Comment (162) Karen Fuller, on Behalf Tompkins County Legislature, on PRM-50-104 Regarding Emergency Planning ZoneML12195A266 |
Person / Time |
---|
Site: |
Calvert Cliffs, Browns Ferry, Nine Mile Point, Three Mile Island, Surry, Fort Calhoun, FitzPatrick ![Constellation icon.png](/w/images/b/be/Constellation_icon.png) |
---|
Issue date: |
07/11/2012 |
---|
From: |
Fuller K Tompkins County, NY |
---|
To: |
NRC/SECY/RAS |
---|
SECY RAS |
References |
---|
77FR25375 00162, NRC-2012-0046, PRM-50-104 |
Download: ML12195A266 (3) |
|
|
---|
Category:Rulemaking-Comment
MONTHYEARML20119A5382020-04-27027 April 2020 Comment from Secretary Patrick Mcdonnell on the Three Mile Island Nuclear Station, Unit 2; Consideration of Approval of Transfer of License and Conforming Amendment ML17165A3272017-06-13013 June 2017 Comment (22) from the Omaha Public Power District Regarding Regulatory Improvements for Power Reactors Transitioning to Decommissioning ML14001A0212013-12-20020 December 2013 Comment (00751) of Christopher Calnan on PR-51, Waste Confidence - Continued Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel ML12201A0392012-07-16016 July 2012 Comment (272) of Michael Griffen, on Behalf of Maryland Dept of Environment, on PRM-50-104 Regarding Emergency Planning Zone ML12200A1732012-07-16016 July 2012 Comment (176) of David O'Leary on PRM-50-104 Regarding Emergency Planning Zone ML12200A1702012-07-16016 July 2012 Comment (173) of Lydia Gralla on PRM-50-104 Regarding Emergency Planning Zone ML12201A0492012-07-16016 July 2012 Comment (275) of Jacqueline Vaughan, on Behalf of Calvert County Govt, on PRM-50-104 Regarding Emergency Planning Zone ML12200A2572012-07-16016 July 2012 Comment (178) of Leonard Wheeler Supporting PRM-50-104 Regarding Emergency Planning Zone ML12200A2882012-07-16016 July 2012 Comment (198) of Tim Brainerd on PRM-50-104 Regarding Emergency Planning Zone ML12202A0362012-07-16016 July 2012 Comment (223) of Pete Mcnally, on Behalf of Polk County Emergency Management, on PRM-50-104 Regarding Emergency Planning Zone ML12201A0352012-07-16016 July 2012 Comment (268) of Maureen Headington on PRM-50-104 Regarding Emergency Planning Zone ML12201A0152012-07-16016 July 2012 Comment (248) of Loren Olson PRM-50-104 Regarding Emergency Planning Zone ML12201A0132012-07-16016 July 2012 Comment (246) of Mary Madigan on PRM-50-104 Regarding Emergency Planning Zone ML12201A0122012-07-16016 July 2012 Comment (245) of Gary Shaw on PRM-50-104 Regarding Emergency Planning Zone ML12201A0112012-07-16016 July 2012 Comment (244) of Sally Shaw on Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-104 Regarding Emergency Planning Zone ML12201A0092012-07-16016 July 2012 Comment (242) of Quinn Montana on Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-104 Regarding Emergency Planning Zone ML12201A0082012-07-16016 July 2012 Comment (241) of Richard Mathews on PRM-50-104 Regarding Emergency Planning Zone ML12201A0072012-07-16016 July 2012 Comment (240) of Carol Letson on Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-104 Regarding Emergency Planning Zone ML12200A4122012-07-16016 July 2012 Comment (227) of Ken Deshaies on Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-104 Regarding Emergency Planning Zone ML12200A3432012-07-16016 July 2012 Comment (197) of Anne Bingham PRM-50-104 Regarding Emergency Planning Zone ML12200A3412012-07-16016 July 2012 Comment (195) of Jan Clarridge on Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-104 Regarding Emergency Planning Zone ML12200A3392012-07-16016 July 2012 Comment (193) of William Collins on Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-104 Regarding Emergency Planning Zone ML12200A3382012-07-16016 July 2012 Comment (192) of John D. Calandrelli Supporting Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-104 Regarding Emergency Planning Zone ML12200A3372012-07-16016 July 2012 Comment (191) of Richard Kranzdorf Supporting Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-104 Regarding Emergency Planning Zone ML12200A3352012-07-16016 July 2012 Comment (189) of Lynn Crandall Supporting PRM-50-104 Regarding Emergency Planning Zone