|
|---|
Category:Rulemaking-Comment
MONTHYEARML12201A0392012-07-16016 July 2012
Comment (272) of Michael Griffen, on Behalf of Maryland Dept of Environment, on PRM-50-104 Regarding Emergency Planning Zone
ML12200A1732012-07-16016 July 2012
Comment (176) of David O'Leary on PRM-50-104 Regarding Emergency Planning Zone
ML12200A1702012-07-16016 July 2012
Comment (173) of Lydia Gralla on PRM-50-104 Regarding Emergency Planning Zone
ML12201A0492012-07-16016 July 2012
Comment (275) of Jacqueline Vaughan, on Behalf of Calvert County Govt, on PRM-50-104 Regarding Emergency Planning Zone
ML12195A2662012-07-11011 July 2012
Comment (162) Karen Fuller, on Behalf Tompkins County Legislature, on PRM-50-104 Regarding Emergency Planning Zone
ML1030800782010-11-0303 November 2010
2010/11/01-Comment (3) of John Jaquin on Nei'S Petition for Rulemaking PRM-26-5, 10 CFR 26, Fitness-For-Duty
L-09-081, Comment (55) of C.L. Funderburk on Behalf of Dominion Resources Services, Inc., on Proposed Rule Pr 31, Regarding Limiting the Quantitiy of Byproduct Material in a Generally Licensed Device2009-10-28028 October 2009
Comment (55) of C.L. Funderburk on Behalf of Dominion Resources Services, Inc., on Proposed Rule Pr 31, Regarding Limiting the Quantitiy of Byproduct Material in a Generally Licensed Device
ML0919003662009-06-23023 June 2009
Comment (36) of C.L. Funderburk on Behalf of Dominion on Draft Regulatory Guide DG-4014, Radiological Surveys and Monitoring During Operations. in Regards to Pr 20,30,40,50,70 and 72, Decommissioning Planning
RS-09-070, Comment (12) of Darin M. Benyak, on Behalf of Exelon Generation Company, LLC, on ANPR 171, Variable Annual Fee Structure for Power Reactors2009-06-0303 June 2009
Comment (12) of Darin M. Benyak, on Behalf of Exelon Generation Company, LLC, on ANPR 171, Variable Annual Fee Structure for Power Reactors
ML0718701532007-07-0303 July 2007
Comment (22) of James A. Spina on Behalf of Constellation Energy on Proposed Rule PR-50, Re Industry Codes and Standards; Amended Requirements (Rin 3150-AH76)
ML0719201582007-06-27027 June 2007
Comment (23) of Charles A. Tomes on Proposed Rules Pr 50 Regarding Industry Codes and Standards; Amended Requirements
ML0717601892007-06-25025 June 2007
Comment (2) of Chris L. Funderburk Submitted by Dominion on Ucs'S PRM-73-13 Re Amend to 10 CFR Part 7, Physical Protection of Plants and Materials
ML0717804182007-06-25025 June 2007
Comment (9) Submitted by Exelon Generation Company LLC, Darin M. Benyak, on Ucs'S PRM-73-13 Regarding to Amend 10 CFR Part 73, Physical Protection of Plants and Materials
ML0717702482007-06-15015 June 2007
Comment (16) Submitted by Charles A. Tomes on Proposed Rule Pr 50 Regarding Industry Codes and Standards; Amended Requirements
ML0716404952007-06-13013 June 2007
Comment (11) Submitted by Dominion Energy Kewaunee, Inc. (Dek), Dominion Nuclear Connecticut, Inc. (Dnc), and Virginia Electric and Power Company (Dominion), Chris L. Funderburk on Pogo and Ucs PRM-50-83 Re Amend 10 CFR Part 50 Concerning D
ML0701804782007-01-13013 January 2007
Comment (1) Submitted by Three Mile Island Alert,L Inc., Eric Epstein on Massachusetts Attorney General'S PRM-51-10 Re to Amend 10 CFR Part 51
ML0636300782006-12-27027 December 2006
Comment (12) Submitted by Ronald K. Scheeler on Proposed Rules PR-50, 72 and 73 Regarding Power Reactor Security Requirements
ML0609600452006-04-0404 April 2006
Comment (76) Submitted Anonymous on Proposed Rule PR-26 Regarding Fitness for Duty Programs
ML0606700642006-03-0303 March 2006
Comment (3) Submitted by Dominion Resources Services, Inc., C. L. Funderburk on Proposed Rule PR-50, Risk-Informed Changes to Loss-of-Coolant-Accident Technical Requirements
RS-04-059, Comment (8) Submitted by Exelon Generation, LLC and Amergen Energy Co., Kenneth A. Ainger, on Proposed Rules PR-19, 20 and 50, Re Collection, Reporting or Posting of Information; Availability of Draft Rule Language2004-04-0909 April 2004
Comment (8) Submitted by Exelon Generation, LLC and Amergen Energy Co., Kenneth A. Ainger, on Proposed Rules PR-19, 20 and 50, Re Collection, Reporting or Posting of Information; Availability of Draft Rule Language
ML0407005072004-03-0404 March 2004
Comment (12) Submitted by Dominion Resources Services, Inc., Chris Funderburk on Proposed Rules PR-170 and PR-171 Re Revision of Fee Schedules; Fee Recovery for Fy 2004
ML0406504702004-03-0303 March 2004
Comment (8) Submitted by Constellation Generation Group, LLC Charles Cruse on Behalf of Licensees Calvert Cliffs and Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, on Proposed Rules PR-170 & PR-171 Regarding Revision of Fee Schedules; Fee Recovery for F
ML0324806772003-08-25025 August 2003
Comment (23) Submitted by Dominion Resources Services Inc., Chris L. Funderburk on Proposed Rules PR-50, Re Risk-Informed Categorization and Treatment of Structures, Systems and Components for Nuclear Power Reactors
ML0323201352003-08-0101 August 2003
