ML12339A221
| ML12339A221 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Braidwood  |
| Issue date: | 11/16/2012 |
| From: | Delaney M Exelon Generation Co, Stevenson & Associates |
| To: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| RS-12-159 12Q0108.10-R-001, Rev 0 | |
| Download: ML12339A221 (124) | |
Text
12Q0108.10-R-001 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-1 2-159 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 1 FC8762B Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment
==
Description:==
Ul SPENT FUEL PIT HX OUTLET VALVE Project: Braidwood 1 SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):
FH, 401.00 ft, ALL Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
No 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Not Applicable
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Yes C-204 12QO108.1O-R-O01 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 1 FC8762B Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment
==
Description:==
Ul SPENT FUEL PIT HX OUTLET VALVE Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Rugged and well-supported valve.Comments Seismic walkdown performed week of 7/16/12 by M. Delaney & P. Gazda Evaluated by: Marlene Delaney Date: 10/1/2012 Philip Gazda 10/1/2012 C-205 12Q0108.10-R-001 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: F N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: Equipment Class: Equipment
==
Description:==
Photos 1 FC8762B (0) Other Ul SPENT FUEL PIT HX OUTLET VALVE I[-k;btbzb 1-16-IZ ut5b It-L;?JtbZt$
t-Id-IZ Ubt C-206 12Q0108.10-R-001 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 1FC8766 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment
==
Description:==
SPENT FUEL PIT FLTR DEMIN LOOP RTRN TO U-1 RWST CHECK VLV Project: Braidwood 1 SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):
Auxiliary, 364.00 ft, ALL Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
No 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Not Applicable
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Yes C-207 12Q0108.10-R-001 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: r N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 1 FC8766 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment
==
Description:==
SPENT FUEL PIT FLTR DEMIN'LOOP RTRN TO U-1 RWST CHECK VLV Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
Yes 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Yes 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Yes 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Support at check valve Comments Seismic walkdown performed week of 7/16/12 by M. Delaney & P. Gazda Evaluated by: Marlene Delaney Date: 10/1/2012 Philip Gazda 10/1/2012 C-208 I 12Q0108.10-R-001 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 1FC8766 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment
==
Description:==
SPENT FUEL PIT FLTR DEMIN LOOP RTRN TO U-1 RWST CHECK VLV Photos FC8766 7-19-12 Group 2 008 C-209 12Q0108.10-R-001 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 1 of 4 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 1FC8793 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment
==
Description:==
SPENT FUEL PIT PMP DISCH CHECK VALVE Project: Braidwood 1 SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):
FH, 401.00 ft, ALL Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
No 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Not Applicable
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Yes C-210 12Q0108.10-R-001 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 2 of 4 Status: F N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 1 FC8793 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment
==
Description:==
SPENT FUEL PIT PMP DISCH CHECK VALVE Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Boric Acid leak identified on tag. No adverse seismic impact.Comments Seismic walkdown performed week of 7/16/12 by M. Delaney & P. Gazda Evaluated by: Marlene Delaney Date: 10/1/2012 C .Philip Gazda 10/1/2012 C-211 1200108.10-R-001 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 3 of 4 Status: F N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 1 FC8793 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment
==
Description:==
SPENT FUEL PIT PMP DISCH CHECK VALVE 1 FC8793 7-18-12 072 C-212 12Q0108.1O-R-0O1 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 4 of 4 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 1 FC8793 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment
==
Description:==
SPENT FUEL PIT PMP DISCH CHECK VALVE 1 FC8793 7-18-12 074 C-213 12Q0108.10-R-001 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 1FC8794 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment
==
Description:==
SPENT FUEL PIT FLTR DEMIN LOOP INLT ISOL VALVE Project: Braidwood 1 SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):
FH, 401.00 ft, ALL Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
No 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Not Applicable
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Yes C-214 12Q0108.10-R-001 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 1FC8794 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment
==
Description:==
SPENT FUEL PIT FLTR DEMIN LOOP INLT ISOL VALVE Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
Yes 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry, block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Yes 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Yes 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Well-supported Comments Seismic walkdown performed week of 7/16/12 by M. Delaney & P. Gazda Evaluated by: Marlene Delaney Date: 10/1/2012 Philip Gazda 10/1/2012 C-215 12Q0108.10-R-O01 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 1FC8794 Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment
==
Description:==
SPENT FUEL PIT FLTR DEMIN LOOP INLT ISOL VALVE Photos lIt-L~ltllV4
/f-Id-I' Wo/11-L;WU4 I-10-1z utt)C-216 12Q0108.10-R-001 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 1 of 4 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 1FT-0121 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment
==
Description:==
CHARGING LINE DIP CELL FLOW XMITTR Project: Braidwood 1 SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):
Auxiliary, 364.00 ft, ALL Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
No 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Not Applicable
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Instrument supported on Panel 1PL97J which is well-supported and braced Yes C-217 12Q0108.10-R-001 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 2 of 4 Status: M N U Seismic WalkdownChecklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 1FT-0121 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment
==
Description:==
CHARGING LINE DIP CELL FLOW XMITTR Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Overhead components including fire protection piping are well-supported.
