unit No. 1 cc Charles R. Kocher, Assistant Joseph 0. Ward, Chief General Counsel Radiological Health Branch James Reoletto, Esquire State Department of Health Southern California Edison Company Services Post Office Box 800 714 P Street, Office Bldg. 8 Rosemead, California 91770 Sacramento, California 95814 David R. Pigott Mr. Hans Kaspar, Executive Director Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe Marine Review Committee, Inc.
600 Montgomery Street 531 Encinitas Boulevard, Suite 105 San Francisco, California 94111 Encinitas, California 92024 Dr. Lou Bernath San Diego Gas & Electric Company P. 0. Box 1831 San Diego, California 92112 Resident Inspector/San Onofre NPS c/o U.S. NRC P. 0. Box 4329 San Clemente, California 92672 Mayor City of San Clemente San Clemente, California 9?672 Chairman Board of Supervisors County of San Diego San Diego, California 92101 Director Energy Facilities Siting Division Energy Resources Conservation &
Development Commission 1516 - 9th Street Sacramento, California 95814 Regional Administrator, Region V U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 1450 Maria Lane Walnut Creek, California 94596
D6pcket,No. 50-206 0
Mr. Kenneth P. Baskin Vice President, Nuclear Engineering Safety and Licensing Department Southern California Edison Company 2244 Walnut Grove Avenue Post Office Box 800 Rosemead, California 91770
Dear Mr. Baskin:
SUBJECT:
REVISED RADIOLOGICAL EFFLUENT TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS AND DELETION OF APPENDIX B TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS Re:
San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, Unit No. 1 The Commission has issued the enclosed Amendment No.
to Provisional Operating License No. DPR-13 for San Onofre Unit No. 1. This amendment is in response to your application dated December 13, 1984, as supplemented January 16, 1985, and revised April 10, 1985.
The amendment (1) modifies portions of the Radiological Effluent Technical Specifications (TS) that were issued by Amendment 79 to the license, (2) updates former Section 5.8 of the environmental TS and redesignates this section as Section 6.19 of the Appendix A TS, and (3) deletes the remaining portion of the Appendix B Environmental TS.
A Notice of Consideration of Issuance of Amendment to License and Proposed No Significant Hazards Consideration Determination and Opportunity for Hearing related to the requested action was published in the Federal Register on May 21, 1985 (50 FR 20990).
No public comments or requests for hearing were received.
A copy of our related Safety Evaluation is also enclosed. This action will appear in the Commission's biweekly notice publication in the Federal Register.
For administrative convenience we are enclosing a revised page 3 of DPR-13 showing the change made by this amendment.
John A. Zwolinski, Chief Operating Reactors Branch #5 Division of Licensing
Enclosures:
- 1. Amendment No.
to License No. DPR-13
- 2. Safety Evaluation cc w/enclosures:
See next page
- SEE PREVIOUS CONCURRENCE DISTRIBUTION Docket File CJamerson ACRS (10)
CMiles, OPA NRC PDR WPaulson RDiggs (w/TACS)
HThompson Local PDR OELD TBarnhart (4)
WMeinke ORB #5 Reading ELJordan LJHarmon NSIC BGrimes MVirgilio JZwolinski JPartlow WJones
- DL: ORB #5
- DL: ORB #5
- OELD DL: 0 B 5 DLQZ k'
CJamerson WPaulson:tm LChandler JZwolinski
('D)rDp field 7/18/85 6/30/85 7/23/85 1 /j\\/85 Z //85
Docket,No. 50-206 0
Mr. Kenneth P. Baskin Vice President, Nuclear Engineering Safety and Licensing Department Southern California Edison Company 2244 Walnut Grove Avenue Post Office Box 800 Rosemead, California 91770
Dear Mr. Baskin:
SUBJECT:
REVISED RADIOLOGICAL EFFLUENT TECHNICAL SPECIFICA ONS AND DELETION OF APPENDIX B TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS Re:
San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, Unit
. 1 The Commission has issued the enclosed Amendment No to Provisional Operating License No. DPR-13 for San Onofre Unit N. 1. This amendment is in response to your application dated December 13, 1984, as supplemented January 16, 1985, and revised April 10, 1985.
