ML050740410

2002 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report - Revised February 2005

ML050740410
Person / Time
Site:	Oyster Creek
Issue date:	03/04/2005
From:	Swenson C AmerGen Energy Co
To:	Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
2120-052-2888, 2130-05-20054
Download: ML050740410 (101)

Text

AmerGen Energy Company, LLC www.exeloncorP.com An Exelon Company Oyster Creek US Route 9 South, P.O. Box 388 Forked River, NJ 08731-0388 Technical Specification 6.9.1.e March 4, 2005 2130-05-20054 2120-052-2888 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555 Oyster Creek Generating Station Facility Operating License No. DPR-16 NRC Docket No. 50-219

Subject:

2002 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report - Revised February 2005 Enclosed is a revised copy of the Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report for calendar year 2002, for the Oyster Creek Generating Station. This submittal is made in accordance with Oyster Creek Generating Station Technical Specification 6.9.1.e.

If any further information or assistance is needed, please contact Douglas Weigle, EnvironmentaU Chemistry at 609-971-4029 or David Fawcett, Regulatory Assurance, at 609-971-4284.

C. N. Swenson Vice President, Oyster Creek Generating Station CNS/DW/DIF Enclosure cc: S. J. Collins, Administrator, USNRC Region I P. S. Tam, USNRC Senior Project Manager, Oyster Creek R. J. Summers, USNRC Senior Resident Inspector, Oyster Creek File No. 03011

-9 5

Docket No: 50-21 9 OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION UNIT I

--- -Annual Ra'diological Environmental Operating Report-

~~.. .. ... ... ,8..

1 January .._~,Y Througdh 31 Decme.20 e~m e,2..00.2 ......_..-......

.. . 7 . i. ,

Teledyne6B'rown Engineering . ..

. Environmental Services..

,,, -, - :Prepar ergy Co.--pany .

Oyster Creek Generating Station Forked River, NJ 08731 Revised February 2005 May 2003

- I Revised February 2005 Table Of Contents I. Summary and Conclusions ............................... - .. 1 II. Introduction .3 A. Objectives of the REMP .........................  :  : .3 B. Implementation of the Objectives. . . 4 IIl. Program Description .................... '.'.-. .  : ' .4 A. Sample Collection ................ .4 B. Sample Analysis .............. -: 6 6

C. Data Interpretation ............... . . .. .. . .. 6

0. Program Exceptions...........................................................................................8 E. Program Changes .9 IV. Results and Discussion .9 A. Aquatic Environment...9..............;.

1. Surface Water .............................................................................. 9

2. Well Water .10

3. Fish .10

4. Clams and Crabs ................. 11

5. Sediment .............. 11 B. Atmospheric Environment . . . ................ 12

1. Airbome ....... : 12 a.- Air Particulates' . ............  ;.;. 12 2 b.. Airborne Iodine...........1................................................................. 13

2. Terrestrial.. '. .........  :.'.. 13

a. Vegetation .13 C. Ambient Gamma Radiation .14.

D. Land Use Survey .15 V. References ........... 16..................

`16

. . ~ . .

. I -

Revised February 2005 Appendices Appendix A Radiological Enfvironimentai Monitoring Report Summary Tables .

Table A-1 Radiological Environnm'ental Monitoring Program Annual Summary for

'the Oyster Creek' Generating Station,2002 '

Appendix B Location Designation, Distance & Direction, And Sample Collection &

Analytical Methods.- .! - <.

-Table B-1: Location Designation and Identification System forlthe Oyster Creek

• Generating' Statio'n - -'

Table B-2: Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program - Sampling Locations, Distance aid Direction, Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2002

• Table B-3 .Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program - S mmary of Sample Collection and Analytical Methods, Oyster.Creek Generating Station,

. .. 2002  : ;- : .

Figures .

Figure B-1: - Oyster Creek Gen'erating Station (OCGS)

Locations of Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program (REMP)

- Stations within two miles of the OCGS Figure B-2: Oyster Creek Generating Station (OCGS) . '

. .. Locations of Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program (REMP)

Stations greater than two miles from the OCGS App endix C Data Tables - Primary Laboratory  ; ...

ITables"'-I Table C-1.1 Concentrations.of Tritium in Surface Water Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2002.

Table C-1.2 Concentrations.of.Gamma Emitters in Surface Water Samples v '

Collected in the Vicinity of Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2002.

Table C-11.1 J Concentrations of Tritium in Well Water Samples Collected in the Vicinity.of Oyster.Creek Generating Station, 2002.

Table C-11.2 . Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Well Water Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2002.

... II

- '-I.

Revised February 2005 l Table C-111.1 Concentratibns of Gamaia Emitters in Predator and Bottom Feeder (Fish) Samples Collected in the.Vicinity of Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2002. .. , -. ., .

Table C-111.2 Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Clam and Crab Samples Collected in the.Vicinity of Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2002.

Table C-IV.1 Concentrations of Gamma Emittbrs in Sedimient Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2002. .

Table C-V.1 Concentrations of Gross Beta in Air Particulate Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2002.

Table C-V.2 Monthly and Yearly Mean Values of Gross Beta Concentrations (E-3 PCI/CU. METER) in Air Particulate Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2002.

Table C-V.3 Concentrations of Strontium inrAir Particulate Samples Collected in the Vicinity.of Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2002.'

Table C-V.4 ' Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Air Particulate Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2002.

Table C-VI.1 Concentrations of 1-131 in Air Iodine Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Oyster Creek Generating Station; 2002.

Table C-VII.1 1 Concentrations of Strontium and Gamma Emitters in Vegetation Samples Collected in the Vicinity, of Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2002.

Table C-VIII. 1 Quarterly TLD Results for Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2002.

Table C-VIII. 2 Mean Quarterly TLD Results for the Site Boundary, Middle, Special Interest, and Control Locations for Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2002..

Table C-VIII. 3 Summary of the Ambient Dosimetry Program for Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2002.:

Table C-IX.1 Summary of Collection Dates for Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2002.

.~ . -

Figures Figure C-1 - Mean Cobalt-60 Concentration in ClamsI OysterCreek Generating Station ,1I983 - 2002. -.

. . .i Mean Cobalt-60 Concentration in Aquatic Sediment I

Figure C-2 Oyster Creek Generating Station,.1984 -'2002:.

Figure C-3 Mean Cesium-1 37 Concentration in Aquatic Sediment Oyster Creek Generating.Station, .1984,- 2002.

.i.

I

If * *; 1  !

Revised February 2005

' 'Figure C4 ' Mean WeeklyGross Beta Concentrations in-Air Particulates Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2002.

' ,,F 1 ,, ' ,,, j ,  ; , . ' ' ,,. . ,

- ~ : * - \ . ..

Figure, C-5 . Mean Monthly Gross Beta Concentrations in Air Particulates

Oyster. Creek Generating Station, 1984 - 2002.-'

Figure C-6 ",Mean Quarterly TLD Gamma Dose ff-vster Creek rAneratinn Stafinn. 2002.

Figure! C-7 Mean Quarterly TLD Gamma Do'se

.. . _Oyster Creek Generating Station, 1989 - 2002.

Appendix C) . Data Tables andFigures - QC Laboratory

. I . . . .; I*f . -

Tables .;-, . ,. .. .. ..:

Table D-1.1 Concentrations of Tritium in Surface Water.Samples Collected in the Vicinity Of Oyster.Creek Generating Station, 2002. I Table D-1.2 AConcentrations of Gamma Emitters in Surface Water Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2002. I Table D-11.1 1Concentrations of Tritium in Well Water Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2002. I Table D-11.2 Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Well Water Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2002. I Table D-lll. 1 Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Clam Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2002. I Table D-IV..1, Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Sediment Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2002. I Table D-V. I Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Vegetation Samples Collected in

,; the Vicinity of Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2002. i I Appendix E Inter-Laboratory Comparison Program Tables Table E-1 Analytics Environmental Radioactivity Cross Check Program' Teledyne Brown Engineering Environmental Services '

Table E-2 DOE/EM L Environ'mehtal'Rddicactivity Cross Check Program Teledyne Brown Engineering Environmental Services Table E-3 ERA Environmental'Radioactivity Cros- Check Program

.,Teledyne Brown Engineering Environmental Services I Table E-4 MAPEP Environmen'tal Radioactivity Cross Check Program

-iv

1-4.

Revised February 2005 Teledyne Brown Engineering Environmental Services Table E-5 ERA Statistical Summary Proficiency Testing Program Environmental, Inc., 2002 Table E-6 DOE's Mixed Analyte.Perforinance E Prograrn (MAPEP)

Environmental, Inc., 2002

, . ': I ., .  ;

- I- .

i; i . ,

.. , . , i

. . .I

• . "i i ' .' . I a;.

I . . -

. i .- .

J. .~

. I I By

Summary and Conclusions -:;; - - i This report on the Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program conducted for

-the Oyster Creek Generating Station (OCGS) by AmerGen Energy Company coversthe period 01 January2002 through 31 December 2002. During that time period, 938 analyses were performed on 810 samples. In assessing all the data gathered for this report and comparing these results with historical data, it was concluded that the operation of OCGS had no adverse radiological impact on the environment. - . ; ,.

Surface and well water samples were analyzed for concentrations of tritium and gamma emitting nuclides. No fission or activation products were detected.

Tritium activity was detected in two surface water indicator stations and at the control station.

Fish (predator and bottom feeder), clams, crabs, and sediment samples were analyzed for concentrations of gamma emitting nuclides. No fission or activation products were detected in fish, clams, or crabs. Cesium-137 levels detected in sediment were consistent with levels detected in previous years and were due to previous plant releases and fallout from nuclear weapons testing. No other OCGS-produced fission or activation products were detected in sediment.

Air particulate samples were analyzed for concentrations of gross beta and gamma emitting nuclides. Cosmogenic Be-7 was detected at levels consistent with those detected in previous years. No fission or activation products were detected.

High sensitivity 1-131 analyses were performed on weekly air samples. All results were less than the minimum detectable activity.

Strontium-89 and strontium-90 and gamma analyses were performed on quarterly composites of air particulate samples. All strontium-89 and strontium-90 results were below the minimum detectable activity.

Vegetation samples were analyzed for gamma emitting nuclides, strontium-89, and strontium-90. Concentrations of naturally occurring K-40 were consistent with those detected in previous years. Cesium-1 37 was detected at levels consistent with those detected in previous years. All strontium-89 results were below the minimum detectable activity. Strontium-90 activity was detected in both indicator and background stations with four (4) of these Sr-90 results being higher than what was historically seen (Table C-VII.1). The investigation that ensued found that the indicator gardens, which contained edible vegetables, failed shortly after the initial harvest in August 2002 due to a severe regional drought. Per the provisions of the Oyster Creek Offsite Dose Calculation Manual, it was permissible to collect broadleaf vegetation, (which could not be eaten by man), as a substitute to the edible vegetables. In all four cases, the higher than expected Sr-90 results (84, 36, 121, and 29 pCi/kg wet) were detected in the non-edible samples. It is believed that due to uptake from fallout

.; 1

fallout from previous atmospheric weapons testing, that these results fall in the normal range for this type of vegetation and are not related to Oyster Creek operation.. To further reinforce that the above given Sr-90 values were not related to Oyster Creek operation,'all Sr-89 and 90 analyses on air'particulate filter composites were less than the ininimrum detectable activity (Table C-V.3).

Using Offsite'Dose Calculation methodology with Sr-90 as the source term, the dose calculated to man was 4.4X10'9 mREM -.

Environnmiental'gamma radiation measurements were performed quarterly using thermoluminescent dosirneters. Levels .detected were consistent with those observed in previous years. .

I . - I .I . I

. . .. I I. ,.

. .. I .

., . - I

.  %. I I . 1 .

. - . .I I

. t I ,. I. I . ..

I .. I ;.

• .. *- q,

. -l ,

• ~ ' ..; ,*J.* .

.I I

2

I II. Introductionduc The Oyster Creek Generating Station (OCGS), consisting of one boiling water reactor owned and operated by AmerGen Energy Company, is located on the AtlariticCoastal Plain Phyfiigraphic.Province in Ocean County, New Jersey, about 60 miles' south of Newark;'9 rnile's'south.of Toms River, and 35 miles north of Atlantic City. It lies approximately 2 miles inland from Bamegat Bay. The site, covering approximately 781 acres, is situated partly in Lacey Township and, to a lesser extent, in OceanrTownship' Access is provided by U.S.' Route 9, passing through thie site and separating 'a 637-acre eastern portion from the' balance of the property west of the highway. The station is about 4 mile west of the highway and 1% miles eastof th`e Parkway. The site property extends about 2V2 miles inland from the bay; the maximum width in the north-south direction is almost 1 mile.' The site location is 'part of the New Jersey shore area with its relatively flat topography and extensive freshwater and saltwater marshlands.

The South Branch of Forked River runs across the northern side of the site and Oyster Creek partly borders th'e southern side.

A Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program (REMP) for OCGS was initiated in 1966. This report covers those analyses performed by Teledyne Brown Engineering (TBE), ICN Pharmaceutical, and Environmental Inc. (Midwest Labs) on samples collected during the period 01 January 2002 through 31 December 2002.

A.' Objective of the REMP : . A .

The objectives of the REMP are to:

1.' Assess dose impacts to the public from the OCGS operations.

2. To verify in-plant controls for the containment of radioactive materials. .. -;

3. To monitor any buildup of long-lived radionuclides in the environmentand' changes in background radiation levels.

4. , To provide reassurance to the public that the program is capable of

-adequatelyassessing impacts and identifying noteworthy changes in the radiological status of the environment.

5. Provide data on measurable levels of radiation and radioactive*

materials in the site environs.-.:

6. Evaluate the relationship between quantities of radioactive material 3

hj released from the plant and resultant radiation doses to individuals from principal pathways of exposure.>

7. To fulfill the requirements of the OCGS Offsite Dose Calculation Manual (ODCM) and Technical Specifications.

B. Implementation of the Objectives' The implementation of the objectives is accomplished by:

. - ~, . 2. 5 I9 -  : i ' -

1: Identifying 'significant exposure'pathways.

2. Establishing baseline radiological data of rmedia within those pathways. 5-

3. Continuously monitoring those media before and during Station operation to assess Station' radiological effects (if any) on man and the environment.

Ill. Program Description A. Sample Collection Samples for the OCGS REMP were collected for AmerGen Energy Company by on-site personnel and Normandeau Associates, RMC Environmental Services Division (RMC). This section describes the general collection methods used to obtain environmental samples for the' OCGS REMP in 2002. Sample locations and descriptions can be found in Tables B-1 and B-2, and Figures B-1 and B-2, Appendix B. The collection procedures are listed in Table B-3.

Aquatic Environment The aquatic environment was evaluated by performing radiological analyses on samples of surface water, well water, fish, clams, crabs, and sediment. One gallon surface-water samples were collected monthly from two locations (33, and 94), semi-annually at two locations (23 and 24), and quarterly from three well water locations' (1,;37, and'38). Control locations were 94 and 37. All samples were collected in new unused plastic bottles, which were'rinsed at-least twice with sobrce water prior to collection. Fish samples comprising the flesh of two groups, bottom feeder and predator, were collected semiannu'ally'at two locations (93 and 94 (control)). Clams were collected- semiannually from three locations (23, 24, and 94 (control)):' One annual crab sample was collected from one location (93).

4

,~ I.

.;. Sediment sampleswere collected at four locations semiannually, 23, 24, 33, and 94. (control). - . .. -

, Atmospheric Environment .I .

• ,r * .* . ,,;.,*;. -'J

.. The atmospheric environment was evaluated by performing radiological

- analyses on samples'of air particulate, airbome.iodine,,and vegetation.

Airborne iodine and particulate samples were collected and analyzed

.weekly at sevenjlocations (C, 3, 20, 66, 7.1, 72, and 73). The control location was C. Airbome iodine and particulate samples were' obtained at each location, using a vacuum pump with charcoal and glass fiber filters

.. attached. The pumps were run continuously and sampled air at the rate of

':. -. - . approximately two tothree cubic feet per minute. The filters were replaced weekly and sent to the laboratory for analysis.

No commercial dairyoperations and no dairy animals producing milk for humian consumption are located-within a 5 mile radius of the plant.

Therefore, vegetation samples were collected in lieu of milk. Vegetation samples were collected, when available, at three locations (35, 36, and 66). Location 36 was the.control. All samples were collected in 18" x 24" new unused plastic bags and shipped promptly to the laboratory.

Ambient Gamma Radiation - . .. .

Direct radiation measurements were made using'Panasonic 814 calcium sulfate (CaSO4) thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLD). .The TLD locations were placed on and around the OCGS site as follows:

A site houndary ring consisting of 16 -locations (1, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65 and 66) near the boundary.

An intermediate distance rng consisting of 16 locations (6, 8, 22, 68, 73, 74, 75, 78, 79, 81, 82, 84, 85, 86, 98, and 99) extending to approximately 5 miles from the site designed to measure possible exposures to close-in

.,population. ,.

-  ; Special interest locations consisting of 10 locations'(3, 9, 11, 71, 72, 88,

• .' .89,90,92, and TI),representing -specialinterest areas such as population

..centers, state parks,'etc. -, ..

• e ., . , ,. * ., ' am *y., ' " ?  :\'4 . * *'.'.' - '*'

.'The balance of two locations,(C and '14) representing control locations.

. .i  ;  ;* ... i .: *...i..

i Xi .

, Indicator TLDs were placed systematically, with at least one station in i., 'ie each of 16 meteorological compass sectors (in a ring), typically within 0.25

. miles of the OCGS, or.as close as reasonable highway access would I 5

permit. TLDs were also placed in each of the 16 sectors within a five mile radius of the OCGS, in areas of public interest, and population centers.

Background locations were located greater than twenty miles distant from the OCGS and generally in an upwind direction from the OCGS.

Two TLDs -each comprised of three CaSO4 thermoluminescent phosphors enclosed in plastic- were placed at each location approximately three to eight feet above ground level. The TLDs were exchanged quarterly and sent to ICN for analysis.

B. Sample Analysis  :

This section describes the general analytical methodologies used by TBE and Midwest Labs to analyze the environmental'samples for radioactivity for the OCGS REMP in 2002. The analytical procedures used by the laboratories are listed in Table B-3.

In order to achieve the stated objectives,-the current program includes the following analyses:

1. Concentrations of beta emitters in air particulates.

2. Concentrations of gamma emitters in surface and well water, fish, clams, crabs, silt, air particulates, and vegetation.

3. Concentrations of tritium in surface and well water.

4. Concentrations of 1-131 in air iodine cartridges.

5. Concentrations of strontium in air particulates and vegetation.

6. Ambient gamma radiation levels at various locations around the OCGS.

C. Data Interpretation The radiological and direct radiation data collected from past years was used for comparison and trending with 2002 operational data. For the purpose of this report, OCGS preoperational data was not used due to it's collection 35 years ago. Several factors were important in the interpretation of the data:

1. Lower Limit of Detection and Minimumi Detectable Activity The lower limit of detection (LLD) was'defined as the smallest concentration of radioactive material in a sample that would yield a 6

4-

.-net count (above background) that would be~detected with only a 5% probability of falsely concluding that a blank observation

. represents a "real" signal. The LLD was intended as a before the fact estimate.of a system (including instrumentation, procedure and

'sample.type) and-not as an after.the fact criteria for the presence of

,:.activity. All analyses.were designed to achieve the required OCGS

. . detection capabilities for environmental sample analysis.

The minimum detectable activity (MDA) is defined above with the exception that the measurement is an after the fact estimate of the presence of activity. :..:

2.. ,Net Activit, Calculation and Reporting of Results 7 Net activity for a sample was, calculated by subtracting background

, . activity from the sample activity. Since the REMP measures

. extremely small changes in radioactivity in the environment, background variations may result in sample activity being lower than the background activity effecting a negative number. An MDA

. . was reported in all cases where positive activity was not detected.

Gamma spectroscopy results for each type of sample were grouped as follows: -

For surface and well water 11 nuclides, Mn-54,Co-58, Fe-59, Co-GO, Zn-65, Zr-95, Nb-95, Cs-134,.Cs-137, Ba-140, and La-

140 . -40were reported. -

For fish eight nuclides, K-40, Mn-54, Co-58, Fe-59, Co-60, Zn-65, Cs-I 34, and Cs-.137 were reported.

K -- -54 C-58F-9

-C. .0 For clams eight nuclides, K-40, Mn-54, Co-58, Fe-59, Co-G, Zn-65, Cs-134, and Cs-I 37 were reported.

.. .. . For crabs eight nuclides, K-40, Mn-54, Co-58; Fe-59, Co-0, a .Zn-65, Css-134, and Cs-137 were reported.,

• - ' ' , -V.-'

) ,, ,', ' .! : . -' '

• *. . . .* .. .-For sedimentsix nuclides, K-40, Mn-54, Co-58; Co-60, Cs-1 34,

• ;..;.and Cs-137-were reported; . - : .

., . 3For-air particulate six nuclides, Be-7, Mn-54, Co-58, Co-G0, Cs-

• . . ;..r.^., -34, and Cs+1 37,were. reported.i .............. -

...or air cartridges one nuclide, 1-1 31 was reported.

• ~' *. ,,. ,; . ,, ;.

7

For vegetation four nuclides,K-40, 1-131, Cs-134, and Cs-137, were reported.

Means and standard deviations of the results were calculated. The standard-deviations represent the variability of measured results for different samples rather than*single analysis uncertainty.

D. Program Exceptions For 2002 the OCGS REMP had a sample recovery rate in excess of 99%.

Exceptions are listed below:

- In August, September, and October 2002, the' iodine-1 31 lower limit of detection (60 pCi/kg wet) was not achieved for thirteen (13) vegetable and broadleaf vegetation samples (Table C-VII.1). Eight (8) samples were collected from indicator gardens and five (5) samples were collected from background gardens. The ensuing investigation discovered that the analysis laboratory failed to analyze these s'amples in a timely manner, resulting in the failure to meet the required detection limit. In addition, these data were reviewed prior to submitting the original 2002 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report, but this review failed to flag and report the missed detection limits. Corrective action to prevent recurrence is in place in which both the Analytical Laboratory and the Licensee perform an independent redundant review bf all analytical data.

The Analytical Laboratory put into place a system where email notification to program managers takes place at the time of counting for missed detection limits, allowing correction of the count time and attainment of the correct LLD. CAP # 02005-0105 was written to capture this event.

Beginning on 03 Sep 02, the charcoal cartridge efficiency (98% efficiency) on Air Iodine samples was incorporated into the analysis result. Prior to this, an efficiency of 100 % was used. All calculated MDAs were well below LLDs.

Two vegetable gardens planted at the site boundary, Stations 35 and 66, failed after the initial harvest on 06 Aug 02 due to a regional severe drought. One cabbage sample was harvested and analyzed from Station 66 on 10 Sep 02, but no other vegetables were available for collection and analysis during this collection period.' Broadleaf vegetation was collected at Stations 35 and 66 in lieu of vegetable samples on 10 Sep 02 and on 10 Oct 02., These broadleaf vegetation samples.' collected in lieu of vegetable samples were harvested from plants in which the vegetation is not eaten by man: Leaves from local deciduous vegetation were collected as samples. CAP # 02005-0124 was written to capture this event.

8

-In October 2002, during the third quarter TLD change out, the field Control TLDs were lost. The Field Control dosimeters monitor the quantity of dose

,,,received during the exchange period. ICN TLD numbers 2016953 and

.'. 2016954 were lostr,.presurmably in the field, during dosimeter exchange.

The dose recorded by theField Control badges that is subtracted from other exposed dosimeters is usually less than 1 mR. CAP # 2003-0583 was written to investigate and document this event.

ICN TLDs were lost at Station 86 during the first quarter of 2002 and at

..- Station 61 during the second quarter of 2002 due tovandalism.

Station 72 failed to operate after running for 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> and 48 minutes.

The volume of air that,passed through this filter was only 58.7 cubic

-meters because of a blown fuse.. -

Each program exception was reviewed to understand the causes of the program exception. Sampling.and maintenance errors were reviewed with the personnel involved to,prevent recurrence..

The overall sample recovery rate indicates that the appropriate procedures and, equipment are in place to assure reliable program Implementation.

I E. Program Changes Beginning the second quarter 2002, Teledyne Brown Engineering Environmental Services became the primary laboratory and Environmental Inc. (Midwest Labs)'became the QC laboratory. Prior to that, Environmental Inc. was the primary analysis laboratory and Teledyne Brown Engineering was the QC laboratory.

IV. Results and Discussion A. .

A.; , Aquatic.Environment -,

• :

• i

,,-1., Surface Water, ';,.- , :

Samples weretaken via grab sample methodology at two locations (3,3, and 94):on.a~monthly schedule. In addition, grab samples

- werecollected semi-annually-at two locations (23 and 24). Of

.these locations 23, .24, and 33, located downstream, could be Surfacect Waternstreamcould b affected by,Oyster.Creek's effluent releases. The following

.,-analyseswere performed: ,,-.,

-. 9 I..

Tritium Samples from all locations were analyzed for tritium activity (Table C-1.1, Appendix C). Tritium activities were consistent with those detected in previous years'.

