ML050740410
| ML050740410 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Oyster Creek |
| Issue date: | 03/04/2005 |
| From: | Swenson C AmerGen Energy Co |
| To: | Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| 2120-052-2888, 2130-05-20054 | |
| Download: ML050740410 (101) | |
Text
AmerGen Energy Company, LLC www.exeloncorP.com An Exelon Company Oyster Creek US Route 9 South, P.O. Box 388 Forked River, NJ 08731-0388 Technical Specification 6.9.1.e March 4, 2005 2130-05-20054 2120-052-2888 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555 Oyster Creek Generating Station Facility Operating License No. DPR-16 NRC Docket No. 50-219
Subject:
2002 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report - Revised February 2005 Enclosed is a revised copy of the Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report for calendar year 2002, for the Oyster Creek Generating Station. This submittal is made in accordance with Oyster Creek Generating Station Technical Specification 6.9.1.e.
If any further information or assistance is needed, please contact Douglas Weigle, EnvironmentaU Chemistry at 609-971-4029 or David Fawcett, Regulatory Assurance, at 609-971-4284.
C. N. Swenson Vice President, Oyster Creek Generating Station CNS/DW/DIF Enclosure cc:
S. J. Collins, Administrator, USNRC Region I P. S. Tam, USNRC Senior Project Manager, Oyster Creek R. J. Summers, USNRC Senior Resident Inspector, Oyster Creek File No. 03011
-9 5
Docket No:
50-21 9 OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION UNIT I
-Annual Ra'diological Environmental Operating Report-
~~..
........,8..
1 January Througdh 31 Decme.20
.. _~,Y e~m e,2..00.2
. 7 .
i.,
Teledyne 6B'rown Engineering Environmental Services..
- Prepar ergy Co.--pany Oyster Creek Generating Station Forked River, NJ 08731 Revised February 2005 May 2003
- I Revised February 2005 Table Of Contents I. Summary and Conclusions...............................
1 II. Introduction
.3 A. Objectives of the REMP.........................
.3 B. Implementation of the Objectives.
4 IIl. Program Description....................
.4 A. Sample Collection................
.4 B. Sample Analysis..............
6 6
C. Data Interpretation...............
6
- 0. Program Exceptions...........................................................................................8 E. Program Changes
.9 IV. Results and Discussion
.9 A. Aquatic Environment...9..............;.
- 1. Surface Water..............................................................................
9
- 2. Well Water.10
- 3. Fish.10
- 4. Clams and Crabs.................
11
- 5. Sediment..............
11 B. Atmospheric Environment
................ 12
- 1. Airbome....... :
12 a.- Air Particulates' 12 2
b.. Airborne Iodine...........1................................................................. 13
- 2. Terrestrial..
13
- a. Vegetation.13 C. Ambient Gamma Radiation.14.
D. Land Use Survey.15 V. References...........
16.................
`16
~
I
Revised February 2005 Appendices Appendix A Radiological Enfvironimentai Monitoring Report Summary Tables Table A-1 Radiological Environnm'ental Monitoring Program Annual Summary for
'the Oyster Creek' Generating Station,2002 Appendix B Location Designation, Distance & Direction, And Sample Collection &
- Analytical Methods.-.!
-Table B-1:
Location Designation and Identification System forlthe Oyster Creek Generating' Statio'n Table B-2:
Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program - Sampling Locations, Distance aid Direction, Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2002
- Table B-3
.Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program - S mmary of Sample Collection and Analytical Methods, Oyster.Creek Generating Station,
.. 2002 Figures.
Figure B-1:
- Oyster Creek Gen'erating Station (OCGS)
Locations of Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program (REMP)
- Stations within two miles of the OCGS Figure B-2:
Oyster Creek Generating Station (OCGS)
... Locations of Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program (REMP)
Stations greater than two miles from the OCGS endix C Data Tables - Primary Laboratory App ITables"'-I Table C-1.1 Table C-1.2 Table C-11.1 Concentrations.of Tritium in Surface Water Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2002.
Concentrations.of.Gamma Emitters in Surface Water Samples v '
Collected in the Vicinity of Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2002.
J Concentrations of Tritium in Well Water Samples Collected in the Vicinity.of Oyster.Creek Generating Station, 2002.
Table C-11.2.
Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Well Water Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2002.
... II
'-I.
Revised February 2005 l Table C-111.1 Table C-111.2 Table C-IV.1 Table C-V.1 Concentratibns of Gamaia Emitters in Predator and Bottom Feeder (Fish) Samples Collected in the.Vicinity of Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2002...,
Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Clam and Crab Samples Collected in the.Vicinity of Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2002.
Concentrations of Gamma Emittbrs in Sedimient Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2002.
Concentrations of Gross Beta in Air Particulate Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2002.
Table C-V.2 Monthly and Yearly Mean Values of Gross Beta Concentrations (E-3 PCI/CU. METER) in Air Particulate Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2002.
Table C-V.3 Concentrations of Strontium inr Air Particulate Samples Collected in the Vicinity. of Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2002.'
Table C-V.4
' Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Air Particulate Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2002.
Table C-VI.1 Concentrations of 1-131 in Air Iodine Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Oyster Creek Generating Station; 2002.
Table C-VII.1 Table C-VIII.
Table C-VIII.
Table C-VIII.
Table C-IX.1 Figures Figure C-1 Figure C-2 Figure C-3 1 Concentrations of Strontium and Gamma Emitters in Vegetation Samples Collected in the Vicinity, of Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2002.
1 Quarterly TLD Results for Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2002.
2 Mean Quarterly TLD Results for the Site Boundary, Middle, Special Interest, and Control Locations for Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2002.
3 Summary of the Ambient Dosimetry Program for Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2002.:
Summary of Collection Dates for Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2002.
.~
- Mean Cobalt-60 Concentration in ClamsI OysterCreek Generating Station,1I983 - 2002. -.
Mean Cobalt-60 Concentration in Aquatic Sediment Oyster Creek Generating Station,.1984 -'2002:.
Mean Cesium-1 37 Concentration in Aquatic Sediment Oyster Creek Generating.Station,.1984,- 2002.
I
.i
.i.
I
If 1 !
' 'Figure C4 '
Revised February 2005 Mean WeeklyGross Beta Concentrations in-Air Particulates Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2002.
1
,,F j
~ :
- \\
Figure, C-5
. Mean Monthly Gross Beta Concentrations in Air Particulates
- Oyster. Creek Generating Station, 1984 - 2002.-'
Figure C-6
",Mean Quarterly TLD Gamma Dose ff-vster Creek rAneratinn Stafinn. 2002.
Figure! C-7 Mean Quarterly TLD Gamma Do'se
_Oyster Creek Generating Station, 1989 - 2002.
Data Tables andFigures - QC Laboratory I*f Appendix C Tables Table D-1.1 Table D-1.2 Table D-11.1 Table D-11.2 Table D-lll.
Table D-IV.
Table D-V.
Appendix E Tables Table E-1 Table E-2 Table E-3 Table E-4
).
I Concentrations of Tritium in Surface Water.Samples Collected in the Vicinity Of Oyster.Creek Generating Station, 2002.
AConcentrations of Gamma Emitters in Surface Water Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2002.
1Concentrations of Tritium in Well Water Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2002.
Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Well Water Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2002.
1 Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Clam Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2002.
.1, Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Sediment Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2002.
I Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Vegetation Samples Collected in
,; the Vicinity of Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2002. i Inter-Laboratory Comparison Program Analytics Environmental Radioactivity Cross Check Program' Teledyne Brown Engineering Environmental Services DOE/EM L Environ'mehtal'Rddicactivity Cross Check Program Teledyne Brown Engineering Environmental Services ERA Environmental 'Radioactivity Cros-Check Program
.,Teledyne Brown Engineering Environmental Services MAPEP Environmen'tal Radioactivity Cross Check Program I
I I
I I
I I
I
-iv
1-4.
Table E-5 Table E-6 Revised February 2005 Teledyne Brown Engineering Environmental Services ERA Statistical Summary Proficiency Testing Program Environmental, Inc., 2002 DOE's Mixed Analyte.Perforinance E Prograrn (MAPEP)
Environmental, Inc., 2002 I
I-.
i;
" i i
, i
.I i
I I
J.
.~
i a;.
I I
By
Summary and Conclusions -:;;
i This report on the Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program conducted for
-the Oyster Creek Generating Station (OCGS) by AmerGen Energy Company coversthe period 01 January2002 through 31 December 2002. During that time period, 938 analyses were performed on 810 samples. In assessing all the data gathered for this report and comparing these results with historical data, it was concluded that the operation of OCGS had no adverse radiological impact on the environment. -
Surface and well water samples were analyzed for concentrations of tritium and gamma emitting nuclides. No fission or activation products were detected.
Tritium activity was detected in two surface water indicator stations and at the control station.
Fish (predator and bottom feeder), clams, crabs, and sediment samples were analyzed for concentrations of gamma emitting nuclides. No fission or activation products were detected in fish, clams, or crabs. Cesium-137 levels detected in sediment were consistent with levels detected in previous years and were due to previous plant releases and fallout from nuclear weapons testing. No other OCGS-produced fission or activation products were detected in sediment.
Air particulate samples were analyzed for concentrations of gross beta and gamma emitting nuclides. Cosmogenic Be-7 was detected at levels consistent with those detected in previous years. No fission or activation products were detected.
High sensitivity 1-131 analyses were performed on weekly air samples. All results were less than the minimum detectable activity.
Strontium-89 and strontium-90 and gamma analyses were performed on quarterly composites of air particulate samples. All strontium-89 and strontium-90 results were below the minimum detectable activity.
Vegetation samples were analyzed for gamma emitting nuclides, strontium-89, and strontium-90. Concentrations of naturally occurring K-40 were consistent with those detected in previous years. Cesium-1 37 was detected at levels consistent with those detected in previous years. All strontium-89 results were below the minimum detectable activity. Strontium-90 activity was detected in both indicator and background stations with four (4) of these Sr-90 results being higher than what was historically seen (Table C-VII.1). The investigation that ensued found that the indicator gardens, which contained edible vegetables, failed shortly after the initial harvest in August 2002 due to a severe regional drought. Per the provisions of the Oyster Creek Offsite Dose Calculation Manual, it was permissible to collect broadleaf vegetation, (which could not be eaten by man), as a substitute to the edible vegetables. In all four cases, the higher than expected Sr-90 results (84, 36, 121, and 29 pCi/kg wet) were detected in the non-edible samples. It is believed that due to uptake from fallout
.; 1
fallout from previous atmospheric weapons testing, that these results fall in the normal range for this type of vegetation and are not related to Oyster Creek operation.. To further reinforce that the above given Sr-90 values were not related to Oyster Creek operation,'all Sr-89 and 90 analyses on air'particulate filter composites were less than the ininimrum detectable activity (Table C-V.3).
Using Offsite'Dose Calculation methodology with Sr-90 as the source term, the dose calculated to man was 4.4X10'9 mREM Environnmiental'gamma radiation measurements were performed quarterly using thermoluminescent dosirneters. Levels.detected were consistent with those observed in previous years.
I I.I
.. I I
I.
I I
t I..
I ;.
I I
1
.I I
I I.
I
- ~
,*J.*
.q,
-l
.I I
2
I II.
Introductionduc The Oyster Creek Generating Station (OCGS), consisting of one boiling water reactor owned and operated by AmerGen Energy Company, is located on the AtlariticCoastal Plain Phyfiigraphic.Province in Ocean County, New Jersey, about 60 miles' south of Newark; '9 rnile's'south.of Toms River, and 35 miles north of Atlantic City. It lies approximately 2 miles inland from Bamegat Bay. The site, covering approximately 781 acres, is situated partly in Lacey Township and, to a lesser extent, in OceanrTownship' Access is provided by U.S.' Route 9, passing through thie site and separating 'a 637-acre eastern portion from the' balance of the property west of the highway. The station is about 4 mile west of the highway and 1% miles eastof th`e Parkway. The site property extends about 2V2 miles inland from the bay; the maximum width in the north-south direction is almost 1 mile.' The site location is 'part of the New Jersey shore area with its relatively flat topography and extensive freshwater and saltwater marshlands.
The South Branch of Forked River runs across the northern side of the site and Oyster Creek partly borders th'e southern side.
A Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program (REMP) for OCGS was initiated in 1966. This report covers those analyses performed by Teledyne Brown Engineering (TBE), ICN Pharmaceutical, and Environmental Inc. (Midwest Labs) on samples collected during the period 01 January 2002 through 31 December 2002.
A.'
Objective of the REMP.:
A The objectives of the REMP are to:
- 1. '
Assess dose impacts to the public from the OCGS operations.
- 2.
To verify in-plant controls for the containment of radioactive materials.
- 3.
To monitor any buildup of long-lived radionuclides in the environmentand' changes in background radiation levels.
- 4.
, To provide reassurance to the public that the program is capable of
-adequately assessing impacts and identifying noteworthy changes in the radiological status of the environment.
- 5.
Provide data on measurable levels of radiation and radioactive*
materials in the site environs.-.:
- 6.
Evaluate the relationship between quantities of radioactive material 3
hj released from the plant and resultant radiation doses to individuals from principal pathways of exposure.>
- 7.
To fulfill the requirements of the OCGS Offsite Dose Calculation Manual (ODCM) and Technical Specifications.
B.
Implementation of the Objectives' The implementation of the objectives is accomplished by:
~,
5 9
- 2.
I i
1:
Identifying 'significant exposure'pathways.
- 2.
Establishing baseline radiological data of rmedia within those pathways.
5-
- 3.
Continuously monitoring those media before and during Station operation to assess Station' radiological effects (if any) on man and the environment.
Ill.
Program Description A.
Sample Collection Samples for the OCGS REMP were collected for AmerGen Energy Company by on-site personnel and Normandeau Associates, RMC Environmental Services Division (RMC). This section describes the general collection methods used to obtain environmental samples for the' OCGS REMP in 2002. Sample locations and descriptions can be found in Tables B-1 and B-2, and Figures B-1 and B-2, Appendix B. The collection procedures are listed in Table B-3.
Aquatic Environment The aquatic environment was evaluated by performing radiological analyses on samples of surface water, well water, fish, clams, crabs, and sediment. One gallon surface-water samples were collected monthly from two locations (33, and 94), semi-annually at two locations (23 and 24), and quarterly from three well water locations' (1,;37, and'38). Control locations were 94 and 37. All samples were collected in new unused plastic bottles, which were'rinsed at-least twice with sobrce water prior to collection. Fish samples comprising the flesh of two groups, bottom feeder and predator, were collected semiannu'ally'at two locations (93 and 94 (control)). Clams were collected-semiannually from three locations (23, 24, and 94 (control)):' One annual crab sample was collected from one location (93).
4
,~
I.
Sediment sampleswere collected at four locations semiannually, 23, 24, 33, and 94. (control). -
, Atmospheric Environment.I
,r
-'J
.. The atmospheric environment was evaluated by performing radiological
- analyses on samples'of air particulate, airbome.iodine,,and vegetation.
Airborne iodine and particulate samples were collected and analyzed
.weekly at sevenjlocations (C, 3, 20, 66, 7.1, 72, and 73). The control location was C. Airbome iodine and particulate samples were' obtained at each location, using a vacuum pump with charcoal and glass fiber filters attached. The pumps were run continuously and sampled air at the rate of
-.approximately two tothree cubic feet per minute. The filters were replaced weekly and sent to the laboratory for analysis.
No commercial d airyoperations and no dairy animals producing milk for humian consumption are located-within a 5 mile radius of the plant.
Therefore, vegetation samples were collected in lieu of milk. Vegetation samples were collected, when available, at three locations (35, 36, and 66). Location 36 was the.control. All samples were collected in 18" x 24" new unused plastic bags and shipped promptly to the laboratory.
Ambient Gamma Radiation Direct radiation measurements were made using'Panasonic 814 calcium sulfate (CaSO4) thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLD)..The TLD locations were placed on and around the OCGS site as follows:
A site houndary ring consisting of 16 -locations (1, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65 and 66) near the boundary.
An intermediate distance rng consisting of 16 locations (6, 8, 22, 68, 73, 74, 75, 78, 79, 81, 82, 84, 85, 86, 98, and 99) extending to approximately 5 miles from the site designed to measure possible exposures to close-in
.,population.
- Special interest locations consisting of 10 locations'(3, 9, 11, 71, 72, 88,
.89,90,92, and TI),representing -special interest areas such as population
..centers, state parks,'etc. -,
- e am *y.,
?
- \\'4.
.'The balance of two locations,(C and '14) representing control locations.
i
.i i X i
- ...i..
, Indicator TLDs were placed systematically, with at least one station in i.,
'ie each of 16 meteorological compass sectors (in a ring), typically within 0.25
. miles of the OCGS, or.as close as reasonable highway access would I
5
permit. TLDs were also placed in each of the 16 sectors within a five mile radius of the OCGS, in areas of public interest, and population centers.
Background locations were located greater than twenty miles distant from the OCGS and generally in an upwind direction from the OCGS.
Two TLDs -each comprised of three CaSO4 thermoluminescent phosphors enclosed in plastic-were placed at each location approximately three to eight feet above ground level. The TLDs were exchanged quarterly and sent to ICN for analysis.
B.
Sample Analysis This section describes the general analytical methodologies used by TBE and Midwest Labs to analyze the environmental'samples for radioactivity for the OCGS REMP in 2002. The analytical procedures used by the laboratories are listed in Table B-3.
In order to achieve the stated objectives,-the current program includes the following analyses:
- 1.
Concentrations of beta emitters in air particulates.
- 2.
Concentrations of gamma emitters in surface and well water, fish, clams, crabs, silt, air particulates, and vegetation.
- 3.
Concentrations of tritium in surface and well water.
- 4.
Concentrations of 1-131 in air iodine cartridges.
- 5.
Concentrations of strontium in air particulates and vegetation.
- 6.
Ambient gamma radiation levels at various locations around the OCGS.
C.
Data Interpretation The radiological and direct radiation data collected from past years was used for comparison and trending with 2002 operational data. For the purpose of this report, OCGS preoperational data was not used due to it's collection 35 years ago. Several factors were important in the interpretation of the data:
- 1.
Lower Limit of Detection and Minimumi Detectable Activity The lower limit of detection (LLD) was'defined as the smallest concentration of radioactive material in a sample that would yield a 6
4-
.-net count (above background) that would be~detected with only a 5% probability of falsely concluding that a blank observation
. represents a "real" signal. The LLD was intended as a before the fact estimate.of a system (including instrumentation, procedure and
'sample.type) and-not as an after.the fact criteria for the presence of
,:.activity. All analyses.were designed to achieve the required OCGS detection capabilities for environmental sample analysis.
The minimum detectable activity (MDA) is defined above with the exception that the measurement is an after the fact estimate of the presence of activity. :..:
2..
,Net Activit, Calculation and Reporting of Results 7 Net activity for a sample was, calculated by subtracting background activity from the sample activity. Since the REMP measures extremely small changes in radioactivity in the environment, background variations may result in sample activity being lower than the background activity effecting a negative number. An MDA was reported in all cases where positive activity was not detected.
Gamma spectroscopy results for each type of sample were grouped as follows:
For surface and well water 11 nuclides, Mn-54,Co-58, Fe-59, Co-GO, Zn-65, Zr-95, Nb-95, Cs-134,.Cs-137, Ba-140, and La-
- 140.
-40were reported.
For fish eight nuclides, K-40, Mn-54, Co-58, Fe-59, Co-60, Zn-65, Cs-I 34, and Cs-.137 were reported.
K
-54 C-58F-9
-C.
.0 For clams eight nuclides, K-40, Mn-54, Co-58, Fe-59, Co-G, Zn-65, Cs-134, and Cs-I 37 were reported.
For crabs eight nuclides, K-40, Mn-54, Co-58; Fe-59, Co-0, a
.Zn-65, Css-134, and Cs-137 were reported.,
-V.-'
)
.-For sedimentsix nuclides, K-40, Mn-54, Co-58; Co-60, Cs-1 34,
- ..;.and Cs-137-were reported;.-
3For-air particulate six nuclides, Be-7, Mn-54, Co-58, Co-G0, Cs-
- .. ;..r.^.,
-34, and Cs+1 37,were. reported.i..............
...or air cartridges one nuclide, 1-1 31 was reported.
- ~'
7
For vegetation four nuclides,K-40, 1-131, Cs-134, and Cs-137, were reported.
Means and standard deviations of the results were calculated. The standard-deviations represent the variability of measured results for different samples rather than*single analysis uncertainty.
D.
Program Exceptions For 2002 the OCGS REMP had a sample recovery rate in excess of 99%.
Exceptions are listed below:
- In August, September, and October 2002, the' iodine-1 31 lower limit of detection (60 pCi/kg wet) was not achieved for thirteen (13) vegetable and broadleaf vegetation samples (Table C-VII.1). Eight (8) samples were collected from indicator gardens and five (5) samples were collected from background gardens. The ensuing investigation discovered that the analysis laboratory failed to analyze these s'amples in a timely manner, resulting in the failure to meet the required detection limit. In addition, these data were reviewed prior to submitting the original 2002 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report, but this review failed to flag and report the missed detection limits. Corrective action to prevent recurrence is in place in which both the Analytical Laboratory and the Licensee perform an independent redundant review bf all analytical data.
The Analytical Laboratory put into place a system where email notification to program managers takes place at the time of counting for missed detection limits, allowing correction of the count time and attainment of the correct LLD. CAP # 02005-0105 was written to capture this event.
Beginning on 03 Sep 02, the charcoal cartridge efficiency (98% efficiency) on Air Iodine samples was incorporated into the analysis result. Prior to this, an efficiency of 100 % was used. All calculated MDAs were well below LLDs.
Two vegetable gardens planted at the site boundary, Stations 35 and 66, failed after the initial harvest on 06 Aug 02 due to a regional severe drought. One cabbage sample was harvested and analyzed from Station 66 on 10 Sep 02, but no other vegetables were available for collection and analysis during this collection period.' Broadleaf vegetation was collected at Stations 35 and 66 in lieu of vegetable samples on 10 Sep 02 and on 10 Oct 02., These broadleaf vegetation samples.' collected in lieu of vegetable samples were harvested from plants in which the vegetation is not eaten by man: Leaves from local deciduous vegetation were collected as samples. CAP # 02005-0124 was written to capture this event.
8
-In October 2002, during the third quarter TLD change out, the field Control TLDs were lost. The Field Control dosimeters monitor the quantity of dose
,,,received during the exchange period. ICN TLD numbers 2016953 and
.'. 2016954 were lostr,.presurmably in the field, during dosimeter exchange.
The dose recorded by theField Control badges that is subtracted from other exposed dosimeters is usually less than 1 mR. CAP # 2003-0583 was written to investigate and document this event.
ICN TLDs were lost at Station 86 during the first quarter of 2002 and at Station 61 during the second quarter of 2002 due tovandalism.
Station 72 failed to operate after running for 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> and 48 minutes.
The volume of air that,passed through this filter was only 58.7 cubic
-meters because of a blown fuse..
Each program exception was reviewed to understand the causes of the program exception. Sampling.and maintenance errors were reviewed with the personnel involved to,prevent recurrence..
The overall sample recovery rate indicates that the appropriate procedures and, equipment are in place to assure reliable program I
E.
Implementation.
Program Changes Beginning the second quarter 2002, Teledyne Brown Engineering Environmental Services became the primary laboratory and Environmental Inc. (Midwest Labs)'became the QC laboratory. Prior to that, Environmental Inc. was the primary analysis laboratory and Teledyne Brown Engineering was the QC laboratory.
IV.
Results and Discussion A.
A.;, Aquatic.Environment i
,,-1.,
Surface Water, Samples weretaken via grab sample methodology at two locations (3,3, and 94):on.a~monthly schedule. In addition, grab samples
- werecollected semi-annually-at two locations (23 and 24). Of Surfacect Waternstreamcould b
.these locations 23,.24, and 33, located downstream, could be affected by,Oyster.Creek's effluent releases. The following
.,-analyses were performed:,,-.,
9 I..
Tritium Samples from all locations were analyzed for tritium activity (Table C-1.1, Appendix C). Tritium activities were consistent with those detected in previous years'.
Gamma Sp&ctrometry Samples from all locations were: analyzed for gamma emitting nuclides (Table C-1.2, Appendix C). All nuclides were less than the MDA.
- 2.
