ML11161A149
| ML11161A149 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Comanche Peak  |
| Issue date: | 06/09/2010 |
| From: | Carlson J, Cloutier W TLG Services |
| To: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, Luminant Generation Co, Luminant Power |
| References | |
| CP- 201100646, TXX-11056 L11-1621-001, Rev 0 | |
| Download: ML11161A149 (178) | |
Text
Attachment A 003
Document L11-1621-001, Rev. 0 DECOMMISSIONING COST STUDY for the COMANCHE PEAK NUCLEAR POWER PLANT prepared for Luminant Generation Company LLC prepared by TLG Services, Inc.
Bridgewater, Connecticut June 2010 004
Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Study Document L11-1621-001, Rev. 0 Page ii of xix APPROVALS Project Manager Project Engineer Technical Manager William A. Cloutier, Jr/'
Ja Carlson Francis W. S;eynj DateF,?'710 Date Date Date/
TLG Services, Inc.
005
Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant Document L11-1621-001, Rev. 0 Decommissioning Cost Study Page iii of xix TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE EXECUTIVE SUM M ARY..................................................................................
viii-xix L
INTRODUCTION.....................................................................................................
1-1 1.1 Objectives of Study...........................................................................................
1-1 1.2 Site Description.................................................................................................
1-1 1.3 Regulatory Guidance........................................................................................
1-2 1.3.1 Nuclear W aste Policy Act......................................................................
1-4 1.3.2 Low-Level Radioactive W aste Acts......................................................
1-6 1.3.3 Radiological Criteria for License Termination....................................
1-8
- 2.
DECOM M ISSIONING ALTERNATIVES..............................................................
2-1 2.1 DECON..............................................................................................................
2-2 2.1.1 Period 1 - Preparations.........................................................................
2-2 2.1.2 Period 2 - Decom m issioning Operations..............................................
2-4 2.1.3 Period 3 - Site Restoration....................................................................
2-7 2.1.4 ISFSI Operations and Decom missioning............................................
2-8 2.2 SAFSTOR..........................................................................................................
2-9 2.2.1 Period 1 - Preparations.........................................................................
2-9 2.2.2 Period 2 - Dorm ancy............................................................................
2-10 2.2.3 Periods 3 and 4 - Delayed Decommissioning.....................................
2-11 2.2.4 Period 5 - Site Restoration..................................................................
2-12
- 3.
COST ESTIMATE.....................................................................................................
3-1 3.1 Basis of Estim ate..............................................................................................
3-1 3.2 M ethodology......................................................................................................
3-1 3.3 Impact of Decommissioning Multiple Reactor Units.....................
3-3 3.4 Financial Components of the Cost M odel.......................................................
3-4 3.4.1 Contingency...........................................................................................
3-4 3.4.2 Financial Risk........................................................................................
3-6 3.5 Site-Specific Considerations.............................................................................
3-7 3.5.1 Spent Fuel M anagem ent.......................................................................
3-7 3.5.2 Reactor Vessel and Internal Components.........................................
3-10 3.5.3 Prim ary System Components.............................................................
3-11 3.5.4 M ain Turbine and Condenser.............................................................
3-12 3.5.5 Retired Components............................................................................
3-12 3.5.6 Transportation M ethods.....................................................................
3-13 TLG Services, Inc.
006
Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant Document L11-1621-001, Rev. 0 Decommissioning Cost Study Page iv of xix TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued)
SECTION PAGE 3.5.7 Low-Level Radioactive Waste Disposal.............................................
3-14 3.5.8 Site Conditions Following Decommissioning....................................
3-15 3.6 A ssum ptions.......................................................................................
3-15 3.6.1 E stim ating B asis.................................................................................
3-15 3.6.2 L abor C osts..........................................................................................
3-16 3.6.3 D esign Conditions................................................................................
3-16 3.6.4 G eneral.................................................................................................
3-17 3.7 Cost Estim ate Sum m ary...............................................................................
3-19
- 4.
SCH EDU LE ESTIM ATE........................................................................................
4-1 4.1 Schedule Estim ate Assum ptions.....................................................................
4-1 4.2 P roject Schedule................................................................................................
4-2
- 5.
RAD IOA CTIVE W A STE S........................................................................................
5-1
- 6.
R E SU L T S.................................................................................................................
6-1
- 7.
R E F E R E N C E S..........................................................................................................
7-1 TABLES DECON Cost Summary, Decommissioning Cost Elements......................... xviii SAFSTOR Cost Summary, Decommissioning Cost Elements....................... xix 3.1 Spent Fuel M anagem ent...............................................................................
3-21 3.2 Unit 1, DECON Alternative, Schedule of Total Annual Expenditures....... 3-23 3.2a Unit 1, DECON Alternative, License Termination Expenditures............... 3-25 3.2b Unit 1, DECON Alternative, Spent Fuel Management Expenditures........ 3-27 3.2c Unit 1, DECON Alternative, Site Restoration Expenditures...................... 3-29 3.3 Unit 2, DECON Alternative, Schedule of Total Annual Expenditures....... 3-31 3.3a Unit 2, DECON Alternative, License Termination Expenditures............... 3-33 3.3b Unit 2, DECON Alternative, Spent Fuel Management Expenditures........ 3-35 3.3c Unit 2, DECON Alternative, Site Restoration Expenditures...................... 3-37 3.4 Unit 1, SAFSTOR Alternative, Schedule of Total Annual Expenditures.... 3-39 3.4a Unit 1, SAFSTOR Alternative, License Termination Expenditures........... 3-41 3.4b Unit 1, SAFSTOR Alternative, Spent Fuel Management Expenditures..... 3-43 3.4c Unit 1, SAFSTOR Alternative, Site Restoration Expenditures................... 3-45 TLG Services, Inc.
007
Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Study Document L1J-1621-001, Rev. 0 Page v of xix TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued)
SECTION PAGE TABLES (continued) 3.5 Unit 2, SAFSTOR Alternative, Schedule of Total Annual Expenditures.... 3-47 3.5a Unit 2, SAFSTOR Alternative, License Termination Expenditures........... 3-49 3.5b Unit 2, SAFSTOR Alternative, Spent Fuel Management Expenditures..... 3-51 3.5c Unit 2, SAFSTOR Alternative, Site Restoration Expenditures................... 3-53 5.1 DECON Alternative, Decommissioning Waste Summary.............................
5-3 5.2 SAFSTOR Alternative, Decommissioning Waste Summary..........................
5-4 6.1 DECON Alternative, Decommissioning Cost Elements.................................
6-4 6.2 SAFSTOR Alternative, Decommissioning Cost Elements.............................
6-5 FIGURES 4.1 A ctivity Schedule..............................................................................................
4-3 4.2 Decommissioning Timeline, DECON..............................................................
4-6 4.3 Decommissioning Timeline, SAFSTOR..........................................................
4-7 APPENDICES A.
Unit Cost Factor Developm ent.........................................................................
A-1 B.
U nit Cost Factor Listing..................................................................................
B-1 C.
Detailed Cost Analysis, DECON.....................................................................
C-1 D.
Detailed Cost Analysis, SAFSTOR..................................................................
D-1 TLG Services, Inc.
008
Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Study Document L11-1621-001, Rev. 0 Page vi of xix TABLE OF ACRONYMS / ABBREVIATIONS AIF/NESP-036 ALARA Comanche Peak CERCLA CFR DECCER DECON DOC DOE ENTOMB EPA FSAR GTCC IP ISFSI LSA LTP MARSSIM Luminant MOU MPC MTU NRC NSSS NWPA PERT PSDAR SAFSTOR SCO TEDE WDF Atomic Industrial Form document delineating a standardized cost estimating model for decommissioning As-Low-As-Reasonably-Achievable Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (also referred to as Superfund)
Code of Federal Regulations TLG's Proprietary Decommissioning Cost Model Prompt Decommissioning (NRC Acronym)
Decommissioning Operations Contractor Department of Energy Entombment or Hardened Storage (NRC Acronym)
Environmental Protection Agency Final Safety Analysis Report Greater-than-Class C (as defined by 10 CFR §61)
Industrial Package Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation Low Specific Activity License Termination Plan Multi-Agency Radiation Survey and Site Investigation Manual Luminant Generation Company LLC Memorandum of Understanding (between NRC and EPA)
Multi-Purpose Canister Metric Tons of Uranium Nuclear Regulatory Commission (or Commission)
Nuclear Steam Supply System Nuclear Waste Policy Act Program Evaluation and Review Technique Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report Passive Storage (NRC Acronym)
Surface Contaminated Object Total Effective Does Equivalent Work Difficulty Adjustment Factors TLG Services, Inc.
009
Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Study Document L1J-1621-001, Rev. 0 Page vii of xix REVISION LOG No.
- Date, Item Revised Reason for Revision 0
06-09-2010 Original Issue TLG Services, Inc.
010
Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant Document L11-1621-001, Rev. 0 Decommissioning Cost Study Page viii of xix EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY
This report presents estimates of the cost to decommission the Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant (Comanche Peak) for the selected decommissioning alternatives. The analysis relies upon site-specific, technical information from an evaluation prepared in 2005,[1] updated to reflect current assumptions pertaining to the disposition of the two nuclear units and relevant industry experience in undertaking such projects. The station inventory, the basis for the decontamination and dismantling requirements and cost, and the decommissioning waste streams, was reviewed for this analysis. The plant confirmed that there were no substantive changes over the four year period to the configuration of the plant or site facilities (that would impact decommissioning).
The current estimates are designed to provide Luminant Generation Company LLC (Luminant) with sufficient information to assess its financial obligations, as they pertain to the decommissioning of the nuclear station. The estimates do not reflect the actual plan to decommission all aspects of Comanche Peak; the plan may differ from the assumptions made in the cost estimates based on facts that exist at the time of the decommissioning activity.
The primary goal of the decommissioning is the removal and disposal of the contaminated systems and structures so that the operating licenses for the nuclear units can be terminated. The analysis recognizes that spent fuel will be stored at the site in the wet storage pools and/or in an independent spent fuel storage installation (ISFSI) until such time that it can be transferred to the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE). Consequently, the estimates also include those costs to manage and subsequently decommission these interim storage facilities.
The currently projected cost to promptly decommission the station (DECON alternative), manage the spent fuel, and restore the site, is estimated at $1,224.4 million, as reported in 2009 dollars. The cost to defer decommissioning by placing the unit in safe-storage (SAFSTOR alternative) for approximately 50 years is estimated at $1,420.9 million, as reported in 2009 dollars.
The estimates are based on numerous fundamental assumptions, including regulatory requirements, project contingencies, low-level radioactive waste disposal practices, high-level radioactive waste management options, and site restoration requirements. The estimates incorporate a minimum cooling period for the spent fuel that resides in the storage pools when operations cease. Once sufficiently cooled 1
"Decommissioning Cost Analysis for the Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station," Document T04-1471-002, Rev. 1, TLG Services, Inc., May 2005 TLG Services, Inc.
011
Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant Document L11-1621-001, Rev. 0 Decommissioning Cost Study Page ix of xix the spent fuel is transferred to the DOE or to the ISFSI for interim storage. The estimates also include the dismantling of site structures and non-essential facilities and the limited restoration of the site.
Alternatives and Regulations The ultimate objective of the decommissioning process is to reduce the inventory of contaminated and activated material so that the license can be terminated. The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) provided initial decommissioning requirements in its rule adopted on June 27, 1988.[21 In this rule, the NRC set forth financial criteria for decommissioning licensed nuclear power facilities. The regulations addressed planning needs, timing, funding methods, and environmental review requirements for decommissioning.
The rule also defined three decommissioning alternatives as being acceptable to the NRC: DECON, SAFSTOR, and ENTOMB.
DECON is defined as "the alternative in which the equipment, structures, and portions of a facility and site containing radioactive contaminants are removed or decontaminated to a level that permits the property to be released for unrestricted use shortly after cessation of operations." [3]
SAFSTOR is defined as "the alternative in which the nuclear facility is placed and maintained in a condition that allows the nuclear facility to be safely stored and subsequently decontaminated (deferred decontamination) to levels that permit release for unrestricted use."[41 Decommissioning is to be completed within 60 years, although longer time periods will be considered when necessary to protect public health and safety.
ENTOMB is defined as "the alternative in which radioactive contaminants are encased in a structurally long-lived material, such as concrete; the entombed structure is appropriately maintained and continued surveillance is carried out until the radioactive material decays to a level permitting unrestricted release of the property."[51 As with the SAFSTOR alternative, decommissioning is currently required to be completed within 60 years.
2 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations, Title 10, Parts 30, 40, 50, 51, 70 and 72 "General Requirements for Decommissioning Nuclear Facilities," Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Federal Register Volume 53, Number 123 (p 24018 et seq.), June 27, 1988 3
Ibid. Page 24022, Column 3 4
Ibid.
5 Ibid. Page 24023, Column 2 TLG Services, Inc.
012
Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant Document Ll1-1621-001, Rev. 0 Decommissioning Cost Study Page x of xix The 60-year restriction has limited the practicality for the ENTOMB alternative at commercial reactors that generate significant amounts of long-lived radioactive material. In 1997, the NRC directed its staff to re-evaluate this alternative and identify the technical requirements and regulatory actions that would be necessary for entombment to become a viable option.
The resulting evaluation provided several recommendations; however, rulemaking has been deferred pending the completion of additional research studies, for example, on engineered barriers.
In
- 1996, the NRC published revisions to the general requirements for decommissioning nuclear power plants to clarify ambiguities and codify procedures and terminology as a means of enhancing efficiency and uniformity in the decommissioning process.[6] The amendments allow for greater public participation and better define the transition process from operations to decommissioning.
Regulatory Guide 1.184, issued in July 2000, further described the methods and procedures acceptable to the NRC staff for implementing the requirements of the 1996 revised rule relating to the initial activities and major phases of the decommissioning process. The costs and schedules presented in this analysis follow the general guidance and processes described in the amended regulations. The format and content of the estimates is also consistent with the recommendations of Regulatory Guide 1.202, issued in February 2005.[7]
Comanche Peak Decommissioning Scenarios Two decommissioning scenarios were evaluated for the Comanche Peak nuclear units.
The scenarios selected are representative of alternatives available to the owner and are defined as follows:
- 1.
The first scenario assumes that the units would be promptly decommissioned (DECON alternative) upon the expiration of the current operating licenses, i.e.,
2030 and 2033 for Units 1 and 2, respectively. Spent fuel in wet storage pools at that time would be relocated to the ISFSI for interim storage until such time that the DOE can complete the transfer.
- 2.
In the second scenario, the nuclear units are placed into safe-storage (SAFSTOR alternative) at the end of their current operating license. Spent fuel in wet storage pools at that time would be relocated to the ISFSI for interim storage so 6
U.S. Code of Federal Regulations, Title 10, Parts 2, 50, and 51, "Decommissioning of Nuclear Power Reactors," Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Federal Register Volume 61, (p 39278 et seq.), July 29, 1996 7
"Standard Format and Content of Decommissioning Cost Estimates for Nuclear Power Reactors,"
Regulatory Guide 1.202, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, February 2005 TLG Services, Inc.
013
Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant Document LJ1-1621-001, Rev. 0 Decommissioning Cost Study Page xi of xix as to minimize caretaking costs. The fuel would be transferred to the DOE (consistent with the assumptions in the DECON scenario) until the process is complete. At that time, the ISFSI would also be placed in safe-storage.
Decommissioning is deferred to the maximum extent (approximately 50 years) such that the licenses are terminated within the generally required 60-year period.
Methodology The methodology used to develop the estimates described within this document follows the basic approach originally presented in the cost estimating guidelines[8] developed by the Atomic Industrial Forum (now Nuclear Energy Institute). This reference describes a unit factor method for determining decommissioning activity costs. The unit factors used in this analysis incorporate site-specific costs and the latest available information on worker productivity in decommissioning.
The estimates also reflect lessons learned from TLG's involvement in the Shippingport Station decommissioning, completed in 1989, and the decommissioning of the Cintichem reactor, hot cells and associated facilities, completed in 1997. In addition, the planning and engineering for the Pathfinder, Shoreham, Rancho Seco, Trojan, Yankee Rowe, Big Rock Point, Maine Yankee, Humboldt Bay-3, Connecticut Yankee and San Onofre-1 nuclear units have provided additional insight into the process, the regulatory aspects, and technical challenges of decommissioning commercial nuclear units.
An activity duration critical path is used to determine the total decommissioning program schedule. The schedule is relied upon in calculating the carrying costs, which include program management, administration, field engineering, equipment rental, and support services, such as quality control and security.
Contingency Consistent with cost estimating practice, contingencies are applied to the decontamination and dismantling costs developed as "specific provision for unforeseeable elements of cost within the defined project scope, particularly important where previous experience relating estimates and actual costs has shown that unforeseeable events which will increase costs are likely to occur."[91 The cost elements in the estimates are based on ideal conditions; therefore, the types of unforeseeable events that are almost certain to occur in decommissioning, based on industry 8
T.S. LaGuardia et al., "Guidelines for Producing Commercial Nuclear Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Estimates," AIF/NESP-036, May 1986 9
Project and Cost Engineers' Handbook, Second Edition, American Association of Cost Engineers, Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, New York, p. 239.
TLG Services, Inc.
014
Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant Document Ll1-1621-001, Rev. 0 Decommissioning Cost Study Page xii of xix experience, are addressed through a percentage contingency applied on a line-item basis. This contingency factor is a nearly universal element in all large-scale construction and demolition projects. It should be noted that contingency, as used in this analysis, does not account for price escalation and inflation in the cost of decommissioning over the remaining operating life of the nuclear units.
Contingency funds are expected to be fully expended throughout the program. As such, inclusion of contingency is necessary to provide assurance that sufficient funding will be available to accomplish the intended tasks.
Low-Level Radioactive Waste Disposal The contaminated and activated material generated in the decontamination and dismantling of a commercial nuclear reactor is classified as low-level (radioactive) waste, although not all of the material is suitable for "shallow-land" disposal. With the passage of the "Low-Level Radioactive Waste Policy Act" in 1980,[110 and its Amendments of 1985,1I1 the states became ultimately responsible for the disposition of low-level radioactive waste generated within their own borders. However, with the exception of Texas (which has issued a license for a new facility), no new compact facilities have been successfully sited, licensed, and constructed.
Until recently, there were two facilities available to Luminant for the disposal of low-level radioactive waste generated by Comanche Peak. As of July 1, 2008, however, the facility in Barnwell, South Carolina was closed to generators outside the Atlantic Compact (comprised of the states of Connecticut, New Jersey and South Carolina).
This leaves the facility in Clive, Utah, operated by EnergySolutions, as the only currently available destination for low-level radioactive waste requiring controlled disposal, until the construction of Waste Control Specialist's facility in Andrews County is complete.
For the purpose of this analysis, the current disposal agreement with EnergySolutions is used as the basis for estimating the disposal cost for the majority of the radioactive waste (Class A [121). EnergySolutions does not have a license to dispose of the more highly radioactive waste (Classes B and C), for example, generated in the dismantling of the reactor vessel. As a proxy, the disposal cost for this material is based upon the last published rate schedule for non-compact waste for the Barnwell facility.
The dismantling of the components residing closest to the reactor core generates radioactive waste that may be considered unsuitable for shallow-land disposal (i.e.,
10 "Low-Level Radioactive Waste Policy Act of 1980," Public Law 96-573, 1980.
11 "Low-Level Radioactive Waste Policy Amendments Act of 1985," Public Law 99-240, 1986.
12 U.S. Code of Federal Regulations, Title 10, Part 61, "Licensing Requirements for Land Disposal of Radioactive Waste" TLG Services, Inc.
015
Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant Document L1-1621-001, Rev. 0 Decommissioning Cost Study Page xiii of xix low-level radioactive waste with concentrations of radionuclides that exceed the limits established by the NRC for Class C radioactive waste (GTCC)). The Low-Level Radioactive Waste Policy Amendments Act of 1985 assigned the federal government the responsibility for the disposal of this material. The Act also stated that the beneficiaries of the activities resulting in the generation of such radioactive waste bear all reasonable costs of disposing of such waste. However, to date, the federal government has not identified a cost for disposing of GTCC or a schedule for acceptance. For purposes of this analysis, the GTCC radioactive waste is assumed to be packaged and disposed of as high-level waste, at a cost equivalent to that envisioned for the spent fuel.
For purposes of this study, GTCC is assumed to be packaged in the same canisters used for spent fuel. The GTCC material is either stored on site or shipped directly to a DOE facility as it is generated (depending upon the timing of the decommissioning and whether the spent fuel has been removed from the site prior to the start of decommissioning).
A significant portion of the waste material generated during decommissioning may only be potentially contaminated by radioactive materials. This waste can be analyzed on site or shipped off site to licensed facilities for further analysis, for processing and/or for conditioning/recovery. Reduction in the volume of low-level radioactive waste requiring disposal in a licensed low-level radioactive waste disposal facility can be accomplished through a variety of methods, including analyses and surveys or decontamination to eliminate the portion of waste that does not require disposal as radioactive waste, compaction, incineration or metal melt. The estimates for Comanche Peak reflect the savings from waste recovery/volume reduction.
High-Level Radioactive Waste Management Congress passed the "Nuclear Waste Policy Act"[131 (NWPA) in 1982, assigning the federal government's long-standing responsibility for disposal of the spent nuclear fuel and high level radioactive waste created by the commercial nuclear generating plants to the DOE. The NWPA provided that DOE would enter into contracts with utilities in which DOE would promise to take the utilities' spent fuel and high-level radioactive waste and utilities would pay the cost of the disposition services for that material. The NWPA, along with the individual contracts with the utilities, specified that the DOE was to begin accepting spent fuel by January 31, 1998.
Since the original legislation, the DOE has announced several delays in the program schedule. By January 1998, the DOE had failed to accept any spent fuel or high level 13 "Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982 and Amendments," DOE's Office of Civilian Radioactive Management, 1982 TLG Services, Inc.
016
Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant Document Ll1-1621-001, Rev. 0 Decommissioning Cost Study Page xiv of xix waste, as required by the NWPA and utility contracts. Delays continue and, as a result, generators have initiated legal action against the DOE in an attempt to obtain compensation for DOE's breach of contract.
The DOE submitted its license application to the NRC on June 3, 2008, seeking authorization to construct a geologic repository at Yucca Mountain, Nevada. The current Administration, however, has stated its intention to eliminate future funding for the project and, as a result, DOE has filed a motion to withdraw its application.
Under the President's proposed plan, a Blue Ribbon Commission would evaluate options and make recommendations to the Administration for developing a new plan for the ultimate disposition of high level waste. Until such a plan is formulated, however, the cost of managing the spent fuel until the DOE is able to complete the transfer to an interim or permanent disposal site is based upon the information available and relied upon in the previous study.
It is generally necessary that spent fuel be cooled and stored for a minimum period at the generating site prior to transfer. As such, the NRC requires that licensees establish a program to manage and provide funding for the management of all irradiated fuel at the reactor site until title of the fuel is transferred to the Secretary of Energy, pursuant to 10 CFR Part 50.54(bb).[1 41 This funding requirement is fulfilled through inclusion of certain cost elements in the decommissioning estimates, for example, construction and operation of the ISFSI and continued operation of the spent fuel pools.
The spent fuel pools are expected to contain freshly discharged assemblies (from the most recent refueling cycles) as well as the final reactor core at shutdown. Over the following five and one half years the assemblies are packaged into multi-purpose canisters (MPCs) for transfer to the DOE or to the ISFSI for interim storage. It is assumed that this period provides the necessary cooling for the final core to meet the transport and/or storage requirements for decay heat.
DOE's contracts with utilities order the acceptance of spent fuel from utilities based upon the oldest fuel receiving the highest priority. However, the DOE contracts provide mechanisms for altering the oldest fuel first allocation scheme, including emergency deliveries, exchanges of allocations amongst utilities and the option of providing priority acceptance from permanently shutdown nuclear reactors.
Because it is unclear how these mechanisms may operate once DOE begins accepting spent fuel from commercial reactors, this study conservatively assumes that DOE will accept spent fuel in an oldest fuel first order. For purposes of this analysis, the first assemblies removed from the Comanche Peak site are 1
U.S. Code of Federal Regulations, Title 10, Part 50, "Domestic Licensing of Production and Utilization Facilities," Subpart 54 (bb), "Conditions of Licenses."
TLG Services, Inc.
017
Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant Document L11-1621-001, Rev. 0 Decommissioning Cost Study Page xv of xix conservatively assumed to be in 2025 based upon the DOE's most recently published annual acceptance rates of 400 MTU/year for year 1, 3,800 MTU total for years 2 through 4 and 3,000 MTU/year for year 5 and beyond. With an estimated, maximum rate of transfer of 3,000 metric tons of uranium (MTU)/year, completion of the removal of fuel from the site is conservatively projected to be in the year 2064. Consequently, costs are included within the estimates for the long-term caretaking of the spent fuel at the Comanche Peak site until the year 2064.
Luminant's position is that the DOE has a contractual obligation to accept Comanche Peak's fuel far earlier than the projections set out above consistent with its contract commitments. No assumption made in this study should be interpreted to be inconsistent with this claim. However, at this time, including the cost of storing spent fuel in this study is the most reasonable approach because it insures the availability of sufficient decommissioning funds at the end of the station's life if, contrary to its contractual obligation, the DOE has not performed earlier.
An ISFSI, which can be operated under a separate and independent license, will be constructed to support management of the spent fuel at the site until the DOE is able to complete the transfer to a federal repository. As such, the fuel that cannot be transferred directly to the DOE from the wet pools is packaged for interim storage at the ISFSI. This will allow decommissioning to continue on the nuclear units.
Site Restoration The efficient removal of the contaminated materials at the site may result in damage to many of the site structures. Blasting, coring, drilling, and the other decontamination activities will substantially damage power block structures, potentially weakening the footings and structural supports. Prompt dismantling of site structures (once the facilities are decontaminated) is clearly the most appropriate and cost-effective option. It is unreasonable to anticipate that these structures would be repaired and preserved after the radiological contamination is removed. The cost to dismantle site structures with a work force already mobilized on site is more efficient than if the process is deferred. Site facilities quickly degrade without maintenance, adding additional expense and creating potential hazards to the public and the demolition work force. Consequently, this study assumes that site structures are removed to a nominal depth of three feet below the local grade level wherever possible. The site is then to be graded and stabilized.
Summary The cost to decommission Comanche Peak assumes the removal of all contaminated and activated plant components and structural materials such that the owner may then have unrestricted use of the site with no further requirements for an operating TLG Services, Inc.
018
Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant Document LI1-1621-001, Rev. 0 Decommissioning Cost Study Page xvi of xix license. Low-level radioactive waste, other than GTCC waste, is sent to a commercial processor for treatment/conditioning or to a controlled disposal facility.
Decommissioning is accomplished within the 60-year period required by current NRC regulations. In the interim, the spent fuel remains in storage at the site until such time that the transfer to a DOE facility is complete. Once emptied, the fuel storage facilities can be decommissioned (DECON alternative) or placed in storage and decommissioned with the reactor complex (SASFTOR alternative).
The decommissioning scenarios are described in Section 2. The assumptions are presented in Section 3, along with schedules of annual expenditures. The major cost contributors are identified in Section 6, with detailed activity costs, waste volumes, and associated manpower requirements delineated in Appendices C and D for the DECON and SAFSTOR alternatives. The major cost components are also identified in the cost summary provided at the end of this section.
The cost elements in the estimates are assigned to one of three subcategories: NRC License Termination, Spent Fuel Management, and Site Restoration. The subcategory "NRC License Termination" is used to accumulate costs that are consistent with "decommissioning" as defined by the NRC in its financial assurance regulations (i.e.,
10 CFR Part 50.75). The cost reported for this subcategory is generally sufficient to terminate the operating licenses for the two reactors, recognizing that there may be some additional cost impact from spent fuel management. This subcategory also includes the costs of disposing of the retired steam generators and the reactor vessel closure head from Unit 1. The study assumes that the disposal of the components would occur after shutdown, however, the costs are identified separately because the disposal activities could be conducted at anytime.
The "Spent Fuel Management" subcategory contains costs anticipated to be incurred once the nuclear units cease operation for the off-loading of the pools either directly to the DOE or to the ISFSI for interim storage, and the eventual transfer of casks from the ISFSI to the DOE. Costs are also included for the operation of the ISFSI until such time that the transfer of all fuel from this facility to an off-site location (e.g., geologic repository) is complete.
"Site Restoration" is used to capture costs associated with the dismantling and demolition of buildings and facilities demonstrated to be free from contamination. This includes structures never exposed to radioactive materials, as well as those facilities that have been decontaminated to appropriate levels. Structures are removed to a depth of three feet and backfilled to conform to local grade.
It should be noted that the costs assigned to these subcategories are allocations.
Delegation of cost elements is for the purposes of comparison (e.g., with NRC financial TLG Services, Inc.
019
Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Study Document L11-1621-001, Rev. 0 Page xvii of xix guidelines) or to permit specific financial treatment (e.g., ARO determinations). In reality, there can be considerable interaction between the activities in the three subcategories. For example, an owner may decide to remove non-contaminated structures early in the project to improve access to highly contaminated facilities or plant components. In these instances, the non-contaminated removal costs could be reassigned from Site Restoration to an NRC License Termination support activity.
However, in general, the allocations represent a reasonable accounting of those costs that can be expected to be incurred for the specific subcomponents of the total estimated program cost, if executed as described.
As noted within this document, the estimates were developed and costs are presented in 2009 dollars. As such, the estimates do not reflect the escalation of costs (due to inflationary and market forces) over the remaining operating life of the station or during the decommissioning period.
TLG Services, Inc.
020
Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Study Document L11-1621-001, Rev. 0 Page xviii of xix DECON COST
SUMMARY
DECOMMISSIONING COST ELEMENTS (thousands of 2009 dollars)
.C o..st E le m en t E.U n it 2
.T...............o l...........................
aDecontamination 9,90O5 15,039.
24,945 Removal 75,849 121,217 197,066 Packaging 15,695 15,202 30,897 a--
Transportation 7,102 5,850 12,952 Waste Disposal 74,142 71,595 145,737 Off-site Waste Processing 18_476.
__23,278 41,754 Program Management [11 245,141 299,888 545,029 Spent Fuel Pool Isolation 11,143 7,429 18,572 Spent Fuel Management (Direct Costs) [21 53,286 50,479 103,765 Insurance and Regulatory Fees 15,336 12,141 27,477 jEner*
7,900 8,313 i 16,214 Characterization and Licensing Surveys 10,902 10.529 1
21,432 Pro erty Taxes 3,507 3,211 6,718 Miscellaneous Equi ment 6,338 6,673 13,012 D9ecomm1ssioning Staff Severane-----
9,.434 _.--_-_
- _9, 18,868 Total [3]
564,156 660,2801 1,224,435 Cost Element T
License Termination (excluding retired large I components) 401,6761 488,483 890,160 Large Components (retired) [41 19,547 1 1,993 21,540 Spent Fuel Management 103,031 100,224 203,255 Site Restoration 39,9021 69,579 109,481 Total 131 660,280 1,224,435
[I]
Includes engineering costs
[2] Excludes program management costs (staffing) but includes costs for spent fuel loading/transfer/spent ftuel pool O&M and EP fees
[3] Columns may not add due to rounding
[4] Includes retired steam generators and reactor closure head from Unit 1 and turbine rotors fiom Unit 2 TLG Services, Inc.
021
Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Study Document Ll1-1621-001, Rev. 0 Page xix of xix SAFSTOR COST
SUMMARY
DECOMMISSIONING COST ELEMENTS (thousands of 2009 dollars)
Cost Element Unit 1 Unit 2 Total Decontamination 8,779 15,696 24,474 Removal 78,070 121,629 j-199,699 Transportation 6,279 4,6971 10,976 Off-site Waste Processing 22,543 28,278 50,821 Program Management [I]
321,379 377,075 698,454 Spent Fuel Pool Isolation
__11,143 7,429 18,572 Spent Fuel Management (Direct Costs) [2]
49,853 47,046 96,899 Insurance and Regulatory Fees 37,897 34,295 72,192 Energy 16,497 16,783 33,280 Characterization and Licensing Surveys I
12,281 11,908 24,190 Property Taxes t
6,143 5,848 11,991 Miscellaneous Egu mrnent 15,395 31,098 1 46,493 Decommissionin.g Staff Severance 9,199 7,693 1 6,891 1"
Total [3]
656,727 764,134]
1,420,860 Cost Element 1
License Termination (excluding retired large components) 1 505,457 572,837 1,078,294 Large Components (retired) [41 19,491 1,993 21,484 Spent Fuel Management 91,037 118,908 209,945 Site Restoration 40,741 70,396 111,137 Total [3]
656,727 764,134 1,420,860
[P] Includes engineering costs
[2] Excludes program management costs (staffing) but includes costs for spent fuel loading/transfer/spent fuel pool O&M and EP fees
[3] Columns may not add due to rounding
[4] Includes retired steam generators and reactor closure head from Unit 1 and turbine rotors from Unit 2 TLG Services, Inc.
022
Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant Document L11-1621-001, Rev. 0 Decommissioning Cost Study Section 1, Page 1 of 9
- 1. INTRODUCTION This report presents estimates of the costs to decommission the Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant, (Comanche Peak) for the selected decommissioning alternatives.
The analysis relies upon site-specific, technical information from an earlier evaluation prepared in 2005,[1]* updated to reflect current assumptions pertaining to the disposition of the nuclear station and relevant industry experience in undertaking such projects. The plant inventory, the basis for the decontamination and dismantling requirements and cost, and the decommissioning waste streams, was reviewed for this analysis. The plant confirmed that there were no substantive changes over the four year period to the configuration of the plant or site facilities (that would impact decommissioning).
The current estimates are designed to provide Luminant Generation Company LLC (Luminant) with sufficient information to assess their financial obligations, as they pertain to the decommissioning of the nuclear station. It is not a detailed engineering document, but a financial analysis prepared in advance of the detailed engineering that will be required to carry out the decommissioning activity.
1.1 OBJECTIVES OF STUDY The objectives of this analysis are to present comprehensive estimates of the costs to decommission Comanche Peak, to provide a sequence or schedule for the associated activities, and to identify the waste streams expected from the decontamination and dismantling activities.
For the purposes of this study, the shutdown dates for the two units are assumed to be February 7, 2030 for Unit 1 and February 1, 2033 for Unit 2, based upon the expiration of the current operating licenses.
1.2 SITE DESCRIPTION Comanche Peak is located in Somervell County in North Central Texas, approximately 65 miles southwest of Dallas-Fort Worth area. The nearest communities are Glen Rose and Granbury, about 4 and 10 miles, respectively, from the site. The station is comprised of two nuclear units that are essentially identical except for certain auxiliary systems.
The nuclear steam supply systems (NSSS) consist of a pressurized water reactor and a four-loop reactor coolant system. Each generating unit has a
- References provided in Section 7 of the document TLG Services, Inc.
023
Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant Document L11-1621-001, Rev. 0 Decommissioning Cost Study Section 1, Page 2 of 9 reference core design of 3612 megawatts (thermal) with a corresponding net electrical rating of 1259 and 1245 megawatts (electric), for Units 1 and 2, respectively, with the reactor at rated power.
Each of the four loops of the reactor coolant system contains a vertical U-tube type steam generator and a single speed centrifugal reactor coolant pump. In addition, the system includes an electrically heated pressurizer, a pressurizer relief tank, and interconnected piping. The reactor coolant system is housed within a containment vessel, a free-standing cylindrical steel structure enclosed by a separate reinforced concrete reactor building. The reactor building is designed to provide biological shielding as well as missile protection for the steel containment vessel. A five-foot annulus space is provided between the containment vessel and reactor building for control of containment external temperatures and pressures and also provides a controlled air volume for filtering and access to penetrations for testing and inspection. The containment shell is anchored to the reactor building foundation with a steel liner plate encased in concrete forming the base of the containment.
Heat produced in the reactor is converted to electrical energy by the steam and power conversion system. A turbine-generator system converts the thermal energy of steam produced in the steam generators into mechanical shaft power and then into electrical energy. The turbine generators consist of a tandem (single shaft) arrangement of a double-flow high-pressure turbine and two identical double-flow, low-pressure turbines driving a direct-coupled generator at 1800 rpm. The turbines are operated in a closed feedwater cycle, which condenses the steam. The heated feedwater is then returned to the steam generators. The condenser circulating water system removes heat rejected in the main condensers. The heat is dissipated to Squaw Creek Reservoir.
1.3 REGULATORY GUIDANCE The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) provided initial decommissioning requirements in its rule "General Requirements for Decommissioning Nuclear Facilities," issued in June 1988.[21 This rule set forth financial criteria for decommissioning licensed nuclear power facilities. The regulation addressed decommissioning planning needs, timing, funding methods, and environmental review requirements.
The intent of the rule was to ensure that decommissioning would be accomplished in a safe and timely manner and that adequate funds would be available for this purpose. Subsequent to the rule, the NRC issued Regulatory Guide 1.159, "Assuring the Availability of Funds for Decommissioning Nuclear Reactors,"[3l which provided additional guidance to the licensees of nuclear facilities on the financial methods acceptable to the NRC staff for complying with the requirements of the rule. The regulatory TLG Services, Inc.
024
Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant Document L11-1621-001, Rev. 0 Decommissioning Cost Study Section 1, Page 3 of 9 guide addressed the funding requirements and provided guidance on the content and form of the financial assurance mechanisms indicated in the rule.
The rule defined three decommissioning alternatives as being acceptable to the NRC: DECON, SAFSTOR, and ENTOMB. The DECON alternative assumes that any contaminated or activated portion of the plant's systems, structures and facilities are removed or decontaminated to levels that permit the site to be released for unrestricted use shortly after the cessation of plant operations.
The rule also placed limits on the time allowed to complete the decommissioning process. For SAFSTOR, the process is restricted in overall duration to 60 years, unless it can be shown that a longer duration is necessary to protect public health and safety. The guidelines for ENTOMB are similar, providing the NRC with both sufficient leverage and flexibility to ensure that these deferred options are only used in situations where it is reasonable and consistent with the definition of decommissioning. At the conclusion of a 60-year dormancy period (or longer for ENTOMB if the NRC approves such a case), the site would still require significant remediation to meet the unrestricted release limits for license termination.
The ENTOMB alternative has not been viewed as a viable option for power reactors due to the significant time required to isolate the long-lived radionuclides for decay to permissible levels. However, with rulemaking permitting the controlled release of a site,[4] the NRC has re-evaluated this alternative. The resulting feasibility study, based upon an assessment by Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, concluded that the method did have conditional merit for some, if not most reactors. However, the staff also found that additional rulemaking would be needed before this option could be treated as a generic alternative. The NRC had considered rulemaking to alter the 60-year time for completing decommissioning and to clarify the use of engineered barriers for reactor entombments.[51 The NRC's staff has recommended that rulemaking be deferred, based upon several factors, e.g., no licensee has committed to pursuing the option, disposition of certain waste forms, effectiveness of engineering barriers, and the NRC's current priorities, at least until after the additional research studies are complete. The NRC concurred with the staffs recommendation.
In 1996, the NRC published revisions to the general requirements for decommissioning nuclear power plants.[61 When the decommissioning regulations were adopted in 1988, it was assumed that the majority of licensees would operate for their full licensed life. However, shortly after the regulations were enacted, several licensees permanently and prematurely ceased operations. Exemptions from certain operating requirements were TLG Services, Inc.
025
Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant Document L11-1621-001, Rev. 0 Decommissioning Cost Study Section 1, Page 4 of 9 required once the reactor was defueled to facilitate the decommissioning. Each case was handled individually, without clearly defined generic requirements.
The NRC amended the decommissioning regulations in 1996 to clarify ambiguities and codify procedures and terminology as a means of enhancing efficiency and uniformity in the decommissioning process. The amendments allow for greater public participation and better define the transition process from operations to decommissioning.
Under the revised regulations, licensees will submit written certification to the NRC within 30 days after the decision to cease operations. Certification will also be required once the fuel is permanently removed from the reactor vessel.
Submittal of these notices will entitle the licensee to a fee reduction and eliminate the obligation to follow certain requirements needed only during operation of the reactor. Within two years of submitting notice of permanent cessation of operations, the licensee is required to submit a Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report (PSDAR) to the NRC. The PSDAR describes the planned decommissioning activities, the associated sequence and
- schedule, and an estimate of expected costs.
Prior to completing decommissioning, the licensee is required to submit an application to the NRC to terminate the license, which will include a license termination plan (LTP).
1.3.1 Nuclear Waste Policy Act Congress passed the "Nuclear Waste Policy Act"171 (NWPA) in 1982, assigning the federal government's long-standing responsibility for disposal of the spent nuclear fuel and high level radioactive waste created by the commercial nuclear generating plants to the DOE. The NWPA provided that DOE would enter into contracts with utilities in which DOE would promise to take the utilities' spent fuel and high-level radioactive waste and utilities would pay the cost of the disposition services for that material. The NWPA, along with the individual contracts with the utilities, specified that the DOE was to begin accepting spent fuel by January 31, 1998.
Since the original legislation, the DOE has announced several delays in the program schedule. By January 1998, the DOE had failed to accept any spent fuel or high level waste, as required by the NWPA and utility contracts. Delays continue and, as a result, generators have initiated legal action against the DOE in an attempt to obtain compensation for DOE's breach of contract.
The DOE submitted its license application to the NRC on June 3, 2008, seeking authorization to construct a geologic repository at Yucca TLG Services, Inc.
026
Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant Document Ll1-1621-001, Rev. 0 Decommissioning Cost Study Section 1, Page 5 of 9 Mountain, Nevada. The current Administration, however, has stated its intention to eliminate future funding for the project and, as a result, DOE has filed a motion to withdraw its application. Under the President's proposed plan, a Blue Ribbon Commission would evaluate options and make recommendations to the Administration for developing a new plan for the ultimate disposition of high level waste.
Until such a plan is formulated, however, the cost of managing the spent fuel until the DOE is able to complete the transfer to an interim or permanent disposal site is based upon the information available and relied upon in the previous study.
It is generally necessary that spent fuel be actively cooled and stored for a minimum period at the generating site prior to transfer. As such, the NRC requires that licensees establish a program to manage and provide funding for the management of all irradiated fuel at the reactor site until title of the fuel is transferred to the Secretary of Energy, pursuant to 10 CFR Part 50.54(bb).[8] This funding requirement is fulfilled through inclusion of certain cost elements in the decommissioning estimates, for example, construction and operation of an ISFSI and continued operation of the spent fuel pools.
The spent fuel pools are expected to contain freshly discharged assemblies (from the most recent refueling cycles) as well as the final reactor core at shutdown. Over the following five and one half years the assemblies are packaged into multi-purpose canisters (MPCs) for transfer to the DOE or to the ISFSI for interim storage. It is assumed that this period provides the necessary cooling for the final core to meet the transport and/or storage requirements for decay heat.
DOE's contracts with utilities order the acceptance of spent fuel from utilities based upon the oldest fuel receiving the highest priority.
However, the DOE contracts provide mechanisms for altering the oldest fuel first allocation scheme, including emergency deliveries, exchanges of allocations amongst utilities and the option of providing priority acceptance from permanently shutdown nuclear reactors. Because it is unclear how these mechanisms may operate once DOE begins accepting spent fuel from commercial reactors, this study conservatively assumes that DOE will accept spent fuel in an oldest fuel first order. For purposes of this analysis, the first assemblies removed from the Comanche Peak site are conservatively assumed to be in 2025 based upon the DOE's most recently published annual acceptance rates of 400 MTU/year for year 1, 3,800 MTU total for years 2 through 4 and 3,000 MTU/year for year 5 and beyond. With an estimated, maximum rate of TLG Services, Inc.
027
Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant Document L11-1621-001, Rev. 0 Decommissioning Cost Study Section 1, Page 6 of 9 transfer of 3,000 metric tons of uranium (MTU)/year, completion of the removal of fuel from the site is conservatively projected to be in the year 2064. Consequently, costs are included within the estimates for the long-term caretaking of the spent fuel at the Comanche Peak site until the year 2064.
Luminant's position is that the DOE has a contractual obligation to accept Comanche Peak's fuel far earlier than the projections set out above consistent with its contract commitments. No assumption made in this study should be interpreted to be inconsistent with this claim.
However, at this time, including the cost of storing spent fuel in this study is the most reasonable approach because it insures the availability of sufficient decommissioning funds at the end of the station's life if, contrary to its contractual obligation, the DOE has not performed earlier.
For purposes of this analysis, it is assumed that spent fuel will be packaged for interim storage in casks and canisters of the Holtec Hi-Storm design. This assumption is necessary because the DOE has not yet provided any storage casks, and has not yet identified the details of the canisters or transport casks that it will provide. DOE's canisters and casks are likely to be different than the Holtec system, with different requirements.
An ISFSI, which can be operated under a separate and independent license, will be constructed to support management of the spent fuel at the site until the DOE is able to complete the transfer to a federal repository.
As such, the fuel that cannot be transferred directly to the DOE from the wet pools is packaged for interim storage at the ISFSI. This will allow decommissioning to continue on the nuclear units.
1.3.2 Low-Level Radioactive Waste Acts The contaminated and activated material generated in the decontamination and dismantling of a commercial nuclear reactor is classified as low-level (radioactive) waste, although not all of the material is suitable for "shallow-land" disposal. With the passage of the "Low-Level Radioactive Waste Policy Act" in 1980,91 and its Amendments of 1985,110) the states became ultimately responsible for the disposition of low-level radioactive waste generated within their own borders. However, with the exception of Texas (which has issued a license for a new facility), no new compact facilities have been successfully sited, licensed, and constructed.
TLG Services, Inc.
028
Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant Document L11-1621-001, Rev. 0 Decommissioning Cost Study Section 1, Page 7 of 9 Until recently, there were two facilities available to Luminant for the disposal of low-level radioactive waste generated by Comanche Peak. As of July 1, 2008, however, the facility in Barnwell, South Carolina was closed to generators outside the Atlantic Compact (comprised of the states of Connecticut, New Jersey and South Carolina). This leaves the facility in Clive, Utah, operated by EnergySolutions, as the only currently available destination for low-level radioactive waste requiring controlled disposal, until the construction of Waste Control Specialist's facility in Andrews County is complete.
For the purpose of this analysis, the current disposal agreement with EnergySolutions is used as the basis for estimating the disposal cost for the lowest level and majority of the radioactive waste (Class A [11]).
EnergySolutions does not have a license to dispose of the more highly radioactive waste (Classes B and C), for example, generated in the dismantling of the reactor vessel. As a proxy, the disposal cost for this material is based upon the last published rate schedule for non-compact waste for the Barnwell facility.
The dismantling of the components residing closest to the reactor core generates radioactive waste that may be considered unsuitable for shallow-land disposal (i.e.,
low-level radioactive waste with concentrations of radionuclides that exceed the limits established by the NRC for Class C radioactive waste (Greater-than Class C or GTCC)).
The Low-Level Radioactive Waste Policy Amendments Act of 1985 assigned the federal government the responsibility for the disposal of this material. The Act also stated that the beneficiaries of the activities resulting in the generation of such radioactive waste bear all reasonable costs of disposing of such waste. However, to date, the federal government has not identified a cost for disposing of GTCC or a schedule for acceptance. For purposes of the estimates, the GTCC radioactive waste is assumed to be packaged and disposed of as high-level waste, at a cost equivalent to that envisioned for the spent fuel.
For purposes of this study, GTCC is assumed to be packaged in the same canisters used for spent fuel. The GTCC material is either stored on site or shipped directly to a DOE facility as it is generated (depending upon the timing of the decommissioning and whether the spent fuel has been removed from the site prior to the start of decommissioning).
A significant portion of the waste material generated during decommissioning may only be potentially contaminated by radioactive materials. This waste can be analyzed on site or shipped off site to TLG Services, Inc.
029
Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant Document Li1-1621-001, Rev. 0 Decommissioning Cost Study Section 1, Page 8 of 9 licensed facilities for further analysis, for processing and/or for conditioning/recovery. Reduction in the volume of low-level radioactive waste requiring disposal in a licensed low-level radioactive waste disposal facility can be accomplished through a variety of methods, including analyses and surveys or decontamination to eliminate the portion of waste that does not require disposal as radioactive waste, compaction, incineration or metal melt. The estimates for Comanche Peak reflect the savings from waste recovery/volume reduction.
1.3.3 Radiological Criteria for License Termination In 1997, the NRC published Subpart E, "Radiological Criteria for License Termination,"[12 ] amending 10 CFR Part 20. This subpart provides radiological criteria for releasing a facility for unrestricted use.
The regulation states that the site can be released for unrestricted use if radioactivity levels are such that the average member of a critical group would not receive a Total Effective Dose Equivalent (TEDE) in excess of 25 millirem per year, and provided that residual radioactivity has been reduced to levels that are As Low As Reasonably Achievable (ALARA).
The decommissioning estimates assume that the Comanche Peak site will be remediated to a residual level consistent with the NRC-prescribed level.
It should be noted that the NRC and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) differ on the amount of residual radioactivity considered acceptable in site remediation. The EPA has two limits that apply to radioactive materials.
An EPA limit of 15 millirem per year is derived from criteria established by the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA or Superfund).I1 3] An additional and separate limit of 4 millirem per year, as defined in 40 CFR §141.16, is applied to drinking water.[14]
On October 9, 2002, the NRC signed an agreement with the EPA on the radiological decommissioning and decontamination of NRC-licensed sites. The Memorandum of Understanding (MOU)[151 provides that EPA will defer exercise of authority under CERCLA for the majority of facilities decommissioned under NRC authority. The MOU also includes provisions for NRC and EPA consultation for certain sites when, at the time of license termination, (1) groundwater contamination exceeds EPA-permitted levels; (2) NRC contemplates restricted release of the site; and/or (3) residual radioactive soil concentrations exceed levels defined in the MOU.
TLG Services, Inc.
030
Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Study Document L11-1621-001, Rev. 0 Section 1, Page 9 of 9 The MOU does not impose any new requirements on NRC licensees and should reduce the involvement of the EPA with NRC licensees who are decommissioning. Most sites are expected to meet the NRC criteria for unrestricted use, and the NRC believes that only a few sites will have groundwater or soil contamination in excess of the levels specified in the MOU that trigger consultation with the EPA. However, if there are other hazardous materials on the site, the EPA may be involved in the cleanup. As such, the possibility of dual regulation remains for certain licensees. The present study does not include any costs for this occurrence.
TLG Services, Inc.
031
Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant Document L11-1621-001, Rev. 0 Decommissioning Cost Study Section 2, Page 1 of 13
- 2. DECOMMISSIONING ALTERNATIVES Detailed cost estimates were developed to decommission Comanche Peak based upon the approved decommissioning alternatives: DECON and SAFSTOR.
Although the alternatives differ with respect to technique, process, cost, and schedule, they attain the same result: the ultimate release of the site for unrestricted use.
Two decommissioning scenarios were evaluated for the Comanche Peak nuclear units. The scenarios selected are representative of alternatives available to the owner and are defined as follows:
- 1.
The first scenario assumes that the units would be promptly decommissioned (DECON alternative) upon the expiration of the current operating licenses, i.e.,
2030 and 2033 for Units 1 and 2, respectively. Spent fuel in wet storage pools at that time would be relocated to the ISFSI for interim storage until such time that the DOE can complete the transfer.
- 2.
In the second scenario, the nuclear units are placed into safe-storage (SAFSTOR alternative) at the end of their current operating license. Spent fuel in wet storage pools at that time would be relocated to the ISFSI for interim storage so as to minimize caretaking costs. The fuel would be transferred to the DOE (consistent with the assumptions in the DECON scenario) until the process is complete. At that time, the ISFSI would also be placed in safe-storage.
Decommissioning is deferred to the maximum extent (approximately 50 years) such that the licenses are terminated within the generally required 60-year period.
The following sections describe the basic activities associated with each alternative.
Although detailed procedures for each activity identified are not provided, and the actual sequence of work may vary, the activity descriptions provide a basis not only for estimating but also for the expected scope of work, i.e., engineering and planning at the time of decommissioning.
The conceptual approach that the NRC has described in its regulations divides decommissioning into three phases. The initial phase commences with the effective date of permanent cessation of operations and involves the transition of both plant and licensee from reactor operations (i.e., power production) to facility de-activation and closure. During the first phase, notification is to be provided to the NRC certifying the permanent cessation of operations and the removal of fuel from the reactor vessel. The licensee is then prohibited from reactor operation.
TLG Services, Inc.
032
Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant Document Ll1-1621-001, Rev. 0 Decommissioning Cost Study Section 2, Page 2 of 13 The second phase encompasses activities during the storage period or during major decommissioning activities, or a combination of the two. The third phase pertains to the activities involved in license termination. The decommissioning estimates developed for Comanche Peak are also divided into phases or periods; however, demarcation of the phases is based upon major milestones within the project or significant changes in the projected expenditures.
2.1 DECON The DECON alternative, as defined by the NRC, is "the alternative in which the equipment, structures, and portions of a facility and site containing radioactive contaminants are removed or decontaminated to a level that permits the property to be released for unrestricted use shortly after cessation of operations." This study does not address the cost to dispose of the spent fuel residing at the site; such costs are funded through a surcharge on electrical generation. However, the study does estimate the costs incurred with the interim on-site storage of the fuel pending shipment by the DOE to an off-site disposal facility.
