ML120100562

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Regulatory Conference Supporting Documentation for Apparent Violations EA-11-241 and EA-11-243, Attachment 3, Root Cause Evaluation-Plant Trip During Panel ED-11-2 Maintenance, Rev 2 - End, Part 7.4 of 7
ML120100562
Person / Time
Site: Palisades Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 01/05/2012
From:
Entergy Nuclear Operations
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML1200100495 List:
References
EA-11-241, EA-11-243, PNP 2012-06 CR-PLP-2011-4822
Download: ML120100562 (31)


Text

A Entergy PSA EA -PSA-SDP - D11-2-11-07 Rev. 1 En g ineerin g Analysis Attachment 12 - Page 1 of 26 Attachment 12 HRA Calculator Output for Developed HEPs This attachment contains the EPRI HRA Calculator output for the failure to trip charging pump HEP, and failure to align EY-10 to the bypass regulator, and failure to align an alternate charger, as discussed in Section 6.3.

References

[1] EPRI HRA Calculator TM, Version 4.0, Electric Power Software Center, 9625 Research Drive, Charlotte, NC 28262.

I EPRI HRA Calculator 4.0 1/5/20121/5/2012 CVC-PMOA-P55-TRIP-S, OP FAILS TO STOP CHARGING PUMP OPERATION (HEP)

Cog nitive Method Date Analyst - Reviewer CBDTM/ASEP/THERP 12/07/11 FJY - BAB Analysis File File Date File Size ( B ytes )

Pal Post HEPs r31-5-11.HRA 12/07/11 5935104 Table 1: CVC-PMOA-P55-TRIP-S

SUMMARY

Analysis Method : CBDTM/ASEP Combination (Sum )

Anal ysis Database : Pal Post HEPs r3 1-5-11.HRA 12/07/11, 5935104 B ytes )

Analysis Results: without Recove ry with Recove ry PCO -CBDTM 6.8e-03 3.1 e-04 PC0 -ASEP 1 .9e-03 1.9e-03 Pexe 2.0e-02 4.6e-03 Total HEP 6.8e-03 Error Factor 5 This HEP is modified from the base case to replicate the conditions of the 9/25/2011 loss of dc event. As a result of the loss of dc and preferred ac power in this event an additional charging pump started on a right channel safety injection signal. Letdown was isolated when CV-2009 closed due a right channel containment high radiation signal. Consequently the event results in a charging letdown flow mismatch which results in a continuous rise in pressurizer level. This condition requires the operator action to control charging to regain control of pressurizer level prior to challenging a pressurizer safety. The timing regarding this action is provided under the time window description. This action is the same as the base case action under different conditions with the same indications and alternate timing as described in the 'Time Window' discussion.

In response to annunciator LETDOWN HT EX TUBE INLET HI-LO PRESS, EK-0704 operators would observe charging and letdown flow and place all 3 orifice valve control switches to CLOSE per ARP-4. The ARP then directs restoring charging and letdown when desired per SOP-2A. If P-55A is not stopped , PZR level will continue rising.

a. SOP-2A Section 7.3.9 TO RESTORE LETDOWN provides direction for restoring letdown flow. There is no stated procedural link between the ARPs and SOP-2A Section 7.3.8 ISOLATE LETDOWN AT RATED CONDITIONS . However, this section does provide direction to successfully mitigate this condition and may be referred to as the title describes the existing condition.
b. In the event action is not taken to manually control charging flow, PZR level will continue rising and the PRESSURIZER LEVEL HI-LO, EK-0761 annunciator will alarm at 62.75% level, and then annunciator PRESSURIZER HIGH LEVEL, EK-0769 will alarm at 75% level. ARP response for these annunciators directs the operator to SHIFT level level control to the channel not in service. Additionally direction is provided that manual control may be necessary.

On reactor trip the operators enter EOP-1.0 STANDARD POST-TRIP ACTIONS . Immediate Actions Step 5 directs the operator to manually control charging and letdown to maintain PZR level between 42% and 57%, at which time they take manual control of the charging pumps.

1. Initial Conditions: Steady state, full power operations Analysis File: Pal_Post_HEPs_r3 1-5-11.HRA (12/07/11, 5935104 Bytes) 2

EPRI HRA Calculator 4.0 1/5/20121/5/2012

2. Initiating Event: Malfunction occurs spuriously isolating letdown.
3. Accident Sequence (preceding functional failures and successes):

LETDOWN HT EX TUBE OUTLET HI-LO PRESS EK-0704 annunciators alarms.

ARP-4 provides guidance that the operator may have to to manually control pressure and RESTORE Charging and Letdown in a controlled manner per SOP-2A.

In this scenario, failure to trip charging pump(s) would challenge pressurizer safeties.

4. Preceding operator errors or successes in sequence: No operator errors or additional successes noted.
5. Operator action success criterion: Success is tripping charging pumps P-55B, C and/or A as necessary to restore level to the normal operating band .
6. Consequences of failure : SORV, LOCA, and potential for core damage.

Cues and Indications Initial Cue EK-0704, LETDOWN HT EX TUBE OUTLET HI-LO PRESS Recovery Cue Pump breaker status indicating lights on panel EC-02.

Charging flow indication FIC-0202 on panel EC-02.

Pressurizer level indication LIC-0101A/B (narrow range on EC-02), LI-0103A (wide range, on EC-02) and LIA-0102A (wide ran g e on p anel EC-12 ) .

Cue/s In response to annunciator LETDOWN HT EX TUBE INLET HI-LO PRESS, EK-0704 operators would observe charging and letdown flow and place all 3 orifice valve control switches to CLOSE per ARP-4. The ARP then directs restoring charging and letdown when desired per SOP-2A.

If P-55A is not stopped, PZR level will continue rising.

In the event action is not taken to manually control charging flow, PZR level will continue rising and the PRESSURIZER LEVEL HI-LO, EK-0761 annunciator will alarm at 62.75%

level, and then annunciator PRESSURIZER HIGH LEVEL, EK-0769 will alarm at 75% level.

Additional indication available:

LI-0103B on panel EC-33 in the Auxiliary Building 590 elevation LI-0102B on panel EC-150 in the Turbine Building 607 elevation De g ree of Clarity Ve Good Analysis File: Pal_Post_HEPs_r3 1-5-11.HRA (12/07/11, 5935104 Bytes)

I EPRI HRA Calculator 4.0 1/5/20121/5/2012 Procedures and Trainin g Co g nitive Procedure ARP-4 TILE 4 ( Revision: 58 )

Co g nitive Ste p Number OPERATOR ACTION Co g nitive Instruction CHECK Charg in g flow and Letdown flow matched.

Execution Procedure ARP-4 TILE 4 ( Revision: 58 )

Other Procedure SOP-2A ( Revision: 69 )

Job Performance Measure PL-OPS-CVC-005J Classroom Trainin g Fre q uency 0.5 p er year Simulator Trainin g Fre q uency : 0.5 p er year Notes Procedures applicable to this action EOP-1.0 STANDARD POST-TRIP ACTIONS REV 12 ARP-4 PRIMARY COOLANT PUMP STEAM GENERATOR AND ROD DRIVES SCHEME EK-07 (EC-12) REV 58 SOP-2A CHEMICAL AND VOLUME CONTROL SYSTEM REV 70 In response to annunciator LETDOWN HT EX TUBE INLET HI-LO PRESS, EK-0704 operators would observe charging and letdown flow and place all 3 orifice valve control switches to CLOSE per ARP-4. The ARP then directs restoring charging and letdown when desired per SOP-2A. If P-55A is not stopped , PZR level will continue rising.

TRAINING:

Initial training and is included in 2 year training plan.