Well Water Quarterly samples were composited from monthly grab samples at three locations (1, 37, and 38). Two locations (1 and 38) could be affected by Oyster Creek's effluent releases. The following analyses were performed:
Tritium Quarterly samples from all locations were analyzed for tritium activity (Table C-11.1, Appendix C). Tritium activity was detected in two samples at concentrations of 131 pCi/I and 166 pCi/I. The highest MDA was calculated at <178 pCi/L.
Gamma Spectrometry Samples from all locations were analyzed for gamma emitting nuclides (Table C-11.2, Appendix C). All nuclides were less than the MDA.
- 3.
Fish-Fish samples comprised of tautog and flounder (bottom feeder) and weakfish, striped bass, white perch, sea bass, bluefish, and puffer (predator) were collected at two location's (93 and 94) semiannually. Location 93 could be' affected by Oyster Creek's effluent releases-. The following analysis was performed:
Gamma. Spectrometry The edible portion of fish samples from two locations were analyzed for gamma emitting nuclides (Table C-111.1, Appendix C).
Naturally occurring potassium-40 was found at all stations and 10
ranged from 3,480 to 5,900 pCi/kg wet and was consistent with levels detected in previous years. No fission or activation products
'we're found... ;,-,-
- 4.
Clams and Crabs, ^
Clams were collected at three locations (23, 24, and 94) semiannually. Crabs were collected at one location (93) annually.
Locations 23, 24, and 93 could be affected by Oyster Creek's effluent releases. JThe following analysis was performed:
~~~,
's..
Lt..
Gamma Spectrometry.
-The edible portion of clam samples from all three locations were analyzed forgamma emitting nuclides (Table C-111.2, Appendix C).
.Naturally,occurring potassium-40.was found at all stations and ranged from 1,120 to 1,420 pCi/kg wet and was consistent with levels detected in previous years. No fission or activation products were found. Historical levels of Co-60 in clams are shown in Figure C-1, Appendix C.
The edible portion of crab samples from one location was analyzed for gamma emitting nuclides (Table C-111.2, Appendix C). Naturally occurring.potassium-40 was found at a concentration of 1,520 pCi/kg wet and was consistent with levels detected in previous years. No fission or activation products were found.
- 5.
Sediment Aquatic sediment samples were collected at four locations (23, 24,
- 33, and 94) semiannually. Of these locations, stations 23, 24, and 33 located downstream, could be affected by Oyster Creek's effluent releases. The-following analysis was performed:
- .Gamma Spectrometry;K A
n.
- A Sediment samples from all four-locations were analyzed for gamma emitting nuclides (Table C-IV.1: Appendix C). Nuclides detected E
were naturally occurring K40, and the fission product Cs-137.
Potassium-40 was found at all stations-and ranged from 806 to 16,300 pCi/kg dry. Concentrations of the fission product Cs-137
... were found in.two sediment samples,.Location 23 had an average
.concentration of 23 pCi/kg'dry. JThe activity detected was
.consistent-with thosedetected in previous'years (Figure C-3,
- - 11
Appendix C). No other Oyster Creek fission or activation products were found. Figure C-2, Appendix C graphs Co-60 concentrations in sediment from 1984 through 2002.
B.
Atmospheric Environment I1.
Airborne
- a.
Air Particulates Continuous air particulate samples' were collected from seven locations on a weekly basis. The seven locations were separated into'three groups: Group I represents locations near the OCGS site boundary (20 and 66), Group II represents the locations at an intermediate distance from the OCGS site (71, 72, and 73), and Group Ill represents the control and locations at a remote distance from OCGS (C and 3). The following analyses were performed:
Gros&Be, at Weekly samples were analyzed for concentrations of beta emitters (Table C-V.1 and C-V.2, Appendix C).
Detectable gross beta activity was observed at all locations.
Comparison of results among the three groups aid in determining the effects, if any, resulting from the operation of OCGS. The results from the On-Site locations (Group I) ranged from 9 to 34 E-3 pCVm3 with a mean of 17 E-3 pCium 3. The results from the Intermediate Distance location (Group II) ranged from 8 to 35 E-3 pC~m 3 with a mean of 17 E-3 pCim 3. The results from the Distant locations (Group 111) ranged from 7 to 32 E-3 pCi/m3 with a mean of 17 E-3 pCi/M3.. Comparison of the 2002 air particulate data with previous years data indicate no effects from the operation of OCGS (Figure C-5, Appendix C). In addition a comparison of the weekly mean values for 2002 indicate no notable differences among the thred groups (Figure C-4, Appendix C).
Strontium-89 and Strontiufr-90 Weekly samples were composited quarterly and analyzed for strontium-89 and strontium-90 (Table C-V.3, Appendix C).
12
I :..
No strontium was detected.-,
Gamma Spectrometry Weekly samples were composited quarterly and analyzed for gamma emitting nuclides (Table C-V.4, Appendix C).
, -,Naturallyoccurring Be-7 due to cosmic ray activity was detected in all samples. These values ranged from 58 to 84
,,E-3 pCUrn3., All other nuclides were less than the MDA.
.b.. >Airborne, Iodine i;.
r
-a -%,e.
.;,. e -........
.* Continuousair samples were collected from seven (C, 3, 20, 66,71,72, and 73) locations and analyzed weekly for 1-131 (Table C-7l.1, Appendix C)., AII results were less than the
<I;
,2.,
Terrestrial '
- a.
- ,_Vegetation, Samples were collected from three locations (35, 36, and 66) e when available.: The following analyses were performed:
' Strontium-89 and Strontium-90 Vegetationssamples from all locations were analyzed for concentrations of strontium-89 and strontium-90 (Table C-
, v.1, Appendix C).- All strontium-89 results were less than
'-the MDA.-Strontium-90 was detected in all but one sample.
The values ranged from 3 to 121 pCi/kg wet. An investigation ensued regarding four Sr-90 analysis results
- that initiallyappeared to be higher than expected. The results of the investigation concluded that the vegetation
,.e,
- ;? collected was non-edible by man and therefore more subject
.to strontium uptake from previous atmospheric weapons t-,
resting fallout and not.Oyster Creek related. To further reinforcethat the above referenced Sr-90'results were Not
--IFacility.related, all strontium analytical results were less than the minimum detectable level for air samples. The dose to man from these SR,90 results was calculated to be 4.4X10-9 mREM. CAP # 02005-0124 was written to capture this event.,,
. " I I..
..1)1,....
I13
K Gamma Snectrometry Each vegetation sample from locations 35, 36, and 66 were analyzed for concentrations of gamma emitting nuclides (Table C-VII.1, Appendix C).
Naturally occurring K-40 activity was found in all samples and ranged from 1,640 to 4,030 pCVI. Cs-1 37 activity detected in two'sa nples was consistent with those detected in previous years. All other nuclides were less than the MDA with the exception of thirteen (13) 1-131 results in which the required LLD of 60 pCilkg'wet was not achieved. The ensuing investigation concluded that the analysis laboratory failed to analyze these'samples in a timely manner, resulting in the failure to meet the required detection limit. In addition, these data were reviewed prior to submitting the original 2002 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report, but this review failed to flag and report the missed detection limits. Corrective action to prevent recurrence is in place in which both the Analytical Laboratory and the Licensee perform an independent redundant review of all analytical data. The Analytical Laboratory put into place a system where email notification to program managers takes place at the time of counting for missed detection limits, allowing correction of the count time and attainment of the correct LLD. CAP # 02005-0105 was written to capture this event.
C.
Ambient Gamma Radiation Ambient gamma radiation levels were measured utilizing Panasonic 814 (CaSO4) thermoluminescent dosimeters. Forty-four TLD locations were monitored around the site. Results of TLD measurements are listed in Tables C-VIII.1 to C-VI11.3, Appendix C.
Most TLD measurements were below 20 mRlstandard quarter, with a range of 6.7 to 21.6 mRlstandard quarter. 2002 gamma radiation data was plotted from the control location along with similar data from the Site, Intermediate Distance, and Outer Ring Locations (Figure C-6, Appendix C). Historical ambient gamma radiation'data from the control location was plotted along with similar data from the Site, Intermediate Distance and Outer Ring Locations (Figure C-7, Appendix C).
14
Land Use Survey A Land Use Surveywas conducted during 2002 around the Oyster Creek
. Generating Station,(OCGS). The purpose of the survey was to determine
'the location'of animalsprpoducing milk for human consumption in each of the sixteen meteorological sections out to a distance of 5 miles from the OCGS. There were no changes required to the OCGS REMP, as a result
- of this su'vey. The"results of this survey are summarized below.
j.;.
^,
7, Distance in Miles from the OCGS Reactor Buildings
-Sector Residence Garden Milk Farm IWSW -'
10.1 2SW 20.3 3 NW 17.7
, 4 NNE' 5.9 b.
I f
I
?
I l,5
V.
References
- 1.
Jersey Central Power and Light Cornpany.'Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Operating License and Technical Specifications, Appendix A, DPR-16, April 1969.
- 2.
AmerGen Energy Company, LLC. Oyster Creek Offsite Dose Calculation Manual, Procedure CY-OC-170-301.
- 3.
AmerGen Energy Company,. LLC. Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station, Updated Final Safety Analjsis Report.
- 4.
National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements, Report No. 93, Ionizing Radiation Exposure of the Population of the United States, 1987.
- 5.
CRC Handbook, Radioecology: Nuclear Energy and the Environment, F. Ward Whicker and Vincent Schultz, Volume I, 1982.
- 6.
National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements, Report No. 22, Maximum Permissible Body Burdens and Maximum Permissible Concentrations of Radionuclides in Air and Water for Occupational Exposure, (Published as National Bureau of Standards Handbook 69, Issued June 1959, superseding Handbook 52).
- 7.
International Commission on Radiological Protection, Publication 2, Report of Committee II on Permissible Dose for Internal Radiation (1959), with 1962 Supplement Issued in ICRP Publication 6; Publication 9, Recommendations on Radiation Exposure, (1965);
ICRP Publication 7 (1965), amplifying specific recommendations of Publication 9 concerning environmental monitoring; and ICRP Publication 26 (1977).
- 8.
Federal Radiation Council Report No. 1, Background Material for the Development of Radiation Protection Standards; May 13, 1960.
- 9.
National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements, Report No. 39, Basic Radiation Protection Criteria, January 1971.
- 10.
National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements, Report No. 62, Tritium in the Environment, March 1979.
- 11.
National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements, Report No. 81, Carbon-14 in the Environment, May 1985.
16
12.'.
United States Nuclear RegulatoryCommission. Regulatory Guide 4.1, Programs for Monitoring Radioactivity in The Environs of Nuclear Power Plants, Revisiofi 1, April 1975..;
- 13.
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Branch Technical Position, An Acceptable Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program, Revision 1, November 1979.
14.,
American National Standards Institute, Inc.-, Performance, Testing, and Procedural Specifications for Thermoluminiescence-Dosimetry, ANSI N545-1975.
1 5.
a.
- .s.
.15. '.tnited States N~uclear:Regulatory Commission..Regulatory Guide
' 4.13, Performance, Testing and Procedural Specifications for Thermoluminescence Dosimetry: Environmental Applications,
-Revision 1, Ju!y1977.`-:v.-.;
X
- 16.
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Regulatory Guide 4.15, Quality Assurance for Radiological Monitoring Programs
.(Normal Operations) -Effluent Streams and the Environment,,
Revision'1, February 1979.-
- 17.
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Regulatory Guide 1.109, Calculation of Annual Doses to Man from Routine Releases of Reactor Effluents for the Purpose of Evaluating Compliance with 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix I, Revision 1, October 1977.
- 18.
NUREGICR-4068, Summary-of Historical Experience with Releases of Radioactive Materials from Commercial Nuclear Power. Plants in the United
'States, 1985.
19.)
Olsen, C.R., et. al.; 1980. Reactor-released Radionuclides and Fine-grained Sediment Transport and Accumulation Patterns in Bamegat Bay, New Jersey and Adjacent Shelf Waters. Estuarine and Coastal
-. Marine Science (1980) 10,119-142..
- 20.
.GPU Nuclear Corporation.,1986 Radiological Environmental Monitong ReportforOyster Creek NuclearGenerating Station.
May 1987.
@~~~S iA
- t s, '.
. 21.
GPU.Nuclear Cprporation. 1987 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report for Oyster Creek Nuclear. Generating Station.
, ay 1988:
17
- 22.
GPU Nuclear Corporation. 1988 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report for Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station.
May 1989.
- 23.
GPU Nuclear Corporation. 1989 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report for Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station.
May 1990.
- 24.
GPU Nuclear Corporation. 1990 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report for Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station.
May 1991.
- 25.
GPU Nuclear Corporation. 1991 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report for Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station.
May 1992.
- 26.
GPU Nuclear Corporation. 1992 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report for Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station.
May 1993.
- 27.
GPU Nuclear Corporation. 1993 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report for Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station.
May 1994.
- 28.
GPU Nuclear Corporation. 1994 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report for Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station.
May 1995.
- 29.
GPU Nuclear Corporation. 1995 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report for Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station.
May 1996.
- 30.
GPU Nuclear, Inc. 1996 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report for Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station. May 1997.
- 31.
GPU Nuclear, Inc. 1997 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report for Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station. May 1998.
- 32.
GPU Nuclear, Inc. 1998 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report for Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station. May 1999.
- 33.
GPU Nuclear, Inc. 1999 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report for Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station. May 2000.
18
- 34.. AmerGen Energy Company; LLC. 2000 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report for Oyster Creek Generating Station. May 2001.
- 35.
AmerGen Energy Company, LLC. 2001 Radiological Environmental
, Monitoring Report for Oyster Creek Generating Station May, 2002.
- 36.
AmerGen Energy Company, LLC. Oyster Creek Generating Station Radioactive Effluent Release Report, January 1, 2002. through December 31, 2002. March 2003 -..;..
.. .
I I.
a I
I.
I I
-^
- *, nt
,' *t "
.-t ;I q
i a
I
!-I
'j-'!
I
.- 19
Da APPENDIX A RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING REPORT
SUMMARY
TABLE A-1 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL
SUMMARY
FOR THE OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2002 Name of Facility:
OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION DOCKET NUMBER:
50-219 Location of Facility: OCEAN COUNTY, NJ REPORTING PERIOD:
2002 INDICATOR CONTROL LOCATION WITH IIIGHEST ANNUAL MEAN LOCATIONS LOCATION MEDIUM OR TYPES OF NUMBER OF REQUIRED MEAN' MEAN' MEAN*
STATION #
NUMBER OF PATHWAY SAMPLED ANALYSES ANALYSES LOWER LIMIT (F)
(F)
(F)
NAME NONROUTINE (UNIT OF PERFORMED PERFORMED OF DETECTION RANGE RANGE RANGE DISTANCE AND DIRECTION REPORTED MEASUREMENT)
(LLD)
MEASUREMENTS SURFACE WATER (PCI/LITER)
TRITIUM 28 3000 147 (5/16)
(<94/327) 142 (4/12)
(<941207) 214 (112)
(<101/327) 24 INDICATOR BARNEGAT BAY 2.1 MILES SE OF SITE 0
GAMMA MN.54 CO-5s CO-60 FE-59 ZN-65 ZR-95 NB-95 28 15 3
(0/16)
(40.9/<6) 15 4
(0/16)
(<1/<6) 15 3
(0/16)
(<0.9/<6) 30 8
(0116)
(<21<12) 30 7
(0/16)
(<21<12) 30 6
(0116)
(<2/<11) 15 4
(0116)
(<11<6) 4 (0/12)
(<11<6) 4 (0/12)
(<11<7) 4-(0/12)
(<11<6) 8 (0/12)
(<21<14) 8 (0/12).
(<21<15) 7 (0/12)
(<2/<1 1) 4 (0/12)
(<1I<7) 4 (0112)
(<1/<6) 4 (0/12)
(<11<7).
4 (0/12)
(<1/<6) 8 (012)
(<51<1 1) 8 (0/12)
(<21<15) 7 (0/12)
(<2<1 1) 5.
(0/2)
(<41<6) 94 CONTROL GREAT BAY/LITTLE EGG HARBOR 20.0 SSW OF SITE 94
. CONTROL GREAT BAY/LITRLE EGG HARBOR 20.0 SSW OF SITE
- 94.
. CONTROL GREAT BAYILIT1LE EGG HARBOR 20.0 SSW OF SITE 24 INDICATOR BARNEGAT BAY 2.1 MILES SE OF SITE 94 CONTROL GREAT BAY/LITTLE EGG HARBOR 20.0 SSW OF SITE 94 CONTROL GREAT BAY/LITTLE EGG HARBOR 20.0 SSW OF SITE 23 INDICATOR BARNEGAT BAY 3.6 MILES SE OF SITE
- THE MEAN AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING BOTH THE MDAs AND THE POSITIVE VALUES FRACTION OF DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS AT SPECIFIED LOCATIONS IS INDICTED IN PARENTHESES (F)
'C.....,.
C.-.
TABLE A-1 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL
SUMMARY
FOR THE OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2002 Name of Facility:
OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION DOCKET NUMBER:
50-219 Location of Facility: OCEAN COUNTY, NJ REPORTING PERIOD:
2002 INDICATOR CONTROL LOCATION WITH HIGHEST ANNUAL MEAN LOCATIONS LOCATION.
MEDIUMOR TYPES OF NUMBER OF REQUIRED
. MEAN MEANS MEANS STATION #
NUMBEROF PATHWAY SAMPLED ANALYSES ANALYSES LOWER LIMIT (F)
(F)
(F)
NAME NONROUTINE (UNIT OF PERFORMED PERFORMED OF DEIECTION RANGE RANGE RANGE DISTANCE AND DIRECTION REPORTED MEASUEN (LLD)
MEASUREMENTS J -
CS-134 is 4
(0/16)
(<0.9/<8)
CS-137 BA-140 LA-140 I18 4
- (Ol16)
- (<0.9/<7)
- 60.
<24.
.(Oil ) 4
(<10/<45) 15 8
(0/16)
(<2/<15) 4 (0/12)
- (<0.9/<7) 4 (0/12) t
.(<1/4)
<26 (0112).;
.(<101<43) 7 (0/12)
(<2/<13) 1i4 (0/4)'
(<861<178) 4
- (0/12)
- (<0.91<8)
- 4.
(0/12)..
(<li6
<36
(<27/<45) 12 (0/2)
(51Ok1<4) 132 (114)
(<86/132) 33 INDICATOR ROUTE9 BRIDGE.-
0.4 MILES ESE OF SITE 94.... CONTROL
~GREAT:BAY/LITILE EGG HARBOR
- 20.0SSWOFSITE;-
24
,INDICATOR BARNEGAT BAY 2.1 MILES SE OF SITE 23 INDICATOR BARNEGAT BAY..
.3.6 MILES ENE OF SITE 38 INDICATOR OCEAN TOWNSHIP MUA PUMP STA 1.3 MILES SSW OF SITE 0
0 0
0 0
_, -1 WELL WATER (PCI/LITER) 1 a:,
TRITIUM 12 2000 130
- (V8)
(<86,<178)
- .1 r i GAMMA MN.54 12 3.
15 3
(0/8).
(<lid5 4
- 4.
(014) i I,,
(< 1<6,..
0 4.. *.
(. 0/4)
(-47<6)
- 1.
37.,
CONTROL LACEY MUA PUMPING STATION 2.2 MILES NNE OF SITE I
I... :
CO.58 is 3
. t.
- 7...
(0/8).
.,,.1 3.
(0/8) 4 4
37 CONTROL
.(0/4)
(014)
LACEY MUA PUMPING STATION
(</<6)
(<2/<6) 2.2 MILES NNE OF SITE
- 4.
- 4.
`37 CONTROL (0/4)
(014)
LACEY MUA PUMPING STATION
(<2/<5)
(<2/<5) 2.2 MILES NNE OF SITE 0
0
- THE MEAN AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING BOTH THE MDAs AND THE POSITIVE VALUES FRACTION OF DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS AT SPECIFIED LOCATIONS IS INDICTED IN PARENTHESES (F)
TABLE A-1 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL
SUMMARY
FOR THE OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2002 Name of Facility:
OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION DOCKETNUMBER:
50-219 Location of Facility: OCEAN COUNTY, NJ REPORTING PERIOD:
2002 INDICATOR CONTROL LOCATION WITH HGIIEST ANNUAL MEAN LOCATIONS LOCATION MEDIUM OR TYPES OF NUMBER OF REQUIRED MEAN' MEAN' MEAN STATION U NUMBER OF PATHWAY SAMPLED ANALYSES ANALYSES LOWER LIMIT (F)
(F)
(F)
NAME NONROUTINE (UNIT OF PERFORMED PERFORMED OF DETECTION RANGE RANGE RANGE DISTANCE AND DIRECTION REPORTED MEASUREMENT)
(LLD)
MEASUREMENTS FE-59 ZN-65 ZR-95 N1-95 30 7
(0/8)
(<3<11) 30 6
(0/8)
(<2/<I I) 30 7
(0/8)
(</<10) 15 4.
(0/8)
(<1/<6) 9 (0/4)
(<51<13) 8 (0/4)
(<4/<13) 8 (0/4)
(<6110)
(0/4)
(<31<7) 9 (0/4)
(<51<13) 8 (0/4)
(<4/<13) 8 (0/4)
(<61<10)
(0/4)
(<3/<7) 37 CONTROL LACEY MUA PUMPING STATION 2.2 MILES NNE OF SITE 37 CONTROL LACEY MUA PUMPING STATION 2.2 MILES NNE OF SITE 37 CONTROL LACEY MUA PUMPING STATION 2.2 MILES NNE OF SITE 37 CONTROL LACEY MUA PUMPING STATION 2.2 MILES NNE OF SITE 0
0 0
0 CS-134 CS-137 BA 140 LA-140 15 3
(<0.9/<6) 18
<3.5 (0/8)
(<11<5) 60
<22 (0/8)
(<13/<40) 15 7
(0/8)
(<41<13) 4 (0/4)
(<2<6)
<3.6 (0/4)
(<2/<6)
<32 (0/4)
(<17l<45) 10 (0/4)
(<3/<15) 4 (0/4)
(<1<6)
<3.6 (0/4)
(<21<6)
<32 (0/4)
(<17/<45).
10 (0/4)
(<31<5) 37 CONTROL LACEY MUA PUMPING STATION 2.2 MILES NNE OF SITE 37 CONTROL LACEY MUA PUMPING STATION 2.2 MILES NNE OF SITE 37 CONTROL LACEY MUA PUMPING STATION 2.2 MILES NNE OF SITE 37 CONTROL LACEY MUA PUMPING STATION 2.2 MILES NNE OF SITE 0
0 0
0
- THE MEAN AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING BOTH THE MDAS AND THE POSITIVE VALUES FRACTION OF DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS AT SPECIFIED LOCATIONS IS INDICTED IN PARENTHESES (F)
- I'--
~
- I t "
~
- I
_,I
-~
I I ~:
I-..*',~
V I.
I I
. I TABLE A-1. RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL
SUMMARY
FOR THE OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2002 Name of Facility:
OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION DOCKET NUMBER:
50-219 Location of Facility: OCEAN COUNTY, NJ
- REPORTING PERIOD:
200i INDICATOR CONTROL, LOCATION WITH HIGHEST ANNUAL MEAN LOCATIONS LOCATION :.
MEDIUM OR TYPES OF NUMBER OF REQUIRED MEAN' MEAN MEAN*
STATION #.
NUMBER OF PATHWAY SAMPLED ANALYSES ANALYSES LOWER LIMIT (F)
(F)
(F)
NAME NONROUTINE (UNIT OF PERFORMED PERFORMED OF DETECTION
- RANGE, RANGE RANGE DISTANCE AND DIRECTION REPORTED MEASUREMENT)
(LLD)
MEASUREMENTS BOTTOM FEEDER (FISH)
(PCI/KG WET)
GAMMA K-40 2
MN.54 N/A 4210 (2/2)
(3480/4940) 130
- 33-(0/2)
(<14/<S2) 130
.37' (0/2)
(C20/C54) 130 33 (0/2)
(<141<53)
./A N/A N/A N/A 4210 93
-INDICATOR._
- (2/2)
. DISCHARGE CANAL (3480/4940) 0.1 MILES WSWOF SITE 33 --
.93*-i u NDICATOR '--:
"i (0/2)
DISCHARGE CANAL
(<14/<52) 0.1 MILES WSW OF SITE
.37',
93 INDICATOR:,
(0(2)
DISCHARGE CANAL
(<20/<54) 0.1 MILES WSW OF SITE 33.*,
- 93.