2.1.1 Period 1 - Preparations In anticipation of the cessation of plant operations, detailed preparations are undertaken to provide a smooth transition from plant operations to site decommissioning. Through implementation of a staffing transition plan, the organization required to manage the intended decommissioning activities is assembled from available plant staff and outside resources. Preparations include the planning for permanent defueling of the reactor, revision of technical specifications applicable to the operating conditions and requirements, a
characterization of the facility and major components, and the development of the PSDAR.
Engineering and Planning The PSDAR, required within two years of the notice to cease operations, provides a description of the licensee's planned decommissioning activities, a timetable, and the associated financial requirements of the intended decommissioning program. Upon receipt of the PSDAR, the NRC will make the document available to the public for comment in a local hearing to be held in the vicinity of the reactor site. Ninety days
.following submittal and NRC receipt of the PSDAR, the licensee may begin to perform major decommissioning activities under a modified 10 CFR §50.59 procedure, i.e., without specific NRC approval. Major TLG Services, Inc.
033
Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant Document L11-1621-001, Rev. 0 Decommissioning Cost Study Section 2, Page 3 of 13 activities are defined as any activity that results in permanent removal of major radioactive components, permanently modifies the structure of the containment, or results in dismantling components (for shipment) containing GTCC, as defined by 10 CFR §61. Major components are further defined as comprising the reactor vessel and internals, large bore reactor coolant system piping, steam generators, and other large components that are radioactive. The NRC includes the following additional criteria for use of the §50.59 process in decommissioning. The proposed activity must not:
" foreclose release of the site for possible unrestricted use,
" significantly increase decommissioning costs,
" cause any significant environmental impact, or
" violate the terms of the licensee's existing license.
Existing operational technical specifications are reviewed and modified to reflect plant conditions and the safety concerns associated with permanent cessation of operations. The environmental impact associated with the planned decommissioning activities is also considered.
Typically, a licensee will not be allowed to proceed if the consequences of a particular decommissioning activity are greater than that bounded by previously evaluated environmental assessments or impact statements.
In this instance, the licensee would have to submit a license amendment for the specific activity and update the environmental report.
The decommissioning program outlined in the PSDAR will be designed to accomplish the required tasks within the ALARA guidelines (as defined in 10 CFR §20) for protection of personnel from exposure to radiation hazards. It will also address the continued protection of the health and safety of the public and the environment during the dismantling activity. Consequently, with the development of the PSDAR, activity specifications, cost-benefit and safety analyses, work packages and procedures, would be assembled to support the proposed decontamination and dismantling activities.
Site Preparations Following final plant shutdown, and in preparation for actual decommissioning activities, the following activities are initiated:
o Characterization of the site and surrounding environs. This includes radiation surveys of work areas, major components (including the TLG Services, Inc.
034
Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant Document Ll1-1621-001, Rev. 0 Decommissioning Cost Study Section 2, Page 4 of 13 reactor vessel and its internals), internal piping, and primary shield cores.
o Isolation of the spent fuel storage pools and fuel handling systems, such that decommissioning operations can commence on the balance of the plant. The pools will remain operational for approximately five and one half years following the cessation of operations before the inventory resident in the core at shutdown can be transferred to the DOE or to the ISFSI for interim storage.
Specification of transport and disposal requirements for activated materials and/or hazardous materials, including shielding and waste stabilization.
- Development of procedures for occupational exposure control, control and release of liquid and gaseous effluent, processing of radwaste (including dry-active waste, resins, filter media, metallic and non-metallic components generated in decommissioning), site security and emergency programs, and industrial safety.
2.1.2 Period 2 - Decommissioning Operations This period includes the physical decommissioning activities associated with the removal and disposal of contaminated and activated components and structures, including the successful termination of the 10 CFR §50 operating license. Significant decommissioning activities in this phase include:
" Construction of temporary facilities and/or modification of existing facilities to support dismantling activities. This may include a centralized processing area to facilitate equipment removal and component preparations for off-site disposal.
o Reconfiguration and modification of site structures and facilities as needed to support decommissioning operations. This may include the upgrading of roads (on-and off-site) to facilitate hauling and transport. Modifications may be required to the containment structure to facilitate access of large/heavy equipment. Modifications may also be required to the refueling area of the building to support the segmentation of the reactor vessel internals and component extraction.
Design and fabrication of temporary and permanent shielding to support removal and transportation activities, construction of contamination control envelopes, and the procurement of specialty tooling.
TLG Services, Inc.
035
Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant Document L11-1621-001, Rev. 0 Decommissioning Cost Study Section 2, Page 5 of 13
" Procurement (lease or purchase) of shipping canisters, cask liners, and industrial packages.
Decontamination of components and piping systems as required to control (minimize) worker exposure.
" Removal of piping and components no longer essential to support decommissioning operations.
" Removal of control rod drive housings and the head service structure from reactor vessel head.
" Removal and segmentation of the upper internals assemblies.
Segmentation will maximize the loading of the shielded transport casks, i.e., by weight and activity. The operations are conducted under water using remotely operated tooling and contamination controls.
" Disassembly and segmentation of the remaining reactor internals, including the core former and lower core support assembly. Some material is expected to exceed Class C disposal requirements. As such, the segments will be packaged in modified fuel storage canisters for geologic disposal.
- Segmentation of the reactor vessel. A shielded platform is installed for segmentation as cutting operations are performed in-air using remotely operated equipment within a contamination control envelope. The water level is maintained just below the cut to minimize the working area dose rates. Segments are transferred in-air to containers that are stored under water, for example, in an isolated area of the refueling canal.
- Removal of the activated portions of the concrete biological shield and accessible contaminated concrete surfaces. If dictated by the steam generator and pressurizer removal scenarios, those portions of the associated cubicles necessary for access and component extraction are removed.
" Removal of the steam generators and pressurizer for material recovery and controlled disposal. The generators will be moved to an on-site processing center, the steam domes removed and the internal components segregated for recycling. The lower shell and tube bundle will be packaged for direct disposal. These components can serve as their own burial containers provided that all penetrations are properly sealed and the internal contaminants are stabilized, e.g.,
with grout. Steel shielding will be added, as necessary, to those external areas of the package to meet transportation limits and regulations.
TLG Services, Inc.
036
Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant Document LII-1621-001, Rev. 0 Decommissioning Cost Study Section 2, Page 6 of 13 At least two years prior to the anticipated date of license termination, an LTP is required. Submitted as a supplement to the Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR) or its equivalent, the plan must include: a site characterization, description of the remaining dismantling activities, plans for site remediation, procedures for the final radiation survey, designation of the end use of the site, an updated cost estimate to complete the decommissioning, and any associated environmental concerns. The NRC will notice the receipt of the plan, make the plan available for public comment, and schedule a local hearing. LTP approval will be subject to any conditions and limitations as deemed appropriate by the NRC. The licensee may then commence with the final remediation of site facilities and services, including:
- Removal of remaining plant systems and associated components as they become nonessential to the decommissioning program or worker health and safety (e.g., waste collection and treatment systems, electrical power and ventilation systems).
- Removal of the steel liners from refueling canal, disposing of the activated and contaminated sections as radioactive waste. Removal of any activated/ contaminated concrete.
- Surveys of the decontaminated areas of the containment structure.
o Remediation and removal of the contaminated equipment and material from the auxiliary and fuel buildings and any other contaminated facility. Radiation and contamination controls will be utilized until residual levels indicate that the structures and equipment can be released for unrestricted access and conventional demolition. This activity may necessitate the dismantling and disposition of most of the systems and components (both clean and contaminated) located within these buildings. This activity facilitates surface decontamination and subsequent verification surveys required prior to obtaining release for demolition.
- Routing of material removed in the decontamination and dismantling to a central processing area. Material certified to be free of contamination is released for unrestricted disposition, e.g., as scrap, recycle, or general disposal. Contaminated material is characterized and segregated for additional off-site processing (disassembly, chemical cleaning, volume reduction, and waste treatment), and/or packaged for controlled disposal at a low-level radioactive waste disposal facility.
TLG Services, Inc.
037
Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant Document L1I-1621-001, Rev. 0 Decommissioning Cost Study Section 2, Page 7 of 13 Incorporated into the LTP is the Final Survey Plan. This plan identifies the radiological surveys to be performed once the decontamination activities are completed and is developed using the guidance provided in the 'Multi-Agency Radiation Survey and Site Investigation Manual (MARSSIM)."1161 This document incorporates the statistical approaches to survey design and data interpretation used by the EPA. It also identifies commercially available instrumentation and procedures for conducting radiological surveys. Use of this guidance ensures that the surveys are conducted in a manner that provides a high degree of confidence that applicable NRC criteria are satisfied. Once the survey is complete, the results are provided to the NRC in a format that can be verified. The NRC then reviews and evaluates the information, performs an independent confirmation of radiological site conditions, and makes a determination on final termination of the license.
The NRC will terminate the operating license(s) if it determines that site remediation has been performed in accordance with the LTP, and that the terminal radiation survey and associated documentation demonstrate that the facility is suitable for release.
2.1.3 Period 3 - Site Restoration Following completion of decommissioning operations, site restoration activities will begin. Efficient removal of the contaminated materials and verification that residual radionuclide concentrations are below the NRC limits will result in substantial damage to many of the structures.
Although performed in a controlled, safe manner, blasting, coring, drilling, scarification (surface removal), and the other decontamination activities will substantially degrade power block structures including the reactor, auxiliary, radwaste warehouse and fuel buildings. Under certain circumstances, verifying that subsurface radionuclide concentrations meet NRC site release requirements will require removal of grade slabs and lower floors, potentially weakening footings and structural supports. This removal activity will be necessary for those facilities and plant areas where historical records, when available, indicate the potential for radionuclides having been present in the soil, where system failures have been recorded, or where it is required to confirm that subsurface process and drain lines were not breached over the operating life of the station.
Prompt dismantling of site structures is clearly the most appropriate and cost-effective option. It is unreasonable to anticipate that these structures would be repaired and preserved after the radiological TLG Services, Inc.
038
Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant Document L11-1621-001, Rev. 0 Decommissioning Cost Study Section 2, Page 8 of 13 contamination is removed. The cost to dismantle site structures with a work force already mobilized on site is more efficient than if the process were deferred. Site facilities quickly degrade without maintenance, adding additional expense and creating potential hazards to the public as well as to future workers. Abandonment creates a breeding ground for vermin infestation as well as other biological hazards.
This cost study presumes that non-essential structures and site facilities are dismantled as a continuation of the decommissioning activity.
Foundations and exterior walls are removed to a nominal depth of three feet below grade. The three-foot depth allows for the placement of gravel for drainage, as well as topsoil, so that vegetation can be established for erosion control. Site areas affected by the dismantling activities are restored and the plant area graded as required to prevent ponding and inhibit the refloating of subsurface materials.
Non-contaminated concrete rubble produced by demolition activities is processed to remove reinforcing steel and miscellaneous embedments.
The processed material is then used on site to backfill foundation voids.
Excess non-contaminated materials are trucked to an off-site area for disposal as construction debris.
2.1.4 ISFSI Operations and Decommissioning The ISFSI will continue to operate under a separate and independent license (10 CFR §72) following the termination of the §50 operating licenses. Assuming the DOE starts accepting fuel from the Comanche Peak spent fuel storage pools in 2025, transfer of spent fuel from the ISFSI is anticipated to begin in 2039, and continue through the year 2064.
At the conclusion of the spent fuel transfer process, the ISFSI will be decommissioned. The NRC will terminate the §72 license when it determines that the remediation of the ISFSI has been performed in accordance with an ISFSI license termination plan and that the final radiation survey and associated documentation demonstrate that the facility is suitable for release. Once the requirements are satisfied, the NRC can terminate the license for the ISFSI.
Spent fuel is stored on the ISFSI in multi-purpose canisters, with a concrete overpack. For purposes of this cost analysis, it is assumed that once the inner canisters containing the spent fuel assemblies have been removed, any required decontamination performed on the storage TLG Services, Inc.
039
Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant Document L1J-1621-001, Rev. 0 Decommissioning Cost Study Section 2, Page 9 of 13 overpack (some minor activation is assumed), and the license for the facility terminated, the concrete overpacks can be dismantled using conventional techniques for the demolition of reinforced concrete. The concrete storage pad is then removed and the area regraded.
2.2 SAFSTOR The NRC defines SAFSTOR as "the alternative in which the nuclear facility is placed and maintained in a condition that allows the nuclear facility to be safely stored and subsequently decontaminated (deferred decontamination) to levels that permit release for unrestricted use." The facility is left intact (during the dormancy period), with structures maintained in a sound condition. Systems that are not required to support the spent fuel pools or site surveillance and security are drained, de-energized, and secured. Minimal cleaning/removal of loose contamination and/or fixation and sealing of remaining contamination is performed. Access to contaminated areas is secured to provide controlled access for inspection and maintenance.
The engineering and planning requirements are similar to those for the DECON alternative, although they are limited in scope with no large scale dismantling activities anticipated. Site preparations are also similar to those for the DECON alternative. However, with the exception of the required radiation surveys and site characterizations, the mobilization and preparation of site facilities is less extensive.
2.2.1 Period 1 - Preparations Preparations for long-term storage include the planning for permanent defueling of the reactor, revision of technical specifications appropriate to the operating conditions and requirements, a characterization of the facility and major components, and the development of the PSDAR.
The process of placing the station in safe-storage includes, but is not limited to, the following activities:
Isolating of the spent fuel storage services and fuel handling systems so that safe-storage operations may commence on the balance of the plant. This activity may be carried out by plant personnel in accordance with existing operating technical specifications. Activities are scheduled around the fuel handling systems to the greatest extent possible.
TLG Services, Inc.
040
Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant Document L11-1621-001, Rev. 0 Decommissioning Cost Study Section 2, Page 10 of 13 Transferring of the spent fuel from the storage pools to the DOE or to the ISFSI for interim storage, following the minimum required cooling period in the spent fuel pools.
Draining and de-energizing of the non-contaminated systems not required to support continued site operations or maintenance.
Disposing of contaminated filter elements and resin beds not required for processing wastes from layup activities for future operations.
o Draining of the reactor vessel, with the internals left in place and the vessel head secured.
o Draining and de-energizing non-essential, contaminated systems with decontamination as required for future maintenance and inspection.
- Preparing lighting and alarm systems whose continued use is required; de-energizing portions of fire protection, electric power, and HVAC systems whose continued use is not required.
o Cleaning of the loose surface contamination from building access pathways.
Performing an interim radiation survey of the plant, posting warning signs where appropriate.
Erecting physical barriers andlor securing all access to radioactive or contaminated
- areas, except as required for inspection and maintenance.
" Installing security and surveillance monitoring equipment and relocating security fence around secured structures, as required.
2.2.2 Period 2 - Dormancy The second phase identified by the NRC in its rule addresses licensed activities during a storage period and is applicable to the dormancy phases of the deferred decommissioning alternatives.
Dormancy activities include a 24-hour security force, preventive and corrective maintenance on security systems, area lighting, general building maintenance, heating and ventilation of buildings, routine radiological inspections of contaminated structures, maintenance of structural integrity, and a site environmental and radiation monitoring program.
Resident maintenance personnel perform equipment maintenance, inspection activities, routine services to maintain safe conditions, TLG Services, Inc.
041
Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant Document L11-1621-001, Rev. 0 Decommissioning Cost Study Section 2, Page 11 of 13 adequate lighting, heating, and ventilation, and periodic preventive maintenance on essential site services.
An environmental surveillance program is carried out during the dormancy period to ensure that releases of radioactive material to the environment are prevented and/or detected and controlled. Appropriate emergency procedures are established and initiated for potential releases that exceed prescribed limits. The environmental surveillance program constitutes an abbreviated version of the program in effect during normal plant operations.
Security during the dormancy period is conducted primarily to prevent unauthorized entry and to protect the public from the consequences of its own actions. The security fence, sensors, alarms, and other surveillance equipment provide security. Fire and radiation alarms are also monitored and maintained.
Consistent with the DECON alternative, the spent fuel storage pools are emptied within five and one half years of the cessation of operations.
The transfer of the spent fuel to the DOE continues throughout the dormancy period until completed in 2064. Once emptied, the ISFSI is secured for storage and decommissioned along with the power block structures in Period 4.
After an optional period of storage (such that license termination is accomplished within 60 years of final shutdown), it is required that the licensee submit an application to terminate the license, along with an LTP (described in Section 2.1.2), thereby initiating the third phase.
2.2.3 Periods 3 and 4 - Delayed Decommissioning Prior to the commencement of decommissioning operations, preparations are undertaken to reactivate site services and prepare for decommissioning. Preparations include engineering and planning, a detailed site characterization, and the assembly of a decommissioning management organization. Final planning for activities and the writing of activity specifications and detailed procedures are also initiated at this time.
Much of the work in developing a termination plan is relevant to the development of the detailed engineering plans and procedures. The activities associated with this phase and the follow-on decontamination and dismantling processes are detailed in Sections 2.1.1 and 2.1.2. The TLG Services, Inc.
042
Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant Document Li1-1621-001, Rev. 0 Decommissioning Cost Study Section 2, Page 12 of 13 primary difference between the sequences anticipated for the DECON and this deferred scenario is the absence, in the latter, of any constraint on the availability of the fuel storage facilities for decommissioning.
Variations in the length of the dormancy period are expected to have little effect upon the quantities of radioactive wastes generated from system and structure removal operations. Given the levels of radioactivity and spectrum of radionuclides expected from forty years of plant operation, no plant process system identified as being contaminated upon final shutdown will become releasable due to the decay period alone, i.e., there is no significant reduction in the waste generated from the decommissioning activities. However, due to the lower activity levels, a greater percentage of the waste volume can be designated for off-site processing and recovery.
The delay in decommissioning also yields lower working area radiation levels. As such, the estimates for this delayed scenario incorporate reduced ALARA controls for the SAFSTOR's lower occupational exposure potential.
Although the initial radiation levels due to 60Co will decrease during the dormancy period, the internal components of the reactor vessel will still exhibit sufficiently high radiation dose rates to require remote sectioning under water due to the presence of long-lived radionuclides such as 94Nb, 59Ni, and 63Ni. Therefore, the dismantling procedures described for the DECON alternative would still be employed during this scenario. Portions of the biological shield wall will still be radioactive due to the presence of activated trace elements with long half-lives (152Eu and '54Eu). Decontamination will require controlled removal and disposal. It is assumed that radioactive corrosion products on inner surfaces of piping and components will not have decayed to levels that will permit unrestricted use or allow conventional removal.
These systems and components will be surveyed as they are removed and disposed of in accordance with the existing radioactive release criteria.
2.2.4 Period 5 - Site Restoration Following completion of decommissioning operations, site-restoration activities can begin.
Dismantling, as a
continuation of the decommissioning process, is clearly the most. appropriate and cost-effective option, as described in Section 2.1.3. The basis for the dismantling cost in this scenario is consistent with that described for TLG Services, Inc.
043
Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Study Document L11-1621-001, Rev. 0 Section 2, Page 13 of 13 DECON, presuming the removal of structures and site facilities to a nominal depth of three feet below grade and the limited restoration of the site.
TLG Services, Inc.
044
Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant Document LJ1-1621-001, Rev. 0 Decommissioning Cost Study Section 3, Page 1 of 54
- 3. COST ESTIMATE The cost estimates prepared for decommissioning Comanche Peak consider the unique features of the site, including the NSSS, power generation systems, support services, site buildings, and ancillary facilities. The basis of the estimates, including the sources of information relied upon, the estimating methodology employed, site-specific considerations, and other pertinent assumptions, is described in this section.
3.1 BASIS OF ESTIMATE The estimates were developed using the site-specific, technical information from the 2005 analysis. This information was reviewed for the current analysis and updated as deemed appropriate. The site-specific considerations and assumptions used in the previous evaluation were also revisited. Modifications were incorporated where new information was available or experience from ongoing decommissioning programs provided viable alternatives or improved processes.
3.2 METHODOLOGY The methodology used to develop the estimates follows the basic approach originally presented in the AIF/NESP-036 study report, "Guidelines for Producing Commercial Nuclear Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Estimates,"[1171 and the DOE "Decommissioning Handbook."[18]
These documents present a unit factor method for estimating decommissioning activity costs, which simplifies the estimating calculations. Unit factors for concrete removal ($/cubic yard), steel removal ($/ton), and cutting costs ($/inch) are developed using local labor rates. The activity-dependent costs are estimated with the item quantities (cubic yards and tons), developed from plant drawings and inventory documents. Removal rates and material costs for the conventional disposition of components and structures rely upon information available in the industry publication, "Building Construction Cost Data," published by R.S. Means.[191 The unit factor method provides a demonstrable basis for establishing reliable cost estimates. The detail provided in the unit factors, including activity duration, labor costs (by craft), and equipment and consumable costs, ensures that essential elements have not been omitted. Appendix A presents the detailed development of a typical unit factor. Appendix B provides the values contained within one set of factors developed for this analysis.
TLG Services, Inc.
045
Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant Document L11-1621-001, Rev. 0 Decommissioning Cost Study Section 3, Page 2 of 54 This analysis reflects lessons learned from TLG's involvement in the Shippingport Station Decommissioning Project, completed in 1989, as well as the decommissioning of the Cintichem reactor, hot cells, and associated facilities, completed in 1997. In addition, the planning and engineering for the Pathfinder, Shoreham, Rancho Seco, Trojan, Yankee Rowe, Big Rock Point, Maine Yankee, Humboldt Bay-3, Oyster Creek, Connecticut Yankee, and San Onofre-1 nuclear units have provided additional insight into the process, the regulatory
- aspects, and the technical challenges of decommissioning commercial nuclear units.
Work Difficulty Factors TLG has historically applied work difficulty adjustment factors (WDFs) to account for the inefficiencies in working in a power plant environment. WDFs are assigned to each unique set of unit factors, commensurate with the inefficiencies associated with working in confined, hazardous environments.
The ranges used for the WDFs are as follows:
" Access Factor 10% to 20%
Respiratory Protection Factor 10% to 50%
" Radiation/ALARA Factor 10% to 37%
" Protective Clothing Factor 10% to 30%
o Work Break Factor 8.33%
The factors and their associated range of values were developed in conjunction with the AIF/NESP-036 study. The application of the factors is discussed in more detail in that publication.
Scheduling Program Durations The unit factors, adjusted by the WDFs as described above, are applied against the inventory of materials to be removed in the radiologically controlled areas.
The resulting man-hours, or crew-hours, are used in the development of the decommissioning program schedule, using resource loading and event sequencing considerations. The scheduling of conventional removal and dismantling activities is based upon productivity information available from the "Building Construction Cost Data" publication.
An activity duration critical path is used to determine the total decommissioning program schedule. The schedule is relied upon in calculating the carrying costs, which include program management, administration, field TLG Services, Inc.
046
Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant Document L11-1621-001, Rev. 0 Decommissioning Cost Study Section 3, Page 3 of 54 engineering, equipment rental, and support services such as quality control and security. This systematic approach for assembling decommissioning estimates ensures a high degree of confidence in the reliability of the resulting costs.
3.3 IMPACT OF DECOMMISSIONING MULTIPLE REACTOR UNITS In estimating the near simultaneous decommissioning of two co-located reactor units there can be opportunities to achieve economies of scale, by sharing costs between units, and coordinating the sequence of work activities. There will also be schedule constraints, particularly where there are requirements for specialty equipment and staff, or practical limitations on when final status surveys can take place. For purposes of the estimates, Units 1 and 2 are assumed to be essentially identical. Common facilities have been assigned to Unit 2. A summary of the principal impacts are listed below.
o The sequence of work generally follows the principal that the work is done at Unit 1 first, followed by similar work at Unit 2. This permits the experience gained at Unit 1 to be applied by the workforce at the second unit. It should be noted however, that the estimates do not consider productivity improvements at the second unit, since there is little documented experience with decommissioning two units simultaneously The work associated with developing activity specifications and procedures can be considered essentially identical between the two units, therefore the second unit costs are assumed to be a fraction of the first unit (- 43%).
o Segmenting the reactor vessel and internals will require the use of special equipment. The decommissioning project will be scheduled such that Unit 2's reactor internals and vessel are segmented after the activities at Unit 1 have been completed.
- Some program management and support costs, particularly costs associated with the more senior positions, can be avoided with two reactors undergoing decommissioning simultaneously. As a result, the estimates are based on a "lead" unit that includes these senior positions, and a "second" unit that excludes these positions. The designation as lead is based on the unit undertaking the most complex tasks (for instance vessel segmentation) or performing tasks for the first time.
- The final radiological survey schedule is also affected by a two-unit decommissioning schedule. It would be considered impractical to try to complete the final status survey of Unit 1, while Unit 2 still has ongoing radiological remediation work and waste handling in process. As such, the transfer of the spent fuel from the storage pools and subsequent TLG Services, Inc.
047
Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant Document Ll1-1621-001, Rev. 0 Decommissioning Cost Study Section 3, Page 4 of 54 decontamination of the fuel building is coordinated so as to synchronize the final status survey for the station.
" The final demolition of buildings at Units 1 and 2 are considered to take place concurrently. This is considered a reasonable assumption since access to the buildings is considered good at the station.
" Unit 1, as the first unit to enter decommissioning, incurs the majority of site characterization costs.
Shared systems and structures are generally assigned to Unit 2.
o Station costs such as emergency response fees, regulatory agency fees, corporate overhead, and insurance are generally allocated on an equal basis between the two units.
3.4 FINANCIAL COMPONENTS OF THE COST MODEL TLG's proprietary decommissioning cost model, DECCER, produces a number of distinct cost elements. These direct expenditures, however, do not comprise the total cost to accomplish the project goal, i.e., license termination and site restoration.
Inherent in any cost estimate that does not rely on historical data is the inability to specify the precise source of costs imposed by factors such as tool breakage, accidents, illnesses, weather delays, and labor stoppages. In the DECCER cost model, contingency fulfills this role. Contingency is added to each line item to account for costs that are difficult or impossible to develop analytically. Such costs are historically inevitable over the duration of a job of this magnitude; therefore, this cost analysis includes funds to cover these types of expenses.
3.4.1 Contingency The activity-and period-dependent costs are combined to develop the total decommissioning cost. A contingency is then applied on a line-item basis, using one or more of the contingency types listed in the AIF/NESP-036 study. "Contingencies" are defined in the American Association of Cost Engineers "Project and Cost Engineers' Handbook"[ 20] as "specific provision for unforeseeable elements of cost within the defined project scope; particularly important where previous experience relating estimates and actual costs has shown that unforeseeable events which will increase costs are likely to occur." The cost elements in this analysis are based upon ideal conditions and maximum efficiency; therefore, consistent with industry practice, TLG Services, Inc.
048
Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant Document L11-1621-001, Rev. 0 Decommissioning Cost Study Section 3, Page 5 of 54 contingency is included. In the AIF/NESP-036 study, the types of unforeseeable events that are likely to occur in decommissioning are discussed and guidelines are provided for percentage contingency in each category. It should be noted that contingency, as used in this analysis, does not account for price escalation and inflation in the cost of decommissioning over the remaining operating life of the station.
Contingency funds are an integral part of the total cost to complete the decommissioning process. Exclusion of this component puts at risk a successful completion of the intended tasks and, potentially, subsequent related activities. For this study, TLG examined the major activity-related problems (decontamination, segmentation, equipment handling, packaging, transport, and waste disposal) that necessitate a
contingency. Individual activity contingencies ranged from 10% to 75%,
depending on the degree of difficulty judged to be appropriate from TLG's actual decommissioning experience. The contingency values used in this study are as follows:
" Decontamination 50%
" Contaminated Component Removal 25%
" Contaminated Component Packaging 10%
o Contaminated Component Transport 15%
o Low-Level Radioactive Waste Disposal 25%
o Reactor Segmentation 75%
" NSSS Component Removal 25%
o Reactor Waste Packaging 25%
- Reactor Waste Transport 25%
- Reactor Vessel Component Disposal 50%
" GTCC Disposal 15%
- Non-Radioactive Component Removal 15%
o Heavy Equipment and Tooling 15%
" Supplies 25%
a Engineering 15%
o Energy 15%
" Characterization and Termination Surveys 30%
o Construction 15%
- Taxes and Fees 10%
" Insurance 10%
o Staffing 15%
TLG Services, Inc.
049
Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant Document L11-1621-001, Rev. 0 Decommissioning Cost Study Section 3, Page 6 of 54 The contingency values are applied to the appropriate components of the estimates on a line item basis. A composite value is then reported at the end of each detailed estimate (as provided in Appendix C and D). For
- example, the composite contingency value reported for the decommissioning activity for the DECON alternative in Appendix C is approximately 18.4% and for the SAFSTOR alternative in Appendix D is approximately 17.1%.
3.4.2 Financial Risk In addition to the routine uncertainties addressed by contingency, another cost element that is sometimes necessary to consider when bounding decommissioning costs relates to uncertainty, or risk.
Examples can include changes in work scope, pricing, job performance, and other variations that could conceivably, but not necessarily, occur.
Consideration is sometimes necessary to generate a level of confidence in the estimate, within a range of probabilities. TLG considers these types of costs under the broad term "financial risk." Included within the category of financial risk are:
" Transition activities and costs: ancillary expenses associated with eliminating 50% to 80% of the site labor force shortly after the cessation of plant operations, added cost for worker separation packages throughout the decommissioning program, national or company-mandated retraining, and retention incentives for key personnel.
" Delays in approval of the decommissioning plan due to intervention, public participation in local community meetings, legal challenges, and national and local hearings.
o Changes in the project work scope from the baseline estimate, involving the discovery of unexpected levels of contaminants, contamination in places not previously expected, contaminated soil previously undiscovered (either radioactive or hazardous material contamination), variations in plant inventory or configuration not indicated by the as-built drawings.
" Regulatory changes, for example, affecting worker health and safety, site release criteria, waste transportation, and disposal.
" Policy decisions altering national commitments (e.g., in the ability to accommodate certain waste forms for disposition), or in the timetable for such, for example, the start and rate of acceptance of spent fuel by the DOE.
TLG Services, Inc.
050
Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant Document L11-1621-001, Rev. 0 Decommissioning Cost Study Section 3, Page 7 of 54 Pricing changes for basic inputs such as labor, energy, materials, and disposal. Items subject to widespread price competition (such as materials) may not show significant variation; however, others such as waste disposal could exhibit large pricing uncertainties, particularly in markets where limited access to services is available.
This cost study does not add any additional costs to the estimate for financial risk, since there is insufficient historical data from which to project future liabilities. Consequently, the areas of uncertainty or risk are revisited periodically and addressed through repeated revisions or updates of the base estimates.
3.5 SITE-SPECIFIC CONSIDERATIONS There are a number of site-specific considerations that affect the method for dismantling and removal of equipment from the site and the degree of restoration required. The cost impact of the considerations identified below is included in this cost study.
3.5.1 Spent Fuel Management The cost to dispose the spent fuel generated from plant operations is not reflected within the estimates to decommission Comanche Peak.
Ultimate disposition of the spent fuel is within the province of the DOE's Waste Management System, as defined by the Nuclear Waste Policy Act.
As such, the disposal cost is financed by a 1 mill/kWhr surcharge paid into the DOE's waste fund during operations. However, the NRC requires licensees to establish a program to manage and provide funding for the management of all irradiated fuel at the reactor site until title of the fuel is transferred to the Secretary of Energy. This funding requirement is fulfilled through inclusion of certain high-level waste cost elements within the estimates, as described below.
Completion of the decommissioning process is highly dependent upon the DOE's ability to remove spent fuel from the site. The timing for removal of spent fuel from the site is based upon the DOE's most recently published annual acceptance rates of 400 MTU/year for year 1, 3,800 MTU total for years 2 through 4 and 3,000 MTU/year for year 5 and beyond. The DOE contracts provide mechanisms for altering the oldest fuel first allocation scheme, including emergency deliveries, exchanges of allocations amongst utilities and the option of providing priority acceptance from permanently shutdown nuclear reactors.
Because it is unclear how these mechanisms may operate once DOE TLG Services, Inc.
051
Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant Document Li1-1621-001, Rev. 0 Decommissioning Cost Study Section 3, Page 8 of 54 begins accepting spent fuel from commercial reactors, this study assumes that DOE will accept spent fuel in an oldest fuel first order.
ISFSI An ISFSI, which can be operated under a separate and independent license, will be constructed to support management of the spent fuel.
The facility is assumed to be available to support spent fuel management until the DOE is able to removal all spent fuel from the site.
The ISFSI will continue to operate throughout decommissioning, and beyond the termination of the operating license in the DECON decommissioning alternative, until such time that the transfer of spent fuel to the DOE can be completed. Assuming, conservatively, that DOE begins to remove spent fuel from the site in 2025, the process is expected to be completed by the year 2064. The scenario is similar for the SAFSTOR alternative; however, based upon the expected completion date for fuel transfer, the ISFSI will be emptied prior to the commencement of decommissioning operations.
Post-shutdown and maintenance costs for the spent fuel pools and the ISFSI are also included and address the cost for staffing the facility, as well as security, insurance, and licensing fees. Costs are provided for the final disposition of the facilities once the transfer is complete.
Canister Design The HOLTEC Hi-Storm system (with a 32 fuel assembly capacity) is assumed for future cask acquisitions. For fuel transferred directly from the pools to the DOE, the DOE was assumed to provide Transport, Aging and Disposal (TAD) canisters with a 21 assembly capacity. DOE has not provided details about the TAD canisters other than assembly capacity.
Canister Loading and Transfer The estimates include the cost for the labor and equipment to transfer and load each spent fuel canister into the DOE transport cask or to the ISFSI from the wet storage pools. For estimating purposes only, approximately 50% of this cost is used to estimate the cost to transfer the fuel from the ISFSI into the transport cask. Since the DOE has not published details about its cask system, this rough estimate is TLG Services, Inc.
052
Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant Document Ll1-1621-001, Rev. 0 Decommissioning Cost Study Section 3, Page 9 of 54 necessary. However, use of this estimate should not be used to infer that TLG has any detailed information on the cask system DOE will ultimately provide.
Operations and Maintenance The estimates include the cost of operating and maintaining the spent fuel pools and the ISFSI, respectively. Pool operations are expected to continue approximately five and one half years after the cessation of operations. ISFSI operating costs are based upon a 31 year period of operations following the shutdown of Unit 2.
ISFSI Design Considerations A multi-purpose (storage. and transport) dry shielded storage canister (MPC) with a vertical, reinforced concrete storage overpack is used as a basis for the cost analyses. The overpacks are assumed to have some level of neutron-induced activation as a result of the long-term storage of the fuel, i.e., to levels exceeding free-release limits. The cost of the disposition of this material, as well as the demolition of the ISFSI facility, is included in the estimates.
GTCC The dismantling of the reactor internals may generate radioactive waste considered unsuitable for shallow land disposal (i.e., low-level radioactive waste with concentrations of radionuclides that exceed the limits established by the NRC for Class C radioactive waste (GTCC)).
The Low-Level Radioactive Waste Policy Amendments Act of 1985 assigned the federal government the responsibility for the disposal of this material. The Act also stated that the beneficiaries of the activities resulting in the generation of such radioactive waste bear all reasonable costs of disposing of such waste. Although the DOE is responsible for disposing of GTCC waste, any costs for that service have not been determined. For purposes of this estimate, the GTCC radioactive waste is assumed to be packaged and disposed of as high-level waste, at a cost equivalent to that envisioned for the spent fuel.
For purposes of this study, GTCC is packaged in the same canisters used to store spent fuel. Disposal costs are based upon a cost equivalent to that envisioned for the spent fuel. It is not anticipated that the DOE would accept this waste'prior to completing the transfer of spent fuel.
Therefore, until such time the DOE is ready to accept GTCC waste, it is TLG Services, Inc.
053
Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant Document Ll1-1621-001, Rev. 0 Decommissioning Cost Study Section 3, Page 10 of 54 reasonable to assume that this material would remain in storage at the Comanche Peak site (for the DECON alternative). In the SAFSTOR alternative, the GTCC material is shipped directly to a DOE facility as it is removed since the fuel has been removed from the site prior to the start of decommissioning.
3.5.2 Reactor Vessel and Internal Components The reactor pressure vessel and internal components are segmented for disposal in shielded, reusable transportation casks. Segmentation is performed in the refueling canal, where a turntable and remote cutter are installed. The vessel is segmented in place, using a mast-mounted cutter supported off the lower head and directed from a shielded work platform installed overhead in the reactor cavity. Transportation cask specifications and transportation regulations dictate the segmentation and packaging methodology.
Intact disposal of reactor vessel shells has been successfully demonstrated at several of the sites that have been decommissioned.
Access to navigable waterways has allowed these large packages to be transported to the Barnwell disposal site with minimal overland travel.
Intact disposal of the reactor vessel and internal components can provide savings in cost and worker exposure by eliminating the complex segmentation requirements, isolation of the GTCC material, and transport/storage of the resulting waste packages. Portland General Electric (PGE) was able to dispose of the Trojan reactor as an intact package (including the internals). However, its location on the Columbia River simplified the transportation analysis since:
0 the reactor package could be secured to the transport vehicle for the entire journey, i.e., the package was not lifted during transport, there were no man-made or natural terrain features between the plant site and the disposal location that could produce a large drop, and 0 transport speeds were very low, limited by the overland transport vehicle and the river barge.
As a member of the Northwest Compact, PGE had a site available for disposal of the package - the US Ecology facility in Washington State.
The characteristics of this arid site proved favorable in demonstrating compliance with land disposal regulations.
TLG Services, Inc.
054
Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant Document LIi1-1621-001, Rev. 0 Decommissioning Cost Study Section 3, Page 11 of 54 It is not known whether this option will be available when the Comanche Peak plant ceases operation. Future viability of this option will depend upon the ultimate location of the disposal site, as well as the disposal site licensee's ability to accept highly radioactive packages and effectively isolate them from the environment. Consequently, the study assumes that the reactor vessel will require segmentation, as a bounding condition.
3.5.3 Primary System Components In the DECON alternative, the reactor coolant system components are assumed to be decontaminated using chemical agents prior to the start of dismantling operations. This type of decontamination can be expected to have a significant ALARA impact, since in this scenario the removal work is done within the first few years of shutdown. A decontamination factor (average reduction) of 10 is assumed for the process. Disposal of the decontamination solution effluent is included within the estimate as a "process liquid waste" charge.
In the SAFSTOR alternative, radionuclide decay is expected to provide the same benefit and, therefore, a chemical decontamination is not included.
Reactor coolant piping is cut from the reactor vessel once the water level in the vessel (used for personnel shielding during dismantling and cutting operations in and around the vessel) is dropped below the nozzle zone. The piping is boxed and transported by shielded van. The reactor coolant pumps and motors are lifted out intact, packaged, and transported for disposal The following discussion deals with the removal and disposition of the steam generators, but the techniques involved are also applicable to other large components, such as heat exchangers, component coolers, and the pressurizer. The steam generators' size and weight, as well as their location within the reactor building, will ultimately determine the removal strategy.
A trolley crane is set up for the removal of the generators. It can also be used to move portions of the steam generator cubicle walls and floor slabs from the reactor building to a location where they can be decontaminated and transported to the material handling area.
Interferences within the work area, such as grating, piping, and other components are removed to create sufficient laydown space for processing these large components.
TLG Services, Inc.
055
Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant Document LI1-1621-001, Rev. 0 Decommissioning Cost Study Section 3, Page 12 of 54 The generators are rigged for removal, disconnected from the surrounding piping and supports, and maneuvered into the open area where they are lowered onto a dolly. Each generator is rotated into the horizontal position for extraction from the containment and placed onto a multi-wheeled vehicle for transport to an on-site processing and storage area.
The generators are disassembled on-site with the outer shell and lightly contaminated subassemblies designated for off-site recycling. The more highly contaminated tube sheet and tube bundle are packaged for direct disposal. The interior volume is filled with low-density cellular concrete for stabilization of the internal contamination.
Disposal costs are based upon the displaced volume and weight of the units. Each component is then loaded onto a rail car for transport to the disposal facility.
3.5.4 Main Turbine and Condenser The main turbine is dismantled using conventional maintenance procedures. The turbine rotors and shafts are removed to a laydown area. The lower turbine casings are removed from their anchors by controlled demolition. The main condensers are also disassembled and moved to a laydown area. Material is then prepared for transportation to an off-site recycling facility where it is surveyed and designated for either decontamination or volume reduction, conventional disposal, or controlled disposal. Components are packaged and readied for transport in accordance with the intended disposition.
3.5.5 Retired Components The estimates include the disposition of four retired steam generators and a retired reactor vessel closure head from Unit 1. The components, currently in storage at the site, will be prepared for transport and disposal. Similar to the disposition of the operating units, the steam domes of the generators are assumed to be removed to meet transport clearances and designated for recycling. The estimates for the retired components include the project management, contractor and supporting costs necessary to execute the tasks assuming that the disposition would be a coordinated effort (i.e., single mobilization effort).
The estimates also include the disposition of one high-pressure and two low-pressure turbine rotors.
TLG Services, Inc.
056
Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant Document LI1-1621-001, Rev. 0 Decommissioning Cost Study Section 3, Page 13 of 54 The cost for disposition of the retired components is summarized in the tables on pages xvii and xix and in Tables 6.1 and 6.2. While the study assumes that the disposal of the components would occur after shutdown, the costs are identified separately because the disposal activities could be conducted at anytime.
3.5.6 Transportation Methods Contaminated piping, components, and structural material other than the highly activated reactor vessel and internal components will qualify as LSA-I, II or III or Surface Contaminated Object, SCO-I or II, as described in Title 49.[211 The contaminated material will be packaged in Industrial Packages (IP-1, IP-2, or IP-3, as defined in subpart 173.411) for transport unless demonstrated to qualify as their own shipping containers. The reactor vessel and internal components are expected to be transported in accordance with Part 71, as Type B. It is conceivable that the reactor, due to its limited specific activity, could qualify as LSA II or III. However, the high radiation levels on the outer surface would require that additional shielding be incorporated within the packaging so as to attenuate the dose to levels acceptable for transport.
Any fuel cladding failure that occurred during the lifetime of the plant is assumed to have released fission products at sufficiently low levels that the buildup of quantities of long-lived isotopes (e.g., 137Cs, 90Sr, or transuranics) has been prevented from reaching levels exceeding those that permit the major reactor components to be shipped under current transportation regulations and disposal requirements.
Transport of the highly activated metal, produced in the segmentation of the reactor vessel and internal components, will be by shielded truck cask. Cask shipments may exceed 95,000 pounds, including vessel segment(s), supplementary shielding, cask tie-downs, and tractor-trailer. The maximum level of activity per shipment assumed permissible was based upon the license limits of the available shielded transport casks. The segmentation scheme for the vessel and internal segments is designed to meet these limits.
The transport of large intact components (e.g., large heat exchangers and other oversized components) will be by a combination of truck, rail, and/or multi-wheeled transporter.
Transportation costs for material requiring controlled disposal are based upon the mileage to the Andrews County facility in western Texas.
TLG Services, Inc.
057
Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant Document L11-1621-001, Rev. 0 Decommissioning Cost Study Section 3, Page 14 of 54 Transportation costs for off-site waste processing are based upon the mileage to Oak Ridge, Tennessee. Truck transport costs are estimated using published tariffs from Tri-State Motor Transit.[22j 3.5.7 Low-Level Radioactive Waste Disposal To the greatest extent practical, metallic material generated in the decontamination and dismantling processes is processed to reduce the total cost of controlled disposal. Material meeting the regulatory and/or site release criterion, is released as scrap, requiring no further cost consideration. Conditioning (preparing the material to meet the waste acceptance criteria of the disposal site) and recovery of the waste stream is performed off site at a licensed processing center. Any material leaving the site is subject to a survey and release charge, at a minimum.
The mass of radioactive waste generated during the various decommissioning activities at the site is shown on a line-item basis in the detailed Appendices C and D, and summarized in Section 5. The quantified waste summaries shown in these tables are consistent with 10 CFR Part 61 classifications. Commercially available steel containers are presumed to be used for the disposal of piping, small components, and concrete. Larger components can serve as their own containers, with proper closure of all openings, access ways, and penetrations. The volumes are calculated based on the exterior package dimensions for containerized material or a specific calculation for components serving as their own waste containers.
The more highly activated reactor components will be shipped in reusable, shielded truck casks with disposable liners. In calculating disposal costs, the burial fees are applied against the liner volume, as well as the special handling requirements of the payload. Packaging efficiencies are lower for the highly activated materials (greater than Type A quantity waste), where high concentrations of gamma-emitting radionuclides limit the capacity of the shipping canisters.
Disposal fees are based upon estimated charges, with surcharges added for the highly activated components, for example, generated in the segmentation of the reactor vessel. The cost to dispose of the lowest level and majority of the material generated from the decontamination and dismantling activities is based upon Luminant's current cost for disposal at EnergySolutions facility in Clive, Utah. Disposal costs for the higher activity waste (Class B and C) were based upon the last published rate schedule for non-compact waste for the Barnwell facility (as a proxy).
TLG Services, Inc.
058
Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant Document L11-1621-001, Rev. 0 Decommissioning Cost Study Section 3, Page 15 of 54 3.5.8. Site Conditions Following Decommissioning The NRC will terminate the site license if it determines that site remediation has been performed in accordance with the license termination plan, and that the terminal radiation survey and associated documentation demonstrate that the facility is suitable for release. The NRC's involvement in the decommissioning process will end at this point. Building codes and environmental regulations will dictate the next step in the decommissioning process, as well as owner's own future plans for the site.
Non-essential structures or buildings severely damaged in decontamination process are removed to a nominal depth of three feet below grade. Concrete rubble generated from demolition activities is processed and made available as clean fill for the power block foundations. Excess construction debris is trucked off site as an alternative to onsite disposal. The excavations will be regraded such that the power block area will have a final contour consistent with adjacent surroundings.
The existing electrical switchyard and access roads will remain in support of the electrical transmission and distribution system. The site access road will be left intact.
The estimates do not assume the remediation of any significant volume of contaminated soil. This assumption may be affected by continued plant operations and/or future regulatory actions, such as the development of site-specific release criteria.
3.6 ASSUMPTIONS The following are the major assumptions made in the development of the estimates for decommissioning the site.
3.6.1 Estimating Basis The study follows the principles of ALARA through the use of work duration adjustment factors. These factors address the impact of activities such as radiological protection instruction, mock-up training, and the use of respiratory protection and protective clothing. The factors lengthen a task's duration, increasing costs and lengthening the overall
- schedule. ALARA planning is considered in the costs for engineering and planning, and in the development of activity specifications and detailed TLG Services, Inc.
059
Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant Document L11-1621-001, Rev. 0 Decommissioning Cost Study Section 3, Page 16 of 54 procedures. Changes to worker exposure limits may impact the decommissioning cost and project schedule.
3.6.2 Labor Costs The craft labor required to decontaminate and dismantle the nuclear units will be acquired through standard site contracting practices. The current cost of labor at the site is used as an estimating basis. Costs for site administration, operations, construction, and maintenance personnel are based upon average salary information provided by Luminant.
Luminant will hire a Decommissioning Operations Contractor (DOC) to manage the decommissioning. The owner will provide site security, radiological health and safety, quality assurance and overall site administration during the decommissioning and demolition phases.
Contract personnel will provide engineering services, e.g., for preparing the activity specifications, work procedures, activation, and structural analyses, under the direction of the owner.
Reductions in the operating organization are handled through normal company practices. No costs have been included for this activity.
Severance costs are included for the decommissioning staff as the organization is downsized.
Security, while reduced from operating levels, is maintained throughout the decommissioning for access control, material control, and to safeguard the spent fuel.
3.6.3 Design Conditions Any fuel cladding failure that occurred during the lifetime of the plant is assumed to have released fission products at sufficiently low levels that the buildup of quantities of long-lived isotopes (e.g., 137Cs, 9oSr, or transuranics) has been prevented from reaching levels exceeding those that permit the major NSSS components to be shipped under current transportation regulations and disposal requirements.
The curie contents of the vessel and internals at final shutdown are derived from those listed in NUREG/CR-3474.[ 23 ] Actual estimates are derived from the curie/gram values contained therein and adjusted for the different mass of the Comanche Peak components, projected operating life, and different periods of decay. Additional short-lived TLG Services, Inc.
060
Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant Document L11-1621-001, Rev. 0 Decommissioning Cost Study Section 3, Page 17 of 54 isotopes were derived from NUREG/CR-0130[241 and NUREG/CR-0672,[251 and benchmarked to the long-lived values from NUREG/CR-3474.
The control elements are disposed of along with the spent fuel, i.e., there is no additional cost provided for their disposal.
Activation of the containment building structure is confined to the biological shield. More extensive activation (at very low levels) of the interior structures within containment has been detected at several reactors and the owners have elected to dispose of the affected material at a controlled facility rather than reuse the material as fill on site or send it to a landfill. The ultimate disposition of the material removed from the reactor building will depend upon the site release criteria selected, as well as the designated end use for the site.
3.6.4 General Transition Activities Existing warehouses are cleared of non-essential material and remain for use by Luminant and its subcontractors. The plant's operating staff performs the following activities at no additional cost or credit to the project during the transition period:
" Drain and collect fuel oils, lubricating oils, and transformer oils for recycle and/or sale.
Drain and collect acids, caustics, and other chemical stores for recycle and/or sale.
- Process operating waste inventories, i.e., the estimates do not address the disposition of any legacy wastes; the disposal of operating wastes during this initial period is not considered a decommissioning expense.
Scrap and Salvage The existing plant equipment is considered obsolete and suitable for scrap as deadweight quantities only. Luminant will make economically reasonable efforts to salvage equipment following final plant shutdown.
However, dismantling techniques assumed by TLG for equipment in this analysis are not consistent with removal techniques required for salvage (resale) of equipment. Experience has indicated that some buyers TLG Services, Inc.
061
Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant Document Ll1-1621-001, Rev. 0 Decommissioning Cost Study Section 3, Page 18 of 54 wanted equipment stripped down to very specific requirements before they would consider purchase. This required expensive rework after the equipment had been removed from its installed location. Since placing a salvage value on this machinery and equipment would be speculative, and the value would be small in comparison to the overall decommissioning expenses, this analysis does not attempt to quantify the value that an owner may realize based upon those efforts.
It is assumed, for purposes of this analysis, that any value received from the sale of scrap generated in the dismantling process would be more than offset by the on-site processing costs. The dismantling techniques assumed in the decommissioning estimates do not include the additional cost for size reduction and preparation to meet "furnace ready" conditions. For example, the recovery of copper from electrical cabling may require the removal and disposition of any contaminated insulation, an added expense. With a volatile market, the potential profit margin in scrap recovery is highly speculative, regardless of the ability to free release this material. This assumption is an implicit recognition of scrap value in the disposal of clean metallic waste at no additional cost to the project.
Furniture, tools, mobile equipment such as forklifts, trucks, bulldozers, and other property is removed at no cost or credit to the decommissioning project. Disposition may include relocation to other facilities. Spare parts are also made available for alternative use.
Energv For estimating purposes, the plant is assumed to be de-energized, with the exception of those facilities associated with spent fuel storage.
Replacement power costs are used to calculate the cost of energy consumed during decommissioning for tooling, lighting, ventilation, and essential services.
Insurance Costs for continuing coverage (nuclear liability and property insurance) following cessation of plant operations and during decommissioning are included and based upon current operating premiums. Reductions in premiums, throughout the decommissioning process, are based upon the guidance and the limits for coverage defined in the NRC's proposed rulemaking "Financial Protection Requirements for Permanently Shutdown Nuclear Power Reactors."[26] The NRC's financial protection TLG Services, Inc.
062
Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant Document L1-1621-001, Rev. 0 Decommissioning Cost Study Section 3, Page 19 of 54 requirements are based on various reactor (and spent fuel) configurations.
Taxes Property taxes are included within the estimates. However, the tax is based upon the land, without any consideration of any ongoing site operations and property assets.
Site Modifications The perimeter fence and in-plant security barriers will be moved, as appropriate, to conform to the Site Security Plan in force during the various stages of the project.
The on-site dike and earthwork network forming water retention ponds and lagoons will be disabled to relieve ongoing inspection requirements.
Site Restoration All structures will be removed except for the switchyard. The switchyard is required for grid operations. Structures to be removed include but are not limited to the reactor, fuel, auxiliary, radwaste warehouse, safeguard, diesel generator, and turbine buildings.
3.7 COST ESTIMATE
SUMMARY
Schedules of expenditures are provided in Tables 3.1 and 3.2. The tables delineate the cost contributors by year of expenditures as well as cost contributor (e.g., labor, materials, and waste disposal).
Additional tables in Appendices C and D provide detailed costs elements. The cost elements are also assigned to one of three subcategories: "License Termination,"
"Spent Fuel Management," and "Site Restoration." The subcategory "License Termination" is used to accumulate costs that are consistent with "decommissioning" as defined by the NRC in its financial assurance regulations (i.e., 10 CFR §50.75). The cost reported for this subcategory is generally sufficient to terminate the plant's operating license, recognizing that there may be some additional cost impact from spent fuel management. This subcategory also includes the costs of disposing of the retired steam generators and the reactor vessel closure head from Unit 1. The study assumes that the disposal of the components would occur after shutdown, however, the costs are identified separately because the disposal activities could be conducted at anytime.
