ML050260692
| ML050260692 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Nine Mile Point  |
| Issue date: | 10/21/2004 |
| From: | Evans T Constellation Energy Group |
| To: | Conte R NRC/RGN-I/DRS/OSB |
| Conte R | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML041450453 | List: |
| References | |
| Download: ML050260692 (68) | |
Text
ES-30 1 Administrative Topics 0 ut I i n e Form ES-301-1 Facility: NINE MILE POINT I Date of Examination: 11/1/2004 Examination Level (circle one): /?O Operating Test Number: NRC-01 Ad mi n is t rat ive To pic Conduct of Operations Equipment Control Radiation Control Emergency Plan Describe activity to be performed:
ACTIONS FOR DEFEATED A NNUNCIA TORS Make entries for defeated annunciators into defeated annunciator
- 2. I. I (3.7) Knowledge of conduct of operations requirements.
- 2. I. I8 (2.9) Abiiity to make accurate /clear and concise logs /
records /status boards / and reports.
GA P-OPS-07; 3.10.7 and Affachrnenf f DJ v m
n n
m r
r CT-log fKBF :ad !l$kk#s.
VERIFICATION OF ELECTRONIC CLEARANCE.
Evaluate electronic clearance sheets for correctness and personnel protection requirements including verification of tags for accuracy and their correct use.
2.2.13 (3.6) Knowiedge of tagging and clearance procedures.
2.1.24 (2.8) Abiiity to obtain and interpret station electrical and mechanical drawings.
GAP-OPS-02; 3.11 RADIOLOGICAL REQUIREENTS RELATED TO OPERATOR INSPECTION OF RAD AND HIGH RAD AREAS.
Given conditions related to an area to be inspected, radiological conditions in the area as shown on a survey map, and other applicable conditions, ensure the appropriate radiological aspects of the job are met prior to performance of the inspection.
2.3. I O (2.9) Abiiity to perform procediires to reduce excessive levels of radiation and guard against personnel exposure.
GAP-RPP-01; 3.5, 3.6, 3.7, GAP-RPP-05; 3.fr 3,3, GAP-RPP-08; 3.2,3.3, NI-PM-MS; 6.0, 8.0 ACTIONS FOR EXTERNAL SECURITY THREATS.
Given plant conditions, respond to a security threat including actions per SOP-33, External Security Threats, and EPIP-EPP-10, Security Contingency Event, including Attachment 2, Security Contingency Event (CSO Checklist) 2.4.72 (3.4) Knowiedge of general operating crew responsibilities during emergency operations.
2.4.39 (3.3) Knowledge of the RO responsibiiities in emergency plan implementation.
SOP-33 and EPIP-EPP-f0; Attachment 2 NOTE: All items (5 total) are required for SROs. RO applicants require only 4 items unless they are retaking only the administrative topics, when 5 are required.
Page 1 of 3 NUREG 1021, Draft Revision 9
Constellation Energy Group OPERATOR JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE
Title:
Actions for defeated Annunciators Task Number:
2990090301 A
Approvals:
Revision: NRC 2004 NA EXAMINATION SECURITY General Supervisor Date Operations (Designee)
NA EXAMINATION SECURITY Configuration Control Date Performer:
(RO)
TrainerEvaluator :
Evaluation Method: PERFORM Evaluation Location: SIMULATOR Expected Completion Time: 10 nlinutes Time Critical Task NO Alternate Path Task: NO Start Time:
Stop Time:
Completion Time:
JPM Overall Rating:
Pass Fail L.
NOTE: A JPM overall rating of fail shall be given if any critical step is graded as fail. Any grade of unsat or individual competency area unsat requires a comment.
Comments:
Evaluator Signature:
Date:
10120/04
Recommended Start Location: (Completion time based on the start location)
NIA Siniulator Set-up:
u NIA Directions to the InstructorIEvaluator:
Simulator available for use to post defeated annunciator sticker(s)
Directions to Operators:
Read Before Every JPM Performance:
For the performance of this JPM, I will function as the SM, CSO, and Auxiliary Operators. Prior to providing direction to perform this task, I will provide you with the initial conditions and answer any questions. During task performance, I will identify the steps to be simulated, or discuss and provide cues as necessary.
Read Before Each Evaluated JPM Performance:
This evaluated JPM is a measure of your ability to perform this task independently. The Control Room Supervisor has determined that a verifier is not available and that additional I concurrent verification will not be provided; therefore it should not be requested.
Read Before Each Training JPM Performance:
During this Training JPM, applicable methods of verification are expected to be used. Therefore, either another individual or I will act as the additional I concurrent verifier.
Notes to Instructor I Evaluator:
- 1.
- 2.
During Evaluated JPM:
- 3.
During Training JPM:
-u Critical steps are identified as PasdFail. All steps are sequenced critical unless denoted by a 0 Self-verification shall be demonstrated.
0 Self-verification shall be demonstrated.
No other verification shall be demonstrated.
References:
- 1.
2, ARP Ll-1-1, alarmcontacts.
GAP-OPS-01; 3.10.7, and Attachment 1
- 3.
C-19429-C, SH 7
- 4.
C-23146-C, SH 1
- 5.
- 6.
- 7.
- 8.
WA 2.1.1 (3.7) Knowledge of conduct of operations requirements.
WA 2.1.14 (2.5) Knowledge of system status criteria which require the notification of plant personnel.
WA 2.1.1 8 (2.9) Ability to make accurate i clear and concise logs / records I status boards / and reports.
WA 2.1.24 (2.8) Ability to obtain and interpret station electrical and mechanical drawings.
Tools and Equipment:
- 1. YELLOW Defeated Annunciator stickers
- 2. RED Defeated Annunciator stickers.
Task Standard: CoiwctLv labeled und correct color sticker for the clearunce WU4U3 and correct entries niude into the defeated annzinciator log. Refer to Attachment 1,for properly completed dejeated annzincicttor.
10120104
Initial Cortditions for clearance W0403:
- 1. You are the CSO.
- 2. The clearance has been hung and includes the defeat of annuciator inputs Specif cnlly :
There are currently no defeated annunciators.
Ask the operator for any questions.
Relay 2H6 arid Re1a.v 2L7 aFCpulled for ANN Ll-1-1.
- 3.
- 4.
Initiating cue:
(Operators name), perfoim the applicable actions for the defeated annunciator inputs.
RECORD START TIME
- 2. *Obtain a copy of the reference GAP-OPS-01 obtained.
procedure and reviedutilize the Section 3.10.7 referenced.
correct section.
- referenced.
10/20/04
I Performnnce Steps I Stanc/ord I
Grade I Comments
- 3. Correctly identifies the defeated annunciators:
- a. Determines all inputs are not defeated and a transparent yellow sticker shall be used to indicate one or more multiple inputs have been defeated Prompt: Ioii have entered data OH the rippropirite sticker and tlte sticker hus been ripplied to the unnunciutor.
- c.
Document number authorizing the defeated annunciator and associated computer point(s) identified on the yellow sticker.
- 4.
Ensure annunciators defeated by a clearance are entered in the Defeated Annunciator Log.
- a.
Complete Item 1 Unit Number.
Enter affected unit (1 or 2).
Using ARP L1-1-1 Alarm Contuct section aridlor electrical prints C-19429-C, SH7 and C-23 146-C, SH 1, delerinines unnunciator hus inore than 2 inputs and only 2 inputs arc.
being defeated (no, all of the inpiits),
Delerniines ILOT ull inputs are defeated therefore a yellow sticker is appropriate and is to be used.
Determines a red slicker is NOT appropriate since all alarm inputs are NOT dejeated.
Enters the clearance number and defeated computer points on the yellow sticker (W0403).
Obtains a copy of GAP-OPS-01, Attachment 1, DEFEATED ANNUNCIATOR LOG.
NOIE: Sample defeated annuciator log for cach assignment provided at end of JPM.
Enters I.
Pass/Fail Pass/Fail Pass/Fail Satnrnsat Sat/Unsat Passmail NRC RO ADMIN JPM 1 4
10I20l04
- b. *Complete Item 2. Annunciator Window Number: Enter affected annunciator window designation and defeated computer points.
- c.
- Complete Item 3. Controlling Document: Enter control document for defeating the annunciator.
- d.
- Complete Item 4. Reason for Defeating: Enter brief description of why the annunciator is defeated.
Prompt: SM will coinplefe item 5.
- e.
- Item 5. Compensatory Action(s) - SM Init/Date: The SM shall enter identified compensatory measures resulting from defeat of annunciators including a brief description of actions applied and shall initial the entry.
- f.
- Item 6. Defeated - CSO Initmate: CSO initials and date indicate the annunciator has been temporarily defeated.
Enkrs d@uted annunciator LI-1-1 and coinpziter point BOICI.
PasdFail Enfers cleurunce m i i n bo:
PassIFail Defern7ines reuson for &feat is to PREVENT MASKING OF ALARMS FOR 112 FAN and eniers reason for dejeut.
PassIFail IdentiJed item 5 to he competed by the SM.
See step 4 for recommended conipensatoiy SatNnsat Enters initials und date.
10120l04
i
- g.
- h.
- 1.
- j.
- Item 7. Sticker On - CSO IniUDate: CSO initials and date indicate the application of a sticker to the annunciator window tile.
Enters initials and date. 2 SaWnsat
- Item 8. Restored - CSO IniUDate:
- Item 9. Sticker Off - CSO InidDate:
- Item 10. Restored - SM Init/Date:
Determines not applicable until affer unnunciutor is no longer dqfeated.
Determines not applicable until after annunciator is no longer defeated.
SatAJnsat Determines not applicable until after annunciator is no longer defeated Satnrnsat End of JPM TERMINATING CUE: Defeated annunciator sticker posted and defeated annunciator log entries made.
RECORD STOP TIME NRC RO ADMIN JPM 1 6
10/20/04
Initial Conditions for clearance W0403:
L
- 1. You are the CSO.
- 2. The clearance has been hung and includes the defeat of annuciator inputs.
Specifically:
Relay 2H6 and Relay 2L7 are pulled for ANNLl-1-1.
- 3. There are currently no defeated annunciators.
- 4. Ask the operator for any questions.
Initiating cue:
(Operators name), perform the applicable actions for the defeated annunciator inputs.