INDICATOR*
(0/2)
DISCHARGE CANAL
(<14/<53) 0.1 MILES WSWOF SITE 0
0 0
CO-58 CO-60 0
-11..
II
-1._
FE-~
I 59' 260 98 (0/2)
N/A 98 (0/2)
(<54/<142) 93 INDICATOR DISCHARGE CANAL 0.1 MILES WSW OF SITE 0
I
- 1.
-I-('>
I.
I 2
- .- ZN6,.--..
260 71 41<142)
N/A :'~,-
71.,.
93.'
i-INDICATOR i
-0 (0/)-,
(0/)
DISCHARGE CANAL
(<531<109) -
t
(<33/1<09)
, 0.1 MILES WSWOF SITE.
CS.134.
130.
CS-137*-
'150 29 (02).
(<13/<44)
N/A 29..
93.
INDICATOR
.(0/2)
DISCHARGE CANAL
(<13k<44) 0.1 MILES WSWOF SITE
+}
0 0
33
- N/A (02)
(<151<52)
- .. 33 (0/2)
(<151<52) 93 INDICATOR DISCHARGE CANAL 0.1 M1LESWSWOFSITE
- THE MEAN AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING BOTH THE MDAs AND THE POSITIVE VALUES FRACTION OF DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS AT SPECIFIED LOCATIONS IS INDICTED IN PARENTHESES (F)
TABLE A-1 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL
SUMMARY
FOR THE OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2002 Name of Facility:
OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION DOCKET NUMBER:
50-219 Location of Facility: OCEAN COUNTY, NJ REPORTING PERIOD:
2002 INDICATOR CONTROL LOCATION WITH IIIGIIEST ANNUAL MEAN LOCATIONS LOCATION MEDIUM OR TYPES OF NUMBER OF REQUIRED MEAN' MEAN' MEAN' STATION #
NUMBER OF PATHWAY SAMPLED ANALYSES ANALYSES LOWER LIMIT (F)
(F)
(F)
NAME NONROUTINE (UNIT OF PERFORMED PERFORMED OF DETECTION RANGE RANGE RANGE DISTANCE AND DIRECTION REPORTED MEASUREMENT)
(LLD)
MEASUREMENTS PREDATOR (FISH)
(PCI/KG WIM GAMMA K-40 9
N/A 4686 (5/5)
(4040/5900) 4578 (4/4)
(3770/5530) 4686 (5/5)
(4005900) 93' INDICATOR DISCHARGE CANAL 0.1 MILES WSW OF SITE 0
MN-54 CO-58 CO-60 130 19 (0/5)
(<12/<29) 130 26 (0/5)
(<15/<42) 130 18 (015)
(<111<25) 25 (0/4)
(<10/<48) 35 (0/4)
(<13/<72) 24 (0/4)
(<10/<48) 25 (0/4)
(<10/<48) 35 (0/4)
(<13/<72) 24 (0/4)
(<1 0<48) 94 CONTROL GREAT BAY/LITTLE EGG HARBOR 20.0 SSW OF SITE 94
-CONTROL GREAT BAY/LITTLE EGG LARBOR 20.0 SSW OF SITE 94 CONTROL GREAT BAY/LITTLE EGG HARBOR 20.0 SSW OF SITE 0
0 0
FE-59 260 63 (0/5)
(<41/<102) 97 (0/4)
(<35/<05) 97 (0/4)
(<35/<205) 94 CONTROL GREAT BAY/LITTLE EGG HARBOR 20.0 SSW OF SIlE I
94 CONTROL GREAT BAY/LITTLE EGG HARBOR 20.0 SSW OF, SITE 0
ZN.65 260 45 (0/5)
(<27/<68) 56 (014)
(<22/<109) 56 (014)
(</<109) 0
(<11/<28) 150 20 (0/5)
(<11/<29) 24 (0/4)
(<101<49) 27 (0/4)
(<101<56) 24 (0/4)
(<101<49) 27 (0/4)
(<101<56) 94 CONTROL GREAT BAYILITTLE EGG HARBOR 20.0 SSW OF SITE 94 CONTROL GREAT BAY/LITTLE EGG HARBOR 20.0 SSW OF SITE 0
0
' THE MEAN AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING BOTH THE MDAs AND THE POSITIVE VALUES FRACTION OF DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS AT SPECIFIED LOCATIONS IS INDICTED IN PARENTHESES (F)
-t I.
I I
,..I I.,
I I
TABLE A-1 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL
SUMMARY
FOR THE OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2002 Name of Facility:
OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION DOCKET NUMBER:
50-219 --
Location of Facility: OCEAN COUNTY, NJ REPORTING PERIOD:
2002 INDICATOR CONTROL LOCATION WITII HIGHEST ANNUAL MEAN LOCATIONS. LOCATION MEDIUMOR TYPES OF, NUMBER OF REQUIRED MEAN'
. MEAN' MEAN' STATION#
NUMBEROF PATHWAY SAMPLED ANALYSES ANALYSES LOWER LIMIT (F)
(F)
(F)
NAME NONROUTINE (UNITOF PERFORMED PERFORMED OFDETECTION RANGE RANGE
'-RANGE DISTANCE AND DIRECTION REPORTED MEASUREMENT)
(LLD)
MEASUREMENTS CLAMS (PCI/KG WET)
GAMMA K-40 A
6
. MN-54 N/A
.,132S
.(414)
(1140/1420) 0 17
'-130' IT
,'1
(<131<21)
.,(04 130 21 (0/4)
(<16/<28) 130 16.
(0/4)
(<14/<17)
- 1215
..(212)
(1120/1310) 20 i(02)
(<14/<27) 25 a(0/2)
(<16/<33) 17 (o02)
(<13/<21) 56 (0/2)
(<33/'9) 35 (0o2)
(<261<47) 17.,
.(o12) -
(<13/<22) 1375 24 INDICATOR
- (2/2)
BARNEGAT BAY, (1340/1410) 2.1 MILESSEOFSITE
- 2.
20
, 94:'.I:,CONTROL;' ;.:'
(O2)
GREAT BAYIXITTLE EGG HARBOR
(<14/<27) 20.0 SSW OF SITE 25 94:.'- CONTROL
(012)
GREAT BAY/LITTLE EGG HARBOR
(<161<33) 20.0 SSW OF SITE 17
- 94
- CONTROL, (012)
GREAT BAYILITTLE EGG HARBOR
(<13/<21) 20.0 SSW OF SITE
'56 94.
CONTROL-(012)
GREAT BAY/LITTLE EGG HARBOR
(<33/f9) 20.0 SSW OF SITE-v 38 23 INDICATOR (012)
(<34/<43) 3.6 ENE OF SITE
- 171, 94,. CONTROL (012)
--- GREAT BAY/LITTLE EGG HARBOR
(<131<22) 20.0 SSW OF SITE 0
0
~.
-260 ZN-65 CS-134
--CS-137
- I
.- 260 51 (0/4)
(<34/<70) 36..
(0/4) -
(<32/<43),
0 0
I 1 e
0 0
0
. 130 14
. (0/4)
(<11/<18)
-,150, ',
17 '
18.
18 I '
94 CONTRo6 (0/4)
(012)
(012)
GREAT BAY/LITTLE EGG HARBOR
(<151<20)
(<15/<22)
(<151<22) 20.0 SSW OF SITE
- THE MEAN AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING BOTH THE MDAs AND THE POSITIVE VALUES FRACTION OF DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS AT SPECIFIED LOCATIONS IS INDICTED IN PARENTHESES (F)
TABLE A-1 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL
SUMMARY
FOR THE OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2002 Name of Facility:
OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION DOCKETNUMBER:
50-219 Location of Facility: OCEAN COUNTY, NJ REPORTING PERIOD:
2002 INDICATOR CONTROL LOCATION WITIH HIGHEST ANNUAL MlEAN LOCATIONS LOCATION MEDIUM OR TYPES OF NUMBER OF REQUIRED MEANS MEANS MEANo STATION U NUMBER OF PATHWAY SAMPLED ANALYSES ANALYSES LOWER LIMIT (F)
(F)
(F)
NAME NONROUTINE (UNIT OF PERFORMED PERFORMED OF DETECTION RANGE RANGE RANGE DISTANCE AND DIRECTION REPORTED MEASUREMENT)
(LLD)
MEASUREMENTS CRABS (PCI/KG WE)
GAMMA K-40 I
N/A 1520 (1/l)
(1520) 130 17.
(0/1)
(<17)
N/A W/A 1520 (1/1)
(1520) 17 -
(0/1)
(<17) 93
. INDICATOR DISCHARGE CANAL 0.1 MILES WSW OF SITE 93 INDICATOR DISCHARGE CANAL 0.1 MILES WSW OF SITE 0
0 MN-54 CO-58 CO-60 130 26 (0/1)
(<26) 130 Is (Ott)
(<15)
N/A 26 (0/1)
(<26) 93 INDICATOR DISCHARGE CANAL 0.1 MILES WSW OF SITE 93.
, INDICATOR DISCHARGE CANAL 0.1 MILES WSW OF SITE 0
N/A 15 (0/1)
(<15)
FE-59 ZN-65 CS 134 260 81 (0/1)
(<81) 260 36 (0/1)
(<36) 130 15 (0<1)
(<15)
N/A N/A N/A 81 (0/1)
(<SI) 36 (0/1)
(<36) is (0/1)
(<15) 93 INDICATOR DISCHARGE CANAL
- 0. IMILES WSW OF SITE..
93 INDICATOR DISCHARGE CANAL
- 0. I MILES WSW OF SITE 93 INDICATOR DISCHARGE CANAL 0.1 MILES WSW OF SITE 0I 0
0 CS.137 150 17 (WI)
(<17)
N/A 17 (01)
(<17)
' 93 INDICATOR DISCHARGE CANAL 0.1 MILES WSW OF SITE 0
- THE MEAN AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING BOTH THE MDAS AND THE POSITIVE VALUES FRACTION OF DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS AT SPECIFIED LOCATIONS IS INDICTED IN PARENTHESES (F)
-~~
-s e
i
. I 4 -
I.
TABLE A-1 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL
SUMMARY
FOR THE OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2002 Name of Facility:
OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION DOCKET NUMBER:
50.219 Location of Facility: OCEAN COUNTY, NJ REPORTING PERIOD:
2002 INDICATOR CONTROL. LOCATION VITHHIGHEST.ANNUAL MEAN LOCATIONS LOCATION,.
MEDIUM OR TYPES OF,.
NUMBER OF REQUIRED MEANS MEAN' MEAN*
-STATION #-
.N.-
NMBER OF PATHWAY SAMPLED ANALYSES ANALYSES LOWER LIMIT (F)
(F)
(F)
NAME NONROUTINE (UNIT OF PERFORMED PERFORMED OF DETECTION RANGE RANGE
' RANGE DISTANCE AND DIRECTION REPORTED MEASUREMENT)
(LLD)
MEASUREMENTS SEDIMENT (PCI/KG DRY)
GAMMA K-40 8
MN.54 CO-58 N/A
'6396 (616)
(806/16300)
N/A
':11.
(016)
N/A 12 (0/6)
(<6/<20)
N/A 11:
(0/6)
(<5/<20)
-.150*
10 (0/6)
(<51<16) 180 13 (2/6)
(<626)
.10 -
17 8290 (2t2)
(2580/14000)
'20'
'(0/2)
(<17/<22) 23 '
(on)
(<18/<28)
- 18. : - '-
(0/2)
(<17/<20)
,9365
- (212)
(2430/16300)
- .;....- i:'
20 I (0/2)
(<17/<22)
'23, (0/2)
(<18/<28)
'18 (0/2)
(<17/<20)
- 23.
,.INDICATOR' BARNEGAT BAY' 3.6 MILES ENE OF SITE
- 94
- CONTROL,
- GREAT BAY/LITTLE EGG HARBOR 20.0 SSW OF SITE
'94' CONTROL GREAT BAY/LITTLE EGG HARBOR 20.0 SSW OF SITE 94 CONTROL' GREAT BAYILITTLE EGG HARBOR 20.0 SSW OF SITE 0
0 0
0 CO-60
-1..
CS-134
..-CS.137
.111..,-
I I i.
17-(0/2)
(<14/<20) 20' (0o2).'
(<16/<24)-.
17 (0/2)
(<141<20) 21..'
- (212)
(16/26)
AIR PARTICULATE.
(E-3 PCIJCU.METER)
GROSS BETA -
364
'. --- -- (312/312) 1.(7/35)
- 28 NZA 2.7 -
(0/24)
(<0.2/<6.6) 1 I
18.'
18
. (S252)- -'-
(S252)'
. (9/32)
. : (9/34).
' 94-'- CONTROL GREAT BAYILITTILE EGG HARBOR 20.0 SSW OF SITE*.
23
-INDICATOR BARNEGAT BAY 3.6 MILES ENE OF SITE 20
- ,INDICATOR FINNINGER FARM '
0.7 MILES E OF SITE 66 INDICATOR OCGS DISCHARGE CANAL 0.4 MILES SE OF SITE 0 O 0
0 0
i.
SR-89
- 2.6
(0/4)
(<0.2<
' 3.2 (0/4) 5.5)
(<0.V<6.6)
- THE MEAN AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING BOTH THE MDAs AND THE POSITIVE VALUES FRACTION OF DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS AT SPECIFIED LOCATIONS IS INDICTED IN PARENTHESES (F)
TABLE A-1 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL
SUMMARY
FOR THE OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2002 Name of Facility:
OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION DOCKET NUMBER:
50-219 Location of Facility: OCEAN COUNTY, NJ REPORTING PERIOD:
2002 INDICATOR CONTROL LOCATION WITh HIGHEST ANNUAL MEAN LOCATIONS LOCATION MEDIUM OR TYPES OF NUMBER OF REQUIRED MEAN' MEAN*
MEANO STATION #
NUMBER OF PATHWAY SAMPLED ANALYSES ANALYSES LOWER LIMIT (F)
(F)
(F)
NAME NONROUTINE (UNIT OF PERFORMED PERFORMED OF DETECTION RANGE RANGE RANGE DISTANCE AND DIRECTION REPORTED MEASUREMENT)
(LLD)
MEASUREMENTS SR-90 GAMMA BE-7 28 28 MN-54 CO-58 CO-60 CS. 34 CS-137 N/A 1.3 (0/24)
(<O.1/<4.4)
N/A 71 (24124)
(60/84)
N/A 0.4 (0/24)
(<0.21<1.0)
N/A 0.5 (0124)
(<0.2/<1.3)
N/A 0.5 (0/24)
(<021<1.2) 50 0.4 (0124)
(<0.2/<0.8) 60 0.4 (0/4)
(<0.1/<0.9) 70 8
(01312)
(<1/<119) 4.7 (0/4)
(<0.11<15) 64 (4/4)
(58/67) 0.3 (0/4)
(<0.2/<0.3) 0.4 (014).
(<0.2/<0.4) 0.3 (0/4)
(<0.3/<0.5) 0.3 (0/4)
(<0.2/<0.3) 0.3 (0/4)
(<0.2/<0.3) 7.-
(0/52)
(<1/<36) 4.7 (0/4)
(<0.11<15) 79 (4/4)
(76/84) 0.5 (0/4)
(<0.3/<1.0) 0.6 (0/4)
(<0.21<1.3) 0.6 (0/4)
(<0.41<1.2) 0.5 (0/4)
(<0.3/<0.8) 0.5 (0/4)
(<0.2/<0.9) 10 (0152)
(<2/<119)
C CONTROL GPU ENERGY OFFICE 24.7 MILES NW OF SITE 20 INDICATOR FINNINGER FARM 0.7 MILES E OF SITE 66 INDICATOR OCGS DISCHARGE CANAL 0.4 MILES SE OF SITE 66 INDICATOR OCGS DISCHARGE CANAL 0.4 MILES SE OF SITE 66 INDICATOR OCGS DISCHARGE CANAL 0.4 MILES SE OF SITE 66 INDICATOR OCGS DISCHARGE CANAL 0.4 MILES SE OF SITE 66 INDICATOR OCGS DISCHARGE CANAL 0.4 MILES SE OF SITE 72 INDICATOR LACEY ROAD 1.9 MILES NNE OF SITE 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
AIR IODINE (E,3 PCIICU.METER) 1.131 364 0
- THE MEAN AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING BOTH THE MDAs AND THE POSITIVE VALUES FRACTION OF DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS AT SPECIFIED LOCATIONS IS INDICTED IN PARENTHESES (F)
TABLE A-I RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL
SUMMARY
FOR THE OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2002 Name of Facility:
OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION DOCKET NUMBER:
50-219 Location of Facility: OCEAN COUNTY, NJ REPORTING PERIOD:
2002 INDICATOR CONTROL LOCATION WITH HIGHEST ANNUAL MEAN LOCATIONS LOCATION MEDIUM OR TYPES OF NUMBER OF REQUIRED MEAN' MEAN MEAN' STATION #.
NUMBER OF PATHWAY SAMPLED ANALYSES ANALYSES LOWER LIMIT (F)
(F)
(F)
NAME NONROUTnNE (UNIT OF PERFORMED PERFORMED OF DETECTION RANGE RANGE RANGE DISTANCE AND DIRECTION REPORTED MEASUREMEIN)
(LLD)
MEASUREMENTS VEGETATION (PCI/KG WET)
SR-89 SR-90 1
GAMMA K-40 16 N/A 23
- 0/9),
(<3/<64) 16 N/A 32 (7/9)
(31121) 16 N/A 2804
- 6(9/9)
(1640/4030) 14 1
(0/7)
(<7/<25) 6.8 (7/7)
(3fl2)
- 3.. -
,4340 (717)
(279016860) 32 -.
(014)
-(<12/<64) 41 (314)
(<3/84) 4340 (717)
(2790/6860) 35*.:' INDICATOR OCGS DISCHARGE CANAL 0.4 MILES ESE OF SITE
.35.. ;.:-INDICATOR
- OCGS DISCHARGE CANAL 0.4 MILES ESE OF SITE 35
'INDICATOR
-OCGS DISCHARGE CANAL
)
0.4 MILES ESE OF SITE 0
0 0
1.131 CS-134 60
.1 358S (0/9)- t
(<28/<1 150) 60
.26 (0/9)
(<7/<49) 80s 30 (2/9).
(<9/<47)
N/A 12.4 (166/166)
(6.7M2I.6)
CS-137 168 (0/7)
(<23/<400) 11 (0/7)
(<6/<22)
II..
(07).
(<6/<23) 12.7 (8/N)
(11.0/14.8) 467
'(014)
(<62/<1150) 33 (0/4)
(<181<49) 37 (1/4)
(281<47) 19.9 (4/4)
(I 8.421.6) 35 INDICATOR OCGS DISCHARGE CANAL 0.4 MILES ESE OF SITE 35 INDICATOR OCGS DISCHARGE CANAL 0.4 MILES ESE OF SITE 35 I INDICATOR OCGS DISCHARGE CANAL 0.4 MILES ESE OF SITE 55 INDICATOR OCGS SWITCHYARD 0.3 MILES W OF SITE 0
0 a
DIRECT RADIATION TLD-QUARTERLY (vILLI-ROENTGEN/STD.QUARTER'.
174 O'
- THE MEAN AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING BOTH THE MDAs AND THE POSITIVE VALUES FRACTION OF DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS AT SPECIFIED LOCATIONS IS INDICTED IN PARENTHESES (F)
APPENDIX B LOCATION DESIGNATION, SAMPLE COLLECTION DISTANCE & DIRECTION, AND
& ANALYTICAL METHODS
TABLE B-1:
Location Designation and Identification System for the Oyster Creek Generating Station Sample Medium APT =
AlO
=
\\WA =
VEG =
SWA =
AQS =
Air Particulate Air Iodine Well Water Vegetation Surface Water Aquatic Sediment Clam = Clam TLD = Thermoluminescent Dosimetry Fish
= Fish Crab = Crab Station Code Station's Designation Distance Distance from the OCGS in miles Azimuth Azimuth with respect to the OCGS in degrees Description Meteorological sector that the station is located and a narrative description B-1
TABLE B-2:
Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program - Sampling Locations, Distance and Direction, Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2002 1
!
Sample Station Distance*-,-
Azimuth TLD 1
0.4 i
219 WWA 0.1 209
- 02.,
349 APT, AIOTLD 3
6.0 97 TLD 6*,
6 2.1 13 iD 8
3 2
- 17. 7 TLD 9
24.7 313 TLD 11 8.2 152
-TLD
, '4 i20.8 2
2 APT,.AIO s 20
, 0.7 95 TLD 22
,21.6 145
-SWACLAMAS 23 3.6 64 SWA.CLAM.AQS 24 2.1 101 SWA. ACS, FISH 33 04 123 VEG 35 0.4 111 VEG 36
- 23.1 319
- WWA, 37
, 2.2 18 WVA 38 1.6 197 TLD 51 04 358 SW of site at OCGS Fire Pond, Forked River. NJ On-site southern domestic well at OCGS, Forked River, NJ On-site northern domestic well at OCGS, Forked River, NJ East of site, near old Coast Guard Station, Island Beach State Park NNE of site, Lane Place, behind St. Pius Church, Forked River, NJ South of site, Route 9 at the Waretown Substation, Waretown, NJ SW of she, where Route 532 and the Garden State Parkway meek Waretown. NJ NW of site, GPU Energy office In rear parking lot, Cookstown, NJ-SSE of site, 80" and Anchor Streets, Harvey Cedars, NJ North of site, Larrabee Substation on Randolph Road, Lakewood, NJ East of site, on Firinger Farm on south side of access road.
Forked River, NJ SE of she, on Long Silver Way, Skippers Cove, Waretown, NJ ENE of site, Bamegat Bay off Stouts Creek, approximately 400 yards SE of 'Flashing Light 1 East of site, Bamegat Bay, approximately 250 yards SE of
'Flashing Light 3 ESE of site, east of Route 9 Bridge In OCGS Discharge Canal ESE of site, east of Route 9 and north of the OCGS Discharge Canal, Forked River, NJ NW of she, at 'U-Pick7 Farm, New Egypt. NJ NNE of Site, off Boox Road at Lacey MUA Pumping Station, Forked River, NJ SSW of Site, on Route 532, at Ocean Township MUA Pumping Station, Waretown, NJ North of she, on the access road to Forked River site, Forked River, NJ I I~
TLD 52 0.3 333 NNW of site, on the access road to Forked River site, Forked River, NJ
-B-2
TABLE B-2:
Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program -Sampling Locations, Distance and Direction, Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2002 Sample Madlum TLD TLD TLD TLD TLD TLD TLD TLD TLD TLD TLD TLD APT. AIO, TLD.
VEG TLD APT, A1O, TLD APT, AIO, TLD APT, AMO. TnD TLD TLD TLD Station 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 61 62 63 64 65 66 68 71 72 73 74 75 78 Distance
- 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.4 1.3 1.6 1.9 1.8 1.8 2.0 1.8 Azimuth 309 288 263 249 206 188 166 104 83 70 48 19 133 265 164 25 108 88 71 2
np-mlriptin NW of site, at sewage lift station on the access road to the Forked River site. Forked River, NJ WNW of site, on the access road to Forked River site, Forked River, NJ West of site, on Southern Area Stores security fence, west of OCGS Switchyard. Forked River, NJ WSW of site, on utility pole east of Southern Area Stores, west of the OCGS Switchyard. Forked River, NJ SSW of site, on Southern Area Stores access road, Forked River, NJ South of site, on Southern Area Stores access road, Forked River, NJ SSE of site, on Southern Area Stores access road, Waretown, NJ ESE of site, on Route 9 south of OCGS Main Entrance, Forked River, NJ East of site, on Route 9 at access road to OCGS Main Gate, Forked River, NJ ENE of site, on Route 9, between main gate and OCGS North Gate access road. Forked River, NJ NE of site, on Route 9 at entrance to Finninger Farm, Forked River, NJ NNE of site, on Route 9 at Intake Canal Bridge, Forked River, NJ SE of site, east of Route 9 and south of the OCGS Discharge Canal, inside fence, Waretown, NJ West of site, on Garden State Parkway at mile marker 71.7.
