ML070300461

Oct. 2006 Exam Final Qa/Related Forms (Folder 1)

ML070300461
Person / Time
Site:	Limerick
Issue date:	11/03/2006
From:	Todd Fish Operations Branch I
To:	Exelon Generation Co
Sykes M, RI/DRS/EB1, (610) 337-5046
References
50-352/06-301, 50-353/06-301, ES-201, ES-201-1 50-352/06-301, 50-353/06-301
Download: ML070300461 (16)

Text

ES-201 Examination Preparation Checklist Form ES-201-1 Facility: ii they?,bk . \ tik Date of Examination: / o / j 3-3./: e

,,/3/0 Developed by: Written Facility W N R C 0 // -

Operating Facility W NRC0 Target Chief Date* Task Description (Reference) Examiner's Initials

-180 I. Examination administration date confirmed (C.l .a; C.2.a and b) *-

-120 2. NRC examiners and facility contact assigned (C.l .d; C.2.e) I -7F

-120 3. Facility contact briefed on security and other requirements (C.2.c)

TF

-120 4. Corporate notification letter sent (C.2.d)

T -

[-901 [5. Reference material due (C.l .e; C.3.c; Attachment 211 hin

(-751 6. Integrated examination outline(s) due, including Foms ES-201-2, ES-201-3, ES-301-1, ES-301-2, ES-301-5, ES-D-l's, ES-401-112, ES-401-3, and ES-401-4, as applicable (C.1.e and f; C.3.d) 7F (7. Examination outline(s) reviewed by NRC and feedback provided to facility licensee (C.2.h; C.3.e))

(-45) 8. Proposed examinations (including written, walk-through JPMs, and scenarios, as applicable), supporting documentation (including Forms ES-301-3, ES-301-4, ES-301-5, ES-301-6, and ES-401-6, and any Form ES-201-3 updates), and reference materials due (C.l.e, f, g and h; C.3.d)

-i-F

-30 9. Preliminary license applications (NRC Form 398's) due (C.1.l; C.2.g; ES-202)

-14 I O . Final license applications due and Form ES-201-4 prepared (C.1.I; C.2.i; ES-202)