TLG Services, Inc.
063
Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Study Document L11-1621-001, Rev. 0 Section 3, Page 20 of 54 The "Spent Fuel Management" subcategory contains costs anticipated to be incurred once the nuclear units cease operation for the off-loading of the pools either directly to the DOE or to the ISFSI for interim storage, and the eventual transfer of casks from the ISFSI to the DOE. Costs are also included for the operation of the ISFSI until such time that the transfer of all fuel from this facility to an off-site location (e.g., geologic repository) is complete.
"Site Restoration" is used to capture costs associated with the dismantling and demolition of buildings and facilities demonstrated to be free from contamination. This includes structures never exposed to radioactive materials, as well as those facilities that have been decontaminated to appropriate levels. Structures are removed to a depth of three feet and backfilled to conform to local grade.
As discussed in Section 3.4.1, it is not anticipated that the DOE will accept the GTCC waste prior to completing the transfer of spent fuel. Therefore, the cost of GTCC disposal is shown in the final year of ISFSI operation (for the DECON alternative). While designated for disposal at the geologic repository along with the spent fuel, GTCC waste is still classified as low-level radioactive waste and, as such, included as a "License Termination" expense.
Decommissioning costs are reported in 2009 dollars. Costs are not inflated, escalated, or discounted over the period of expenditure (or projected lifetime of the plant). The schedules are based upon the detailed activity costs reported in Appendices C and D, along with the timeline presented in Section 4.
TLG Services, Inc.
064
Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Study Document L11-1621-001, Rev. 0 Section 3, Page 21 of 54 TABLE 3.1 COMANCHE PEAK NUCLEAR POWER PLANT SPENT FUEL MANAGEMENT Fuel Assembly InventoOE L Year Pool ISFSI Aceptance 2010 2171 0
2011 2257 96 2012 2058 384
.~ ~ ~~~~~...........
2013 2151 384 2014 2333 384 2015 2038 768 2016 2131 768 2017 2313 768 2018 2018 1152 2019{
2111 1152 2020!
2293 1152 2021 1998 1536 2022 1 2091 1536 2023 2273 1536 2024 1978 1920 2025 2029 1920 42 2026 2043 1920 168 2027 1942 1984 126 2028 1909 1984 126 2029 1944 1984 147 2030 2100 1984 126 2031 1974
+/-
1984 126 2032 1916 1984 147 2033 1983 1984 126 2034 1569 2272 126 2035 1134 2560 147 2036 720 2848 126 2037 306 3136 126 2038 0
- 3316, 126 2039 3188 128 TLG Services, Inc.
065
Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Study Document Li1-1621-001, Rev. 0 Section 3, Page 22 of 54 TABLE 3.1(continued)
COMANCHE PEAK NUCLEAR POWER PLANT SPENT FUEL MANAGEMENT Fuel Assembly Inventory DOE Year I
Pool ISFSI Acceptance 2040 I3060 128 2041 2932 128 2042
____2804 128 2043 2644 160 2044 2516 T
128 2045_*~.__
2388
__128
.........~~
~~.
.2_
4
..!2 8
2 2046 2260 128 2047......
2132 128 2048........
___1972 160 2049_
1844 128 2050 1716 128 2051
__1588 128 2052 1460 128 2053 1300 160 2054 1172 128 2055
].__
1044 128 2056
__916 128 2057
__788 128 2058 7 660 128 2059
].
532 128 2060 404 128 2061 276 128 2062 148 128 2063 20 128 2064 0
20 Total 5101 5101 TLG Services, Inc.
066
Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Study Document LI1-1621-001, Rev. 0 Section 3, Page 23 of 54 TABLE 3.2 COMANCHE PEAK NUCLEAR POWER PLANT, UNIT 1 DECON ALTERNATIVE SCHEDULE OF TOTAL ANNUAL EXPENDITURES (thousands, 2009 dollars)
Equipment &
Year Labor Materials Energy Burial Other Total 2030 _
40,171
___1,963 1,249 i27 3,085~ 46,495 1,.3 4_
..2......
- 3. (.. _.......
._.6 _4 5_..
2031 53,519 13,918 1 2,067 21,734 19,728 110,964 2032 49,121 19,855 1 1,324 44,367 922 138 2033 29,244 10,261 {
1,066 6,770 4,140 51,481 2034 27,411 9,376 1,042 3,292 3,671 44,792 2035 19,351 7,623 6671 3,472 4,743 35,856 2036 1,948 2,441
__0__.0 4
1,002 5,396 2037 1,943 2,434[
0 4
1L000 5,381 2038 1,943 2,434 0
4 1,000 5,381 2039 12,613 1,684 F 164 I 14 2,155 1 16,628 2040 12,531 6,927[
1621 3
1,775 21,398 2041 11,014 8,035 139 0
1,536 20,724 2042 3,122 1,335 22 0
844.
5,322 2043 1,661 95 0
0 715 2,472 2044 1,666 95 0
0 7171 2,478 2045 1,661 95 0
04 715 2,472 2046 1,661 95 0
0 715 2,472 2047 1,661 95 0
0 715 2,472 2048 1,666 95 0
0 717 2,478 2049 1,661 95 0
0 715 2,472 2050 1,661 95 0
0 7151 2,472j 2051 1,661 95 0
0 715 2,472 2052 1,666 95 0
0 717 2,478 2053 1,661 95 0
0 715 2,472 2054 1,661 95 0
0 715 2,472 2055 1,661 95 0
01 715 2,472 2056 1,666 95 0
0_
7171 2,478 2057 1,661 95 0
0 715 2,472 2058 1,661 95 0
0 I 715 2,472 2059 1,661 95 0
0 715 2472 2060 1,666 95 0
0 717 2,478 2061 1,661-95 0
0 715 2,472 2062 1,661 95 0
0 715 2,472 TLG Services, Inc.
067
Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Study Document L11-1621-001, Rev. 0 Section 3, Page 24 of 54 TABLE 3.2 (continued)
COMANCHE PEAK NUCLEAR POWER PLANT, UNIT 1 DECON ALTERNATIVE SCHEDULE OF TOTAL ANNUAL EXPENDITURES (thousands, 2009 dollars)
Equipment &
Materials Energy Year Labor Burial Other Total 2063 1,661 95 0
0 715 1 2,472 1 8 4 9----
2064 1,662 603 0 1 4
13,180 15449 2065 819 821.7 1 0
460 956 3061 301,32 91709 7,900 80,156 83,070 564,156 TLG Services, Inc.
068
Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Study Document L11-1621-001, Rev. 0 Section 3, Page 25 of 54 TABLE 3.2a COMANCHE PEAK NUCLEAR POWER PLANT, UNIT 1 DECON ALTERNATIVE LICENSE TERMINATION EXPENDITURES (thousands, 2009 dollars)
Equipment &
Year Labor Materials Energy Burial Other Total 2030 39,443 1,503 1 1,249 1 27 1,813 44,034 2031 51,875.
13,281._
2,067 i 21,734 18,402 i 107f359 2032 47,589 18,963 1,324 44,367 8,034 120,276 2033 27,041 5,936 1 1,066 6,770 2,964 43,777 2034 25,146 4,732 1 1,042 1 3,292 2,496 36,707 2035 17,640 3,778 667 3,472 3,922 29,478 2036 1162 82 0
4 704 1,951 2037 1,159 81
- 0.
4 702 1,946 2038 1,159 81 0
4 702 1,946 2039 12,272 661 164 14 1,857 14,967 2040 3,385 175 1 46 3
1,125 4,734 2041 111 0'
0 0
820 930 2042 17 01 0
0 12 1451 2043 0
0 o0 0
_0 0
0 2044 0
0 O0 0
0 0
2045 0__
00 0
0 4_
2046 0
0 0
0 0
0 2047 0
Oj 0{
0 0
0 1 2048 0
0 0
0 0
0 2049 0
0 0
0 0
0 2050 0
0 0
0 0
0 2051 0
0 0
0 0
0 2052 0
0 0
0 J0 0
2053 0
0 0
0 0
0 2054 0
0 0
0 0
0 2055 0
0 0
0 0
0 2056 0
0 0
0 0
0 2057 0
0 0
0 0
0 2058 0
0 0
0 0
0 2059 0
0 0
0 0
0 2060 0
0 0
0 0
0 2061 0
01 0
0 0
0 2061 0
0 0
0 !0 0
2062 0
0 0
0 0
0 TLG Services, Inc.
069
Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Study Document L11-1621-001, Rev. 0 Section 3, Page 26 of 54 TABLE 3.2a (continued)
COMANCHE PEAK NUCLEAR POWER PLANT, UNIT 1 DECON ALTERNATIVE LICENSE TERMINATION EXPENDITURES (thousands, 2009 dollars)
Equipment &
Materials Year Labor Energy Burial Other Total
. 2063..
0 0
0 0 K-..o oo<
o 0
2064 0
509 0
- 0.
12.,4.62 12,972 2 0 4...........
O.............
.)
0
....1-4 6
.9-7 2..
2065 0
0 0
0 0_
0 9.2.62......
9.69. -.
4 2
227,996 49,782 7,623 i 79,691 56,131 1 421,223 TLG Services, Inc.
070
Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Study Document L11-1621-001, Rev. 0 Section 3, Page 27 of 54 TABLE 3.2b COMANCHE PEAK NUCLEAR POWER PLANT, UNIT 1 DECON ALTERNATIVE SPENT FUEL MANAGEMENT EXPENDITURES (thousands, 2009 dollars)
Equipment &
Year Labor Materials Energy Burial Other Total 2030 153 460 0
0 i 1,273 1,886.
2031 201 604 0
0 i
1,322 2,127 2032 270 810 0
0 1,178 2,258 2033 1,432 4,296 0
0-i 2034 1,540 4,620 0
0 1,175 [
7,335 2035 1,277 3,831 0 0 0
821 5,929 1 2036 786 2,359:
0 0
2 9 9 3,444 2037 784 2,353 0
0 298 3,435 2038 784 2,353[
0 0 [
298 3,435 2039 341 1,023 01 0
298
__1,661 2040 1,398 95 23 0
649 2,165 2041 1,661 95 28 0
715 2,499 2042 1,661 95 4 41 715 2,4762 2043 1,661 95 0
0_
715 2,47281 2044 1,666 95 0
0 717 2,478 2045 1,661 95 0
0 715 2,472 2046 1,661 95 0
0 715 2,472 2046 1,661 95 0
0 715 2,472 2047 1,661 95 0
0 715 2,472 2048 1,661 95 0
0 715 2,478 2054 1,661 95 0
0 715 2,472 2050_
1,661 95 0
0_
715 2,472 2051 1,666 95 0
0 o 715 2,472 2052 1,661 95 0
0 715 2,472 2053 1,661 95 0ol 0
715 2,472 2054 1,661 95 0
0 715 2,472 2055 1,661 95 0
0 715 2,472 2056 1,661 95 0
0 715 2,472 2057 1,661 95 0
0 715 2,472 2058 1,661 95 0
0 715 2,472 2065 1,661 95 0
0 715 2,472 12061 1
1,661 95 0
0 715 2,472
__2062 1,661 95 1 0
0 715 2,472i TLG Services, Inc.
071
Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Study Document L1I-1621-001, Rev. 0 Section 3, Page 28 of 54 TABLE 3.2b (continued)
COMANCHE PEAK NUCLEAR POWER PLANT, UNIT 1 DE CON ALTERNATIVE SPENT FUEL MANAGEMENT EXPENDITURES (thousands, 2009 dollars)
Equipment &
Year Labor Materials Energy Burial Other Total 2063 1,661 95 !
0 0
715 2,472 2064 1,662 94
_01
.4 7181 2,4784 2*iii* 4*
_-_---* -211*-*--iiii~~~~~~i*/*!...........................
. *..i~~iiiii~~ii IU U *......*47.
2065 819 827 1 0
I 460 956 3,061 4 9, 6 8 17.
0 T 49,6'81 2-.5,,90"7 i55 464i 26,92 10303 TLG Services, Inc.
072
Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Study Document L11-1621-001, Rev. 0 Section 3, Page 29 of 54 TABLE 3.2c COMANCHE PEAK NUCLEAR POWER PLANT, UNIT 1 DECON ALTERNATIVE SITE RESTORATION EXPENDITURES (thousands, 2009 dollars)
Equipment &
Year Labor Materials Energy Burial Other Total 2030 575 0
0 0
5751
- 1.
~ ~~~~~~~~~..
-V.....
2031 1,443 32' 01 01 4
1,4791 2032 1,262 82 01 0 1 10 1,355 2033 771 29 1 0
_0 1 801 2034 726 24 0
0{
0 750 2035 434 14 0
0 0
448 2036 0
0 0
0 0
0 2037 0
o.01o0 6_-
0 o 2038 0
0 0
01 0_o_
0 2039 0
0 01 01 0
0 2040 7,748 6,657 93 1 0
1 14,499 2041 9,242 7,940i 111i 0
1 17,295
-.2042 1,443 1,240 17 I 0-2,701
............................... I I........
2043 0
0 0
0 01 0
2044 0
0 0
0 0
0 2045 0
0 0
0 0
0 2046 0
0 0
0 0
0 2047 0
0 0
0 0
0 2048 0
0 0
0 0
0 2049 0
0 0
0 0
0 2050 0
0!
0 0
0 0
2051 0
0 0
0 0
0 2052 0
01 0
0 0
0 2053 0
00 0
0 0
2054 0
_0 01 0
0 0
2055 0
01 0o 0
~
0 01 2056 0
0 0
0 0
0 2057 0
0 0
0 0
0 2058 0
0_
0 O0 0
0 2059 0
0 0
0 0
0 2060 0
0 0
0 0
0 2061 0
0 0
0 0
01 2062 0
0 0
0 0
0 TLG Services, Inc.
073
Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Study Document L11-1621-001, Rev. 0 Section 3, Page 30 of 54 TABLE 3.2c (continued)
COMANCHE PEAK NUCLEAR POWER PLANT, UNIT 1 DECON ALTERNATIVE SITE RESTORATION EXPENDITURES (thousands, 2009 dollars)
Equipment &
Year Labor Materials Energy Burial Other Total 2063 0_
0 0
0 0
2064 0
0 0
0 0
0 2065 0
0 0
0F o
3,64 1-6,019 1222 0 117 39,902 TLG Services, Inc.
074
Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Study Document L-1-1621-001, Rev. 0 Section 3, Page 31 of 54 TABLE 3.3 COMANCHE PEAK NUCLEAR POWER PLANT, UNIT 2 DECON ALTERNATIVE SCHEDULE OF TOTAL ANNUAL EXPENDITURES (thousands, 2009 dollars)
Equipment &
Year Labor Materials Energy Burial Other Total 2033 42,059 7,235 1,272 1 27 1 2,887 53,480 2034 54,983 19,318 1 2,066 20,650 12,425 109,442 2035 54,915 24,158 1,320 39,812 7,009 I 127,214_
2036 44,073 9,9081 1,058 7,1141 3,154 65,307 1 2037 43,418 9,186 1042 5,500 2,957 62,104 1 2038 38,422 8,146 841 6,035 3,609 1 57,054 2039 26,918 3,616 1 392 2,803 4,730 1 38,459 2040 17,985 14,056 162 3
2,090 34,297.
2041 16,780 16,475 139 0 1 1,539 34,933 2042 -----
4,0.22 2,6531 22 01 844 7,5411 2043 1,661 95 0
0o 715 2,4721 2044 1,666 95 0
0 717 2,478 2045 1,661 95 0
0 7150 2,472 2046 1,661 95j 0
0 715 2,4721 2047 1,661 95 0
0 715 2,472' 2048 1,666 95 0
0, 717 2478 2049 1,661 95 0
0 1 715 2,472 2050 1,661 95 0
0 __715 2,472 2051 1,661 95 0
0 715 2,472 -
2052 1,666 95 0
0L 717 2,478 2053 1,661 95 0
0 715 2,472 2054 1,661 95 0
0f 715 2,472 2055 1,661 95 0
715 2,472 2056 1,666 95 0
0 717 2,478 2057 1,661 95 0
0 70 2,472I 2058 1,661 95 0
0 715 2,472 2059 1,661 95 0
0 715 2,472 2060 1,666 95 0
0 717 2478 2061 1,661 95 0
0 715 2,472 2062 1,661 95 0
0 715 2,472 2062 1,661 95 0
0 715 21472 1 2063 1,661 95 0
0 715 2,47249 2064 1,662 603T 0
4 ]
13,180 15,449 TLG Services, Inc.
075
Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Study Document L11-1621-001, Rev. 0 Section 3, Page 32 of 54 TABLE 3.3 (continued)
COMANCHE PEAK NUCLEAR POWER PLANT, UNIT 2 DECON ALTERNATIVE SCHEDULE OF TOTAL ANNUAL EXPENDITURES (thousands, 2009 dollars)
Equipment &
Year Labor Materials Energy Burial Other Total 2065 819 827j 380,968 118,172 8,313 i 460 956j 3,061 82,410 70,415 660,279 TLG Services, Inc.
076
Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Study Document L11-1621-001, Rev. 0 Section 3, Page 33 of 54 TABLE 3.3a COMANCHE PEAK NUCLEAR POWER PLANT, UNIT 2 DECON ALTERNATIVE LICENSE TERMINATION EXPENDITURES (thousands, 2009 dollars)
Equipment &
Year Labor Materials Energy Burial Other Total 2033 39,1,531 1,272 27 1 1,591 1 44,327
.... ? * --T...~~~~~~~...
g*.......
...................... ;i*.........* *i* *....*
T....1-i 6 2034 52,586 15,9 2,066 20,650 11,104 1 101,603 2035 52,058 2__0,161 1 1,320 39,812 1 5,825 1 119,176 2036 41,796 7,032 1,058 7,114 I 1,976 1 58,976
.o-i 5
.i 6 *
} - -..
o-- 4 2037 41,176 6,373 1,042 5,500 1,783 55874 2'038 37,039 6,322 841 6,035 2,797 53,034 2039 26,831 3,386 392i 2,803 4,432 37,845 2040 3,952 228 46 3 i 438 5,668 2041 47 0'
0 0
820 867 2042 7
0 F0 0 0 128 135 2043 0
0 0[
0 0
0 2044 0
0' 01 0
0 2045 0
01 0
0 0
0 2046 0
- 0.
0 0
- 0.
0 2047 0
01 0
0 0
0 2048 0
01 0
0 0
0 2049 0
0i 0
0 0
0 2050 0
0 0
0 0
0 2051 0
0 0
0 0
0 205200 0
_0 0
0 0
2052 0
0 0
0 2053 0
O 0
0 0
0 2054 0
0 0
0 0
0 205 0
[0 0
00 2055 0
0 0
0 0
0 2056 0
o0 0
0 0
2057 0
0 i 0
0 0
0 2058 0
01 0
0 0
0 2059 0
0
-0 0
0 0
2060 0
0 0
0 0
0 2061 0
0 0
0 0
0 2060 0
09 0
0 0
2062 0
0........
000 2063 0
0 0
0 0
0' 2064 0
509 F0 0
12,462 12,9721 TLG Services, Inc.
077
Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Study Document L11-1621-001, Rev. 0 Section 3, Page 34 of 54 TABLE 3.3a (continued)
COMANCHE PEAK NUCLEAR POWER PLANT, UNIT 2 DECON ALTERNATIVE LICENSE TERMINATION EXPENDITURES (thousands, 2009 dollars)
Equipment &
Year Labor Materials Energy Burial Other Total 2065 0
0 0
0 0~
01
.....~~....
6......
o..
.. ].
_o 1
295,400 60,739 8,036 81,946 44,356 1 490,476.
TLG Services, Inc.
078
Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Study Document Ll1-1621-001, Rev. 0 Section 3, Page 35 of 54 TABLE 3.3b COMANCHE PEAK NUCLEAR POWER PLANT, UNIT 2 DECON ALTERNATIVE SPENT FUEL MANAGEMENT EXPENDITURES (thousands, 2009 dollars)
Equipment &
Year Labor Materials Energy Burial Other Total 2033 1,902 5,705
__0_
0_
1,296 1 8,902 7
V~~~~
2034 1,360----4,080' 0
0 1,318 6,7581 2035 1,299 3,898 0
0 1,175 6,372 2036 938 2,814 1178 4,930 2036 938 2,814 i 2037 918 2,753 1 0
0 175_
4,845 2038 596 1,789 0
0 812 3,197 2039 77 230 0.
298 604 2040 1,398 95 l
-23 i
0 649 2,165 2041 1,661 95T 281 01 715 2,499 2043 1,661 95 0
0 715 2,472 i
2044 1,666 951 01 0
717 2478
.........................................................................................................................o.......................
2046 1,661 95 01 0
7151 2,472 2047 1,661 95 0
0 715 2,472 2048 1,666 95 0
0 717 2,478 2049 1,661 95 0
0 715 2,472 2050 1,661 95 0
0 I 715 2,472 2051 1,661 95 0
0 715 2,472 2052 1,666 95 0
01 717 2,478 2053 1,661 95 0
0 715 2,472 2054 1,661 95 0
0 1 715 2,472 2055 1,661 95 0
0 715 2,472 2056 1,666 95 0
0 j 717 2,478 2057 1,661 95 0o 0
715 2,472 2058 1,661 95 0
0' 715 2,472 2059 1,661 95 0
0 715 2,472 2060 1,666 95 0
0 717 2,478 2061 1,661 95 0
0 715 2,472 2062 1,661 95 0
0 715 2,472 2063 1,661 95 0
0 T 715 2,472 2064 1,662 94 0
4 718 2,478 TLG Services, Inc.
079
Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Study Document L11-1621-001, Rev. 0 Section 3, Page 36 of 54 TABLE 3.3b (continued)
COMANCHE PEAK NUCLEAR POWER PLANT, UNIT 2 DECON ALTERNATIVE SPENT FUEL MANAGEMENT EXPENDITURES (thousands, 2009 dollars)
Equipment &
Year Labor Materials Energy Burial Other Total 205 19 827:
_0_
4601956 J
3,06 4920 1 24,466 155 1
464 26,038 1 100,224 TLG Services, Inc.
080
Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Study Document Ll1-1621-001, Rev. 0 Section 3, Page 37 of 54 TABLE 3.3c COMANCHE PEAK NUCLEAR POWER PLANT, UNIT 2 DECON ALTERNATIVE SITE RESTORATION EXPENDITURES (thousands, 2009 dollars)
Equipment &
Materials Energy Year Labor Burial Other Total 2033 250 0
0 1 0
o i 250 2034 1,038 40 00 4
1,082
-*.................~~~~~~~~~..
...........6 !.
...- -........ ]..........
2035 1,557 99 0
0 10 1,666 2036 1,339 62 0 i 0_
0 1,402 2037 1,325 60___
0 0_
0 1,3851 2038 787 35 0
0 0
0:
823 2039 11 0
0 0
- 0.
11 2040 12,635
_.13,733 93 0
3 26,464 2041 15,072 16,380-111 0
4 1 31,567 2042 2,354 2,558 171 0
____41 4,930 2043 0
0 0
0 0o 0
2044 0
0 0
0 0
0 2045 0
0 0
0 0
0 2046 0
0 0
0 01 0
2047 0
0 0
0 0
0 204780 0
0 0
0 0
2048 0
0 0
0 0_
2049 0
0 0
0 0
0 2050 0
0 0
0 0
0 2051 0
0 0
0 0
0 2052 0
0 0
0 0
0 2053 0
0 0
0 0
0 2054 0
0 0
0 0
0 2055 0
0 0
0 0
0 2056 0
0 0
0 01_
0 2057 0
0 0
0 0
0 2058 0
0 0
0 0
0 2059 0
0 0
0 0
0 2060 0
0 0
0 0
0 2061 0
0 0
0 0
0 2062 0
0 0
0 0
0 2063 0
0 0
0 0
0 2064 0
0 0
0i 0
0 TLG Services, Inc.
081
Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Study Document L-i-1621-001, Rev. 0 Section 3, Page 38 of 54 TABLE 3.3c (continued)
COMANCHE PEAK NUCLEAR POWER PLANT, UNIT 2 DECON ALTERNATIVE SITE RESTORATION EXPENDITURES (thousands, 2009 dollars)
Equipment &
Year Labor Materials Energy Burial Other Total 2065 -
0
_)
0 00 1-~~~
57 1
36368 32,968 222l 0
22 69,579 TLG Services, Inc.
082
Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Study Document LI1-1621-001, Rev. 0 Section 3, Page 39 of 54 TABLE 3.4 COMANCHE PEAK NUCLEAR POWER PLANT, UNIT 1 SAFSTOR ALTERNATIVE SCHEDULE OF TOTAL ANNUAL EXPENDITURES (thousands, 2009 dollars)
Equipment &
Year Labor Materials Energy Burial Other Total 2030 31,012 1,523 1,24 1
27 3,085 T 36,895 2031 21,638 6,092 1 954 1,051 15,468 1 45,202 2032 3,457 279 16 4,215 1 10,054 2033 2,083 3,4471 278 16 4,204 1 10027 2034 20,83 3,447 278 :
16 I 4,204 10027 2035 2,330 2,314 222 16 2,902,
7,784 2036 2,704 636 139 16 975 4,470 2037 2,696 634 139 16 972 4,457 2038 2,696 634 1 139 16 1 972 4,457 2039 2696 634T 139 16 972.
4457 2040 2,704 636 139i 16' 975j 4,470 2041 2,696 634 139i 16 972i 4,457 20422 634 139_
16 972 4,457 2043 2,696 634 139 16 1 972 4,457 2044 2,704 636 139 16 975 4,470 2045 2,696 634 139 16 972 4,457 2046 2,696 634 139 16 972 4,457 2047 2,696 634 139 16 972 4,457 2048 2,704 636 139 16 975 4,470 2049 2,696 634 139 16 972 4,457 2050 2,696 634 139 16 972 4,457 2051 2,696 634 139 16 972 4,457 2052 2,704 636 139 16 975 4,470 2053 2,696 634 139 16 972 4,457 2054 2,696 634 139 16 972 4,457 2055 2,696 634 I 139 16 972 4,457 2056 2,704 636:T 139 16 975 4,470 2057 2,696 634 1 139 16 972 4,457 2058 2,696 634 139 16 972 4,457 2059 2,696 634 139 16 972 4,4457 2060 2,704 636 139 16 975 4,4701 2061 2,696 634 139 16 972 4,457 2062 2,696 634 139 16 972 4457 TLG Services, Inc.
083
Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Study Document L11-1621-001, Rev. 0 Section 3, Page 40 of 54 TABLE 3.4 (continued)
COMANCHE PEAK NUCLEAR POWER PLANT, UNIT 1 SAFSTOR ALTERNATIVE SCHEDULE OF TOTAL ANNUAL EXPENDITURES (thousands, 2009 dollars)
Equipment &
Year Labor Materials Energy Burial Other Total 2063 2,696 634 139 16]
972 4457
- -5 *.....
... 5......................... * -J.....
].............
.. - -4
, 6 2064 2,701 635 139 16 9 7 4,464 2065 1,582 239 139 151 636 2,612 2066 1,582 239 139 15 1 636 2,612 2067 1,582 239 139 115 1
636 I 2,612 2068 1,587 239 139L 16 1 638j 2,619 2069 1,582 239 139 15 636 2,612 2070 1,582 239 139 15 j 636 2,612 2071 1,582 239I 139 15 636 2,612 2072 1,587 239 139 E16 i
638 2,619 2073 1,582 239 139i 15 636 2,612 2074 1,582 239 139 15 1 636 2,612 2075 1,582 239
-t, 139i-15 636 2,612 2076 1,587 239i 139 I 16 638 2,619 2077 1,582 239_
139 1 15 636 2,612 2078 1,582 239 1 1391 15 636 2,612 2079 1,582 239 139 15 636 2,612 2080 1,587 239 139 16 638 2,619 2081 1,582 239 139 15 636 2,612 2082 22,606 1,072 910 21 685 25,295 2083 43,272 5,758 1,382 4,546 5,174 60,132 2084 46,730 19,769 1,324 41,377 17,190 126,390 2085 24,542 6,113 1,067 6,844 3,611 42,177 2086 22,349 4,760 1,042 3,423 I 2,266 33,841 2087 13,845 2,902 "
628
--12,065i 1,481 20,920 2088 944 82 0
4!
290 1,320 2089 12,728 724 183 15 698 14,347 2090 10,773 7,414 153 2
195 18,537 2091 9,860 8,131 139 0
114 18,244 2092 945 780 13 0
11 1,749 374,991 100,252 16,497 60,157 104,828 656,727 TLG Services, Inc.
084
Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Study Document Li1-1621-001, Rev. 0 Section 3, Page 41 of 54 TABLE 3.4a COMANCHE PEAK NUCLEAR POWER PLANT, UNIT 1 SAFSTOR ALTERNATIVE LICENSE TERMINATION EXPENDITURES (thousands, 2009 dollars)
Equipment &
Year Labor Materials Energy Burial Other Total 2030 30,858 1,063 1,249 1 27 1,813 359 2031 21,079 4,548.
900 1,051 13,217.
40,794..
2032 902 241 139 16 1!
661 1,959 2033 900 240 139 16 659 1,953 2034 900 240 139i 16 659 1,953 2035 1,175 241 139 16 659I 2,229 2036 1,587 243-1 139 16-.
661 2646 2037 1,582 242 139 16 659 i 2,638 2038 1,582 242 1 139 16 659 2,638 2048 1,582 1
242 139_6_
65 1
2,638 2039 1,582 242 139 16 659 2,638 2040 1,587 243 139 1 16 661 1 2,646 2041 1,582 242 I 139 16 659 2,6381 2042 1,582 242 139 16 659 2,638 2043 1,582 242 139 16 659 2,638 2044 1,587 243 139 16 661 2,646 2045 1,582 242 139 16 659 2,638 2046 1,582 242 139 16 659 2,638 2047 1,582 242 139 16 659 2,638 2048 1,587 243 139 16 661 2,646 2049 1,582 242 139 16 659 I 2,638 2050 1,582 242 139 16 659 T 2,638 1 2051 1,582 242 139 16 659 2,638 2052 1,587 243 139 16 661 2,646 2053 1,582 242 139 16 659 2,638 2054 1,582 242 139 16 659 2,638 2055 1,582 242 139 16 659 2,638 2056 1,587 243 139 16 661 2,646 2057 1,582 242 139 16 659 2,638 2058 1,582 242 139 16 659 2,638 2059 1,582 242 139 16 659 2,638 2060 1,587 243 139 16 661 2,646 1 2061 1,582 242 139 16 659 2,638 2062 1,582 1 242 139 16 659 2,638 TLG Services, Inc.
085
Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Study Document L1-1621-001, Rev. 0 Section 3, Page 42 of 54 TABLE 3.4a (continued)
COMANCHE PEAK NUCLEAR POWER PLANT, UNIT 1 SAFSTOR ALTERNATIVE LICENSE TERMINATION EXPENDITURES (thousands, 2009 dollars)
Equipment &
Year Labor Materials Energy Burial Other Total 2063 1,582 242 139 16 659 2,638
........~~~~~~.......
.06
,5 2
i1 6 6
, 1 2064 1,587 243 139 16 661 2,646 2065 1,582 239 139i 15 636 2,612 2066 1,582 239 139 165 6386 2,61.29 2067 1,582 239 139 1 15 636 2,612 20671 1,582 239 139 j 15 636 2,612 2068 1,587 239 139 16 638 2,619 2069 1,582 239 1
15 636 2,612 2070 1,582 239 139 1 15 636 2,612 2071 1,582 239 139 165 636 2,612 2070 1,582 239 139 15 636 2,612 2073 1,582 239 139 1_5_
636 1 2,612 2071 1,582 239 139 15 636 2,612 2073 1,582 239 11 139 15 636 1 2,612 2074 1,587 239 139 16 638 2,619 2077 1,582 239 139 15
-636 j
2612 2076 1,587 239 139 16 638 2,1 2078 1,582 239 139 15 636 2,612 2087 1,582 239 139 15 636 2,612 2081 1,582 239 139 15 636 2,612 2082 22,191 1,072 910 21 T 685 24,879 2083 41,959 5,748 1,382 4,546 i 5,173 1 -58,807 2084 45,178 19,672 1,324 41,377 17,180 124,730 2085 23,736 6,077 1,067 6,676 3,317 40,874 2086 21,617 4,731 1,042 3,238 1,943 32,572 2087 13,403.
2884 628 1,954 1,286 20,156 2088 944 82 0
4 290 1,320 2089 12,728 724 183 15 698 14,347 2090 2,012 107 28 2
92 2,242!
2091 111 0
0 01 0
111_i 2092 11 0
0 01 o{
ii 312,536 58,768 15,665 59,693 78,286 524,948 TLG Services, Inc.
086
Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Study Document L11-1621-001, Rev. 0 Section 3, Page 43 of 54 TABLE 3.4b COMANCHE PEAK NUCLEAR POWER PLANT, UNIT 1 SAFSTOR ALTERNATIVE SPENT FUEL MANAGEMENT EXPENDITURES (thousands, 2009 dollars)
Equipment &
Year Labor Materials Energy Burial Other Total 2030 153 460 0
0 1,273 1,8861 2031 559 1,544 54 0
2,250 4,408 2032 1,186 3,216 139 0
3,554 80096 2033 1,183 3,207 139 -
0 3,545j 8,074 2034 1,183 3,207 139 0
3,545 8,074 2035 1,155 2,073 83 0
2,243 5,555 2036 1,117 393 0 -
314 1,824 2037 1,114 392' 0
01 313 1,819 2038 1,114 392 1 0
0 313 1819 2392 0
1 3
1,819
.~~.................
2040 1,117 393 0
0 3141 1,8241 2041 1,114 392 o0 0
313 1,819 2042 1,114 392 0
o0 313 1,819 2043 1,114 3921 0 I 0
313 1,819 2044 1,117 393 0
0 314 1,824 2045 1,114 392 0
0 313 1,819 2046 1,114 392 0
0 313 1,819 2047 1,114 392 0
0 313 1,819 2048 1,117 393 0
0 314 1,824 2049 1,114 392 0
ol0
_313 1,819 2050 1,114 392 0
01 313 1,819 2051 1,114 392 0
0 313 1,819 2052 1,117 393 0 1 0
314 1,824 2053 1,114 392 0
0 313 1,819 2054 1,114 392 0
0 313 1,819 2055 1,114 392 0
0 313 1,819 2056 1,117 393 0
0 314 1,824 2057 1,114 392 0
0 313 1,819 2058 1,114 392 0
0 313 1,819 2059 1,114 392 0
0 313 1,819 2060 1,117 393 0
0 314 1,824 2061 1,114 392 0
0 313 1,819 2062 1.114 392 0
0 313 1,819 TLG Services, Inc.
087
Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Study Document L11-1621-001, Rev. 0 Section 3, Page 44 of 54 TABLE 3.4b (continued)
COMANCHE PEAK NUCLEAR POWER PLANT, UNIT 1 SAFSTOR ALTERNATIVE SPENT FUEL MANAGEMENT EXPENDITURES (thousands, 2009 dollars)
Equipment &
Materials Year Labor Energy Burial Other Total 2063 1,114 392 0
0 313 1,819 2064 1,114 392
-0~
0 331 11 2065 0
__0i 01 0I 01 0
2066 0
01 01 01 0__0 207oo0 o
2065 0
00 0
0 0
2067 0
0 0 i 0
0 0
207 0 O
iO 2067 0
0 01 01 0[
0 2069 0
0, 0
00 0 0
0 2070 0
0' 0
0t 00 2070 0
0 0
0 0
0 2072 0
0 00 0
0 0
2073 0
0 0
00 0
2074 0
0 0
0 0
0 2075 00 o0 0
000 2076 0
01 0
0 0
0 2077 0
0 o
0 0 0
0 2078 0
0 0
0 0
0!
2079 0
0 0
0 0
01 2080 0
0 0
0 0
0 2081 0
07 0
0 0
51 2082 0
0 0
0 0
0 2084 0
0 0
0 0
0 200 208416 0
0 13 08 2085 6
5[
0 168 293 4721 2086 7
5
~
0 185 322 19 2087 4
30 ill1 194 313 2088
- 0.
0f o
0 0
0 2089 0
0
~
01 0
0 0
2090 208 167 0
0 13 388 2091 232 185 0
0 14 431 2092 22 18 0
0 1
41 38,228 25,460 555 464 26,331 91,037 TLG Services, Inc.
088
Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Study Document Ll1-1621-001, Rev. 0 Section 3, Page 45 of 54 TABLE 3.4c COMANCHE PEAK NUCLEAR POWER PLANT, UNIT 1 SAFSTOR ALTERNATIVE SITE RESTORATION EXPENDITURES (thousands, 2009 dollars)
Equipment &
Year Labor Materials Energy Burial Other Total 2030 0
o 0
o 0-0 0
0 2031.0 0
- 0.
0 0
0.....
20321 0
01 0
01 0
0 3...............
..... 0 -.......
........ - " ]...
...0..
2033 0
0 0
~
0 0
2033 0
0 0
0 0
0 2035 0..
o0 2036 0
0 0
0_
0 2035 0
0 0o 0t 0u 0
2038 0
0 0
0 0
2039 0
0 0
00 0
0 2039 0
0 01 0
0 0
20401 0
0!
0 0
0 0
2041 0 0 0
0 O00 2042 0
0 0
0 0
2043 0
0 0
00 0
2044 0
0 0
0 0
0 2045 0
0 0
0 0
0 2046 0
0 0
0 0
0 2047 0
0 10 0
0 01 2048 0
0 0
0 0
0!
2049 0
0 0
0 0
0 2050 0
0 0
0 0
0 2051 0
0 0
0 0
0 2052 0
0 0
0 0
0 2053 0
0 0
0 0
0 2054 0
0 0
0 0
0 2055 0
0 0
0 0
0 2056 0
0 0
0 0
0 2057 0
0 0
0 0
0 2058 0
0 0
0 0
0 2059 0
0 0
0 0
0-2060 0
0 0
0 0
0 2061 0
0 0
0 0
0 2062 0
0 0
0 0
0 TLG Services, Inc.
089
Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Study Document Li1-1621-001, Rev. 0 Section 3, Page 46 of 54 TABLE 3.4c (continued)
COMANCHE PEAK NUCLEAR POWER PLANT, UNIT 1 SAFSTOR ALTERNATIVE SITE RESTORATION EXPENDITURES (thousands, 2009 dollars)
Equipment &
Year Labor Materials Energy Burial Other Total 2063 0
0 0
01 0!
0 2064 0
01 01:
- 0.
01 0
2065 0
0 0
0 04 0
2066 0
0 0
0 0:
0
..........~~~.
2067 0
0 0
0 0
0 2068 0
0 0
0 0
0 2069 0
0 0
0 0 10 0
0 0
2070 0
0o 0
0 0
2071 0
0 0
01,,,]
0 0
2072 0
0 0
0 0
0 2073 0
01 0
0 0
0 2074 0
01 0
0 1 0
60
_ 2..8..
2_......... _ _2 _..
5 00 20875438
__4 0 0 4 0
45 2075 0
0 0
0 0
0 2076 0
0 0
0 0
0 2077 0
0 01 0
0 0
2079 0
0 0
0 0
0 2080 0
0 0
0j 0
0' 2081 0
0 0
01 0
-0 2082 416 0
0 0,0 416ý 2083 1,313 11 0
0!
1 1,325 2084 1,553 97 0
0 10 1,6609 2085 800 31 0
0j 1
8321 2086 726 24 0
0170 2087 438 14 0
O 02 452 2088 0
0 0
o0 o0 0
2089 0
0 0
oT 00 2090 8,553 7,140 125 0 T90 15,907 2091 9,517 7,945 139 0 {100 17,702_
2092 913 762 13 01 10 1,6971 24,228 16,024 277 0
212 471 TLG Services, Inc.
090
Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Study Document LI1-1621-001, Rev. 0 Section 3, Page 47 of 54 TABLE 3.5 COMANCHE PEAK NUCLEAR POWER PLANT, UNIT 2 SAFSTOR ALTERNATIVE SCHEDULE OF TOTAL ANNUAL EXPENDITURES (thousands, 2009 dollars)
Equipment &
Materials Year Labor Energy Burial Other Total 2033 35,537 6,787 1,272 27 1 2,887 46,510 2034 30,502 10,166 936 1 1,175 11,509]
54,289 2035 11,248 3,512 278 18 3,839 1 18,895 2036 11,279 3,522 279 18 2037 11,248 3,512 j 278 '1 18 j 3,839.
18,895 1 2038 7,757 2,232 220 17 2,659 12,885 2039 2,810 417 139 16 987 4,369 2040 2,818 418 1 139 i 16 990 1 4,381 2041 2,810 417 1 139 f 16 987 4,369 202280 13 T...16 i
987 I 4,369 2042 2,810 417 1 139 16 987 436 2043 2,810 417!
139i 16i 987i 4,369 2044 2,818 418 139' 16 990 4,381 2045 22810 417.
.139---------16 987 4,369 2046 2,810 417 139 16 987...
.4,3-69 2047 2,810 417 139 16 987 4,369 2048 2,818 418 1 3 9 16 990 4,381 2049 2,810 417 139 16 987 4,369 2050 2,810 417 139 16 987 4,369 2051 2,810 417 139 16 1 987 4,3 6 9 2052 2818 418 139 16 990 4,381 2053 2,810 417 139 16 987 4,369 2054 2,810 417 139 16 987 4,369 2055 2,810 417 139 16 987 4,369 2056 2,818 418 139 16 990 4,381 2057 2,810 417 139 16 987 4,369 2058 2,810 417 139 16 987 4,369 2059 2,810 417 139 16 987 4,369 2060 2,818 418 139 16 990 4,381 2061 2,810 417 139 16 987 4,369 2062 2,810 417 139 16 987 4,369 2063 2,810 417 139 16 987 4,369 2064 2,815 418 139 16 989 4,377 2065 1,724 308 139 15 664 2,851 TLG Services, Inc.
091
Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Study Document LI1-1621-001, Rev. 0 Section 3, Page 48 of 54 TABLE 3.5 (continued)
COMANCHE PEAK NUCLEAR POWER PLANT, UNIT 2 SAFSTOR ALTERNATIVE SCHEDULE OF TOTAL ANNUAL EXPENDITURES (thousands, 2009 dollars)
Equipment &
Year Labor Materials Energy Burial Other Total 2066 1,724 308 139 15 664 1 2,851 2067 1,724 308 139 15 664 2,851i 2068 1,729 309 139 16 666 1 2,859 2069 1,724 308 139 15 664 2,851 2070 1,724 308 139 15 664 2,851 2071 1,724 308 139 15j 664 2,851 2072.
1,729 309 139 16r 666 2,859 2
3 0 8 3
.5".
.............................. 2 8 i i 2073 17438139 15J 664 1 2,851 2074 1,724 308 139 15 664 2,851 2075
-1,724 308 139 15 664 1 2,851 2076 1,729 309 139 1 16i 666 2,859 2077 1,724 308 139 15 664 2,851 2078 1,724 308 139 15 664 2,851 2079 1,724 308 139 1 15 664 2,851.
2080 1,729 309 139 16 J 666 2,859 2081 1,724 308 139 15 664 2,851 2082 1,724 308 139 15 664 2,851 2083 10,409 824 653 18 668 12,572 2084 25,781 4,257 1,393 23 703 32,158 2085 45,947 20,879 1,327 33,561 14,028 115,742 2086 38,485 9,240 1,097 11,700 4,698 65,220 2087 36,243 6,056 1,042 5,482 2,070 50,893 2088 36,343 6,073 1,045 5,497 2,076 51,033 2089 27,282 2,980 540 1,890 1,125 33,817 i 2090 16,335 15,0311 153 2
169 31,689 2091 15,626 16,571 139 0
117 32,453 2092 1,498 1,589 13 0
11 3,112 1
465,692 129,640 16,783 60,134 85 764,134 TLG Services, Inc.
092
Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Study Document L11-1621-001, Rev. 0 Section 3, Page 49 of 54 TABLE 3.5a COMANCHE PEAK NUCLEAR POWER PLANT, UNIT 2 SAFSTOR ALTERNATIVE LICENSE TERMINATION EXPENDITURES (thousands, 2009 dollars)
Equipment &
Year Labor Materials Energy Burial Other Total 2033
_ 33,636 1,082 1,272 27 1
1591 37,608
... _2 _3_*
5.* 8.....................
3..8........
--A.
1_
_ 1 7 1_
3 9_.......
3
- 0 204 25,785 6,3 831 879 j 1,175 9379 43,602 2035 1,724 343 139 1 18 674 2,898 2036 1,729 344 139 1 18 676 2,906 2038 1,724 330 139 17 674 2884 2039 1,724 312i 1391 16 674
_ 2,865 2040 1,729 313 1391' 16 1 676 2,873 2041 1,724 312 1391 16 674 2,865 2042 1,724 312 139 16 674 2,865 2043 1,724 312 139 16 674 1 2,865 2044 1,729 313 1391 16 676 2,873 2045 _
1,724
.3112
-9............
1667 j2 5
2046 1,724 312 139 I 16 674 2,865 2047 1,724 312 1 139 16 674 2,865 2048 1,729 313 139 16 676 1 2,873 2049 1,724 312 139 16 674 2,865 2050 1,724 312 139 16 674 2,865 2051 1,724 312 139 16 674 2,865 2052 1,729 313 139 16 676 2,873 2053 1,724 312 139 16 674 2,865 2054 1,724 312 139 16 674 1 2,865 2055 1,724 312 139 16 674 2,865 2056 1,729 3131 139 16 676 1 2,873 2057 1,724 312 139 16 674 2,865 2058 1,724 312 1 139 16 674 2,865 2059 1,724 312 t 139 16 674 2,865 2060 1,729 313 139 16 676 2,873 2061 1,724 312 139 16 674 2,865 2062 1,724 312 139 16 674 2,865 2063 1,724 312 139 16 674 2,865 2064 1,729 313 139 16 676 2,873 2065 1,724 3081 139 15 664]
2,851 TLG Services, Inc.
093
Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Study Document Li1-1621-001, Rev. 0 Section 3, Page 50 of 54 TABLE 3.5a (continued)
COMANCHE PEAK NUCLEAR POWER PLANT, UNIT 2 SAFSTOR ALTERNATIVE LICENSE TERMINATION EXPENDITURES (thousands, 2009 dollars)
Equipment &
Year Labor Materials Energy Burial Other Total 2066 1,724 308
__139 15 664 1 2,851 2067
__1,724 308 139 15 664 1 2,851
...20 6 7.......
- 0
- I.... i 3
£ -........................... -...........................
2068 1,729 309 139 16 666 2,859 2069_.............. 1,724 308 1 139.
15 664 2,851 2070 1,724
_3081 139 15_
664d 2,851!
2071 1,724 308 i 139i 15 i 664 2,851 2071 1,724 308 139 15 6646 2,851 2072...
1,729..............
-**................. 309T 139........
165 6664 !_
2,859 2074 1,724 308i 139 i 15i 6641 2,851 20 5..
7_4_ _
0 1
9 I........
.1
.5 k.....
-6.6 -.........
_-8 5--
2073 1,724 308 139 15 664 2,851 2076 1,29 3089 139J 156 66 2,859 2074 1,724 308 139 15 1 664 1 2,851 2079 1,724
.3081 139 15!
664 I 2,851 2080 1729 309 139 16 666 2,859 2081 1,724 308 l 139 15 664 2,85!'
2082 1,724 308 139 15 664 2,851 2083 10,290 824 653 18 668 12,453 2084 25,302 4,257 1,393 23 703 31,679 2085 44,017 20,766 13 6
4,019 113,689 2086 37,212 9,173 1,097 11,582 64490 632553 2087 35,162 6,003i 1,042 5,334 1,813 49,354 2088 35,258 6,020 1,045 5,349 1,818 49,489 2089 26,32,257 540 1,840 1,037 31,6790 2090 2,335 140 28 2
64 2,569 2091 47 0
0 0
0 47 2092 5
0 0
0 0
5 358,787 72,649 15,950 59,670 67,774 574,830 TLG Services, Inc.
094
Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Study Document Ll1-1621-001, Rev. 0 Section 3, Page 51 of 54 TABLE 3.5b COMANCHE PEAK NUCLEAR POWER PLANT, UNIT 2 SAFSTOR ALTERNATIVE SPENT FUEL MANAGEMENT EXPENDITURES (thousands, 2009 dollars)
Equipment &
Year Labor Materials Energy Burial Other Total 2033 1,902 5,7051 0
0 1 296_
8,902 2034 4,717 3,783 57 0 I 2,130 1,8 0
210 1
10,687 7
3,7 8 3 2035 9,523 3,170 139 0 1 3,165 F 15,997 2036 9,550 139 0
3,173 16,041 2037 9,523 3,170 39 0i 3,165 15,997 2038 6,033 1,902 81 0
1,985i 10,001 2039 1,086 1051 0 I0 313 1,504 2040 1,089 105 !
0 0 0
314!
1,508 2041 1,086 105 0
0 3131 15041 2042 1,086 1051 0'
0 313 504 2043 1,086 1051 0
01 313 1,504 2044 1,089 1051 0
0 314 1,508 2045__
1,086 0
313 1,5041 2046 1,086 1051 0
01 313 1,504 2047 1,086 105 0
0 313 1,504 2047 1,086 105 0
0 313 1,504 2048 1,089 105 0
0 314 1,508 2049 1,086 105 0
0 313 1,504 2050 1,086 105 0
0 313 1 504 2051 1,086 105 0
0 313 1,504 2052 1,089 105 0
0 314 1504 2053 1,086 105 0
0 313 1,504 1 2054 1,086 105 0
0 313 1,504 2055 1,086 105 0
0 313 1,504 2056 1,089 105 0
0 314 1,508 2057 1,086 105 0
0 313 1,504 2058 1,086 105 0
0 313 1,504 2059 1,086 105 0
0 313 1,504 2060 1,089 105 0
0 314 1,508 2061 1,086 105 0
0 313 1,504 2062 1,086 105 0
0 313 1,504 2063 1,086 105 0
0 313 1,504 2064 1,8 1051 0
0 313 j!04j 2065 0
0 i1 0
0 0
0o TLG Services, Inc.
095
Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Study Document L11-1621-001, Rev. 0 Section 3, Page 52 of 54 TABLE 3.5b (continued)
COMANCHE PEAK NUCLEAR POWER PLANT, UNIT 2 SAFSTOR ALTERNATIVE SPENT FUEL MANAGEMENT EXPENDITURES (thousands, 2009 dollars)
Equipment &
Materials Year Labor Energy Burial Other Total 2066 0
0 0
0 i 0
1_
0 2069 0
0 i0 0
01 0
2070o 0
Oo 0:
o[
01 _o 2071 0
00 0j 0o 2072 0
0 o0 0
0o 0
2073 0
0 0!
01 0
0 0___
0 2070 0
0 0!.
0 0
2076 0
0 0
0 01 0
2077 0
0 0
0 0
0 20785.
0 O.0 0
0 0
2079 0
0 0
0 0!
0 2074 0
0 1 00 0
0 20785 0
0 0
0 20901 0
0 2080O 0
0' 0
0 01 0_
2081 0
0 0
0 0
2082 0
01 0
0 0
0 2083 0
0 0
0 0
0 2084 0
0 0
0 0
0 2085 0
0 0
0 0
0 2086 4
3 0
118 207 332 2087 5
4 0
147 257 414 2088 5
4 0
148 258 415 2089 2
1 0
51 88 142 2090 208 167 0
0 13 388 2091 232 185 0
0 14 431 2092 22 18 0
0 14 41 69,974 24,019 555 464 23,896 118,908 TLG Services, Inc.
096
Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Study Document L11-1621-001, Rev. 0 Section 3, Page 53 of 54 TABLE 3.5c COMANCHE PEAK NUCLEAR POWER PLANT, UNIT 2 SAFSTOR ALTERNATIVE SITE RESTORATION EXPENDITURES (thousands, 2009 dollars)
Equipment &
Year Labor Materials Energy Burial Other Total 2033 0
0i 0l 0
0 0
2036 ~~~
................. O_
.... 0 _
2034 0 0 O0 O A 0
"T-..
..~
~.........
2035 0
O0 0
0 0
0
!4 2036 0
0 0
0 0
2037 0
o 0
o 0 o
0 2038 0
0 0
01 0_
O 0
2039 0
o0 o
o0i 0
0 0
2040 0
0 0
0 0
0 2041 0
0 0
0 [0 0
2042 0
0 0 10 2043 0
o oo 0
o0 of o_
2045 0
0 0
0 0
0 2046 0
0 0
0 00 2047 0
0 0
0 0
0 2048 0
- 0.
0
- 0.