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments Seismic walkdown performed week of 7/16/12 by M. Delaney & P. Gazda Evaluated by: Marlene Delaney Date: 10/1/2012 C. .Philip Gazda 10/1/2012 C-218 12Q0108.1O-R-OO1 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-1 2-1 59 Sheet 3 of 4 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 1FT-0121 Equipment Class: (18) Instr.Equipment
==
Description:==
CHARGIIN Iments on Racks IG LINE DIP CELL FLOW XMITTR Photos Photos-0121 (AWB -Housekeeping) 7-18-12 023 1 FT-0121 (AWB -Housekeeping)7-18-12 024 C-219 12Q0108.10-R-001 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 4 of 4 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 1FT-0121 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Eauipment
==
Description:==
CHARGING LINE DIP CELL FLOW XMITTR 1FT-0121 7-18-12 022 C-220 12Q0108.1O-R-001 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 1FT-0132 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment
==
Description:==
LETDOWN FLOW DIP CELL Project: Braidwood 1 SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):
Auxiliary, 383.00 ft, ALL Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
No 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Not Applicable
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Yes C-221 12QO108.10-R-001 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 1FT-0132 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment
==
Description:==
LETDOWN FLOW DIP CELL Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Seismic block walls 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
minor discoloration and deterioration near equipment Comments Seismic walkdown performed week of 7/16/12 by M. Delaney & P. Gazda Evaluated by: Marlene Delaney Date: 10/1/2012 Philip Gazda 10/1/2012 C-222 12Q0108.10-R-001 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-1 2-1 59 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: Equipment Class: Equipment
==
Description:==
IFT-01 32 (18) Instruments on Racks LETDOWN FLOW DIP CELL Photos 1t- I Y-U132 (AVVb concrete aamage) t-1 it-iz uuU 11- 1 Y-UiJ32 1-1 U-1 2 OUtS C-223 12Q0108.10-R-001 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 1 of 2 Status: F N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 1FT-AF014 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment
==
Description:==
AF TO SG 1B FLOW TRANSMITTER Project: Braidwood 1 SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):
Auxiliary, 364.00 ft, ALL Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
No 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Not Applicable
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Instrument is securely attached to Rack IPL84JB which is well-anchored and braced Yes C-224 12Q0108.10-R-001 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 2 of 2 Status: F N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 1FT-AF014 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment
==
Description:==
AF TO SG 1B FLOW TRANSMITTER Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments Seismic walkdown performed week of 7/16/12 by M. Delaney & P. Gazda Evaluated by: Marlene Delaney Date: 10/1/2012 Evaluated by: Philip Gazda 10/1/2012 Photos None C-225 12Q0108.10-R-001 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 1HS-FC001 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment
==
Description:==
SPENT FUEL PIT PUMP Project: Braidwood 1 SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):
FH, 401.00 ft, ALL Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
No 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Yes 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Not Applicable
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Anchored to seismic block wall.Yes C-226 12QO108.10-R-001 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 1HS-FC001 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment
==
Description:==
SPENT FUEL PIT PUMP Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments Seismic walkdown performed week of 7/16/12 by M. Delaney & P. Gazda Evaluated by: Marlene Delaney Date: 10/1/2012 Philip Gazda 10/1/2012 C-227 12Q0108.10-R-001 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 1HS-FC001 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment
==
Description:==
SPENT FUEL PIT PUMP Photos C-228 12QO108.10-R-001 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: EY- N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: lIP02E Equipment Class: (4) Transformers Equipment
==
Description:==
INSTRUMENT BUS 112 TRANSFORMER
-DIV. 12 Project: Braidwood 1 SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):
Auxiliary, 451.00 ft, ALL Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?
Yes 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Yes 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Yes This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Drawing 20E-0-3391K Revision AF 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?
C-229 12Q0108.10-R-001 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: Y-] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 1 IP02E Equipment Class: (4) Transformers Equipment
==
Description:==
INSTRUMENT BUS 112 TRANSFORMER
-DIV. 12 Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Seismic block walls 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments Seismic walkdown performed week of 7/16/12 by M. Delaney & P. Gazda Evaluated by: Marlene Delaney Date: 10/1/2012 Evaluated by: Philip Gazda 10/1/2012 C-230 12Q0108.10-R-001 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: Equipment Class: Equipment
==
Description:==
1 IP02E (4) Transformers INSTRUMENT BUS 112 TRANSFORMER
-DIV. 12 Photos 11P0F1:E 7-1 U-1 2 U58 1IP02E 7-16-12 057 C-231 12Q0108.1O-R-001 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.:. lIP02J Equipment Class: (14) Distribution Panels Equipment
==
Description:==
120 VAC INSTRUMENT BUS DISTRIBUTION PANEL 112- DIV. 12 Project: Braidwood 1 SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):
Auxiliary, 451.00 ft, ALL Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoraqe 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?
Yes 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Yes 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes Attached to safety related block wall.5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Yes This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Drawing 20E-O-3391F Revision AN Detail 123 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of .Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?
