ML13025A042
| ML13025A042 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Oconee  |
| Issue date: | 01/22/2013 |
| From: | NRC/RGN-II |
| To: | |
| References | |
| Download: ML13025A042 (61) | |
Text
ES-201 Examination Preparation Checklist Form ES-201-1 Facility:
Oconee 2012-302 Date of Examination:
12/13/2012 acilili NRC Examinations Developed by:
Written I Operating Test Written
/
Operating Test T
t Chief r
Task Description (Reference)
Examiners Initials
-180 1.
Examination administration date confirmed (C. 1.a; C.2.a and b) 4/25/2012
-120 2.
NRC examiners and facility contact assigned (C.1.d; C.2.e) 4/25/2012
-120 3.
Facility contact briefed on security and other requirements (C.2.c) 4/25/2012
-120 4.
Corporate notification letter sent (C.2.d) 07/02/2012
[-901
[5.
Reference material due (C.1.e; C.3.c; Attachment 2)]
10/15/2012
{-75}
6.
Integrated examination outline(s) due, including Forms ES-201-2, ES-201-3, ES 301-1, ES-301-2, ES-301-5, ES-D-ls, ES-401-1/2, ES-401-3, and ES-401-4, as 10/01/2012 applicable (C.1.e and f; C.3.d)
{-70}
{7. Examination outline(s) reviewed by NRC and feedback provided to facility 10/03/20 12 licensee (C.2.h; C.3.e)}
{-45}
8.
Proposed examinations (including written, walk-through JPMs, and scenarios, as 10/15/2012 applicable), supporting documentation (including Forms ES-301-3, ES-301-4, (W)
ES-301-5, ES-301-6, and ES-401-6), and reference materials due (C.1.e, f, g and 10/30/2012 h;C.3.d)
(O)
-30 9.
Preliminary license applications (NRC Form 398s) due (C.1.l; C.2.g; ES-202) 11/16/2012
-14
-14 1 1. Examination approved by NRC supervisor for facility licensee review N/A (C.2.h;_C.3.f)_(Licensee_prepared_examination).
-14
- 12. Examinations reviewed with facility licensee (C.1.j; C.2.f and h; C.3.g)
N/A
-7
- 13. Written examinations and operating tests approved by NRC supervisor 12/03/2012 (C.2.i; C.3.h)
-7
- 14. Final applications reviewed; 1 or 2 (if>10) applications audited to confirm qualifications / eligibility; and examination approval and waiver letters sent 12/04/2012 (C.2.i;_Attachment_4;_ES-202,_C.2.e;_ES-204)
-7
- 15. Proctoring/written exam administration guidelines reviewed with facility licensee 12/12/2012 (C.3.k)
-7
- 16. Approved scenarios, job performance measures, and questions distributed to 12/03/2012 NRC examiners (C.3.i)
Target dates are generally based on facility-prepared examinations and are keyed to the examination date identified in the corporate notification letter. They are for planning purposes and may be adjusted on a case-by-case basis in coordination with the facility licensee.
[Applies only] {Does not apply} to examinations prepared by the NRC.
ES-201 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2 Facility: Oconee Date of Examination: 12-17-12 Initials Item Task Description 1
a.
Verify that the outline(s) fit(s) the appropriate model, in accordance with ES-401.
A w
R b.
Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with I
Section D.1 of ES-401 and whether all K/A categories are appropriately sampled.
T T
c.
Assess whether the outline over-emphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics.
d.
Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected K/A statements are appropriate.
2.
a.
Using Form ES-301 -5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number of normal evolutions, instrument and component failures, technical specifications, S
and major transients.
M b.
Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number U
and mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule L
without compromising exam integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be tested using A
at least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated T
from the applicants audit test(s), and that scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days.
c.
To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conform(s) with the qualitative and quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D.
3.
a.
Verify that the systems walk-through outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-2:
(1) the outline(s) contain(s) the required number of control room and in-plant tasks W
distributed among the safety functions as specified on the form I
(2) task repetition from the last two NRC examinations is within the limits specified on the form T
(3) no tasks are duplicated from the applicants audit test(s)
(4) the number of new or modified tasks meets or exceeds the minimums specified on the form c.
(5) the number of alternate path, low-power, emergency, and RCA tasks meet the criteria on the form.
b.
Verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-1:
(1) the tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form (2) at least one task is new or significantly modified (3) no more than one task is repeated from the last two NRC licensing examinations
c.
Determine if there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix of applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subsequent days.
4.
a.
Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including PRA and IPE insights) are covered in the appropriate exam sections.
b.
Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41/43 and 55.45 sampling is appropriate.
cfç c.
Ensure that K/A importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5.
d.
Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections.
L e.
Check the entire exam for balance of coverage.
f.
Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level (RO or SRO).
- a. Author Pa7J
- b. Facility Reviewer ()
-f
- c. NRC Chief Examiner (#)
G,AOt J.
/
- d. NRC Supervisor Jt(I.G/U7; kI/1%44/A,/
L;h2:3I2.
Note:
- Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column c; chief examiner concurrence required.
Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination outlines
ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3 1.
Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of 12I17120l2 as of the date of my signature.
I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner.
I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensees procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations andlor an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee.
I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.
2.
Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of 1211712012. From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.
1.
- 2..Z
- 3. EI-r4,Jgug4EL.
4.Ci U4ALspo._
- 5. Dct.
1ijdJSv-6,
- 7. ML
- 8..344 griSi.
9.
Va 4
1i c OS+TOv 11.
(Qç 12.W 1
1l 13.e LMrk I4rt-1 26 6
pLvP PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE / RESPONSIBILITY SIGNATURE (1)
,1 3
4(t4.. f4-3 oJIIrItL.
4i-f-(t WvIf-2P$
.1 LPk Ptt?11t
£A4 SV)-L
oO DATE SIGNATURE (2)
DATE NOTE 4q
/
b12d c? 42 4/4 LJ4M22 LGJJLt Ln-W Qit U4 k O)/_ ( - I IL 2IWi2/
7I24,Z. 4Lc7-
_c 1 t
-, i
( L4J
7/(/(.
4 Gi, aA4 %tC 1I57icJii 22ir rr Mnin c&UC 11/
ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201 -3 1.
Pre-Examinatiori I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of 1211712012 as of the date of my signature.
I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner.
I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensees procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee.
I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.
2.
Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of 12/1712012. From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.
PRINTED NAME 1.
(:lc Oi--:
- 2. /mj 4.-1 qg 0
J 3.
4 5.
24I4 8.9, 7
c&b
- 10. Ri 6 ii. Jc 12.
13.
- 14. 7
- 15. J-.. <. -L-d NOTES:
JOB TITLE / RESPONSIBILITY
+/ y.ld1-i
/to MAS /Exa-i 7-v-..--
oPc /s 0P5-SO off- /Zo oc
-o opS oc,
(IfS Ac cws Rc
(?% OL SIGNATURE (1)
DATE SIGNATURE (2)
DATE NOTE l,Jzc1iz.
F(&+c4 1-3-13 7 19 i.2 I 3*/3 jzt /3
IZza-i_
iO//ir
_iOrz_
1\\L
.jQ8-iz
?bJ.
Lp-(l--j 1-V1 it 1 - J4fJJ
-tI1-,,
41, n
.I-z I Ii2I l 1/4/13 Il2tl (2-i I ?
ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201 -3 1.
Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of 12/1712012 as of the date of my signature.
I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner.
I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensees procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee.
I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.
2.
Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of 1211712012. From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.
PRINTED NAME 1.
t1v1t
- 2. 2
Ø4.L_ T-i..t t)iT) LAtJ uou
- 5. fk(f 6.
7.
9.
t.
lo.t-
- 4. p.th R.
£L-L 12.Il,k. -Qu.ri.
1 3.,Jt4n 4 VA4r(
14.
tcJ 15.7/.41 CjlAriØ)
NOTES:
JOB TITLE / RESPONSIBILITY tflS 5,Zo
C)PS/tPc.UV oes!rzo c2P Jc, (DPc
<()
JS/aO of
,5 7/
OP-S 71 2
LiAS&
P Tev Fb.Jccor Oi /A0 O,s) )Z)
V I12JZ 3.
4.
DATE NOTE SIGNATURE (1)
DATE SIGNATU,E(2) jo-/9/z Jjjjtt_(L___
Iz_z-lo -2/2 io.zh-f2-
)O2lZ ff-Z/.17_
12 lQ.
fri-I?
4cØ 9
AM412 g
ii -z2--ia R-
/2 21 - / Z kQ 4
.L-IJw -. ).L3 7i
. (
hi/t, (b/ZT
/3 /3
ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201 -3 1.
Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of 1211712012 as of the date of my signature.
I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner.
I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensees procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee.
I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.
2.
Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of 1211712012. From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.
PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE / RESPONSIBILITY SIGNATUF(1)
DATE SIGNATURE (2)
DATE, NATE i.________ p 7f 2.
i 7AZ eJmAJ,e Lt_
/z./,z/,z U
- 3. 3Aic m,Y 2
/z/ia) 2)5t4LOSc5 3
4./f /1 (hii7 P///fz.-,L 1 -i,
/2-/2-5/ffcJ. Vf(
Of5 7$Ø 2tW(
/4%/ft
- 6. AM 1-A)<
/2n61/Z iz/Wiz 7.S(elN 3
&.)4 (LI I754cudr, 8.
cr-
9.
\\v
\\rtg..
1-
/
10.
Z/ 1 c,j y--..-_
- 11.,cr- //4tOtw.-
?O$
/e,24/k r cj,J EI& SI4V I.-t%-t2_ Th, cf j2j2.
13.f5 I
14.
15.
NOTES:
ES-301 Administrative Topics Outline Form ES-301-1 Facility: Oconee Date of Examination:
12/17/12 Examination Level:
1 Administrative Topic Type Describe activity to be performed (see Note)
Code*
Conduct of Operations N
ADMIN-132, Determine makeup requirements G2.1.25 (3.9/4.2) (12 mm)
for Hotwell and minimum UST level. (Both)
Conduct of Operations D
ADMIN-124, Determine if RO License G2.1.4 (3.3/3.8) (15 mm)
requirements met (RO Only)
Equipment Control N R ADMIN-238, Perform NI Surveillance and G2.2.12 (3.7/4.1) (14 mm)
Determine Any Required Actions (RO Only)
Radiological Control ADMIN-305, Determine RP Requirements for an G2.3.7 (3.5/3.6) (14 mm)
N,R Assigned Task (Both)
Emergency Plan N/A NOTE:
All items (5 total) are required for SROs. AC applicants require only 4 items unless they are retaking only the administrative topics, when all 5 are required.
- Type Codes & Criteria:
(C)ontrol room, (S)imulator, or Class(R)oom (D)irect from bank ( 3 for ROs; 4 for SROs & RO retakes)
(N)ew or (M)odified from bank ( 1)
(P)revious 2 exams ( 1; randomly selected)
ES-301 Administrative Topics Outline Form ES-301-1 Facility: Oconee Date of Examination:
12/17/12 Examination Level:
RO LI SRO.LI Operating Test Number:
1 Administrative Topic Type Describe activity to be performed (see Note)
Code*
Conduct of Operations N R ADMIN-132, Determine makeup requirements G2.1.25 (3.9/4.2) (12 mm)
for Hotwell and minimum UST level. (Both)
Conduct of Operations D R ADMIN-125, Determine if SRO License G2.1.4 (3.3/3.8) (15 mm)
requirements met (SRO only)
Equipment Control N R ADMIN-239, Perform NI Surveillance and G2.2.12 (3.7/4.1) (18 mm)
Determine Any Required Actions (SRO Only)
Radiological Control ADMIN-305, Determine RP Requirements for an G2.3.7 (3.5/3.6) (14 mm)
N,R Assigned Task (Both)
Emergency Plan ADMI N-407, Determine Emergency G2.4.38 (2.4/4.4) (20 mm)
M,R Classification and Complete Emergency Notification Form (SRO Only)
NOTE:
All items (5 total) are required for SROs. nO applicants require only 4 items unless they are retaking only the administrative topics, when all 5 are required.