JPM PL-OPS-CVC-005J, MANUALLY LOWER CHARGING AND LETDOWN FLOW includes an action to manually stop P - 55B or P - 55C when desired to reduce letdown flow . Stopping P-55A would be a similar action.

Man power Req uirements Default Actual O perations : Shift Mana g er 1 0 Shift Su p ervisor 1 1 STA 1 0 Reactor O p erators 2 1 Plant O p erators 4 0 Maintenance Mechanics 0 0 Electricians 0 0

&C Technicians 0 0 Health Physics Technicians 1 0 Chemist : Technicians 1 0 Analysis File: Pal_Post HEPs_r3 1-5-11.HRA (12/07/11, 5935104 Bytes)

I EPRI HRA Calculator 4.0 1/5/20121/5/2012 CVC-AVOB-CV-2001 OP FAILS TO CLOSE CV-2001 ON HIGH TEMP AT LETDOWN HX E-58 (HEP)

CVC-AVOA-CV-2003 OPERATOR FAILS TO CLOSE LETDOWN ORIFICE STOP VALVE CV-2003 (HEP)

CVC-AVOA-CV-2122. OP FAILS TO OPEN LETDOWN INTERMEDIATE PRESSURE CONTROL (HEP)

CVC-PMOA-P55-TRIP OP FAILS TO STOP CHARGING PUMP OPERATION (HEP)

CVC-PMOE-P-55-2 OP FAILS TO START ADDITIONAL CHARGING PUMPS FOR 2 IN SERVICE CVC-MVOA-SUCT-SRCE OP FAILS TO TRANSITION SUCTION SOURCE TO SIRWT (HEP)

Timing Analysis 62.00 Minutes TS 22.00 Minutes I T1/2 29.00 Minutes, T 2.00 Minutes T delay Irreversible Cue DamageState t=0 Timin g Analysis Tsw 62.00 Minutes Tdela y 22.00 Minutes T112 29.00 Minutes TM 2.00 Minutes Time available for recove ry 9.00 Minutes SPAR - H Available time 38.00 Minutes

( co g nitive )

SPAR - H Available time 5.50

( execution ) ratio Minimum level of dependence HD for recove Analysis File: Pal_Post_HEPs_r3 1-5-11.HRA (12/07/11, 5935104 Bytes) 5

EPRI HRA Calculator 4.0 1/5/20121/5/2012 Regarding Tsw : The time for Tsw is based on the 9/25/2011 loss of dc event that led to increasing pressurizer level. The rising pressurizer level was consequence the loss dc power that caused isolation of letdown flow and a right channel safety injection signal. The right channel safety injection signal resulted in the start of an additional charging pump. The excess charging flow with no letdown flow caused the rise in pressurizer level and pressure. Based on the event timeline and additional information provided in the EA-PSA-SDP-D11-2-11-07, the time to the consequential condition that pressurizer safety would be challenged without operator intervention was determined to be 62 minutes. Additional details regarding the event response are discussed in the EA.

The time to the indication of high pressurizer pressure and increasing level was 22 minutes. The median (actual) response time was 29 minutes. The response time was a result of operator action to verify boration requirements were met prior throttling injection flow.

The base version of the HEP assumed a bounding condition and was based on three charging pumps operating with nominal letdown and assumed the consequential failure occurs when 100%

level is reached and ignored the volume above 100%. The base version with three charging pumps operating predicted the time to consequential failure to be 30 minutes. The base version with only two charging pumps operating operating predicts consequential failure at 64 minutes similar to the Tsw for 9/25/2011 event.

The execution time is unchanged as the actions in this version are the same actions used in the base case.

Per P-IOAQ (RMassa, 12/21/2010):

Tm: It would take - 2 minutes to complete the action once the need is identified.

NOTE: Currently, actions to open the additional letdown valves are not credited as part of this action.

Analysis File: Pal_Post_HEPs_r3 1-5-11.HRA (12/07/11, 5935104 Bytes)

EPRI HRA Calculator 4.0 1/5/20121/5/2012 Cognitive Analysis Pc Failure Mechanism Branch HEP Pca: Availability of Information a ne .

Notes : Indicators available, accurate. Crew trained.

PCb: Failure of Attention I 7.5e-04 Notes : Workload expected to be high (multiple alarms). Operators monitor pressurizer conditions, usin g instruments located on a front p anel. Indicators are alarmed.

P,,: Misread/miscommunicate data a neg .

Notes : The applicable indications are easy to locate and they do not have human en g ineerin g deficiencies. The Palisades o p erators use formal communications.

Pcd: Information misleadin g a ne g .

Notes : Cues as stated.

Pce: Ski p a ste p in p rocedure 6.Oe-03 Notes : The steps concerning pressurizer control and leak isolation are not hidden in any way although they are not graphically distinct. The operators are in multiple procedures. The ONPs and the ARPs are Continuous Use procedures and the operators are required to mark off ste p s as the y are com p leted via the circle/slash method of lacekee in g .

PCf: Misinterp ret Instructions a ne g .

Notes : The procedure steps involving pressurizer control use standard wording and the o p erators have all the information the need to com p lete this action.

P,, : Misinterp ret decision lo g ic I ne g .

Notes : There are no NOT, AND or OR statements in the decision logic for pressurizer control. The operators have practiced pressurizer control, however, the scenarios postulated for this action are do not clearly link the symptoms to the action of controlling the charging p um p s.

Pch: Deliberate violation a ne g .

Notes : The operators believe that the instructions contained in their procedures are accurate and ade q uate.

Initial P, without recove ry credited ) 6.8e-03 Notes Co g nitive Com p lexity  :::= Com p lex E q ui p ment Accessibility Control Room ( Panel C-12 ) : Accessible pca: Availability of information Indication Avail in CR Indication Warning/Altemate Training on CR Accurate in Procedure Indicators

- -- 1.Oe-01--- --- (a) neg.

O.Oe+00

( b) neg.

1.0e+00 de-w00 (c) neg.

1 . 0e-01 3.0e-03 (d) 1.5e-03 Yes 1.Oe+00

5. Oe-01

( e) 5.0e-02 No 1.Oe-01 1.0e+00 (f) 3.0e-01 1.Oe+00 (g) 0.0e+00 Indicators available, accurate. Crew trained.

Analysis File: Pal_Post_HEPs_r3 1-5-11.HRA (12/07/11, 5935104 Bytes)

EPRI HRA Calculator 4.0 1/5/20121/5/2012 pcb: Failure of attention Low vs. Hi Check vs. Monitor Front vs. Back Alarmed vs.Not Workload Panel Alarmed Check 0.0e+00 (a) neg.

O.Oe+00 Back (b) 1.5e-04 S.Oe-02 Low 3 . 0e-03 (c) 3.0e-03 1.0e+00 1.Oe+Op Front (d) 1.5e-04 5.0e-02 Monitor O.Oe+00 ( e) 3.0e-03 1.Oe+00 3.0e-03 Back (f) 3.0e-04 5.Oe-02 3 . 0e-03 (g ) 6.0e-03

1. Ch ice

- 1.Oe+00

2. Ch ice Front (h) neg.

5.0e-02 Check O . Oe+00 (i) neg.

1.Oe+00 O.Oe+00 Back (j) 7.5e-04 5.Oe-02 Hi 3.0e-03 ( k) 1.5e-02


1.0e+00 16e+00 - Front ( 1) 7.5e-04


--- 5. De 42 Monitor 0.Oe+00 ( m) 1.5e-02 1.0e+00 3.Oe-03 Back ( n) 1.5e-03 S.Oe-02 3.0e-03 (o) 3.0e-02 1.0e+00 Workload expected to be high (multiple alarms). Operators monitor pressurizer conditions, using instruments located on a front panel. Indicators are alarmed.

pcc: Misread/miscommunicate data Indicators Easy to Good/Bad Indicator Formal Locate Communications r O.Oe+00 ( a) neg.