-14 ll. Examination approved by NRC supervisor for facility licensee review (C.2.h; c.3.f)

~~~ ~~ ~

I- ~

-14 12. Examinations reviewed with facility licensee (C.1.j; C.2.f and h; C.3.g)

-7 13. Written examinations and operating tests approved by NRC supervisor (C.2.i; C.3.h)

-7 14. Final applications reviewed; 1 or 2'(if >IO) applications audited to confirm qualifications I eligibility; and examination approval and waiver letters sent TP (C.2.i; Attachment 4; ES-202, C.2.e; ES-204)

-7 15. Proctoringlwritten exam administration guidelines reviewed with facility licensee (C.3.k) TV

-7 16. Approved scenarios, job performance measures, and questions distributed to NRC examiners (C.3.i)

• Target dates are generally based on facility-prepared examinations and are keyed to the examination date identified in the corporate notification letter. They are for planning purposes and may be adjusted on a case-by-case basis in coordination with the facility licensee.

[Applies only] {Does not apply} to examinations prepared by the NRC.

ES-201, Page 24 of 27

Initials tem Task Description a l b

• l c #

1. a. Veri@that the outline(s) fit(s) the appropriate model. in accordance with ES-QOI.

W R b. Assess whether the outline was systematicallyand randomly prepared in accordance with I Section D.1 of ES-401and whether all WA categories are appropriateIYsamPM.

T T c. Assess whether the outline overemphasizesanysysterns. evolutions. or generic topics.

E N d. Assess whether the justifications for deselected ar rejected KIA statements are appropriate.

a. Using F m ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number

2. of normal eVolutions, instrument and component failures, technical spedfications,

- and major transients.

I b. Assess whether there are enough scenario se6 (and spa&) to test the projecbed number M

U L

A and mix of applicants in accordancewith the expeckd crew composition and rotationschedule without compromisingexam integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be tested using at least one new or significantiymodified scymb, that no scenarios are duplicated w

from the applicants' audit test@),and scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days.

T ,

0 c To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conform(s) with the qualitative R and quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-3014 and desaibed in Appendix D. IW

3. a. Verify that the systems walk-through outline meets the criteria specilied on Form ES-301-2:

(1) the outline(s) contain(s) the required number of control room and in-plant tasks W distributed among the safety functions as specified on the form I (2) task repetition from the last two NRC examinations is within the limits &ed on the form T (3) no tasks are duplicated from the applicants' audit test@)

(4) the number of new or modified tasks meets or exceeds the minimums specified on the form (5) the number of alternate path, low-power, emergency, and RCA tasks meet the criteria on the form I 1 I

b. Verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-1:

(I)the tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form

. . at least one task is new or significantly modified (2)

(3) no more than one task is repeated frob the last two NRC licensing examinations " I

c. Determine if there are enough differentoutlines to test the projected number and mix of applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subsequent days. M

4. a. Assess whether plant-specificpriorities (induding PRA and IPE insights) are covered in the appropriate exam section. w E b. Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41/43 and 55.45 sampling is appropriate. lw N

c

c. Ensure that WA importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5. I - I .-

d. Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections.

e. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage. ,,-. .

• L

f. Assess whether the exam fits the appropriatejob level (RO or SRO).

a. Author

b. Facility Reviewer C)

c. NRC Chief Examiner (#)

d. NRCSupervisor NOTE: # Independent NRC Reviewer initial items in Column %; chief examiner concurrence required.

ES-201.Page 25 of 27

i i (' I 2006 LIMERICK INITIAL LICENSE EXAM ES-201 Examination Securitv Aareement Form ES-201-3

?. Pre-Examination EXAM SECURITY set on June 14,2006 I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of 0/23/06 as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and I authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations andlor an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2. Post-Examination gym /

To the best of my knowledqe. I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensin&examinations administered during the week(s) of 10123106. From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.

ES-21 age 26 of 27 a

(; . -,.. .

2086 LIMERICK INITIAL LICENSE EXAM ES-201 Examination Security Agreement Form ES-201-3 I. Pre-Examination EXAM SECURITY set on June 14,2006 I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of 0123/06 as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, 1 am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations andlor an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2. Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, 1 did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensinqexaminations administered during the week(s) of 10/23/06. From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.

PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE I RESPONSIBILITY SIGNATURE (1) DATE SlGNATURE(2) DATE NOTF ,

NOTES:

ES-2C age 26 of 27 fw 2

ES-301 Operating Test Quality Checklist Form ES-301-3

adlity: Limerick Date of Examination: 1012312006 OperatingTest Number: lLTO51

~~

I. GENERAL CRITERIA -

iitials b'

1. The operating lest confOm\s with the previouslyapproved outline; changes are consistent with sampling requirements(e.g., 10 CFR 55.45, operational importance, safely function distributim).

~ ~ -~~

). There is no day-foday repetitionbetween this and other operating tests to be administered during this examinabon.