- Type Codes & Criteria:
(C)ontrol room, (S)imulator, or Class(R)oom (D)irect from bank ( 3 for ROs; 4 for SROs & RO retakes)
(N)ew or (M)odified from bank ( 1)
(P)revious 2 exams ( 1; randomly selected)
ES-301 Control Room/In-Plant Systems Outline Form ES-301-2 Facility:
Oconee Date of Examination: 12/17/12 Exam Level: RO SRO-I SRO-U Operating Test No.:
1 Control Room Systems@ (8 for RO); (7 for SRO-l); (2 or 3 for SRO-U, including 1 ESF)
System / JPM Title Type Code*
Safety Fu notion a.
CRO-112, ATWSWithFailureofCHPIP M A EP/1/A/1800/00l (Emergency Operating Procedure),
Rule 1 (ATWSIUNPP)
[KA:BW/E13EA1.1 (3.4/3.2)1(5mm) b.
CRO-214, RCS Leak While on DHR N A L 2
API1 IA/i 700/026 (Loss of Decay Heat Removal)
End. 5.12 (RCS Makeup)
[KA: APEO25 AA1.02 (3.8/3.9)] (16 mm) c.
CRO-310, Align Post Loca Boron Dilution Flowpath M A L 3
EP/1/A/1800/001 (Emergency Operating Procedure),
LOCA CD tab
[KA: EPEO1 1 EA2.01 (4.2/4.7)] (12 mm) d.
CRO-412, Align ECCS suction with 1LPSW-4 failed M A, EN, L 4P closed EP/1/A/i800/001 (Emergency Operating Procedure), End.
5.12 (ECCS Suction Swap)
[KA:_BW/E08_EA1_.1_(4.0/3.7)]_(20_mm) e.
CRO-401A, Following a loss of all FDW, Feed a dry SG M, L 4S with the TDEFWP EP/i/A/1800/001 (Emergency Operating Procedure),
Rule 3 (Loss of Main or Emergency FDW)
[KA: APE 054 AA2.04 (4.2/4.3)] (15 mm) f.
CRO-600, Recover from Switchyard Isolation D
6 AP/1 /A/i 700/011 (Recovery From Loss of Power), End.
5.3 (Recovery from Switchyard Isolation)
[KA: BW/A05 AA1.1 (4.3/4.2)] (20 mm) g.
CRO-701, Adjust RIA4O setpoints N
7 AP/1 IA/i 700/03i (Primary To Secondary Leakage)
End. 5.8 (Resetting 1 RIA-40 and DAC Setpoints)
[KA: APE 061 AA2.03 (3.0/3.3)] (18 mm) h.
CRO-802, Respond to a fuel handling accident in the N
L 8
Reactor Building.
AP/1 /A/i 700/009 (Spent Fuel Damage)
[KA: APE 036 AA1.01 (3.3/3.8)] (14 mm)
In-Plant Systems@ (3 for RO); (3 for SRO-l); (3 or 2 for SRO-U) i.
NLO-300, Swapping In Service Seal Return Coolers N E R 3
AP/3/A/1 700/002 (Excessive RCS Leakage) End. 5.7 (Swapping In Service Seal Return Coolers)
[KA: SYS 002 A2.01 (4.3/4.4)] (19 mm) j.
NLO-605, Startup a Vital Bus Inverter D
6 OP/2/A/l 107/004 (Operation of Vital Bus, Computer, ICS, and Auxiliary Inverters) End. 4.2 (Startup of Vital Bus I nverters)
[KA: SYS 062 A3.04 (2.7/2.9)] (12 mm) k.
NLO-801, HPSW And LPSW AB Flood Isolation M A E 8
AP/3/A/1 700/030 (Auxiliary Building Flooding) End. 5.1 (H PSW AB Flood Isolation) and 5.2 (LPSW AB Flood Isolation)
[KA: BWAO7 AA2.2 (3.3/3.7)] (16 mm)
All RO and SRO-l control room (and in-plant) systems must be different and serve different safety functions; all 5 SRO-U systems must serve different safety functions; in-plant systems and functions may overlap those tested in the control room.
- Type Codes Criteria for RD I SRO-l / SRO-U (A)lternate path 4-6 / 4-6 / 2-3 (C)ontrol room (D)irectfrom bank (E)mergency or abnormal in-plant 1 /
1 I 1
(EN)gineered safety feature
- /
/ 1 (control room system)
(L)ow-Power / Shutdown 1 1 1 I 1
(N)ew or (M)odified from bank including 1 (A) 2 I 2 I 1
(P)revious 2 exams 3 I 3 I 2 (randomly selected)
(R)CA (S)imulator
ES-301 Control Room/In-Plant Systems Outline Form ES-301-2 Facility:
Oconee Date of Examination: 12/17/12 Exam Level: RO SRO-I SRO-U Operating Test No.:
1 Control Room Systems@ (8 for RO); (7 for SRO-l); (2 or 3 for SRO-U, including 1 ESF)
System / JPM Title Type Code*
Safety Function a.
CRO-112, ATWS With Failure of C HPIP M A 1
EP/1/A/1800/001 (Emergency Operating Procedure),
Rule 1 (ATWS/UNPP)
[KA: BW/E13 EA1.1 (3.4/3.2)] (5 mm) b.
CRO-214, RCS Leak While on DHR N A L 2
AP/1 IA/i 700/026 (Loss of Decay Heat Removal)
End. 5.12 (RCS Makeup)
[KA: APEO25 AA1.02 (3.8/3.9)] (16 mm) c.
CRO-310, Align Post Loca Boron Dilution Flowpath M A L 3
EP/1/A/1 800/001 (Emergency Operating Procedure),
LOCA CD tab
[KA: BW/E08 EA1.3 (3.3/3.8)] (12 mm) d.
CRO-412, Align ECCS suction with 1LPSW-4 failed M, A, EN, L 4P closed EP/1/A/1800/001 (Emergency Operating Procedure), End.
5.12 (ECCS Suction Swap)
[KA: BW/E08 EA1.1 (4.0/3.7)] (20 mm) e.
CRO-401A, Following a loss of all FDW, Feed a dry SG M, L 4S with the TDEFWP EP/1/A/1 800/001 (Emergency Operating Procedure),
Rule 3 (Loss of Main or Emergency FDW)
[KA: APE 054 AA2.04 (4.2/4.3)] (15 mm) f.
N/A g.
CRO-701, Adjust RIA 40 setpoints N
7 AP/1/A/1 700/031 (Primary To Secondary Leakage)
End. 5.8 (Resetting 1 RIA-40 and OAC Setpomnts)
[KA: APE 061 AA2.03 (3.0/3.3)] (18 mm) h.
CRO-802, Respond to a fuel handling accident in the N
L 8
Reactor Building.
AP/1/A/1700/009 (Spent Fuel Damage)
[KA: APE 036 AA1.01 (3.3/3.8)] (14 mm)
In-Plant Systems@ (3 for RO); (3 for SRO-l); (3 or 2 for SRO-U) i.
NLO-300, Swapping In Service Seal Return Coolers N E R 3
AP/3/A/1 700/002 (Excessive RCS Leakage) End. 5.7 (Swapping In Service Seal Return Coolers)
[KA: SYS 002 A2.01 (4.3/4.4)] (19 mm) j.
NLO-605, Startup a Vital Bus Inverter D
6 0 P/2/A/i 107/004 (Operation of Vital Bus, Computer, lOS, and Auxiliary lnverters) End. 4.2 (Startup of Vital Bus I nverters)
[KA: SYS 062 A3.04 (2.7/2.9)] (12 mm) k.
NLO-801, HPSW And LPSW AB Flood Isolation M A E 8
AP/3/A/1700/030 (Auxiliary Building Flooding) End. 5.1 (HPSW AB Flood Isolation) and 5.2 (LPSW AB Flood Isolation)
[KA: BWAO7 AA2.2 (3.3/3.7)] (16 mm)
All RD and SRO-l control room (and in-plant) systems must be different and serve different safety functions; all 5 SAC-U systems must serve different safety functions; in-plant systems and functions may overlap those tested in the control room.
- Type Codes Criteria for RD I SAC-I / SAC-u (A)lternate path 4-6 / 4-6 / 2-3 (C)ontrol room (D)irectfrombank (E)mergency or abnormal in-plant 1 /
1 /
I (EN)gineered safety feature
- /
/ 1 (control room system)
(L)ow-Power / Shutdown 1 I 1 I 1
(N)ew or (M)odified from bank including 1 (A) 2 I 2 I 1
(P)revious 2 exams 3 I 3 I 2 (randomly selected)
(R)CA (S)imulator
ES-301 Control Room/In-Plant Systems Outline Form ES-301-2 Facility:
Oconee Date of Examination: 12/17/12 Exam Level: RO SRO-l SRO-U Operating Test No.:
1 Control Room Systems@ (8 for RO); (7 for SRO-l); (2 or 3 for SRO-U, including 1 ESF)
System / JPM Title Type Code*
Safety Function a.
CRO-112, ATWS With Failure of C HPIP M A EP/1/A/1800/001 (Emergency Operating Procedure),
Rule 1 (ATWS/UNPP)
[KA: BW/E13 EA1.1 (3.4/3.2)] (5 mm) b.
CRO-214, RCS Leak While on DHR N A L 2
AP/1/A/1700/026 (Loss of Decay Heat Removal)
End. 5.12 (RCS Makeup)
[KA:_APEO25_AA1.02_(3.8/3.9)]_(16_mm) c.
N/A d.
CRO-412, Align ECCS suction with 1LPSW-4 failed M A, EN, L 4P closed EP/1/A/1800/001 (Emergency Operating Procedure), End.
5.12 (ECCS Suction Swap)
[KA: BW/E08 EA1.1 (4.0/3.7)] (20 mm) e.
N/A f.
N/A g.
N/A h.
N/A
In-Plant Systems@ (3 for RO); (3 for SRO-I); (3 or 2 for SRO-U) i.
NLO-300, Swapping In Service Seal Return Coolers N E R 3
AP/3/A/1 700/002 (Excessive RCS Leakage) End. 5.7 (Swapping In Service Seal Return Coolers)
[KA: SYS 002 A2.01 (4.3/4.4)] (19 mm) j.
NLO-605, Startup a Vital Bus Inverter D
6 OP/2/A/l 107/004 (Operation of Vital Bus, Computer, ICS, and Auxiliary Inverters) End. 4.2 (Startup of Vital Bus I nverters)
[KA: SYS 062 A3.04 (2.7/2.9)] (12 mm) k.
N/A All RO and SRO-l control room (and in-plant) systems must be different and serve different safety functions; all 5 SRO-U systems must serve different safety functions; in-plant systems and functions may overlap those tested in the control room.
- Type codes criteria for RD / SRO-l / SRD-U (A)lternate path 4-6 / 4-6 / 2-3 (c)ontrol room (D)irectfrom bank (E)mergency or abnormal in-plant 1 I 1 /
1 (EN)gineered safety feature
- /
/ 1 (control room system)
(L)ow-Power / Shutdown 1 /
1 I 1
(N)ew or (M)odified from bank including 1 (A) 2 /
2 I? 1 (P)revious 2 exams 3 I 3 I 2 (randomly selected)
(R)CA (S)imulator
ES-301 Operating Test Quality Checklist Form ES-301-3 Facility:
Oconee Date_of_Examination:
12/17/12 Operating_Test Number:
1 Initials
- 1. General Criteria ac a.