ML12200A3342012-07-16016 July 2012 Comment (188) of Doug Brown Supporting PRM-50-104 Regarding Emergency Planning Zone ML12200A3222012-07-16016 July 2012 Comment (222) of Robert Heron on PRM-50-104 Regarding Emergency Planning Zone ML12200A3212012-07-16016 July 2012 Comment (221) of Priscilla Bradley on PRM-50-104 Regarding Emergency Planning Zone ML12200A3192012-07-16016 July 2012 Comment (219) of Rachel Herbener on PRM-50-104 Regarding Emergency Planning Zone ML12200A3142012-07-16016 July 2012 Comment (217) Robert Tohe on PRM-50-104 Regarding Emergency Planning Zone ML12200A3122012-07-16016 July 2012 Comment (216) of Frank Snapp on PRM-50-104 Regarding Emergency Planning Zone ML12200A3092012-07-16016 July 2012 Comment (213) of Troy Lynn Hamzy on PRM-50-104 Regarding Emergency Planning Zone ML12200A3082012-07-16016 July 2012 Comment (212) of Charlene Woodcock on PRM-50-104 Regarding Emergency Planning Zone ML12200A3042012-07-16016 July 2012 Comment (208) of Oleh Sydor on PRM-50-104 Regarding Emergency Planning Zone ML12200A2982012-07-16016 July 2012 Comment (207) of Lewis Patrie on PRM-50-104 Regarding Emergency Planning Zone ML12200A2972012-07-16016 July 2012 Comment (206) of Linda Griggs on PRM-50-104 Regarding Emergency Planning Zone ML12200A2962012-07-16016 July 2012 Comment (205) of Tara Hands on PRM-50-104 Regarding Emergency Planning Zone ML12200A2932012-07-16016 July 2012 Comment (203) of Jeanne Raymond on PRM-50-104 Regarding Emergency Evacuation Planning Zone ML12200A2922012-07-16016 July 2012 Comment (202) of Steve Patton on PRM-50-104 Regarding Emergency Planning Zone ML12200A2902012-07-16016 July 2012 Comment (200) of Leonard Goodisman on PRM-50-104 Regarding Emergency Planning Zone ML12200A2892012-07-16016 July 2012 Comment (199) of Joe Weatherby on PRM-50-104 Regarding Emergency Planning Zone ML12195A2662012-07-11011 July 2012 Comment (162) Karen Fuller, on Behalf Tompkins County Legislature, on PRM-50-104 Regarding Emergency Planning Zone ML12145A5492012-05-16016 May 2012 Comment (13) of Isabel Cohen on PRM-50-104 Regarding Emergency Planning Zone ML12145A5392012-05-16016 May 2012 Comment (3) of Stephan Donovan on PRM-50-104 Regarding Emergency Planning Zone ML12145A5412012-05-16016 May 2012 Comment (5) of John Papandrea on PRM-50-104 Regarding Emergency Planning Zone ML12145A5472012-05-16016 May 2012 Comment (11) of Carol Savary on PRM-50-104 Regarding Emergency Planning Zone ML12145A7162012-05-16016 May 2012 Comment (31) of Jordan Van Voast on PRM-50-104 Regarding Emergency Planning Zone ML12145A7172012-05-16016 May 2012 Comment (32) of Robert Cerello on PRM-50-104 Regarding Emergency Planning Zone ML12145A7272012-05-16016 May 2012 Comment (41) of Thomas Meacham on PRM-50-104 Regarding Emergency Planning Zone ML12125A1402012-05-0404 May 2012 Comment (21) of J.W. Shea, on Behalf of Tennessee Valley Authority, on ANPR-50 Regarding Station Blackout 2020-04-27
[Table view] |
Text
Tompkins County Legislature DOC ID: 3515 320 North Tioga Street, Ithaca, NY 14850 PRM-50-104 Department:
Legislature Office www.tompkins-co.org/legislature (77FR25375)
Category:
Legislation or Funding -State and Federal Functional Category:
Environmental, Legislation/Regulations ADOPTED (D Resolution No. 2012-129 Resolution in Support of Expanding Emergency Planning Zones Around Nuclear Power Plants WHEREAS, of the 104 nuclear power plants currently operating in the United States, 23 of them are the same design as the Fukushima-style General Electric Mark I boiling water reactor, and two of those are in central New York State (FitzPatrick and Nine Mile Point 1, both in Oswego), and WHEREAS, after the 1979 Three Mile island accident the nation's nuclear regulators adopted community emergency-planning requirements for both a plume exposure pathway (10-mile radius evacuation planning) and an ingestion pathway (25-mile-radius monitoring and possible interdiction of foods), with both numbers based on models rather than experience, and WHEREAS, the April 1986 Chernobyl nuclear accident resulted in interdiction of contaminated food and livestock hundreds of miles away (and as far away as contaminated livestock in