ML050260630
| ML050260630 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Nine Mile Point  |
| Issue date: | 09/09/2004 |
| From: | Evans T Constellation Energy Group |
| To: | Collins S NRC/RGN-I/DRS/OSB |
| Conte R | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML041450453 | List: |
| References | |
| NMP-97991 | |
| Download: ML050260630 (55) | |
Text
Constellation Energyo Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station P.O. Box 63 Lycoming, NY 13093 NMP-9799 1 September 9,2004 Mr. Samuel J. Collins Regional Administrator USNRC Region I 475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19406 - 1415 ATTENTION: Mr. John G. Caruso, Senior Examiner/Lnspector
SUBJECT:
NINE MILE POINT UNIT 1 INITIAL OPERATOR EXAMINATION SUBMITTAL
Dear Mr. Collins:
In response to the NRC Letter of June 17,2004 entitled SENIOR REACTOR AND REACTOR 1, arrangements have been made for the administration of licensing examinations at Nine Mile Point, Unit 1 during the week of 1 November 2004. The examinations have been prepared based on the guidelines in Revision 9 of NUREG 1021, "Operator Licensing Examination Standards for Power Reactors." To meet the examination schedule, Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station was requested to furnish the examinations by September 10,2004.
OPERATOR INITIAL EXAMINATIONS - NINE MILE POINT NUCLEAR STATION, UNIT Enclosed are the written examinations, operating tests and supporting reference materials for the Reactor Operators and Senior Reactor Operators. The enclosed materials have been approved for use by NMP in accordance with 10CFR55.40(b)(3).
Please withhold this examination material from public disclosure until after the examinations have been completed.
If you have any questions regarding the submittal, please contact Gregg Pitts (General Supervisor Operations Training) at 3 15-349-1864, or Michael Jaquin (Initial Operations Training Supervisor) at 3 15-349-1 508.
TAE/crr Enc.
ES-301 Administrative Topics Outline Form ES-301-1 Facility: NINE MILE POINT 1 Date of Examination: 11/1/2004 Examination Level (circle one): RO Operating Test Number: NRC-01 Ad mi n ist rat ive Topic Conduct of 0 perat ions Equipment Control Radiation Control Emergency Plan Describe activity to be performed:
ACTIONS FOR DEFEATED ANNUNCIATORS TO INCLUDE DETERMINING AND APPLYING APPROPRIATE STICKERS.
Make entries for defeated annunciators into defeated annunciator log including posting the appropriate yellow and/or red stickers.
- 2. I. I (3.7) Knowledge of conduct of operations requirements.
2.1.18 (2.9) Ability to make accurate /clear and concise logs /
records /status boards /and reports.
GAP-OPS-01; 3.10.7 and Attachment I VERIFICATION OF ELECTRONIC CLEARANCE.
Evaluate electronic clearance sheets for correctness and personnel protection requirements including verification of tags for accuracy and their correct use.
2.2.13 (3.6) Knowledge of tagging and clearance procedures.
2.7.24 (2.8) Ability to obtain and interpret station electrical and mechanical drawings.
GAP-OPS-02; 3.11 RADIOLOGICAL REQUIREENTS RELATED TO OPERATOR INSPECTION OF RAD AND HIGH RAD AREAS.
Given conditions related to an area to be inspected, radiological conditions in the area as shown on a survey map, and other applicable conditions, ensure the appropriate radiological aspects of the job are met prior to performance of the inspection.
2,3. IO (2.9) Ability to perform procedures to reduce excessive IeveIs of radiation and guard against personnel exposure.
GAP-RPP-07; 3.5, 3.6, 3.7, GAP-RPP-02; 3.7, 3,3, GAP-RPP-08; 3.2, 3.3, NI-PM-Mli; 6.0, 8.0 ACTIONS FOR EXTERNAL SECURITY THREATS.
Given plant conditions, respond to a security threat including actions per SOP-33, External Security Threats, and EPIP-EPP-I O, Security Contingency Event, including Attachment 2, Security Contingency Event (CSO Checklist) 2.4.12 (3.4) Knowledge of general operating crew responsibilities during emergency operations.
2.4.39 (3.3) Kt7owledge of the RO responsibilities in emergency plan implementation.
SOP-33 and PIP-EPP-IO; Attachment 2 NOTE: All items (5 total) are required for SROs. RO applicants require only 4 items unless they are retaking only the administrative topics, when 5 are required.
Page 1 of 3 NUREG 1021, Draft Revision 9
ES-301 Administrative Topics Ou t h e Form ES-301-1 Facility: NINE MILE POINT I Date of Examination: 11/1/2004 Examination Level (circle one): SRO Operating Test Number: NRC-01 Administrative Topic Conduct of Operations Conduct of Operations E q u i pme n t Con t ro I Describe activity to be performed:
PERFORM PLANT IMPACT REVIEW FOR A DER.
SRO will be required to perform several actions in response to a
- 2.
I. 7 (3,8) Knowledge of conduct of operations requirements.
2.4.30 (3.6) Knowledge of which events related to system operafions/sfatus should be reported to outside agencies.
DER-NM-2004-1428, I I Containment H202 System Removed From Service NIP-ECA-01; 3.2, and Attachment 2.
DER review including recognition that the event is reportable. /
~
EVALUATE PLANT CHEMISTRY REPORT AND RESPOND.
Review plant daily status report, which includes plant chem>istry, specification reactor coolant chemistry parameters.
- 2. I. 25 (3. I ) Ability to obtain and interpret station reference materials such as graphs /monographs / and tables which contain performance data.
2.1.34 (2.9) A bility to maintain the primary and secondary plant chemistry within allowable limits.
DER-NM-2004-958, Exceed GAP-CHE-07 Action Level I Threshold for Sulfates GAP-CHE-07; 3.2; Enclosure I identify and determine required actions in response to out-df-J DETERMINE POST WINTENANCE TEST REQUIREMENTS FOR REFUELING EQUIPMENT.
Given conditions related to a failure of the refueling interlocks during refueling (over-core limit switch failure), the SRO will be required to determine post-maintenance test requirements and implement those requirements by indicating the procedure to be used and the steps that must be petformed to demonstrate operability.
2.2.21 (3.5) Knowledge of pre and post maintenance operability requirements.
2.2.26 (3.7) Knowledge of refueling administrative requirements.
GAP-SAT-02; 3.1, Attachments I and 2 CIRCUIT BREAKER FAILURE. Cause was inadequade post maintenance testing. Contributing factors included lack of compliance with admin procedures.
J LER 2002-002. LOSS OF ONE CRD P U W TRAIN DUE TO Page 2 of 3 NUREG 1021, Draft Revision 9
Ad mi n istrat ive To Dics Outline Form ES-301-1 ES-301 Facility: NINE MILE POINT I Date of Examination: ~1/1/2004 Examination Level (circle one): SRO Operating Test Number: NRC-07 Ad mi n ist rative Topic Radiation Control Emergency Plan Describe activity to be performed:
DIRECT EXCLUSION AREA EVACUATION IN RESPONSE TO SITE AREA EMERGENCY WITH A RELEASE IN PROGRESS.
Given plant conditions and a required exclusion area evacuation, direct the appropriate actions per EPIP-EPP-OSC.
2.3.10 (3.3) Ability io perform procedures to reduce excessive levels of radiation and guard against personnel exposure.
2.4.40 (4.0) Knowledge of the SROs responsibilities in emergency plan implementaiion.
PIP-EPP-OX; Section 3.7, Attachment 7 CLASSIFY EMERGENCY EVENTS FOR SCENARIO (EAL)
AND COMPLETE NOTIFICATION FACT SHEET (PART 7).
Classify emergency events based on plant conditions during the simulator scenario in which the candidate is the SRO and complete the notification fact sheet (Part 1 only) for transmittal within a specified period of time (TIME CRITICAL to ensure information can be transmitted within 15 minutes).
2.4.4 1 (4. 1) Knowledge of the emergency action level thresholds and classifications.
2.4.43 (3.5) Knowledge of emergency con-rmunication systems and techniques.
PlP-EPP-ZO; 3.7 and Attachment I A EPlP-EPP-07; EPIP-EPP-01-EAL; NOTE: All items (5 total) are required for SROs. RO applicants require only 4 items unless they are retaking only the administrative topics, when 5 are required.
t Page 3 of 3 NUREG 1021, Draft Revision 9
Constellation Energy Group OPERATOR JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE
Title:
Actions for defeated Annunciators Task Number:
2990090301 Revision: NRC 2004 NA EXAMINATION SECURITY General Supervisor Date Operations Training (Designee)
Operations (Designee)
NA EXAMINATION SECURITY Configuration Control Date Performer:
(RO)
TrainerIEvaluator:
Evaluation Method: PERFORM Evaluation Location: SIMULATOR Expected Completion Time: 10 minutes Time Critical Task: NO Alternate Path Task: NO Start Time:
Stop Time:
Completion Time:
JPM Overall Rating:
Pass Fail NOTE: A JPM overall rating of fail shall be given if any critical step is graded as fail. Any grade of unsat or individual competency area unsat requires a comment.