Comment (9) Submitted by Morgan Lewis & Brockus, Llp, Steven P. Frantz, P.M. Bessette, on Behalf of Exelon Gen., S. Texas, on Proposed Rule PR-50 Re Risk-Informed Categorization & Treatment of Structures, Systems & Components for Nuclear Po
ML0312800372003-05-0505 May 2003
Comment (15) Submitted by Constellation Energy Group, Charles H. Cruse, Supporting and Endorsing the Comments Submitted by NEI on Proposed Rule PR-170-171 Revision of Fee Schedules; Fee Recovery for Fy 2003
ML0228303132002-09-30030 September 2002
Comment from Oula Shehab on Draft EIS-Surry Power Station
ML0226805452002-09-13013 September 2002
Comment from Michael T. Chezik on Draft Supplement 10 (NUREG-1437) to the Generic Environmental Impact Statement
ML0225600462002-08-27027 August 2002
Comment of Michael P. Gallagher Concerning Draft Plant-Specific Supplement 10 to the Generic Environmental Impact Statement Regarding Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station
ML0222101472002-08-0101 August 2002
Comment of Joe Mangano on Draft plant-specific Supplement 10 to Generic Environmental Impact Statement Re Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Units 2 & 3
ML0222101342002-07-10010 July 2002
Comment by Michael T. Chezik on NUREG-1437, Draft Supplement 6 to the Generic Environmental Impact Statement Regarding Surry Units 1 & 2
2012-07-16
[Table view] |
Text
Page 1 of 1 PRM-50-1 04 P7FRM503104 As of: July 17, 2012 (77FR25375)
Received:
July 16, 2012 PUBLIC SUBMISSION Status: PendingPost PUBLICSUBMISION racking No. 8109cd13 Comments Due: July 16, 20 Submission Type: Web Docket: NRC-2012-0046 Petition for Rulemaking Submitted by Nuclear Information and Resource Service and Multiple Co-Petitioners
-Expansion of Emergency Planning Zone 12 a 7L: Comment On: NRC-2012-0046-0003 Emergency Planning Zone; Notice of Receipt and Request for Comment Document:
NRC-2012-0046-DRAFT-0176 Comment on FR Doc # 2012-10314 DOCKETED USNRC July 17, 2012 (1:35 pm)OFFICE OF SECRETARY RULEMAKINGS AND ADJUDICATIONS STAFF Submitter Information Name: Michael Griffen Address: 1800 Washington Blvd Baltimore, MD, 21230 Organization:
Styate of Maryland, Department of Environment Government Agency Type: State Government Agency: MAryland Department of Environment (MDE)General Comment See attached file, please.Attachments MDE comments -add'l -on NRC EPZ Petition https://www.fdms.gov/fdms-web-agency/component/contentstreamer?objectld=09000064...
07/17/2012 This additional information is intended to clarify the Maryland Department of Environment
[MDE] position in opposition to Petition PRM-50-104, which would extend Emergency Planning Zones surrounding the nation's nuclear power plants. The recent NRC initiated State-of-the-Art Reactor Consequence Analyses (SOARCA) project mentioned in the previously filed comment involved the Pressurized Water Reactors [PWRs] at the Surry Power Station, located in Surry, VA and the Boiling Water Reactors [BWRs] at the Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station, located in Delta, PA. The Surry reactors are very similar in design, construction and age as the reactors in the Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant, located in Lusby, MD. The Peach Bottom reactors are both BWR Mark I reactors, which are the same type as those damaged last year in Japan, and both Peach Bottom reactors remain fully operational as expected.The facility at Peach Bottom is approximately
2.5 miles
north of the Maryland and Pennsylvania border. As such, Maryland has extensive experience supporting Peach Bottom during exercises, drills and various emergency planning activities.
Maryland also participates in quarterly stakeholder meetings with plant representatives along with Federal, State, County, Township and Borough officials from the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and Maryland.Maryland Emergency Preparedness and Planning staff had several opportunities to meet and discuss with the National Nuclear Security Administration
[NNSA] team that made numerous reconnaissance and field assay flights over the accident site and the surrounding area in Japan. Maryland has also had the opportunity to view and review special reporting to the NRC Commissioners from the NRC Japan Task Force, and also discussed findings with special response team members [both military and civilian]
in national meetings and at individual meetings at several State locations.
Maryland supports the NRC on any additional studies or investigations it may perform, particularly as they relate to the recent events in Japan, as well as through any future rulemaking changes or guidance decisions that are deemed necessary to improve the safety and health of our citizens.
Rulemaking Comments From: Sent: To:
Subject:
Attachments:
Gallagher, Carol Tuesday, July 17, 2012 8:35 AM Rulemaking Comments Comment on PRM-50-104 NRC-2012-0046-DRAFT-0176.pdf Van, Attached for docketing is a comment from Michael Griffen, MD Department of Environment, on the above noted PRM that I received via the regulations.gov website on July 16, 2012.Thanks, Carol 1