Wales, 1000 miles from Chernobyl), and WHEREAS, the March 2011 nuclear accident at Fukushima resulted in a mandatory evacuation within a 12-mile radius around the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear site, a recommended evacuation within an 18-mile radius, and actual evacuation of. villages 25 miles to the northwest, as well as numerous documented instances of contaminated food and livestock more than 100 miles away, and the U.S.government warned U.S. citizens to stay at least 50 miles away, and WHEREAS, in response to the March 2011 Fukushima disaster the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) established a Task Force to determine lessons learned and to review NRC regulations to see if any additional measures are warranted, and WHEREAS, the NRC Task Force issued its report on July 11, 2011, concluding there is no imminent risk but that enhanced to safety and emergency preparedness are warranted, issued a dozen proposed regulations, and continues to make additions and recommendations, and WHEREAS, in seeming contradiction to this, the NRC published in a December 2011 Federal Register changes to community emergency planning that had been in the works for several years and that took effect December 23 and that require fewer exercises for major accidents and recommend that fewer people be evacuated right away; these changes clearly seem to clash with the lessons learned from Fukushima, and WHEREAS, on February 12, 2012, in response to these changed emergency preparedness regulations, the Nuclear Information and Resource Service (NIRS) and 37 co-petitioners filed a Petition*for Rulemaking with the NRC to expand emergency planning and evacuation zones and strengthen emergency regulations, and WHEREAS, tornadoes, hurricanes, and floods during 2011 caused loss of offsite power and other damage to several nuclear reactor sites across the United States, including Browns Ferry in Alabama, Surry in Virginia, Calvert Cliffs in Maryland, and Fort Calhoun in Nebraska, demonstrating that natural disasters can challenge nuclear safety systems, and current NRC regulations do not require emergency exercises to include scenarios with regionally appropriate initiating or concurrent natural disasters, and DOCKETED USNRC July 11, 2012 (4:30 pm)OFFICE OF SECRETARY RULEMAKINGS AND ADJUDICATIONS STAFF Tompkins County Legislature Meeting of July 3, 2012 Resolution No. 2012-129 Resolution in Support of Expanding Emergency Planning Zones Around Nuclear Power Plants WHEREAS, most nuclear reactors were licensed with an expected life of 40 years and, when sited 40 years ago, were in low-population areas, but today hundreds of millions of Americans live within 50 miles of a nuclear power plant, and WHEREAS, current NRC emergency planning regulations are inadequate to sufficiently protect residents of Tompkins County, now therefore be it RESOLVED, That the Tompkins County Legislature is in favor of the U.S. NRC expanding emergency planning zones and improving its regulations to reflect updated radiation science and the real-world lessons learned from Fukushima and elsewhere, as reflected in the NIRS Petition for Rulemaking.
SEQR ACTION: TYPE 11-20 RESULT: MOVER: SECONDER: AYES: EXCUSED: ADOPTED [UNANIMOUS]
Dooley Kiefer, Member Kathy Luz Herrera, Member Burbank, Chock, Dennis, Luz Herrera, Kiefer, Lane, Mackesey, McBean-Clairborne, McKenna, Proto, Pryor, Robertson, Robison, Shinagawa Peter Stein STATE OF NEW YORK )) ss: COUNTY OF TOMPKINS)I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct transcript of a resolution adopted by the Tompkins County Legislature on July 3, 2012.9 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said Legislature at Ithaca, New York, on July 11, 2012.A-V£ -Clerk Tompkins County Legislature Page 2 Rulemaking Comments From: Sent: To:
Subject:
Attachments:
Karen Fuller [kfuller@tompkins-co.org]
Wednesday, July 11, 2012 1:44 PM Rulemaking Comments Comment regarding Docket ID NRC-2012-0046 R129-12.doc Please see the attached resolution passed by the Tompkins County Legislature.
Karen Fuller Deputy Clerk Tompkins County Legislature Inclusion through Diversity 1