T O.Oe+00 I ( b) 3.Oe-03


3.0e-03 O.Oe+00 (c) 1.0e-03 1.0e-03 ( d) 4.0e-03 Yes 3.0e-03 No (e) 3 . 0 e- 03 O.Oe + 00 O.Oe+00 3.0e-03 ( f) 6.0e-03 3.Oe-03 O.Oe+00 ( g) 4.0e-03 1.Oe-03 (h) 7.0e-03 The applicable indications are easy to locate and they do not have human engineering deficiencies. The Palisades operators use formal communications.

Analysis File: Pal_ Post_HEPs_r3 1-5-11.HRA (12/07/11, 5935104 Bytes) 8

I EPRI HRA Calculator 4.0 1/5/20121/5/2012 pcd: Information misleading All Cues as Stated Warning of Specific Training General Training Differences

-- - - - - - - ---- (a) neg.

(b) 3.0e-03 No (c) 1.0e-02 (d) 1.0e-01 1.

(e) 1.0e+00 Cues as stated.

pce: Skip a step in procedure Obvious vs. Single vs. Multiple Graphically Placekeeping Aids Hidden Distinct 3.0e-03 ( a) 1.0e-03 3.3e-01 (b) 3.0e-03 1.Oe-02 O.Oe+00 3.0e-03 ( c) 3.0e-03 1.0e+00 (d) 1.0e-02 1.Oe-02 O.Oe+00 (e ) 2.Oe-03 3.Oe-03 3.3e-01 (f) 4.0e-03 Yes 1.Oe-02 3.Oe -03 -

No (g) 6.Oe-03

3. Oe 03 1.Oe+00 (h) 1.3e-02 1.0e-02 1.0e-01 (i) 1.0e-01 The steps concerning pressurizer control and leak isolation are not hidden in any way although they are not graphically distinct. The operators are in multiple procedures. The ONPs and the ARPs are Continuous Use procedures and the operators are required to mark off steps as they are completed via the circle/slash method of placekeeping.

pcf: Misinterpret instruction Standard or All Required Training on Step Ambiguous wording Information O.Oe+00 ------------- (a) neg.

(b) 3.Oe-03 1.0e-01 3.0e-02 (c) 3.0e-02 Yes 1.0e+00 No (d) 3.0e-03 (e) 3.0e-02 (f) 6.0e-03 (g) 6.0e-02 The procedure steps involving pressurizer control use standard wording and the operators have all the information they need to complete this action.

Analysis File: Pal_Post_HEPs_r3 1-5-11.HRA (12/07/11, 5935104 Bytes)

I EPRI HRA Calculator 4.0 1/5/20121/5/2012 pcg: Misinterpret decision logic "NOT" tatement °AND" or "OR" Both "AND" 3 Practiced Scenario Statement "OR" 3.3e-01 ( a) 1.6e-02 3.0e-02 (b) 4.9e-02 1.0e+00 1.2e-02 3.3e-01 ( c) 6.Oe-03 0.0e+00 ( d) 1.9e-02 1.Oe+00 3.3e-01 ( e) 2.0e-03 O.Oe+00 3.3e -0 1 (g) 1.0e-02 No 3.0e-02 (h) 3.1e-02 1.Oe+00 1.Oe-03 (i) 3.0e-04 3.3e-01 O . Oe+00 0 ) 1.0e-03 O.Oe+00 1.Oe+00 (k) neg.


_--- 3.3e-01 O.Oe+00 - - - (I) neg.

1.0e+00 There are no NOT, AND or OR statements in the decision logic for pressurizer control. The operators have practiced pressurizer control, however, the scenarios postulated for this action are do not clearly link the symptoms to the action of controlling the charging pumps.

pch: Deliberate violation Belief in Adequacy Adverse Reasonable Policy of of Instruction Consequence if Alternatives "Verbatim"

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - a neg.

(b) 5.0e-01 No (c) 1.0e+00 (d) neg.

(e) neg.

The operators believe that the instructions contained in their procedures are accurate and adequate.

Analysis File: Pal_Post_HEPs_r3 1-5-11.HRA (12/07/11, 5935104 Bytes) 10

I EPRI HRA Calculator 4.0 1/5/20121/5/2012 Cog nitive Rec very L >, >,

ova 14i)3: 4 LL W (V c >, d am ^^ d w > x > : W.5 cY dv>

C2 0 w V Uw w^ w >> Ii>

d^ Q aai ^ -j X PCa ne g . - - - - - N/A - 1.0e+00 Pcb 7.5e-04 X - X - - N/A - 1.0e-02 7.5e-06 Pc,, ne g . - - - - - N/A - 1.0e+00 Pcd ne g . - - - - - N/A - 1.0e+00 Pce 6.0e-03 X X - - - N/A - 5.0e-02 3.0e-04 Pcf ne g . - - - - - N/A - 1.0e+00 Pc ne g . - - - - - N/A - 1.0e+00 Pch ne g . - - - - - N/A - 1.0e+00 Final Pc (with recove credited ) 3.1e-04 Notes Pc uses "extra crew" as a surrogate for shift supervisor credit (Control Room Supervisor).

Control room actions would be peer checked as they are performed by the other Reactor O p erator, Shift En g ineer or Control Room Su p ervisor.

Pc ASEP Nominal Diagnosis Model In order to compensate for possible non-conservative estimates produced by the cause-based method for short term actions (Time available for recovery <1 hour), the cognitive failure probability for short term actions is taken to be the sum of the cause-based and ASEP results; longer term actions do not include the ASEP component.

Use Nominal HEP because the event is not a "well-recognized classic", but it is trained on.

Actual Time Error Factor Median HEP Mean Upper Bound Lower Bound 29.0 minutes 10 4.6e-04 1.9e-03 6.7e-03 3.1e-05 Execution Performance Sha p in g Factors Environment Li g htin g Normal Heat Normal Radiation Backg round Atmos p here Normal Equipment Accessibility Control Room (Panel Accessible EC-02 )

Stress Moderate Plant Response As Yes Exp ected:

Workload: Hi g h Performance Shaping Optimal Factors:

Notes Following recognition of the need for the action (Pcognitive), the operator workload is assessed as high due to the number actions required as a consequence of the event. The PSFs are not ne g ative for this action which is executed in the control room.

Execution Com p lexit y Sim p le Analysis File: Pal_Post_HEPs_r3 1-5-11.HRA (12/07/11, 5935104 Bytes) 11

EPRI HRA Calculator 4.0 1/5/20121/5/2012 Execution Unrecovered Procedure : ARP-4 TILE 4, PRIMARY SYSTEM VOLUME LEVEL PRESSURE SCHEME EK-07 (C-12) Comment Stress Over Step No . Error THERP Factor Ride Instruction /Comment HEP Type Table Item IF PLCS does NOT respond, THEN RESTORE AND MAINTAIN PZR level between 42% and 57%: a. OPERATE PZR Level Control S ystem ( PLCS ) .

EOP-1 Step -- EOM 20-7b 2 1.3E-3 2 5.1 a EOC 20-12 2 3.8E-3 Total Step HEP 1.0e-02 IF PLCS does NOT respond, THEN RESTORE AND MAINTAIN PZR level between 42% and 57%:b. MANUALLY OPERATE Charg in g and Letdown EOP-1 Step -- EOM 20-7b 2 1.3E-3 2 5.1 b EOC 20-12 2 3.8E-3 Total Step HEP 1.Oe-02 Execution recovery provided by independent personnel See Section 4.3 of the HRA Notebook for further information . This execution recovery factor is applied to the individual execution steps with a EXEC ICRRECOV time available for reco v e ry. 2 0.1

- CR y. Note that the execution stress factors applied to the execution subtasks are not applied to the execution recovery factor . The EOM does not a pp l y .