The amendment (1) modifies portions of the R iological Effluent Technical Specifications (TS) that were issued by Ame dment 79 to the license, (2) updates former Section 5.8 of the env* onmental TS and redesignates this section as Section 6.19 of the Appe dix A TS, and (3) deletes the remaining portion of the Appendix Environmental TS.
A Notice of Consideration of Issuan of Amendment to License and Proposed No Significant Hazards Considerati n Determination and Opportunity for Hearing related to the requested ction was published in the Federal Register on May 21, 1985 (50 FR 20990).
No public comments or requests for hearing were received.
A copy of our related Safe Evaluation is also enclosed. This action will appear in the Commission' biweekly notice publication in the Federal Register.
Sincerely, John A. Zwolinski, Chief Operating Reactors Branch #5
Enclosures:
Division of Licensing
- 1. Amendmen No.
to Licen e No. DPR-13
- 2. Safet Evaluation cc w/enc osures:
See ne page DIST IBUTION Do et File CJamerson ACRS (10)
CMiles, OPA N PDR WPaulson RDiggs (w/TACS)
HThompson ocal PDR OELD TBarnhart (4)
WMeinke ORB #5 Reading ELJordan LJHarmon RDudley NSIC BGrimes MVirgilio JZwolinski JPartlow WJ n DL: ORB #5 DL\\A B #5 LD L: ORB #5 DL: AD/SA CJamerson:
WPaulson 0tot gJZwolinski DCrutchfield L
L/)/8
/O 85 D
/85
V, I
P'ft REGL,< 110 UNITED STATES FI t NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 Docket No. 50-206 Mr. Kenneth P. Baskin Vice President, Nuclear Engineering Safety and Licensing Department Southern California Edison Company 2244 Walnut Grove Avenue Post Office Box 800 Rosemead, California 91770
Dear Mr. Baskin:
SUBJECT:
REVISED RADIOLOGICAL EFFLUENT TECHNICAL SPECIF)CATIONS AND DELETION OF APPENDIX B TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIS Re:
San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, Anit No. 1 The Commission has issued the enclosed Amen ent No.
to Provisional Operating License No. DPR-13 for San Ono f Unit No. 1. This amendment is in response to your application dat December 13, 1984, as supplemented January 16, 1985, and revised April 10, 1985.
The amendment (1) modifies.port ns of the Radiological Effluent Technical Specifications (TS) that wer ssued by Amendment 79 to the license, (2) updates former Section F-f8 of the environmental TS and redesignates this section as Section.19 of the Appendix A TS, and (3) deletes the remaining portion the Appendix B Environmental TS.
A Notice of Consi ration of Issuance of Amendment to License and Proposed No Significant zards Consideration Determination and Opportunity for Hearing relat to the requested action was published in the Federal Register on ay 21, 1985 (50 FR.20990). No public comments or requests for heari g were received.
A cop of our related Safety Evaluation.is also enclosed. This action will app ar in the Commissiob's biweekly notice publication in the Federal ister.
Sincerely, John A. Zwolinski, Chief Operating Reactors Branch #5 E
s Division of Licensing
Enclosures:
b
- 1. Amendment No.
to d-"
License No. DPR-13
- 2. Safety Evaluation cc w/enclosures:
See next page
-2 from gross activity monitor R-1214 to noble gas monitor R-1219, (
delete the channel test footnote (1) from monitor R-1214 on Table 4.1..1 because this monitor does not perform an isolation function, (3) revi the surveillance frequency for R-1214 to be consistent with the urveillance frequency required for other stack monitoring instruments, 4) add monitor R-1254 to Section 1.d of Tables 3.5.9.1 and 4.1.3.1 becau e this monitor has a particulate sampler filter, (5) modify the interv for flow estimation (if the stack fan flow indicator or the sampler flow r te measuring device are inoperable) from once per 4 hours4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br /> to at least on e per 8 hours9.259259e-5 days <br />0.00222 hours <br />1.322751e-5 weeks <br />3.044e-6 months <br /> in Action 24 of Table 3.5.9.1 on the basis that syste desian characteristics can be used to estimate flow and that these chara eristics are not.subject to rapid change, (6) correct the provision for m st of the RETS Action Statements that now indicate that Specificatio 3.0 is not applicable to indicate that Specifications 3.0.3 and 3.0.4 re not applicable, (7) correct the provisions in the Action Statements of S ecifications 3.18.3 and 3.19 regarding the applicability of the special eporting requirement of Specification 6.9.2.b(2), (8) include the combination of the noble gas activity monitor, R-1219, the particulat sampling filter, R-1220, and the iodine sampler cartridge, R-1221, for nitoring gross activity in Table 3.5.9.1, and (9) incorporate other mi or footnote corrections to add a missing footnote reference and delete anothe which is not applicable.