Lacey Township. NJ SSE of site, on Route 532 at the Waretown Municipal Building, Waretown, NJ NNE of site, on Lacey Road at Knights of Columbus Hall, Forked River, NJ ESE of site, on Bay Parkway, Sands Point Harbor, Waretown, NJ East of site, Orlando Drive and Penguin Court, Forked River, NJ ENE of site, Beach Blvd. and Maul Drive, Forked River, NJ North of site, 1514 Arient Road, Forked River, NJ B-3
TABLE B-2:
Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program 2 Sampling Locations, Distance and Direction, Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2002 Sample Station Distance.,
Azimuth MPdlouom_
rWag mesal nDedic T.D
.79 TLD TIJ)
TLI)
.. I 81 3.5
- 82
-4.4>
84 4.4 3..
85.,.3.9
- 86.
.0 88 6.6 89 61 -
90 6.3 92 9.0 93
.0.1 TLD TLD.
TLD,,
TLD FISH, CRAB
- SWvA,
'aS. CLAM,.
FISH TLO TLD 160 201 36 332 250 224 125 108 75 46 242 198 292 310 219 SSE of site, Hightide Drive and Bonita Drive. Waretown, NJ SSW of site, on rose Hill Road at Intersection with Bamegat Boulevard, Barnegat. NJ NE of site, Bay Way and Clairmore Avenue, Lanoka Harbor, NJ NNW of site. on Lacey Road. 1.3 miles west of the Garden State Parkway on siren'pole, Lacey Township, NJ.
WSW of site, on Route 532. just east of Wells Mills Park, Waretown. NJ SW of site, on Route 554,1 mile west of the Garden State Parkway. Barnegat, NJ SE of site, eastern end of 3M Street. Bamegat Light, NJ ESE of she, Job Francis residence. Island Beach State Park ENE of site, parking lot A-5. Island Beach State Park NE of site, at Guard ShackIToll Booth. Island Beach State Park WSW of sie, OCGS Discharge Canal between Pump Discharges and Route 9, Forked River. NJ SSW of site, In Great Bay/Little Egg Harbor WNW of site, on Garden State Parkway at mile marker 72.3.
Lacey Township, NJ NW of site'ori Garden State Parkway at mile marker 72.8, Lacey Township, NJ I
SW of site, at OCGS Fire Pond, Forked River, NJ 94; 98 99
'TI 20.0i 1.3
-1.5 _
4, e
I 4
I I
f
1 i
i I
B4
TABLE B33:
Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program - Summary of Sample Collection and Analytical Methods, Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2002 Sample Analysis Sampling Method Collection Procedure Number Sample Size Analytical Procedure Number Medium Surface Water Gamma Spectroscopy Grab Sample.
2120-IMP-4522.06 Oyster Creek sample 1 gallon TBE, PRO-042-5 Determination of gamma emitting collection procedure - surface water radioisotopes RMC-ER5 Collection of water samples for Env. Inc., GS-01 Determination of gamma emitters by radiological analysis (Oyster Creek Generating gamma spectroscopy Station)
Surface Water Tribum Grab Sample.
2120-IMP-4522.06 Oyster Creek sample 1 gallon TBE. PRO-052-35 Determination of tritium in water by liquid collection procedure - surface water scintillation RMCER5 Collection of water samples for Env. Inc.. T-02 Determination of tntium in water (direct radiological analysis (Oyster Creek Generating method)
Station)
Well Water Gamma Spectroscopy Monthly samples 2120-IMP-4522.10 Oyster Creek sample 1 gallon TSE, PRO-042-5 Determination of gamma emitting composited quarterly.
collection procedure - well water radioisotopes Env. Inc.. GS-01 Determination of gamma emitters by gamma soectroseovY Well Water Tritium Monthly samples 21204IMP-4522.10 Oyster Creek sample 1 gabon TeE, PRO-052-35 Determination of tritium in water by liquid composited quarterly.
collection procedure - well water scintillation Env. Inc., T-02 Determination of tritium in water (direct method}
Fish Gamma Spectroscopy Semi-annual samples 2120-DMP-4522.14 Oyster Creek sample 1000 grams (wet)
TBE, PRO-042-5 Determination of gamma emitting collected via hook and collection procedure - fish radioisotopes line technique and traps RMC-ER5 Collection of fish samples for Env. Inc., GS-01 Determination of gamma emitters by radiological analysis (Oyster Creek Generating gamma spectroscopy St ti n)___
____Sta tio n )__
Clams and Gamma Spectroscopy Semi-annual and annual 21204MP-4522.16 Oyster Creek sample 1000 grams (wet)
TBE, PRO-042-5 Determination of gamma emitting Crabs samples collected using collection procedure - clams and crabs radioisotopes clam tongs and traps.
RMC-ER6 Collection of fish samples for Env. Inc., GS-01 Determination of gamma emitters by radiological analysis (Oyster Creek Generating gamma spectroscopy Station)
Sediment Gamma Spectroscopy Semi-annual grab 2120-IMP-452Z03 Oyster Creek collection 1000 grams (dry)
TBE, PRO-042-5 Determination of gamma emitting samples procedure - aquatic sediment radioisotopes RMC-ER7 Collection of sediment samples for Env. Inc., GS-01 Determination of gamma emitters by radiological analysis (Oyster Creek Generating gamma spectroscopy I Station)
B-5
.I TABLE B-3:
Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program - Summary of Sample Collection and Analytical Methods, Oyster Creek Generating Station, 2002 It Sample Analysis Sampling Method Collection Procedure Number Sample Size Analytical Procedure Number Medium Air Particulates Gross Beta One week composite of 2120-IMP.4522.05 Oyster Creek sample 1 filter (approximately TiE. PRO-032-10 Gross beta andlor alpha activity In air continuous air sampling collection procedure - air particulate and air -.
700 cubic meters particulate filters (direct count method) through glass fiber filter Iodine weeky) paper Env. Inc., AP-02 Determination of gross alpha and/or gross beta In air particulate filters Air Particulates Gamma Spectroscopy.
Quarterly composite of 2120-IMP-4522.05 OysterCreek sample 13 filters '
TiE. PRO-042-5 Determination of gamma emitting each station collection procedure - air particulate and air (approxmimtely 9100X' radiolsotopes Iodine..
cubic meters)
- -.Env. inc., GS-01 Determination of gamma emitters by oam m a snectrosco ny Air Particulates Strontium-89190.
Quarterly composite of.
2120-lMP 4522.05 Oyster Creek sample 13 filters - -
T8E. PRO-032-24R Determination of radlostrontium In '>
each station collection procedure - Air particulate and air (ipproxdmat*y 9100 comnposited air particulate filters I
_lodine cubic meters)
Air Iodine Gamma Specroscopy.
One-week composite of 2120-iMP4522.05 Oyster Creek sample 1 filter (approximately TBE. PRO-042-5 Determinaton of gamma emitting continuous air sampling collection procedure - air particitiat and air 700 cubic meters redibisotopes*
.throughcharcoal filter lodlne
-.eekly
) *n
- J cntersbvamma soeitrscoov (batchimethod)
Vegetation Gamma Spectroscopy.
Grab sample during 21204MP.4522.04 Oyster Creek sample
'10D0 grams TBE0 PROa42-5 Determination of gamma emittng growing season.
collection procedure - food products and.
radioisotopes broadleaf vegetables
- St.
.i-8:9-Grab
-Env.
Inc., GS-01 Determination of gamma emitters by Vegetation StronUum-89/90 Grab sample during
- 2120-IMP-4522.04 Oyster Creek sample 1000 grams growing season.
collection procedure - food products and feedstiff and forage broadleaf etables TLD Thermoluminescence Quarterly TLDs 2120-IMP4522.02 Oyster Creek sample 2 dosimeters ICN Pharmaceutical.
Dosimetry comprised of two collection procedure-Tharmoluminescent Panasonic 814 Doilmetry.
(containing 3 each CaSOj elements)
I 13-6
Figure B-i1 Oyster CreekGenerating Station (OCGS)
Locations of Radioiogical Eniironmental MIonitO.ng'Pogra' (HEMP Staions withinnho miles ofthe OCGS E3-7
"T
<0.*
I t
- *e t,
- I Oyster. Crek Generating Station (OCGS).
Locaiiois ofRadio~
gi& Bwiinnwntal Monitong Program (EMIP)
Stafions greater tItn 2 miles'fnm the 0 CGS B-8
x
? 4 en
? S-
\\
S
- h.
?
A, L
a, h
r v
Cat' APPENDIX C DATA TABLES PRIMARY LABORATORY
TABLE C-1.1 CONCENTRATIONS OF TRITIUM IN SURFACE WATER SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2002 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER *2 SIGMA COLLECTION PERIOD 23 24 33 94 JAN FEB MAR APR.
MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
< 102
< 162 132 +/- 85
< 101 327 +/- 87 214 +/- 320
< 113
< 94
< 98 138 +/- 65
< 106 95 +/- 60 160 +/- 83 195 +/- 77
< 121
< 159
< 183
< 194 138 +/- 78
< 113
< 94
< 99 114 +/- 63
< 107
< 95 207 +/- 84 196 +/- 79 125 +/- 77
< 169
< 189
< 191 142 +/- 89 MEAN*
- THE MEAN AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING BOTH THE MDA AND POSITIVE VALUES C-1
TABLE C-1.2 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN SURFACE WATER SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2002 I.
RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER +/- 2 SIGMA STC COLLECTION
- Mn-54 PERIOD 23 JAN FEB MAR APR
<4 MAY JUN
'JUL
~AUG
-SEP (2
3 3
i3
- t.
24 JAN FEB MAR APR (4
MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP 2
.Zn-65 Zr-95 Nb-95 Cs-i 34 Cs-137 Ba-140 La-140
<(5
-' 3
<' 10
,;c (4
k 2
-< 9
('<5
'C-5
.' I
<c4
< 4 2
.< 2 4
' I
<41 3.
< 14
'(10
. I.
C.
12 12 +/- 6
< 15
.T
.1.
.1 r.
4-k 3 (5
8- *
' 11 5
3-+/- 3
,7, 7
< 10 6 +/- 4 5 +/- 3
.3 3
<2
'5 (4
< 2 3; +/- 3 36:+/-
<4
<45 (4
.4 -
< 4
< 3
<2
< 2
< 27
< 9 11 I
I6I
< 8 c 6
< 4 MEAN*
.3.
3.3
. 4 +/- 4 -. 8.+/-.8 3 +/- 4.
7 +/- 9 6 +/- 7 4 +/- 4 3 +/- 4 3 +/- 3 36 +/- 26 12 +/- 9 EN I
AR U
E M A A D P V
- THE MEAN AND 2STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING BOTH THE MDA AND POSITIVEVALUES
TABLE C-1.2 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN SURFACE WATER SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2002 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER +/- 2 SIGMA STC COLLECTION PERIOD 33 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Zr-95 Nb-95 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-140 La-140 8 A e a
< 3
<3
<5
<6
<5
<6
<4
<3
< 2
< 0.9
<2
<2 e3
<4
<2
<6
<5
<8
<6
<12
<5
<12
<6
<11
<4
<9
<4
<8
<2
<4 41 c2
<2
<6
<2
<9 2
< 3
<6
< 5
< 5
< 5
< 4
< 3 c 1 40.9
<2
<3
<4
< 10
< 12
< 11
< 12
<8
< 7
<3 c2
<4
<8
<6
< 11
<c9
< 9
< 9
< 8
< 6
< 3
< 2
<4
<3
<4
<3
<3
<3
<6
<8
<6
<6
<6
<5
<6
<6
<5
<4
<4
<3
<2
<1
< 1
<0.9
<2
<2
<2
<2
<4
<2
<5
<6
<7
<6
<4
<4
<2
< 0.9
<2
<2
< 15
< 11
< 11
< 29
< 40
<26
<26
< 24
< 17
< 10
<21
< 11
<2
<2
<3
<9
< 13
<8
<8
<7
<6
<3
<7
<3 MEAN*
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC MEAN' 3
3 3
3 7
+/- 6 3
3 7 +/- 7 6 +/- 6 4
4 4
4 4
4 20 +/- 18 6
+/- 7
<2
<1
<6
<3
<5
<4
<3
<3
<4
<18
<2
<4
<4
<6
<4
<4
<6
<3
<3
<5
<22
<3
<3
<4
<8
<3
<8
<6
<6
<4
<4
<30
<7
<6
<6
<12
<5
<13
<10
<6
<7
<6
<30
<9
<3
<3
<7
<3
<6
<6
<4
<3
<3
<26
<9
<6
<6
<12
<6
<14
<10
<6
'7
<6
<30
<9
<4
<5
<10
<4
<9
<8
<5
<4
<4
<26
<9
'6
<7
<14
<6
<15
<11
<7
<6
<6
<38
<13
<2
<2
<5
<2
<4
<3
<2
<2
<2
< 18
<6
<4
<4
<10
<4
<8
<9
<5
<3
<4
<43
<13
< 1
< 1
<2
< 1
<2
<2
<1
<0.9
<1
<10
< 3
<2
<2
<5
<2
<4
<4
<3
<2
'2
<16
<5 4
+/- 4 4
+/- 4 8 i 7
4 +/- 3 8 +/- 9 7
+/- 6 4 +/- 4 4 +/- 4 4
3 26 t 19 7 +/- 7
' THE MEAN AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING BOTH THE MDA AND POSITIVE VALUES
TABLE C-11.1 CONCENTRATIONS OF TRITIUM IN WELL WATER SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2002 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PC/LITER i 2 SIGMA 1
a 37 38
,4 j
COLLECTION PERIOD JAN - MAR 131 +/- 55 APR - JUN
< 98 JUL -SEP,
< 131 OCT - DEC
- < 151
.A 1
44 MEAN' 128 :t 44
< 86
< 97
'c 133 178 124
- 83 166 132
< 86
< 97
+/- 86
< 178 94 X
'I 9..
I I
I I
1.
I.-
I.
¶4
-S4
.I'.
4.. 5, V
l
. -; I-I I
^ THE MEAN AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING BOTH THE MDA AND POSITIVE VALUES C-4
TABLE C-11.2 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN WELL WATER SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2002 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER + 2 SIGMA STC COLLECTION PERIOD Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 CO-60 Zn-65 Zr-95 Nb-95 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-140 La-140 1
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC MEAN*
<5
<4
<5
<4
<5
<10
<4
<3
<4
<14
< 5
<3
<3
<8
<3
<6
<6
<4
<3
<3
<23
<5
<5
<11
<5
<11
<9
<6
<6
<5
<-40
< 13 3 1
< 1
< 3 c 3
< 2
< 3 6 3
c 1 3
1 c 13
< 4 3 +/- 3 4 +/- 3 7 i 7 3 i 3 6 +/- 7 7 i 6
4 +/- 4 3 +/- 4 4 i 3 22 +/- 25 8 +/- 8 C0 in 37 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC MEAN*
<2
<2
<5
<4 c5
<10
<2
<4
<7
<3
<4
<2
< 17
<4
<9
<8
<5
<4
<4
<31
< 11
<6
<6
<13
<5
<13
<10
<7
<5
<6
<45
<.15
<3
<3
<8
<3
<6
<6
<4
<2
<3
<34
<12 4 +/- 3 4 +/- 4 9 +/- 7 4 +/- 3 8 +/- 8 8 t 4 5 +/- 4 4 t 3 4 +/- 3 32 +/- 23 10 +/- 10
- THE MEAN AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING BOTH THE MDA AND POSITIVE VALUES
TABLE C-11.2 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN WELL WATER SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2002 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER
-.PERIOD Co-58 P0 F-59 CO-60 Zn-65 Zr-95 Nb-95 Cs-I134 Cs-i 37 Ba-140 La-140 38
'JAN FEB MAR
'APR MAY
,JUN!
< 4 (3
- 6.
( c4
(
.<4
< 10 34 4
< 7<
<1 7 3*3 3*3 7*3
< 3
- . (<7
< 6
,<4
- 3cj 0 8
<4 4
(-c3 5
( 5I
<(5
(
15..
(6
- < 3,
-- I
( 24 I
t
(.c 35 - '
< 11
<2
' '<(4
<C2
< 1
< I
<1I' 4*+/-4
.3*+/-3
- 4*+/-'3
< 14
<(4 3*+/-2 6*+/-5 6+/-i6 22.+/- 19 7*+/-6
.I I %.'.__ - -
THE MEAN AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING BOTH THE MDA AND POSmTVE VALUES
TABLE C-111.1 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN PREDATOR & BOTTOM FEEDER (FISH)
SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2002 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/KG WET +/- 2 SIGMA STC COLLECTION K-40 Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-S0 Zn-65 Cs-134 Cs-137 PERIOD 93 PREDATOR 04115 -
04/15 -
09/10 09111 09/12
- 04/15/02
- 04/15102 09/10/02 09/11/02 09/12/02 4650 +/- 344 4040 +/- 306 4750 +/- 421 4090 i 438 5900 i 486 c 17
< 14
< 12
<29
< 25
< 18
< 17
< 15
< 42
< 36
( 40
< 41
< 43
< 102
- 90 63 +/- 60
< 142
< 54
< 16
< 15
< 11
<25
< 24 18 +/- 12 (53
< 14
< 41
( 34
< 27
<68
< 56 45 +/- 34
< 109
< 33
< 14
< 13
< 11
< 28 (21
< 17
< 16
< 11
<29
<25 MEAN*
4686 i 1501 19 +/- 14 26 +/- 25 18 +/- 14 20 +/- 14 93 BOTTOM FEEDER 04)18 - 04/18/02 09/12 09/12102 3480 +/- 724 4940 +/- 481
< 52
< 14 (54 (20
< 44
< 13
< 52
< 15 MEAN*
4210 +/- 2065 33 +/- 53 37 +/- 49 98 +/- 125 33 +/- 56 71
+/- 108 29 +/- 43 33 +/- 53 94 PREDATOR 10/04 - 10/04/02 10/04 --10/04/02 10/04 - 10/04/02 10104 - 10/04/02 3770 +/- 298 5530 +/- 447 4380 +/- 377 4630 t 823
< 16 (25
< 10
< 48
<21
< 34
< 13
<72
<61
'85
< 35
< 205
< 15
< 24
< 10
<48 (37
< 57 c 22 c 109
< 14
< 22
< 10
< 49
< 15
< 24
< 10
< 56 MEAN*
4578 +/- 1461 25 +/- 33 35 +/- 53 97 +/- 150 24 +/- 34 56 t 76 24 +/- 35 27 +/- 42
- THE MEAN AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING BOTH THE MDA AND POSITIVE VALUES
TABLE C-111.2 I.
.~
.I
, - I I I
I -,.
CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN CLAM AND CRAB SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2002 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/KG WET t 2 SIGMA STC COLLECTION PERIOD K.40 Mn-54 Co 58 Fe-59 Co-60 Z1-65 Cs-134 Cs-137 23 CLAMS 04116 - 04116102 1420
- 220
< 16 09/10 - 09110102 1140
- 292 --
,< 21
~s
-^ --
-^. _
< 16
<28
<40 70
< 16
<17
< 34
<43
< 14
< 18 MEAN-
-- 1280U +/- J9
-24
- CLAMS, 04116--.04/16102
'1410 t 238 09/10 -,09110/02
-. 1340-t 255.--
MEAN'
- 1375*99 -, -
94 CLAMS 04/17 -'04117/02 1310
- 210 09112
'09112102 1120 t.250 1W +/- I
< 13
,, j <17
-15 +/- 4
< 14
- <27 22 +/- 16 55 +/-*41 16
- 2 38 t*13 16 +/- 6
< 16
,< 22
( 34
. <62
- < 14
<(16,
(32 (6
36.
11
, <15
< 16
< 20 18
- 5
< 15
- 7. i<
16 16 1
(.15
(-
<22 19 +/- 9.
48 +/- 40
,1 15 +/- 3 -:'
34
- 6 13 *5 s t I
- <16
<33
( 33
<(79
< 13
<.21 s - 26
< 47" c 13
<-22 MEAN*
-:1215 +/- 269.
20* 19 93 CRABS 25 +/- 24 56 +/- 65 17 +/- 11' 36 +/- 30
... ~~
I 17
- 12
. I 18
- 10 04118 - 04118/02 1520
- 236
. 1,
, 17 I. j.,.
<26
<81
< 15
- ( 36
( 15
< 17 t
I-
- 2.
I -1 '- -
I -
.. I -
I I - - -
, 1.
- ".' " I -' i. I ;. '
'
.,. I -
w.
T h E M
A A
2 D EiA T IO N V
A C A L C U L A T E D' -U S I N I
M,- A A P O I
t
- THE MEAN AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING BOTH THE MDA AND POSlTIVE VALUES
TABLE C-IV.1 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN SEDIMENT SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2002 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/KG DRY +/- 2 SIGMA STC COLLECTION PERIOD Be-7 K-40 Mn-54 CO-58 Co-60 Cs-1 34 Cs-137 23 04/16/02 09/10/02
' 131
< 182 2430 +/- 227 16300 +/- 455
< 13
< 18
< 13
< 20
< 13
< 20
< 11
< 16 16 +/- 10 26 i 17 MEAN'
- 157 +/- 72 24 9365 +/- 19615 806 +/- 148 14600 +/- 455 16 +/- 8
( 10 (9
17 +/- 9
< 11
< 10 168-9
< 10
' 8 -
13 t 7 21 +/- 15 04/16/02 09/11/02
< 98
< 96 9
< 10
< 10 MEAN*
33 04/16/02 09/11/02 MEAN*
97 t 3
< 113
< 57 85 +/- 79
< 162
( 280 221+/-t 167 7703 +/- 19508 2990 +/- 211 1250 t 222 2120 +/- 2461 14000 +/- 420 2580 t 366 8290 +/- 16150 10 +/- 2
( 12
<6 9 +/-8 (c 17
< 22 20 i 7 10 +/- 1
< 12 (6
9 +/- 10
< 18
< 28 23 t 14 9 +/-2
< 11 (5
8 +/-8
< 17
< 20 18 +/- 4 9 +/-2
< 11
<5
< 12
<6 8 +/-8 10 +/- 0 9 i 10 94 04/17/02 09/12/02
< 14
< 20
< 16
< 24 MEAN*
17 +/- 8 20 +/- 10
- THE MEAN AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING BOTH THE MDA AND POSITIVE VALUES
TABLE C-V.1 CONCENTRATIONS OF GROSS BETA IN AIR PARTICULATE SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2002 RESULTS IN UNITS OF E-3 PCI/CU METER +/- 2 SIGMA.
GROUP I GROUP II 7-7 7 IRGRC 73 C,
)UP [if WEEK 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 MEAN' 20 28 t 1 24 +/-2 25 +/- 2 17 +/-2 19 +/-2 29 +/-2 17 +/- 2 18 I
2 19 +/- 2 26 +/-2 16 +/-2 20
- 2 14 +/-2 15 +/- 2 16 +/- 2 19 +/- 2 15 +/- 2 15 +/-2 15 +/-2 15 +/-2 12 1 1 17 +/- 2 10 +/- 1 9
1 15 +/- 1 18 +/-2 34 3
14 +/- 2 24 +/-2 11 +/- 2 25 +/-2 14 1 1 21 +/- 2 17 *2 10
- 1 16 +/-2 15 +/- 1 20 +/- 3 19 +/- 3 28 +/- 3 13 +/- 2 14 +/- 2 15 +/- 2 17 +/- 2 24 +/-3 17 +/-2 17 +/-2 17 +/-2 17 +/-2 14 +/-2 13 +/-2 15 +/- 2 66 25 +/- 1 26 +/- 3 32 +/- 3 12 +/- I 19 +/- 2 28 +/- 2 16 +/- 2
.17
- 2 19 *2 27 +/-2 16 +/- 2 20 +/-2 14 +/-2 16 +/-2 14 +/- 2
.17 +/- 2 15 +/- 2 14 +/- 2 15 +/- 2 14 +/- 2 12 +/- 2 17 2:
11 +/- 2
.10 +/-2 15 +/- 2 16 +/- 2 29 +/- 3 15 +/- 2 25 +/-2 12 +/-2 23 +/-2 14 *2 18 +/-2 14 *2 10 1 1 15 +/-2
.14 +/-2 16 +/- 3 15 +/- 3 25 +/- 3 10 I 1 12 +/-2 17 +/-3 13 +/-2 23 +/-3
.14 2,
'18 +/- 3 18 +/-2
.18 +/-2 14 +/- 3 14 +/- 2 14 +/- 2 m
71 27 +/- 1 25 +/- 2 25
- 2 15 +/- 2 21 +/- 2 26 2
17
- 2
-18 t 2 17
- 2 25 t2 17 t 2 19
- 2 13 t 2 16 2'
14 t 1
'19 t 2 14 t 2 12 1 1 15 t 2 15 +/- 2
.12 I1 18 t+/-2 10 t I
10 t 1 15 +/- 1 17 +/- 2 29't 2 18 ' 2 23 +/- 2 13 t 2 27 +/- 2 13 I 1 21 t 2 17 +/- 2 9
I 1 15 +/- 2 15 I 1 19 t 2 17 t 3 24 t 3
,11 t 1
'13 t 2 15 t 2 13 +/- 7
'22 +/- 3 15 2
20 +/- 2
'17 t 2 16 +/- 2 14 t 2 14 +/- 2 14, 2 21 +/- 1
.28 2
25 i2 17 +/- 2 19 +/- 2
'26'+/- 2 15 +/- 2
.,18 +/- 2
'19 +/- 2 24 2.