1 OI2QlQ4
Constellation Energy Group OPERATOR JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE
Title:
Verification of an Electronic Clearance Revision: NRC 2004 Task Number:
2999020305
'V'
/-I Approvals:
NA EXAMINATION SECURITY Date General Supervisor Date Operations (Designee)
NA EXAMINATION SECURITY Configuration Control Date Performer:
(RO)
Evaluation Method: Perform Evaluation Location: Admin JPM can be performed in Simulator or other designated location.
Expected Completion Time: 10 minutes Time Critical Task: NO Alternate Path Task: NO Start Time:
Stop Time:
Completion Time:
JPM Overall Rating:
Pass Fail NOTE: A JPM overall rating of fail shall be given if any critical step is graded as fail. Any grade of unsat or individual competency area unsat requires a comment.
Comments:
Evaluator Signature:
Date:
10/20/2004
Recommended Start Location: (Completion time based on the start location)
Simulator or other designated area with required references available.
Simulator Set-up:
L-NIA Directions to the InstmctorlEvaluator:
None.
Directions to Operators:
Read Before Every JPM Performance:
For the performance of this JPM, I will function as the SM, CSO, and Auxiliaiy Operators. Prior to providing direction to perform this task, I will provide you with the initial conditions and answer any questions. During task performance, I will identify the steps to be simulated, or discuss and provide cues as necessary.
Read Before Each Evaluated JPM Performance:
This evaluated JPM is a measure of your ability to perform this task independently. The Control Room Supervisor has determined that a verifier is not available and that additional I concurrent verification will not be provided; therefore it should not be requested.
Read Before Each Training JPM Performance:
During this Training JPM, applicable methods of verification are expected to be used. Therefore, either another individual or I will act as the additional / concurrent verifier.
Notes to Instructor I Evaluator:
- 1.
- 2.
During Evaluated JPM:
- 3.
During Training JPM:
-L.
Critical steps are identified as Pass/Fail. All steps are sequenced critical unless denoted by a.
Self-verification shall be demonstrated.
Self-verification shall be demonstrated.
No other verification shall be demonstrated.
References:
- 1. GAP-OPS-02; 3.1 1.
- 2. Nl-ST-M4A; 8.1.3.a.
- 4. WA 2.2.13 (3.6).
- 5. WA 2.1.24 (2.8).
- 3. C-18026-C SH 1; F3, G3.
Tools and Equipment:
- 1. None Task Standard:
Clearance boundary points for EDG 102 - PREVENT START FOR HAND CRANKING verified and identifies starting air needs to be isolated and starting air pressure downstream of the isolation point needs to be removed.
1012012004
Initial Conditions:
1. Unit 1 is at 100% power.
- 2. Nl-ST-M4A, Emergency Diesel Generator 102 and PB 102 Operability Test, is scheduled for performance tomorrow.
- 3. EDG 102 will be marked up for personnel protection during hand jacking.
- 4. The EDG 102 - PREVENT START FOR HAND CRANKING clearance has been developed and a copy will be provided to you.
- 5. You have been assigned as the clearance section reviewer for verification of the clearance development.
- 6. Ask the operator for any questions. Then provide EDG 102 - PREVENT START FOR HAND CRANKING clearance to performer.
Initiating cue:
(Operators name), review and verify the adequacy of the EDG 102 - PREVENT START FOR HAND CRANKING clearance section.
- 1. Provide repeat back of initiating cue.
Proper communications used for repeat back SatAJnsat Evaluator Acknowledge repeat back (GAP-OPS-01) pi*oviding correction if necessary RECORD START TIME
- 2. *Obtain a copy of the reference GAP-OPS-02; section 3.1 1 referenced.
Sat/Unsat/NA procedure and reviewlutilize the Nl-ST-M4A; section 8.1.3 referenced.
Sat/Unsat/NA correct section.
C-18026-C SH 1; F3, G3.
Sat/Unsat/NA
- 3..Identify boundary points to ensure Confirm electrical boundary adequate.
SatNnsat electrical energy is removed.
10/20/2004
- 4.
- Identify boundary points to ensure Determine mechanical boundary inadequate:
mechanical energy is removed.
Air starting pressure must be isolated:
96-82 (DGA-30) BV-DG 102 STARTING AIR BEFORE FLEX CONNECTION, to be tagged CLOSED.
Air start pressure downstream of the isolation point must be removed:
96-83 (DGA-708) DRAIN - DG 102 AIR START STRAINER 96-76, to be tagged OPEN.
PassIFail Pass/Fail PassIFail Pass/Fail End of JPM TERMINATING CUE: Clearance boundary points for EDG 102 - PREVENT START FOR HAND CRANKING verified and identifies starting air needs to be isolated and starting air pressure downstream of the isolation point needs to be removed.
RECORD STOP TIME NRC RO ADMIN JPM 2 4
10/20/2004
Initial Conditions:
- 1.
- 2.
- 3.
- 4.
- 5.
- 6.
L Unit 1 is at 100% power.
N1 -ST-M4A, Emergency Diesel Generator 102 and PB 102 Operability Test, is scheduled for performance tomorrow.
EDG 102 will be marked up for personnel protection during hand jacking.
The EDG 102 - PREVENT START FOR HAND CRANKING clearance has been developed and a copy will be provided to you.
You have been assigned as the clearance section reviewer for verification of the clearance development.
Ask the operator for any questions.
Initiating cue:
(Operators name), review and verify the adequacy of the EDG 102 - PREVENT START FOR HAND CRAMING clearance section.
10/20/2004
Standard Section Clearances 45 - DIESEL GENS Remarks:
Reason:
PREVENT START OF DG 102 FOR HAND JACKING FOR N1 -ST-M4 Placement Instructions:
RACK OUT BREAKER AS PER N1-OP-30 Release Instructions:
RACK IN BREAKER AS PER N1-OP-30 Tagged Component Description EDG 102 - PREVENT START FOR HAND CRANKING DG 102 -EMERGENCY DIESEL GENERATOR 102 Location Tag PI.
Rest.
Tagged Restoration Type Seq.
Seq.
Position Position Tag Placement Notes R-I 022 CONT SW I DG 102 - OUTPUT BKR CONT RM - A4 I Danger I 1 I 5 I PULLTOLOCK NEUTRAL-I PNL I AFTERTRIP Tag Removal Notes INSTALLED IN INSTALLED IN I
I I
I OFF POSITION I ON POSITION R-1022 CLOSE FUSE DG 102 - OUTPUT BKR TB 261 - PB 102 Danger 2
I R-1022 MTR BKR R-1022 TRIP FUSE R-I 022 ELEVATE HANDLE DG 102 - OUTPUT BKR TB 261 - PB 102 No Tag 3
3 RACKED OUT RACKED IN DG 102 - OUTPUT BKR TB 261 - PB 102 Danger 4
2 INSTALLED IN INSTALLED IN OFF POSITION ON POSITION DG 102 - OUTPUT BKR TB 261 - PB 102 Danger 5
1 SECURED FREE TO ELEVATOR CONTROL 0 P E RATE HANDLE NRC RO ADMIN JPM 2 G
10/20/2004
Constellation Energy Group OPERATOR JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE
Title:
Radiological Requirements Related to Operator Inspection Of High Radiation Areas
.L./
Task Number:
N/A Revision: NRC 2004 Approvals:
NA EXAMINATION SECURITY General Supervisor Date Operations (Designee)
NA EXAMINATION SECURITY Configuration Control Date Performer:
(RO)
TrainedEvaluator:
Evaluation Method: PERFORM Evaluation Location: SIMULATOR OR OTHER DESIGNATED LOCATION Expected Completion Time: 10 minutes Time Critical Task: NO Alternate Path Task: NO Start Time:
Stop Time:
Completion Time:
JPM Overall Rating:
Pass Fail L--
NOTE: A JPM overall rating of fail shall be given if any critical step is graded as fail. Any grade of unsat or individual competency area unsat requires a comment.
Comments:
Evaluator Signature:
Date:
10/20/04
Recommended Start Location: (Completion time based on the start location)
Simulator or other designated location.
Simulator Set-up:
u NIA Directions to the InstructorlEvaluator:
Several RWPs and survey maps are to be provided. The performer must select the RWP and survey maps applicable to the work.
Directions to Operators:
Read Before Every JPM Performance:
For the performance of this JPM, I will function as the SM, CSO, and Auxiliary Operators. Prior to providing direction to perform this task, I will provide you with the initial conditions and answer any questions. During task performance, I will identify the steps to be simulated, or discuss and provide cues as necessary.
Read Before Each Evaluated JPM Performance:
This evaluated JPM is a measure of your ability to perform this task independently. The Control Room Supervisor has determined that a verifier is not available and that additional I concurrent verification will not be provided; therefore it should not be requested.
Read Before Each Training JPM Performance:
During this Training JPM, applicable methods of verification are expected to be used. Therefore, either another individual or I will act as the additional I concurrent verifier.
Notes to Instructor I Evaluator:
LJ
- 1.
- 2.
During Evaluated JPM:
- 3.
During Training JPM:
Critical steps are identified as PasdFail. All steps are sequenced critical unless denoted by a "*".
Self-verification shall be demonstrated.
Self-verification shall be demonstrated.
No other verification shall be demonstrated.
References:
- 1. N1-PM-MS; 6.0, 8.0.
- 2.
GAP-RPP-01; 3.5.
- 3. GAP-RPP-02; 3.3.
- 4.
GAP-RPP-08; 3.2.
- 5.
GAP-RPP-07; 3.2.5
- 6. WA 2.3.10 (2.9) Ability to perform procedures to reduce excessive levels of radiation and guard against personnel exposure.
Tools and Equipment:
- 1. None.
Task Standard: Radiological requirements related to the performance of N1-PM-M5 are met prior to and during the performance of the inspection.
10/20/04
Initial Conditions:
- 1. Unit 1 is operating at 100% power.
- 2.
N1-PM-MS, OPERATOR INSPECTION OF RAD AND HIGH RAD AREAS, is scheduled for this shift.
- 3. You will be conducting an inspection of the SHUTDOWN COOLING ROOM.
- 4. An RWP and survey map are provided.
- 5. A WCMOSSE steam leak list has been referenced and there are no steam leaks.
- 6. Your current exposure is 1800 mrem TEDE.
- 7. Ask the operator for any questions.
Initiating cue:
(Operators name), you will be performing N1-PM-MS, OPERATOR INSPECTION OF RAD AND HIGH RAD AREAS, for the SHUTDOWN COOLING ROOM. An RWP and survey amp are provided. Address the radiological aspects of perfoming this inspection.