The operating test shall not duplicate items from Ute applicants' audit test(s)(see Section D.1.a).

1. Overlap with thewritten examination and b e w e n diirent parts of the operating test is withim acceptable limits.

3. It appears thatthe operating test will differentiatebetween competent and less-than-mmpetent applicants at !he designated license level.

2. WALK-THROUGH CRITERIA

a. Each JPM indudes the following, as applicable:

initial conditions initiatingcues references and tools, including assodated procedures reasonableand validated time limits {averaw time allowed for completion) and spedfic designation if deemed to be time critical by the tacility licensee operationally important specific performance aiteria that indude:

- detailedexpected actions with exact aiteria and nomenclature

- system response and other examiner cues

- statements desaibing important observationsto be made by the applicant

- criteria for successful completion of the task

- idenfication of critical steps and their asstrdated performancestandards

- resbidons OR the sequence of steps, if applicable

~ ~~

b. Ensure that any changes from the previouslyapprovedsystems and administrativewalk-through outlines ( F o m ES-301-1 and 2) have not caused the test to deviate from any of the acceptance a'teria (e.g., item distribution, bank use, repetition from the last 2 NRCexaminations)specified on those f o m and Form ES-201-2.

3. SIMULATOR CRITERIA The associated simulator operating tests (scenario sets) have been reviewed in accordance with Form ES-301-4 and a copy is attached.

a. Author

b. Facility Reviewer r)

c. NbC Chief Examiner (#I

d. NRC Supervisor NOTE: + The facility signature is not applicable for NRCdeveloped tests

1. IndependentNRC reviewer initial items in Column '%*; chief examiner mncurrence is required.

ES-301, Page 24 of 27

ES-301 Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist Form ES-3014 I

Facility: Umerick Date of Exam: 10/23/06 Scenario Numben: I/ 2 / 3 OperatingTest Number: ILTO5-1 ]I Initials QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES a b' & .

1. The initial conditions are realistic, in that some equipment andlor insbumentationmay be out of service, but it does not cue the operators into expected events. &4- @o -fe 2.

3.

The scenarios consist mostly of related events.

Each event desaiption consists of (70 zc-the point in the scenario when it is to be initiated the malfunction(s) that are entered to initiate the event the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew the expected operator actions (by sh& position) the event termination point (if applicable)

4. No more than one non-mechanisticfailure (e.g., pipe break) is incorporated into the scenario without a credible precedingincident such as a seivnic event.

5. The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics.

6. Sequendngand timing of events is reasonable, and attows the examinationteam to obtain mrnolete evaluation results commensurate with the scenario obiedves.

7. If time compression techniques are used. the scenario summary dearly so indicates.

Operators have suffiaent time to carry out expected activities without undue time constraints.

Cues are given.

8. The simulator modeling is not altered. (pg 4

9. The scenarios have been validated. Pursuant to IOCl%55,46(d), any open simulator performance defiaenaes or deviations from the referenced plant have been evaluated to ensure that functional fidelitv is maintainedwhile runninq the planned scenarios.

IO. Every operator will be evaluated using at least one new or significantly modified scenario.

All other scenarios have been altered in accordance with Sedion D.5 of ES-301.

11.

12.

All individual operator competenaescan be evaluated, as verified using Form ES301-6 (submit the form along With the simulator scenarios).

Each applicant will be significantly involved in the minimum number of transients and events

/!iLPQ <e.

speafied on F m ES-301-5 (submit the form with the simulator scenarios).

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 acility: Limerick Date of Exam: 10/23/2006 Operating Test Number: lLTO5-1 A E Scenarios P v P E 3 4 M

N 1 2 0 I T

CREW CREW CREW CREW T N POSITION POSITION POSITION POSITION-A I T L M Y S A B U P R T 0 E o c P M(*)

0 L R

T Rx 0 1 NOR 0 1 I/C .4.5.7.8, 6 4 9

MAJ 6 1 2 TS 3.4 2 0 2 2 Rx 2 1 1 0 NOR 1 1 1 1 I/C 3,5.7.9 9 4 MAJ 6 2 2 TS 2 0 2 2 Rx 1 1 1 0 NOR I 1 1 1 I/C 7 4 4 2 MAJ 2 2 2 1 TS 2 0 2 2 Rx 1 1 1 0 NOR 1 1 1 1 IIC 7 4 4 2 MAJ 2 2 2 1 TS 2 0 2 2 Instructions:

1. Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type: TS are not a plicable for RO applicants. ROs must serve in both the at-the-controls (ATC) and balance-of-p/&-tt(BOP) positions. Instant SROs must do one scenario, including at least two instrument or component (VC) mal#unctionsand one major transient, in the ATC position.

Reactivit manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to 2.

3.

Section Z.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D

-r) Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component mal unctions on a I-for-I basis.

Whenever practical, both. instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require venfiable actions that.provide insight.to the applicants competence count toward the minimum requirements specified for the applicants license level in the nght-hand columns.

ES-301,Page 26 of 27

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 xility: Limerick Date of Exam: 10/23/2006 Operating Test Number: lLTO5-1 E Scenarios v

E 1 2 3 4 N

T T

Y CREW POSITION CREW POSITION I CREW POSITION 1 CREW POSITION P

E Rx NOR I/C MAJ TS

'T Rx NOR 1 1 1 1 IRO-1-5 I/C 9 4 4 2 MAJ 2 2 2 TS Rx

" NOR I/C 4 MAJ

!io-" TS 2

2 2 1 2

RX 0 1 1 0 NOR I/C SRO-U MAJ 7 TS 2 Instructions:

1. Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not a plicable for RO applicants. ROs must serve in both the "at-the-controls (ATC)"

and "balance-of-pgnt (BOP)"positions. Instant SROs must do one scenario, including at least two instrument or component (I/C) malhnctions and one major transient, in the ATC position.