0 0
2049 0
0 0
01 0
0 2050 0
0 0
0 0
0 2051 0
0 0
0 0
0 2052 0
0 0
0 0
0 2053 0
0 0
0 0
0 2054 0
0 0
0 0
0 2055 0
0 0
0 0
0 2056 0
0 0
0 0
0 2057 0
0 0
0 0
0 2058 0
0 0
0 0
0 2056 0
0 0
0 0
0 2060 0
0 0
0 0
0 2058 0
0 0
0 0
2062 0
0 0
0 0
0 2063 0
0 0
0 0
0 2064 0
0 0
0[
0 0
2065 0
0 0
0' 0
01 TLG Services, Inc.
097
Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Study Document Ll1-1621-001, Rev. 0 Section 3, Page 54 of 54 TABLE 3.5c (continued)
COMANCHE PEAK NUCLEAR POWER PLANT, UNIT 2 SAFSTOR ALTERNATIVE SITE RESTORATION EXPENDITURES (thousands, 2009 dollars)
Equipment &
Year Labor Materials Energy Burial Other Total 2066 0
0 0
o o_
0 0
0 2068 0
0 0
0 0
0 A -
- o.
2069 0
0 0
0 0
0 2070 0
0 0
0 0
2071 0
0 0
0 0
0 2072 0
000j 0i 0
2073 0
01 0
0 01 0
2076 0
0 o
0 o0 0
2077 0
0 0
0 0
2078 0
0 01 0
0 0
2079 0
0 0
01 0'
0 2085 0
0 0
-4 0!
0 0
2079 0
0 o
0 o1 0
2081 0
0 0
0 0
0 2083 119 0
0 0 !0 119 2084 479 0
0 0 !0 479 2085 1,930 113 0
0 1 9
2,053 2086 1,269 64 0
0 2
1,335 2087 1,077 49 0
0 0
1,125 2088 1,079 49 0
0 0
1,128 2089 369 17 0
0 0
385 2090 13,791 14,724 125 0
92 28,733 2091 15,347 16,385 139 0
103 31,974 2092 1,472 1571 13 o0 10 3,066 36,932 32,972 277 0
216 70,396 TLG Services, Inc.
098
Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant Document L11-1621-001, Rev. 0 Decommissioning Cost Study Section 4, Page 1 of 7
- 4. SCHEDULE ESTIMATE The schedules for the decommissioning scenarios considered in this study follow the sequences presented in the AIF/NESP-036 study, with minor changes to reflect recent experience and site-specific constraints. In addition, the scheduling has been revised to reflect the spent fuel management plan described in Section 3.5.1.
A schedule or sequence of activities for the DECON alternative is presented in Figure 4.1. The scheduling sequence is based on the fuel being removed from the spent fuel pools within five and one half years. The key activities listed in the schedule do not reflect a one-to-one correspondence with those activities in the cost tables, but reflect dividing some activities for clarity and combining others for convenience. The schedule was prepared using the "Microsoft Project Professional 2003" computer software.1271 4.1 SCHEDULE ESTIMATE ASSUMPTIONS The schedule reflects the results of a precedence network developed for the site decommissioning activities, i.e., a PERT (Program Evaluation and Review Technique) Software Package. The work activity durations used in the precedence network reflect the actual man-hour estimates from the cost table, adjusted by stretching certain activities over their slack range and shifting the start and end dates of others. The following assumptions were made in the development of the decommissioning schedule:
" The fuel handling area is isolated until such time that all spent fuel has been discharged from the spent fuel pools to the DOE or to the ISFSI for interim storage. Decontamination and dismantling of the storage pools is initiated once the transfer of spent fuel is complete (DECON alternative).
- All work (except vessel and internals removal) is performed during an 8-hour workday, 5 days per week, with no overtime. There are eleven paid holidays per year.
- Reactor and internals removal activities are performed by using separate crews for different activities working on different shifts, with a corresponding backshift charge for the second shift.
o Multiple crews work parallel activities to the maximum extent possible, consistent with optimum efficiency, adequate access for cutting, removal and laydown space, and with the stringent safety measures necessary during demolition of heavy components and structures.
TLG Services, Inc.
099
Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Study Document L11-1621-001, Rev. 0 Section 4, Page 2 of 7 o For plant systems removal, the systems with the longest removal durations in areas on the critical path are considered to determine the duration of the activity.
4.2 PROJECT SCHEDULE The period-dependent costs presented in the detailed cost tables are based upon the durations developed in the schedules for decommissioning. Durations are established between several milestones in each project period; these durations are used to establish a critical path for the entire project. In turn, the critical path duration for each period is used as the basis for determining the period-dependent costs. A second critical path is shown for the spent fuel storage period, which determines the release of the fuel storage area for final decontamination.
Project timelines are provided in Figures 4.2 and 4.3, with milestone dates based on the 2030 and 2033 shutdown dates for Units 1 and 2, respectively. The fuel pools are emptied approximately five and one half years after shutdown, while ISFSI operations continue until the DOE can complete the transfer of assemblies to its geologic repository. Deferred decommissioning in the SAFSTOR alternative is assumed to commence so that the operating license is terminated within a 60-year period from the cessation of plant operations.
TLG Services, Inc.
100
Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Study Document L11-1621-001, Rev. 0 Section 4, Page 3 of 7 FIGURE 4.1 ACTIVITY SCHEDULE I
f'PSE~S DECON, Unit 1 2 sciv-iule Shuct~down t :ml I I 7elrit)I Il t Unit I - ShiltdownM thi-Oug LW311itriI Fuel ieluovgi' por" lc, Preparec activity s5pocifications 1
N.erform ite tuchnruwc~rizaticrn Cutfaeof peonlizintnt tinof Og.-rnl ionuý Aubrifittud I SI)ARl s chinitt cd WVrit (ell cctrtficate a17;en'cnalneil unlnovul of fuel tuubinit tud Site sq~circ dvrzr rnnii uoning costu etuhiznate submiittrd DOC: sw~ffnobih*e1 Unit; 2 COporations Fuiel Smcolagye pool ofem-aijolts r{k-folfigtlre plant (0)oo(l end)
[
Dry fuel storage opearttions i]
P'repare deitauiled work piceduros Decon NSSS
[
Isolgtieq'p'ett fuel Pool......
Period id unit I. - Large cuixorn neml(, reroval FuelI storage ipool operations, Dry lael storagv jopertilons isa turmiite4eonerator Main condon7sue i~ieLparation. rbr reactor v cc,-% romoval eactor vessel &imiteennis 1Remaining lar-ge, NISSScoutnpoune dieposifion Shiutdown Unit 20 Taskm I
Cr~ica Task L,~fi~~-s Mllestae
+
surunary 14OMOM TLG Services, Inc.
101
Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant Document L1J-1621-001, Rev. 0 Decommissioning Cost Study Section 4, Page 4 of 7 FIGURE 4.1 (continued)
ACTIVITY SCHEDULE
-ID~ I Task Name
[f7-117=1jj 5 1 YG I Y7 IY8 IY9 10Y1l IYILY13Y lI I
I I
I 44 Period la Unit 2 - Shutdown through transition 43 lal slilore poill (ID* rhttOOl 4"---
I{,eronrfiru ra* plantl 4-Dry fIel setorage operationq 49 Prepare aetivity spccificutions 50 Perform site clmaracterization 4"5 vt tifi ca: et" pwaina
- r. r.45 as tio n of oper*t ino.nsonitted 5.1 PSODAR submitted 52 Written veili [icatc of prmuanont removal of fuel submit ted 53 Site spleific decoissioning cost estim ate suhbmitted
+
.54 r) snff mohilized 29 Period 2b Unit I -Decontonination (wet fuel)
-30 Reactor Building Decon 31 Pl))! stowage Inx)0 loeraw iuns 32 Dry fu-iel storage operatinnA
,33 Remove,ystems not supporting wet fuel Atorage 3t De.on buildings not supporting wet fuel. storage*.
55 Period "i1,tUnit 2.'DI.eeornmiss~r*ianig preparations Er?
Fuel storage pool operations 57 Reconfigure plant (continued) 58 Dry fuel storage operations 5"9 Prepire detailed work procedures t
OftDevo NSSS 5
61
.late
-spent fiel pool.
35 Period ý.bnit i -Decontamination ullulwiug vwet fuel storage 36 Dry fuel storage operations 37 Remove spent fuel caoling system components 38 Decon wet fuel storage area 62 Period 2a Unit 2 - Large component removal 63 Fuel storage pool operations Task ~
cniftc Task 7
7>, 7 wrietes Summary TLG Services, Inc.
102
Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Study Document L11-1621-001, Rev. 0 Section 4, Page 5 of 7 FIGURE 4.1 (continued)
ACTIVITY SCHEDULE ID I Tack Name 1Yil1Yl 1Y21V31Y41Y1, IOY11YI *'k" 13YI 4 OYIIylgyl3yl 64, M
66 67 68 69 10 40 2
73 74 7.5 76 77 78 79,
-- z--
h8 85 88 92 64 Dmy fuel Itinwugn operutionne 65 replnriona for rit'eac.t ve1-rl 1'E0rnv1wll 66 encWtoa1 vv'4i-pl k-int nnals R~emini~tng large NSSSi comp-IO ný dtois 101ositiot 68 NoUaLxoSscmtial cyltenna Mlain t Urbine/gencr ator 70 min condenser 7.1a~t I teitni nil ion pl6ra ubmtittOd J'erictd 2d 1 Unit 1, - Delay bczlbre L.icense Teirm S~tart Delaty 72 Period 2b Unit 2 - Decontammination (wet fuel) 73 Fuel storae.e pool operatione 74 1)rv fi(A, StL.,tr,,g. Opcrki-tj(,t l)Re.MOWe rysrettle not sup1Jporting Wet 1111Pr.1 ag 76 Decon buildings not supporting Not, fupl. storage 77c rt ne t o rni nat ion plan a ppIrovedi 78auttl storage, pool amvailable rn,' decomal-m-tuot(intt 79 Period 2e Unit 2 - Decontamnination following wet fuel 5torage Dz !ue torage Operationsg 81 Remove remaining -systemns 82 cean wet fioal sioraltil nm naf Iur iod 2e Unit 1 &2 - Plont lieanasc tentrtain.L01 Div fulstor age ope rat ions N-1,L review & ap proval ar 0limnnsotoiyminatorl eri od SoIT n it I & 2-Site r es torn tion delaE y 91 Period 3'b Unit I & 2 - Site restoration 92 Building detuovlitivits, backfill and laadscaý,ping 7
Task Crittlca Task,~lIi~
Mileston.
ýSumnsry WMMM TLG Services, Inc.
103
Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant Document Ll1-1621-001, Rev. 0 Decommissioning Cost Study Section 4, Page 6 of 7 FIGURE 4.2 DECOMMISSIONING TIMELINE DECON (not to scale)
Unit 1 (Shutdown February 7, 2030)
Pool and ISFSI Operations ISFSI Operations Period 3 Site Period 1 Transition and Preparations Period 2 Decommissioning lSFSI Operations ISFSI 02/2030 08/2031 03/2040 02/2042 12/2064 06/2065 Storage Pools Empty 08/2038 Unit 2 (Shutdown February 1, 2033)
Period 1 Transition and Preparations Period 2 Decommissioning 02/2033 Period 3 Site Restoration 0
02/2042 ISFSI Operations II ISFSI D&DI 08/2034 03/204' 12/2064 06/2065 v
TLG Services, Inc.'
104
Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant Document L11-1621-001, Rev. 0 Decommissioning Cost Study Section 4, Page 7 of 7 FIGURE 4.3 DECOMMISSIONING TIMELINE SAFSTOR (not to scale)
Unit 1 (Shutdown February 7, 2030)
Period 1 Transition and Preparations Period 2 Dormancy Period 3 Delayed Preparations Period 4 Decommissioning Period 5 Site Restoration I
I 2
02/2030 08/2031 05/2082 11/2083 02/2090 02/2092 Storage Pools Empty 08/2038 S
Spent Fuel Storage ISFSI Empty 12/2064 Unit 2 (Shutdown February 1, 2033)
Period 1 Transition and Period 2 Dormancy Period 3 Period 4 Period 5 Delayed Decommissioning Site 02/2033 08/2034 08/2083 02/2085 02/2090 02/2092 TLG Services, Inc.
105
Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant Document Li1-1621-001, Rev. 0 Decommissioning Cost Study Section 5, Page I of 4
- 5. RADIOACTIVE WASTES The objectives of the decommissioning process are the removal of all radioactive material from the site that would restrict its future use and the termination of the NRC license. This currently requires the remediation of all radioactive material at the site in excess of applicable legal limits. Under the Atomic Energy Act,1281 the NRC is responsible for protecting the public from sources of ionizing radiation. Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations delineates the production, utilization, and disposal of radioactive materials and processes. In particular, Part 71 defines radioactive material as it pertains to transportation and Part 61 specifies its disposition.
Most of the materials being transported for controlled burial are categorized as Low Specific Activity (LSA) or Surface Contaminated Object (SCO) materials containing Type A quantities, as defined in 49 CFR Parts 173-178. Shipping containers are required to be Industrial Packages (IP-1, IP-2 or IP-3, as defined in 10 CFR
§173.411). For this study, commercially available steel containers are presumed to be used for the disposal of piping, small components, and concrete. Larger components can serve as their own containers, with proper closure of all openings, access ways, and penetrations.
The volumes of radioactive waste generated during the various decommissioning activities at the site are shown on a line-item basis in Appendices C and D, and summarized in Tables 5.1 and 5.2. The quantified waste volume summaries shown in these tables are consistent with Part 61 classifications. The volumes are calculated based on the exterior dimensions for containerized material and on the displaced volume of components serving as their own waste containers.
The reactor vessel and internals are categorized as large quantity shipments and, accordingly, will be shipped in reusable, shielded truck casks with disposable liners.
In calculating disposal costs, the burial fees are applied against the liner volume, as well as the special handling requirements of the payload. Packaging efficiencies are lower for the highly activated materials (greater than Type A quantity waste),
where high concentrations of gamma-emitting radionuclides limit the capacity of the shipping canisters.
No process system containing/handling radioactive substances at shutdown is presumed to meet material release criteria by decay alone (i.e., systems radioactive at shutdown will still be radioactive over the time period during which the decommissioning is accomplished, due to the presence of long-lived radionuclides)..
While the dose rates decrease with time, radionuclides such as 137Cs will still control the disposition requirements.
TLG Services, Inc.
106
Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Study Document Lil-1621-001, Rev. 0 Section 5, Page 2 of 4 The waste material produced in the decontamination and dismantling of the nuclear plants is primarily generated during Period 2 of DECON and Period 4 of SAFSTOR. Material that is considered potentially contaminated when removed from the radiological controlled area is sent to processing facilities in Tennessee for conditioning and disposal. Heavily contaminated components and activated materials are routed for controlled disposal. The disposal volumes reported in the tables reflect the savings resulting from reprocessing and recycling.
For purposes of constructing the estimates, the Luminant's current cost for disposal at the EnergySolutions facility was used as a proxy for Waste Control Specialists' yet-to-be constructed Andrews County facility. Separate rates were used for containerized waste and large components.
Demolition debris including miscellaneous steel, scaffolding, and concrete was disposed of at a bulk rate. The decommissioning waste stream also included resins and dry active waste.
Since EnergySolutions is not currently able to receive the more highly radioactive components generated in the decontamination and dismantling of the reactor, disposal costs for the Class B and C material were based upon the last published rate schedule for non-compact waste for the Barnwell facility (as a proxy).
Additional surcharges were included for activity, dose rate, and/or handling added as appropriate for a particular package.
TLG Services, Inc.
107
Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Study Document L11-1621-001, Rev. 0 Section 5, Page 3 of 4 TABLE 5.1 DECON ALTERNATIVE DECOMMISSIONING WASTE
SUMMARY
Waste Low-Level Radioactive Waste (near-surface disposal)
Cost Basis Class [1]
Waste Volume (cubic feet)
Ene Slton E
n....
u...n
-_---.1-Barnwell Barnwell Spent Fuel Equivalent A
B 244,213 7,971 Mass 20,377,455 993,361 208,292
+
C 18 Greater than Class C (geologic repository) 1,010 GTCC Toa 1[21~-
254,113
__21,676,004 Processed/Conditioned Recycling (off-site recycling center)
Vendors A
396,629 15,295,339
[I]
Waste is classified according to the requirements as delineated in Title 10 CFR, Part 61.55
[2]
Columns may not add due to rounding.
TLG Services, Inc.
108
Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Study Document L11-1621-001, Rev. 0 Section 5, Page 4 of 4 TABLE 5.2 SAFSTOR ALTERNATIVE DECOMMISSIONING WASTE
SUMMARY
Waste Cost Basis Low-Level Radioactive EnergSolutions Waste (near-surface disposal)
I Barnwell SWaste Volume Mass Class ['I j (cubic feet)
.(pounds)
I..
B 6,660 704,866 C
939.
95,516 GTC1010 208.292 Barnwell Greater than Class C
(@eolouic rep)ositorv)
Spent Fuel Eauivalent Total [2]
221,513 17,019,526 Processed/Conditioned Recycling off-sit ycing center)
Vendors A
477,172 18,650,521
[Il Waste is classified according to the requirements as delineated in Title 10 CFR, Part 61.55
[21 Columns may not add due to rounding.
TLG Services, Inc.
109
Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant Document L11-1621-001, Rev. 0 Decommissioning Cost Study Section 6, Page I of 5
- 6. RESULTS The analysis to estimate the costs to decommission Comanche Peak relied upon the site-specific, technical information developed for a previous analysis prepared in 2005, updated to reflect current assumptions pertaining to the disposition of the nuclear station and relevant industry experience in undertaking such projects.
While not an engineering study, the estimates provide Luminant with sufficient information to assess their financial obligations, as they pertain to the eventual decommissioning of the nuclear station.
The estimates described in this report are based on numerous fundamental assumptions, including regulatory requirements, project contingencies, low-level radioactive waste disposal practices, high-level radioactive waste management options, and site restoration requirements. The decommissioning scenarios assume continued operation of the station's spent fuel pools for a minimum of five and one half years following the cessation of operations for continued cooling of the assemblies.
The cost projected to promptly decommission the station, manage the spent fuel, and restore the site, is estimated to be $1,224.4 million. The majority of this cost (approximately 74.5%) is associated with the physical decontamination and dismantling of the nuclear plant so that the operating license can be terminated.
Another 16.6% is associated with the management, interim storage, and eventual transfer of the spent fuel. The remaining 8.9% is for the demolition of the designated structures and limited restoration of the site.
The cost projected for deferred decommissioning (SAFSTOR) is estimated to be
$1,420.9 million. The majority of this cost (approximately 77.4%) is associated with placing the plant in storage, ongoing caretaking of the plant during dormancy, and the eventual physical decontamination and dismantling of the nuclear plant so that the operating license can be terminated. Another 14.8% is associated with the management, interim storage, and eventual transfer of the spent fuel. The remaining 7.8% is for the demolition of the designated structures and limited restoration of the site.
The primary cost contributors, identified in Tables 6.1 and 6.2, are either labor-related or associated with the management and disposition of the radioactive waste.
Program management is the largest single contributor to the overall cost. The magnitude of the expense is a function of both the size of the organization required to manage the decommissioning, as well as the duration of the program. It is assumed, for purposes of this analysis, that Luminant will hire a Decommissioning Operations Contractor (DOC) to manage the decommissioning. The owner will TLG Services, Inc.
110
Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant Document Li1-1621-001, Rev. 0 Decommissioning Cost Study Section 6, Page 2 of 5 provide site security, radiological health and safety, quality assurance and overall site administration during the decommissioning and demolition phases. Contract personnel will provide engineering services, e.g., for preparing the activity specifications, work procedures, activation, and structural analyses, under the direction of the owner. The size and composition of the management organization varies with the decommissioning phase and associated site activities. However, once the operating licenses are terminated, the staff is substantially reduced for the conventional demolition and restoration of the site, and the long-term care of the spent fuel (for the DECON alternative). Finally, both the estimates for DECON and SAFSTOR include the costs of disposing of the retired steam generators and the reactor vessel closure head from Unit 1. The study assumes that the disposal of the components would occur after shutdown, however, the costs are identified separately because the disposal activities could be conducted at anytime.
As described in this report, the spent fuel pools will remain operational for a minimum of five and one half years following the cessation of operations. The pools will be isolated and an independent spent fuel island created. This will allow decommissioning operations to proceed in and around the pool area. Over the five and one half-year period, the spent fuel will be packaged into transportable canisters for loading into a DOE-provided transport cask or relocation to the ISFSI.
The cost for waste disposal includes only those costs associated with the controlled disposition of the low-level radioactive waste generated from decontamination and dismantling activities, including plant equipment and components, structural material, filters, resins and dry-active waste. As described in Section 5, disposition of the majority of the low-level radioactive material requiring controlled disposal will be at Waste Control Specialists' Andrews County facility. Highly activated components, requiring additional isolation from the environment (GTCC), are packaged for geologic disposal. The cost of geologic disposal is based upon a cost equivalent for spent fuel.
A significant portion of the metallic waste is designated for additional processing and treatment at an off-site facility. Processing reduces the volume of material requiring controlled disposal through such techniques and processes as survey and sorting, decontamination, and volume reduction. The material that cannot be unconditionally released is packaged for controlled disposal at one of the currently operating facilities. The cost identified in the summary tables for processing is all-inclusive, incorporating the ultimate disposition of the material.
Removal costs reflect the labor-intensive nature of the decommissioning process, as well as the management controls required to ensure a safe and successful program.
Decontamination and packaging costs also have a large labor component that is based upon prevailing wages. Non-radiological demolition is a natural extension of TLG Services, Inc.
111
Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant Document Ll1-1621-001, Rev. 0 Decommissioning Cost Study Section 6, Page 3 of 5 the decommissioning process.
With a
work force mobilized to support decommissioning operations, non-radiological demolition can be an integrated activity and a logical expansion of the work being performed in the process of terminating the operating license. Prompt demolition reduces future liabilities and can be more cost effective than deferral, due to the deterioration of the facilities (and therefore the working conditions) with time.
The reported cost for transport includes the tariffs and surcharges associated with moving large components and/or overweight shielded casks overland, as well as the general expense, e.g., labor and fuel, of transporting material to the destinations identified in this report. For purposes of this analysis, material is primarily moved overland by truck.
Decontamination is used to reduce the plant's radiation fields and minimize worker exposure. Slightly contaminated material or material located within a contaminated area is sent to an off-site processing center, i.e., this analysis does not assume that contaminated plant components and equipment can be decontaminated for uncontrolled release in-situ. Centralized processing centers have proven to be a more economical means of handling the large volumes of material produced in the dismantling of a nuclear plant.
License termination survey costs are associated with the labor intensive and complex activity of verifying that contamination has been removed from the site to the levels specified by the regulating agency. This process involves a systematic survey of all remaining plant surface areas and surrounding environs, sampling, isotopic analysis, and documentation of the findings. The status of any plant components and materials not removed in the decommissioning process will also require confirmation and will add to the expense of surveying the facilities alone.
The remaining costs include allocations for heavy equipment and temporary services, as well as for other expenses such as regulatory fees and the premiums for nuclear insurance. While site operating costs are greatly reduced following the final cessation of plant operations, certain administrative functions do need to be maintained either at a basic functional or regulatory level.
TLG Services, Inc.
112
Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Study Document L11-1621-001, Rev. 0 Section 6, Page 4 of 5 TABLE 6.1 DECON ALTERNATIVE DECOMMISSIONING COST ELEMENTS (thousands of 2009 dollars)
Cost Element Total i.Percentage 2 4,9 45...
2.0Jl li i i :; l l Decontamination Removal Packa gin.
Transportation 24,945 197,066 30,897 2.0 2.5 1.1 12,952 12,952 Waste Disposal 145,737 11.9 Off-site Waste Processing.....
41,754 3.4 Program Management 1
545,029
- 44. 5 g.........
.........I......
_Spent Fuel Pool Isolation 18,5721__.................
1.5 Spent Fuel Management (Direct Costs) [21 103,765 8.5 Insurance and Regulatory Fees 27,477.
2.2 Energ~y
__16,214 1.3 Characterization and Licexnsing 6ur2,718432 1.8 Property Taxes 6,718 0.5 Miscellaneous Equipment 13,012 I 1.1 Decommissioning Staff Severance 18,868 1.5 Total [31 1,224,435 100.0 Cost Element Total Percentage-License Termination (excluding retired large components) 890,160 72.7 Large Components (retired) [4]
21,540 1.8 Spent Fuel Management 203,255 16.6 Site Restoration 109,481 8.9 Total [3]
1,224,435 100.0 I1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
Includes engineering costs Excludes program management costs (staffing) but includes costs for spent fuel loading/transfer costs/spent fuel pool O&M and EP fees Column may not add due to rounding Includes retired steam generators and reactor closure head from jnit 1 and turbine rotors from Unit 2 TLG Services, Inc.
113
Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant Document L11-1621-001, Rev. 0 Decommissioning Cost Study Section 6, Page 5 of 5 TABLE 6.2 SAFSTOR ALTERNATIVE DECOMMISSIONING COST ELEMENTS (thousands of 2009 dollars)
FCost Element Total Percenta Decontamination 24,474 1.7 i
199,699 14.1
[ P a g _ g
......................... 2..
5............
Packaging--.-.--
21,532
_1.5
, T ra rtation 10,976 0.8 Waste Disposal 94,396 6.6 Off-site Waste Processin.
50,821 3.61 Program-Management[
1 698,4541 49.2 Spent Fuel Pool Isolation 18,572 1.3 Spent Fuel Management (Direct Costs) [2]
96,899 6.8 Insurance and Regulatory Fees 72,192 5.1 Enr33,2801 2.3 Characterization and LicensingSurveys 24,190 1.7 Property Taxes 11,991 0.8 Miscellaneous Equipment 46,493 3.3 Decommissioning Staff Severance F
16,891 1.2 T
1,420,8601 100.0 Cost Element Total Percentage License Termination (excluding retired large components) 1,078,294 75.9 Large Components (retired) [4]
21,484 1.5 Spent Fuel Management 209,945 14.8 Site Restoration 111,137 7.8 Total [3]
1,420,860 100.0 III Includes engineering costs
[21 Excludes program management costs (staffing) but includes costs for spent fuel loading/transfer costs/spent fuel pool O&M and EP fees
[31 Column may not add due to rounding
[4] Includes retired steam generators and reactor closure head from Unit 1 and turbine rotors from Unit 2 TLG Services, Inc.
114
Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant Document Ll1-1621-001, Rev. 0 Decommissioning Cost Study Section 7, Page 1 of 3
- 7. REFERENCES
- 1.
"Decommissioning Cost Analysis for the Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station," Document T04-1471-002, Rev. 1, TLG Services, Inc., May 2005
- 2.
U.S. Code of Federal Regulations, Title 10, Parts 30, 40, 50, 51, 70 and 72, "General Requirements for Decommissioning Nuclear Facilities," Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Federal Register Volume 53, Number 123 (p 24018 et seq.), June 27, 1988
- 3.
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Regulatory Guide 1.159, "Assuring the Availability of Funds for Decommissioning Nuclear Reactors," October 2003
- 4.
U.S. Code of Federal Regulations, Title 10, Part 20, Subpart E, "Radiological Criteria for License Termination"
- 5.
U.S. Code of Federal Regulations, Title 10, Parts 20 and 50, "Entombment Options for Power Reactors," Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, Federal Register Volume 66, Number 200, October 16, 2001
- 6.
U.S.
Code of Federal Regulations, Title 10, Parts 2,
50 and 51, "Decommissioning of Nuclear Power Reactors,"
Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Federal Register Volume 61 (p 39278 et seq.), July 29, 1996.
- 7.
"Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982 and Amendments," U.S. Department of Energy's Office of Civilian Radioactive Management, 1982
- 8.
U.S. Code of Federal Regulations, Title 10, Part 50, "Domestic Licensing of Production and Utilization Facilities," Subpart 54 (bb), "Conditions of Licenses"
- 9.
"Low Level Radioactive Waste Policy Act," Public Law 96-573, 1980
- 10.
"Low-Level Radioactive Waste Policy Amendments Act of 1985," Public Law 99-240, 1986
- 11.
Waste is classified in accordance with U.S. Code of Federal Regulations, Title 10, Part 61.55
- 12.
U.S. Code of Federal Regulations, Title 10, Part 20, Subpart E, "Radiological Criteria for License Termination," Federal Register, Volume 62, Number 139 (p 39058 et seq.), July 21, 1997 TLG Services, Inc.
115
Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant Document L11-1621-001, Rev. 0 Decommissioning Cost Study Section 7, Page 2 of 3
- 7. REFERENCES (continued)
- 13.
"Establishment of Cleanup Levels for CERCLA Sites with Radioactive Contamination," EPA Memorandum OSWER No. 9200.4-18, August 22, 1997.
- 14.
U.S.
Code of Federal Regulations, Title 40, Part 141.16, "Maximum contaminant levels for beta particle and photon radioactivity from man-made radionuclides in community water systems"
- 15.
"Memorandum of Understanding Between the Environmental Protection Agency and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission: Consultation and Finality on Decommissioning and Decontamination of Contaminated Sites," OSWER 9295.8-06a, October 9, 2002
- 16.
"Multi-Agency Radiation Survey and Site Investigation Manual (MARSSIM),"
NUREG/CR-1575, Rev. 1, EPA 402-R-97-016, Rev. 1, August 2000
- 17.
T.S. LaGuardia et al., "Guidelines for Producing Commercial Nuclear Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Estimates," AIF/NESP-036, May 1986
- 18.
W.J. Manion and T.S. LaGuardia, "Decommissioning Handbook," U.S.
Department of Energy, DOE/EV/10128-1, November 1980
- 19.
"Building Construction Cost Data 2009," Robert Snow Means Company, Inc.,
Kingston, Massachusetts
- 20.
Project and Cost Engineers' Handbook, Second Edition, p. 239, American Association of Cost Engineers, Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, New York, 1984
- 21.
U.S. Department of Transportation, Title 49 of the Code of Federal Regulations, "Transportation," Parts 173 through 178
- 22.
Tri-State Motor Transit Company, published tariffs, Interstate Commerce Commission (ICC), Docket No. MC-427719 Rules Tariff, March 2004, Radioactive Materials Tariff, January 2009
- 23.
J.C. Evans et al., "Long-Lived Activation Products in Reactor Materials" NUREG/CR-3474, Pacific Northwest Laboratory for the Nuclear Regulatory Commissiory. August 1984 TLG Services, Inc.
116
Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Study Document L11-1621-001, Rev. 0 Section 7, Page 3 of 3
- 7. REFERENCES (continued)
- 24.
R.I. Smith, G.J. Konzek, W.E. Kennedy, Jr., "Technology, Safety and Costs of Decommissioning a Reference Pressurized Water Reactor Power Station,"
NUREG/CR-0130 and addenda, Pacific Northwest Laboratory for the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. June 1978
- 25.
H.D. Oak, et al., "Technology, Safety and Costs of Decommissioning a Reference Boiling Water Reactor Power Station," NUREG/CR-0672 and addenda, Pacific Northwest Laboratory for the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. June 1980
- 26.
"Financial Protection Requirements for Permanently Shutdown Nuclear Power Reactors," 10 CFR Parts 50 and 140, Federal Register Notice, Vol. 62, No. 210, October 30, 1997
- 27.
"Microsoft Project Professional 2003," Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA.
- 28.
"Atomic Energy Act of 1954," (68 Stat. 919)
TLG Services, Inc.
117
Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Study Document Ll1-1621-001, Rev. 0 Appendix A, Page I of 4 APPENDIX A UNIT COST FACTOR DEVELOPMENT TLG Services, Inc.
118
Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant Document L11-1621-001, Rev. 0 Decommissioning Cost Study Appendix A, Page 2 of 4 APPENDIX A UNIT COST FACTOR DEVELOPMENT Example:
Unit Factor for Removal of Contaminated Heat Exchanger < 3,000 lbs.
- 1.
SCOPE Heat exchangers weighing < 3,000 lbs. will be removed in one piece using a crane or small hoist. They will be disconnected from the inlet and outlet piping. The heat exchanger will be sent to the waste processing area.
- 2.
CALCULATIONS Activity Critical Act Activity Duration Duration ID Description (minutes)
(minutes)*
a Remove insulation 60 (b) b Mount pipe cutters 60 60 c
Install contamination controls 20 (b) d Disconnect inlet and outlet lines 60 60 e
Cap openings 20 (d) f Rig for removal 30 30 g
Unbolt from mounts 30 30 h
Remove contamination controls 15 15 i
Remove, wrap, send to waste processing area 60 60 Totals (Activity/Critical) 355 255 Duration adjustment(s):
" Respiratory protection adjustment (50% of critical duration) 128
+ RadiationlALARA adjustment (37% of critical duration) 95 Adjusted work duration 478
+ Protective clothing adjustment (30% of adjusted duration) 143 Productive work duration 621
+ Work break adjustment (8.33 % of productive duration) 52 Total work duration (minutes) 673
- Total duration = 11.217 hr ***
- alpha designators indicate activities that can be performed in parallel TLG Services, Inc.
119
Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Study Document LI1-1621-001, Rev. 0 Appendix A, Page 3 of 4 APPENDIX A (continued)
- 3.
LABOR REQUIRED Duration Rate Crew Number (hours)
($/hr)
Cost Laborers 3.00 11.217
$21.36
$718.79 Craftsmen 2.00 11.217
$31.68
$710.71 Foreman 1.00 11.217
$34.00
$381.38 General Foreman 0.25 11.217
$36.13
$101.32 Fire Watch 0.05 11.217
$21.36
$11.98 Health Physics Technician 1.00 11.217
$41.28
$463.04 Total Labor Cost
$2,387.22
- 4.
EQUIPMENT & CONSUMABLES COSTS Equipment Costs Consumables/Materials Costs
-Blotting paper 50 @ $0.65 sq ft {1)
-Plastic tarp 50 @ $0.48/sq ft {2}
-Gas torch consumables 1 @ $11.31/hr x 1 hr {3}
Subtotal cost of equipment and materials Overhead & profit on equipment and materials @ 16.25 %
none
$32.50
$24.00
$11.31
$67.81
$11.02
$78.83 Total costs, equipment & material TOTAL COST:
Removal of contaminated heat exchanger <3000 pounds:
Total labor cost:
Total equipment/material costs:
Total craft labor man-hours required per unit:
$2,466.05
$2,387.22
$78.83 81.88
- denotes business sensitive information TLG Services, Inc.
120
Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Study Document L11-1621-001, Rev. 0 Appendix A,, Page 4 of 4
- 5.
NOTES AND REFERENCES
" Work difficulty factors were developed in conjunction with the Atomic Industrial Forum's (now NEI) program to standardize nuclear decommissioning cost estimates and are delineated in Volume 1, Chapter 5 of the "Guidelines for Producing Commercial Nuclear Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Estimates," AIF/NESP-036, May 1986.
" References for equipment & consumables costs:
- 1. www.mcmaster.com online catalog, McMaster Carr Spill Control (7428T13)
- 2. R.S. Means (2009) Division 01 56, Section 13.60-0200, page 20
- 3. R.S. Means (2009) Division 01 54 33, Section 40-6360, page 658
" Material and consumable costs were adjusted using the regional indices for Dallas, Texas.
TLG Services, Inc.
121
Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Study Document Ll1-1621-001, Rev. 0 Appendix B, Page I of 7 APPENDIX B UNIT COST FACTOR LISTING (DECON: Power Block Structures Only)
TLG Services, Inc.
122
Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant Document L1I-1621-001, Rev. 0 Decommissioning Cost Study Appendix B, Page 2 of 7 APPENDIX B UNIT COST FACTOR LISTING (Power Block Structures Only)
Unit Cost Factor Cost/Unit($)
Removal of clean instrument and sampling tubing, $/linear foot 0.25 Removal of clean pipe 0.25 to 2 inches diameter, $/linear foot 2.59 Removal of clean pipe >2 to 4 inches diameter, $/linear foot 3.77 Removal of clean pipe >4 to 8 inches diameter, $/linear foot 7.53 Removal of clean pipe >8 to' 14 inches diameter, $/linear foot 14.31 Removal of clean pipe >14 to 20 inches diameter, $/linear foot 18.67 Removal of clean pipe >20 to 36 inches diameter, $/linear foot 27.46 Removal of clean pipe >36 inches diameter, $/linear foot 32.59 Removal of clean valve >2 to 4 inches 49.89 Removal of clean valve >4 to 8 inches 75.27 Removal of clean valve >8 to 14 inches 143.11 Removal of clean valve >14 to 20 inches 186.72 Removal of clean valve >20 to 36 inches 274.56 Removal of clean valve >36 inches 325.92 Removal of clean pipe hanger for small bore piping 17.66 Removal of clean pipe hanger for large bore piping 60.20 Removal of clean pump, <300 pound 128.37 Removal of clean pump, 300-1000 pound 358.35 Removal of clean pump, 1000-10,000 pound 1,401.73 Removal of clean pump, >10,000 pound 2,715.77 Removal of clean pump motor, 300-1000 pound 148.90 Removal of clean pump motor, 1000-10,000 pound 581.12 Removal of clean pump motor, >10,000 pound 1,307.54 Removal of clean heat exchanger <3000 pound 756.44 Removal of clean heat exchanger >3000 pound 1,910.89 Removal of clean feedwater heater/deaerator 5,360.37 Removal of clean moisture separator/reheater 10,984.97 Removal of clean tank, <300 gallons 164.95 Removal of clean tank, 300-3000 gallon 517.46 Removal of dean tank, >3000 gallons, $/square foot surface area 4.42 TLG Services, Inc.
123
Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant Document L11-1621-001, Rev. 0 Decommissioning Cost Study Appendix B, Page 3 of 7 APPENDIX B UNIT COST FACTOR LISTING (Power Block Structures Only)
Unit Cost Factor Cost/Unit($)
Removal of clean electrical equipment, <300 pound 68.77 Removal of clean electrical equipment, 300-1000 pound 242.43 Removal of clean electrical equipment, 1000-10,000 pound 484.87 Removal of clean electrical equipment, >10,000 pound 1,163.08 Removal of clean electrical transformer < 30 tons 807.74 Removal of clean electrical transformer > 30 tons 2,326.16 Removal of clean standby diesel generator, <100 kW 825.04 Removal of clean standby diesel generator, 100 kW to 1 MW 1,841.54 Removal of clean standby diesel generator, >1 MW 3,812.36 Removal of clean electrical cable tray, $/linear foot 6.52 Removal of clean electrical conduit, $/linear foot 2.85 Removal of clean mechanical equipment, <300 pound 68.77 Removal of clean mechanical equipment, 300-1000 pound 242.43 Removal of clean mechanical equipment, 1000-10,000 pound 484.87 Removal of clean mechanical equipment, >10,000 pound 1,163.08 Removal of clean HVAC equipment, <300 pound 83.17 Removal of clean HVAC equipment, 300-1000 pound 291.30 Removal of clean HVAC equipment, 1000-10,000 pound 580.57 Removal of clean HVAC equipment, >10,000 pound 1,163.08 Removal of clean HVAC ductwork, $/pound 0.26 Removal of contaminated instrument and sampling tubing, $/linear foot 0.91 Removal of contaminated pipe 0.25 to 2 inches diameter, $/linear foot 15.63 Removal of contaminated pipe >2 to 4 inches diameter, $/linear foot 24.11 Removal of contaminated pipe >4 to 8 inches diameter, $/linear foot 38.23 Removal of contaminated pipe >8 to 14 inches diameter, $/linear foot 71.78 Removal of contaminated pipe >14 to 20 inches diameter, $/linear foot 84.77 Removal of contaminated pipe >20 to 36 inches diameter, $/linear foot 114.41 Removal of contaminated pipe >36 inches diameter, $/linear foot 133.82 Removal of contaminated valve >2 to 4 inches 276.89 Removal of contaminated valve >4 to 8 inches 326.43 TLG Services, Inc.
124
Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant Document L11-1621-001, Rev. 0 Decommissioning Cost Study Appendix B, Page 4 of 7 APPENDIX B UNIT COST FACTOR LISTING (Power Block Structures Only)
Unit Cost Factor CostlUnit($)
Removal of contaminated valve >8 to 14 inches 652.11 Removal of contaminated valve >14 to 20 inches 819.22 Removal of contaminated valve >20 to 36 inches 1,078.41 Removal of contaminated valve >36 inches 1,272.51 Removal of contaminated pipe hanger for small bore piping 91.19 Removal of contaminated pipe hanger for large bore piping 299.22 Removal of contaminated pump, <300 pound 587.31 Removal of contaminated pump, 300-1000 pound 1,332.63 Removal of contaminated pump, 1000-10,000 pound 4,017.31 Removal of contaminated pump, >10,000 pound 9,773.05 Removal of contaminated pump motor, 300-1000 pound 609.79 Removal of contaminated pump motor, 1000-10,000 pound 1,680.39 Removal of contaminated pump motor, >10,000 pound.
3,773.08 Removal of contaminated heat exchanger <3000 pound 2,466.05 Removal of contaminated heat exchanger >3000 pound 7,271.21 Removal of contaminated tank, <300 gallons 988.26 Removal of contaminated tank, >300 gallons, $/square foot 17.93 Removal of contaminated electrical equipment, <300 pound 434.73 Removal of contaminated electrical equipment, 300-1000 pound 1,057.73 Removal of contaminated electrical equipment, 1000-10,000 pound 2,039.65 Removal of contaminated electrical equipment, >10,000 pound 4,023.44 Removal of contaminated electrical cable tray, $/linear foot 20.96 Removal of contaminated electrical conduit, $/linear foot 11.65 Removal of contaminated mechanical equipment, <300 pound 482.74 Removal of contaminated mechanical equipment, 300-1000 pound 1,164.82 Removal of contaminated mechanical equipment, 1000-10,000 pound 2,242.31 Removal of contaminated mechanical equipment, >10,000 pound 4,023.44 Removal of contaminated HVAC equipment, <300 pound 482.74 Removal of contaminated HVAC equipment, 300-1000 pound 1,164.82 Removal of contaminated HVAC equipment, 1000-10,000 pound 2,242.31 TLG Services, Inc.
125
Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant Document L11-1621-001, Rev. 0 Decommissioning Cost Study Appendix B, Page 5 of 7 APPENDIX B UNIT COST FACTOR LISTING (Power Block Structures Only)
Unit Cost Factor CostfUnit($)
Removal of contaminated HVAC equipment, >10,000 pound 4,023.44 Removal of contaminated HVAC ductwork, $/pound 1.50 Removal/plasma arc cut of contaminated thin metal components, $/linear in.
2.26 Additional decontamination of surface by washing, $/square foot 5.04 Additional decontamination of surfaces by hydrolasing, $/square foot 20.56 Decontamination rig hook up and flush, $/ 250 foot length 4,003.80 Chemical flush of components/systems, $/gallon 18.83 Removal of clean standard reinforced concrete, $/cubic yard 99.17 Removal of grade slab concrete, $/cubic yard 125.48 Removal of clean concrete floors, $/cubic yard 278.38 Removal of sections of clean concrete floors, $/cubic yard 779.93 Removal of clean heavily rein concrete w/#9 rebar, $/cubic yard 192.63 Removal of contaminated heavily rein concrete w/#9 rebar, $/cubic yard 1,473.98 Removal of clean heavily rein concrete wf#18 rebar, $/cubic yard 243.47 Removal of contaminated heavily rein concrete w/#18 rebar, $/cubic yard 1,944.71 Removal heavily rein concrete w/#18 rebar & steel embedments, $/cubic yard 343.57 Removal of below-grade suspended floors, $/cubic yard 278.38 Removal of clean monolithic concrete structures, $/cubic yard 621.93 Removal of contaminated monolithic concrete structures, $/cubic yard 1,456.81 Removal of clean foundation concrete, $/cubic yard 492.12 Removal of contaminated foundation concrete, $/cubic yard 1,358.02 Explosive demolition of bulk concrete, $/cubic yard 22.57 Removal of clean hollow masonry block wall, $/cubic yard 69.52 Removal of contaminated hollow masonry block wall, $/cubic yard 241.23 Removal of clean solid masonry block wall, $/cubic yard 69.52 Removal of contaminated solid masonry block wall, $/cubic yard 241.23 Backfill of below-grade voids, $/cubic yard 24.72 Removal of subterranean tunnels/voids, $/linear foot 78.60 Placement of concrete for below-grade voids, $/cubic yard 147.79 Excavation of clean material, $/cubic yard 2.77 TLG Services, Inc.
126
Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant Document L11-1621-001, Rev. 0 Decommissioning Cost Study Appendix B, Page 6 of 7 APPENDIX B UNIT COST FACTOR LISTING (Power Block Structures Only)
Unit Cost Factor Cost/Unit($)
Excavation of contaminated material, $/cubic yard 32.47 Removal of clean concrete rubble (tipping fee included), $/cubic yard 22.05 Removal of contaminated concrete rubble, $/cubic yard 20.58
.Removal of building by volume, $/cubic foot 0.25 Removal of clean building metal siding, $/square foot 0.71 Removal of contaminated building metal siding, $/square foot 2.73 Removal of standard asphalt roofing, $/square foot 1.15 Removal of transite panels, $/square foot 1.47 Scarifying contaminated concrete surfaces (drill & spall), $/square foot 10.02 Scabbling contaminated concrete floors, $/square foot 5.51 Scabbling contaminated concrete walls, $/square foot 13.82 Scabbling contaminated ceilings, $/square foot 46.72 Scabbling structural steel, $/square foot 4.47 Removal of clean overhead crane/monorail < 10 ton capacity 345.27 Removal of contaminated overhead crane/monorail < 10 ton capacity 1,076.87 Removal of clean overhead crane/monorail >10-50 ton capacity 828.65 Removal of contaminated overhead crane/monorail >10-50 ton capacity 2,584.04 Removal of polar crane > 50 ton capacity 3,487.65 Removal of gantry crane > 50 ton capacity 14,538.47 Removal of structural steel, $/pound 0.15 Removal of clean steel floor grating, $/square foot 2.63 Removal of contaminated steel floor grating, $/square foot 8.14 Removal of clean free standing steel liner, $/square foot 6.62 Removal of contaminated free standing steel liner, $/square foot 20.77 Removal of clean concrete-anchored steel liner, $/square foot 3.31 Removal of contaminated concrete-anchored steel liner, $/square foot 24.20 Placement of scaffolding in clean areas, $/square foot 16.97 Placement of scaffolding in contaminated areas, $/square foot 23.14 Landscaping with topsoil, $/acre 21,306.65 Cost of CPC B-88 LSA box & preparation for use 2,407.05 TLG Services, Inc.
127
Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Study Document L11-1621-001, Rev. 0 Appendix B, Page 7 of 7 APPENDIX B UNIT COST FACTOR LISTING (Power Block Structures Only)
Unit Cost Factor Cost/Unit($)
Cost of CPC B-25 LSA box & preparation for use Cost of CPC B-12V 12 gauge LSA box & preparation for use Cost of CPC B-144 LSA box & preparation for use Cost of LSA drum & preparation for use Cost of cask liner for CNSI 8 120A cask (resins)
Cost of cask liner for CNSI 8 120A cask (filters)
Decontamination of surfaces with vacuuming, $/square foot TLG Services, Inc.
1,970.13 1,766.89 10,860.78 167.84 8,307.75 8,897.11 0.53 128
Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Study Document L11-1621-001, Rev. 0 Appendix C, Page 1 of 25 APPENDIX C DETAILED COST ANALYSIS DECON Tables C-1 Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 1...............................................
2 C-2 Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 2.............................................
14 TLG Services, Inc.
129
Comaince Peao N-clear Power Plant Deconmiaaloingn Coat Study Douirent LI1-1621-O01, Ree. 0 Appenidix C, Page 2 of RE Table C-i Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant, Unit I DECON Decommissioning Cost Estimate (thousands of 2009 dollars) 0on-site LLW NRC Spent.Fuel site Prou..se.
Buiatsolues Bull'a I yand Activity Oecon Removal Paukaglng Trensport Processlng Disposal Other Total Total Lie. Term.
Management Restoration Vol.mo Class A Class 5 Class C GTCC Ptouessed Craft Contractor Inde.
AeUvily D.s.ription Cost Cost Costs Costs Costs Costs Costs Contingency-costs Costs Costs Costs Cu. Feet Ca. Feet Cu. Feet Co. Feet Cu. Feet VA., Lbs.
Manhouts Manhours PERIOD i. - Shutdown thuughTransitian Period l Direct Decommlssioning Activilies 1.1.1 Prepare preliminary decommissioning cost 1i.i.2 Notifatian of Cessation of Operations 3..ai3 Remove fuel & source material la.1.4 Notification of Permanent DefuelIng l.1.5 Deactivate plant systems & process waste la.1.6 Proeare and submit PSDAR 1a.i.7 Review plant dwga & specs.
la.1,8 Perform detailed rad survey la..9 Estimate by-product Inventory ol.1i0 End product description Isi11 Detailed by-product lnventory 1i.132 Define major eqak sequence 1a.10 Perform SER and EA il.1-14
,eform
,ite-Specific Cost Study laijA erepare/submit License Termination Plan la.1.6 Receive NlC approval oftermination plan Activity Specifications io.1.57.t Plant & temporartyfaclties 1a..172 Plant syslems la..17 3 NaSS Decontamaatlion Flush la.117.a4 heactoanislernalt ia.i.17.5 Ooattonvessel ia.i.17.6 Oiologioal hield l
.?7 Steam generators ia.L17 a Relnfored conomrt la1.17i,9 Main Turbine la.1.17.10 Main Condansee 10.1,17.11 Plan struatuas & baldings la.i17.12 Wase management
- .1.1t7.13 Facility & site Closeout tul7I Total Planning & Site Preparations lail18 Prepare dsmantlingsequence 1.4.19 Plant prep. & temp. suces Il.
Design water clean-up system lai.
p2D Slgig/CanLt Cold Enutpc/toollng/etc.
sa.L22 Procureooaska/Itoets
& containers ta.1 Sub total Pedod la Activity Costs Pariod la Collateral Costa a3'.I Spent Fuel Capital and Transfer la.3 Subtotal Period la Collateral Costs Period la Period-Depeudent Costs la4.1 Insurance la42 Property taxes la..3 Heallh physics supplies TLG Seruloe, n. a.
160 24 184 184 aN.a 1,300 246 566 123 160 923 381 615 S04 605 513 62 874 800 62 384 197 49 49 384 566 4.655 295 172 2.100 151 14,076 593 593 37 293 283 as ass 651 a
1i 142 142 10 142 142 24 184 i84 138 i,Dll 1.061 57 439 439 92 708 708 75 580 580 a
9i 696 627 77 550 531 9
71 71 131 1,005 c,005 120 920 920 9
71 71 58 Aa 442 30 226 113 7
57 7
S7 58 442 221 01 651 65s 17 127 64 698 5,353 4,714 04 340 340 420 3,220 3,220 26 198 19B 330 2,53 2,530 23 174 174 2,111 16,187 1S,548 113 57 57 217 639 639 2,000 coo00 7.500 4.096 4,20 4.157 100 7,10D 6.00 oson 3.120 1400 400 3,120 4,600 900 37,827 2.40D 1.40D 1,230 73.7S3 09 602 682 B9 882 682 404 1,005 101 1,106 1,106 90 9
99 99 101 S05 505
Comanche Peals Nucearl-PowerPlant Decommissioning Cost Study Donumenrt L11-1621-001, Re. 0 Appendix C, Page 3 of 25 Table C-1 Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 1 DECON Decommenissioning Cost Estimate (thousands of 2009 dollars)
Off..s"l LLRW NRC SpentFuel Site Processed BurialVlumes riall OUllty and Aticity De.ne Remasal Paekaglng Transport Processlng Dilspessl Other Total Total Uc. Term.
Management Resaoratlon Volume Class A Class B Class C GTCC Prssesd Craft Contractor Index nAsal Dsssrlplon Cost Cost Costs Casts Costs Costs Costs Contingency Costs Costs Costs Costs Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Fool CU. Feet WL, Lbs.
Manhours Mnhauras Pearid 1s Period-Oependeat Costs (onatlnsed) 5a.4.4 Heary equipment rental le,4.1 Disposal of DAW generated Ia,4.6 Plant energy budget Ia.4.7 NRC Fees 0:A4.8 Emergency Planning Fees 1l.0.9 Spent Fuel Pool O&M 1..4.10 1tFSI Operating Costs Ial.11 Securiry Staff Cost la,4.12 Utility Staff Cost 1t.4 Subtotal Period la PenlodOependent Costs 10.0 TOTAL PERIOD ls COST PERIOD Sb - Decommlssloning Preparations Period lb Direct Daommis$loningdActivitles Oetalled Work Procedures Sb.S.1.3. Plant systems 1b.1, 1.2 NSSS OeaaconrminutIn Flush lb.1.1.3 Reactar i.terenls
,b.L.1.4 Pemaining bui!digst Ilb.E.L COOD cool1& assembly ib. 1.I.0 CRD houslrngs
& IC tubes Sb.t1..7 Intore instrumentuton lb. 1. 1.t Reactor estel lb.LO1.9 Faulity aloeetut 1b.l1.-l0 Missile shields lb.1l1.1 Biogleal shield 1b.1..12 Steam generatars lb,1.1.13 Reinforced tonarete 1b.11.14 Main Turbine Sb,1.15 Main Condensert lb,.1.S1l Auallaty building 1b.1'.L17 Reactor building 11.1.1 Total lb.1.2 Decon prinary loop 11,1 Subtotal Period lb Activuty Costs Period lb Additional Costs lb.2.1 Site Characterization 1b.2.2 Spent fuel sel itolation 1b,2 Subtotal Period bu Additional Costs Period lb Collateral Costs lb..3.1 Oecon eqiupment 1b.3.2 DOC staff relocation expenses lb.3.3 Process liquid waste lb.3.4 Small tool allowance 15.3.5 Pipe cutting equipment 514 918 2
0 2
0 24 1.208 738 445 762 44 370 24.777 24 29,440 77 591 591 O
32 32 181 1,390 1.390 74 812 812 44 489 114 877 7
51 56 426 426 3,717 28,493 28.493 4,486 34,870 33,453 489 077 ItnI 51.1 493 9,851 2
12.264 423.400 9,854 2
435,664 918 z
0 24 44,109 6.687 51,739 49.001 2.09 3
493 93 9.854 2
509.417 582 123 308 166 132 123 123 447 55 141 160 123 192 1932 330 335 4,093 07 670 003 18 142 142 40 354 354 21 191 48 18 142 142 18 142 142 18 142 142 67 504 514 22 170 t1 a
64 64 22 170 170 8S 651 GS1 ie 142 71 29 221 29 021 so 306 348 so 386 348 114 4,705 3,820 348 1,044 1,044 67 4.733 1,000 2.100 143 1.350 1.000 1.000 1,000 3,030 85.