16 t2 20 +/-2
- 15'+/- 1 14 +/- 2 14 +/- 2 19 +/- 2 15 +/- 2 14 +/- 2 13 +/- 2
'13 +/- 2 12 +/- 1 30 +/- 15 10 +/- 2
.9 +/-1 14 1 1 18 t 2
.35.+/- 3 15 t 2 25 +/-2 12 +/-2
- 25 +/-2 14 I 1
'23 t2 18 t2
,8 I1
'15 t 2 14 +/- 1
'18:+/- 2 16 t3 28 +/- 3 12 +/- I 13 +/- 2
.15 +/- 2
'15 t2
'23'+/- 3 14 +/- 2 18 +/-2 19 '
2 19 +/- 2
.13 +/- 2
'15 +/-,2 15 +/- 2 Z4 t I 26 2
25 +/-2 15 +/-2 17 2:
19'+/- 2
,16 +/- 2 16+/-2 17 +/-2 24 2
23 +/-2 20 t 2 13 +/-1 16 2
13 +/-1
.16 +/-2 15 t 2 14 +/-1 15 2
13 +/-2 12 +/-.1 18 +/--2 9 I1 10 1
-15 t 1 16 +/-2 28 2
14 2
22 *2 10
- 2 23 2
13 1.
19 2
17 t2 9 t1 15 2
.12 1
17 +/-2 14 2
22 3
11 +/-.1 11 +/-2 14 2'
11 2
22 +/-'3-11 +/-2 17 +/-2 17 2
19 +/-2 15 +/-3 12 t2 15 +/-2 2b +/- 1 27+/- 2 27+/- 2 16+/- 2
.18+/- 2
'28 +/- 2 15 +/- 2 18+/- 2 19+/-2 24+/-2 16 2
21 2
15 1
14 +/- 2 14 2
18 2
11 +/- I 14 2
13 1
,.:13 I
.11 +/-F1 16+/-2
.9 1
.9+/-i1.
17 1
18 +/- 2 32 3
15 +/- 2 26 +/- 2 14 2
28 t2 14 1
23 2
20 2
10 1
18 2
17 +/- 2 18 2
18 +/-3 22 +/- 3 9
1 14 2
14 2
17 2
25 3
14 +/-2 20 2
18 2
18 +/- 2 13t 2 14 2
15 +/- 2 18+/-t11 27+/-1 26 +/- 2 25 +/- 2 15 2
19 +/-2 28 +/-2 16+/-2 15 2
18 +/- 2 26 +/-2 16 +/-2 20 t2 15 +/- 1
.16 +/-2 13 +/- 1 18 2
13 2
15 +/-2 12 2
10 1
10 +/- 1 17 +/- 2
.10 1
8 1 1 17 2
16 +/- 2 29 +/-3 15 +/-2 24 +/-2 13 2
25 +/- 2 13 1 1
.18 t2 14 +/- 2 7
I1 15 t2 15 I 1 16 +/-2 14 +/-3 26 t3
..10 I 1 13 +/-2 14 2
+/-,14 2
24 +/-3 11 +/- 2 17 +/- 2 15 2
18 2
11 I 2
13 eF2 15 +/-2 17 I 11 18 +/- 10
- 17 +/-10
'17 +/- 10 I.
I
.I I
'18 Ill1
-16
+/- 9 I~~
I..
(1) SEE PROGRAM EXCEPTIONS SECTION FOR EXPLANATIONi.
- THE MEAN AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING BOTH THE MDA AND POSITIVE VALUES C-1 0
TABLE C-V.2 MONTHLY AND YEARLY MEAN VALUES OF GROSS BETA CONCENTRATIONS (E.3 PCI/CU METER) IN AIR PARTICULATE SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2002 GROUP I - ON-SITE LOCATIONS GROUP II - INTERMEDIATE DISTANCE LOCATIONS GROUP III - CONTROL LOCATIONS COLLECTION PERIOD 17131101 02104102 03/04/02 04/01/02 04/29/02 06/03102 07101/02 08/05/02 09/02/02 09130/02 11/04/02 12102102
- 02/04/02
- 03/04/02
- 04101/02
- 04/29/02
- 06/03/02
- 07/01102
- 08/05/02
- 09/02102
- 09/30/02
- 11/04102
- 12/02/02
- 12130/02 MIN.
MAX.
MEAN t 2 SD 12 32 24 : 13 16 29 20 +/- 10 14 27 19+/-9 14 19 16 +/- 3 12 15 14 +/- 3 9
18 14 t7 11 34 20 +/- 17 14 25 18+/-8 10 20 15i 6 10 28 17 +/- 13 13 24 18 +/- 8 13 18 15 +/- 4 COLLECTION PERIOD 12/31101 02/04/02 03104/02 04/01/02 04/29/02 06/03102 07/01/02 08/05/02 09/02/02 09130/02 1 1/04/02 12/02102
- 02/04/02
- 03104/02
- 04101/02
- 04/29/02
- 0603/02
- 07/01/02
- 08/05/02 9/02102
- 09/3002
- 11/04/02
- 12/02102
- 12130/02 MIN.
MAX.
MEAN $
2 SD 15 28 23 +/- 9 15 26 19+/-F 7 13 25 19 +/- 8 13 19 15 +/- 4 12 15 13 +/-2 9
30 15 t 11 10 35 20 +/- 16 13 27 19 +/- 9 8
19 14 +/-7 11 28 16 +/- 12 11 23 17+/-8 12 19 16 +/- 5 COLLECTION PERIOD
^,q^.lms lIImJlF l&tJllvl 02104/02 0304102 04/01/02 04/29/02 06103102 07101/02 08/05/02 09/02/02 09/30/02 11/04/02 12/02/02
- UlfjWU&
- 03/04/02
- 04101/02
- 04/29/02
- 06/03102
- 07/01/02
- 08/05/02
- 09/02/02
- 09130102
- 11/04/02
- 12/02102
- 12/30102 MIN.
MAX.
MEAN +/-
2 SD' 15 27 24 +/- 10 15 28 20 +/- 11 15 26 19 t 8 11 18 15 +/- 5 10 15 12 +/- 3 8
18 14 +/- 8
.13 32 21 +/- 15 13 28 19 +/- 11 7
18 15 +/- 7 9
26 15 +/- 11 11 25 18 +/- 10 11 18 15 +/- 5 r
12131101 - 12130102 9
34 17 $ 6 12131/01 - 12130102 8
35 17 +/-6 12131/01 - 12130102 7
32 17 +/- 7
- THE MEAN AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING BOTH THE MDA AND POSITIVE VALUES
TABLE C-V.3 CONCENTRATIONS OF STRONTIUM IN AIR PARTICULATE SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2002 RESULTS IN UNITS OF E-3 PCI/CU METER i 2 SIGMA COLLECTION PERIOD STC 3
12/31101
- 03125/02
'07101102 09130/02
- 03/25/02
- 07/01/02
- 09/30t02
- 12/30102 SN4 COLLECTION 89 Sr-90 STC PERIOD 0.2
_, <,0.2.
72 12/31)01 - 03125102 0.4
< 0.1 03/25/02 - 07/01/02 3.7 t < 1.4 07/01/02 - 09/30/02 5.2 i, 3.1 09/30/02 - 12130102 m
Sr-89
< 0.3 S 1.0
< 4.0 I
<5.6 Sr-90
< 02
< 0.3
< 1.0
< 3.6 I
MEAN.
2A
- 4.9 '
1.2*+
2.8 MEAN-2.7
- 5.0 1.3 +/- 3.2 20 12131101 03/25102 07101102 09/30102
- 03/25/02
- 07/01102
- 09130102
- 12/30102 MEAN'
- 03)25/02
- 07)01102
- 09/30102
- 12/30/02
< 0.2
- < 4.4
< 5.6 2.7
- 5.5 I< 0.2
<0.7
< 5.2
< 6.6 1
< 0.1 I
,< 0.1
.< 1.0 I
< 3.3 1
.I 1.1 +/- 3.0
< 0.2
< 0.24
< 4.4' 73 12/31101
. -03/25)02 07101102 09/30/02 C
,12/31101
-03)25102 07101/02 0930/02
- 03)25/02
&I
- 07/01/02 T
- 09)30/02
- 12/30/02
< 0.2
-< 0.7
<4.3
< 5.7 66 12131/01 03125/02 07/01102 09/30/02 MEAN-2.7 +/- 5.4 1
i,
- 03125/02
< 0.2
- 07101/02
< 0.5
- 09)30J02
< 4.1
- 12/3002
< 5.5
< 0.1
< 0.2
< 1.0
< 3.4 1.2 +/- 3.0
< 0.1
< 0.1
< 15
< 3.6 4.7
- 13.9 MEAN' 71 12/31)01 03/25/02 07101/02 09)30102
- 03)25/02
- 07/01/02
- 09/30/02
- 12)30/02 MEAN' 3.2
- 6.4
< 0.3
< 0.4
'< 4.3
< 5.8 1.5,+/- 3.9 i,.,
1
.0
< 0.1
.< 1.5 -
< 3.0
,E A
2 5 3 MEAN'.,
2.6 +/- 5.3 2.7
- 5.5 1.2 +/- 2.7 I
v 7
-A -
I-..
t-Di --
1..
I
.. I.
I il I
i
.. V-I-s ;
I I
t i
I I
- THE MEAN AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING BOTH THE MDA AND POSITIVE VALUES A C-12
TABLE C-V.4 CONCENTRATION OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN AIR PARTICULATE SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2002 RESULTS IN UNITS OF E-3 PCI/CU METER +/-2 SIGMA STC COLLECTION Be-7 Mn-54 Co-58 Co-60 Cs-134 Cs-137 PERIOD 3
12131 - 03125102 62+/- 10
< 0.2
< 0.2
< 0.4
< 0.3 c0.1 03125 - 07101/02 69 +/- 5
< 0.3
< 0.4
< 0.3
< 0.3
'0.3 07/01 - 09130102 69 +/- 7
< 0.4
< 0.5
< 0.4
< 0.4
< 0.4 09/30 - 12130102 66 +/- 45
< 0.4
< 0.5
< 0.5
< 0.3
< 0.4 MEAN' 66 +/- 7 0.3 +/- 0.2 0.4 +/- 0.3 0.4 +/- 0.2 0.3
- 0.1 0.3 +/- 0.3 20 12131 - 04101102 76 +/-10
< 0.2
< 0.4
< 0.3
< 0.3
<0.5 04101 - 07/01/02 84+/- 6
<0.3
<0.4
<0.2 0.2
<0.3 07101 - 09/30102 78 +/- 6
< 0.3
< 0.4
< 0.3
< 0.3
< 0.3 09/30 - 12130/02 78 +/- 51
< 0.9
< 1.2
< 1.2
< 0.7
< 0.8 MEAN' 79 +/- 7 0.4 +/- 0.6 0.6 t 0.8 0.5 +/- 0.9 0.4 0.45 0.5 +/- 0.5 66 12131 - 04/01/02 17+/- 11
' 0.3
< 0.2
< 0.4
< 0.4
< 0.2 04/01 - 07/01/02 73 +/- 5
< 0.4
< 0.6
< 0.4
< 0.4
< 0.4 07/01 - 09/30102 82 +/- 8
< 0.4
< 0.4
< 0.4
< 0.3
< 0.4 09/30 - 12/30102 74 +/- 68
< 1.0
< 1.3
< 1.2
< 0.8
< 0.9 MEAN' 77 +/- 8 0.5 +/- 0.6 0.6+/- 1.0 0.6 +/- 0.8 0.5 +/- 0.5 0.5 +/- 0.6 71 12131 - 04/01/02 73 +/- 9
< 0.3
< 0.2
< 0.4
< 0.4
< 0.2 04/01 - 07/01/02 72 +/- 5
< 0.4
< 0.5
< 0.3
< 0.4
< 0.4 07/01 - 09/30/02 65 +/- 5
< 0.3
< 0.4
< 0.4
< 0.2
< 0.2 09/30 - 12/30/02 73 +/- 53
< 1.0
< 1.1
< 0.8
< 0.7
< 0.8 MEAN' 71 +/- 8 0.5 +/- 0.6 0.6 +/- 0.8 0.5 +/- 0.5 0.4 +/- 0.4 0.4 +/- 0.6 72 12131 - 04101J02 70 +/- 10
< 0.2
< 0.2
< 0.3
< 0.3
< 0.1 04/01 - 07/01/02 67 +/- 4
< 0.2
< 0.3
< 0.2
< 0.2
< 0.2 07/01 - 09/30/02 77 7
' 0.3
< 0.3
< 0.3
< 0.2
< 0.2 09/30 - 12/30/02 77 +/- 52
<0.6
<1.1
< 0.7
< 0.6
< 0.8 MEAN 73 +/- 10 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.8 0.4 t 0.5 0.3 0.3 0.3 +/- 0.6 73 12131 - 04/01/02 65 t 10
< 0.2
< 0.3
< 0.3
<0.3
< 0.2 04/01 - 07/01/02 64 +/- 5
< 0.3
< 0.4
< 0.3
< 0.3
< 0.3 07/01 - 09/30/02 60 +/- 5
< 0.3
< 0.5
< 0.3
< 0.3
< 0.3 09/30 - 12/30/02 62 +/- 41
< 0.8
< 0.9
< 0.8
< 0.6
< 0.7 MEAN*
63 t 5 0.4 +/- 0.5 0.5 +/- 0.6 0.4 +/- 0.5 0.4 +/- 0.3 0.4 +/- 0.4 C
12/31 - 04/01/02 64 +/- 11
< 0.2
< 0.2
< 0.3
< 0.3
< 0.2 04/01 - 07/01/02 58 +/- 4
< 0.3
< 0.4
< 0.3
< 0.3
< 0.3 07/01 - 09/30/02 67 +/- 5
< 0.3
< 0.4
< 0.3
< 0.3
< 0.3 09/30 - 12/30102 67 +/- 26
< 0.3
<0.4
< 0.5
< 0.2
< 0.3 MEAN' 64 +/- 9 0.3 +/- 0.1 0.4 0.2 0.3 +/- 0.2 0.3 +/- 0.1 0.3 i 0.1
' THE MEAN AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING BOTH THE MDA AND POSITIVE VALUES C-1 3
TABLE C-VI.1 CONCENTRATIONS OF 1-131 IN AIR IODINE SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2002 RESULTS IN UNITS OF E-3 PCI/CU METER + 2 SIGMA GROUP I WEEK 1
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 9
10 11 12:
13 14 15-16 17 -
18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 MEAN' 20
< 5
-c 3
<5
<2.
5.
<4
- < 3 j.
< 7
<3-
<2.
<43
<2
< 6
< 12
< 9
<<8
< 6
< 8
<9
<6
< 10
<8
<8
< 8
< 16,
< 7
<4
< 11
<7
<7X-
<7
< 13
< 5
<19
< 7
< 15
< 19
<5
<3
< 17
< 12:
< 22
<6. -
<5
<4
< 3 3
<1>
< 9
< 5 7 i 9 66 71 C
n
< 6
< 6
< 5
<3
<3
<3
< 4.
< 6
< 3
<7.
< 13
<9
<8
< 7
< 6
< 6
< 10
< 9
< 8
< 9
< 18
< 8
< 5
< 12
< 8
<8
< 12'
<9
< 6
<21
< 8
< 17
< 21
<6
<4
< 19
<14
< 25 7
6
<5.. -
<5-..
<3
<1 I
<10
<6 8 t 10
<U
<7
<4
<3
<3
<5
.5
<53
<2
.< 3
<3.
t::
< 12
.. <.9
< 7
<6
<5
< 7
-<8-.
<'S4
<7
- < 4,
< T -
t
< 18
<9
<4
<9,
,?
<5
<5 zi
<8 6
< 18
<7 k9 1f
<24
<3
<9
<14
<69 3
- < 2 3
< 4
<3
<5 GROUP II 72
<7
<6
<4.:
<3
< 3
< 5
< 5
<5
< 5
<3
<2
<3
< 5
< 4
< 6
< 12
< 9
< 7'
<5 6
<9
< 119 (
< 10 k8
< 7
< 8
< 21 9
5 9
5
<5
< 10
< 12 5
< 18
< 7
<9
< 24
<7 5
<13
<14
< 10
<3
< 12
<3
<4
<6
-<3.
<5
<5 GROUP III 1) 73
<5 7
4 3
3
<4
<5
< 5
<5
< 3
< 2
< 3
<4
<3
<6
< 11
<8
<6
<4
<6
<5
<6 8
<7
<6
<3
< 16
< 8
<4
< 9 5
< 5
<8
'<11
<5
< 17
< 7
<9
< 23
<6
<5
< 13
< 13
<10
< 3
< 8
<3
<2
< 5
<4 8
<6 7
8 6
4
<3 4
2
<6 3
<3 6
<2 2
3 4
-c3
<6
<12 6
8 75 5
9 7
7 2
<15 7
5
<9 7
<6 9
<12 3
<17
<6
<14
<18 5
3
<16
<11
<20
< 6
<5
<4
<3
<4
< 1.
<8
<5 7
9 U
6
<4 3
4 2
6
<4 3
7 3
2 3
3 3
6 15
<7
<9
<5
<9
< 6
- < 10
< 8
<8
<4
<16
<7
<5
<10
- 11
<7
< 9
<8
<7
<19
<7
- 15
<19
<5
<6
< 17
< 12
<22
< 6
<5
<4 3
4
<1
<9 5
'7
- 10 8 at: 19
'10 32
- ,4 (1) SEE PROGRAM EXCEPTIONS SECTION FOR EXPLANATION
TABLE C-VII.1 CONCENTRATIONS OF STRONTIUM AND GAMMA EMITTERS IN VEGETATION SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2002 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/KG WET + 2 SIGMA STC COLLECTION Sr-89 Sr-90 K-40 1-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-140 La-140 PERIOD 35 08/07/02
< 24 4 +/- 2 2710 i 204
< 62 (1)
< 18 28 t 6
< 127
< 40 Cabbage 35 08107/02
< 38 8 +/- 3 4030 +/- 325
< 102 (1)
< 31
< 36
< 197
< 13 Collards 35 09/10/02
< 28 84 +/- 5 2220 t 514
< 1150 (1)
< 49
< 47
< 1040
< 344 Broadleaf 35 10/10/02
< 12 36 +/- 3 1640 +/- 368
< 554 (1)
< 34
< 37
< 675
< 217 Broadleaf MEAN' 26 +/- 22 41 +/- 81 2650 t 2037 467 1014 33 25 37 16 510
- 859 154 312 THE MEAN AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING BOTH THE MDA AND POSITIVE VALUES (1) SEE PROGRAM EXCEPTIONS SECTION FOR EXPLANATION
TABLE C-VIi.1.... CONCENTRATIONS OF STRONTIUM AND GAMMA EMITTERS IN VEGETATION SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2002 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PC01KG WET +/- 2 SIGMA STC COLLECTION Sr-89 PERIOD Sr-90 K-40 1-131 Cs-134 Cs-1 37 Ba-140 La-140 36 Cabbage 08/06/02
< 10 6 +/- 1
<14 12+/-1 2880 +/- 153 3820
- 211 I
I
<23
<50 5
< 15
<45
< 15
< 31 36 08/06/02 Collards L,..
- 13
< 103 i36 09110102
- Cabbage.. -,.
'36^,
09110102
! Mustard Greens'--
, 8 3
- 1
..A J;,
.1 3000 +/- 427 I:-;,
< 400 (1)
< 22 I
I
<23
<485
- ~
8....
< 149
<25 5 *2 6860 i 279
( 164 (1)
.. ~:
- I.! ",
<(7
< 173 J,v
< 53 I...
36
- -. : 09/10/02 Collards
<23 9 +/-3 6080 +/- 372
<326 (1)
< 13
< 15
< 353
< 106 36 10/10/02 Cabbage
<7 4 +/- 1 2790 +/- 139
<96 (1)
<5 I
< 106
<33 36
- i..l 10/10/02 Collards
'11 9 *2 4950 +/- 221
< 115 (1)
(7
'7
< 136
< 44 MEAN_
1-30 3 0 2 MEAN*,
W4 14-7 6
4340 +/- 3302 168 +/- 285 11
- 13 1
- 1 3 2
0*
3 1 8 9
6 11 +/- 13 200 +/- 318 62 +/- 96
.I
',THE MEAN AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING BOTH THE MDA AND POSITIVE VALUES (1) SEE PROGRAM EXCEPTIONS SECTION FOR EXPLANATION I
I
TABLE C-VII.1 CONCENTRATIONS OF STRONTIUM AND GAMMA EMITTERS IN VEGETATION SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2002 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/KG WET +/- 2 SIGMA STC COLLECTION Sr-89 Sr-90 K-40 1-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-140 La-140 PERIOD 66 08/07/02
< 30
<5 3000 +/- 175
< 28
< 7 15 4
< 60
< 18 Cabbage 66 08107/02
< 11 4+/- 1 3060 t 338
< 91 (1)
< 27
<27
< 187
< 57 Collards 66 09/10/02
< 23 121 +/- 8 2090 +/- 284
< 483 (1)
< 23
< 26
< 520
< 164 Broadleaf 66 09/10102
< 11 3+/- 1 2770 +/- 298
< 147 (1)
<7
< 9
< 172
< 54 Cabbage
-4 66 10/10/02
< 3 29 +/- 1 3720 i 458
< 602 (1)
< 36
< 41
< 690
< 228 Broadleaf MEAN' 16 +/- 21 32 +/- 102 2928 t 1173 270 +/- 511 20 +/- 25 23 25 326 +/- 533 104 +/- 176
- THE MEAN AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING BOTH THE MDA AND POSITIVE VALUES (1) SEE PROGRAM EXCEPTIONS SECTION FOR EXPLANATION 1
TABLE C-VIII.1 I
QUARTERLY TLD RESULTS FOR OYSTER CREEK GENERATION STATION, 2002 RESUL. S
.IN-UNI
.T.O Q
2 S RESULTS IN UNITS OF MILLI-ROENTGENISTD. QUARTER i 2 STANDARD DEVIATIONS STATION CODE MEAN
..JAN -:MAR
- t i APR - JUN JUL-- SEP
- 2S.D.
OCT - DEC C
11.9 i 1.8 14 13.5 i 2.6 1
13.4 +/- 3.8 Ti 13.9 + 4.1 3
10.7+/- 4.1 6
11.9 +/- 7.2 8,
,11.1
+/- 4.9 9
11.9 +/- 5.2 11 11.1 +/- 4.5 22 10.4 +/- 5.5 51 14.0 +/- 3.8 52 15.7 +/- 3.1 53 15.4 +/- 4.1 54 11.7*+/- 3.7 55 19.9 +/- 2.6 56 18.0 +/- 2.0 57 14.9 +/- 2.7 58 15.7 +/- 32
.59 14.1 +/- 4.7 61 1222 +/- 3.1 62 132'i 1.2 63 12.4 +/-3.7 64 12.6 +/- 2.8 65 12.3 +/- 3.0 66 10.8 +/- 2.6 68 12.0 +/- 4A 71 12.2 +/- 2.9 72 11.3 +/- 2.9 73 10.9 +/- 3.9, 74'
' 11.2 3.
