|
---|
Category:General FR Notice Comment Letter
MONTHYEARML1108203422011-03-18018 March 2011 Comment (10) of Thomas N. Weber, on Behalf of Arizona Public Service, on Draft NRC Regulatory Issue Summary 2011-XX, Adequacy of Station Electric Distribution System Voltages ML1104900582011-02-14014 February 2011 Comment (1) of Scott Sysum on Behalf of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Comments on the Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement ML1105506442011-02-11011 February 2011 Comment (2) of Us Environmental Protection Agency, on Plant-Specific Supplement 43 to the Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants Regarding Palo Verde Final Report for Comment ML1031205492010-10-29029 October 2010 Comment (1) of Kathleen M. Goforth, on Behalf of Us Environmental Protection Agency, on Plant-Specific Supplement 43 to Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants Regarding Palo Verde Draft Report for ... ML1026502752010-09-18018 September 2010 Comment (1) E-mail Regarding Palo Verde Lr - Dseis ML1027208302010-08-10010 August 2010 Comment (13) of Warren Potter on Behalf of Arizona Public Service Company on Draft Guide 1248 ML0929400412009-10-16016 October 2009 Comment (12) E-mail Regarding Palo Verde Lr - Scoping ML0929301522009-10-15015 October 2009 Comment (1) of D. Hooper, on Behalf of Strategic Teaming and Resource Sharing, Relating to Draft Regulatory Guide DG-5029 Pressure-Sensitive and Tamper-Indicating Seals for Material Control and Accounting Use. ML0927103232009-09-23023 September 2009 Comment (11) E-mail Regarding Palo Verde Lr - Scoping ML0922200442009-07-27027 July 2009 Comment (14) of Judy M. Burges, on Behalf of Self, Supporting Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station and the Review for Continued Operation ML0921602322009-07-27027 July 2009 Comment (3) E-mail Regarding Palo Verde Lr - Scoping ML0921602232009-07-27027 July 2009 Comment (2) E-mail Regarding Palo Verde Lr - Scoping ML0921804312009-07-27027 July 2009 Comment (13) of Patricia Fleming on Behalf of Arizona State District 25 Supporting the Renewal of Palo Verde Application ML0921804292009-07-27027 July 2009 Comment (11) of Tom Kelly on Behalf of Us Environmental Protection Agency Re the Renewal Application for Palo Verde ML0921804282009-07-27027 July 2009 Comment (10) of Rep. Tom Boone on Behalf of Himself Supporting the Renewal Application for Palo Verde ML0921602382009-07-26026 July 2009 Comment (4) E-mail Regarding Palo Verde Lr - Scoping ML0921602412009-07-26026 July 2009 Comment (6) E-mail Regarding Palo Verde Lr - Scoping ML0921602392009-07-26026 July 2009 Comment (5) E-mail Regarding Palo Verde Lr - Scoping ML0921804302009-07-24024 July 2009 Comment (12) of Deanna K. Kupcik on Behalf of Buckey Valley Chamber of Commerce Supporting the Renewal Application for Palo Verde ML0921604342009-07-24024 July 2009 Comment (7) E-mail Regarding Palo Verde Lr - Scoping ML0921604352009-07-24024 July 2009 Comment (8) E-mail Regarding Palo Verde Lr - Scoping ML0921604362009-07-24024 July 2009 Comment (9) E-mail Regarding Palo Verde Lr - Scoping ML0921804272009-07-24024 July 2009 Comment (8) of Louis J. Manuel on Behalf of AK-Chin Indian Community on Renewal Application for Palo Verde'S Nuclear Plants ML0921806662009-07-24024 July 2009 Comment (9) of Phil Gordon on Behalf of Himself, Supporting the Renewal Application for Palo Verde ML0923700652009-07-23023 July 2009 Comment (15) of Todd Sanders on Behalf of Greater Phoenix Chamber of Commerce Supporting License Renewal Application Process for Palo Verde ML0921106342009-07-22022 July 2009 Comment (3) of James M. Cavanaugh, on Behalf of Goodyear, Az, on License Renewal of Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station ML0921804092009-07-21021 July 2009 Comment (7) of Mary Peters on Behalf of Herself Supporting the Renewal Application for Palo Verde ML0921106362009-07-21021 July 2009 Comment (5) of Senator Jack Harper Supporting Renewal Application of the Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station ML0921106352009-07-20020 July 2009 Comment (4) of Bas Aja, on Behalf of Self, Supporting Renewal Application for Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station ML0921106372009-07-16016 July 2009 Comment (6) of Connie Wilhelm, on Behalf of Home Builders Association of Arizona, Supporting Renewal Application for Palo Verde'S Nuclear Plants ML0920401252009-06-25025 June 2009 Comment (2), Transcript of Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station License Renewal Public Meeting Evening Session, Thursday, June 25, 2009, Pages 1-48 ML0917000262009-06-12012 June 2009 Comment (1) of T. A. Moser, on Behalf of Strategic Teaming & Resource Sharing (Stars) Alliance, on Draft Regulatory Guide DG-1211, Materials and Inspections for Reactor Vessel Closure Studs. ML0917303772009-06-0202 June 2009 Comment (1) E-mail Regarding Palo Verde Lr - Scoping ML0811302952008-04-0909 April 2008 Comment (5) of Tod Moser on Behalf of Strategic Teaming and Resource Sharing (Stars) Re NUREG-1855, Guidance on the Treatment of Uncertainties Associated with PRAs in Risk-Informed Decision Making, Draft Report for Comment ML0806401992008-02-20020 February 2008 Comment (1) of