Comments:
Evaluator Signature:
Date:
09108f 04
Recommended Start Location: (Completion time based on the start location)
N/A
-, Simulator Set-up:
NIA Directions to the InstructorIEvaluator:
Simulator available for use to post defeated annunciator sticker(s)
Directions to Operators:
Read Before Every JPM Performance:
For the performance of this JPM, I will function as the SM, CSO, and Auxiliary Operators. Prior to providing direction to perfoim this task, I will provide you with the initial conditions and answer any questions. During task performance, I will identify the steps to be simulated, or discuss and provide cues as necessary.
Read Before Each Evaluated JPM Performance:
This evaluated JPM is a measure of your ability to perform this task independently. The Control Room Supervisor has determined that a verifier is not available and that additional / concurrent verification will not be provided; therefore it should not be requested.
Read Before Each Training JPM Performance:
During this Training JPM, applicable methods of verification are expected to be used. Therefore, either another individual or I will act as the additional / concurrent verifier.
Notes to Instructor / Evaluator:
- 1.
- 2.
During Evaluated JPM:
- 3.
During Training JPM:
L./
Critical steps are identified as Pass/Fail. All steps are sequenced critical unless denoted by a 0.
0 Self-verification shall be demonstrated.
Self-verification shall be demonstrated.
0 No other verification shall be demonstrated.
References:
- 1.
- 2.
- 3.
- 4.
- 5.
GAP-OPS-01; 3.10.7, and Attachment 1 WA 2.1.1 (3.7) Knowledge of conduct of operations requirements.
WA 2.1.14 (2.5) Knowledge of system status criteria which require the notification of plant personnel.
WA 2.1.18 (2.9) Ability to make accurate / clear and concise logs / records I status boards I and reports.
WA 2.1.24 (2.8) Ability to obtain and interpret station electrical and mechanical drawings.
Tools and Equipment:
- 1. YELLOW Defeated Annunciator stickers
- 2. RED Defeated Annunciator stickers.
Task Standard: Correctly labeled and correct color sticker for the clearance WO403 and correct entries made into the defeated annuncialor log. Refer to Attachment I for. properly completed defealed annunciator, NRC RO ADMIN JPM 1 2
09/08/04
Initial Conditions:
- 1. You are the (30.
- 2.
- 3.
- 4.
The clearance has been hung and includes the defeat of annuciator inputs.
There are currently no defeated annunciators.
Ask the operator for any questions.
Initiating cue:
(Operators name), perform the applicable actions for the defeated annunciator inputs.
c
- 1. Provide repeat back of initiating cue.
Evaluator Acknowledge repeat back providing correctioiz if necessary SatiUnsat Proper communications used for repeat back (GAP-OPS-0 1)
I RECORD START TIME
- 2.
- Obtain a copy of the reference procedure and reviewlutilize the coli-cct section.
GAP-OPS-0 1 obtained.
Section 3.10.7 referenced.
- referenced. r SatKJnsat NRC RO ADMIN JPM 1 3
09/08/04
- 3. Correctly identifies the defeated annunciators:
- a. A transparent yellow sticker shall be used to indicate one or more multiple inputs have been defeated NOTE: circle the work order evaluated.
Determines yellow sticker is uppropriute and uses a yellow sticker (JVO403). 1 Pass/Fail/NA Prompt: You Iw*e entered datu oil the appropriate sticker iiitil the sticker lras bee11 lipplied to the ntimunciutor.
- c.
Document number authorizing the defeated annunciator and associated computer point(s) identified on the yellow sticker.
- 4. Ensure annunciators defeated by a clearance are entered in the Defeated Annunciator Log.
- a. Complete Item 1 Unit Number.
Enter affected unit (1 or 2).
Enters the clearance nzrinber and defeated computer points on the yellow sticker (W0403).
Obtains a copy of GAP-OPS-0 1, Attachment 1, DEFEATED ANNUNCIATOR LOG.
SatKJnsat NO'I'f;: Sample defcatcci atinuciator log for each assignment provided at cnd of JPR/I.
Enter-s I.
Pass/Fail f l
09/08/04
- b.
Complete Item 2. Annunciator Window Number: Enter affected annunciator window designation and defeated computer points.
Enters defeated anniinciutor L I - I - I urd coniputer point B048.
Pass/Fail
- c.
Complete Item 3. Controlling Document: Enter control document for defeating the annunciator.
- d.
Complete Item 4. Reason for Defeating: Enter brief description of why the annunciator is defeated.
Prompt: Sib1 will conipleie item 5.
- e.
.Item 5. Compensatory Action(s) - SM Init/Date: The SM shall enter identified compensatory measures resulting from defeat of annunciators including a brief description of actions applied and shall initial the entry.
- f.
- Item 6. Defeated - CSO Init/Date: CSO initials and date indicate the annunciator has been temporarily defeated.
Enters clenrance number.
Pass/Fail Enters reason,for defeat: PREVENT Pass/Fail MASKING OF ALARM FOR 112 FAN.
Identified itan 5 to be conipeted by the SM Sea step,,for recomniended conipensator)>
uctions.
Sat/Unsat Enters indials and date.
Pass/Fail NRC RO ADMIN JPM 1 5
09/08/04
tire uppropriofe sfir1,et iiiiil flw sticker hirs been ry~plied to fife mrzunciaior.
- g.
.Item 7. Sticker On - CSO Initmate: CSO initials and date indicate the application of a sticker to the annunciator window tile.
Enters initiu1.r and date.
- h.
.Item 8. Restored - CSO InitiDate:
Determines not upplicuble until after annunciator is no longer defeated.
- i.
.Item 9. Sticker Off - CSO InitiDate:
Determines not applicable until ufter annunciator is no longer defeated.
- j.
.Item 10. Restored - SM InitDate:
Detern? inss not upplicuhle until after annunciutor is no longer defeated.
Sat/Unsat E Sat/Unsat x Sat/Unsat End of JPM TERMINATING CUE: Defeated annunciator sticker posted and defeated annunciator log entries made.
RECORD STOP TIME NRC RO ADMIN JPM 1 6
09/08/04
Initial Conditions for clearance W0403:
~i-, 1. You are the CSO.
- 2. The clearance has been hung and includes the defeat of annuciator inputs.
Specifically:
Relay 2H6 and Relay 2L7 are pulled for ANN Ll-1-1.
- 3. There are currently no defeated annunciators.
- 4. Ask the operator for any questions.
Initiating cue:
(Operators name), perform the applicable actions for the defeated annunciator inputs.
09/08/04
r=il Yellow sticker Prevent NRC RO ADMIN JPM 1 8
blank 09/08/04
Constellation Energy Group OPERATOR JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE
Title:
Verification of an Electronic Clearance Revision: NRC 2004
\\-
Task Number:
2999020305 n
Approvals:
NA EXAMINATION SECURITY General Supervisor Date Operations Training (Designee)
Operations (Designee)
NA EXAMINATION SECUHTY Configuration Control Date Performer:
(RO)
TrainedEvaluator:
Evaluation Method: Perform Evaluation Location: Admill JPM can be performed in Simulator or other designated location.
Expected Completion Time: 10 minutes Start Time:
Stop Time:
Completion Time:
JPM Overall Rating:
Pass Fail Time Critical Task: NO Alternate Path Task: NO L,
NOTE: A JPM overall rating of fail shall be given if any critical step is graded as fail. Any grade of unsat or individual competency area unsat requires a comment.
Comments:
Evaluator Signature:
Date:
9/8/2004
Recommended Start Location: (Completion time based on the start location)
Simulator or other designated area with required references available.
L Simulator Set-up:
NIA Directions to the Instructor/Evaluator:
None.
Directions to Operators:
Read Before Evely JPM Performance:
For the performance of this JPM, I will function as the SM, CSO, and Auxiliary Operators. Prior to providing direction to perform this task, I will provide you with the initial conditions and answer any questions. During task performance, I will identify the steps to be simulated, or discuss and provide cues as necessary.
Read Before Each Evaluated JPM Performance:
This evaluated JPM is a measure of your ability to perform this task independently. The Control Room Supervisor has determined that a verifier is not available and that additional / concurrent verification will not be provided; therefore it should not be requested.