The operating test conforms with the previously approved outline; changes are consistent with J
sampling requirements (e.g., 10 CFR 55.45, operational importance, safety function distribution).
b.
There is no day-to-day repetition between this and other operating tests to be administered during this examination.
c.
The operating test shall not duplicate items from the applicants audit test(s). (see Section D.1.a.)
d.
Overlap with the written examination and between different parts of the operating test is within acceptable limits.
e.
It appears that the operating test will differentiate between competent and less-than-competent 1) applicants at the designated license level.
- 2. Walk-Through Criteria a.
Each JPM includes the following, as applicable:
initial conditions initiating cues references and tools, including associated procedures reasonable and validated time limits (average time allowed for completion) and specific designation if deemed to be time-critical by the facility licensee operationally important specific performance criteria that include:
detailed expected actions with exact criteria and nomenclature
system response and other examiner cues
statements describing important observations to be made by the applicant
criteria for successful completion of the task
identification of critical steps and their associated performance standards
restrictions on the sequence of steps, if applicable b.
Ensure that any changes from the previously approved systems and administrative walk-through outlines (Forms ES-301 -1 and 2) have not caused the test to deviate from any of the acceptance criteria (e.g., item distribution, bank use, repetition from the last 2 NRC examinations) specified on those forms and Form ES-201 -2.
04k
=
- 3. Simulator Criteria The associated simulator operating tests (scenario sets) have been reviewed in accordance with Form ES-301 -4 and a copy is attached.
Printed Name/Signat r Date\\
a.
Author b.
Facility Reviewer(*)
,1 4
AIt c.
NRC Chief Examiner (#)
/
d.
NRC Supervisor as
/(-
NOTE:
The facility signature is not applicable for NRC-developed tests.
Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column c; chief examiner concurrence required.
ES-301 Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist Form ES-301-4 Facilty: Oconee Date of Exam:12-17-12 Scenario Numbers:
11 2 /3 Operating Test No.: 1 QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES lnftials
a b*
1.
The initial conditions are realistic, in that some equipment and/or instrumentation may be out ol service, but It does not cue the operators into expected events.
2.
The scenarios consist mostly of related events.
44) 3.
Each event description consists of the point in the scenario when it is to be initiated the maltunction(sl that are entered to initiate the event the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew the expected operator actions (by shift position) the event termination point (it applicable) 4.
No more than one non-mechanistic failure (e.g., pipe break) is incorporated into the scenario without a credible preceding incident such as a seismic event.
5.
The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics.
6.
Sequencing and timing ot events is reasonable, and allows the examination team to obtain complete evaluation results commensurate with the scenario objectives.
7.
If time compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates.
Operators have sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue time constraints.
\\ J Cues are given.
8.
The simulator modeling is not altered.
9.
The scenarios have been validated. Pursuant to 10 CFR 55.46(d), any open simulator performance deficiencies or deviations from the referenced plant have been evaluated to ensure that functional fidelity is maintained while running the planned scenarios.
10.
Every operator will be evaluated using at least one new or significantly modified scenario.
All other scenarios have been altered in accordance with Section D.5 of ES-301.
cfl 11.
All individual operator competencies can be evaluated, as verified using Form ES-301-6 (submit the form along with the simulator scenarios).
L 12.
Each applicant will be significantly involved in the minimum number of transients and events specified on Form ES-301 -5 (submit the form with the simulator scenarios).
13.
The level of difficulty is appropriate to support licensing decisions for each crew position.
Target Quantitative AttrIbutes (Per Scenario; See Section D.5.d)
Actual Attributes 1.
Total malfunctions (58) 71 8 / 7 2.
Malfunctions after EOP entry (12) 1 /2
/ I 3.
Abnormal events (24) 4 /
4 /4 4.
Major transients (12) 1 /
2
/ 2 5.
EOPs entered/requiring substantive actions (12) 2 /
2
/ 2 0
6.
EOP contingencies requiring substantive actions (02) 2 /
1 I 1 7.
Critical tasks (23) 3 / 2 / 2
ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 Facility: Oconee Date of Exam: 12-17-12 Operating Test No.:
1 A
E Scenarios P
V 1
2 3
4 T
M P
E o
I L
N CREW CREW CREW CREW T
N I
T POSITION POSITION POSITION POSITION C
A M
S A
B S
A B
S A
B S
A B
L u
A T
A T
0 R
T 0
R T
0 R
T 0
M(*)
N Y
0 C
P 0
C P
0 C
P 0
C P
T P
RI E
RO AX 4
110 X
NOR 111 SRO-l I/C 3,6 4,5, 2,5,6 4
4 2
SAO-U 6
MAJ 7
7,8 7,8 2
2 1
TS 0
22 RO AX 110 X
NOR 5
1 1
111 SAO-l I/C 1,2 2,3 3,4 4
4 2
SAO-U MAJ 7
7,8 7,8 2
2 1
D TS 022 AO AX 4
T E SAO-l NOR 5
1 1
1 1
1 I/C 1,2,3 2,3,4 2,3, 4
4 2
SRO-U 6
5,6 4, 5, x
MAJ 7
7,8 7,8 2
2 1
TS 1,2, 3,5 2,4 0
2 2
4 Instructions:
1.
Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for AO applicants. ROs must serve in both the at-the-controls (ATC) and balance-of-plant (BOP) positions; Instant SROs must serve in both the SRO and the ATC positions, including at least two instrument or component (I/C) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position.
If an Instant SRO additionally serves in the BOP position, one I/C malfunction can be credited toward the two I/C malfunctions required for the ATC position.
2.
Reactivity manipulations maybe conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix 0. (*) Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a 1 -for-i basis.
3.
Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicants competence count toward the minimum requirements specified for the applicants license level in the right-hand columns.
ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES3O1-6 Facility: Oconee Date of Examination:
12/17/12 Operating Test No.:
1 APPLICANTS P0 X
RO X
P0 El RO El SRO-l El SRO-l El SRO-I El SRO-I El SRO-U El SRO-U El SRO-U X
SRO-U El Competencies NiO_ CEO_
SCENARKD -
1234123412341234 Interpret/Diagnose 1,2, 1,2, 1,2, 1,2, 1,4, 1,2, 1,2, 1,2, 1,2, 3,4, 3,5, 3,4, 3,4, 5,6, 5,6, 3,4, 3,4, 3,4, Events and Conditions 6,7 7,8 7
7,8 7,8 5,6, 5,6, 5,6, 7
7,8 7,8 Comply With and 1,2, 1,2, 1,2, 1,2 1,4, 1,2, 1,2, 1,2, 1,2, 3,4, 3,5, 3,4, 3,4, 5,6, 5,6, 3,4, 3,4, 3,4, Use Procedures (1) 6,7 7,8 5,7 7,8 7,8 5,6, 5,6, 5,6, 7
7,8 7,8 Operate Control 2,3 1,2, 1,2, 1,2 1,4, 1,2, 46 3 7, 3,4, 3,4 5,6, 5,6, Boards (2) 7 8
5,7, 7,8 7,8 Communicate 1,2, 1,2, 1,2, 1.2, 1,2, 1,2, 1,2, 1,2, 1,2, 3,4, 3,5, 3,4, 3,4, 4,5, 3,4, 3,4, 3,4, 3,4, and Interact 6,7 7,8 5,6, 5,6, 6,7, 5,6, 5,6, 5,6, 5,6, 7,8 7
8 7,8 7
7,8 7,8 Demonstrate 1,2, 1,2, 1,2, 3,4, 3,4, 3,4, Supervisory Ability (3) 5,7 5,6, 5,6, 7,8 7,8 Comply With and 1,2, 35 2,4 UseTech. Specs. (3)
Notes:
(1)
Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO.
(2)
Optional for an SRO-U.
(3)
Only applicable to SROs.
Instructions:
Check the applicants license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant.
ES-401 PWR Examination Outline Form ES-401-2 Facility:
OCONEE Date of Exam:
DECEMBER 2012
RO K/A CaioPoints
SRO-Only_Points Tier Group KK KKKKAAAAG A2 G*
Total 1
2 3
4 5
6 1
2 3
4 Total 1.
1 3
3.
3 3,
3-3 1 8 3
3 -
6 Emergency &
Abnormal 2
2 1
2 N/A 2
I, N/A 1
9 2
2 4
Plant v
Evolutions TierTotals 5
4 5
5 4
4 27_
5
5 10 1
3.
3_
2.-
3.-
3 2.
2.-
2.
3.-
3, 2_
28_
2 3
5_
2.
Plant 2
I-1.11.0L.ll.!1,l 10-0 1-2 3
Systems Tier Totals 4
4 3
4 3 3
3 3
4 4
3 38-3 5
8
- 3. Generic Knowledge and Abilities 1
2 3
4 10 1
2 3
4 7
Categories 2-2-
3-3 1
2 2
2 Note:
1.
Ensure that at least two topics from every applicable K/A category are sampled within each tier of the RO and SRO-only outlines (i.e., except for one category in Tier 3 of the SRO-only outline, the Tier Totals in each K/A category shall not be less than two).
2.
The point total for each group and tier in the proposed outline must match that specified in the table.
The final point total for each group and tier may deviate by +/-1 from that specified in the table based on NRC revisions.
The final RO exam must total 75 points and the SRO-only exam must total 25 points.
3.
Systems/evolutions within each group are identified on the associated outline; systems or evolutions that do not apply at the facility should be deleted and justified; operationally important, site-specific systems/evolutions that are not included on the outline should be added. Refer to Section D.1.b of ES-401 for guidance regarding the elimination of inappropriate K/A statements.
4.
Select topics from as many systems and evolutions as possible; sample every system or evolution in the group before selecting a second topic for any system or evolution.
5.
Absent a plant-specific priority, only those K/As having an importance rating (IR) of 2.5 or higher shall be selected.
Use the RO and SRO ratings for the RO and SRO-only portions, respectively.
6.
Select SRO topics for Tiers 1 and 2 from the shaded systems and K/A categories.
7*
The generic (G) K/As in Tiers 1 and 2 shall be selected from Section 2 of the K/A Catalog, but the topics must be relevant to the applicable evolution or system. Refer to Section D.1.b of ES-401 for the applicable K/As.
8.
On the following pages, enter the K/A numbers, a brief description of each topic, the topics importance ratings (IRs) for the applicable license level, and the point totals (#) for each system and category. Enter the group and tier totals for each category in the table above; if fuel handling equipment is sampled in other than Category A2 or G* on the SRO-only exam, enter it on the left side of Column A2 for Tier 2, Group 2 (Note #1 does not apply).
Use duplicate pages for RO and SRO-only exams.
9.
For Tier 3, select topics from Section 2 of the K/A catalog, and enter the K/A numbers, descriptions, IRs, and point totals (#) on Form ES-401-3. Limit SRO selections to K/As that are linked to 10 CFR 55.43.
- WRIYIEN EXAM SAMPLE PLAN ONLY ES-201 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2 Facility:
OCONEE Date of Examination:
DECEMBER 2012 Initials Item Task Description
1.
a.
Verify that the outline(s) fit(s) the appropriate model, in accordance with ES-401.
N/A w
R b.
Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with N/A I
Section D.1 of ES-401 and whether all K/A categories are appropriately sampled.
T c.
Assess whether the outline over-emphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics.
N/A N
d.
Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected K/A statements are appropriate.
N/A 2.
a.
Using Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number N/A N/A N/A of normal evolutions, instrument and component failures, technical specifications, S
and major transients.
M b.
Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number N/A N/A N/A u
and mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation L
schedule without compromising exam integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be A
tested using at least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are T
duplicated from the applicants audit test(s), and that scenarios will not be repeated on o
subsequent days.
R c.