Gamma Sp&ctrometry Samples from all locations were: analyzed for gamma emitting nuclides (Table C-1.2, Appendix C). All nuclides were less than the MDA.

2. Well Water Quarterly samples were composited from monthly grab samples at three locations (1, 37, and 38). Two locations (1 and 38) could be affected by Oyster Creek's effluent releases. The following analyses were performed:

Tritium Quarterly samples from all locations were analyzed for tritium activity (Table C-11.1, Appendix C). Tritium activity was detected in two samples at concentrations of 131 pCi/I and 166 pCi/I. The highest MDA was calculated at <178 pCi/L.

Gamma Spectrometry Samples from all locations were analyzed for gamma emitting nuclides (Table C-11.2, Appendix C). All nuclides were less than the MDA.

3. Fish-Fish samples comprised of tautog and flounder (bottom feeder) and weakfish, striped bass, white perch, sea bass, bluefish, and puffer (predator) were collected at two location's (93 and 94) semiannually. Location 93 could be' affected by Oyster Creek's effluent releases-. The following analysis was performed:

Gamma. Spectrometry

• The edible portion of fish samples from two locations were analyzed for gamma emitting nuclides (Table C-111.1, Appendix C).

Naturally occurring potassium-40 was found at all stations and 10

ranged from 3,480 to 5,900 pCi/kg wet and was consistent with levels detected in previous years. No fission or activation products

'we're found...  ;,-,-

4. Clams and Crabs , ^  ;;

Clams were collected at three locations (23, 24, and 94) semiannually. Crabs were collected at one location (93) annually.

Locations 23, 24, and 93 could be affected by Oyster Creek's effluent releases. JThe following analysis was performed:

• * - ~~~, ., 's..

Lt .. Gamma Spectrometry.

-The edible portion of clam samples from all three locations were analyzed forgamma emitting nuclides (Table C-111.2, Appendix C).

.Naturally,occurring potassium-40.was found at all stations and ranged from 1,120 to 1,420 pCi/kg wet and was consistent with levels detected in previous years. No fission or activation products were found. Historical levels of Co-60 in clams are shown in Figure C-1, Appendix C.

The edible portion of crab samples from one location was analyzed for gamma emitting nuclides (Table C-111.2, Appendix C). Naturally occurring .potassium-40 was found at a concentration of 1,520 pCi/kg wet and was consistent with levels detected in previous years. No fission or activation products were found.

5. Sediment Aquatic sediment samples were collected at four locations (23, 24,

33, and 94) semiannually. Of these locations, stations 23, 24, and 33 located downstream, could be affected by Oyster Creek's effluent releases. The-following analysis was performed:

.Gamma Spectrometry;K

. ,  : A n.  :- : . :A ,  : : .

,- . Sediment samples from all four-locations were analyzed for gamma emitting nuclides (Table C-IV.1: Appendix C). Nuclides detected E ., ,, were naturally occurring K40, and the fission product Cs-137.

Potassium-40 was found at all stations-and ranged from 806 to 16,300 pCi/kg dry. Concentrations of the fission product Cs-137

... were found in.two sediment samples, .Location 23 had an average

. .. . - .concentration of 23 pCi/kg'dry. JThe activity detected was

-;, .. , .consistent-with thosedetected in previous'years (Figure C-3,

- - 11

Appendix C). No other Oyster Creek fission or activation products were found. Figure C-2, Appendix C graphs Co-60 concentrations in sediment from 1984 through 2002.

B. Atmospheric Environment I1. Airborne

a. Air Particulates Continuous air particulate samples' were collected from seven locations on a weekly basis. The seven locations were separated into'three groups: Group I represents locations near the OCGS site boundary (20 and 66), Group II represents the locations at an intermediate distance from the OCGS site (71, 72, and 73), and Group Ill represents the control and locations at a remote distance from OCGS (C and 3). The following analyses were performed:

Gros&Be,at Weekly samples were analyzed for concentrations of beta emitters (Table C-V.1 and C-V.2, Appendix C).

Detectable gross beta activity was observed at all locations.

Comparison of results among the three groups aid in determining the effects, if any, resulting from the operation of OCGS. The results from the On-Site locations (Group I) ranged from 9 to 34 E-3 pCVm3 with a mean of 17 E-3 pCium 3 . The results from the Intermediate Distance location (Group II) ranged from 8 to 35 E-3 pC~m 3 with a mean of 17 E-3 pCim 3 . The results from the Distant locations (Group 111) ranged from 7 to 32 E-3 pCi/m 3 with a mean of 17 E-3 pCi/M3 .. Comparison of the 2002 air particulate data with previous years data indicate no effects from the operation of OCGS (Figure C-5, Appendix C). In addition a comparison of the weekly mean values for 2002 indicate no notable differences among the thred groups (Figure C-4, Appendix C).

Strontium-89 and Strontiufr-90 Weekly samples were composited quarterly and analyzed for strontium-89 and strontium-90 (Table C-V.3, Appendix C).

12

I : ..

, .. No strontium was detected.-,

-- Gamma Spectrometry Weekly samples were composited quarterly and analyzed for gamma emitting nuclides (Table C-V.4, Appendix C).

, -,Naturallyoccurring Be-7 due to cosmic ray activity was detected in all samples. These values ranged from 58 to 84

,. . , ,E-3 - pCUrn 3., All other nuclides were less than the MDA.

, ,' .b.. >Airborne, Iodine

- i;. r,;. .:.- -  ; -a-%,e.

e-........

' .* Continuousair samples were collected from seven (C, 3, 20, 66,71,72, and 73) locations and analyzed weekly for 1-131

, (Table C-7l.1, Appendix C)., AII results were less than the

,2.,

<I; Terrestrial ' ' .'"

a. *,_Vegetation,

': . . -. Samples were collected from three locations (35, 36, and 66) e when available.: The following analyses were performed:

' Strontium-89 and Strontium-90 Vegetationssamples from all locations were analyzed for concentrations of strontium-89 and strontium-90 (Table C-

, v.1,Appendix C).- All strontium-89 results were less than

'-the MDA.-Strontium-90 was detected in all but one sample.

The values ranged from 3 to 121 pCi/kg wet. An investigation ensued regarding four Sr-90 analysis results

that initiallyappeared to be higher than expected. The results of the investigation concluded that the vegetation

, e. , . * - ;? collected was non-edible by man and therefore more subject

.to strontium uptake from previous atmospheric weapons resting fallout and not.Oyster Creek related. To further t-,

reinforcethat the above referenced Sr-90'results were Not

--IFacility.related, all strontium analytical results were less than the minimum detectable level for air samples. The dose to man from these SR,90 results was calculated to be 4.4X10-9 mREM. CAP # 02005-0124 was written to capture this event.,,

. "I I .. . .1)1, .. . .

I13

- K-Gamma Snectrometry Each vegetation sample from locations 35, 36, and 66 were analyzed for concentrations of gamma emitting nuclides (Table C-VII.1, Appendix C).

Naturally occurring K-40 activity was found in all samples and ranged from 1,640 to 4,030 pCVI. Cs-1 37 activity detected in two'sa nples was consistent with those detected in previous years. All other nuclides were less than the MDA with the exception of thirteen (13) 1-131 results in which the required LLD of 60 pCilkg'wet was not achieved. The ensuing investigation concluded that the analysis laboratory failed to analyze these'samples in a timely manner, resulting in the failure to meet the required detection limit. In addition, these data were reviewed prior to submitting the original 2002 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report, but this review failed to flag and report the missed detection limits. Corrective action to prevent recurrence is in place in which both the Analytical Laboratory and the Licensee perform an independent redundant review of all analytical data. The Analytical Laboratory put into place a system where email notification to program managers takes place at the time of counting for missed detection limits, allowing correction of the count time and attainment of the correct LLD. CAP # 02005-0105 was written to capture this event.

C. Ambient Gamma Radiation Ambient gamma radiation levels were measured utilizing Panasonic 814 (CaSO4) thermoluminescent dosimeters. Forty-four TLD locations were monitored around the site. Results of TLD measurements are listed in Tables C-VIII.1 to C-VI11.3, Appendix C.

Most TLD measurements were below 20 mRlstandard quarter, with a range of 6.7 to 21.6 mRlstandard quarter. 2002 gamma radiation data was plotted from the control location along with similar data from the Site, Intermediate Distance, and Outer Ring Locations (Figure C-6, Appendix C). Historical ambient gamma radiation'data from the control location was plotted along with similar data from the Site, Intermediate Distance and Outer Ring Locations (Figure C-7, Appendix C).

14

Land Use Survey A Land Use Surveywas conducted during 2002 around the Oyster Creek

. Generating Station,(OCGS). The purpose of the survey was to determine

'the location'of animalsprpoducing milk for human consumption in each of the sixteen meteorological sections out to a distance of 5 miles from the OCGS. There were no changes required to the OCGS REMP, as a result

of this su'vey. The"results of this survey are summarized below.

• , ;;..- j.;. -

^, . . . , ._ 7,

- Distance in Miles from the OCGS Reactor Buildings

-Sector - Residence ' Garden Milk Farm IWSW -' 10.1 2SW 20.3 3 NW 17.7

, 4 NNE'  :. 5.9

.. b.

'. ' . - -' . .$' ': . .. ? I ,

, ,_ l ,5 I f I

V. References

1. Jersey Central Power and Light Cornpany.'Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Operating License and Technical Specifications, Appendix A, DPR-16, April 1969.

2. AmerGen Energy Company, LLC. Oyster Creek Offsite Dose Calculation Manual, Procedure CY-OC-170-301.

3. AmerGen Energy Company,. LLC. Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station, Updated Final Safety Analjsis Report.

4. National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements, Report No. 93, Ionizing Radiation Exposure of the Population of the United States, 1987.

5. CRC Handbook, Radioecology: Nuclear Energy and the Environment, F. Ward Whicker and Vincent Schultz, Volume I, 1982.

6. National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements, Report No. 22, Maximum Permissible Body Burdens and Maximum Permissible Concentrations of Radionuclides in Air and Water for Occupational Exposure, (Published as National Bureau of Standards Handbook 69, Issued June 1959, superseding Handbook 52).

7. International Commission on Radiological Protection, Publication 2, Report of Committee II on Permissible Dose for Internal Radiation (1959), with 1962 Supplement Issued in ICRP Publication 6; Publication 9, Recommendations on Radiation Exposure, (1965);

ICRP Publication 7 (1965), amplifying specific recommendations of Publication 9 concerning environmental monitoring; and ICRP Publication 26 (1977).

8. Federal Radiation Council Report No. 1, Background Material for the Development of Radiation Protection Standards; May 13, 1960.

9. National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements, Report No. 39, Basic Radiation Protection Criteria, January 1971.

10. National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements, Report No. 62, Tritium in the Environment, March 1979.

11. National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements, Report No. 81, Carbon-14 in the Environment, May 1985.

16

12.'. United States Nuclear RegulatoryCommission. Regulatory Guide 4.1, Programs for Monitoring Radioactivity in The Environs of Nuclear Power Plants, Revisiofi 1, April 1975. .;

13. United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Branch Technical Position, An Acceptable Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program, Revision 1, November 1979.  :

14., American National Standards Institute, Inc.-, Performance, Testing, and Procedural Specifications for Thermoluminiescence-Dosimetry, ANSI N545-1975.

1 5. a. *.s. . . !.

.15. '.tnited States N~uclear:Regulatory Commission..Regulatory Guide

'4.13, Performance, Testing and Procedural Specifications for Thermoluminescence Dosimetry: Environmental Applications,

-Revision 1, Ju!y1977.`-:v.-.; X ,

16. United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Regulatory Guide 4.15, Quality Assurance for Radiological Monitoring Programs

.(Normal Operations) -Effluent Streams and the Environment,,

Revision'1, February 1979.-

17. United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Regulatory Guide 1.109, Calculation of Annual Doses to Man from Routine Releases of Reactor Effluents for the Purpose of Evaluating Compliance with

10 CFR Part 50, Appendix I, Revision 1, October 1977.

18. NUREGICR-4068, Summary-of Historical Experience with Releases of Radioactive Materials from Commercial Nuclear Power. Plants in the United

'States, 1985. -  ;

19.) Olsen, C.R., et. al.; 1980. Reactor-released Radionuclides and Fine-grained Sediment Transport and Accumulation Patterns in Bamegat Bay, New Jersey and Adjacent Shelf Waters. Estuarine and Coastal

-. Marine Science (1980) 10,119-142..

20. . GPU Nuclear Corporation. ,1986 Radiological Environmental Monitong ReportforOyster Creek NuclearGenerating Station.

May 1987. -

@~~~S - . . *.' ,'

iA ;t s,' .

. 21. GPU.Nuclear Cprporation. 1987 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report for Oyster Creek Nuclear. Generating Station.

, ay 1988:

- - 17

22. GPU Nuclear Corporation. 1988 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report for Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station.

May 1989.

23. GPU Nuclear Corporation. 1989 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report for Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station.

May 1990.

24. GPU Nuclear Corporation. 1990 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report for Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station.

May 1991.

25. GPU Nuclear Corporation. 1991 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report for Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station.

May 1992.

26. GPU Nuclear Corporation. 1992 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report for Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station.

May 1993.

27. GPU Nuclear Corporation. 1993 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report for Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station.

May 1994.

28. GPU Nuclear Corporation. 1994 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report for Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station.

May 1995.

29. GPU Nuclear Corporation. 1995 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report for Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station.

May 1996.

30. GPU Nuclear, Inc. 1996 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report for Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station. May 1997.

31. GPU Nuclear, Inc. 1997 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report for Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station. May 1998.

32. GPU Nuclear, Inc. 1998 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report for Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station. May 1999.

33. GPU Nuclear, Inc. 1999 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report for Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station. May 2000.

18

34. . AmerGen Energy Company; LLC. 2000 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report for Oyster Creek Generating Station. May 2001.

35. AmerGen Energy Company, LLC. 2001 Radiological Environmental

, Monitoring Report for Oyster Creek Generating Station May, 2002.

36. AmerGen Energy Company, LLC. Oyster Creek Generating Station Radioactive Effluent Release Report, January 1, 2002. through December 31, 2002. March 2003 -. .;.. - , .:

I . -,

• .. . a

• I I

.: - .. I.

. . I I

, -^ ,  : *, nt ,' *t" .-t ;I q !. a i , 'j-'! '. .' .

I . . .  !-I I  ; , '..- .. ,

- .- 19

Da APPENDIX A RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING REPORT

SUMMARY

TABLE A-1 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL

SUMMARY

FOR THE OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2002 Name of Facility: OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION DOCKET NUMBER: 50-219 Location of Facility: OCEAN COUNTY, NJ REPORTING PERIOD: 2002 INDICATOR CONTROL LOCATION WITH IIIGHEST ANNUAL MEAN LOCATIONS LOCATION MEDIUM OR TYPES OF NUMBER OF REQUIRED MEAN' MEAN' MEAN* STATION # NUMBER OF PATHWAY SAMPLED ANALYSES ANALYSES LOWER LIMIT (F) (F) (F) NAME NONROUTINE (UNIT OF PERFORMED PERFORMED OF DETECTION RANGE RANGE RANGE DISTANCE AND DIRECTION REPORTED MEASUREMENT) (LLD) MEASUREMENTS SURFACE WATER TRITIUM 28 3000 147 142 214 24 INDICATOR 0 (PCI/LITER) (5/16) (4/12) (112) BARNEGAT BAY

(<94/327) (<941207) (<101/327) 2.1 MILES SE OF SITE GAMMA 28 MN.54 15 3 4 4 94 CONTROL (0/16) (0/12) (0112) GREAT BAY/LITTLE EGG HARBOR (40.9/<6) (<11<6) (<1/<6) 20.0 SSW OF SITE CO-5s 15 4 4 4 94 . CONTROL (0/16) (0/12) (0/12) GREAT BAY/LITRLE EGG HARBOR

(<1/<6) (<11<7) (<11<7). 20.0 SSW OF SITE CO-60 15 3 4- 4 94. . CONTROL .

(0/16) (0/12) (0/12) GREAT BAYILIT1LE EGG HARBOR

(<0.9/<6) (<11<6) (<1/<6) 20.0 SSW OF SITE FE-59 30 8 8 8 24 INDICATOR (0116) (0/12) (012) BARNEGAT BAY

(<21<12) (<21<14) (<51<11) 2.1 MILES SE OF SITE ZN-65 30 7 8 8 94 CONTROL (0/16) (0/12). (0/12) GREAT BAY/LITTLE EGG HARBOR

(<21<12) (<21<15) (<21<15) 20.0 SSW OF SITE ZR-95 30 6 7 7 94 CONTROL (0116) (0/12) (0/12) GREAT BAY/LITTLE EGG HARBOR

(<2/<11) (<2/<1 1) (<2<1 1) 20.0 SSW OF SITE NB-95 15 4 4 5. 23 INDICATOR (0116) (0/12) (0/2) BARNEGAT BAY

(<11<6) (<1I<7) (<41<6) 3.6 MILES SE OF SITE

• THE MEAN AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING BOTH THE MDAs AND THE POSITIVE VALUES FRACTION OF DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS AT SPECIFIED LOCATIONS IS INDICTED IN PARENTHESES (F)

'C.....,.

C.-. . -.

TABLE A-1 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL

SUMMARY

FOR THE OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2002 Name of Facility: OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION DOCKET NUMBER: 50-219 Location of Facility: OCEAN COUNTY, NJ REPORTING PERIOD: 2002 INDICATOR CONTROL LOCATION WITH HIGHEST ANNUAL MEAN LOCATIONS LOCATION. ..

MEDIUMOR TYPES OF NUMBER OF REQUIRED . MEAN MEANS MEANS STATION # NUMBEROF PATHWAY SAMPLED ANALYSES ANALYSES LOWER LIMIT (F) (F) (F) NAME NONROUTINE (UNIT OF PERFORMED PERFORMED OF DEIECTION RANGE RANGE RANGE DISTANCE AND DIRECTION REPORTED MEASUEN (LLD) .. , MEASUREMENTS J-CS-134 is 4 4 .. 4 33 INDICATOR 0 (0/16) (0/12) *(0/12) ROUTE9 BRIDGE.- .

(<0.9/<8)  : (<0.9/<7) *(<0.91<8) 0.4 MILES ESE OF SITE CS-137 I18 4 . 4 4. . 94 .... CONTROL 0

(Ol16) (0/12) t (0/12). . ~GREAT:BAY/LITILE EGG HARBOR

• (<0.9/<7) .(<1/4) (<li6 *20.0SSWOFSITE;-  :, ;,

BA-140 60. <24. <26 <36 24 ,INDICATOR 0

.(Oil ) 4 (0112).; BARNEGAT BAY

(<10/<45) .(<101<43) (<27/<45) 2.1 MILES SE OF SITE LA-140 15 8 7 12 23 INDICATOR 0 (0/16) (0/12) (0/2) BARNEGAT BAY..

(<2/<15) (<2/<13) (51Ok1<4) .3.6 MILES ENE OF SITE

-. . _ , -1 WELL WATER TRITIUM 12 2000 130 1i4 132 38 INDICATOR 0 (PCI/LITER) - - - - (V8) (0/4)' (114) - - OCEAN TOWNSHIP MUA PUMP STA 1

': -'-. a:, . . (<86,<178) (<861<178) (<86/132) 1.3 MILES SSW OF SITE

!.- *.1 ..- . , .

• r i GAMMA *.. 12 4 .. ,

".  : 1.  :

3. 4. . 0 ..

MN.54 -. 15 3 ., 4.. *. 37., CONTROL (0/8). (014) i (.0/4) LACEY MUA PUMPING STATION

(<lid5 I,, (< 1<6,.. (-47<6) . 2.2 MILES NNE OF SITE .

I I... : CO.58 is 3 4 4 37 CONTROL 0

. t. . . *7... (0/8). .(0/4) (014) -- LACEY MUA PUMPING STATION

(</<6) (<2/<6) 2.2 MILES NNE OF SITE CO-60 .,,.1 . 3. 4. . 4. . . `37 CONTROL 0

(0/8) (0/4) (014) LACEY MUA PUMPING STATION

(<2/<5) (<2/<5) 2.2 MILES NNE OF SITE

• THE MEAN AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING BOTH THE MDAs AND THE POSITIVE VALUES FRACTION OF DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS AT SPECIFIED LOCATIONS ISINDICTED INPARENTHESES (F)

TABLE A-1 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL

SUMMARY

FOR THE OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2002 Name of Facility: OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION DOCKETNUMBER: 50-219 Location of Facility: OCEAN COUNTY, NJ REPORTING PERIOD: 2002 INDICATOR CONTROL LOCATION WITH HGIIEST ANNUAL MEAN LOCATIONS LOCATION MEDIUM OR TYPES OF NUMBER OF REQUIRED MEAN' MEAN' MEAN STATION U NUMBER OF PATHWAY SAMPLED ANALYSES ANALYSES LOWER LIMIT (F) (F) (F) NAME NONROUTINE (UNIT OF PERFORMED PERFORMED OF DETECTION RANGE RANGE RANGE DISTANCE AND DIRECTION REPORTED MEASUREMENT) (LLD) MEASUREMENTS FE-59 30 7 9 9 37 CONTROL 0 (0/8) (0/4) (0/4) LACEY MUA PUMPING STATION

(<3<11) (<51<13) (<51<13) 2.2 MILES NNE OF SITE ZN-65 30 6 8 8 37 CONTROL 0 (0/8) (0/4) (0/4) LACEY MUA PUMPING STATION

(<2/<I I) (<4/<13) (<4/<13) 2.2 MILES NNE OF SITE ZR-95 30 7 8 8 37 CONTROL 0 (0/8) (0/4) (0/4) LACEY MUA PUMPING STATION

(</<10) (<6110) (<61<10) 2.2 MILES NNE OF SITE N1-95 15 4. 37 CONTROL 0 (0/8) (0/4) (0/4) LACEY MUA PUMPING STATION

(<1/<6) (<31<7) (<3/<7) 2.2 MILES NNE OF SITE CS-134 15 3 4 4 37 CONTROL 0 (0/4) (0/4) LACEY MUA PUMPING STATION

(<0.9/<6) (<2<6) (<1<6) 2.2 MILES NNE OF SITE CS-137 18 <3.5 <3.6 <3.6 37 CONTROL 0 (0/8) (0/4) (0/4) LACEY MUA PUMPING STATION

(<11<5) (<2/<6) (<21<6) 2.2 MILES NNE OF SITE BA 140 60 <22 <32 <32 37 CONTROL 0 (0/8) (0/4) (0/4) LACEY MUA PUMPING STATION

(<13/<40) (<17l<45) (<17/<45). 2.2 MILES NNE OF SITE LA-140 15 7 10 10 37 CONTROL 0 (0/8) (0/4) (0/4) LACEY MUA PUMPING STATION

(<41<13) (<3/<15) (<31<5) 2.2 MILES NNE OF SITE

• THE MEAN AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING BOTH THE MDAS AND THE POSITIVE VALUES FRACTION OF DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS AT SPECIFIED LOCATIONS ISINDICTED INPARENTHESES (F)

~

I'-- - I t " ~

* * ,., . .. , - - I . . _,I -~  ! .

• . .- .: . . I I ~: -' I-..*' ,~ " V ** .. . - I. ..- I . ' - - .- I .' . .: . I - .

TABLE A-1. RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL

SUMMARY

FOR THE OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2002 Name of Facility: OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION DOCKET NUMBER: 50-219 Location of Facility: OCEAN COUNTY, NJ - REPORTING PERIOD: 200i INDICATOR CONTROL, LOCATION WITH HIGHEST ANNUAL MEAN LOCATIONS LOCATION :.

MEDIUM OR TYPES OF NUMBER OF REQUIRED MEAN' MEAN MEAN* STATION # . NUMBER OF PATHWAY SAMPLED ANALYSES ANALYSES LOWER LIMIT (F) (F) (F) NAME NONROUTINE (UNIT OF PERFORMED PERFORMED OF DETECTION RANGE, RANGE RANGE DISTANCE AND DIRECTION REPORTED MEASUREMENT) (LLD)  ;. , - ' MEASUREMENTS BOTTOM FEEDER (FISH) GAMMA 2 K-40 N/A 4210 ./A . 4210 93 -INDICATOR._ 0 (PCI/KG WET)

(2/2) *(2/2) . DISCHARGE CANAL

- (3480/4940) (3480/4940) 0.1 MILES WSWOF SITE MN.54 130 *33- N/A 33 -- .93*-iu NDICATOR '--: "i 0 (0/2) (0/2) DISCHARGE CANAL

(<14/<S2) (<14/<52) 0.1 MILES WSW OF SITE CO-58 130 .37' N/A .37', 93 INDICATOR:, 0 (0/2) (0(2) DISCHARGE CANAL (C20/C54) (<20/<54) 0.1 MILES WSW OF SITE CO-60 130 33 N/A 33.*, 93. INDICATOR* 0 (0/2) (0/2) DISCHARGE CANAL

(<141<53) (<14/<53) 0.1 MILES WSWOF SITE

-11..