C-232 12Q0108.1O-R-OO1 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 1 IP02J Equipment Class: (14) Distribution Panels Equipment
==
Description:==
120 VAC INSTRUMENT BUS DISTRIBUTION PANEL 112 -DIV. 12 Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
Yes 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Seismic block walls 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Yes Yes 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments Seismic walkdown performed week of 7/16/12 by M. Delaney & P. Gazda t l -A( 4d __", Evaluated by: Marlene Delaney Date: 10/1/2012 C- " Philip Gazda 10/1/2012 C-233 12Q0108.10-R-001 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: T N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: Equipment Class: Equipment
==
Description:==
IlP02J (14) Distribution Panels 120 VAC INSTRUMENT BUS DISTRIBUTION PANEL 112 -DIV. 12 Photos None.C-234 12QO108.10-R-001 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: lIP06E Equipment Class: (16) Battery Chargers and Inverters Equipment
==
Description:==
INSTRUMENT BUS 112 INVERTER -DIV. 12 Project: Braidwood 1 SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):
Auxiliary, 451.00 ft, ALL Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Yes 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Drawing 20E-O-3391BK Revision D Detail 19271 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Yes Yes C-235 12Q0108.10-R-O01 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: lIP06E Equipment Class: (16) Battery Chargers and Inverters Equipment
==
Description:==
INSTRUMENT BUS 112 INVERTER -DIV. 12 Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Seismic block walls 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments Seismic walkdown performed week of 7/16/12 by M. Delaney & P. Gazda Evaluated by: Marlene Delaney Date: 10/1/2012 Philip Gazda 10/1/2012 C-236 12Q0108.1O-R-OO1 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-1 2-1 59 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: FT N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: Equipment Class: Equipment
==
Description:==
1IP06E (16) Battery Chargers and Inverters INSTRUMENT BUS 112 INVERTER -DIV. 12 Photos 11v-Uti-:
f-lt0-lz Ub 1IlPU-. 7-16-12 054 C-237 12Q0108.10-R-001 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 1 IP08E Equipment Class: (16) Battery Chargers and Inverters Equipment
==
Description:==
INSTRUMENT BUS 114 INVERTER -DIV. 12 Project: Braidwood 1 SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):
Auxiliary, 451.00 ft, ALL Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?
Yes 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Yes 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Yes This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Drawing 20E-O-3391BK Revision D Detail 19271 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?
C-238 12Q0108.10-R-001 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: lIP08E Equipment Class: (16) Battery Chargers and Inverters Equipment
==
Description:==
INSTRUMENT BUS 114 INVERTER -DIV. 12 Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
Yes 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Seismic block walls 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments Seismic walkdown performed week of 7/16/12 by M. Delaney & P. Gazda Evaluated by: Marlene Delaney Date: 10/1/2012 62 Gazda 10/1/2012 C-239 12Q0108.10-R-001 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: MI- N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: lIP08E Equipment Class: (16) Battery Chargers and Inverters Equipment
==
Description:==
INSTRUMENT BUS 114 INVERTER -DIV. 12 Photos I11VUtIt f-1 b-1 z Il-UI: [Fts -1U-12z Ub.C-240 12Q0108.10-R-001 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-1 2-159 Sheet 1 of 4 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 1 LT-0932 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment
==
Description:==
REF WTR STG TK LVL D/P XMTTR Project: Braidwood 1 SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):
Auxiliary, 379.00 ft, ALL Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
No 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Not Applicable
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Yes C-241 12Q0108.10-R-001 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 2 of 4 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 1LT-0932 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment
==
Description:==
REF W"R STG TK LVL D/P XMTTR Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
See A WC 39 for discussion on water leak in tunnel Comments Seismic walkdown performed week of 7/16/12 by M. Delaney & P. Gazda Evaluated by: Marlene Delaney Date: 10/1/2012 Philip Gazda 10/1/2012 C-242 12Q0108.10-R-OO1 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 3 of 4 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: Equipment Class: Equipment
==
Description:==
1 LT-0932 (18) Instruments on Racks REF WTR STG TK LVL D/P XM1TR Photos.Photos 1LT-0932 (AWB -water leak from hatch) 7-19-12 017 1LT-0932 7-19-12 015 C-243 12Q0108.10-R-001 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 4 of 4 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: lLT-0932 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks EauiDment
==
Description:==
REF WTR STG TK LVL DIP XMTTR 1LT-0932 7-19-12 016 C-244 12Q0108.10-R-001 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: j N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 1MS001A Equipment Class: (7) Fluid-Operated Valves Equipment
==
Description:==
MS ISOL VLV LOOP 1A ASMBLY; 30-1/4" Project: Braidwood 1 SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):
Auxiliary, 377.00 ft, ALL Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
No 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Not Applicable
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Yes C-245 12Q0108.10-R-001 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 1MS001A Equipment Class: (7) Fluid-Operated Valves Equipment
==
Description:==
MS ISOL VLV LOOP 1A ASMBLY; 30-1/4" Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Valve is robust.Comments Seismic walkdown performed week of 7/16/12 by M. Delaney & P. Gazda Evaluated by: Marlene Delaney Date: 10/1/2012 Philip Gazda 10/1/2012 C-246 i2QO1O8.1O-R-O01 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: MI N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 1MS001A Equipment Class: (7) Fluid-Operated Valves Equipment
==
Description:==
MS ISOL VLV LOOP 1A ASMBLY; 30-1/4" Photos 1MS001A 7-17-12 011 1MS001A 7-17-12 012 C-247 12Q0108.10-R-001 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 1 of 4 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 1MS018A Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment
==
Description:==
S/G lA PORVASMBLY; 8" Project: Braidwood 1 SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):
Auxiliary, 401.00 ft, ALL Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL, The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
No 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Not Applicable
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Yes C-248 12Q0108.10-R-001 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 2 of 4 Status: F N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 1MS018A Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment
==
Description:==
S/G 1A PORVASMBLY; 8" Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Valve is robust.Comments Seismic walkdown performed week of 7/16/12 by M. Delaney & P. Gazda Evaluated by: Marlene Delaney Date: 10/1/2012 Philip Gazda 10/1/2012 C-249 12Q0108.10-R-001 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 3 of 4 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: lMS018A Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment
==
Description:==
S/G lA PORVASMBLY; 8" Photos 1MSO18A 7-17-12 008 C-250 1200108.1O-R-001 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-1 2-1 59 Sheet 4 of 4 Status: F-] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: Equipment Class: Fnuinm~nt Dnsqcrintinn:
1MS018A (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves S/G 1A PORV ASMBLY; 8" C-251 12Q0108.10-R-001 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 1 of 4 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 1MS018B Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment
==
Description:==
S/G 1 B PORV ASMBLY; 8" Project: Braidwood 1 SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):
Auxiliary, 401.00 ft, ALL Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
01o 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Not Applicable
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Yes C-252 12Q0108.10-R-001 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 2 of 4 Status: Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 1MS018B Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment
==
Description:==
S/G 1 B PORV ASMBLY; 8" Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Scaffolding near equipment is well-supported.