To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conform(s) with the qualitative N/A N/A N/A and quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D.
3.
a.
Verify that the systems walk-through outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301 -2:
N/A N/A N/A (1) the outline(s) contain(s) the required number of control room and in-plant tasks W
distributed among the safety functions as specified on the form
/
(2) task repetition from the last two NRC examinations is within the limits specified on the form T
(3) no tasks are duplicated from the applicants audit test(s)
(4) the number of new or modified tasks meets or exceeds the minimums specified on the form (5) the number of alternate path, low-power, emergency, and RCA tasks meet the criteria on the form.
b.
Verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301 -1:
N/A N/A N/A (1) the tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form (2) at least one task is new or significantly modified (3) no more than one task is repeated from the last two NRC licensing examinations
c.
Determine if there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix N/A N/A N/A of applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subsequent days.
4.
a.
Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including PRA and IPE insights) are covered N/A in the appropriate exam sections.
b.
Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41/43 and 55.45 sampling is appropriate.
N/A c.
Ensure that K/A importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5.
N/A
d.
Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections.
N/A N/A N/A L
e.
Check the entire exam for balance of coverage.
N/A
f.
Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level (RO or SRO).
N/A
- a. Author Michael K. Meeks I 04/04/2012
- b. Facility Reviewer (*)
N/A
- c. NRC Chief Examiner (#)
- d. NRC Supervisor Note:
I Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column c; chief examiner concurrence required.
Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination outlines
- WRITTEN EXAM SAMPLE PLAN ONLY
ES-401, REV 9 Ti Gi PWR EXAMINATION OUTLINE FORM ES-401-2 KA NAME / SAFETY FUNCTION:
IR Ki K2 K3 K4 K5 K6 Al A2 A3 A4 G TOPIC:
RO SRO 007EA2.04 Reactor Trip
- Stabilization
- Recovery 4.6 4.4 LI If reactor should have tripped but has not done so, I 1 manually trip the reactor and carry out actions in ATWS EOP 008AK2.03 Pressurizer Vapor Space Accident / 3 2.5 2.4 j Controllers and positioners 009EA2.33 Small Break LOCA / 3 3.3 3.8 LI El El El El El El j El El El RCS water inventory balance and Tech-Spec limits 011 EK4Gi Large Break LOCA / 3 1 4,4-El El El El El Natural circulation and cooling, includifg-fefltfx-beiiing.
2..
iLto&dy Lc-L-t(Dt cA Pf2).
015AK3.04 RCP Malfunctions! 4 3.1 3.2 El El El El El El El LI El []
Reduction of power to below the steady state power-to flow limit 025AK2.0l Loss of RHR System / 4 2.9 2.9 El El El El El El El El El El RHR heat exchangers 026AG2.4.50 Loss of Component Cooling Water /8 4.2 4.0 El El El El El El El El LI El Ability to verify system alarm setpoints and operate controls identified in the alarm response manual.
027AG2.4.49 Pressurizer Pressure Control System 4.6 4.4 El El El El El El El El El El Ability to perform without reference to procedures those Malfunction / 3 actions that require immediate operation of system components and controls.
029EA1.13 ATWS/ 1 4.1 3.9 El El El El El El El El El El Manual trip of main turbine 038EA2.07 Steam Gen. Tube Rupture! 3 4.4 4.8 El El El El El El El El El El Plant conditions from survey of control room indications 054AK1.0l Loss of Main Feedwater/4 4.1 4.3 El El El El El El El El El El MFW line break depressurizes the S!G (similar toa steam line break)
Page 1 of 2 4/4/2012 9:49AM
ES-401, REV 9 T1G1 PWR EXAMINATION OUTLINE FORM ES-401-2 KA NAME/SAFETY FUNCTION:
IR Ki K2 K3 K4 K5 K6 Al A2 A3 A4 G TOPIC:
HO SRO 055EA1.05 Station Blackout I 6 3.3 3.6 Battery when approaching fully discharged 058AK3.0l Loss of DC Power! 6 3.4 3.7 Use of dc control power by DIGs 062AA1.05 Loss of Nuclear Svc Water! 4 3.1 3.1 The CCWS surge tank, including level control and level alarms and radiation alarm 065AG2.1.23 Loss of Instrument Air! 8 4.3 4.4 Ability to perform specific system and integrated plant procedures during all modes of plant operation.
077AK1.03 Generator Voltage and Electric Grid 3.3 3.4 Li Under-excitation Disturbances / 6 BEO4EK2.l Inadequate Heat Transfer
- Loss of 3.8 4
Li Li Li Li Li Li Li Li Li Li Components, and functions of control and safety Secondary Heat Sink! 4 systems, including instrumentation, signals, interlocks, failure modes, and automatic and manual features.
BEO5EK3.2 Steam Line Rupture - Excessive Heat 3.5 4
Li Li Li Li Li Li Li Li Li Li Normal, abnormal and emergency operating procedure&
Transfer! 4 associated with (Excessive Heat Transfer).
Page2of2 4!4!2012 9:49AM
ES-401, REV 9 T1G2 PWR EXAMINATION OUTLINE FORM ES-401-2 KA NAME I SAFETY FUNCTION:
IR Ki K2 K3 K4 K5 K6 Al A2 A3 A4 G TOPIC:
RD SRO 003AK2.05 Dropped Control Rod! 1 2.5 2.8 Control rod drive power supplies and logic circuits 005AG2.4.4 Inoperable/Stuck Control Rod / 1 4.5 4.7 U
Ability to recognize abnormal indications for system operating parameters which are entry-level conditions for emergency and abnormal operating procedures.
028AA2.04 Pressurizer Level Malfunction ! 2 2.6 3.1 U U U U U U U U U U Ammeters and running indicators for CVCS charging pumps 032AK3.02 Loss of Source Range NI! 7 3.7 4.1 Guidance contained in EOP for loss of source-range nuclear instrumentation 037AA1.08 Steam Generator Tube Leak/3 3.3 3.1 U
Charging flow indicator BAO2AK3.4 Loss of NNI-X! 7 3.7 3.7 RD or SRO function within the control room team as appropriate to the assigned position, in such a way that procedures are adhered to and the limitations in the facilities license and amendments are not violated.
BAO5AK1.3 Emergency Diesel Actuation ! 6 3.8 3.7 U
Annunciators and conditions indicating signals, and remedial actions associated with the (Emergency Diesel Actuation).
BEO3EA1.1 Inadequate Subcooling Margin / 4 4.1 3.8 Components, and functions of control and safety systems, including instrumentation, signals, interlocks, failure modes, and automatic and manual features.
BEO9EK1.1 Natural Circ. / 4 3.5 3.7 Components, capacity, and function of emergency systems.
Page 1 of 1 4/4/2012 9:50AM
ES-401, REV 9 T2G1 PWR EXAMINATION OUTLINE FORM ES-401-2 KA NAME / SAFETY FUNCTION:
IR Ki K2 K3 K4 K5 K6 Al A2 A3 A4 G TOPIC:
RO SRO 003A4.03 Reactor Coolant Pump 2.8 2.5 RCP lube oil and lift pump motor controls 004A1.10 Chemical and Volume Control 37 3.9
(
Reactor power 004K6.26 Chemical and Volume Control 3.8 4.1 Methods of pressure control of solid plant (PZR relief and water inventory) 0051(4.06 Residual Heat Removal 2.7 3.0 Function of RHR pump miniflow recirculation 005K5.01 Residual Heat Removal 2.6 2.9 Nil ductility transition temperature (brittle fracture) 006K6.1O Emergency Core Cooling 2.6 2.8 El Valves 007A4.01 Pressurizer Relief/Quench Tank 2.7 2.7 El El El El El El El El El El PRT spray supply valve 008K1.02 Component Cooling Water 3.3 3.4 El El El El El El El El El El Loads cooled by CCWS 010K2.01 Pressurizer Pressure Control 3.0 3.4 El El El El El El El El El El PZR heaters 012K3.04 Reactor Protection 3.8 4.1 El El El El El El El El El El ESFAS 012K5.0l Reactor Protection 3.3 3.8 El El El El El El El El El El DNB Page 1 of 3 4/4/2012 9:50 AM
ES-401, REV 9 T2G1 PWR EXAMINATION OUTLINE FORM ES-401-2 KA NAME I SAFETY FUNCTION:
IR Kl K2 K3 K4 K5 K6 Al A2 A3 A4 G TOPIC:
RO SRO 013K1.14 EngineeredSatetyFeaturesActuation 3.1 3.4 El El El lAS 022A2.03 Containment Cooling 2.6 3.0 El El El El El El El El El El Fan motor thermal overload/high-speed operation 022K2.02 Containment Cooling 2.5 2.4 El El El El El El El El El El Chillers 026K2.0l Containment Spray 3.4 3.6 El El El El El El El El El El Containment spray pumps 026K3.02 Containment Spray 4.2 4.3 El El El El El El El El El El Recirculation spray system 039K5.08 Main and Reheat Steam 3.6 3.6 El El El El El El El El El El Effect of steam removal on reactivity 059A3.03 Main Feedwater 2.5 2.6 El El El El El El El El El El Feedwater pump suction flow pressure 061A3.03 Auxiliary/Emergency Feedwater 3.9 3.9 El El El El El El El El ] El El AFW S/G level control on automatic start 062G2.2.12 AC Electrical Distribution 3.7 4.1 El El El El El El El El El El Knowledge of surveillance procedures.
063(32.2.22 DC Electrical Distribution 4.0 4.7 El El El El El El El El El El Knowledge of limiting conditions for operations and safety limits.
063K4.02 DC Electrical Distribution 2.9 3.2 El El El El El El El El El El Breaker interlocks, permissives, bypasses and cross-ties.
Page2of3 4/4/2012 9:50AM
ES-401, REV 9 KA 064A1.05 064A3.07 073A4.03 076A2.02 078K1.04 103K4.04 T2G1 PWR EXAMINATION OUTLINE IR Kl K2 K3 K4 K5 K6 Al A2 A3 A4 G RO SRO 2.5 2.5 3.6 3.7 3.1 3.2 2.7 3.1 2.6 2.9 2.5
3.2 TOPIC
EDIG room temperature Load sequencing Check source for operability demonstration Service water header pressure Cooling water to compressor Personnel access hatch and emergency access hatch NAME / SAFETY FUNCTION:
Emergency Diesel Generator Emergency Diesel Generator Process Radiation Monitoring Service Water FORM ES-401-2 Instrument Air Containment Page 3 of 3 4/4/2012 9:50AM
ES-401, REV 9 T2G2 PWR EXAMINATION OUTLINE FORM ES-401-2 KA NAME/SAFETY FUNCTION:
IR Ki K2 K3 K4 K5 K6 Al A2 A3 A4 G TOPIC:
RO SRO 011G2.l.7 Pressurizer Level Control 4.4 4.7 LI Ability to evaluate plant performance and make operational judgments based on operating characteristics, reactor behavior and instrument interpretation.
014K4.06 Rod Position Indication 3.4 3.7 Individual and group misalignment 017K6.0l In-core Temperature Monitor 2.7 3.0 Sensors and detectors 027A2.0l Containment Iodine Removal 3.0 3.3 High temperature in the filter system 034A4.02 Fuel Handling Equipment 3.5 3.9 Neutron levels 041 K2.01 Steam Dump/Turbine Bypass Control 2.8 2.9 LI LI LI LI LI LI LI LI LI LI ICS, normal and alternate power supply 045K3.01 Main Turbine Generator 2.9 3.2 LI LI LI LI LI LI LI LI LI LI Remainder of the plant 068A3.0l Liquid Radwaste 2.5 2.4 LI LI LI LI LI LI LI LI LI LI Evaporator pressure control 075K1.08 Circulating Water 3.2 3.2 LI LI LI LI LI LI LI LI LI LI Emergency/essential SWS 086A1.03 Fire Protection 2.7 3.2 LI LI LI LI LI LI LI LI LI LI Fire doors Page 1 of 1 4/4/2012 9:50 AM
RO SRO ES-401, REV 9 T3 PWR EXAMINATION OUTLINE FORM ES-401-2 KA NAME I SAFETY FUNCTION:
IR Ki K2 K3 K4 K5 K6 Al A2 A3 A4 G TOPIC:
G2.1.3 Conductof operations 3.7 3.9 LI Knowledgeofshiftorshortterm reliefturnoverpractices.
