|
|---|
Category:Rulemaking-Comment
MONTHYEARML12201A0392012-07-16016 July 2012
Comment (272) of Michael Griffen, on Behalf of Maryland Dept of Environment, on PRM-50-104 Regarding Emergency Planning Zone
ML12195A2662012-07-11011 July 2012
Comment (162) Karen Fuller, on Behalf Tompkins County Legislature, on PRM-50-104 Regarding Emergency Planning Zone
ML1030800782010-11-0303 November 2010
2010/11/01-Comment (3) of John Jaquin on Nei'S Petition for Rulemaking PRM-26-5, 10 CFR 26, Fitness-For-Duty
ML1026301272010-08-17017 August 2010
Petition for Rulemaking PRM-26-6 of Erik Erb with co-signers, Requesting the NRC to Decrease the Minimum Day Off (MDO) Requirement for Security Officers Working 12 Hour Shiftts from 3 Days Per Week to 2.5 or 2
RS-09-070, Comment (12) of Darin M. Benyak, on Behalf of Exelon Generation Company, LLC, on ANPR 171, Variable Annual Fee Structure for Power Reactors2009-06-0303 June 2009
Comment (12) of Darin M. Benyak, on Behalf of Exelon Generation Company, LLC, on ANPR 171, Variable Annual Fee Structure for Power Reactors
ML0717804182007-06-25025 June 2007
Comment (9) Submitted by Exelon Generation Company LLC, Darin M. Benyak, on Ucs'S PRM-73-13 Regarding to Amend 10 CFR Part 73, Physical Protection of Plants and Materials
ML0716305372007-06-12012 June 2007
Comment (8) Submitted by Constellation Energy, Terry F. Syrell by John M. Heffley, on Pogo and Ucs PRM-50-83 Re Amend 10 CFR Part 50 Concerning Design Basis Threat
ML0701804782007-01-13013 January 2007
Comment (1) Submitted by Three Mile Island Alert,L Inc., Eric Epstein on Massachusetts Attorney General'S PRM-51-10 Re to Amend 10 CFR Part 51
ML0636300782006-12-27027 December 2006
Comment (12) Submitted by Ronald K. Scheeler on Proposed Rules PR-50, 72 and 73 Regarding Power Reactor Security Requirements
ML0609600452006-04-0404 April 2006
Comment (76) Submitted Anonymous on Proposed Rule PR-26 Regarding Fitness for Duty Programs
RS-04-059, Comment (8) Submitted by Exelon Generation, LLC and Amergen Energy Co., Kenneth A. Ainger, on Proposed Rules PR-19, 20 and 50, Re Collection, Reporting or Posting of Information; Availability of Draft Rule Language2004-04-0909 April 2004
Comment (8) Submitted by Exelon Generation, LLC and Amergen Energy Co., Kenneth A. Ainger, on Proposed Rules PR-19, 20 and 50, Re Collection, Reporting or Posting of Information; Availability of Draft Rule Language
ML0406504702004-03-0303 March 2004
Comment (8) Submitted by Constellation Generation Group, LLC Charles Cruse on Behalf of Licensees Calvert Cliffs and Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, on Proposed Rules PR-170 & PR-171 Regarding Revision of Fee Schedules; Fee Recovery for F
ML0323201352003-08-0101 August 2003
Comment (9) Submitted by Morgan Lewis & Brockus, Llp, Steven P. Frantz, P.M. Bessette, on Behalf of Exelon Gen., S. Texas, on Proposed Rule PR-50 Re Risk-Informed Categorization & Treatment of Structures, Systems & Components for Nuclear Po
ML0312800372003-05-0505 May 2003
Comment (15) Submitted by Constellation Energy Group, Charles H. Cruse, Supporting and Endorsing the Comments Submitted by NEI on Proposed Rule PR-170-171 Revision of Fee Schedules; Fee Recovery for Fy 2003
ML0226805452002-09-13013 September 2002
Comment from Michael T. Chezik on Draft Supplement 10 (NUREG-1437) to the Generic Environmental Impact Statement
ML0225600462002-08-27027 August 2002
Comment of Michael P. Gallagher Concerning Draft Plant-Specific Supplement 10 to the Generic Environmental Impact Statement Regarding Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station
ML0222101472002-08-0101 August 2002
Comment of Joe Mangano on Draft plant-specific Supplement 10 to Generic Environmental Impact Statement Re Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Units 2 & 3
2012-07-16
[Table view] |
Text
Pane 1 nf 1 DOCKETED....