- 1. Provide repeat back of initiating cue. Proper communications used for repeat back SatNnsat Evaluator Acknowledge repeat back (GAP-OPS-01) providing coi-i-ection if necessary I
I RECORD START TIME NOTE: A score card is attached to ths JPM identifying the items for the performer to identify.
Nl-PM-M5 ohtained;6.0 and 8.0 referenced
.Obtain a copy of the reference procedure and reviewlutilize the correct section.
SatNnsat GAP-RPP-01; 3.5 refet.eiTced tiAP-RPP-02: 3.3 referenced.
GAP-RPP-08; 3.2 referenced.
GAP-RPP-07; 3.2.5 referenced.
10/20/04
Peifoiwirriice Steps I Standard
- 3. *Addresses radiological aspects of N 1 -PM-05 precautions/limitations:
Grade I Comineiits
- a. *Applicable radiological Reviews R WP / Sztniey hiup:
precautions shall be observed.
Rad Protection shall be contacted
- Defermine rudiologicul controls:
for guidance as required.
SCORECARD #I: HIGH RADIA TIOR' AREA SCORECARD ff2: Areu close rates up to 180 mrem/iiour.
- Determine protective clothing:
SCORECARD #3: Although no PC requirements are outlined an the R WP, determines PROTECTIVE CLOTHING IS REQUIRED because the area is a contaminated area and determines that RP must be consulted for guidance.
- Determine entry requirements dosimetry:
SCORECARD #4: Determine TLD and ED required to enter tire urea.
- Per GAP-RPP-08, Step 3.2.2, determine deltu exposure:
SCORECARD #5: Determiire within delta exposure of 300 inrein and uilrlitioncd upprovals required prior to performing the inspection.
1800+300 = 2100 mrem (Administrative limit is 2000 mrem).
Pass/Fail Pass/Fail Pass/Fail SatAJnsat Pass/Fail NRC RO ADMIN JPM 3 4
10/20/04
- c..Obtain associated key(s) fiom SCORECARD #8: Determine HlR-3 key is neerleil (inrlicnted on survey mrip) find it is ohtairtedjronz raiiiation protection.
SaWnsat radiation protection.
- a. Check the RadiatiodHigh Radiation Entiy Record Sheet (Attachment 2) for the areas which require inspection.
RP would not issue an X-R key if requested so not critical.
NOTE: X R key is for LOCKED HIGH RAD AREAS and is controlled solely by RP. X-R keys are dlrerent than keys for HIGH RAD AREAS, which we keep locked.
Needs HIR-3 key (indicated oil Reviews iVI-PA4M5 atfachiizent 2.
References note (*)for SDC ROOM.
'% Arecis where contamination inay be hiinselfherself with the contaniination levels on the survey map.
40,000 dptn/lOO cn22 and fnniiliurizes Pass/Fail SCORECARD #6: Notes area @ and @
A ii ve tlt e high est contamination levels.
SCORECARD #7: Area @ is above this tltresltold so a specific R WP is required.
Pass/Fail PROMPT: (f deferinines X-R key, infirm the petjbrnier thut RP is riot authorized to issue X-R keyy io operators.
End of JPM TERMINATING CUE: Radiological aspects are addressed prior to performing N1-PM-M5, OPERATION INSPECTION OF RAD AND HIGH RAD AREAS, in the C/U Valve and Heat Exchanger Area.
RECORD STOP TIME NRC RO ADMIN JPM 3 5
10/20/04
Initial Conditions:
- 1.
- 2.
- 3.
- 4.
- 5.
- 6.
- 7.
b Unit 1 is operating at 100% power.
N1-PM-M5, OPERATOR INSPECTION OF RAD AND HIGH RAD AREAS, is scheduled for this shift.
You will be conducting an inspection of the SHUTDOWN COOLING ROOM.
An RWP and survey map are provided.
A WCMOSSE steam leak list has been referenced and there are no steam leaks.
Your current exposure is 1800 mrem TEDE.
Ask the operator for any questions.
Initiating cue:
(Operators name), you will be performing N1-PM-M5, OPERATOR INSPECTION OF RAD AND HIGH RAD AREAS, for the SHUTDOWN COOLING ROOM. An RWP and survey map is provided. Address the radiological aspects of performing this inspection.
10/20/04
Answer the following when performing this task:
I SCORECARD #I:
Classify the area (check one):
0 Radiation Area 0 High Radiation Area 0
Very High Radiation Area SCORECARD #2:
Designate the highest dose rate in the area and the location:
ScaREcAm #4:
Designate required dosimetry to enter the area:
SCORECARD #5:
Evaluate delta exposure (check one):
0 Acceptable 0
Additional approval(s) required SCORECARD #6:
Designate the two (2) highest contamination levels in the room and the location:
Designate the RWP required to be used (check one):
0 Current Standing RWP is acceptable 0 Specific RWP should be requested Designate the key to be obtained AND who controls the key:
10/20/04
NOTE: THIS IS THE EXAMINER SCORECARD.
DO NOT PRO WDE TO THE CANDIDATE.
I Answer the following when performing this task:
I SCORECARD #I:
PASSfFAIL I Classify the area (check one):
O Radiation Area I
/High Radiation Area 0 Locked High Radiation Area 0
Very High Radiation Area SCORECARD #2:
PASS/FAXL Designate the highest dose rate in the area and the location:
I80 mrem/hr, north of (or adjacent to) 39-04 drain taps SCORECARD #3:
PASS/FAIL 1
Designate whether or not protective clothing is required (check one):
J Yes 0
No SCORECARD ##:
SAT/UNSAT Designate required dosimetry to enter the area:
TLD and ED (Electronic Dosimeter)
SCORECARD #S:
PASS/FAIL Evaluate delta exposure (check one):
0 Acceptable
/Additional approval(s) required SCORECARD #6:
PASSfFAIE Designate the two (2) highest contamination levels in the room and the location:
Area 0 at 45,000 dpm/lOOcm2 at 12 SDC Pump base Area 0 at 5,000 dpm/lOOcm2 on floor between lland 12 SDC Pumps SCORECARD #E SATRJNSAT Designate the RWP required to be used (check one):
0 Current Standing RWP is acceptable
/Specific R WP should be requested SCORECARD #8:
SAT/UNSAT to be obtained AND who controls the key:
1 HIR-3 controlled by RP NRC RO ADMIN JPM 3 8
10/20/04
ES-301 Ad mi nistrative Topics Outline Form ES-301-1 i--
L Facility: NINE MILE POINT 7 Date of Examination: 7 7/7/2004 Examination Level (circle one): SRO Operating Test Number: NRC-07 Administrative Topic Conduct of Operations Conduct of Operations Equipment Control Describe activity to be performed:
PERFORM PLANT IMPACT REVIEW FOR A DER.
SRO will be required to perform several actions in response to a DER review including recognition that the event is reportable.
- 2. ?. I (3.8) Knowledge of conduct of operations requirements.
2.4.30 (3.6) Knowledge of which events related to system operations/sfatus should be reported to outside agencies.
DER-NM-2004-7428, 7 I Containment H202 System Removed From Service NIP-ECA-01; 3.2, and Affachment 2.
EVALUATE PLANT CHEMISTRY REPORT AND RESPOND.
Review plant daily status report, which includes plant chemistry, identify and determine required actions in response to outaf-specification reactor coolant chemistry parameters.
2.1.25 (3.7) Ability to obtain and interpret station reference materials such as graphs /monographs /and tables which contain performance data.
- 2. ?. 34 (2.9) Ability to maintain the primary and secondary plant chemisfry within allowable limits.
DER-NM-2004-958, Exceed GAP-CHi5-01 Action Level 1 Threshold for Sulfates GAP-CHE-07; 3.2; Enclosure 7 DETERMINE POST MAINTENANCE TEST REQUIREMENTS FOR REFUELING EQUIPMNT.
Given conditions related to a failure of the refueling interlocks during refueling (over-core limit switch failure), the SRO will be required to determine post-maintenance test requirements and implement those requirements by indicating the procedure to be used and the steps that must be performed to demonstrate operability.
2.2.21 (3.5) Knowledge of pre and post n-rainfenance operability requirements.
2.2.26 (3.7) Knowledge of refueling adminisfrafive reqtriremenfs.
GAP-SAT-02; 3.1, Aftachmenfs 7 and 2 CIRCUIT BREAKER FAILURE. Cause was inadequak post maintenance testing. Contributing factors included lack of compliance with admin procedures.
LER 2002-002. LOSS OF ONE CRD PUW TRAIN DUE TO Page 2 of 3 NUREG 1021, Draft Revision 9
- c.
ES-301 Ad mi nistrative Topics Outline Form ES-301 -I
~~
~~
Facility: NINE MILE POINT I Date of Examination: 11/1/2004 Examination Level (circle one): SRO Operating Test Number: NRC-01 Administrative To pic Radiation Control Emergency Plan Describe activity to be performed:
DIRECT EXCLUSION AREA EVACUATION IN RESPONSE TO SITE AREA EMERGENCY WITH A RELEASE IN PROGRESS.
Given plant conditions and a required exclusion area evacuation, direct the appropriate actions per EPIP-EPP-05C.
2.3. IO (3.3) Ability to perform procedures to reduce excessive levels of radiation and guard against personnel exposure.
2.4.40 (4.0) Knowledge of the SRUs responsibilities in emergency plan implementation.
EPIP-EPP-05C; Section 3.1, Attachment I CLASSIFY EMERGENCY EVENTS FOR SCENARIO (EAL)
AND COMPLETE NOTIFICATION FACT SHEET (PART I).
Classify emergency events based on plant conditions during the simulator scenario in which the candidate is the SRO and complete the notification fact sheet (Part 1 only) for transmittal within a specified period of time (TIME CRITICAL to ensure information can be transmitted within 15 minutes).
2.4.4 7 (4. I) Knowledge of the emergency action level thresholds and classifications.
2.4.43 (3.5) Knowledge of emergency communication systems and techniques.
EPIP-EPP-20; 3.1 and Attachment ?A EPIP-EPP-01; EPIP-EPP-01-Ai; NOTE: All items (5 total) are required for SROs. RO applicants require only 4 items unless they are retaking only the administrative topics, when 5 are required.