G2.1.40 Conduct of operations 2.8 3.9 LI LI LI Knowledge of refueling administrative requirements G2.2.l Equipment Control 4.5 4.4 Ability to perform pre-startup procedures for the facility, including operating those controls associated with plant equipment that could affect reactivity.
G2.2.43 Equipment Control 3.0 3.3 LI LI LI LI LI fl Knowledge of the process used to track inoperable alarms
-Q2,&4---
Radiation Control 38 AS Ability to control radiation reIc G2-3. ]
3f 3.f UCL O WO4CLh4-cO2 Q-ia.4 c,-rJ-G2.3.15 Radiation Control 2.9 3.1 Knowledge of radiation monitoring systems G2.3.7 Radiation Control 3.5 3.6 Ability to comply with radiation work permit requirements during normal or abnormal conditions G2.4.2 Emergency Procedures/Plans 4.5 4.6 j U Knowledge of system set points, interlocks and automatic actions associated with EOP entry conditions.
G2.4.41 Emergency Procedures/Plans 2.9 4.6 LI LI LI LI LI LI LI LI LI LI Knowledge of the emergency action level thresholds and classifications.
G2.4.42 Emergency Procedures/Plans 2.6 3.8 LI LI LI LI LI LI LI LI LI LI Knowledge of emergency response facilities.
Page 1 of 1 4/4/2012 9:50AM
ES-401, REV 9 KA NAME / SAFETY FUNCTION:
008AA2.1 0 Pressurizer Vapor Space Accident /3 015AA2.10 RCP Malfunctions / 4 025AG2.1.27 Loss of RHR System / 4 054AA2.06 Loss of Main Feedwater /4 055EG2.2.3 Station blackout / 6 BEO4EG4&
1 t-1nadequate Heat Transfer - Loss of Secondary Heat Sink / 4 SRO T1G1 PWR EXAMINATION OUTLINE IR K1K2K3K4K5K6A1A2A3A4G RO SRO 3.6 3.6 3.8 3.9 424.1
- 2. 7 FORM ES-401-2 TOPIC:
High-pressure injection valves and controllers When to secure RCPs on loss of cooling or seal injection Knowledge of system purpose and or function.
AFW adjustments needed to maintain proper T-ave. and S/G level (multi-unit license) Knowledge of the design, procedural and operational differences between units.
Knowldgs of RO tasks performed outs-ide the-mai4
.rntrol roomdurfng-an--emergncy-and th res14tafft-operational effects
)Jede fi.vtAJVf 1kd
+e fs opVnJ1t /ç4eJ-t T+
rc.ekJ 4. /ki or
.gwd.s..s) 0.4 4-W S-e-e f-k NRI 44w Page 1 of 1 4/4/2012 9:50AM
ES-401, REV 9 KA NAME I SAFETY FUNCTION:
001 AA2.0i Continuous Rod Withdrawal/i 069AG2.4.41 Loss of CTMT Integrity /5 BEO3EG2.1.32 Inadequate Subcooling Margin /4 BE14EA2.1 EOP Enclosures SRO T1G2 PWR EXAMINATION OUTLINE IR K1K2K3K4K5K6A1A2A3A4G RO SRO 4.2 4.2 2.9 4.6 84.0 3.44 FORM ES-401-2 TOPIC:
Reactor tripped breaker indicator Knowledge of the emergency action level thresholds and classifications.
Ability to explain and apply all system limits and precautions.
Facility conditions and selection of appropriated procedures during abnormal and emergency operations.
Page 1 of 1 4/4/2012 9:50AM
ES-401, REV 9 SRO T2G1 PWR EXAMINATION OUTLINE FORM ES-401-2 KA NAME / SAFETY FUNCTION:
IR Ki K2 K3 K4 K5 K6 Al A2 A3 A4 G TOPIC:
RO SRO 004A2.1O Chemical and Volume Control 3.9 4.2 Inadvertent boration/dilution 006G2.4.47 Emergency Core Cooling 4.2 4.2 Ability to diagnose and recognize trends in an accurate and timely manner utilizing the appropriate control room reference material.
061A2.02 Auxiliary/Emergency Feedwater 3.4 3.5 Air or MQV failure 063G2.2.25 DC Electrical Distribution 3.2 4.2 Knowledge of the bases in Technical Specifications for limiting conditions for operations and safety limits.
078G2.4.18 Instrument Air 3.3 4.0 Knowledge of the specific bases for EOPs.
Page 1 of 1 4/4/2012 9:50AM
ES-401, REV 9 KA NAME/SAFETYFUNCTION:
01 6G2.2.36 Non-nuclear Instrumentation 017A2.01 In-core Temperature Monitor 033G2.4.46 Spent Fuel Pool Cooling SRO T2G2 PWR EXAMINATION OUTLINE IR K1K2K3K4K5K6A1A2A3A4G AC SAC 3.1 4.2 3.1 3.5 4.2 4.2 FORM ES-401-2 TOPIC:
Ability to analyze the effect of maintenance activities, such as degraded power sources, on the status of limiting conditions of operations Thermocouple open and short circuits Ability to verify that the alarms are consistent with the plant conditions.
Page 1 of 1 4/4/2012 9:50AM
ES-401, REV 9 SHO T3 PWR EXAMINATION OUTLINE FORM ES-401-2 KA NAME / SAFETY FUNCTION:
IR K1 K2 K3 K4 K5 K6 Al A2 A3 A4 G TOPIC:
RO SRO G2.1.20 Conduct of operations 4.6 4.6 Ability to execute procedure steps.
G2.2.l 1 Equipment Control 2.3 3.3 Knowledge of the process for controlling temporary design changes.
G2.2.23 Equipment Control 3.1 4.6 LI Ability to track Technical Specification limiting conditions for operations.
G2.3. 11 Radiation Control 3.8 4.3 J
- I G2.3.5 Radiation Control 2.9 2.9 LI LI LI LI LI LI LI LI Ability to use radiation monitoring systems G2.4.26 Emergency Procedures/Plans 3.1 3.6 LI LI LI LI LI LI LI LI LI LI Knowledge of facility protection requirements including fire brigade and portable fire fighting equipment usage.
G2.4.6 Emergency Procedures/Plans 3.7 4.7 LI LI LI LI LI LI LI LI LI LI Knowledge symptom based EOP mitigation strategies.
Page 1 of 1 4/4/2012 9:50 AM
ES-401 Record of Rejected K/As Form ES-401 -4 Tier!
Randomly Reason for Rejection Group Selected KA 2 / 1 SYSO07 A4.01 Q(34) Oconee does not have a QT spray supply valve. Cheif supplied new KA on 8/28/12
- 007A4.09 2 / 1 SYSO12 K3.04 Q(37) Very little interaction between the two systems. Could not write a discriminating question.Chief selected KA: 012K3.03 09/07/2012 2 / 1 SYSO22 K2.02 Q(41) Could not write a discriminating question on this KA. Chief examiner selected a new KA on 6/26/2012. 022K3.02 2 / 1 SYSO64 A1.05 Q(50) Could not write a discriminating question on this KA. Chief examiner selected a new KA on 6/26/2012. 064A1.03 2 / 2 SYSO27 A2.01 Q(59) The only containment Iodine removal system that we have had was the Penetration Room Ventilation system. It was for leakage from the RB. It has been removed from service and taken out of TS and procedures.Chief selected new KA 2 / 2 SYSO68 A3.01 Q(63) We do not use any evaporators. Chief selected new KA
- 002A3.01 1 / 1 APEO25 2.1.27 Q(78) Could not determine how to meet the KA at the SRO level. The purpose and function would appear to be RO knowledge.
Chief selected new KA 8/28/12 025AG2.1.35 1 / 1 EPEO55 2.2.3 Q(80) Could not find any significant unit differences during a blackout.Chief selected new KA 8/28/12
- 055EG2.2.37 1 / 2 APEOO1 AA2.03 Q(82) Could not write an SRO question to this KA. Chief selected a new KA 003AA2.03 10/02/2012 1 / 2 APEOO1 AA2.01 Q(82) We do not have Reactor Tripped Breaker indicators. However would could use the associated Statalarms. But I could not find a way to tie this to a continuous rod withdrawal. Chief selected new KA 8/28/12
- OO1AA2.03 2 / 2 SYSO17 A2.01 Q(92) Could not write SRO level question. Chief replaced KA with 034A1.01 2 / 2 SYSO17 A2.02 Q(92) Could not write SRO level question on this KA. Chief supplied new KA 017A2.01 07/1/12 2 / 2 SYSO17 A2.01 Q(92) We have no procedural guidance on what to do if a CETC fails. Chief selected new KA 08/28/12
- 017A2.02
ES-401 Written Examination Quality Checklist Form ES-401-6 V3 f Facility:
Oconee Nuclear Station Date of Exam:
12/1f47012 Exam Level:
RD 1/ SRO,
Initial Item Description a
b*
c 1.
Questions and answers are technically accurate and applicable to the facility.
2.
a.
NRC K/As are referenced for all questions.
b.
Facility learning objectives are referenced as available.
3.
SRO questions are appropriate in accordance with Section D.2.d of ES-401 4.
The sampling process was random and systematic (If more than 4 RD or 2 SRD questions were repeated from the last 2 NRC licensing exams, consult the NRR DL program office).
5.
Question duplication from the license screening/audit exam was controlled as indicated below (check the item that applies) and appears appropriate:
the audit exam was systematically and randomly developed; or the audit exam was completed before the license exam was started; or the examinations were developed independently; or the licensee certifies that there is no duplication; or other (explain) 6.
Bank use meets limits (no more than 75 percent Bank Modified New Q
from the bank, at least 10 percent new, and the rest new or modified); enter the actual RD / SRO-only question distribution(s) at right.
9 I 3 6
I 3 60 I 19 7.
Between 50 and 60 percent of the questions on the RD Memory C/A exam are written at the comprehension/ analysis level; the SRD exam may exceed 60 percent if the randomly selected K/As support the higher cognitive levels; enter 35 /
7 40 /
18 the actual RD / SRD question distribution(s) at right.
8.
References/handouts provided do not give away answers or aid in the elimination of distractors.
9.
Question content conforms with specific KJA statements in the previously approved examination outline and is appropriate for the tier to which they are assigned; deviations are justified.
10.
Question psychometric quality and format meet the guidelines in ES Appendix B.
11.
The exam contains the required number of one-point, multiple choice items; the total is correct and agrees with the value on the cover sheet.
Printed Name / Signature Date
- a. Author
- b. Facility Reviewer (*)
Jha3
- c. NRC Chief Examiner (#)
frit /
.e&1e,I fi,i3o/VI1.
- d. NRC Regional Supervisor IJALoI(-r Note:
- The facility reviewers initials/signature are not applicable for NRC-developed examinations.
- Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column c; chief examiner concurrence required.
ES-401, Rev. 9 Oconee 2012-302 RO Written Examination Review Worksheet FINAL (12/1712012)
Form ES-401-9 1.
2.
- 3. Psychometric Flaws
- 4. Job Content Flaws
- 5. Other 6.
7.
Q#
LOK LOD (F/H)
(1-5)
Stem Cues T/F Cred.