Read Before Each Training JPM Performance:
During this Training JPM, applicable methods of verification are expected to be used. Therefore, either another individual or I will act as the additional I concurrent verifier.
Notes to Instructor / Evaluator:
- 1.
- 2.
During Evaluated JPM:
- 3.
During Training JPM:
L, Critical steps are identified as PasdFail. All steps are sequenced critical unless denoted by a 0 0
Self-verification shall be demonstrated.
Self-verification shall be demonstrated.
No other verification shall be demonstrated.
References:
- 1. GAP-OPS-02; 3.11.
- 2.
Nl-ST-M4A; 8.1.3.a.
- 4. WA 2.2.13 (3.6).
- 5. WA 2.1.24 (2.8).
- 3. C-18026-C SH 1; F3, G3.
Tools and Equipment:
- 1. None Task Standard:
Clearance boundary points for EDG 102 - PREVENT START FOR HAND CRANKING verified and identifies starting air needs to be isolated and starting air pressure downstream of the isolation point needs to be removed.
9/8/2004
Initial Conditions:
i
- 1. Unit 1 is at 100% power.
- 2.
Nl-ST-M4A, Emergency Diesel Generator 102 and PB 102 Operability Test, is scheduled for performance tomorrow.
- 3. EDG 102 will be marked up for personnel protection during hand jaclung.
- 4. The EDG 102 - PREVENT START FOR HAND CRANKING clearance has been developed and a copy will be provided to you.
- 5. You have been assigned as the clearance section reviewer for verification of the clearance development,
- 6. Ask the operator for any questions. Then provide EDG 102 - PREVENT START FOR HAND CRANKING clearance to performer.
Initiating cue:
(Operators name), review and verify the adequacy of the EDG 102 - PREVENT START FOR HAND CRANKING clearance section.
- 1. Provide repeat back of initiating cue.
Evaluator Acknowledge repeat back providing correction if necessary RECORD START TIME
- 2.
- Obtain a copy of the reference procedure and reviewlutilize the correct section.
- 3. *Identify boundary points to ensure electrical energy is removed.
- 4. *Identify boundary points to ensure mechanical energy is removed.
Proper communications used for repeat back (GAP-OPS-01)
Sat/Unsat GAP-OPS-02; section 3.1 1 referenced.
Nl-ST-M4A; section 8.1.3 referenced.
C-18026-C SH 1; F3, G3.
Sat/Unsat/NA Sat/UnsatfNA Sat/Unsat/NA Confirm electrical boundary adequate.
Sat/Unsat u Determine mechanical boundary inadequate:
Air starting pressure must be isolated:
96-82 (DGA-30) BV-DG 102 STARTING AIR BEFORE FLEX CONNECTION, is to be tagged closed.
Air start pressure downstream of the isolation point must be removed:
96-83 (DGA-708) DRAIN - DG 102 AIR START STRAINER 96-76, to be tagged open.
( Sannsat )
- artiig L1 must be isolated and starting air pressure downstream of the isolation point must be removed.
Identifying the specific isolation point and how to remove the starting air pressure is not critical and therefore is measured as SaWnsat.
9/8/2004
d 0
0 hl 00 o\\.
0 d u d z
Initial Conditions:
i/
- 1. Unit 1 is at 100% power.
- 2. Nl-ST-M4A, Emergency Diesel Generator 102 and PB 102 Operability Test, is scheduled for performance tomorrow.
- 3. EDG 102 will be marked up for personnel protection during hand jacking.
- 4. The EDG 102 - PREVENT START FOR HAND CRANKING clearance has been developed and a copy will be provided to you.
- 5. You have been assigned as the clearance section reviewer for verification of the clearance development.
- 6. Ask the operator for any questions.
Initiating cue:
(Operators name), review and verify the adequacy of the EDG 102 - PREVENT START FOR HAND CRANKING clearance section.
9/8/2004
Constellation Energy Group OPERATOR JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE
Title:
Radiological Requirements Related to Operator Inspection Of High Radiation Areas Revision: NRC 2004
'V Task Number:
N/A Approvals:
Generals %e p rvisor Operations Training (Designee)
Operations (Designee)
Date
'/q/&
General NA EXAMINATION Supervisor SECURITY Date NA EXAMINATION SECURITY Configuration Control Date TrainedEvaluator :
Evaluation Method: PERFORM Evaluation Location: SIMULATOR OR OTHER DESIGNATED LOCATION Expected Completion Time: 10 minutes Time Critical Task: NO Alternate Path Task: NO Start Time:
Stop Time:
Completion Time:
JPM Overall Rating:
Pass Fail
.u NOTE: A JPM overall rating of fail shall be given if any critical step is graded as fail. Any grade of unsat or individual competency area unsat requires a comment.
Comments:
Evaluator Signature:
Date:
09/09/04
Recommended Start Location: (Completion time based on the start location)
Simulator or other designated location.
Simulator Set-up:
N/A Directions to the Instructor/Evaluator:
Several RWPs and survey maps are to be provided. The performer must select the RWP and survey maps applicable to the work.
Directions to Operators:
Read Before Every JPM Performance:
For the performance of this JPM, I will hction as the SM, CSO, and Auxiliary Operators. Prior to providing direction to perform this task, I will provide you with the initial conditions and answer any questions. During task performance, I will identify the steps to be simulated, or discuss and provide cues as necessary.
Read Before Each Evaluated JPM Performance:
This evaluated JPM is a measure of your ability to perform this task independently. The Control Room Supervisor has determined that a verifier is not available and that additional / concurrent verification will not be provided; therefore it should not be requested.
Read Before Each Training JPM Performance:
During this Training JPM, applicable methods of verification are expected to be used. Therefore, either another individual or I will act as the additional / concurrent verifier.
L-Notes to Instructor / Evaluator:
- 1.
- 2.
During Evaluated JPM:
- 3.
During Training JPM:
Critical steps are identified as PasslFail. All steps are sequenced critical unless denoted by a a.
Self-verification shall be demonstrated.
Self-verification shall be demonstrated.
No other verification shall be demonstrated.
References:
- 1. N1-PM-M5; 6.0, 8.0.
- 2.
GAP-RPP-01; 3.5.
- 3.
GAP-RPP-02; 3.3.
- 4. GAP-RPP-08; 3.2.
- 5. GAP-RPP-07; 3.2.5
- 6. WA 2.3.10 (2.9) Ability to perform procedures to reduce excessive levels of radiation and guard against personnel exposure.
Tools and Equipment:
- 1. None.
Task Standard: Radiological requirements related to the performance of N1-PM-M5 are met prior to and during the performance of the inspection.
09/08/04
/
Initial Conditions:
is scheduled for this shift.
r
- 6.
- 7.
Your current exposure is 1800 mrem TEDE.
Ask the operator for any questions.
Initiating cue:
(Operators name), you will be perfoiming NI-PM-MS, OPERATOR INSPECTION OF RAD AND HIGH RAD AREAS, for the SHUTDOWN COOLING ROOM. An RWP and survey amp are provided. Address the radiological aspects of performing this inspection.
- 1. Provide repeat back of initiating cue.
Proper communications used for repeat back Sat/Unsat (GAP-OPS-0 1)
Evaluator Acknowledge repeat back providing correction if necessary RECORD START TIME NOTE: A score card is attached to this JPM identifying the items for the performer to identify.
- 2. *Obtain a copy of the reference NI-PM-iVJ ohtained;6.0 and 8.0 referericed.
SaWnsat procedure and reviewlutilize the correct section.
CAP-RPP-01; 3.5 tvfererzced GAP-RPP-02: 3.3 referenced GAP-RPP-08; 3.2 rgferenced.
GAP-RPP-07; 3.2.5 referenced.
09/09/04
- 3. *Addresses radiological aspects of N 1 -PM-05 precautions/limitations:
- a. *Applicable radiological precautions shall be observed.
Rad Protection shall be contacted for guidance as required.
Reviews RWP /Siirwy Map:
Detcrniine rudiiologicul controls:
HIGH RADIATIOA AREA Area dose rates up to 180 mrendliour.
Notes up to 45000 ilpm/1OOcin2 oii.floor Deterni ine protective clothing:
Recognizes no PC requirements outline and must consult RP for guidmcE. s c3 Determine respiratoiy protection:
None required Determinejob coverage:
None required Deterniine entry requirements dosimetry:
Pass/Fail*
PadFail Satdunsat Satdunsat SatNnsat Pass/Fail h
Can also be identified when evaluating the survey map for the area and be considered pass.