Page 3 of 3 NUREG 1021, Draft Revision 9
Constellation Energy Group OPERATOR JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE L-
Title:
Plant Impact Review for a DER Task Number:
3420 160303 Revision: NRC 2004 NA EXAMINATION SECURITY General Supervisor Date Operations (Designee)
NA EXAMINATION SECURITY Configuration Control Date Performer:
(SRO)
TrainerEvahat or:
Evaluation Method: PERFORM Evaluation Location: SIMULATOR OR OTHER DESIGNATED LOCATION Expected Completion Time: 15 minutes Time Critical Task: NO Alternate Path Task: NO Start Time:
Stop Time:
Completion Time:
-%+-
JPM Overall Rating:
Pass Fail NOTE: A JPM overall rating of fail shall be given if any critical step is graded as fail. Any grade of unsat or individual competency area unsat requires a comment.
Comments:
Evaluator Signature:
Date:
10/20/04
Recommended Start Location: (Completion time based on the start location)
Simulator Set-up :
N/A Directions to the Instructor/Evaluator:
None Directions to Operators:
Read Before Every JPM Performance:
For the performance of this JPM, I will function as the SM, CSO, and Auxiliary Operators. Prior to providing direction to perform this task, I will provide you with the initial conditions and answer any questions. During task performance, I will identify the steps to be simulated, or discuss and provide cues as necessary.
Read Before Each Evaluated JPM Performance:
This evaluated JPM is a measure of your ability to perform this task independently. The Control Room Supervisor has determined that a verifier is not available and that additional / concurrent verification will not be provided; therefore it should not be requested.
Read Before Each Training JPM Performance:
During this Training JPM, applicable methods of verification are expected to be used. Therefore, either another individual or I will act as the additional / concurrent verifier.
u-Notes to Instructor / Evaluator:
- 1.
- 2.
During Evaluated JPM:
- 3.
During Training JPM:
Critical steps are identified as Pass/Fail. All steps are sequenced critical unless denoted by a "*".
Self-verification shall be demonstrated.
Self-verification shall be demonstrated.
No other verification shall be demonstrated.
References:
- 1.
- 3.
- 4.
NIP-ECA-0 1 ; 3.2, and Attachment 2 WA 2.1.1 (3.8) Knowledge of conduct of operations requirements.
WA 2.4.30 (3.6) Knowledge of which events related to system operatiodstatus should be reported to outside agencies
- 2. DER-NM-2004-1428 Tools and Equipment:
- 1. Access to ESL Log to obtain the next sequential number (for ths JPM prompt is added to provide an ESL# (04-0320) verbally when requested by the performer).
Task Standard: NIP-ECA-01 Attachment 2 parts 1,2,3, and 4 completed and applicable actions have been identified in response to the DER operability and reportability review.
10/20/04
i Initial Conditions:
- 1. You are the SM.
- 2.
- 3.
- 4.
You are being provided DER-NM-2004-1498 for SM plant impact review.
Current plant conditions are unchanged from those identified in the DER.
Ask the operator for any questions.
Initiating cue:
(Operators name), perform the applicable plant impact review for DER-NM-2004-1498, and complete the applicable form.
- 1. Provide repeat back of initiating cue.
Evaluator Acknowledge repeat back providing correction if necessaiy RECORD START TIME
- Obtain a copy of the reference procedure and reviewlutilize the correct section.
.If the DER description does not contain sufficient information to determine whether additional review is necessaiy, then designate the DER as Not Approved for Screening.
- If the condition described in DER does not involve an Operability Concern and is not reportable, then, indicate approved for screening, indicate no operability1 reportability concern, enter initials and date, then save. No further action is required.
Proper communications used for repeat back SatKJnsat (GAP-OPS-01)
NIP-ECA-0 I obtained.
Section 3.2 referenced.
- referenced SatIUnsat Determines suflcienl injormntion mmilable SatIUnsat jor screening ut this time.
Recognizes operuhility concern and goes to NIP-ECA-01, Attachment 2, Operability and Reportability Review Form.
SatKJnsat NRC SRO ADMIN JPM 1A 3
1012QlO4
i
- 5..If the condition described in the DER represents an operability concern or is reportable, complete NIP-ECA-01, Attachment 2, Operability and Reportability Review Form, Page 2 as follows:
- a..PART 1A: SSCs shall be declared either operable or inoperable and marked on form.
- b..PART 1A: If SSC was inoperable at time of discovery, but at time of review is operable, the SSC shall be reported operable with comments explaining the previous inoperable condition in Block 4C, Evaluation comments.
- d. *PART 1A: Indicate an operability determination is not required.
- e..PART 1B: Determine if entry into a LCO is required.
Obtains copy qf NIP-ECA-01, Atfaclimen[ 2, Operability and Reportability Review Form, Page 2.
Entecy DER No. NM-2004-1498 Determines SSC is inoperable.
Part IA: checks Equipment Opei-able as NO.
Determines SSC remains inoperable.
Part IA: enters Required Mode as Power Operating Condition.
P u t In: checks Clperabili~~
Determination as NO.
Part 4C: checks Basis for Operability Determinution LIS N/A.
Determine TS LC0 3.6. I l.a, Table 3.6.11-1, Parameter G, nnd Tuble 3.6.11-2, Action 4.a
>repare and submit a Special Report to the Commission within 14 d y s following the event outlining the action taken, the cause of the inoperability and the plans and schedule for restoring the system to OPERABLE status.
apply. specifically:
NRC SRO ADMIN JPM 1A Satfunsat Satfunsat Pass/Fail SaWnsat SatAJnsat Sat/Unsat PasdFail 4
1 Ol20104
l
- f. *PART 1B: Mark the appropriate LCO ENTRY Yes I No option.
- g. *PART 1B: Enter the Tech Spec LCO number.
- 11. *PART 1C: Determine if entry into ESL Log is required.
- i. *PART 1C: Mark the appropriate ESL ENTRY Yes / No option.
- j. *PART 1C: Enter the ESL number.
- k. *PART 1D: Nuclear ESA may be requested to support an operability determination.
Part I B: checks LCO Entry as YES.
Sat/Unsat I
I Part 1B: eniers LCO nunibev as TS 3.6.11-2.
Rejerences GAP-OPS-01, 3. I0.5.b. I.
Determine entty into ESL Log is reqziired based on station equipnient determined to be inoperable which impact Tech Specs.
Part 1 C: checks ESL Entry us YES I
I PRUiMPl: Provide ESL# 04-0320 if tisked.
Obtains the next sequential ESL Log number from the ESL Log.
Part IC: enters the ESL Log number.
Determine hluclear ESA not required.
Part ID: checks Nuclear ESA Reqziestecl a,v NO.
Part 4C: checks ESA /Requested Action Details as hVA.
- 1. *PART 1E: Determine if event Determines NO Tech Spec violation.
constitutes a Tech Spec violation.
- m..PART 1E: Mark appropriate TS VIOLATION Yes / No option.
Part IC: checks TS Violation as NO. I SatAJnsat NRC SRO ADMIN JPM 1A 5
10120104
- n. *PART 1E: Document the determination in PART 4C, Evaluation Comments.
- 0. *PART 2A: Determine if event is reportable to NRC per NIP-IRG-01 or to other outside agencies per NIP-IRG-02.
- p. *PART 2A: Document the reportability in space provided.
- q. *PART 3A: Notify NRC Resident Inspector and document the person and dateltime contacted.
- r. *PART 3A: Notify the NRC/NRR (red phone) and document the person and dateltime contacted.
Otherwise leave blank.
Determines no continents are required in Part 4C, Evaluution Comments.
Purt 4C: checks Tech Spec Violution Description us N/A.
References NIP-IRG-01 us applicable Determines reportable per TS Tuhle 3.6.11 -
2, Action Statement 4a, which requires u Special Report to the coiizniission within 14 dqs.
Part 2A: checks Deviotion/Event Reportable us YES.
Part 2A: checks Other (Per NIP-IRG-01/02) block.
Part 4C: Under Other Comments, indicates a Special Report must be prepared and submitted to the Contrnission within I4 days per TS 3.6. I I-2, Action Statement 4a.
PROMPT: Pruviiic nckitutoiciigement qf tiotijfcatiotr.
Part 3A: checks NRC Resident Inspector Contacted us YES.
Records name of person contacted and date/t im e contacted.
P u t 3A: checks NRC Region/NRR Notified as NO.
Leaves person contacted and datehime contacted blank.
NRC SRO ADMIN JPM 1A SatNnsat Sat/Unsat PasdFail Satfunsat SatNnsat SatNnsat SatNnsat SatNnsat 6
10/20/04
PRU;CWT: If asked, eieciroliic EC4P systein is nviiifnhle.
- s. *PART 4A: Document results by checking if DER is Approved or Not Approved for Screening Checks approvedjbr screening block.
SaWnsat 1
- t. *PART 4D: Document Unit, Checks Unit 1 block SatAJnsat Sat/Unsat SaWnsat name, and date of review.
Prints nanie, initials, una' enters date Checks Other Unit SA4 Concurrence block as NA.
PROMPT: You ure iiot required to iiplule ECil P lo indicate tire re.sult.s ofyour review.
- 6. *Document required entry into ESL On the DER form:
Log and record ESL number in the Comments Section of the DER Identification Page.
Enters ESL Log number in the Operations Comments block.
Signs for Operations Approval.
Sat/Unsat Sat/Unsat End of JPM TERMINATING CUE: NIP-ECA-01, Attachment 2 completed, and DER approved for screening.
RECORD STOP TIME NRC SRO ADMW JPM 1A 7
10/20/04
Initial Conditions:
- 1. You are the SM.
- 2. You are being provided DER-NM-2004-1498 for SM plant impact review
- 3. Current plant conditions are unchanged from those identified in the DER.
- 4. Ask the operator for any questions.
~=..-,
Initiating cue:
(Operators name), perform the applicable plant impact review for DER-NM-2004-1498 an complete the applicable form.
10/20/04
\\.-
DER - NM-2004-1498 - Unscreened Identification Section (Printed: Today)
Issue Topic:
Plant Material Condition Date Discovered: Today Date Occurred:
Today
^I I^^
_" -~
Time Discovered:
Two (2)
~
--_-I minutes -
ago can be done. Drywell CAM needs to have a new air pump installed. 12 Containment H202 system is 1
\\
*a A
Units Affected:
Unit Status:
% Power:
u 1 1 - Power Operations 100 Unit Status Remarks:
1 Remarks:
Identifiers Role:
- Peer How was this condition found?
