ML042530221

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Updated Responses to Requests for Additional Information (Rais) on the Proposed Perry Nuclear Power Plant Physical Security Plan
ML042530221
Person / Time
Site: Perry 
Issue date: 08/31/2004
From: Myers L
FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Co
To:
Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Security and Incident Response
References
PY-CEI/NRR-2826L, TAC MC2955
Download: ML042530221 (2)


Text

FENOC 76 South Main Street FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Com.pany Akron, Ohio 44308 Lew W. Myers 330-384-3733 Chief Operating Officer Fax: 330-384-3799 August 31, 2004 PY-CEI/ NRR-2826L U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555-0001 Perry Nuclear Power Plant Docket No: 50-440 Subiect: Updated Responses to Requests for Additional Information (RAIs) on the Proposed Perry Nuclear Power Plant Physical Security Plan (TAC NO. MC2955)

This letter provides updated, non-safeguarded responses to four Requests for Additional Information (RAIs) regarding the proposed Perry Nuclear Power Plant (PNPP) Physical Security Plan (PSP). The PNPP PSP was 'submitted to the NRC in a letter dated April 28, 2004 (PY-CEI/NRR-2797L).

NRC Issue: At the end of the first paragraph of Section 9.3 of the Plan, please add the word 'retrieved".

Response: The word 'retrieved' will be added as the last word in the first paragraph of Section 9.3.

NRC Issue: For Section 7 of the Safeguards; Contingency Plan (SCP), RAIs'A and B addressed actions being taken in'response'to the Safeguards Advisory for Operating Reactors (SA-04-07) and Paragraph B.5.a of Attachment 2 of the ICM Order, respectively. Please identify the section(s) in the SCP that address these actions.

Response: The actions necessary to address both paragraph B.5.a of Attachment 2 to the ICM order and SA-04-07 fall under, and are governed by, requirements currently outlined in-SCP Section 4.4.- This supersedes-the-response provided in of a letter dated August 17, 2004 (PY-CEI/NRR-2822L).

NRC Issue: In Section 10.5.1, please revise your PSP to describe the actual approach or combination of approaches that will be implemented at your facility.

Response: Section 10.5.1 will be revised to include the following sentence at the end, just after Approach 10.5.1 ;4:' "Presently,PNPP uses a combination of approaches 10.5.1.3 and 10.5.1.4." This supersedes the response provided in of a letter dated August 17, 2004 (PY-CEI!NRR-2822L).

NRC Issue: In Section 14.1, the first paragraph, please revise the word "capability" in lines 4 and 7 to be 'conditions".

Response: In Section 14.1, lines 4 and 7 of the first paragraph will be revised to use the word "conditions" rather than `capability". This is a revision of a response provided in Attachment 3 of a letter dated August 17, 2004 (PY-CEI/NRR-2822L).

August 31, 2004 PY-CEI/NRR-2826L Page 2 of 2 There are no regulatory commitments contained in this letter. If there are any questions concerning this matter, please contact Mr. Ronald V. Rose, Manager - Site Protection, at 440-280-5314.

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on August 31, 2004.

cc: NRC Region III NRC Resident Inspector NRC Project Manager