All overhead components are well-supported.
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Rugged valve Comments Seismic walkdown performed week of 7/16/12 by M. Delaney & P. Gazda Evaluated by: Marlene Delaney Date: 10/11/2012 Philip Gazda 10/1/2012 C-253 1200108.10-R-001 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 3 of 4 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: Equipment Class: Equipment
==
Description:==
1MS018B (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves S/G 1B PORV ASMBLY; 8" Photos 1MSO18B 7-17-12 004 1MS018B 7-17-12 005 C-254 12QO108.10-R-001 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 4 of 4 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: lMS018B Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment
==
Description:==
S/G 1 B PORV ASMBLY; 8" 1MSO18B 7-17-12 006 IMS018B 7-17-12 007 C-255 12QO108.10-R-001 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 1 of 4 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 1PA01J Equipment Class: " (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment
==
Description:==
PROTECTION SYSTEM CABINET (l&E Prot. Cab. CH 1)Project: Braidwood 1 SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):
Auxiliary, 451.00 ft, ALL Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?
Yes Welded detail 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Yes 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes Floor is tile so cracks can't be seen exterior to cabinet. Details are welded.5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Yes This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Drawing 20E-0-3391C Revision BM Detail for miscellaneous racks 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?
C-256 12Q0108.1O-R-001 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 2 of 4 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 1PA01J Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment
==
Description:==
PROTECTION SYSTEM CABINET (I&E Prot. Cab. CH 1)Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
Yes 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Yes Yes Yes 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments Seismic walkdown performed week of 7/16/12 by M. Delaney & P. Gazda Evaluated by: Marlene Delaney Date: 10/1/2012 Philip Gazda 10/1/2012 C-257 12Q0108.10-R-O01 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 3 of 4 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 1PA01J Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment
==
Description:==
PROTECTION SYSTEM CABINET (I&E Prot. Cab. CH 1)Photos 1PA01J 7-16-12 009 I VAUIJ I-Ib-U UUtS C-258 12Q0108.10-R-001 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 4 of 4 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: Equipment Class: FIauinmpnt Descrintion:
1 PAO1 J (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets PROTECTION SYSTEM CABINET (I&E Prot. Cab. CH 1)1PA01J 7-16-12 010 C-259 12Q0108.10-R-001 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 1 of 4 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 1PA03J Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment
==
Description:==
PROTECTION SYSTEM CABINET (I&E Prot. Cab. CH 3)Project: Braidwood 1 SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):
Auxiliary, 451.00 ft, ALL Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?
Yes Welded detail 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Yes 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes Tile floor 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Yes This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Drawing 20E-0-339 IC Revision BM Detail for miscellaneous racks 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?
C-260 12Q0108.1O-R-001 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 2 of 4 Status: E-Y] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 1PA03J Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment
==
Description:==
PROTECTION SYSTEM CABINET (I&E Prot. Cab. CH 3)Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
Yes 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Yes 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Yes 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments Seismic walkdown performed week of 7/16/12 by M. Delaney & P. Gazda Evaluated by: Marlene Delaney Date: 10/1/2012 Philip Gazda 10/1/2012 C-261 12Q0108.10-R-001 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 3 of 4 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: Equipment Class: Equipment
==
Description:==
1 PA03J (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets PROTECTION SYSTEM CABINET (I&E Prot. Cab. CH 3)Photos 1PA03J 7-16-12 011 1PA03J 7-16-12 012 C-262 12Q0108.10-R-001 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 4 of 4 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: Equipment Class: EauiDment
==
Description:==
1 PA03J (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets PROTECTION SYSTEM CABINET (I&E Prot. Cab. CH 3)1PA03J 7-16-12 013 C-263 12Q0108.10-R-001 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: 7 N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 1PA07J Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment
==
Description:==
PROC I&C RACK CONT GRP 3 CAB 7 Project: Braidwood 1 SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):
Auxiliary, 451.00 ft, ALL Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?
Yes 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Yes 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Yes This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Drawing 20E-0-3391C Revision BM Detail for miscellaneous racks 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?