- . II . -

1._ - I FE-~ 59' 260 98 N/A 98 93 INDICATOR 0 (0/2) (0/2) DISCHARGE CANAL

1. - - -I- ('> 41<142) .. . (<54/<142) 0.1 MILES WSW OF SITE I. I - . . .: . . 2 . .

. i N/A:'~,- 71 .,. 93.' i-INDICATOR .. -0 I . * .- ZN6 ,.--.. -- 260 71 (0/)-, . -, -,  : . (0/) DISCHARGE CANAL

(<531<109) -  ; t ,. (<33/1<09) , 0.1 MILES WSWOF SITE .

CS.134. 130. 29 N/A 29 .. 93 . INDICATOR 0 (02). .- - DISCHARGE CANAL .(0/2)

(<13/<44) (<13k<44) 0.1 MILES WSWOF SITE

- +} . .

CS-137*- '150 33 -- '-  ; N/A * .. 33  ; - 93 INDICATOR 0 (02) (0/2) DISCHARGE CANAL

(<151<52) (<151<52) 0.1 M1LESWSWOFSITE

• THE MEAN AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING BOTH THE MDAs AND THE POSITIVE VALUES FRACTION OF DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS AT SPECIFIED LOCATIONS ISINDICTED INPARENTHESES (F)

TABLE A-1 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL

SUMMARY

FOR THE OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2002 Name of Facility: OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION DOCKET NUMBER: 50-219 Location of Facility: OCEAN COUNTY, NJ REPORTING PERIOD: 2002 INDICATOR CONTROL LOCATION WITH IIIGIIEST ANNUAL MEAN LOCATIONS LOCATION MEDIUM OR TYPES OF NUMBER OF REQUIRED MEAN' MEAN' MEAN' STATION # NUMBER OF PATHWAY SAMPLED ANALYSES ANALYSES LOWER LIMIT (F) (F) (F) NAME NONROUTINE (UNIT OF PERFORMED PERFORMED OF DETECTION RANGE RANGE RANGE DISTANCE AND DIRECTION REPORTED MEASUREMENT) (LLD) MEASUREMENTS PREDATOR (FISH) GAMMA 9 (PCI/KG WIM K-40 N/A 4686 4578 4686 93' INDICATOR 0 (5/5) (4/4) (5/5) DISCHARGE CANAL (4040/5900) (3770/5530) (4005900) 0.1 MILES WSW OF SITE MN-54 130 19 25 25 94 CONTROL 0 (0/5) (0/4) (0/4) GREAT BAY/LITTLE EGG HARBOR

(<12/<29) (<10/<48) (<10/<48) 20.0 SSW OF SITE CO-58 130 26 35 35 94 -CONTROL 0 (0/5) (0/4) (0/4) GREAT BAY/LITTLE EGG LARBOR

(<15/<42) (<13/<72) (<13/<72) 20.0 SSW OF SITE CO-60 130 18 24 24 94 CONTROL 0 (015) (0/4) (0/4) GREAT BAY/LITTLE EGG HARBOR

(<111<25) (<10/<48) (<1 0<48) 20.0 SSW OF SITE FE-59 260 63 97 97 94 CONTROL 0 (0/5) (0/4) (0/4) GREAT BAY/LITTLE EGG HARBOR

(<41/<102) (<35/<05) (<35/<205) 20.0 SSW OF SIlE I . .

ZN.65 260 45 56 56 94 CONTROL 0 (0/5) (014) (014) GREAT BAY/LITTLE EGG HARBOR

(<27/<68) (<22/<109) (</<109) 20.0 SSW OF, SITE

• CS.134 130 18 24 24 94 CONTROL 0 (0/5) (0/4) (0/4) GREAT BAYILITTLE EGG HARBOR

(<11/<28) (<101<49) (<101<49) 20.0 SSW OF SITE CS 137 150 20 27 27 94 CONTROL 0 (0/5) (0/4) (0/4) GREAT BAY/LITTLE EGG HARBOR

(<11/<29) (<101<56) (<101<56) 20.0 SSW OF SITE

' THE MEAN AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING BOTH THE MDAs AND THE POSITIVE VALUES FRACTION OF DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS AT SPECIFIED LOCATIONS IS INDICTED IN PARENTHESES (F)

. -t " .,' - . .

." . , I.

. - . -. I .  : - . . . .- - - . - I

, - .; ,..I ... I., . .. . . I I TABLE A-1 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL

SUMMARY

FOR THE OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2002 Name of Facility: OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION DOCKET NUMBER: 50-219 --

Location of Facility: OCEAN COUNTY, NJ REPORTING PERIOD: 2002 INDICATOR CONTROL LOCATION WITII HIGHEST ANNUAL MEAN LOCATIONS. LOCATION :

MEDIUMOR TYPES OF, NUMBER OF REQUIRED MEAN' . MEAN' MEAN' STATION# NUMBEROF PATHWAY SAMPLED ANALYSES ANALYSES LOWER LIMIT (F) (F) (F) NAME NONROUTINE (UNITOF PERFORMED PERFORMED OFDETECTION RANGE RANGE '-RANGE DISTANCE AND DIRECTION REPORTED MEASUREMENT) (LLD) , , . . MEASUREMENTS CLAMS GAMMA 6 (PCI/KG WET) K-40 N/A .,132S :1215 1375 24 INDICATOR 0

, -. A

.(414) ..(212)  ; (2/2) BARNEGAT BAY, (1140/1420) (1120/1310) (1340/1410) 2.1 MILESSEOFSITE

. -. .-2.

. 0 .. 17

. MN-54 '-130' ,'1IT 20 20 , 94:'.I:,CONTROL;' ;.:' 0 i(02) (O2) ' GREAT BAYIXITTLE EGG HARBOR

- (<131<21)

.,(04 (<14/<27) (<14/<27) 20.0 SSW OF SITE CO-58 130 21 25 25 94: .'- CONTROL

(0/4) a(0/2) (012) GREAT BAY/LITTLE EGG HARBOR

(<16/<28) (<16/<33) (<161<33) 20.0 SSW OF SITE CO-60 130 16. 17 17 ;94 CONTROL, 0

(0/4) (o02) (012) GREAT BAYILITTLE EGG HARBOR

(<14/<17) (<13/<21) (<13/<21) 20.0 SSW OF SITE

.. . . - - - -- , - FE-59 .. ~.

- - . -260 51 - 56 - '56 '. 94 . CONTROL- 0 (0/4) (0/2) (012) GREAT BAY/LITTLE EGG HARBOR

• I I1 , . e

(<34/<70) (<33/'9) (<33/f9) 20.0 SSW OF SITE-v

.- 260 ' 0 ZN-65 36 .. 35 38 23 INDICATOR (0/4) - . (0o2) (012) BARNEGAT BAY

(<32/<43), (<261<47) (<34/<43) 3.6 ENE OF SITE CS-134 . 130 14 17., 171, 94,. CONTROL 0

... .. . (0/4) .(o12)- - (012) --- GREAT BAY/LITTLE EGG HARBOR

(<11/<18) (<13/<22) (<131<22) 20.0 SSW OF SITE

--CS-137 . -,150, ', 17 ' . 18 . 18 I ' 94 CONTRo6 - ' ' 0 (0/4) - (012) (012) GREAT BAY/LITTLE EGG HARBOR

(<151<20) (<15/<22) (<151<22) 20.0 SSW OF SITE

• THE MEAN AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING BOTH THE MDAs AND THE POSITIVE VALUES FRACTION OF DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS AT SPECIFIED LOCATIONS IS INDICTED IN PARENTHESES (F)

TABLE A-1 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL

SUMMARY

FOR THE OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2002 Name of Facility: OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION DOCKETNUMBER: 50-219 Location of Facility: OCEAN COUNTY, NJ REPORTING PERIOD: 2002 INDICATOR CONTROL LOCATION WITIH HIGHEST ANNUAL MlEAN LOCATIONS LOCATION MEDIUM OR TYPES OF NUMBER OF REQUIRED MEANS MEANS MEANo STATION U NUMBER OF PATHWAY SAMPLED ANALYSES ANALYSES LOWER LIMIT (F) (F) (F) NAME NONROUTINE (UNIT OF PERFORMED PERFORMED OF DETECTION RANGE RANGE RANGE DISTANCE AND DIRECTION REPORTED MEASUREMENT) (LLD) MEASUREMENTS CRABS GAMMA I (PCI/KG WE) K-40 N/A 1520 N/A 1520 93 . INDICATOR 0 (1/l) (1/1) DISCHARGE CANAL (1520) (1520) 0.1 MILES WSW OF SITE MN-54 130 17. W/A 17 - 93 INDICATOR 0 (0/1) (0/1) DISCHARGE CANAL

(<17) (<17) 0.1 MILES WSW OF SITE CO-58 130 26 N/A 26 93 INDICATOR 0 (0/1) (0/1) DISCHARGE CANAL

(<26) (<26) 0.1 MILES WSW OF SITE CO-60 130 Is N/A 15 93 . , INDICATOR (Ott) (0/1) DISCHARGE CANAL

(<15) (<15) 0.1 MILES WSW OF SITE FE-59 260 - 81 N/A 81 93 INDICATOR 0I (0/1) (0/1) DISCHARGE CANAL

(<81) (<SI) 0. IMILES WSW OF SITE ..

ZN-65 260 36 N/A 36 93 INDICATOR 0 (0/1) (0/1) DISCHARGE CANAL

(<36) (<36) 0.I MILES WSW OF SITE CS 134 130 15 N/A is 93 INDICATOR 0 (0<1) (0/1) DISCHARGE CANAL

(<15) (<15) 0.1 MILES WSW OF SITE CS.137 150 17 N/A 17 ' 93 INDICATOR 0 (WI) (01) DISCHARGE CANAL

(<17) (<17) 0.1 MILES WSW OF SITE

• THE MEAN AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING BOTH THE MDAS AND THE POSITIVE VALUES FRACTION OF DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS AT SPECIFIED LOCATIONS IS INDICTED INPARENTHESES (F)

-~~ .:. e i  ; ;-. -s ... .I 4 -

I . . .

TABLE A-1 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL

SUMMARY

FOR THE OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2002 Name of Facility: OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION DOCKET NUMBER: 50.219 Location of Facility: OCEAN COUNTY, NJ REPORTING PERIOD: 2002 INDICATOR CONTROL . LOCATION VITHHIGHEST.ANNUAL MEAN LOCATIONS LOCATION,. ..... .

MEDIUM OR TYPES OF ,. NUMBER OF REQUIRED MEANS MEAN' MEAN* -STATION #- .N.- NMBER OF PATHWAY SAMPLED ANALYSES ANALYSES LOWER LIMIT (F) (F) (F) NAME NONROUTINE (UNIT OF PERFORMED PERFORMED OF DETECTION RANGE RANGE ' RANGE DISTANCE AND DIRECTION REPORTED MEASUREMENT) (LLD) .. . MEASUREMENTS SEDIMENT GAMMA 8  : .!

(PCI/KG DRY) K-40 N/A '6396 8290 ,9365 23. ,.INDICATOR' 0 (616) (2t2)  :(212) BARNEGAT BAY' (806/16300) (2580/14000) (2430/16300) 3.6 MILES ENE OF SITE

.; ....- i:' .......

MN.54 N/A ':11. '20' 20 I :94 CONTROL, 0 (016) '(0/2) (0/2) ;GREAT BAY/LITTLE EGG HARBOR

(<17/<22) (<17/<22) 20.0 SSW OF SITE CO-58 N/A 12 23 ' '23, '94' CONTROL 0 (0/6) (on) (0/2) GREAT BAY/LITTLE EGG HARBOR

(<6/<20) (<18/<28) (<18/<28) 20.0 SSW OF SITE CO-60 N/A 11: 18. : - '- '18 94 ' CONTROL' 0 (0/6) (0/2) (0/2) GREAT BAYILITTLE EGG HARBOR

(<5/<20) (<17/<20) (<17/<20) 20.0 SSW OF SITE

i. . . . . .

-1.. - - - - - - CS-134 - .150* 10 17- 17 ' 94-'- CONTROL 0O (0/6) (0/2) (0/2) GREAT BAYILITTILE EGG HARBOR

.111 . .,- II (<51<16) (<14/<20) (<141<20) 20.0 SSW OF SITE*.

. .-CS.137 180 13 20' 21..' 23 -INDICATOR 0 (2/6) (0o2) .' *(212) BARNEGAT BAY

(<626) (<16/<24)-. (16/26) 3.6 MILES ENE OF SITE

, 1 ., . I . , -

AIR PARTICULATE. - GROSS BETA - .' 364 .10 - 17 18 .' . 18  : 20 :,INDICATOR 0 (E-3 PCIJCU.METER) - -- - . '. --- -- (312/312) * . (S252)- -'- (S252)' FINNINGER FARM '

- 1.(7/35) , . (9/32) . .  : (9/34). 0.7 MILES E OF SITE i . SR-89  : 28  : NZA ' 2.7 - '

• 2.6 ' 3.2 66 INDICATOR 0 (0/24) (0/4) (0/4) OCGS DISCHARGE CANAL

(<0.2/<6.6) (<0.2< 5.5) (<0.V<6.6) 0.4 MILES SE OF SITE

• THE MEAN AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING BOTH THE MDAs AND THE POSITIVE VALUES FRACTION OF DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS AT SPECIFIED LOCATIONS ISINDICTED INPARENTHESES (F)

TABLE A-1 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL

SUMMARY

FOR THE OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2002 Name of Facility: OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION DOCKET NUMBER: 50-219 Location of Facility: OCEAN COUNTY, NJ REPORTING PERIOD: 2002 INDICATOR CONTROL LOCATION WITh HIGHEST ANNUAL MEAN LOCATIONS LOCATION MEDIUM OR TYPES OF NUMBER OF REQUIRED MEAN' MEAN* MEANO STATION # NUMBER OF PATHWAY SAMPLED ANALYSES ANALYSES LOWER LIMIT (F) (F) (F) NAME NONROUTINE (UNIT OF PERFORMED PERFORMED OF DETECTION RANGE RANGE RANGE DISTANCE AND DIRECTION REPORTED MEASUREMENT) (LLD) MEASUREMENTS SR-90 28 N/A 1.3 4.7 4.7 C CONTROL 0 (0/24) (0/4) (0/4) GPU ENERGY OFFICE

(<O.1/<4.4) (<0.11<15) (<0.11<15) 24.7 MILES NW OF SITE GAMMA 28 BE-7 N/A 71 64 79 20 INDICATOR 0 (24124) (4/4) (4/4) FINNINGER FARM (60/84) (58/67) (76/84) 0.7 MILES E OF SITE MN-54 N/A 0.4 0.3 0.5 66 INDICATOR 0 (0/24) (0/4) (0/4) OCGS DISCHARGE CANAL

(<0.21<1.0) (<0.2/<0.3) (<0.3/<1.0) 0.4 MILES SE OF SITE CO-58 N/A 0.5 0.4 0.6 66 INDICATOR 0 (0124) (014). (0/4) OCGS DISCHARGE CANAL

(<0.2/<1.3) (<0.2/<0.4) (<0.21<1.3) 0.4 MILES SE OF SITE CO-60 N/A 0.5 0.3 0.6 66 INDICATOR 0 (0/24) (0/4) (0/4) OCGS DISCHARGE CANAL

(<021<1.2) (<0.3/<0.5) (<0.41<1.2) 0.4 MILES SE OF SITE CS. 34 50 0.4 0.3 0.5 66 INDICATOR 0 (0124) (0/4) (0/4) OCGS DISCHARGE CANAL

(<0.2/<0.8) (<0.2/<0.3) (<0.3/<0.8) 0.4 MILES SE OF SITE CS-137 60 0.4 0.3 0.5 66 INDICATOR 0 (0/4) (0/4) (0/4) OCGS DISCHARGE CANAL

(<0.1/<0.9) (<0.2/<0.3) (<0.2/<0.9) 0.4 MILES SE OF SITE AIR IODINE 1.131 364 70 8 7.- 10 72 INDICATOR 0 (E,3 PCIICU.METER) (01312) (0/52) (0152) LACEY ROAD

(<1/<119) (<1/<36) (<2/<119) 1.9 MILES NNE OF SITE

• THE MEAN AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING BOTH THE MDAs AND THE POSITIVE VALUES FRACTION OF DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS AT SPECIFIED LOCATIONS ISINDICTED INPARENTHESES (F)

TABLE A-I RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL

SUMMARY

FOR THE OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2002 Name of Facility: OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION DOCKET NUMBER: 50-219 Location of Facility: OCEAN COUNTY, NJ REPORTING PERIOD: 2002 INDICATOR CONTROL LOCATION WITH HIGHEST ANNUAL MEAN LOCATIONS LOCATION MEDIUM OR TYPES OF NUMBER OF REQUIRED MEAN' MEAN MEAN' STATION #. . NUMBER OF PATHWAY SAMPLED ANALYSES ANALYSES LOWER LIMIT (F) (F) (F) NAME NONROUTnNE (UNIT OF PERFORMED PERFORMED OF DETECTION RANGE RANGE RANGE DISTANCE AND DIRECTION REPORTED MEASUREMEIN) (LLD)  ; .* . MEASUREMENTS VEGETATION SR-89 16 N/A 23 14 1 32 - . 35*.:' INDICATOR 0 (PCI/KG WET) - 0/9), (0/7) (014) OCGS DISCHARGE CANAL

(<3/<64) (<7/<25) -(<12/<64) 0.4 MILES ESE OF SITE SR-90 16 N/A 32 6.8 41 .35.. ;.:-INDICATOR 0 (7/9) . (7/7) (314) *OCGS DISCHARGE CANAL 1 .

(31121) (3fl2) (<3/84) 0.4 MILES ESE OF SITE

. :3.. -

GAMMA 16 K-40 N/A 2804 ,4340 4340 35 'INDICATOR 0

6(9/9) (717) (717) -OCGS DISCHARGE CANAL (1640/4030) (279016860) (2790/6860) ) 0.4 MILES ESE OF SITE 1.131 60 .1 358S 168 467 35 INDICATOR 0 (0/9)- t (0/7) '(014) OCGS DISCHARGE CANAL

(<28/<1150) (<23/<400) (<62/<1150) 0.4 MILES ESE OF SITE CS-134 60 .26 - 11 33 35 INDICATOR 0 (0/9) (0/7) (0/4) OCGS DISCHARGE CANAL

(<7/<49) (<6/<22) (<181<49) 0.4 MILES ESE OF SITE CS-137 80s 30 II. . 37 35 I INDICATOR a (2/9). (07) . (1/4) OCGS DISCHARGE CANAL

(<9/<47) (<6/<23) (281<47) 0.4 MILES ESE OF SITE DIRECT RADIATION TLD-QUARTERLY 174 N/A 12.4 12.7 19.9 55 INDICATOR O' (vILLI-ROENTGEN/STD.QUARTER'. ' (166/166) (8/N) (4/4) OCGS SWITCHYARD (6.7M2I.6) (11.0/14.8) (I 8.421.6) 0.3 MILES W OF SITE

• THE MEAN AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING BOTH THE MDAs AND THE POSITIVE VALUES FRACTION OF DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS AT SPECIFIED LOCATIONS ISINDICTED INPARENTHESES (F)

APPENDIX B LOCATION DESIGNATION, DISTANCE & DIRECTION, AND SAMPLE COLLECTION & ANALYTICAL METHODS

TABLE B-1: Location Designation and Identification System for the Oyster Creek Generating Station Sample Medium APT = Air Particulate Clam = Clam AlO = Air Iodine TLD = Thermoluminescent

\WA = Well Water Dosimetry VEG = Vegetation Fish = Fish SWA = Surface Water Crab = Crab AQS = Aquatic Sediment Station Code Station's Designation Distance Distance from the OCGS in miles Azimuth Azimuth with respect to the OCGS in degrees Description - Meteorological sector that the station is located and a narrative description B-1

TABLE B-2: Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program - Sampling Locations, Distance and Direction, Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2002 . . ..

Sample Station Distance*-,- Azimuth

... I I~

TLD 1 . 0.4 i - 219 SW of site at OCGS Fire Pond, Forked River. NJ WWA 0.1 209 On-site southern domestic well at OCGS, Forked River, NJ On-site northern domestic well at OCGS, Forked

02., 349 River, NJ APT, AIOTLD 3 , 6.0 . . 97 East of site, near old Coast Guard Station, Island Beach State Park TLD 6 6*, 2.1 , 13 NNE of site, Lane Place, behind St. Pius Church, Forked River, NJ iD 8 - 23 - 17.7 South of site, Route 9 at the Waretown Substation, Waretown, NJ TLD 9 2.0, 230 SW of she, where Route 532 and the Garden State Parkway meek Waretown. NJ APT, AIO, TLD C 24.7 313 NW of site, GPU Energy office In rear parking lot, Cookstown, NJ-TLD 11 8.2 152 SSE of site, 80" and Anchor Streets, Harvey Cedars, NJ

-TLD , '4 , i20.8 22 North of site, Larrabee Substation on Randolph Road, Lakewood, NJ APT,.AIO s 20 , 0.7 95 East of site, on Firinger Farm on south side of access road.

Forked River, NJ TLD 22 ,21.6 145 SE of she, on Long Silver Way, Skippers Cove, Waretown, NJ

-SWACLAMAS - 23 3.6 64 ENE of site, Bamegat Bay off Stouts Creek, approximately 400 yards SE of 'Flashing Light 1 SWA.CLAM.AQS 24 2.1 101 East of site, Bamegat Bay, approximately 250 yards SE of

'Flashing Light 3 SWA. ACS, FISH 33 04 123 ESE of site, east of Route 9 Bridge In OCGS Discharge Canal 1 ! - .

VEG . 35 -. 0.4 111 ESE of site, east of Route 9 and north of the OCGS Discharge Canal, Forked River, NJ VEG 36 ;23.1 319 NW of she, at 'U-Pick7 Farm, New Egypt. NJ WWA, 37 , 2.2 18 NNE of Site, off Boox Road at Lacey MUA Pumping Station, Forked River, NJ WVA . 38 1.6 197 SSW of Site, on Route 532, at Ocean Township MUA Pumping Station, Waretown, NJ TLD 51 04 358 North of she, on the access road to Forked River site, Forked River, NJ TLD 52 - 0.3 333

• NNW of site, on the access road to Forked River site, Forked River, NJ

-B-2

TABLE B-2: Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program -Sampling Locations, Distance and Direction, Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2002 Sample Station Distance Azimuth Madlum np-mlriptin TLD 53

• 0.3 309 NW of site, at sewage lift station on the access road to the Forked River site. Forked River, NJ 0.3 TLD 54 0.3 288 WNW of site, on the access road to Forked River site, Forked River, NJ TLD 55 0.3 263 West of site, on Southern Area Stores security fence, west of OCGS Switchyard. Forked River, NJ TLD 56 0.3 249 WSW of site, on utility pole east of Southern Area Stores, west of the OCGS Switchyard. Forked River, NJ TLD 57 0.2 206 SSW of site, on Southern Area Stores access road, Forked River, NJ TLD 58 0.2 188 South of site, on Southern Area Stores access road, Forked River, NJ TLD 59 0.3 166 SSE of site, on Southern Area Stores access road, Waretown, NJ TLD 61 0.3 104 ESE of site, on Route 9 south of OCGS Main Entrance, Forked River, NJ TLD 62 0.2 83 East of site, on Route 9 at access road to OCGS Main Gate, Forked River, NJ TLD 63 0.2 70 ENE of site, on Route 9, between main gate and OCGS North Gate access road. Forked River, NJ TLD 64 0.3 48 NE of site, on Route 9 at entrance to Finninger Farm, Forked River, NJ TLD 65 0.4 19 NNE of site, on Route 9 at Intake Canal Bridge, Forked River, NJ APT. AIO, TLD. 66 0.4 133 SE of site, east of Route 9 and south of the OCGS Discharge VEG Canal, inside fence, Waretown, NJ TLD 68 1.3 265 West of site, on Garden State Parkway at mile marker 71.7.

Lacey Township. NJ APT, A1O, TLD 71 1.6 164 SSE of site, on Route 532 at the Waretown Municipal Building, Waretown, NJ APT, AIO, TLD 72 1.9 25 NNE of site, on Lacey Road at Knights of Columbus Hall, Forked River, NJ APT, AMO. TnD 73 1.8 108 ESE of site, on Bay Parkway, Sands Point Harbor, Waretown, NJ TLD 74 1.8 88 East of site, Orlando Drive and Penguin Court, Forked River, NJ TLD 75 2.0 71 ENE of site, Beach Blvd. and Maul Drive, Forked River, NJ TLD 78 1.8 2 North of site, 1514 Arient Road, Forked River, NJ B-3

TABLE B-2: Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program 2 Sampling Locations, Distance and Direction, Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2002 Sample Station Distance., Azimuth MPdlouom_ ' rWag mesal nDedic T.D . . . .79 160 SSE of site, Hightide Drive and Bonita Drive. Waretown, NJ TLD 81 ' 3.5 201 SSW of site, on rose Hill Road at Intersection with Bamegat Boulevard, Barnegat. NJ TIJ)

• 82 -4.4> 36 NE of site, Bay Way and Clairmore Avenue, Lanoka Harbor,

.. I NJ  ;

' 84 4.4 332 NNW of site. on Lacey Road. 1.3 miles west of the Garden State Parkway on siren'pole, Lacey TLI) Township, NJ.