75 12.5
- 3.5 78 11.1'+/- 4.4 79 11.2 +/- 3.0 81 10.9 +/- 3.8 82 11.6 +/- 3.2
- 84.
11.6 +/- 3.4 85 10.9 +/- 3.2 86 102+/- 4.8 88 10.0 +/- 5.3 89 10.1 +/- 3.5 90 10.1 +/- 2.9 92 11.6
- 3.5 98
'13.0 +/- 4.8 99 11.3 +/- 3A 11.4 +/- 2.3 12.8
- 0.9 15.1 i 1.2 15.1 +/-'1.2'-'
12.0
- 6.4 16.4 +/- 19.1 12.6 +/- 0.9
.13.6 +/- 0.9 12.4
- 1.1 11.0 +/- 2.3 1::
-t2.0
+/-I 16 10.8 +/- 1.1
- 10.8 +/- 1.1
, 7.8 o.5 7.7+/- 0.(
- 7.7 +/- O.t 8.1 +/- 2.A 7.9 +/- 1.
11.8
- 1.2 16.2 *1.9..
17.6* 1.7 13.6
- 0.9 21.6 1.2 18.9
- 2.0 16.5*
1.7s,-:
17.4
- 2.3 7.-,
14.6 0.0 1
13.1
- 1.1 13.5 1.4.
12.6
- 0.9 12.9 +/- 1.2 13.3
- 0.9 10.2 +/- 1.9 114 +/- 0.9 11.1 +/- 1.1 9.9*1.1 9.5 +/-.1.7k, 11.0
- 0.9 13.1 +/-.1.8,.
11.7 1
,j 11.4 0.9 12.0 1.1 12A.*
1.A 13.3
- 1.7 11.2
- 0.0 (1) 9.4 17 9.2 i 1.2,.
9.2
- 1.2 11.2 1.2 13.1 1.1.-
12.5
- 0.9' 6.7 I.Z 11.6 i 1.,
13.7
- 1.
13.7 +/- I.t 9.7 +/- 2.,
18A *.2.e 16.6 A 2.t 13.7 *k 2.'
,15.1 +/- 15 11.2
- 1.i 10.0+/-* 1.t (1) 10.0 1 1.1 10.6 +/- 1.;
10.2 +/- 2.'
9.3 +/- 1.'
9.3 +/- 1.,
10.8
- 1.,
10.3 +/- 2.!
8.9 +/- I.:
9.1 +/- 1.:
9.9*
1.
7.9'+/- 0.!
92 3.
8.1
- 1.
9.3 2.
9.7
- 2.
8.6
- 1.
10.0
- 1.
6.7 +/- 0.
8.3
- 1!
8.7 +/- 1.
9.3 +/- 2.
10.0
- 1.
8.8 +/- 1.
3 13.0 2.4-14.8 1.9 I
14.6 1.2 1
14.5 1.1 12.3 1A 12.6 1.8 1 13.1 1.1 13.5 1.1 5
12.9 1.7 13.0
- 1.1 14.3
- 1.0 6
. '16.2-+/-'1.5 6
16.7
-1 A.
2 12.8
- 0.8 5
-19.9
+/-'2.1 5
18.3
- 1A I
15.6
- 1.9
- .1
-16.4 1.9 13.8' 2.2 12.1 1.0 12.5
- 0.9 12.6* 1.7 2
12.8
- 1.0 1
12A
- 1.7 1
12.2 2.4 2
12.7 +/- 0.8 1
13.2 +/- 1.8 5
13.0 +/- 1.6 3
12.2
- 1.5 3
12.3
- 0.8 7
13.3 1.3 9
11.8
- 1.8 2
11.3 0 4
.1
'11.6 +/- 1.0 1
12.0 +/- 1.5' 1
10.7 +/- 1.6 6
12.2 +/- 1.7 3
12.7
- 1.3 0
11.1
- 1.1 5.8 12.3 2.2 9
11.9
- 0.8 2
12.7 1.A 6
15.9 +/- 12.2 3
12.2 *11.6 12A +/- 1.1 14.3 1.7' 13.0+/- 1.9 15.1 +/- 9.3 10.6 +/-.1.3 10.8 +/- 0.7 11.0 +/- 2.0 12.2
- 1.5 11.0
- 1.2 10.1 +/- 1.5 14.1
- 3.6 15.6 *'1.0 13.6
- 1.4 10.6
- 0.7 19.8
- 2.0 18.4 4+/- 4.6 13.9
'2.9 13.8
- 1.5 16.9 +/- 10.9 13A.*
1.2 13.6 +/-.1.9 14.5 +/- 0.8 13.9
- 1.6 13A +/- 1.3 11A +/- 2.7 14.5 +/- 1.2 13.6 +/- 1.3 12.1 +/- 1.9
- -12.9 +/- 3.0 12.2 +/- 2A
- 13.6 +/- 0.9 12.9 +/- 3.3 12.8 +/- 1.0 12.0
- 2.0 12.9 +/- 2.0 12.8 +/- 2.7 11.7+/- 42 7.9 +/- 0.7 13.0 +/- 1.9 10.7 +/- 0.8 10.7 +/- 2.0 13.2 +/- 1A 13.1 +/- 0.8 11.5 +/- 1.7 (1) SEE PROGRAM EXCEPTIONS SECTION FOR EXPLANATION C-18
TABLE C-VIII.2 MEAN QUARTERLY TLD RESULTS FOR THE SITE BOUNDARY, MIDDLE, SPECIAL INTEREST AND CONTROL LOCATIONS FOR OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2002 RESULTS IN UNITS OF MILLI-ROENTGEN PER STD. QUARTER +/- 2 STANDARD DEVIATIONS OF THE STATION DATA STATION CODE SITE BOUNDARY k2S. D.
MIDDLE SPECIAL INTEREST CONTROL JAN-MAR APR-JUN JUL-SEP OCT-DEC 15.3 +/- 5.7 12.3 +/- 5.5 14.6 +/- 4.8 14.4 +/- 4.7 12.2 +/- 3.0 8.8 +/- 1.9 12.5 +/- 2.3 12.0 +/- 3.1 11.3 +/- 4.0 8.9 +/- 2.8 12.7 +/- 1.9 12.2 +/- 3.0 12.1 +/- 2.0 11.5 +/- 1.4 13.9 +/- 2.5 13.4 +/- 2.7 TABLE C-VlII.3
SUMMARY
OF THE AMBIENT DOSIMETRY PROGRAM FOR OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2002 RESULTS IN UNITS OF MILLI-ROENTGEN/STD. QUARTER LOCATION SITE BOUNDARY MIDDLE DISTANCE SPECIAL INTEREST CONTROL SAMPLES ANALYZED 63 63 40 8
PERIOD MINIMUM 9.3 6.7 6.7 11.0 PERIOD MAXIMUM 21.6 16.4 15.1 14.8 PERIOD MEAN
- 2s.d.
14.2 + 5.5 11.4 +/- 4.0 11.3 +/- 4.2 12.7 +/- 2.6 SITE BOUNDARY STATIONS - 1, 51.52,53,54, 55, 56, 57, 58.59,61,62.63,64,65,66 MIDDLE DISTANCE STATIONS - 6,8,22.68,73,74,75,78,79,81.82,84,85,86,98,99 SPECIAL INTEREST - 3.9,11.71,72,88,89,90,92, Ti CONTROL STATIONS - C. 14 C-19
TABLE C-IX.1
SUMMARY
OF COLLECTION DATES FOR SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2002 ISURFACE WATER (RriTu IQUVI 661SCINTILLA6iON)'.
t.
COLLEC11ON PERIOD 231 24" 33' J
94 JAN
.01102/02 01102)02 FEB 02113)02
.~02/13)02 MAR 03112/02:-`:03112/02-.
APR':
'04/09/02
- 04/09)02.04/09102.'. _.4)09/02
.MAY.
- '03)0510Y 03/0-512 JUN 06/04/02 06/04102 JUL
~~7
)2$
07/05102 AUG 08/02/02'
,08/02102 SEP 0904102' 09104102' 09/04/02,
-09104/02 OCT
.10)0W212
-10/02102 NOV 11/05/02 11/05102 DEC 120312 -'12/03102 4'..,
I
I -1 t
I I.
SURFACE WATERl 1GAMMVA SPECTROSCOMY COLLECTiON.
PERIOD 23.2--33 9
JAN 01/02102
-01102102 FEB
-02113102
-02113102, MAR
"<-`-
' 0312/02-D03112102" APR 04109102 04)09102 £ 04)0/02' 04)09102 MAY 03)05/02 03105102
-JUL 07)00102 -
0 7105/02 AUG
.08)02/02.-
0802/02 SEP
-.09104.102
.09/04/02 "09)04)02 09)04102,
- OCT,
-i" 102102 10102102 NOV
-11)05)02
'11)05/02, DEC 12/03102'1130 WELL WATER (TRifUM & GAMVMA spECTROsCOY COLLECTION
- PERIOD
-1
-37 38 i -
L I
I..
I
I.
I T
-. JAN-MAR
.02/19102 02/15/02 02/1 5/02 APR-JUN 03/27)02
-05/10)02 03127102 ~_05/10/02
-03127102
- -05/10102 JUL-SEP 06)06/02 08/12102 06)010 08)12/02 0610612 -0122 OCT-DEC' 09106/2 -11/07/02 09)06/02' 11)07/02
'09/06)02
-11)07/02 AIR PARTICULATE (GAMMA SPECTROSCOPY)
COLLECTION C-::3 20 PERIOD 66 JAN-MAR 12131)01 -04101102
-12/31101 04101/02 12)31/01 7 04)01102 12/31/01 - 04)01/02 APR-JUN
-03125/2-.-
07101/02,0/012.70)0 4010 07)01)02 0'4)01)02 - 07)01/02 JUL-SEP
,.07)01102
- 09/30)2 207/01/02
-09130/02 07101/02 ~'-09130102
-07)01/02 - 09130102 OCT-DEC 09/30/02. - 12130)02
'09130/02-12130102. 09130102
-12130102 09130/02 - 12130102 COLLECTION 71 72 73 PERIOD JAN-MAR APR-JUN JUL-SEP OCT-DEC 12131101 - 04101/02 04/01/02 - 07)01)02 07101102 - 09130102 09130/02 -
12130102 12131/01 03125/02 07/01/02 09130/02
- 04/01/02 12/31/01 04)01102
- 07)01)02
. 04/01)02 -
07)01/02
- 09130/02 07/01/02 -
09130102
- 12130)02 09/30/02 -
12130102 II '
~)C-20
TABLE C-IX.1
SUMMARY
OF COLLECTION DATES FOR SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2002 AIR PARTICULATE (GROSS BETA & 1-131}
COLLECTION PERIOD
-m 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 c
3 20 68 71 1;abiiU1 - Upldi 01/08102 - 01/14/02 01114102 - 01/22/02 01122102 - 01129102 01129/02 -02104102 02104/02 -02111/02 02111/02 - 02118102 02)18102 - 02/25102 02/25/02 - 03104/02 03104102 - 03111/02 03/11102 - 03119/02 03119/02 - 03125102 03/26102 - 04/02/02 04/02/02 - 04/08/02 04/08102 - 04/116/02 04/16/02 - 04/23/02 04123102 - 04/29/02 04/29/02 - 05107102 05/07102 - 05113102 05/13102 - 0510/02 05/20/02 - 05/28102 05/28/02 - 06104102 06/04/02 - 06110102 06110102 - 06/17/02 06117/02 - 06/24/02 06/24/02 - 07/01/02 07/01102 - 07/08102 07/08102 - 07/15102 07/15/02 - 07/22102 07122102 - 07129102 07129102 - 08/O5/02 08105/02 - 08/13102 08113102 - 08119/02 08/19/02 - 08/2102 08126102 - 09103102 09/03102 - 09109/02 09109102 - 09/17/02 09/17102 - 09124/02 09/24/02 - 09130102 09130/02 -
10107102 10/07/02 -
10/14/02 10114/02 -
10/21/02 10121/02 - 1028102 10128/02 - 11/04/02 11104/02 -
1/11/02 11/11/02 - 11/18102 11/18102 -
11/25102 11/25/02 - 12102/02 12/02/02 - 1209/02 12109102 - 12116102 12116/02 - 12/23102 12/23102 -
12130/02 1UjiiIU1 -
WIUIJUy ladliul
- UlUllUZ 14iul - Uliol/uz uJi/Ul -U1/U77Ul 01/07/02 - 01114/02 01/07t02 - 01/14/02 01/07/02 - 01/14/02 01/07/02 - 01114/02 01/14/02 - 011 0114/02 01/21102 01114/02 -, 01/21/02 01/14/02 - 01t21/02 01121102 - 01128/02 01/21/02 - 01/2802 01121/02 - 01128/02 01121/02 - 01128/02 012a8/02 - 0204/02 01/28/02 - 02/04102 012/02M - 02/04/02 01/28/02 - 02/04/02 02/04/02 - 02111/02 02/04/02 - 02)11/02 02/04/02 - 02/11/02 02/04/02 - 02111/02 0211/02 - 0211802 02/11/02 - 02/18/02 02/11/02 02118/02 02/11/02 - 02/18t02 02/18/02 - 02/25/02 02/18/02 - 02/25/02 02/18/02 02/25/02 02/18/02 - 02/2n02 02/25/02 - 03104/02' 02/25/02 - 03104/02 O2/5o02 - 03104/02. 0225/02 - 03/04/02 03/04/02 - 03111/02 03/04/02 - 03/11/02 03/04/02 - 03111102 03104/02 - 03111/02 03111/02 - 03/18/02 03111/02 - 03118/02 03111/02 - 0311802 03/11/02 - 03118/02 03/18/02 - 03/25t02 03/8102 - 03125/02 03118/02 - 03/25/02 03/18/02 - 03125/02 03125/02 - 04/01/02 03/25/02 - 04/01/02 03125/02 - 04/01/02 03/25/02 - 04/01/02 04/01/02 - 04/O08/2 04/01/02 - 04108/02 04101/02 - 04/08/02 04/01/02 - 04/08/02 04/08/02 - 04/15/02 04/08/02 - 04/15/02 04108/02 -. 04/15/02 04/08/02 - 04115/02 04/15/02 - 04/22/02 04/15/02 - 04r22 04/15/02 - 04/22/02 04/15/02 - 04W22J02 04122t02 - 04/29/02 04/22/2 - 04/29/02 042202. - 02902 04122042 - 04/29102 04/2902 - 05/06/02 04/29/02 - 05o06t02 04129/02 -05/062 04/29/02 - o0/0s602 05/08/02 - 05/13/02 05/06/02 - 05/13/02 05/06102 - 05/13102 05/0602 - 05/13/02 05113102 - 05/2002 05/13/02 - 0o520/02 05/13/02 - 05/2002 0513102 - 05/20/02 05/20/02 -
s527/02 05/20102 - 05/27/02 05/20/02 - 05/27/02 05120/02 - 05/27/02 051272 - 06/03/02 05/27r02 - 06/03/02 05/27/02 - 06/03/02 05127/02 - 06/03/02 06/03102 - 06/10/02 06/03/02 - 06/10/02 06/03/02 - 06/10/02 06/03102 - 06/10/02 06/10/02 - 06/17/02 06/10/02 - 06/17/02 06/10/02 - 06/17/02 06/10/02 -06/17/02 06)17/02 - 06124/02 06117/02 - 0624/02 06/17/02 - 06/24/02 06117/02 - 06/24/02 06/24/02 -07/01/02
.06124/02 - 07/01/02' 06/24/02 -07/01102 06/24/02 - 07/01D02 07/01/02 - 07/08/02 07/01/02 - 07/08/02 07/01/02 - 07/08/02 07/01/02 - 07/08/02 07/08/02 - 07115/02 07/08/02 - 07/15/02 07/08/02 -07/15/02 07/08/02 - 07/15/02 07/15/02 - 07/22102 07/15/2 - 07/2202 07/15/02 - 07/2202 07/15/02 -07/22/02 O0722/02 - 07n/902 07122102 - 07/29N02 07/2/02 - 07/29/02 OM722/2 -07/29/02 07129/02 - 08/05/02 07/2902 -08/S0/2 07/29/02 - 08105/02 07/29/02 - 08/05/02 08/05/02 - 08/12/02 08/05/02 - 08J12/02 08/O5O2. - 08112/02 08/05/02 - 08/12/02 08/12102 - 08/1902 08/12/02 - 08/19/2 08/12/02 - 08/19/02 08/1202 - 08/1902 08/19/02 - 0/26102 08/19102 - 08/26802 08/19/02 - oa82 08/19/02 - o082/02 08/26/02 - 09/02/2 0816102 - 09/02/02 0812812 - 09/02/2 08/26/02 - 09/02/02 09/02/02 - o09/0/2 09/02/02 - 09109/02 09/02102 - 0909/02 09/02/02 - 09/09/02 09109/02 -O916102 09)09/02 - 09/16/02 09/09/02 - 09/16102 09/09/02 - 09/16102 09/16/02 - 09/23/02 09)16/02 - 09/23r02 09)16/02 - 09/3/02 09/11602 - 0923102 o9/3/02 - 09/30/02 09/2302 - 09/30r/2 09/3/02 - 09/30/o2 09/23r02 - O0930/02 09130/02 - 10/07102 09130/02 - 10/07/02 09/3002' - 10/07102 09/30/02 - 10/07/02 10/07/02 - 10/14/02 10/07102 - 10/14/02 10/07/02 - 10/14/02 10/07/02 - 10/14/02 10/14/02 - 10/21/02 10/14102 - 10/21/02 10/14/02 - 10/21/02 10/14102 - 10/21/02 10/21/02 - 10/28/2 10/21/02 - 10128102 1n0102 - 10/28/02 10121102 - 10128/02 10/28/02 - 11104/02 10/28/2 - 11/04/02 10128/02 - 11/04/o2 10128/02 - 11/04/02 11104102 - 11/11/02 11/04/02 - 11/11102 11/04/02 - 11/11/02 11/04102 -
11/11/02 1111/02-11118/02 11/11102 - 11118/02 11/11/02 - 11/18/02
.11/11/02 - 11/18/02 11118/02 - 1112502 11/18/02 - 11/2502 11/1802 - 11/25/2 11/1802 -
11125/02 11125/02 - 1202/02 11/25/02 - 12/02/02 11/25/02 - 1202/02 11125/2 - 12/0202 12/02/02 - 12/o9)02 - 12102/02 - 12/0S9/2 12/0202 - 12/09/02 1202/02 - 12/09/02 12/s02 - 12168102 12109/02 - 12116/02 12/092 - 12/16102 12/09/02 - 12/1602 12/1602 - 12/23102 12/16102 - 12/2302 12116t02 - 12/02 12/16/02 - 12/23/02 12/23102 - 12/30102 12/23102 - 12/30/02 12/23102 - 12/30/02 12/23/02 - 12/30102 C-21
TABLE~ C-IX.1
SUMMARY
OF COLLECTION DATES FOR SAMPLES COLLECTED IN
-THE VICINITY, OFOYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2002 AIR PARTICULATE (GROSS BETA & 1-1311 COLLECTION PERIOD 72 73 I
.J,1U1
-ju U-.Iuwuz ZIZJljIU I '-
U ItUIIUz 2
01108102,-01114102.
01107102 -:01114/02 3
.01114102,- 01/22102 01114102 - '01121102 4
0122/02.- 01/29!02 0/l1t
'-01I28/02.~
5 01129102 - 02104/02>t 01/OM=
-.02104/02'-
.6 02104102 - 02111102,, 02/04102-- 02/11/02
-7 02J11102~- ~02/l8/02~ ~02111I0Z.-,b2118/02
- ..8'
.02/18102
-'02/25/02'
'.~02I18/02'.',0~2125/02
' 02/25102 - 0310412.
o02r25/D2'-,
0:310-4102 10 03104102 -'03/111/02
!,03/04102.-.,03I11/02 I 11
.03111102'-,03/19/02
,03111102, -.03118/02 1 2
.03/19102 -"03125102 03l18/2'.;03t25/02 13 03/28102 -. 04/02/02,'.03r2!/02.- 0410110
. 14 04/02102, '04/08102
- .04/01102.-,.04/08102 15 04/08/02'.- 04/16/02, 04/08102 -,04/1 5/02
- 1 6
04/16102 - 04123/2 04/15102
." 041A220
.17 04/23/02 - 04/29/02 "04/22102 -'0412/02 18 04/29102 - 05/07/02.04/2910
- ,05106/2 19 05107102'- 05/13102
.050/0dl2.- 05ll3/02-.,--,
20 05/13102 - 0520/02 05113/02 - 05/20/02.
_ 21 05120102 - 05/28/02
'05/20/02 -' 05/27/02 22 05128/02
-0610/0 05/27102 4.'06/03102'.
23 06/04/02,- 06/10/02 -
06/03/02 -, 06/110/02 24
-06/10/02
- 06/17/02 06/10/02 -,06/17I02.
25 -
06/17/02 - 06/24/02 06/17102 -.06/24/02,
'26
,.06/24/02
'07/01102.06/24/02
'Q7/01/02
.27 07101/02 -0082
-07/01/02
.0/80 28 07/08/02. - '07/15/02
,b71O802.-,07/15102 29
- .07/15/02
- 07/22/02 07/15/02, - 07122/02
- 30 07/22/02 -O0/2/0 0712/0
-.07129/02 31 07129/02 -08/05/2 7/29/0 085/05/02
-32 08/05102.- 08/13/02
' 08/05/02 -08/12/02 33
'08/13102
- 08/19/02
.. 08/12/02 -08/19/02 34 08/19102 - 08/26/02" 08/19/02 08/26/02
- 35
.08/26102 :- 09/03102 08212-'09/0=2/0
'3
- 09/03/02 -. 09/09/02. :09/02/02.-'9/90 37 09/0902 -.09/17/02. 09/09/02 - 09/16/02
- '38 09/17102 - 09/24/02 09/16/02 -09/23/02
- 39 09/24/02
'09/30/02' '09/310
- 0/3002 40 09/30102
- '10/07/02 09/30/0
-10/07/02
- 41.
1 0/07102 -. 10114/02
.10/07/02 -.10114102
- 42 10/14/02 - 10/21/02'.10I/14102 ~10/21/02
'3 10/21/02 - 10/28/02
'10/21102 '-10/28/02
- 44 l 1028/02 - 11/04102. '10/28/02 -', 11/04/02 45 11/04/02 - 11/111/02.
.11/04/02 -.11/111/02
'48 11/111102 - 11/18/02:
I Ill 0 2 r -I11/1802 47 11/1.1802 11125102 111802 11125/02 48
'11/25/02 2W/02/2 ','.11125/02 -',12/02/02' 49.'
.12/02102 -12/09102
'12/02/02
- 12/09/02
- 51.