C-264 12Q0108.1O-R-001 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 1 PA07J Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment
==
Description:==
PROC I&C RACK CONT GRP 3 CAB 7 Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments Seismic walkdown performed week of 7/16/12 by M. Delaney & P. Gazda Evaluated by: Marlene Delaney Date: 10/1/2012 Philip Gazda 10/1/2012 C-265 12Q0108.10-R-001 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 1PA07J Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment
==
Description:==
PROC I&C RACK CONT GRP 3 CAB 7 Photos 1PA07J 7-16-12 014 1PA07J 7-16-12 015 C-266 12Q0108.10-R-001 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 1 of 4 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 1PA14J Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment
==
Description:==
ESF SEQUENCING
& ACTUATION CABINET TRAIN B Project: Braidwood 1 SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):
Auxiliary, 451.00 ft, ALL Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be-used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?
Yes 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Yes 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes Tile floor so cracks can't be seen 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Yes This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Drawing 20E-0-3391C Revision BM Mounting of Sequencing
& Act. Cabinet IPA14J Weld exceeds drawing requirements
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?
C-267 12QO108.10-R-O01 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 2 of 4 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 1PA14J Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment
==
Description:==
ESF SEQUENCING
& ACTUATION CABINET TRAIN B Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments Seismic walkdown performed week of 7/16/12 by M. Delaney & P. Gazda Evaluated by: Marlene Delaney Date: 10/1/2012 Philip Gazda 10/1/2012 C-268 12Q0108.10-R-001 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 3 of 4 Status: T N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 1PA14J Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment
==
Description:==
ESF SEQUENCING
& ACTUATION CABINET TRAIN B Photos 1PA14J 7-16-12 016 1PA14J 7-16-12 017 C-269 12Q0108.10-R-001 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 4 of 4 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 1PA14J Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment
==
Description:==
ESF SEQUENCING
& ACTUATION CABINET TRAIN B 1PAI4J 7-16-12 018 C-270 12Q0108.10-R-001 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 1 of 4 Status: EY- N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 1PA28J Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment
==
Description:==
AUX SAFEGUARD RELAY CABINET (B)Project: Braidwood 1 SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):
Auxiliary, 451.00 ft, ALL Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?
Yes 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Yes 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Yes This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Weld exceeds drawing dimensions.
Drawing 20E-0-3391C Revision BM Mounting Detail for Miscellaneous Racks 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?
C-271 12QO108.10-R-001 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 2 of 4 Status: j N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 1PA28J Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment
==
Description:==
AUX SAFEGUARD RELAY CABINET (B)Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions
.11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments Seismic walkdown performed week of 7/16/12 by M. Delaney & P. Gazda Evaluated by: Marlene Delaney Date: 10/1/2012 Philip Gazda 10/1/2012 C-272 1200108.10-R-001 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 3 of 4 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 1PA28J Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment
==
Description:==
AUX SAFEGUARD RELAY CABINET (B)Photos 1 VAZWJ 7-1( U1 9 1FA2.6J 7-1(j-1Z 020 C-273 12Q0108.10-R-001 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 4 of 4 Status: FTN U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 1PA28J Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment
==
Description:==
AUX SAFEGUARD RELAY CABINET (B)1PA28J 7-16-12 021 C-274 12Q0108.10-R-001 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 1 of 4 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 1PA34J Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment
==
Description:==
CONTROL SYSTEM CABINET ESF DIV. 12 Project: Braidwood 1 SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):
Auxiliary, 451.00 ft, ALL Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?
Yes 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Yes 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Yes This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Weld exceeds drawing dimensions.
Drawing 20E-0-3391C Revision BM Mounting Detail for Misc. Racks 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?
C-275 12Q0108.10-R-001 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 2 of 4 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 1PA34J Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment
==
Description:==
CONTROL SYSTEM CABINET ESF DIV. 12 Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
See A WC 3 for discussion on test cabinet.8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Overhead lights on rods and secure.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments Seismic walkdown performed week of 7/16/12 by M. Delaney & P. Gazda Evaluated by: Marlene Delaney Date: 10/1/2012 Philip Gazda 10/1/2012 C-276 12Q0108.10-R-O01 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 3 of 4 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: Equipment Class: Equipment
==
Description:==
1 PA34J (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets CONTROL SYSTEM CABINET ESF DIV. 12 Photos 1 PA34J (AWB Test Panel) 7-16-12 024 1 PA34J (AWB Test Panel)7-16-12 025 C-277 12Q0108.10-R-001 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 4 of 4 Status: MI N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 1PA34J Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment
==
Description:==
CONTROL SYSTEM CABINET ESF DIV. 12 1PA34J 7-16-12 022 1PA34J 7-16-12 023 C-278 12Q0108.1O-R-O01 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: F N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 1PI-0627 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment
==
Description:==
GAUGE; PRESSURE, U.S. GAUGE CO.,0-160 PSIG Project: Braidwood 1 SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):
FH, 401.00 ft, ALL Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for, documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
No 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Not Applicable
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Yes C-279 12Q0108.1O-R-O01 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 1PI-0627 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment
==
Description:==
GAUGE; PRESSURE, U.S. GAUGE CO.,0-160 PSIG Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments Seismic walkdown performed week of 7/16/12 by M. Delaney & P. Gazda Evaluated by: Marlene Delaney Date: 10/1/2012 Philip Gazda 10/1/2012 C-280 12Q0108.10-R-001 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 1PI-0627 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment
==
Description:==
