ML13007A123
| ML13007A123 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Davis Besse  |
| Issue date: | 10/31/2012 |
| From: | KLD Engineering, PC |
| To: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| L-12-441 KLD TR-482, Rev 2 | |
| Download: ML13007A123 (30) | |
Text
APPENDIX G Traffic Management Plan G. TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT PLAN NUREG/CR-7002 indicates that the existing TCPs and ACPs identified by the offsite agencies should be used in the evacuation simulation modeling.
The traffic and access control plans for the EPZ are discussed in the following documents:
0 S Lucas County REP Plan, Pages II-J-20, II-J-21 (map)Ottawa County Traffic and Access Control Points, Page 11-J-20, II-J-25 (map)These plans were reviewed and the TCPs and ACPs were modeled accordingly.
Table G-1 summarizes the location of these TCPs on the DYNEV II network. Figure G-1 presents a map of traffic control points.G.1 Traffic Control Points As discussed in Section 9, traffic control points at intersections are modeled as actuated signals.If an intersection has a pre-timed signal, stop, or yield control, and the intersection is identified as a traffic control point, the control type was changed to an actuated signal in the DYNEV II system. Table K-2 provides the control type and node number for those nodes which are controlled.
If the existing control was changed due to the point being a TCP, the control type is indicated as "Traffic Control Point" in Table K-2.The lack of significant congestion in the Davis-Besse EPZ indicates that additional traffic control points are not required.Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Evacuation Time Estimate G-1 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 2 Table G-1. Existing Traffic Control Points Modeled in DYNEV II Node Location Node Location SR 2 and CR 104 (Toussaint South 126 oad)154 State Route 2 & Teachout Road 126 Road) 154 SR 2 and CR 23 (Benton-Carroll Corduroy Road at Teachout Road &141 Road) 153 Anchor Point Road 145 SR 2 and SR 579 NM State Route 2 & Bono Road SR 590 and SR 105 Howard Road & State Route 2 (Jerusalem 182 149 Road)181 SR 590 and SR 163 151 Howard Road & Corduroy Road SR 163 and CR 23 (Benton-Carroll 22 R 3and) NM 2Interstate 1-280 and State Route 2 223 Road) NM 260 SR 163 and SR 19 1 State Route 2 & North Curtice Road 228 SR 163 and SR 105 SR 2 and Erie Industrial Park NM (Tettau Road/CR 14)111 SR 2 and SR 358 25 SR 53 (Fremont Road) and SR 2 298 Fremont Road and Portage Street East Perry Street and Buckeye 331 Boulevard East Perry Street and Jefferson 312 Street West Perry Street and Monroe 319 Street Third Street at Fulton Street and NM Lincoln Drive 109 SR 2 and SR 163 Connector 351 SR 163 and SR 53 North SR 53 North at SR 2 and State 91 Road NOTE: NM = Not Modeled Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Evacuation Time Estimate G-2 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 2 G.2 Access Control Points It is assumed that ACPs will be established within 2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br /> of the advisory to evacuate to discourage through travelers from using major through routes which traverse the EPZ. Access control points were defined in the Lucas and Ottawa County Plans.Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Evacuation Time Estimate G-3 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 2 Figure G-1. Davis-Besse Traffic Control Points Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Evacuation Time Estimate G-4 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 2 APPENDIX H Evacuation Regions H. EVACUATION REGIONS This appendix presents the evacuation percentages for each Evacuation Region (Table H-i) and maps of all Evacuation Regions. The percentages presented in Table H-1 are based on the methodology discussed in assumption 5 of Section 2.2 and shown in Figure 2-1. As discussed in Section 6, based on local procedures, Subarea 10 evacuates under all circumstances and is included in all Regions.Note, the baseline ETE study assumes 20 percent of households will not comply with the shelter advisory, as per Section 2.5.2 of NUREG/CR-7002.
Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Evacuation Time Estimate H-1 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 2 Table H-1. Percent of Subarea Population Evacuating for Each Region 2-Mile Ring S-Mile Ring El Z R a Rrtctv AtonAe Rego0idDrcio2rm 5 6 7 8 9 1 1 1 N Refer to Region R02 R04 NNE, NE, ENE, E, ESE20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20%SE, SSE, S, SSW, SW, WSW, W Refer to Region R01 ROS WNW 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 2 20%NW, NNW Refer to Reiion R02 Evauat 2 ia Raiu an Donwn to th Z Bonary Region Wi NE,cENE 20% 2 2 2 20%R09 ~~~~E, ESE20 20 20 20 2% 2%RiO ~~~SE20 20 20 20 20 20 20 2%_SSE, S, SSW, SW, WSW, W R1 WNW R12 NW R13 NNW I k2J20% 20% 20%0 20% 20% 20%20% 20%20%20%20%Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Evacuation Time Estimate H-2 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 2 Regio Nin Dieco 2ro% 10 220%56 7 8 0 1 1 SSE, S, SSW, SW, WSW, W Refer to Region R02 I___ WNW, NW Refer to Region R12 N NW I 20% I20%I220%
%20% ~420% 20 20% 1 20% M 20% 1 20% 120%Refer to Region Subarea(s)
Shelter-in-Place Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Evacuation Time Estimate H-3 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 2 Figure H-1. Region R01 Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Evacuation Time Estimate H-4 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 2 Figure H-2. Region R02 Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Evacuation Time Estimate H-5 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 2 Figure H-3. Region R03 Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Evacuation Time Estimate H-6 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 2 Figure H-4. Region R04 Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Evacuation Time Estimate H-7 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 2 Figure H-5. Region R05 Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Evacuation Time Estimate H-8 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 2 Figure H-6. Region R06 Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Evacuation Time Estimate H-9 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 2 Figure H-7. Region R07 Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Evacuation Time Estimate H-10 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 2 Figure H-8. Region Rog Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Evacuation Time Estimate H-11 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 2 Figure H-9. Region R09 Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Evacuation Time Estimate H-12 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 2 Figure H-10. Region RIO Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Evacuation Time Estimate H-13 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 2 Figure H-11. Region Rll Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Evacuation Time Estimate H-14 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 2 Figure H-12. Region R12 Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Evacuation Time Estimate H-15 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 2 Figure H-13. Region R13 Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Evacuation Time Estimate H-16 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 2 Figure H-14. Region R14 Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Evacuation Time Estimate H-17 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 2 Figure H-15. Region RIS Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Evacuation Time Estimate H-18 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 2 Figure H-16. Region R16 Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Evacuation Time Estimate H-19 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 2 Figure H-17. Region R17 Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Evacuation Time Estimate H-20 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 2 Ij Figure H-18. Region R18 Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Evacuation Time Estimate H-21 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 2 Figure H-19. Region R19 Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station H-22 Evacuation Time Estimate KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 2 Figure H-20. Region R20 Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Evacuation Time Estimate H-23 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 2 Figure H-21. Region R21 Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Evacuation Time Estimate H-24 KLD Engineering, P.C.Rev. 2