Partial Job-Minutia
- 1 Back-Q SRO U/E/
Explanation Focus Dist.
Link units ward K/A Only S
Instructions
[Refer to Section D of ES-401 and Appendix B for additional information regarding each of the following concepts.]
- 1. Enter the level of knowledge (LOK) of each question as either (F)undamental or (H)igher cognitive level.
- 2. Enter the level of difficulty (LOD) of each question using a 1
- 5 (easy
- difficult) rating scale (questions in the 2 4 range are acceptable).
- 3. Check the appropriate box if a psychometric flaw is identified:
The stem lacks sufficient focus to elicit the correct answer (e.g., unclear intent, more information is needed, or too much needless information).
The stem or distractors contain cues (i.e., clues, specific determiners, phrasing, length, etc).
The answer choices are a collection of unrelated true/false statements.
The distractors are not credible; single implausible distractors should be repaired, more than one is unacceptable.
One or more distractors is (are) partially correct (e.g., if the applicant can make unstated assumptions that are not contradicted by stem).
4.
Check the appropriate box if a job content error is identified:
The question is not linked to the job requirements (i.e., the question has a valid K/A but, as written, is not operational in content).
The question requires the recall of knowledge that is too specific for the closed reference test mode (i.e., it is not required to be known from memory).
The question contains data with an unrealistic level of accuracy or inconsistent units (e.g., panel meter in percent with question in gallons).
The question requires reverse logic or application compared to the job requirements.
5.
Check questions that are sampled for conformance with the approved K/A and those that are designated SRO-only (K/A and license level mismatches are unacceptable).
6.
Based on the reviewers judgment, is the question as written (U)nsatisfactory (requiring repair or replacement), in need of (E)ditorial enhancement, or (S)atisfactory?
7.
At a minimum, explain any U ratings (e.g., how the Appendix B psychometric attributes are not being met).
1 2.
- 3. Psychometric Flaws
- 4. Job Content Flaws
- 5. Other 6.
7.
Q#
LOK LOD
I (F/H)
(1-5)
Stem Cues T/F Cred. IPaiaI Job-Minutia
- 1 Back-Q=
I SRO U/E/
Explanation Focus Dist.
Link units ward K/A Only S
H 2
S 007EA2.04 Question appears to match the K/A. SAT NEW 2
H 2
S 008AK2.03 Question appears to match the K/A. SN NEW Reworded first part of stem for clarity. 111301201 H
2 X
U 009EA2.33 Question appears to match the K/A. Witi 3
water going into the RB sump, and the ability to quantify it, does that make it identified leakage?
One could always say that any leakage is unidentified leakage until it is determined where it is coming from. With that being said, how can C and D be plausible? Need to add some more information in stem to make C and D more plausible. SAT 11I15I2012 NEW 4
F 2
5 011 EK2.02 Question appears to match the K/A. Not very discriminating. Otherwise SAT NEW 5
F 2
S 015I017AK3M4 Question kind of matches the K/A.
Not very discriminating as written. Otherwise SAT NEW 6
H 2
X E
025AK2.01 Question kind of matches the K/A. What is the difference between the series and switchover modes? Just want to be sure they are plausible.
If they are not, then both B and D would need to be fixed.
Discussed SAT 1111512012 NEW
1.
2.
- 3. Psychometric Flaws
- 4. Job Content Flaws
- 5. Other 6.
7.
Q#
LOK LOD
r
I (F/H)
(1-5)
Stem Cues T/F I Cred.
Partial Job-Minutia
- /
Back-Q I
SRO U/E/
Explanation Focus j Dist.
Link units ward K/A J Only S
7 H
2 S
026G2.4.50 Question appears to match the K/A.
SAT NEW 8
F 2
S 027AG2.4.49 Question appears to match the K/A.
SAT BANK 2009B NRC Exam 9
H 2
5 029EA1.13 Question appears to match the K/A. SAT NEW 10 H
2 E
038EA2.07 Question appears to match the K/A.
Some of these items are tested in SRO 76, and SRC
- 90. We need to change one of these. Changed C and D to rupture versus leak. SAT 1111512012 NEW 1 1 H
2 E
054AK1.01 Question appears to match the K/A.
Both distractors C and D have a reason in them, A and B do not. Recommend removing to secure the Main FDW pumps. This would leave AFIS has or has not actuated.
BANK 2007 NRC Retest Changed C and D as requested SAT 1111512012
2.
- 3. Psychometric Flaws
- 4. Job Content Flaws
- 5. Other 6.
7.
Q#
LOK LOD
I i
r
I (F/H)
(1-5)
Stem Cues T/F J Cred. J Partial Job-J Minutia
- /
Back-Q J
SRO U/E/
Explanation Focus Dist. j Linki units ward K/Al Only S
12 H
2 X
EIS 055EA105 Question appears to match the K/A. Will air still be available 4 hours4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br /> after the station blackout? If air is no longer available, then A would be correct. What mode of force opens and closes the valve? Obviously I do not completely understand the operation of the valve.
I have read the lesson plan on the valve, and I understand the reason behind it. Just want to be sure there is only one correct answer. Will Discuss. Otherwise SAT.
Made changes in time SATIIII 512012 NEW 13 F
2 S
058AK3.01 Question appears to match the K/A. This question is on the Hydro units (serves the same purpose as DIG at Oconee). SAT.
NEW Added ACB -4 to ensure only one correct answer. SAT 11/15/2012 14 F
2 X
SIE 062AA105 Question appears to match the K/A. Do not really like the A distractor (temperature is monitored mostly; however I believe you are trying k balance the question. (Two temps, two levels). Will discuss. (Not very discriminating).
NEW Shelf Question for now, maybe new KIA Changed distractor A as requested. SAT 1113012012 15 H
2 X
X SIE 065G2.t23 Question appears to match the K/A.
Third bullet reads: 1A & lB Main FDW Pump speeds are both increasing. Change this to IA & I B Main FDW Pump speeds are both rising slowly. This will make distractors A and B more plausible. With this change the question will be SATIIII 512012 BANK ONS 2009 RO Q#16
B1WEO5EK3.2 Question appears to match the K/A.
After reading the lesson material, I would suggest changing distractors B and D to tensile stresses.
This is not correct, and is much more plausible.
How can you get compressive stresses in the OTSG s? Will Discuss Made changes as suggested. SAT 11/1 5/2012 NEW 003AK2.05 Question appears to match the K/A. SAT 2.
- 3. Psychometric Flaws
- 4. Job Content Flaws
- 5. Other 6.
7.
Q#
LOK LOD
(F/H)
(1-5)
Stem Cues T/F Cred.
Partial Job-Minutia
- 1 Back-Q=
SRO U/E/
Explanation Focus Dist.
Link units ward K/A Only S
16 H
2 X
U 077AA1.03 Question does not meet the K/A. This question is asked with a lagging power factor, and this means the generator is over-excited, to the point of exceeding its limits.
If the power factor was leading then the generator would be under-excited (the gird would be supplying part of the excitation.
This generator is over-excited (and gird voltage is still low) which means lower grid voltage and max vars out. Made changes as requested SAT 1111512012 NEW 17 H
2 S
BIWEO4EKI.2 Question appears to match the K/A.
Need to reverse the answers so they are not exactly like the bank question.
BANK 2009A NRC exam question #17 SAT 1111512012 18 H
2 X
E NEW
1 2.
- 3. Psychometric Flaws
- 4. Job Content Flaws
- 5. Other 6.
7.
Q#
LOK LOD
F (F/H)
(1-5)
Stem Cues T/F Cred.
Partial Job-Minutia
- 1 Back-Q=
SRO U/E/
Explanation Focus Dist.
Link unitsj ward K/A Only S
20 F
2 S
005AG2.4.4 Question appears to match the K/A. Not sure this is at the comprehensive or higher level.
Otherwise SAT NEW 21 H
2 S
028AA2.04 Question appears to match the K/A. Not very discriminating. SAT NEW 22 F
2 E
032AK3.02 Question appears to match the K/A (because Oconee does not have actions in the EOP, the Chief Examiner allowed AOP actions to be tested).
I suggested some changes to make the first version more discriminating and make distractors A and B more plausible, you decided not to use them.
So, on this version WR power should be changed to I E-4%, to make the question more discriminating.
NEW SAT 1111512012 Also changed the second part of distractors A and C for clarity 11/30/2012 23 H
2 5
037AA1.08 Question appears to match the K/A. SN NEW 24 H
2 U
BWAO2AK3.4 Question appears to match the K/A.
Distractors A and B are not plausible. Even I know that you are not allowed to increase FW, and that rods are used to control RCS pressure. This question as written has very little discriminating value.
NEW Made changes as requested to distractors A and B. SAT 1111512012
1 2.
- 3. Psychometric Flaws
- 4. Job Content Flaws
- 5. Other 6.
7.
Q#
LOK LOD
(F/H)
(1-5)
Stem Cues T/F Cred.
Partial Job-Minutia
- 1 Back-0=
SRO U/E/
Explanation Focus Dist.
Link units ward K/A Only S
25 H
2 S
BWAO5AKI.3 Question appears to match the K/A.
SAT NEW 26 H
2 S
BWEO3EAI.1 Question appears to match the K/A.
Modified ONS NRC 2009A # Q27 27 H
2 S
BWEO9EKI.1 Question appears to match the K/A.
NEW 28 F
2 S
003A4.03 Question appears to match the K/A. Not very discriminating.
NEW 29 H
2 S
004A1.01 Question appears to match the K/A. Not very discriminating.
NEW 30 H
2 5
004K6.26 Question appears to match the K/A. SAT NEW 31 F
2 S
005K4.06 Question appears to match the K/A.
Second part of question is kind of confusing, are you asking if the pump is operable or if it can still operate? You mention a time frame in the distractor analysis, if the pump is run with less than 800gpm flow how long does it have to run before it must be tested.
I think depending on how you read the question all of the answers could be correct depending on how long you run the pump.
NEW Made change to remain running SAT
1.
2.
- 3. Psychometric Flaws
- 4. Job Content Flaws
- 5. Other 6.
7.
Q#
LOK LOD
(F/H)
(1-5)
Stem Cues TIE Cred.
Partial Job-Minutia
- 1 Back-Q=
SRO U/E/
Explanation Focus Dist.
Link units ward K/A Only S
1111512012 32 F
2 X
E 005K5.01 Question kind of matches the K/A.
Distractors A and B may not be plausible with 375 psig. Second part is ok. Need to discuss the pressure.
NEW 33 F
2 5
006K6.10 Question appears to match the K/A. Not very discriminating.
34 H
2 S
007A4.09 Question appears to match the K/A. SAT NEW 35 F
2 S
008K1.02 Question appears to match the K/A.
Distractor C should state RCPs may continue to operate no longer than 100 hours0.00116 days <br />0.0278 hours <br />1.653439e-4 weeks <br />3.805e-5 months <br />. Distractor D should state RCPs may continue to operate indefinitely. Then SAT. Made changes as requested. SAT 1111512012 ONS 2007 NRC Retest Q36 36 F
2 X
E 010K2.01 Question appears to match the K/A.
Would heater group B be a better distractor?
Was D selected because it can be used during emergencies? With it not being controlled from the
2.
- 3. Psychometric Flaws
- 4. Job Content Flaws
- 5. Other 6.
7.
Q#
LOK LOD
(F/H)
(1-5)
Stem Cues T/F Cred. IPaial Job-Minutia
- 1 Back-Q=
SRO U/E/
Explanation Focus Dist.
Link units ward K/A Only S
SSF I am not sure it is plausible. Will discuss.