Total Ste p HEP 1.0e-01 12

I EPRI HRA Calculator 4.0 1/5/20121/5/2012 Execution Recovered Critical Recovery Ste No . Ste No . Action HEP ( Crit ) HEP (Rec) Dep. Cond . HEP ( Rec ) Total for Ste p EOP-1 IF PLCS does NOT respond, THEN RESTORE 1.0e-02 2 . 3e-03 Step 5.1 AND MAINTAIN PZR level between 42% and 57%:

a a. OPERATE PZR Level Control S ystem ( PLCS ) .

EXEC Execution recovery provided by independent 1.0e-01 MD 2.3e-01 RECOV - ICR p ersonnel EOP-1 IF PLCS does NOT respond, THEN RESTORE 1.0e-02 2 . 3e-03 Step 5.1 AND MAINTAIN PZR level between 42% and b 57%:b. MANUALLY OPERATE Charging and Letdown EXEC Execution recovery provided by independent 1.0e-01 MD 2.3e-01 RECOV - ICR personnel Total Unrecovered : 2.0e-02 Total Recovered : 4.6e-03 13

I EPRI HRA Calculator 4.0 1/5/20121/5/2012 ACP-CBOB-BYREG-2, OPERATOR FAILS TO ALIGN BUS Y-01 THROUGH BYPASS REGULATOR TO SUPPLY A DE-ENERGIZED PFAC BUS (HEP)

Anal yst: FJY Rev. Date : 12/08/11 Reviewer: BAB Co g nitive Method : CBDTM/THERP Analysis Database : Pal Post HEPs r3 1-5-11.HRA 12/08/11, 5967872 B ytes )

Table 2: ACP-CBOB-BYREG-2

SUMMARY

Analysis Results : without Recove ry with Recove ry Pco 1.2e-02 6.0e-04 Pere 6.5e-02 3.3e-02 Total HEP 3.3e-02 Error Factor 5 Assigned Basic Events:

Related Human Interactions:

Although Y20 is modeled in this calculation, the analysis applies equally to the alignment of any of the remaining preferred AC busses.

Initial Cue:

Loss of Preferred AC Bus Y10, Y20, Y30, or Y40 Recovery Cue:

Cue:

Multiple procedures (as listed in the "Procedures" section) direct the operators to verify that AC busses are energized. For the preferred AC busses, the contingency action directs OPS to:

ONP-24. 1, LOSS OF PREFERRED AC BUS Y10 ONP-24.2, LOSS OF PREFERRED AC BUS Y20 ONP-24.3, LOSS OF PREFERRED AC BUS Y30 ONP-24.4, LOSS OF PREFERRED AC BUS Y40 Degree of Clarity of Cues & Indications:

Very Good Procedures:

Cognitive : ONP-24. 2 (LOSS OF PREFERRED BUS Y20) Revision: 23 Execution : SOP-30 (STATION POWER ) Revision: 53 Other : EOP-9.0 (FUNCTIONAL RECOVERY PROCEDURE ) Revision: 19 14

I EPRI HRA Calculator 4.0 1/5/20121/5/2012 Cognitive Procedure:

Step: 4.17 Instruction: IF a fault does NOT exist on Y20, THEN REFER TO SOP-30 AND PLACE Y20 on the Bypass Regulator.

Procedure Notes:

EOP-1.0, STANDARD POST-TRIP ACTIONS step 4. 4.6) states: VERIFY 3 of 4 Preferred AC buses are energized.

EOP-2.0, REACTOR TRIP RECOVERY, step 4.9 directs the operators to verify that the given AC buses are energized. The contingency action for the preferred AC busses directs the operators to ONP-24.1 through ONP-24.4, LOSS OF PREFERRED AC BUS Y10 / Y20 / Y30 / Y40.

The following procedures contain this action:

EOP-2.0 REACTOR TRIP RECOVERY EOP-9.0 FUNCTIONAL RECOVERY PROCEDURE MV-AE-DC-1 ONP-2.3 LOSS OF DC POWER ONP-24.1, 24.2, 24.3, 24.4 LOSS OF PREFERRED BUS Y-10, Y-20, Y-30, Y-40 ARP-3 WINDOWS 34, 44, 45, 46 PREFERRED AC BUS NO. 1, 2, 3, 4 TROUBLE ARP-3 WINDOW 48 125V DC BUS UNDERVOLTAGE/TROUBLE SOP-30, STATION POWER, Section 7.6.2, To Supply a Preferred AC Bus With the Bypass Regulator This is an Auxiliary Operator action, and the following JPMs are available:

(Licensed Operators ) JPMPL-OPS- EPS-001 (PLACE PREFERRED AC BUS, Y-20 ON BYPASS REGULATOR)

Training:

Simulator, Frequency: 0.5 per year JPM Procedure:

JPM ISBA-JPM-04 (PLACE PREFERRED AC BUS, Y-20 ON BYPASS REGULATOR) Revision:

6 Identification and Definition:

This action aligns power from bus Y-01 via the bypass regulator to a preferred AC power bus (Y-10, Y-20, Y-30 or Y-40) which has failed due to a failure of its power source , i.e. MCC-1 or MCC-

2. As stated earlier, although Y20 is modeled here, the analysis applies to the alignment of any of the remaining preferred AC busses.
1. Initial Conditions: Steady state, full power operations
2. Initiating Event: LODC (bus ED-10)
3. Accident Sequence (preceding functional failures and successes):

Loss of DC power to DC bus ED10-R and ED10-L.

Reactor Trip 15

I EPRI HRA Calculator 4.0 1/5/20121/5/2012 Turbine Trip OPS enters EOP-1.0 and performs the standard post-trip actions.

The operators would continue in EOP-1.0 and enter ONP-24.1 and ONP-24.3 For post trip actions and indications of loss of preferred ac panels EY-10 and EY-30.

ARP-3, alarm response refers the operators to ONP-24.1 and ONP-24.3 for alternatives to power the preferred AC panel loads.

EOP-1.0 event diagnostic directs the operator to EOP 9.0 if 3 of 4 preferred AC busses are not energized. Given the safety function criteria (SF) are not met (2 or more preferred AC busses NOT energized), then the operators would transition to EOP-9.0 Functional Recovery Procedure and start working through success path MV-AE-DC-1 since it is the only "jeopardized" SF. MV-AE-DC-1 step 6 directs operators to verify at least 3 preferred AC busses are energized. If less than 3 are available, step 6.1 directs operators to ENERGIZE ALL available preferred AC Buses per ONP-24.1, 2, 3, 4 as applicable.

ONP-24.2 step 4.17 directs: IF a fault does NOT exist on Y20, THEN REFER TO SOP-30 AND PLACE Y20 on the Bypass Regulator.

SOP-30, STATION POWER, Section 7.6.2, To Supply a Preferred AC Bus With the Bypass Regulator.

4. Preceding operator errors or successes in sequence: No operator errors or additional successes noted.
5. Operator action success criterion : Success is restoring Y20 prior to battery depletion.
6. Consequences of failure: Loss of TD AF pump and AF valve control Key Assumptions:

Current modeling assumes only Y-20 can be backed up by the bypass regulator. Any single preferred AC bus can be backed up.

Operator Interview Insights:

EOP-2.0, REACTOR TRIP RECOVERY, would only be entered if the scenario was an "uncomplicated " trip. If a LOOP is in progress, the operators would transition from EOP-1.0 to EOP-8 .0 LOSS OF OFFSITE POWER/NATURAL CIRCULATION RECOVERY. EOP-8.0 safety function status checks require 3 of 4 preferred AC busses to be energized . So if only one is not energized , the function is met and NO corrective action is directed.

