ML071350626
| ML071350626 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Crane  |
| Issue date: | 03/25/2007 |
| From: | D'Antonio J Operations Branch I |
| To: | AmerGen Energy Co |
| Sykes, Marvin D. | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML060800145 | List: |
| References | |
| Download: ML071350626 (17) | |
Text
ES-401 Written Examination Review Worksheet Form ES-401-9 The stem lacks sufficient focus to elicit the correct answer (e.g., unclear intent, more information is needed, or too much needless information).
The stem or distractors contain cues (i.e., clues, specific determiners, phrasing, length, etc.).
The answer choices are a collection of unrelated true/false statements.
The distractors are not credible; single implausible distractors should be repaired, more than one is unacceptable.
One or more distractors is (are) partially correct (e.g., if the applicant can make unstated assumptions that are not contradicted by stem).
The question is not linked to the job requirements (i.e., the question has a valid WA but, as written, is not operational in content).
The question requires the recall of knowledge that is too specific for the closed reference test mode (i.e., it is not required to be known from memory).
The question contains data with an unrealistic level of accuracy or inconsistent units (e.g., panel meter in percent with question in gallons).
The question requires reverse logic or application compared to the job requirements.
0.
0.
- 1.
Check the appropriate box if a job content error is identified:
0 0
0 IF.
At a minimum, explain any "U" ratings (e.g., how the Appendix B psychometric attributes are not being met).
ES-401 2
Form ES-401-9
ES-401 2
Form ES-401-9
ES-401 2
Form ES-401-9
ES-401 2
Form ES-401-9
87 1 replace J Done 981Enhance done I
I IRequired !Done I
I N I A I Done
-1 i
EXAM: CWRITfEB / WALK-THR 7
s t
Item (QuestionlJ P MlScenar io, etc.)
e 5 TQ-AA-104-3001 Revision 2 Page 63 of 66 5 "Sample" Exam Comment Sheet Page I of 1 SUBMITTED BY: G ki/&&@
- It!?c ROlSRO RO/SRO Sheet of __
UGH / SIMULATOR SCENARIO fcircle one)
Reference Remarks P CCRC-J9 Additional com ments:
Exam Analyzer comments Final Resolution Reviewed by: -'-5?%@-?-
Facility Author / Date Approved by:
Facility Representative / Date
DATE:
g t y / 2 0 0 t EXAM: WRITTEN / WALK-THR(
Test Item QuestionlJPMlScenario, etc.) 5 Sample Exam Comment Sheet Page I of I TQ-AA-104-30U I Revision 2 Page 63 of 66 SUBMITTEDBY:
/dogk / h d c RO/SRO RO/SRO Sheet of __
UGH /SIMULATOR SC Concern or Problem
- 6. d.0, CAP;- fPLY&
@T L
Reference Additional comments Exam Analyzer comments Final Resolution 1
Reviewed by, h dP-*4 6cility Author / Date Approved by:
Facility Representative / Date
EXAM: WRITTEN / WALK-THR Test Item (QuestionlJPMIScenario, etc.)
c4# ( 8 Attachment I 5 "Sample" Exam Comment Sheet Page 1 of I TQ-AA-104-30UI Revision 2 Page 63 of 66 SUBMITTEDBY:
G' /b& / flk ROlSRO RO/SRO Sheet 2 of ___
UGH /SIMULATOR SC NARIO (circle one)
Recommended Resolution c/d/lrOC;e~ i-d "Y /tniC//fL C&T&
L c IC J&?/U Reference Remarks Additional comments:
Exam Analyzer comments.
Final Resolution Approved by Facility Author / Date Facility Representative / Date
DATE:
EXAM: WRITTEN / WALK-THR(
Test Item (Question/#M/Scenario, etc.)
> 5 ccSample Exam Comment Sheet Page I of 1 TQ-AA-104-30b I Revision 2 Page 63 of 66 RO/SRO RO/SRO Sheet __ + of ___
SUBMITTEDBY: LL
,/ PPC UGH I SIMULATOR SC Concern or Problem Kc/p m s # h ~ C l J NARIO (circle onel Reference Remarks Additional comments Exam Analyzer comments Final Resolution Reviewed by
/>&7 Approved by.
Facility Representative / Date
TQ-AA-104-3001 Revision 2 Page 63 of 66 5 Sample Exam Comment Sheet Page 1 of 1 DATE:
SUBMITTED BY:
RO/SRO ROlSRO Sheet s o
f EXAM: WRITTEN / WALK-THR Test Item (QuestionlJ PMlScenar io, etc.)
Q#7C Reference Re marks Additional comments:
Exam Analyzer comments.