3..

85 .,.3.9 - 250 WSW of site, on Route 532. just east of Wells Mills Park, Waretown. NJ TLD 86. .0 224 SW of site, on Route 554,1 mile west of the Garden State Parkway. Barnegat, NJ TLD 88 6.6 125 SE of site, eastern end of 3M Street. Bamegat Light, NJ TLD. 89 61 - 108 ESE of she, Job Francis residence. Island Beach State Park 90 6.3 75 ENE of site, parking lot A-5. Island Beach State Park TLD,,

TLD 92 9.0 46 NE of site, at Guard ShackIToll Booth. Island Beach State Park -.

FISH, CRAB 93 .0.1 242 WSW of sie, OCGS Discharge Canal between Pump Discharges and Route 9, Forked River. NJ SWvA, 'aS.CLAM,. 94; 20.0i 198 SSW of site, In Great Bay/Little Egg Harbor FISH 98 292 WNW of site, on Garden State Parkway at mile marker 72.3.

1.3 ' Lacey Township, NJ TLO 99 -1.5 _ 310 NW of site'ori Garden State Parkway at mile marker 72.8, Lacey Township, NJ I TLD 'TI 219 SW of site, at OCGS Fire Pond, Forked River, NJ

' 4,

,. . , - . e  : , . ;..' - ..

... I I

4

. I f .

. 1

. ,, i i I -- _ .. ,

B4

TABLE B33: Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program - Summary of Sample Collection and Analytical Methods, Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2002 Sample Analysis Sampling Method Collection Procedure Number Sample Size Analytical Procedure Number Medium Surface Water Gamma Spectroscopy Grab Sample. 2120-IMP-4522.06 Oyster Creek sample 1 gallon TBE, PRO-042-5 Determination of gamma emitting collection procedure - surface water radioisotopes RMC-ER5 Collection of water samples for Env. Inc., GS-01 Determination of gamma emitters by radiological analysis (Oyster Creek Generating gamma spectroscopy Station)

Surface Water Tribum Grab Sample. 2120-IMP-4522.06 Oyster Creek sample 1 gallon TBE. PRO-052-35 Determination of tritium in water by liquid collection procedure - surface water scintillation RMCER5 Collection of water samples for Env. Inc.. T-02 Determination of tntium in water (direct radiological analysis (Oyster Creek Generating method)

Station)

Well Water Gamma Spectroscopy Monthly samples 2120-IMP-4522.10 Oyster Creek sample 1 gallon TSE, PRO-042-5 Determination of gamma emitting composited quarterly. collection procedure - well water radioisotopes Env. Inc.. GS-01 Determination of gamma emitters by gamma soectroseovY Well Water Tritium Monthly samples 21204IMP-4522.10 Oyster Creek sample 1 gabon TeE, PRO-052-35 Determination of tritium in water by liquid composited quarterly. collection procedure - well water scintillation Env. Inc., T-02 Determination of tritium in water (direct

. method}

Fish Gamma Spectroscopy Semi-annual samples 2120-DMP-4522.14 Oyster Creek sample 1000 grams (wet) TBE, PRO-042-5 Determination of gamma emitting collected via hook and collection procedure - fish radioisotopes line technique and traps RMC-ER5 Collection of fish samples for Env. Inc., GS-01 Determination of gamma emitters by radiological analysis (Oyster Creek Generating gamma spectroscopy

__ _____ __ __ ___ __ ___ __ __ ___ __ __ Sttitionn)___

)__ __ __ ___ __ ___ __ __ ____Sta ___ __ __

Clams and Gamma Spectroscopy Semi-annual and annual 21204MP-4522.16 Oyster Creek sample 1000 grams (wet) TBE, PRO-042-5 Determination of gamma emitting Crabs samples collected using collection procedure - clams and crabs radioisotopes clam tongs and traps.

RMC-ER6 Collection of fish samples for Env. Inc., GS-01 Determination of gamma emitters by radiological analysis (Oyster Creek Generating gamma spectroscopy Station)

Sediment Gamma Spectroscopy Semi-annual grab 2120-IMP-452Z03 Oyster Creek collection 1000 grams (dry) TBE, PRO-042-5 Determination of gamma emitting samples - procedure - aquatic sediment radioisotopes RMC-ER7 Collection of sediment samples for Env. Inc., GS-01 Determination of gamma emitters by radiological analysis (Oyster Creek Generating gamma spectroscopy I Station)

B-5

.I TABLE B-3: Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program - Summary of Sample Collection and Analytical Methods, Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2002 It Sample Analysis Sampling Method Collection Procedure Number Sample Size Analytical Procedure Number Medium Air Particulates Gross Beta One week composite of 2120-IMP.4522.05 Oyster Creek sample 1filter (approximately TiE. PRO-032-10 Gross beta andlor alpha activity In air continuous air sampling collection procedure - air particulate and air - . 700 cubic meters particulate filters (direct count method) through glass fiber filter Iodine

• weeky) paper Env. Inc., AP-02 Determination of gross alpha and/or gross

.___ _ . beta In air particulate filters Air Particulates Gamma Spectroscopy. Quarterly composite of 2120-IMP-4522.05 OysterCreek sample 13 filters ' TiE. PRO-042-5 Determination of gamma emitting each station collection procedure - air particulate and air (approxmimtely 9100X' radiolsotopes Iodine .. cubic meters) -

-.Env. inc., GS-01 Determination of gamma emitters by

.. ._ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ .. _ _ __ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ oam ma snectrosco ny Air Particulates Strontium-89190 . Quarterly composite of . 2120-lMP 4522.05 Oyster Creek sample - 13 filters - - T8E. PRO-032-24R Determination of radlostrontium In'>

each station collection procedure - Air particulate and air (ipproxdmat*y 9100 comnposited air particulate filters

. ._._-_._:_- I

_lodine - cubic meters)

Air Iodine Gamma Specroscopy. One-week composite of 2120-iMP4522.05 Oyster Creek sample 1filter (approximately TBE. PRO-042-5 Determinaton of gamma emitting

continuous air sampling collection procedure - air particitiat and air 700 cubic meters redibisotopes*

. .throughcharcoal filter lodlne - .eekly ) *n

. _____._________.__.__.__.__ .-  :: J . cntersbvamma soeitrscoov (batchimethod)

Vegetation Gamma Spectroscopy. Grab sample during - 21204MP.4522.04 Oyster Creek sample '10D0 grams TBE0 PROa42-5 Determination of gamma emittng

. growing season. . collection procedure - food products and. radioisotopes broadleaf vegetables

. . .  : St. .i-8:9-Grab .. -Env. Inc., GS-01 Determination of gamma emitters by Vegetation StronUum-89/90 Grab sample during  : 2120-IMP-4522.04 Oyster Creek sample 1000 grams .

growing season. collection procedure - food products and feedstiff and forage  :

.._ _._.__. broadleaf etables  :-- .

TLD Thermoluminescence Quarterly TLDs 2120-IMP4522.02 Oyster Creek sample 2 dosimeters ICN Pharmaceutical.

. Dosimetry . comprised of two collection procedure-Tharmoluminescent

. Panasonic 814 - - Doilmetry .

(containing 3 each

_ _ .__ CaSOj elements) . -_._.

. I 13-6

Figure B-i1 Oyster CreekGenerating Station (OCGS)

Locations of Radioiogical Eniironmental MIonitO.ng'Pogra' (HEMP Staions withinnho miles ofthe OCGS E3-7

"T <0.*

I t  ; *e t,

• I Oyster. Crek Generating Station (OCGS).

Locaiiois ofRadio~ gi& Bwiinnwntal Monitong Program (EMIP)

Stafions greater tItn 2 miles'fnm the 0 CGS B-8

' . ' , .. x ,' .. ... .. , , .:  ; . ;:  ! ' .  :

. *  ? 4 en  ;  ? S- \ S

h. '  ? A,

. , L _ . _ ,, ,. , ,,, a, . - > . h _ . . . -

.. , . . , r . . . .

, . v .

• *-  ; ' Cat'  ;:

.- -- APPENDIX C  ;

DATA TABLES PRIMARY LABORATORY

TABLE C-1.1 CONCENTRATIONS OF TRITIUM IN SURFACE WATER SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2002 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER *2 SIGMA COLLECTION 23 24 33 94 PERIOD JAN < 113 < 113 FEB < 94 < 94 MAR < 98 < 99 APR. < 102 < 101 138 +/- 65 114 +/- 63 MAY < 106 < 107 JUN 95 +/- 60 < 95 JUL 160 +/- 83 207 +/- 84 AUG 195 +/- 77 196 +/- 79 SEP < 162 327 +/- 87 < 121 125 +/- 77 OCT < 159 < 169 NOV < 183 < 189 DEC < 194 < 191 MEAN* 132 +/- 85 214 +/- 320 138 +/- 78 142 +/- 89

• THE MEAN AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING BOTH THE MDA AND POSITIVE VALUES C-1

TABLE C-1.2 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS INSURFACE WATER SAMPLES COLLECTED INTHE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2002 I. .

RESULTS INUNITS OF PCI/LITER +/- 2 SIGMA STC COLLECTION - Mn-54 . Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 .Zn-65 - Zr-95 Nb-95 Cs-i 34 Cs-137 Ba-140 La-140 PERIOD 23 JAN FEB MAR . 4 APR <4 <(5 <' 10 (4 -< 9 . .; <4 <41 < 14 MAY JUN .- 2 .

'JUL

~AUG  ;. .< 2

'I

-SEP (2 -' 3 ,;c k2 ('<5 'C-5 <c4 3. '(10

.' I OCT NOV . .T '. -' -

. I. .

.1 . .1 DEC'3 r.

C. -

MEAN^ 3 i33 4-k 3 8-

• 5 3-+/- 3 ,7, 7 6 +/- 4 5 +/- 3 .3 3 3; +/- 3 36:+/- 12 12 +/- 6

t. 24 JAN FEB MAR . I6I APR (4 (5 ' 11 (4 < 10 <8 c6 <4 <4 <45 - < 15 MAY JUN JUL AUG .4 -

SEP 2 <2 '5 <2 (4 <4 <3 <2 <2 < 27 <9 11 . I OCT NOV DEC-MEAN* .3.

3.3 . 4 +/- 4 -. 8.+/-.8 . 3 +/- 4. 7 +/- 9 6 +/- 7 4 +/- 4 3 +/- 4 3 +/- 3 36 +/- 26 12 +/- 9 EN . . . I AR .U . E M . A A. D P V . .

• THE MEAN AND 2STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING BOTH THE MDAAND POSITIVEVALUES

TABLE C-1.2 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN SURFACE WATER SAMPLES COLLECTED INTHE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2002 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER +/- 2 SIGMA STC COLLECTION Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Zr-95 Nb-95 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-140 La-140 PERIOD e a 33 JAN <3 e3 <4 2 8 A <4 <3 <4 < 15 <2 FEB <3 <2 <6 <3 <4 <6 <3 <3 <2 < 11 <2 MAR <5 <5 <8 <6 < 10 < 11 <6 <8 <5 < 11 <3 APR <6 <6 <12 <5 < 12 <c9 <6 <6 <6 < 29 <9 MAY <5 <5 <12 <5 < 11 <9 <6 <5 <7 < 40 < 13 JUN <6 <6 <11 <5 < 12 <9 <6 <6 <6 <26 <8 JUL <4 <4 <9 <4 <8 <8 <5 <4 <4 <26 <8 AUG <3 <4 <8 <3 <7 <6 <4 <3 <4 < 24 <7 SEP <2 <2 <4 c 1 <3 <3 <2 <1 <2 < 17 <6 OCT < 0.9 41 c2 40.9 c2 <2 <1 <0.9 < 0.9 < 10 <3 NOV <2 <2 <6 <2 <4 <4 <2 <2 <2 <21 <7 DEC <2 <2 <9 <3 <8 <3 <2 <2 <2 < 11 <3 MEAN* 3 3 3 3 7 +/- 6 3 3 7 +/- 7 6 +/- 6 4 4 4 4 4 4 20 +/- 18 6 +/- 7 JAN <2 <1 <6 <3 <5 <4 <3 <3 <4 <18 <2 FEB <4 <4 <6 <4 <4 <6 <3 <3 <5 <22 <3 MAR <3 <4 <8 <3 <8 <6 <6 <4 <4 <30 <7 APR <6 <6 <12 <5 <13 <10 <6 <7 <6 <30 <9 MAY <3 <3 <7 <3 <6 <6 <4 <3 <3 <26 <9 JUN <6 <6 <12 <6 <14 <10 <6 '7 <6 <30 <9 JUL <4 <5 <10 <4 <9 <8 <5 <4 <4 <26 <9 AUG '6 <7 <14 <6 <15 <11 <7 <6 <6 <38 <13 SEP <2 <2 <5 <2 <4 <3 <2 <2 <2 < 18 <6 OCT <4 <4 <10 <4 <8 <9 <5 <3 <4 <43 <13 NOV < 1 <1 <2 < 1 <2 <2 <1 <0.9 <1 <10 <3 DEC <2 <2 <5 <2 <4 <4 <3 <2 '2 <16 <5 MEAN' 4 +/- 4 4 +/- 4 8 i 7 4 +/- 3 8 +/- 9 7 +/- 6 4 +/- 4 4 +/- 4 4 3 26 t 19 7 +/- 7

' THE MEAN AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING BOTH THE MDA AND POSITIVE VALUES

TABLE C-11.1 CONCENTRATIONS OF TRITIUM IN WELL WATER SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2002 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PC/LITER i 2 SIGMA COLLECTION 1 a 37 - 38 -

. ,4 ,' j . . . . .

PERIOD JAN - MAR 131 +/- 55 < 86 < 86 APR - JUN < 98 < 97 < 97 JUL -SEP, < 131 'c 133 166 +/- 86 OCT - DEC  ; < 151 . .< 178 < 178

.A . .1 44 MEAN' 128 :t 44 124

• 83 132 94 .

X . 'I 9..

I I .

I I

1.

I.- *. ¶4 -

I .

-S4 *

.I'.

4.. 5, V

l ' . -; I- ., I

I . ..  :

^ THE MEAN AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING BOTH THE MDA AND POSITIVE VALUES C-4

TABLE C-11.2 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN WELL WATER SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2002 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER + 2 SIGMA STC COLLECTION Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 CO-60 Zn-65 Zr-95 Nb-95 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-140 La-140 PERIOD 1 JAN FEB <5 <4 <5 <4 <5 <10 <4 <3 <4 <14 <5 MAR APR <3 <3 <8 <3 <6 <6 <4 <3 <3 <23 MAY JUN JUL <5 <5 <11 <5 <11 <9 <6 <6 <5 <-40 < 13 AUG SEP OCT 31 <1 < 3 c3 <2 < 3 6 c31 1 3 c 13 < 4 NOV DEC C0 in MEAN* 3 +/- 3 4 +/- 3 7 i 7 3 i 3 6 +/- 7 7 i 6 4 +/- 4 3 +/- 4 4 i 3 22 +/- 25 8 +/- 8 37 JAN FEB <2 <2 <5 <2 <4 <7 <3 <4 <2 < 17 MAR APR <4 c5 <10 <4 <9 <8 <5 <4 <4 <31 < 11 MAY JUN JUL <6 <6 <13 <5 <13 <10 <7 <5 <6 <45 <.15 AUG SEP OCT <3 <3 <8 <3 <6 <6 <4 <2 <3 <34 <12 NOV DEC MEAN* 4 +/-3 4 +/- 4 9 +/-7 4 +/- 3 8 +/-8 8 t 4 5 +/- 4 4 t 3 4 +/- 3 32 +/- 23 10 +/- 10

• THE MEAN AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING BOTH THE MDA AND POSITIVE VALUES

TABLE C-11.2 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS INWELL WATER SAMPLES COLLECTED INTHE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2002 C A RESULTS INUNITS OF PCI/LITER

• 2 SIGMA STC COLLECTION Mn-54 Co-58 P0 F-59 CO-60 Zn-65 Zr-95 Nb-95 Cs-I134 Cs-i 37 Ba-140 La-140

- .PERIOD 38 'JAN FEB <4 .. (3 . < 6. (

c4 .<4( <10 <(5 (15.. (6 -

MAR

'APR <3 *. (<7 <6 <4 4 ... (-c3 - < 3, (24 MAY -- I 34 4 < 7< I t

,JUN! 5 -. ( 5I

,<4 ;3cj 0 8 (.c 35 - ' < 11

!AUG SEP OCT <17 <2 <(4 <C2 <1 < I -, <1I' < 14 <(4 DEC MEAN* 3*3 3*3 7*3 3*+/-2 6*+/-5 6+/-i6 4*+/-4 .3*+/-3 :4*+/-'3 22 .+/- 19 7*+/-6

.I .. ' I %.' .__ - -

THE MEAN AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING BOTH THE MDA AND POSmTVE VALUES

TABLE C-111.1 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN PREDATOR & BOTTOM FEEDER (FISH)

SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2002 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/KG WET +/- 2 SIGMA STC COLLECTION K-40 Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-S0 Zn-65 Cs-134 Cs-137 PERIOD 93 PREDATOR 04115 -- 04/15/02 4650 +/- 344 c 17 < 18 ( 40 < 16 < 41 < 14 < 17 04/15 -- 04/15102 4040 +/- 306 < 14 < 17 < 41 < 15 ( 34 < 13 < 16 09/10 09/10/02 4750 +/- 421 < 12 < 15 < 43 < 11 < 27 < 11 < 11 09111 09/11/02 4090 i 438 <29 < 42 < 102 <25 <68 < 28 <29 09/12 09/12/02 5900 i 486 < 25 < 36 - 90 < 24 < 56 (21 <25 MEAN* 4686 i 1501 19 +/- 14 26 +/- 25 63 +/- 60 18 +/- 12 45 +/- 34 18 +/- 14 20 +/- 14 93 BOTTOM FEEDER 04)18 - 04/18/02 3480 +/- 724 < 52 (54 < 142 (53 < 109 < 44 < 52 09/12 09/12102 4940 +/- 481 < 14 (20 < 54 < 14 < 33 < 13 < 15 MEAN* 4210 +/- 2065 33 +/- 53 37 +/- 49 98 +/- 125 33 +/- 56 71 +/- 108 29 +/- 43 33 +/- 53 94 PREDATOR 10/04 - 10/04/02 3770 +/- 298 < 16 <21 <61 < 15 (37 < 14 < 15 10/04 - -10/04/02 5530 +/- 447 (25 < 34 '85 < 24 < 57 < 22 < 24 10/04 - 10/04/02 4380 +/- 377 < 10 < 13 < 35 < 10 c 22 < 10 < 10 10104 - 10/04/02 4630 t 823 < 48 <72 < 205 <48 c 109 < 49 < 56 MEAN* 4578 +/- 1461 25 +/- 33 35 +/- 53 97 +/- 150 24 +/- 34 56 t 76 24 +/- 35 27 +/- 42

• THE MEAN AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING BOTH THE MDA AND POSITIVE VALUES

- I .~. . . , .I . . * , , . ; , - I I . I .. . I -, .

TABLE C-111.2 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN CLAM AND CRAB SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2002 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/KG WET t 2 SIGMA STC COLLECTION K.40 Mn-54 Co 58 Fe-59 Co-60 Z1-65 Cs-134 Cs-137 PERIOD 23 CLAMS 04116 - 04116102 1420

• 220 < 16 < 16 <40 < 16 < 34 < 14 < 16 09/10 - 09110102 --, 1140

• 292 -- ,< 21 <28 70 <17 <43  : < 18 < 20 MEAN-

~s

-- 1280U

--- -^ --

+/- J9

-^ . _

1W +/- I 22 +/- 16 55 +/-*41 16

• 2 38 t*13 - 16 +/- 6 18

• 5

-24 CLAMS, -**.,- .

04116--.04/16102 '1410 t 238 < 13 < 16 ( 34 *< 14 (32 *< 11 < 15 09/10 -,09110/02 -. 1340-t 255.-- ,, j <17 ,< 22 . <62 <(16 , (6 36. , <15 7. i< 16 MEAN' :1375*99-, - -15 +/- 4 19 +/- 9 . 48 +/- 40 15 +/- 3 -:' 34

• 6 13 *5 16 1

. . .. . ,1 . st . , .; I . .

94 CLAMS 04/17 -'04117/02 1310

• 210 < 14 - <16 (33 < 13 s- 26 c 13 (.15 09112 '09112102 1120 t.250 * <27  :: <33  : <(79 <.21 < 47" <-22 <22

(-

MEAN* -:1215 +/- 269 . 20* 19 25 +/- 24 56 +/- 65 17 +/- 11' 36 +/- 30 17

• 12 18

• 10

~~

... .. . . . . I . I 93 CRABS 04118 - 04118/02 1520

• 236 , 17 <26 <81 < 15 - ( 36 ( 15 < 17 I . j . ,. . -

-..  :., .. " . . 1,

. '.. " - - - I -1 '- - I - .. I - I - ... - -- - I- - - ' . - ... -

t -. I- -. -- *- . . 2. '

.. ., . I - , . : . . , .

, 1.  ; ".' " I -' i. I ; . ' - ., ' - '- " '  :! .. .. . . ., . w . .

T h .E M A A 2 , D EiA ' N: V T IO , , , A , C A L C U L A T E D' -US I N . I , ' M,- A A P O t , I . ', . .

• THE MEAN AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING BOTH THE MDA AND POSlTIVE VALUES

TABLE C-IV.1 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS INSEDIMENT SAMPLES COLLECTED INTHE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2002 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/KG DRY +/- 2 SIGMA STC COLLECTION Be-7 K-40 Mn-54 CO-58 Co-60 Cs-1 34 Cs-137 PERIOD 23 04/16/02 ' 131 2430 +/- 227 < 13 < 13 < 13 < 11 16 +/- 10 09/10/02 < 182 16300 +/- 455 < 18 < 20 < 20 < 16 26 i 17 MEAN' - 157 +/- 72 9365 +/- 19615 16 +/- 8 17 +/- 9 168- 9 13 t 7 21 +/- 15 24 04/16/02 < 98 806 +/- 148 ( 10 < 11 < 10 9 < 10 09/11/02 < 96 14600 +/- 455 (9 < 10 ' 8- < 10 MEAN* 97 t 3 7703 +/- 19508 10 +/- 2 10 +/- 1 9 +/-2 9 +/-2 10 +/- 0 33 04/16/02 < 113 2990 +/- 211 ( 12 < 12 < 11 < 11 < 12 09/11/02 < 57 1250 t 222 <6 (6 (5 <5 <6 MEAN* 85 +/- 79 2120 +/- 2461 9 +/-8 9 +/- 10 8 +/-8 8 +/-8 9 i 10 94 04/17/02 < 162 14000 +/- 420 (c 17 < 18 < 17 < 14 < 16 09/12/02 ( 280 2580 t 366 < 22 < 28 < 20 < 20 < 24 MEAN* 221+/-t 167 8290 +/- 16150 20 i7 23 t 14 18 +/- 4 17 +/- 8 20 +/- 10

• THE MEAN AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING BOTH THE MDA AND POSITIVE VALUES

TABLE C-V.1 CONCENTRATIONS OF GROSS BETA IN AIR PARTICULATE SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2002 RESULTS IN UNITS OF E-3 PCI/CU METER +/- 2 SIGMA .

GROUP I _.