- 4. Addresses radiological aspects of steps 8.1 through 8.3:
- c. *Obtain associated key(s) from Deiernziiie HI R-3 key is iieeded,fi-orn sndiution protection (indicclted on susvey m UP)
Sat'Unsat radiation protection.
- a. *Check the RadiatiodHigh Reviews MI-PkJ-M.5 uttuchinenl 2.
Refesences note (*)for SDC ROOM.
- Areas where contuminution inuy he Iiiniself/herselfwith the contaniinatioiz levels on the siu-vey map.
Radiation Entry Record Sheet (Attachment 2) for the areas which require inspection.
40,000 dpm/lOO e1722 and faniiliui%es m u l d not issue an X-R key if requested so not critical.
corztaminution levels.
Arerr @ is crbove ihis thrcshold so u specific R WP is reqzhd.
PassIFail NRC RO ADMIN JPM 3 5
09/08/04
Initial Conditions:
- 1. Unit 1 is operating at 100% power.
- 2. N1-PM-M5, OPERATOR INSPECTION OF RAD AND HIGH RAD AREAS, is scheduled for this shift.
- 3. You will be conducting an inspection of the SHUTDOWN COOLING ROOM.
- 4. An RWP and survey map are provided.
- 5. A WCMOSSE steam leak list has been referenced and there are no steam leaks.
- 6. Your current exposure is 1800 mrem TEDE.
7. Ask the operator for any questions.
~U Initiating cue:
(Operators name), you will be performing N1 -PM-MS, OPERATOR INSPECTION OF RAD AND HIGH RAD AREAS, for the SHUTDOWN COOLING ROOM. An RWP and survey map is provided. Address the radiological aspects of performing this inspection.
09/08/04
Answer the following when performing this task:
- 1.
Classify the area (check one):
0 Radiation Area 0 High Radiation Area 0 Locked High Radiation Area 0
Very High Radiation Area
- 2.
Designate the key to be obtained:
- 3.
1 Designate the highest dose rate in the area and the location:
- 4.
Designate the two (2) highest contamination levels in the room and the location:
I 0 Specific RWP should be requested I
- 6.
Designate whether or not protective clothing is required (check one):
0 Yes
- 8.
I Evaluate delta exposure (check one):
0 Acceptable 0
Additional amrovaKs) reauired NRC RO ADMIN JPM 3 7
09/08/04
L L
NOTE: THIS IS THE EXAMINER SCORECARD.
DO NOT PROVIDE TO THE CANDIDATE.
/High Radiation Area 0
Locked High Radiation Area NRC RO ADMIN JPM 3 8
0910 8/04
Map No.
1 RB 261' Shut-Down Cooling Room 1
25b Nine Mile Point Unit One
= Area Rad Monitor
- 9.
=VAMPNumber y = Readings in mRem/hr. p = Readings in mRad/hr.
\\%marks:
Update survey to support scaffold erection, for area 29 30 H R A
~~
Number of Smears =
10 Surveyor:
Jeff Allen Dose:
5 I Reviewed By:
All smears ~400dpm/100cm2 Pr unless noted on map.
High Noise Area 31 I Date:
I I
RWP No. 104019, Task 1 100 Rx Power I 9 I Floor I 500 I I
SHIELDING $#++
South I
I I
d No Beta Detected GIA unless otherwise noted
- 3.
= General Area Unless Noted
- 1. -
= Rope/Area Boundary 2. @ = Smear Location
- 5. A
= Neutron (mRem/hr)
- 6. iA/sl =Air Sample 7.#Large Area I
I
Page 3 of7 9/1/2004 7:10:23AM Radiation Work Permit: 1041 002 Operations Personnel Standing RWP HRA Ll' Survey Data:
Radiation Levels:
Turbine Building HRA's Reactor Building HRA's Rad Waste Buiding HRAs Off Gas Building HRA's 2 - 200mRem/hr 2 - 250mRem/hr 2 - 600mRem/hr 2 - 120mRem/hr Contamination Levels:
Airborne Levels:
~ 0. 3 DAC Specific areas as per RP briefing and / or survey maps.
<400 - 10,000 dpm/lOOcm2 Other Ops Activities TASK: 3 High Radiation Area Low Risk Activity **********
- $e*******
Dose Alarm 50 mRem Dose Rate Alarm 500 mRemlHr Backoff Dose 40 mRem Elapsed Time Alarm 780 minutes Protective Clothing Requirements:
PC Set Name - not designated
\\.-
TLD, Electronic Dosimeter Instructions:
I)
Notify RP prior to venting/draining evolutions or other system breach.
- 2) No entry above arms reach unless specifically approved by RP.
ALARA Review Number:
N/A Scanning or entering RWP and Task number signify that I have read, understand and will comply with the RWP
Constellation Energy Group OPERATOR JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE u
Title:
Plant Impact Review for a DER Task Number:
3420160303 Revision: NRC 2004 P
EXAMINATION SECURITY General Subekisor Date General Supervisor Date Operations Training (Designee)
Operations (Designee)
NA EXAMINATION SECURITY Configuration Control Date TrainedEvaluator:
Evaluation Method: PERFORM Evaluation Location: SIMULATOR OR OTHER DESIGNATED LOCATION Expected Completion Time: 15 minutes Time Critical Task: NO Alternate Path Task: NO
\\W Start Time:
Stop Time:
Completion Time:
JPM Overall Rating:
Pass Fail NOTE: A JPM overall rating of fail shall be given if any critical step is graded as fail. Any grade of unsat or individual competency area unsat requires a comment.
Comments:
Evaluator Signature:
Date:
09/08/04
Recommended Start Location: (Completion time based on the start location)
Simulator Set-up:
N/A Directions to the InstructodEvaluator:
None Directions to Operators:
Read Before Every JPM Performance:
For the performance of this JPM, I will function as the SM, CSO, and Auxiliary Operators. Prior to providing direction to perform this task, I will provide you with the initial conditions and answer any questions. During task performance, I will identify the steps to be simulated, or discuss and provide cues as necessary.
Read Before Each Evaluated JPM Performance:
This evaluated JPM is a measure of your ability to perform this task independently. The Control Room Supervisor has determined that a verifier is not available and that additional / concurrent verification will not be provided; therefore it should not be requested.
Read Before Each Training JPM Performance:
During this Training JPM, applicable methods of verification are expected to be used. Therefore, either another individual or I will act as the additional / concurrent verifier.
L-Notes to Instructor / Evaluator:
- 1.
- 2.
During Evaluated JPM:
- 3.
During Training JPM:
Critical steps are identified as PasdFail. All steps are sequenced critical unless denoted by a e Self-verification shall be demonstrated.
Self-verification shall be demonstrated.
No other verification shall be demonstrated.
References:
- 1.
- 3.
- 4.
NIP-ECA-01; 3.2, and Attachment 2 WA 2.1.1 (3.8) Knowledge of conduct of operations requirements.
WA 2.4.30 (3.6) Knowledge of which events related to system operatiodstatus should be reported to outside agencies
- 2. DER-NM-2004-1428 Tools and Equipment:
- 1. Access to ESL Log to obtain the next sequential number (for this JPM prompt is added to provide an ESL# (04-0320) verbally when requested by the performer).
Task Standard: NIP-ECA-01 Attachment 2 parts 1,2,3, and 4 completed and applicable actions have been identified in response to the DER operability and reportability review.
09/08/04
Initial Conditions:
- 1. You are the SM.
- 2.
- 3.
- 4.
You are being provided DER-NM-2004-1498 for SM plant impact review.
Current plant conditions are unchanged from those identified in the DER.
Ask the operator for any questions.
I Performance Steps I Standarc/
Initiating cue:
(Operators name), perform the applicable plant impact review for DER-NM-2004-1498, and complete the applicable fom.
Grade I Comments
- 1. Provide repeat back of initiating cue.
Evaluator Acknowledge repeat back (GAP-OPS-01) providing correction if necessaiy Proper communications used for repeat back RECORD START TIME
- 2.
- Obtain a copy of the reference NIP-ECA-OI obtained.
procedure and reviewlutilize the Section 3.2 referenced.
correct section.
- referenced.
- 3. *If the DER description does not contain sufficient information to determine whether additional review is necessary, then designate the DER as Not Approved for Screening.
Determines sz!flcienl injbmintion avniluble jor screening ut this tinze.
- 4.
- If the condition described in DER does not involve an Operability Concern and is not reportable, then, indicate approved for screening, indicate no operability/ reportability concern, enter initials and date, then save. No further action is required.
Recognizes operubility concern andgoes to NIP-ECA-0 I, Attachment 2, Operability and Reportability Review Form.