GAUGE; PRESSURE, U.S. GAUGE CO.,0-160 PSIG Photos None.C-281 12Q0108.10-R-001 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: FT N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 1PI-0633 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment
==
Description:==
SPENT FUEL PIT PUMP SUCTION PRESSURE INDICATO Project: Braidwood 1 SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):
FH, 401.00 ft, ALL Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
No 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Not Applicable
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Instrument attached a rack that is well-anchored to the wall.Yes C-282 12QO108.1O-R-001 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 1PI-0633 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment
==
Description:==
SPENT FUEL PIT PUMP SUCTION PRESSURE INDICATO Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
Yes 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
See A WC 30 for discussion on seismic housekeeping issue 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Yes Yes 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments Seismic walkdown performed week of 7/16/12 by M. Delaney & P. Gazda Evaluated by: Marlene Delaney Date: 10/1/2012 Philip Gazda 10/1/2012 C-283 12Q0108.10-R-001 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 1PI-0633 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment
==
Description:==
SPENT FUEL PIT PUMP SUCTION PRESSURE INDICATO Photos 1 PI-0633 (AVVB -housekeeping) 7-18-12 080 1 PI-0633 7-18-12 079 C-284 12QO108.10-R-001 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 1 of 4 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 1PL08J Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment
==
Description:==
1B DG CONTROL PANEL Project: Braidwood 1 SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):
Auxiliary, 401%00 ft, ALL Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
No 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes welded at base 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Yes 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Not Applicable
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Yes C-285 12Q0108.10-R-001 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 2 of 4 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 1PL08J Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment
==
Description:==
1B DG CONTROL PANEL Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not-likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments Seismic walkdown performed week of 7/16/12 by M. Delaney & P. Gazda Evaluated by: Marlene Delaney Date: 10/1/2012 Philip Gazda 10/1/2012 C-286 12Q0108.10-R-001 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 3 of 4 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 1 PL08J Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment
==
Description:==
1B DG CONTROL PANEL Photos 1PL08J 7-16-12 081 1PLOJ 7-16-12 082 C-287 12Q0108.10-R-001 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 4 of 4 Status: F N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: Equipment Class: P:ni iinmant r)Pczf.rintinn-1 PL08J (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets 1B DG CONTROL PANEL 1PL08J 7-16-12 083 C-288 12Q0108.1O-R-001 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 1 of 4 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 1PM05J Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment
==
Description:==
MAIN CONTROL BOARD Project: Braidwood 1 SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):
Auxiliary, 451.00 ft, ALL Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?
Yes 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Yes 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes Exterior to panel is carpeted so cracking cannot be seen.5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Yes This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Back of panel opened at all locations and weld detail verified.
Front of panel, one cabinet opened due to accessibility issues. Outer cabinet weld detail could be verified based on exterior visual inspection.
Based on the inspection, the anchorage is acceptable.
Drawing 20E-O-3391AT Revision V 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?
C-289 12Q0108.1O-R-001 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 2 of 4 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: lPM05J Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment
==
Description:==
MAIN CONTROL BOARD Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
Adjacent cabinets (1PMO5J and IPMO6J) are bolted together.8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
See Area Walk-by 2.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions.
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments Seismic walkdown performed week of 7/16/12 by M. Delaney & P. Gazda C-290 12Q0108.1O-R-001 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-1 2-1 59 Sheet 3 of 4 Status: FYC k N Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)U Equipment ID No.: lPM05J Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment
==
Description:==
MAIN CONTROL BOARD 12Q0108.10-R-001 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 3 of 4 Evaluated by: Marlene Delaney Date: 10/1/2012 Philip Gazda 10/1/2012 Photos 1PMO5J 7-16-12 005 1PM05J 7-16-12 006 C-291 12Q0108.1O-R-001 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 4 of 4 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: lPM05J Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Eauioment Descriotion:
MAIN CONTROL BOARD ItImuoi I-10-1Z uut C-292 12QO108.10-R-001 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 1PT-0516 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment
==
Description:==
S/G LOOP 1A STM PRESS XMTTR Project: Braidwood 1 SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):
Auxiliary, 377.00 ft, ALL Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
No 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Not Applicable
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Instrument mounted to rack with detail specified on Drawing M-33 Sheet 108.Rack is well-anchored.
Yes C-293 12Q0108.10-R-001 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 1PT-0516 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment
==
Description:==
S/G LOOP 1A STM PRESS XMTTR Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
Yes 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Nearby scaffolding is tied off to prevent contact. Other plant components prevent scaffold from impacting instrument.
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Yes Yes Yes 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments Seismic walkdown performed week of 7/16/12 by M. Delaney & P. Gazda Evaluated by: Marlene Delaney Date: 10/1/2012 Philip Gazda 10/1/2012 C-294 12Q0108.10-R-001 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 1PT-0516 Equipment Class: (18) Instruments on Racks Equipment
==
Description:==
S/G LOOP 1A STM PRESS XMTTR Photos None.C-295 12Q0108.10-R-O01 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 1RHO1PB Equipment Class: (6) Vertical Pumps Equipment
==
Description:==
PUMP,1B RESIDUAL HEAT REMOVAL ASMBLY Project: Braidwood 1 SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):
Auxiliary, 364.00 ft, ALL Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?
Yes 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Yes 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Yes This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Drawing M-1219 Sheet 2 Revision Y 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?