GROUP II 7IRGRC)UP [if WEEK 20 66 71 7-7 73 - C, m

28 t 1 25 +/- 1 27 +/- 1 21 +/- 1 Z4 t I 2b +/- 1 27+/-1 2 24 +/-2 26 +/- 3 25 +/- 2 .28 2 26 2 27+/- 2 26 +/- 2 3 25 +/- 2 32 +/- 3 25

• 2 25 i2 25 +/-2 27+/- 2 25 +/- 2 4 17 +/-2 12 +/- I 15 +/- 2 17 +/- 2 15 +/-2 16+/- 2 15 2 5 19 +/-2 19 +/- 2 21 +/- 2 19 +/- 2 17 2: .18+/- 2 19 +/-2 6 29 +/-2 28 +/- 2 26 2 '26'+/- 2 19'+/- 2 '28 +/- 2 28 +/-2 7 17 +/- 2 16 +/- 2 17

• 2 15 +/- 2 ,16 +/- 2 15 +/- 2 16+/-2 8 18 I 2 .17

• 2 -18 t 2 .,18 +/- 2 16+/-2 18+/- 2 15 2 9 19 +/- 2 19 *2 17

• 2 '19 +/- 2 17 +/-2 19+/-2 18 +/- 2 10 26 +/-2 27 +/-2 25 t2 24 2. 24 2 24+/-2 26 +/-2 11 16 +/-2 16 +/- 2 17 t 2 16 t2 23 +/-2 16 2 16 +/-2 12 20

• 2 20 +/-2 19

• 2 20 +/-2 20 t 2 21 2 20 t2 13 14 +/-2 14 +/-2 13 t 2 :15'+/- 1 13 +/-1 15 1 15 +/- 1 14 15 +/- 2 16 +/-2 16 2' 14 +/- 2 16 2 14 +/- 2 .16 +/-2 15 16 +/- 2 14 +/- 2 14 t 1 14 +/- 2 13 +/-1 14 2 13 +/- 1 16 19 +/- 2 .17 +/- 2 '19 t 2 19 +/- 2 .16 +/-2 18 2 18 2 17 15 +/- 2 15 +/- 2 14 t 2 15 +/- 2 15 t 2 11 +/- I 13 2 18 15 +/-2 14 +/- 2 12 11 14 +/- 2 14 +/-1 14 2 15 +/-2 19 15 +/-2 15 +/- 2 15 t 2 13 +/- 2 15 2 13 1 12 2 20 15 +/-2 14 +/- 2 15 +/- 2 '13 +/- 2 13 +/-2 , .:13 I 10 1 21 12 11 12 +/- 2 .12 I1 12 +/- 1 12 +/-.1 .11 +/-F1 10 +/- 1 22 17 +/- 2 17 2: 18 t+/-2 30 +/- 15 18 +/--2 16+/-2 17 +/- 2 23 10 +/- 1 11 +/- 2 10 t I 10 +/- 2 9 I1 .9 1 .10 1 24 9 1 .10 +/-2 10 t 1 .9 +/-1 10 1 * .9+/-i1. 8 11 25 15 +/- 1 15 +/- 2 15 +/- 1 14 11 -15 t 1 17 1 17 2 26 18 +/-2 16 +/- 2 17 +/- 2 18 t 2 16 +/-2 18 +/- 2 16 +/- 2 27 34 3 29 +/- 3 29't 2 .35.+/- 3 28 2 32 3 29 +/-3 28 14 +/- 2 15 +/- 2 18 ' 2 15 t 2 14 2 15 +/- 2 15 +/-2 29 24 +/-2 25 +/-2 23 +/- 2 25 +/-2 22 *2 26 +/- 2 24 +/-2 30 11 +/- 2 12 +/-2 13 t 2 12 +/-2 10

• 2 14 2 13 2 31 25 +/-2 23 +/-2 27 +/- 2 :25 +/-2 23 2 28 t2 25 +/- 2 32 14 11 14 *2 13 I1 14 I1 13 1. 14 1 13 11 33 21 +/- 2 18 +/-2 21 t 2 '23 t2 19 2 23 2 .18 t2 34 17 *2 14 *2 17 +/- 2 18 t2 17 t2 20 2 14 +/- 2 35 10

• 1 10 1 9 I1 ,8 I1 9 t1 10 1 7 I1 36 16 +/-2 15 +/-2 15 +/- 2 '15 t 2 15 2 18 2 15 t2 37 15 +/- 1 .14 +/-2 15 I1 14 +/- 1 .12 1 17 +/- 2 15 I1 38 20 +/- 3 16 +/- 3 19 t 2 '18:+/- 2 17 +/-2 18 2 16 +/-2 39 19 +/- 3 15 +/- 3 17 t 3 16 t3 14 2 18 +/-3 14 +/-3 40 28 +/- 3 25 +/- 3 24 t 3 28 +/- 3 22 3 22 +/- 3 26 t3 41 13 +/- 2 10 I1 ,11 t 1 12 +/- I 11 +/-.1 9 1 ..10 I 1 42 14 +/- 2 12 +/-2 '13 t 2 13 +/- 2 11 +/-2 14 2 13 +/-2 43 15 +/- 2 17 +/-3 15 t 2 .15 +/- 2 14 2' 14 2 14 2 44 17 +/- 2 13 +/-2 13 +/- 7 '15 t2 11 2 17 2 +/-,14 2

45 24 +/-3 23 +/-3 '22 +/- 3 '23'+/- 3 22 +/-'3- 25 3 24 +/-3 46 17 +/-2 .14 2, 15 2 14 +/- 2 11 +/-2 14 +/-2 11 +/- 2 47 17 +/-2 '18 +/- 3 20 +/- 2 18 +/-2 17 +/-2 20 2 17 +/- 2 48 17 +/-2 18 +/-2 '17 t 2 19 ' 2 17 2 18 2 15 2 49 17 +/-2 .18 +/-2 16 +/- 2 19 +/- 2 19 +/-2 18 +/- 2 18 2 50 14 +/-2 14 +/- 3 14 t 2 .13 +/- 2 15 +/-3 13t 2 11 I 2 51 13 +/-2 14 +/- 2 14 +/- 2 '15 +/-,2 12 t2 14 2 13 eF2 52 15 +/- 2 14 +/- 2 14 , 2 15 +/- 2 15 +/-2 15 +/- 2 15 +/-2 MEAN' 18 +/- 10 *17 +/-10 '17 +/- 10 '18 Ill1 -16 +/-9 18+/-t11 17 I 11 I . I . .I .. .-:,.

I I~~ . .. -.. I.. . ,

(1) SEE PROGRAM EXCEPTIONS SECTION FOR EXPLANATIONi.

• THE MEAN AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING BOTH THE MDA AND POSITIVE VALUES C-1 0

TABLE C-V.2 MONTHLY AND YEARLY MEAN VALUES OF GROSS BETA CONCENTRATIONS (E.3 PCI/CU METER) IN AIR PARTICULATE SAMPLES COLLECTED INTHE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2002 GROUP I - ON-SITE LOCATIONS GROUP II - INTERMEDIATE DISTANCE GROUP III - CONTROL LOCATIONS LOCATIONS COLLECTION MIN. MAX. MEAN t COLLECTION MIN. MAX. MEAN $ COLLECTION MIN. MAX. MEAN +/-

PERIOD 2 SD PERIOD 2 SD PERIOD 2 SD' 17131101 - 02/04/02 12 32 24 : 13 12/31101 - 02/04/02 15 28 23 +/-9 ^,q^.lms _

l&tJllvl lIImJlF

- UlfjWU& 15 27 24 +/- 10 r 02104102 - 03/04/02 16 29 20 +/- 10 02/04/02 - 03104/02 15 26 19+/-F 7 02104/02 - 03/04/02 15 28 20 +/- 11 03/04/02 - 04101/02 14 27 19+/-9 03104/02 - 04101/02 13 25 19 +/- 8 0304102 - 04101/02 15 26 19 t 8 04/01/02 - 04/29/02 14 19 16 +/- 3 04/01/02 - 04/29/02 13 19 15 +/- 4 04/01/02 - 04/29/02 11 18 15 +/- 5 04/29/02 - 06/03/02 12 15 14 +/-3 04/29/02 - 0603/02 12 15 13 +/-2 04/29/02 - 06/03102 10 15 12 +/- 3 06/03102 - 07/01102 9 18 14 t7 06/03102

• 07/01/02 9 30 15 t 11 06103102 - 07/01/02 8 18 14 +/- 8 07101/02 - 08/05/02 11 34 20 +/- 17 07/01/02 - 08/05/02 10 35 20 +/- 16 07101/02 - 08/05/02 .13 32 21 +/- 15 08/05/02 - 09/02102 14 25 18+/-8 08/05/02 - 9/02102 13 27 19 +/- 9 08/05/02 - 09/02/02 13 28 19 +/- 11 09/02/02 - 09/30/02 10 20 15i 6 09/02/02

• 09/3002 8 19 14 +/-7 09/02/02 - 09130102 7 18 15 +/- 7 09130/02 - 11/04102 10 28 17 +/- 13 09130/02

• 11/04/02 11 28 16 +/- 12 09/30/02 - 11/04/02 9 26 15 +/- 11 11/04/02 - 12/02/02 13 24 18 +/-8 11/04/02 - 12/02102 11 23 17+/-8 11/04/02 - 12/02102 11 25 18 +/- 10 12102102 - 12130/02 13 18 15 +/-4 12/02102 - 12130/02 12 19 16 +/-5 12/02/02 - 12/30102 11 18 15 +/- 5 12131101 - 12130102 9 34 17 $ 6 12131/01 - 12130102 8 35 17 +/-6 12131/01 - 12130102 7 32 17 +/- 7

• THE MEAN AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING BOTH THE MDA AND POSITIVE VALUES

TABLE C-V.3 CONCENTRATIONS OF STRONTIUM IN AIR PARTICULATE SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2002 RESULTS IN UNITS OF E-3 PCI/CU METER i 2 SIGMA COLLECTION COLLECTION STC PERIOD - SN489 Sr-90 STC PERIOD  : Sr-89 Sr-90 m

3 12/31101 - 03/25/02 0.2 _, <,0.2 . 72 12/31)01 - 03125102 < 0.3 < 02

03125/02 - 07/01/02 0.4 < 0.1 03/25/02 - 07/01/02 *- S 1.0 < 0.3

'07101102 - 09/30t02 3.7 t < 1.4 07/01/02 - 09/30/02 < 4.0 < 1.0 09130/02 - 12/30102 5.2 3.1 i, 09/30/02 - 12130102 I <5.6 < 3.6 I MEAN. 2A

• 4.9 ' 1.2*+ 2.8 . MEAN- 2.7

• 5.0 1.3 +/- 3.2 20 12131101 - 03/25/02 <0.2 I

< 0.1 73 12/31101 - 03)25/02 ' .. < 0.2 < 0.1

_ . . &I 03/25102 - 07/01102 ,< 0.1 . -03/25)02 - 07/01/02 . . - T

-< 0.7 < 0.2 07101102 - 09130102  ; < 4.4 .< 1.0 07101102 - 09)30/02 <4.3 < 1.0 09/30102 - 12/30102 < 5.6 I < 3.3 09/30/02 - 12/30/02 < 5.7 < 3.4

.. 1

.; . .I MEAN' 2.7

• 5.5 1.1 +/- 3.0 MEAN- 2.7 +/- 5.4 1.2 +/- 3.0 1 i, .

66 12131/01 - 03)25/02 I< 0.2 < 0.2 C ,12/31101 - 03125/02 , < 0.2 < 0.1 03125/02 - 07)01102 <0.7 < 0.24 -03)25102 - 07101/02 . < 0.5 < 0.1 07/01102 - 09/30102 < 5.2 07101/02 - 09)30J02 < 4.1 < 15 09/30/02 - 12/30/02 < 6.6 1 < 4.4'  :  : 0930/02 - 12/3002 < 5.5 < 3.6 A .

2,E

• 5 3 MEAN' 3.2

• 6.4 1.5 ,+/- 3.9 MEAN'., 2.6 +/- 5.3 4.7

• 13.9 i, ., .

1 .0 -

71 12/31)01 - 03)25/02 < 0.3 03/25/02 - 07/01/02 < 0.4 - < 0.1 07101/02 - 09/30/02 - '< 4.3 .< 1.5 -

09)30102 - 12)30/02 < 5.8 < 3.0 MEAN' 2.7

• 5.5 1.2 +/- 2.7 v I ,. , - 7

-A -

.. I-.. .:

1.. I  :.  ;

t- Di-- .. I . I il I ..i V- - I-s  ; '* , . , . - .- I

. - .. I t i . . .

. I . I

• THE MEAN AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING BOTH THE MDA AND POSITIVE VALUES A C-12

TABLE C-V.4 CONCENTRATION OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN AIR PARTICULATE SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2002 RESULTS INUNITS OF E-3 PCI/CU METER +/-2 SIGMA STC COLLECTION Be-7 Mn-54 Co-58 Co-60 Cs-134 Cs-137 PERIOD 3 12131 - 03125102 62+/- 10 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.4 < 0.3 c0.1 03125 - 07101/02 69 +/- 5 < 0.3 < 0.4 < 0.3 < 0.3 '0.3 07/01 - 09130102 69 +/- 7 < 0.4 < 0.5 < 0.4 < 0.4 < 0.4 09/30 - 12130102 66 +/- 45 < 0.4 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.3 < 0.4 MEAN' 66 +/- 7 0.3 +/- 0.2 0.4 +/- 0.3 0.4 +/- 0.2 0.3

• 0.1 0.3 +/- 0.3 20 12131 - 04101102 76 +/-10 < 0.2 < 0.4 < 0.3 < 0.3 <0.5 04101 - 07/01/02 84+/- 6 <0.3 <0.4 <0.2 0.2 <0.3 07101 - 09/30102 78 +/- 6 < 0.3 < 0.4 < 0.3 < 0.3 < 0.3 09/30 - 12130/02 78 +/- 51 < 0.9 < 1.2 < 1.2 < 0.7 < 0.8 MEAN' 79 +/- 7 0.4 +/- 0.6 0.6 t 0.8 0.5 +/- 0.9 0.4 0.45 0.5 +/- 0.5 66 12131 - 04/01/02 17+/- 11 ' 0.3 < 0.2 < 0.4 < 0.4 < 0.2 04/01 - 07/01/02 73 +/- 5 < 0.4 < 0.6 < 0.4 < 0.4 < 0.4 07/01 - 09/30102 82 +/- 8 < 0.4 < 0.4 < 0.4 < 0.3 < 0.4 09/30 - 12/30102 74 +/- 68 < 1.0 < 1.3 < 1.2 < 0.8 < 0.9 MEAN' 77 +/- 8 0.5 +/- 0.6 0.6+/- 1.0 0.6 +/- 0.8 0.5 +/- 0.5 0.5 +/- 0.6 71 12131 - 04/01/02 73 +/- 9 < 0.3 < 0.2 < 0.4 < 0.4 < 0.2 04/01 - 07/01/02 72 +/- 5 < 0.4 < 0.5 < 0.3 < 0.4 < 0.4 07/01 - 09/30/02 65 +/- 5 < 0.3 < 0.4 < 0.4 < 0.2 < 0.2 09/30 - 12/30/02 73 +/- 53 < 1.0 < 1.1 < 0.8 < 0.7 < 0.8 MEAN' 71 +/- 8 0.5 +/- 0.6 0.6 +/- 0.8 0.5 +/- 0.5 0.4 +/- 0.4 0.4 +/- 0.6 72 12131 - 04101J02 70 +/- 10 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.3 < 0.3 < 0.1 04/01 - 07/01/02 67 +/- 4 < 0.2 < 0.3 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.2 07/01 - 09/30/02 77 7 '< 0.3 < 0.3 < 0.3 < 0.2 < 0.2 09/30 - 12/30/02 77 +/- 52 <0.6 <1.1 < 0.7 < 0.6 < 0.8 MEAN 73 +/- 10 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.8 0.4 t 0.5 0.3 0.3 0.3 +/- 0.6 73 12131 - 04/01/02 65 t 10 < 0.2 < 0.3 < 0.3 <0.3 < 0.2 04/01 - 07/01/02 64 +/- 5 < 0.3 < 0.4 < 0.3 < 0.3 < 0.3 07/01 - 09/30/02 60 +/- 5 < 0.3 < 0.5 < 0.3 < 0.3 < 0.3 09/30 - 12/30/02 62 +/- 41 < 0.8 < 0.9 < 0.8 < 0.6 < 0.7 MEAN* 63 t 5 0.4 +/- 0.5 0.5 +/- 0.6 0.4 +/- 0.5 0.4 +/- 0.3 0.4 +/- 0.4 C 12/31 - 04/01/02 64 +/- 11 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 0.3 < 0.3 < 0.2 04/01 - 07/01/02 58 +/- 4 < 0.3 < 0.4 < 0.3 < 0.3 < 0.3 07/01 - 09/30/02 67 +/- 5 < 0.3 < 0.4 < 0.3 < 0.3 < 0.3 09/30 - 12/30102 67 +/- 26 < 0.3 <0.4 < 0.5 < 0.2 < 0.3 MEAN' 64 +/- 9 0.3 +/- 0.1 0.4 0.2 0.3 +/- 0.2 0.3 +/- 0.1 0.3 i 0.1

' THE MEAN AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING BOTH THE MDA AND POSITIVE VALUES C-1 3

TABLE C-VI.1 CONCENTRATIONS OF 1-131 IN AIR IODINE SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2002 RESULTS IN UNITS OF E-3 PCI/CU METER + 2 SIGMA GROUP I GROUP II GROUP III WEEK 20 66 71 72 73

- U -

<7 n

1

<5 _ C .

<U <5 6 6 2 <6 <7 <6 7 4 <4

-c 3 3 <5 , <4 <4.: 4 <3 3 4 <3 <3 3 4 4 5 <2. <3 <3 3 2 2

.. 6

• 5. <6 <5 <4 <6 6 7 <4 <5 .5<5 <5 <5 3 <4 8 - < 3 j. <3 <5 <5 <3 3 9 < 7 <5 <5 6 7 10 *: <53 <3 <2

<3- <3 < 3 3 11 <2. <3 -  ;. <2 <2 <2 2 2

.< 3 <3 12: <43 < 4. < 3 3 3 13 <6 <5 <4 4 3 14 <2 <3 -- <3 . <4 <3 -c3 3 15- <6 <7. <6 <6 <6 6 16 < 12 < 13 t:: < 12 < 12 < 11 <12 15 17 - <9 <9 .. <.9 <9 <8 6 <7 18 <<8 <8 <7 < 7' <6 8 <9

., 19 < 6 <7 <5 <4 . <5 20 < 8 <6 6 <6  ; 7 21 <9 <6 <5 <9 <5 5 <9 22 <6 <6 - . <7 < 119 ( 1) <6 5 <6 23 < 10 < 10 -<8-. < 10 -. 8 9 *< 10

-: 24 <8 <9 .  ::< <7

<'S4 4, k8 <7 7 <8 25 <8 <8 < T - <7 <6 7 <8 26 <8 - <9 <8 <3 2 <4 27 < 16, < 18 t < 18 < 21 < 16 <15 <16 28 < 7 <8 <9 9 <8 7 ' <7 29 <4 <5 <4 5 <4 5 <5 30 < 11 < 12 ., <9, 9 <9 <9 <10 31 <7 <8 ,? <5 5 5 7 - 11

32 <7X- <8 ' <5 <5 < 5 <6 <7 33 <7 < 12' < 10 <8 9 <9 34 < 13 <9 zi <8 < 12 '<11 <12 <8 35 < 5 <6 6 5 <5 3 * <7 36 <19 <21 < 18 < 18 < 17 <17 <19 37 <7 <8 <7 < 7 < 7 <6 <7

• 38 < 15 < 17 k9 <9 <9 <14

• 15 39 < 19 < 21 1f <24 < 24 < 23 <18 <19 40 <5 <6 <7 <6 5 <5 41 <3 <4 . . <3 5 <5 3 <6 42 < 17 < 19 <9 <13 < 13 <16 < 17 43 < 12: <14 <14 <14 <11

< 13 < 12

• 44 < 22 < 25 <69 < 10 <10 ' <20 <22

-. 45 <6. - 7 ,: 3 <3 < 3 <6 < 6

- 46 <5 6  :< 2 < 12 <8 <5 <5 47 <4 <5.. - 3 <3 <3 <4 <4 48 <5-.. <4 <4 <2 <3 3 49 < 3 <3 <3 <6 <5 <4 4

.,.< 3

50 <1> <1I -<3. <4 < 1. . <1 51 < 9 <10 <5 8 <8 <9 52 < 5 <6 <5 <5 <6 <5 5 MEAN' 7 i 9 8 t 10 8at: 19 '10 32 7 8 7 9 '7

• 10

,4 ,  ; .

(1) SEE PROGRAM EXCEPTIONS SECTION FOR EXPLANATION

• THE MEAN AND.2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING BOTH THE MDA AND POSITIVE VALUES C-14

TABLE C-VII.1 CONCENTRATIONS OF STRONTIUM AND GAMMA EMITTERS INVEGETATION SAMPLES COLLECTED INTHE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2002 RESULTS INUNITS OF PCI/KG WET + 2 SIGMA STC COLLECTION Sr-89 Sr-90 K-40 1-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-140 La-140 PERIOD 35 08/07/02 < 24 4+/- 2 2710 i 204 < 62 (1) < 18 28 t 6 < 127 < 40 Cabbage 35 08107/02 < 38 8+/- 3 4030 +/- 325 < 102 (1) < 31 < 36 < 197 < 13 Collards 35 09/10/02 < 28 84 +/- 5 2220 t 514 < 1150 (1) < 49 < 47 < 1040 < 344 Broadleaf 35 10/10/02 < 12 36 +/- 3 1640 +/- 368 < 554 (1) < 34 < 37 < 675 < 217 Broadleaf MEAN' 26 +/- 22 41 +/- 81 2650 t 2037 467 1014 33 25 37 16 510

• 859 154 312 THE MEAN AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING BOTH THE MDA AND POSITIVE VALUES (1) SEE PROGRAM EXCEPTIONS SECTION FOR EXPLANATION

TABLE C-VIi.1.... CONCENTRATIONS OF STRONTIUM AND GAMMA EMITTERS INVEGETATION SAMPLES COLLECTED INTHE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2002 RESULTS INUNITS OF PC01KG WET +/- 2 SIGMA STC COLLECTION Sr-89 Sr-90 K-40 1-131 Cs-134 Cs-1 37 Ba-140 La-140 PERIOD 36 08/06/02 < 10 6 +/-1 2880 +/- 153 <23 5 <45 < 15 Cabbage 36 08/06/02 <14 12+/-1 3820

• 211 <50 < 15  : 13 < 103 < 31 Collards L,.. I . I ...

i36 - 09110102 , 8 3 *1 3000 +/- 427 < 400 (1) < 22 <23 . <485 < 149

..AJ;, .1 I:-;, .. - I  % I , - .. *~ 8.... ,

• Cabbage .. -,. -

'36^ , 09110102 <25 5 *2 6860 i 279 ( 164 (1) <(7 < 173 < 53

! Mustard Greens'-- .. -;-. . .. ~::- -. .  : I .!",  !., . ,. .; J,v I ...

36 *-. : 09/10/02 <23 9 +/-3 6080 +/- 372 <326 (1) < 13 < 15 < 353 < 106 Collards -.

36 - 10/10/02 <7 . 4 +/-1 2790 +/- 139 <96 (1) <5 < 106 <33 Cabbage  :-; . , I 36

• i..l 10/10/02 '11 9 *2 4950 +/- 221 < 115 (1) (7 '7 < 136 < 44 Collards -.  : .