12/16102 -- 12/13/02,
. 12/10902 ~-12/16102:'
2 12/2102 - 4123102
'12/16102:-
2123002~:-
52
'-W
'2
- 1. ;
I
. I I
I I
I I
I i
I I
1 -
4
.'
i, '
.~- _1 C-22
TABLE C-IX.1
SUMMARY
OF COLLECTION DATES FOR SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2002 TLD STATION CODE C
14 1
Ti 3
6 8
9 11 22 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 61 62 63 64 65 66 68 71 72 73 74 75 78 79 81 82 84 85 86 88 89 90 92 98 99 JAN - MAR APR - JUN JUL - SEP OCT - DEC 01)14102 - 04/15/02 01114102 - 04/15102 01/14/02 - 04/15102 01114/02 - 04/15102 01/14/02 - 04/15102 01114102 - 04115/02 01114/02 - 04115/02 01114102 - 04115/02 01114/02 - 04/15102 01/14/02 - 04/15/02 01/14102 - 04/15/02 01/14/02 - 04/15102 01/14/02 - 04115/02 01/14102 - 04/15102 01/14/02 - 04/15/02 01/14/02 - 04115/02 01/14/02 - 04/15/02 01114/02 - 04/15/02 01114102 - 04115102 01/14J02 - 04115/02 01114/02 - 04115/02 01/14/02 - 04/15/02 01114/02 - 04115/02 01/14102 - 04/15/02 01/14/02 - 04/15/02 01/14/02 - 04115/02 011t4/02 - 04/15102 01/14/02 - 04/15/02 01/14102 - 04115/02 01114/02 - 04115/02 01/14/02 - 04115/02 01114/02 - 04/15/02 01/14/02 - 04/15/02 01114/02 - 04115/02 01114/02 - 04/15/02 01/14/02 - 04115/02 01/14/02 - 04/15/02 01/14/02 - 04/15/02 01/14)02 - 04/15/02 01/14)02 - 04/15/02 01/14/02 - 04/15102 01/14/02 - 04115102 01/14102 - 04/15102 01/14/02 - 04/15102 04/15/02 - 07115102 04/15/02 - 07/1 502 04/15/02 - 071t5/02 04/15/02 - 07115102 04115/02 - 07115/02 04/15/02 - 07115102 04/15/02 - 07/15102 04115102 - 071 5/02 04/15/02 - 07115/02 04/15/02 - 0711502 04/15/02 - 07115102 04/15/02 - 07/1502 04/15/02 - 07/15/02 04/15/02 - 07115/02 04/15/02 - 07115/02 04115/02 - 07115/02 04/15/02 - 07115102 04/15/02 - 071t5/02 04/15/02 - 07115/02 04/15/02 - 07115/02 04115/02 - 07/15102 04115/02 - 071t5/02 04115/02 - 07115/02 04/15/02 - 07/15/02 04/15/02 - 07115/02 04/15/02 - 07115/02 04115102 - 07115/02 04115/02 - 07115/02 04115/02 - 07115/02 04115/02 - 07/1 U02 04115/02 - 07/15/02 04/15/02 - 07115/02 04115102 - 07115/02 04/15/02 - 07115/02 04)15/02 - 07/15/02 04)15/02 - 07/15/02 04115/02 - 07115/02 04115102 - 07115/02 04115/02 - 07115102 04/15/02 - 07/15102 04)15/02 - 07/15/02 04)15/02 - 07/15/02 04/15/02 - 07/15102 04/15/02 - 07115/02 07/15/02 - 10/14/02 07/15/02 - 10/14/02 07/15/02 - 10/14/02 07/15/02 - 10114102 07115/02 - 10/14102 07/15/02 - 10/14/02 07115/02 - 10/14/02 07/15/02 - 10/14/02 07/15102 - 10/14/02 07115/02 - 10114/02 07115/02 - 1014102 07115/02 - 10/14/02 07115/02 - 10114102 07115/02 - 10114/02 07/15/02 - 10114/02 07/15/02 - 10114/02 07/1502 - 10114/02 07115/02 - 10114/02 07115/02 - 10114/02 07115/02 - 1014102 07115/02 - 10114102 07115/02 - 10114102 07115/02 - 10/14/02 07115/02 - 10114/02 07115/02 - 10114/02 07115/02 - 10114J02 07/15/02 - 10114102 07/15/02 - 10114102 07115/02 - 10114/02 07115102 - 10/14/02 07115102 - 10114/02 07115/02 - 10114/02 07115/02 - 10/14/02 07/15/02 - 10/14102 07/15/02 - 10/14/02 07115/02 - 10/14/02 07/15/02 - 10114102 07115/02 - 10/14/02 07/15/02 - 10114102 071t5/02 - 10/14/02 07115102 - 10/14/02 07/15/02 - 10/14/02 07115102 - 10/14/02 07115/02 - 10/14/02 10/14/02 - 01/13/03 10/14102 - 01/13/03 10/14/02 - 01113103 10114/02 - 01/13/03 10/14102 - 01/13/03 10/14/02 - 01/13/03 10/14/02 - 01113/03 10/14/02 - 01113/03 10114102 - 01113/03 10114/02 - 01113/03 10/14/02 - 01113/03 10/14/02 - 01/13/03 10/14/02 - 01/13/03 10114)02 - 01113/03 10114102 - 01113103 10/14102 - 01113/03 10/14/02 - 01/13/03 10/14102 - 01113/03 10114/02 - 01113/03 10/14/02 - 01113/03 10114102 - 01/13/03 10114/02 - 01113/03 10W14102 - 01113/03 10114/02 - 01113/03 10W14/02 - 01113/03 10/14/02 - 01113/03 10114/02 - 01113/03 10/14/02 - 01/13f03 10/14/02 - 01/13/03 10/14/02 - 01/13/03 10114102 - 01/13/03 10114/02 - 01113/03 10114/02 - 01113103 10/14102 - 01113/03 10W14/02 - 01113/03 10/14102 - 01113/03 10114102 - 01113/03 10/14102 - 01113/03 10/14102 - 01113103 10/14/02 - 01/13/03 10/14/02 - 01/13/03 10114/02 - 01/13/03 10/14/02 - 01/13/03 10/14102 - 01/13/03 C-23
I'.,
C
- 1.
!.1 C.,..-.
-I,
.1 ;
- I I
- U I.
c 4..
.4',-
-I.
I A
Blank "I'
1
- I X
-i U
lntentionally Left B
..
'c-
- 1.
4 -
FIGURE C-1 MEAN COBALT-60 CONCENTRATION IN CLAMS OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 1983 - 2002 20.....
-O-INDICATOR STATION
-B-. BACKGROUND STATION 1
15...............................................................................................................................
-10 5
s ~ -..
J..
0 C
n tJ 0
tN t
X 0 000 c
00%
C O O
rl N
N N
IOn t oc 00 00 00 00 0000 00 00 0
00 0 O
0%
Cm Ch 0O m\\
0e n0 O'
O 0CO o 0\\
ON 0
0 0
m m
o m
0m ON cz m
m 0m0
>t0 oi0 0
H
-H
'^
^
'H
'~
-i
-1 w4 YEAR
ir FIGUREC-2 i MEAN COBALT-60 CONCENTRATION IN AQUATIC SEDIMENT
- .1 OYSTER
- CREEK GENERATING STATION, 1984 - 2002 350 i
NDICATOR STATION MEAN 300..............
3001; BACKGROUND STATION MEAN 50'..................-;;....
I......................................
200' 150 Wo),150 i fEN ' D j...........................................................
A U.
t n
in tn tri
'o o
w t-t-".
oo000 0N q% *o
-e i
t coo0 o 000000000 00 00 00 0000 0000000go00 00 00 0000co.
0%
0%
0 "c
0%
0%
0%
ON 0%
ON ON 0%
0A *%
0% ON as 0%
0%
'% 0%
0%
aA 0a 0%
ti Cs 0%
0% 0%
ON 0%
ON Cs as O
YEAR
FIGURE C-3 MEAN CESIUM-137 CONCENTRATION IN AQUATIC SEDIMENT OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 1984 - 2002 INDICATOR (Stations 23 & 24) BACKGROUND (Station 94) 600 a..-
t.o 0
Cl 6
.2
.2 400 200
- v v
v tn w
'. 0A t
w w
G t
O x x
0'.
0'.
0o 0
N en t
tn
'O t-0 c
O GO GO G GO GO GO GO O
GO GO G GO GO GO GO GO 0%
0' 0%
0% 0% 0%
0 0'
m '.
0%0' 0% 0' 0
0% 0' 0'
0% 0' 0'
0' 0'
OwO 0% 0' 0'
0 0' 0% ak 0% 0% 0%
0% 0 V-(
I*
-4 V-. V-9-
V-V-
T-PO 7-V-4 V-9-
V-V-
N YEAR
-FIGURE C-4 MEAN WEEKLY GROSS BETA CONCENTRATIONS IN-AIR PARTICULATES OYSTER-CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2002;
~~~~.
BACKGROUND 2.OOE E
- .I I II.I.
L i
^
I I Date
FIGURE C-5 MEAN MONTHLY GROSS BETA CONCENTRATIONS IN AIR PARTICULATES OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 1984 - 2002 0.18 CHERNOBYL ACCIDENT 0.16................-------
INDICATORSTATIONS BACKGROUND STATION l 0.14.........................................................................................................................
,>0.12
- 0.10.
t'0.08..........................................................................................................................
0.14 0.04......
0.02 0.00.
v v
%n in X0 X 0X fiX e
.a qe xw o
t-
- r. 0 00 0% 0% $
$ O "t2 o o e. 0 0 c s o v c r o o
z.
o s
o o0 C
oh 0
o o e
0 0
0 0 o r-rt f
eN N
ei q
N
' Data from Cookstown station ONLY after December 1996 YR
A I I
I J FIGURE C-6 MEAN QUARTERLY TLD GAMMA DOSE.
- OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2002
_40 2.
M et
=1 v:I 00 I--
W C)
=
20 7
,t 18.
1......
16-14 -
10 '
14 --:.:
2M 6
I OTO2-4..--'
2TO5MnM OVER 5MTES DISTANCE RING FROM PLANT
-. I r Apr-02 1 Jul-02 M Oct-02 01 Jan-0o3
- First quarterly result utilized Harshaw TLD's. Second, Third, and Fourth quarter results utilized Panasonic TLDs
FIGURE C-7 MEAN QUARTERLY TLD GAMMA DOSE OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 1989 - 2002
- 20 L~ 15_
5
~ 0 1v In
.[..................................
- INDICATOR MEAN
- BACKGROUND MEAN I
I U
I I
d d
I N I
ri I
I I
U I
I Uo I-0%
0%
0 0
W 0%
0%
0%
a%
0%
0 0%
0%
o4 a
0%
0%
N N
0%
0%
0%
0%
o S I 0%
0%
V'4 rn
- e
'o 0%
0,% *%
0%
0%
0%
V-V-
II tn 0%
V4 Ia 0%
0%
W4 0%
'.4 I
a
~0 0%
'4 I
I I
I S
I 0 %
0 %
0 %
0%
0%
0%
V-
'4 V-II 0%
'-4
.I I
I 0%
0 0%
a 0%
0 r-4 N4 I
0 0
0N 0
0 N4 I
I "A
0 C
N rI I
I I1 N
N en o
o 0
o o
o eN N
N Year Harshaw Model 110 TLDs were used during the first quarter of 2001. Panasonic Model 814 TLDs were used in the second, third, and fourth quarters of 2001.
-1 I:
I L
I!I I
I Cf V.
I, 7!
C'.'
C 4
. *'*'
V.
-a l;
el
- t.
C I.
I.
k J
.2.
I I
t I 4
'I I
C' Ine to al Lef Blank
APPENDIX D DATA TABLES QC LABORATORY
The following section contains data illustrating the analyses performed by the quality control laboratory, Teledyne Brown Engineering (TBE).. Duplicate samples were obtained from several locations and media and split between the primary laboratory, Environmental Inc. (Env) and TBE. Comparison of the results for most media were within expected ranges.
I I
t
-. iD-1
Intentionally Left Blank D-2
TABLE D-1.1 CONCENTRATIONS OF TRITIUM IN SURFACE WATER SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2002 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/LITER i 2 SIGMA COLLECTION PERIOD 24 OCA QCB 04116102 09111102 MEAN'
< 101
< 102 327 i 86.9 510
- 84
< 100 I
<.145 214 +/- 320 306
- 577 122 +/- 63 11 4'.
1 I
I I.
. I
- I c
I 1
.. I I
- THE MEAN AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING BOTH THE MDA AND POSITIVE VALUES D-3
TABLE D-1.2 STC COLLECTION PERIOD 24 04/16102 09/11/02 MEAN' QCA 04/16102 09/11/02 MEAN' QCB 04/16/02 09/111/02 MEAN*
I CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN SURFACE WATER SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2002 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCIILITER +/- 2 SIGMA Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Zr-95 Nb-95 Cs-134 Cs-137
<4.4
<5.1
<11
<4.3
<10
<8.4
<5.9
<4.2
<4.3
< 1.91
<2.1
<5.07
< 1.67
<3.71
< 3.68
<2.8
< 1.57
< 1.85 3+/-3 4i4 8+/-8 3+/-4 7+/-9 6+/-7 4+/-4 3+/-4 3+/-3
<2
<2
<4
<2
<3
<3
<2
<2
<2 2
<2
<6
<2
<4
<4
<3
<2
<2 2+/-0 2+/-0 5+/-2 2+/-0 4t1 4+/-1 3t1 2+/-0 2+/-0
<2.1
<2.2
<7.8
<1.9
<6.2
<7.0
<4.4
<2.8
<2.9
<2.1
<4.2
<6.5
<2.5
<5.1
<5.7
<3
<3.3
<1.9 2 +/-0 3 +/-3 7 +/-2 2+/- 1 6+/- 2 6 +/-2 4 +/-2 3 +/- 1 2 +/- 1 Ba-140
<45
< 27.2 36 +/- 26
< 20
< 28 24 +/- 10
< 33
< 17.2 25 +/- 23 La-140
< 15
< 8.7 12 +/- 9
< 7
< 9 8 +/-3
< 4.3
< 4.6 4 +/-0 w
0
- THE MEAN AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING BOTH THE MDA AND POSmVE VALUES
I TABLE D-11.1 CONCENTRATIONS OF TRITIUM IN WELL WATER SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2002 SI O F CR RESULTS IN UNITS'OF PCI/LITER i 2 SIGMA COLLECTION PERIOD 1
QCA QCB 01/01/02 - 03/27/02 131
+/- 55
< 86-C 100 03Q27J02 - 05/10/02 c 98
.C97' 136 06/06/02 - 08/12102
< 131
< 131 137 09106/02 - 11107/02
< 151
< 161
< 184 MEAN' 128 4
1194 68
-140 :69
- , I
-r.
r-I V
- . It t.
- 1 I
I..
1..
il I
,. 11 I-I I
I I
I I
I
,' r I'.,
I
- 1.
- ;t
f I
-!
I L
- THE MEAN AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING BOTH THE MDA AND POSITIVE VALUES
TABLE D-11.2 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN WELL WATER SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2002 RESULTS IN UNITS OF E-3 PCI/CU METER +/- 2 SIGMA STC COLLECTION PERIOD 1
01/01 - 03/27102 03/27 -
05/10/02 06/06 -
08/12/02 09/06 - 11/07/02 Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Zr-95 Nb-95 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-140 La-140
<5
<4
<5
<3
<3
<8
<5
<5
<11 (1
<1 3
(4
<- 5
'3
<6
<5
<11
'1
<2
<10
'6
< 9
'3
<4 (3
(4
<14
<4 (3
<3
<23
<6
<6 (5
<40
<1
<1
<1
<13 (5
<8
< 13
'4 MEAN' 3.5 +/- 3.4 3.6 +/- 3.5 6.8 +/- 7.0 3.4 i 3.1 6.2 +/- 7.5 6.7 t 6.5 3.9 t 3.9 3.2 t 3.6 3.5 t 3.2 22 +/- 25 7.6 +/- 8.3 QCA 01101 03/27 06/06 09/06
- 03127/02 05/10/02
- 08/12/02 11/07/02 (3
(3
<5 (3
( 2 7
(3
<3
<2
'15 (2
<3 (5
<2
<5
'4
<3
'2 (3
<18
<2
<2 (5
<2 (4
<4
<3
<2
<2
<17
<1
<2
<4
'1 (3
<3
<2
<1
<2
<22
'3
'5
<6
< 7 0)
MEAN*
2.1 +/- 1.0 2.2 +/- 0.9 4.7 t 1.2 2.1 +/- 1.3 3.4 +/- 2.0 4.6 +/- 3.6 2.5 +/- 0.9 2.1 +/- 1.4 2.1 +/- 0.9 18 +/- 5.5 5.3 +/- 2.7 QCB 01/01 03/27 06/06 09/06 03/27/02 05110/02
- 08/12/02 11/07/02
<4
<4 (9
<(4 (9
(7
<4
<4
<4
<20
<2
<1 (5
<2
<4
<2 (3
<2
<2
<25
<2
<2
<5
<1
<4
<3
<3
<1
<2
<20
<5
<6
<6
<4
<5
<9
<4 (5
<6
<39
( 7
<2
<6
< 10 MEAN*
3.4 i 3.2 3.3 i 4.0 6.3 +/- 3.4 2.9 +/- 2.7 5.4 +/- 5.3 5.1 +/- 5.9 3.5 +/- 1.2 3.0 +/- 3.3 3.7 t 3.9 26 +/- 18 6.1 +/- 6.5
- THE MEAN AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING BOTH THE MDA AND POSITIVE VALUES
r'
.l TABLE D-111.1 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN CLAM SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2002
-RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/KG WET i 2 SIGMA STC COLLECTION K-40 Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 CO-60 Zn-65 Cs-134 Cs-137 PERIOD A,
_ A 24 04/16102 1410 +/- 238
< 13
< 1I
<C 4
< 10
-J4 OCA 04116102 1620
- 170 Qcs 04/16/02 1307 +/- 396 8,
I.
< 18
< 16
<20
< 14
<43
<67 I
< 18
< 11
<40
<29 I
' 19 I
< 19 I
e '
' ~;';
! I'.' '-'
¢ I~~~ ~ ~
I I
< 23
< 16 I.
I
.~
- y s..~1-.-
I I
. I I
~-
4 II I I.
4
.:4.
4
~..
-- I I
4
TABLE D-IV.1 STC COLLECTION PERIOD 24 04116102 09/10/02 MEAN*
QCA 04/16/02 09/10102 MEAN' QCB 04/16/02 09/10/02 MEAN' CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN SEDIMENT SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2002 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/KG DRY +/- 2 SIGMA Be-7 K-40 Mn-54 Co c 98 806 +/- 148
< 10
< 96 14600 i 455
< 9 97 +/- 3 7703 +/- 19508 10 +/- 2 10
< 115 938 139
< 11
< 160 1960 197
< 13 138 +/- 64 1449 +/- 1445 12 +/- 4 13
< 184 871 +/- 262
< 16
< 200 2056 6+/-453
< 1e 192 +/- 23 1764 +/- 2524 16 +/- 0 31 i
- 58 c 11 c 10 C 12 c 14
'3 c 46
' 17
- 41 Co-60
< 10
<8 9 +/-2
< 10
< 12 11 +/- 3
< 8
< 18 13 +/- 14 Cs-134
<9
<8 9 +/-2
< 10
< 12 11 +/- 2
< 16
< 32 24 t 23 Cs-137
< 10
< 10 10 +/- 0
< 12
< 14 13 +/- 3
< 15
< 14 15 t 1
- THE MEAN AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING BOTH THE MDAAND POSITIVE VALUES
l )
CONCENTRATIONS OF STRONTIUM AND GAMMA EMITTERS IN VEGETATION SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION, 2002 TABLE D-V.1 RESULTS IN UNITS OF PCI/KG WET STC COLLECTION Sr-89 Sr-90 PERIOD 36 CABBAGE AUGUST
< 10 5.8 +/- 0.8 COLLARDS AUGUST
' 14.
12 i 1.3 MEAN 12 +/-f 8.9 +/- 8.6 QCA CABBAGE AUGUST
'20 3.0 i 1.2 COLLARDS AUGUST c 13 5.7 +/- 1.1 MEAN 17 *10 4.4 *3.8 QCB CABBAGE AUGUST
<5
<2 COLLARDS AUGUST c 7 c4 MEAN*
6 3
3 +/- 3
- 2 SIGMA K-40 1-131 2888
- 153
< 23 3820
- 211
' 50 3354 1318 36 38 3280
- 171 c28 4720
- 219
< 43 4000 2038 35 *22 2479 *205.
- ' 9 3937 -270"
'<7 3208 2062..
8 4
Cs.134
' 5
' 15 10
- 14
' 6
' 13 1i** 10 I...
':-<10.
1; t..-
10 '+/-
I I.,
U Cs.137 Ba-140 La-140
'f6 (45
<15
< 13
< 103
<31 10 10 74 82 23
- 23
'7
'54
<18
'1
' 86
< 26 11*11 70*45 22+/-12
'7
< 29
< 4 7c7
<c34 5c7 7 +1
'31
+/- 8 5+/- 4 1.
- THE MEAN AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING BOTH THE MDA AND POSITIVE VALUES
APPENDIX E INTER-LABORATORY COMPARISON PROGRAM
TABLE E-1 ANALYTICS ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY CROSS CHECK PROGRAM TELEDYNE BROWN ENGINEERING ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES (PAGE 1 OF 3)
Identification Reported Known Ratio (c)
Month/Year Number Matrix Nuclide (1)
Units ' Value (a) Value (b) TBElAnalytics Evaluation (d)
February, 2002 A15211-55 Liquid Sr-89 Sr-90 uCVmL 1.60E-03 2.03E-03 2.90E-04 3.64E-04 0.79 0.80 W
A A15213-55 Liquid H-3 uCVmL pCiL 1.08E-03 1.19E-03 0.90 A
March, 2002 E3064-396 Milk Sr-89 Sr-90 80 83 28 27 0.96 1.04 A
A
- E3065-396 Milk E3067-396 AP 1-131 Ce-141 Cr-51 Cs-134 Cs-137 Mn-54 Fe-59 Zn-65 Co-60 1-131 Cr-51 Cs-134 Cs-137 Mn-54 Fe-59 Zn-65 Co-60 pCi/L 86 300 256 94 252 217 108 218 147 92 326 267 122 266 224 116 221 158 199 163 74 162 136 70 134 96 pCi 202 166 77 162 135 70 128 95 0.93 0.92 0.96 0.77 0.95 0.97 0.93 0.99 0.93 1.02 1.02 1.04 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.96 0.99 0.86 A
A A
W A
A A
A A
A A
A A
A A
A A
A E3066-396 Charcoal 1-131 pCi' 66 77 May, 2002 A15521-55 Liquid Gr-Alpha uCi/mL 8.48E-04 7.15E-04 1.19 A
A15520-55 Liquid Sr-89 Sr-90 A15522-55 Liquid Tritium uCi/mL 2.63E-03 3.25E-03 2.51 E-04 2.70E-04 uCi/mL 1.35E-03 1.46E-03 0.81 0.93 0.92 A
A A
E-1
I.I.v,
,7., I
,
t., "... - : '
TABLE E-11, ANALYTICS ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY CROSS CHECK PROGRAM TELEDYNE BROWN ENGINEERING ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
. PAGE 2 OF 3)
Identification Reported Known Ratio (c)
Month/Year Number Matrix Nuclide(1)
Units Value(a)
Value(b) TBE/Analytics
-Evaluation(CD June,20022 E3220-396 Milk June.200,
- v v i; v
2Kj E3222-396 AP H
i4;.
f i
F
, F D021, A16018-55 Liquid.
A16020-55 Liquid-s 1-131;-
Ce-141 Cr-51 Cs-,134 Cs-137
- Co58, Mn-54 Fe-59 Zn-65 Co-60 Ce-141 Cr-51 Cs-134 Cs-137 Co-58 Mn-54 Fe-59 Zn-65 Co-60 Sr-89 Sr-90 Tritium pCUL.,
0.
uCVmL uCmL 86 84 197 110 96 95 106 95 186 132 85 199 96 92 98 87 85 182 121 87 90 235 120 91 100 95 81 I
180 125
. ' ' 0.99 0.93 0.84 0.92 1.05 0.95 1.12 1.17 7
1.03 1.06 75 196 100:
76 83
- 79 67 150 104 u
.August, 2C 1.13 1.02 0.96 1.21 1.18 1.10 1.27 1.21 1.16 0.83 0.92 0.97 A
A A
A A
A A
A A
A A
A A
W A
Aww A
A A
A 4.12E-03 4.99E-03 2.43E-04 2.64E-04 1.93E-03 2.OOE-03 September, 2002 Al 5989. -148
' September,2 E3324-396.
... 1 3
.2.3 P
202 E3325-396 I
Liquid Milk Milk I
Sr-89, Sr-90 Sr-89
.I ~Sr-90 1-131 Ce-141 Cr-51 Cs-134 i I Cs-137 Co-58 Mn-54 uCVmL 4.02E-03 4.99E-03 2.49E-04 2.64E-04 pCi/L '
106 39 pC,i.L-84 168
- i 210.5 127
.136 93 165 90.
196 147 92 39 80 160 227 132 127 97 152 89 187 149 0.81' A
0.94 A
1.15 !
A 1.00 A
1.05 A
1.05 A
0.93 A
0.96 A
1.07 A
0.96 A
1.09 A
1.01.'