1,200 3ASO 1,200 460 1.200 4,600.
71 1,000 221 1,561) 221 M1.50 39 2.730 39 2,730 885 33.243 1,007 596 696 4.091 962 5,749 4,864 885 1,007 33,243:
27.670 10.132 27,670 10,32 4.324 1,297 5,u21 5,021 9.090 1,013 11,143 11,143 14.014 2,751 16,704 16,764 991 59 1,100 83 233 3,502 149 1,140 1,140 223 1,709 1.709 947 4,022 4,822 0
3 3
165 1,265 1.265 172 829 11t.a07 234 a
TLG Serriea., Ine.
Comanche Peak Nurclear Poaer Plan t Decormmnasioning Coat Stuldy Doazeent.t L7I-1621-001, Re. 0 Appeadi, C, Page 4,af2 Table C-I Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant, Unit I DECON Decommissioning Cost Estimate (thousands af 2009 dollars)
Off-Site LLRW NRC Spent Feel site Pracessed lariat Vatamas arliUtility and Activity Decon Removal Packaging Transport Processing Disposal Otaer Total Tom Uc. Tero.
Managrt.ent Restoration Volume Clasa A Class 0 Class C GTCC Proaessed Craft Contractor Index Activity Dscrlption Cast Cost Costs Csts Cost Cast Cast Cnensen ~
Cast Costs Casts
- Cost, Cu. Feet Cu. Fart Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Fact W.7 Lbs.
Manhoars Mabhuars Period Sb Collateral Costs (continued) lb3..6 Dea-n rig b.3.7 Spent Fuea Capital and Transfer lb.
Subtotal Period SI Collateral Costs Period Ib Period-Dependent Costs 1b.4.1 Decon supplies 1b.4.2 Insuranrt Ibs4.3 Property rter b.4 ti Heatlth physlc suppiles l5.*.S Hravy equipment rental lb.4.6 Dfspasal ot OAW geneated 1b.4.7 plant energy budget 11b4.8 NRC Fees 1b.4.9 Emergency Planning Fees 1b.4.10 Spent Fuel Pooa O&M 1b.4.11 ISFSI Operating Costs 1b 4O12 Security Staff Cost 1b.4.13 OCC staff Cost lb.4.14 Utility Staff Cost 1b.4 Subtotal Period lb Period Dependent Costs 1l.0 TOTAL PERIOD lb COST PERIOD I TOTALS PERIOD 2a - Large Component Removal Period 2a Direct Decommlssloning Activities Nuslear Steam Supply System Removal 2a.1.1.1 Reactor Coolant Piping 2a.12.12 Pressurlaze Relief Yank 24.1.1.3 Reacor Coolant Pumps & Motors 2a.1.1.4 Presarizer 2a.l..5 SteamnGenerators 2a3lO
.6 l
Re edSteatGeaoratilrnitu 2ate.1.7 CROMn/iCI e-rale Structure Removal 2a..1.1B8 Reactor Vessel Internals 2.11.9 Reactor Vessel 2, 1.1
- Total, Removal of Major Equipment 2a.1.2 Main Turbinn/Generator 2a.1.3 Main Condensers Cascading Costs from Clean Building DeOmoition 2a.1.4.1 Raeaor 2a,1.4.2 Safeguard 2al.4 Totals 1,402 273 2,448 1,102 83 233 3.502 1,759 250 1.610 1,610 41 314 1,735 12.052 10,548 314 314 322 829 31 237 261 31 497 3,175 1.599 3,175 2,517 1
0 44 234 as 234 509 25 1.225 374 225 386 22 188 4.687 12.635 15 20.299 3,517 40,162 3,540 84,272 a
38 35 51 560 560 5
so 50 39 296 295 39 306 300 4
20 20 104 1.409 3.409 37 412 412 23 248 248 58 444 444 3
25 26 28 216 216 703 S,390 S,390 1,49S 14,S31 14.531 3.097 23,939 23,222 710 0,S44 5721S 55,398 1,032 05S 15,231 109,054 104,40D 3,131 1.324 303 303 675 829 1t16O 829 114.407 234 5.050 3
6.216 64.486 215.657 6,1O0 1
286,359 120.457 29.972 329,734 13D.311 28.975 839.151 71 04 16 10 16 7
69 59 155 25 32 382 227 3,087 1,964
,455 3,312 92 68 263 72 2,241 5,079 54 4,213 3,544 629 11,252 10,721 6
3 115 74 1,264 1,527 19 110 319 3,833 228 95 2,030 967 2,946 6,568 2,946 6.379 891 312 8,047 242 8.302 242 5,891 33,209 1,375 116 521 521 38 178 178 699 3.017 3,017 312 1.792 1,792 3,35S 19,411 19,411 2,094 137403 17.403 170 925 925 7,174 23,364 23.364 7,978 22,930 22,930 22.627 89,540 89,540 722 07.332 4,301 329 36.553 1.072 7.231 792,800 4.095 100 3,445 231,471 2.415 930 4D.067 23.397 3,329,768 23,233 2,125 40,067 22.721 3,144,067 22.467 14,033 4,.52 119.556 4.524 1.377 903 459 326.029 26.933 1,209 6.606 2,254 976.569 26,933 1,209 30.134 70.680 3.156 459 9.066,165 116,47S 20,415 251 33S 74 754 466 337 2,217 2,217 771 194 56 714 466 444 2,645 2.645 3.775 2.102 6,756 1,992 509,467 8.266 482,702 2S.30O 1,002 100 1.109 150 1,152 1,152 16 124 124 165 1.276 1,276 13.996 1.588 15.584 L*
TLG Serrices, ana.
Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant Deommnision-og Coat Soudy Do. oeoI L11.1621-001, Reu0 8
Appendlx C. Page 5 of25 Table C-I Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 1 DECON Decommissioning Cost Estimate (thousands of 2009 dollars)
Ott-Site 1URW NRC Spent Foei Site Prceassed Burtlal Volumos all tlty and Atlolty Deaon Removal Pacskaging Transport Processlng Disposal Other Total Total Lic. Term.
Management pastoration Volume Class A Closs class C GTCC Processed Ctra Contractor Irdes Activity Descrptlon Cost Cost Costs Costs Costs Costs Costs Cotingerl ny Costs Casts
- Cost, Costs Cu. Fnot Cu. Feot Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu.iFeet WL, Lbs.
Manhours Machoots Disposal of Plant Systems 2I.1.S.1 AunilioFr Feedwater lirsuloted) 2a.1.1.2 AuilIarny Steam 2a.1.5.3 Boron Recycle (insulated) 2a.3.5.4 Rtoro Recycle unlncinoltedl 2a..S.5 Doon Thermal Regeneratloc (insulated) 2a..S,5 Boron Thermal RegeneDation (aniulated) 2a.1.5.7 Chemical & Volume Control (lnsalared) 2a.1.S.8 Chemical & Voline Control (unrhsulated) 2a.1.5.9 Chemical Peed 2a.1.5.10 Cheniut Feed - RCA 2a.3.5.11 Chiled Watr. -Stfedt 2a...5.32 ChilledWate Saset. -RCA 2a.1.S.13 Cimcubtio8 Water 2a.,.S.14 Component Cooling Water D:.t-.5.'5 Component Coolng Water -RCA 2D.1.50. Condensate (insulated) 2 I.,.i7 Cond ensate
.(unlnulated) 2a.SS8 Condenate Polbhlng 2a.t..9.1S CondenserVacuom & Water Rot Plrmir8 2a,.l.20 ERtraction Steam 2a.1.S.2S Peedwater 2a.1.5.22 ee-dwater-RCA 2a.1.5.23 Generator& Exaitet 2a.1.5.24 Generatersac Cooing 2D.1.S.25 Genera toar Pimary Waler 2a.1.5.26 GeneratorSea Oil 2a.1.5.27 Hydmoen Qd5 2a.1.5.28 Maln Steam Reheat
& Steam Dump 2a.2.5.29 Main Steam Reheat & Steam Dump -RCA 2a.1.5.30 Main TurbIne Lube Oil 2a.,.5.31 Main TurbIne i Purification 2aO.5.32 Nitrogen Sae 2a.1.5.33 Post Accident Sampling 2a.1.5.34 Process Sampling (unInsulated) 2D.1.5,35 Reactor Coolant 2a.1.5.36 Residual Heat Remnoal 2a. LS.37 Safety Injection (insulated) 2a.1.5.38 Safe*ty Injeson (uninsulated) 3a.1.5.35 Secondaey Plant Sampling 2a.S.S.0 Steam Generator Blowdown & Cleanup 2a.1.5.4 Tur bilne Ele:tohydr Cntt r insulatedl 2a.1.s.42 Turbine RlemtohvdCnctri (uninsulated) 2a.S.5.03 Turbine Gland Steam Q
Drains 2a.1.S.44 Turbine Heater Drains 2o.1.I.45 Torbine Plant Cooling (lnsuiated(
2a.S.S.46 Tutbine tart Coo:ing (nninsulated) 2a.S.5.47 Turbinet (nigh - toL- (insulated) 2a.1.5.dR Turbines (High
- Low) (uninsulated) 2a,1.S.d4 Vent Chlied Water - Non Safety 2a.S.10S. Vent Chited Water-Non Safety-RCA 2.o..5,5t Westinghouse Process instruments 2a,.l5 Totals 504 16 IS 15 2t 35 73 32 183 75 159 155 321 6
7 4
79 834 107 185 53 60 1.*
37 35 I
S 30 37 73 10 17 07 501 293 250 128 33 1
26 91 117 11 35 327 00 117 44 33 3
775 5,040 43 4R 696 2
1 7
5 2
17 is 6
53 11 4
34 25 11 97 o
0 113 115 28 1,623 7
5 121 41 40 540 220 13 30 109 77 186 z
35 771 5J 275 7
63 545 69 59 1
297 1,008 2
12 2
15 19 as 49 219 129 507 103 461 223 1,0?0 5
7 3
13 1
4 34 184 22 172 3
22 674 4,133 16 123 13 99 12 93 o
63 9
69 20 213 46 294 0
1 1
a a
61 1
7 O
2 5
35 257 1,541 6
43 11 04 S
1 7
42 65 310 397 1.884 72 404 S2 2S6 4
30 14 105 3
20 2
19 5
41 49 376 2
16 is 135 4
33 7
51 2
55 55 307 1
6 1,10 218 587 461 1,020 13 18i 4,133 294 I,541 7.296 986 12 10 10 74 56 175 1i4 553 468 351 329 1,018 1
04 7
4 294 ISO 172 22 17.003 3,294 123 99 93 63 69 213 1,265 218 61 7
2 35 5,653 1,173 43 84 2
9 RS 31 209 271 3.580 2,332 1.423 29a 30 IDS 105 13 41 376 16 133 195 31 15 ass 252 14 2
380.578 13,S98 395 1.275 131 8,044 1,165 21.764 2.845 64,160 7,194 0,3716 6,290 112,745 11,686 218 935 253 139 25.363 1.982 5,720 709 985.976 32.599 4.155 3.200 3.095 2.054 2,335 7,102 70.944 1,406 39 247 2.003 332 53 1.105 3340793 10,397 1.390 2.778 so 909 221 10,323 265 32.751 3.8R5 3S.SA43 7,303 8d.tS9 3.671 6,471 1,040 3,483 663 416 1.357 12.,00 1,105 1.703 500 49,160 2.953 782 95 2,582,830 170,326 0
0 1
1 a
3 68 35 10 10 0
38 20 342 136 12 42 310 1,884 24 307 6
9 5
63 363 296 3,7935 2,526 2,745 15,540 13,SR6 1,954 39.759 10,852 Is)
TLG Senwiae. Ito.
Cooonc Peal Ndtleas Power Plant Decornomlsolanlsg Cost Study Doctcemtt LI1-1621-001, fas. 0 ApttoodLt C. Page 6a [25 Table C-1 Comancbe Peak Nuclear Power Plant, Unit I DECON Decomsmissioning Cost Estimate (thousands of 2009 dollars)
Index AcUvA l
Descripton Otf-Slte LLRW NRC Spent Fuel Sitt Processed Buril Volumes Budial I Ut1ily and Dcoon Removal Packging Transport Processing Dlspost Other Total Total Lie. Term.
Management Ronoootion Volume Class A Class a Class C TCC Processed Craft Contractor Cost Cost Costs ooa Costas Costa Costs Contngeoty Costs Costs Costs Cost.
Cu. Foot Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Wt.. Lbs.
Manhoots Machoots 2a2.1.6 5ufotlding in supprttof decommissioning 2a.1 Subtotal Peorod 2a Actlovit Costs Period 2a Additional Costs 2.2.1 Retired Reactor Closure Head 2..2 Subtotal Period 2a Additoioal Costs Period 2a ColateralCosts 2a.3.1 Process liquid..ito 2o.3.2 Small tool allowance 2o.333 Spent Fuel Capital and Transfer 2o.3 uotbotal Period 2o Colateral Costs Period 2a Period-Dependent Costs 2o.4.1 aecon supplies oa.4.2 Insurance 2a.4.3 Property taxes 2a.4.4 Health physics supplies 2a.4.5 Heao equipment rental l4.4.6 Disposal of DAW genterted 2a.4.7 Plant energy budget 2a.4.8 N RC Fees 2o.4.9 Emergency Plannnig Fees 2a.4.10 Decommissioning Staff Stverance 2a.4.1I Spent Fuel Pool O&M 2
l.4.12 ISFS[ Operating Costa 2a.4.13 Securty Staff Cost 2a.4.14 DOC Staff Cost 2a.4.1S Utlity Staff Cost 2a.4 Subtotal Period 2a Perlod-0ependent Costs ta.S TOTAL FERICS DSo COST PCRIO1 Sb 21,- Site Decontamination Periad 2b Direct Decommissioning Activites Disposal of Plant System, 2b.1.1.1 Auxiliary Building HVAC (insulated) 2b.1-1.2 Auxiliary BuSiding HVAC (uninsulatedI 2b.1.1.3 Batt Sma;
& Miso Uncontrolled Aco. HVAC Sb.1.1A4 Compressed Air - Into. Ale (Isiulated) 2b.1.1.5 Compresoed Ale -nstrumet Ale - RCA u 2b.1.1.6 C.opressed Air-lint:
etAlr-A uCAo 2b.1.1.7 Co mpressed Air -Service Air 2b.1.1.0 Co mpressed Air -Sernlce Air -RCA 2b.1.1.9 Compressed Aft -Instr. Air ounsioulated) 26.1.1.10 Cortoinmenot atotoes 2b.1f.11 Co.tatoncr. Hydrogen Purge HVAC 2b.".1"2 Contaim ent Spray 2b.1.5.13 CoLtainrno Ventilstion tVAC (insuluted) 2b.1.1.10 Cootainont Vootilatios bVAC[onirsulotod) 435 8
2 37 5
1.023 18.858 11,621 4,266 11.192 36,673 1,375 261 477 814 261 477 814 134 137 304 866 63 1.t86 134 263 137 384 966 1,186 554 133 2.318 3,209
.1 2
230 1.698 1,016 333 2.557 1.128 65 513 16,435 26.125 90 5,527 10 5
230 50,558 1.627 24,648 12,036 5,129 11.132 30,583 53,319 1
2 9
1 0
3 4
105 7
3 31 46 23 122 0
4 43 54 23 7
0 2
3 2
35 3
0 43 16 335 73 97 1.403 420 192 32 0Q 577 192 27 2
4 64 4
117 G05 605 26,436 111,823 109,069 592 2.114 2.145 592 2.145 2.145 35S 1,077 1.877 39 302 272 205 1.594 602 3,773 2.149 340 22 17,641 17.252 1,954 130.782 85,640 3,156 459 1 2.658.810 353.402 20.415 5.241 3.241 1,594 1.594 1.984 30 30 1.994 22 112 112 15 C1 610 13 147 132 is 979 2.97 2.097 401 3,691 3,691 59 307 307 753 25S 1.9S3 1,953 102 2.118 1.118 33 366 366 394 2,041 2,941 169 1,297 1,297 10 75 75 77 590 190 3,455 18.901 18,901 3,919 30.043 3D.043 0.624 65.047 63.295 1,738 15 4.753 36,254 102.707 177,457 3,332 1.999 130,782 95.626 3,156 508.950 3.023 2.00D 508,950 3.023 2.00D 174,286 387 174.236 397 95.0S2 22 16,971 234.514 436,629 95.052 22 688,114 459 13,437.90 356,834 710,S29 3,604 217 S3 38 3,058 231 30.051 2.002 083 39,153 3,199 883 2.330 190 24,705 1.043 761,331 9,328 318,902 5,369 28,729 791 5
19 19 o
2 O
2 4
22 22 44 235 235 3
26 52 283 203 3
26 3
16 16 20 121 121 422 2,754 2754 191 1.221 1.271 18 119 119 04 2
36 18 323 195 26 451 232 26 37 9
456 70 14,70 1.834 6,044 819 668 10 a)
A TLG Serices. fo.
Comanche Pealk Ntclear Power Plant Oecurnieoionisg Coast Study Do.-imaut LII-11721-001, Re,:. 0 Appetdix C. Page 7 of 25 Table C-1 Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 1 DECON Decommissioning Cost Estimate (thousands of2009 dollars)
"OttSite LLRW NRC Spent Fuel Site Processed Burial Volumes Burial I Uitgy and I pallslty Decon Removae Packaging Transport Processing Disposal Other Total Total Us. Term.
Management Restoration Volume Class A Class t Class C GTCC Processed Craft Contractor Indax AoUttyeesnrtpion 605t COst Cost.
Costs
- Cost, Costa Casts contingency Costs Costs Costs Costs Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Wt., Lbs.
Manhoure
- Mothour, Disposal of Plant Systems (continued) 2b.t.t.tS Control Room HVAC 2b..1.6S Daminerailiod & RCS Makeup Water 2b..1.7 Demilerulled & RCS Makeup Water - RCA 2b.1..1B Diesel Gen & Auxniarles (insulatedl 2b.I.1.1: Diesel Gen & Auxlilaries (uninsulated) 2b.1.1.20 Diesel Denetotor Fuel Oil 2b.2.1.2t Diesel Room HVAC 2b.1. 122 Electrinal C Clean 2b.1.1.23 Eectriral-Contaminated 2b.1.2.4 Electrical - RCA 2I.s.1.2 Fire Protection 2b.1-1.D6 Fire Protetion - RCA 2b.L,. 27 Leak Rate Test 2b.21..28 Potable Water 2b.tI1.D9 Radiation Monioring 2b,.1.3S0 Safeguards Buitding HVAC (insulated) 2b.2.t.3t Safeguads Butoding HVAC luninsutatedi 2b.2.1,52 SemiMe Water 2b.1.1.33 Senice Water -RCA 2b.2.1.34 biaebulidlng HVAC (Insulated) 2b.1.35 TurbseBuilding HVAC (uninsulatedl 2b.1.2.36 Vents & Drains 2b.1.1.37 Vents'& Drains - RCA 2b.1.1.3 Wast. Management suninsulated) 2b.1.1.39 Waste Processing Liquid (insulated) 2b.S.t.dD Waste Pronessig Liquid Iuelnsutadl 2b6..1.41 Weste Processing Solid 2b.1.1 Totals 2b.1.2 Scaffoldingin support oftdeonmmissiontng Dennamiuntion ftSiun Buildings 2,1.3.1 taa-tor 2b, 1.3.2 Safeguard 2b.1.3 Totals 2b.1 Subtotal Period 2b Activity Costs Period 2b Colateral Costs 2b.3.1 Process liquid waste 2b.3.2 Small tool astowance 2b.3.3 Spent Fuel Capital and Transfer kb.3 Subtotal Period 2b Collateral Costs Period 2b Period-Dependent Costs 2b-4.1 Decon supplies 2b.4.2 Insurance 2b.4.3 Property taxes 2b.4.4 Health physins supplies 2b.4.5 Heav equipment rental 2b.4.6 Disposal of DAW generated 2b.4.7 Plant energy budget 2
25 DS t~as 5
60 10 3
1,34S 113 Has SnE 69 177 9
15 is 40 32 164 2
19 13 59 140 55 120 Is Sir 2
152 4,300 3
14 1
p 21 217 3
33 4D 6
94 6
54 ME; 56 9
113 a5 1
1 5
1 22 1
3 52 3
26 3s7 148 4
51 53 3
17 63 2
1t 35 0
1 1
265 3,794 1.254 0
2 4
29 37 204 204 1
6 9
69 1
11 3
4 2D2 1,tsa SO 292 292 375 2,256 2,256 10 79 a8 a
496as S
3D 3D 0
c 4
19 119 119 5
37 137 853 853 0
2 3
22 2
15 92 41d 41i 0
3 77 343 343 39 176 17:
1 5
5 1,931 11,913 10,029 146 756 756 1.004 4.217 4.217 lDo 441 4oa 1,113 4,658 0.558 3,190 17,326 15,442 29 343 170 6
69 11 4
1,547 999 26 8.992 239 79 1,182 406 106 20 1
231 6
542 14 37 3.741 630 2
22 15 S3B 227
- 75 26H 110 I52 9
S 1.884 39.756 5.363 436 27 3,072 7,255 644 705 3,717 7,951 1,8B4 43,908 13.351 62 911 29.18t 2,071 182 2,239 364 117 49,165 42,S22 3.472 386.642 t0,767 2,628 84.4D3 4.518 6,66 263 39 33 9.920 356 23.313 1.1S4 1.240 2DB.435 4,a99 92 722 495 42,230 5,053 91 31,121 4,798 17.788 2,309 812 53 2.094,944 133.533 22,051 21.565 So 10 3
45 6
1,045 663 162 63 293 986
- 13.
67 7
8 61 42 1,183 730 179 71 355 1,028 1.335 5,574 40D 339 4,195 2,288 114:,PB 49,4t9 95,457 5,679 910,345 1.,168 3,027,34t 210,266 64,173 191 64,173 191 127 68 197 319 178 87 878 121 18 1 39 139 13.4SB 2,019 15ii476 127 121 n8 187 319 13.45B 2,215 16,494 1,017 15.476 15,471 977 977 L919 S
5,406 941 226 10 1
.ISO 2,277 213 1,067 1.067 94 1,036 1,036 23 249 249 48D 2,39t 2.398 a ll 6,217 6,217 39 20D 220 342 2,618 2,618 3.655 61,893 10 LAS TLO Sericeas, r.c.
Comanche Penh Nrsclear Power Plant Decoanmisoianni Coast Study D.oonnesst L13-1621-001. ReL. 0 Appesdix C, Page 8 r25 Table C-I Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant. Unit I DECON Decommissioning Cost Estimate (thousands of 2089 dollars)
Ottalte LLRW NRC Spent Fuol Site Processed Burial Volumes Buolali Utility and Actvity Decon Remonal Packaging Transport Prouossing Disposal Other Total Total Uo. Taro.
M6aagennns Rostoraton Volume Class A Class B Class C GTCC Processed Craft Contrator.
Inde Auyali D*secrploo Coast Cast Costs Costs Costn Costa Costs Contlngency Costs Csts Cost Csts Cu. Feet Cu. Feat Cu, Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet WL, Lbs.
Manhours Manhours Period 2b Period-Dependent Costs continued) 2b.4,8 NRC Fees 2b,4.1 Emetgenoc Planning Fees 2b.4.10 Deeommissinrllg Stalf Severer ne 2b.4.11 Spent Fuel Pool O&M 2b.4.12 Llqld Radwanle Processing Equilpmen/5ernaces 2b.4.13 15FSI Operating Costs 2b.4.14 Security Staff Cost 2bhtS SOC Staff Cast 2b.4 '6 Utility Staff Cost 2b4 Subtotal Periosd 2b Pesiod-iependent Costs 854 7.324 5
5
]B50 2b.O TOTAL PERIOD 2b COST 2,316 13,019 494 S26 4,195 2,757 PERIOD 2, -Decontamrieation Falloagng Wet Fuel storage Period 2c Direct Decommissioning Actlltles 2c.1.1 Remnov spent fuel racks 124 t
70 6
257 Disposal of Plant Systems 2o.1.2.1 Foel Raildlng VIt uACfninsulatadc)
S 0
0 S
0 Ss,1.2.2 Fuel HandllIng S
0 D
6 2
2c.1.2.3 Spent Fuel Pool Cooling & Cleanup 134 7
3 24 54 2'.1.2 Totals 125 8
4 35 56 1,726 173 1.B98 1,898 565 SR6 621 621 5,677 2S2 1,929 1.929 1.915 287 2,203 2,203 481 72 553 553 110 17 127 127 571 131 1.001 1.001 28,821) 19.635 2.803 21,488 21.488 282,960 30.523 4,579 35,107 35.107 526,620 60.001 10.370 78.713 7S.762 2.951 3.095 61.893 14 838,400 73.451 15,775 112,32 92.221 18.427 1,884 43.988 17,423 3.153,406 210,471 838,40) 137 RU7 607 2
14 14 3
17 17 47 209 249 S2 280 280 29 1SI 551 Z1i 1,038 1.038 1.09.
93,510 428 55 1
2.405 169 R
i0 3.557 150
- SO 230 30.730 3,129 371 M4 36,692 3,448 Decontamination of Site Buildings Sc.1.3 Totals 2c.1.4 Satffolding in support of idecomminrislng Sca1 Subtotal Period 2a Abtlvity Coasts Period 2S Additional Costs 2c.2,1 License Termination Suray Panning 20.2 Subtotal Period 2c Additional Costs Period 2c Collaeral Costs 2c.3.1 Process lIquld waste 2c.3L2 Small tool allonance 2c.3.3 Decomamislosing Equipment Disposition 2c.3.4 Spent Fuel Capital and Transfer 2c.3 Subtotal Period Sc Collateral Costs Period 2a Period-Depeodent Costs 2C.4.1 Cecon supplies sc.4.2 Insurane 25,4.3 Property taues 2c.4, Health physics supplIes 2c,4.1 Heavy equipmert rntal 2c.4.6 Disposalof DAW generated 20,4.7 Plant energy budget 2c.4.4 NRC Fees 2C.4.9 EOner*ency Planning Fees TLG Ser-ieaa. Foc.
509 2
1 9
1 124 255 80 11 41 315 87 S
458 1,344 4.410 4,313 139,612 3,190 655 197 852 852 655 197 938 852 6,240 6,240 78 37 102 160 7
140 so 634 87 360 78 7
177 152 634 247 360 5
65 171 30 7
0 17 38 55 18 98 474 474 1
8 B
138 1,050 1.050 S4 415 291 1,946 1,532 1
6 6
3 33 33 1
8 8
16 61 81 26 197 197 4
23 23 6
44 44 O
60 60 2
2D 415 415 535 32,00 I04 6,O0P 373 303.107 88 6.000 908 335.608 192 351
'20 7,011
Comanche Pench Nitletr Pwr-Plant Deescm.isoicsiong Cost Study Docomeoti LI)-1621.O01, Re. 0 Appercdlix C, Poge 9of25 Table C-I Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant, Unit I DECON Decommissioning Cost Estimate (thousands of 2009 dollars)
Or-Site.L.W NRC spent Fuel site Processed Burial Volumet Burls I Williy and AcluItvy Rse.n Ramoval Packaging Transport Processing Disposai other Total Total UL.Term.
Management Restoration Volume Class A Class B Class C OTCC Processed Craft Contractor Index Astllty De.sription Cost Cost Costs Costs Costs Costs Costs Contngency Costs Costs Costs Costs Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet C". Feet Ca. Feet WM. Lbs.
Manhouars Mannrs-Period zt PeriodoDependent Cos (continued) t t4.10 Decommissioning Staff Severanoe 2c,4.t4 tiquid Radwas1e Processing Equipiment/SeloIces 2,.d2 SF51 Operting Costs 2c.4.13 Security Staff Cost 2.4.14 DOC Staff Cost 2c.4.26 Utility Stat) Cost 2c.4 Subtotal Period 2o Period-Dependent Costs 210 TOTAL PERIOD 2c COST PERlop 2d - Delay before License Termination Period 2d Direct Oeommissioning Activities Period 2d Collateral Costs 2d.3.1 Spent Fuel Capital and Transfer 2d.3 Subtotal Period 2d Collateral Costs Period 2d Period-De pendent Costs 2d.4.1 Insurance 2d.0..
Property taxes 2d.4.3 Health physics supplies 2d.4.4 Disposal of DAW generatid 2d.04 Plant energy budget 2d.4.6 8R0 Fees 2d.4.7 Emergency Planning Fees 2)d4.8 ISFSI Operating Costs 2d.4.5 Security Staff Cost 2d.4.10 Utiliy Staff Cost 2d.4 Subtotal PeFoid 2d Period-Dependent Costs 7d.0 TOTAL PERIOD 2d COST PERIOD 2. - License Temeinetlon Period 2e Diiect Decommissloning Actiuilties te,1,1 ORSE confirMatooy survey
- 2. 1.2 Teominate lieonse 2o.,
Subtotal Period 2e Aýriiv Costs PFoild 2e Additional Costs 2e.2.1 Lisense Teiminaton Suron 2e.t Subtotal Perdod 2o Additional Costs Period 2e Collateral Costs 2:.3.1 DOC statf reloation expenses 2e.S.
Spoot Fuel Capital and Transfer Ze.)
Subtotal Period 2n Collateral Costs Period 2e Perlod-Depondent Costs 2e.4.1 Insurance 2c.4.2 Propertfy Iaes TLG Servicee, Inl 1,637 245 1S8i2 1,082 30 5
35 35 3
1 4
15 2
17 17 401 60 461 4d1 571 05 657 657 S
235 1
0 17 2,805 463 3,527 3,504 207 407 250 152 670 579 3,821 1,169 7.354 6.925 Z4 438 497 6,049 10,025 7.011 2
16,571 482.231 8.384 22.811 351 6.458 Z.603 10.194 1,529 11,724 11,724 10,194 1.S20 11.724 11,720 1.400 140 IS4D 1.540 6
-33 34 370 370 243 61 304 3C4 D
13 3
17 17
-. 8 65 212 712 845 80 924 924 164 2S 189 189 707 106 413 813 3.,09 405 3.S17 3.517 243 1
5 13 7,153 976 0,380 7,773 1,113 243 1
5 13 17,340 2.505 20.100 7,273 12,837 263 5,268 r
23.383 54.S60 283 5.268 1
77,943 263 5.268 1
77.943 151 45 197 197 151 45 197 197 3.2St 977 4.233 0,233 3,256 927 4.230 0.233 85,031 3.120 06.835 3.120 1,006 223 2,709 1,709
.8 3
12 55 1,580 235 1,804 t,7l9 95 95 24t s8 25 373 273 7
75 75
Comanche Poath Nuclear Power Plant Deanomomiaosiong Cost Study Document LII-1621-001, Reu. 0 Appendix C. Page 10 of 25 Table C-1 Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant, Unit1 DECON Decommissioning Cost Estimate (thsousandis af 2009 dollars)
IActivity ads.
AoUv~tY Descrltiaon Period 2a Period-"Dpondent Costs Econtinued) 2e.4.t Health physicssupplies 2.0.4 Zlopnsal Of DAW generated 2e.4.S Plant energy budget 2e,4.6 NRC Fees 2o.4.7 Emergency Planning Fees 2e.4.t Decommissioning Staff Severance 2e.4.9 ISFS Operating Costs 2e.4,10 SecurL"sutfCmt 2c,4.11 DOC Staff Cost 2et4.12 Utility Staff Cost 2e.4 Subtotal Period 2e Period-Dependent Costs 2e.O TOTAL PERIOD 2e COST PERIOD 0
TOTALS PERIOD 31b-Site Restoration Period 3b Direct Decommissoonlng Activities Demolition of Remaining Site Bulldings 3b.1.1.1 Reactor 31, 1.1.2 Circ Water Yard Piping 3b.1.1.3 Diesel Generator 3b.1.0.4 Old Steam Genrator Storage Facilit 3b.1.1.5 Sofegeard 3b.1.1.6 wiltchgear 3b.t..7 Turbine 3b.1.1.0 Turbine Pedestal 3b.1.0 Totals Site Closeout Activities 3b.1.2 Grade & landscape site 3b,1.3 Final report to NRC 3b.1 Subtotal Period 35 Activlty Costs Period 35 Additional Costs b2.1."
Concrete Processing 35,2 Subtotal Period 3b Additiona[ Costs Period 35 CollateraI Cols 3b.3.0 Small tool allowance 31.1.2 Spent Fuel Capital and Transfer 31.1 Subtotal Period 35 Collateral Costs Period 3It Period-Deperdont Cots 3b.4.1 Insurance 13.4.2 Property taunt 3b.4.3 Hear equipment rental 31b..4 Plant energy budget 3b54.5 NRC ISFS0 Fees 3b.4.6 Emergency Planning Feer 0O1-oI to L L R W N R C S p e n t F uo l S i ft P ro c e s s e d B u ria l V o lu m e s B a wa l I U ti l ty a n d Decon Bemoval Pockaging Transport Processing Disposal Other Totat Total LU. Term.
Management Restoralon Volume Class A Class B Class C GTCC Processed Craft Contractor Cost Cost Cotta Costs Costs Cosrs Costs Contingency Cats Costs Cash Coso Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Wm.. Lbs.
Manhours Maohouts 473 182
.182
$56 169 910 33 934 3.225 3.805 473 1
12 10.131 473 1
0 12 15,107 4,150 38,871 12,7.0 5,816 16,066 41.943 163,055 118 592 592 3
16 6
249 4,974 1
27 209 209 S6 612 615 17 186 186 137 1,047 1,047 5
38 38 040 1,074 1,074 27.093 414 3,709 3.709 46.750 571 4,376 4,376
.0,107 0.589 12,207 11.903 230 249
'.974 t
114,750 7.847 18,440 13.121 320 249 4,974 85.836 137.g70 SSSSO 341.133 301,997 35,353 3.803 181,149 116.160 3,156 459 17,032.970 66Zu.s5 1,787.553 5,679 17 605 946 2,001 113 550 1,108 1L147 477 11,624 521 529 050 6,531 3
19 91 695 142 1,087 309 2,358 17 130 82 632 178 1.366 1.672 12.019 192 192 72 549 29 221 221 1,772 13,389 221 6.531 19 69S 2.358 130 t63Z 1.36G 12.813, 549 13,368 611 611 301 1
252 252 ill 361 198 7,0356 55 222 27:
493 79.425 36 8.905 11.858 30.297 2,049 11.258 15.907 1S9.729 1,292 1,560 161.021 0.560 2
80 611 2
00 61t 2,483 2,4813 96 219 96 219 6,136 328 241 250 448 14 011 33 252 47 362 33 361 08 198 920 7.056 35 277 (0) 25 275 45 493 W,4 TLG Serriceo. la.
00
Comanche Peah Novcear Power Plant Deco isnsisting Cost Study Dorumen*o L31.21o01, fec. 0 Appendix C. Page 11 sf25 Table C-1 Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant. Unit I DECON Decotmmissioning Cost Estimate (thousands of 2009 dollars) lActivity O4-S1te LLRW NRC spent Fuel site Proseosed Buallsvolumes Burials Utility andi Decsn Removal Packaging Transport Processing Disposal Other Total Total LI. Term.
Management Restotetion Volume Class 5 Class B Class C OTCC Processed Craft Contractor Coat Cost Coosn Costa Costs Cost Cosos Contingency Coats
- Cast, Costs Costs Cu. Fees Cu. Feet CU. Feot Cu. Feet CU. Feet WL. Lbs.
Manheats Manhours I d.
a Period 3b Period-Dependent Costs (continued) 3b.4.7 Decommissioling Staff Severance 3b.4.3 ISFSI Operating Costs Sb.4.9 Security Staff Cost 30.4.10 DOCStalfCost 3b.4.11 Utilisy Staff Cost 3b.4 Subtotal Period 3b Perisr. Dependent Costs 3b.5 TOTAL PERIOD 31 COST PERIOD 3s -Fuel Storage Oteralonse/ShppIna Period 3c Direct Decommissioning Activities P.niod 3c Collate al Costs 3c.3.1 Spent Fuel Ca pital and Transfe r 3c.S Subtotal Period 3c Collateral Costs Period 3c Period-Depndenta Costs Zc.4.1 L
Isurance X0.4.2 Property taco 3u.4.3 Plant energy budget 3c.4.4 NRC $SF1 FPeas 3c.4.5 Emrergency Planning Fets So.4.5 ISFS1 Operating Costs 3S.o.7 Sesuoli Staff Cost 30,4.e utility Staff Cost 3c.4 Subtotal Period 3c Period-Dependent Costs 3c.0 TOTAL PERIOD 3c COST PERIOD 3d - GTCC shipping Period 3d Direct Decommlssioning Activities Nuclear Steam Supply System Removal 3d.,1.1.
VeSsels Intamals GTCC OaptaNI 3d.,.,
Totals Md.A Subtotal Period 3d Activity Costs Period 3d PerlodoDepadent Costs 3d.4.1 Insuannce 3d.4.2 Property tases 3d,4.3 Plant energy budget 3d.4.4 Emergency Planning Fees 34..5 ISFSI Dperatlng Costa 3d.4.6 Soco"rySsaffnCost 3d.4.7 Utility Staff Cost
- 34.
Subtotal Period 3d Period-Dependent Costs 3d.0 TOTAL PERIOD 3d COST 1,422 as 2.362 7.431 4,448 17.197 17,610 213 1,635 1.635 13 101 101 354 2,716 0
2.227 1,301 8.546 667 5D11S (01 1.023 3.440 26.773 2,635 4,733 5.339 41,335 ouS6 4.994 489 8.546 4.032 20,405 34,49S 70,221 110.240 70,221 250.682 163,50 252,242 6,136 18,386 2.009 376 2.885 2,885 2D509 376 2,885 2,885 3.752 2,054 2,856 5.131 1,033 22,168 10.170 47.134 49,643 373 4.127 200 2.260 206 3,142 513 5,644 ISO 1.153 3,325 25,493 1,52S 11,693 6,380 S3,S15 6,737 56,400 4,127 2,260 5,644 1,153 25.493 11,69S
$3,515 S6,400 612.523 1600B69 003.392 803,390 453 463 463
-t.t37 3
1.672 12,972 12.372 10.837 1.672 12,970 7
2.972 10.837 1,672 12,972 12.972 505 104,146 SOS 104,t46 500 104.,46 2
37 17 74 10,837 74 3
7 O
4 O
9 6
43 3
20 10 65 1,682 13,056 12,972 7
43 29 43 05 85 505 10,100 1,063 210 1.35D TLG Se*ot'ices, Y..
Comnnche Peak Nuclear Power Plant Decosmmsiooning Cost Study D~ocrn~t LII-) '21-O0), Rer. i AppendIn C. Page 12 of 25 Table C-1 Comanche Peak Nuclear Fewer Plant, Unoit I DECON Decommissioning Cost Estimate (thsousnods of 2009 dollars)
I AcO ulty O~f-Slte LLRW NRC S peer Fuel sit.
Processed Buri.1 Volu.es Burial t Utility :and Decon Removal Packaging Transport Processing Disposal Other Torl Total Lib. Term.
M.anagoecmnt Restoration Volume Class A Class 0 Class C GTCC Processed Craft Contrator Cost C
asost Costs Costs Castt C
osts Contlcgney Ceets Costs Costs Costs Cu. Feet Cu. Feel Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet WL. Lbs.
Manohurs Manhours m nu~
as*ly
~~l U PERIOD 31 - ISFS ODesontinetion Period 3e Direct Oecommlssolning Activitlet Period 3e Additional Costs 3e.2.
ISFSI License Tenmlttleaon 3e.2 Su blotla Period 3e AddIlonsl Costs Period 3e Collateral Costs 3e.3.1
- mail tool allourace 3e.3 Subtotal Perod 3e Collateral Costs Period 3e Period-Depscdent Costs 3e..4.
Insurance 3e.4.2 Property taxes Se.4.3 Heua equol.nent rental 3..4.4 Plant energy budget 3t.4.5 ISFSI Operating Cots 3,4r.6 Security Staff Cost 3e,4.7 Utility Staff Cost 3e.4 Subtotal Period 3e Period-Depesndent Costs 3e.0 TOTAL PERIOD 3e COST PERIOD 31 -15151 Site Restoration Period 3f lireot Docommissioning Activities Period 3f Additional Costs 3.2.1 ISFSi Demoltion and Site Restoration 3f.2 Subtotal Period 3f Addltional Costs Peraod 31 Collateral Costs 30.0.1 Small tool slloowan.e 31.3 Subtotal Period 3Y Collateral Cost, Period 3f Period-Dependent Costs 3f.4.1 Insurance 3f,4.2 Property tases 3:.4.3 Heavy equipment rental 3f.4.4 Plant energy budget 3:.4.5 Security Stalf Cost 3f.4.6 Utility Staff Cost 31.4 Subtotal Period 3f Period-Dependent Costs 3f.O TOTAL PERIOD 3f COST PERIOD TOTALS TOTAL COST TO DECOMMISSiION 23 0
a 371 696 23 1
0 371 696 2D4 1.304 204 1,304 1,304 1.304 1.70 142.522 2.1S6S
,200.
1.701 142.522 2,165 1280 0
O 0
0 0
0 274 274 297 30 14 85 119 303 371 999 5
59 3
33 41 315 2
17 13 90 10 137 82 659 287 2,964 59 33 315 27 90 137 509 29SS6 1.701 2.409 1.3 6 4.375 142.523 2,S65 3,605 7Z4 724 21 112 860 860 25 112 8E0 840 14,350 80 14,3150 0
15 43 so 106 107 838 132 19.521 463 a
11.20t 68,459 7,325 60,909 13,329 6,039 16,066 55.692 315.705 2
10 L
16 16 122 6
At 7
57 31 244 14S 1,114 14,209 113,E69 14.527 83,990 564,136 421.223 10 10 16 122 49 1.245 57 771 244 3,016 1,0114 14.350 2.096 64,547 34.495 1.701 53S 246.669 100,419 1,064,734 103,031 39.902 181,319 119.033 3.986 439 000 17,459,950 071,918 3,691.438 o
TLG Serties, Inc.
Coanoche Peth Nh IV ear Power Plaot Dooooomsioinolog Cost Study NlerororrI L11-1061-001, Rau, 0
.4ppseodi, C, Page a
)or25 Table C-1 Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 1 DECON Decommissionsing Cost Estimate (thousands of 2009 dollars)
OBS-atu LLRW NRC Spent Foe Sits Pr.. eSds
-Boslol iloloyre Burial I Ulliity cod Activlty Cecon Removal P.ckaging Transport Processlng Disposal Other Totaz Total Lie. Tor.
Management Restoration Volume Class A Class S Class C GTCC Processed Craft Contractor Incex ActIlvRy Description Cost Cost Costs Costs Costs Costs Costs Coningency Costs Coost Costs Costs Cu. Feet Cu. Fee e
Co.Foot CU. Feet Cu. Fest Wt. Ltss.
Manthous Mareouss TOTALCOSTTODECOMMISSION WITH B.48%CONTINGENCY:
Ss64.155 thousandsof 2009 dollars OTALNBC LICENSE TERMINATION COBTiS 74.66% OR:
$421,223 thousands of 2009 dolars, PENT FUEL MANAGEMENT COST B 18.26% O1:
SB3,0B1 thousands of 2009 dollars NON-NUCLEAR DEMOLITION COST IS 7.D7%
ON S39.902 thousands of 2009 dollars OTAL LOW-LEVEL RADIOACTIVE WASTE VOLUME BURIED IEXCLUDING GTCC)!
123,47B cubic ftet OTAL GREATER THAN CLASS C RADWASTE VOLUME GENERATED'.
505 cubic feet OTAL SCRAP METAL REMOVED:
01,834 tons OTAL CRAFT LABOR REQUIREMENTS:
870,918 man-hoor, End Notes:
Ila-Indicates that this activity not charged as decommissioning expense.
a i indlcates that this activity Performed by decommissioning staff.
0 - indicates that this value is laess than 0.5 but Is non-sero.
a cell nontaln;ng"
-" indicates a..ro value TLG Ser'iooo, Ie,
Comanche Peak NuRclear Poaer Plant leeontetsiooniog Coot Stuody Dloenrment L.I1.62.1-00), Ret. 0 Appendix C, Page 14 of 25 Table 0-2 Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 2 DECON Decommnissioning Cost Estimate (theouands of 1200 dollars)
[+7 Off0sio LLRW PRC Spent Fuel Site Processed Bural Volumes Burial I Utility and Oa wa Rmorval Paokag.ng Transport Peosoing Dispoal Other Toni Total Lie, Term.
Management Restoraton Volume Class A Cless B Ciaso C GTCC Prooesoed Craft Contr2ctorI
'n.
__s d=...
1-st lvb Css Cninec ot osts.
1.0s rots 1u. -1e C. Fe-1
-U FIe rU Fet
-U Pee
-~. b.Mnor M.nh.urs 1.1.21:1.1, AZtIvItyDacrIPtlcn PERIOD la -Shutdown through Transition Period la Direct OeDoMmliSSoningdAcllities la.1.1 Prepare preliminary deoadmmissioning cost lo:.2 Notificaioen of Cessation of Operations la.13 Remove fuel & taunte material lal4 Notification of Permanent Defueling lol.
Oeactivate plant syotems & processwaste 1.t.6 Prpare and submit PSDAR lc.1.7 Review plant dwgs & specs.
te.1.t Perform detailed tad suveV lo.1.9 Estimate by.product Inventory 1.1.10 End produot description l.1,1 Decailed by-product Inventory elal Define major wek sequence l
3 Perform SER and EA 1a.1.14 Perform Site-SpeeltIr Cost Study ta.1 Prepane/sohmit LioCese Termination Plan a.1.16 Receive NRC approval of termination plan Activit Specifitations Oa.i.17.1 Plant & temporary facilties 1a.117.2 Plant systems ia..2.1.3 NSSi Denantamlnatlon Flush la.i.IOA4 Reactor internaio ia.i.17.S Reator eseol ia.1.12.6 Biological shield Ia.i.t7,7 Steam generators ls.2.07.
Reinforced conrete la.1.17.9 Main Turbine So.i 7.10 Main Condensers Pa.l.0.1
,.leetstructurms
& buildings la.l.i7.52 Waste management
,a.,1,l3 foellit & site ¢ioeSout 1a.1.1?
Total Planning & Site Preparations la.ul Prepam dismanting sequence 1a:11 Plant prep. & temp. s.oe*
.l,0 Design water ctean-up system lah..2 P igging/Cont.
Cotrf Envfps/tooling/etc.
la t
Procure oashr/iiners
& sontaieers l.l Subtotal Period Ia Activity Costs Period la la teoral Costs la.3.1 Spent Fuel Capital and Transten la.3 Subtotal Period So Collateral Costs Period la Poriod-Dependent Costs 10.4.1 InSurane.
t.e,2 Pnoperty toees l1.4.3 Health physics supplies TLG S-er1ice, Ion-68 10 79 79 n/a 105 16 t21 121 242 06 279 279 t3 i3 68 395 160 263 216 251 219 26 37a 342 26 164 84 21 21 242 47 1,992 P
61 61 e
61 Pt 10 79 79 59 454 454 24 198 189 40 303 303 32 248 258 3g 298 268 33 252 227 4
30 30 56 430 430 52 394 390 a
30 30 25 1P9 189 to 97 4
3 24 o
oI
,5 100 90 06 279 279 7
97 27 299 2,291 2,017 19 145 245 420 3,220 3,220 11 as as 330 2,530 2,532 10 71 7S 1.333 10,217 9.944 556 856 2,969 428 425 556 3,210 1,327 2,1d0 1,753 300 21 24 24 94 27 274 2.106 1.783 254 3,039 2,782 214 1,335 605 171 070 1,33S 1.969 16,19D 1.027 599 526 01.565 126 2,000 74 2,200 P5 0.000 274 7,228 1,004 8,312.
.,312 7,228 1,084 0.312 8.312 9.005 101 1,106 1.106 90 9
99 99 404 01 DS5 505
Caoetaeh Pean Nanlear Pawer Plant DeeacenissianLng Cost Study Dtracmr et L.12401-001. Rau. 0 Apjendl-i C. Page 15 of 25 Table C-2 Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 2 DECON Decommissioning Cost Estimate (thousanda of 2009 dollars)
OITt-Olt LLRW SRC Spsit Fuel site Pocessed Burial Vatumes Burtlr I uir n Actiuity Decon Removna Packaging Transport Ptocesslin Disposal Other Total Total Lie. Term.
Management Restoration nore ClassA Ciass 0 Cass C GTCC Prnoessed Crat Conoectrr IndeA A
rflesrtitdo cost
- oot, Ceta Casts costs Costa Casts Conngen Costs Costs Costs Costs CU. Feett Co.Fe Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cs. Feet Wt., Lbs.
Maniouts Mabhours Petiad la Penlcd-Depeedent Costs conotisued) la.4.4 Hesvy equipment rental 1:.4.S Disposal oa DAW generated Ia.4.6 Plant energy budget 1a,4.7 NRC Fees 1a.4.8 Emergency Plannlng Fees l.d.9 Spent Fuel Pool O&M loA,10 ISFSI Operating Costs la.4.I SecurityStaffCost la.12 Utiirv StaI Cost la,e Subtetal Period Is Period-Depeedent Costs la.0 TOTAL PERIOD ls COST PERIOD lb - Decommissioning Preparations Period lb Direct Decomrmssiocnng Activites Detailed Work Procedures lb1.1,1 Plant systems 1b.l.1.2 2
NSS Denetamination Rush 6.1..3 Reactor internal 11,.1.4 Remaining buildings 11,1.1.5 CRD cooling assembly 21,l.1.6 CRD husIna & 10 tubes lb.1.1.7 lacore instrumentation 16,L.1.. Reautorsvesset lbLl.t FaclIily nios aut 1b,1.1.10 Missile shields IbMl.i1 Biological shield lb,1.1.12 Steam gsneratots lb.1.1.13 Reinforced concrete 1.1,1,4 Marc Turbini nb.1.1.15 Main Condesers Ob.1.1.16 Auoiilary building lb.1.0.17 Reactor building Ob.lml Totai 1b.1.2 eD.n-primary loop 514 a1e 2
0 24 1,20g 4B5 445 752 54 2 0 24 28,7)7 2
2O 24 33,015 5
32 42 101 1,390 1.390 41 533 533 44 489 114 877 7
51 750 5,749 5,749 3,717 28.493 l8,493 5.155 39.915 38,s98 489 877 51 1.416 9a7r9 274 493 9,S0 493 9.854 493 9,854 157,471 423.400 2
580,871 2
612,439 918 2
c 24 49a9sa 7,572 58,444 48,442 249 S3 292 71 53 53 S3 191 63 24
- 3 242 53 82 82
- 144
- 144
]17*1 37 287 25e 8
61 61 20 151 151 11 82 20 8
6t 61 a
61 61 8
61 61 29 220 220 9
73 36 4
27 27 9
73 73 36 279 079 8
61 30 12 94 12 94 22 165 149 2ZZ 165 149 263 2.014 1,635 29 61 30 94 94 17 379 2.026 428 1,070 178 428 420 428 1.554
$14 193 514 1.969 420 66g 668 1.168 1.168 14.228 1.087 1,067 14.ý28 11.831 4,332 1X831 4,332 696 2b.1 Subtotal Period lb Activity Costs 596 Period lb Additional Costs lb.2.1 Site Chatauterliation Ib.2.2 Spent fuel pooel iolation 1b.2 Subtotal Period lb Additional Costs 348 1.044 1.044 1.701 611 3.058 2,079 1,049 555 2,404 2,404 6.460 969 7,429 7,429 8,309 1,524 9.832 9.832 379 Period 06 CoUlmteral Costs 1b.3.1 Decon eQuinment lb1.3.2 OC staff reloCation expenses Ib.s3.3 Process liquid waste lb.3.4 Smarl tool allowarce 1b.3.5 Pipe cutting equipment 991 56 2
1.100 1.483 13 230 9.02 149 1,140 1.140 223 1,709 1.709 947 4.822
-. 822 0
3 3
105 1,265 1.265 372 829 114.407 234 A
(.43 TLG Service.,. r.