C-296 12Q0108.1O-R-0O1 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 1RH01PB Equipment Class: (6) Vertical Pumps Equipment
==
Description:==
PUMP,1B RESIDUAL HEAT REMOVAL ASMBLY Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments Seismic walkdown performed week of 7/16/12 by M. Delaney & P. Gazda Evaluated by: Marlene Delaney Date: 10/1/2012 Philip Gazda 10/11/2012 C-297 12Q0108.10-R-001 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 1RH01PB Equipment Class: (6) Vertical Pumps Equipment
==
Description:==
PUMP,1B RESIDUAL HEAT REMOVAL ASMBLY Photos 1RH01PB 7-19-12 001 1RH01PB 7-19-12 002 C-298 12Q0108.10-R-001 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 1RH01PB-A Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment
==
Description:==
RH PUMP 1 B SEAL COOLER VALVE Project: Braidwood 1 SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):
Auxiliary, 346.00 ft, ALL Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Component is a valve 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?No Not Applicable
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable
- 6. -Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Yes C-299 12Q0108.10-R-O01 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 1 RH0l1PB-A Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment
==
Description:==
RH PUMP 1B SEAL COOLER VALVE Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
Yes 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Yes 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Yes 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments Seismic walkdown performed week of 7/16/12 by M. Delaney & P. Gazda Evaluated by: Marlene Delaney Date: 10/1/2012 Philip Gazda 10/1/2012 C-300 12Q0108.1O-R-001 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 1RH01PB-A Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment
==
Description:==
RH PUMP 1B SEAL COOLER VALVE Photos 1 RHO1 PB-A 7-19-12 006 C-301 12Q0108.10-R-001 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 1 RH607 Equipment Class: (7) Fluid-Operated Valves Equipment
==
Description:==
RESIDUAL HEAT REMOVAL HX 11B FLOW CONT VLV ASMBLY; 8" Project: Braidwood 1 SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):
Auxiliary, 357.00 ft, ALL Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
No 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Not Applicable
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Yes C-302 12Q0108.10-R-001 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: V N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 1RH607 Equipment Class: (7) Fluid-Operated Valves Equipment
==
Description:==
RESIDUAL HEAT REMOVAL HX 1 B FLOW CONT VLV ASMBLY; 8" Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
overhead well-supported including tube track directly above valve seismic block walls 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments Seismic walkdown performed week of 7/16/12 by M. Delaney & P. Gazda Evaluated by: Marlene Delaney Date: 10/1/2012 62/A Philip Gazda 10/1/2012 C-303 12Q0108.10-R-001 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: [T N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: Equipment Class: Equipment
==
Description:==
1 RH607 (7) Fluid-Operated Valves RESIDUAL HEAT REMOVAL HX 1 B FLOW CONT VLV ASMBLY; 8" Photos iKHtiu1 (-ThJ-1Z UU(I1KHMU 17-19-12 C-304 12Q0108.10-R-001 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 1 of 4 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 1SIO1T Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment
==
Description:==
REFUELING WATER STORAGE TANK Project: Braidwood 1 SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):
FH Out, 401.00 ft, ALL Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
The RWST is a reinforced concrete tank that is anchored into a reinforced concrete pad via reinforcing steel dowels. No anchorage can be verified for this component.
Details shown on Drawing S-1402 Revision J and S-1404 Revision W 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?
Yes 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Yes 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Not Applicable This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?
C-305 12QO108.10-R-O01 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 2 of 4 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 1SI01T Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment
==
Description:==
REFUELING WATER STORAGE TANK Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Scaffolding adjacent to the tank is well-supported.
Would not adversely impact robust tank if scaffold fell.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction.evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments Seismic walkdown performed week of 7/16/12 by M. Delaney & P. Gazda Evaluated by: Marlene Delaney Date: 10/1/2012 Philip Gazda 10/1/2012 C-306 12Q0108.10-R-001 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 3 of 4 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 1SI01T Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment
==
Description:==
REFUELING WATER STORAGE TANK Photos 1SI01T 7-17-12 001 ISIO0T 7-17-12 002 C-307 12Q0108.10-R-001 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 4 of 4 Status: M-J N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: Equipment Class: Equipment
==
Description:==
ISIQIT (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers REFUELING WATER STORAGE TANK C-308 12Q0108.10-R-O01 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 1S18801B Equipment Class: (7) Fluid-Operated Valves CHG PMP TO COLD LEGS INJECTION ISOL VLV (C/S AT 1 PM05J)Equipment
==
Description:==
ASMBLY; 4" Project: Braidwood 1 SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):
Auxiliary, 375.00 ft, ALL Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
No 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Not Applicable
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Yes C-309 12Q0108.10-R-001 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 1S18801B Equipment Class: (7) Fluid-Operated Valves CHG PMP TO COLD LEGS INJECTION ISOL VLV (C/S AT 1PM05J)Equipment
==
Description:==
ASMBLY; 4" Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
Yes, 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Yes Yes Yes 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Rugged valve Comments Seismic walkdown performed week of 7/16/12 by M. Delaney & P. Gazda Evaluated by: Marlene Delaney Date: 10/1/2012 Philip Gazda 10/1/2012 C-310 12Q0108.10-R-O01 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)EquipmentID No.: 1S18801B Equipment Class: (7) Fluid-Operated Valves CHG PMP TO COLD LEGS INJECTION ISOL VLV (C/S AT 1 PM05J)Equipment
==
Description:==
ASMBLY; 4" Photos 1S18801B 7-19-12 Group 2 005 1S18801B 7-19-12 Group 2 006 C-311 12Q0108.10-R-O01 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 1 of 4 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 1S18804B Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment
==
Description:==
ASSY -MOV lB RH HX TO 1B SI PP SUCT HDR ISOL VLV Project: Braidwood 1 SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):
Auxiliary, 364.00 ft, ALL Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
No 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Not Applicable
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Yes C-312 12QO108.10-R-001 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 2 of 4 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 1S18804B Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment
==
Description:==
ASSY -MOV lB RH HX TO lB SI PP SUCT HDR ISOL VLV Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Seismic block walls Overhead components are well-supported
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Pipe is well-supported Comments Seismic walkdown performed week of 7/16/12 by M. Delaney & P. Gazda Evaluated by: Marlene Delaney Date: 10/1/2012 Philip Gazda 10/1/2012 C-313 12Q0108.10-R-001 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 3 of 4 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 1S18804B Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment
==
Description:==
ASSY -MOV 1B RH HX TO 1B SI PP SUCT HDR ISOL VLV Photos 1S18804B 7-19-12 011 1S18804B 7-19-12 012 C-314 12Q0108.10-R-001 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 4 of 4 Status: r-71 N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 1S18804B Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment
==
Description:==
ASSY -MOV 1 B RH HX TO 1 B SI PP SUCT HDR ISOL VLV 1ZSItJt$U4t$
(-19-12 U13 IbWtMU4tS
(-ThJ-1 U14 C-315 12Q0108.10-R-001 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 1S18809B Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment
==
Description:==
RH TO COLD LEGS 11B/1C ISOL VLV (1PM06J) ASMBLY; 8" Project: Braidwood 1 SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):
Auxiliary, 364.00 ft, ALL Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
No 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Not Applicable
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Yes C-316 12Q0108.10-R-001 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: T N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 1S18809B Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment
==
Description:==
RH TO COLD LEGS 1B/iC ISOL VLV (1PM06J) ASMBLY; 8" Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments Seismic walkdown performed week of 7/16/12 by M. Delaney & P. Gazda Evaluated by: Marlene Delaney Date: 10/1/2012 Philip Gazda 10/1/2012 C-317 12QO108.10-R-001 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: Equipment Class: Equipment
==
Description:==
I S18809B (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves RH TO COLD LEGS 1 B/1 C ISOL VLV (1 PM06J) ASMBLY; 8" Photos izil dbuub t-19-IZ Uroupz UU/C-318 12QO108.10-R-O01 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: T N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 1SX004 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment
==
Description:==
CC HX 1 iNLT VLVASMBLY; 30" Project: Braidwood 1 SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):
Auxiliary, 330.00 ft, ALL Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
No 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Not Applicable
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Yes C-319 12Q0108.1O-R-OO1 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 1SX004 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment
==
Description:==
CC HX 1 INLT VLV ASMBLY; 30" Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
above components are well-supported
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Pipe well-supported near valve Comments Seismic walkdown performed week of 7/16/12 by M. Delaney & P. Gazda Evaluated by: Marlene Delaney Date: 10/1/2012 Philip Gazda 10/1/2012 C-320 12Q01 08.10O-R-001 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: MI N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: Equipment Class: Equipment
==
Description:==
1SX004 (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves CC HX 1 INLT VLV ASMBLY; 30" Photos Photos 1SX004 7-18-12 049 C-321 12Q0108.10-R-001 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: F N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 1SX005 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment
==
Description:==
U-0 CC HX INLT VLV ASMBLY; 30" Project: Braidwood 1 SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):
Auxiliary, 330.00 ft, ALL Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Not Applicable
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Yes C-322 12Q0108.10-R-001 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: ' N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 1SX005 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment
==
Description:==
U-0 CC HX INLT VLV ASMBLY; 30" Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
well-supported fire protection piping 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
pipe is well-supported Comments Seismic walkdown performed week of 7/16/12 by M. Delaney & P. Gazda Evaluated by: Marlene Delaney Date: 10/1/2012 Philip Gazda 10/1/2012 C-323 12Q0108.10-R-001 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: FTN U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 1SX005 Equipment Class: (8) Motor-Operated and Solenoid-Operated Valves Equipment
==
Description:==
U-0 CC HX INLT VLV ASMBLY; 30" Photos UJU 1)AUU0 1-1qi-Lu4U C-324 12Q0108.1O-R-001 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 1SX01FB Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment
==
Description:==
1B SX PP DSCH STRN Project: Braidwood 1 SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):
Auxiliary, 330.00 ft, ALL Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?
Yes 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Yes 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yes 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: Yes This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Drawing M-1218 Revision AA 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?
C-325 12QO108.10-R-001 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 1SX01FB Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment
==
Description:==
1B SX PP DSCH STRN Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
Yes Yes 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Yes 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments Seismic walkdown performed week of 7/16/12 by M. Delaney & P. Gazda Evaluated by: Marlene Delaney Date: 10/1/2012 Philip Gazda 10/1/2012 C-326 12QO108.1O-R-OO1 Rev. 0 Correspondence No.: RS-12-159 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: F N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: 1SX01FB Equipment Class: (0) Other Equipment
==
Description:==
1 B SX PP DSCH STRN Photos 1SXOIFB 7-18-12 032 C-327