NRC SRO ADMIN P M 1A SatNnsat SatNnsat SatNnsat SatNnsat 3
09/08/04
- 5..If the condition described in the DER represents an operability concern or is reportable, complete NIP-ECA-0 1, Attachment 2, Operability and Reportability Review Form, Page 2 as follows:
- a..PART 1A: SSCs shall be declared either operable or inoperable and marked on form.
- b..PART 1A: If SSC was inoperable at time of discovery, but at time of review is operable, the SSC shall be reported operable with comments explaining the previous inoperable condition in Block 4C, Evaluation comments.
- d..PART 1A: Indicate an operability determination is not required.
- e..PART 1B: Determine if entry into a LCO is required.
Obtains copy of NIP-ECA-01, Attachment 2, Operability and Reportability Review Form, Page 2.
Enters DER No. NM-2004-1498 Determines SSC is inoperable.
Part IA: checks Equipment Operable as NO.
Determines SSC remains inoperable.
Part IA: enters Required Mode as Power Operating Condition.
Pnrt IA: checks Operability Determination as NO.
Part 4C: checks Basis for Operability Determinulion CIS W A.
Determine TS LCO 3.6. I 1 u, Tuhle 3.6.11-1, Parnmeter 6, and Table 3.6. I 1 -2, Action 4.
a prepare and submit a Special Report to the Commission within 14 duys,fi,llowing the event outlining the action taken, the cause of the inoperability and the plans and schedule for restoring the system to OPERABLE status.
apply. LYpepecificully:
NRC SRO ADMIN JPM 1A SatNnsat SatRJnsat PasdFail SatKJnsat Satnrnsat Satmnsat Pass/Fail 4
09/08/04
- f. *PART 1B: Mark the appropriate LCO ENTRY Yes / No option.
- g. *PART 1B: Enter the Tech Spec LCO number.
- 11. *PART 1C: Determine if entry into ESL Log is required.
- i. *PART 1C: Mark the appropriate ESL ENTRY Yes / No option.
- j. *PART 1C: Enter the ESL number.
- k. *PART 1D: Nuclear ESA may be requested to support an operability determination.
- 1. *PART 1E: Deteimine if event constitutes a Tech Spec violation.
- m. *PART 1E: Mark appropriate TS VIOLATION Yes / No option.
Purt IB: checks LCO Entry as YES.
Past 1 B: enless LCO number AS TS 3.6. I 1-2.
Rejerences GAP-OPS-01, 3.10.j.b.l.
Detesrnine entsy into ESL Log is required based on station equipment determined to be inoperable which impact Tech Specs.
Part 1 C: checks ESL Entry as YES, PROitrll.TI:. Provide X;sL# 04-0320 if asked.
Obtains the next sequential ESL Log number poin the ESL Log.
Part IC: enters the ESL Log number.
Determine Nuclear ESA not required.
Past ID: checks Nuclear. ESA Requested AS NO.
Past 4C: checks ESA i Requested Action Detai1.T as hVA.
Detesinines NO Tech spec violation.
Part IC: checks TS Violation as NO.
NRC SRO ADMIN JPM 1A Satfunsat Sattunsat SatAJnsat Satfunsat Sat/Unsat Sat/Unsat Sattunsat Sat/Unsat 5
09/08/04
determination in PART 4C, Evaluation Comments.
- 0. *PART 2A: Determine if event is reportable to NRC per NIP-IRG-01 or to other outside agencies per NIP-IRG-02.
- p. *PART 2A: Document the reportability in space provided.
- q. *PART 3A: Notify NRC Resident Inspector and document the person and dateltime contacted.
r.*PART 3A: Notify the NRC/NRR (red phone) and document the person and datehime contacted.
Otherwise leave blank.
Determines no coniments are required in Part 4C, Evaluation Comments.
SatNnsat Pnrt 4C: checks Tech Spec Violation Description as N/A.
References NIP-IRC-0 I us applicable.
Determines reportable per TS Table 3.6. I I -
2, Action Statement 4a. which requires a Special Report to the commission within I4 duys.
Part 2A: checks Deviation/Event Reportable as YES.
Part 2A: checks Other (Per NIP-IRG-O1/02) block.
Part 4C: Under Other Comments, indicates a Special Report must be prepared and submitted to the Commission within 14 days per TS 3.6.11-2, Action Statement 4a.
PROMPT: Provide acknoruiedgenienf qf noti@ation.
Part 3A: checks NRC Resicienl Inspector Contacted as YES.
Records name ofperson contacted and date/tinie contacted.
Purt 3A: checks NRC Region/NRR Notijied as NO.
Leaves person contacted and datehime contacted blank.
NRC SRO ADMIN JPM 1A SatIUnsat Pass/Fail SatNnsat SatNnsat Satmnsat Satmnsat SatNnsat 6
09/08/04
I Pelforinatice Steps I StcincIard 1
Grade I Coinmetits 1
PROMPT: If asked, eleciroiric EC4 P system is irvriilrihle.
- s. *PART 4A: Document results by checking if DER is Approved or Not Approved for Screening Checks upprovedjbr screening block.
Satfunsat
- t. *PART 4D: Document Unit, Checks Unit I block.
SatNnsat SatNnsat name, and date of review.
Prints name, initials, and enters date.
Checks Other Unit SM Conciirrence hhck as NA.
Satfunsat PROMPT: You me m i required to uplute ECAP to irrrlicure ilw results ofyour review.
- 6. *Document required entry into ESL Log and record ESL number in the Comments Section of the DER Identification Page.
On the DER form:
Enters ESL Log number in the Operations Conirnents block.
Signsfor Operations Approvul.
Satfunsat SatNnsat End of JPM TERMINATING CUE: NIP-ECA-01, Attachment 2 completed, and DER approved for screening.
RECORD STOP TIME NRC SRO ADMIN JPM 1A 7
09/08/04
Initial Conditions:
- 1. You are the SM.
- 2. You are being provided DER-NM-2004-1498 for SM plant impact review
- 3. Current plant conditions are unchanged from those identified in the DER.
- 4. Ask the operator for any questions.
Initiating cue:
(Operators name), perform the applicable plant impact review for DER-NM-2004-1498 an complete the applicable form.
0910 8/04
Constellation Energy Group OPERATOR JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE u
Title:
Evaluate Plant Chemistry Report and Respond Task Number:
3410220303 Revision: NRC 2004 Approvals:
NA EXAMINATION SECURITY Date General Supervisor Date Operations (Designee)
General Sube isor Operations Training (Designee)
NA EXAMINATION SECURITY Configuration Control Date Performer:
(SRO)
TrainedEvaluator:
Evaluation Method: PERFORM Evaluation Location: SIMULATOR OR OTHER DESIGNATED AREA Expected Completion Time: 10 minutes Time Critical Task: NO Alternate Path Task: NO
'r L-Start Time:
Stop Time:
Completion Time:
JPM Overall Rating:
Pass Fail NOTE: A JPM overall rating of fail shall be given if any critical step is graded as fail. Any grade of unsat or individual competency area unsat requires a comment.
Comments :
Evaluator Signature:
Date:
09/09/04
Recommended Start Location: (Completion time based on the start location)
L N/A Simulator Set-up:
N/A Directions to the Instructor/Evaluator:
To be performed as an administrative JPM.
Directions to Operators:
Read Before Every JPM Performance:
For the performance of this JPM, I will fbnction as the SM, CSO, and Auxiliary Operators. Prior to providing direction to perform this task, I will provide you with the initial conditions and answer any questions. During task performance, I will identify the steps to be simulated, or discuss and provide cues as necessary.
Read Before Each Evaluated JPM Performance:
This evaluated JPM is a measure of your ability to perform this task independently. The Control Room Supervisor has determined that a verifier is not available and that additional / concurrent verification will not be provided; therefore it should not be requested.
Read Before Each Training JPM Performance:
During this Training JPM, applicable methods of verification are expected to be used. Therefore, either another individual or I will act as the additional / concurrent verifier.
L Notes to Instructor / Evaluator:
- 1.
- 2.
During Evaluated JPM:
- 3.
During Training JPM:
Critical steps are identified as Pass/Fail. All steps are sequenced critical unless denoted by a 0.
0 Self-verification shall be demonstrated.
0 Self-verification shall be demonstrated.
0 No other verification shall be demonstrated.
References:
- 1.
- 2.
- 3.
- 4.
GAP-CHE-0 1 ; 3.2; Enclosure 1.
DER-NM-2004-958, Exceeded GAP-CHE-0 1 Action Level 1 threshold for sulfates during RWCU maintenance.
WA 2.1.25 (3.1) Ability to obtain and interpret station reference materials such as graphs / monographs / and tables which contain performance data.