NEW Would like you to change to B. Then SAT SAT 1111512012 37 H
2 S
012K3.03 Question appears to match the K/A. SAT NEW 38 F
2 S
012K501 Question appears to match the K/A. (The Exam already has one question on DNBR). Question
- 5. Need to make sure they do not overlap. Will Discuss otherwise SAT NEW 39 H
2 S
013K1.14 Question appears to match the K/A. SAT NEW 40 F
2 S
022A2.03 Question appears to match the K/A. SAT NEW 41 F
2 X
X U
022K3.02 Question may not meet the K/A. Will get another examiner to review. These are just ACC numbers. All of the RBC units could be on and if RB pressure continued to rise to greater than 3.0 psig, then these values would still be the proper values to use.
In fact you could remove that bullet from the stem and still ask the question. How does this pressure increase or temperature increase affect PZR level or SIG levels? Also with pressure rising, the only plausible choices would be values that are ACC numbers. Therefore the other distractors are not plausible. Rewrote question (still kind of GFES) but will allow. SAT 11I15I2012 NEW Removed actual temperatures from the
1.
2.
- 3. Psychometric Flaws
- 4. Job Content Flaws
- 5. Other 6.
7.
Q#
LOK LOD r (F/H)
(1-5)
Stem CuesJ T/F Cred.
Partial Job-Minutia
- 1 Back-Q=
SRO U/E/
Explanation Focus Dist.
Link units ward K/A Only S
stem and put in trends to ensure only one correct answer. 11/20/2012.
42 F
2 S
026K2.01 Question appears to match the K/A. SAT ONS NRC 2007 RO RETEST Q #42 MODIFIED 43 H
2 S
026K3.02 Question appears to match the K/A. SAT NEW 44 H
2 S
039K5.08 Question appears to match the K/A. SAT NEW 45 H
2 5
059A3.03 Question appears to match the K/A.
Would this be different on another unit? Otherwise SAT BANK ONS NRC 2009 Q #43 46 H
2 S
061A3.03 Question appears to match the K/A. Very similar to question #27.
I realize the conditions are different. Otherwise SAT.
NEW
2.
- 3. Psychometric Flaws
- 4. Job Content Flaws
- 5. Other 6.
7.
Q#
LOK LOD
(F/H)
(1-5)
Stem Cues T/F Cred.
Partial Job-Minutia
- 1 Back-Q SRO U/E/
Explanation Focus Dist.
Link units ward K/A Only S
47 F
2 S
062G2.2.12 Question kind of matches the K/A. Is OP/I/NI 105/014, a surveillance? If so the question is SAT.
If not we need to find a surveillance that does this. It appears it is a daily surveillance but it does not state this. Will discuss NEW 48 F
3 X
E 063G2.2.32 Question appears to match the K/A. Not sure a reference is required. ROs are required to know the information above the line. This will be a difficult question without a reference, but not very discriminating with it. Will discuss.
NEW SAT will ask Malcolm if a reference should be allowed.
1111512012 Upon further discussion allowed the reference. 11/30/2012 49 F
2 X
E 063K4.02 Question appears to match the K/A. Are buses 1 PA and I PB the same train of power, or different trains?
I do not think this is plausible if they are different trains of power. That would make distractors A and C second part not plausible.
NEW Left question as is. SAT 1111512012 50 H
2 S/E 064A1.03 Question appears to match the K/A. (The hydro units are used in place of E DIG.) Do not believe the all of enclosure 5.IA is required as a reference. Just the graph is required. Will Discuss Just the graph.
ONS NRC 2007 Q #43 MODIFIED 51 H
2 S
064A3.07 Question kind of matches the K/A (hydro instead of E DIG) and load shed and sequencing.
SAT NEW
i.
a
- 3. Psychometric Flaws 1
- 4. Job Content Flaws
- 5. Other 7.
Q#
LOK LOD -j (F/H)
(1-5)
Stem Cues T/F Cred.
Partial Job-Minutia
- 1 Back-Q SRO U/E/
Explanation Focus Dist.
Link units ward K/A Only S
52 F
2 S
073A4.03 Question appears to match the K/A. Not very discriminating. SAT NEW 53 H
2 E
076A2.02 Question kind of matches the K/A in a backward manner. Header pressure is not included in the stem, but does have an effect on the correct answer. May look at replacing or modifying this question. Will the answer be B if the time in the stem is changed to 15 seconds? This is the fourth repeated questions from the 2009 exam.
BANK ONS NRC 2009A Q #52 54 F
2 5
078K1.04 Question appears to match the K/A. Not very discriminating. SAT NEW 55 F
2 E
103K4.04 Question appears to match the K/A.
Distractor D is not plausible.
If there was a leak it might be, but as question is asked it is not.
I think this is a memory level question.
NEW 56 H
2 5
011G2.1.7 Question appears to match the K/A. Kind of similar to question 21. Otherwise SAT NEW 57 H
2 5
O14K4O6 Question appears to match the K/A. SAT NEW
2.
- 3. Psychometric Flaws
- 4. Job Content Flaws
- 5. Other 6.
7.
Q#
LOK LOD
(F/H)
(1-5)
Stem Cues T/F Cred.
Partial Job-Minutia
- 1 Back-Q=
SRO U/El Explanation Focus Dist.
Link units ward K/A Only S
58 H
2 X
E 017K6.01 Question appears to match the K/A. As written B and D distractors are not plausible. Need to change the stem to have the second part test how many CETC will be used on the B train and use 4 or 5.
NEW Changed to 4 much discussion will leave as is SAT 11/15/2012 59 H
2 X
E 016A2.01 Question appears to match the K/A. This is the fifth question from the 2009 exams. We need to attempt to modify this question.
I do not believe distractors B and D are plausible. Maybe these should state 1A, 1 B MFW and Steam Generator Master to hand and A and C should state only.
BANK ONS NRC 2009 Q58 Three exams were labeled as 2009 exams. (2009-301,2010-301 and 2010-302. Verified there was not excessive sampling from each exam.
60 F
2 5
034A4.02 Question appears to match the K/A. Not very discriminating.
NEW 61 F
2 S
041K2.01 Question appears to match the K/A. Is the voltage on KX the same as KI and KU, if so the question is SAT? If not another power supply should be selected.
NEW 62 H
2 E
045K3.01 Question appears to match the K/A.
Similar to question 37, although it is testing a different condition. This could be double jeopardy.
Will discuss.
NEW
1.
2.
- 3. Psychometric Flaws
- 4. Job Content Flaws
- 5. Other 6.
7.
Q#
LOK LOD
(F/H)
(1-5)
Stem Cues T/F Cred.
Partial Job-Minutia
- 1 Back-Q SRO U/E/
Explanation Focus Dist.
Link units ward K/A Only S
63 H
2 E
OO2A301 Question kind of matches the K/A, as discussed with the plant staff. As written not very discriminating. Will discuss a method to make it more discriminating. (Possible to raise pressurizer level to > 220 inches showing over-shoot (221 inches and slowly rising). The applicant would then have to base the leakage off of the RCS leak detection system.
NEW Made changes SAT 1111512012 64 H
2 S
075K1.08 Question appears to match K/A. SAT NEW 65 F
2 S
086A1.03 Question appears to match K/A. SAT NEW 66 F
2 5
G2.1.3 Question appears to match K/A. SAT NEW 67 F
2 X
U G2.1.40 Question appears to match K/A. As written distractors B and D are not plausible. B should state; 1 RIA-49 fails (low or high). D should state: it is discovered that Emergency Air lock doors are open and a temp cover has been installed. Something to make it sound like the items just happened C
should state spent fuel pool level has slowly lowered to 1.2 feet. Some of the distractor analysis is incorrect, SFP levels lowers to 1 FT.
NEW Made changes as requested. SAT 1111512012
1.
2.
- 3. Psychometric Flaws
- 4. Job Content Flaws
- 5. Other 6.
7.
Q#
LOK LOD
(F/H)
(1-5)
Stem Cues T/F Cred.
Partial Job-Minutia
- /
Back-Q=
SRO U/E/
Explanation Focus Dist.
Link units ward KJA Only S
68 F
2 E
G2.2.1 Question appears to match the K/A. Not very discriminating as written. Can we have an annunciator on the turbine side of the board come in and ask essentially the same question? Will discuss.
NEW Made changes as requested SAT 1111512012 69 F
2 S
G2.2.43 Question appears to match K/A. SAT 70 F
2 E/S 2.3.14 Question appears to match K/A. Could we change the TB sump to something else, like hotwell, or CBP discharge etc. Otherwise SAT ONS NRC 2009 RO Q#72 MODIFIED 71 F
2 S
23.15 Question appears to meet the KIA.
ONS NRC 2007 Retest Q #52 BANK 72 F
2 S
G2.3.7 Question appears to match the K/A. SAT BANK 73 F
2 S
G2.4.2 Question appears to match the K/A. Not very discriminating. SAT NEW 74 F
2 E/S G2.4.41 Question appears to match the K/A.
Overlap with 75 otherwise SAT NEW changed question SAT 1111512012 After validation licensee requested to change the first part of the question to make it more operationally valid for ROs. 11/30/2012
1.
2.
- 3. Psychometric Flaws
- 4. Job Content Flaws
- 5. Other 6.
7.
Q#
LOK LOD (F/H)
(1-5)
Stem Cues T/F Cred.
Partial Job-Minutia
- 1 Back-Q=
I SRO U/E/
Explanation Focus Dist.
Link units ward K/A Only S
75 F
2 EIS G2.4.42 Question appears to match the K/A. This question overlaps with the previous question When is the EOFITSC manned? Need to alter one of these to prevent overlap.
BANK CNS 2008 NRC Exam SAT 11/15/2012 47 Sats, 5 Unsats, and 23 Enhancements
ES-401, Rev. 9 Oconee 2012-302 SRO Written Examination Review Worksheet Final (1211712012)
Form ES-401-9 1.
2.
- 3. Psychometric Flaws
- 4. Job Content Flaws
- 5. Other 6.
7.
Q#
LOK LOD (F/H)
(1-5)
Stem Cues T/F Cred.
Partial Job-Minutia
- /
Back-Q=
SRO U/E/
Explanation Focus Dist.
Link units ward K/A Only S
Instructions
[Refer to Section D of ES-401 and Appendix B for additional information regarding each of the following concepts.]
- 1. Enter the level of knowledge (LOK) of each question as either (F)undamental or (H)igher cognitive level.
- 2. Enter the level of difficulty (LCD) of each question using a 1
- 5 (easy
- difficult) rating scale (questions in the 2 4 range are acceptable).
- 3. Check the appropriate box if a psychometric flaw is identified:
The stem lacks sufficient focus to elicit the correct answer (e.g., unclear intent, more information is needed, or too much needless information).
The stem or distractors contain cues (i.e., clues, specific determiners, phrasing, length, etc).
The answer choices are a collection of unrelated true/false statements.
The distractors are not credible; single implausible distractors should be repaired, more than one is unacceptable.
One or more distractors is (are) partially correct (e.g., if the applicant can make unstated assumptions that are not contradicted by stem).
4.
Check the appropriate box if a job content error is identified:
The question is not linked to the job requirements (i.e., the question has a valid K/A but, as written, is not operational in content).
The question requires the recall of knowledge that is too specific for the closed reference test mode (i.e., it is not required to be known from memory).
The question contains data with an unrealistic level of accuracy or inconsistent units (e.g., panel meter in percent with question in gallons).
The question requires reverse logic or application compared to the job requirements.
5.
Check questions that are sampled for conformance with the approved K/A and those that are designated SRO-only (K/A and license level mismatches are unacceptable).
S.
Based on the reviewers judgment, is the question as written (U)nsatisfactory (requiring repair or replacement), in need of (E)ditorial enhancement, or (S)atisfactory?
7.
At a minimum, explain any U ratings (e.g., how the Appendix B psychometric attributes are not being met).
2.
- 3. Psychometric Flaws
- 4. Job Content Flaws
- 5. Other 6.
7.