Final Resolution.
J Reviewed by: 9-4 &(,@&~%!??.
FaGIity Author I Date Approved by:
Facility Representative / Date
TQ-AA-I 04-3001 Revision 2 Page 63 of 66 DATE: 5 Sample Exam Comment Sheet Page 1 of 1 SUBMITTEDBY: e,
&oga / NK RO/SRO RO/SRO Sheet __ 6 of __
EXAM: WRITTEN / WALK-THROUGH / SIMULATOR SCENARIO (circle one)
Test Item (QuestionlJPMIScenario, etc.)
Qtc56-Concern or Problem Recommended Resolution Reference Remarks Additional comments:
Exam Analyzer comments Final Resolution Reviewed by:
Approved by:
Facility Author I Date Facility Representative / Date
DATE:
~
I Reference EXAM: WRITTEN / WALK-THR(
Test Item Concern or Problem ovER 9/3b?L@
G 7J.77 1
(QyestiQnlJ PtvllScenar io, etc.)
Recommended Resolution pck h E W &/& -_
Tv2W 0 &.-sa rp4C LjrQ-ZmJ I Qk7 5 Sample Exam Comment Sheet Page 1 of 1 RO/SRO RO/SRO SUBMITTED BY:
TQ-AA-104-30Ul Revision 2 Page 63 of 66 Sheet 7 of -
Remarks I
Additional comments Exam Analyzer comments Final Resolution 5
Sample Exam Comment Sheet Page 1 of 1 ROlSRO RO/SRO n A r c.
SUBMITTED BY: c(
w n i L EXAM: WRITTEN / WALK-THROUGH / SIMULATOR SCENARIO (circle one)
Test Item (QuestionlJ P MlScenar io, etc.)
Concern or Problem Recommended Resolution Reference TQ-AA-I 0 4 - 3 0 ~
I Revision 2 Page 63 of 66 I
Sheet 8 of __
Remarks
TQ-AA-104-3001 Revision 2 Page 63 of 66 5 Sample Exam Comment Sheet Page 1 of I SUBMITTEDBY:
G fi CGg RO/SRO RO/SRO Sheet r of -
Reference EXAM: WRITTEN / WALK-THROUGH /SIMULATOR SCI Test Item (QuestionlJPMIScenario, etc.)
Remarks Concern or Problem VARIO (circle one)
Recommended Resolution hlE-L3WjZ Q5E
- 2.
il 3 3 Additional comments:
~
~-
Exam Analyzer comments Final Resolution Facility Representative / Date Reviewed by d(
4 /[dT Approved by acility Author / Date
Scenario 1 Removed excessive steps Added Booth operator directions for "tripping" EF-P-1 if required in event 2.
Added steps for letdown restoration (optional)
Added steps for MU-P-1 Ell A swap.
Added words to delay report of steam leak.
Corrected event 3 header.
Corrected typos.
Added steps to transition from HPI/PORV cooling to Primary Secondary and draw pressurizer bubble (optional).
Added follow-up question on highest event.
Scenario 2 0
0 Removed excessive steps.
0 Removed NI-11 failure, also affects ES-D-1.
Added reactor premature critical by lowering Boron concentration to 1495 actual.
Removed T.S. call associated with NI-I 1 failure Corrected event 9,10,11 header to read MS-V-13A 0
Scenario 3 0
Added PORV leak to replace report of PORV breaker trip. This also affected ES-D-1, and bean counts as URO now has 1 more component, blocking PORV is required to stop RCS (losses) to RCDT. Scenario Event description modified to match.
Updated T.S. call on above, added T.S. 3.1.6 Leakage as a possible referral though leakage will be for such a short time as to NOT be quantifiable.
Added steps for transferring rods to aux supply to exercise (event 2). Added note to booth operator to remove malfunction to allow rod to be excercised.
0 0
0 Repaired spelling errors.
0 Removed excessive steps.
Added follow-up question on highest event.
Scenario 4 0
Deleted note on clearing AMBER lights prior to reset of 27/86 lockouts, does not apply to this scenariokondition.
0 Deleted excessive steps Corrected typographical errors.
0 Added phase 2 OTSG isolation steps, including note on MS-V-2A may fail to close.
Added follow-up question on highest event.
Updated ES-301-6 to reflect change from event 2 to 5 T.S. call Updated ES-301-5's to reflect use of surro ates, T.S. call change above, addition of Component event 1 to CRS / URO for PORV leak. Remove 2 CRS from SROI-1 & SROI-2.
"9 Note the use of surrogates places R02 & R03 at minimum in all categories.