Thomas N. Weber, on Palo Verde, Units 1, 2, & 3, & ISFSI, Proposed NRC Regulatory Information Summary, Implementation of Certificate of Compliance Amendments to Previously Loaded Spent Fuel Storage Casks ML0635600242006-12-12012 December 2006 Comment (16) of D. Hooper on Behalf of Strategic Teaming and Resource Sharing on Implementing of Reactor Oversight Process, Stars Have Been Working with NEI and RUG IV in Development of Industry Comments ML0628605752006-09-25025 September 2006 Comment (45) of D. R. Woodlan, Supporting Nrc'S Low Level Radioactive Waste Program ML0533604262005-11-23023 November 2005 Comment (2) on Draft NUREG-1829, Estimates of LOCA Frequencies ML0517402062005-06-13013 June 2005 Comment (10) of D. R. Woodlan on Behalf of Strategic Teaming and Resource Sharing on Draft GL-05-0XX; Grid Reliability and the Impact on Plant Risk and the Operability of Offsite Power ML0416903232004-06-0202 June 2004 Comment (12) of D. R. Woodlan Supporting Comments on the Proposed Generic Communication: Potential Impact of Debris Blockage on Emergency Recirculation During Design Basis Accidents at Pressurized Water Reactors ML0414100492004-05-0606 May 2004 Comment (1) of Scott A. Bauer on Model Safety Evaluation on Technical Specification Improvement to Eliminate Requirements to Provide Monthly Operating Reports & Occupational Radiation Exposure Reports ML0412503992004-04-16016 April 2004 Comment (17) of D. R. Woodlan Endorsing Comments Made by NEI on Draft NUREG-1778, Knowledge Base for Post-Fire Safe-Shutdown Analysis ML0401307322003-12-12012 December 2003 Comment (18) of Frank F. Navarrete on Behalf of State of Arizona, Department of Emergency and Military Affairs Regarding Nrc'S Reactor Oversight Process ML0329303512003-10-0808 October 2003 Comment (5) of Scott A. Bauer on Proposed Generic Communication - Method for Estimating Effective Dose Equivalent from External Radiation Sources Using Two Dosimeters. ML0231101032002-10-25025 October 2002 Comment from D. R. Woodlan on DG-1099, Anchoring Components and Structural Supports in Concrete. 2011-03-18
[Table view] |
Text
RULE . *..., F S ro_ UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTIONAGENCY At 3:56 IX
,REGION 75 Hawthorne Street
- 6+,4 o-San Francisco, CA 94105 July 27, 2009 Michael Lesar Chief, Rulemaking and Directives Branch (Majistop TWB 5B-O1M) (/
Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001
Subject:
Scoping Comments for the Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station, Units 1, 2 and 3, Maricopa, Arizona
Dear Mr. Lesar:
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has reviewed the Federal Register Notice published on May 26, 2009, requesting comments on the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's (NRC's) Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement and Conduct Scoping Process for Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station, Units 1, 2. and 3 (Palo Verde). Our comments are provided pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA),
Council on Environmental Quality regulations (40 CFR Parts 1500-1508) and our NEPA review authority under Section 309 of the Clean Air Act.
EPA recognizes the difficulty of finding a viable alternative to an existing facility, such as Palo Verde, but we encourage you to consider a full range of alternatives. We recommend that NRC examine the most recent information available on renewable energy generation. The Bureau of Land Management and Department of Energy have prepared many~documents that may be helpful, and are currently working on a Solar Energy Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (http://solareis.anl.gov/). This effort is intended to facilitate utility scale solar energy development in selected solar energy zones in six western states, including Arizona. We also recommend the Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) discuss the feasibility of using residential and wholesale distributed renewable energy generation, in conjunction with increased energy efficiency, as a viable alternative in your analysis.
With regard to the existing Palo Verde facility, we recommend the DEIS include: an evaluation of environmental justice concerns, based on CEQ guidance'; a summary of routine releases and a description of any non-routine releases; a discussion of the capacity and adequacy of nuclear waste storage for an additional twenty years or more; an updated estimate to.
decommission the facility; and financial assurance mechanisms in place to ensure proper decommissioning in the event of bankruptcy on the part of the owner.
Environmental Justice Guidance under 'the National Environmental Policy'Act,; Appendix A (Guidance for.Federal Agencies on Key Termis in Executive Order 12898), CEQ, December 10,. 1997.
We appreciate the opportunity to provide comments on the preparation of the DEIS, and look forward to continued participation in this process as more information becomes available.
When the Draft EIS is released for public review, please send one copy to the address above (mail code: CED-2). If you have any questions, please contact me at 415-972-3856 or kelly.thomasp@epa.gov.
Sincerely, Tom Kelly Environmental Review Office Communities and Ecosystems Division 2