WA 2.1.34 (2.9) Ability to maintain the primary and secondary plant chemistry within allowable limits.
Tools and Equipment:
- 1. None.
Task Standard: Determine GAP-CHE-01 Action Level 1 exceeded for reactor water sulfates due to RWCU maintenance outage, and that a plant shutdown is required if not corrected in 96 hours0.00111 days <br />0.0267 hours <br />1.587302e-4 weeks <br />3.6528e-5 months <br />.
09/09/04
Initial Conditions:
- 1.
- 2.
- 3.
- 4.
- 5.
Unit 1 is at 100% power.
You are the Unit 1 CRS.
At 02:30 on 3/10/2004 RWCU was removed from service for maintenance with an expected duration of three (3) days. Conductivity recorder was aligned to the recirculation system.
Chemistry is taking reactor water samples twice per shift for conductivity and sulfates.
At 05:OO on 3/12/2004 Chemistry reports the following reactor water samples:
Sulfates = 5.05 ppb Nobel Metal Chemical Application (NMCA) is not in service.
Ask the operator for any questions.
Conductivity = 0.147 uS/cm at 25°C.
- 6.
- 7.
Initiating cue:
(Operators name), evaluate the 3/12/2004 05:OO chemistry and respond as necessary.
- 1. Provide repeat back of initiating cue.
Evaluator Acknowledge repeat back.
RECORD START TIME
- 2. *Obtain a copy of the reference procedure and reviewlutilize the coi-rect section.
- 3. *Evaluate GAP-CHE-0 1 Enclosure 1, Part I (TECH SPECS) for applicability.
Proper communications used for repeat back (GAP-OPS-0 1)
GA P-CHE-0 I obtaineli.
- Enclosure I referenced.
- Section 3.2. I referenced Coinpares saiizple resvlts to GAP-CHE-01 Enclosure I, Part I [TECH SPECS), for REACTOR CONDITION 3.
Determines conductivity W A C T I O N LE VEL I limit of 0.19.
Determines sulfates above ACTlOhr LEVEL 1 value of 5 and below ACTION 2 LEVEL value of 20.
NRC SRO ADMIN JPM 1B Sat/Unsat Sat/Unsat SatAJnsat Pass/Fail 3
09/08/04
1, Part I1 (FUEL WARRANTY) for applicability.
for REACTOR CONDITION 3.
Enclosure I, Part I1 (FUEL WARRANT)?,
Determines conducf ivity ACTION SatAJnsat LEVEL I limit oj'1.00.
Determines.eirljutes not evulucrtecl as a jirel wur.ranty linzil.
- 5..Evaluate GAP-CHE-01 Enclosure Comnpures suinple results to GAP-CHE-01 1, Part I11 (EPRI) for applicability.
Enclosure I, Part 111 (EPRI), jor REACTOR CONDITION 3.
Determines conductivity ACTION Sat/Unsat LEVEL I limit of 0.30.
Delermines sulfales &
ACTION LE VEL 1 value of 5 and below ACTION 2 LEVEL value of 20.
PassIFail
- 6..Reference GAP-CHE-0 1, Section 3.2 and 3.2.1 as follows:
- a. Event time clock begins at time of discovery.
- b. Notify the SM, Operations Manager, General Supervisor Chemistry, Plant General Manager and Principle Engineer Reliability Engineering of the parameter which has exceeded Action Level 1 limits.
Notes tiine that discovered ACTION LE FEL I was exceeded.
SatIUnsat Injornis the following the TECH SPEC und EPRI ACTION LEVEL I sulfate thrvsholds ure exceeded due to R WCU maintenance:
s;M Operutions hlanuger General Supervisor Chemistry Plant General Manager Principle Engineer Reliability SaWnsat Engineering NRC SRO ADMIN JPM 1B 4
09/08/04
i io.sc.n~ice ~, ~ : i ~ / i i i i six (6j hoiiix (sulfates) must be below the ACTIOiV LEVEL I value within 96 hours0.00111 days <br />0.0267 hours <br />1.587302e-4 weeks <br />3.6528e-5 months <br /> of time of discovery.
Determines thut returning R WCU to service will restore the szilfute paraimter to within ACTION LEVEL 1 vuhe ifreturned within the predicted tiine qf three (3) dqs.
- c. Determine corrective actions be Deterixines the chemistry parunieter Pass/Fail taken to return chemistry to within limits.
Sat/Unsat End of JPM TERMINATING CUE: ENCLOSURE 1, Part I, Part 11, and Part I11 evaluated and it is determined that the TECH SPEC and EPRI ACTION LEVEL 1 thresholds are exceeded for sulfates.
RECORD STOP TIME NRC SRO ADMIN JPM 1B 5
09/08/04
Initial Conditions:
- 1. Unit 1 is at 100% power.
- 2. You are the Unit 1 CRS.
- 3. At 02:30 on 3/10/2004 RWCU was removed from service for maintenance with an expected duration of three (3) days. Conductivity recorder was aligned to the recirculation system.
- 4. Chemistry is taking reactor water samples twice per shift for conductivity and sulfates.
- 5. At 05:OO on 3/12/2004 Chemistry reports the following reactor water samples:
Sulfates = 5.05 ppb
- 6. Nobel Metal Chemical Application (NMCA) is not in service.
- 7. Ask the operator for any questions.
Conductivity = 0.147 vS/cm at 25°C.
Initiating cue:
(Operators name), evaluate the 3/12/2004 05:OO chemistry and respond as necessary.
09/08/04
ENCLOSURE 1: WATER CHEMISTRY GUIDELINES - UNIT 1
'c-NOTES:
- 1.
This enclosure has three sections; Technical Specifications, Fuel Warranty, and EPRl Guidelines. Each section needs to be evaluated for applicability.
- 2.
Water chemistry limits at specific Reactor Conditions are based on BULK REACTOR WATER TEMPERATURE AND MODE SWITCH POSITION.
- 1.
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS NOTE:
Action level 2 limits may be exceeded for a maximum of 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br />, OR a shutdown shall be initiated within one hour and reactor coolant temperature be reduced to <200"F within 10 hours1.157407e-4 days <br />0.00278 hours <br />1.653439e-5 weeks <br />3.805e-6 months <br />.
REACTOR CONDITION 2: Reactor water bulk temperature 2 200°F AND reactor thermal powers 10 %
Control Parameter Action Levels
'L' 1
2 3
Reactor Water Conductivity (pS/cm) at 25°C
> 1.o** > 5.0****
Chloride (ppb)
>loo >200 Sulfate (ppb)
> 100
>200 REACTOR CONDITION 3: Reactor thermal power > 10%
Control Parameter Action Levels (Cl,C2)Reactor Water Conductivity (pS/cm) at 25°C
>0.19* > 1.0***
> 5.0 Chloride (ppb)
>5*
>20
> 100 Sulfate (ppb)
>!7
>20
> 100
- Technical Specification 3.2.3 bases value NOT a Limiting Condition of Operation
- Post NMCA the limit is 2 pS/cm for up to a 5 month period at power operations.
- During NMCA, the limit is 20 pSlcm.
c-Page 8 GAP-CHE-01 Rev 09
ENCLOSURE 1 (Cont)
II.
FUEL WARRANTY REQUIREMENTS REACTOR CONDITION 1: Reactor water bulk temperature 5 212 OF System and Control Parameter Action Levels 1
2 3
Reactor Water and Fuel Storage Pool pH at 25" C(applied only when reactor water >1.OFSlcm) (Low) ~ 5. 3
<4.9
<4.6 (High) >8.6
>9.3
>9.6 Conductivity (pslcm @25"C)
>2.0
>5.0
>10.0 Chloride, sulfate (ppb)
>loo
>200
>500 REACTOR CONDITION 2: Reactor water bulk temperature >212"F Svstem and Control Parameter Action Levels 1
2 3
Reactor Water pH at 25" C(applied only when reactor water >1.OpS/cm) (Low) <5.6 (4.9
<4.6 (High) >8.6
>9.3
>9.6 Conductivity (pskm @ 25°C)
>1.o
>5.0
>10.0 Chloride, sulfate (ppb)
>I 00
>200 9300 REACTOR CONDITION 3: Reactor thermal power > 25%
Reactor Water pH at 25" C(applied only when reactor water >1.Op.S/cm) (Low) <5.6
<4.9
~ 4. 6 (High) >8.6
>9.3
>9.6 Conductivity (pslcm @ 25°C)
>1.o
>5.0
>10.0 Chloride, sulfate (ppb)
>I 00.