If the safety function criteria (SF) are not met (2 or more preferred AC busses NOT energized),

then the operators would transition to EOP-9.0, Functional Recovery Procedure, and start working through success path MV-AE-DC-1 since it is the only "jeopardized" SF. MV-AE-DC-1 step 6 directs operators to verify at least 3 preferred AC busses are energized. If less than 3 are available, step 6.1 directs operators to ENERGIZE ALL available preferred AC Buses per ONP-24.1, 2, 3, or 4 as applicable.

In summary, for loss of 1 preferred bus with any other single event in progress procedures do not direct any action being taken with exception of annunciator response procedure ARP-3.

16

I EPRI HRA Calculator 4.0 1/5/20121/5/2012 Manpower Requirements:

O p erations : Shift Mana g er 1 0 Shift Su p ervisor: 1 1 STA: 1 1 Reactor o p erators: 2 1 Plant o p erators: 4 2 Maintenance : Mechanics: 0 0 Electricians: 0 0

&C Technicians: 0 0 Health Ph ysics : Technicians: 1 0 Chemist  : Technicians: 1 0 Execution Performance Shaping Factors:

Environment : Li g htin g Normal Heat/Humidity Normal Radiation Backg round Atmos p here Normal S p ecial Re q uirements:

Com p lexi ty of Res p onse : Cog nitive Sim le Execution Com p lex E q ui p ment Accessibilit : Control Room Accessible Cable Spreading Room (AB Accessible 607' Stress : Moderate Plant Response As Exp ected: Yes Workload: Low Performance Shaping Factors: Ne g ative Performance Shaping Factor Notes:

Because of the relatively long system window, the workload is not high. While the PSFs could be assigned as "negative" due to the emergency lighting in service for a LOOP case, operator interviews conducted in August 2009 confirmed that there is sufficient emergency lighting available for both access and execution. The PSFs are therefore not assessed as negative.

Additionally, a second AO would do peer checking on a "not to delay basis." However, there is more than sufficient time to complete this action as the SPAR execution ratio is 6.

17

EPRI HRA Calculator 4.0 1/5/20121/5/2012 Timing:

T 4.00 Hours SW T delay 60.00 Minutes I T11 0.00 Minutes T H 30. 00 Minutes Irreversible Cue DamageState t=0 Timing Analysis:

The system window is based on battery depletion time. As given in the EOP-3.0 basis document (rev 11) [47], the battery depletion time is 4 hours4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br /> per DBD Chapter 4.01, Section 3.2.2, and FSAR Chapter 8.

According to an OPS estimate, it will take the operators 20 minutes to complete EOP-1.0. For a LOOP event, the crew will then transition to EOP-8.0 LOSS OF OFFSITE POWER/NATURAL CIRCULATION RECOVERY. EOP-8.0 safety function status checks require 3 of 4 preferred AC busses to be energized. If the safety function criteria (SF) are not met (2 or more preferred AC busses NOT energized), then the operators would transition to EOP-9.0 Functional Recovery Procedure and start working through success path MV-AE-DC-1 since it is the only "jeopardized" SF. MV-AE-DC-1 step 6 directs operators to verify at least 3 preferred AC busses are energized.

If less than 3 are available, contingency action step 6.1 directs operators to ENERGIZE ALL available preferred AC Buses per ONP-24.1, 2, 3, 4 as applicable. Reaching this step is expected to take another 40 minutes per OPS estimates (08/26/09). Therefore, the time to reach the direction for this action is expected to take a total of 60 minutes. (Tdelay)

The manipulation time estimate for this action is 30 minutes. (OPS estimate 08/26/09)

Time available for recovery : 150.00 Minutes SPAR - H Available time ( cognitive ): 150.00 Minutes SPAR-H Available time ( execution ) ratio: 6.00 Minimum level of dependence for recovery: ZD 18

I EPRI HRA Calculator 4.0 1/5/20121/5/2012 Cognitive Unrecovered ACP-CBOB-BYREG-2 Table 3: ACP-CBOB-BYREG-2 COGNITIVE UNRECOVERED Pc Failure Mechanism Branch HEP Pca: Availabilit y of Information a ne g .

Pcb: Failure of Attention a ne g .

Pc,,: Misread/miscommunicate data a ne g .

Pcd: Information misleadin g a ne g .

Pce: Ski p a ste p in p rocedure 6.0e-03 Pcf: Misinterp ret instruction a ne g .

Pc : Misinterp ret decision lo g ic c 6.0e-03 Pch: Deliberate violation a ne g .

Sum of PCa throu g h PCh = Initial Pc = 1.2e-02 19

EPRI HRA Calculator 4.0 1/5/20121/5/2012 pca: Availability of information Indication Avail in CR Indication Warning/Aitemate Training on CR Accurate in Procedure Indicators


-- 1.Oe-01 (a) neg.

O.Oe+00 1.0e+00 ( b) neg.

6.Oe+00 (c) neg.

Me-01 3.0e-03 (d) 1.5e-03 Yes 1.Oe+ 1

5. 0e-01 (e) 5.0e-02 No 1.Oe-0 1.0e+00 (f) 5.0e-01 1.Oe+00 1.0e+00 ( g) O.Oe+00 Preferred AC bus indications are available in the CR and they are accurate . The operators have been trained on all CR indications.

pcb: Failure of attention

[:J Low vs . Hi ck vs. Monitor Front vs. Back Alarmed vs.Not Workload Panel Alarmed Check Er +00 - - - - - - - ( a) neg.

O.Oe+00 Back (b) 1.5e-04 S.Oe-02 Low 3. 0e-03 (c) 3.0e-03 1.0e+Dn (d) 1.5e-04 (e) 3.0e-03 (f) 3.0e-04

1. (g) 6.0e-03
2. (h) neg.

(i) neg.

(j) 7.5e-04 (k) 1.5e-02 (I) 7.5e-04 (m) 1.5e-02 (n) 1.5e-03 (o) 3.0e-02 The operator workload would not be high in view of the long system window. The operator would only need to check preferred AC bus status, located on a front panel, to recognize the need for this action.

20

I EPRI HRA Calculator 4.0 1/5/20121/5/2012 pcc: Misread/miscommunicate data Indicators Easy to Good/Bad Indicator Formal Locate Communications

- - r O.Oe+00 - (a) neg.

- - r oe-woo - - - - (b) 3.0e-03 3.0e-03

+00 (c) 1.0e-03 1.0e-03 (d) 4.0e-03 3.0e-03 No (e) 3.0e-03 (f) 6.0e-03 (g) 4.0e-03 (h) 7.Oe-03 The AC bus indications are easy to locate and they do not have human engineering deficiencies.

The Palisades operators use formal communications.

pcd: Information misleading All Cues as Stated Warning of Specific Training General Training Differences


(a) neg.

(b) 3.Oe-03 No (c) 1.0e-02 (d) 1.0e-01 (e) 1.0e+00 All cues are as stated.

pce: Skip a step in procedure Obvious vs. Single vs. Multiple Graphically Placekeeping Aids Hidden Distinct 3.0e-03 (a) 1.Oe-03 3.3e-01 ( b) 3.0e-03 1.Oe-02 O.Oe+00

( c) 3.0e-03 3.Oe-03 1.0e+00 ( d) 1.0e-02 1.0e-02 O.Oe+00 3.0e-03 ( e) 2.Oe-03 3.3e-01 (f) 4.0e-03 Yes 1.Oe-02 3.Oe-03 -- --- --- ( g) 6.0e-03 No 3. Oe-0 3 1.Oe+00 (h)1.3e-02 1.0e-02 (i) 1.0e-01 The applicable procedure steps are not hidden in any way although they are not graphically distinct. The operators are potentially in multiple procedures. The EOPs have placekeeping aids and the Palisades operators use the circle/slash method of placekeeping for the SOPs.