Reactivit manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to 2.

3.

r Section 8.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. ) Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component mal unctions on a I-for-I basis.

Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that.provide insight.to the applicant's com etence count toward the minimum requirements specified for the applicant's license level in t\e right-hand columns.

ES-301, Page 26 of 27

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 acility: Limerick Date of Exam: 10/23/2006 Operating Test Number: lLTO5-1 E Scenarios v I I I I T M

E 1 2 3 4 I N I I I lo I T T N CREW CREW CREW CREW A I T POSITION POSITION POSITION POSITION M Y

P E

20-1 Rx NOR I/C MAJ TS p

RX NOR Y-I SRO-U I/C MAJ 1

TS z3 Rx NOR 1

1 1 0 1

iF

?-I IIC 4 1 4 1 2 Y- MAJ TS Rx zi4 SRO-I NOR 7 IIC Yo-u MAJ TS 2 2 Instructions:

1. Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not a plicable for RO applicants. ROs must serve in both the at-the-controls (ATC) and balance-of-pknt (BOP) positions- Instant SROs must do one scenario, including at least two instrument or component (I/C) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position.

2. Reactivit manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to 3.

r Section 8.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. ) Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component mal unctions on a I-for-I basis.

Whenever practical both. instrument aFd component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiab/e actions that.provide insight. to the applicants competence count toward the minimum requirements specified for the applicants license level in the right-hand columns.

ES-301, Page 26 of 27

ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 Facility: Limerick Date of Examination: 10/23/2006 Operating Test No.: ILT05-1 APPLICANTS RO RO 0 RO 17 RO 0 Competencies SRO-I SRO-1-1 [XI SRO-1-2 [XI SRO-1-3 SRO-U [XI SRO-U 0 SRO-U 0 SRO-U 0 SCENARIO SCENARIO CENARIO SCEF ARIO 112 3 4 Interpret/ Diagnose I

Events and Conditions 1.2.3.4 5.6.7

+ I 1.2.3.4. 1.2.4.5, 5.6.7 6.7 Comply With and Use Procedures (I)

Operate Control 1.2.3.4, 56.7 I

I 12.3.4, 1.2.4.5, 5.6.7 6.7 Boards (21 Communicate and Interact Demonstrate I 1234, 5.6.i SuDervisow Abilitv (3)

Comply With and 2.4 I

~

Use Tech Specs. (3)

Notes:

(1) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO.

(2) Optional for an SRO-U.

(3) Only applicable to SROs.

Instructions:

Check the applicant's license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant.

ES-301, Page 27 of 27

ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 Interpret/ Diagnose 1.2.3.4.5 1,2,4,5, 36,7 6*7 Events and Conditions With and Use 1.2.3.4.5 1.2.4.5.

-6.7 6.7 Procedures (1)

Operate Control 2.4.5.6 Boards (2)

Communicate 1,2,3.4.5 1.2.4.5.

-6.7 6.7 and Interact Demonstrate 1.2.3.4.5 Supervisory Ability (3) s687 Comply With and 2,4 Use Tech SDecs. (31 Notes:

(1) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO.

(2) Optional for an SRO-U.

(3) Only applicable to SROs.

Instructions:

Check the applicants license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant.

ES-301, Page 27 of 27

~

ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 Facility: Limerick Date of Examination: 10/23/2006 Operating Test No.: ILT05-1

~ ~~

Competencies Interpret/ Diagnose 1.3.4.5. 1.3.4.5. 1,2.3,4, 53,7 Events and Conditions Notes:

(1) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO.

(2) Optional for an SRO-U.

(3) Only applicable to SROs.

Instructions:

Check the applicant's license type and enter one or more evenf numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluafe every applicable competency for every applicant.

ES-301, Page 27 of 27

ES-401 Written Examination Quality Checklist Form ES-401-6

~ ~~

Facility: Limerick Date of Exam: 10/23/2006 Exam Level: RO 0 SRO 10.

~~

Question psychomettic quality and format meet the guidelines in ES Appendix B. I M

11. The exam contains the required number of one-point, multiple choice items; the total is correct and agrees with value on cover sheet Printed Name / Sigpature

a. Author

b. Faality Reviewer c)

c. NRC Chief Examiner (#I

d. NRC Regional Supervisor Note: The facility reviewer's initialskignature are not applicable for NRC-developed examinations.

1. Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c"; chief examiner concurrence required.

ES-401, Page 29 of 33

ES-401 Written Examination Quality Checklist Form ES-401-6 Facility: Limerick Date of Exam: 10/23/2006 Exam Level: RO SRO Initial Item Description a l b . 1 d elow (check the item that applies) and appears appropriate:

the SRO exam may exceed 60 percent if the randomly Printed Name I Signature

a. Author

b. Facility Reviewer ('1

c. NRC Chief Examiner (#)

d. NRC Regional SupewiSOr Note: ' The faality reviewer's initialskignature are not applicable for NRC-developedexaminations.

1. Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c"; chief examiner concurrence required.

ES-401,Page 29 of 33

ES-403 Written Examination Grading Form ES-403-1 Quality Checklist Facility: L I M@1CK Date of Exam: I 13 1% Exam Level: R O a S R O n 0 -

Initials Item Descciption a b C

1. Clean answer sheets copied before grading

2. Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented

6. Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of questions missed by half or more of the applicants Date

a. Grader

b. Facility Reviewerr)

c. NRC Chief Examiner (*)

d. NRC Supervisor (*)

(*) The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required.

ES-403, Page 5 of 5

ES-403 Written Examination Grading Form ES403-1 Quality Checklist

'acility: &f? 1 Date of Exam: \ 1 & Exam Level: R O D S R O M 1 3 I Initials ns checked to ensure that grades Printed NamelSignature , , Date

a. Grader

b. Facility Reviewerr)

c. NRC Chief Examiner r)

d. NRC Supervisor (*)

(*) The fauliRy reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required.

I' ES-403, Page 5 of 5