Observed results/Consequences
^ _ " --
Immediate Corrective Action Comments:
I I
Entered By:
Hicks, Quentin J Team:
Ops Mgmgt WEC U1 Group:
Operations Date:
10/20/04
ATTACHMENT 2 (Cont) 4D. SM
.Unit 1
0 Unit 2 Print Name: Prints Name Initials: Enters Initials PAGE 2 Date Enters date Other Unit SM Concurrence (Print Name) MNIA
-W
+-
No 0 Yes* 0 Operable, but degraded 0 NIA Number: Enter next sequential Required Mode: Power Operation Condition Operability TS 3.6.11.a TS TBL 3.6.11-1 #6, number from ESL Log.
20.2201 1 0 Immediate 1 1 50,;;;;;l; 1 0 1 Hr.
20.2202 0 Immediate 0 24 Hr.
50.36 c 2 0 1 Hr.
40CFR302 0 Immediate 20.2203 0 3 0 D a s 0 1 Hr. 0 4 Hr. 0 8 Hr.
SPDES Permit Violation 0 Yes 1
1 73.71 1 0 1 Hr.
0 No Yes, Person Contacted: Enters persons name Enters date &time W No 0 Yes, Person INoti fied:
I I
I I
Part 4: Operations Evaluation Results and Comments NRC SRO ADMIN JPM 1A 10 10/20/04
Constellation Energy Group OPERATOR JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE
Title:
Task Number:
34 10220303 Evaluate Plant Chemistry Report and Respond b'
Revision: NRC 2004 NA EXAMINATION SECURITY General Supervisor Date Operations (Designee)
NA EXAMINATION SECURITY Configuration Control Date Performer:
( S W TrainerIEvaluator :
Evaluation Method: PERFORM Evaluation Location: SIMULATOR OR OTHER DESIGNATED AREA Expected Completion Time: 10 minutes Start Time:
Stop Time:
Completion Time:
JPM Overall Rating:
Pass Fail Time Critical Task: NO Alternate Path Task: NO
'L-NOTE: A JPM overall rating of fail shall be given if any critical step is graded as fail. Any grade of unsat or individual competency area unsat requires a comment.
Comments:
Evaluator Signature:
Date:
10/20/04
Recommended Start Location: (Completion time based on the start location)
N/A L
Simulator Set-up:
N/A Directions to the InstructorlEvaluator:
To be performed as an administrative JPM.
Directions to Operators:
Read Before Every JPM Performance:
For the performance of this JPM, I will function as the SM, CSO, and Auxiliary Operators. Prior to providing direction to perform this task, I will provide you with the initial conditions and answer any questions. During task performance, I will identify the steps to be simulated, or discuss and provide cues as necessary.
Read Before Each Evaluated JPM Performance:
This evaluated JPM is a measure of your ability to perform this task independently. The Control Room Supervisor has determined that a verifier is not available and that additional I concurrent verification will not be provided; therefore it should not be requested.
Read Before Each Training JPM Performance:
During this Training JPM, applicable methods of verification are expected to be used. Therefore, either another individual or I will act as the additional I concurrent verifier.
=-/-
Notes to Instructor / Evaluator:
- 1.
- 2.
During Evaluated JPM:
- 3.
During Training JPM:
Critical steps are identified as Pass/Fail. All steps are sequenced critical unless denoted by a e.
Self-verification shall be demonstrated.
Self-verification shall be demonstrated.
No other verification shall be demonstrated.
References:
- 1.
- 2.
- 3.
- 4.
GAP-CHE-0 1 ; 3.2; Enclosure 1.
DER-NM-2004-958, Exceeded GAP-CHE-01 Action Level 1 threshold for sulfates during RWCU maintenance.
WA 2.1.25 (3.1) Ability to obtain and interpret station reference materials such as graphs / monographs I and tables which contain performance data.
WA 2.1.34 (2.9) Ability to maintain the primary and secondary plant chemistry within allowable limits.
Tools and Equipment:
. 1. None.
Task Standard: ENCLOSURE 1, Part I, Part 11, and Part I11 evaluated and it is determined that the TECH SPEC and EPRI ACTION LEVEL 1 thresholds are exceeded for sulfates and ACTION LEVEL 2 thresholds are exceeded for conductivity. Determines there is a required shutdown for chemistry but this time is later than the required shutdown that is determined for the inoperable continuous conductivity recorder.
10/20/04
Initial Conditions:
1,
- 2.
- 3.
- 4.
- 5.
- 6.
Unit 1 is at 100% power.
You are the Unit 1 CRS.
At 03:OO on 3/06/2004, the conductivity recorder was declared inoperable and remains out of service.
At 02:30 on 3/10/2004 Cleanup was removed from service for forced maintenance with an expected duration of four (4) days.
Chemistry is taking reactor water samples twice per shift for conductivity and sulfates.
At 0S:OO on 3/12/2004 Chemistry reports the following reactor water samples:
Sulfates = 5.05 ppb Noble Metal Chemical Application is not in service.
Ask the operator for any questions.
Conductivity = 1.012 uS/cm at 25OC.
- 7.
- 8.
Initiating cue:
(Operators name), evaluate the above conditions and respond as necessary.
- 1. Provide repeat back of initiating cue.
Evaluator Acknowledge repeat back.
RECORD START TIME
- 2.
.Obtain a copy of the reference procedure and reviewlutilize the correct section.
- 3..Evaluate GAP-CHE-0 1 Enclosure 1, Part I (TECH SPECS) for applicability.
Proper communications used for repeat back SatNnsat (GAP-OPS-0 1)
GAP-CI-IE-01 obtained.
- Enclosure I refeienced.
- Section 3.2. I rqferenced.
Compcwes sample results to GA P-CHE-01 Enclosure I. Part 1 (TECH SPECS), for REACTOR CONDITION 3.
SaWnsat Determines condzrctivi~~
Above ACTION PasdFail LEVEL 2 limit qf 1.0 but below ACTION LEVEL 3 limit.
Determines sulfates above ACTION LE VEL I limit of 5 and below ACTION 2 LEVEL limit of 20.
PassIFail NRC SRO ADMIN JPM 1B 3
10/20/04
- 4..Evaluate GAP-CHE-01 Enclosure 1, Part I1 (FUEL WARRANTY) for applicability.
- 5.
.Evaluate GAP-CHE-01 Enclosure 1, Part I11 (EPFU) for applicability.
Conipures sample results to GA P-CHE-01 Enclosure I. Purt II (FUEL WARRANTU, for. REACTOR CONDITION 3.
Determines conductivity above ACITION LEVEL I limit of 1.00 but belowAC710N LEVEL 2 limit of i.0.
Determines su@tes not evaluated us a f i d warrunty limit.
Compares sample results to GAP-CHE-01 Enclosure I, Purt Iii (EPRI),,for. REACTOR CONDITION 3.
Determines conductivity above ACTION LEVEL 2 limit of 1.0 but below ACTION LE VEL 3 limit.
Determines suIfates ACTION LEVEL I limit of 5 and below ACTION 2 LEVEL limit of 20.
- 6..Reference GAP-CHE-01, Section 3.2 and 3.2.1 as follows:
- a. Event time clock begins at time of Notes time that discovered ACTION LEVEL discovery.
I IWS exceeded.
PasdFail SaWnsat Pass/Fail PasslFail Sat/Unsat NRC SRO ADMIN JPM 1B 4
10/20/04
r
- b. Notify the SM, Operations Manager, General Supervisor Chemistry, Plant General Manager and Principle Engineer Reliability Engineering of the parameter which has exceeded Action Level 1 limits.
- c. Determine corrective actions be taken to return chemistry to within limits.
informs the following the TECH SPEC m d EPIU ACTION LE VEL I sulfate thresholds are exceeded:
SM Operations Munuger General Supervisor C'heinistiy Plan1 Genernl Miiiuger Principle Engineer Reliability Engineering PROMPT IJ u.<keti, RCVC'C I S evl7ectc.d to he retzirned to service in two 0) clays hut no sootter than two 1'2) duys Determines the chemistry paranieter (iu1fate.s) must be below the ACTION LE VEL 1 value within 96 hours0.00111 days <br />0.0267 hours <br />1.587302e-4 weeks <br />3.6528e-5 months <br /> of time of discovery.
Determines that returning R WCU to service will restore the sulfate parameter to within ACTION LEVEL I value ifreturned within the predicted time of three (3) days.
- Reference GAP-CHE-01, Section 3.2 and 3.2.2 as follows:
- a. Event time clock begins at time of discovery.
- b. Notify the SM, Operations Manager, General Supervisor Chemistry, Plant General Manage]
and Principle Engineer Reliability Engineering of the parameter which has exceeded Action Level 1 limits.
Noles time that discovered ACTION LEVEL 2 was exceeded.
1nJi)rm.y the.following the TECH SPEC and EPRI ACTION LE VEL 2 conduclivily thresholds are exceeded:
SM Operatiotis Manager General Supervisor Chemistry Plant General Manager Principle Engineer Reliability Engineering NRC SRO ADMIN JPM 1B SatNnsat PasdFail SatNnsat PasdFail SatNnsat 5
1 10/20/04
- c. Determine corrective actions be Determines the chemistry parumeter (condzictivity) must be below the ACTION LEVEL 2 vulue within 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> of time of discovei-y.
taken to return chemistry to within limits.
- d. Determine Cleanup cannot be Deterniines the chemistry parurneter (conductivity) will hrOT be restored below the ACTION LEVEL 2 valiie within 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> of tinie of discovery.
returned to service and restoration below LEVEL 2 limit within 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> is not likely.
Determines plant shutdown to be initiated NO LATER THAN 05:OO on 3/13/2004.
which is less restrictive than the Tech Spec required shutdown (See #8 below).
Determines conductivity will not be below the ACTION LEVEL 2 limit within the time period required to achieve an order&
shutdown, therefore, power operation cannot continue.
Pass/Fail Pass/Fail SatNnsat
- 8..Reference Tech Spec 3.2.3.d for the implications of the inoperable conductivity recorder.
- a. Evaluate Tech Spec 3.2.3.
Determines with the continuous conductivity monitor inoperable,for more than seven (7) days, a shutdown shall be initiated within I hour und the reactor shall be shutdown and the reactor coolant ternperatwe be reduced to below 200 O F within 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br />.
Pass/Fail Determines plant shutdown to be initiated NO LATER THAN 04:OO on 3/13/2004, which is more restrictive than the shutdown for chemistry (see #7.d above).