Comanche Pnh Niclear Pawerr Plant Dscannmiuiao-ing Cost Study Doenmert LII-162j-.OO, Re,. 0 Apprcdiix C, Pge JG16f 28 Table C-2 Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 2 DECON Decommissioning Cost Estimate (thousands of 2009 dollars)
Off-Slte LLRW NRIt Spent Fuel Site Ptocessed Burial VolumWo..
Bril I Utility nd Activity oeeon Removal Packaging Transport Processlng Disposal Other Total Total Lie. Term.
Management Restoration Volume Class U Class 8 Class C GTCC Processed Craft Contractor Index Actlvliy gaseripIUen Cost Cost Corts Costs Costs Costs Costs Corns to-y Costs Costs Costs Costs CU. pert Cu. FFet Co. Frst Cu. Frt Cu. Feat Wt., Lbs.
Manhours Manhours Period lb Collateral Costs (continued) lb.3.6 Deoon rig lb.3,7 Spent Furl Capitol and Tranrfer lb.3 Subtotal Period 3b Cgtateral Costs Period lb Period-Dependent Costs 1b.4.1 Decon supplier tb.4.2 insurance lb.4.3 Property taxes 2b.4.4 Health physics supplies 1b.4.S Heavy equipment rental tb.4.6 Disposal of 0AW generated 1b.4.7 Plant energy budget tb.4.8 NRC Fees Lb.4.9 Emrrgrncy Planning FeeP 1b.4.10 Spent Puel Poole O&
lb.4.11 ISFSI Operating Costs lb.4.12 Securily Staff Cost lb.4.13 DOC Stall Cost 1b.4.'4 Utility Sota Cost lb.4 Subtotal Period lb Period.-Dependrnt Costs lb.0 TOTAL PERIOD 2b COST PERIOD 1 TOTALS PERIOD la -Large Component Removal Period 2a Direct Decommissioning Actiritles Nuclear Steam Supply System Removal 2a.1.1.1 Reactor Coolant Piping 2o.1.1.2 Pressurizer Relief Tank 2a.1.1.3 leacr Contlant Pumps & Motors 2a.S.1.4 Presnuriern 2a.I.1.3 Steam Generators 2a.1.1.1 CRDMs/ICIr/SerViuc Structune Removal 2a.
0 1.7 ReactorVessel Inremals 2:.t.1.8 ReactorVensel 2a.1.1
- Total, RemOal of Major Equipment 2a.l.t Main Turbine/Generator 2a.1.3 Main Condensers Cascading Costs from Clean ouilding Demolition 2a.1.4.1 Reactor lo.1.0.2 Auxiliary 20.1.0.3 Safeguard ZI.1A.4 FTol 20..0A Totais 1.40 3 210 2.610 1,010 2,272 341 2,612 2.612 2.448 1,02 83 333 3,502 3,757 2t035 13,261 10.548 2.612 372 829 114,407 Z34 237 261 31 497 3.17 1.599 3,175 2.517 84 0
t6 234 S09 46 is 35 1.225 246 225 386 22 2,534 4.687 12,636 15 22.$17 3,517 36.334 3.540 86,262 0
38 38 S1 500 563 o
SO so 59 296 294 39 300 300 4
20 20 104 1,409 1.009 25 270 270 23 240 50 444 9
26 380 2,914 2.914 703 5,390 S.350 1.895 14,531 14.531 31436 26,495 25,778 7.605 12,547 48,338 15,177 110,992 97.280 247 444 26 718 3.330 13.059 303 303 379 675 029 652 1.168 829 0.0802 79.814 64,480 215,657 6,005 1
359,957 120,4S7 13.133 378,517 130.311 13,136 990.955 71 84 16 5
228 18 10 7
3 95 69 59 114 2S 2,030 25 32 3t2 74 007 227 3,002 1,964 1.264 2,946 0.568 92 68 263 19 312 72 2,241 5,079 S10 8,051 242 S4 4,210 1,544 319 0.500 242 629 9,798 9,409 2.310 Z.900 70.839 484 248 393 74 747 462 771 194 58 714 466 116 521 521 38 170 178 589 3.037 3.017 312 1.792 1.797 3.355 19,411 19.411 170 923 925 7,176 23,370 23,370 7,980 22.937 22,937 19,737 72,150 72,150 334 2,193 2.198 444 2.645 2.645 150 1,152 1L150 7I 54Z 547 16 124 124 70 537 537 307 2.355 2,355 722 329 7,231 3,445
ý0.067 23.397 4.852 1,377 903 459 6,060 2.754 40.067 47,959 3.tS6 459 87,332 4.301 36.553 1.072 792.800 4.59S 100 20S1.72 2.415 932 3,329.768 23.233 2.125 119.5%0 0.524 320.029 26.933 1.209 978,589 26.933 1,209 5.9n2,097 94.003 5,582 3,742 2.080 6.756 1,992 1,002 472 105 467 2,048 505,024 8,194 482.702 25.500 13,996 6,723 1.580 6.652 29.019 AA TLG Ser-ices, 1o-.
Comanche PeNrt Nuclear Power Plant Deeonmnisioning Coat Study Dfoe ntent LII-162-OOJe Roe. 0 Appendi. C. Pnge.17af25 Table C-2 Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 2 DECON Decommissioning Cost Estimate (thousands of 2009 dollars) nflSite LLBW NRC ipsot Foci Sito Pronenir Banial volumes BuralI juistn Actiulty Becon Removal Pacukging Transport Processing Disposal Other Total Totl Lie.Term.
Management Restoration Velumo Class A Class B Class C GTCC Processed Craft C
utnsntot ande ActCaty Oescpoon Cos t Cot Costs Costs Costs Cost s
Oots Contingency o
Coon Costs Costs Costs CU. Feet CU. Feet Cu. Feet Cu, Feel Cu. Feet WL. Lbs.
Manhours Monhouro Disposal of Plant Systems is.1.5.1 Auxiliary Feedwater (insulated) 2.1.5.2 Auoiiiaryiteam 2a.1.5.3 Bown Rerycle (insulatedl 2o.t.5.4 Boron Recytle uoninsulated) 2a.1.5.5 Roorn Thertnal Regeneration (Inolatted) 2a.1.5.6 Boron Thermal Regeneration (snnsoulatet) 2a.1.5.7 Carbon Dioxide Gas 2a.2.5.,
Chemical B Volume Control Insulated) ta.1.5.9 Chemical & Volume Control (uninsulated) 2a.1.5.1O Chemical teed 2o.i.5.t1 Chemical ten
- RCA 2a.1.5.12 Chilled Water. Sotet 2o.t.S.t3 Chilled Water - Bater - RCA 2a.1.5.14 Chlorine 2:..St1S Circulating Water 2o.1.5.t1 Component Cooing Water 2a.1.5.17 Component Coaling Water - RCA 2a:.15.1l Condensate (inoulatod)
IS.i 9 Cnndenrate uninsutsted) 2I.3.5.20 Condenoa Polishing 2a.1,5.2. Condere Vacuumn
& Water Be Pritming 2ati.,S1 Entrortion Steam 2o.t.S.23 Feedwater 2a,1.5.24 Feedoater-RCA 20.1.5.25 Generator & troter 2a.1,5.26 Generator Gas Cooling ia4,.5.27 Generator Primary Wator 2a,1.5.2g Gener.tor Seal Oil 2a1.5,.29 Hydrogen Gas 2:e1.5.30 Main Steam Reheat & Steam Dump 2o.1.5.31 Moin Steam Reheat & Strom Dump RCA 2,.I.5.32 Ma:in Turbine lube Oil 20,1,5.33 Main Turbine Oil Purification 2a.1..334 Nitmogen Gao 5o.1.3.35 Oxygen Gas 2a.1.5.36 Post Accident Sampling 2o.1.5.37 Process Sampling (uninsulated) 2a,.15.33 ReactorCoolant 2a.1,5.39 Resennir Makeup Water 2a.t,.40 Rereolt Return Water io.t.B,4t Reservoir tervice Tower 2a.1.5.12 Residual Heat Reorval 2o.t.ia3 Sate1: injecion (ilnsulted) 2I,1,5.al S:et TIniecton unlnsuluted) io.1,5.45 Secondary Plant Sampling 20.1.06 Steam Generator 5olwdn & Cleanup 2o.1.0.47 Turbine Electrohydr CotIrl (insulated) 2a.1.5.4g Turbine EieCtrohadr Cntrl (unlnsulated) 2u4.i.45, lorhine Giand$team & Dralr 2a.ti.5O Turbine Heater Dralns 2uti-1..1 Turbine Plant Cooling (Insulated) 2.t.5-52 Turbine Plant Cooling Innnsulated) 519 597 is 32 226 309 3S 74 97 197 80 174 263 4S6 127 7
4 88 10 273 947 113 95 87 53 47 52 1
7 45 6
1 31 385 37 1
7 0 7
46 101 73 S
55 286 203 101 304 22 15 v
29 319 14 S15 a3 50 717 223 2
t 6
14 02 23 301 191 5
2 17 38 16 7
71 Ill 11 4
37 82 40 24 283 271 D
02 6
3 32 38 119 126 1.715 804 B
9 124
'52 40 39 532 268 0
B 0
2 I
I is 7
8 3
20 63 63 34 337 542 g
to sit 6o 34 St 008 122 305 1,858 1.658 10 011 20 90 RD 290 1,372 1.372 49 219 219 139 538 530 0
2 111 499 499 363 1,700 10700 7
tO 3
13 1i 1
3 37 20' 203 2
12 43 314 O
14 726 4,436 4,436 17 130 14 110 a
61 7
54 20 213 47 292 292 0
1 1
B 7
53 1
7 O
2 5
3S 253 1,517 1,517 6
43 11
&1 o
1 D
2 12 12 7
42 42 6R 310 310 11 34 a
63 1
9 392 1,863 1.i61 BR 395 i95 232 1,657 1.657 4
3D 17 120 3
25 3
17 4
34 48 357 2
16 17 133 7,517 999 57 62 3.154 9B2 179 161 743 492 309 349 2,968 1,270 is 10 3i2 162 12 314 24 17.972 3,036 1t0 1to 100 61 54 213 1.301 223 B
S3 35 5,577 1.143 43 81 01 2
9 IRS 31 2t4 267 84 63 9
3,129 2,317 1.451 295 9,308 592 30 128 2S 17 34 367 16 133 390.707 14.049
-,676 0.135 1,291 201,319 15.631 21.715 2,867 72,909 7,53 20 47,009 61,54 224.227 20,003 021 935 253 155 27.976 2,209 360 W.,429 763 1,03g.029 20,662 4,373 3,041 3.327 2,017 1,806 7.084 72.083 1.401 39 247 1.745 218 54 1.136 32B,9'g5 10.309 1.383 2,663 39 a 2
""03023 "S'S 32,646 3.908 2.790 2,09S 303 151.078 7.03:
85,411 2.70*
424.574 2.160 1.040 t2 4,265 83H 552 1.133 12,296 549 4,420 j*
TLG Services, Inc.
Comanche Pooh Nuclear Power Plant De-omao ssiiangg Coat Study 11-e1met LI-1621.001, Are. 0 Appendis C, Page 8l;a 25 Table C-2 Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 2 DECON Deconmmissioning Cost Estimate (thousands of 2000 dollars)
Ott-Site LIOW SOIC SpeotFoel Site Processed sutlalvolatoes Burrsch Ut'lllvad Actilvty Decon Removal Pasokglng Transport Processing Disposal Other Total Total L,. Term.
Management Restoration Volume Class A Class Clasxs C GTCC Procesoed Craft Canenusot Indes Actlity Desecrpton Cost Ceat Costs costs Coots Costs Costs Contingency Costs Costs Costs Costs Cu. F Ca. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet W.. Lbs.
Manhouts Meohoars Disposal of Plant Systems (continued) 2a.1.S.53 Turbinos (HIGH -LOW) (insulatedl 4
2a.S.S.54 Turbines (HIGH
- LOW) (unitrsuietedl 12 2a.,.S.Sh VHna Ceilled Water - Non Safeoy 63 2a.1.5.56 VHt Chilled Water -Non Safety - RCA 529 42 34 2a.1.5.57 Westinghouse Process Instruments 3
Ga.1.5 Totals 1.047 0,563 49S 429 446 281 2
1 0.686 3,101 139 19 10.23M 35,060 484 2a.1.6 Scaffolding in support of devmsrnissioniug 2a.1 Subtotal Period 2a Actvlity CoSts Period 2a Additional Costs 2lol.1 Retired HP & 12 turbine Rooms a.2 Subrtoal Period 2a Additional Costs Period 2a Collateral Costs 2a.3.1 Process liquid waste 2:.1.2 Small tool allowanve 2a'3.3 Spent Fuel Capital and Transfer 2.3 Subtotal Porlod 2G Coalateral Costs Period Ga Period-Dependent Costs a.4.1 Dewon supceies 2a.4.2 tusurnooe 2a.4.3 Property taxes 2a.4.4 Health physics supplies Za.4.5 Heavy equipm-ot renta) 2a.0.4 Disposal of DAW generated 2a.4.7 Plant energy budget 2a.4.8 HOC Fees la.4.9 Emergency Planni*g Fees 2a..10 Decommissioning Staff Severance 2a.4.11 Spent Fuel Pool O&M 2a.4.G12 1PSI Operatinv Costs 2a.4.13 Security Staff Cost 2a.4.14 DOC Staff Cost a.4.15 utility Staf Cost 2C..
Subtotal Period 2a Periad-Dependent Costs 20.o TOTAL PERIOD 2a COST PERIOD Zb -Site DOeontamlnsen Period 2b Direct Decommissiaoning Aciities Disposai of Plant Systems 2b.11.1 Auxlliaery Building HVAC lInsulated) 2b.1..2 Auxiliary Buildng HVAC uolnsulated) 2b.1.1.3 Sort Ois & Miss Uncontrolred Amo.
HVAC 2..1.14 Cmoressed bi.- Instr. Air (insulated) 2b.1.1.
Compressed Air -Instmment Air - RCA (I 21b1.1.6 Compressed Air - Instrument Air -RCA (u C
TLG Gesricea. Inc.
1,o58 31 9
1.676 20,485 Io,4i1 2.787 340 56 1.244 340 11 1.244 234 09 525 277 234 277 109 525 2,624 3.155 19 2
oa 5,700 19 2
1,998 26,542 10,999 3.461 1,104 6.575 1,104 6,575 545 131 279 1.670 673 327 2,557 2.109 64 16,162 6.262 25.689 279 5S.071 10,232 33.094 62,136 1
5 2
14 9
73 279 1.611 1,511 1
7 7
3.719 21,110 18,732 29S 2,50 1.550 24.835 102.009 99.631 353 1,993 1,993 353 1.093 1,993 491 2,043 2.543 41 318 206 986 7,561 1,h18 10,422 2,829 22 110 110 50 600 600 13 144 130 656 3,280 3.280 473 3,629 3.629 72 372 372 250 1.920 1,927 67 741 741 33 36D 384 2.941 2.941 256 1,275 10 74 923 7,073 7,073 Z.424 18,385 10,506 3.853 29,543 29,543 9.401 70,647 600924 35,101 185,071 173.377 24 1S1 151 29 179 279 a
3 o
2 I4 74 7a 50 276 270 S
14 73 4,673 1.120 16 3
2.378 59.579 14,004 1.313 8Z 2,370 111.455 66,120 3,156 5,019 5.014 2.727 32 7,561 7.561 32 2.727 360 3.275 74 1,709 04 S1703 9.270 2,424 121,b56 79,610 3.136 728 19 846 13 04 3
51 59 462 220 6960.O0 1,200 1,000 696.003 1.200 1.00D 222.065 S32 221.065 532 115.142 26 191.919 230,606 429,351 115.142 20 851.876 4S9 11,647.760 423.196 808.457 51,309 1,123 36.394 1.466 91 33 7,399 1,174 380.02 2,046 459 155 474 2.423 297,550 13,734 913 111 3,638.353 224.459 66,395 aO.25G 10,614,570 421.438 5,582 47 2
4 00 5
57 1
5 S1 5
2 30 2
1 S
14
- 11.
0 4
44 02
Comanche Peah Ntelear-Pouer Plant Decommo iioisog Coat Study Document L.11-121.001, Re-, 0 Appendix C. Poge 19 of gS Table C-2 Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 2 DECON Decomminssioning Cost Estimate (thousands or2009 dollars)
Off-Site LLRW NRC Spent Fuol Site Proessed ButlIVolumes Burial I Utility and Activty Decon Removal Packaglng Transport Processing Disposal Other Total Toalt Lb. Tram.
Management Restoration Poluet Class A close S class C GTCC Processed croft controctor AtIndex Avity Descripron Cost Cost coats toots Cos coon Costs Contingency costs costs Costn Costa Cu. Fees Cu. Feot Cu.t, et Ct Fent Cu, Feet WL. Lbs.
Maonours Manhount bisposal of Plant Systems (continued) 2b.1.1.7 Comptnsed Air.O Sere kir 21.1.l.0 ComoressedAllr-Seo Alo-Ir RIA 2b.1.1.9 Compressed Ale - iosr. Alrlunlnsuiotodl 2b.l1.10 Containment Hatches 14.1..1 Containment Hydtaen Purge HVAC 2b.1.1.12 Contsaanmentspray 2b.1.t.L 3 Cotrlslrnant Vcnslitlon HSIAC
[uslnsol 2b'1..o14 Cent alnme Ietontliol HVokAC(Insulatedl 2b.1.1.05 Control Room WkAC 25,1.1.6 Oeminerallted & ACS Makeup Water 2b.1.1.17 Oemlnsrat'ed &
n Makeop Water - RCA lb.1.1.1D Diesel Gen & Auxiliaries (insulated) 2k.1.1.19 Diesel Gen & Auxiliaries (unsnsulated) 2b.1.1.20 Diesel GenerateFuel Oil lb.,1.21 Diesel Rooun HVAC 2b.1.222 Eiestrical - Clean 05.3.1.23 EIectricoi Contaminated 2blt.24 Electrical - RCA 2b.1.025 FPie Protectlon 25.1..26 Leak Rate Test 2b.1.1.27 Mit Plant HVAC (itsulated) 2b.1.1.20 Miss Plant MVAC (unlnsutated) 2b.1.1.23 Miscellaneous Equipment 2b.1.1.30 Of1ico & lenite HVAC 23.1.1.31 Potable Water 2b.1.2.32 Ptimo*sPlantHVAC tjnsuiatedi 2b.1.1.33 Primasy Plant HVAC luninsuloted) 2b.1.0.34 Radiation Monitanitn 2bk..1.30 Sofeguords Ouilding HVAC (insulated) 2 6.,1.25 Sfeguards Building HVAC suoinsulated) 2b.1.2.37 Seni*c Woter 2b.1.1.38 SeniceW ete-RCA 2b.1.1.39 TUrbkne Building HVAC (Insulated) 2b.1.1.40 Torblne tinulding 1VAC (uninsuited) kb.1.1.41 UPSHVAC,
2b,1o1:42 Vents & Oins 2b. 1.143 Vents & Oains - RCA 2b.2.1,04 Waste Mooaenaemt (itsulotedI 2b...1,5 Waste Moenage tnt (unolsuioted) 2b.1.1.46 Waste ProcessInGs s juninsulated) 0b.1.1.47 010 1Pronessont liquid (isulatedl 0b.0.2.48 W.ste prossint Uquid tuninsuoted) 0b,1.149 Wasn a
Proresso
.nSoin d
2b.1.1,50 Wteor Treatment (Insulated) 2b.S.1.5' Woter Treotnnont (uninsulated) 2b.1.1 Totals 2b.1.2 Staffoldin8 in supports1 decoamissioning Decontamination of Site Buildings 2b.1,3.t ReItuor 2k,1.3.2 Aufiiiry 23 1222 33 s5 so 3218 27 196 30 101 377 5
62 10 3
-1.54 S 26 2,405 397 4
2 24 2
52 48 87 3
415 940 49 187
-2 22 29 197 407 10 107
& I 215 256 257 328 5
19 46 490 574 8.507 31 4
74 2
32 2S 7
54 04 32 3
35 50 1
9 5
4 57 24 95 1,416 432 4
64 4
41 5s9 196 14 160 171 17 262 17 148 2,344 153 0
3 2
1 9
1 S
72 5
10 165 11 1
02 1
3 52 3
37 516 215 12 101 223 13 206 19 O
37 131 27 271 40 '
3 30 35 462 6.619 2.183 3
25 so 270 270 5
38 6
35 36 28 167 167 427 2,785 Z785 in 119 119 193 1,238 1.238 4
34 is 115 165 912 912 2
5 9
72 1
12 0
4 233 1.797 114 605 G5a 1.020 6,133 6,133 60 457 2
12 12 0
2 4
27 3
22 20 0
3 8
19 25 157 157 51 331 331 0
3 0
40 48 19 119 119 7
57 187 1.173 1.173 0
2 3
26 0
1 a
33 276 1,245 1,245 2
12 16 123 58 383 383 163 725 725 531 1.713 1,713 22 1
118 7
53 73 563 3.774 22,5813 19,067 25 381 216 38 91 193 598 103 14,039 1.849 668 10 6,171 039 34 116 1.675 719 6
72 11 4
1,787 2.749 73 24.556 653 457 31 0
2 27 94 5
3 59 756 20 1.740 46 3
221 5
542 14 57 5,402 919 2
25 33 1.053 954 12 123 0LIS5 18D 387 559 2.830 2,201 313 153 53 563 3,520 69.360 9,Kfb 1.641 IQ2 006 34.004 3,057 1.207 5,053 411 33.522 1.445 76*,251 9.S62 28,729 791 325.88.
5,211 1.144 3,652 133.365 9,434 185 2.310 365 117 56,765 110.221 7,346 0,055,64 65.899 1,996 121 72 955 4,320 176 84 32.492 1,166 74.811 2.402 102 9,920 356 23.318 1,154 1,882 301.826 5.303 92 840 39 1,092 120,257 15,702 399
,4,043 94,792 2.598 65,799 10,215 271.616 17,303 26.256 605 1.70 10,716 3.653,120 201.030 00,994 50,323 814,082
-9A489 580059.
29,277 30 7
19 4Go 3M 1.322 38 11 274 24 368 1.938 1,938 1,045 663 162 53 203 900 712 373 116 45 159 235 1.004 4,217 4,217 565 2,266 2,266 3,077 7.255 1.670 5,.15
-3.
TLG Serolces, Inc.
Comanche Pea h Nuclear Poter Plant Decosnmiaai.inol Cost Study Doflcmclrl LlJ-JS.3-D40 Rev. 0 Aplpendix C, Page 20 of 25 Table C-2 Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 2 DECON Decommissioning Cost Estimate (thor....oda Of 20DD dollar.)
AUIefuty Off-site LLRW NRC Spent Fuel site Processed Burial Volumes Burial I UtIlity and Denor Reeoval PaFagilng Transpost Proe.seIng Disposal Other Total Total La. Term.
Management Oestoratloe Volume Class A close 8 Class c GTCC Processed Craft Cantrator Cost Cost Cuet.
Costs Costs Costa Costs Contngeesy Costs Costs Costs Costs Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu, Feel Cu. Feet WIL, Lbs.
Manhours Manhours IZ A U 1 0 1 9 ex c v ac, p on Decontamination of ite Buildines (continued) 2b.1.3.3 Rodwaser Warehoose 2b.1.,3.
Safeguard 2b.1.3 Totals 2b.1 Subtotal Period 21 Activity Costh Period 2b Collateral Costa 20.3,1 Procese liquid as.te lb.3.2 Small tool aloanoe 21523-Spent Fuel Capital and Tranafer 2b.3 Subtotel Period 2b Collateral Costs Period 2b Period-Dependent Csots 2b.4.1 Decn supplies 2b.4.2 Insurance 2b.4.3 Property taxes 2b.4.4 Health physics supplies 2b.4.5 Heavy equipment rental Zb.4.6 Disposal of DAW generated 2b.4.7 Plant energy budget 2b.4.8 NRC Fees 2b.4.09 EmergenoY Plannilng Fees 2b.4.10 Decommlssioning Staff Severance 2b.4.11 5pent Fuel Pool O&M 2b.4.12 Liquid Radwaste Pecnensing EQuedment/Seneices 2b.4.13 IST11 Operating Costs 2b.4.14 Seuerlty ntul Cos 2b.4.135 DOC Staff Cost 2bS.16 Utility Stall Cost 2b.4 Sutotal Pedod 2b PerId-dOependent Costs 20,0 TOTAL PERIOD 21, COST PERlOD 2S - Decontamination Following Wet Fuel Storage Period St Direct Oacommihioanng Activities 2
0.1.1 Remove spant fuel ralk Disposal of Plant Systems 2c.1.2.1 Electrical - Contaminated FHB 2
,12.2.0 Electrlal - RCA FHi Ic. 1.2.3 Fire Protection - RCA 2
. 1.2.4 Foal Buildlnl HVAC (insulated) 2o. 1,2, Fuel uiidlec HVAC{unlnsulated) 2u.1.2.6 Fuel Handling 2c21.2.7 Sewge Treatment 7:11.2,4 Spent Fuel Paol Cooltng & Cleanup 2s.1.2 Totals Decontamination of Site tuildings 2c.1.3.1 Fuel 2,.1.3 Totals
'TLG S-ei.ces, Inn.
00 212 25 6
2 15 177 407 407 134 67 17 8
61 42 o10 441 441 2.127 1,127 301 LIS 514 1,338 1.80S 7,330 7,330 2.701 11,037 727 591 7.307 3,545 5,947 31,50 28,335 3.520 230 130 360 641 244 0.115 233 244 130 360 641 8,115 1,630 953 229 3,060 S,471 19 2
279 2.304 1.177 572 245 1,938 487 122 10,748 27.042 43.129 L630 8,530 19 2
279 7 3
,996 4,S61 19,811 877 953 7.307 4,465 97,113 342 1.704 1.704 37 261 291 1.217 9,332 1.596 1L317 1.9385 407 2.037 2,037 90 0,048 2.043 23 252 252 76S 3.825 3,825 821 6,291 6.291 72 373 373 346 2,050 2,650 118 1,293 1.295 57 629 37 282 232 291 2,229 73 50 060 17 129 1.610 12,360 12,360 4.056 31,098 31,098 6.478 49,667 49667 15.258 114.725 111,739 22.810 157,898 142.058 137 607 637 21 147 147 190 11269 1,169 370 2.169 2,169 11 30 68 13 82 82 3
17 17 3
21 472 2,615 2,615 1,092 6,290 6.269 9.332 9.332 679 2,229 129 2.986 12.319 3.520 270 644 705 5.386 13,385 75,387 23,296 1,884 1.884 5.768 0.768 76.387 30,908 2509,4 7,504 95.457 5.679 1,517.903 91,949 5.254.016 423.302 128,989 367 I28.999 367 115.351 26 335,406 387.109 718.537 115.351 25 1.441.051 6.498.356 423,96 1.481.051 98.510 420 23,478 1,671 221.262 10.133 403.lln 18.261 141.5 SOB 16.560 677 3.57 1SO 678 487,492 22,005 1,170,023 S4,083 124 11 70 6
257 1.098 62 1
3 52 3
411 14 31 491 32 703 57 46 598 389 21 2
z 31 2
26 1
2 37 2
S 0
0 6
2 19 773 160 47 444 779 2,021 175 132 1,660 1,211 546 1i 5.146 137 6,266 1.662 329 9
385 10 65 10 21 4,652 3.334 21 17.390 5,177 683 751 40 30 374 98 818 2,594 2.594 683 751 40 30 374 9a 623 2,594 2,594 3,919 1.424 299,006 43.624 3.919 1,424 299.006 43,624
Comarnche Pera. N1clear Power Plant Deoor sonsiaioog Cost Study Dorreoort LII-1621-001, Re,. 0 ApperdtU C, Page 21 of 25 Table C-2 Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 2 DECON Decommissioning Cost Estimate (thousanda of 2009 dollars)
Index AcdoityPesoripUon Dfft'aie LLRW NRC Spent Fuel Sit.
P.rocessed Burial Volumes Burial I UUtIi'eoarr Oecon RemoVil Packaging Transport Processing Disposal Other Total Total Lb. Term.
Mansgement Restoraton Volume Class A Class B Class C GTCC Proessoed Craft Contracror Cost Cost Costs Costs Costs Costs Costs Contingenoy Casts Costs Coors
- Cost, Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet WL, Lbs.
Manhours Monhours 264 8
2 35 5
74 308 388 328 20 16,599 10.065 B0O 3.047 293 171 2.068 1,570 1,921 9,879 9,857 21 21.637 7,719 1,584,137 108.199 2C.1.4 Staffoldingei support otf decmmissionlng 2c01 Subtotal Perlod 23Actrivty Costs Period 2c Addiftonal Costs 2c.2.1 License Terminaton Sunaey Planning 2c.2 Subtotal Period 2cAdditional Coots Period 20 Collateral CostV 2.3.-1 Process liquid haste 2c.3.2 Small tool allowance 2c.3.3 Decommissloning Equipment Dispotition 20.3.4 Spent Fuel Copital acd Transfer 2c.3 Subtotal Period 2 cCollateral Costs Period 20 Petiod-Depondest Costs Go.4.1 Decon supplies 2u.4.2 lcourase~
2c.4.3 Property taxes 2c.4,4 Health Physics supplies 2c.4.5 Heany equipment rental Zc.4.6 Disposal of DAW generated 2c.4?
Plant energy budget 2C.4.8 NRC Fees 2c.",9 Emergency Planning Fees 2C.4.10 Decomnissloning Staff Severonco 2c.4.11 Liqoid Radwaste Processing Equipment/Semrices 2c.4.12 IS FS O perating Costs 2c4ll13 Security Staff Cost 2c.4.14 DOCStaff Cot DoR4,S Utility Stalf Coot 2c.R Subtotal Period Oc Period-Oependent Casts 2c.0 TOTAL PERIOD 2 COST PERIOD 1,-Lienseto Teenrttrsron Peniod le Direct De.ommisslorign ActririeS 2o.1.1 ORISE confirmatoc surny 2e.l.2 Terminate liceose 2e.,
Subtotal Period 2e Activity Costs Period Uc Additional Costs 2e.2.1 Uicenre Termination Sunacy 2e.2 Subtotal Period 2c Additional Costs Period Oe Collateral Costs Ze.3,1 DOC staff relocation expenses 2e.3.2 Spent Fuel Capit*l and Transofe 2e.3 Subtotal Period 2e Collateral Costs 055 197 852 852 655 197 852 852 6.240 6,240 100 at 131 200 67
- 40 0
034 87 100 67 188 181 634 293 404 30G9 74 841 1,774 9
1 130 399 382 180 1,637 316 36 1,977 5,998 10.166 281 2,610 9
1 131 21,423 1,189 5,730 490 353 2,703 1,995 22,488 126 611 611 10 77 77 138 1,0LS 1.050 61 465 335 2,203 1,738 70 351 351 31 340 3.0 7
82 02 210 1,052 1,052 266 2.4t 2,041 34 176 176 60 458 458 38 420 420 19 204 245 1.082 1,882 47 363 363 S
41 209 2,216 2,216 900 6,897 6,397 1ý52S 11,691 11,691 3,747 20,213 Z7,968 6,201 41,147 40,415 465 465 201 42 246 711 689 41.360 134 6.000 373 303.507 88 6,000 1,063 344,867 223 2,0215 54.323 12 57,190 86,000 004.250 2,710 54,300 12 307.450 21 27,637 11,497 1,983,304 114.,74 307.450 151 45 197 197 a
151 45 197 197 5,444 5,444 1,633 7,077 7,077 1,633 7,077 7.077 153,52S 3,120 153.525 3,120 1,486 223 1.709 1,709 83 it 95 1.560 235 1.004 0,709 95 V95 0
TLO Ser,-icea, Inc.
Comanche Posi, Nuclear Potter Plant DecorunsloionIvg Coat Study Docunmentt LIJ-)621-°01. Re,. 0 Appendix C, Poge 22 t 25 Table C-2 Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 2 DECON Decommissioning Cost Estimate (thousands of 2009 dollars)
Off-Sits LLRW NRC Spent Fuel Site Processed Budil Volume, Buriali UtIlRty and Activit Occur Remuval Pactroging Transport Processing Oisp.os.l Other Total Total Lie. Term.
Management Restoration Volume Claos A Class Clas C GTCC Processed Ctaft Contra.tor enetlx AstlWty D.esc.lption Cost Cost Costs Costa Costs Cost Costs Contingency Costs Costs Costs Costs Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Wt., Lbs.
Manhoors Maonhurs Period 2e Period-Doependet Costs 2e.4.1 Insurance 2e.4.2 Property taces 2e.4.3 Health physics supplies 2e.4.
Disposal of DAW generated 2.4.5 PlanIt erneregy budget 2,.4.6 NRC Fees 2e.4.7 Emergency Planning Fees 2A.4.8 Decoumissioeing Satl Sevueanca 20.4.9 ISFSI Operating Cosl 2e.4.10 Security Staff Cost 2e.4.t1 DOC Staff Cost 2eAS12 Utility Staff Cost 2e.4 Subtotal Period 2e Peliod-Dependent Costs 2e.
TOTAL PERIOD 2e COST PERIOD 2 TOTALS PERIOD 3b - SItM Resttoation Period 3b Direct Decommisslonlng Autlvities DemoIitiov of Remaining Site Bolldings 3b.1.1.1 Reactor 3b.1.52 Administration 3b.1.1.3 Audiliry 3b. 1.1.4 Chlorination (CW Intake) 3b..l.S Chlorination (SW Intake) 3b..1.6 CIro Water intabe 3b.1.1.7 Circ Water Yard Piping 3b2.1.8 Diesel Generator 3bA.l.t9 Maintenance 3b.1.1.10 Megawatt Support Cur & Mateial Staging 3 b.1.1.11 Miecelianeous Site Sterutures 3b.1.S.12 Radwaaste Warehouse 3b.1.S.13 Safeguard 3b.1.l.14 Semice Water Intake Structure 3b.l1l1t5 Switchtgea 3b.1.1.t6 Switchyard Relay House 3b..1.17 Tanks & Tunnels 3b. 1. 1.
Turbine 3b.1.1.09 Turbine Pedestai 3b.0.1.20 Fuel 3b.l1 Totals Site Closeout Acrioities 3b.1.2 OockFiil Site Sk,.t Grade & landdstape tite Sb.1.A Final report to NOC 3b.1 Subtotal Period Sb Activity Costs 668 0
248 112 365 169 2.342 33 934 3,225 12 11.372 25 273 273 7
75 75 167 835 835 3
16 16 27 209 209 37 402 400 17 186 351 2,594 2,694 S
3S 14D 1.074 1,074 484 3,709 1.709 571 4,376 d.376 1,833 13,887 13.662 3.747 22,964 22.605 186 38 224 320 249 70la 4,974 27,893 46.750 6 0.107 1
134.750 4.974 660 1
0 12 10.536 249 4,974 153.526 137.870 7,748 52,751 12,360 4,767 20,242 40,066 200,271 68,868 407,080 379,495 22,619 5,966 215.480 122.312 3.156 459 19,134,410 1.115.092 2.744.829 S5679 96 4,249 17 6
L322 17 605 198 331 224 2,051 521 103 182 929 3SD 1,188 4.201 31,213 2.643 477 34,332 82 82 852 6,531 14 11 637 4,886 3
50 1
6 198 1.520 3
19 91 695 3D 227 30 381 1,336 10.245 32 246 308 2.358 78 599 17 13D 3
21 139 1,060 82 632 178 1,366 630 4,031 4,682 35,695 6,S31 511 4,886 20 S
1.520 19 695 227 301 10,246 246 2.358 599 130 21 1,066 632 1.366 4,831 35,095 79,426 2,092 61,157 443 141 17,143 36 8,90B 4,321 7,669 174.325 5.675 30,287 7,175 2,049 451 15.724 11,258 15,907 59,067 504.053 6,414 1.292 668 511.759 668 396 3,039 3.039 72 549 5 49 12 94 94 5.162 39,577 90 39.402 I*1 TLG Ser
- Inice, lay.
Comanche Perth Ntclea Poier Plant Deoartrriasiong Cost Study Dorateol L1l-1621-O01, Rev. 0 Appendix C, Pago 23 of 23 labia C-2 Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant. Unit 2 DECON Decommissioning Cost Estimate (thousands of 2009 dollars)
Inde Acvily Oescrlpdton Period 3b Additional Costs 3b.2.1 Concrete Processing 3b.2.2 Circulatieg Water Cofferdam 3b.2.3 Servie Water Cofferdam 3b.2 Subtotal Period 3b Additional Costs Period 3b Collateral Cosat 3b.3.2 Small tool atooaane 303.2 Spo nt fuel Capital a nd Transfer 3b.3 Subtotal Period 3h Collateral Costs Period 3S Period-Dpoep ndent Costs 3b.4.1 Insurance 3b04.2 Property taoes 31,4.3 Heavy enqipment rental 31.4.A Plant energy budget 31,4.5 NRC ISFSI Fees 35.4.6 Emergency Plannong Fees 3b.4.7 Decommissioning Staff Seaersn-e 3b.4.8 ISFPS Operating Costs 3b.4.9 Securiy Staff Cost 3b.4.to DOC Staff Cost 3b.4Sh1 Utility Stal" Cost 3b.4 Subtotal Period 3b Peolad-Cetendent Costs 3b.0 TOTAL PERtIOD S COST PERIOD 3c -Fuel Storage OperattiooftShpplng Period 3c Direct Decommissiolnin Activlites Period 3o Clotatioal Caro 30.3.1 Spent Fuel Capital and Transfer 3c.3 Subtotal Period 3S Colluteral Costs Period 3c Period.Dependent Costs 3c.4.1 In-trac.e SF4.2 Propert taxes 3c4.3 PIant energy budget 3c.4.4 NRC ISFSI Fees 3c,4.5 Emergency PlannIng Fees 3c4.6 ISFbi Operating Costs 3c,4.7 Sounrity Staff Coot 3.,4.
Utility Sta"f Cart 3c.4 Subtotal Period 3u Perod-Dependent Costs 3c.0 TOTAL PERIOD 3c COST OMi-stto LLRW MRC Spent Fuel Site Pro.essed Buria Volumes Burial I Uilily and Dtean Removal Pookageag Transport P Dooesoltg tisposal Other Total Total LIt. Term.
Manegement Restoration Volume Class A Class 8 Class C GTCC Processed Craft Contra.tota Coot Cost Crts Costs Costr cstr Costs Coos Sntingenoy Costs Cors Coilt Costs Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feat WL. Lbs.
Manhours Munhourst 1,521 428 409 2,359 307 307 46,136 6,136 4 3,134 6
229 1,757 64 492 61 471 6
355 2.370 46 353 219 33 252 219 79 60S 1,757 492 471 2.720 353 252 252 353 7.139 3.894 3.725 14.751 328 180 241 250 448 1,422
- t 2,362 7,431 4,448 17,197 17.S05 33 3S3 361 18 198 198 920 7.056 7.056 36 277 (a) 55 222 25 275 275 45 493 493 213 1.635 1,635 13 101 101 354 2.716 0
2,227 489 1,115 8,45 8.h546 667 5,2115 i0 1,023 4,092 3.440 26,773 1.63S 4,733 20,405 9,036 69,671 1,730 4,984 62.961 70.221 110,240 70.221 250.682 526.517 251.349 2.509 376 2,885 2,885 2.509 376 2,680 2.885 3.752 2,054 2,856 5,131 1,003 22,168 10,170 47.134 49,643 375 4.127 205 2,260 266 3,142 513 5,644 1SO 1,113 3.325 25,493 1,525 11.693 6.380 53.515 6,757 56,400 4,127 2,260 3,142 5.644 1,103 25,493 31,695 53,515 56,400 642,523 160,809 803.392 801,392 tJl TLG Sert4 ceo.In,.
Comanche Peah Nuclear Power Plant Decommissioning Coat Study Documerrt L)I-162-1-001, Re-. 0 Appendix C, Page 24 of 2S Table C-2 Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 2 DECON Decomnmissioning Cost Estimate (thousands of 2009 dollars)
Ott-Site LL5W NRIC Spent Fuel Site Ptooossed Burial Voluimes Briaio I Utisliy and Activity Deosa Remowl P.akaglag Transport Processing Disposal Other Total Total Llo.Tetm.
Mtanoomoet Restoration Volume Class A Class S Class C GTCC Pro-cased Craft Coatrotor Index Actvilty Des..lpurn Coat Cost Costs Costa Costs Costs Costs Canting.n.y Cost.
Costs Costs Coats Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Wt, Lbs.
Manhours Manhours PERIOD 3d - GTCC shipping Period 3d Diect Decomnlssloontn Activities Nuclear Steam Supply System Removal 3d,1.1.1 Vessel & Internals GTCC Disposal 3d.1.I Totals 3d.1 Subtotal Period 3d Activity Costs Period 3d Period-Dependent Costs 3d.4.1 Insurance 3d.4.2 Property taos 3d.O.3 Plot energy budget 3d.4.4 Emergency Planning Fees 3d.4.S ISFS1 Operating Casts 3d.4.6 Security StMff Cost 3d.4.7 Utility Staff Cost Ad.4 Subtotal Period 3d Period-Dependent Costs 3d,.
TOTAL PERIOD 3d COST PERIOD 3e - ISFSI Deorntamlnation Period 3e Direct Decommissioning Activities Period Se Additional Costs 3e2.1 ISFSI LicensmTermination 3e.2 Subtotal Period le Addiional Costs Period 3e Collateral Costs 3e.1.1 Small tool allowance 3e.3 Subtotal Period So Collateral Costs Period 3e Period-Deprndent Costs Se.4-1 Insuonnce 3e.4.2 Property tfaes 3e.4.3 Heavy equipmerttal 3e,4.4 Plant energy budget 3e..5 ISF51 operating Costa 3e4.6 Security Staff Coat 30.4.7 Utility Staff Cost 3e.4 Subtotal Period 3e period-Dependent Costs 3..o TOTAL PERIOD 3S COST PERIOD 3f-. FSI Site Restoration Period 2f Direct Decommlssionlng Activities Period 3f Additional Costs 31.2.1 lSrSI Demolition and Site Restoration 3f.2 Subtotal Period 3t Additional Coats 463 10,837 1,672 12,972 12.972 463 10,837 1,672 12970 12.972 463 20,837 1.672 12,972 12,972 1
0 4
9 1
9 2
0 2
37 6
43
-1 37 20 74 10 85 463 10,-37 7T 1,682 13,056 12.972 23 1
371 696 204 1,304 23 5
1 371 696 204 1,304 SOS 104,146 505 104.146 505 504,146 2
43 1,080 20 270 aS 1,35D 5
505 104.145 1,350 1,304 1.304 1,701 142,522 2,565 1,280 1.701 42,522 2.565 1.2t 0 0
O 0
0 0
0 0
274 274 297 1
g 724 724 54 5
59 30 3
33 41 335 14 2
17 85 13 98 119 1i 137
- 303 82 659 371 999 287 1.964 25 112 86D
- 5 112 060 33 315 17 98 237 6]i9 1,964 1,701 B60 E60 2.499 4.375 142.522 2.560 5.655 14.350 s0 14.350 tO k)
LO Rerrioco, lear
Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Study Docuoment L11-10!l-001, Re-. 0 Appendix C. Page 25 of 25 Table C-2 Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 2 DECON Decommissioning Cost Estimate (thousands of 2009 dollars)
O0-Slt tLe NRC Spenr Fuel SIt.
Procensd eurlaiol aumme Branal Utlity and Acrtlity Deon Removal Pacokaging Transport ProF.sslng Disposal Other Total Total Lie.Term.
Management Restorarlon Volume Crass A Class B Class C GTCC Processed Craft Contractrh Index ACosffy Dessripon Cast ent Ceots Costs Costs Costs Costs Contingency Costs Costs costs Costs Cu. Feet Cs. Feet Cu.Feect C.
uFeel Cu.Feat Wt.. Lin.
Manhours Manhours Period 3f Collateral Costs 3:.3.1 Small tool allowance Sf.3 Subrotal Period 3f Collateral Costs Peaoed 3t Perlod.Depeedent Conts 3f.4.1 Insurance 3f.4.2 Property taxes 3f.4.3 HeaW equlpment rental 3f.4.4 Plant energy budget 3t.4.5 Security Staff Cost 34..6 Utilit starf Cost 3f.4 Subtotal Period 3f Period-De pendent Costs 3f.0 TOTAL PERIOD 3f COST PERIOD 3 TOTALS TOTAL COST TO D1ECOMMISSION 1
10 1
10 15 1
10 M16 43 6
5s 7
106 107 31 333 132 1-5 44,27D 463 8
11,208 58.353 17.926 10.922 99.538 12,917 5.009 20.242 54,815 354.006 101,951 16 122 57 244 1,114 142.208 14,701 690.280 490.477 10 10 16 122 49 1.245 57 771 2144 2,016 1'll 14.350 2,096 64,5.7 62.961 1,701 505 246,665 543,432 1,U63,02 100.224 69.579 21S.480 125,180 3.986 459 SOS 19.511.390 1.671.660 4.799.626 OTALCOST1OECOMMISSIO WITH 8.261%
CONTINGENCY:
$660.280 thousands of 2009 dollars OTAL NRCLICENSETIERMINATION COST15 74.21% OR:
$490,476 thousands of 2009 dollars P ENT FUEL MANAGEMENT COST IS 15.18%OR:
$000=.4 thousands of 2009 dollars ONC-NUCLEAR DEMOLITION COST IS1 1.541 OR:
$69,579 thousands of 2009 dollars TAL LOW-LEVEL RADIOACTIVE WASTE VOLUME BURIED (EXCLUDING GTCC):
129,62S cubic feet TOTAL GREATER THAN CLASS C RADWASTE VOLUME GENEPRATED:
501 eublofeet TOTAL SCRAP METAL REMOVED:
94,931 tons TOTAL CRAFT LABOR REQUIREMENFS:
1,672,860 a.,hors End Notes:
n/a
- Indicates that this activiW not charged as decommissioning expense.
- a. -ndicates that this activity performed by decommissioning staff.
0- indicates that this value Is less than 0.S but Is non-earo.
a call centsining -
-indlcates a zero value TLG Ser'lves. Ina.
Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Study Document Ll1-1621-001, Rev. 0 Appendix D, Page 1 of 27 APPENDIX D DETAILED COST ANALYSIS SAFSTOR Tables D-1 Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 1...............................................
2 D-2 Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 2.............................................
15 TLG Services, Inc.
154
Comanche Peah NoCleai Power Plan.t Deocmmissioning Cost Study laeretott LIJ-12 1-001. Re.. 0 Appendix D. Patgr 2 of27 Table D-1 Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant. Unit I SAFSTOR Decommissioning Cost Estimate (thousands of 2009 dollars)
Activity Ole-Site LIRW NRC Spent Fuel Site Processed Burial Volumes Buriali UItlity and 0esan Removal Packaging Transport Processing Disposal ODeer Total Total Lir.Termi Management Restoration Volume Class A Class 0 Class C GTCC Processed Craft Contractor I
[M*w*
A*HVI* *l*rin*lnn Ind x F-ity Desert Can cost Cost C-ts, costs Costs Costs
- Cozo, tung... Y Cost.
Co..
C-ts Costs Cu Feet Cu Feet Cu Feet Cu Feet Cu Feet mh.-
Manhours P
-=.ý PERIDD Ia -Shutdown through Transitlon Period la Direc Doecommlssionlng Activities la.l.1 SAFSTOR site chatacterisatlon survey lu.1.2 Prepare preliminary decommissioning Cost la.t.3 iotlncatico of CoootlosaoflOperations la.t,4 Remove fuel & source material Ia.t.D Notification of Permanent Defueling a,.l6 Deactivate plant systems & process waste lal.7 Prepare and submit PSOAR a.l. 8 Reisew plant dwg; & specs.
la.1.9 Perform detailed red survey laI..DI Estimate by-product Inventory la.lt Endposducrtdoscrlpton l:.1.12 Detailed by-product Inventory la.It13 Define majornork sequence a.1.1-s Pertorm DEI and 1A
- talt, Per:orm i.te-Specific Cost study Activity Speiaticatlon la.1.16.I Prepare plant and facilities for DAFSTOR l1.t16,2 Plant systems la.1.16,3 Plant oMructures a nd buildings la,.1t.4 Waute management Da..16.D Facility and site dormancy la,1.16 Total Detailed Work Procedures la.t.17.l Plant systems la.t.l7.2 Facility closeout & dormancy la.t.17 Total la I'
erocm cacuum drying system Sally Drain/de-energize nancont. systems la,1.20 Drsin & dri NS$0 la.1.22 Dr ei/de-energize Contaminated systems 1a3..22 Decon/secure contaminated systems la.1 Subtotal Period la Activity Costs Period l1 Collateral Costs la.3.1 Spent Fuel Capital and Transfer la..
Subtotal Period la Collateral Costs Period ta Poriod-Drpeodent Cots
,a.4.1 Insurance la.4.t Proper*y tuaes la,.3 "eaith physics supplies ta.4.4 Heavy equipment rental la.4.l Disposal of DAW generated la.4.6 Plant energy budget l.a.4,7 11C Fee, butt Emergency Planning Fees 328 160 246 160 123 123 123 381 615 90 426 426 24 184 184 n/a 37 283 283 24 184 184 10 14 2 142 18 t42 141 28 21Z 2Zl is 142 14a 57 439 439 92 708 708 91 696 096 77 59D S9g S&
442 442 37 283 283 37 283 203 299 2294 2,194 22 167 167 22 17D 170 44 337 337 1,300 1.000 1,000 1,500 3,100 5,000 4,920 4.167 3.120 2.100 2,000 16.207 605 S13 984 246 246 1,994 146 148 293 1,10l3 1,200 2,383 100 02 2
t4 14 4,744 761 6,505 5,SDS 35,890 593 593 t1005 90 404 1ý124
- 2
'124.
1,208 7.8 4a5 09 632 612 89 582 682 101 1,1c6 tl06 9
99 99 101 505 505 77 591 591 6
32 32 180 1,,90 1,390 74 812 812 44 419 4119 493
.s9.S4 2
TL Servicea. Inc.
Comanche Pearh Nuclear Power Plant Oecomonsiaoioning Coat Study Danouet LI-1621-001, Rev. 0 Appendix D, Page 3of27 Table D-I Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant, Unit I SAFSTOR Decommissioning Cost Estimate (thousands of 2009 dollars) beIVIs O f*,its LLRW URC Spent Fuel Site Processed Burial Volumes Bu11.1 IUllyadI Decon Removnl Packaging Transport Processing Disposal Other Total Total Uc, Term.
Management Restoration Volume Class A Class B Class C GTCC Processed Craut Contlretor Cost Coat Cast.
Cast.
Costs Costs Costs ContngCenoy Cost costs Cast s Cas Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Wt. Lbs.
Manhours Manhouro I
)no Period la Period-Depsndent Costs (continued) 1.4.9 Spent Fuel Pool O&M la.4.10 JSFS1 Operating Costs Ia.4.l Security SttflCst lo.4.12 Utillty StaffCost la.4 Subtotal Period to Perlod-Dependent Costs lus.D TOTuL PERIOD to COST PERIOD Ib -SAFSTOR Umtted DECON Activiotes Period lb Direct Decommlssioning Activities Decotonimination of Site Buildings lb.-l..1 Reactor lb.1.1.2 Safeguand MbIA.1 Totals 1b.1 Subtotal Period Ib Activity Costs Period lb Addiltonol Costs lb.2.1 Spent fuel pool Isolation lb.2 Subtotal Period tb Additional Costs Period lb Collateral Costs lb.3.1 Dccon equipment tb.3.2 Process liquid -ts.e Db.3.3 Small tool alluowanc lb.3, Spent Fuel Capita Iand Transler lb.3 Subtotal Period lb Collateral Costs Period lb 1,oriod-Dcperdent Costs lb.4.1 D=on supplies 11.4.2 insurance tb.4,.3 Propertytases tb.4.4 Health physics supplies 1b.4.5 Heovy equipmrnt rental lb.4,6 Disposal of DAW generated lb4.7 Plant energy budget tb,4.a NRC Fees lb.4,9 Emergency Planning Fees IbuI.D0 Spent Fuel Pool O&M lbt4.11 ISFSI Operatigo Costs lb.4.12 Secudry Staff Coot lb.4.13 Utility Staff Cost 1b,4 Subtotal Period lb Period-Dependent Costs lb.0 TOTAL PERIOD lb COST 910 918 2
0 2
0 762 44 370 24,777 24 29.440 24 34,778 t14 877 7
51 56 426 426 3,717 28,493 28,493 4.486 34,870 33.453 5,336 41,057 38,959 877 51 1,416 2,D09 493 493 9,854 9,R34 12,264 423,400 2
435,664 2
471,554 1,033 132 1,165 1,165 9,690 9,690 991 177 83 229 21 1,160 21 03 229 605 269 130 2
0 683 399 2
3,119 420 D
s 229 359
- 33 359 136 253 23 24 305 186 112 192 11 93 6,245 24 7.420 383 17,245 517 1,550 1,550 66 198 193 S83 1,740 1,740 583 1,740 1,748 1,453 11,143 11,143 1,453 11,143 11,143 149 1,140 l,14C 221 1,068 1,069 3
24 24 20 056 393 2.383 2,232 171 8S7 057 25 279 279 2
25 2S 67 336 336 19 149 149 5
32 32 40 350 350 19 205 205 11 123 29 221 2
13 14 107 107 937 7,182 7,182 1,349 9,879 9,522 3,778 25,159 24,646 30.861 3,960 34.821 34.821 ISS 1SG 1,203 72,196 235 1.203 72,196 235 490
.9.961 2
3,091 106,725 498 9,951 2
109,811 1,701 82,147 3S,0S5 109,811 123 221 13 357 513 TLG Services, Inc.