Amendment No. 79, in addition to dding the RETS to the Appendix A TS, also deleted the then existing R diological Environmental TS from Appendix B. With the redesigna ion of Section 5.8 of the Appendix B TS, discussed above, all that rem ns of Appendix B are definitions and administrative controls for that have been deleted. Because the definitions are no longer a plicable and the administrative controls are duplicated in the Appendi A TS, the licensee has requested that Appendix B be deleted in its entire y. References to Appendix B would also be deleted consistent with the del tion of Appendix B.
3.0 EVALUATION 3.1 Modification to th RETS The proposed ch ges to the RETS for San Onofre Unit No. 1 have been reviewed, eval ated, and found to be in compliance with the requirements of the NRC re ulations and with the intent of the staff's model RETS for pressurized ater reactors, NUREG-0472, Revision 2, February 1, 1980.
3.2 Redesign tion of Updated Section 5.8 of the Ap endix B TS and De eti of the Remaining ortion of the Appendix B TS The roposed updating of Section 5.8 of the Appendix B TS and redesignation of he revised section as Section 6.19 of Appendix A, have been reviewed.
T descriptive updating of the section on heat treatment used for i crustation control clarifies that normally only the intake conduit is reated. In addition, the description of the temperature of the water
7J~eJ670 4L 4
~
~
§
~4
~
s; F 6 7Z A
-3 has been updated to reflect the temperature of the water in the conduit rather than the temperature of the water as it is discharged from th condenser. This is a descriptive change only and has no environme al implication because the thermal discharge is regulated Piahection Ageney through the licensee's National Pollution Di harge Elimination System (NPDES) permit. During the staff's revie of this updated section, it was noted that the licensee had inadver ently omitted the description of the estimated length of time that reve sed flow is maintained in the conduit and the frequency at which th. heat treatment is employed for incrustation control. The staff disc sed this inadvertent omission with the licensee and it was mutually agree to add this description to the proposed TS. These changes are escriptive in nature and have no safety or environmental significance-therefore, they are acceptable.
Two sentences in the section on land managem t were deleted because the information was no longer accurate, due in art, to the construction of San Onofre Units 2 and 3. This change ha no safety or environmental impact.
The redesignation of Section 5.8 of t e Appendix B TS as Section 6.19 of Appendix A is an administrative cha e that has no safety or environmental significance; therefore, it is acc table. Section 6.9.3.g has been added to reference the special reportin requirements in new Section 6.19. This is an administrative change mad in conjunction with the addition of Section 6.19 to the Appendix A S. This change has no significant environmental or safety impa ; therefore, it is acceptable.
With the redesignation of ection 5.8 of the Appendix B TS, discussed above, all that remains in Appen ix B are definitions and administrative controls for TS that have been d eted. The RETS were added to Appendix A by Amendment 79 to the li ense. This amendment also deleted the RETS in Appendix B. Because e administrative controls are duplicated in Appendix A and the definitions re no longer applicable, the staff finds that the deletion of the App ndix B TS would have no environmental or safety impact.
Therefore, the st f concludes that the deletion is acceptable. Consistent with this deleti
, the modification of Paragraph 3.8 of the license to delete the refe ence to Appendix B is also acceptable because it is a strictly administrative change with no safety or environmental impact. Similarly, the deletion of te parenthetical references to Appendices A and B in TS 6.5.2.1 is acceptable b cause with the deletion of the Appendix B TS, only Appendix A TS remain.
his change is also administrative and has no safety or environmen al impact.
4.0 ENVIRONM TAL CONSIDERATION This a ndment involves changes to requirements with respect to the instal ation or use of facility components located within the restricted area s defined in 10 CFR Part 20 and changes to the surveillance requ rements as well as changes to reporting and administrative procedures.
The staff has determined that the amendment involves no significant increase in the amounts, and no significant change in the types, of any effluents that may be released offsite and that there is no significant