PasdFail NRC SRO ADMIN JPM 1B 6
10/20/04
L" L-'
a
Initial Conditions:
- 1.
- 2.
- 3.
- 4.
- 5.
- 6.
- 7.
- 8.
Unit 1 is at 100% power.
You are the Unit 1 CRS.
At 03:OO on 3/06/2004, the conductivity recorder was declared inoperable and remains out of service.
At 02:30 on 3/10/2004 Cleanup was removed from service for forced maintenance with an expected duration of four (4) days.
Chemistry is taking reactor water samples twice per shift for conductivity and sulfates.
At 05:OO on 3/12/2004 Chemistry reports the following reactor water samples:
Sulfates = 5.05 ppb Noble Metal Chemical Application is not in service.
Ask the operator for any questions.
Conductivity = 1.012 vS/cm at 25°C.
Initiating cue:
(Operators name), evaluate the above conditions and respond as necessary.
1 OI2OlO4
Constellation Energy Group OPERATOR JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE
.u'
Title:
Determine Post Maintenance Test (PMT) Following Corrective Revision: NRC 2004 Maintenance (Refueling Bridge Over-Core Limit Switch Replacement)
Task Number:
3420130303 NA EXAMINATION SECURITY General Supervisor Date Operations (Designee)
Date NA EXAMINATION SECURITY Configuration Control Date TrainedEvaluator:
Evaluation Method: PERFORZM Evaluation Location: SIMULATOR OR OTHER DESIGNATED AREA Expected Completion Time: 12 minutes Time Critical Task: NO Alternate Path Task: NO Stop Time:
Completion Time:
Start Time:
JPM Overall Rating:
Pass Fail NOTE: A JPM overall rating of fail shall be given if individual competency area unsat requires a comment.
critical step is graded as fail. Any grade of unsat or Comments:
Evaluator Signature:
Date:
10/20/2004
Recommended Start Location: (Completion time based on the start location)
Simulator or other designated location.
Simulator Set-up:
NIA LJ Directions to the InstructorlEvaluator:
To be performed as an administrative JPM.
Directions to Operators:
Read Before Every JPM Performance:
For the performance of this JPM, I will function as the SM, CSO, and Auxiliary Operators. Prior to providing direction to perform this task, I will provide you with the initial conditions and answer any questions. During task performance, I will identify the steps to be simulated, or discuss and provide cues as necessary.
Read Before Each Evaluated JPM Performance:
This evaluated JPM is a measure of your ability to perform this task independently. The Control Room Supervisor has determined that a verifier is not available and that additional I concurrent verification will not be provided; therefore it should not be requested.
Read Before Each Training JPM Performance:
During this Training JPM, applicable methods of verification are expected to be used. Therefore, either another individual or I will act as the additional / concurrent verifier.
Notes to Instructor I Evaluator:
- 1.
- 2.
During Evaluated JPM:
- 3.
During Training JPM:
Critical steps are identified as Pass/Fail. All steps are sequenced critical unless denoted by a 0.
Self-verification shall be demonstrated.
Self-verification shall be demonstrated.
-L No other verification shall be demonstrated.
References:
- 1.
- 2.
- 3.
- 4.
- 5.
- 6.
- 7.
- 8.
GAP-SAT-02; 3.1, Attachment 2.
LER 2002-002. LOSS OF ONE CRD PUMP TRAIN DUE TO CIRCUIT BREAKER FAILURE. Cause was inadequate post maintenance testing.
WA 2.2.21 Knowledge of pre and post maintenance operability requirements (3.5).
WA 234000 K4.01 Knowledge of FUEL HANDLING EQUIPMENT design feature(s) and/or interlocks which provide for the following: ?Prevention of core alterations during control rod Movements (4.1).
WA 234000 K4.02 Knowledge of FUEL HANDLING EQUIPMENT design feature(s) and/or interlocks which provide for the following: ?Prevention of control rod movement during core Alterations (4.1).
WA 234000 K5.02 Knowledge of the operational implications of the following concepts as they apply to FUEL HANDLING EQUIPMENT: ?Fuel handling equipment interlocks (3.7).
WA 234000 A2.01 Ability to (a) predict the impacts of the following on the FUEL HANDLING EQUIPMENT; and (b) based on those predictions, use procedures to correct, control, or mitigate the consequences of those abnormal conditions or operations: ?Interlock failure (3.7).
Nl-ST-W3, Refueling Platform Interlock Test Tools and Equipment:
- 1. None.
Task Standard: Indicate Nl-ST-W3 steps that must be performed (which are incorrectly annotated as NIA) to demonstrate operability.
1012012004
- 1.
Initial Conditions:
1,
- 2.
- 3.
Unit 1 Refueling Outage is in progress.
You have just assumed the shift as the CRS.
The first fuel shuffle is in progress. After releasing a fuel assembly in the reactor core and moving the refueling bridge to the spent fuel pool to grapple the fuel assembly specified in the next step, ROD BLOCK INTERLOCK #1 did not clear as expected when the refueling bridge was no longer over the reactor core. The SRO on the refueling bridge contacted the control room and refueling operations have been halted. The refueling bridge is in the spent fuel pool with the main hoist normal up and unloaded.
- 4.
I&C has determined that the refueling bridge over core limit switch broke and remained actuated.
- 5. A clearance has been hung, the limit switch has been replaced, and the clearance has been removed. WO # 2004-1465.
- 6. Annunciator F3-4-4, ROD BLOCK, is clear.
- 7. The refueling bridge is in the spent fuel pool with the main hoist normal up and unloaded.
- 8. N1-PM-SO is current.
- 9. The CRS fiom the previous shift has prepared a copy of Nl-ST-W3, Refueling Platform Interlocks Test, to use for the Post Maintenance Test operability testing. This copy is provided for your use.
- 10. Ask the operator for any questions.
Initiating cue:
(Operators name), evaluate the N1 -ST-W3, Refueling Platform Interlocks Test, Post Maintenance Test prepared by the CRS that you just relieved for appropriateness.
- 1. Provide repeat back of initiating cue.
Proper communications used for repeat back Sattunsat Evaluator Acknowledge repeat back (GAP-OPS-01) pi-oviding correction i f necessary RECORD START TIME
- 2. *Obtain a copy of the reference procedure and reviewhtilize the
- Section 3. I referenced correct section.
- Attachnient 2 refirenced.
GA P-SA T-02 obtained.
Sat/Unsat
- 3. *References GAP-SAT-02, Determine replncetnent of litnit switches Satfunsat, Electrical PMT Guidelines, for limit switches.
requires vertfiing actuation ojcontrolled device including any interlock(s).
10/20/2004
l' I'
i"
- a. Per step 4.3: When used for PMT, perform applicable subsections /
steps of sections 7.0 through 10.0.
NOTE: To test the refueling interlocks, the main hoist must be loaded. This is accomplished by grappling and using the dummy fuel assembly. It is critical that these steps be performed for operability testing of the refueling interlocks.
SECTION 7.0:
Determines section 7.0 (steps 7.1, 7.2, 7.3, 7.4, 7.5, 7.6, 7.7.1, 7.7.2. 7.8, 7.9) are correctly inarlied.
SECTION 7.0:
Determines steps 7. I0 through 7. I3 are left Hunk since these ure steps that this CRS will perfornz prior to starting the test.
SECTION 8.1:
DeterminesSteps 8.1.1, 8.1.2, 8.1.3, 8.1.4, 8.1.5 ure INCORRECTLY niitrkerl AYA itnil MUST BE PERFORMED.
SECTION 8. I :
Determines steps 8.1.6 through 8.1.9 are correctly marked NiA.
SECTIUN 8.2:
Determines steps 8.2.1, 8.2.2, 8.2.3 are correclly mirrked NiA.
SECTlUN 8.3.
Determines steps 8.3. I through 8.3.4 und steps 8.3.6 through 8.3.11 are correctly le3 blank (required to he perfornze4 AND step 8.3.5 is correctlv inurked N/A since rod withdrawal will be simulated.
SECTION 8.3:
Determines Steps 8.3.12, 8.3.13, 8.3.14, 8.3.15 are INCORRECTLY marked N/A and MUST BE PERFORMED.
SatNnsat Sat/Unsat Pass/Fail Sat/Unsat SatAJnsat SatAJnsat PasslFail NRC SRO ADMIN JPM 2 4
10/20/2004
r:'
End of JPM TERMINATING CUE: Indicate N as NIA) to demonstrate operability.
RECORD STOP TIME SECTlON 8.4:
Determine.y steps S.4. I, S.4.2 ore correclb murked N/A.
SECTION 9.0:
Determines steps 9. I, 9.2, 9.3 are correctly le$ blank (required to he perfornied)
SECTION IO:
Determines step IO. 1.I.n is correctly incrrked N/A.
SECTlOiV IO:
Determinessteps lO.l.l.b, lO.l.l.c, lO.l.l.cl are correctb I@ blank (required to be performed)
SECTION 10:
Determines steps 10.1.2, 10.1.3, 10.2 are correctly left blank kequired to be perjtwmed)
ATTACHMENT 2 and ATTACHMENT 3:
Determines all steps 10. I. 2, IO. I. 3, IO. 2 are correctlji left blank (required to be performed).
Sat/Unsat SaVUnsat SatNnsat Pass/Fail Sat/Unsat SatNnsat
-ST-W3 steps that must be performed (which are incorrectly annotated NRC SRO ADMIN JPM 2 5
10l2012004
Initial Conditions:
- 1.
- 2.
- 3.
- 4.
- 5.
- 6.
- 7.
- 8.
- 9.
- 10.
Unit 1 Refueling Outage is in progress.
You have just assumed the shift as the CRS.
The first fuel shuffle is in progress. After releasing a fuel assembly in the reactor core and moving the refueling bridge to the spent fuel pool to grapple the fuel assembly specified in the next step, ROD BLOCK INTERLOCK #I did not clear as expected when the refueling bridge was no longer over the reactor core. The SRO on the refueling bridge contacted the control room and refueling operations have been halted. The refueling bridge is in the spent fuel pool with the main hoist normal up and unloaded.
I&C has determined that the refueling bridge over core limit switch broke and remained actuated.
A clearance has been hung, the limit switch has been replaced, and the clearance has been removed. WO # 2004-1465.
Annunciator F3-4-4, ROD BLOCK, is clear.