Camanchae Peah Nuclear Pater Plant Dexxreareieasxala Cxxi Stsedy Doeurp.nt Ltl-IC021-Ot, Reu. 0 Appendix A, Page 4 027 Table D-1 Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant. Unit I SAFSTOR Decommissioning Cost Estimate (thouaaaads of 2ti09 dallarn) 1-t1att O ff-S it.
LL R W NR C
S pent Fu el S ite P No es ed B turi a V olu m es B u rial I U.1lg 1ty rn d l Onetn Removal Psakaging Transport Proeesslng Disposal Other Total Total Lin. Term.
Management Restoration Volume Class A Class 6 Class C GTCC Processed Craft Contractot Cast Cast Costs Casts Caste Costs Casts Contingency Casts Caste Costs Costs Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Fact Cu. Feet Wt.. Lbs.
Muahaure Manhaute lad PERIOD is -Preparations for SAFYaOR Dormancy Period 1i Direct Docarmlssianine Astisities i.1.1i Prepare support equlipmentfor storage I*i.1Z Install containaent pressure equat. lines lc.i.3 Interim sureey prior to dormancy lc.1.4 Secure building easesses it.1.5 Prepare & submit interim report It.C Subtotal Period 1c Artvity Cashs Period ic Collateral Costs t¢.t.1 Process !iquid waste Jt.3.2 Small tool allowance ic.3.3 Spent Fuel Capital and Transfer 1i.3 Subtotal Period ic Collateral Costs Period ic Perlod-Dependent Costs ic.4.t Insuranne 1u.4S2 Property tanes 1cs.3 Health physics supplies ir.4.
Heaav equiprtient rental 1c.4.5 Disposal oa DAW generated 1c.4.6 Plant energy bsdget 1c,4.7 NRC lees ic.4.8 Emergency Planning Fees lca.4.
Spent Fuel Poal O&M iliD.1 ISFSI Operattrg Casts 1,411 Security Staff Cast lc,.12 Utility Staff Cost It.4 Subtotal Period lo Peniod-Denendent Costs lc.0 TOTAL PERIOD It COST FERIOD I TOaUa PERIOD 2a -SAFSTOR Dormancy with Wet Spent Fuel Storage Period Za Direct Decommissioning Activities 2a.1.1 Quartarly Inspecsian 2s.i.2 Semi-annual enstronmental surney 2a.i.3 Prepare reports 2e.i.4 Biruminaus roof replarement 2a.LS Maintenance supplies Za.l Subtotal Period 2e Actlviy Cast Period 2a Collateral Caste 2a.3.I Spent Fuel Capital and Transfer 2a.3 Subtotal Period Da Coltateral Costs 342 22 733 72 tOS 370 52 400 400 3
26 26 220 953 953 21 93 83 286 1.461 1,461 273 1,323 1,323 0
3 3
21 15S 294 1.464 1,326 37000 16,711 563 10,411 513 219 103 283 444 22
-137 219 2
223 293 444 137 256 26 282 282 23 2
25 25 202 so 252 232 131 20 151 alt 2
6 2
a a
308 46 354 353 is$
19 207 207 113 11 125 194 29 223 11 2
13 94 54 108 IDa 6,313 947 7,260 7,260 333 0
0 6
7.523 1.168 9.0i8 6,647 219 705 104 264 451 8,443 1.746 11.953 11,434 3.238 2,042 190 513 857 60,467 10.862 78.159 75,038 116 156 12S 223 13 361 S18 3.131 1,490 89,428 291 1,490 89.428 2981 126 2,511 1
W.7.880 126 2.511 i
211.005 1.116 91,939 22.702 I11.$61 1,810 193.940 55,763 692,953 502 503 0
2 2
125 627 627 126 629 629 14,844 2,227 17,070 14,844 2,327 17,072 17.070 17,070
-,.t TLG Sr.ices., Inc.
Comanche Pekh Nuclear Power Plant Deeommlnroeinolg Coal Study Dotmstent, LJI-21-001, Reo. 0 A.)pendlx D, Page 5 of 27 Table D-]
Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant, Unit I SAFSTOR Decommissioning Cost Estimate (thousands of 2009 dollars)
Off-Site LLRW NRC Spent Fuel sito Processed Burial Volumes auilI Utlity and t
Antivlty Oeaon Removal Packaging Transport Processing Disposal Oihee Total Total Lie. Term.
Management Restoration Volume Class A Class e
Class C GTCC Processed Craft Contractor lndex Activity Description Cost cost Coots Costs Costs Csts Costa Caste Costs Cu. Feet Cu, Fent Cu. Foot Cu. Feet Cu. Foot Wt. Lbs.
Mostrooro Manhnoour Period 2a Priaed-DyprndentCosts 2a.4.1 Insurance 20.4.2 Property to..s 2a.4.3 Health physics supplies 2a.0.4 Disposal of SAW generated 2a.4.5 Plant energy budget 2a.4.6 NRC Fees 2a.4.7 Emergency Plnnlng Fees Za.4.8 Deconrmlssionlng Staff Severance 2a.4.9 Spent Ftel PoolO&M 2a.4.10 ISFSI OperatLo1 Costs Za.4.11 oftiIIty Stall cost 20.4 Subtotal Period 2a Period-Dependent Costs 2a.O TOTAL PERIOD 2a COST PERIOD Zb -SAFSTOR Dormancy wmih Dry Spent Fuel Storage Period 2b Direct Decommissioning Activities 2b.2.1 Quarterly Inspection 2b.2.2 Snmida-nualt nvironmenetat survey 2b.1.3 Prepare reports 2b.1.4 Bituminous roof replacement 2b.tIS Maintenance supplies 2b.t Subtotal Period 2b Activity CoorS Period 2b Collatera Costs 2bk.3.
Spent Fuel Capital and Transfer 2b.3 Subtotal Period 21 Cotlltonal Cost, Period 21 Pctlod-Depondenr Costs 2b.4.1 ntsureare 21b4.2 Propertytaeos 2b.4.3 Health physica supplies 2b.4.4 Disposal of DAW generated 2b,4.5 Plant energy budget 21.4.6 NRC Fees 2b.4.7 Emergency Ptnaning Fees 2b.d4.
ISF9I Operatng Costs 2b.4.9 Security Staff Cost 2b.4.10 Utility Staff Cost 2b.4 Subtotal Period 2t Period-Dependent Cons 2b.0 TOTAL PERIOD 2b COST PE9RI0O 2c -SAFTOR Dormana"yowkhou Spent Fuel Storage Period 2c Diretct Decommissioning Actilvties 2c.1.1 Quarterly Inspection 2c.1.2 Seml-annual environmental sulme 2c.1.3 Prepare reports 2o.t.4 Bituminous roof replacement 2o.a.5 Maintenance suppiles 00 TLG Services, 1a-.
2.496 250 2.645 1.384 262 359 35 395 395 261 65 326 326 3
0 so 13 66 6n 965 14S 1.109
$$5 555 774 77 1t 051 898 90 987 987 7,999 1.200 9,199 9,199 t3.0t 456 3,500 3,,52 17S 26 202 202 3,517 S28 4.045 3.S91 s54 261 5
0 90 19,226 2,706 22.326 7,108 15,158 261 3
0 SC 34,573 5.138 40.025 7,797 32,228 a
13 2
15 i5 3,698 925 4,623 4.023 3,711 926 4,637 4.637 13,365 t005 15,370 15.370 13,365 2,o5 s5,370 15.370 9,675 96s 10.643 10,199 445 2,649 265 2,914 2,914 1,994 496 2,481 2,481 26 3
371 96 495 493 S3,3555 533 4.088 4,088 5,703 570 6,273 6,273 6,615 662 7,277 7.277 1,293 194 2,487 1.487 28.582 4.287 32.872 20.076 12,794 37,050 S,SS7 42,607 2GA466 16,141 2,904 26 3
371 95,123 13,622 111,139 72,990 38,104 1,984 26 3
371 222.199 16.559 131,142 77.520 53.514 1.027 20.3.36 62,443 1,077 20.536 5
62,443 1.027 20,536 5
62,443 7.*57 153.138 30 828,437 613.6S7 7.657 050,130 3S 1,442,094 7.657 153,138 35 2,442,094 7
1 9
9 2,17 547 2,734 2,734
Corn..che Pesh Nuclear Pow.r Plant Decommisio.iaing Cost Study Donrnen t LII-t121-041, Ret'. 0 Appendix D. Page 6 of 27 Table D-I Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 1 SAFSTOR Decomnmissioning Cost Estimate (thousands of 2009 dollars)
OftS~tte LL5W NEI Spent Fool Site Prooessed BurialVolumes BUriall Utility and Activity
'enoon Remnvan Packaging Transport Processing Disposal Other Total Total UI. Term.
Management Rstarotlan Vol..n Cico, A Claos 8 Class C GTCC Prooessad CretS Contractor Index Actvity rescripton Cost Cost Costs Costs Costs Costs Costs Contingency Costs Costs Costs Costs Cu. Feet Cu.Fest Cu. Fet Cu. Fet Cu. Feet WLt. Lbn.
Manhours Manhours 2c I S,
,ubItotnalP e Ariod2..
la A
ts 2,194 S48 2.742 2.742 Poeiod 2u Perrod-Dopendent Cotts 2a.4.1 Insurance 2o.4.2 Property taxes 2.4.3 Health physics supplies 2.4.4 Dispoai ofDAWgenenated 2A..S Plant energly Budget 2c.4.6 NRiC Fees 2c.S.7 Security Staff Cost 2C.4.5 utility staft Cost 2c.4 Subtotal Period tc Period-De pendent Costs 2,.0 TOTAL PERIOD 2o COST PERIOD 2 TOTALS PERIOD 3a. Reactlvate Site Following SAFSTOR Dormancy Period 3S liect Decommisslonlng Actsiitles 3a.1.1 Prepare prelimlnary decommlssionlng nost 3a.1.2 Reolew plant dwgs & specs.
3a.1.3 Perform detailed rad survey 3a.1.4 End product dsaipttion 3a.1.S Detailed by-product Inventory 3a.1.6 Desine majorwonn sequence 3o.1.7 Perform SER and CA 3a.1.S Perform Site-Specinc Cost Study 3t.1.9 Pnepare/submit Ucense Termination Plan 3a.110 ReceNe NRC approval of termination plan Actioity Speuficatilns 3a.1.1.1 Re-actloate planr & temporary fdllities 3a.1.11.2 Plant systems 3a.1.13 RSeautor internaIs 3a,1S.4 ReaItoressel 3..1.S i*ogsical shield 3o.S.11.6 Steam generatnrs 3a.S.12.7 Relosortedi anonrete 3a.S.1S.8 Main Turbine 3a.t.1..9 Main Condensers 3ao.I.t.1S Plant struotures & bulidlngs Ia.t.0t.1 Wosts ma naement 3a.1.13.t1 Pojo it.
tultostoeout 3ailt Total Planning t Site Preparations 3a.152 Prayre dismuntling sequence 3a.1.53 Plant prep. & temp. totes 3al1d Design water clean-up system 3a,1.tS RliglngICont. Cnti Ennlys/tootlng/ets.
SaLS.1, Procune casksAliners
& containers 1,122 1,122 15 2
5,482 1.566 210 2.102 3,015 10,323 1,609 216 3,09:
S48 5.030 6,U30 157 1.723 1,723 210 1.402 1,402 56 28t 228 551 2.418 2,418 301 3,316 3,316 1,540 11,871 11,871 2,041 15,649 IS,a49 5,247 42,696 42,696 4.452 4,452 4,452 89.031 20 272.143 23L.503 89,034 20 503,646 89,034 20 503,646 1,122 16 2
216 38,290 5.79S 45,439 4S.439 S,367 44 5
636 IDSSgI 27,492 216.606 130,863 05.743 13,13S 262,708 60 2.008.183 160 24 114 184 566 85 ass 651 123 150 923 381 504 907 513 874 goo 62 384 197 49 49 384 566 111 4,895 295 2,800 172 2.200 151 IS 142 142 24 134 184 238 1.061 1,061 57 439 039 92 70T 708 76 So0 580 136 1.043 939 77 590 531 131 1,005 1,00O 120 920 920 9
71 71 58 442 441 30 226 113 7
17 7
S7 58 442 221 as 661 6S1 17 127 64 734 S.629 4.955 14 340 342 420 3,220 3,220 26 198 105 330 2.510 2.530 23 174 174 104 59 S7 57 221 64 674 7,37D 4,167 7,100 6,500 TOO 3,120 1.600 402 400 3,120 4,600 900 39,777 2M40O 1.400 1,230 1.300 4.602 3,ODO 1,300 7,5O00 3,102 5,000 4.096 I
TLG Ser.ices, Inc.
Comanche Peak NuclesrPawer Plant Decommissioning Coat Study DOon-ment L1-11721-001. Rev.
Appendix D, Pope 7 of 27 Table D-1 Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant, Unit I SAFSTQR Decommissioning Cost Estimate (thousandls or 2R009 dollars)
I Activity Off-site LLRW NRC Spent Fuel Site Processed Burial Volumes Burial /
Ltllpyll and Cecon Remoral Packaging Transport Peocesslng Disposal Other Total Total Lic. Term.
Management Restoatrotd Volume Class A Class B Class C STCC Processed Craft Contractor Cost Cost Costh Coste Costs Costs Costs Contingency Costs Costs Costs Costs Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Wt.. Lbs.
Manhours Manrsours miss 3a.1 Subtotal Period 3a Actvity Costs PerIod 3a Perdod-Otpendent Costs 3a.4.l InsuIance 3a.4.2 PFopers sates 3a.4.3 Health physics supplies 3a.4.4 Heaw equipment rental 3a.A.5 Disposal oaf DAW generated 3a.4.6 Plant energy budget 3a.4.7 NRC Fees 3:.4.8 SecurityvStaffCost 3o.4.9 Utlity Staff Cost 3a.4 Subtotal Period 3a Period-Dependent Costs 3..0 TOTAL PERIOD 3a COST PERIOD 3b - DecommlssIoning Preparatlons Period 3b Direct Decommssionlirg Acllvities Detailed Work Procedures 3b.2.D.
Plant syste" n
3b.1.1.2 Reactor Internals 3b 1.1.3 Remaining buildings 3b.1.1..4 CAD cooling assembly 3b.t.1.6 CR0 housings & ICI tubes 3b.1.1.6 ocore ic*strmentation 3b.1i1.7 Reactor
'nssel 3b.2.18 Facilit closeout 3b.1,1.9 Missile shields 3b.1,1.0 Biological shield 3b6.1.L. Stean gerneraton 3b.1.1.12 Reinforced conctete 3b.1.1.13 Main Turbine 3b.1.2.14 Main Coodensers 3b.t.1.19 Auoiliary building 3b.i.1.16 Rctor building 3b.L.
Total 3b.1 Subtotal Period 3b Actilvt Costs Period 3b Additional Costs 5h.2.1 S1,e Charactetitation 3b.2 Subtotal Period 3b Additional Costs Period 3b Collateral Costs 3b.3.1 Decon equipment 3b.3.2 DOC taff. relscation eopenses 3b.3.3 Pipe cutting equipment 3b,3 Subtotal Period 3b Collateral Costs 13,947 2,092 16,039 15,365 674 72,703 339 514 853 853 315 90 019 1,228 245 2.211 15,376 0
19 19,445 32 347 347 9
99 99 8s 4A3 423 77 591 591 5
26 26 181 1.390 1,390 25 270 270 332 2,542 2,542 2,306 17,682 17,652 3,051 23,370 23,370 398 7,951 398 7,951 65,179 258,629 2
323.807 19 33.392 5.143 39,409 38,734 674 398 7.951 2
396,510 582 309 166 123 123 123 447 348 Ss 148 566 123 192 192 336 336 3,968 07 soc 603 46 354 3SA 25 192 48 Is 1a2 142 18 142 142 is 142 142 67 514 514 22 170 85 g
64 64 22 170 170 as 651 Es1 18 142 TI 29 221 22 221 s0 306 348 50 306 348 295 4,963 3,678 as 221 221 39 39 06 4.733 2.500 1.350 1,000
- 1,.0 1,.000 3,630 1.2D0 450 1,2D0 4.600 1.000
- SO60 1,S60 2.73D 2.730 32.243 32.243 27,670 10,132 27.670 10.132 3.968 595 4,563 3.678 s85 4,324
.4,324 1,297 5.621 S,621 1.297 5.622 5,021 931 1.100 991 1,100 149 1,140 1.140 1,486 223 1.739 1,709 165 1,26S 1.265 1,486 537 4,113 4,113 o
,TLG Seicaes, Ioe.
Caoneche Peah Nrcleer Power Pletr flaeaorsialaning Coat Study Documoenrt L1.1621-001, Reu. 0 Appendix* D Page 8of 27 Table D-1 Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 1 SAFSTOR Decommissioning Cost Estimate (thousands ol 2009 dollars)
Otele IR R
pn~e
~
e PaesdarsvlmsO~ll uliys JActivit o n"-Snt LLRW NRC Spent Fuel site Processed Burial Volumes Bu rial I Ul~
n beaon Remotaal Packaging Transport Processlng Disposal Other Total Total Uc.Term,.
Mana.ement Restoration Volume Class A Class B Class C GTCC Processed Craft Cortrar Cast Cost Casts Casts Casts Casts Casrs Conngeny Costs Costs Costs Costs Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Ca. Feet CU. Feet Wt. Lth.
Manholnus Meanhous (ode Period 3b Period-Sependent Costs 3b,4.1 DSatn supplies 3b.4.2 Insurance 3b.4.3 Property taxes 3b.4.4 Health physics supplies 3b.4.S Heasy equipment rental 30.4.6 Disposal of DAW generated 3b.4.7 Plant senrgy budget 3b.4.8 NRC Fees 3b.4, "
Security StaHfCaSt 3b.4.10 SOC StafflCst 3b.4.11 VIA yStalffCost 3b.4 Subtotal Period 3b Pedsod-Dependet Costs 3b.0 TOTAL PERIOD 30 COST PERIOD 3 TOTALS PERIOD 4a. -arge Component Removal Period 4a Siret Decommlsslonlng Activities Nuclear Steam Supply System Removal 5a.I..l Reactor Coolant Piping 4..1.2 Prestulzer Relef Tank 4..1.1.3 Reactor Coorant Pumps & Motors 4 t.1.1.4 Pressurizer 4a.1.5 Steam Generators 4a.1.1.6 Retired Steam Generator Units so.1.1.7 CRDMs/ICIsfSeatoce Structure Removal Oa.1.1.O Reactor Vessel Internals 4a.1.1.0 Vessel & Internbs GTCC Osposal 4s.1.1.0 ReactorVessel 0o.1.1 Totals Removal of Major Equipment
._.1.2 Main Tocbine/Oeneratnr 4a.1.3 Main Condensers Cascading Costs from Clean Building Demolition 4a.1.4.1 Reactor 4..1.4.2 Safeguard 4a..4 Totals Disposal of Plant Systems 40.cIS.1 Auxiliary Feedwater (Insulated) 4a.1.0.2 Aualllanyoteom ol..
oamen Recyala (insulated) 4..1,4 Boron Recocle (uninsulated) 4a.1,5.S SarronThermal Regeneration (insulated) 4a.1.5.6 Baron Thermal egaeneration (uaelsalated) 41.1.5.7 Chemical & Volume Control (insulated) 4a.1.5.8 Chemlcal & Volume Control luninsuloted) 31 195 261 31 455 46 612 124 1.121 4,311 7,793 S
S 10 14,197 a
38 38 19 209 209 5
50 57 49 244 244 39 300 300 3
is 10 92 704 704 12 137 137 16S 1,289 1,289 647 4.958 4,958 1,109 8,962 8,962 2,210 16.906 16.906 236 2356 236 630 4,714 4.714 33,036 59,200 1321,0B 223.3 20 t.022 1,505 1
0 1,022 2,409 2
a 11 23,975 4.639 31,103 30.319 0S0 4,714 27.671 26S,696 12,665 27.673 662,206 31
$7,366 9.762 70.612 69,053 1.655 10 70 16 7
t4 4 1
73 390 090 a
1i r
3 43 as 25 105 145 17 53 46 92 2,030 548 Z.786 2.785 6
32 338 73 967 097 1,713 1,713 51 3,087 1,260 1.24S 2,046 6,379 3.146 17.113 18,113 1.455 1,260 1,S27 2.946 6.379 991 2,909 17,346 17,346 21 66 255 15 127 149 111 742 742 31 1,778 3,600 249 3.734 169 4,226 13,01 13,979 0,03S7 1.626 12,462 12.462 3,747 975 158 3,877 169 S.045 13,922 13,902 145 10,310 7,840 3,319 6,155 34,514 1.230 17,9806 91S.0 81,505 221 227 55 794 205 1.502 1,502 593 156 46 752 309 1.956 1,956 1.002 150 1,152 1,152 108 16 114 124 Ling 166 1,276 1,276 361 361 03,745 1.449 169 165 36.553
$96 7.231 702,800 2.801 so 3,445
.51.471 tt 1,2 750 40,067 23,397 3.329.760 20.508 1,500 40.07 711 3.14,D67
- 22. 467 14,033 1.450 3.004 111.119 2.342 2.312 376 470 326.129 17,867 847 505 104.146 6.672 2.955 935,320 17,867 847 0z,110 69,347 3,330 470 505 9,165.21 88.408 180,57 3.973 7,111 337,743 7.200 320,000 22,781 13.006 15.504 504 30 4
06 67 169 146 295 19 54 0
0 1
6.
4 2
51 7
11 7
0 4
18 12 072 1
2 10 17 20 27 01 73 50 56 150 120 267 1.716 1,716 2
12 2
10 10 11 55 S0 50 154 c54 75 415 410 60 325 326 130 726 726 9,141 371.224 13,548 12 m
95 15 7
1,251 117 101 42 7,900 650 271 114
,214250 1,019 853 312 S 62,4 4,567 524 240 42,797 3.936 1,571 516 109,905 8,027 ON TLG Sericesa. fae.
Comarre)ho Pen.c Nr-lear Poit, Plant Deomnrloi~iniag Cost Strdy DoerrIenI L21-1621-001, Rea. 0 Appendix D, Page 9.f27 Table D-i Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 1 SAFSTOR Decormnissioning Cost Estimate (thousands or 2009 dollars) 11nt111.1 Off-SIe LLRW NRC Spent Fuel Site Processed Bural Volumes Burial GiUIOt and I
Decon Removal Packaging Transport Processing Disposal Other Total Total Lic. Term.
Management Restoration Volume Class A Class B Class C GTCC Proessed Craft Contraotor Cost Cost Co0t3 Costs Costs Cost.
Coasts Contingency Costs Costs Costs Cashl Cu. Feet Cu. Feet C,. Feet Cu. Feel Cu. Feet Wt., Los.
Manhoues Manhours I 0o.
AnUlty -es..paoon Disposal of Plant Systems (continued)
Ia.1.l.9 Chemical Feed 4a..,S.10 Chetmoal Feed - RCA 4a.1.S.1S Chilled Water -Safey 4i.2.5-12 Chilled Water. Safety-RCA 4a.1.S.13 Circulatlng Water 4a..S.14 Component Coollng Water 4a.lS.1S Component Cooling Water
- RCA 4a1..S.16 Condensate (inslated) 40.1.5.17 Condent le ru nin(ulaled) 44.I.5.1a Condensate Polishirng 4as1.S.19 Condner, rVa..
& Water Bo. Prining 4a...S.20 Extraction Steam 4o.1.5.21 Reedwater Ra.l.S.22 Feedwator - RCA 4a.1.5.23 Generator & Extiter 4aý,,l.24 GeneraSon Ges Cooling 4a.l.5,25 Generator PrimaryWater 4:.L.S26 Generator Seal OIl 4a.lS.27 I
Hydrogen Gas 4i.1.S.28 Main Steam Reheat & Steam Dump 4o.l.S.25 Main Steam Reheat& Steam Dump - RCA 4u.l.5.30 Main Turbine tube lil 4t.l.5.31 Maio Turbine Oil Purillcatlon 4 a.1.5.32 Nitrogen 'ao 4o.l.5.33 Post Accident Samplint 4a.l.5.34 Process Sampling (unlnsulated) 4a.1.5,35 Reacltor Coolant 4Aa.1S..3 Relidual Heat Remonal 4aL.5.37 Satfey Injection {Insulated) 4a.l1S.38 Satety lnleutlon (unineulated) 4a.15.33 Serondary Pliant Sampling 4a.1..40 Swam Generator tlowdomn &
Ieaoop 4.l..S.41 Tur bine tentrohydrC*tr (Insulatoed) 4a.1.5.42 Turbine Elrctrohydr eCarl (uninoulated) 4a.1.S.13 Turbine Gland Steam & Drains 4x.e.Sa4 Turbine Neater Oraint 4a.1.S.05 Turbine Plat Coaling (lnuliated) a.t..S.4a Turbine Plint Coolln (uninsulated) 4a.1.S.47 Turbines (High - Low) (insulated) 4 a.1,.48 Turbines (High
- Laows (unlnsalsterl 4a.1.5.4l Vent ChIled Water - Non Safely 4a.1.S.S0 Vent Chilled Water, Non Safely-RCA
.t,1.$S Westinghouse Process Instruments 4a.1.5 Totala 4a.l1.
Scaffolding In support of decommirsionlng 4o.1 Subotal Period 4. Activity Castn PFriod 4. Additiaoal Costs 4a.2.1 Retired Reactor Closure Head 4a.2 Subtotal Period 4a Addlitonal Costs
- 1.
TLG Settlcea, Inc.
6 7
4 79 150 19 834 107 86 81 54 60 185 So 1
7 53 6
1 30 383 37 73 16 l
l7 110 35
- 20 91 17 11 35 307 14 117 28 44 13 1173
- 03 5,020 0
8 2
O 3
50 49 138 2243 4
10 I1o2 17 47 70 0
7 1
1 24 7
3 30 St 33 43 623 19S 4
12 191 1I 42 609 2
7 110 0
0 2
194 387 6,101 533 1
7 2
12 12 1
4 29 l8 168 22 172 3
22 570 3.834 3.034 16 123 13 99 12 93 8
63 9
69 28 213 38 218 11 0
1 1
8 8
61 1
7 0
2 S
35 220 1.432 1,472 6
43 11 84 0
1 2
11 11 O
35 091 42 225 225 180 1,277 1,277 60 382 "tt 10" 1.134 1,1St 4
30 14 105 3
20 2
13 5
41 49 376 2
16 1I 135 4
33 7
51 O
15 47 283 283 1
5 5
2,200 14.425 50.472 111 575 575 20 587 172 22 23,501 123 9V 93 63 69 213 1.696 01 8
61 7
2 35 7.963 43 84 I
20 247 314 217 60524 832 7,217 30 105 20 376 16 135 33 51 1
1 13 1,954 63,733 2,282 349 22 218 021 212 139 23,832 1.973 5,70 709 954,385 22A404 3.200 3.09S Z.0S4 2,335 7.102 68,878 1.398 39 247 232 53 1.103 323.390 10.344 2,778 SO 811 111 10.030 236 32.214 2.507 339.502 5.523 891294 3,2S7 293,092 6.097 1.040 3,403
- 03 416 1,337 Zt
,6O0 033 4,49S 1,703 SOD 46.6'34 2,941 760 as 2,792,SS 4
155,301 17,72 1 16,373 412 8
2 37 5
14S 17.766 8.431 3,810 13,82D 35,052 1.230 20,986 101,243 99,287 1.954 157,284 71.50 3,330 470 S50 12.633,050 305.737 18,8S7 201 477 261 477 814 84 502 2,145 2,145 592 2.145 2.105 3.241 3,241 502,9S0 3,083 0,000 508,50 3.023 2,000
Comanche Peal Nuclear aPwer Plarnt D2eaomnloaning Coat Study lne~rret 2L1-1621-001. Re-. 0 Aplpendtix 0, Pace JO of 27 Table D-1 Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 1 SAFSTOR Decomnnissioning Cost Estimate (thousands or2009 dollars)
Ott-alft LRW NRC scent Fuel si.t Pc.....s..
Baial Volumes Burial I....
tand ACalrloy leona Removal Packaging Trtasport Processing Disposal Other Total Total Lie. Term.
Management Restoration Volume Class A Class 5 class c GTCC Processed Craft Contraotor lates Aedvlty Description Cost Cost Costh Costs Costs Costs Costs Contingency Costs Cost" Costs Costs CU. Foet CU. Feel Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet WI Lbs.
MOanhours Manhours Period 4a Collateral Costt 4a.3.1 Process liquid waste 4a.3.2 Small tool allowance 40.3 Subtotal Period 4a Collateral Costs PerIod 4a Period-Dopendent Ccsts 4s.4.1 Decoa Supplies 4a.4.2 Insurance 4a.4.3 Property taxes 40,4.4 Health physlct supplies 4a.4.5 Heavy equipment rental 4a.4.5 Disposal of DAW generated 4a.4.7 Plant energy budget 4a.4.4 NRC Fees 4,.4.9 Liquid Fodwoste Prooerslng Equip ment/Services 4a.4.10 Security Staff Cost 40.4.11 DOC Staff Cost
.4a.412 UtIlity Staff Cost 4a.4 Subtotal Period 4a Period -Dependent Costs 4..0 TOTAL PERIOD 4a COST PERIOD 4b -Sit. Decontamlenalon Period 41, Direct Decommissioning Actvitles 4b.1.1 Remove spent fuel racks Disposal Of Plant Systems 4b.1.2.1 Auxlliary Building WVAC linsulated) 4b.0.2.2 Auoliary Building HVAC luninsulated) 4b.1.2.3 Betse Rs & Misc Uncontrolled Aco. HVAC 45.1.2.4 Comprossed Air -Instr Air (insulated) 4h.1.2.S Comp.eaed Air -Instrument Alt -RCA I 4b1,2.6 Compet.oed AIr.lintsrumesntAr. RCA (o 4b,1.2.2 CompressedAir -Service Air 4b,1.2.8 Comproesed Air. e Srioe Air-RCA 4b,1.2.9 Compressed Air Ilnstr. Air funinsulated) 4',
."*1 Containect catches 41,1.2.1 Containcract Hydraoea Purge VAC 41,1.2.12 Containment Spray 41,1.2.13 Conrslintnt Ventiltion HVAC (insulated) 41,1.2.14 ContainmntVentilationHVAC(uninsulated) 41,1.2.15 Control Room HVAC 4b,1.2.16 Seminerarlzed
& RCS Makeup Water 4b.1.2.17 0e..oeralired & RCS Makeup Water -RCA 4b1-.4 -h Diesel Sen & Auxiliaries (insulated) 4b,1.2.19 Diesel Gen B Auxiliaries (unlnsulated) 4b.1.2.20 Diesel Generator Fuel OH 40.1.2.21 Oiesel Room HVAC 41,1.2.22 Eleotincl -Clean 4E.1.2.23 Electrical -Contarninated 4b,1.2.24 Electsaca -RCA 4b.1.2.25 Fire Protection 36 20 54 85 221 36 221 20 S4 85 73 1.951 2,609 73 4.560 451 108 13 2
190 826 461 2,659 12,037 18,601 13 2
190 36.523 254 22,547 8,726 4,343 13,820 36,141 37,753 124 11 7D B
2S7 2
49 244 244 33 210 229
.2 492 473 lB 91 91 45 496 496 11 119 107 49R 2.430 2,438 392 3,000 3,000 49 214 254 207 1,51B 1,588 83 909 909 69 530 530 399 3.058 3,058 1.0S 13,842 13,842 2,790 21,392 21.392 6.315 47,716 47.704 O8,016 151,599 149,508 132 591 591 3
lB 1s a
2 O
2 3
20 22 37 215 215 3
24 44 oaR 260 3
26 2
24 14 17 410 100 365 2,S88 Z.588 1i1 1.126 1,126 17 114 114 0
2 4
23 32 1.7 147 1
6 9
69 1
11 0
I 202 1.247 47 277 277 368 2.235 2,235 1O 79 285 28 12 3.924 12 3.924 1.991 157,284 79.100 3,330 17.073 SS 17.073 55 78,476 lB 78,393 173.091 313,571 78.476 18 5%5,056 470 523 13,237,50 308.834 S85.912 1,098 98,510 428
's2 9
IDS 23 122 236 32 330 173 25 2
25 85 75 60 10 1,340 122 8 8 6 69 0
0 7
1 4
67 2
5 6
0 0
5 1
3 S7 38 108 1,748 16 45 731 1
4 67 1
4 64 2
6 99 20 55 903 00 2
71 735 26 909 26 55 592 18.315 7,654 723 2
29 676 6
I9 1..07 1,041 9,465 79 3.53 193 33 58 2.075 430 20.626 2.7a0 043 36,757 3,185 883 2.234 169 24.061 928 743.712 9,2S3 310.986 4,712 2B,562 700 62 911 27.445 2.061 12 2,239 364 117 S
49,165 42,206 3,106 384.391 22,759 26,2 Or TLIJ Oerroicoa. Tn.,
Comanche Pena Nuclear Power Plant Decommiaiaoning Cost Study Dlocrnrenf LPI-1621-001, Re., 0 Appeudizer D. Page I1 of 27 Table D-I Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant, Unit I SAFSTOR Decommissioning Cost Estimate (thousands of 2099 dallars)
,Ot.
LLRW NRC Spent Fuel it P.eo.
d Burial
- Volames, B6. I Ut.iyentd Activlty Decon Removal Packag Transport Processing Disposal Other Total Total Uc. Term.
Management Restoration volume CloanA Glees 0 Clas C OTCC Processed triO Contractor Indes AcUvltn Desedipgoo Cost Cast Costs Costs Costs Cost Costs Contingency Costs Coats Costs Costa Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet CU. Feet We.. Lbs.
Machours Manhours Disposal of Plant Systems (continued) 4b.1.2.26 Fire Proteclon -RCA 46.1.2.27 Fuel ilding HVAC (uoinsclatedl 4b.1.2.20 Fuel Hondlirg 4b.1.2.29 Leak Rate Test 4b.1.2.30 Potable Water 4b.1.2.31 Radiation Monitodng 4 1.1.2.32 toeguards tuiding
- lAC Cinsuloted1 45.1.2.33 Saleguarde tuilding HVAC mlnsuilated) 45.1.2.34 Seruie Water b.1.2.35 Seruise Water - RCA 4b.1.2.36 Spent Fuel Pool Cooling & Cleanup b.2.2.37 Torbine tuild.ng HVAC lnIsutated) 4b.1.D.38 Turbine tuilding HVAC enensulested) 0b.2.2.39 Vents & Drains 4 b.1.2.40 Vents & Dals-RCA 4b.1.2,41 Waste Mlana ement (clcnsulated) 0b.11.42 Waste Processing Liquid (insulated) 4b.1.2.43 Waite Processing Liquid (uninsulated) 4b.1.2,44 Wate Processing solod 4b.1.2 Totals 4b.1.3 5caffoidlng in support of decommissioning Decontamination of Site Buildings 4b.,...1 Reactor 41.2.4.2 Safeguard 4b.t.4 Totals 4b.1 Subtotal Period 4b Activlty Costs Period 4b Additie.al Costo 4b.2.t Licente TerminatIon tumtes Planning 4b.2.2 tSFS License Termlnatlon 4b.2 Subtotal Period 4b Addltienal Coitn Period 4b Collateral Costs 4b.3.1 Process itquid waste 4b.3.1 Small tool allowance Sb.3.D Decommissioning Equipment Olsposition 0b.3 Subtotal Period 4b Collateral Coste Period 4b Period-Dopendent Costs 4b.4.1 Deron supplies 4b.4.2 Insucane 0b.4.2 Propertytaaes 4b.4.4 Health physics supplies b,4.S.
heaH y equipment rental tb.4.6 Disposal of DAW generated 4bs4.7 Plant energy budget 4b.45.
NRC Fees Sb.4.9 Liquid Radwaste Processing Equipment/Semices 4b.4.10 Security Staff Cost 177 4
12 109 5
0 0
7 5
0 a
7 4 1
.4 11 14 D
1 23 36 1
3 S4 32 149 10 29 476 106 5
3 34 41 19 13 129 8
4 51 53 1 2
-2 S
111 7
3 24 504 53 4
2 15 29 1
0 5
1 1
4,336 126 296 4,738 178 75 457 4S7 2
13 13 3
16 16 4
28 28 0
1 O
01 7
.6 46 18 113 113 5
37 114 779 779 43 232 232 0
2 3
22 2
15 SS OCS 300 0
3 46 244 244 23 126 126 1
4 4
1.732 11A406 9.522 1,979 80,3-8 4,497 59 2,391 151 76 5
3,504 132 145 5,873 234 S
39 S.
-33 203 9.a62 306 571 23,182 1,019 37 1,24-4,985 202,443 4,360 359 1
30,t46 2,tDO 2
92 22 722 is 49S 53t 227 42,230
.,433 3
91 2'247 231 30,733 2.965 1S9 125 17.530 1.420 14 2
790 47 1,994 49,605 764 2,084,632 129.704 R18 12 55 8
IG6 863 863 S23 033 25.461 24.559 947 S46 136 50 293 345 763 3,080 3,03 124 St 9
6 61 23 89 353 353 1,071 587 146 63 355 368 892 3,442 3.442 3,072 5.918 713,778 43,076 644 367 61,t99 4,625 3,717 62285 775,377 47,701 11t85 5.552 354 369 5.148 all 2,882 16,302 14.410 1,804 13.890 8.179 2,984.980 202,392 655 21 1
0 371 696 23 1
a 371 1,352 197 852 852 204 1.934 401 2,156 852 1,304 1.304 t.701 1.701 6,240 142,522 2,565 1,280 142,522 8,305 1,280
_63 30 95 150 87 029 439 S
11a 10 10 136 140 5D 634 07 13:
1,050 1OOSO 63 118 175 145 634 237 243 1.616 1,611 8022 1,174 S,406 941 226 2,277 1,726 962 871 206 1.028 1.020 94 1,036 1,036 23 249 249 469 2,343 2,343 811 6,217 6,217 36 187 187 342 2,618 2,618 173 1,890 1,898 144 1,107 1,137 101 1,001 1,001 502 30,119 98 6,000 373 303,507 88 6.002 875 333,626 186 29 7
.57.936 13 28.820 0N TLG Seerce. ine.
Comanche Pear Nuclear Power Plant Deeanaariaaiasisg Coast Study Dennorent L1-1621-001, Ren. 0 App-nrdix D, Page 12 of 27 Table D-1 Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant, Unit S SAFSTOR Decommissioning Cost Estimate (thousands of 2009 dollars)
Actihity on.!-'.t LLRWv NRC spent Fuel Site Pro......d 1* Volumes Buria 1 Utlfity...
Deoon Removal Packaging Transport Processing Disposal Other Total Total Lie. Term.
Management Restoration Volume Ctass A Class B Class C OTCC Processed Craft Contre.tor Cost Cast Costs Costs Cast Costs Costs Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Co. Feet Cu. Feet CU. Feet WL, Lbs.
Manhours Manhours
]ada.
Period 4b Period-Dependent Costs (continued) 4b,4.l1 DOC Sraff Cost 4h.4.12 Utility Staff Cost 4b.4 Subtotal Period 4b Period.Dependent Costs 4b.0 TOTAL PtRtOD~b COlT PERIOD ad - Delay betre ticene Tertmination Period 4d Direct Decommlssioninrg Activities Period dd Period-Deptndent Costs 4d.4.1 Insurance 4d.4.2 Property taxes 4d.4.3 Healih physics supplies 4d.4.4 Disposal of DAW generatad 4d.4.t Plant energy budget dA4.6 ONC fees 4d4.47 Utility Staff Cost 4d.4 Subtotal Period 4d Period. Dependent Costs 4d.0 TOTAL PEIO D ad COST PERDie 4e - Lcense Termination Period 4e Direct Decommlssionine Activities 4,1.1 06ISE oonfirmator surmey 4ea..2 Terminate license 4P.1 Subtotal Period 4e Activity Costs Period 4e Additional Costs 4r.2.i License Termination Survey 4e.2 Subtotal Period 4e Additional Costs Period 4e Collateral Costs 4Z.3.S DOC staff relocation expenses 4a.3 Subtotal Perdod 4s Callateral Costs Period 4e Period-Dependent Costs call.
Insurance 4e.4.2 Property tcxes 4e.A.3 Health physics supplies 4o.4.4 Disposal of DAW generated 4:.4.5 Plant energy budget 4o46 NRC Seet 4e,4.7 Security Staff Cost a4.a DCC Sctff Cost 4e.4.9 UtilitV Stalf Cost 4e.4 Subtotal Period 4e Period-Dependent Costs 4e.O TOTAL PERIOD 4e COST PEROeD 4 TOTALS 15,917 2,388 19Sf 8.305
,0 246,280 25,181 3.777 28,9Sb 28,958 440,160 2zz 7,280 10 1
140 48,101 8,592 64,947 60,947 Z'897 57.936 13 715,26D 2,070 12.973 539 524 5.183 1.560 49,453 1l.118 85.020 81.81
,304 1,884 59.890 13.652 3.519,053 211.396 716.540 113 113 213 0
157 302 1.426 6
1 gas 6
1,885 16 173 173 28 14t 1t2 2
8 a
30 332 332 i14 1.640 1,Ot4 290 2,294 2,294 290 2,294 2,294 123 2,456 123 2.456 123 2,aS4 1
25,440 1
25.440 1
2S,440 1b1 45 197 197 151 4S 197 197
.3,256 3,256 977 4,233 4,233 977 4,233 4,2933 86,83S 3,120 86,83S 3.120 1,481 223 1,709 1.709
,485 223 1.7D9 2.709 474 1
474 1
0 2,324 36,107 9,266 4,us7 63 12 183 56D 415 3,249 3-63Z 12 8,100 12 it,3Ot 19.603 37.719 102,09t 7
75 75 110 592 592 3
10 16 24 211 211 56 616 616 60 477 477 487 3,736 3,735 545 4,177 4,177 1,305 9,901 9,901 2,51 16,039 10,039 42.9735 254,952 249,773 4,974 1
11.871 47,090 57,379 249 4,974 1
116,340 249 4,974 86,836 119,460 1,304 3,875 217,178 93.123 3,330 470 505 06.764.050 607.067 1,447.352
-a ON Us TLG Serices. Inc.
Comn-che Peal Nudcear Power Plant Decommissioning Cost Stusdy Doccoreot L11-1621-001, Rec. 0 Appvcludiý A. Poge 18of27 Table D-1 Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 1 SAFSTOR Deconumissioning Cost Estimate (thousands of 2009 dollars)
... Sire tL.W NC Spent Fuel Site Processed ur.iVloe.....s Borisi I utility and Activity Decon Remoal Packaging Transport Processing Disposal Other Total Total Li.Term.
Management Restoration V014ne Class A Class 5 Class C GTCC Processed Craft Contractor Index Actvity Desrlptlon Cast Cost Costs Costs Costs Costs Costs Contingency Casts Costs Costs Costs Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet WL, Lbs.
Manhouos ManhoUrs PERIOD 5b -Site Restoration Period 5 b Direct Decommissianing Antivities Demolition of Remaining Site Buildings 5b.D.1.1 Reactor 5b.D.1.2 Cirr Water Yard Piping 5b.D.1.3 Diesel Generator tb.D1,.,4 Od Steam GeneratorSaorage Faclity Sb.l.1.b Safeguard Sb1.I.76 Sw~tchgear 5b.I.7 Turbire Sb.1.t18 Turbine Pedestal S.1.
Tatalt 5,679 17 605 946 2,051 113 550 1.188 11.147 B52 6,531 3
19 91 695 142 1,087 308 2.358 17 130 82 632 178 1,366 1,672 12,819 6.531 19 695 1,087 2,358 130 632 1,366 12,819 79,426 35 8,908 11.858 30,287 2,049 11,258 15,9D7 159,729 Site Cioseout Activtlies 5b.1.2 Gcad. & landscape site 477 Sb.1.3 Final report to NRC 5b.1 Subtotal Period Sb Activity Costs 11,624 Period Sb Additional Costs 5b.2.1 Concrete Processing 529 5b.2.2 ISFSI Demolition and Site Restoration 724 5b.2 Subtotal Period Sb Additional Costs 1.2S3 Period Sb Collateral Costs 5b.3.1 Small tool allowance 105 5b.3 Subtotal Period Sb Collateral Costa 105 Period Sb Peniod-DOpendont Costs 5b.4.1 Insurance 5b.4.2 Property taxes S5b4.3 Heavyequlpment rental 130,13 5b.4.4 Plantenergybudget 5b.4.D Security Stff Cost 5b.4.6 DOC StaffCost 5b.4.7 utility StalfCost 5b.4 Subtotal Period 5b Period-Dependeot Coats
,136 5b.0 TOTAL PERIOD Sb COST 19,118 72 549 192 29 221 221 192 1.772 13.589 221 so 611 25 112 860 27 192 1,471 16 120 16 120 S49 13.368 1,560 161.82 1,50 860 660 611 2,483 14,352 80 1.8,83 80 120 120 LED 241 7,431 3,481 12,313 12,532 12,532 9,503 5,385 19,603 39,243 417,517 St 198 920 7,056 36 277 147 1,127 1,115 8,546 522 4,003 2,758 21,207 4,738 36,388 221 4.730 36,388 221 95.849 656,727 524,948 198 7,056 277 1,127 8,546 4,003 21,207 860 35,307 885D 35,307 91,037 4D,741 217,174 110,702 3,330 27.181 110,240 54,080 191.901 177,854 193,541 177,85a 193,541 470 SOS 17.223,360 868,416 5.004,236 PERIOD 5 TOTALS TOTAL COST TO DECOMMISSION 6.584 63,043 ON TLG Serriosa, Pnc.
Corn.echo Pooh Nuclear Power Plant Deeonalasloning Cost Study Documntoo LJu-I V1-00.
Roev. 0 Ap..dis, D. Prig. 14.of 27 Table D-1 Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 1 SAFSTOR Decommission ing Cost Estimate (thousands of 2009 dollars) ott~llo LLRW NRC Spent Fool Silo Processed!
Burial volumes Burial I tUll1ty and Actolly Decon Removal Packaging Transport Processing Disposal Other Total Total Li. Term, Management Restoration Volume Class A Class 8 Class C GTCC Processed Croft Contractor lndex AcdttvhttyD olotlan Cost Coal Costs Costa Costa Costs Costs Contingency Casts Costs Costs CosL.
Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feel CU. Foet CU. Feet Wt. Lbs.
Mranhours Mnhouns rOTALCOSTTO DECOMMISSION WITH 17.0996 CONTINGENCY:
$555,7Z7 thousandsaf 2009 dollars TOTAL NRC UCENSE TERMINATION COST 579.93% OR:
$524.948 thotandsof 2009 dollars SPENT FUEL MANAGEMENTCOST IS 13.96% OR:
$91.037 thousaodsof 2009 dollars 4ON-NUCLEAR DEMOUTION COST IS 6.2% OR.-
$40,741 thousandsof 2009 dollars TOTAL LOW-LEVEL RADIOACTIVE WASTE VOLUME BURIED (EXCLUDING GTCCJ:
114,501 cubl fetet TOTAL GREATER THAN CLASS C RADWASTE VOLUME GENERATED:
SOS cubic feat TOTAL SCRAP METAL REMOVED; s1t7SI tons TOTAL CRAFT LABOR REQUIREMENTS:
960,416 man-hours End Notes:
n/a -indicates that this acvoity not charged as decommissloning expense.
a. indicates that this activity performed by decommissioning staff.
0. Indiotes that thit vlue is less INat 0.5 but is non-sero.
a cell containing " - " Indicates a eron, value TLG Sn.,,ioe, Int.
Comanche Peah Nuolear Power Plant Decorno'riootning Cost Scada Dacuoo t LII-162)-FOO Rev.
.douendid D, Page 1 f27 Table D-2 Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 2 SAFSTOR Decommissioning Cost Estimate (thousands of 2009 dollars)
Off-Sits LLRW NRC Spec: Fuel Site P.oueused Burlal Vo.Imen Burial!
Utilty and Aculuity Decon Removal Packaglng Transport Proesstnog Disposal Oaher Total Toota Lic.Tarm.
Management Restoraton Volume Clots A Class 0 Class C GTCC Peccessed Craft ConrtacrI Indes AcnIay Desuriptioc Cost Cost Casos Casts Costs Costs Costs Contingency Costs Co Casts Costs Cu. Fet Cu. Feet CuM Feet CU. Feet CU. Feet Wt, Lbs.
aanhours Manhouts PERIOD la -Shutdown thbuehTransslloc Period la Direct DecommlsslolngActivities to.5.1 SAFSTOR site tharacterieatioc survey 2a.l.2 Prepare prelimnary decomnrrsslnlng cost Ia.1.3 Notiflcutiuc at Cessation of opertions 1:.1..
Rteove fuel & source material lo.*.S Notifiitlon of Permanent Defueling lo.1.6 Deactivate plant systems & process waste 2s.1.7 Prepare and submit PSUAR la.t.8 Review plant dwrgs & specs.
1a.1.9 Perform detailed tad survey 1AlAD Estimate by-product Inventory 1l..lt End product description b
.t12 Detailed by-product Inventory ls.1.13 Define major work sequence t:.1.14 Perore SIR acd EA olt.IlS Perforc Site-SpecIfi: Cast Study Acttlity Specifications ls.1.16.1 Prepare plant and facilities for SAFSTOR Ia..16. 2 Plant systems la.1.16.3 Plant stctures and buildings 1e.1.16.4 Waste management Ia.1.16.5 Facility and site dormancy jau1.16 Total Detailed Work Procedures ja,2.27.2 Plat systems la.1.17.2 Facility closeout & docmocoy la.1.17 Total lul18 Procure vacuum drying eytem lull9 Soair/de.energize noo-cast, systems 1a.1.20 Srain & dry NSSS la.121 Srairfde-energiae oontaminated systems la,1.22 Decon/secure aontaminated systema la.l Subtotal Period la ACtivty Costs Period 1a CaIlatrrol Costs lo.3.1 Spent Fuel Capital and Transfer l..3 Subtotal Period la Collateral Costs Period IU Period-Depencdet Costs la.4,1 Insurance lo,4.2 Property tsaes lo,4,2 liealth physics supplies la.44 Hauvy equipment rental la.4.5 Disposal of DAW geceratd la,4.6 Plant energy budaet la.
N11 Feas lo.4.8 Emergency Planning Fees 0l PrLG Serictao Inc.
328 98 426 426 68 1t 79 79 556 105 68 53 53 79 53 163 263 c/a a
16 121 121 1
79 79 e
61 61 8
61 61 1z 91 91 a
61 61 24 16R 188 40 303 303 39 298 298 33 252 252 25 189 189 16 121 121 16 121 121 128 902 902 656 556 428 428 642 428 1,327 2.140 259 219 164 105 IDS
-54 2.105 1.783 L335 856 856 6.936 62 9
72 72 13 9
73 73 126 19 144 144 5
1 6
6 2.218 302 2,600 2.600 S14 1.020 43 15,361 7,228 7.229 A44 514
-2 c
1.005 90 24
-2
-,~
485 445 1.084 8,312 1,084 8,322 IDI 1,106 1,106 9
a9 95 I0I 505 505 77 591 591 6
32 32 101 1.302 1.390 48 533 533 44 489 9.312 6312 4091 4938 9.854 2
Cossanche Pearh Nuclear, Poaer Plant Decommiasnlsong Cast Study Drnraect L1l-16021-001, Rec. 0 Appendix D. Page 16 sf27 Table D-2 Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 2 SAFSTOR Decommissioning Cost Estimate (thousands of 2009 dollars)
Off-sie LLRW NRC Spent Fuel Site Proesesed nudal Volunmes
. ritl Utity 0d0 Autlulty eanen Rnmoval Pacaginog Transport Processing Disposal Other Total Total Lic.Term.
Management Restoration Volume C Class B
aes 0 Class C GTCC Prosessed Craft Conttacto, ides Activity Description Cost Cost
- Cost, Costs Cost.
costs Cost Contingency Costs Costs Corn Costs CU. Feet CU. Feet Cu. Fees Cu. Feet Cu. Feel WIL.,
Lbs.
MaInoots Conhours Ferod Is Period-Oependent Costs (continued) la.4.9 Spent Fuel Pool O&M la.4.10 ISF51 Operatina Costs la.4.t Security Staff Cost 1:.44.2 Utility Staff Cost Ia.4 Subtotal Period ta Period-Oependent Costs l..0 TOTAL PERIO0 to COST PEtIOD lb - bdFSTOR Limited DECON Activities Period lb Direct Decommissioning Activities Decontamination of Site Sutdiogs s1..1..