21

I EPRI HRA Calculator 4.0 1/5/20121/5/2012 pcf: Misinterpret instruction Standard or All Required Training on Step Ambiguous wording Information rde-ROO - - - - - - - (a) neg.

Oe+00 (b) 3.0e-03 1 Oe-01 3.0e-02 (c) 3.0e-02 1.0e+00 No (d) 3.0e-03 1.0e-01 (e) 3.0e-02 1.0e+00 (f) 6.Oe-03 1.0e-01 4 n"-nn (g) 6.0e-02 The applicable procedure steps use standard wording and the operators have all the information they need to complete this action.

pcg: Misinterpret decision logic "NOT" Statement "AND" or "OR" Both "AND" & Practiced Scenario Statement "OR" 3.3e-01 ( a) 1.Be-02 3.Oe-02 (b) 4.9e-02 1.Oe+00 2e-02 (c) 8.Oe-03

_---- -- 3.3e-01 O.Oe+00 ( d) 1.9e-02 6Ae-03 1.0e+00 (e) 2.0e-03 3.3e-01 L oe+oo

1. Oe+00 ( f) 6.Oe-03 Yes 3.3e -0 1 (g) 1.0e-02 No 3.0e-02 (h) 3.1e-02 1.Oe+00 1.0e-03

( i) 3.0e-04 3.3e-01 O . Oe+00 (j) 1.Oe-03 O.Oe+00 1.Oe+00 (k) neg.

3.3e-01 O.Oe+00 n ^^n (I) neg.

There are implied NOT and AND statements in the decision logic for this action. There are no OR statements. The operators have practiced loss of preferred AC bus restoration actions in the simulator.

pch: Deliberate violation Belief in Adequacy Adverse Reasonable Policy of of Instruction Consequence if Alternatives "Verbatim" O.Oe+00 -- - - -- ----- ( a) neg.

Yes O. Oe+00 ( b) 5.0e-01 No O.Oe+00 (c) 1.0e+00 O.Oe+00 O.Oe+00 O.Oe+00 O . Oe+00 ( d) neg.

0.0e+00 ( e) neg.

The Palisades operators believe in the adequacy of their instruction.

22

EPRI HRA Calculator 4.0 1/5/20121/5/2012 Cognitive Recovery ACP-CBOB-BYREG-2 Table 4: ACP-CBOB-BYREG-2 COGNITIVE RECOVERY 3: < LL co Initial HEP a > !E CU 0^ "-  ? Final Wa) Luc) U) >a) o wa) > 0 = Value of Pca: ne g . - - - - 1.0e+00 Pcb: ne g . - - - - - - 1.0e+00 Pcc: ne g . - - - - - - 1.0e+00 Pcd: ne g . - - - - - - 1.0e+00 Pce: 6.0e-03 X X - - - 5.0e-02 3.0e-04 Pcf: ne g . - - - - - - 1.0e+00 Pc : 6.0e-03 - X X - - 5.0e-02 3.0e-04 Pch: ne g . - - - - - - 1.0e+00 Sum of Pca throu g h Pch = Initial Pc = 6.0e-04 Notes:

"Extra crew" is used as a surrogate for "Shift Supervisor" (Control Room Supervisor) credit.

23

I EPRI HRA Calculator 4.0 1/5/20121/5/2012 Execution Unrecovered ACP-CBOB-BYREG-2 Table 5: ACP-CBOB-BYREG-2 EXECUTION UNRECOVERED Procedure : SOP-30 , STATION POWER Comment Stress Over Ride Step No. Instruction /Comment Error THERP HEP Factor Type Table Item CHECK for fault per Note located prior to step 4.17 in ONP-24.2 NOTE located prior to step 4.17 in ONP-24.2:

NOTE: If the loss of the preferred AC bus is due to the Inverter DC input breaker opening and the NP-24.2 NOTE Inverter AC output breaker did NOT trip, it is unlikely 2 that there is a fault on the referred AC bus itself.

EOM 20-7b 2 1.3E-3 EOC 20-9 2 1.3E-3 EOC 20 11 7 ne g .

Total Ste p HEP 5.2e-03 IF the Preferred AC Bus is to be restored on the Bypass Regulator following an Inverter failure , THEN PLACE the Manual Bypass Switch in the BYPASS SOURCE p osition.

SOP 7.6.2.c -- EOM 20-7b 2 1.3E-3 2 EOC 20-12 4 1.3E-3 EOC 20-12 8a 2.7E-4 Total Ste p HEP 5.8e-03 CLOSE ( ON ) Breaker 41 on Instrument AC Bus Y01 EOM 20-7b 2 1.3E-3 2 SOP 7.6.2.d EOC 20-12 12 3.8E-3 EOC 20-12 8a 2.7E-4 Total Ste p HEP 1.1e-02 PLACE the Kirk interlock key (SS key #234) into the breaker lock for selection error is negligible Preferred AC Bus to be transferred . ( Located in B yp ass Re g ulator )

SOP 7.6.2.e -- EOM 20-7b 2 1.3E-3 2 used as a surro g ate EOC 20-12 8a 2.7E-4 Total Ste p HEP 3.1e-03 PLACE the breaker lock to OPEN position (this allows permissive closing of associated breaker ) .

SOP 30 - 7 . 6 . 2 . f EOM 20-7b 2 1.3E-3 2 EOC 20-12 3 1.3E-3 EOC 20-12 8a 2.7E-4 Total Ste HEP 5.8e-03 24

I EPRI HRA Calculator 4.0 1/5/20121/5/2012 CLOSE ( ON ) the B yp ass Re g ulator Breaker to the Inverter to be s pared.

EOM 20-7b 2 1.3E-3 2 SOP 30 - 7.6.2.g EOC 20-12 4 1.3E-3 EOC 20-12 8a 2.7E-4 Total Ste p HEP 5.8e-03 PERFORM the following to transfer loads from the Inverter to the Bypass Re g ulator EOM 20-7b 2 1.3E-3 selection error - CLOSE B yp ass Source AC In ut Breaker . EOC 20-12 4 1.3E-3 mani p ulation error - CLOSE B yp ass Source AC In p ut Breaker . EOC 20-12 8a 2.7E-4 VERIFY In S y nc li g ht is ON. EOC 20-9 1 ne .

VERIFY In S y nc li g ht is ON. EOC 20-11 7 ne .

PUSH "B yp ass Source To Load" ushbutton. EOC 20-12 4 1.3E-3 PUSH "B ypass Source To Load" p ushbutton . EOC 20-12 8a 2.7E-4 VERIFY "B yp ass Source Su pp l y in g Load" li g ht is ON. EOC 20-9 2 1.3E-3 SOP 30 - 7.6.2.h. VERIFY "B ypass Source Su pp l y in g Load" li g ht is ON. EOC 20-11 7 ne g . 2 ENSURE Manual B yp ass Switch in BYPASS SOURCE p osition . EOC 20-9 2 1.3E-3 ENSURE Manual Bypass Switch in BYPASS SOURCE position . Used as EOC 20-11 7 neg.

a surrog ate.

OPEN Inverter Out p ut breaker . EOC 20-12 4 1.3E-3 OPEN Inverter Out p ut breaker . EOC 20-12 8a 2.7E-4 OPEN B yp ass Source AC In p ut breaker. EOC 20-12 4 1.3E-3 OPEN B yp ass Source AC In p ut breaker. EOC 20-12 8a 2.7E-4 DEPRESS ALARM RESET to clear Inverter alarms . EOC 20-12 3 1.3E-3 DEPRESS ALARM RESET to clear Inverter alarms . EOC 20-12 8a 2.7E-4 Tot al Ste p HEP 2.3e-02 OPEN Inverter Output breaker . SHOULD I ADD THE STEPS OMITTED? If not -

chan a to short list SOP 30 - 7.6.2.6 EOM 20-7b 2 1.3E-3 2 EOC 20-12 4 1.3E-3 EOC 20-12 8a 2.7E-4 Tot al Ste p HEP 5.8e-03 Execution recovery provided by independent personnel See Section 4 . 3 of the HRA Notebook for further 2 0.5 information . This execution recovery factor is applied to the individual execution steps with a dependence factor based on the time available for recovery. Note EXEC RECOV - that the execution stress factors applied to the OCR execution subtasks are not applied to the execution recovery factor. The EOM does not apply. Although the execution occurs in both the control room and in the cable spreading room, the "outside control room" execution recove ry factor is a pp lied.