The refueling bridge is in the spent fuel pool with the main hoist normal up and unloaded.
N1-PM-SO is current.
The CRS from the previous shift has prepared a copy of Nl -ST-W3, Refueling Platform Interlocks Test, to use for the Post Maintenance Test operability testing. This copy is provided for your use.
Ask the operator for any questions.
Initiating cue:
(Operators name), evaluate the N1 -ST-W3, Refueling Platform Interlocks Test, Post Maintenance Test prepared by the CRS that you just relieved for appropriateness.
10/20/2004
Constellation Energy Group OPERATOR JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE
-L#*
Title:
Direct An Exclusion Area Evacuation Task Number:
3440240303 Revision: NRC 2004 NA EXAMINATION SECURITY Date General Supervisor Date Operations (Designee)
NA EXAMINATION SECURITY Configuration Control Date Trainer/Evaluator :
Evaluation Method: PERFORM Evaluation Location: SIMULATOR OR OTHER DESIGNATED AREA Expected Completion Time: 15 minutes Time Critical Task: NO Alternate Path Task: NO L/
Start Time:
Stop Time:
Completion Time:
JPM Overall Rating:
Pass Fail NOTE: A JPM overall rating of fail shall be given if any critical step is graded as fail. Any grade of unsat or individual competency area unsat requires a comment.
Comments:
Recommended Start Location: (Completion time based on the start location)
Simulator Set-up:
NIA Directions to the InstructorIEvaluator:
To be performed as an administrative JPM.
Directions to Operators:
Read Before Every JPM Performance:
For the performance of this JPM, I will function as the SM, CSO, and Auxiliary Operators. Prior to providing direction to perform this task, I will provide you with the initial conditions and answer any questions. During task performance, I will identify the steps to be simulated, or discuss and provide cues as necessary.
Read Before Each Evaluated JPM Performance:
This evaluated JPM is a measure of your ability to perform ths task independently. The Control Room Supervisor has determined that a verifier is not available and that additional I concurrent verification will not be provided; therefore it should not be requested.
Read Before Each Training JPM Performance:
During this Training JPM, applicable methods of verification are expected to be used. Therefore, either another individual or I will act as the additional I concurrent verifier.
Notes to Instructor / Evaluator:
- 1.
- 2.
During Evaluated JPM:
- 3.
During Training JPM:
Critical steps are identified as Pass/Fail. All steps are sequenced critical unless denoted by a 0.
0 Self-verification shall be demonstrated.
Self-verification shall be demonstrated.
No other verification shall be demonstrated.
References:
- 1.
- 2.
- 3.
- 4.
- 5.
EPIP-EPP-OK; Section 3.1, and Attachment 1.
EPIP-EPP-18; Attachment 1 Figure 1, and Attachment 2.
EPIP-EPP-08; Attachment 1 Figure 1.5.
KIA 2.3.10 (3.3) Ability to perform procedures to reduce excessive levels of radiation and guard against personnel exposure.
WA 2.4.40 (4.0) Knowledge of the SROs responsibilities in emergency plan implementation.
Tools and Equipment:
- 1. None.
Task Standard: Directs an Exclusion Area Evacuation to the east and then south which includes contacting security to open the east gate on lake road (normally closed and locked) so personnel can be evacuated using the Fitzpatrick access road and enters applicable information on emergency announcement check sheet.
L--
10120104
Initial Conditions:
- 1.
- 2.
- 3.
- 4.
A Site Area Emergency has been declared on Unit 1 due to release rates.
A release is in progress.
Wind direction is from 45 degrees. No lake breeze.
Ask the operator for any questions.
Initiating cue:
(Operators name), determine and direct the applicable EVACUATION including completion of the applicable emergency announcement form. It is not necessary to address ACCOUNTABILITY for completion of this task
- 1. Provide repeat back of initiating cue.
Evaluator Acknowledge repeat back providing correction if necessary RECORD START TIME
- 2.
- Obtain a copy of the reference procedure and reviewlutilize the correct section.
- 3. *Determines plume direction.
- 4.
- Deteimines evacuation is safe.
Proper communications used for repeat back (GAP-OPS-0 1)
Rejkrence EPIP-EPP-IS Attachment I Figure I, to determine type of evacuation.
Determines plume direction from 45 degrees (bused on wind direction) und the following ERPAs are afected: 1,2,3,5,6,10,11,26,27.
Determines evacuution to EAST through the norinally locked security gute on Lake Roud (to Fitzpatrick acceam road) is SAFE.
Determines evacuution to WEST through the normal Lake Roadplant access is UNSAFE.
Determines EPIP-EPP-OX, EXCLUSION AREA EVACUATION, is required.
NRC SRO ADMIN JPM 3 SatNnsat Sat/Unsat Pass/Fail Pass/Fail Pass/Fail Pass/Fail 3
10/20/04
- 5. *Obtain a copy of the reference procedure and reviewhtilize the correct section.
NOTE: There is no procedure guidance to direct security to open the EAST gate.
The SRO candidate must make this determination based on determining an evacuation to the EAST is safe.
- 6. *Determine route of travel information to the Offsite Assembly Area based on plume direction.
Obtains PIP-EPP-O5C.
- Section 3. I and 3. I. 1. a referenced
- Attachment 2 rejerenced.
Directs security to open the EAST gate on Lake Road in support of the EXCLUSION AREA EVACUATIOiV.
NOTE: Trrnd routes w e liighlightd and w e provided us un attachment lo this JPM Rejerences EPIP-EPP-OSC, Attachment 2, and determines the evacuation route(s) as:
Lake Roud to the east to Rte. 29 south Nine Mile Point Road south.
THEN Rte. I east.
THEN Rte. 6 south THEN Rte. 45 west.
THEN Silk Road south.
THEN Howard Road west to the NMPC Service Area ojjsite asseinbly area.
OR Mcy determine a dijyerent assembly location and ifso the location must be outside the ufected ERPAs to be acceptable.
NOTE: This alternate assembly location would normally be coordinated with the county representatives in the EOF.
Sat/Unsat I PassIFail PassLFail 4
10/20/04
PR0,2.lt-7 Dimct tlw perfimiiet. to conipiete EPIP-EPP-18, Attachnwtit 2. purl 3 und Part 8 (at n ininmiurn)
Direct announcenient per EPIP-EPP-18, spec$cully
- Purr 2 checks bozitzd evacuation alatm
- Part 3 checks Site Area Emergency and
- Part 8 checks a and I
- Part 8 checks b and add.7 SPECIFIC oDnect an announcement per EPIP-EPP-1 8 ensuring route of travel lnformatloll included as appropriate.
SatNnsat adds due to elevated release rates ROUTE TO E VACUATE STARTING WITH E VACUA TE TO THE EAST (See step 6 above for spec@ route)
End of JPM TERMINATING CUE: Directs an Exclusion Area Evacuation to the east and then south which includes contacting security to open the east gate on lake road (normally closed and locked) so personnel can be evacuated using the Fitzpatrick access road and enters applicable information on emergency announcement check sheet.
RECORD STOP TIME NRC SRO ADMIN JPM 3
Initial Conditions:
- 1. A Site Area Emergency has been declared on Unit 1 due to release rates.
- 2. A release is in progress.
- 3. Wind direction is from 45 degrees.
- 4. NO lake breeze.
- 5. Ask the operator for any questions.
Initiating cue:
(Operators name), determine and direct the applicable EVACUATION including completion of the applicable emergency announcement form. It is not necessary to address ACCOUNTABLITY for completion of this task NRC SRO ADMIN JPM 3 6
1 OI20l04
ATTACHMENT 2:
EVACUATION ROUTES 6291 1 This map shows all possible routes to the Offsite Assembly Area, located at the Howard Road NMPC service area.
During an Exdusion Area Evacuation, att personnel adhere to instrudons provided as to which route to travel.
Fulton, NY Ofbite Assembly Area NMPC Votney Service Center Howard Rd.
Volney, NY I
Response to the Offsite Assembly Area is required to ensure accountability, and to reduce the possible spread of contamination.
I.
Page 12 EPIP-EPP-05C Rev 01
5-ATTACHMENT 1:
INITIAL DOSE ASSESSMENT AND PROTECTIVE ACTIONS Sheet 4 of 4 FIGURE 1.5 - ERPA Map 28 29 e
.-e-- - -.
5 a
26 27 0-C
?
Emergency Response Planning Areas (ERPA)
.with 2003 Population Estimates Page 11 EPIP-EPP-08 Rev 15
ATTACHMENT I:
FIGURE 1 EVACUATION/ACCOUNTABlLlTY FLOWCHART classification of the NOTE:
IF evacuation is being directed due to a hazmat event affecting the owner controlled area, THEN implement an exclusion area evacuation OR move people as far away from the hazmat area as possible.
I Yes Y
/Emergency Classified,
/ \\
I Implement I
EPIP-EPP-O5C t
i Exclusion Area safe to do7
~
~
Evacuation
~
Implement b
EPIP-EPP-OSD %
Accountability I
/ d h e E m e r g e n i.
Classified as aSite
\\Area Ernergency7,-,
\\
/
~- -
EPIP-EPP-O5C Exclusion Area Implement Accountability b
EPIP-EPP-OSD, A
J No I ++
++
~
I No
/
Implement EPIP-EPP-05B Protected Area Evacuation Implement b
EPIP-EPP-05D 2 IAW EPIP-EPP-ia AND EPIP-EPP-23 Accountability
?
No 1
EPIP-EPP-O5B Protected Area Evacuation lsthe \\,
Yes b EPIP-EPP-O5D Accountability No No
/
No Evacuation i
~~
~
/
evacuation
- -No
\\
/ Is
\\
~
1 I
__ --No-----
10/20/04
AlTACHMENT 2 Date EMERGENCY ANNOUNCEMENT Time:
NSTRUCTIONS: (check boxes to select appropriate announcement)
I.
Place GAltronics in Merge.
!. Sound the APPROPRIATE alarm:
0 Station alarm for 10 seconds.
H Evacuation Alarm for 10 seconds. (When any evacuation is being ordered)
- 1.
Announce only those items checked:
- a.
Yttention. Attention all personnel. This (is a drill) or (this is an actual emergency)
Nine Mile Point Unit ( I or 2) is experiencing" 0 "An Unusual Event due to 17 "An Alert emergency condition due to w "A Site Area Emergency due to 0 "A General Emergency due to If this is the first announcement for an Alert or higher, then always add "All Emergency Response Organization personnel are to report to their Emergency Response Facilities and card in.