MEAN_.- - . . 1-

. . . 30 3 02 1

• 1 3 2 - 0*

, 3. 1. 8 . 9 6 MEAN*, W4 14- 7 6 4340 +/- 3302 168 +/- 285 11

• 13 11 +/- 13 200 +/- 318 62 +/- 96

- .: . . .I . .- .  :  : . . *  :  :

I

',THE MEAN AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING BOTH THE MDA AND POSITIVE VALUES -. I (1) SEE PROGRAM EXCEPTIONS SECTION FOR EXPLANATION

TABLE C-VII.1 CONCENTRATIONS OF STRONTIUM AND GAMMA EMITTERS INVEGETATION SAMPLES COLLECTED INTHE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2002 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/KG WET +/- 2 SIGMA STC COLLECTION Sr-89 Sr-90 K-40 1-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-140 La-140 PERIOD 66 08/07/02 < 30 <5 3000 +/- 175 < 28 <7 15 4 < 60 < 18 Cabbage 66 08107/02 < 11 4+/- 1 3060 t 338 < 91 (1) < 27 <27 < 187 < 57 Collards 66 09/10/02 < 23 121 +/- 8 2090 +/- 284 < 483 (1) < 23 < 26 < 520 < 164 Broadleaf 66 09/10102 < 11 3+/- 1 2770 +/- 298 < 147 (1) <7 < 9 < 172 < 54 Cabbage

-4 66 10/10/02 < 3 29 +/- 1 3720 i 458 < 602 (1) < 36 < 41 < 690 < 228 Broadleaf MEAN' 16 +/- 21 32 +/- 102 2928 t 1173 270 +/- 511 20 +/- 25 23 25 326 +/- 533 104 +/- 176

• THE MEAN AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING BOTH THE MDA AND POSITIVE VALUES (1) SEE PROGRAM EXCEPTIONS SECTION FOR EXPLANATION 1

TABLE C-VIII.1 QUARTERLY TLD RESULTS FOR OYSTER CREEK GENERATION STATION, 2002 I

RESUL. S UNI

.IN- .T .O - -. Q 2S RESULTS IN UNITS OF MILLI-ROENTGENISTD. QUARTER i 2 STANDARD DEVIATIONS STATION MEAN ..JAN -:MAR - t i APR - JUN - JUL-- SEP OCT - DEC CODE *2S.D. , .--.--- '- . -

C 11.9 i 1.8 11.4 +/- 2.3 11.0 +/- 2.3 3 13.0 2.4- 12A +/- 1.1 14 13.5 i 2.6 12.8

• 0.9 1:: +/-I 16

-t2.0 14.8 1.9 14.3 1.7' 1 13.4 +/- 3.8 15.1 i 1.2 10.8 +/- 1.1I 14.6 1.2 13.0+/- 1.9 Ti ' ' 13.9 + 4.1 15.1 +/-'1.2'-'

• 10.8 +/- 1.11 14.5 1.1 15.1 +/- 9.3 3 10.7+/- 4.1 12.0

• 6.4 , 7.8 o.5 12.3 1A 10.6 +/- .1.3 6 - 11.9 +/- 7.2 16.4 +/- 19.1  : ', 7.7+/- 0.( 12.6 1.8 10.8 +/- 0.7 8, ,11.1 +/- 4.9 12.6 +/- 0.9  ; 7.7 +/- O.t 113.1 1.1 11.0 +/- 2.0 9 11.9 +/- 5.2 .13.6 +/- 0.9 8.1 +/- 2.A - . 13.5 1.1 12.2

• 1.5 11 11.1 +/- 4.5 12.4

• 1.1 7.9 +/- 1. 5 12.9 1.7 11.0

• 1.2 22 10.4 +/- 5.5 11.8

• 1.2 6.7 I .Z 13.0

• 1.1 10.1 +/- 1.5 51 ' 14.0 +/- 3.8 16.2 *1.9.. 11.6 i 1., 14.3

• 1.0 14.1

• 3.6 52 ,, 15.7 +/- 3.1 13.7

• 1. 6 . . '16.2-+/-'1.5 15.6 *'1.0 53 15.4 +/- 4.1 17.6* 1.7 13.7 +/- I.t 6 16.7 -1A. 13.6

• 1.4 54 11.7*+/- 3.7 13.6

• 0.9 9.7 +/- 2., 2 12.8

• 0.8 10.6

• 0.7 55 19.9 +/- 2.6 21.6 1.2 18A *.2.e5 -19.9 +/-'2.1 19.8

• 2.0 56 18.0 +/- 2.0 18.9

• 2.0 16.6 A 2.t5 18.3

• 1A 18.4 4+/- 4.6 57 14.9 +/- 2.7 16.5* 1 .7s,-: 13.7 *k 2.' I 15.6

• 1.9 13.9 '2.9 58 15.7 +/- 32 17.4

• 2.3 7.- , ,15.1+/- 15 ;.1 -16.4 1.9 13.8

• 1.5

.59 14.1 +/- 4.7 14.6 0.0 - 111.2

• 1.i 13.8' 2.2 16.9 +/- 10.9 61 1222 +/- 3.1 13.1

• 1.1 10.0+/-* 1.t 12.1 1.0 13A.* 1.2 62 132'i 1.2 13.5 1.4. (1) 12.5

• 0.9 13.6 +/-.1.9 63 12.4 +/-3.7 12.6

• 0.9 10.0 1 1.1 12.6* 1.7 14.5 +/- 0.8 64 12.6 +/- 2.8 12.9 +/- 1.2 10.6 +/- 1.;2 12.8

• 1.0 13.9

• 1.6 65 12.3 +/- 3.0 13.3

• 0.9 10.2 +/- 2.' 1 12A

• 1.7 13A +/- 1.3 66 10.8 +/- 2.6 10.2 +/- 1.9 9.3 +/- 1.' 1 12.2 2.4 11A +/- 2.7 68 12.0 +/- 4A 114 +/- 0.9 9.3 +/- 1.,2 12.7 +/- 0.8 14.5 +/- 1.2 71 12.2 +/- 2.9 11.1 +/- 1.1 10.8

• 1.,1 13.2 +/- 1.8 13.6 +/- 1.3 72 11.3 +/- 2.9 9.9*1.1 10.3 +/- 2.!5 13.0 +/- 1.6 12.1 +/- 1.9 73 10.9 +/- 3.9, 9.5 +/-.1.7k, 8.9 +/- I.:3 12.2

• 1.5  ;-12.9 +/- 3.0 74' ' 11.2 3. 11.0

• 0.9 9.1 +/- 1.:3 12.3

• 0.8 12.2 +/- 2A 75 12.5

• 3.5 13.1 +/-.1.8, . 9.9* 1.7 13.3 1.3

• 13.6 +/- 0.9 78 11.1'+/- 4.4 11.7 ,j 1 7.9'+/- 0.!9 11.8

• 1.8 12.9 +/- 3.3 79 11.2 +/- 3.0 11.4 0.9 92 3. 2 11.3 0 4 12.8 +/- 1.0 81 10.9 +/- 3.8 12.0 1.1 8.1

• 1..1 '11.6 +/- 1.0 12.0

• 2.0 82 11.6 +/- 3.2 12A.* 1.A 9.3 2. 1 12.0 +/- 1.5' - 12.9 +/- 2.0

84. 11.6 +/- 3.4 13.3

• 1.7 9.7

• 2. 1 10.7 +/- 1.6 12.8 +/- 2.7 85 " 10.9 +/- 3.2 11.2

• 0.0 8.6

• 1.6 12.2 +/- 1.7 11.7+/- 42 86 102+/- 4.8 (1) 10.0

• 1.3 12.7

• 1.3 7.9 +/- 0.7 88 10.0 +/- 5.3 9.4 17 , 6.7 +/- 0. 0 11.1

• 1.1 13.0 +/- 1.9 89 10.1 +/- 3.5 9.2 i 1.2,. 8.3

• 1!5.8 12.3 2.2 10.7 +/- 0.8 90 10.1 +/- 2.9 9.2

• 1.2 8.7 +/- 1.9 11.9

• 0.8 10.7 +/- 2.0 92 11.6

• 3.5 11.2 1.2 9.3 +/- 2. 2 12.7 1.A 13.2 +/- 1A 98 ' '13.0 +/- 4.8 13.1 1.1.- 10.0

• 1.6 15.9 +/- 12.2 13.1 +/- 0.8 99 - 11.3 +/- 3A 12.5

• 0.9' 8.8 +/- 1.3 12.2 *11.6 11.5 +/- 1.7

-. (1) SEE PROGRAM EXCEPTIONS SECTION FOR EXPLANATION C-18

TABLE C-VIII.2 MEAN QUARTERLY TLD RESULTS FOR THE SITE BOUNDARY, MIDDLE, SPECIAL INTEREST AND CONTROL LOCATIONS FOR OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2002 RESULTS IN UNITS OF MILLI-ROENTGEN PER STD. QUARTER +/- 2 STANDARD DEVIATIONS OF THE STATION DATA STATION SITE BOUNDARY MIDDLE SPECIAL INTEREST CONTROL CODE k2S. D.

JAN-MAR 15.3 +/- 5.7 12.2 +/- 3.0 11.3 +/- 4.0 12.1 +/- 2.0 APR-JUN 12.3 +/- 5.5 8.8 +/- 1.9 8.9 +/- 2.8 11.5 +/- 1.4 JUL-SEP 14.6 +/- 4.8 12.5 +/- 2.3 12.7 +/- 1.9 13.9 +/- 2.5 OCT-DEC 14.4 +/- 4.7 12.0 +/- 3.1 12.2 +/- 3.0 13.4 +/- 2.7 TABLE C-VlII.3

SUMMARY

OF THE AMBIENT DOSIMETRY PROGRAM FOR OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2002 RESULTS IN UNITS OF MILLI-ROENTGEN/STD. QUARTER LOCATION SAMPLES PERIOD PERIOD PERIOD MEAN ANALYZED MINIMUM MAXIMUM *2s.d.

SITE BOUNDARY 63 9.3 21.6 14.2 + 5.5 MIDDLE DISTANCE 63 6.7 16.4 11.4 +/- 4.0 SPECIAL INTEREST 40 6.7 15.1 11.3 +/- 4.2 CONTROL 8 11.0 14.8 12.7 +/- 2.6 SITE BOUNDARY STATIONS - 1, 51.52,53,54, 55, 56, 57, 58.59,61,62.63,64,65,66 MIDDLE DISTANCE STATIONS - 6,8,22.68,73,74,75,78,79,81.82,84,85,86,98,99 SPECIAL INTEREST - 3.9,11.71,72,88,89,90,92,Ti CONTROL STATIONS - C. 14 C-19

TABLE C-IX.1

SUMMARY

OF COLLECTION DATES FOR SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2002 ISURFACE WATER (RriTu IQUVI 661SCINTILLA6iON)'. -- . : - t.

COLLEC11ON PERIOD ' 231 24" 33' J 94 JAN .01102/02 01102)02 FEB *- 02113)02 .~02/13)02 MAR .. -' 03112/02:-`:03112/02-.

APR': '04/09/02 :04/09)02 .04/09102.'. _.4)09/02 4'.., , ,

.MAY. -.

• '03)0510Y 03/0-512 JUN - 06/04/02 06/04102 - I I -1 JUL ~~7 )2$ 07/05102 . t AUG .... 08/02/02' ,08/02102

. I SEP , 0904102' 09104102' 09/04/02, -09104/02 I. . .

OCT .10)0W212 -10/02102 NOV . 11/05/02 11/05102 DEC .'- 120312 -'12/03102 SURFACE WATERl 1GAMMVA SPECTROSCOMY COLLECTiON.

PERIOD . 23.2--33 9 JAN .  :. 01/02102 -01102102 FEB -02113102 -02113102,

• MAR "<-`- ' 0312/02- D03112102"

• APR 04109102 04)09102 £04)0/02' 04)09102 MAY 03)05/02 03105102

-JUL . ' 07)00102 - 07105/02 AUG .08)02/02.- 0802/02 SEP -.09104.102 .09/04/02 "09)04)02 09)04102, OCT, - -i" 102102 10102102 NOV -11)05)02 '11)05/02, DEC  : -' 12/03102'1130 WELL WATER (TRifUM & GAMVMA spECTROsCOY COLLECTION .--

• PERIOD -1 -37 38

-. JAN-MAR .02/19102 - 02/15/02 02/1 5/02 APR-JUN '. 03/27)02 -05/10)02 03127102 ~_05/10/02 -03127102 *-05/10102 JUL-SEP 06)06/02 08/12102 06)010 08)12/02 0610612 -0122 OCT-DEC' 09106/2 -11/07/02 09)06/02' 11)07/02 '09/06)02 -11)07/02 i - L -

I AIR PARTICULATE (GAMMA SPECTROSCOPY)

COLLECTION  ;. C-::3 20 66 II T.

PERIOD . . ..

I . . .

JAN-MAR 12131)01 -04101102 -12/31101 ' 04101/02 12)31/01 7 04)01102 12/31/01 - 04)01/02 APR-JUN -03125/2-.- 07101/02,0/012 .70)0 4010 07)01)02 0'4)01)02 - 07)01/02 07101/02 ~'-09130102 I..

JUL-SEP ,.07)01102 - 09/30)2 207/01/02 -09130/02 -07)01/02 - 09130102 OCT-DEC 09/30/02. - 12130)02 '09130/02- 12130102. 09130102 -12130102 09130/02 - 12130102 COLLECTION 71 72 73 PERIOD JAN-MAR 12131101 - 04101/02 12131/01 - 04/01/02 12/31/01 - 04)01102 APR-JUN 04/01/02 - 07)01)02 03125/02 - 07)01)02 . 04/01)02 - 07)01/02 JUL-SEP 07101102 - 09130102 07/01/02 - 09130/02 07/01/02 - 09130102 OCT-DEC 09130/02 - 12130102 09130/02 - 12130)02 09/30/02 - 12130102 II ~)C-20

TABLE C-IX.1

SUMMARY

OF COLLECTION DATES FOR SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2002 AIR PARTICULATE (GROSS BETA & 1-131}

COLLECTION c 3 20 68 71 PERIOD

-m , - 1;abiiU1 - Upldi 1UjiiIU1 - WIUIJUy ladliul - UlUllUZ 14iul - Uliol/uz uJi/Ul -U1/U77Ul -

2 01/08102 - 01/14/02 01/07/02 - 01114/02 01/07t02 - 01/14/02 01/07/02 - 01/14/02 01/07/02 - 01114/02 3 01114102 - 01/22/02 01/14/02 - 011 0114/02 01/21102 01114/02 -, 01/21/02 01/14/02 - 01t21/02 4 01122102 - 01129102 01121102 - 01128/02 01/21/02 - 01/2802 01121/02 - 01128/02 01121/02 - 01128/02 5 01129/02 -02104102 012a8/02 - 0204/02 01/28/02 - 02/04102 012/02M - 02/04/02 01/28/02 - 02/04/02 6 02104/02 -02111/02 02/04/02 - 02111/02 02/04/02 - 02)11/02 02/04/02 - 02/11/02 02/04/02 - 02111/02 7 02111/02 - 02118102 0211/02 - 0211802 02/11/02 - 02/18/02 02/11/02 02118/02 02/11/02 - 02/18t02 8 02)18102 - 02/25102 02/18/02 - 02/25/02 02/18/02 - 02/25/02 02/18/02 02/25/02 02/18/02 - 02/2n02 9 02/25/02 - 03104/02 02/25/02 - 03104/02' 02/25/02 - 03104/02 O2/5o02 - 03104/02 . 0225/02 - 03/04/02 10 03104102 - 03111/02 03/04/02 - 03111/02 03/04/02 - 03/11/02 03/04/02 - 03111102 03104/02 - 03111/02 11 03/11102 - 03119/02 03111/02 - 03/18/02 03111/02 - 03118/02 03111/02 - 0311802 03/11/02 - 03118/02 12 03119/02 - 03125102 03/18/02 - 03/25t02 03/8102 - 03125/02 03118/02 - 03/25/02 03/18/02 - 03125/02 13 03/26102 - 04/02/02 03125/02 - 04/01/02 03/25/02 - 04/01/02 03125/02 - 04/01/02 03/25/02 - 04/01/02 14 04/02/02 - 04/08/02 04/01/02 - 04/O08/2 04/01/02 - 04108/02 04101/02 - 04/08/02 04/01/02 - 04/08/02 15 04/08102 - 04/116/02 04/08/02 - 04/15/02 04/08/02 - 04/15/02 04108/02 -. 04/15/02 04/08/02 - 04115/02 16 04/16/02 - 04/23/02 04/15/02 - 04/22/02 04/15/02 - 04r22 04/15/02 - 04/22/02 04/15/02 - 04W22J02 17 04123102 - 04/29/02 04122t02 - 04/29/02 04/22/2 - 04/29/02 042202. - 02902 04122042 - 04/29102 18 04/29/02 - 05107102 04/2902 - 05/06/02 04/29/02 - 05o06t02 04129/02 -05/062 04/29/02 - o0/0s602 19 05/07102 - 05113102 05/08/02 - 05/13/02 05/06/02 - 05/13/02 05/06102 - 05/13102 05/0602 - 05/13/02 20 05/13102 - 0510/02 05113102 - 05/2002 05/13/02 - 0o520/02 05/13/02 - 05/2002 0513102 - 05/20/02 21 05/20/02 - 05/28102 05/20/02 - s527/02 05/20102 - 05/27/02 05/20/02 - 05/27/02 05120/02 - 05/27/02 22 05/28/02 - 06104102 051272 - 06/03/02 05/27r02 - 06/03/02 05/27/02 - 06/03/02 05127/02 - 06/03/02 23 06/04/02 - 06110102 06/03102 - 06/10/02 06/03/02 - 06/10/02 06/03/02 - 06/10/02 06/03102 - 06/10/02 24 06110102 - 06/17/02 06/10/02 - 06/17/02 06/10/02 - 06/17/02 06/10/02 - 06/17/02 06/10/02 -06/17/02 25 06117/02 - 06/24/02 06)17/02 - 06124/02 06117/02 - 0624/02 06/17/02 - 06/24/02 06117/02 - 06/24/02 26 06/24/02 - 07/01/02 06/24/02 -07/01/02 .06124/02 - 07/01/02' 06/24/02 -07/01102 06/24/02 - 07/01D02 27 07/01102 - 07/08102 07/01/02 - 07/08/02 07/01/02 - 07/08/02 07/01/02 - 07/08/02 07/01/02 - 07/08/02 28 07/08102 - 07/15102 07/08/02 - 07115/02 07/08/02 - 07/15/02 07/08/02 -07/15/02 07/08/02 - 07/15/02 29 07/15/02 - 07/22102 07/15/02 - 07/22102 07/15/2 - 07/2202 07/15/02 - 07/2202 07/15/02 -07/22/02 30 07122102 - 07129102 O0722/02 - 07n/902 07122102 - 07/29N02 07/2/02 - 07/29/02 OM722/2 -07/29/02 31 07129102 - 08/O5/02 07129/02 - 08/05/02 07/2902 -08/S0/2 07/29/02 - 08105/02 07/29/02 - 08/05/02 32 08105/02 - 08/13102 08/05/02 - 08/12/02 08/05/02 - 08J12/02 08/O5O2. - 08112/02 08/05/02 - 08/12/02 33 08113102 - 08119/02 08/12102 - 08/1902 08/12/02 - 08/19/2 08/12/02 - 08/19/02 08/1202 - 08/1902 34 08/19/02 - 08/2102 08/19/02 - 0/26102 08/19102 - 08/26802 08/19/02 - oa82 08/19/02 - o082/02 35 08126102 - 09103102 08/26/02 - 09/02/2 0816102 - 09/02/02 0812812 - 09/02/2 08/26/02 - 09/02/02 36 09/03102 - 09109/02 09/02/02 - o09/0/2 09/02/02 - 09109/02 09/02102 - 0909/02 09/02/02 - 09/09/02 37 09109102 - 09/17/02 09109/02 -O916102 09)09/02 - 09/16/02 09/09/02 - 09/16102 09/09/02 - 09/16102 38 09/17102 - 09124/02 09/16/02 - 09/23/02 09)16/02 - 09/23r02 09)16/02 - 09/3/02 09/11602 - 0923102 39 09/24/02 - 09130102 o9/3/02 - 09/30/02 09/2302 - 09/30r/2 09/3/02 - 09/30/o2 09/23r02 - O0930/02 40 09130/02 - 10107102 09130/02 - 10/07102 09130/02 - 10/07/02 09/3002' - 10/07102 09/30/02 - 10/07/02 41 10/07/02 - 10/14/02 10/07/02 - 10/14/02 10/07102 - 10/14/02 10/07/02 - 10/14/02 10/07/02 - 10/14/02 42 10114/02 - 10/21/02 10/14/02 - 10/21/02 10/14102 - 10/21/02 10/14/02 - 10/21/02 10/14102 - 10/21/02 43 10121/02 - 1028102 10/21/02 - 10/28/2 10/21/02 - 10128102 1n0102 - 10/28/02 10121102 - 10128/02 44 10128/02 - 11/04/02 10/28/02 - 11104/02 10/28/2 - 11/04/02 10128/02 - 11/04/o2 10128/02 - 11/04/02 45 11104/02 - 1/11/02 11104102 - 11/11/02 11/04/02 - 11/11102 11/04/02 - 11/11/02 11/04102 - 11/11/02 46 11/11/02 - 11/18102 1111/02- 11118/02 11/11102 - 11118/02 11/11/02 - 11/18/02 .11/11/02 - 11/18/02 47 11/18102 - 11/25102 11118/02 - 1112502 11/18/02 - 11/2502 11/1802 - 11/25/2 11/1802 - 11125/02 48 11/25/02 - 12102/02 11125/02 - 1202/02 11/25/02 - 12/02/02 11/25/02 - 1202/02 11125/2 - 12/0202 49 12/02/02 - 1209/02 12/02/02 - 12/o9)02 - 12102/02 - 12/0S9/2 12/0202 - 12/09/02 1202/02 - 12/09/02 50 12109102 - 12116102 12/s02 - 12168102 12109/02 - 12116/02 12/092 - 12/16102 12/09/02 - 12/1602 51 12116/02 - 12/23102 12/1602 - 12/23102 12/16102 - 12/2302 12116t02 - 12/02 12/16/02 - 12/23/02 52 12/23102 - 12130/02 12/23102 - 12/30102 12/23102 - 12/30/02 12/23102 - 12/30/02 12/23/02 - 12/30102 C-21

TABLE~ C-IX.1

SUMMARY

OF COLLECTION DATES FOR SAMPLES COLLECTED IN

-THE VICINITY, OFOYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2002 AIR PARTICULATE (GROSS BETA &1-1311 COLLECTION 72 73 PERIOD -',

I .J,1U1 -ju U-.Iuwuz ZIZJljIU I '- U ItUIIUz 2 01108102 ,-01114102. 01107102 -:01114/02 3 .01114102,- 01/22102 01114102 - '01121102 4 0122/02 .- 01/29!02 0/l1t '-01I28/02.~

5 01129102 - 02104/02>t 01/OM= -.02104/02'-

.6

• 02104102 - 02111102,, 02/04102-- 02/11/02

-7 02J11102~- ~02/l8/02~ ~02111I0Z.-,b2118/02

• ..8' .02/18102 -'02/25/02' '.~02I18/02' .',0~2125/02

' 02/25102 - 0310412. o02r25/D2'-, 0:310-4102 10 03104102 -'03/111/02  !,03/04102.-.,03I11/02 ,

I11 .03111102'-,03/19/02 ,03111102, -.03118/02

• 12 .03/19102 -"03125102 03l18/2'.;03t25/02 '2

13 03/28102 -. 04/02/02,' .03r2!/02.- 0410110

. 14 04/02102, '04/08102 *.04/01102.-,.04/08102 15 04/08/02'.- 04/16/02, 04/08102 -,04/1 5/02

• 1 6 04/16102 - 04123/2 04/15102 ." 041A220

.17 04/23/02 - 04/29/02 "04/22102 -'0412/02 18 04/29102 - 05/07/02 .04/2910  ;,05106/2 19 .. 05107102'- 05/13102 .050/0dl2 .- 05ll3/02-.,--,

20 05/13102 - 0520/02 05113/02 - 05/20/02.

_21 05120102 - 05/28/02 '05/20/02 -' 05/27/02 22 05128/02 -0610/0 05/27102 4.'06/03102'.

23 06/04/02 ,- 06/10/02 - 06/03/02 - , 06/110/02 24 -06/10/02 - 06/17/02 06/10/02 - ,06/17I02.

25 - 06/17/02 - 06/24/02 06/17102 - .06/24/02,

'26 ,.06/24/02 '07/01102 .06/24/02 'Q7/01/02

.27 07101/02 -0082 -07/01/02 .0/80 28 07/08/02. - '07/15/02 ,b71O802 .- ,07/15102 29 *.07/15/02 - 07/22/02 07/15/02, - 07122/02

• 30 - 07/22/02 -O0/2/0 0712/0 -. 07129/02 31 07129/02 -08/05/2 . 7/29/0 085/05/02

-32 08/05102 .- 08/13/02 ' 08/05/02 -08/12/02 .