USNRC PRM 26-5 November 3, 2010 (11:18am)
(7FR65249)3 OFFICE OF SECRETARY RULEMAKINGS AND ADJUDICATIONS STAFF As of: November 03, 2010 Received:
November 01, 2010 Status: Pending-Post PUBLIC SUBMISSION Tracking No. 80b7c8b4 Comments Due: January 05, 2011 Submission Type: Web Docket: NRC-2010-0304 Nuclear Energy Institute
-Fitness-for-Duty Programs Comment On: NRC-2010-0304-0001 Anthony R. Pietrangelo on Behalf of the Nuclear Energy Institute; Receipt of Petition for Rulemaking Document:
NRC-2010-0304-DRAFT-0003 Comment on FR Doc # 2010-26715 Submitter Information Name: Jon Jaquin Address: 4 Mallard Lane Oswego, NY, 13126 Organization:
Nne Mile Point Security General Comment Ladies and Gentleman although unfortunate, the events at Peach Bottom seemed to be a result of accepted culture. Because of the actions of a few, my family has had to adjust to a paycut of over $12,000 this year. Any fatique on my behalf has had more to do with working a 12 hour1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> rotating shift forcing me to go back and forth between days and nights on short turnaround.
We all know how unnatural this is otherwise there would not have been computer based training instructing us on proper techniques including effective use of caffienated drinks and frequent naps on our free/family time to combat fatique. How are frequent naps as opposed to family outings or a childs athletic event a good quality of life? Since the fatigue rules have gone into effect I have heard the word "forced overtime" and seen more individuals get forced in to work on thier "pass" days more than in the previous five years while others that were willing to work the overtime were turned away.Once again, I ask is this quality of life? I think not! Either address the real cause of fatique or just go back to the old system and hold individuals accountable for poor practices.
T pIto , https://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/submitterlnfoCoverPage?Call=Print&Printld...
11/03/2010 Rulemaking Comments From: Sent: To:
Subject:
Attachments:
Gallagher, Carol Wednesday, November 03, 2010 9:47 AM Rulemaking Comments Comment on PRM-26-5 NRC-2010-0304-DRAFT-0003.pdf Van, Attached for docketing is a comment on PRM-26-5 (75 FR 65249) that I received via the regulations.gov website on November 1, 2010.Thanks, Carol 1 Received:
from HQCLSTR01 .nrc.gov ([148.184.44.76])
by OWMS01 .nrc.gov ([148.184.100.43])
with mapi; Wed, 3 Nov 2010 09:47:36 -0400 Content-Type:
application/ms-tnef; name="winmail.dat" Content-Transfer-Encoding:
binary From: "Gallagher, Carol" <Carol.Gallagher@nrc.gov>
To: Rulemaking Comments <Rulemaking.Comments@nrc.gov>
Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2010 09:46:57 -0400
Subject:
Comment on PRM-26-5 Thread-Topic:
Comment on PRM-26-5 Thread-Index:
Act7XZUI91 nzxydiRse9ubOxDRStnw==
Message-ID:
<6F9E3C9DCAB9E448AAA49B8772A448C5469C225844@HQCLSTRO1 .nrc.gov>Accept-Language:
en-US Content-Language:
en-US X-MS-Has-Attach:
yes X-MS-Exchange-Organization-SCL:
-1 X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
<6F9E3C9DCAB9E448AAA49B8772A448C5469C225844@HQCLSTRO1.nrc.gov>
MIME-Version:
1.0