Total Ste p HEP 5.0e-01 25

EPRI HRA Calculator 4.0 1/5/20121/5/2012 Execution Recovery ACP-CBOB-BYREG-2 Table 6: ACP-CBOB-BYREG-2 EXECUTION RECOVERY Critical Step No. Recovery Step No. Action Cond. HEP Total for HEP (Crit) HEP (Rec) Dep ONP-24.2 NOTE ecec step CHECK for fault er Note located p rior to ste p 4.17 in ONP -24.2 5.2e-03 2 . 6e-03 EXEC RECOV - Execution recovery provided by independent personnel OCR 5.0e-01 ZD 5.0e-01 SOP 7 . 6.2.c IF the Preferred AC Bus is to be restored on the bypass Regulator following an Inverter failure , THEN PLACE the 5 . 8e-03 2 . 9e-03 Manual B yp ass Switch in the BYPASS SOURCE p osition.

EXEC RECOV - Execution recovery provided by independent personnel OCR 5.0e-01 ZD 5.0e-01 SOP 7 . 6.2.d CLOSE ( ON ) Breaker 41 on Instrument AC Bus Y01 1 . 1e-02 5.5e-03 EXEC RECOV - Execution recovery provided by independent personnel OCR 5.Oe-01 ZD 5.Oe-01 SOP 7 . 6.2.e PLACE the Kirk interlock key (SS key #234) into the breaker lock for Preferred AC Bus to be transferred. (Located in 3.1a-03 1.6e-03 B yp ass Re g ulator )

EXEC RECOV - Execution recovery provided by independent personnel OCR 5.Oe-01 ZD 5.Oe-01 SOP 30 - 7.6.2.f PLACE the breaker lock to OPEN position (this allows p ermissive closin g of associated breaker ) . 5.8e-03 2.9e-03 EXEC RECOV - Execution recovery provided by independent personnel OCR 5.Oe-01 ZD 5.0e-01 SOP 30 - 7.6.2.g CLOSE ( ON) the Bypass Regulator Breaker to the Inverter to be s p ared . 5.8e-03 2.9e-03 EXEC RECOV - Execution recovery provided by independent personnel OCR 5.0e-01 ZD 5.0e-01 SOP 30 - 7 . 6.2.h. PERFORM the following to transfer loads from the Inverter to the B yp ass Reg ulator 2.3e-02 1.2e-02 EXEC RECOV - Execution recovery provided by independent personnel OCR 5.Oe-01 ZD 5.Oe-01 SOP 30 - 7.6.2.6 OPEN Inverter Out p ut breaker . 5.8e-03 2 . 9e-03 EXEC RECOV - Execution recovery provided by independent personnel OCR 5,1: -01 ZD 5.Oe-01 Total Unrecovered: 6.5e-02 Total Recovered : 3.3e-02 26

Entergy PSA EA - PSA-SDP-D11 11-07 Rev. 1 En g ineerin g O EnteiXy Analysis Attachment 13 - Page 1 of 4 Attachment 13 Procedure Use Evaluation for DC Panel ED-11-2 Fault Event This attachment contains the following:

  • Event procedure use in narrative format
  • Event procedure use in flow chart format (Figure Al 3-1)

Note: the narrative and flow chart provide an overview of procedure usage during the ED-11-2 event.

They are not all inclusive, i.e. they do not include all procedures referenced / used during the event.

Procedure Use Narrative

1. Procedure Use Expectations During the ED-11-2 event multiple procedures were concurrently in use, including Emergency Operating Procedures (EOPs), Off Normal Procedures (ONPs), Annunciator Response Procedures (ARPs), General Operating Procedures (GOPs) and System Operating Procedures (SOPs). EOP and ONP procedure steps are written in the order the writer expects the plant to respond. Since the plant may not respond exactly as predicted, performance of steps out of sequence may be necessary. To avoid masking event symptoms and complicating diagnosis, additional actions to those stated in the EOP-1.0 Immediate Actions are not permitted until EOP-1.0 event diagnosis completion, except as directed as an immediate action of an applicable ONP, or are otherwise immediately essential for personnel safety, plant safety, equipment protection or safety of the public.

II. EOP-1.0 Standard Post-Trip Actions Operators enter EOP-1.0 Standard Post-Trip Actions and perform Immediate and Operator Actions. The loss of dc and preferred ac buses precluded verification of some required conditions. For example, main generator breaker, atmospheric steam dump valve, and auxiliary feedwater pump P - 8B and associated flow control valve indications were not available . Operators performed contingency action 2 . b.1 to open the main generator breakers after verifying their status with International Transmission Control (ITC). The loss of dc panels ED-11-1 and ED 2 and preferred ac buses EY-10 and EY- 30 were identified.

EOP-1.0 Operator Actions include performing GOP-10 Balance of Plant Actions Following A Reactor Trip and event diagnosis using the diagnostic flow chart . Due to not having at least 3 preferred ac buses energized , the operators were directed to EOP -9.0 Functional Recovery Procedure . GOP-10 checklist GCL-10.1 Post Trip Checklist Inside Control Room directs review of control panel annunciators and referencing associated ARPs. The unavailability of ED-11-1 and ED 2 noted previously and annunciator EK-0548 125V DC UNDERVOLTAGE ARP-3 Electrical Auxiliaries and Diesel Generator Scheme EK- 05 (EC - 11) direction provided cues for ONP - 2.3 Loss of DC Power entry. Operators entered both EOP - 9.0 and ONP-2.3.

Entergy PSA EA-PSA-SDP-D11 11-07 Rev. I En g ineerin g Entero b-y Analysis Attachment 13 - Page 2 of 4 III. EOP-9.0 Functional Recovery Procedure Operators enter EOP-9.0 and perform Operator Actions including referring to Site Emergency Plan (SEP)

EI-1, verifying emergency boration in progress and identifying in use safety function success paths. It was determined that SEP implementation was not required.

The following safety function success paths were selected based on EOP-9.0 Resource Assessment Tree 'conditions' criteria:

1. Reactivity Control: RC-3 Boration Using SIS (due to SIAS activated)
2. Maintenance of Vital Auxiliaries Electric DC: MVAE-DC-1 Battery Chargers/Station Batteries
3. Maintenance of Vital Auxiliaries Electric AC: MVAE-AC-1 Offsite Power
4. Inventory Control: IC-2 Safety Injection (due to SIAS activated)
5. Pressure Control: PC-3 Saturated Pressure Control (due to SIAS activated)
6. Heat Removal: HR-2 S/G with SI Operating (due to SIAS activated)
7. Containment Integrity: CI-1 Automatic/Manual Isolation
8. Containment Atmosphere Control: CA-1 Containment Air coolers (Normal Mode*)
9. Maintenance of Vital Auxiliaries Water: MVAW-1 Service Water and CCW
10. Maintenance of Vital Auxiliaries Air: MVAA-1 Instrument Air Compressors
  • Note: Although containment air coolers were operating in the Emergency Mode, CA-1 was selected based on meeting plant conditions criteria, i.e. containment temperature < 125oF and containment pressure < 0.85 psig.