33 '08/13102 - 08/19/02 .. 08/12/02 -08/19/02 34 08/19102 - 08/26/02" 08/19/02 08/26/02

• 35 .08/26102 :- 09/03102 08212-'09/0=2/0

'3 :09/03/02 -. 09/09/02 . :09/02/02.-'9/90 37 09/0902 - .09/17/02 . 09/09/02 - 09/16/02

• '38 09/17102 - 09/24/02 09/16/02 -09/23/02

• 39 09/24/02 '09/30/02' '09/310 - 0/3002 40 09/30102 '10/07/02

09/30/0 -10/07/02 . ., '. 1. ;

41. 10/07102 -. 10114/02 .10/07/02 -.10114102

• 42 10/14/02 - 10/21/02'.10I/14102 ~10/21/02

'310/21/02 - 10/28/02 '10/21102 '-10/28/02 I

• 44 l1028/02 - 11/04102. '10/28/02 -', 11/04/02 .. . I . . I 45 11/04/02 - 11/111/02. .11/04/02 -.11/111/02

'48 11/111102 - 11/18/02: I Ill 0 2 r-I11/1802 47 *. 11/1.1802 - 11125102 111802 11125/02 48 '11/25/02 - 2W/02/2 ','.11125/02 -',12/02/02' I I I 49 .' .12/02102 -12/09102 '12/02/02 :12/09/02 I

51. 12/16102 -- 12/13/02, . 12/10902 ~-12/16102:' I i

-' 2 12/2102 - 4123102 '12/16102:- 2123002~:-

52 . .. . '-W I I 1 - . . 4 .' i, '

.~- _1 C-22

TABLE C-IX.1

SUMMARY

OF COLLECTION DATES FOR SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2002 TLD STATION JAN - MAR APR - JUN JUL - SEP OCT - DEC CODE C 01)14102 - 04/15/02 04/15/02 - 07115102 07/15/02 - 10/14/02 10/14/02 - 01/13/03 14 01114102 - 04/15102 04/15/02 - 07/1 502 07/15/02 - 10/14/02 10/14102 - 01/13/03 1 01/14/02 - 04/15102 04/15/02 - 071t5/02 07/15/02 - 10/14/02 10/14/02 - 01113103 Ti 01114/02 - 04/15102 04/15/02 - 07115102 07/15/02 - 10114102 10114/02 - 01/13/03 3 01/14/02 - 04/15102 04115/02 - 07115/02 07115/02 - 10/14102 10/14102 - 01/13/03 6 01114102 - 04115/02 04/15/02 - 07115102 07/15/02 - 10/14/02 10/14/02 - 01/13/03 8 01114/02 - 04115/02 04/15/02 - 07/15102 07115/02 - 10/14/02 10/14/02 - 01113/03 9 01114102 - 04115/02 04115102 - 071 5/02 07/15/02 - 10/14/02 10/14/02 - 01113/03 11 01114/02 - 04/15102 04/15/02 - 07115/02 07/15102 - 10/14/02 10114102 - 01113/03 22 01/14/02 - 04/15/02 04/15/02 - 0711502 07115/02 - 10114/02 10114/02 - 01113/03 51 01/14102 - 04/15/02 04/15/02 - 07115102 07115/02 - 1014102 10/14/02 - 01113/03 52 01/14/02 - 04/15102 04/15/02 - 07/1502 07115/02 - 10/14/02 10/14/02 - 01/13/03 53 01/14/02 - 04115/02 04/15/02 - 07/15/02 07115/02 - 10114102 10/14/02 - 01/13/03 54 01/14102 - 04/15102 04/15/02 - 07115/02 07115/02 - 10114/02 10114)02 - 01113/03 55 01/14/02 - 04/15/02 04/15/02 - 07115/02 07/15/02 - 10114/02 10114102 - 01113103 56 01/14/02 - 04115/02 04115/02 - 07115/02 07/15/02 - 10114/02 10/14102 - 01113/03 57 01/14/02 - 04/15/02 04/15/02 - 07115102 07/1502 - 10114/02 10/14/02 - 01/13/03 58 01114/02 - 04/15/02 04/15/02 - 071t5/02 07115/02 - 10114/02 10/14102 - 01113/03 59 01114102 - 04115102 04/15/02 - 07115/02 07115/02 - 10114/02 10114/02 - 01113/03 61 01/14J02 - 04115/02 04/15/02 - 07115/02 07115/02 - 1014102 10/14/02 - 01113/03 62 01114/02 - 04115/02 04115/02 - 07/15102 07115/02 - 10114102 10114102 - 01/13/03 63 01/14/02 - 04/15/02 04115/02 - 071t5/02 07115/02 - 10114102 10114/02 - 01113/03 64 01114/02 - 04115/02 04115/02 - 07115/02 07115/02 - 10/14/02 10W14102 - 01113/03 65 01/14102 - 04/15/02 04/15/02 - 07/15/02 07115/02 - 10114/02 10114/02 - 01113/03 66 01/14/02 - 04/15/02 04/15/02 - 07115/02 07115/02 - 10114/02 10W14/02 - 01113/03 68 01/14/02 - 04115/02 04/15/02 - 07115/02 07115/02 - 10114J02 10/14/02 - 01113/03 71 011t4/02 - 04/15102 04115102 - 07115/02 07/15/02 - 10114102 10114/02 - 01113/03 72 01/14/02 - 04/15/02 04115/02 - 07115/02 07/15/02 - 10114102 10/14/02 - 01/13f03 73 01/14102 - 04115/02 04115/02 - 07115/02 07115/02 - 10114/02 10/14/02 - 01/13/03 74 01114/02 - 04115/02 04115/02 - 07/1 U02 07115102 - 10/14/02 10/14/02 - 01/13/03 75 01/14/02 - 04115/02 04115/02 - 07/15/02 07115102 - 10114/02 10114102 - 01/13/03 78 01114/02 - 04/15/02 04/15/02 - 07115/02 07115/02 - 10114/02 10114/02 - 01113/03 79 01/14/02 - 04/15/02 04115102 - 07115/02 07115/02 - 10/14/02 10114/02 - 01113103 81 01114/02 - 04115/02 04/15/02 - 07115/02 07/15/02 - 10/14102 10/14102 - 01113/03 82 01114/02 - 04/15/02 04)15/02 - 07/15/02 07/15/02 - 10/14/02 10W14/02 - 01113/03 84 01/14/02 - 04115/02 04)15/02 - 07/15/02 07115/02 - 10/14/02 10/14102 - 01113/03 85 01/14/02 - 04/15/02 04115/02 - 07115/02 07/15/02 - 10114102 10114102 - 01113/03 86 01/14/02 - 04/15/02 04115102 - 07115/02 07115/02 - 10/14/02 10/14102 - 01113/03 88 01/14)02 - 04/15/02 04115/02 - 07115102 07/15/02 - 10114102 10/14102 - 01113103 89 01/14)02 - 04/15/02 04/15/02 - 07/15102 071t5/02 - 10/14/02 10/14/02 - 01/13/03 90 01/14/02 - 04/15102 04)15/02 - 07/15/02 07115102 - 10/14/02 10/14/02 - 01/13/03 92 01/14/02 - 04115102 04)15/02 - 07/15/02 07/15/02 - 10/14/02 10114/02 - 01/13/03 98 01/14102 - 04/15102 04/15/02 - 07/15102 07115102 - 10/14/02 10/14/02 - 01/13/03 99 01/14/02 - 04/15102 04/15/02 - 07115/02 07115/02 - 10/14/02 10/14102 - 01/13/03 C-23

I'.,

C ,

. - , I.

C.,..-.

• 1.

- .1;

• U

• I I c

!.1

-I.

4..

. -: I

-I, "I'

- A . -

1 , :I X -i LI '

.4',- , , . U ., ,

lntentionally Left BBlank

1. .. . . 'c- 4-

FIGURE C-1 MEAN COBALT-60 CONCENTRATION IN CLAMS OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 1983 - 2002 20 ..... ......................................... ............................ . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

-O-INDICATOR STATION

-B-. BACKGROUND STATION 115 ...............................................................................................................................

-10 ........................................................... ..............

5s ~J.. - ...............................................................................................................

0 C n tJ 0 tN t X 0 000 00% c CO N ON N rl IOn t oc 00 00 00 00 0000 00 00 0 00 0 O Cm Ch 0% 0O m\ n0 0e O' O 0CO o 0\

> > o ON m 0m 0 0 0 m 0m0m >t0 cz ON m m oi0 0

- H - ^-H '^ 'H -- - - '~ -i - -1 - - - - - w4 YEAR

ir

• :; -  : . FIGUREC-2 i  ;. ..

- MEAN COBALT-60 CONCENTRATION IN AQUATIC SEDIMENT

.1 OYSTER

CREEK GENERATING STATION, 1984 - 2002 350 . .. .............  : .;

i ..- NDICATOR STATION MEAN .

300 .............. . . .. . . . . . ... . ... ... . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . .

3001; . - -- BACKGROUND STATION MEAN

.. . .. 50'................. .- ....

.... I...................... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

200'

150 Wo) ,150 i fEN ' D j. ................. .................. ........ ..... ..... .....

A .

U . ........ .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ........ ..... ........ ... .. ... .. ... .. ... .. ... .. ... .

coo0 - t 000000000 o

n in tn tri 'o - wo 00 00 00 0000

% t- t-".

0000000go00 00 oo000 00 0000co.

0N q% *o -e 0% 0% "c

- i 0%

0%

t 0% 0%

ON 0% ON ON 0% 0A *% 0% ON as 0% 0% '%0% 0% aA 0a 0% ti Cs 0% 0% 0% ON 0% ON Cs as O YEAR

FIGURE C-3 MEAN CESIUM-137 CONCENTRATION IN AQUATIC SEDIMENT OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 1984 - 2002

--- INDICATOR (Stations 23 & 24)

. BACKGROUND (Station 94) 600  ;.................................

t.

o a..-

Cl 6

400

.2 0

.2 200

• v v v tn w t w '.0A w  % t OG x x 0'. 0'. 0o 0 '- N en t tn 'O t- 0c O GO GO G GO GO GO GO O GO GO G GO GO GO GO GO 0% 0' 0% % 0% 0% 0%  % 0 0' m'. 0%0' 0%0' 0 0% 0' 0' 0% 0' 0' 0' 0' OwO 0% 0' 0' 0 0' 0%ak 0% 0% 0% 0% 0

" .' V-( . . I* -4 V- . V V- V- " " T- PO " 7- V-4 V- -

9- V- V- N YEAR

.- -FIGURE C-4 MEAN WEEKLY GROSS BETA CONCENTRATIONS IN-AIR PARTICULATES OYSTER-CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2002;

. .. ~~~~. .. . ..... ... .... ,.-...... . ............... ...-. . BACKGROUND

' 2.OOE , ^ , _ _ , . . . .. . . . . : . . .

L i

.I E III.I. .

- I I; Date

FIGURE C-5 MEAN MONTHLY GROSS BETA CONCENTRATIONS IN AIR PARTICULATES OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 1984 - 2002 0.18 CHERNOBYL ACCIDENT 0.16 . ...............------- ---- INDICATORSTATIONS BACKGROUND STATION l 0.14 ............... .................................................................................................... . . . . . .

,>0.12 . . . . . . . .................................................................................................................

0.14

0.10 . . . . . . . . ................................................................................................................

t'0.08 ................................................................................................................... . . . . . . .

0.04 ...... ....................................................................................................................

0.02 0.00.

ovo ve . %n 00 inc s X0 ov X c ro 0X z. fiX eC s 0 .a qe o xwo oo o0t- r. 0oh 00 o0%o0% $e $O"t2 0 0 0 o

_ _ _ - - - - _ _ - _ - - _ _ _ _ - - - - - _ _ - r- _ - _ rt - - f eN N ei q N

' Data from Cookstown station ONLY after December 1996 YR

I ..

I J A I -

FIGURE C-6 MEAN QUARTERLY TLD GAMMA DOSE.

;OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2002 20 *' .. '.... .. .. 7..............

,t,'. , . . . . .' ... ... .',, ............ "- . ............ . . . ;'. .' .' . .. '.

18.

1 ...... ......................................................... ........................................ ................

_40 2 .

et M 16-

=1

- . v:I 14 -

00 I--

W .,

10 '

C) 14 --:.:

=

6 ... .... .. .... .....

2M .... .... .... .. . ...... . ... ... .

OTO2- 2TO5MnM 4..--' OVER 5MTES I

DISTANCE RING FROM PLANT

-. I r Apr-02 1 Jul-02 MOct-02 01 Jan-0o3 .. - .---

• First quarterly result utilized Harshaw TLD's. Second, Third, and Fourth quarter results utilized Panasonic TLDs

FIGURE C-7 MEAN QUARTERLY TLD GAMMA DOSE OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 1989 - 2002

• 20

.[.................................

• INDICATOR MEAN

• BACKGROUND MEAN L~ 15_

I I U I IN

~0 1v I I ri . d I I I I U d I

- 5 In Uo I-

. a .

S I II Ia I a I I I I S I .I I I I I I rI I I I1 0% 0% 0 0 " N N rn *e 'o tn ~0 0% 0% 0%

II 0% 0 0 "A N N en W 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0,% *% 0% 0% a 0 0 0 o o 0 a% 0% 0 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0 0 0 C o o o

- o4 - - - o - V'4 -. V- V- V4 W4 '.4 '4 V- '4 V- '-4 r-4 N4 N N4 N eN N N Year Harshaw Model 110 TLDs were used during the first quarter of 2001. Panasonic Model 814 TLDs were used in the second, third, and fourth quarters of 2001.

-1 I:

., , . ., , I!I I . I Cf I

V.

l; I, * -

7!

el

. L C'.'

C 4 *, . *'*' V.

- -a -

I4 I

'I I

t. .' C I t

• ' I. I.

C' k J Ine to al Lef Blank

.2.

APPENDIX D DATA TABLES QC LABORATORY

The following section contains data illustrating the analyses performed by the quality control laboratory, Teledyne Brown Engineering (TBE).. Duplicate samples were obtained from several locations and media and split between the primary laboratory, Environmental Inc. (Env) and TBE. Comparison of the results for most media were within expected ranges.

I  !-

I t . . .-.

-. iD-1

Intentionally Left Blank D-2

TABLE D-1.1 CONCENTRATIONS OF TRITIUM IN SURFACE WATER SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2002 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER i 2 SIGMA COLLECTION 24 OCA QCB PERIOD 04116102 < 101 < 102 < 100 I .

09111102 327 i 86.9 510

• 84 <.145 MEAN' 214 +/- 320 306

• 577 122 +/- 63 11

. 4'.

. 1 I

I I.

.I ; I -:

I . .

c 1 .. I I

• THE MEAN AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING BOTH THE MDA AND POSITIVE VALUES D-3

TABLE D-1.2 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS INSURFACE WATER SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2002 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCIILITER +/- 2 SIGMA STC COLLECTION Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Zr-95 Nb-95 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-140 La-140 PERIOD I <4.4 <5.1 <11 <4.3 <10 <8.4 <5.9 <4.2 <4.3

- - w 24 04/16102 <45 < 15 09/11/02 < 1.91 <2.1 <5.07 < 1.67 <3.71 < 3.68 <2.8 < 1.57 < 1.85 < 27.2 < 8.7 MEAN' 3+/-3 4i4 8+/-8 3+/-4 7+/-9 6+/-7 4+/-4 3+/-4 3+/-3 36 +/- 26 12 +/- 9 QCA 04/16102 <2 <2 <4 <2 <3 <3 <2 <2 <2 < 20 < 7 09/11/02 2 <2 <6 <2 <4 <4 <3 <2 <2 < 28 <9 MEAN' 2+/-0 2+/-0 5+/-2 2+/-0 4t1 4+/-1 3t1 2+/-0 2+/-0 24 +/- 10 8 +/-3 QCB 04/16/02 <2.1 <2.2 <7.8 <1.9 <6.2 <7.0 <4.4 <2.8 <2.9 < 33 < 4.3 09/111/02 <2.1 <4.2 <6.5 <2.5 <5.1 <5.7 <3 <3.3 <1.9 < 17.2 < 4.6 0 MEAN* 2 +/-0 3 +/-3 7 +/-2 2+/- 1 6+/- 2 6 +/-2 4 +/-2 3+/- 1 2+/- 1 25 +/- 23 4 +/-0

• THE MEAN AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING BOTH THE MDA AND POSmVE VALUES

I TABLE D-11.1 CONCENTRATIONS OF TRITIUM INWELL WATER SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2002 SI OF CR RESULTS IN UNITS'OF PCI/LITER i 2 SIGMA COLLECTION 1 - QCA QCB PERIOD 01/01/02 - 03/27/02 131 +/- 55 < 86- C 100 03Q27J02 - 05/10/02 c 98 .C97' '  ; 136 06/06/02 - 08/12102 < 131 < 131 . 137 09106/02 - 11107/02 < 151 < 161 < 184 MEAN' 128 4 1194 68 -140 :69

.

• I, ,

1 . ..

I

-r. r- . '

. I..

I V  : . It .-

t .

1..

. . I I , . 11 I- I .

il I . . . ... .

.. -. . I

- I ..

I I ,' r -. I'.,

I 1. -  ;;t I . L

." f I - -!

• THE MEAN AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING BOTH THE MDA AND POSITIVE VALUES

TABLE D-11.2 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS INWELL WATER SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2002 RESULTS IN UNITS OF E-3 PCI/CU METER +/- 2 SIGMA STC COLLECTION Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Zr-95 Nb-95 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-140 La-140 PERIOD 1 01/01 - 03/27102 <5 <4 <5 (4 <-5 <10 <4 (3 (4 <14 (5 03/27 - 05/10/02 <3 <3 <8 '3 <6 '6 <4 (3 <3 <23 <8 06/06 - 08/12/02 <5 <5 <11 <5 <11 <9 <6 <6 (5 <40 < 13 09/06 - 11/07/02 (1 <1 3 '1 <2 '3 <1 <1 <1 <13 '4 MEAN' 3.5 +/- 3.4 3.6 +/- 3.5 6.8 +/- 7.0 3.4 i 3.1 6.2 +/- 7.5 6.7 t 6.5 3.9 t 3.9 3.2 t 3.6 3.5 t 3.2 22 +/- 25 7.6 +/- 8.3 QCA 01101 - 03127/02 (3 (3 <5 (3 (2 7 (3 <3 <2 '15 '3 03/27 - 05/10/02 (2 <3 (5 <2 <5 '4 <3 '2 (3 <18 '5 06/06 - 08/12/02 <2 <2 (5 <2 (4 <4 <3 <2 <2 <17 <6 09/06 - 11/07/02 <1 <2 <4 '1 (3 <3 <2 <1 <2 <22 <7 MEAN* 2.1 +/- 1.0 2.2 +/- 0.9 4.7 t 1.2 2.1 +/- 1.3 3.4 +/- 2.0 4.6 +/- 3.6 2.5 +/- 0.9 2.1 +/- 1.4 2.1 +/- 0.9 18 +/- 5.5 5.3 +/- 2.7 0)

QCB 01/01 - 03/27/02 <4 <4 (9 <(4 (9 (7 <4 <4 <4 <20 ( 7 03/27 - 05110/02 <2 <1 (5 <2 <4 <2 (3 <2 <2 <25 <2 06/06 - 08/12/02 <2 <2 <5 <1 <4 <3 <3 <1 <2 <20 <6 09/06 - 11/07/02 <5 <6 <6 <4 <5 <9 <4 (5 <6 <39 < 10 MEAN* 3.4 i 3.2 3.3 i 4.0 6.3 +/- 3.4 2.9 +/- 2.7 5.4 +/- 5.3 5.1 +/- 5.9 3.5 +/- 1.2 3.0 +/- 3.3 3.7 t 3.9 26 +/- 18 6.1 +/- 6.5

• THE MEAN AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING BOTH THE MDA AND POSITIVE VALUES

r'

.l TABLE D-111.1 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN CLAM SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2002

-RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/KG WET i 2 SIGMA STC COLLECTION K-40 Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 CO-60 Zn-65 Cs-134 Cs-137 PERIOD A, - -, -, _ A 24 04/16102 1410 +/- 238 < 13 < 1I <C 4 <C14 ICjz IC 11 < 10 OCA 04116102 1620

• 170 < 18 <20 <43 < 18 <40 ' 19 < 23

.. . . I .

Qcs 04/16/02 1307 +/- 396 < 16 < 14 <67 < 11 <29 < 19 < 16

. I

- . 8, -

I. . . ' ~;';  ! I'.' '-' ¢ I - . , , . I e'

-J4

~~

I~~~ I .  % . .

I.

... , , I ' .!

I

.~

-. . ;y --- . s..~1-.-

. ' .I . . .- - I . . .I . ~- -I . . II4 I I . .' "

. 4 -. . - ..

4 .:4.

. ~. . 4.. -- I I

TABLE D-IV.1 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN SEDIMENT SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2002 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/KG DRY +/- 2 SIGMA STC COLLECTION Be-7 K-40 Mn-54 Co*58 Co-60 Cs-134 Cs-137 PERIOD 24 04116102 c 98 806 +/- 148 < 10 c 11 < 10 <9 < 10 09/10/02 < 96 14600 i 455 <9 c 10 <8 <8 < 10 MEAN* 97 +/- 3 7703 +/- 19508 10 +/- 2 10 9 +/-2 9 +/-2 10 +/- 0 QCA 04/16/02 < 115 938 139 < 11 C 12 < 10 < 10 < 12 09/10102 < 160 1960 197 < 13 c 14 < 12 < 12 < 14 MEAN' 138 +/- 64 1449 +/- 1445 12 +/- 4 13 '3 11 +/- 3 11 +/- 2 13 +/- 3 QCB 04/16/02 < 184 871 +/- 262 < 16 c46 <8 < 16 < 15 09/10/02 < 200 20566+/-453 < 1e ' 17 < 18 < 32 < 14 MEAN' 192 +/- 23 1764 +/- 2524 16 +/- 0 31 i : 41 13 +/- 14 24 t 23 15 t 1

• THE MEAN AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING BOTH THE MDAAND POSITIVE VALUES

l )

TABLE D-V.1 CONCENTRATIONS OF STRONTIUM AND GAMMA EMITTERS INVEGETATION SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2002 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/KG WET *2 SIGMA STC COLLECTION Sr-89 Sr-90 K-40 1-131 Cs.134 Cs.137 Ba-140 La-140 PERIOD U -

36 CABBAGE AUGUST < 10 5.8 +/- 0.8 2888

• 153 < 23 '5 'f6 (45 <15 COLLARDS AUGUST ' 14. 12 i 1.3 3820

• 211 ' 50 ' 15 < 13 < 103 <31 MEAN 12 +/-f 8.9 +/- 8.6 3354 1318 36 38 10

• 14 10 10 74 82 23

• 23 QCA CABBAGE AUGUST '20 3.0 i 1.2 3280

• 171 c28 '6 '7 '54 <18 COLLARDS AUGUST c 13 5.7 +/- 1.1 4720

• 219 < 43 ' 13 '1 ' 86 < 26 MEAN 17 *10 4.4 *3.8 4000 2038 35 *22 1i** 10 11*11 70*45 22+/-12 I .. .

QCB CABBAGE AUGUST <5 <2 2479 *205. -' 9 .--':-<10.

' '7 < 29 <4 COLLARDS AUGUST c7 c4 3937 -270" '<7 7c7 <c34 5c7 1;

t ..- ,

MEAN* 6 3 3 +/-3 3208 2062.. 8 4 10 '+/- I ' 7 +1 '31 +/-8 5+/- 4 I.,

. 1.

• THE MEAN AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING BOTH THE MDA AND POSITIVE VALUES

APPENDIX E INTER-LABORATORY COMPARISON PROGRAM

TABLE E-1 ANALYTICS ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY CROSS CHECK PROGRAM TELEDYNE BROWN ENGINEERING ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES (PAGE 1 OF 3)

Identification Reported Known Ratio (c)

Month/Year Number Matrix Nuclide (1) Units ' Value (a) Value (b) TBElAnalytics Evaluation (d)

February, 2002 A15211-55 Liquid Sr-89 uCVmL 1.60E-03 2.03E-03 0.79 W Sr-90 2.90E-04 3.64E-04 0.80 A A15213-55 Liquid H-3 uCVmL 1.08E-03 1.19E-03 0.90 A March, 2002 E3064-396 Milk Sr-89 pCiL 80 83 0.96 A Sr-90 28 27 1.04 A

• E3065-396 Milk 1-131 pCi/L 86 92 0.93 A Ce-141 300 326 0.92 A Cr-51 256 267 0.96 A Cs-134 94 122 0.77 W Cs-137 252 266 0.95 A Mn-54

• 217 224 0.97 A Fe-59 108 116 0.93 A Zn-65

• 218 221 0.99 A Co-60 147 158 0.93 A E3067-396 AP 1-131 pCi 202 199 1.02 A Cr-51 166 163 1.02 A Cs-134 77 74 1.04 A Cs-137 162 162 1.00 A Mn-54 135 136 0.99 A Fe-59 70 70 1.00 A Zn-65 128 134 0.96 A Co-60 95 96 0.99 A E3066-396 Charcoal 1-131 pCi' 66 77 0.86 A May, 2002 A15521-55 Liquid Gr-Alpha uCi/mL 8.48E-04 7.15E-04 1.19 A A15520-55 Liquid Sr-89 uCi/mL 2.63E-03 3.25E-03 0.81 A Sr-90 2.51 E-04 2.70E-04 0.93 A A15522-55 Liquid Tritium uCi/mL 1.35E-03 1.46E-03 0.92 A E-1

I.I.v,

,7. ,I ,

t., "... - : ' ,' ,

TABLE E-11, ANALYTICS ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY CROSS CHECK PROGRAM TELEDYNE BROWN ENGINEERING ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES

. PAGE 2 OF 3)

Identification -. - Reported Known Ratio (c)

Month/Year Number Matrix Nuclide(1) Units Value(a) Value(b) TBE/Analytics -Evaluation(CD June,20022 E3220-396 Milk 1-131;- pCUL., 86

• 87 . ' ' 0.99 -- A

., . , ,;, . Ce-141 84 90 0.93 A Cr-51 197 235 0.84 A Cs-,134 110

• 120 0.92 A Cs-137 96 91 1.05 A

. . ... Co58, 95 100 0.95 A Mn-54

v v i;

0. 106 95 1.12 A

. . , Fe-59 95 81 1.17 A

., ,; Zn-65 186 I 180 7 1.03 A Co-60 132 125 1.06 A

.

• v June.200, 2Kj E3222-396 AP > . Ce-141 85 75 1.13 A Cr-51 199 196 1.02 A

. . . .  % .. Cs-134 96 100: 0.96 A Cs-137 92 76 1.21 W Co-58 98 83 1.18 A

., ,  :: Mn-54 87 :79 1.10 A Fe-59 85 67 1.27 w i4;.

.. H

', f Zn-65 182 150 1.21 w i . . , F .';.

Co-60 121 104 1.16 A

, F , .. .

. u . - . . .

A

.August, 2CD021 , A16018-55 Liquid . Sr-89 uCVmL 4.12E-03 4.99E-03 0.83

, . Sr-90 2.43E-04 2.64E-04 0.92 A A16020-55 Liquid- Tritium uCmL 1.93E-03 2.OOE-03 0.97 A

• s , .