Reactor lb.1.2.2 Auxoliary 1b.1.1.3 Radwaste Wanehouse lb.1.S.4 Safeguard 1b.1.15 Fuel 1b.l.1 Toats 1b.1 Subtotal Period Ib ActtInY COSTo Period lb Additienal Coste lb.2.1 Spent fuel pool isolation 1b.2 Subtotal Period lb Additlei Costs Period Sb Collateral Costs 16.3.1 aecon equlpmennt 5b.3.2 Process liquid waste 11.3.3 Small tool allowance 1,.3.4 Spent Fuol Capital and Transfer 1b.3 Subtotal Period Sb Collateral Costs Period Sb Period-Dependent Costs 1b.4.1 Decon supplies 1b.42 Inscrance 1b.4.3 Property taxes 5b.4.4 Heaotth physics supplaes 5b.4 5 HeaV aquipr.rnt reetol 06.4.6 Dicposai of DAW generated 5b.4.7 Plant energy budget 5b.4.8 NRC Fees 1b.4.9 Emergency Planning Fees 11b.,01 Spent Fuel Pool O&M Sb.l11 SF1 Opnating Costs 5b.4.12 Security Staff Cost 1bA.13 Utility Staff Cost 1b.4 Subtotal Period Sb Perlod-Deeendent Costs 2b.0 TOTAL P ERIOD Sb COST 762 44 4,999 24,777 915 a
0 24 33.016 918 2
0 24 43,262 1.033 671 227 132 672 2,73S 2,735 6,460 6.460 991 215 101 278 437 1,130 1,206 s0 101 278 437 1,130 1,587 253 23 4 9 130 3
0 45 305 122 112 192 11 1,260 6,245 5,517 622 3
45 0,523 5.520 672 I05 279 482 15,113 114 077 7
51 750 5.749 S,749 3.717 28.493 28,033 S
31 :
3,91S 33,496 6.621 50,827 41,098 S17 1,550 1.550 335 1,006 1.006 113 340 340 6b 198 198 336 soon 1.100 1.367 4,102 4,102 1,367 4,102 0.102 969 7,429 7.429 969 7.429 7,429 149 L140 1.240 269 1.30D 1.300 7
57 57 169 1,299 594 3,796 2,497 397 1,984 1.984 25 279 279 2
2I 25 123 616 61s 19 149 149 12 60 60 46 350 350 12 134 134 11 123 29 220 2
13 189 1,449 1,449 937 7,182 7,182 1.084 12,586 12,229 4,734 27,912 26,056 877 01 1.416 9,729 30.861 20.089 6,787 3.960 19,958 81,655 81,6Sa
.57.471 493 9,054 2
580,871 493 9,1954 2
596,232 1.299 1,299 1.464 87,843 205 1,45.4 R7,643 285 935 18,700 39.691 106.720 935 18,700 4
146,411 2I39 106,543 01.945 146.411 123 221 53 357 1,656 CN VITLG Se'n-ras. Inc.
Comanche Pena Nuclear Pouter Plant Denommisiuoning Cost Study Document LII-)71-001, Re. 0 Appendix D. Pace 17of 27 Table D-2 Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant. Unit 2 SAFSTOR Decommissioning Cost Estimate (thousands of 2009 dollars)
Off-Site LLRW NRC Spent Fuel Site Processed Butlal Volumes Buriol I Utilidt org Atoiity 0-n Removal Paokaging Transport Prosessing Disposal Other T
Total Ota Is.Term.
Management Restoratuon Volume Class A Class 8 Class C GTCC Processed Craft Conteaotot ndex Actvty Descrptiont Cost Cost Costs Cost.
Costs Costs Costs Contingency Costs Costs Costs Costs Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feot Cu. Feet Wt, Lbs.
Manhours Manhours PERIOD le. Preparations for SAFSTOR Dormanry Period Ic Direct Decommissioning Activities c.1.1 Prepare support equipment for storage ls.1.2 Install containment pressureequal. lInes lc.1.3 Interim survey prior to dortanry 10.1.4 Secure building acesse, tp.S.S Prepare & submit interim report lC.1 Subtotal Period 1c Activity Costs Period Sc Collateral Costs I.3.1 Process liquid waste 1s.9.2 Small tool allowance lC.3.3 Spent Fuel Capital and Transfer l'.3 Subtotal Period Ic Collateral Costs Period Sc Perlod-.ependent Costs lr.4.1 insurance 1,.4.2 Propenrntsaes 1c.4.3 Heeltr physics supplies 10.4.4 HeSo equipmenrt rental 1c.4.5 Disposal of OAW generated 1,.4.6 Plant energy budget 1c.4.7 NSC Fees 1c.4.8 Emergency Planning Fees IC.4.9 Spent Fuel Pool S&M 1c.4.0 ISFSI Operatlng Costs 1c.4.11 SecurIn Staff Cots 1c.4.12 UtllI/vStaff Cost ls.4 Subtotal Period Is PernodSoe pendent Costs 1c.0 TOTAL PERSIOD So COST PERIOD 1 10060 PERIOD Zo -SAFSTOR Dranosus with Wet Spent Fuel Storage Period 2a Direct Decommissionig Activities 2:.1.1 Quartedry Inspection 2o.1.2 Srmi-ancual environmental survey 2a.1.3 Prepare reports 2a.1.4 Bituminous roof replacement 2a, 1.5 Maintenance supplies 1A.1 Subtotal Period 2a Activity Costs Period 2a Collateral Costs 2a.3.1 Spors Fuel Capital and Transfer 2o.t Subtotal Period 2a Collateral Costs 348 22 370 733 31 764 219 103 283 444 2
L142 219 2
103 083 444 1,142 202 231 0
a 333 0
0 219 705 104 284 3,747 2.295 21D 562 256 23 308 124 113 194 11 1.274 6,313 S 8 8.616 451 10,522 956 69,892 52 400 400 3
26 26 220 953 953 5
35 3S 280 1,413 1,413 273 2,323 1,323 D
3 3
171 1,313 445 2,539 1,326 06 282 282 2
25 25 5s 252 252 20 151 151 2
u 8
45 394 350 12 136 135 II 125 29 223 2
13 191 1.455 1,455 947 7.260 7,260 1,338 10.294 9,933 2,063 14,346 12.672 13A19 93.06 890.026 3,000 70D 16,711 20.411 250 tu
.89,428 291 1,313 1
8 291 1,313 1.49Q0 9.2 9
125 223 13 361 1.674 13.059 126 2,S11 1
40,123 107.880 126 2.511 1
149,D03 1,616 91,939 20.702 149,253 4.509 208,336 102,649 090,896 1,118 188 1,2816 1,280 502 126 623 628 1,62D 293 1,914 1,914 14,690 14,690 2,203 16,93 16,893 2,203 1,8893 16.893
--_aStuc~e
Comnnche Pent, Nuelear Pore Plantt Decrsnisiaoonig Coat Study DoctrrIt L11-1621-001, Rco. 0 A.ppe11,cv A. Page dolf27 Table D-2 Comanche Pealk Nuclear Power Plant. Unit 2 SAFETOR Decommissioning Coat Estimate (thousands af 2009 dollars)
I Actlvlty off-S*ie LLRW NRC Spent Fuel Site Prooe.sed Burial Volumes BurialI Utility and 0e-on Removal Packaging Transport Processing Disposal Other Total Total Uo. Teta..
Monagement Restosation Volume Class A Ciass B Class C GTCC Processed Craft Contractor Cost Cost costt Costs
- Cost, Costs Costs Contingency Coste Ctsts Costs Costs Cu. Feet CU. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Wt.,
M-nlo-ure Matheors I dex Period 20 Period-Oependean Costs 11.4.1 Insurance 2:.4.2 Propery taxes
- 3..3 Health physics supplies 2e.4.4 Disposal of DAW generteld 2a.4.3 Plana ener*y budget 2,.4.6 NRC Fees 2a.4.7 Emergency Planning Fees 21.4.
Decommissioning Staff Seserance 32.4.9 Spent Fuel Pool CAM 2a.4.30 ISFSI Operating Costs la.4.11 Security Staff Cost 2a.4.12 Uitilt Staff Cost r.4 5u btotarPeriod 2a Period-Oepe ndent Costs 2a.0 TOTAL PERIOD ha COST PERODh 2b -SAFSTOR Dormarn. wih Dry Spent Fuel 5torage Period 2b Dir Deacommsiionlng Activities 2bI..I Quarterly inspection 2b.1."
Seman-anual environmental survey Zb.I.3 Prepare reports 2b.1.4 Bituminous roof replacement 2b.1.5 Maintenance supplies 0b.I Subtotal Pernid 2b Activiy Costs Period 2b Collateral Costs 0b.3.1 Spent Fuol Capital and Transfer it.3 Subtotal Period 2b Collateral Costs Period 2b Period-Dependent Costs b6.4.1 Insurance 2b.4.2 Poperty m
aAes 2b.43 Health phystcs supplies 2b.4.4 Disposal of DAW generated 2b.4.5 Plant energp budget 5b.4.6 56C Fees 2b.4.7 Emergency Plannin Fetn 2b.4.8 ISFSI Operating Casts 21
.4.9 Security Staff Cost 2b.4.10 Utility Staff Cost 2b.4 Subtotal Period 26 Period-Dependent Costs 2b.0 TOTAL PERIOD 2b COST PERIOD 2e -SAFSTOR Dormancy without Spent Fuel Storage Period 2c Direct Decommissioning Activities 2h.1.1 Quarterly Inspection 2c,.2 Semi-anral environmental survey 2c.1.3 Prepare reports 2c.1.4 Bituminous roaf replacement S
TLG Serr~ira. lnc.
4 0
366 4
366 4
0 1,493 9
SO 1,04S 1,385 262 360 35 395 396 92 458 458 57 15 76 76 966 145 1.111 555 555 676 6A 744 744 e99 90 989 989 6.669 1,003 7,693 7,693 3,047 4S7 3.504 3,504l 176 26 202 202 14,379 2.157 16.536 2,551 13,985 20,31S 3,047 23,362 3,503 t9,859 57 49,006 7.216 56.719 q,669 47,053 57 65,316 9,782 75,527 l1,583 63,943 3,12 23,646 443,953 329.317 1,18s 23,646 S
773.270 1,182 23.646 5
773,270 7,392 10109 8.501 8,501 3,323 831 4,153 4,153 10,715 1,939 12,654 12,654 3.21S 3,215 482 3,597 3,697 482 3,697 3.697 1,783 23 1,783 23 1,733 23
-8,691 869 9,561 9,161 4AD 2,379 238 2,617 2,617 t46 2,223 2,228 333 85 449 445 3,194 479 3.673 3.673 4,473 447 4,920 4,920 5,543 594 6,537 6,537 1,162 174 1,336 1,336 25,676 3.851 29,527 16,866 12.652 33,282 4,992 38,274 23,164 15.110 333 84.80O 12,177 99,119 63,074 36,045 333 98,729 14.599 115,470 75,728 39,741 6,878 6.387 6,875 137,506 32 744,197 551,257 137,566 32 1,295,454 137,566 32 1,291,454 3
3 5,203 780 5,984 5.984
Coronadh. Penh NalelerPeoerPltst Daeo~rommicoocg Coat Study Doc-irenrt LII.-621-001, Rea. 0 Appendix D. Page 19 of 27 Table D-2 Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 2 SAFSTOR Decommissioning Cost Estimate (thousands of 2009 dollars)
Ac1trlsy Off-oit LLRW NRC Spent Fuel Site Processed Burial Volumes Burial?
Ilt1lnty and Decon Removal Packaging Transport Processing Disposal Other Total Total
. Term.
Management Restoration Volume Class A Class 8 Class C GTCC Processed Craft Contieclor Cost Cost Costs Coolr Cots Cese Cools Cests Costs Cc. Feet Cu. Feel Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet WL. Lbs.
Banhours Manhours I d ex 2c.1.5 Maintenance supplies 2c.1 Subtotal Period 2c Actinity Costs Period 2c Period-Dependent Costs 2c.4.1 insurance 2c.4.2 Proerry taes 2c.4.3 Health physics supplies 2t.4.4 Disposal of DAW generated 2t.4.5 Plant energy budget 2,-4.6 NMC Fees 2c.4.7 SectitySltaff Coot 2,,4.8 Utility StaIl cost 2t.4 Subtotol Period 2c Period-Dopendent Costs 2c,0 TOTAL PERIOD 2c COST PERIOD 2 TOTALS PERIOD 3a -Reactivate Site Following SAFSTOR Dormancy Period 3a chest Decommlssioning Actilrties 3e.1.1 Prepare preliminary decomrnissionlng tosl 3a.eL Review plant dwgs & specs.
3a.1.3 Perform detailed red survey 3a.1.4 End product descrtipton 3..1.5 Detailed by-product Inventory 3a.1.6 Detlne major work sequence 3:.1.7 Pertorm 3ER and CA 38.1,0 Pertorm Site-Specific Cost Study 30.1.0 Prepare/subml ULinse Termination Plan 3a.1.10 Receive hoC approval of tetmination plan Artnity Specifications 3:.1.11.1 Oa.Otivate plant & temporary facililies 3e.1.t1.2 Plant systems 3a.1.11.: Reucttr internals 3.1.11.4 Reactor
.esset 3S.t1 1.5 Biological shield 3a.1.21.6 Steam generators 3:.111:.1 RePintloed conorete 3a.1.11.0 Mth Turbine 3u.1.l1.9 Mein COndensers 3a.1.11.1l Plant struotures & buildIngs 3a.,1.11 Wiste management 3a.1.11.11 Facility & cite closeuo 3:.1 Total Planning
& Site Preparations 3U.1
.2 Prepare dicmantlng sequence 30.1.23 Plent prep. B lamp, svoeo 3-.1.14 Design water clean-up system 3a.1..15 Riggi./Cont. Cotl Envips/toolingatc.
7,542 1,197 1,197 16 2
16 2
5.862 1,675 230 2.248 2.985 10,323
-14.178 230 37.269 505 2.923 2.923 1.36S 0,907 80907 586 6,445 6,448 157 12.42 2,84Z 299 1,495 1,496 59 308 308 337 2,585 2,S1 293 3,283 3.203 1.54 11,B71 11,871 2.127 16,304 16,304 5,423 44,137 44,137 4.757 9S,131 4.757 95.131 22 271,98 241,336 22 113,314 1.197 16 2
23c 44,81.
6.788 53,044 13,044 4.757 91,131 22 S13,324 3346 43 S
621 208,856 32.169 244.U40 140,355 103,685 12.B17 216.344 19 3,21048 6G 10 79 73 242 36 279 279 53 B
61 61 68 10 79 70 395 59 454 494 163 24 109 180 263 40 303 393 216 32 24B 240 a
556 1,969 428 3,210 2.;40 1.753 383 219 374 342 26 154 04 21 21 164 242 47 2.095 58 446 402 33 292 227 56 430 430 11 394 394 4
30 30 25 189 183 13 97 46 3
24 3
24 25 189 94 36 279 279 7
51 27 314 2.409 2.121 19 145 141 420 3,220 3.220 11 a5 61 330 2.530 2,930 45 24 24 94 27 299 3.114 1.783 3.039 2.782 214 1.335 695 171 171 1.33S 1.969 301 17,024 126 2,100 74 2,20D 1,027 599 TIC Sesyicro, Jar.e
Co.socthe Pea., Nuclear Power Plant Decmmissioaing Cost Study Document L)2-1G21-8OJ, Res. 0 Appendix DA Page 20027 Table D-2 Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 2 SAFSTOR Decommissioning Cost Estimate (thousands sf2009 dallses)
Act iyty Itn~des Activi ty Description Off-Sita LLRW NRC Spent Fuel Sits Processed Burial Volumes Souial I Utilty and Deson Remosal Packaging Transport Processing Disposal Other Total Total Us. Term.
Management Restoratuon Volume Class A Class B Class C GTCC Processed Crat Contractor Cost Cost Costs Cast costs Cost Costs Contingency Costa Costs Costs Costs Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Wl Lbs.
aunh.urs Mashtuts 3a.1.16 Procure casks/liners & containers 3a.1 Subtotal Perod 3a Actlvity Costs Perod Ia Period-Dependent Costs 3a.4.1 Insurance 3s.4.2 Property tases 3a.4.3 Health physics supplies 30.4.4 Heavy equipment rental 3a.4.5 Disposal of SAW generated 3:-4.6 Plant energy budget 3l.47 NRC Fees 3e.4.t Security Stall Cost 3a.4.9 utility Staff Cost 3a.4 Subtotal Period 3a Period-Dependent Cnts 3u.D TOTAL PERIOD 3a COST PERIOD 3b - Decommissionlg Prepa rations Period 3 b Direct Decommissioning Activities Detailed Work Prosedures 1b.1.1.t Plant systems 3b.t.1.2 Reactor internals 3b.1.113 renmaining buildings 3b.1.14 CRD cooling assembly 3b.l.1.5 CRD housings & Ci tubes 3b.1.1.6 Incore Instrumentation 9b.5.1.7 Reastar sessel 1b.1.1.8 Facitlyoseost 3b.1.1.9 Missile shields 3b.1.LS RicOlogical shield 3b.1.1.
Steam generators 3b.1.1.12 Reinforced concrete 3b..1,13 Main Turbine 3b.1.1.14 Main Condensees 3b.1.1.5S Auciliary bulding 3b.1.1.
Reactor buiding 3b.1.1 Total 3b.l Subtotal Period 3b Astulity Costs Period 36 Additional Costs 3b.2.1 Site Characterization 3b.2 Subtotal Period 3b Addltlonai Costs Period 31 Collateral Costs, 3b.3.1 Decon equipment 3b.3.2 DoC staff relocation expenses 3b13.3 Pipe cutting equipment 3b,3 Subtotal Period 3b Collateral Costs 55 1D 75 75 8,829 1,324 10,154 9,8615 289 31.117 316 514 830 l
0 315 32 347 347 90 9
99 99 79 395 395 77 591 591 ti 5
24 24 1,228 101 1,390 1,390 208 21 229 229 1t19 28 217 217 11,357 1.703 13.062 13,060 18 13.367 2.135 16,351 16,351 10 22,196 3.459 26.504 26,216 289 364 364 364 7,277 7,277 6,257 200,229 206.486 83D 1
8 7,277 2
237,603 249 37 287 Z58 132 20 151 151 71 11 S2 ZD 59 8
61 61 53 8
62 61 S 51 t
1 51 191 29 220 220 63 9
73 36 24 4
27 27 03 7
73 73 242 30 279 279 53 8
82 3D t
12 94 82 12 94 144 12 1it 149 144 22 165 14:
1,698 2SS 1,953 15274 29 61 36 94 94 17 17 379 2,*26 1,07D 578 412 428 1,354 514 193 514 1,969 420 660 668 1,168 1,168 13,800 13,808 1,698 295 1.953 1.874 3799 1,849 555 2,404 2.4D4 1,049 555 2,404 2,4D4 11.831 4,232 11211 4.332 991 991 1.100 1,100 1,486 1,486 149 1,140 1,140 223 1,709 1,799 165 t,265 1,269 U97 4.113 4.113 ljJ TLG Satwicee, loc.
Comanche Peatk No.ce,- Power Plant Deoontmisaioning Coat Study Dacnttnent L11-1721-001. Rec. 0 Appendix A.
Page 27 of.7 Table D-2 Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 2 SAFSTOR Deconarnissioning Cost Estimate (thousands of 2009 dollars)
Off-Site LLRW NRC spent Fuel Site Processed Butloi Vaolmos Burial I Utilittyand SoAoivt DeCon Removal Packaging Transport Processlng Disposal Other Totau Total Uc. Term.
Management Restoration Volume Class A Class B Class C GTCC Prtcessed Craft Cantrantat Ind Activity Description Cost Cost Casts Cott Costs Canto Costt Cantn anoy Costs Coats Costs Costs Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Wt., Lbs.
Mtont.
s Manheats Period 3b Period.Oepeodent Casts 3b.4.1 Decon supplies 16.4.1 ensuroee 3b.4.3 Property txaes 35.4.4 Health physies soppiies 3b.4.5 neavy equipment rental 3b.4.6 Dispotot of DAW generated 3b.4.7 Plant energy budget 3b.4.8 NRC Fees 3b.4.9 Security Staff Cost 3b.4.10 DOC Staff Cost 3b.4.11 Utility Staff Cost 3b.4 Subtotal Period 31 Period-Dependent Costs SAO TOTAL PERIOD Sb COST PERIOD S TOTALS PERiO D 4a -Large Component Removal Period 43 Direct OecsmmissoneIrg Activities Nuclear Steam Suppli System Removal IA,.11 Reactor Coolant Piping 4am1.12 Pressurizer eEief Tank 4o.1.1.3 Reactor Coolant PUmps & Motors 4a.1.1.4 Pressuriter 4a..1.5 Steam Genertors 4a.1.1.6 CRDM/itCIs/Serue Structure Removal 4a.1.1.7 Reactor Vess.i Internals 4a.t.S.8 Vessnil&imtInals GTCC Disposal 4a.1.1.9 Reactor Vessel 4a.1.1 Totals Removal of Major Equipment 4a.1.2 Main Turblne/Genetort 4a.1.3 Main Condensers Caste ding Costs from Clean Building Demolition 4a.1.4.1 Reactor 4a.1.4.2 Auxltiary 4a.1.4 3 Safeguard 4a.1.4.4 Fuel 41.1.4 Totals 31 177 261 1
R 31 438 1
0 1,022 1,538 1
0 1.022 2n368 2
0 16 78 16 7
4 15 7
3 17 53 46 82 6
32 338 73 S1 3,087 1,260 1,245 21 66 255 15 31 1.770 3,690 249 3,747 975 108 145 8,855 6.586 3,792 a
38 38 190 19 2DS 209 46 S
so 50 44 221 221 39 300 300 10 a
14 14 612 92 704 704 s05 11 116 116 96 14 110 110 2,973 446 3,419 3,419 5,75g 863 6,620 6.620 10 9,778 1.543 1,801 S1,80S 10 l4,811 2,839 20,271 19,B92 2S 37,007 6.349 46,775 e8,108 94 114 73 398 398 43 8
25 145 145 2.030 548 2,786 2,786 967 g-29'
.7 "
1,71" 2.946 6,379 3,146 10.113 18,113 127 149 111 742 742 3'769 169 4,244 13.929 13,929 10,837 1,626 12,461 12,452
.88R 169 5,047 13.927 13.927 3.210 28,171 339 15,111 s
4,216 S4,216 737 204 1.490 1,490 752 309 1.956 1956 209 4,189 1
8,171 mrt.430 101,486 209 4.189 1
148rQD0 379 209 a,089 11,832 165.132 567 S73 11,465 11.834 403,735 361 361 83,745 2,449 165 165 36,553 596 7,231 792,800 2,801 s0 3.445 2-1,471 1,512 750 40.067 23,397 3,329,768 20.500 1.000 1,45g 3,044 111,119 2,342 2.312 376 470 326.129 17.867 307 505 104.146 6,672 2,955 98S.324 17,867 847 42.051 46.626 3,330 470 505 6.021.054 65,942 4,023 219 225 95 503 156 gg 1,002 472 108 467 2,048 3,939 7,111 Disposal Of Plant Systems 4a.2.5.1 uxefliay Feedwater (Insulated)
S19 20 SS 4a.2.5.2 Auxiliary Steam 97 4a.1.5.3 Boron Recycle (Intriatred) 29 2
1 4.1.5.4 Some Recyale luhinsouat ed) 128 19 26 oa.1.5,S Borer Thermal Regeneration (insuarted) 66 4
2 4a.1.5.6 Boron Thermal Regeneration (uninsulatedl 185 11 4a.1.5.7 Carbon Olovide Gas I
.4.
TLG Setoices, noe.
896 9
21 387 S4 25 26 183 71 150 1,152 1.152 71 542 502 16 124 104 70 537 537 307 2.355 2,355 274 1,764 1.764 19 111 12 83 63 511 9R4 I54 28 194 150 81 455 455 O
1 334,798 7:.06 320,000 20,781 13,996 6,783 1,508 6,652 29.019 9.388 381.245 13.999 111
.3.676 96 96 7.980 793 4,060 391 196,594 8.21B 275 112 21.205 1 '839 1,082 307 71,239 4.995 20
Comanche Peah Nuclear Power Plant De-unoonisoloninr Cost Sttdy Dfouneit L,11-161-001, Ret. 0 Appendix D. Page 22 sf27 Table D-2 Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 2 SAFSTOR Decormanissioning Cost Estimate (thousands of 0059 dollars) off-site LLRW NRC Spent Fuel Site Processed Burial Votumee Burial I Utility and Activity econ Removal Packaging Transport PFotessing Dlsposai Other Total Total Lic.Term.
Management Restoration Volume Closs A Class B Clots C GTCC Processed Craft Contractor index ActvltyDescprtton Cost Cost Costs Costs costs Costs Costs Contingency Costs Costs Costs Costs CU. Feet CU. Feet Cu. Feet Co. Feet Cu. Feet Wa.. Lbs.
Manhouts Manhooas Disposal of Plant Systems (continued) 4a.1.S.8 Chemical &Volume Control (Insulated) 4a.1.5.9 Chemical & Volunme Control (uninsulated) 4a,15.10 Chemrial Feed 4a.1.5.11 Chemical Feed - RCA 4a.1.5.12 Chilled Water - Safety 4a.1.5.13 Chilled Water - Safety - RCA 4a.1.5.14 Chlorine 4:..S.15 Circulatng Water 4a.t.S.16 Component Cooling Water 4a.1.5.17 Component Cooling Warer-RCA 4a.t.5.15 Condensate (insulated) da.t.S19 Condensate (uninsulated) 4a.t.0.20 Condensate Polishlin 4a.1.t.21 Condonser Vacuum
& Water Box Priming 4a.t.S.22 Extraction Steam 4a.l.S.S3 Feedwater 4a.1.S.24 Feedwater -RCA 4a.l.t.12 Generator & Exciter 4a.1.S.2t Generator Gas Cooling 4A.1.5.27 Geoerator Prtimry Water 4a.1.S.2R Generator teal Oil 4a.1.5.29 Hydrogen Gas 4a.:.I,30 Main Sloan Reheat & Steam Dump oa.t.5.31 Main Steam Reheat & Steam Dump - ICA Oa.t.t,32 Main Tonbine oIbe Oil Oa.t.5.33 Main Tarbine Oil Purification 4a.t.5.34 R1rogen Gao 4a.1.5.35 Oxygen Gas 4a.1.5.36 Post Accident Sompnlog 4a.l.S.37 Protes Sampllng (uninolated) 4a.1.5.38 Reactor Cooloat 4a..S.39 Besereoir Maheup Water 4a.1.5.40 Reseroir Return Water 4a.1.5.4L Reservoir Sence Toer da.1t5.42 Residual Heat eetoval 4a.1.543 Safete Injectico (insulated)
Oa.1.5.44 Safety I1ection (unlnsliated) 4aS.1.OS4 SecoodotyFlant Sampling 0a.1.5.46 Steam Generator Blowdono & Cleanup 4a.15.47 Turbine Rlecttolydr Cnt I (Insulated) a.S.15
- o. Tunbina a leottohydr Ctnt r (unlnsulated)
- 1.S.5.49 Tuatana Gland Steam & 0eams aa.1,S.SO Turbne Heater DBils 4a.1.S.S1 Tuthlno Plano Cooling (Insulated) ea.1.S.52 Turbine Plant Cooling (unislawued) 4Oa.1,S.S3 Turbines (:biG -LOW) (lnsulated) 4a.t,.S.B Turbines (BIOH -LOW) (unnsulated) 4..1.5.5 Vent Chilled Water-Non Safety 4a.1.5,56 Vent Chilled Ratar - Non Saftec - RCA 4a..5.57 Wectinghouse Process Instruments 4a.2.5 Totala 160 417 11 74 as 10 2:73 21 947 113 95 07 53 47 185 52 OR 37 70 7
91 31 55 itls SOS 3D4 11 12 1
19 731 155 125 slo 529 1,45 9
5 26 27 O
0 o
4 50 145 4
10 0
0 1
B 7
3 33 43 4
12 22 61 is 4
0 0
244 491 55 no 384 145 62 52
-52 24-311 isao 615 19 194 985 671 2
7,724 601 6S 352 352 20S 1,205 1,205 2
13 2
12 12 5
5 32 107 187 2
12 41 314 3
24 61B 4,123 4,123 17 130 14 110 13 100 8
61 7
50 2S 213 40 272 272 0
1 S
8 7
53 1
7 0
2 5
35 217 1,411 1,411 6
43 11 81 0
1 O
1 11 11 6
39 39 41 225 225 11 84 o
13 1
9 197 1.266 1.261 57 36B 35t 231 1,607 1.607 4
30 17 128 3
25 2
17 4
34 48 367 2
16 17 133 1
5 2
14 9
73 240 1,496 1,495 1
7 7
2,88 13,340 15.971 5*.
255 4,026 642 13 20 S
649 12 314 24 2,.747 130 110 100 61 54 213 1,741 53 3S 7,827 43 81 20 247 319 21 63 9
6.443 82 2.032 10.333 128 25 1 7 34 367 1 6 133 5
14 73 7.033
-30 0,9;6 23 36 133
-093
.9 46,114 4,319 218,992 11,014 421 821 252 159 26,322 2,200 369 10.429 763 1,040999 25,510 4,373 3,541 3,327 2,017 1,006 7,084 70.713 1,449 35 047 1,745 218 54 1.136 317,874 1D.257 1.383 2,553 39 42 ll 221 5D,030 236 32,110 2,527
.790 2,D95 30S 336,207 1,506 B2.534 2,690 419,61i 9,137 1,040 4,265 838 552 1,233 22.216 S49 4,420 156 S
474 2,423 285,611 13,663 3
93 9
99 3,1372023 598,602 t.A' TLG Sertces,. Inc.
Comanche Peah Nucleal Power Plant Oeeooonsiaoioolg Coat Study Dorr-nrst LIr -
1 21-0-0, Reo 0 Appendix A, Page 23 oe27 Table D-2 Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 2 SAFSTOR Decommissioning Cost Estimate (thousands of 2009 dollars)
Onfflte LL6W NRC Spent Fuel site Procestsed auial Volumes Burial /
Utility and Aetivity Decon Retnoat Packaging Transport Processing Disposae Othet Total Total LiU.Term.
Management Restoration Volume Clss A Class B Class C GTCC Processed Craft Conactator Index Acolu Cescrlaon Cost Cost Costs Costa Costs Costs Costs Contlogency Costs Costs Costs Costs CU. Feet Cu. Feet CU. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet WL. Lbs.
Manhours Manhours 4a...6 Scaffolding in support of decommissioning 4o.1 Subtotal Period 4a Activity Costs Period 4a Additional Coos 4a.2.1 Retired HP & LP Turbine Rotors 4a.2 Subtotal Period 4A Additional Costs Period 4a Collateral Costs 4A.3.1 Process liquid waste 4A.3.2 Small tool allowance 4a.3 Subtotal Period 4a Collateral Costs Period 4a Period-Dependent Costs 4a.4.1 Decon supplies 4a.4.2 Insurance 4a.4.3 Property taxos 4*.4.0 Health physics supplies 4a.4.5 Heavy equipment rental
'144.6 Oisposal of DAW generated 4a.4.7 Plant energy budget 4a.4.O NOC Fees 4:.4.I Liquid Raduaste Processi*g Equipment/Seruices 4a.t0 Security Staff Cost 4A.dit DOC Start Cost du..t12 Utility tafrCost 4a.4 Subtotul Period 4a Period-Dependent Costs 4a.0 TOTAL PERIOD 4a COST PERIOD 4, -Site Decontamination Period 41b Direct Decommissioning Actinities 4b.1.1 Remove spent fuel racks Disposal of Plant Systems 4b.1.2.1 Auxiliary Building HVAC i(nsulatred 4b.1,2.2 Auxiliary Building HVAC iuninsrlated) 4'.1,2.3 Dart Rms A Mist Unnotoroled Aoe. HVAC 4Z1..1b Compressed Air-instr, Air (inslted) 4U.-2.5 Corpresed Arl-Instrument Air. RCA i Ab.1.2.. Compressed Air -Instrument Air. RCA (u 4b,1.2.7 Cormpressed Air -
ricea Air 4b.1.2.t Compressed Air -Serlc Air -RCA 4b.1.2.
Cor pressed Air - Instr. Air(unlnsulated) 4b.1.2.20 Containment Hatches 4b.1.31 Cart ainment NHdrogen Purge HVAC 4b.l.2.15 Contoinment Spray 4b.1.2.13 Cantuinmen Ventilation OVAC iunrnsul) 4b1..2.14 Cot ainment Ventilation HVACrinsulated) 4b.t.2.15 Contli Room 1WAC 4b.12.16 Deminenalited & RCS Makeup Water 4b.1.2.17 Demineralhed & RCS MakeupWater -RCA 970 31 9
239 19 272 1440 2440 1313 82 66395 36951 245 19,217 7.241 2,393 12,61t 28,033 339 19,026 89,804 87,427 340 56 1,244 353 L993 2,993 340 6
,244 2
353 1.993 1,993 39 S1 tr 90 226 39 226 21 18 90 67 414 99 2.165 2,395 16 0
224 1,267
$11 423 2.441 01149 17.076 67 4,560 16 2
214 33,291 201 24.009 7.617 2.508 12,611 30,391 33.620 53 210 Z60 34 260 234 87 520 404 17 84 84 41 455 455 10 109 98 51 2,706 2,705 359 2,754 2.754 58 299 299 190 1,458 1,458 91 562 552 63 486 486 366 2,807 2,807 1,657 1t,707 12,707 2.561 19,637 19,537 S.916 44,36S 44,014 25,382 136.382 133,966 132 SDI 510 23 lOS 195 27 171 171 0
3 0
2 12 67 67 43 2S4 2S4 3
26 43 248 248 5
38 5
32 92 24 152 152 359 1,610 2.615 t7 114 114 163 1,142 1,142 4
34 142 840 640 2,378 23S,346 49,50S 3,330 470 S0S 10.274,540 360,581 4.023 5,024 696,100 1,200 1,000 5,014 696,000 1,200 1,000 303 18,167 59 21 303 18,167 59 11 4,725 9 2,503 21 71,964 15a,897 207.857 11 4,62S 92,093 2t 518.719 2,414 135.346 59.447 3.330 470 505 1t.081.210 361,61 523,702 1.098 98,510 428 766 11.17 967 s9 36,193 1.273 3
91 2
89 167 6.768 1.170 2
893 36.261 2.033 8 02 32.579 3,243 38 1.267 129 5,257 35 001 32,515 1,290 18,462 760,573 9,487 703 28,562 700 7.825 317.781 4,573 04
.1,144 116 3,662 3,201 120,978 9,392 134 15 70 6
257 43 2
A 73 53 2
89 2
2 38 0
1 16 110 2
5 85 03 122 2
5 77 33 14 0
1 12 45 2
5 75 338 39 108 1.764 25 2
4 67 170 56
- 4.
742 30 101 377 6
10 296
-- a TLO Serticos. Io..
Comanche Peah Nuclear Power Plant Decomati.ia.nig Coat Study Document L1I-I621-00, Ree. 0 Appendix D, Pnge 24 of 27 Table D-21 Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 2 SAFSTOR Decommissinning Cost Estimate (thousands of 2009 dollars)
IAotlcit o
ff S it LLR W N R C S pent Fuel Site P roc ssd B urils v olum es B u aLOW UII" y and Decon Removal Packaging Transport Processing Disposal Othet Total Total Lic. Term.
Management Restoration Volume Class A Class 8 Class C GTCC Processed Craft ContractorI Cost Cost Costs Coats Casts Costs Costs Contnagency Costs Costs Costs Costt Cu. Feel Cu. feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet WL.. Ls.
Manhours ManoS I
[tidal AC*
UBICrlUUD*
I d..
.. mmy --
ptum Disposal of Plant Systems (continued) 4b.1.2.18 Diesel Gen & AuXllisdes (insulated) 4b.1.21.9 Diesel Gen & Aunolies (uninsulated) 4b.1.2.2L Diesel Generator Fuel Oil 40.1.3.21 Diesel Roora HIVAC abl.2.22 Electrical Clean 4b.1.1.223 tectdcal -Ccrtaeinated 40.1,'.24 Electrical - Cont Inated dFHO 4f.1.3.2" Eleotrical. RCA 4b.12.22 Eentrinal -RCA FHB 46.1.2.27 Fire Fraleooian 4a.1.2.28 Firt potetion -RCA 40.1.2.29 Fo saildiag HVAC (insularced) 4b.l.2.3D Fuel aulldin HOVAC ulnintuiated) 06.1.2.31 Fuel Handling 41.1.2.3t Leak Rate Test 4b.1.2.33 Misc Plant FHAC (Insulated) 4b.1.2.34 Mist Piact VAC{unlinsulated) 41.1.2.35 Misoeliaeo.us Equipment 4b.1.2.36 Office & Service HVAC 4b.1.237 Potable Water 4b.1.2.3B Primarl Plant HVAC (Insulated) 4.1a.2.39 Primary Plant HVAC (uninsulated) 4b..D.40 Radiation Monitoring 4b.1.2.41 Satfegurds Building d:VAC insulared) ab.1.2.42 Safeguards tuilding HVAC unlnsulated) 46.1.2.41 Service Water 4".1.2.44 Service Water-RCA 0b.l.2.45 Sewage Treatment 0b.1.2.46 Spent Fuel Pool Coatng & Cleanup 4b.1.2.47 Turbine Building HVAC (Insulated) 46.1.2.49 Turbine Building HVAC (uainsulated) 46.1.2.4 UPS HVAC ab,1.21D Vent & Drains c6.1.2.51 Vents & Drains - RCA 4b.1,253 woste M anagemen (insulated) 46.1.2.13 Waste Managrmenluninsulated) 4b.1.2.54 Waste ProcessingDas(uninnalated) 46.1.2.55 Waste Pronessing Liquid (insulated) 4b.1.2.56 Waste Processing liquid (uninsulated) 40.1.2.57 Waste Processing Solid 40.1.2.5 Water Treatment (insulated) 4:.5.2.29 Water Treatmernt (unInsulated) 46.12 Totals 4b.13 Scaffolding in supipcrs of decommissioning De-natamInaticn of Site Buildi*gs 46.1.4.2 Reactor 46.1.4.2 Auciliary 05.1.4.3 RadwanteWarehoe 45.1.4.4 Safeguard 4b.1.4.5 Fuel TLG Serrlces, Ice.
5 62 10 3
1,554 245 57 2,197 411 397 70, 79 24 5
4 2
2 t2 15 so 3
14 36 49 710 2
22 29 374 16 174 107 73 236 290 17 46 490 11,161 7
17 1
3 53 152 14 31 20 56 1
2 1
2 O
6 O
0 O
5 4
11 0
1 1
3 15 42 59 56 51 16 5
14 16 6
39 31 2
3 333 654 262 17 52 3
2.461 491 32 910 33 39 76 5
176 23 S.
6a9 766 377 221 52 112 416 234 48 13 12,248 939 1
6 9
72 1
11 0
4 233 1,787 109 626 23 n4D 947 5019 l9D 1,169 60 457 313 1,01t 16 65 10 76 3
16 2
10 0
2 4
17 3
19 0
3 5
59 13 156 48 317 0
3 7
46 18 113 7
57 ISt 1.091 3
21 401 Z.369 o
1 3
26 a
1 4
33 159 876 2
12 16 123 24 366 97 519 203 1,217 11 99 7
53 73 363 4.131 26.470 656 lao 1.169 2,011 65 7.
16 10 19 1130 46 113 1,o91 27369 876 366 119 1,217 99 22,928 72 11 1,787 2.749 73 546 12 25,g49 5,146 137 532 347 405 76 47 27 59 795 1.831 3
243 57 71 57 7.217 21 9,022 1.611 26 1
33 3
1.676 63t 12 123 1,316 540 480 4,306 1.230 502 96 S3 S63 3,542 107,378 4.244 2.314 366 117 56,765 118,221 6.S68 23,478 1,494 1.049.729 58,812 221.262 10,133 t -,85 367.103 18.179 S 4,073 437 16,464 588 3,504 132 1,917 108 72 955 4.266 155 14 1,892 32203 1.104 74.376 2I'll tO0 9.862 306 23.182 1.619
.1,82 293.103 5.265 678 470,187 19,622 92 840 39 1,092 125.003 10,174 399 4,043 94,036 2.334 64,978 6,363 264,642 9.206 25,353 532 1,78D 18.716 4.720,620 314.121 99,592 55,426 713.770 43.076 326,210 22,901 S 13:482 6,324 61,599 4.625 233,846 37,849 1.455 45 14 208 29 409 2,160 2.160 1,969 123 947 346 135 58 293 345 763 3t088 3.088 633 195 61 27 159 153 438 1.555 1.665 210 11 3
2 9
110 343 343 124 41 9
6 82 23
-9 353 353 611 626 26 25 374 1
D540 2.253 2.263 3.072 5.918 1.670 2.611 S13S 644 367 3.919 772
Comanche Pen Is Nuclear Power Plant Dretonisoianlrg Coat Study Document LII-1617-001. Re 0
Appendix D, Page 22 of27 Table D-Z Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant. Unit 2 SAFSTOR Decommissioning Cost Estimate (thousands of 2009 dollars) off-sit.
.Spent Ft sit..o Proes.sed ou.rll 9W.1 rI C
Utily adi Aotluity DBoon Roe.oal Peokaging Tteespoft Proes.s.ig Disposal Other Total Total Le.
Term.
Management Restoredon Volume Closs A Class 0 Class C GTCC Proes.sed Croft Conteator Inde.
Actulty Descrprton Coast Cast Costh Coos Costh Cosh Costh C-o ngeenyr Casts Casts Casts Costo Cu. Feet Cus rFot Cu. Feet Cu. Feel Cua Feet Wt.. Lbs.
Manhoos Manhoots 0b.1,4 Totals 2,525 21419 236 116 880 590 1t939 7,713
- 7,713 9,305 9,803 1.348.904 t 14.734 4b.1 Subtotal Period 4b Activit Costs 2.639 13,045 685 790 1.,344 1,015 6,615 36.934 33.392 3,542 1180.52 15.868 6,267,626 47.7717 Period 4bAdditional CostS 41.2.1 License Term]nmatlon Suaey Planning 4b.2.2 S F51 Lcense Ternination 4b.2 Subtotal Period 4b Additinal Casts Period 46 Collateral Costs 4b.3.1 Process liquid waste 4 b.3.2 Small tool allowanoe 41.3.3 Decommissioning Equiprment Disposition 40.3 Subtotal Period 4b Collateral Costs Period 46 Period-Oependent Costs 4b.4.1 Decon.uppilos 46.4.2 Insococe 4b.4.3 Propenytaxes 4b.4.4 Health physics supplies 4b.4.IS eaoy equipment rental 46.4.6 Disposal of DAW generated 4Al.4.7 Plant energy budget 45.4.8 NRC Fees 41.4.9 Liquid Radwaste Processing Equopment/Serices 41.4.0 Sourrity Staff Cost 4b,4.1 1 DOC Staff Cost 41,4.12 utility Staff Cost 4bA Subtotal Period 46 Pedrid-Dependent Costs 4bO TOTAL PERIOD 4b COST PERIOD 4e - License Terminlaton Period 4e Direct Decommissioning Activities 4e.1.1 ORISE oant fenatory suroey 4e.1.2 Terminate:tieonse 0e.1 Subtotal Period 4e Actiitry Costs Period 4e Additional Coast 4e.2.1 License Tertnination Suey 4e.2 Subtotal Period 4e Addilonal Costs Period 4e Coalateral Costs 4e.3.1 DOC staff relocation expenses 4e.3 Subtotal Period 4e Collateral Costs Period 4e Perlod-Dependent COats 4o.4,1 Insurnoee 4e.442 Property taxes
,e.4,3 Health physics supplies 8e.4.4 Disposal ofOAW generated 4e.4.S riant energy budget 23 23 655 1
0 371 696 1
8 371 0,352 197 852 852 204 1,304 401 2.156 852 1,304 1.300 1,701 1.701 6,240 142,522 2,565 1.280 142.522 8c805 1,800 go 4a 121 277 140 50 80 277 1t4 171 1.762 3,533 6,773 22 2
1,762 10,306 22 2
4,402 23,652 892 171 189 110 544 544 42 329 319 634 87 138 1.cso 1,050 634 277 290 1.913 1,913 441 2,203 2.203 tIS8o 610 1,298 1,298 203 20 312 312 883 4,416 4,416 1,06 7,709 7,789 321 83 429 429 l.OS3 428 3181 3,281 t437 146 t6O03 1,603 1,2C6 181 1t387 1,307 6,959 3,044 8,003 8,003 30,616 4,592 35,209 35,209 46,329 6,949 53,278 53,278 321 90,883 15,909 119,207 119,207 11,970 2.784 92,231 23.215 160,210 155,364 1,304 635 38,106 124 6,001 373 333507 88 6.000 1,009 3401.13 t12 6,630 132,591 30 205.179 439,903 774,754 6,630 132,596 30 1,419,836 3,542 124.652 24,608 6,884,3SR 483.764 1,421,116 151 45 197 137 151 45 097 197 5,444 1,633 7,877 7,077 5.440 1.633 7,077 7,877 153.525 3.120 063.525 3,120 1,486 203 5,709 1,09 1,486 225 1.709 1,705 668 68 103 7
75 75 167 935 035 3
16 10 28 211 211 309 4.974 TLG Sertico, Irrc.
00
£aeonache Pes, NaaCoear PStuedyiend D~eronsohsiooitsing Cost Sau~d 7
Dorunerit L11-IC21.001, Res,. 0 Appensdi.n D, Page 26.f27 Table D-2 Comnanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 2 SAFSTOR Decommuissioning Cost Estimate (thoosands of 2009 dollars)
A.0tluy Off-Site LLRW NRC Spent Fuel Site Processed Burial Volumes Bulal I Utility andI Decon Removal Packaging Transport Processing Disposal Other Total Total Lic. Term.
Management Restoration Volume Class A Class B Class C GTCC Processed Cra ContractorI Cost Cost Coste costa Costs Coots Costs Contingenccy Costs Costs Costs Costs Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet Cu. Feet W. Lbs.
Manhoues Manthours IodV A U I D I III x
c v p on Period 0r Period-Oependent Costs [continued) 4e.4.6 NRC Feet 4e.4.7 Security Staff Cost 4e.4.8 DOC Staff Cost 4e.4.9 UtiiW Staff Cost 4e.4 Subtotal Period 4e Period-Dependent Costs 4e.0 lOTAL PERIOD 4e COST PERIOD a TOTALS PERIOD Sb -Site Restoratlon Period 5b Direct Decommissioning Activities Demolition of Remaining Site Buildlnegs Sb,.S.2.
Reactor Sb,.1.2 Adminleration 5b.1.1.3 Aulliary 56.1.1.4 Chtlotratian (CW Intake) 6.I5.1.5 Chlorination (SW Intake) 5S.S.1S. CItI Water Inlake 5s..1.,7 CircWat CYordPipng 5b..11.8 Diesel Generator 5b.1.1.9 Mointenance Sb.1.1.10 Meogoatt Support Ctr & Material Staging 5b.S.1.11 MiscellaneousSite Structures 5b..1.123 Fodwoser warehouse 5b.1.1.13 Safeguord 51b1.1.14 Serocec Water lntake Steucture 56.1.1.15 Saitcrgnar 5b.1.1.16 Swilthyard Relay House 5b.1..I7 Tanks & Tunnels 5b.1. 1.1 Turbine 51.1.1.9 Turbine Pedestal 55.1.1S.S Fuel 5b.1.]
- Total, Site Coseout Actijitles 5b.5.2 BackFill Site 5.,1.3 Grade & tand-pcae sIte 56.2.4 Final report to NRC 36.1 Subtotal Period Sb Activity Costs Period Sb Additional Costs 51,.,1 Concrete Processing 56.2.2 Cirrularing Water Cafferdam 5S.2.3 tSetlie water Cofferdam 5.2.4 ISFSI 1emolItion and Site Rtestoralloc 5b52 Subtotal Period Sb Additional Costs Period 5b Collateral Costs Sb.3.1 Small tool allowance V
TLG Selerices, Inc.
GSB 415 3,249 3,632 0
12 7,915 37 400 405 62 477 477 487 3,736 3,736 545 4,177 4,577 1.336 9,932 9.932 249 2,a9 11,821 47,090 57.379 4,974 1
116,340 4,974 153.526 119,436 569 5
0 12 14.996 3.237 18,914 18,914 4.732 48,323 8.510 3.479 24,589 33.188 140.851 51,834 315,506 308,245 1,304 S.956 259.998 8e.303 3,330 470 505 17.970,540 999,152 Z,06n.310 5,679 95 4.249 17 6
1,322 17 605 198 331 214 2,001 521 113 18 929 SSO 1.188 4,201 31,213 2,643 477 34,332 1521 428 409 724 3,082 2
252 6.531 14 111 837 4.886 3
20 O
6 198 1,520 3
19 91 695 30 227 10 3t1 1.336 10,24G 32 246 305 2,38R 78 699 17 130 3
21 139 1.009 82 632 178 1.366 630 4,831 4,682 33.899 396 3,039 72 049 12 94 5,162 39,5074 4
6.531 111
.805 695 227 381 10,206 246 2,358 599 130 21 632 1,366 3 5.895 3.039 549 39,482 1,757 492 471 606 2.720 79,426 2,092 61.157 443 141 17.143 36 8.908 4,321 7,669 174,325 5,675 30,267 7,17S 2,049 451 15,724 11.259 15.907 59,867 504.053 6.414 1.292 511,759 068 6
25 31 229 1.717 i4 492 11 4 7 1 112 8 90 467 3,580 7.139 3,904 3.725 14,350 29.108 s0 s0 316 47 363
-363
Cotoanchb Pest Nuclear Power Plant Dooontfairng Cost Sturdy Do.smet LII-1621-301. Ret. 0 Appcrni.ix D. Puge 27sf27 Table D-2 Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant. Unit 2 SAFSTOR Decommissioning Cost Estimate (thousands of 2009 dollars)
Off-Slte LLRW NBC Spent Fuel silo Processead BurIiaValurnes Outle.,
U"ItIy and Astlt Sn tor Removal Packagilg Transport Processlng Oisposel Other Total Total Uc. Term.
Management Restoration Volume Class A Class B Class C GTCC Processed Crat Contractor Iner AcdtlIty Desctption Cost Cost Costs Costs Costs Costs Costa Contngency Costs Costs Costs Costs Cu. Feet CU, Feet Cu. Feet Cs. Feet Cu. Feet Wt.. Lbs.
Manhourt Monhouns Sb.3 Subtotal Period Sb Collateral Costs 316 47 363 353 Period 5b Period-Dependent Costs Sb.4.1 Insurance Sb.4.2 PaPerteytaeI 5b.4,3 Heayw equlpment rental Sb.4,4 Plant energy budget Sb.4,S Security staff Cost Sb.'.6 DOC Staff Cost bb.4.7 utility Slaff Cost 5b.4 Subtotal Period Sb Petiod-Dependent Costs Sb.O TOTAL PERIOD Sb COST PERIOD 5 TOTALS TOTAL COST TO DECOMMISSION 180 158 i
1B8 6,136 920 7,056 7.055 241 356 277 277 9110 147 1,127 1.127 27,581 7,431 1.115 8,546 8.546 110,240 3
,481 522 4,003 4.003 54,080 6,136 12.313 2,758 21,207 21,207 191.901 43,866 2,a26 aa435 64,727 94 560 63,772 540,867 192,649 43,866 12.426 8,.435 64,727 94 660 63,772 540.867 192.649 11,501 IOs97 8,765 4.047 24,589 34,792 469,036 111,206 764,134 S74,3B0 118,908 70.396 259,998 102.201 3.30 470 SOS 18,446.,8 u
1,654,561 6,133.645 OTAL COSTTO DECOMMISSION WITH 17.003%CONTINGENCY:
$764,134 thousandssof 2009 dolars
'OTALNRCLICENSETERMINATION COST-I7S.23%0OR
$574,30 thousandsof 5009 dollars PENT FUEL MANAGEMENT COST 1 15.56% OM:
$18,908 tbousandsof 2289 dollars ION.NUCLEAR DEMOLITION COST IS9.21% OR:
$70,396 thousands of 2039 dollars 01AL LOW-LEVEL RADIOACTiVE WASTE VOLUME OU RIED [EXCLUDING GTCC);
106.051 cubic feet OTAL GREATER THAN CLASS C RADWASTE VOLUME GENERATED:
505 cubi tfeet OTAL SCRAP METAL REMOVED:
94.995 tons OTAL CRAFT LABO R REQUIREMENTS:
1,654.561 mon-houts lb End Notes:
n/a - indicates that this activity not charged as decommissioning eopense.
a
- indlcatos that Ibis anisity performed by decommissioning staff.
- 0. Indics that 1
his value is less than 0.5 but Is non-aero.
a cll uontalning indicates a lre. salue 00 C
TLO Serri.ce leeIn.