Operators identified MVAE-DC-1 as the only jeopardized safety function and proceeded completing appropriate actions while monitoring other safety functions by performing periodic safety function status checks (SFSCs).

The MVAE-DC-1 instruction column Step 6 condition requiring at least 3 preferred ac buses energized was not met. This required operators to perform the contingency action ('ENERGIZE ALL available Preferred AC Buses'), referring to applicable ONPs (ONP-24.1 Loss of Preferred AC Bus Y-10 and ONP-24.3 Loss of Preferred AC Bus Y-30). After verification of bus EY-30 being fault-free, operators energized EY-30 from the bypass regulator per ONP-24.3 and SOP-30 Station Power Section 7.6.2.

Pressurizer (PZR) pressure and level controllers and the heater select switch were placed in channel B during performance of ONP-24.3. This action enabled the PZR spray valves (lowered PCS pressure),

reduced P-55A charging pump speed from 53 gpm to 33 gpm and opened the letdown orifice isolation valves. Opening the orifice valves resulted in RV-2006 lifting and annunciator EK-0702 RELIEF VALVE 2006 RELIEF VALVE DISCH HI TEMP alarming. Operators isolated flow to RV-2006 by placing the orifice valve handswitches to close per ARP-4 Primary System Volume Level Pressure Scheme EK-07 (C-12).

Due to observed high PZR level, in use success paths Inventory Control IC-2 and Heat Removal HR-2 were referenced for direction to stop PCS inventory addition. Emergency boration requirements were verified per HR-2 Step 6 and safety injection throttling criteria verified per IC-2 Step 10. Operators then throttled safety injection, including stopping both operating charging pumps.

Entergy PSA EA-PSA-SDP - D11 11-07 Rev. 1 En g ineerin g nteW Analysis Attachment 13 - Page 3 of 4 IV. ONP-2.3 Loss of DC Power Due to observed steam generator E-50A high level, operators identified the need to stop AFW pump P-8B. ONP-2.3 Step 2.b directs stopping P-8B by closing steam supply valve CV-0522B per SOP-12 Feedwater System Section 7.2.3 and Attachment 9. Operators dispatched a plant operator to close CV-0522B using EOP Supplement 19 Alternate Auxiliary Feedwater Methods Section 4 Steps 2.a and 2.b, which is equivalent to SOP-12 for the necessary actions.

After verifying dc buses ED-1 OL and ED-10R fault free, operators energized them from station battery ED-01 per ONP-2.3 Step 11 and placed #3 battery charger ED-17 in service per SOP-30 Step 7.8.2. After verifying bus EY-10 fault-free, and due to its normal power supply (inverter ED-06) not being available (dc input breaker tripped open), operators energized EY-30 from its normal power supply (inverter ED-08) per SOP-30 Step 7.6.3 and energized EY-10 from the bypass regulator per SOP-30 Step 7.6.2.

Reenergizing panel ED-11-1 resulted in instrument air compressor C-2A tripping and annunciator EK-1104 AIR COMPRESSORS C2A, C2B, C2C TRIP alarming. Per ARP-7 Auxiliary Systems Scheme EK-11 (C-13) operators manually started C-2B and C-2C and referred to ONP-7.1 Loss of Instrument Air.

(Compressors C-2B and C-2C did not automatically start due to breaker 72-119 not being available.)

Procedure Use Flow Chart Procedure Use Flow Chart Figure A13-1 : Procedure Use Flow Chart

Entergy PSA EA-PSA-SDP - D11 11-07 Rev. 1 Ift En g ineerin g Entero Analysis Attachment 13 - Page 4 of 4 References

[1] Admin 4.06, Revision 20, Emergency Operating Procedure Development and Implementation

[2] Admin 4.16, Revision 3, Off Normal Procedure Development and Implementation

[3] ARP-3, Revision 70, Electrical Auxiliaries and Diesel Generator Scheme EK-05 (EC-1 1)

[4] ARP-4, Revision 58, Primary System Volume Level Pressure Scheme EK-07 (C-12)

[5] ARP-7, Revision 79, Auxiliary Systems Scheme EK-1 1 (C-13)

[6] EI-1, Revision 54, Emergency Classification and Actions

[7] EOP Supplement 19, Revision 10, Alternate Auxiliary Feedwater Methods

[8] EOP-1.0, Revision 13, Standard Post-Trip Actions

[9] EOP-9.0, Revision 21, Functional Recovery Procedure

[10] EOP-9.0 HR-2, Revision 22, Heat Removal-2

[11] EOP-9.0 IC-2, Revision 22, Inventory Control-2

[12] EOP-9.0 MVAE-DC-1, Revision 20, Maintenance of Vital Auxiliaries Electric-DC-1

[13] GOP-10, Revision 21, Balance of Plant Actions Following A Reactor Trip

[14] ONP-2.3, Revision 16, Loss of DC Power

[15] ONP-7.1, Revision 13, Loss of Instrument Air

[16] ONP-24.1, Revision 24, Loss of Preferred AC Bus Y10

[17] ONP-24.3, Revision 24, Loss of Preferred AC Bus Y30

[18] SOP-12, Revision 60, Feedwater System

[19] SOP-30, Revision 63, Station Power

Figure A13-1: Procedure Use Flow Chart EOP-1.0 Standard Post-Trip Actions Contingency actions are required, e.g. jumper to open EOP-1.0 main generator breakers Immediate Actions Operators note ED-11-1 and ED-11-2 not energized EOP-1.0 Step 4.6 acceptance criteria Operator Actions not met, i.e. <3 preferred ac buses energized Perform diagnostic flow chart Step 6 directs performing GOP-10 Balance of Plant Actions Following A Reactor Trip (includes GCL-10.1, GCL-10.2)

EOP-9.0 Functional Recovery Procedure GCL-10.1 Step 11 directs review all alarms, report unexpected alarms to the CRS and refer to ARPs as necessary EOP-9.0 Operator Actions ARP-3 for annunciator EK-0548 Step 11 directs identifying safety 125V DC UNDERVOLTAGE directs Step 1 directs referring to function success paths Site Emergency Plan El-1 referring to ONP-2.3 Loss of DC Power (MVAE-DC-1 is "jeopardized", (determined implementation i.e. acceptance criteria not met) not reauired)

ONP-2.3 symptoms observed, entry conditions met Perform Operator Perform Safety Perform Operator Perform Operator Actions for Function Status Checks Actions for IC-2 Actions for HR-2 MVAE-DC-1 (SFSCs) on remaining safety functions Step 6 Contingency Action Step 10 Verifies Step 6 Verifies PCS directs energizing ALL 51 throttling boron concentration available preferred ac buses criteria met met for securing per applicable ONPs, i.e. I emergency boration ONP-24.1 and ONP-24.3 Stopped ON P-24.3 O N P-24.1 charging pumps Loss of Preferred Loss of Preferred AC Bus Y-30 AC Bus Y-10 Step 4.5 directs placing EY-30 Step 4.4 directs on the bypass regulator per selection PZR level Step 2.b directs stopping Step 11 directs restoring station SOP-30 Step 7.6.2 control channel B auxiliary feedwater (AFW) battery ED-01 dc bus sections, and pump P-8B per SOP-12 verifying preferred ac inverters Placed EY-30 on #3 Step 4.5 directs Section 7.2.3, Attachment 9 restored (ED-06 not available) and inverter ED-08 per selection PZR heater 1 battery charger in service SOP-30 Step 7.6.3 control channel B

  • Operators performed this action per EOP Supplement 19 Step 4.6 directs Section 4 Steps 2a and 2b Placed #3 battery charger selecting PZR pressure which direct equivalent actions ED-17 in service per control channel B SOP-30 Step 7.8.2 Step 4.15 directs placing EY-10 on the bypass regulator per SOP-30 Step 7.6.2