September, 2002 Al 5989. -148 Liquid I Sr-89, uCVmL 4.02E-03 4.99E-03 0.81' - A

- Sr-90 2.49E-04 2.64E-04 0.94 A E3324-396. Milk Sr-89 pCi/L ' 106 92 1.15 ! A

... 1 3 .2.3 . .I ~Sr-90 39 39 1.00 A

... . P

' September,2 202 E3325-396 Milk 1-131 pC,i.L- 84 80 1.05 A

. . I

- Ce-141 168 160 1.05 A

Cr-51 - i 210.5 227 0.93 A Cs-134 127 132 0.96 A iI Cs-137 .136 127 1.07 A Co-58 93 97 0.96 A Mn-54 165 152 1.09 A Fe-59 ,- - . 90 . 89 1.01.' A

- 196 187 1.05 - A Co-60 147 149 - 0.99 A E-2

TABLE E-I ANALYTICS ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY CROSS CHECK PROGRAM TELEDYNE BROWN ENGINEERING ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES (PAGE 3 OF 3)

Identification Reported Known Ratio (c)

Month/Year Number Matrix Nuclidie 1) Units

• Value (a) Vlue (b) TBEIAnalytics Evaluation (d)

September, 2002 E-3327-396 Filter Ce-141 pCi 115 110 1.05 A Cr-51 163.6 156 1.05 A Cs-134 79 90 0.88 A Cs-137 95 87 1.09 A Co-58 71 67 1.06 A Mn-54 118 104 1.13 A Fe-59 76 61 1.25 A Zn-65 155 130 1.19 A Co-60 108 102 1.06 A E3326-396 Charcoal 1-131 pCi 73 85 0.86 A December, 2002 E3520-396- Milk Sr-89 pCiL 88 68 1.29 W Sr-90 40 38 1.05 A E3521-396 Milk 1-131 pCi/L 97 86 1.13 A Ce-141 136 111 1.23 W Cr-51 347 346 1.00 A Cs-134 97 99 0.98 A Cs-137 229 220 1.04 A Co-58 143 139 1.03 A Mn-54 162 142 1.14 A Fe-59 80 72 1.11 A Zn-65 217 178 1.22 W Co-60 172 164 1.05 A December, 2002 E3523-396 Filter Ce-141 pCi 108 128 0.84 A Cr-51 370 398 0.93 A Cs-134 79 114 0.69 N (2)

Cs-137 226 253 0.89 A Co-58 141 160 0.88 A Mn-54 152 163 0.93 A Fe-59 89 83 1.07 A Zn-65 196 206 0.95 A Co-60 170 189 0.90 A E3522-396 Charcoal 1-131 pCi 84 96 0.88 A (1) Only analyses performed routinely for the REMP are included on this table.

(2) Coincidental summing resulted in low Cesium-134 activity. Elimination of the coincidental summing resulted in an activity of 110 pci.

No further action required.

Analytics known values were incorrectly calculated. Revised (as shown) evaluation was acceptable.

(a) Teledyne Brown Engineering reported result.

(b) The Analytics known value is equal to 100°% of the parameterpresent in the standard as determined by gravimetric and/or volumetric measurements made during standardcpreparation.

(c) Ratio of Teledyne Brown Engineering to Analytics results.

(d) Analytics evaluation: A= Acceptable. Reported result falls within ratio limits of O.80-1.20. W=Acceptable with warning.

Reported result falls within ratio limits of 0.70-0.79 and 1.21-1.30.

E-3

- I F<>

TABLE E-2 DOEIEML ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY CROSS CHECK PROGRAM TELEDYNE BROWN ENGINEERING ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES

, .(PAGE I OF 2)

Identification -' -- Reported Known Ratio (c)

MonthlYear Number' Media Nuclide(1) Units- Value(a) Valuet(b) TBE/EML Evaluation (d)

. . ~~- I. . *--.4 > ..A--8X::..........,....

June,2002 QAP 56 AP Co-60 Bq/filter 31.7: 30.52 s , 1.04 -: A 0.,.

, Cs-137 , - 30.4 28.23 1.08 A

. I Gr-Beta I 1.21 1.30 0.93 A I ., 1.

Mn-54 38.3 38.53 0.99 A Sr-90 4.68 4.832 0.97 A Soil... Ac-228 Bqlkg 50 - 51.167 0.98 A Bi-212 . 35.9 53.43 0.67 A B1-214 46.3 53.933 0.86 W Cs-137 1300 1326.67 0.98 A K-40 608 621.67 0.98 A Pb-212 49.4 ,, 51.1. I 0.97 A Pb-214 49.1 54.367 0.90 A Sr-90, 46.6, . 53.756 0.87 A Vegetation Co-60 Bq/kg 11.7 11.23 1.04 A Cs-137 346. 313.667 1.10 A K-40 ' 952 864.33 1.10 A Sr-90 477 586.28 0.81 A

- June,2002 QAP 56 -, Water: Co-60 Bq/L 367 347.33 1.06 A Cs-134 2.93 3.357 0.87 W Cs-137 59.6 56.067 1.06 A Gr-Beta 895 1030 0.87 A r . H-3. 285 283.7 1.00 A Sr-90 5.78 7.579 0.76 W

.,.1 3,

,1 . .. .

S :

I.. .. . -

.4 .. . . ..

.. 3.-

E-4

TABLE E-2 DOEIEML ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY CROSS CHECK PROGRAM TELEDYNE BROWN ENGINEERING ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES (PAGE 2 OF 2)

Identification Reported Known Ratio (c)

MonthlYear Number Media Nuclide (1) Units Value (a) Value (b) TBEIEML Evaluation (d)

December, 2002 QAP 57 AP Co-60 Bq/filter 24.1 23.0 1.05 A Cs-137 36.1 32.5 1.11 A Gr-Beta 0.813 0.871 0.93 A Mn-54 58.3

• 52.2 1.12 A Sr-90 5.86 5.561 1.05 A Soil Bi-212 Bqikg 23.2 45.93 0.51 w Bi-214 32.4 33.63 0.96 A Cs-137 835 829.33 1.01 A K-40 671 637.67 1.05 A Pb-212 42.00 43.43 0.97 A Pb-214 44.46 35.2 1.26 A Sr-90 41.00 41.16 1.00 A December, 2002 QAP 57 Vegetation Co-60 Bq/kg 11.5 9.66 1.19 A Cs-137 345 300.67 1.15 A K-40 1690 1480 1.14 A Sr-90 457 476.26 0.96 A Water Am-241 Bq/L 2.89 3.043 0.95 A W

Co-60 303 268.67 1.13 Cs-134 59 60.2 0.98 A Cs-1 37 85.8 81.43 1.05 A Gr-Beta 817 900 0.91 A H-3 353 227.3 1.55 W Sr-90 8.58 8.69 0.99 A (1) Only analyses perfonmed routinely for the REMP are included on this table.

(a) Teledyne Brown Engineering reported result.

(b) The DOE/EML known value is equal to 100YO of the parameterpresent in the standard as determined by gravimetric andfor volumetric measurements made during standard preparation.

(c) Ratio of Teledyne Brown Engineering to DOE/EML results (d) DOE/EML evaluation: A-acceptable, W=acceptable with warning, N=not acceptable.

E-5

11 - . 1 - , ,

i -1 .

. j. - ;  : , ., , .

, ,. e r-, 10 ' "

TABLE E-3 ERA ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY CROSS CHECK PROGRAM TELEDYNE BROWN ENGINEERING ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES

- . . . <(PAGE 1 OF 11 Identification - Reported Known Ratio (c)

MonthlYear Number Media Nuclide (i) Units Value (a) Value (b) TBE/ERA Evaluation (d)

May. 21302 Rad, 49. ,:

Water.. Gr-Beta . . .... 162 189 0.86 I A t

>, *. Co-60 39.3 39.1 1.01 A I.

. . L I .

Cs-134 .. . 15.5 17.1 0.91 A

' ' t " .

Cs-137 , , . cI I 52.2 52.1 1.00 A Sr-89 i, -.- '

27.2 31.7 0.86 A

. Sr-90 25.1 28.3 0.89 A c...

1-,131 13.35 14.7 0.91 A H1-3. I' - .1 14600 17400 0.84 A

! . i, s . , .

I' L November, 2002 ,Rad 151 ' Water H-3 . pC/

10100 10200 0.99 A

. . I 1-131

. .  ;. . 7.94 6.76 1.17 A Gr-Beta 280 330 0.85 A

( .  : . ..' ' l I Sr-89 41.7 47.6 0.88 A

, . . )

.. . . .. Sr-90 6.75 7.56 0.89 A

C0-60; 122 104 , 1.17

• A Cs-134 60.0 55.5 1.08 A Cs-137 140 117 1.20 A 4, .

(1) Only analyses performed rautinefy for the REMP are Included on this table, .. *-

(a) Teledyne Brown Engineering reported result . ,. , ,,., .

(b) The ERA lkxown value Is equal to 100Y%of the pararneterpresent In the standard as deterinned by gravimetric and/or vohumetrfc measurements made during standardpreparation. ' .

(c) Ratio of Teledyne Brown Engineering to ERA results.:-

(d) ERA evaluation: A=acceptable. Reported result falls within the Waming LUnit& 'NA=not acceptable. Reported result falls outside of the Control Limits. CE-check hr Enror. Reported result falls within the Contrd Limits and outside of the Waming Limit.

• -. E-6

TABLE E-4 MAPEP ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY CROSS CHECK PROGRAM TELEDYNE BROWN ENGINEERING ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES (PAGE 1 OF 1)

Identification Reported Known Month/Year Number Media Nuclide (1) Un ts Value (a) Value (b) Control Limits Evaluation (c)

March, 2002 01-W9 Water Mn-54 BqIL 253 246 172.20 - 319.80 A Co-57 141 143 100.10- 185.90 A Co-60 143 141 98.70 - 183.30 A Cs-I 34 26.0 28.5 19.95 - 37.05 A Cs-137 270 286 200.20 - 371.80 A Sr-90 4.71 4.8 3.39 - 6.24 A August, 2002. 02-S9 Soil Mn-54 Bqlikg 679 546 382.2 - 709.8 W Co-57 - 289 246 172.2 - 319.8 A Co-60 109 87.5 61.25- 113.75 W Cs-134 948 862 603.4 - 1120.6 A Cs-137 131 111 77.7- 144.3 A Zn-65 1020 809 556.3- 1051.7 W K-40 722 652 456.4 - 847.6 A (1) Only analyses performed routinely for the REMP are induded on this table.

(a) Teledyne Brown Engineering reported result.

(b) The MAPEP known value is equal to 100% of the parameterpresent in the standard as determined by gravimetrk and/or volumetric measurements made during standard preparation.

(c) DOEIMAPEP evaluation: A=acceptable, W-acceptable with warning. N=not acceptable.

E-7

'-1 " . . --t-11-F -!

-% * '0' TABLE E-5 DOE EML Cross

__________ A. Check P9rogram Results for Environmental, Inc., 2002 . ."-

.t ____________. ________________

Environmental. Inc. EML _

. . i Nuclide. ,Value Uncertainty Value M i Max Agreem ent Lab Code Toe Date (A); -(B & E) - (C&E) (D& E) Ratio l Ratio (F)

STW-945 Water - 03/01102 Co-60 349.20 i 2.60

• 347.33 0.80 - 1.20 A STW-945s. Water

• 03/01/02 Cs-134

• 3.40 +/- 0.60 -3.36 0.80 -1.30 A STW-945 Water 03/01/02 Cs-137 ,57.20 1.70 56.07 0.80 -1.22 A STW-945; Water 03/01/02 Sr-90 . .-. -7.40 +/- 1.30 .7.58 0.69 -1.34 A STW-946 Water; 03/01/02 Gr. Beta -

• r,930.60 +/-12.00 1030.00 0.61 -1.43 A STW-946 Wate'r 03101102 HW3 226.30 1 32.70 283.70 0.78 -2.45 A STSO-947 Soil. 03/01/02 Ac-228 - 55.00D 5.50 51.17 0.80 - 1.38 A STSO-947 Soil - 03/01/02 Bi-212 -r '* _49.20 t+/-12.40 53.43 0.50 - 1.34 A STSO-947. Soil, 03/01/02 Bi-214 46.60 +/- 3.10 53.93 0.78 - 1.42 .A STSO-947; Soil 03/01/02 Cs-137

• 1401.60 9.10 1326.67 0.80 - 1.25 A STSO-947- Soil 03011/02 K ,t613.10 +/- 28.10 621.67 0.80 -1.32 - A STSO-947 Soil, 03101/02 Pb-212 N 51.60 +/- 2.60 51.10 0.78 -1.32 A STSO-947 Soil 03101/02 Pb214 52.00 +/- 3.60 54.37 0.76- 1.46 STSO-947 Soil 03/01/02 Sr-90 52.10 +/- 6.30 53.76 0.67 -2.90 A STVE-948 Vegetation 03/01/02 Co-60 ,. 13.50 +/- 2.10 11.23 0.80 -1.44 A STVE-948 Vegetation 03101/02 Cs-137,. 350.40 +/- 6.30

• 313.67

• 0.80 - 1.31 A STVE-948 Vegetation 03/01/02 K-40 '.* 940.80 +/- 45.60 .,864.33 .0.79 -1.39 - A STVE-948 Vegetation' 03/01/02 Sr-9O 543.40 24.90 +/- 586.28 0.55 -1.21 A STAP-949 Air Filter 03/01/02 Co-60 30.10 +/- 0.30 30.52 0.80 - 1.26 A STAP-949 Air Filter 03/01/02 Cs-137 29.90 +/- 0.30 28.23 0.80 - 1.32 A STAP-949 Air Filter 03/01/02 Mn-54 40.40+ 0.40 38.53 0.80 -1.35 A STAP-949 Air Filter 03/01/02 Sr-90 3.40 +/- 0.40 4.83 0.53 -1.84 A STAP-950 Air Filter 03/01/02 Gr. Beta 1.34 +/- 0.05 1.30 0.76 - 1.36 A STW-959 Water 09/01/02 Co-60 258.40 +/- 2.30 268.67 0.80 -1.20 A STW-959 Water 09/01/02 Cs-134 50.80 +/- 3.30 60.20 0.80 -1.30 A STW-959 Water 09/01/02 Cs-137 80.10 +/- 0.30 81.43 0.80 -1.22 A STW-959 Water 09/01/02 H-3 271.90 +/- 20.90 227.30 0.78 -2.45 A STW-959 Water 09/01/02 Sr-90 9.70 +/- 0.20 8.69 0.69 -1.34 A STW-960 Water 09/01/02 Gr. Beta 852.00 +/- 26.50 900.00 0.61 -1.43 A STSO-961 Soil 09/01/02 Ac-228 47.60 +/- 1.90 42.30 0.80 -1.38 A STSO-961 Soil 09/01/02 Bi-212 45.60 +/- 1.70 45.93 0.50 - 1.34 A STSO-961G Soil 09/01/02 Bi-214 48.80 +/- 4.90 33.63 0.78 - 1.42 W STSO-961 Soil 09/01/02 Cs-I 37 819.60 +/- 16.60 829.33 0.80 - 1.25 A STSO-961 Soil 09/01/02 K-40 705.30 +/- 31.40 637.67 0.80 - 1.32 A STSO-961 Soil 09/01/02 Pb-212 . 48.60 +/- 3.40 43.43 0.78 - 1.32 A STSO-961 Soil 09/01/02 Pb-214 51.10 +/- 5.10 35.20 0.761 - .6 A STSO-961 Soil 09/01/02 Sr-9O 38.50 +/- 0.10 41.16 0.67 -2.90 A SSVE-962 Vegetation 09/01/02 Co-6O 11.80 +/- 1.50 9.66 0.80 -1.44 A STVE-962 Vegetation 09/01/02 Cs-137 340.30 +/-16.80 . .,.300.67 0.80 -1.31 A STVE-962 Vegetation 09/01/02 K-40' 1646.00 +/- 74,40, 1480.00 0.79 -1.39 A STVE-962 Vegetation 09/01/02 Sr-90 .345.60 +/-97.80 . 476.26 0.55 -121 A F-A.

I TABLE E-5 DOE EML Cross Check Program Results for Environmental, Inc., 2002 Environmental. Inc EML Nuclide Value Uncertainty L Value Min Max, Agreement Lab Code Type Date (B&E) (C & E) (D & E) iRatio - Ratio' (F)

STAP-963 Air Filter 09/01/02 Co-60. 24.90 t 0.60  : 23.00 0.80 -1.26 ' . A STAP-963 Air Filter 09/01/02 Cs-137 38.00 t 1:30 32,50 0.80 -,1.32 A.

STAP-963 Air Filter 09/01102 Mn-54 60.80 + 1.90 52.20 0.80 - 1.35 'A STAP-963 Air Filter 09/01/02 Sr-90' 5.20 i 0.20 556 0.53 - 1.84 A STAP-964 Air Filter 09/01/02 Gr. Beta 0.80 i 010 '  ; 0.87 ; 0.76 - 1.3 A A. Only analyses performed routinely for the REMP are Induded on this table.'  :: . -- -

B. The Environmental, Inc. value Is the mean of I or Smeasurements/deterrinations. . -

C. The Environmental, Inc. uncertainty is the 2-sigmra counting uncertainty for one determination and one, standard deviation for three determinations. at - ,

D. The DOE EML value Is the mean of replicate determinations for eadc radionudide.

E. Reporting units are Bq/L for water, Bq/kg (dry) for soil, Bq/kg (wet) for vegetations and total Bq for air filters F. The control limits (min ration and max ratio are established by DOE EML Acceptable agreement Is adhieved if the ratio of the Environmental. Inc. value divided by the DOE EML value falls within the control imits..

G. This naturally occuririg radionuctide Is present in the shield background. No follow-up actions were performed because al of the other gamma scan results were acceptable and the subject result was Just outside of the upper control finit; -

The control limit conceptwas established from percenbles of historic data distributions (1982-1992). The:

evaluation of this historic data and the development of the control limits are presented in DOE report EML-564. ,

The control limits listed In this table were developed from percentiles of data distribution for the years.1993-1999.

'.4

! ,  ? :1 -

.- a- - Z  ;  ;

! . ' , .  ! . - s .............................. .;

,. ,',' ,, i , .; 0 ,,

._ , . . . + .

I i - 6 I .  :- I ' , '. a - 4..

,. , . Ij I I ,' , 7- I . . ' I -- . - .

I I I i . I

"S

• e l TABLE E-6 ERA STATISTICAL

SUMMARY

PROFICIENCY-TESTING PROGRAM FOR

~~~~~~~~~. 'ENVIRONMENTAL, Inc., 2002 r

. . ,' Environmental,' Inc. _____ ERA LabCode:

- Nuclide, Value Uncertainty Value Min .Max Agreemer Otis': C' I

.~~~~

. ~Date (A)' (B & Ej) -(C

& E) (D) - Ratio 'Ratio' (E)

STW-940 02/20/02 Sr-89 53.0 *2.5 : 55.3 46.6 -64.0 l -

STW-940 02(20/02 " Sr-90,, 16.6 +/- 0.5 .15.9

. A Sv

, :7.2 24.6 A STW-942 02120102' Gr. Beta 45.7 3.1 48.3 39.6 -57.0 A STW-944 02/206i2' C6-60 76.9 2.72 ' 73.4 64.7 -82.1 'A STW-944 02/20102 Cs-134 38.7 +/-1.6 ; 421 33.4-50.8 A S1W-944 02120102 -Cs-137 92.9 +/-2.7,: ... 8-8.8 '80.1 -97.5 A S1W-944 02/20/02 -Zn-65 . 361.0 +/- 9.2 . , 359.0 ' 298.0 -420.0 ' A STW-952 0512210 2 Co-60 37.9 0.7,, 39.1 ' 30.4 -47.8 A S1W-952- 05/22/02 Cs-134 ' 14.5 +/-0.8. 17.1 ,8.4 -25,8 . A STW-952 - 05122102 ' *50 2.0 52.1 ' ' AACs-137 STW-952 05/22102 Gr. Beta " 171.0 2 .*5, . 189.0 .140.0 -238.0 ,- A S1W-952 05;22102 Sr-89 28.4 +/- 4.'8- 31.7 23.0 -40.4 A STW -952 05122102 Sr-90' 32.4 +/-3.1,, 28.3 , 19.6- 37.0 A STW-953F 05122/02 H-3 ' 13900.0 +/-100.0 17400 14400 20400 W STW-954 05/22102 - 1-131 -- 14.6 j+/-0.3 14.7 -. -11.2 -18.2 A STW-965 0812102 Co-60 23.8 +/-1.0 . 23.3 :14.6 -32.0 A STW-965 08(21/02 Cs-134 0 - 62.9+/- 1.2 71.7 63.0-80.4 A STW-965 08(21/02 Cs-137 219.3 +/- 10.7 214.0 195.0 -233.0'- 'A S1W-965 08121/02 Gr. Beta 26.7 +/-0.4 -21.9 13.2 -30.6 ' W STW-965 08121/02 Sr-89 ' 28.4 1.5i +/- 29.0 20.3 -37.7 A STW-965 08/2102 Sr-90' ' 36.5 1.1 +/- 36.4 27.7 -45.1 A STW-965 08121/02 Zn-65 92.4 +/- 2.2 95.7 79.4112.0

-- A STW-966 11(20/02 Gr. Beta 44.7 +/-1.0 47.0 38.3 - 55.7 A STW-967 11/20/02 H-3 10100.0 +/- 38.7 10200 8440 12000 A STW-969 11/20/02 1-131 6.0 +/-0.4 6.8 3.3 -10.2 A STW-970 11(20102 Co-60 104.0 +/-7.1 104.0 95.0 -113.0 A STW-970 11(20/02 Cs-134 48.2 +/- 2.3 55.5 46.8 -64.2 A STW-970 11(20/02 Cs-I37 109.0 +/- 12.6 117.0 107.0

- 127.0 A STW-970 11(20102 Gr. Beta 252.0 +/- 26.8 288.0 244.0 -416.0 A STW-970 11 (20/02 Sr-89 43.2 +/- 0.7 47.6 38.9 - 58.3 A STW-970 11/20/02 Sr-90 .7.5 +/- 0.2 7.6 0.0 - 16.2 A A. Only analyses performed routinely for the REMP are indluded on this table.

B. The Environmental. Inc. value Is the mean of 3 measurements/determinations.

C. The Environmental, Inc. uncertainty is the 2-sigma counting uncertainty for one determination and one standard deviation for three determinations.

D. The ERA value is equal to 100% of the parameter present In the standard as determined by gravimetric and/or volumetric measurements made during standard preparation. -

E. A= Acceptable - Reported Result falls within the Control mits.

NA = Not Acceptable - Reported Result falls outside of the Control Limits.

F. The analysis was repeated: result of reanalysis: 16114+- 487 pCIL/

G. ERA acknowledged an unacceptably high percentage of failure for Cs-134 and questioned its own control limits.

No problems were identified in the analysis.

E-1 0

-- ^ l. rvS

.

• I ., I . , L. - . I . t I '

TABLE E-7 , MAPEP Cross Cheick Progran Results for Environmental, Inc., 2002

'I'1 Environmental, Inc. - MAPEP Nuclide Value Uncertainty Value Min Max IAgreement Lab Code Type Date (A) (B & E) (C & E) (D & E) Rato Rato (F)

STW-939 water 12V01101 Co-57 -138.9 $0.5 -143 *14.3 100.1 -185.9 STW-939 water 12V01/01 Co-60 139.1 +/-0.5 141 +/- 14.1 98.7 - 183.3 STW-939 water 12/01/01 Cs-134 25.16 +/- 0.2 28.5 i0.3 19.95 - 37. 1 STW-939 water 12V01101 Cs-137 279.96 +/-0.9. 286 *28.6. 200.2 -371.8 STW-939 water 12101/01 Mn-54 253.64 *0.9 246 *0.2 172.2 -319.8 STW-939 water 12101/01 Sr-90 4.88 +/- 0.3 4.8 +/- 0.5 3.36 - 6.2 STW-939 water 12/01/01 Zn-65 70.6 +/- 1.1 67.3 +/- 6.7 47.11 - 87.5 STSO-955. soil . 10116102 Co-57-- - 210.58

• 2.0 . 246 *24.6 172.2 -319.8 STSO-955 soil 10/16102 Co-60 84.38 +/-0.9 87.5 +/-8.8 61.25 -113.8, STSO-955 soil 10/16102 Cs-134 692.6 2.1 , 862 +/- 86.0 603.4 - 1120.6 STSO-955 soil 10/16102 Cs-137' 96.98 +/-1.7. 11111.1 77.7 - 144.3 STSO-955 soil -10J16/02 Mn-54 509.74 +/-3.4 546

• 54.6 382.2 -709.8 STSO-955 soil 10/16102 Zn-65 783.59 + 6.4 809 *: 80.9 566.3 - 1051.7 A. Only analyses perfomied routinely for the REMP are Induded on this table. -

B. The Environmental, Inc. value is the mean ofI or 3 measurements/deternminations.

C. The Environmental, Inc uncertainty isthe 2-sigma counting uncertainty for one determination and one standard deviation for three determinations. r D. The DOE EML value Isthe mean of replicate determinations for each radionudide.

E. Reporting units are Bq/L for water, Bqog (dry) for soil, Bqflcg (wet) for vegetations and total Bq for air filters F. The control limits (min ration and max ratio are estabished by DOE EML Acceptable agreement Is achieved if the ratio of the Environmental. Inc. value divided by the DOE EML value falls within the contro limits.

I II I I i I ...

I . . I

. I I I .. II .. I I

i I. II

. I I .- ,

. t I .

i I .

I