>ZOO
>500 Svstem and Control Parameter Action Levels 1
2 3
Condensate Effluent and Feedwater Conductivity at 25°C Dissolved Oxygen (ppb)
Feedwater Total Copper (ppb) (a) kon (PPb)
Total metals (ppb)
Fe,Cu,Ni,Zn (soluble & insoluble)
Total Zinc (ppb)
>0.065
>0.1
>0.2 (Low) <30
<lo (High) >200
>500 0.5
>2.0
>4.0 Insoluble
>10
>20
>40 Soluble 1.o
>2.0
>4.0
>15
>30
>60
~ 1. 3
>2 (a)
High feedwater copper is known to play a role in fuel cladding corrosion. See DER 2001-5276 for details Page 9 GAP-CHE-01 Rev 09
ENCLOSURE 1 (Cont) 111.
EPRl BWR WATER CHEMISTRY GUIDELINE REACTOR CONDITION 1:
Reactor water bulk temperature c 200°F
\\.
Svstem and Control Parameter Action Levels Value Prior to Startup 1
2 3
Reactor Water Conductivity ( Slcm @ 25"C)(2)(3)
>2.0 Sulfate (pp )
>IO0 - -
Chloride (ppbr
>IO0 - -
REACTOR CONDITION 2:
Reactor water bulk 2200°F AND reactor thermal power 510%
<1.o
- 4 00
300(l) -
>1.0 S.0
>IO0
>200
- <TO
<20 Condensate Influent (CDI) conductivity @ 25°C
>IO Feedwater
>0.15 -
>200 -
>IO0 -
REACTOR CONDITION 3:
Reactor thermal power >lo%
Svstem and Control Parameter Action Levels 1
2
'=..---
Control Rod Drive Conductivi @ 25°C Dissolved 8 xygen (ppb)
Feedwater *EPRI Guidelines for weekly integrated value)
>0.2
>5
- Total Iron (ppbp Conductivity @ 25°C
~ 0 6 5 -
- Total L opper ( pb) (a) 3
<ZO Condensate Influent (CDI) conductivity @ 25°C
>0.10 -
>IO Reactor Water Conductivity pS/cm @ 25°C)
Chloride, SUI I ate (ppb)
NWC Action Levels 1
2 3
1 2
3
>0.30 >1.0
>5.0
>0.30(3) >l.O
>5.0
>5
>20
>IO0
>5
>50 9 0 0 HWC/NMCA Action Levels (1) When Reactor water temperature is >284 degrees F (140°C)
(2) During NMCA, the conductivity will intentionally exceed AL2 for over 48 hours5.555556e-4 days <br />0.0133 hours <br />7.936508e-5 weeks <br />1.8264e-5 months <br />. No additional Corrective action required.
(3) Conductivity excludes contribution from Iron during and post noble metals chemical addition.
(4) After establishing condenser vacuum with steam jet air ejectors.
(a)High feedwater copper is known to play a role in fuel cladding corrosion. See DER 2001-5276 for details
\\..-
Page IO GAP-CHE-01 Rev 09
Constellation Energy Group OPERATOR SOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE
'u
Title:
Determine Post Maintenance Test (PMT) Following Corrective Maintenance (Refueling Bridge Over-Core Limit Switch Replacement)
Revision: NRC 2004 Task Number:
3420130303 Approvals:
Generals %e p rvisor e/4/.L/
Date General NA EXAMINATION Supervisor SECURITY Date Operations Training (Designee)
Operations (Designee)
NA EXAMINATION SECURITY Configuration Control Date TrainerIEvaluator:
Evaluation Method: PERFORM Evaluation Location: SIMULATOR OR OTHER DESIGNATED AREA Expected Completion Time: 12 minutes Start Time:
Stop Time:
Completion Time:
Time Critical Task NO Alternate Path Task NO L
JPM Overall Rating:
Pass Fail NOTE: A JPM overall rating of fail shall be given if any critical step is graded as fail. Any grade of unsat or individual competency area unsat requires a comment.
Comments:
Evaluator Signature:
Date:
9/8/2004
Recommended Start Location: (Completion time based on the start location)
Simulator or other designated location.
Simulator Set-up:
L NIA Directions to the Instructor/Evaluator:
To be performed as an administrative JPM.
Directions to Operators:
Read Before Every JPM Performance:
For the performance of this JPM, I will function as the SM, CSO, and Auxiliary Operators. Prior to providing direction to perform this task, I will provide you with the initial conditions and answer any questions. During task performance, I will identify the steps to be simulated, or discuss and provide cues as necessary.
Read Before Each Evaluated JPM Performance:
This evaluated JPM is a measure of your ability to perform this task independently. The Control Room Supervisor has determined that a verifier is not available and that additional / concurrent verification will not be provided; therefore it should not be requested.
Read Before Each Training JPM Performance:
During this Training JPM, applicable methods of verification are expected to be used. Therefore, either another individual or I will act as the additional I concurrent verifier.
Notes to Instructor / Evaluator:
- 1.
- 2.
During Evaluated JPM:
- 3.
During Training JPM:
L-Critical steps are identified as PadFail. All steps are sequenced critical unless denoted by a 0.
0 Self-verification shall be demonstrated.
0 Self-verification shall be demonstrated.
0 No other verification shall be demonstrated.
References:
- 1. GAP-SAT-02; 3.1, Attachment 2.
- 2.
- 3. KIA 2.2.21 (3.5)
- 4.
LER 2002-002. LOSS OF ONE CRD PUMP TRAIN DUE TO CIRCUIT BREAKER FAILURE. Cause was inadequate post maintenance testing.
Nl-ST-W3, Refueling Platform Interlock Test Tools and Equipment:
- 1. None.
Task Standard: Indicate N1-ST-W3 steps to be performed at a MINIMUM to demonstrate operability are identified.
Indicates NOT REQUIRED for steps that do not have to be performed.
9/8/2004
(
Initial Conditions:
1,
- 2.
Unit 1 Refueling Outage is in progress.
The first fuel shuffle is in progress. After releasing a fuel assembly in the reactor core and specified in the next step, ROD BLOCK INTERLOCK #1 did not clear as expected when bridge contacted the control room and refueling operations have been halted. The I&C has determined that the refueling bridge over core limit switch broke and the spent fuel pool to grapple the fuel assembly over the reactor core. The SRO on the refueling the main hoist normal up and unloaded.
- 3.
- 4.
- 6. The refueling bridge A clearance has been hung, the limit switch has been replaced, and the clearance has been removed. WO # 2004-1465.
with the main hoist normal up and unloaded.
- 7. N1-PM-SO is current.
- 8. Ask the operator for any questions.
Initiating cue:
(Operators name), determine the Post Maintenance Test requirements including specific steps to be performed at a MINIMUM to demonstrate operability in Nl-ST-W3. Indicate Not Required (N/R) for steps that do not have to be performed.
1 Pe$orniance Steps I Standarc]
I Grade 1 Comments
- 1. Provide repeat back of initiating cue. Proper communications used for repeat back Sat/Unsat Evaluator Acknowledge repeat back (GAP-OPS-01) providing correction if necessaiy RECORD START TIME
- Obtain a copy of the reference procedure and reviewhtihze the
- Section 3. 1 referenced correct section.
- Attachinent 2 rejerenced.
GAP-SAT-02 obtained.
~
SatlUnsat
- References GAP-SAT-02, Determine replacetnent oflii?iit.rwitclzcs SatNnsat, Electrical PMT Guidelines, for limit switches.
- Determines Nl-ST-W3 is the Nl-ST-W3 obtained.
Satmnsat applicable procedure to be used for post maintenance testing.
requires verlfiing actuation of controlled device including uny interlockcyj.
- Determines Nl-ST-W3 steps to be performed.
I
- a. Per step 4.3: When used for PMT, perform sections 1.O through 6.0.
Determine Sections 1.0 through 6.0 are required (cannot be AVA or N/R).
9/8/2004 m
- b. Per step 4.3: When used for PMT, perfoim applicable subsections 1 steps of sections 7.0 through 10.0.
Step 7.
I: checks post-niuinlenunce testiiig und enters work order number.
Step 7.7. I und 7.7.2 iV/R Steps 8.1. 4 rind 8.1.5 lire required.
Steps 8.1.6 through 8. I. 5, alae NOT required.
Steps 8.2.1 through 8.2.3 are NOT required Steps 8.3.1 through 8.3. I6 tire required.
Steps 8.d. I through 8.4.2 ure NOT required.
Section 9.0 steps ure required.
Step I0.I.I.u is NOTrequired Steps 10.1.1.6 tlzrough 10.1.1.d are required.
Steps 10.1.2 and 10.1.3 are required.