11 11 elevated release rates with a release in proqress.
11 I
- b.
- 4. For A Credible Insider Security Threat, ADD (Only do once)
- a.
Secure all non-essential activities in vital areas, the two person line of sight vital area access rules are now in effect.
0 a.
'2ln evacuation of:
is being ordered due to:
All personnel are to leave the (Unit 1/2)
(area) staying clear of and reporf to 11
- 6.
FOR ACCOUNTABILITY WITHOUT EVACUATION, ADD (only use with 4 above and only once.)
if evacuation unsafe 0 a.
- 7.
FOR A PROTECTED AREA EVACUATION, ADD (Only do once) 0 a.
'2lccountability is being performed in the Protected Area. All personnel shall report to an onsite assembly area, card in and remain in the area until further notice. 'I "All personnel not assigned emergency response duties shall evacuate the Protected Area.
Personnel who entered the site at Unit I should exit via the Unit I security building and report to the Nuclear Learning Center. Personnel who entered the site at Unit 2 should exit via the Unit 2 securitj building and report to the P-Building. Personnel shall remain at these locations until further notice".
CONTINUED NEXT PAGE-----
10/20/04
ATTACHMENT 2 EMERGENCY ANNOUNCEMENT 0 a.
"Personnel in protective clothing should" (se
- 9 and#10 0 1.
Yeave the area removing PCs as b 0 2.
Yeave the area immediately and 0.
are optional access control point.
IF APPROPRIATE, ADD: (Only do once)
IO.
- 3. FOR AN EXCLUSION AREA EVACUATION, ADD (Only do once)
- a.
'All personnel not assigned emergency response duties shall evacuate the Nine Mile w 1.
"Offsite Assembly Area located on Howard Road in Volney (or provide other Point Exclusion Area immediately and report to:" (select appropriate)
- j.
assistance at the location as appropiatel - ~~,
~
Maps may be obtained from security as you exit. ' I MAY PROVIDE ALTERNX~E ~FFSITE ASSEMBLY LOCATION.
OR -
n 2.
"Home"
- b.
IF NECESSARY ADD: (If radioactive release is in progress, then obtain plume direction from Chem Tech and check appropriate box below) 0 Personnel are to leave the area heading west towards Oswego then turn south.
n
- 9. IF APPROPRIATE, ADD: (Only do once)
- 11.
Always add 0 "I repeat this is a drill. ' I "I repeat this is an actual emergency. 'I
- 12.
- 13.
- 14.
Repeat the alarm and announcement so that it is made 2 (two) times.
Leave GAltronics in merge mode for the duration of the event.
Upon completion return this attachment to the EP Dept.
10/20/04
Constellation Energy Group OPERATOR JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE
Title:
Task Number:
3440390303 Classify Emergency Event for Scenario / Complete Notification Fact Sheet
--/
Revision: NRC 2004 NA EXAMINATION SECURITY General Supervisor Date Operations (Designee)
NA EXAMINATION SECURITY Configuration Control Date Performer:
(SRO)
Trainer/Evaluator :
Evaluation Method: PERFORM Evaluation Location: SIMULATOR FOLLOWING SCENARIO AS SRO Expected Completion Time: 15 minutes Time Critical Task: YES Alternate Path Task: NO Start Time:
Stop Time:
Completion Time:
JPM Overall Rating:
Pass Fail
".V NOTE: A JPM overall rating of fail shall be given if any critical step is graded as fail. Any grade of unsat or individual competency area unsat requires a comment.
Comments:
Evaluator Signature:
Date:
10/20/04
Recommended Start Location: (Completion time based on the start location)
Simulator Set-up:
NIA Directions to the InstructorIEvaluator:
At the end of the scenario, have the candidates provide the highest emergency classification achieved during the scenario. This notification part of this Admin JPM will be performed when all SROs receive their admin JPMs. Each will be provided the same EAL information for which to complete the notification form.
Directions to Operators:
Read Before Every JPM Performance:
For the performance of this JPM, I will function as the SM, CSO, and Auxiliary Operators. Prior to providing direction to perform this task, I will provide you with the initial conditions and answer any questions. During task performance, I will identify the steps to be simulated, or discuss and provide cues as necessary.
Read Before Each Evaluated JPM Performance:
This evaluated JPM is a measure of your ability to perform this task independently. The Control Room Supervisor has determined that a verifier is not available and that additional I concurrent verification will not be provided; therefore it should not be requested.
Read Before Each Training JPM Performance:
During this Training JPM, applicable methods of verification are expected to be used. Therefore, either another individual or I will act as the additional I concurrent verifier.
Notes to Instructor I Evaluator:
- 1.
- 2.
During Evaluated JPM:
- 3.
During Training JPM:
Critical steps are identified as Pass/Fail. All steps are sequenced critical unless denoted by a 0.
0 Self-verification shall be demonstrated.
Self-verification shall be demonstrated.
0 No other verification shall be demonstrated.
References:
- 1. EPIP-EPP-0 1 ; EPIP-EPP-0 1 -EAL.
- 2.
- 3.
- 4.
EPIP-EPP-20; 3.1 and Attachment 1A.
WA 2.4.41 (4.1) Knowledge of the emergency action level thresholds and classifications.
WA 2.4.43 (3.5) Knowledge of emergency communication systems and techniques.
Tools and Equipment:
- 1. Simulator at the completion of a scenario.
Task Standard: Appropriate emergency event EAL made based on the scenario being evaluated (SCENARIO #1, SCENARIO #2, SCENARIO #3, or SCENARIO #4) and Notification Fact Sheet completed for transmittal for a EAL provided by the examiner.
10120104
Initial Conditions:
- 1.
- 2.
- 1. Meteorological data:
You have just declared a site area emergency based on EAL 2.2.2.
Time of shutdown is thirty (30) minutes prior to event classification time.
Wind speed from 30 level = 8.0 mph; 200 level = 9.0 mph Wind direction from 30 level = 95 degrees; 200 level = 95 degrees Stability class from 200 level = F
- 3.
- 4.
- 5.
- 6.
This JPM is a time critical. You have 15 minutes to complete the assigned task.
Your event classification time will be when you acknowledge the initiating cue provided by the examiner.
Your time begins when you acknowledge the initiating cue provided by the examiner.
Ask the operator for any questions.
Initiating cue:
(Operators name), complete a notification fact sheet for transmittal.
I Comments Grade I Performance Steps I Standard
- 1. Provide repeat back of initiating cue.
Evaluator Acknowledge repeat back providing correction if necessary Proper communications used for repeat back SatKJnsat (GAP-OPS-0 1)
I I
RECORD START TIME
- 2.
- Obtain a copy of the reference procedure and reviewhtilize the correct section.
- 3. Continually monitor and evaluate plant conditions to determine if one or more EAL thresholds in the EAL Matrix have been met or exceeded.
EPIP-EPP-01 EAL obtuined.
- EAL Mutrix referenced.
d SatNnsat EPIP-EPP-20 obtained.
SatNnsat
- Attachnwnt 1A referenced.
Classifies the event and provides the related EAL provided with the scenario.
Pass/Fail NRC SRO ADMIN JPM 4 3
10/20/04
i
- 4.
Complete Part I Notification Fact Notrfication Fact Sheet obtained Sheet using the instructions on the back of the form as follows.
NOlE: Sample Notification Fact Sheet for each sceiiario is attached.
- a. *Item 2
- b. *Item 3
- c. *Item 4
- d. *Item 5
- e. *Item 6
- f. *Item7
- g. *Item 8
- h. *Item 9:
- i. *Item 10 2A ciscled 3 0 circled.
4D circled.
Enters todays date nnd time of declaration of emergency.
6a circled Determines no PARS becuuse general emergency not achieved.
7A circled As a miniman, EA L f f identijied in the B(3X.
9A E 9B circled.
9D circled.
I OB circled.
Dute and time entered.
Sat/Unsat Pass/Fail Pass/Fail Pass/Fail Pass/Fail d Passmail I Passmail PassFai1 fl SatAJnsat Sat/Unsat Sat/Unsat NRC SRO ADMIN JPM 4 4
L c)
E c) 4
Initial Conditions:
- 1.
- 2.
- 3.
- 1.
- 2.
- 4.
- 5.
- 6.
- 7.
4 You have just declared a site area emergency based on EAL 2.2.2.
Time of shutdown is thirty (30) minutes prior to event classification time.
Meteorological data: Wind speed from 30 level = 8.0 mph; 200 level = 9.0 mph Wind direction from 30 level = 95 degrees; 200 level = 95 degrees Stability class from 200 level = F This JPM is a time critical. You have 15 minutes to complete the assigned task.
Your event classification time will be when you acknowledge the initiating cue provided by the examiner.
Your time begins when you acknowledge the initiating cue provided by the examiner.
Ask the operator for any questions.
Initiating cue:
(Operators name), complete a notification fact sheet for transmittal.
10/20/04
NOTIFICATION No.
0 NEW YORK STATE WARNING POINT PART 1 - GENERAL INFORMATION (Read step number, and information, example: "number I, This message...)
0 OSWEGO COUNTY 0 JA FITZPATRICK UNAFFECTED 9MP WARNING POINT WARNING POINT UNIT
- 1. This message is being transmitted on:
(Date) at (Time)
NOTIFICATION No.
VIA:A. RECS B. Other 0 NEW YORK STATE 0 OSWEGO COUNTY JA FITZPATRICK UNAFFECTED gMP WARNING POINT WARNING POINT WARNING POINT UNIT
~~
- 2.
This is:
3 The facility providing this information is:
- 4.
The Emergency Classification is, A. Unusual Event E Emergency F. Recovery NOT an Exercise 8. An Exercise E Nine Mile Point Unit 2 F. J.A. Fitzpatrick Terminated B. Alert D. General Emergency G. Transportation Incident
~~
- 5.
This Emergency Classification declared on:
Release below federally approved operating limits (Technlcal Specrf/cations) 0 To Atmosphere TO water C. Release above federally approved operating limits (Technical Specifications) 0 To Atmosphere 0 TO water D. Unmonitored release requiring evaluation
- 7.
The following Protective Actions are recommended to be implemented as soon as practical.
B EVACUATE and implement the KI Plan for the following W A S and SHELTERall remaining ERPAs:
@ No need for Protective Actions outside the site boundary 1
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 9 10 1 1 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29
10/20/04