Q#
LOK LCD
(F/H)
(1-5)
Stem Cues T/F Cred.
Partial Job-Minutia
- 1 Back-Q=
SRO U/E/
Explanation Focus Dist.
Link units ward K/A Only S
76 H
2
?
E 008AA2.10 Question kind of matches the K/A. It s
does test what happens when ECCS valves fail. Is the intent for the first part of the question to be the SRO only part? The second part (from rule 7, is RO knowledge they are the operators that establish this). Will discuss the first part being SRO only Made changes to second part of stem in distractors A and C. Question appears to be SAT 1111512012 NEW 77 H
2
?
E 015I017AA2.10 Question appears to match the K/A.
The first part is immediate trip criteria and is considered RO knowledge. The second part maybe considered SRO only knowledge if the reactor would not have tripped if the pump was secured at 70%
power and that this was only due to the direction of the procedure. Will discuss. Discussed with licensee second part appears to be SRO only knowledge.
The reactor will not trip if pump is tripped at this power. Procedure directs tripping of pump SAT 11I15I2012 NEW H
2 S
025G21.35 Knowledge of the fuel-handling 78 responsibilities of SROs. (This is the KIA for this question and was assigned). Question appears to match the K/A, appears to be SRO only.
BANK 2009A Q#95. Appearance changed somewhat. SAT. 10/24/2012
2.
- 3. Psychometric Flaws
- 4. Job Content Flaws
- 5. Other 6.
7.
Q#
LOK LOD
(F/H)
(1-5)
Stem Cues T/F Cred.
Partial Job-Minutia
- 1 Back-Q=
SRO U/E/
Explanation Focus Dist.
Link units ward K/A Only S
79 H
2 S
O54AA2O6 Question appears to match the K/A.
Appears to have an SRO aspect to it. SAT 10/24/2012. NEW 80 H
2 X
E 055EG2.2.37 Question appears to match the K/A.
Appears to have an SRO aspect to it. As written there appears to be a subset issue. 450°F is 550°F. What does the procedure step state. We need to ensure that there is not a subset issue.
Otherwise SAT Long discussion on whether the question was SRO only. Made change to first part o all distractors. Appears to be more SRO only.
Changed second part to state whether a cooldown was allowed. SAT 1111512012 NEW 81 F
2 5
BIWEO5G2.4.30 Question appears to match K/A.
Appears to be SRO only. Not very discriminating, as written. Otherwise SAT.
NEW 82 H
2 X
E 003AA2.03 Question appears to match the K/A.
Appears to have an SRO aspect to it. The second part of distractors A and C are not plausible.
I have seen this question used before and requested this be changed. Why would someone think brittle fracture to be a concern? Need to find another distractor. Made changes as requested. SAT 1111512012 BANK 83 H
2 S
069AG2.4.41 Question appears to match K/A.
2.
- 3. Psychometric Flaws
- 4. Job Content Flaws
- 5. Other 6.
7.
Q#
LOK LOD
(F/H)
(1-5)
Stem Cues T/F Cred.
Partial Job-Minutia
- 1 Back-Q SRO U/E/
Explanation Focus Dist.
Link units ward K/A Only S
NEW 84 H
2 X
X U
BIWEO3EG2.l.32 Question appears to match K/A.
Does not appear to be SRO only. Exceeding designed flowrate is RO knowledge. Knowing what systems are required to combat a large break LOCA is also RO knowledge. This information may be in the basis document but it is knowledge taught is system training and all RO are required to know what equipment is required. As written distractor D is also not plausible.
If only one HPI pump is exceeding the limit and it is secured why would anyone think two are required? Will Discuss.
Change to HPI headers and limits on flow and ability to provide enough flow to satisfy the safety analysis.
Still Working 1111512012. Changed second part o:
question SAT 11/30/2012 NEW 85 H
2 X
E B!WEI4EA2.1 Question appears to match K/A.
Appears to be SRO only. Not sure distractors A and C are totally plausible. Why would you stop steaming both generators? Why do you stop steaming the affected generator? Maybe the reason for stopping the steaming should be tested?
Made changes to the question on distractors A and C. SAT11I15I2012 NEW After validation added more data to stem so applicants did not have to make assumptions 11/30/2012
1.
2.
- 3. Psychometric Flaws
- 4. Job Content Flaws
- 5. Other 6.
7.
Q#
LOK LOD
(F/H)
(1-5)
Stem Cues T/F Cred.
Partial Job-Minutia
- 1 Back-Q=
SRO U/E/
Explanation Focus Dist.
Link units ward K/A Only S
86 H
2 S
004A2.1O Question appears to match K/A. Appears to be SRO only. Need to make sure these references do not answer any other questions.
Otherwise SAT.
NEW 87 H
2 X
E 006G2.4.47 Question appears to match K/A.
Appears to be SRO only. Second part of distractors B and D are not plausible. Why would the basis in the BWST be linked to shutdown conditions? This does not pass the common sense test. Second part of the question makes it SRO only. Try to tie trend into the SRO piece. 1111512012 Changed the second part of the question as requested.
11/30/2012.
NEW 88 H
2 X
E 061A2.07 Question appears to match K/A. Appears to be SRO only. Not sold on the 252 hours0.00292 days <br />0.07 hours <br />4.166667e-4 weeks <br />9.5886e-5 months <br />. Will discuss Changed all dstractors. SATI 1/15/2012 89 H
2 5
063G2.2.25 Question appears to match K/A.
Appears to be SRO only. SAT NEW 90 F
2 S
078G2.4.18 Question kind of matches the K/A. Chief Examiner allowed APs because the EOPs do not direct IA operation. Question appears to have an SRO aspect to it. SAT NEW
2.
- 3. Psychometric Flaws
- 4. Job Content Flaws
- 5. Other 6.
7.
Q#
LOK LOD
(F/H)
(1-5)
Stem Cues T/F Cred.
Partial Job-Minutia
- 1 Back-Q=
SRO U/E/
Explanation Focus Dist.
Link units ward K/A Only S
91 H
2 E
016G2.2.36 Question appears to match K/A.
Question may be SRO only. Distractors C and D ar not plausible. After mode I is reached, no systems will cause power production to be limited, unless the power assent is dependent on the item lost like circ water pumps etc.
Changed power level to less than 5 %, SAT 1111512012 NEW 92 H
2 X
X U
017A2.02 Question does not meet the K/A. What is the impact of core damage on the ITM system? If core damage occurs, how will it affect the CETCs?
That is what the K/A is stating the applicant should know.
It appears to have some SRO knowledge in the use of the SAGs. However, distractors B and D are not plausible. The SAGs and EOPs are not used at the same time. However portions of the EOPs may be directed by the SAGs to protect the RB. Need to write another questions that will test the K/A.
NEW 1110612012 changed KA 017A2.02 TO 034A1.01 New question had two distractors were not plausible will change two distractors (weight tha is greater than the weight of fuel stick).
Made changes as requested. 11/30/2012
2.
- 3. Psychometric Flaws
- 4. Job Content Flaws
- 5. Other 6.
7.
Q#
LOK LOD
(F/H)
(1-5)
Stem Cues T/F Cred.
Partial Job-Minutia
- 1 Back-Q=
SRO U/E/
Explanation Focus Dist.
Link units ward K/A Only S
93 H
2 X
U 033G2.4.46 Question appears to match the K/A.
After further review, I do not believe the question is testing the K/A at the SRO level. Are there any other alarms associated with the Spent fuel pool cooling system, if so we could use both of the alarms and have the applicant determine which needed to be addressed first (using procedure selection assuming both procedure entry conditions were met, or close to being met). Will discuss.
Changed parts of the stem and all of the distractors. SAT 1111512012 NEW 94 H
2 5
GZI.20 Question appears to match the K/A, and appears to be Modified. Appears to be SRO only.
SAT. MODIFIED 95 F
2 X
E G2.2.1 I Question appears to match the K/A.
Appears to be SRO only. Distractors B and D are not plausible. Normally the ops group does hang tags, but in this case you used electrical tags. This does not seem to be plausible.
If a temp change is made are there any other tags used.
If so, this may be ok. Will discuss. After review of procedure decided more changes were required including online change and remove tags. Changed first part as requested. Also changed second part to ask if operations was responsible to maintain a log of temporary changes. NEW 1113012012 96 H
2 S
G2.2.23 Question appears to match the K/A.
Appears to be SRO only. Ensure the TS reference cannot answer any other questions on the test (including RO exam). Reorder the dates from soonest to longest. That would make the answer B.
2.
- 3. Psychometric Flaws
- 4. Job Content Flaws
- 5. Other 6.
7.
Q#
LOK LOD (F/H)
(1-5)
Stem Cues T/F Cred.
Partial Job-Minutia
- 1 Back-Q=
SRO U/E/
Explanation Focus Dist.
Link units ward K/A Only S
Otherwise SATI 111512012 BANK 97 H
2 E
G2.3.11 Question appears to match the K/A.
Appears to be SRO only. Change any SRO to Unit 3 Control Room Supervisor or whatever it is you call them (US maybe). Then let the first parts be Unit 3 CRS or US, and OSM. Any SRO does not sound correct. Some SRO from training or engineering?
Will discuss. Made Changes as requested.
SATI 111512012 MODIFIED 98 H
2 X
U G23.5 Question appears to match the K/A. Although the first part is in the basis document, in TS 3.4.13 pressure boundary leakage is listed as (a.) and SG tube leakage is listed in (d.). All of this information is above the line in TS and therefore is RO knowledge.
So, the first part is not SRO only knowledge. The second part of the question asks which SG will be used for the cooldown, I am not sure that this is SRC only knowledge. Typically any faulted SG would not be used for cooldown unless it was the only one available.
In this case the lB is still available (tube leak). This is overall mitigation strategy, and also is not SRO only knowledge. Will discuss options.
Changed per suggestions also added not to use ED Judgment. SAT 11I15I2012 NEW
1.
2.
- 3. Psychometric Flaws
- 4. Job Content Flaws
- 5. Other 6.
7.
Q#
LOK LOD
(F/H)
(1-5)
Stem Cues T/F Cred. IPaiaI Job-Minutia
- 1 Back-Q=
SRO U/E/
Explanation Focus Dist.
Link units ward K/A Only S
99 F
2 X
U G2.4.26 Question appears to match the K/A. May not be SRO only. What qualifications must an NEO have to serve at fire brigade leader?
I think anyone with the appropriate qualifications will always be correct, why would anyone pick the other distractors need to fix the second half of the questions. Again I do not believe this is SRO only.Upon further discussion, ROs do not perform any fire brigade activites.
. therefore by default it is SRO knowledge.
SAT 1111512012 100 H
2 S
G2.4.6 Question appears to match the K/A. Appeart to be SRO only. SAT 10 Sats, 5 Unsats, and 10 Enhancements
ES-403, Rev. 9 Written Examination Grading Form ES-403-1 Quality Checklist Facility:
Oconee Nuclear Plant Date of Exam: 12/13/2012 Exam Level: ROISRO Initials Item Description a
b 1.
Clean answer sheets copied before grading N/A 2.
Answer key changes and question deletions justified and N/A documented 3.
Applicants scores checked for addition errors
/)-
N/A (reviewers_spot_check>_25%_of_examinations) 4.
Grading for all borderline cases (80 +/-2% overall and 70 or 80, N/A as_applicable,_+/-4%_on_the_SRO-only)_reviewed_in_detail 5.
All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades N/A are_justified 6.
Performance on missed questions checked for training N/A deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of questions_missed by half or more of the applicants Printed Name/Signature Date
- a. Grader
!/w/ /3
- b. Facility Reviewer(*)
- c. NRC Chief Examiner (*)
- d. NRC Supervisor (*)
WLcoLSA
(*)
The facility reviewers signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required.