Step 10.2 is required, For steps irzdicuted N/A or iViR document ilie reuson in section 10. I reinurks.
Enswe that [f steps not peyfhrnied, then the surveillmce jieqwency is not ultered.
End of JPM SatIUnsat Sat/Unsat Pass/Fail**
SatAJnsat S at/Unsa t PasslFail**
SatRJnsat PassIFail SatlUnsat Pass/Fail SatlUnsat Sa'r/Unsat S at/Unsat SatNnsat TERMINATING CUE: Indicate Nl-ST-W3 steps to be performed at a minimum to demonstrate operability. Indicates NOT REQUIRED for steps that do not have to be performed.
NOTE: Although testing in Section 8. I and Section 8.2 (ire not required for PMT, Section 8.1 steps 8.1.4 mil 8.1.5 will Itme to be performed because Section 8.3 interlock checks require tliat the rluminy fuel (issernbly be gruppkrl aitd t1ii.c. is peifortned in steps 8.1, and 8. I. 5.
Section 8.2 is not required.
1
- Because of the organization of the section signoff blocks (lines), the performer nzay determine all of sections 8.1 and 8.3 ore required to be performed. If this rletermination is made, the minimum required steps will hccve been identified and these steps are groiled cis PASS.
RECORD STOP TIME NRC SRO ADMJN JPM 2 4
9/8/2004
Initial Conditions:
c
- 1.
- 2.
- 3.
- 4.
- 5.
- 6.
- 7.
- 8.
Unit 1 Refueling Outage is in progress.
The first fuel shuffle is in progress. After releasing a fuel assembly in the reactor core and moving the refueling bridge to the spent fuel pool to grapple the fuel assembly specified in the next step, ROD BLOCK INTERLOCK #1 did not clear as expected when the refueling bridge was no longer over the reactor core. The SRO on the refueling bridge contacted the control room and refueling operations have been halted. The refueling bridge is in the spent fuel pool with the main hoist normal up and unloaded.
I&C has determined that the refueling bridge over core limit switch broke and remained actuated.
A clearance has been hung, the limit switch has been replaced, and the clearance has been removed. WO # 2004-1465.
Annunciator F3-4-4, ROD BLOCK, is clear.
The refueling bridge is in the spent fuel pool with the main hoist normal up and unloaded.
N1-PM-SO is current.
Ask the operator for any questions.
Initiating cue:
(Operators name), determine the Post Maintenance Test requirements including specific steps to be performed at a MINIMUM to demonstrate operability in Nl-ST-W3. Indicate Not Required (N/R) for steps that do not have to be performed.
9/8/2004
Constellation Energy Group OPERATOR JOB PERFORMANCE MEASURE L
Title:
Direct An Exclusion Area Evacuation Revision: NRC 2004 Task Number:
3440240303 Approvals:
/7 NA EXAMINATION SECURITY General Supervisor Date hm6L Date 7$/4 General Subehisor Operations Training (Designee)
Operations (Designee)
NA EXAMINATION SECURITY Configuration Control Date TrainerIEvaluator:
Evaluation Method: PERFORM Evaluation Location: SIMULATOR OR OTHER DESIGNATED AREA Expected Completion Time: 15 minutes Time Critical Task: NO Alternate Path Task: NO L-Start Time:
Stop Time:
Completion Time:
JPM Overall Rating:
Pass Fail NOTE: A JPM overall rating of fail shall be given if any critical step is graded as fail. Any grade of unsat or individual competency area unsat requires a comment.
Comments:
09/08/04
Recommended Start Location: (Completion time based on the start location)
N/A Simulator Set-up:
N/A Directions to the InstructorlEvaluator:
To be performed as an administrative JPM.
Directions to Operators:
Read Before Every JPM Performance:
For the performance of this JPM, I will function as the SM, CSO, and Auxiliary Operators. Prior to providing direction to perform this task, I will provide you with the initial conditions and answer any questions. During task performance, I will identify the steps to be simulated, or discuss and provide cues as necessary.
Read Before Each Evaluated JPM Performance:
This evaluated JPM is a measure of your ability to perform this task independently. The Control Room Supervisor has determined that a verifier is not available and that additional / concurrent verification will not be provided; therefore it should not be requested.
Read Before Each Training JPM Performance:
During this Training JPM, applicable methods of verification are expected to be used. Therefore, either another individual or I will act as the additional / concurrent verifier.
L.
Notes to Instructor / Evaluator:
- 1.
- 2.
During Evaluated JPM:
- 3.
During Training JPM:
Critical steps are identified as Pass/Fail. All steps are sequenced critical unless denoted by a 0.
Self-verification shall be demonstrated.
0 Self-verification shall be demonstrated.
No other verification shall be demonstrated.
References:
- 1.
- 2.
- 3.
- 4.
- 5.
EPIP-EPP-0%; Section 3.1, and Attachment 1.
EPIP-EPP-18; Attachment 1 Figure 1, and Attachment 2.
EPIP-EPP-08; Attachment 1 Figure 1.5.
KIA 2.3.10 (3.3) Ability to perform procedures to reduce excessive levels of radiation and guard against personnel exposure.
WA 2.4.40 (4.0) Knowledge of the SROs responsibilities in emergency plan implementation.
Tools and Equipment:
- 1. None.
Task Standard: Directs Exclusion Area Evacuation using the following route(s): Lake Road (w), to Lakeview Road (s), to Rte. 1 (w), to Creamery Road (s), to 104 (w) to Rte. 53 (S) to Howard Road Q& continue (s) on Clocks Corner Road to Rte. 4 to Rte. 4 (w) to Rte. 53 (s) to Howard Road Q& to Rte. 4 (e) to NYS Rte. 178 (s) to Howard Road or any combination of these routes and roads that connect between them.
-/
09/08/04
Initial Conditions:
- 1.
- 2.
- 3.
- 4.
- 5.
A Site Area Emergency has been declared on Unit 1 due to release rates.
A release is in progress.
An Exclusion Area Evacuation is required because of the release. It is safe to perform the evacuation.
Wind direction is from 278 degrees with no lake breeze.
Ask the operator for any questions.
Initiating cue:
(Operators name), direct the required EXCLUSION AREA EVACUATION including specific evacuation routes to the offsite assembly area and completion of the applicable emergency announcement form.
- 1. Provide repeat back of initiating cue. Proper communications used for repeat back S at/Unsat Evaluator Acknowledge repeat back (GAP-OPS-01) providing correction if necessary RECORD START TIME
- 2.
- Obtain a copy of the reference Obtainx EPIP-EPP-OSC.
procedure and reviewlutilize the
- Section 3.1 referenced correct section.
- Attachment 2 referenced Muy rej2rence EPIP-EPP-IS Attachment 1 Figure 1, to determine type of evmudion.
- 3. *Determines plume direction.
I Deteimines pliirne direction,fioin 2 78 degrees (based on wind direction) and that ERPAs 1,2,3,4,7,9,26,27 could be ufecfed PasdFail Sat/Unsat I
- 4. *Determines evacuation is safe.
Dekimines evacuu~ion is sufe.
09/08/04
XOTE: Trtrvel i*oufes uiv h&$/ighled und urc provided us un ulfuchnient fo thi,v JPM and delemines the evaciiation routecs) as:
Lake Road (wj, to Lakeview Road (s), to Rte.
I (tvj. to Creamery Road (T), to I04 (141) to Rte. 53 (S) to Howard Road
- 5. *Determine route of travel References EPIP-EPP-OX, Attachment 2, PassIFail information to the Offsite Assembly Area based on plume direction.
Luke Road h$ to Lakeview Road (s), to Rte.
1 (w), to Crearnety Road CY). continue (s) on Klocks Comer Road to Rte. 4 to Rte. 4 (w) to Rte. 53 (9) to Howard Road.
Lake Road (w), to Lakeview Road (T),
to Rte.
1 (w), to Creamery Road (s), continue (s) on Klocks Corner Road to Rte. 4 to Rte. 4 (e) to NYS Rte. I78 (s) to Howard Road.
Any combination of these routes and roads that connect hemeen them.
09/08/04
w M
Initial Conditions:
- 1. A Site Area Emergency has been declared on Unit 1 due to release rates.
- 2. A release is in progress.
- 3. An Exclusion Area Evacuation is required because of the release. It is safe to perform the
- 4. Wind direction is from 278 degrees with no lake breeze.
- 5. Ask the operator for any questions.
L evacuation.
Initiating cue:
(Operators name), direct the required EXCLUSION AREA EVACUATION including specific evacuation routes to the offsite assembly area and completion of the applicable emergency announcement form.
09/08/04