A 1.05
- A 0.99 A
Fe-59, -
Co-60 E-2
TABLE E-I ANALYTICS ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY CROSS CHECK PROGRAM TELEDYNE BROWN ENGINEERING ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES (PAGE 3 OF 3)
Identification Reported Known Ratio (c)
Month/Year Number Matrix Nuclidie 1)
Units
- Value (a) Vlue (b) TBEIAnalytics Evaluation (d)
September, 2002 E-3327-396 Filter Ce-141 Cr-51 Cs-134 Cs-137 Co-58 Mn-54 Fe-59 Zn-65 Co-60 pCi 115 163.6 79 95 71 118 76 155 108 110 156 90 87 67 104 61 130 102 1.05 1.05 0.88 1.09 1.06 1.13 1.25 1.19 1.06 A
A A
A A
A A
A A
E3326-396 Charcoal December, 2002 E3520-396-Milk E3521-396 Milk 1-131 Sr-89 Sr-90 1-131 Ce-141 Cr-51 Cs-134 Cs-137 Co-58 Mn-54 Fe-59 Zn-65 Co-60 Ce-141 Cr-51 Cs-134 Cs-137 Co-58 Mn-54 Fe-59 Zn-65 Co-60 pCi pCiL 88 68 40 38 73 85 pCi/L 97 136 347 97 229 143 162 80 217 172 86 111 346 99 220 139 142 72 178 164 128 398 114 253 160 163 83 206 189 0.86 1.29 1.05 1.13 1.23 1.00 0.98 1.04 1.03 1.14 1.11 1.22 1.05 0.84 0.93 0.69 0.89 0.88 0.93 1.07 0.95 0.90 0.88 A
W A
A W
A A
A A
A A
W A
A A
N (2)
A A
A A
A A
A December, 2002 E3523-396 Filter pCi pCi 108 370 79 226 141 152 89 196 170 E3522-396 Charcoal 1-131 84 96 (1) Only analyses performed routinely for the REMP are included on this table.
(2) Coincidental summing resulted in low Cesium-134 activity. Elimination of the coincidental summing resulted in an activity of 110 pci.
No further action required.
Analytics known values were incorrectly calculated. Revised (as shown) evaluation was acceptable.
(a) Teledyne Brown Engineering reported result.
(b) The Analytics known value is equal to 100°% of the parameterpresent in the standard as determined by gravimetric and/or volumetric measurements made during standardcpreparation.
(c) Ratio of Teledyne Brown Engineering to Analytics results.
(d) Analytics evaluation: A= Acceptable. Reported result falls within ratio limits of O.80-1.20. W=Acceptable with warning.
Reported result falls within ratio limits of 0. 70-0.79 and 1.21-1.30.
E-3
I F<>
TABLE E-2 DOEIEML ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY CROSS CHECK PROGRAM TELEDYNE BROWN ENGINEERING ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
.(PAGE I OF 2)
Identification Reported Known Ratio (c)
MonthlYear Number' Media Nuclide(1)
Units-Value(a)
Valuet(b)
TBE/EML Evaluation (d)
. ~~-
I.
- --.4 >.. A--8X::..........,....
June,2002 QAP 560.,
I., 1.
AP I
Co-60 Bq/filter
, Cs-137 Gr-Beta I
30.4 1.21 38.3 4.68 30.52 s,
28.23 1.30 38.53 4.832 1.04 -:
1.08 0.93 0.99 0.97 A
A A
A A
Soil...
Vegetation Water:
Ac-228 Bi-212 B1-214 Cs-137 K-40 Pb-212 Pb-214 Sr-90, Co-60 Cs-137 K-40 '
Sr-90 Co-60 Cs-134 Cs-137 Gr-Beta H-3.
Sr-90 Bqlkg
- June,2002 QAP 56 r
Bq/kg Bq/L 50 35.9 46.3 1300 608 49.4 49.1 46.6, 11.7 346.
952 477 367 2.93 59.6 895 285 5.78 51.167 53.43 53.933 1326.67 621.67 51.1.
I 54.367
. 53.756 11.23 313.667 864.33 586.28 347.33 3.357 56.067 1030 283.7 7.579 0.98 0.67 0.86 0.98 0.98 0.97 0.90 0.87 1.04 1.10 1.10 0.81 A
A W
A A
A A
A A
A A
A 1.06 0.87 1.06 0.87 1.00 0.76 A
W A
A A
W
..,.1
,1 3 S
I..
.4
..
3.-
E-4
TABLE E-2 DOEIEML ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY CROSS CHECK PROGRAM TELEDYNE BROWN ENGINEERING ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES (PAGE 2 OF 2)
Identification Reported Known Ratio (c)
MonthlYear Number Media Nuclide (1)
Units Value (a) Value (b)
TBEIEML Evaluation (d)
December, 2002 QAP 57 AP Co-60 Cs-137 Gr-Beta Mn-54 Sr-90 Bq/filter 24.1 36.1 0.813 58.3 5.86 Soil Bi-212 Bi-214 Cs-137 K-40 Pb-212 Pb-214 Sr-90 Bqikg 23.2 32.4 835 671 42.00 44.46 41.00 23.0 32.5 0.871
- 52.2 5.561 45.93 33.63 829.33 637.67 43.43 35.2 41.16 9.66 300.67 1480 476.26 1.05 1.11 0.93 1.12 1.05 0.51 0.96 1.01 1.05 0.97 1.26 1.00 1.19 1.15 1.14 0.96 A
A A
A A
w A
A A
A A
A A
A A
A December, 2002 QAP 57 Vegetation Co-60 Cs-137 K-40 Sr-90 Bq/kg 11.5 345 1690 457 Water Am-241 Co-60 Cs-134 Cs-1 37 Gr-Beta H-3 Sr-90 Bq/L 2.89 303 59 85.8 817 353 8.58 3.043 268.67 60.2 81.43 900 227.3 8.69 0.95 1.13 0.98 1.05 0.91 1.55 0.99 A
W A
A A
W A
(1) Only analyses perfonmed routinely for the REMP are included on this table.
(a) Teledyne Brown Engineering reported result.
(b) The DOE/EML known value is equal to 100YO of the parameterpresent in the standard as determined by gravimetric andfor volumetric measurements made during standard preparation.
(c) Ratio of Teledyne Brown Engineering to DOE/EML results (d) DOE/EML evaluation: A-acceptable, W=acceptable with warning, N=not acceptable.
E-5
11 -. 1 -
i
-1
- j. -
e r-,
10' ' ' "
TABLE E-3 ERA ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY CROSS CHECK PROGRAM TELEDYNE BROWN ENGINEERING ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
. <(PAGE 1 OF 11 Identification Reported Known Ratio (c)
MonthlYear Number Media Nuclide (i)
Units Value (a) Value (b)
TBE/ERA Evaluation (d)
May. 21302
- Rad, L
49 Water t >, *.
I t
c...
i, s
51 '
Water
(
)
November, 2002,Rad 1 I
Gr-Beta Co-60 Cs-134 Cs-137 Sr-89 Sr-90 1-,131 H1-3.
H-3 1-131 Gr-Beta Sr-89 Sr-90 C0-60; Cs-134 Cs-137 I
. cI I i,
162 39.3 15.5 52.2 27.2 25.1 13.35 14600 189 39.1 17.1 52.1 31.7 28.3 14.7 17400 0.86 1.01 0.91 1.00 0.86 0.89 0.91 0.84 I' -
.1 I'
L pC/
..' ' l I I A A
A A
A A
A A
10100 7.94 280 41.7 6.75 122 60.0 140 10200 6.76 330 47.6 7.56 104,
55.5 117 0.99 1.17 0.85 0.88 0.89 1.17 1.08 1.20 A
A A
A A
A A
A 4,
(1) Only analyses performed rautinefy for the REMP are Included on this table, (a) Teledyne Brown Engineering reported result (b) The ERA lkxown value Is equal to 100Y% of the pararneterpresent In the standard as deterinned by gravimetric and/or vohumetrfc measurements made during standardpreparation.
(c) Ratio of Teledyne Brown Engineering to ERA results.:-
(d) ERA evaluation: A=acceptable. Reported result falls within the Waming LUnit& 'NA=not acceptable. Reported result falls outside of the Control Limits. CE-check hr Enror. Reported result falls within the Contrd Limits and outside of the Waming Limit.
E-6
TABLE E-4 MAPEP ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY CROSS CHECK PROGRAM TELEDYNE BROWN ENGINEERING ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES (PAGE 1 OF 1)
Identification Reported Known Month/Year Number Media Nuclide (1)
Un ts Value (a) Value (b) Control Limits Evaluation (c)
March, 2002 01-W9 Water Mn-54 Co-57 Co-60 Cs-I 34 Cs-137 Sr-90 BqIL 253 141 143 26.0 270 4.71 246 143 141 28.5 286 4.8 172.20 - 319.80 100.10- 185.90 98.70 - 183.30 19.95 - 37.05 200.20 - 371.80 3.39 - 6.24 A
A A
A A
A August, 2002.
02-S9 Soil Mn-54 Co-57 Co-60 Cs-134 Cs-137 Zn-65 K-40 Bqlikg 679
- 289 109 948 131 1020 722 546 246 87.5 862 111 809 652 382.2 - 709.8 172.2 - 319.8 61.25-113.75 603.4 - 1120.6 77.7-144.3 556.3-1051.7 456.4 - 847.6 W
A W
A A
W A
(1) Only analyses performed routinely for the REMP are induded on this table.
(a) Teledyne Brown Engineering reported result.
(b) The MAPEP known value is equal to 100% of the parameterpresent in the standard as determined by gravimetrk and/or volumetric measurements made during standard preparation.
(c) DOEIMAPEP evaluation: A=acceptable, W-acceptable with warning. N=not acceptable.
E-7
'0' 4 -1 "
.. --t-11-F -! '
TABLE E-5 DOE EML Cross Check P9rogram Results for Environmental, Inc., 2002 A.
.t
- Environmental. Inc.
EML i
Nuclide
,Value Uncertainty Value M i Max Agreem ent Lab Code Toe Date (A);
-(B
& E) -
(C&E)
(D & E)
Ratio l Ratio (F)
STW-945 Water 03/01102 Co-60 349.20 i 2.60 347.33 0.80 - 1.20 A
STW-945s. Water 03/01/02 Cs-134 3.40 +/- 0.60
-3.36 0.80 -1.30 A
STW-945 Water 03/01/02 Cs-137
,57.20 1.70 56.07 0.80 -1.22 A
STW-945; Water 03/01/02 Sr-90
.-. -7.40 +/- 1.30
.7.58 0.69 -1.34 A
STW-946 Water; 03/01/02 Gr. Beta -
- r,930.60 +/-12.00 1030.00 0.61 -1.43 A
STW-946 Wate'r 03101102 HW3 226.30 1 32.70 283.70 0.78 -2.45 A
STSO-947 Soil.
03/01/02 Ac-228 -
55.00 D 5.50 51.17 0.80 - 1.38 A
STSO-947 Soil 03/01/02 Bi-212
-r
'* _49.20 t+/-12.40 53.43 0.50 - 1.34 A
STSO-947. Soil, 03/01/02 Bi-214 46.60 +/- 3.10 53.93 0.78 - 1.42
.A STSO-947; Soil 03/01/02 Cs-137
- 1401.60 9.10 1326.67 0.80 - 1.25 A
STSO-947-Soil 03011/02 K-40
,t613.10
+/- 28.10 621.67 0.80 -1.32 A
STSO-947
- Soil, 03101/02 Pb-212 N 51.60 +/- 2.60 51.10 0.78 -1.32 A
STSO-947 Soil 03101/02 Pb 214 52.00 +/- 3.60 54.37 0.76 - 1.46 STSO-947 Soil 03/01/02 Sr-90 52.10 +/- 6.30 53.76 0.67 -2.90 A
STVE-948 Vegetation 03/01/02 Co-60 13.50 +/- 2.10 11.23 0.80 -1.44 A
STVE-948 Vegetation 03101/02 Cs-137,.
350.40 +/- 6.30 313.67
- 0.80 - 1.31 A
STVE-948 Vegetation 03/01/02 K-40 940.80 +/- 45.60
.,864.33
.0.79 -1.39 A
STVE-948 Vegetation' 03/01/02 Sr-9O 543.40 +/-
24.90 586.28 0.55 -1.21 A
STAP-949 Air Filter 03/01/02 Co-60 30.10 +/- 0.30 30.52 0.80 - 1.26 A
STAP-949 Air Filter 03/01/02 Cs-137 29.90 +/- 0.30 28.23 0.80 - 1.32 A
STAP-949 Air Filter 03/01/02 Mn-54 40.40 +
0.40 38.53 0.80 -1.35 A
STAP-949 Air Filter 03/01/02 Sr-90 3.40 +/- 0.40 4.83 0.53 -1.84 A
STAP-950 Air Filter 03/01/02 Gr. Beta 1.34 +/- 0.05 1.30 0.76 - 1.36 A
STW-959 Water 09/01/02 Co-60 258.40 +/- 2.30 268.67 0.80 -1.20 A
STW-959 Water 09/01/02 Cs-134 50.80 +/- 3.30 60.20 0.80 -1.30 A
STW-959 Water 09/01/02 Cs-137 80.10 +/- 0.30 81.43 0.80 -1.22 A
STW-959 Water 09/01/02 H-3 271.90 +/- 20.90 227.30 0.78 -2.45 A
STW-959 Water 09/01/02 Sr-90 9.70 +/- 0.20 8.69 0.69 -1.34 A
STW-960 Water 09/01/02 Gr. Beta 852.00 +/- 26.50 900.00 0.61 -1.43 A
STSO-961 Soil 09/01/02 Ac-228 47.60 +/- 1.90 42.30 0.80 -1.38 A
STSO-961 Soil 09/01/02 Bi-212 45.60 +/- 1.70 45.93 0.50 - 1.34 A
STSO-961G Soil 09/01/02 Bi-214 48.80 +/- 4.90 33.63 0.78 - 1.42 W
STSO-961 Soil 09/01/02 Cs-I 37 819.60 +/- 16.60 829.33 0.80 - 1.25 A
STSO-961 Soil 09/01/02 K-40 705.30 +/- 31.40 637.67 0.80 - 1.32 A
STSO-961 Soil 09/01/02 Pb-212 48.60 +/- 3.40 43.43 0.78 - 1.32 A
STSO-961 Soil 09/01/02 Pb-214 51.10 +/- 5.10 35.20 0.76 -
1
.6 A
STSO-961 Soil 09/01/02 Sr-9 O 38.50 +/- 0.10 41.16 0.67 -2.90 A
SSVE-962 Vegetation 09/01/02 Co-6O 11.80 +/- 1.50 9.66 0.80 -1.44 A
STVE-962 Vegetation 09/01/02 Cs-137 340.30 +/-16.80.
.,.300.67 0.80 -1.31 A
STVE-962 Vegetatio n 09/01/02 K-40' 1646.00 +/- 74,40, 1480.00 0.79 -1.39 A
STVE-962 Vegetation 09/01/02 Sr-90
.345.60 +/-97.80 476.26 0.55 -121 A
F-A.
I TABLE E-5 DOE EML Cross Check Program Results for Environmental, Inc., 2002 Environmental. Inc EML Nuclide Value L
Uncertainty Value Min
- Max, Agreement Lab Code Type Date (B&E)
(C & E)
(D & E) iRatio -
Ratio' (F)
STAP-963 Air Filter 09/01/02 Co-60.
24.90 t 0.60 23.00 0.80 -1.26 A
STAP-963 Air Filter 09/01/02 Cs-137 38.00 t 1:30 32,50 0.80 -,1.32 A.
STAP-963 Air Filter 09/01102 Mn-54 60.80 + 1.90 52.20 0.80 - 1.35
' A STAP-963 Air Filter 09/01/02 Sr-90' 5.20 i 0.20 556 0.53 - 1.84 A
STAP-964 Air Filter 09/01/02 Gr. Beta 0.80 i 010 0.87 ;
0.76 - 1.3 A
A. Only analyses performed routinely for the REMP are Induded on this table.'
B. The Environmental, Inc. value Is the mean of I or Smeasurements/deterrinations.
C. The Environmental, Inc. uncertainty is the 2-sigmra counting uncertainty for one determination and one, standard deviation for three determinations.
at D. The DOE EML value Is the mean of replicate determinations for eadc radionudide.
E. Reporting units are Bq/L for water, Bq/kg (dry) for soil, Bq/kg (wet) for vegetations and total Bq for air filters F. The control limits (min ration and max ratio are established by DOE EML Acceptable agreement Is adhieved if the ratio of the Environmental. Inc. value divided by the DOE EML value falls within the control imits..
G. This naturally occuririg radionuctide Is present in the shield background. No follow-up actions were performed because al of the other gamma scan results were acceptable and the subject result was Just outside of the upper control finit; -
The control limit conceptwas established from percenbles of historic data distributions (1982-1992). The:
evaluation of this historic data and the development of the control limits are presented in DOE report EML-564.
The control limits listed In this table were developed from percentiles of data distribution for the years.1993-1999.
? :1 -
'.4 a-Z s
i 0
+
I
a 4..
Ij I
I I
i 6 I.
I I 7-I.
i
. I I
I - -. -
"S e
- l TABLE E-6 ERA STATISTICAL
SUMMARY
PROFICIENCY-TESTING PROGRAM FOR
'ENVIRONMENTAL, Inc., 2002
~~~~~~~~~.
Environmental,' Inc.
- Nuclide, Value Uncertainty Value Min
.Max Agreemer Lab Code: Date (A)'
(B & Ej) -(C
& E)
(D)
Ratio
'Ratio' (E)
.~~~~ ~.
STW-940 02/20/02 Sr-89 53.0 *2.5 :
55.3.
46.6 -64.0 A
STW-940 02(20/02 "
Sr-90,,
16.6 +/- 0.5
.15.9
, :7.2 24.6 A
STW-942 02120102' Gr. Beta 45.7 3.1 48.3 39.6 -57.0 A
STW-944 02/206i2' C6-60 76.9 2.72 73.4 64.7 -82.1
'A STW-944 02/20102 Cs-134 38.7 +/-1.6 421 33.4-50.8 A
S1W-944 02120102
-Cs-137 92.9 +/-2.7,:...
8-8.8
'80.1 -97.5 A
S 1W-944 02/20/02
-Zn-65
. 361.0 +/- 9.2 359.0
' 298.0 -420.0 A
STW-952 0512210 2 Co-60 37.9 0.7,,
39.1 '
30.4 -47.8 A
S1W-952 -
05/22/02 Cs-134 14.5 +/-0.8.
17.1
,8.4
-25,8 A
STW-952
- 05122102 ACs-137
' *50 2.0 52.1 A
STW-952 05/22102 Gr. Beta
" 171.0 2
.*5 189.0
.140.0 -238.0 A
S1W-952 05;22102 Sr-89 28.4 +/- 4.'8 -
31.7 23.0 -40.4 A
STW -952 051 221 02 Sr-90' 32.4
+/-3.1,,
28.3,
19.6 - 37.0 A
STW-953 F 05122/02 H-3 '
13900.0 +/-100.0 17400 14400 20400 W
STW-954 05/22102 -
1-131 14.6 j+/-0.3 14.7 -.
-11.2
-18.2
-' A STW-965 0812102 Co-60 23.8 +/-1.0 23.3
- 14.6 -32.0 A
STW-965 08(21/02 Cs-134 0 -
62.9+/- 1.2 71.7 63.0 -80.4 A
STW-965 08(21/02 Cs-137 219.3 +/- 10.7 214.0
195.0 -233.0'-
'A S1W-965 08121/02 Gr. Beta 26.7 +/-0.4
-21.9 13.2 -30.6 '
W STW-965 08121/02 Sr-89 '
28.4 +/-
1.5i 29.0 20.3 -37.7 A
STW-965 08/2102 Sr-90' 36.5 +/-
1.1 36.4 27.7 -45.1 A
STW-965 08121/02 Zn-65 92.4 +/- 2.2 95.7 79.4 --
112.0 A
ST W-966 11(20/02 Gr. Beta 44.7 +/-1.0 47.0 38.3 - 55.7 A
STW-967 11/20/02 H-3 10100.0 +/- 38.7 10200 8440 12000 A
STW-969 11/20/02 1-131 6.0 +/-0.4 6.8 3.3 -10.2 A
STW-970 11(20102 Co-60 104.0 +/-7.1 104.0 95.0 -113.0 A
STW-970 11(20/02 Cs-134 48.2 +/- 2.3 55.5 46.8 -64.2 A
STW-970 11(20/02 Cs-I37 109.0 +/- 12.6 117.0 107.0 127.0 A
STW-970 11(20102 Gr. Beta 252.0 +/- 26.8 288.0 244.0 -416.0 A
STW-970 11 (20/02 Sr-89 43.2 +/- 0.7 47.6 38.9 - 58.3 A
STW-970 11/20/02 Sr-90
.7.5
+/- 0.2 7.6 0.0 - 16.2 A
r Otis':
l Sv C'
I A. Only analyses performed routinely for the REMP are indluded on this table.
B. The Environmental. Inc. value Is the mean of 3 measurements/determinations.
C. The Environmental, Inc. uncertainty is the 2-sigma counting uncertainty for one determination and one standard deviation for three determinations.
D. The ERA value is equal to 100% of the parameter present In the standard as determined by gravimetric and/or volumetric measurements made during standard preparation.
E. A= Acceptable - Reported Result falls within the Control mits.
NA = Not Acceptable - Reported Result falls outside of the Control Limits.
F. The analysis was repeated: result of reanalysis: 16114+- 487 pCIL/
G. ERA acknowledged an unacceptably high percentage of failure for Cs-134 and questioned its own control limits.
No problems were identified in the analysis.
E-1 0
^
- l. rvS TABLE E-7 I
I L. -
I t
I
, MAPEP Cross Cheick Progran Results for Environmental, Inc., 2002
'I'1 Environmental, Inc.
MAPEP Nuclide Value Uncertainty Value Min Max IAgreement Lab Code Type Date (A)
(B & E)
(C & E)
(D & E)
Rato Rato (F)
STW-939 water 12V01101 Co-57
-138.9 $0.5 -143
- 14.3 100.1 -185.9 STW-939 water 12V01/01 Co-60 139.1 +/-0.5 141 +/- 14.1 98.7 - 183.3 STW-939 water 12/01/01 Cs-134 25.16 +/- 0.2 28.5 i0.3 19.95 - 37. 1 STW-939 water 12V01101 Cs-137 279.96 +/-0.9.
286 *28.6.
200.2 -371.8 STW-939 water 12101/01 Mn-54 253.64 *0.9 246 *0.2 172.2 -319.8 STW-939 water 12101/01 Sr-90 4.88 +/- 0.3 4.8 +/- 0.5 3.36 - 6.2 STW-939 water 12/01/01 Zn-65 70.6 +/- 1.1 67.3 +/- 6.7 47.11 - 87.5 STSO-955. soil
. 10116102 Co-57--
210.58
- 2.0 246 *24.6 172.2 -319.8 STSO-955 soil 10/16102 Co-60 84.38 +/-0.9 87.5 +/-8.8 61.25 -113.8, STSO-955 soil 10/16102 Cs-134 692.6 2.1 862 +/- 86.0 603.4 - 1120.6 STSO-955 soil 10/16102 Cs-137' 96.98 +/-1.7.
11111.1 77.7 - 144.3 STSO-955 soil
-10J16/02 Mn-54 509.74 +/-3.4 546
- 54.6 382.2 -709.8 STSO-955 soil 10/16102 Zn-65 783.59 + 6.4 809 *: 80.9 566.3 - 1051.7 A. Only analyses perfomied routinely for the REMP are Induded on this table.
B. The Environmental, Inc. value is the mean of I or 3 measurements/deternminations.
C. The Environmental, Inc uncertainty is the 2-sigma counting uncertainty for one determination and one standard deviation for three determinations.
r D. The DOE EML value Is the mean of replicate determinations for each radionudide.
E. Reporting units are Bq/L for water, Bqog (dry) for soil, Bqflcg (wet) for vegetations and total Bq for air filters F. The control limits (min ration and max ratio are estabished by DOE EML Acceptable agreement Is achieved if the ratio of the Environmental. Inc. value divided by the DOE EML value falls within the contro limits.
I I
I I
I I
I. II II I
I II I
I I
I i
i i
t
. I I
I I
.